J ' ip irr**/ , |
{$!•$) >?$ -»/</■<;■ 4
A WEEKLY RECORD
OP THE
PROGRESS OF PHOTOGRAPHY.
VOLUME XXXIV.
/
Nulla recordanti lux est ingrata. — Martial.
LONDON:
PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY PIPER AND CARTER,
5, FURNIVAL STREET, IIOLBORN, LONDON, E.C.
%
1890.
INDEX TO VOL. XXXIV.
w.
A
Abbe, E., and Rudolph, P., New photographic
objectives, 475
Abney, Cape. W. de W., A photographic un-
truth, 293
, Colour sensation, 299
, How to carry the camera, 683
Abolition of London smoke, 656, 695. 754
Abuse of hand-cameras, Use and, 686
Acid sulphite of soda iu photography, 784
Acres, Birt, Exposure and development, 583
, The Photographic Manufacturers’ and
Dealers’ Association, 852
Adams, A. L., The Camera Club and trading in
photography, 679
Advice to amateurs, 778
Aid to daylight, An, 778
Aids to science, Photographic, 877
Albumen, A new test for, 190
paper, Blistering of, 752
paper doomed ? Is, 797
paper, Ready-sensitised, 980
Albumenised paper, Sensitising and conserva-
tion of, 274
Album, The costume, 48 1
Alcohol, Impurities in, 881
AMehvd-n iri photography, 457
Alkaline developing baths. Action of borax in,
961
Alp a paper. 852
Aluminium, 380, 445, 550, 573, 755
in photograph c anparatus, 213, 273, 620
, The cheapening of. 824
Amateur at the last Washington Convention,
An, 791
photographer, Vocation of an, 181
photography, A wife’s view of, 130
Amateurs an i professionals, 173
American Amateur Photographers, National
Associa'iou of, 982
amateurs’ expenses in photography, 928
— — photographers, Weights and Measures used
by, 585
Photographic Conventiou, 573, 634, 689,
732 ’
photographic journal, A new, 217
America, Photographic exhibitions in, 281
Ammonia formed by burning magnesium, 697
Amsterdam, The photographic international
exhibition at, 267
Andresen’s eikonogen patent. Dr., 150
Animal photography, 505
studies at exhibitions, 658
Annan, J. c., The sizes of photographic plates,
Annuals, The photographic, 607
Antwerp, Photo-micrographic exhibition in.
Qia
Apparatus, Aluminium in
273, 620
photographic, 213,
at the Photogiaphic Exhibition, 792, 802,
824. 844, 869
, Photographic, 265, 301
Arc light for projection The, 909
Aristotype paper, 497, 699
Artificial illumination, 428
light, Copying by, 958
Artistic blue prints, 848
education for children, 648
pbotogiaphy, 497, 609
— photography, Poetry and, 767
Artist photographer — a claim for liberty, 942,
968
Art of drawing and photogra hy, The, 277
photography recognized at last, 33
, Some o! the tendencies in photographic,
• 983, 1002
Arts, Tne Society of, 345
Aslanoglou, P. L , Ammonia formed by burning
magnesium. 697
Astronomical photography, 390, 815
tel scopes, 6, 923, 992. 1013
Aurora, The light of the, 984
Austria, Photography in, 911, 979
Baby, Photographing the, 45
Bick, M., Grouo d awbacks, 610
Baggage, Custom II iuse examination of, 723
Balagny, M., Treating flexible plates, 597
Barnes, C. B., Cold weather notes, 25
, Detective cameras, 165
, Employers and employed, 317
, Groups and grouping, 396
, Package of photographs for post, 47
, Photographic Printing, Out-door and in,
255
, Some experiments with eikonogen, 1 .7
. 0. W , American amateurs’ expenses in
photography, 928
, An amateur at the Washington Conven-
tion, 791
, Illustrating poems by photography, 556
Basset work in photography, 37, 74
Bath Literary and Philosophical Association,
944
, The Photographic Convention at, 531
Beach, V. C., Lantern slide making, 770
. The eikonogen developer, 697
Beadle, C„ Lantern slide making, 769
“ Beauty," Mr Ruskin on, 190
Bede and his book, “ Photographic Pleasures,”
The late Cuthbert, 71, 85
Bedford, V.. Photographers’ Benevolent Asso-
ciat on, 446
Belcher, J. C., Sulphites: their stability and
preservation, 780
Belgian International Photographic Exhibition,
178
Belgium, Photography id, 178
Bell, W., Emulsions, 259
Benham, W., International copyright, 105
Be3t photographer, The, 64
uses of photography, 638, 658
Beyer5dorff, F. A., 281
Bibliography, 24
Bingley, U„ Lantern slide work, 333
Blackie, W. G., Gelati no-chloride paper, 852
Blistering of albumen paper, 752
Biurringdesirable in a photograph? Is, 881
Bolton. G., Animal photography, 505
, Animal sudies at exhibitions, 658
Book illustration, 981
illustration. An experiment in, 785
Borax in alkaline developing batbs, Action of
961 ’
Botanical photography, 322
Bothamley, C. U., A standard method of de-
velopment, 356, 374, 393
, Chemical Section, British Association, 708
, The latent photographic image, 283, 303.
320, 339
, Weights, measures, and formula', 562
Brebner, Hugh, Repairing broken negatives,
20
Brightman, B., Carbon printing, 380
Brilliant negative, 2
British Association at Leeds, 621, 698, 703
photographers and foreigu fortifications,
17
Broken neg Hives, Repairing 20
Bromide enlarging end printing, 41
• — — paper, Developing enlargements on, 782
pictures, Clouds in, 825
Bro ks, E. E., The phosphoresc-nce of lithium
compounds invacuo, 901
Brooks. W., Photographs of the Tower of Lon-
don, 466
Brown, G., Photography and illustrated papers,
111
•, Best uses of photography, 658
— , Gen. J. B., A writing ink printing
process, 263
, J., A photographic exhibition at Uexbam,
442
— , W. A , Special railway fares for photo-
graphers, 892, 952
Bollock, J. G., and Mitchell, C. L , Dangers of
flash-light compounds, 109
Burton, W. K., Depth of focus and diffusion of
focus, 472, 5n4, 514
, Eikonogen, 79
, The camera and its various motions, 831,
840. 919, 974, 1000
, Treatment of subjects by focus, 587
Business, flow to build up a, 1011
, I’hoto-eugraviug as a, 600
, Photography and, 788
By-ways of photography, The, 859
C
Calcium bisulphite, Quinol developer with, 246
Calcutta photographic exhibition, 89, 994
Camberwell, A photographic societ.- in, 487
Camera an 1 its various motions, 831, 840, 949,
974, 1000
Club and trading in photography, The,
643, 661, 679
— Club c inference. The 1890, 93, 193, 216, 232
Club exhibitions, 74, 719
i lub for South London, Proposed, 874
Club, Mr. Lyddell Sawyer’s picturos at
the, 783, 812
Ciub new session, The, 780
Club, The new premises of the, 617, 944
, I Low to carry the, 683
, Lantern slide making with the, 943
stind adjunct, A, 570
the historian of the future, The, 653
Cameron’s photographs, An exhibition of Mrs.,
354
Carbon printing, 380
process, 5b4, 733
Card frames. Novel. 688
Carry the camera. How to, 683
Carte-de-visite, The, 685, 736
Cataldi, C., Sensitising and conservation of
albumenised paper, 274
Cellomtc, Celluloid or, 224
Celluloid as a drawing and printing material,
379
film, The new Tollable, 103
or cellonite, 224
, Photographs on, 1008
vanish, A, 602
THE GET7V CENTER
LIBRARY
January 2, 1891.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
[Supplement— iii.
Cement, A, 190
Censures on photographic dealers, 196
Challenge cup competition at the Crystal
Palace, 25o, 281, 303, 325, 310
Changing bag, The, 721
Channel passages, Tourist photographers and
the, 003, 020, 003, 082
Cheinic >1 phenomena of light. The, 250
section, Biitish Association, 708
Chemistry in the dark room, 970
of photography. The, 713
Chesterman, O. T , Photography in Russia, 905
Chester, The Photographic Convention at, 33,
171, 310, 115, 100, 109, 139. 191, 510. 531, 559
Chicago International Exhibition of 1892, The,
960
Children, 243
, Artistic education for, 018
Chlorophyll aod leaf green, 901
, Colouring matter from, 388
Christmas photographs, S99
Chromo-collographic priming, 529
Chromo-photography by block printing, 219
in the printing-press, 202
Church architecture, Photographing, 150
services, Dissolving views in, 893
City photographic exhibition, 289, 381, 132,
590, 009 *
Clark. Lyonel, Eikonogen, 83
, W. 11. II , Progress of photography during
year closing August, 1890, 811, 830, 815
Clayden, A. W., Photographs of meteorological
phenomena, 913
Cleaning soiled engravings, 010
Clearing collodion, 321. 587
Clifton, E., Photographers' Benevolent Asso-
ciation, 11
Cloud-, 011
in bromide pictures, 825
, Self-luminous, 43
Coating celluloid films, 591
Cold weather notes, 25
Colebrook, II., tirade in professional photo-
graphy, 223
, Truth in photography, 012
Cole, J. J , Passing plates through foreign
Custom Houses, 187
Collier, A., Pictorial definition, 870
Collision between a photographer and a cougar,
A, 909
Collodion emulsion, A modified, 221
versus gelatine, 731
Collographic process, 538
Collotype plate making, 737
Colonials, Unhappy, 420
Colour, 353
sensation, 299
Colour-blindness and its causes, 280
- Colour-sensitiveness at ditferent times, Differ-
ences of, 239
Coloured glasses, Effect upon t ning of printing
through, 453
phonographs by toning. Production of, 980
screens in photo-micrography, 204
Colours, Photography in, 397, 981
Combined hyaroquinone and eikonogen deve-
loper, 578, 753
pyro and quinol developer, 901
Commerce, Photography in iis relation to, 978
Common, A. A., Astronomical telescopes, 923,
992, 1013
Comparative intensities of illuminants, 579
Comparison of developers, 321, 735
Composite photography in France, 222
Composition, Photographic, 290
Compressed gases, 838
Conference at Leeds, The Pharmaceutical, 709
, The 1890 Camera Club, 93, 193, 216, 232
Conjugal likeness, 519
Conservation of albumenised paper, Sensitising
and, 271
Contretypes in china ink, 206
, Theory of, 120
Control in tin- density of negatives, 100
Controversy, The spherical aberration, 896
Convention, American photographic, 573, 631,
689, 732
at Bath, The photographic, 531
at Chester, The Photographic, 33, 174, 316,
415, 166, 469, 489, 491, 510, 531, 559
, Novelties at the Photographic, 509
of Herman amateur photographers at
Berlin, 781
Conventions, Photographic, 613
Conversazione of the Photographic Society,
The, 762
— of the Royal Society, 371
Copenhagen, Photography in, 592
Copying and projection appliances, Photo-
graphic, 7 16
by artificial light, 958
drawings, 108
tracings, 707
Copyright, 17, 26, 105, 603
Reproductions and, 11, 33, 51
Costume album, The, 481
Cougar, A collision between a photographer
and a, 909
Cravat, Photographic. 963
Cresswell, Dr. F., The chemistry of photo-
graphy. 745
Criminal jurisprudence, Photography in, 572
“ Orotonwanze ” once more, The, 571
Crowd-1, P hotographers and, 350
Crystal Palace, 1 hallerge Cup Competition at
the. 250, 281. 305, 325, 346
Palace exhibition, 25, 205, 214, 267
Curious photographs, 996
Custom House examination, 487, 723
Cyanotype reproduction of sea-weeds, The,
948
Cylindrograph, Moessard’s, 370
D
Daguerre and Talbot, 64
monument at Washington, The, 72, 604
, The statue of, 647
D illas, D. C., Best uses of photography, 639
Dallmeyr, T R , Mr. Debenham and spherical
aberration, 873
, Photographic len-es, 314, 361, 372, 400
, Reflected images in optical combinations,
466
, Spherical aberration and focussing, 543,
679, 834
, Treatment of subjects by focus, 304, 311,
623, 629, 660, 711
Damoizeau’s panoramic apparatus, 962
Damp process, A, 389
Dangers of flash-light compounds, 109
Dark room. Chemistry in the, 976
room comforts, 586
room light, 753
Davis, H. E., Artist photographer — a claim for
liberty, 942, 968
Davison, Q., A photographic scholarship, 230
, Camera Club exhibitions, 74
, Impressionism in photography, 990, 1009
, Photographic exhioitions, 440, 452, 474,
503, 520, 532
, The 1890 Camera Club conference, 93
. The focus question, 883
Daylight, An aid to, 718
Dealers’ Association, Photographic Manufac-
turers’ and, 717, 765, 852
, Censures on photographic, 496
Debenham, W. E.,and spherical aberration, 873
, W. E., An isoradtal focussing eye-piece,
143
, Is blurring desirable in a photograph ?
881
, Optical aspect of “ naturalistic ” defini-
tion. 800
, Ortnochromatic photography, 74
, Present stale of the carbon process, 733
, Selecting local distance with detective
cameras, 87
, Spherical aberration, 646, 724,852
— -, Unnaturnluess u( naturalistic focussing,
862, 934
Decimal system in London schools, The, 879
Decomposition o’ eikoDogen, 649
Decoudin’s photometer, 811, 822
Defective ( holographs. Optical causes of, 369
Definition, Naturalistic, 885
, Pictorial, 870
Density of negatives, Control in the, 100
Depth of focus and diffusion of focus, 472, 501,
514
of focus, Spherical aberration and, 724, 834,
852
Detective cameras, 165
cameras, Selecting focal distance with, 87
photographj, 313
Detonations, Lights from explosions or, 97
Developer for dry plates, Guaiacol as a, 431
Developers, About some, 450
•, Comparison of, 321, 735
, Reactions of various, 184
, The application of naphthalin derivatives
as photographic, 915
, The new photographic, 131
, The poisonous influence of certain,
897
used by German professionals, 414, 456,
510, 551
Developing dishes, 833
flash light negatives, 437
room. Light for the, 620
, Soakiog before, 61
transparencies, 686
Development, A standard method of, 356, 371,
393
in two solutions, 325, 385
, Temperature in, 70
Devices, A few hints and, 832
Devon and Cornwall Camera Club, 938
Diaphragms, Stops or, 577
Diazotype or primuline process. The, 701, 707,
777, 857, 959 ’ ’
. printing processes, 931, 952
processes, The, 937
Differences ot colour-sensitiveness at different
times, 239
Diffusion of focus, 801, 829
of focus, Depth of focus and, 472, 504, 514
Direct platinum printing, 370
reading photometer, A new, 713
Dissolving views in church services, 893
Distance beyond which objects will be iu focus,
91
Dobson, F. 8., Unhappy colonials, 426
Double faces, People with, 220
Doubly albumenised papers, 432
Drage, R. P„ Use and abuse of hand-cameras,
686
Drapers’ nail, Photographs at the, 433
Drawbacks, Group, 610
Drawing and photography, The art of, 277
Drawings for process blocks, 919
Dredge, J., The Chicago International Exhibi-
tion of 1892,960
Dry plate process, A neglected, 533
I lates by insects, Destruction of, 148
plates, Crossing national frontiers with,
336 ’
Duchochois, P. C., More experiments with
eikonogen, 189
Duner, N E , Diffusion of focus, 801, 829
Duration of flash-lights, Timing, 644
Dye-stuffs, Fast and fugitive, 712, 725, 751
E
Eclipse of December 22nd, 45
Eder, Dr. .1. M., A new lithographic transfer
ink, 169
, Intensifying collodion negatives with
hydroquinone, 3
, Photographs in natural colours by Herr
Veress, 360
, Photography of the insane for purposes of
psychiatria, 29
Edinburgh Photographic Exhibition, Optics at
the, 945
Photographic Exhibition, The pictures at
the, 970, 989, 1005
, The International Photographic Exhibi-
tion in, 899, 920, 939
Edwards & Co., B. J., Edwards’s isochromatic
plates, 52, 93
Edwards, B. J., Development in two solutions,
385
Eiffel a photographer, Mr., 330
Eikonogen, 69, 79, 83, 689, 697, 782, 934
compound, A permanent, 852
, Decomposition of, 649
, Experiments with, 107, 189
formulae, 849
patent, Dr. Andresen’s, 150
, Peculiarities of, 572
Electioneering photographs, 652
Electricity on iodine, The action of, 43
Electric light and photography, 116
spark, Photography by the light of the, 297
Employers and employed, 317
EmulsioD, A modified collodion, 221
Emulsions, 259
, Washing apparatus for, 291
Euamelling, 616
English Photography, Professor Luckhardt on,
864
Engraviog process, New, 120
Engravings, Cleaning soiled, 646
on bromide paper, Developing, 782
Enlargements, Salted paper for, 285
Enlarging and priming, Bromide, 40
Establishments, Photographic, 562
Etcbing metals. 456
process. Electro-chemical, 203
Ethics of photography, 412, 136
Eton, Photography at, 376
Exeter Hall Camera Club, 217
Exhibition, Apparatus at the Photographic 792,
802, 824, 811, 869 *
at Leipzig, 961
at Louth, Photographic, 984
at Vienna, The jury of tbe next inter-
national, 933
, City Photographic, 289, 381, 432, 690, 609
, Crystal Palace, £5, 205, 211, 267
, Geneva Photographic, 733
in Edinburgh, The International Photo-
graphic, 899, 920, 939
, Newcastle International Photographic, 309
of photo-mechanical work. An, 812
— — of the Medical Congress in Berlin, 664, 722
of 1892, The Chicago International, 960
, Royal Cornwall Polytechnic, 716
, The Calcutta, 994
, The Photographic Society’s, 560, 759, 763,
779, 798, 819, 831, 839, 861
Supplement — iv.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 2, 1891.
exhibition. The South London Photographic
Society’*, 923
, Tunbridge Wells Photographic, 841, 922,
973
Exhibitions, Photographic, 385, 440, 452, 474,
503, 520, 532
, Rules for photographic, 201
Expenses in photography, American amateurs’,
928
Experiment in book illustration, An, 785
Experiments, Ueliochromic. 357
Explosions, Flash powder, 191, 225
or detonations. Lights frcm, 97
Exposed plates. Restoring, 810
Exposure and development, 583
shutters, 200, 352
Exposures, The mathematical calculation of,
319
Expression, 549
Extraordinary a'sertions, 260
Eye and the camera, The, 4
, A new, 129
Eye-piece, An isoradial focussing, 143
for the Lick telescope, 428
for focussing. 873
to photography, Application of the, 125
F
Faded Photographs, Four, 464
Failures, Percentage of, 490
Fairfax, J. S., Flexible supports for films,
569
Fast and fugitive dye-stuffs, 712, 725, 751
Feat in photography. A, 5
Ferrero, K., The new premises of the Camera
Club, 617
Fickcn, 11. E., Rules of lighting. 677
Fiction, Photography in, 312, 337. 403, 420
Fiend, A photographic, 108
Figures in landscape, 965
in photographs, 188, 950
Films, Flexible supports for, 569
in a tropical atmosphere, 811
on glass surfaces, 138
Film, The new Tollable celluloid, 103
Fine art and photography, Some relations be-
tween, 179
Fishing match at Amberley, 774
Fixing photographs, 654
with magnesium chloride, 203
Flange screws of lenses, 487
Flash-light, A new, 67
compounds, Dangeis of, 109
gallery, Schirm’s, 123
Flash lights, Magnesium, 823
, Timing duration of, 644
Flash powder explosi ms, 191, 225
torch for producing magnesium flash,
24
Flexible plates, Treating, 597
■ supports for films, 589
Florence, Photography in, 263, 441, 609, 612
Flowers, Photographing, 511
Fluor spar in optic il instruments, 745
Foaming of liquids, 268
Focal distance with detective cameras, Select-
ing, 87
Focus, Depth of focus and diffusion of, 472,
604,514
Diffusion of, 801, 829
question, The, 883
, Treatment of subjects by, 304, 314, 587,
623, 629, 646, 666, 714
upon finely-ground glass screens, Obtain-
ing, 78
Focussing appliances, 117, 173
, Eye-pieces for, 873
, Spherical aberration and, 543, 679, 834
, Wnnaturalness of naturalistic, 862, 931
Fol, II., The permanence of photographic
prints, 343
Foreign fortifications, British photographers
and. 17
Formic aldehyde and its compounds, 67
Formula! used in photography, Weights,
measures, and, 523, 543, 562
Forth Bridge, Photographing the, 182
Four faded photographs, 464
France, Photography in, 23, 120, 206, 302, 352,
538, 590, 628, 902, 962
French econ inv, 39
metric system, The, 78L
Photographic Union, 87
— — seaports. Photographing at, 719
Frewing, E , Photogravure, 183
Fugitive dye-stufis, Fast and, 712, 725, 751
Fulgur universal lamp, The, 601
Future, Retouching in the near, 416
, The camera the historian of the, 653
, The light of the, 662
, The photographer cf the, 268
G
Gaeiiicke, I., Photography in natural colours,
618
Gale, J., Figures in landscape, 965
Gas cylinders, 132
cylinders, Severe tests of compressed, 239
Gases, t'ornpressed, 838
Gearv, II., Dissolving views in church services,
893
Gelatine, Collodion versus, 731
films, New, 543
in place of glass for stereoscopic slides, 931
negatives. Stripping the films of, 497, 903
plates, The keeping qualities of, 852
Gelatino and collodio-chioride prints to glass,
Transferring, 921
Gelatino-chloride paper, 818, 852
paper, Toning bath for, 589
Geological photographs committee. The, 892
photographs, Tne British Association Com-
mittee on, 705, 729, 747, 768
Geneva Photographic Exhibition, 733
German language, Photographic terms and the,
636
Photographic Union, The, 330
professionals, Developers used by, 414,456,
540, 551
Germany, Photography in, 27. 67, 99, 187, 203,
215, 291, 321, 357, 454. 197, 578, 610, 644, 734,
752. 781, 810, 822, 903, 98)
Gestures and speech mechanically reproduced,
104, 240
Giles, F. M., A few hints and devices, 832
“ Giphantia ’’ investigated, 253
Glasgow Photographic Exhibition. The, 377
Glass bottles, The solubility of, 121
screens for developing room lamps, 410
, The production of stereograms on, 879
, Transferring gelatino and collodio- chloride
prints to, 921
Glow of phosphorus, The, 576
Gold bath, 196
leaf, Size for, 1016
, Japaoese photographs in, 890
Golledge, E. A , Effect upon toning of printing
through coloured glasses, 453
Goold, J. E„ Printing processes for copying
tracings, 151
Gore, St. George, Short-focus and wide-angle
lenses, 692
Gotz, J. R„ New gelatine films, 543
, New Obernetter paper, 446
Goupil Gallery, Paintings at the, 495
Grade in professional photography, 223
Grainmophone, The, 187
Gravestones, Photographs on, 660
Green, A. G., A new photographic printing
process, 707
, Cross, A Bevan, Diazotype printing pro-
cesses, 934
Greene, F., A new rapid printing mi chine, 888'
, Photography in an age of movement, 183
Greenwich Ob>erva'.ory, Photography at, 477
Grey bromide prints, 603
Grosvenor Gallery, The, 480
Group drawbacks, 610
-, llow to make a, 619
Groups, Photographic, 278, 396
Grumblers, Photographic, 566
Guatacol as a developer for dry plates, 431
Gum arabic, 825
picking in Trieste, 753
Gun, Photographic, 24 *
Gunther, II E., Photography in Germiny, 27,
67. 99, 187, 204, 245, 291, 321, 357, 454, 497,
578,644, 752, 781, 903, 980
, Photogravure, 153
, Photo-lithography, 117
, The production of stereograms on glass,
879
. The progress of the photo-mechanical
printing processes, 396, 47 1, 548, 608, 684
, Transferring gelatino and collodio-chioride
prints to glass, 921
H
Ilabatia, Photography in, 256
Haddon, A., Notes on the report of the Lens
.Standard Committee, 501
Half-penny Inland postage, 143
Halation, 302, 352, 451, 978
Halo, Prevention of, 206
, Theoretical explanation of, 206
Hand apparatus, 24, 686, 702 ,
Hands, Photogruphing the, 43
Hannyngton, J. C., Detective photography, 313
Hardening gelatine prints, 08
Harrison, W. J„ Photographic survey of
Warwickshire, 12, 30, 43, 173
Hartley, W. N., Chlorophyll and leaf green,
9d4
Harvard College telescope, 6
Havre Photographic Club, The, 259
Heat on sodium carbonate. Action of, 140
negarty, J. C., My experience with hydro-
quinone, 808
Ueliochromic experiments. 357
Hester, T. N., Gas cylinders, 132
Hexham, A photographic exhibition at, 442
Hiding photographic defects, 699, 739
High art. 413
Himes, Prof. C. F., The new photographic «j
developers, 131
Hinges of dark-slide shutters, The, 164
Hints about negatives, Some, 985
— - and devices, A few, 832
Historian of the future, The camera the, 653
Historical photographs, Permanent, 565
Holding, T H., The Lantern Soc ety, 52, 209
Holiday, The photographers, 630
Holland, Photographv in, 139
Home portraiture, 553
Hopkiuson, J., Meteorological photography,
Horuig, The late Dr. E., 127
Horse, Drawing of the, 47
Hospitals, The Magic Lantern in, 961
Howson, J., A photographic scholarship, 230,
250, 325
Hubert, J., A warning. 795
Human expression, Code of, 86
Hummel, Prof. J. J., Fast and fugitive dye-
stuffs, 71 1, 725, 751
numphery, E. J , The reproduction of positives
and negatives, 908
Hurter and Driffield, Photo-chemical in-
vestigations, 593, 674, 693, 718, 738, 750, 772,
789, 809, 828, 842, 929
Hydroquinone development, Utilisations of,
635
, Intensifying collodion negatives with, 3
, My experience with, 808
Hydroxy lamme developers, 432
Hygrometer, A new, 547
Hypo, Elimination of, 10
I
Idealistic photography, 976, 994
Illuminaois, Comparative intensities of, 579
Illumination, Artificial, 428
Illustrated papers, Photography and, 111
Illustrating pot ms by photography, 556
Image, The latent photographic, 283, 303, 320,
339, 557, 580, 599
Imaging. Imagining and, 495, 515 538
Impressionism in photography, 990, 1009
Impurities in alcohol, 881
Incandescent lamp, 103
Indexing photographic literature, 913
Indian notes, 517, 567, 803
India, Photographic exhibitions in, 335
Ingall, W. T. F. M., Focussing appliances, 173
Ink for wriciog on photographs, 7
Insane for purposes of psychiatria. Photography
of the, 29
Insects, Destruction of dry plates by, 148
Instantaneous photography, 719, 941, 959
Institute of photography, Ad, 162, 888, 957,
1003
Instructions for the use of optical lanterns,
913
Instruments, Remarkable novelties in photo-
graphic, 421
Intensifies Quinol, 68
Intensifying negatives. 3, 578, 718
process, A new, 1001
Intensities of illuminants, Comparative, 579
Intensity of light. Time and, 1012
Interiors, Photographing, 5,898
International copyright, 105
Photographic Congress, Report of the,
137
In vacuo, The phosphorescence of lithium com-
pounds, 904
Invention, A wonderful, 818
Invisible in solar spectroscopy, Photographs of
the, 705
photographic image, The, 233, 402
Iodide of nitrogen, 799
Iodine, The action of electricity on, 43
Is ^chromatic or orthochromatic, 152
plates, Edwards’s, 23, 52, 93
Isoradial focussing eye-piece, An, 143
Ives, F. K , Photography in natural colours on
silver plates, 153
Ivory, A new species of, 684
J
Japanese mulberry-bark paper, 457
photographs in gold, 895
Jeffs, 0. W., The geological photographs com-
mittee, 892
Johnson, G. L., An institute of photography,
January 2, 1891.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Supplement — v.
Jones, Chapman, The Platinotype Co. and
reduction of platinotype prints, 994
, Control in the density of negatives, 100
, The hinges of dark-slide shutters, 164
Jones, The late Mr. Baynham, 526
Judges of photographs, Painters as, 409, 406
Jurisprudence, Photography in ciiminal, 572
Jury of the next international exhibition at
Vienna, 933
Just, Dr. Otto, 121
K
Keene, R., Convention visit to Old Moreton
Hall, 487
Keeping qualities of gelatine plates, The, 652
King, E. P., Lighting, 805
Kingsley's home at Eversley, 626
Kircher, the inventor of the magic lantern,
Athanasius, 118, 141, 198
Kiss.Capt,, Gelatine in place of glass for stereo-
scopic slides, 931
L
Lambert, F. C., Paintings at the Gonpil Gallery,
495
, Photographs at the Drapers’ Hall, 433
■ ■ ■, Retouching in the near future, 416
, Royal Academy of Arts, 350, 374, 399, 417,
431
, The Grosvenor Gallery, 480
, Wantid, a word, 870
Lamps, Glass screens for developing room, 110
, Magnesium, 77
, Translucent screens for developing room,
429
Landscape, Figures in, 950, 965
Lang, \V„ A neglected dry plate process, 533
, A i experiment in book illustration, 785
, Presidential address to the Glasgow
Photographic Association, 972, 9s8
. The cyanotype reproduction of sea-weeds,
918
, The Edinburgh Photographic Exhibition,
920
, The late Cuthbert Bede and his book,
“ Photographic Pleasures,” 71, 85
Lantern club, Formation of a, 52
slide making, 769, 770, 805, 878, 913, 943
■ slides. Developer for, 860
slides. Mounting, 241
slide work, 333, 696
Society, The, 209, 287, 332, 628
carrier, 691
plates, 991
Latent photographic image, The, 283, 303, 320,
339, 657, 580, 599
Litouche, T. I)., With the Lushai field force,
111, 261
Laudy, L. II , The arc light for projection, 909
Laughlin, Ada M., Artistic education for chil-
dren, 648
Leaf green, Chlorophyll and, 964
Leipzig, Exhibition at, 961
Lenses, Improvements in the mounts of, 329
, New photographic, 476, 524, 535
, Photographic, 344, 361 , 372, 400
, Short-focus and wide-angle, 692
Lens mounts. Uniformity in, 561
, Selecring a, 295
Lens standards, 341, 381, 390, 501
, The large, 868
Lettering prints, 60 2
Liberty, A. L., Japanese mulberry-bark paper,
Light and shade, 640
, Curlou3 experiments with, 411
, Dark-room, 753
for the developing room, 620
of the future, The, 662
, Physiological effect of a bright, 994
— , The chemical phenomena of, 256
, Thomas Wedgwood’s experiments on, 167
Ligntiog, 805
, Rules of, 677
Lightning, Photographing, 7, 22
L ghts from explosions or detonations, 97
Literary Notices, 162, 597, 606, 673, 688, 723,
784, 933, 940, 969, 981, 1004
Lithium compounds in vacuo , The phosphores-
cence of, 904
Lithographic transfer ink, A new, 169
Litho-photogravure, 99
Lithography in the United States, 896
Litmus, Purification of, 4
Livetpool Photographic Exhibition, The, 415
Lodge, R. B , Fishing match at Amberley, 774
London Chamber of Commerce, The, 985
, Photographs of, 430
— schools, The decimal system in, 879
smoke, Abolition of, 656, 695, 754
Long-focus lenses for portraiture, 891, 934
Louth, Photographic Exhibition at, 984
Luckhardt on English photography, Professor,
864
Luders, T. H., Vapour development, 48
Lunar photography, 802
Lushai field force, With the, 111, 261
Lustrous surfaces on glass, 145
M
Machine camera, A, 157
Magic lantern, Athanasius Kircher, the inven-
tor of the, 118, 141,198
lantern in hospitals, The, 961
Magnesium, Ammonia formed by burning, 697
chloride. Fixing with, 203
— — Hash-lights, 823
tlash-light studio, 27
lamps, 77, 302, 570
Maitland, G., Art photography recognized at
laf t, 33
Manufacturers’ and Dealers’ Association, Photo-
graphic, 717, 765, 852
Marion and Co., A permanent eikonogen com-
pound, 852
Marriott, W., Royal Meteorological Society,
209
Marshall, C. P., How to make a group, 619
Maskell, A., The progress of quinol develop-
ment, 11, 21
Mathematical calculation of exposures. The,
319
Matting lantern slides, 566
.M Hyland, W.t Censures on photographic dealers,
496
Meagher, P., “ The Camera and its various
motions,” 974
Measures in photography, Weights and, 523,
543.562, 738
Medical Congress, Photography at the exhibi-
tion of the, 664, 722
Meldola, Prof. R , Col. Russell’s contributions
to photography, 18
— — , Eikonogen, 69
, The photographic image, 557, 580, 699
Meteorological phenomena. Photographs of,
913
photography, 714
Metric system in photography, The, 545, 613,
761
Mew, J., A biography of J. H. Schulze, 39
, Athanasius Kircher, the inventor of the
magic lantern, 118. 141, 198
, Expression, 549
, Instantaneous photography, 941
, The carte-de-visite, 685, 730
, The photographer's holiday, 63(1
, The photographic tout, 821
, The statue of Daguerre, 647
Mexicm fire-flies, 178
Mica as a support for films, 904
Micklewood, E. II , Lantern slide making, 913
Micro-photographs of wood sections, 24
Milan, Photography in, 376
Military photography, 600
Mirages, 68
Mirror, An electroscopic, 563
Mitchell, C. L., Flash powder explosions, 191,
225
Modern developments of photography, 667
Moessard’s cylindrograph, 370
Morton, T. H., Negatives, 461
Motions, The camera and its various, 831, 840,
949, 974, 1000
Mountant, A good, 472
Mounting lantern slides, 241
Mounts of leases. Improvements in, 329
, Photographic, 404
Movement, Photography in an age of, 183
N
Nantes, Photographic Society of, 37
Naphthalin derivatives as photographic deve-
lopers, Tne application of, 945
National Association of American Amateur
Photographers, 982
— Association of Professional Photographers,
The, 971, 971
frontiers with dry plates. Crossing, 336
photographic exhibition, 84
Natural colours, Photography in, 153, 217, 276,
449, 610, 618
Naturalistic definition, 800. 885
focussing, Unnaturalness of, 862, 934
— — photography, 989
Negatives, 461
for photo-mechanical work, 470
, Same hints about, 985
, The reproduction of positives and, 908
Newcastle international photographic exhibi-
tion, 309
New engraving process, 120
New gas, A, 925
Newman, P. H., Imagining and imaging, 495,
515, 538
, Naturalistic definition, 885
, Some of the tendencies in photographic
art, 983, 1002
, Some relations between fine art and
photography, 179
Newspaper pictures, 1008
Newspapers by photography, Printing, 857
Niekel-in-the-slot camera, Pictures by the,
1012 J ’
Nitrogen, Iodide of, 799
Noble, W., Painters as judges of photographs,
466
Nomenclature, Photographic, 590
Non-actinic white light, 561
North of France, Photographic Society of, 642
Notes on. the report of the Lens Standard
Committee, 501
Notices of Books 10, 70, 192, 247, 422, 442, 463,
481, 570 ’ ’
Novelties at the Photographic Convention, 509
Novelty, A useful, 747
O
Obemetter paper. New, 446
Obituary, 165, 352, 515, 526. 707, 903, 988
Objectives, New photographic, 4,5, 500
Observatory on Mount Etna, A photo-astrono-
mictl, 1000
Old Moreton Hall, Convention visit to, 487
photograph book, An, 160
Operating notes, 793
Optical aspect of " naturalistic ” definition, 800
causes of defective photographs, 369
combinations, Reflected images in, 460
instruments, Fluor spar in, 745
lantern as it was, The, 197, 226, 758
lanterns, Instructions for use of, 913
pyrometer, 635
Optics at the Edinburgh Photographic Exhibi-
tion, 915
Ornamental printing in photography, 3
Orthochromatic, Isochromatic or, 152
photography, 74
photography, Sensitoe-lorimetry for, 591
plates, Developers f >r, 852
Orthochromatism applied to the reproduction
of pictures, 120
, Practical, 207
Osmium toning baths, 803
Oxygen in water, 149
P
Package of photographs for post, 47
Painters as judges of photographs, 409, 466
Painting, Photography and. 905
Paintings at the Goupil Gallery, 495
Palmer, H. G., The French metric system, 761
Panoramic apparatus, Damoizeau’s, 962
Paper, A new material for, 885
works, Ready-sensitised, 547
Paris, Amateur photography in, 84
Exhibition, 32
Paste, Adhesive, 765, 872
Pastels and photography, 858. 892
Patents and photographic progress, 173
Patent Intelligence : Specifications Published —
Alkaline cyanides, Preparatiun of, Gruneberg
and others, 657
Alloys of aluminium, Clark, 526
— — of aluminium, Green, 405
Aluminium, Bamber, 381
, Daniel, 227
, White, 993
Apparatus, Schneider, 93 i
, Damoizeau, 425
, Kipper and Perry, 382
, Winter, 50
Ascertaining distances, Watkin, 73
Automatically operating valves. Murray, 193
Azo eo'ouring ma tert, Friswell & Green,
951
colouring matter, Green and Lawson, 1014
Bone or celluloid. Substitute for, Callender,
833
Box cameras, Inkpen, 424
Burnishing machine, Bayly, 1014
Calculating exposures, W atkins, 1014
Cameras, Baker, 13
, Beauchamp, 911
, Boult, 851
, Carter, 1014
, Dallmeyer, 51
, Freeworth, 229
, Gray, 171
, Haddon, 850
, Heyburn, 850
, Johnson, 208
, LawraDce, 871
Supplement — vi.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 2, 1891
Patent Intelligence, continued —
Cameras, Lorain, 794
, Luc<“, 445
, McKellen, 911
, Merrit & Spencer, 583
, Miall, 170, 891
, Mills, 622
, Ransom, 912
, Raymond 193
, Rogers, 638
, Scorer, 13
, Skinnei 4 Lyth, 305
, Smith & Willis, 285
, Thomas, 425
— — , Turner, 93
, Watson, 31
, Whitney, 773
and dark slides. Colter, 171
and lenses, Dallmeyer, 248
and shutters, Edwards, 621
Cardboard impervious to action of photo-
chemicals, Rendering, Greene. 542
Carriers for magnesium lamps, Slingsby, 1011
, M all, 172
Centrifugal machines, Hellstrom,622
Changing boxes, Bramley & Butterworth, 912
■ plates, Ee-rero, 170
slides, Herbert, 13!
Cleaning glass plates, Wilson, 871
Coating of mucilaginous substance, Applying,
Hudson, 346
p'ates, Bishop 4 Cowan, 445
plates, Smith, 541
Copying apparatus, Barr & Stroud, 406
Cramp for gluing frames, Ott, 328
Crude glass. Preparation or, Quaglio, 305
Cutting screw threads, Hulse, 268
shape, Jumeaux. 773
Developer, Jumeaux, 812
Developers, Jones, 286
Diaphragms, Stuart, 134
Discolouring tannic acid solutions, Iladdon,
51
Dissolving-view lanterns. Bond, 773
Dusting on process, Wood, 872
Enlargements, Guttenberg, 952
Etching on glass, Meth & Kreitner, 774
Exhibiting ph tographs, Kitto, 249
photographs, Taunt, 170
Exposure in platinotype printing, Deciding,
Crawford, 406
Films, Eastman, 382, 425, 443
, Schwiriz& Mercklin, 31
Flashing lights. Hart, 227
Flash-lamp, Leisk, 112
Flash-light, Redwood, 952
exposures, Controlling, Hart, 112
Focussing arrangement, Shenstone, 912
magnifiers, Bis'iop, 602
Gelatine, New use for, Brunton, 248
Glass sheets in roofs, Drummond, 268
Glazing buildings, Heywood. 1014
Hand-cameras, McNama a, 229
Iland-drawn negatives, Mullock, 637
Head for stands. Shew. 287
Heads for stands, Taylor, 32
Heating glass rooms, Poat, 871
Holder, Staniforth, 1014
Illusions by persistence of vision, Bruce, 363
Improvements in photography, Fartn-r. 911
Instantaneous photographs, Donisthorp i &
Crofts, 993
Lamp, Lancaster, 73
Lamps for enlarging, Shenstone, 622
Lantern, Burns, 227
slides for copying, Griffiths, 407
Lanterns, Wrench, 93
Lenses, Blackwood, 133
Lime-light jets, Suiter, 891
Luminous preparation to paper, Applying,
Causton, 582
Magic lanterns. Gray A Kemp, 249
lanterns, Hughes, 249
lanterns, Steward, 637
Magnesium flash-lamps, Sinse’,872
Matt surface to albumenised prints, Payne,
851
Measuring distances, Martin, 249
Microscopically examining photographs,
Duncan, 582
Negatives for photo - mechanical printing,
286
Objectives, Gund ach, 851
, Krugener, 542
Opera-glesses, Levi, 229
, Pocock, 228
Optical illusions. Keller & Castan, 14
illusions, Reynaud, 170
- lanterns, Hugh'S. 993
Paper for photographic purposes, Treatment
of, Williams, 582
Photographic piinting, Nicol, 207
Photographs in rapid series, Taking, Greene
& Evans, 465
Patent Intelligence, continued—
Photometric apparatus. Methven, 227
Phototypes, Fischer, i26
Plate-changing apparatus, Fichtner, 249
Po ket lamp, Abel, 249
Polishing engraved glass, Facer, 5 26
glass, Malevez, 1014
Posing chair, Dow, 912
Preventing second exposures, Renwick, 678
Purifying comoounds of aluminium, Castner,
795
Reducing camera, Pearson, 912
Reproducing pictures, Le Boulch, 227
Shutters, Bishop, 326
, Browne, 113
, Oooybeire, 850
, Dallmeyer, 171
, Daniels, 286
, Eastman, 465
, Greeoall, 172
, Hoddle, 637
, Kershaw, 405
, Lancaster, 92, 850
, Perken & Rayment, 32
, Trunberry, 602
Spreading gum, Ac., Buhler, 325
Stand for enlarging, Shenstone, 678
Stands, Boyd and others, 678
Stereoscopes and cameras, Ransom, 248
Supports, Manse I A Frith, 425
Tissue transfer paper, Pkeenix, 171
Tourists’ apparatus, Darier-Gide, 229
Transparencies, Apparatus for, Morris, 50
Transp nent printed paper, Wise, 363
Umbrella walking stick, Peyman, 326
Washing trough, Ellis, 833
Wooden vessels, Turner, 193
Patterson, C. 8., Photography in the United
States, 982
Percentage of f lilures, 490
Perfumed photographs, 623
Perken, Son, and Rayment, Instructions for use
of optical lanterns, 9 3
Perkins, F. P., Platinum and palladium toning,
164
, Rev. T., Photographing church architec-
ture, 150
Permanence of negatives, 10
of photographic prints, The, 313, 817
Permanent eikonogen compound, A, 852
historical photographs, 565
Perry, Father, 34
Perspective in photography, 626
Pharmaceutical conference at Leeds, The, 709
Phillips, G. B., The value of silver waste, 634
Phonograph, Liesegang's, 645
Phosphorescence of lithium compounds in
vacuo , Tne, 904
Phosphorus, The glow of, 576
Photo-chemical investigations, 598, 674, 693,
718, 738, 150,772, 789, 809, 828, 812, 929
Photo-chronographio researches, 902
Photo-engraving as a business, 600
Photographed, How they were, 672
Photographer and a cougar, A collision between
a, 909
Photographers’ Benevolent Association, 14, 89,
446
Photographer’s holiday. The, 630
Photographic Club, The, 339
Exhibition, Apparatus at the, 792, 802,824,
844, 869
exhibitions, 385, 440, 452, 474, 503, 520,
532
image, The, 557, 580, 599
Institute, The proposed, 162, 888, 957, 1003
lenses, 344, 361, 372, 400
“ Pleasures,” The l,te Cuthbert Bede and
his book, 71, 85
Society’s Exhibition, 560, 759, 763, 779,
798, 819, 834, 839, 851
Society, The, 977
Society. The dinner of the, 132
Society, The new premises ot the, 951
tout. The, 821, 841
Photographing at French seaports, 719
Photography and business, 788
and hand drawings, 8
and painting, 905
in its relation to commerce, 978
: the science and the art, 669
Photograving on sensitive paper, 500
Photogravure, 133, 153, 625
Photo-lithographic transfer paper, A new, 185
Photo-lithograpliy, 147
Photo-mechanical printing processes, 324, 396,
471, 648, 608, 684
work, An exhibition of, 812
work, Negatives for, 470
Photometer, A new, 512, 713
, Decoudin’s, 811, 822
Fhoto-micrographic exhibition in Antwerp, 349
Photo-micrographs, 938
Photo-micrography, The record of, 521
rhoto-nephoeraph. The, 232
Photonom, The, 67
Pictorial arts, Photographic competition with
other, 111
Pictorial definition, 870
Pictorial Supplements—
“Penzance Harbour,” February 11th
The first magic lanterns, March 14th
Thomas Wedgwood. April 11 th
Specimen from “ Remtrkable Bindings in the
British Museum,” July 11th
Charles Kingsley’s house aud church, Evers-
liy, August 15th
“ Richmond Bridge,” September 26th
Picture framing, 637
Pictures at the Edinburgh Photographic Ex-
hibition, The, 970, 989, 1005
, Orthochromatism applied to the reproduc-
tion of, 120
Pike, G. C , A photographic society in Camber-
well, 487
, The platinotype process, 932
Pinhole negatives, 126
Plate changing, 998
Plate-making. Collotype, 737
Plates, Steeling photogravure, 587
, The sizes of photographic, 220, 241
Platinotype Company and the reduction of
platinotype prints, 974, 994
process. The, 932
Platinum and palladium toning, 164
, A sulpho-carbi'ie of, 833
— - group. Toning with metals of the, 185
printing. Direct, 370
— — ■, The price of, 977
Pleasant expression, Securing a, 998
Plummer, W. E., Astronomical photography,
390
Pocklington, H., Vocation of an amateur photo-
grapher, 181
Poems by photography, Illustrating, 556
Poetry and artistic photography, 757
Poisonous influences of certain developers, 897
Poor Negatives, Improving, 965
Pope, T. A,. Utilisations of hydroquinone deve-
lopment, 635
Portrait gallery, Photographic, 717
Portraiture, Home, 553
, Long-focus lenses for, 891, 934
, Success in, 649
Positive development, Preparation of thio-
sinamine for, 868
Positives and negatives, The reproduction of,
908
Powell, G. F., Stereoscopic photography, 355
Premises of the Photographic Society, The new,
762
Preservation, Sulphites: their stability and, 780
Presidential address to the Glasgow Photo-
graphic Association, 972,989
I’rimuline piocesses, 701, 777,889
Pringle, A., Stereoscopic vision, 172
, The record of photo-micrography, 521
Printing and writing papers, Table of sizes of,
65
, Bromide enlarging and, 40
, Chromo-collographic, 529
frame, A simple, 630
frames, 994
machine, A new rapid, 868
machin of the future, A. 164
material, C-lluloid as a drawing and, 379
newspapers by photography, 857
operations, 593
, outdoor and in, Photograph c. 255
paper, The “ Thula ” direct, 782
, Photo-mechanical, 324
press, Chromo-photography in the, 202
process, A new photographic, 707
procesi, A writing ink, 263
processes for copying tracings, 151
processes, Progress of the photo-mechani-
cal, 396, 471, 548. 608, 684
Prints and drawings, 82
, The permanency of photographic, 343,
817
, Washing, 616
Pritchard. C. F., Copyright law, 603
. Reproduction and copyright, 33
Problem in the history of photography. An un-
solved, 177
Process blocks, Drawings for, 919
Professional photographers. The National
Association of, 971, 974
Professionals, Amateurs and, 173
Professional use of photography, A, 1005
Profession for women, A new, 848
Progress of photography during year closing
August, 1890. 811, 830, 845
of photography. The, 925
Projection appliances, photographic copying
and, 746
, The arc light for, 909
January 2, 1891.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Supplement — vii.
Property in photographic work, 629, 903
Prospective and retrospective, 1
Psychiatria, Photography of the insane for
purposes of, 29
Publishers, The rights of photographic, 771
Purification of litmus, 1
Purpose in photographic work, 57
Pyrogallol stains, Clearing, 709
Pyrometer, An optical, 635
<2
Quick work, 73
Quinol developer with calcium bisulphite, 246
development, The progress of, 11, 21
hydroquinone developer, 984
intcnsifier, 68
R
Railway fares for photographers, Special, 892,
953
Ramsden eye-piece to photography, Application
of the, 125
Rapid printing machine, A new, 868
Rayleigh, Lord, Instantaneous photographs of
water jets, 719
, Photography by the light of the electric
spark, 297
Reactions of various developers, 184
Red glass, 474, 611, 735
Reducer, Uelilzki’s durable, 989
Reducing halation, 451
Reduction of p'atinotype prints, Platinotype
Company and, 974, 994
Reiiccted images in optical combinations, 460
Refrangible rays, Photography of the more,
361, 381, 392
Rejlander, Oscar Gustav, 9, 27
Repairing broken negatives, 20
Reproduction and copyright, 14, 33, 51
of positives and negative*, Che. 908
of sea-weeds, The cyanotype, 948
Restoring exposed plates, 810
Retouch' r’s point, The, 100
Retouching in the near future, 416
negatives, 203
Reversal of the negative image by thio-carba-
midcs 727, 741, 765
Richaids, C. P , The National Association of
Professional Photographers, 974
Robinson, II. P., Oscar Gust iv Rejlander, 927
, R- W., Pnotographie exhibitions, 385
. Reproduction and copi right, 14, 51
“ Roll Call,” the, 74
Home, Photography in, 218, 431
Rossi. A. M., The art of drawing anl photo-
graphy, 277
Royal Academy of Arts, 350, 374, 399, 417, 414
Cornwall Polytechnic Exhibition, 457, 716
Institution, The, 58, 98, 122, 159, 353 402,
994
.Meteorological Society, 209
Meteorological Society, Photography at
the, 215
Society, Conversazione of the, 371, 482
Rudolph, P., New photographic lenses, 476,
524, 535
Rules fer photographic exhibitions, 201
Ruskin on “ Beauty,” 190
Russell’s contributions to photography, Co!., 18
Russia, Photography in, 905
Rutherfurd, Lewis Morris, 4
S
Sachse, J. F., Botanical photography, 322
, Some hints about negatives, 985
, Developers used by German professionals,
414, 456, 540, 551
, Photography in criminal jurisprudence,
672
, The application of naphthalin derivatives
as photographic developers, 945
, The camera the historian of the future.
653
Salomons, Sir D., Distance beyond which ob-
jects will be in focus, 91
Salted paper for enlargements. 285
Sawyer, Ly.ldeil, Mr. Lyddell Sawyer’s pictures
at the Camera Club, 812
Sawyer’s pictures at the Camera Club, Mr.
Lyddell, 783, 812, 834
Scaling, W., Basket work in photography, 74
, Tourists’ baggage, 34
Sobering, Ernst , 104
Schirm’s Hash-light gallery, 123
Scholarship, A photographic, 230, 250, 325
Schulze, J. H., A biography of, 39
Schumann, V., Photography of the more re-
frangible rays, 361, 381, 392
Science, 1’hotographic aids to, 877
Screens, Obtaining locus upon finely-ground
glass, 78
Seaman, W. H., The metric system in photo-
graphy, 613
Sea-weeds, The cyanotype reproduction of, 948
Self-luminous transparencies, 105
Senier, H., Proposed Camera Club for South
London, 874
Sensitised photographic silk, 878
Sensitising and conservation of albutnenised
paper, 274
Sensitiveness, To increase, 979
Sensito-colorimetry for orlhochromatic photo-
graphy, 591
Sensitometer, A new, 454
Sermons in stones, 741
Seyd, E., Aluminium in photographic apparatus,
620
Shade, Light and, 640
Short focus and wide-angle lenses, 692
Shutters, The hinges of dark slide, 164
Silhouettes, Photographic, 641
Silk, Sensitised photographic, 878
Silver malonates, 652
elates, Photography in natural colours on,
153
, Sub-fluorid • of, 662
Sitter couldn’t look pleasant, Why a, 680
Size for gold leaf, 1016
Sizes of photographic plates, The, 220, 241
Smith, A. P., A modified collodion emulsion,
221
, Preparation of thiosin&tnine for positive
development, 868
Smithsonian Institute, The, 713
Smyih on figures in photographs, I'rof. i’iazzi,
188
Photographs of the invisible in solar
spectrosc ipy, 705
Snap snot photography, 655
Soaking before developing, 64
Social fancy, A new, 672
Societies, Proceedings of —
Abuey Camera Clu ', 35, 75, 176
Amateur Photographic Assoc ation, 541
Bath Photogtap ic Society, 55. 116. 195, 271,
366, 447, 527, 604, 680, 775, 875, 1015
Birmingham Photographic So nety, 55, 96,
156, 386, 5.8, 603, 680, 699, 776, 855, 915,
954
Bolton Photographic Society, 288
Brechin Photographic Association, 996
Brighton Pnot graphic Society. 155
Bris'Ol and Wes' »t England Amateur Photo-
graph c Association, 195, 407, 584
Bnxton and Uiaphnu Camera Club. 936
Camera Club, 34. 52, 75, 94, 113, 135, 153,
175, 194, 210. 233, 269, 307, 327, 347, 361,
386, 427, 813, 835, 853, 874, 893, 914, 935,
975, 395
Cardiff Amateur Photogr.phic Society, 775
Croydon Camera Club, 307, 503. 815
D- rby I hntograpbic Society, 76, 115, 230,
327,836, 1015
Devon and Cornwall Camera Club, 35
Dundee and East of Scotland Photographic
Association, 56, 113, 156, 212, 307, 366,
816, 976
Dunedin Photographic Society, 659
Edinburgh Photographic Society, 34
Enfield Camera Club, 798, 895, 955
Glasgow Amateur Photographic Association,
856, 936, 1016
Glasgow Photographic Association, 76, 135,
231, 915, 996, 1016
Glenalmond 1’hotographic Club, 915
Gloucestershire Photographic Society, 367
Great Yarmouth and Eastern Oouotier Pho-
tographic Society, <76, 815, 875, 956
Hackney Photographic Society, 55, 96, 155,
194, 307, 366, 386, 427, 487, 527, 564, 659,
699, 776, 814, 855, 915, 954
Holborn Camera Club, 544
India, Club of Amateur Photographers of,
856
Ireland, Photographic Society of, 16, 196,
231, 252, 272, 308, 348, 387, 428, 816, »55,
916, 953, 995
Japan, Photographic Society of, 175, 328,
367, 976
Kimberley Camera Club, 446
Lantern Society, 252, 855, 874, 931, 995
Leeds Photographic Society, 895
Leicester and Leicestershire Photographic
Society, 56, 155, 232, 307, 408, 776, 916, 954
Lewes Photographic Society, 56, 212, 288,
387, 488, 720
Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association,
114, 195, 251, 271, 446, 507, 624, 700, 881,
875, 955
London and Provincial Photographic Associa-
tion, weekly
London University College Photographic
Club, 230
Manchester Amateur Photographic Society,
75,116
Societies, continued —
Nelson (New Zealand) Camera Club, 856
Newcastle-on-Tyne and Northern Counties
Photograph c Association, 155, 307, 365,
528, 583, 756, 836, 935, 996
New York, Society of Amateur Photographers
of, 36, 15G
Northern Tasmanian Camera Club, 659
North Middlesex Photognphic Club, 16, 95,
155, 195, 232, 328, 488, 659, 740, 775, 836
Notts Amateur Vhotogtaphic Association,
838, 896, 956, 995
Oblfum Photograp ic Society, 875
Oxford I’hotograpbic Society, 895, 1015
Philadelphia, Photographic Society of, 35, 115,
270, 366, 447, 8i6
Photographers' Benevolent Association, 75,
271, 366, 563. 659, 756, 854, 895
Photographic Club, weekly
1‘hotograpVc Society ol Great Britain, 15, 52,
94. 131, 174, 209. 250, 306, 347, 385, 426,467,
507, 583, 679, 774, e53, 893,935, 974
Sheffield Camera Club, 136, 19a, 719, 875
Sheffield Photographic Society, 35, 113, 209,
211, 287, 387, 468, 488, 544, 640, 815, 895
South London Photographic Society (late East
Dulwich and Peckhnm), 34, 75, 212, 659,
719, 756, 796, 835,895, 1015
Soulhsea Amateur Photographic Society, 270
Torquay Photographic Association, 995
Tooting Camera Club, 776
Vienna Pi Olographic Society, 916
W' st Londm Photographic Society, 15,95,
154. 194, 231, 303, 624, 775, 815, 835, 854,
915, 953, 1015
West Surrey Aaut iir Photographic Society,
387
Soda in photography. Acid sulphite of, 784
Sodium c irbonaie, Action of heat on, 140
Solar activity, 649
Club, The, 963
Sold r, A tenacious, 49
Solubi'ity of glass bo ties, The, 121
South London Photographic Society’s Exhibi-
tion, Tne, 923
Spec’aele gla-ses, M k ng, 816
Spectroscopy, Photographs of the invisible in
solar, 705
Speucer, J. n,, The “ Roll Call,” 74
spherical Aberration, 643, 7 4, 834 852, 873
b rration an I focussing, 543, 679, 834
Spiller, J., Amateurs and professionals, 173
Sundry notes and corrections, 33
, The chemical phei'mena of light, 256
Standard light in photography, A, 917
Stars in the d.yt,mo, Photographing, 803
ftatue of Daguerre, 647
SteeliLg photogravure plates, 587
Stellar photography, 99
Stereograms on glass, The proilucticn of, 879
Stereoscopic photography, 152, 355
slid s, Gel atine m [dace of glass for, 931
vision, 172
Stones, Sermons in, 741
Stops or diaphragms, 577
Stripping the films of gelatine negatives, 497,
903
Studio in summertime. The, 596
Subterranean photography, 672
Success in portraiture, 649
Suggestions of sitters, 532
Sulphite of soda, 302
Sulphites : their stability and preservation, 780
Summer photographic exhibition, London, 209
Summertime, The studio in, 596
Sundry notes and corrections, 33
Sun’s eye, In the, 681
Supplee, II. H., Home portraiture, 553
Supplements, Pictorial —
‘‘Penzance Harbour,” February 14th
The first magic lanterns, March 14th
Thomas Wedgwood, April 11th
Specimen from “ Remarkable Bindings in the
British Museum,” July 11th
Charles Kingsley’s house and church, Evers-
ley, August 15th
“ Richmond Bridge,” September 26th
Survey, Another photographic, 219
Survey of Warwickshire, Photographic, 12, 30,
43, 173, 422
Sweden, Photography in, 90, 254
Swing-back, The, 39
Switzerland, Photography in, 145, 742
, Tourist photographers in , 594
Syllabus, Brighton Photographic Society’s, 221
T
Tarniquet, F., Enamelling, 616
Taylor, J. T., Ethics of photography, 412, 436
Telegraph, Photography by, 38, 53o
Telescopes, Astronomical, 6, 923, 992, 1013
Temperature ia development, 70
of photographic manipulations, The, 144
Supplement— viii.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 2, 1891.
Tendencies in photographic art, Some of the,
983, 1002
Tennant, J. A., The studio in summertime,
598
Terms and the German language, Photographic,
836
Tests of compressed gas cylinders. Severe, 239
Thio-carbamides, Reversal of the negative
image by, 727, 743, 7G5
Thiosinamlne for positive development, Pre-
paration of, 808
Thorpe, T. E„ The glow of phosphorus, 76
“Thula” direct printing paper, The. 782
Time and intensity of light, 1812
Tombstone photography, 1010
Toning albumen prints, 27
bath, A, 454
bath for gelatino-chloride paper. 589
bath for yellow-sta'Ded pistes, 980
gelatino-chloride paper, 587
,• Production of coloured photographs by,
980
with metals of the platinum group, 185
Toole among photographers, Mr., 485
Tourist photographers and the Charnel
passages, 605, 626, 663, 682
Tourists' baggage, 2, 34
Tout, The photographic, 821, 841
Tower of London, Photographs of the, 466
Tracings, Copying, 151, 707
Trade union of photographic workmen, 7
Trading in photography, The Camera Club and,
643, 661, 679
Transferring gelatino and collodio-chloride
prints to glass, 921
Translucent screens for developing room amns
429 y
Transparencies, 838
, Developing, 686
, Self-luminous, 105
Transparent, Making paper, 977
Treatment of subjects by focus, 304, 314, 587
623, 6.9, 646,666, 714
Truth in photography, 612
Tulloch, J. K , Selecting a lens, 295
Tunbridge Wells Photographic Exhibition, 841
922, 973 ’
Two solutions, Development in, 325, 385
Typographic engraving, 120
U
Ullman, L. J.. Operating notes, 793
United States, Photography in the, 982
Unnaturalness of naturalistic focussing 862,
934 953
Untruth, A photographic, 293
Uranium intensifler, 980
residues, Treatment of, 277
Use and abuse of hand-cameras, 686
Utilisations of bydroquinone development, 635
V
Value of silver waste, The, 634
Vanderweyde, H., Exhibition of the Photo-
graphic "Society, 834
Van Neck, L., Reactions of various developers,
184
Vapour development, 48
Varley, F. II., A new photometer, 512
, A new direct reading photometer, 713
, Application of the Ramsden eye-piecc to
photography, 125
, Iodide of nitrogen, 799
, Obtaining focus on finely-ground glass
screens, 78
, Sending pictures and writing by the
electric telegraph, 38
Varnishing, 627
Varnish vehicle in painting, 402
Verfss, Photographs in natural colour; by,
360
Vidal, Lion, Orthochromatic photography, 74
, Photography in France, 23, 120, 206, 302,
52, 538, 590, 628, 902, 962
Vienna, Imperial Institute at, 665
, International photograph c exhibition in,
390
International Photographic Salon, 661
, Photography in, 821
Vocation of an amateur photographer, 181
Vogel, Dr. II. W., Differences of colour-sensi.
tiveness at different times, 239
, Photography in Germany, 187, 61 J, 734,
810, 822
, Schirm’s flash-light gallery, 123
W
Walker, W. II., The new Tollable celluloid film,
103
Wallace, E., Fixing photographs, 654
, Lantern slide making with the camera,
943
, Photography and business, 788
, Printing operations, 593
, Stops or diaphragms, 577
Want-d, a word, 870
Waste, The value of silver, 634
Warm glass studios for the winter, 837
Warming solutions, 165
Warnerke, L., Weights and measures at the j
Photographic Convention, 543
Warning, A, 795
Warwickshire, Photographic survey of, 12, 30
43, 173, 422
Washing apparatus for emulsions, 291
prints, 616
the faces of sitters, 695
Washington Convention, An amateur at the
last, 791
Waste products, Photographic, 128
Water for photographic purposes, 128
Waterhouse, Col. J., Celluloid as a drawing and
printing material, 379
, Guaiacol as a developer for dry plates,
431
, Indian notes, 517, 567, 803
, Reversal of the negative image by thio-
carbamides, 727, 743, 765
Water jets, Iustantaneous photographs of, 719
lichtdruck process, 187
Watkins, A., Exposure meter, 874
, The mathematical calculation of exposures
319
Wax finish, A, 991
Weather forecasts, About, 546
Webster, Sir R., The progress of photography,
925
Wedgwood’s experiments on light, Thomas,
167
Weights and measures in photography, 738
and formula) used in photography, 523,
543, 562, 585
Werge, J., The late Mr. Baynham Jones, 526
West London Photographic Society, Exhibition
of the, 49
Wet orthochromatic process, The, 752
What photography will not do, 246
Wheeler, W. H„ Eve-pieces for focussing,
873
, Long-focus lenses for portraiture, 892
, Perspective in photography, 526
, Unnaturalness of naturalistic focussing,
953
White light, Non-actinic, 561
Wide-angle lenses, Short-focus and, 692
Wiedersen, J., Photographing the baby, 45
Wife’s view of amateur photography. A, 130
Wilcock, J., Another photographic survey,
219
Wild bear, Photographing a, 981
beast photography, 359, 849, 865
Williams, D„ An exhibition of photo-mechani-
cal work, 812
Wilson, F. II., Photographic groups, 278
, The best photographer, 64
Winter pictures from the Ilartz Mountains,
27
scenes, Photographing, 6
, Warm glass studios for the, 837
Wire screen background, A, 898
Women, A new profession for, 848
Wood engraving, Photography and. 287, 601
Writing ink printing process, A, 263
Y
Year-Book, The Photographic News, 844
Year, The photographic, 14
1890, The, 997
Yellow fog, 188
stains, 590
Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, Holboni, Loudou, E.C.
I
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1635>r— January 3, 1890.
... V
\ ^
CONTENTS.
not
Prospective and Retrospective 1
Photographic Tourists’ Baggage 2
Intensifying Collodion Negatives with llydrokinone. By Dr.
J.M.Eder 3
Ornamental Printing in Photography 3
Lewis Morris Rutherfurd 4
A Feat in Photography 3
Photographing Winter Scenes G
The Harvard College Telescope G
Pictures sent by Lightning 7
Notes 3
PAGE
Oscar Gustav Rejlandcr. By H. P. Robinson 9
Notices of Books 10
The Progress of Quinol Development. By Alfred
Maskell 11
Photographic Survey of Warwickshire. By W. Jerome
Harrison, F.G.S 12
Patent Intelligence 13
Correspondence.— Photographers’ Benevolent Association —
Reproduction and Copyright 14
Proceedings of Societies IS
Answers to Correspondents 16
PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE.
Thf. Jubilee Year of Photography just closed has fur-
nished occasion for taking note of the progress of our
Art-Science in its many phases and applications ; the
Congresses of London, Paris, and Berlin have each
dealt with it in turn, and yet the subject is far from
being exhausted. The reports show steady advances
all round, with vastly increased number of votaries
and new resources in the way of materials and appa-
ratus. The practice of photography has now become
so much simplified, that hosts of recruits have been
attracted to us, many of whom may eventually be
induced to pursue their studies in a more scientific or
artistic spirit than that which served as the first motive
in taking up the camera. Scarcely any public event
now escapes being recorded, and where no camera is
seen, it is not safe to assume that the photographer is
not secretly working amongst us. Cumbrous appa-
ratus is all but banished in favour of smaller appli-
ances for producing negatives of the required delicacy,
which can a'terwards be enlarged. Weighty glass is
giving way to light celluloid films, and bulky carriers
to roller-slides, so that pedestrians and cyclists no
longer hesitate to carry the needful outfit amongst
their impedimenta, and they find dark-room accommo-
dation provided for them at many points along their
route.
To keep pace with the growing demands — commer-
cial and otherwise — the London Chamber of Commerce
has added a photographic section, which may be ex-
pected to deal with questions of piracy and commercial
immorality, standards of weights and measures, and,
what is equally important, provide the machinery for
referring to arbitration all sorts of matters in dispute.
It may eventually undertake the testing of lenses and
chemical products, stamping them as with a hall mark
when approved.
The notable increase in the number of amateur
clubs and local societies, with discussions and proceed-
ings calling for review or report, made it imperative to
increase the size of the News, and in the month of
October it was expanded from sixteen to twenty pages.
Advantage was taken of this change to introduce new
paper and type, more attention being paid also to the
quality of the pictorial illustrations. In this manner
it is hoped to combine the very desirable features of
prompt report and technical excellence. Attention has
likewise been given to the column headed “ Answers
to Correspondents,” which, for the first time, has been
placed under separate management. The new arrange-
ment has been of great service to subscribers in the
country and abroad, who have freely availed themselves
of the facilities offered for pushing their enquiries at
head-quarters. An outcome of such intercommunica-
tion is the discovery that a wide-spread desire exists
for practical instruction in the photo-mechanical pro-
cesses, and suggests that the time has arrived when
classes for the practice of Collotype, Woodburytvpe, &c.,
might very well be formed in one or more of our
technical institutes.
As with the camera at public festivals, so the lantern
display has come to be regarded as indispensable for
lecture illustration. The tourist, naturalist, and his-
torian alike resort to it as a ready means of enlivening
a narrative or illustrating a point in science. The
painted slides have given way to photo-transparencies,
for which an endless numberof requisites have been put
upon the market. Scenes on land and sea, the starry
heavens and nebultc, gigantic explosions, street scenes,
objects in motion, and the movements of animals, are
all made to tell their tale through the instru-
mentality of the rapid plates now put into the
hands of the photographer, and if he is not satisfied
with the old developers, there are two new ones at
least — pyrocatechin and eikonogen — with which he
may feel inclined to experiment. Orthochromatic
photography has been made the subject of further
study by Mr. Andrew Pringle and Mr. C. H.
Bothamley ; new methods of platinum toning
by Mr. Valentine Blanchard and Mr. Lyonel
Clark ; the acid fixing bath has been again revised,
and flash lighting for home portraits has scored
a success during the past year; whilst theoretical
photography and measurement of density in
negatives have received a fair share of attention from
Professors Carey Lea, R. Meldola, W. R. Hodgkinson,
and Capt. Abney ; but whether the photo-chloride or
oxy-chloride theory, or neither, is to be adopted, stands
over for decision to another year.
2
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 3, 1890
PHOTOGRAPHIC TOURISTS’ BAGGAGE.
In the Photographic News Year-Book for 1890 is nn
article by Mr. Fleetwood Pritchard, which gives u-iful
practical information to the photographic tourist proper;
that is to say, to the traveller who does not confine his
expeditions to well-trodden routes, but who, indepen-
dently of railways and other conveyances, carries all
his luggage knapsack-fashion on his back. Such is the
best method of travelling both for health and for in-
formation ; the photographer is then free to <juit the
main routes frequented by the English ; he can traverse
footpaths and put up at wayside inns wherein a
foreigner is rarely seen ; he can talk with the villagers
in their mountain homes, can enter into their joys and
their sorrows, and sec the people as they actually are.
The photographer who is “put through ” by tourists’
agencies, or who independently traverses the ordinary
routes, finds English spoken at all the large hotels, and
everything about him made as English as possible, sc
that for the purpose of gaining some kinds of informa-
tion he might as well have remained at home.
Supplementary to the suggestions of Mr. Pritchard,
it is our object to point out additional precautions
which should be taken in advance by the photographic
tourist proper. One of these is that he should have a
written list of all the articles he may require in his
travels, keep this list permanently attached to the
inside of his knapsack, and make additions to the
written items as experience may dictate. In places
where there are no shops within several miles, and
where the few shops then to be found contain only
articles of immediate necessity, such as those of food
and clothing, the omission of trifling things obtainable
at once in towns will sometimes be the cause of con-
siderable annoyance. For instance, if he should desire
to develop a few plates when away from home, to make
sure on the spot, ere it is too late, that he has obtained
some of the more important photographic records of his
travels, he requires a few two or three-ounce bottles
for his solutions, especially those solutions which are
most liable to oxidation in the air. In the wayside
inn or the mountain cottage he may find nothing but
wine-bottles, which are scarcely good for the purpose,
and the kindly hostess may empty her little bottle of
eau de Cologne o one of those vast receptacles to
oblige the stranger. A cork or two may be wanted ;
a wine-cork has to be cut down, and in a small bottle
may more or less freely permit the passage of both air
and liquids. The said photographic tourist never fora
moment thought of putting a few gummed labels in his
baggage, and having mixed his solutions, finds gum to
be practically an article never seen in his temporary
domicile ; but after an hour’s delay, when he cannot
conveniently spare any time, some freshly-manufactured
flour paste is obtainable. More serious is the omission
of filtering paper of any description. He should never
take out new apparatus if he can help it, however
expensively it may have been made ; the apparatus
should always be well tested by experimental work for
a week or two before he starts. The means for making
small improvements or corrections are frequently not
present in districts remote from towns. In fact, pre-
paration for travel with light photographic baggage in
regions far from the larger centres of human industry
requires a considerable amount of care and forethought,
which can be appreciated only by those who have had
the experience.
One of the best things ever suggested in relation to
tourists’ baggage originated with Mr. William England,
who, in the days of old, advocated the use of basket
portmanteaus in place of ordinary portmanteaus ; the
former are very light, and give great protec-
tion to any glass articles they may contain. Captain
Abney tried and publicly endorsed the merits
of this plan, so also did Mr. Fleetwood Pritchard.
Such portmanteaus should be lined with thin india-
rubber doth ; they may be either specially made to
hold apparatus in compartments, or the elegant French
palm-baskets, resembling portmanteaus in form, may
be bought ready-made at moderate prices in certain
shops near Covent Garden. Our own workmen arc not
competent to manufacture them, so they have to be
imported. With properly-constructed focussing glasses,
focussing cloths will iu time become unnecessary for
small cameras, and die best cloth for the purpose, as
originally published by Captain Abney, is common
mackintosh; it is absolutely opaque and very light;
moreover, it will always be useful as a protection for
the table in the hotel bedroom when photographic
operations are carried on thireupon. A wipe after-
wards with a sponge or duster cleans the cloth. In
studios, Italian cloth is excellent for focussing purposes,
but it is altogether too heavy and bulky for tourists’
baggage. In hot sandy places, where dust penetrates
everywhere, Captain Abney’s plan of rubbing a part
of the interior framework of each slide with glycerine
is good. One writer complained that it was bad because
the glycerine found its way on to his plates; probably
he applied too much glycerine, and had common slides ;
the place for the glycerine is iu the grooved portion,
where there is countci sinking.
The perfecting of tourists’ baggage is a subject which
will demand closerpublic attention than it has hitherto
received, for the requirements of not a few photo-
graphers bear relation thereto.
A “ Brilliant Negative.” — Many will perhaps say that it is
better known than described ; but, if a description had to be
given, it would mean a plate in which the silver deposit
ranged from opacity to clear glass, with a wide range of tone
between. In many cases the description would be correct,
and, if the colour of the negative were of the blackish or
bluish grey obtained by the use of sulphite of soda or fer-
rous-oxalate, the resulting print would, no doubt, be a bril-
liant picture. But tinge the film yellow or orange, and the
“brilliant negative” will give only hard, “soot and white-
wash ” prints. This was the rock on which the old collodion
workers split ; they found that with gelatine plates and pyro-
ammonia development, what they had learned to regard as
brilliant only produced irredeemable hardness. I should,
therefore, be inclined to define a “ brilliant negative ” as one
that gives a brilliant print, that is, a picture with a minute
quantity of pure black and white, and a wide gradation of tone
between. — Journal of the Photographic Society of India,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
S
January .‘5, 1890.]
INTENSIFYING COLLODION NEGATIVES
WITH HYDRO K I N ON E .
BY 1)B. J. M. EDER.
For the purposes of photographic reproduction the
collodion process is still of the greatest value. For
photo-lithography, zincotype, lichtdruck, &c., collodion
plates are better adapted than gelatine emulsion,
because they more readily reproduce faint lines with
clearness.
In the reproduction of line subjects, intensifying is
generally effected by means of iodide of mercury,
followed by blackening with sulphide of ammonium.
We thereby obtain a very dense opaque deposit. For
more delicate negatives, of half-tone subjects particu-
larly, the well-known mixture of pyrogallic acid,
nitrate of silver, and citric acid, has been hitherto
employed. Captain Hiibl, of the Imperial Military-
Geographical Institute in Vienna, has introduced with
success a process of intensifying with hydrokinone,
nitrate of silver, and acid, resembling in action the old
pyrogallic method, but safer to work.
With an unfixed wet collodion plate, this intensifier
not only effects a harmonious strengthening of the
picture, but it acts also by continuing the action of the
developer which has preceded it, in bringing out
details. Applied after fixation, it intensifies without
injury to the clear shadows.
The action of this intensifier is, however, not like
that of mercury solution, which acts only in proportion
to the amount of reduced silver present, but a larger
proportion is deposited upon the high lights, thus
assisting in the production of brilliancy.
Captain Hiibl mixes his re-developer according to
the following formula : — 10 grammes of hydrokinone are
dissolved in 1,000 grammes of water, and so much acid
is added that when the solution is mixed with one-
third of its volume of a three per cent, nitrate of silver
solution, it remains clear for the space of five minutes.
The addition of a few drops of sulphuric acid or of five
grammes of citric acid fulfils this condition. Tnis
intensifier is more dedicate in its action than that Com-
posed of iron and silver, and has the great advantage
over pyrogallic acid, that fixed negatives may be
treated in full daylight, and the action renewed without
danger as many times as may be desired.
At the Imperial School and Institute for research in
photography and reproduction processes in Vienna
also, Hiibl’s hydrokinone developer intensifier for wet
collodioa plates is worked with the best results, and is
highly recommended by the staff.
In accordance with the foregoing formula, solutions
were made of
A. — Hydrokinone
Water
Citric acid
B. — Nitrate of silvei
Water
10 parts
1,000 „
6 „
1 part
30 parts ■
Before use, 3 volumes of A (hydrokinone solution)
are mixed with 1 volume of B (silver solution).
For a somewhat under-exposed negative, the plate
is intensified with the accustomed sulphate of iron
solution before fixing; by this means detail is got out.
A properly exposed and fully developed negative, on
the other hand, is intensified after fixing.
Negatives intensified with hydrokinone become so
dense, that they suffice perfectly for all kinds of repro-
duction processes, photo-lithography, &c. If, how-
ever, complete opacity is desired, the plate intensified
with hydrokinone is afterwards treated with iodide of
mercury and sulphide of ammonium. We recommend
all photographers who still work the wet collodion
process to give the hydrokinone intensifier a trial.
ORNAMENTAL PRINTING IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
Mich use can often be made of fine ornamental engravings
found on ball orders and menu covers, also of scenery engra-
vings, paintings, embossed, painted, or otherwise decorated
plaques, in ornamental printing.
First, select your engraving, an assortment of which can
generally be found in art stores or stationery supply houses.
An engraving with a bust or view in a circle, or some other
shape, gives most satisfactory results. If you wish to mount
the print on regular size mounts, you will have to take the pro-
portions into consideration, but as that would make selection
difficult, the best plan would be to cut the mount to suit the
print ; the edges could be bevelled, and the whole mounted on
a larger size gilt edge mount.
When the engraving is selected, place it in a good light,
square to the camera, make a negative, and take a proof. With
a thin-bladed and very sharp knife, cut out the circle or opening
in the proof, being careful to make a single clean edge cut.
Stick the centre cut-out exact)}' in the opening on the negative,
and adjust the outside on the portrait negative you wish to
print from. Take off a good print from the ornamental nega-
tive, which will now be blank inside the circle, in which space
the portrait or view is to be printed. By holding the negative
to the light, the print can be adjusted by looking through ; the
printed border will lie protected by the cut-out around the
portrait.
It is desirable to find a larger engraving than the finished
work is to be, as reducing adds to its fineness.
If an engraving with a circle cannot be readily obtained, a
landscape can be used, and a white card cut to any desired
shape, with edges bevelled or otherwise ornamented, and artfully
placed on. It adds to the effect if the corner be curled upward
a trifle. This gives the form to cut out by.
Portraits can be v ig netted in, in place of using forms, by aid
of “dodgers.” A good dodger can be made by cutting a card
to the desired shape, and pasting on layers of white tissue
paper, each layer a trifle larger than thci-one before. This
grades off the light, and very little move# - ' will be necessary.
Tie a thread to it, and let it hang in contact with the negative
over the spot you wish to keep blank, moving it slightly while
printing. Then, to protect the border while the portrait is
printing, make a dodger by cutting a hole through a card, and
trimming the opening with tissue, to be used in the same way.
If a circle, oval, or arcli-top form be used, the form c.in be
embossed after the print is mounted and burnished. Many
photographers already have one of the old embossing presses,
and a new iron pattern to fit the form could easily be obtained.
An ingenious printer will see many ways in which to use the
above for decorating showcases, reception rooms, for holiday
trade, for use on silk handkerchiefs, hat crowns, &e. If you
are looking for something new, perhaps this will assist you, as
it has never been used by the profession at large. — Boston
Photographic Review.
Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
Wednesday, January 8th, will be “The Best Way of Storing
Negatives”; and on January 15th, “Intensifying and Re-
ducing Negatives,”
\
THE PHOTOGRAPH TC NEWS.
|_ January 3, 181*0.
LEWIS MORRIS RUTHERFURD.
The Scientific American of December 14 gives a portrait of this
scientist, together with an interesting account of his career.
Mr. Rutherfurd, it appeal's, was born in New lork in 1816,
and comes of distinguished lineage, his grandfather being John
Rutherfurd, twice elected to the United States Senate. Senator
Rutherfuid’s father entered the British Army at the age of
seventeen, and after taking part in the Canadian campaign,
resigned his commission, married a daughter of James Alex-
ander—thus making him a brother-in-law of Lord Stirling —
and became a citizen of New York.
His grandson (Lewis Morris Rutherfurd) selected law as the
profession which lie proposed to follow, and studied under
Governor William H. Seward (afterwards Secretary of State in
President Lincoln’s cabinet) in Auburn for two years, and then
in New York City with George Wood, who was at that time
one of the foremost lawyers in the country.
In 1837 Mr. Rutherfurd was admitted to the bar of the New
York State Courts, and entered into partnership with Peter
Augustus Jay, the son of the Chief Justice who administered
the oath to President Washington in 1789, with whom he con-
tinued until Mr. Jay’s death, in 1842, and then he became
associated with Hamilton Fish, who was afterwards Secretary
of State in President Grant’s cabinet. Mr. Rutherfurd con-
tinued in active practice until 1849, when lie went to Europe.
On his return he did not resume his profession, but thereafter
devoted his leisure to studies in astronomy and optics. He
erected an observatory in the garden of his residence, and
there did his principal scientific work.
One of his earliest contributions was concerning the “ Com-
panion of Sirius,” whose discovery had just been announced by
Alvan G. Clark, the well-known maker of telescope lenses.
In 1861 he began a series of experiments with the view of
determining the best form of instrument for the purpose of
continuing Fraunhofer’s observations upon the spectra of the
heavenly bodies. He adapted Bunsen’s and Kirchhoff’s simple
form of spectroscope, consisting of a condensing telescope with
adjustable slit, a scale telescope with photographed scale of
equal parts showing bright lines upon a dark ground, a flint
glass prism of 60°, and an observing telescope with Huygenian
eyepiece, magnifying about five times, the whole firmly but
lightly mounted on seasoned wood, and provided with an adapt-
ing tube in front of the slit, by means of which the spectro-
scope is attached to the eve-tube of the equilateral. A year
later he published his results in a paper, giving the fixed lines
exhibited by the moon ; also the lines and bands of Jupiter
and Mars, with maps of the spectra of seventeen of the fixed
stars, and including a full description of the instruments that
he used.
This was the first work to be published after the great reve-
lations of Bunsen and Kirclilioff, and was the first attempt to
classify the stars according to their spectra. While Mr. Ruther-
furd was engaged in making these researches on the spectra of
the stars, he discovered the use of the star spectroscope, by
means of which it is possible to show the exact state of achro-
matic correction in an object glass, and is particularly adapted
for the rays that are used in photography.
In 1864, after many experiments in various directions, but
all undertaken for the same purpose, he succeeded in devising
and constructing an objective of 11 j inches aperture and about
15 feet focal length, corrected for photography alone. It was
constantly used by him in making negatives of the sun, moon,
and star groups.
At the January meeting of the National Academy of
Sciences, in 1864, he presented a paper “ On Photographs of
the Solar Spectrum,” accompanied by a picture that he had
taken by means of bisulphide of carbon prisms. It contained
more than three times the number of lines that had been laid
down within similar limits on the charts by Bunsen and
Kirchhoff.
He also was the first to show the double character of the D
sodium lines in the spectrum, finding that it “ is resolved into
fourteen fine and close lines, with a beautiful and symmetrical
band of finely doubled lines stretching towards A.”
About the same time he published criticisms on different
j forms of spectroscopes that had been used by Secclii, Airy, and
! Donati, and in 1865 produced an automatic form of a six-prism
spectroscope, which still continues the best in use.
In 1868 he built a new objective, with 13 inches aperture
and about 15 feet focal length. This glass was an ordinary
achromatic, such as is used for vision, and was converted into a
photographic objective by the addition of a third lens of flint
glass, which made the proper correction, and could be affixed
in a few minutes. With this instrument Mr. Rutherfurd made
several photographs of the moon that are of remarkable beauty,
and have never been surpassed in delicacy or exactness. One
taken on February 27th, 1871, is stated by M arren de la Rue
to be the finest in existence.
He constructed a micrometer for the measurement of astro-
nomical photographs for use uixm pictures of solar eclipses
or transits and upon groups of stars, of which he has mea-
sured several hundred, showing, as it is claimed by him, that
the photographic method is at least equal in accuracy to that
of the heliometer or filar-micrometer, and far more conve-
nient.
In 1870 he constructed a small ruling engine, which pro-
duced inference gratings on glass and speculum metal that
were superior to all others until the recent productions of
Professor Henry A. Rowland, of the Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity. With one of these gratings he obtained a photograph of
the solar spectrum that for a long time was unsurpassed.
In 1883 failing health led to the discontinuance of his
scientific work, and in December of this year he presented his
astronomical instruments to the observatory of Columbia Col-
lege, where they are mounted.
Besides membership in various other scientific bodies, Mr.
Rutherfurd is an associate of the Royal Astronomical Society
of Great Britain, and his work has been recognized by the gift
of various diplomas, orders, and medals, both at home and
abroad.
The Eye and the Camera. — The eye requires at least a
tenth of a second to close, so that all separate motions which
are quicker than that appear blurred to one looking at them.
It can easily be understood, therefore, how a photograph ob-
tained of a moving object by an exposure of one-hundredth, or
even, as sometimes is done, by one-thousandth part of a second,
while accurately reproducing the exact position of the object
at the time of photographing, is not a representation of the
subject as it appears to the human eye. It does not convey
the idea of motion even, but rather of “petrified motion,” as
some one has said, and seems grotesque and unnatural. Such
photographs, however, give investigators an opportunity, which
they otherwise could not have, of studying separate motions,
and are often of the greatest value. — IF. I. Lincoln Adams.
Purification of Litmus. — Dr. Otto Foerster, says the
American Druggist, prepares the pure colouring matter of
litmus in the following manner : — Commercial litmus of best
quality is first extracted by ordinary alcohol in the cold, then
digested with water, the solution filtered and evaporated.
This is a combination of the processes proposed by Wartha
and Mohr. The residue is again dissolved in water, the solu-
tion filtered, ami the filtrate precipitated with absolute
alcohol mixed with a little glacial acetic acid. The precipitate
is collected upon a filter and washed with alcohol. This
causes a violet, fluorescent colouring matter to remain in solu-
tion. The remaining residue is once more dissolved in water,
and the precipitation, filtration, and washing repeated. At this
stage a red colouring matter, which has a violet tint in an
alkaline liquid, remains in solution. After once again repeat-
ing this process, only a small amount of the last-named
colouring matter remains in solution The precipitate upon
the filter is then dried, being repeatedly moistened during the
drying with alcohol, for the purpose of expelling the acetic
acid. The precipitate is then again dissolved in water, and the
solution filtered. Finally, the colouring matter is precipitated
with alcohol rendered faintly alkaline with ammonia, then
collected upon a filter, washed with pure alcohol, and dried. —
After Zeitsch. f. anal. Chem., 1889, 428.
January o, lBOO.-]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
o
A FEAT IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
Trotting horses, leaping acrobats, running hounds, even
a locomotive at full speed, have proved comparatively
easy subjects for instantaneous photography, but certain
other moving objects have severely tested the skill of the
photographer as well as the capacity of the apparatus em-
ployed.
Perhaps the most difficult feat yet attempted in the line
of photograpy is that of catching an impression of a bullet
or a cannon ball as it flies across the field of the camera.
This has been accomplished with varying degrees of suc-
cess, but most of the specimens of this class of work
hitherto produced have been at the best mere streaks, not
in any way resembling the projectile. This failure to pro-
cure a sharp impression is shown by the photograph itself
to be due to lack of shutter speed.
A recent invention, to which we alluded a short time
since in an article on “The Tachyscope,” has apparently
obviated this difficulty, so that it can no longer be said to
be impossible to secure a recognisable picture of a flying
projectile.
Hist year Mr. Ottomar Anschutz, of I.issa, Prussia,
tried some very interesting experiments at Gruson, near
Magdeburg in Germany, which demonstrate the practica-
bility of photographing a flying bullet by daylight. Mr.
Anschutz constructed a small camera of great strength,
in which he arranged a shutter of his own invention,
which in this case was operated by an eight hundred pound
weight. The shutter is arranged immediately in front of
the sensitive plate, and consists simply of a curtain having
a narrow slit as long as the plate, the width of the
slit being variable. This slitted curtain passes over
the entire face of the sensitive plat^i exposing suc-
cessive portions thereof to the action of the light. This
arrangement insures a brief exposure of all portions of the
image of the moving figure, thereby producing an ex-
tremely sharp negative. The slit in the shutter during
this experiment was adjusted to a width of 0 ‘002 of an
inch.
[Figs. 1 and 2 represent the relative sizes of the photo-
graph and its enlargement.]
±
• *
* . . . . * -i. * * . i* •
' .a— ----- ' - - ~ ' ■_ fe.. ..tv ---*2.1,
In the field of the camera, which covered a space of 40
feet, Mr. Anschutz drew a canvas curtain, and atevery 13£
feet suspended a projectile 12 inches long, for comparison
with a projectile of the same kind to be fired from a can-
non. At a distance of 200 feet a wire netting was placed,
which was connected electrically with Anschutz’s drop
shutter. The projectile passed through the wire netting
at a velocity of 1,312 feet per second, and its image was
caught on the sensitive plate after having sped along the
canvas curtain a distance of 42 feet. The shutter passed
over the plate in the short space of 75-1,000,000 of a
second. The numbers marked on the canvas indicate
the distance in meters. The projectile shown below the
space between the 10th and 12th meters is one of those
suspended for comparison ; the other shown above the
13th meter is the one photographed in its flight.
The photograph we reproduce was furnished us by the
United States Photograph Supply Company, of No. 3, East
14th Street, New York City, who represent Mr. Anschutz
in this country. — Scientific American.
Photographing Interiors. — Mr. G. Alpers says that gelatine
plates should be exposed proport ionat el y much longer than wet
collodion ones. He had made the photograph of an interior
with the aid of this last process, exposing for three hours, and
he desired to reproduce this same interior on a gelatine plate
which was from ten to fifteen times more sensitive. He sup-
posed that an exposure of thirty minutes would be sufficient,
but in developing he obtained almost nothing, and he was
obliged to give an exposure of five hours. The author explains
this singular fact as follows : — Bromide of silver is much more
sensitive than the iodide of the same metal to the intense rays,
whilst it is not more sensitive than iodine to the very weak
rajrs. This explains why the negatives of portraits on gelatine
are generally harder than those on collodion. To reproduce in-
teriors having windows placed opposite the objective, the author
covers them with red tissue paper, which he removes for a few
seconds at the end of the exposure. — Invention.
A Substitute for Christmas Cards. — The Birmingham
Weekly Mercury recently offered a prize in a “ Suggestion Com-
petition ” for the best idea for something that would make a
good substitute for Christmas cards. In their Christmas
number of December 21st, they state that the two best sug-
gestions are ctjual, and they have therefore divided the prize.
One of the winners of the divided prize suggests that Christ-
mas cards should be coupons to entitle the recipient to a
chance in a prize etching or engraving lottery. The other
winner is Mr. E. Smith. His suggestion is as follows : — “ The
popular form of Christinas greeting 1 would suggest as an
equivalent for Christmas cards would take the form of photo-
graphy. I would suggest that the large photographer of the
city, the local photographer of the small town, and the
amateurs who are now numbered by thousands, should carry
out next year the following scheme. The pictures to be sent
to our friends maybe: (1) Family groups in interiors pro-
duced in the evenings by the aid of magnesium light, and
printed by the artistic and permanent bromide process. The
family may be engaged at dinner, playing some game, reading,
writing, romping, &c. (2) The provision of multiplied copies
of some object or objects of interest in a town or village,
either printed faintly, or a part blocked out for the printing
from another negative or single figures or groups in the fore-
ground. (3) The pourtrayal by the same means as No. 2 of
a scene in which the recipients are persons having some interest
in the past, and in which the recipient may be represented, if
necessary, by a friend who makes up for the absent man.
Unless the friend was something of an actor in the posing, he
had better be kept well in the background, or be nearly hidden
by the other dramatis personal. These would be tableaux
vivantt. For them the larger and wholesale photographers
would have to keep background negatives, foreign, as well as
home views. The merits of the scheme are that a more per-
sonal and interesting character can be given to the photographs
than is possible with the vague and multiplied Christmas cards ;
that it would foster an artistic and dramatic taste, and afford
scope for amusement, ingenuity, and humour in the carrying
out ; that the cheaper ones would entail less trouble, as well
as cost, to those not having sufficient leisure ; that the cards,
conveying the next best representation of their friends, and
their present or past surroundings, to the presence of the
friends themselves, would be valued and treasured ; that they
would afford winter work as well as summer to the photo-
grapher, amateur as well as professional ; and that the scheme
would undoubtedly further develop photography as a line art,
G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGRAPHING WINTER SCENES.
Ron.in.v speaking, there are two classes of winter pic-
tures which the photographer meets with on an outing. A
typical landscape of one class is a snow-covered landscape
in which trees, shrubs, buildings — everything — are com-
pletely enveloped in white. The trees and bushes glitter
with ice ; the fields sparkle beneath the sun. There are
no contrasts, but only a mass of brightness, glitter, and
glare. In order to photograph it satisfactorily, we must
select a time of day when the sun is at one side of our
camera and a little behind it. This is in the early morn-
ing or in the afternoon, according to the point of view
which we have chosen for our camera. When the sun is
obscured, the shadows are soft and the snow is devoid of
reflections. On such days the winter picture we have
selected can be photographed with advantage. The ex-
posure should be rather short on such a day, for the
light is rather weak, and the brisk development which is
required will give a proper contrast and brilliancy to the
negative. Isolated bits of frost work, a glittering bush
sparkling with ice jewels, or a fence-corner covered with
dazzling whiteness, shoul I be photographed in a similar
manner. Such subjects arc very satisfactory when repro-
duced by the camera.
The other, and perhaps the largest class of snow scenes,
is quite different from the one we have been considering;
it is therefore photographed quite differently. In this
class we have winter pictures of the greatest contrasts:
dazzling whites and profoundest blacks ; a field covered
with glittering snow, edged with the darkest trees. The
photographer must now overcome contrast, and give soft-
ness to the picture. As before, overcast days are chosen,
and the exposures are made in the morning or afternoon ;
but the exposure must be ample, and the development
very slow. This will aid in overcoming the brilliant con-
trasts in the natural view. Orthochromatic or colour-
sensitive plates may be used with advantage in photo-
graphing such scenes. The developer should be rather
weak, especially in beginning the process. It may be
strengthened as development goes on, until the proper
density is secured in the negative.
For developing negatives of the first class spoken of,
the developer can be of full strength in order to bring out
all the contrasts there may be in the picture, but it
should be used cautiously, especially when first applied to
the plate. In the development of snow pictures there is
opportunity for the greatest skill. A well-selected and ex-
posed plate may be lost by careless or ignorant develop-
ment; while, on the other hand, errors in exposure may
be to a great extent corrected by judicious developing.
The new developing agent, eikonogen, has been used with
good effect in this kind of work, as it renders the most
delicate details in the half-tones and shadows.
fixing, washing, and the subsequent processes are, of
course, the same in this as in other classes of photo-
graphic work ; but in toning and mounting winter pic-
tures there is room for the exercise of good taste. Do
not tone a winter picture to a warm brown, ahd mount
on a chocolate card. Let the toning be carried to the
cohl blacks and whites, and mount on white or pearl
cardboards, llromide paper is peculiarly appropriate for
winter negatives, and the platinotype may also be used
with good effect. Ferro-prussiate or “blue” paper is
especially suitable for printing many snow negatives, and
when slightly worked over with colours harmonising with
[January 3, 1890.
the appropriate blues and whites of the cyanotype, a de-
lightful art feeling can often be given a blue print of a
winter landscape. These additional touches, however,
must not be overdone, the merest retouching here and
there being all that is necessary to bring out a most
pleasing result. They may be mounted with good effect
on larger sheets of heavy paper, and f ramed in plain wood,
narrow and light. Bromides and platinotypes should be
similarly mounted. — Abstracted from the Photographic Times.
THE HARVARD COLLEGE TELESCOPE.
'Fin: photographic telescope presented to the Observatory
of Harvard College promises to be the most perfect instru-
ment of its kind. It will have a lens of about twenty-four
inches aperture, and a focal length of about eleven feet.
It will differ from other large telescopesin the construction
of its object-glass, which will be a compound lens of the
form used by photographers, and known as the portrait
lens. The focal length of such a lens is very small com-
pared with its diameter, and much fainter stars can be
photographed in consequence. The advantage is even
I greater in photographing nebula1 or other faint surfaces.
Moreover, this fori® of lens will enable each photographic
plate to cover an area several times as great as that which
is covered by an instrument of the usual form. The time
required to photograph the entire sky is reduced in the
same proportion. A telescope of the proposed form, hav-
ing an aperture of eight inches, has been inconstant use in
Cambridge for the last four years, and is now in Peru,
photographing the southern stars. It has proved useful
.for a great variety of researches. Stars have been photo-
graphed with it too faint to be visible in the fifteen-inch
refractor of the observatory. Its short focal length ena-
bles it to photograph as faint stars as any which can be
taken with an excellent photographic telescope having an
aperture of thirteen inches. The eight-inch telescope will
photograph stars about two magnitudes fainter than can
be taken with a similar instrument having an aperture of
four inches. A corresponding advantage is expected from
the increase of the aperture to twenty-four inches.
Other advantages to be anticipated from the use of such
an instrument will arise from the opportunities which the
photographs will give for continuous and detailed study.
With them work can be done at any place and any time,
and, by multiplying copies, by any number of observers.
And with them more could be added by a single lens to
our knowledge of the stars than could be obtained by any
number of telescopes of the usual kind. Professor Pick-
ering is seeking the best possible location at which to mount
the instrument. Owing to the difficulty in maintaining
regular observations in the Eastern States that arises from
the prevalence of cloudiness, lie suggests one of the
mountains of southern California as likely to offer the most
favourable climatic conditions attainable.
The Christmas number of the Photojraphic Times is both
poetic and artistic. It contains no less than five poems, and
four illustrations exolusive of the ordinary illustrative cuts.
The illustrations include “ Chris turns tide in Shakespeare’s
Country,” from a negative by Dr. J. L. Williams, the reproduc-
tion being by the Photogravure Company, of New York ; a
dog portrait, from a photographic portrait of a painting
reproduced by the Electro-Tint Engraving Company, who also
reproduce a film negative, by Mr. W. J. Stillman, of “The
Facade of the Duoino of Florence;” there is also a pretty
child picture by Husuik, with a descriptive article of his method
known as “ Leimtypie.”
January 3, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
7
PICTURES SENT BY LIGHTNING.
Foil some time the transmission of pictures by electricity has
been discussed as within the range of possibility, and we now
find in The Bouton Herald an account of an interview with an
inventor residing in New York, according to which the problem
has actually been solved ; provided, of course, that the whole
matter is based on fact, and not fiction. This is how our con-
temporary publishes the event, in the form of that favourite
American mode of an interview.
“ What would people say of a newspaper that published, say,
a dozen pictures of the recent Sullivan-Kilrain prizefight, taken
from instantaneous photographs, transmitted by telegraph, and
reproduced in its columns within six or eight hours after the
battle ?” This was the extraordinary question put by L. Gino-
cliio, a chemist, electrical expert and successful inventor, and it
naturally caused the gentlemen who heard him to open their
oyes wide in astonishment. M. Ginochio smiled. “ I have
not suggested an impossibility,” he said; “indeed, I have
already completed a machine which will do just the very thing
I have mentioned. I have applied for a patent, and while its
construction is to some extent a secret, I am willing to show
you the machine in operation.”
In his laboratory and e.\i>erimenting rooms on West Thirty-
fourth Street were a number of electrical machines of various
descriptions. Great coils of wire lay around on the floor, and
on tables were rolls of “ No. 32 ” wire, as fine as the hair of a
woman’s head. Telephones, battery cups, galvanometers,
electric switches, and other apparatus lay about in seemingly
hopeless confusion. On a table was a box of about 20-in. square,
attached to wires on an electric battery. A “ feedboard ” or
shelf projected on one side of the box. “This is the machine
that is to revolutionise newspaper pictorial art,” explained
Mr. Ginochio. ‘ ‘ It is filled with clockwork, and operated by a
strong electric battery. Its mate is at the other end of the
line. Now you can write a signature or a letter, and it will
transmit either, with the identical characters formed by your
pen. Bnt that would be. nothing. Auto-telegraphy has been
known for fully ten years. But this will carry out the auto-
telegraphic idea to the fullest extent. You can write as much
as you please, thousands of words if you like, as newspaper
men and others frequently have to do, and this machine will
chew it up — that is, transmit it as fast as you write. Indeed,
the writing can be done on a continuous roll, and when a score
of lines are written, the top of the roll can be fed to the
machine while the writer continues filling up the rest, and with-
out tearing the roll. It can be regulated so as to keep pace
exactly with the pace of the writer, and by the time he has
finished the machine will be on its last lap, and will end its
task almost immediately. The newspaper or other office receiv-
ing the matter will thus have it in the writer’s own hand-
writing, and within a few moments after it has passed out of
his hands.”
“ But how is it proposed to transmit pictures ?” “ By the
same method. The paper to be used will be washed with a
weak solutien of chloride of calcium, which will make it a con-
ductor. The ink will be the non-conductor or insulator. The
pictures will have to be reproduced with pen and ink at the
point of sending, and with, this as the only delay they can be
transmitted without difficulty, every line and shadow being
reproduced with extreme fidelity.” “ Have you tested the
machine?” “ I have, and found it worked like a charm. So
long as the clockwork keeps running it cannot get out of order.
This machine is designed especially for the use of the daily
press, and will enable our newspai>er& to produce accurate and
excellent pictures of events in the issue immediately following,
instead of, as now, waiting a day or two for the artist. You
can readily understand how such an instrument could be applied
on a leased wire, where voluminous press reports have to be sent
daily or nightly. Every reporter could then be his own operator.
The delay in filling despatches would be obviated, and the slow-
going Morse transmission superseded. Besides, another point
in its favour, which all electricians will appreciate, is that the
broader surface presented magnifies the electric ratio so greatly
that, even at a time when ordinary telegraphic instruments are
unavailable, on account of storm or for other causes, this
machine w ill unfailingly give a connection strong enough to do
the work required.”
“ What will the instruments cost when completed ?” “ I
cannot tell yet, but they will be within the reach of every
enterprising newspaper, you may be sure.” The pictures trans-
mitted by Mr. Ginochio’s machine, though faint, are described
as sufficiently distinct for all purposes. The minutest detail is
reproduced with the fidelity of a photograph. Of course only
pictures that have been first drawn upon the prepared paper
can be transmitted. The time consumed does not exceed many
seconds. A grinding noise, like the slow running down of a
clock, is heard in the machine while in operation. With a few
touches at the hands of a competent draftsman the pictures are
sent to the engraver or electrotyper. If properly prepared in
the first instance before transmission, Mr. Ginoehio says they
will not re <pi ire retouching at all, as the machine will report
electrically every mark upon the paper. Mr. Ginochio, the
inventor, is an Italian by birth. His father was a man of con-
siderable rank in the household of the first Napoleon, and was
with the “Little Corporal” through many of his troubles.
The son, who came to this country when a child, is a veteran of
the civil war. He is stated to have many electrical and other
patents now in operation in different parts of the States, but
if his transmission of pictures by telegraph should prove a
success, it would no doubt do more for him than all his other
inventions. — Invention.
Process work, it is said, has so diminished the demand tor
good box-wood for wood-engraving, that it is becoming difficult
to procure, the best having nearly trebled in price in recent
years.
Ink for Writing on Photographs. — The following formula
is said to produce an ink serviceable for marking proofs ; the
writing being executed on a dark portion, the lines soon bleach
by the conversion of the silver into an iodide i —
Iodide of potassium ... ... ... 10 parts
AVater ... ... ... ... ... 30 ,,
Iodine ... ... ... ... ... 1 part
Gum ... ... ... ... ... 1 ,,
London “in Camera.” — In an article in the City Life of
January 1st, illustrated by five reproductions of instantaneous
photographs by Mr. T. C. Hepworth, the writer says i — “The
time is coining when we shall see London as it really is. A
good many artists have tried to depict it, with more or less
success. Hogarth drew its seamy side, Cruikshank its extrava-
gant aspect, John Leech the picture of the middle class. All
these attempts had their excellences, but to look at them now'
they seem to be more or less caricatures. In a hundred years
hence, when future generations gaze at the instantaneous pho-
tographs taken in the London streets to-day, they will see the
good-and-bad citizens of the nineteenth century exactly as they
are.”
Trade Union of Photographic Workmen. — Mr. Arthur
G. Field, Maidstone, sends us a letter advocating the formation
of a photographic trade union. His proposal, he says, has no
connection with an attempt to found a so-called “ National
Photographic Union ” formed merely of representative photo-
graphers to guard the interests of the trade, but is in favour
of the foundation of a trade union, to which every photographic
worker (male or female) may belong on proving his or her
capability. The object, he explains, will be as follows : — By
paying a sum w'eekly (say 6d.) a fund will be created which will
be applied to the payment of “ donation benefit ” or “un-
employed benefit” to those out of work (say 10s. weekly). In
case of disputes with employers the payment will also be made.
By a system of qualification, either by apprenticeship, by
receipt of wage for a number of months, or by examination, the
ability of members will be assured. Each branch will send its
monies to London, and London will make all payments of bene-
fits to the branches — “centralisation, but federation,” with
direct responsibility of the executive to the smallest bodies
capable of exercising electoral power. Those interested in the
project arc invited to communicate with our correspondent as
above.
8
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 3, 1890.
iflotcs.
Our suggestion last week apropos of the possibility
of utilising Hansom cabs when on the rank for the
purpose of obtaining instantaneous photographs of
scenes in the streets of London appears to have “ caught
hold.” The Daily News comments upon it, and
prophesies that some one before long will be tempted
to put the suggestion into practice. The Daily News
does not name the source of its inspiration, but we do
not grumble, as our contemporary has on nearly every
other occasion when it has quoted from our pages — not
seldom by the way — given us due credit. The Glibe
looks upon the photographic cab-driver as a person not
to be encouraged. It is bad enough to know, it remarks,
that one’s private conversations may be handed down
to posterity by the cabman who writes shorthand, but
it is worse if the said conversations will be illustrated
with “ instantographs ” of the tops of our hats and the
ends of our noses. Frightful as this possibility may
appear, it is within measurable distance, though the
operators may not be cabmen with a fancy for photo-
graphy.
The Daily Graphic is still an object of curiosity with
those who know the stupendous difficulties to be over-
come. We stated a week or two ago, upon reliable
information, that wood blocks would be mostly used,
as being more quickly produced than “ process,” though
much more costly. The editor of Science and Art , who
was present at the reception given at the Graphic
office, states that but for photography and photo-
mechanical printing, the scheme of a daily illustrated
paper could not bo carried out. The editor of Science and
Art does not give any official information, and in the
absence of this, we are inclined to adhere to our state-
ment, and for more reasons than one. Whatever the
Graphic will do, will be done artistically. Mr.
Thomas’ policy has always been to produce the best
thing possible, and this policy will be carried out in
the daily paper.
Mr. 1 homas’ notion is that a rara avis in the shape
of a reporter who can sketch may be caught, and this
is the kind of thing he wants to cultivate. We are
afraid, however, that it will he a long time before he
will get a man equally good with the pen and pencil.
There are a few reporters with a taste for sketching,
but to sketch with a pencil is one thing, to prepare a
sketch ready for photographing, or to draw on the
ordinary transfer paper suitable at once for zincography,
is another. What the Graphic will probably do, will
be to expect sketches as well as they can do them from
its reporters, and have them “ touched up ” or redrawn
by its own artists. This system has been going on for
years both at the Graphic and Illustrated London News,
and enables them to produce a number of highly
finished drawings of scenes in all parts of the world,
the foundation of which were the merest skeletons
furnished by travellers. In this way a good deal may
be done, but as for photography, it is out of the ques-
tion. Even with the assistance of the electric light,
the time required is longer than that in which a wood-
cut can be produced.
The respective merits of photography and hand-
drawings have been pretty warmly discussed by
astronomers in regard to their own particular study,
and the general opinion appears now to be that photo-
graphy has advantages which drawings lack. It would
seem as if very much the same battle was about to he
fought by microscopists. When photography was
applied to the microscope, everybody was in its favour ;
tl ere are, however, signs of a reaction. Anyway,
advocates of the older method of representation are
not wanting. Mr. W. J. Simmons, in the American
Monthly Microscopical Journal , urges that photography
is too indiscriminately faithful ; it perpetuates details,
such as dirt and extraneous matters, which may well
be left out of a drawing accurate enough for all prac-
tical purposes. Photography does not compel the
thorough study of the object necessary when you sit
to draw it, besides which it involves the expenditure
of more time and money than many can spare. Mr.
Simmons admits that photography is useful to correct
the inaccuracies in a drawing, but, as a discipline for
accurate observation, photo-micrography is inferior to
drawing, and cannot be regarded as a substitute.
The automatic machine may perhaps revive the taste
for the stereoscope — in a way. In Paris the two
things have been combined. You drop in the usual
penny, and apply your eyes to a pair of lenses arranged
after the fashion of an opera-glass. Pictures are then
displayed in rapid succession, one picture lasting seven
seconds, until the contents of the box are all exhibited.
The pictures are illuminated by the electric light,
which is started by the mechanism which receives the
penny. The automatic machine which delivers photo-
graphs of popular actresses is, we believe, not a very
brilliant success. The automatic stereoscope might
answer for a time.
The question of the site of the National Portrait
Gallery has been settled. The new building is to be
situated at the back of the National Gallery, on a piece
of ground which, owing to the alterations effected by
the construction of the Charing Cross Road, looks at
the present moment a very dismal blank. The Office
of Works, it is satisfactory to see, has an eye to the
future, for it has got permission from the Treasury to
purchase from the County Council the rights in a small
triangular piece of ground which, if it were built upon,
would effectually obscure the view of the new gallery.
It is perhaps vain to expect that the glance of the Office
of Works will be carried still farther into the future,
and to hope that the new building will he constructed
with an eye to the possible erectioa of a new National
Gallery worthy of the art treasures possessed by the
nation.
January 3, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
9
OSCAR GUSTAV IlEJ LANDER.
BY II. 1>. ROBINSON.
The idea of an exhibition of all that could be gathered
together of the works of O. G. Rejlander at the Camera
Club was a happy one, and will serve to recall to the
memory of many photographers the great artist and genial
friend who honoured our art with his genius ; and he was
the greatest genius who ever gave up to photography
talents which would have enabled their possessor to shine
in any form of art,
Rejlander was one of the earliest friends 1 made through
photography, and it gives me great pleasure to respond to
the request of the Editor of the Photographic News to
say a few words on the man and his works. I first met
him at a meeting of the Birmingham Photographic Society
in 1858. lie was then living in Wolverhampton, and
shortly after our meeting he came to visit me at Leaming-
ton ; from which time until his death in January, 1875,*
we continued in the closest friendship, and for many years,
in photographic criticism, our names — perhaps because we
had the same aims, and partly also, probably, for the sake
of alliteration — were coupled together, a conjunction of
which I have always been proud ; and it is a curious
coincidence that our works have again come together, or,
rather, followed each other, in the “ One Man ” exhibitions
of the Camera Club.
At the time I have mentioned, Rejlander had made him-
self famous by many pictures which were far and away, in
all essential art qualities, beyond anything that had ever
been before shown, and especially by his wonderful com-
position which represented allegorically “The Two Ways
of Life.” This was first shown at the Art Treasures Exhi-
bition at Manchester, in 1857, to which exhibition, by the
way, I had sent my first poor efforts at pictorial photo-
graphy. This famous picture, as was also much of his best
work, was executed at Wolverhampton, in a small studio
in which many a photographer would scarcely have found
room to photograph a single head. Here this astonishing
group, consisting of about thirty figures, and attempting
the highest poetry in art with so much success as to gain
respect, if not approval, from all, was put together. Any-
one but an enthusiast would have seen the impossibility of
success with such a subject in such materials, but amid
difficulties that would have scared most men, Rejlander
saw only the end, and if he did not succeed in reaching it,
his failure was almost as honourable as complete success.
Apart from the subject, which is allegorical, and partly
carried out by the use of the nude — now ruled, and rightly,
to be outside the natural limitations of the art — the picture
is a marvel of skill and excellence. In composition and
in clearness of story telling it has never been surpassed in
any art, and the apparent impossibilities he overcame have
always been a wonder to those who know most of the means
by which it was produced. No photograph has ever met
with so much criticism, for and against. It was rejected
at an Edinburgh exhibition, not, however, on its artistic
merits ; a picture intended to convey the highest moral
was rejected because of its supposed immorality. It would
take too much space here to trace the courses of the two
youths, who are represented as going the two ways of life,
the one to the good and the other to the bad. In 1858
Rejlander was persuaded to read a paper before the Pho-
tographic Society of London— the only one he ever read —
Buth Almanacs record Lis death as takingplace in January and June,
fhis was obviously impossible. The real date was January 18th, 1S75.
in which he explained the meaning of every figure. At
the same time, with the generous intention of being of use
to photographers, and to further the cause of art, he, un-
fortunately, described the method by which the picture
J had been done ; the little tricks and dodges to which he
had to resort ; how, for want of classic architecture fol-
ios background, he had to be content with a small portico
in a friend’s garden ; how bits of drapery had to do duty
for voluminous curtains; a simplicity into which others
also have fallen, and thereby gave the clever critics the clue
they wanted, and enabled the little souls to declare that
the picture was only a thing of shreds and patches. It is
so much easier to call a picture a patchwork combination
than to understand the inner meaning of so superb a work
as this masterpiece of Rejlander’s ! He had a sense of the
injustice of judging a work by the method of its produc-
tion. He says in his paper, “ I have a lively presentiment
that the time will come when a work will be judged by its
merits, and not by the method of its production ; and then,
with some fostering care, things can and will be done that
scarcely believers, and never unbelievers, yet dream of in
their philosophy. ”
This picture was Rejlander’s greatest effort, and I much
regret that the committee of the Club was not able to
secure a full-sized copy for exhibition ; the small reduc-
tion gives a very inadequate idea of the large picture. In
his paper the artist promised other and greater efforts in
succeeding years; this 2>romise was never destined to be
fulfilled, lie often regretted that he never afterwards
found time, and, indeed, the means — for such pictures are
expensive to produce — to carry out his intention. He
felt that such ambitious work was not properly appreci-
ated, but he never lost faith in the method of combination
printing, of which he was the originator, and occasionally
employed it for smaller pictures up to the last. One of
these, now in the Camera Club Exhibition, I greatly value.
He was always brimming over with happy ideas, and would
at any time prefer to express himself in a picture than
writing. I was once in the middle of a now long-forgotten
controversy, endeavouring to defend our art from those
who could only see in it a mechanical trade, when I re-
ceived the little picture I have mentioned from him. He
was a volunteer as well as an artist. The photograph
represents Rejlander the artist jumping up from before
his easel to introduce Rejlander the volunteer. The con-
trast between the artist in velvet coat and broad-brimmed
felt hat, and the same man in the same picture in his regi-
mentals, was startling. Under it was written “ (). G. R.
introduces himself as a volunteer to II. 1’. R. ,” thus deli-
cately and pleasantly conveying that his help was at my
service.
In ordinary manipulation Rejlander could not be called
a perfect photographer ; so that he conveyed his thoughts
clearly, he did not care for delicacies of development or
clean plates. To him art was a vehicle for conveying a
thought. It was the thing to be said, not the manner of
saying it, that demanded all his powers. He could never
see the beauty of the indefinite. Being without affecta-
tion, a sound artist and real poet, nothing short of real
art and true poetry would satisfy him. Though most
original, he abhorred the eccentric.
Perhaps, after all, it was in fertility of ideas and imagi-
nation, and the readiness with which he used them, that
he was at his greatest. As an example of his readiness,
here is an illustration. He once sent home a portrait of a
bright little boy dressed in velvet coat and knickerbockers.
10
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 3, 1890.
The boy had one hand in his pocket, and the action bent
the figure a little aside. The picture was rejected because
the figure was not upright. Rejlander immediately wrote
underneath it, “ I’ve got a pocket too!” and the picture
was at once a tremendous success. Yet I remember an
occasion when it happened that a title he strongly objected
to turned one of his pictures into the most popular photo-
graph of the day. It happened this way. He sent to an
exhibition a picture of a very little boy yelling furiously.
He was then making experiments in expressions to illus-
trate Darwin's “ Expression of the Emotions in Man and
Animals !” and entitled this photograph “ Mental Distress.”
In his notice of the exhibition, a former Editor of the
Photographic News, the late ever-regretted II. Baden
Pritchard, called the howling youngster “(link's Baby.”
This hit the humour of the hour, which was then much
interested in a book of that name, and it became the
photograph of the day and sold by thousands ; but Rej-
lander was never reconciled to the loss of his scientific
title. Many examples may be quoted of his happy thoughts,
both pathetic and humorous, but it would be difficult to
describe them so as to do them justice, unaccompanied by
the pictures. “ Grief,” “ Night in London ” — a most mov-
ing picture of a ragged and desolate boy seated on a door-
step— and “Tis Light within — Dark without!” a blind
woman singing, are examples of the pathetic that occur at
the moment ; while the humorous are represented by
“ Did She?” one man (Rejlander himself) tellingan amus-
ing secret to another, whose face expresses a full apprecia-
tion of what he hears, and “She is looking at me, the
dear creature !” an ngly and vain old man smirking and
looking out of the corners of his eyes.
In the very interesting book of Darwin’s I have men-
tioned, are several figures in which Rejlander has tried
to express in his own person the expressions intended
to .be -onveyed. The contrasted figures of Anger and
Humility on Plate VI., figures 2 and 3, are perfect, and
show what possibilities as an actor were in him had he
followed that branch of art.
Personally, Rejlander was beloved by all who knew him.
His winning ways, his kindly genial charm, his ever fresh
and humorous anecdotes, his quaint thoughts and original
expre^sio is, his enthusiasm for all art, and especially for
the art of his adoption, his simplicity and sincerity,
endeared him to his many friends. He was never known
to use a word that would hurt the feelings of others ; he
preferred to be silent rather than condemn the work of
another, and always took great delight in praising the
attempts of a brother photographer when he honestly
could, llis was not one of those envious natures that
cannot brook any success not his own ; he rejoiced in the
progress of the art, even when it was accomplished by
other hands. He was absolutely free from petty jealousy.
It was not necessary, nor his way, as it unfortunately is
the way with some photographic aspirants, to denounce
all art a nl artists so that he may stand in the foreground
on his own little molehill. He was a rare man, a great
artist, and a loving friend.
Elimination ok Hypo. — Writing on the claim so often and
so generally made, “ that salt in the water in which prints are
washed is a ]>owerful aid in ridding them of hypo,” Mr W. H.
Sherman contends that “ the function of saltwater containing
prints impregnated with hypo is to seriously hinder its elimina-
tion ; and that “ it is, therefore, a serious mistake and loss
of time to use it for the purpose of facilitating the accomplish-
ment of thaL object.”
XotircS of Uoofts.
Thk Ocean of Air : Meteorology for Beginners. By
Agnes Giberne, with Preface by Rev. C. Pritchard,
F. R.S. (Scilf’it and Co., Limited, Essex Street, Strand.)
The student of photography in its scientific aspects should
include in his course of study the principles not only of
chemistry and optics, but also of meteorology, between
which and photography there is a close relationship, for
while in this day the changes of weather are recorded pho-
tographically (as shown in the book under notice), those
changes themselves affect photography to a degree that is
more commonly experienced than understood. Tempera-
ture affects not only the developing, fixing, and toning
baths, but also lenses, which not unfrequcntly suffer, for
instance, from the effects of frost, owing to the contraction
of the brass rims, while condensed moisture (“water-
dust,” as it has been termed) on the glasses in cold weather
is a common form of inconvenience. If it were necessary
still further to urge the importance of meteorological study,
argument might be found in the necessity of taking account,
for the production of successful results in photography,
of the optical conditions of the atmosphere, the require-
ment of attention to the correct representation of clouds
in landscape, the hygroscopic properties of many substances
used in photography, and the usefulness of some ability to
calculate the probability of weather changes.
Though the volume before us is professedly written for
beginners, and may not contain such specific information
for photographers as is given, say, in Mr. Vincent
Elsden’s admirable papers in our pages some years since
on “Meteorology for Photographers,” still it embraces
much that is well worthy the study of all who wish to
obtain, in simple and graphic language, a general and
intelligent conception of the nature of the phenomena in
the midst of which we live. The interest of photographers
in Miss Giberne’s book will certainly not be decreased by
the fact that it is illustrated by sixteen admirable illustra-
tions engraved from instantaneous photographs.
Measuring the Spherical and Chroma tc Aberration of
Object-Glasses for the Microscope. C. J. A. Leroy. —
In the present state of construction the problem of achromatism
may be considered as solved, whilst this is far from being the
case with aplanetism. The correction of spherical aberration
requires, therefore, to be studied for the improvement of
objectives. — Chemical News.
Kidderminster Photographic Exhibition, March, 1890. —
Several intending exhibitors having misunderstood rule 1 of
the prospectus of the above, the Secretary desires to state that
the entrance fee in each class is 2s., covering any number of
frames. Also, in answer to the questions of numerous
enquirers, he announces that the date for sending in appli-
cation for space will be extended to February 1st, 1890.
Permanence of Negatives.- — Negatives developed with pyro.
are quite as permanent as those treated with the ferrous-
oxalate developer, if care be taken to ensure perfect fixation.
Leave the negative in the fixing bath fully three or four
minutes after it has been apparently fixed, and years will find
its colour and printing qualities unchanged. With the ferrous-
oxalate developer errors in exposure may be corrected to a cer-
tain extent, but not so much as with pyro. When develop-
ment Hags, a drop or two of the fixing solution will accelerate
the action of the ferrous-oxalate developer considerably, but
nothing will save a much under-exposed plate. As with pyro,
the bromide of potassium or ammonium acts as a retarder of
development. — Editor, Journal of the Photographic Sociity of
India.
January 3, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS..
11
THE PROGRESS OF QUINOL DEVELOPMENT*
BY AI.!'KED HASKELL.
The difference of working with quinol is chiefly this:
that whereas with pyro you commence with the bath
uncompleted in composition and by tentative action, now
that this is added according to the behaviour of the
negative, with quinol you select the bath of suitable
energy and modified composition, and allow the action to
go on until its duty has been fulfilled in all particulars of
which it is capable. Supposing the right one is not at first
selected, still you cannot go wrong provided the suc-
cession of baths is in an increasing ratio of energy. The
method of pyro development is not so applicable in this
case. There appears to come a point when increasing
quantities of alkali do not produce the same progressive
effect, at the same time that in the composed bath there is
great latitude in their proportional quantities without pro-
ducing fog. With a properly composed developer we
commence development with a strength of alkali which
we do not intend to augment, and the action is allowed to
proceed in assisting to bring out all possible details of
which it is capable, the quinol concurrently acting its part
in building up the requisite amount of density. A greater
proportion of quinol will produce greater density, but the
normal proportion can in every case be made to produce
the same intensity uf density, whether the bath be new
and powerful, or old and worn out. In the latter case the
action must always be slow, its application being to cases
of extreme exposure. A point to be remembered is that
in the repeated use of the same developer, the bath
becomes more and more charged with a powerful restrainer,
produced by the bromide of soda resulting from the com-
bination of the bromide given up by the plates previously
developed with the soda of the developer. I will now
proceed with a description of what I consider the best
method of using the quinol developer. This consists
simply in a selection, from what may be called a battery of
baths of different degrees of energy, of that one most
suited to the exposure which the plate has received. For
short exposures a new and powerful bath ; for long, an old
and previously used one. If you use a new bath for a
prolonged exposure, you will infallibly fog. With an old
bath for long exposures, interiors, dark woods, and so on,
you will get fine contrasts; if the old bath refuses to
develop, add quite new solution, as may be necessary.
For instantaneous work a new bath has been recommended,
but I think the addition of a third of an old bath is better.
Warming the solution will produce greater energy. It
must be borne in mind that a new bath may be too strong
or too weak, according to its composition ; it may be too
strong, .also, for instantaneous work taken in June,
although correct for that done in January ; therefore you
must know the primary standard of the bath you use, and
regulate accordingly. For contrasts, use an old bath ;
for softness, a more powerful and less exhausted one.
Development should be carried on until the negative
appears to veil over, the details almost entirely disappearing.
My practice is to keep the most energetic or least
used baths in five or six four-ounce bottles, keeping them
full to the glass stopper. As a plate is developed by one
I mark the label accordingly, whole-plate, half-plate,
lantern-plate, &c. , as the case may be. You soon, in this
way, acquire a sufficiently accurate idea of the state of
energy of the contents. 1 have never thrown away any
* Continued from page 873, vol. xxxui.
solution since I first used quinol, as it is always useful,
however much exhausted.
For lantern plates or bromide paper you must use new,
or, at any rate, clear solutions ; but quite a couple of
dozen lantern-plates may be developed in the same four
ounces of developer. The question of warm tones for
these depends on the protraction of the exposure and the
development in a weak or used bath. The alkalies
ordinarily used, as I before stated, are the carbonates or
hydrates of soda or potash. The caustic alkalies are
undoubtedly the most energetic, but I myself prefer the
fixed ones. The hydrates tend to frilling ; besides, within
reasonable limits, I am contented with the slower deve-
lopment, For those who prefer to buy their developers
ready made, there are a large number in the market. The
llintokinone of Messrs. Hinton and Co. is very good,
both for lantern slides and bromide paper. The ready-
made preparation which I have found the best is that
made by Messrs. Mercier, of the Faubourg Montmartre,
the salts being sold in crystals, with instructions for
making up. So far as 1 know by weighing these, it
consists of (11 grains quinol, 492 grains sulphite of soda,
and the same weight of carbonate of soda to 18 ounces of
water, the sulphite being tinged with cosine, perhaps to
give the bath a non-actinic colour. Mr. Mercier says, in
his description, that an organic corrective is added, capable
of neutralising the most feeble traces which may remain of
free — that is, of uncombined — soda. I do not know what
this corrective may be ; perhaps he adds something in the
nat ure of acetic or gallic acid.
The formula which I prefer is that of the Photo. ( 'lub
of Paris. It consists, roughly speaking, of ^ of an ounce
quinol, 2.V ounces sulphite of soda, and 5 ounces car-
bonate of soda, all avoirdupois weight, with the addition
of 8 to 10 drops acetic acid. The exact composition,
together with a few other formula? and additional remarks,
will be found in the paper which I lay on the table, and
with which I need not weary you by reading at length.
With the exception that the quinol is not dissolved in
alcohol, it appears to me to be identical with M. Balagny’s
first published formula.
An excellent metlod of intensification is to bleach with
mercury, and redevelop with a used quinol bath. Some
months ago I soaked a dry plate in quinol developer and
exposed it ; on immediately returning to the dark room, I
found the development completed. There is no practical
utility in this, but it has struck me that the idea might be
applied to enlargement with a view of controlling the
simultaneous exposure and development. If time permits,
at the conclusion of the discussion, I propose to try this
experiment here with the aid of the optical lantern and
limelight. If at all successful, several modifications will
suggest themselves.
I will now bring under your notice the examples which
have been so kindly placed at my disposal by Messrs.
Mawson and Swan, together with a few others— not so
many, I regret to say, as I had hoped to be able to present
to you. In producing these specimens, 1 acknowledge
the difficulty of coming to a reliable conclusion from a
cursory examination of them. ( onclusions, to be of
value, require very careful and minute study, and it would
not be possible to give this to them in this room, and at
the present time ; still, it is the best that can be done
under the circumstances, and they are worth something to
you, at all events, even now.
The experiments made by Mr. Clark were upon a
12
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 3, 1890.
graduated sensitometer screen. I will not be hardy enough
to deny the value of these ; at the same time, it must be
remarked that the light used was artificial, and the varying
colours of natural objects which we have to translate into
black and white were wanting. I cannot do better than
hand round Mr. Swan's examples, with a resume of the
remarks made by himself on the reading of his paper.
The next is the result on a somewhat difficult subject of
an exposure of two minutes, the correct exposure being
about two seconds. I may mention that 1 placed the
negative in a very old bath, and simply left it to itself for
four hours. A better mode of development might have
been employed, but this was purposely done. There is
also a print from it. The others are comparisons of pyro
and quiuol, part of some experiments with this object
which I was unable to complete. 1 show also on the
screen some slides to illustrate different tones or colours.
Many of them are by Mr. Victor Corbould, who will, I
dare say, explain to you his method. 1 have also a selection
of negatives on Eastman films, kindly lent to me by
Mi-. Ashburner. I selected them out of several hundred
for the specialities which they illustrate, and the excellence
of many of them will, I think, be generally admitted,
notably the one on the very thin skin, which has a fine
amount of gradation. This 5 by 4 negative I show to
illustrate the yellow stain of under-exposure on some
plates ; it is a Thomas’s thick-coated extra rapid. These
two on Thomas’s thick-coated ordinary show a curious
eating away or disintegration of the film, which 1 have
remarked now and again. This is an instantaneous ex-
posure with a hand-camera on a Lumiere plate, the day in
September rather dull.
(To be continued.)
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF WARWICK-
SHIRE.*
BY W. JEROME HARRISON, F.G.S.
The Warwickshire of To-day. — And, lastly, we come to
our own times. It is clearly our duty to secure, so far as
in us lies, a faithful representation of the state of things as
it is to-day. For every year we are “making history,” and
such a record will be just as much prized by posterity as
we should ourselves prize it did it exist for the past. Just
think what would be the value of good photographs of
Racon and of Shakespeare ; or of Queen Elizabeth and
her minister Cecil. Looking forward into the centuries,
we can discern a time when no less value will be assigned
to Mrs. Cameron’s grand photographs of such men as
Herschel and Tennyson ; with those by other workers of
our good Queen Victoria, and her “men of mind,”
Salisbury and Gladstone.
We must accumulate portraits, then, of all our local
worthies. And to them we must add street scenes —
secured with the hand-camera — from all our towns ;
delineations of the avocations of the people must also be
obtained, from the country labourer in his smock-frock
—a garment now rapidly disappearing — to the skilled artisan
of the city, seated before his lathe. Nothing that illus-
trates contemporary life must be omitted ; the policeman,
the soldier, and the volunteer must adorn our albums;
and we must go “slumming” to depict the shady side of
life.
Most congenial will be the task of recording the cottage
* Continued from page SJ2, vol. xxsiii.
and village scenery of Warwickshire. I have travelled
round the world, I have spent many holidays in various
parts of the British Isles ; and I can assert, without fear of
contradiction, that for characteristic pictures of rural and
home life our county is unequalled. Take the string of
Shakespearean villages along the Avon, for example : —
“Piping Pebwoith, dancing Marrt n,
Haunted Hillborougb. hungry Grafton,
Dadgeing Exball, Papist Wixford,
Beggarly Broom, atd drunken Bidford.’’
Let anyone who loves English scenery drive (with his
camera under the box-seat) from Warwick, through
Charlecote (the home of the Lucys), to Stratford ; and
thence on to Evesham and Tewkesbury, calling at the
villages named in the above quatrain (said to have been
penned by Shakespeare) en route. Let him not hurry — ■
take a fine week in (say) June — and I will answer for it
that he will ever afterwards mark that excursion with the
whitest of white stones.
In writing this brief account of our county, I must
acknowledge my indebtedness to Mr. Sam. Timmins’s
recently published “ History of Warwickshire ; ” but I
have also studied most of the original authorities from
Dugdale to I Ialli well. Our noble Free Reference Library
contains practically everything that lias been published on
Warwickshire ; and some useful county books are also to
be found in the Old Library.
If we are to “survey” Warwickshire in earnest, we
must become students as well as photographers (and to
my mind this will be one great good resulting from the
task) ; we shall have to think of something else besides the
beautiful and the picturesque ; and we must remember
that its associations may dignify the meanest dwelling, and
render of world-wide interest the most prosaic surround-
ings.
Scientific Studies for Warwickshire Photoyrujdiers. —
Archaiology — the study of the past — and Ethnology — the
study of the inhabitants of the district at the present day —
we have already touched upon. But there is much work
also to be done in Geology, Botany, and Zoology.
The t ieoloyy of Warwickshire. — The coloured maps issued
by the Geological Survey show the different strata of
which the surface of the county is composed ; and in a
book which 1 wrote in 1881* a general description of the
rocks of the county will be found.
Every landscape depends for its main outlines upon the
rocks which lie beneath the soil ; and for those who can
“ read the rocks” the study of the scenery of any district
has a double pleasure. The oldest rocks of Warwickshire
are the Cambrian quartzites and shales which lie between
Atherstone and Nuneaton. These had been wrongly
assigned to the Carboniferous period by the Geological
Survey, and the discovery of their true age was made by
Professor Lapworth and myself in 1882. The quartzites
(altered sandstones) are magnificently exposed in a series
of immense quarries, and they are traversed by great
masses of dark, igneous rocks. The shales are well seen
in the Stockingford railway cutting.
In the Warwickshire coal-field, photographs of the
surface works, collieries, and colliers might be secured;
while, descending beneath the surface, the flash-light
would enable us to secure interesting records of the mines
and miners.
Of the Triassic strata which succeed, there is a fine
* “ Geology of the Counties of England, and of North aud South Wales.’*
Kelly and Co. Ss. (Now out cf print.)
January 3. 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
13
section of the red sandstone, sixty feet in vertical height, i
at Hockley Cemetery, in Birmingham. Elsewhere the
Triassic rocks are hut seldom exposed, and we must be
content with noting the level plains and rolling hills pro-
duced by their marls and sandstone.
The I.iassic strata — limestones and clays — which rest
upon the Trias, are quarried at Wilmcote, Binton, &c. , in
South Warwickshire. The fossils contained in these and
in other local rocks, of which there is a grand series in the
Warwick Museum and in the Museum of the Mason
College, Birmingham, will form interesting subjects for
our cameras.
Lastly, we have the Drift, including those confused
beds of clay and sand, often containing great blocks of
rock (erratics), which have been conveyed from Wales or
from Scotland by the agency of ice during the glacial
epoch. The immense boulder which lies in Cannon Hill
Park (Birmingham) is a fine example of such a travelled
block ; but there are hundreds of others, and they are
continually being destroyed — the farmers blow them up
with dynamite. So, too, with the sections— the quarries,
railway cuttings, &c. — where the solid rocks are finely
exposed. They change from day to day, until at last they
are grassed over and lost. Let it be our task, by the
aid of photography, to record their features for ever for
the students of geology.*
The Hot aw/ of Wanrickshirc. — The flora of our county
has been carefully studied and described by Messrs.
William Matthews, M.A., .1. E. Bagnall, A.L.S., W. B.
Grove, B. A., and other specialists. Artists have long
visited our parks — l’ackington Park especially — to portray
the grand old trees which adorn them, remnants of the old
forest of Arden. Photography can admirably record
every twig and leaf. It is certain that good photographs
of plants, especially if taken while growing in their native
haunts, would help to vivify the dry leaves of herbaria,
and they would be much valued by those who study and
teach botany. I have seen some exquisite work in this
direction done by one of our members, Mr. Charles
Humphrey. Let me advise those who make this branch a
speciality to photograph trees cither early or late in the
day, when the nearly horizontal rays illuminate their
trunks. Let photographs of the same tree be taken at
different seasons of the year ; then shall you be able to
prepare a series of “dissolving views,” in which the tree
shall be shown to bud and blossom, be covered with leaves,
and anon be bare, yet beautiful with frost-rime.
(To he continued).
Camera Cr.un Notices. — Thursday, January 2nd, 8 p.m.,
Lantern Evening ; Monday, 6th, 8.30 p.m., Smoking Concert ;
Thursday, 9th, 8 p.m., Mr W. H. Walker, “The New Rel-
iable Celluloid Film;” Thursday, 16th, 8 p.m., Mr R. Tin-
dall, “Plane Polarisation of Light;” Monday, 20th, 8 to
9.30 p.m., Mr. Roberts will be prepared with the lantern if
any member or members send him advice to the Club that
they would like to try slides ; Thursday, 23rd, 8 p.m.. Rev.
T. Perkins, “ English Church Architecture as a Subject for
Photography”; Thursday, 30th, 8 p.m., Mr. T. It. Pallmeyer,
“ On some Practical Deductions from the Law of Conjugate
Foci ” ; Monday, February 3rd, 8.30 p.m., Smoking Concert ;
Thursday, 6th, 8 p.m., Lantern Evening ; Thursday, 13th,
8 p.m., Mr. Graham- Balfour, “ Landscape.”
* See paper on “ Aid Rendered by Photography to Geology, ’ by
W. J. Harrison, Photoo bai’uic News for 2nd October, 1885.
patent £nttUtgnut.
Specifications Published.
16,894. — November 20 th, 1888. “Photographic Cameras.”
William Ritchie Baker, 94, Seaside, Eastbourne, Sussex,
Chemist.
According to this invention the camera is made to contain a
number of sensitized plates which can be used in succession.
The plates are arranged one in front of another in a receptacle
at the back, or it may be at the sides of the camera, and an
opening furnished with a close fitting cuff or sleeve is provided,
so that the hand can be introduced to arrange the plates with-
out the admission of light. When the pile of plates is at the
back of the camera they are separated from one another by
opaque paper or the like, so that the front plate can be exposed to
the light without the others being acted upon. When a picture
has been taken the front (date is removed and placed at the
back of the pile, leaving the next plate in position for the next
picture.
In place of employing a transparent screen of ground glass
for receiving the image whilst the lens is being focussed, as is
now usual, I employ an opaque screen, and view the image upon
it by a hinged mirror or other convenient means. I prefer to
hinge the screen so that, when in position for receiving the
image, it lies in front of the pile of plates at the back of the
camera, but can be drawn up and made to lie against the inner
side of the top of the camera when it is desired to take a pic-
ture.
In order that the screen may occupy exactly the same posi-
tion as the plate to be acted upon, I place springs at the back of
the pile of plates, so that the screen, when lowered, forces the
pile slightly backwards, taking the place of the front plate.
When, however, the screen is drawn up out of the way, the
springs force the pile of plates forward again into position.
The camera is provided with two doors, one at the top and
the other at the bottom. That at the top serves as an open-
ing through which the opaque screen can be viewed, whilst
that at the bottom is for the manipulation of the plates, as
above described.
In order to render the camera as compact as possible, I
carry the lens upon the end of a drawer which, when pulled
out, gives the requisite focus length, the focussing being per-
formed by adjusting the distance to which the drawer is pulled
out.
1 do not fix the lens rigidly to the end of this drawer, but I
connect it to it by mechanism in such a way that when the
drawer is closed the front of the lens lies flush with the end,
but when the drawer is pulled out the lens is protruded.
The inventor claims : —
1st. A photographic camera having a receptacle or changing
box carrying the sensitive plates or other media, this said
receptacle or changing box being arranged to move within the
body of the camera in a backward or forward direction, an
opaque focussing screen arranged on the front face of the said
receptacle or changing box, a hinged mirror, and a suitable close
fitting or sleeve.
2nd. In a photographic camera the combination of an opaque
focussing screen with a movable receptacle or changing box
holding the sensitive plates or other media.
3rd. In a photographic camera the combination of an opaque
focussing screen with a mirror, and a suitable aperture and
door in the door of the camera, for viewing the said mirror.
14,537. — 16</i September, 1889. “Photographic Cameras.”
William Scorer, Watchmaker, Jeweller, and Photographer,
North Street, Havant.
The inventor says that his invention consists of a front to be
used as part of a photographic camera, to hold the lens in any
convenient position opposite the slide containing the sensitive
plate, and which has the means of moving the opening contain-
ing the lens to any convenient position, the device being a great
improvement upon the usual vertical and horizontal slides to
which the lens is usually fixed. This form of front, he says,
is particularly adapted to the form of camera having a parallel
14
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
[January
1850.
bellows, but may also be used to advantage with a camera
having a taper or conical bellows, having also a rising front.
He describes several other devices in the construction of photo-
graphic cameras.
16,593. — October 21 st, 1889. “Optical Illusions.” Jacob
Keller, Merchant, of 10, Pcrleupfuhl, Cologne, and Gustav
Castan, Sculptor, of 13, Stiihlerstrasse, Berlin.
The invention chiefly relates to new combinations and ar-
rangements of mirrors, which give the visitor the impression
that he is placed in a labyrinth formed by c do nnades or arcades,
mirrors and painted views.
Although the apparatus occupies a very small space, the
inventors say that the visitor believes himself to stand before
endless colonnades, and, if tempted to enter the same, he finds
himself suddenly stopped by a mirror, from which the deep
colonnades seem to extend to the right and to the left.
They say that one illusion represents a tropical garden, and
the background forms the entrance to a Moorish Temple, while
palms and exotic plants are placed between the mirrors.
Owing to the multiple reflection, the single entrance appears
like an entire mosque, surrounded by a tropical garden. The
space in which the visitor stands occupies scarcely two square
meters, but the whole looks like a great palm garden in a
tropical country.
The invention also comprises a specially constructed camera
or kaleidoscope, which has the shape of a regular tetrahedron.
The upper three sides of the tetrahedron are formed by three
large triangular mirrors, the edges of which are ground and fitted
together, so that the whole appears to be made of one piece.
The chamber is entered from below through a circular staircase,
and a second staircase serves for the exit.
The visitor ascending the spiral staircase sees a great number
of repetitions of his own image from the front, from the back,
and from both sides. Four or five persons standing together in
the kaleidoscope appear as an innumerable crowd.
The following are considered the essential features of the
invention : —
1. That the mirrors and passages are inclined to each other
at an angle of 60° or at a multiple of 60°, the horizontal sec-
tion of the individual compartments being composed of equi-
lateral triangles.
2. That the mirrors and passages are all alike as regards
their width and height, as well as the shape, size, and design
or decoration of the frames or borders.
3. The kaleidoscope, which is accessible only from below,
while the sides or walls are composed of large triangular
mirrors, which form three adjoining sides of a regular tetra-
hedron, and are therefore placed to each other and to the floor
at an angle of 60°.
The specification is accompanied by drawings.
The Photographic Year. — In its record of the leading facts
of progress made in photography since January, 1889, the
Photographic Times calls attention to celluloid as a substitute
for glass in photography, and as a material well suited for mak-
ing focussing screens and other articles requiring great lightness
and strength ; to magnesium for illuminating subjects by arti-
ficial light. “In development,” it says, “ hydrochinon has
waxed and waned in popular esteem, and eikonogen has largelv
taken its place, especially among amateurs. Pyro continues to
be largely used, however, by all classes of photographers.
Lantern slides and photomicrographs are being made in greater
numbers than ever before, and the colour-sensitive plate is being
more largely used. Dry plates have improved in quality during
the past year.” Our contemporary then goes on to note the
increase in the number of photographic clubs, of amateur pho-
tographers, and of photographic instruction books ; and con-
cludes by expressing the opinion that “ the improvements made
in photographic optics and the manufacture of cameras, tripods,
and other apparatus, make it possible for photographic prac-
tical workers to do better work with greater facility than ever
before. The outlook was never brighter for a new year.”
d^omspontinuc.
PHOTOGRAPHERS’ BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION.
Sir, — The Photographers’ Benevolent Association is now so
well and favourably known to most of your readers that I
feel emboldened to ask space for this short communication.
The Association has, after a long struggle with the apathy
of those whom it wished to benefit, at last become the
recognised charitable centre of the profession. Its objects are
already widely known, ami during the sixteen years of its
existence there has not been a single charge against the
committee of unfairness or injustice in their awards. This the
committee freely acknowledge is in a great measure due to
the careful investigation which each case has received at the
hands of the secretary, Mr H. Harland. Owing to the pres-
sure of other business this gentleman is compelled to resign
his position in February next, and the committee have, in
consequence, to seek for a successor to him. This affords a
I favourable opportunity to replace a paid secretary by an
honorary one, provided that a gentleman, either amateur
or professional, can be found able and willing to devote a
small portion of his time to the duties. It has been several
times pointed out that the secretary’s salary, small though it is,
forms a serious item in the yearly balance sheet, and it is
with the hope of being able to still further benefit their
poorer brethren that the committee now appeal to the pho-
tographic community for a volunteer in this capacity. It may
be mentioned that the duties are simple, and can easily be
performed by anyone who has had any business experience.
The chairman of committee, Mr. W. Bedfoid, 326, Camden
Road, N., will be pleased to furnish further particulars, list of
committee, &o. Pro Committee P.B.A., E. Clifton.
REPRODUCTION AND COPYRIGHT.
Sir, — I read the first of the notes in your issue of December
13th with some astonishment. From it I conclude that in
your opinion when a photographer has given permission to a
certain newspaper to reproduce a photograph, he should hence-
forth consider the copyright, as far as this kind of reproduction
is concerned, at the disposal of the newspaper to whom per-
mission to copj' has first been granted. Permission to repro-
duce photographs in newspapers and magazines is being made
too cheap, and I think most photographers of experience will
agree with me that the advertisement obtained from the average
illustrated paper reproduction is not likely to give the photo-
grapher adequate repayment, save in exceptional cases, for the
use of his copyright.
A late experience of mine of the wiles of illustration hunters
may be of interest, and perhaps instructive to some of your
readers.
A publishing firm wrote me requesting permission to pro-
duce a wood-cut from a photograph of mine for a magazine
(specified, andsample copy sent) circulating, as was evident from
its general character, among a class of people by whom it could
not possibly be of any account to me whether my picture
were seen or not, even if it had been well reproduced, which I
knew from previous experience it would not be. My answer
was that the photograph in question could be used as re-
quested on payment of one guinea. This was agreed upon, a
print of the photograph sent and the invoice ; but being some-
what more wary than the firm had evidently anticipated, I
wrote on the invoice that permission to copy was granted only
for the particular paper specified. This did not suit the pub-
lishers at all, and they wrote me to the effect that permission
to reproduce could not be accepted under conditions. Thus,
although the request had only been made for a specified paper
of limited circulation, the intention was evidently to make in-
discriminate use of my copyright for small consideration.
There is very exceptionally any encouragement to profes-
sional photographers to produce pictures except the love of it,
and the expense is to many a verj- serious consideration ; and
surely anything which makes the practice of art less burden-
some to the pocket of the photographer should receive the sup-
port of the photographic press.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
lf>
January 3, 1890.]
The experiences and opinions of others of your readers in this
connection would be interesting.
There is also another matter which I should like to mention,
and on which I believe there is considerable misconception. 1
have heard it stated by men one would expect to know, that a
photograph must be registered before publication in order to
make copyright sccurable ; also that to mark a photograph
copyright which has not been registered is a fraud. Now, as I
understand the Act, copyright in a photograph belongs to the
producer of such photograph, or to the person paying a valuable
consideration for its production ; and such owner of copyright
can secure legal protection against infringement whenever lie
likes to register his copyright, but cannot obtain any compen-
sation for infringement previous to registration. This is quite
a different thing to total loss of copyright through neglect of
registration previous to publication. I believe a clear and
correct statement of the law in connection with such cases
would be of immense value to photographers.
R"dhiU, December 30 th. Ralph AY. Robinson.
li)roceet»mgg of Soriettcg.
Photographic Society ok Great Britain.
At the technical meeting of this Society held on the 31st ult.,
the chair was occupied by Mr. Atkinson.
Some photographs of groups of theatrical subjects, taken
upon the stage with magnesium flash lamps, were exhibited by
Mr. 1‘. Downer, of Watford. In <>no of these groups there were
whitish streaks, extending about a quarter of the distance
from the sides towards the centre of the plate. He enquired
the opinion of the members as to this appearance.
Mr. W. E. Debenham suggested that they were probably due
to the flashes shining upon the lens, and giving rise to what
were called “ ghost ” images. When very bright artificial light
"as used, the camera ought to be shaded from such light by a
hood.
Mr. Chapman Jones thought tint that was the probable
explanation of the markings.
The Chairman showed a photograph of a family group
taken with flash lamp. The picture was somewhat weak and
flat.
Mr. L. \\ arxerke thought that too much magnesium had
been used. A very small quantity sufficed if it was thoroughly
burned. When it was attempted to burn a large quantity,
not only did some escape burning, but the duration of the
flash was so long that movement on the part of the sitters
became probable.
Mr. Friese Green had tried the magnesium flash lamp com-
mercially for about three months, but had had to give it up.
The pictures taken with it generally failed to give satisfaction
to the sitters.
Mr. Chapman Jones asked if there was any magnesium
flash lamp that burned the metal quickly enough.
Mr. Warnerke replied that there was, provided that only a
small quantity was used.
Mr. Chapman Jones enquired whether Mr. Warnerke had
found it advantageous to dry the magnesium powder before
using it.
Mr. Warnerke replied that he dried it after purchase, and
then preserved it in a bottle for use.
Mr. Chapman Jones had found that a mixture of freshly-
dried magnesium and chlorate of potash exploded with such
rapidity that fourteen grains of it would shake the windows of
the room in which it was used, but that after an hour or so
it lost this power of extremely rapid combustion.
Mr. Warnerke showed a lamp for burning magnesium
ribbon, of which he had spoken at previous meetings. It was
made in Berlin, by Ney, and had several points of novelty
about it, the chief of which was the contrivance for automa-
tically striking down the burned ribbon at short intervals. This
action made a clicking sound, and as it was repeated at the
rate of once for a little more than an inch of ribbon burned,
it was practicable, by counting the clicks, to know and regulate
the amount of magnesium used for the exposure. For copy-
ing purposes he held the lamp during about seven clicks, on
each side of the picture. This equalised the lighting, and
pievented irregularities in the surface of the picture from show-
ing in the negative. The exposure he had mentioned, repre-
senting about fifteen inches of ribbon, was what he found to
be right for copying an engraving half its real size when using
a plate giving fifteen on the sensitometer, and a lens of the
portable symmetrical character. There was a hood in front of
the lamp furnished with a groove into which a ground glass
could be fitted for ordinary work, and coloured glasses
for orthochromatic work. He had come to the con-
clusion that for copying it was folly to use daylight. The
certainty of exposure, as well as the convenience of lighting
so as to obviate the irregularities of surface from showing, were
advantages on the side of the magnesium lamp far outweighing
the trifling expense attached to it. As to the smoke, the
chimney belonging to the lamp could be contrived by a paper
tube to any opening connected with the outer air. He had
tried condensing chambers in which the fumes passed over a
surface moist with acid, but they proved a failure.
Mr. Debenham asked whether Mr. Wai nerke had tried
Meydenbauer’s condensing chimney, in which the result was
brought about by keeping the magnesia diluted with as little
air as possible.
Mr. Warnerke had not tried it. He then referred to
eikonogen, which was in his opinion much better than any other
developer that he had tried. He had worked one mixture for
a whole week, developing a plate in it occasionally, and found
it good to the last. He found caustic potash better than the
carbonate. The formula used was a concentrated one as
follows : —
Sulphite of soda ... ... ... ... 40 parts
Boiling distilled water ... ... ... 100 ,,
Eikonogen... ... ... ... ... 10 ,,
Caustic potash ... ... ... ... 10 , ,
The sulphite was first dissolved, then the eikonogen, and
lastly the potash. It was filtered and bottled away whilst hot.
For use he diluted with two or three parts of water if he
wanted strong contrasts, and with from nine to ten for softer
pictures. During his visit to the Paris Exhibition he had
met with M. Maret, who was working on physiological subjects,
where he only exposed for about the j^o part of a second, using
hydrokinone. On comparing with eikonogen, however, they
found the power of the latter in bringing up detail to be very
much greater.
Some photographs of large size (about 21 by 17) of American
scenery by Jackson, taken direct, were shown by Mr. Friese
Greene.
West London Photographic Society.
On the 27th December, a technical meeting of the above
Society was held at the Addison Hall, Mr. C. Garner
Richardson, M.A., occupying the chair. Mr. St. Clair
Buxton, F.R.C.S., Mr. W. H. Whitear, and Mr. Miller were
elected members.
The discussion upon Mr. Stein’s paper on Hand Cameras was
adjourned until the second meeting in January.
The Secretary (Mr. Hodges) informed the meeting that the
annual exhibition would be held on the 10th January, at
half-past seven, and would remain open on Saturday, 11th,
from three to half-past nine. Mr. Mial, the inventor of the
Facile Detective Camera, attended and explained its construc-
tion to the members.
In reply to the question, “ Would the addition of sulphurous
acid to the fixing bath have an injurious effect on the negative?”
Mr. Stein said the effect would be to liberate sulphur, which
would be prejudicial to the negatives.
Mr. Hodges thought it not advisable to add any acid to the
fixing bath, and least of all sulphurous acid.
Mr. Rickford desired to know the proper quantity of
magnesium ribbon to burn when reducing half-plate negatives
to lantern size by reduction in the camera.
Mr. Bennett had produced many slides in that way, and had
found three to five feet necessary, and burnt about three inches
behind the negative.
16
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC XE\\>.
[Jam ary 3, 1800
Mr. Winter thought the amount excessive.
Mr. Cobb showed some bromide prints which had been
bleached by immersing in a solution of bichromate of potassium
acidified with hydrochloric acid, and, after exposure to light,
redeveloped with ferrous oxalate. The tones produced were
warm brown.
Mr. Hodges said the degree of warmth would depend upon
the amount of re-exposure given. Bromide prints would tone
to a good brown with the ordinary uranium intensifier.
Mr. Leslie Selby recommended bleaching with mercury, and
subsequent treatment with sulphite of soda, as advocated by
Mr. A. K. Dresser.
North Middlesex Photographic Club.
The above Club held an exhibition on Monday, December 16th,
consisting of members’ work. There were six classes for competi-
tion, to which were contributed about 200 pictures, and 150
lantern slides. The judges were Messrs. S. Herbert Fry and
Charles W. Hastings.
The following are the classes and prizes taken in each : —
Class I. — (Landscapes in Silver, any size), first-class certificate,
C. Beadle ; second ditto, J. W. Marchant ; lion, mention,
W. T. Goodhew. Class II. — (Landscape in Platinum or
Bromide, any size), first-class certificate, W. T. Goodhew :
second ditto, C. Beadle ; hon. mention, Geo. R. Martin.
Class III. — (Portrait, not less than four admitted to competi-
tion), first-class certificate, H. Beckett ; special class, formed
by request of the judges (Figure Studies), first-class certificate,
R. B. Lodge. Class V. — (Lantern Transparencies, not less
than six admitted to competition), first-class certificate, C.
Beadle ; second ditto, H. Walker. Class VI. — (Enlargements),
first-class certificate to A. Le Vierge ; second, W. Sweeting.
The “ Amateur Photographer Bronze Medal ” was awarded to
Mi-. W. T. Goodhew, for his picture of the waterfall in
Battersea Park. In the evening there were two lantern displays,
followed by vocal and instrumental music.
In the mounting of some of the exhibits, the prints were
squeegeed into optical contact with the glass, leaving a consider-
able margin of clear glass round the edge, and then placed in the
frames with a piece of plain oak a short distance from the glass.
The exhibition was to some extent marred by pictures being
hung too high through insufficient room, as although the hall
was capableof holding six hundred people, the available space was
largely occupied by recesses and windows.
Photographic Society of Ireland.
A TECHNICAL meeting was held at the Society’s rooms, ] 5, Daw-
son Street, Dublin, on Friday, December 20th, Mr. Louis
M ELDON in the chair.
Dr. Cosgrave read some notes on Ilford lantern plates,
relative to his experiments with those plates under varying
periods of exposure to the light of an ordinary gas jet, the
results obtained being exhibited at the same time through the
lantern.
Dr. Scott showed in the same manner a set of these plates,
some exposed to the light of a paraffin lamp, and some to that
of magnesium wire, the developer being eikonogen with all.
Very rapid results were obtained with the magnesium wire.
Mr. Conan brought forward the subject of the construction
of the dark room proposed to be fitted up on the Society’s
premises. An interesting discussion followed, in which many
of the members took part.
The negatives taken during the excursion of the Society
in September were handed round for inspection and criticism.
Eleven new members were elected, and seven proposed.
Received. — “ Wintering on Lakes Le Arau and Marapouri ” ;
a Photographic Diary by Alfred H. Burton. Some of Mr.
Burton’s diaries have in past years been reproduced in the
Photographic News, and this, the latest account of his photo-
graphic experiences in opening up new country, reprinted from
the Otago Daily Timex, is of a very interesting character. At
the end of the Diary is a catalogue of the views taken during
Mr. Burton s trip. — Messrs. T. Fletcher & Co’s., New Patent
Calendar for 1890 is a combination of illustrated catalogue and
calendar.
aitstocvg to (?ToiTC$ijponticnt:5.
All Alvertisemcnts and communications rel Ring to money matters, and
to the sale ot the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic N’kws, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Purnival Street, London.
All Communications, exiept advertisements, intended for publication,
should be adtreisel to the E lit or of the Photographic NV.\vs, 6, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questi'ns requiring a reply in this column should be aldressed to
Mr John Spille-, P C S., 2, S’. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
The Rev. F. C. Lamiibrt writes to make a correction in his note
on the “ Champion Class,” at page U3of the Year-Book. The
reader is requested to run his pen through the word not at the
end of the fifteenth line, in the sentence, “ Why should he (not)
run again in another race.”
S. T. — Your reference is at fault; the specification refers to a
totally different matter. We have made another search without
finding any record of a patent having been applied for in Great
Britain.
W. L. (Java). — We have been to inspect the enlarging lantern at
£6 fi->. It is a thoroughly efficient instrument, with 5-inch com-
pound condenser, and front combination lens fitted with rack and
pinion, triple wick lamp (not quadruple), in Russian iron case,
oak mounted, and all suitable for quarter-plats negative; but if
you wish to use it with your larger size, 7J by 4J, it will be
necessary to begin by reducing them to appropriate dimensions,
an ! then afterwards to amplify in this particular form of apparatus
Boston, U.S.A. — Calcium chloride in collodion. Since answer-
ing you oa th:s point a fortnight ago, we have found a reference
to the use of cbdoride of calcium for making a special chloro-
bromide collodion emulsion said to be used, when tinted with
ch’orophyll, for taking photographs of the >un. The statement
occurs in Mr. Hermann Gunther's letter lo the News of Aug. 9th,
1889 (see page 525 of last volume), and is an ingredient of the
collodion formula therein given as that of Dr. Zenger. Half a
gramme of calcium chloride, and three and a quarter grammes of
cadmium bromide, are used for sailing the collodion.
A. M. M. — Great cred t is due lo you for the admirable summary
of photographic literature which appears in the “Abstracts”
given in the December number of the Photographic Journal,
There will be, at times, some overlapping, tor tne paper on
eikonogen by Prof. G. D. Ijiveing did not fir^t appear in the
journal to which reference was made.
Id. B.— You can g t the illuslrated ca’alogue of the Paris Salon at
the Slade S:h ol Art Depot, 137, Go.ver Street, W.C.
E. I,., and Grained. — Read first Mr. W. K. Burtm’s “Manual
of Collotype, Zincography, and Photo- mechanical Printing”
(M irion and Co., Soho Square) ; you will then sec what apparatus
you require. The lithographic press and othir items, such as
r filers and ink. ran be piocured of Messrs. Hughes and Kirnber,
ant Mr. Wins'on-, of Shoe Line. You should not begin with
12 by 10 pla’es, but get experience with half-plateor cabinet size,
and gradua'ly work upwards when the technical difficulties
are fairly mastered. We cannot refer you to any school of
instruction.
J. M. G. — The round white spo's on your silver print are evidently
the result of smie accidental splashes of acid, or of a corrosive
metallic salt; but, when moistened with water and tested with
blue litmus paper, we failed to get any indication of free acid,
which may, however, have evaporated off meanwhile.
Printer. — A plough cutter, such as used by bookbinders and
stationers, would answer your purpose. Enquire of Messrs.
Wuterlow and S >ns, Limited, Finsbury Works, E.C. It is
figured in their catalogue.
J. E. (Oxon). — The ether saturator can be procured of Mr. W. C.
Hughts, 82, Mortimer Road, Kingsland, N .
W. George. — Every carbon print shows a slight relief when deve-
loped and diied. The degree of prominence will depend somewhat
upon the character of the original negative, but upon applying to
the Autotype Co.npiny, 74, New Oxford Street, your special
requirements may be met by varying the amount of pigment or
chemical quality of the tissue.
Bavox. — This question has often been asked of late. Only those
who have been appointed photographers to the Queen, or to the
Prince of Wales, have the right to use the Royal Arms. Such
persons hold an official document, signed by the Comptroller of
the Household, notifying their appointment.
Several other correspondents in our next.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
I n- ' * *
I )
Vol. XXXIY. No. 1636. — January 10, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAO X
British Photographers and Foreign Fortifications 17
The Law of Copyright 17
The Late Col. Russell’s Contributions^ Photography. By
Prof. Raphael Meldola, F.R.8., F.C.S 18
Repairing Broken Negatives. By Hugh Brebner 20
The Progress of Quinol Development. By Alfred Maskell 21
Photographing Lightning 22
Photography in France. By Leon Vidal 23
Cold Weather Notes. By C. Brangwin Barnes 25
Notes 20
P AO R
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 27
Photography of the Insane for Purposes of Psychiatria. By
Dr. Eder 29
Photographic Survey of Warwickshire. By W. J. Harrison ... SO
Patent Intelligence 31
Correspondence.— Reproduction and Copyright — Art Photo-
graphy Recognized at Last — Sundry Notes and Corrections
—Photographic Tourists’ Baggage 33
Proceedings of Societies 34
Answers to Correspondents 36
BRITISH PHOTOGRAPHERS ANT) FOREIGN
FORTIFICATIONS.
Examination of the periodical photographic literature
of this country for many years past, proves that when
London and some other British photographers have but
a few days to spare, and wish to spend those three or
four days on the Continent, Antwerp is selected as the
place to visit in the great majority of cases. The
reasons for this may readily be seen. A boat train
leaves at night when the engagements of the day may
be supposed to be over, and on board the boat a complete
night’s rest may be obtained ; especially has it been so
of late years, since the accommodation for passengers by
this route has been so liberally improved. The day-
time is thus left unbrokenly and on land at the dis-
posal of the traveller. In addition to these advan-
tages of that particular trip, Antxvcrp is a great city
abounding in picturesque architectural food for the
camera.
Short photographic excursions of the same kind to
France are scarcely ever described in the photographic
journals; yet Havre, like Autwerp, is a place which
can be visited with a complete night’s rest on board
the boat, both in going and returning by the
London and South Western route. A great impedi-
ment to shortphotographicexcursions to any French port
is, the uncertainty whether the holiday-seeker may
not get into trouble by innocently taking pictures too
near fortifications, for several cases have been published
of late years of unpleasant treatment by French officials
of perfectly harmless landscape photographers. Of
course, on this side of the xvater we are liable to see
but ex parte statements of each case, the aspects
whereof might appear in a different light were the
other side of the case put forth from a French source.
Broadly speaking, it is a recognized fact that the
average English are not popular on the Continent, and
this arises chiefly from the offensive manners of a por-
tion of our countrymen ; perhaps some English
photographers who have found themselves in trouble
on the other side of the water, would have been better
treated had they been decently affable.
Last Monday, when returning from more southern
parts, we called upon some of the officials of the Photo-
graphic Club at Havre, and inquired whether the
presence of the surrounding fortifications would causa
the prohibition of out-door photographic work by any
English photographers who might visit the city for a
few days’ holiday. They replied that nobody would
interfere with their photographing inside Havre itself,
and that they did not think that there would be any
objection to their photographing along the beach, but
would make inquiries on the subject. On the other
side of the mouth of the Seine are the two pretty little
seaside places of Trouville and Honfleur, and the time
of reaching them from Havre by small passenger boats
is three-quarters of an hour. They are good places for
camera work, and especially is this the case with Trou-
ville and its neighbourhood. Unfortunately, however,
there is at present but one boat a day, with a few ex-
ceptions in the course of each month, to either place,
and that boat does not start daily at the same hour ;
the service is a tidal one. A new pier is nearly com-
pleted at Trouville. It is said that when it is finished
communication with Havre by small passenger boat
will be kept up at regular hours, and several times a
day. A good service of boats and trains between
Havre, Trouville, Lc Mans, and forking off at the latter
place to Tours and Angers, would be a great boon to
English tourists visiting the Loire district.
THE LAW OF COPYRIGHT.
Some useful information about the law of copyright in
relation to photographs, given this week in our corres-
pondence columns, is of value because it comes from a
legal source, Mr. Fleetwood Pritchard. The selling
of a photographic print by its owner does not, it seems,
prevent his copyrighting the picture at a sub-
sequent date. We believe it to be the same with
books. The whole subject of the law of copyright
as applied to photographs is about to be taken
I Chamber of Commerce, when these and other technical
j points of interest to photographers will no doubt be
well threshed out by experienced persons commercially
interested in the subject, and whose deliberations will
be fortified by authoritative legal advice from one or
two members of the Section.
13
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
[January 10, 1890.
T1IE LATE COE. RUSSELL'S CONTRIBUTIONS
TO PIIOTOGRABIIY.*
BY PROFESSOR RAPHAEL MELDOLA, F.R.S., F.C.S.
In the coure of preparing a series of lectures on Photo-
graphy, which 1 delivered at the Finsbury Technical
College during the early part of the year 1888, I had
occasion to search the literature of this subject, and was
much interested to find how largely we are indebted for
the advancement of modern photography to the work of
our late member, Colonel Russell, of Stubbers, of whom
ail obituary notice has already been published in the
Essex Naturalist (voL i., p. Id!)). As an Essex worthy,
whose merits as an investigator are so widely known, both
in this country and on the Continent, it seems only a just
tribute to his memory that his labours in the cause of
science should find record in our pages. It is with this
object that I have undertaken to give a brief sketch of
his photographic contributions.
Before the introduction of the gelatine dry plates, which
are now so generally used, the process invariably adopted
by photographers was that in which the plate was first
coated with a film of collodion containing a soluble iodide
— or bromide and iodide — and then sensitised by immer-
sion in a silver nitrate bath.
The collodion process was first suggested by a French-
man (Legray) in 1850, but its practical working out is due
to our own countrymen — Scott-Archer, Fry. and the late
Dr. Hugh Diamond, in 1851.
'There can be no doubt that the use of collodion marks
one of the greatest epochs in the history of photography,
and the method thus introduced for convenience of
manipulation and certainty of results far transcended
any of the older processes. But in these times of restless
activity in every department of science, it is not likely
that a process which possessed so many disadvantages
should be allowed to rest without attempts being made to
improve upon it or to supersede it.
The drawbacks to the old wet collodion process are
familiar to all who have worked at it. The plate had to
be coated, sensitized, exposed, and then developed as
soon as possible after removal from the camera. In field
work the dark tent had to be dragged about as a part of
the necessary paraphernalia, and in addition to this and
the camera the photographer was obliged to carry with
him a stock of chemicals, such as bath solution, developer,
fixing solution, Arc., to say nothing of sometimes finding
himself driven to extremities for want of a supply of clean
water. The amateur of the present time lives in a golden
age of photographic facilities ; he knows nothing of the
agony of learning to coat a glass plate with collodion with
perfect uniformity and smoothness, using only a minimum
of the viscid solution, performing the operation with the
greatest possible speed, and returning the excess to the
bottle without pouring it up his sleeve or over his boots.
A\ ho that has had to manipulate the collodion process
under a tropical sun will forget the anxiety consequent
upon the transport of bottles of ether into temperatures
of something over 100’ F. in the shade ? I have vivid
recollections of the Eclipse Expedition of 1875 to the
island of ( amorta, in the Bay of Bengal, somewhere about
8 from the equator. Our observations were to have been
chiefly photographic, and we were well equipped with
photographic materials. But the experience gained at home
* A lecture delivered before the members of the Essex Field Club, and
reported in the Ease? Naturalist,
went only a little way towards helping us to manipulate
collodion in a temperature at which the ether evaporated
almost as soon as the film was spread over the plate. The
tents had to be kept wetted with water, and the dark slide
was brought out of the tent and fixed in its telescope
camera swaddled in wet cloths to prevent the too rapid
drying of the sensitive film.
These and other difficulties are now experiences of the
past. At the present time a complete photographic equip-
ment, weighing only a few pounds, can be taken into the
field, and the plates or films developed at leisure any time
after exposure. The sensitiveness of modern dry plates
so far transcends that of the old collodion process that
instantaneous effects can be secured by any amateur pos-
sessed of ordinary skill. It is desirable that Essex people
should know what a Large share the late Colonel Russell
had in bringing about this state of affairs.
'The most obvious way of getting rid of the difficulties
of working the wet collodion process out of doors is. of
course, to coat the plate with a dry sensitive film, which
can be prepared some time before being actually required
for use. Attempts were accordingly made to prepare
sensitive dry plates soon after the introduction of the col-
lodion process, the first important step in this direction
having been made by Professor Taupenot, in 1855. This
investigator coated his plates with ordinary iodized collo-
dion, sensitized in a silver bath, washed out the excess
of silver nitrate, and then coated with iodized albumen
and dried. Before use the plates were sensitized by im-
mersion in a silver acetate bath, and then washed and
again allowed to dry. Taupenot' s dry plates were the first
| successfully used by photographers, but they were very
insensitive and uncertain in their action.
An improvement was introduced in 1858 by Fothcrgill,
who used ordinary albumen instead of iodized albumen
for coating the sensitized collodion film, thus doing away
with the second sensitizing operation. Passing over cer-
tain minor modifications in the dry plate processes intro-
duced by subsequent workers, we come to the year 18(11,
when Russell put the finishing touch to the method of
collodion dry plate photography. The plate was first of
all coated with gelatine as a substratum, and then received
the film of bromo-iodized collodion, which was sensitized
in a silver bath in the usual way. After washing out the
silver nitrate the plate was coated with a solution of tannin
and then dried. 'The tannin, known technically as a
“preservative,” restored the sensitiveness lost by the
removal of the silver nitrate, and thus placed in the hands
of photographers a really dependable dry plate possessed
of greater sensitiveness and durability than any other dry
plate known up to that time. Russell's tannin dry plates
soon came into general use ; his work on the process was
published in 1861, and reached a second edition in 1866,
both editions having been translated into German.
In these days of rapid photography, we should consider
a tannin dry plate a very insensitive thing to work with,
being at the best less sensitive than a good wet plate.
But the other advantages of the dry plate outweighed this
one disadvantage, and the favour with which the tannin
process was received showed how eager photographers
were to dispense with the cumbrous appliances of the wet
plate method. From this discovery of Russell’s to modern
dry plate photography it is but a step, that step being the
precipitation of the silver iodide or bromide in the collo-
dion itself in the form of an emulsion, instead of coating
the plate first with the salted collodion, and then forming
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
January 10, 1890.]
19
the sensitive silver salt by immersion in a silver nitrate
bath. Emulsion photography is par excellence the photo-
graphy of the present time, and there can be no doubt
that the success of Russell’s dry plates largely contributed
to its introduction.
Important as was the advancement rendered possible by
the use of tannin as a preservative, this is by no means
the only noteworthy photographic achievement with which
our late member must be credited. Only a year after the
introduction of his dry plate method, Col. (then Major)
Russell made known the use of ammoniacal solution of
pyrogallol (pyrogallie acid) as a developing agent, a dis-
covery which marks a distinct epoch in the history of the
art, and of which the practical utility makes itself felt at
the present time. Prior to the year 1862, the developers
in use by photographers were of an acid character, Gallic
acid mixed with silver nitrate had been used by Fox Tal-
bot for developing his paper prints as far back as 1810.
Pyrogallol was known to be a more powerful developer
than gallic acid both by I.iebig and Rcgnault in 1851.
The use of ferrous sulphate, the active substance in the
“ iron developer ” of the old collodion process, was known
to the late Robert Hunt in 1844. When dry plates first
came into vogue, acid development had to be resorted to
as the only known method of bringing into visible exist-
ence the invisible image formed by the action of light on
the photographic plate.
For certain chemical reasons, which need not be entered
upon in detail here, an acid developer is eminently unsuited
for dry-plate work. The early experimenters in this field
were not only at a disadvantage as regards the comparative
insensitiveness of their plates, but this slowness of action
could not be compensated for by using a stronger deve-
loper, because the free silver nitrate, which is an essential
constituent of an acid developer, would be reduced, and
metallic silver deposited all over the film ; that is to say,
the plate would become fogged. It is, of course, impos-
sible to trace the precise origin of the idea which led to
the use of alkaline pyrogallatc. It appears that experi-
ments had been made bv Anthony, of New York, in 1862,
having for their object the increased sensitiveness of dry
plates by exposing them to ammonia vapour before use,
and about the same time Glover attempted to increase the
sensitiveness by the action of ammonia vapour after ex-
posure and prior to development. Whether Colonel
Russell was aware of these experiments there are at pre-
sent no means of ascertaining, but it is not improbable
that his attention may have been directed thereby to the
use of ammonia. The fact that dry plates could be deve-
loped by means of a neutral solution of pyrogallol with-
out free silver nitrate was made known by Mudd, Wardley,
and Wharton Simpson in 1861. All the conditions forthe
introduction of alkaline development were therefore ripe,
and the important discovery was announced by Russell in
1862, and about the same time, but independently, by
Leahy. The importance of alkaline development is too
well known to photographers to require specially enlarging
upon. It will suffice to say that the powerful developer
given to the world by our late member put dry-plate
photography on an entirely new basis. Want of sensitive-
ness could be overcome by increased developing power; in
fact, the reducing action of ammonium pyrogallate is so
great that it tends to fog the plate unless restrained by
suitable means. In connection with the general theory
of the development of the photographic image, this dis-
covery was of the highest order of importance, and its
j bearings were fully recognised by Col. Russell. In the
old process of acid development, the image is built up by
i the deposition of metallic silver from the developing solu-
! tion, whereas in alkaline development the image is formed
I chiefly out of the silver reduced in the film itself. For
the full establishment of this most essential distinction be-
tween the two kinds of development we are also indebted
I to our late member. In the course of a controversy
carried on in 1865 with Carey Lea, of Philadelphia, Russell
j proved his point most convincingly by a beautifully de-
j vised experiment. He showed that if an ordinary collo-
dion negative after development is treated with nitric acid,
the whole of the picture is dissolved off, and the plain film
left in its original condition ; the silver image is here simply
raised in relief upon the surface of the film, and the acid
dissolves it off. He then showed that a negative dry plate
developed by the alkaline method, and treated with nitric
acid as before, gave a transparent positive of the picture
sunk in depression ; the silver image is in this case im-
bedded in the film instead of being raised upon its surface,
and the acid accordingly dissolves it out, leaving its
counterpart in depression. This proof not only convinced
Russell’s antagonist and the photographic world at large
of (he truth of his views, but the experiments led to that
j which is dear to all Englishmen, and which is, in the minds
of many, the only true measure of success, viz., a practi-
cal result. He published the details of a method in 1868,
based on the foregoing experiments, by means of which a
reversed negative, or a transparent positive, could be ob-
tained from a dry-plate negative by treatment with nitric
acid after alkaline development and before fixing. This
process is now obsolete, but it has its historical interest, as
being the outcome of a theoretical discussion.
The value of Col. Russell’s introduction of alkaline
development in 1 862 does not, however, end with his own
application of the process to the dry plates then in vogue.
The germ of the discovery which has revolutionized
modern photography was in existence in 1864, when Bolton
and Sayce made known their collodion emulsion process,
which was followed up by many workers, and culminated
in the introduction of gelati no-bromide emulsion by Dr.
Maddox in 1871. From that time emulsion processes have
steadily been gaining favour, and now are almost exclu-
sively in use. From the very beginning of their history,
in 1864, these processes had therefore the benefit of
Russell's method of alkaline development, by which, or by
some analogous plan — such as the ferrous oxalate developer
— are they only workable. It will thus be seen that the
influence of our late member’s work makes itself felt, as
was stated previously, at the present time. Whether CoL
Russell continued his photographic work in later times I
j have not been able to ascertain, but his name does not
occur among the more recent investigators in this depart-
I ment of applied science. It is possible that the few years
I during which he occupied himself with photography re-
presented but a passing phase of the many-sided pursuits
to which he was attached. That he has left a permanent
mark in this field will be gathered from the present sketch,
and the genial naturalist and ardent sportsman must cer-
tainly take rank among Essex worthies as an original in-
vestigator in a department of science widely remote from
those other pursuits by which he is, perhaps, more gener-
ally known to the members of the Essex Field Club.
The number of the English eikonogen patent is stated to be
5207, March 26th, 1889,
20
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 10, 1800.
REPAIRING BROKEN NEGATIVES.*
the films in pure methylated spiiit to shrink the expanded
BY HUGH BKKBNFR.
The operation of mending broken negatives so that the
lines of junction will barely be visible, and will scarcely
show in the print, is one requiring at once time, good day-
light, carefully arranged paraphernalia, and a sure and
skilful hand.
Before proceeding to work, I should like to draw atten-
tion to, and to emphasise the fact that when an ordinary
negative is broken, and the bits of glass are pieced toge-
ther, the print will show a harsh black and white line at
every junction, or if printed while revolving, the desirable
loss in sharpness will be disagreeably counterbalanced by
a painful gain in the breadth of the “ fuzzy ” line.
Dry plates to-day are so much more reliable and perfect
than they used to be, and our familiarity with their treat-
ment so great, that the stripping of a film, even from a
surface prepared to hold the gelatine firmly, presents no
difficulties which a vex-y little care and skill cannot over-
come. The subsequent replacing of the pieces of the
broken film upon a fresh piece of glass, and the method
whereby the edges of the gelatine shall be brought toge-
ther so that the direction of the fracture can with difficulty
be detected in the print, and can very easily be touched
away, are the points upon which T have more particularly
to dwell.
The denser the image, the less will the line of junction
show ; and, when the mending is at all skilfully effected,
a soft, thin line on the most transparent portions will be
the only trace. Landscapes, also groups and vignettes,
are less liable, for the same reason, to exhibit traces of the
mended line, than are plain or cameo heads. If, however,
it be important that no line be at all visible, all sign of in-
equality of tint — beyond that characterising the picture —
may be got rid of without much difficulty, and with con-
siderable certainty.
If the negative has been modelled and varnished before
being broken, the varnish must, of course, be removed
with methylated spirit in the usual way, and it is perhaps
better to treat even an unvarnished (broken) negative to
a preliminary bath of spirit, or, in its place, alum may be
used, as this toughens the film and prevents extreme ex-
pansion. Having carefully preserved each chip, examine
each for tiny splinters of broken glass, and when found
remove them. Lay the chips, well separated from each
other, to prevent further chipping, in a large, flat bath
full of acidulated water (IIC1). After some time, by
preference just when frilling begins at the broken edges,
take out chip after chip, and successively plunge each
under water in another bath, and drag the fingers against
the broken edges upwards and backwards till the margin
of the film is loosened on two edges of the chips — whe-
ther triangular or lozenge-shaped. Then, with only a
slight modification of the action of the fingers, fold back
the film upon itself, and with repeated touches free it
entirely from the glass. It will be found that this can very
easily be done where the cut is clean, and where the film
is of equal thickness. It is a very much more difficult
operation if the attempt be made to begin upon the ori-
ginal margin of the plate. Throw away the bits of glass,
or piece them together somewhere else as a guide. Throw
each film as it is detached into a vessel of gently moving
water, so that the films may expand equally. Immerse
Abstract of a paper read at a meeting of the Edinburgh Photographic
film, and thereby recover density.
Have ready a clean piece of glass, and, having lifted out
the largest piece of film as wet as possible, throw it down
on the glass and rapidly spread it out, right side up, in the
place it should occupy. Now, holding the film in its place
at the edge, incline the glass so that the superfluous mois-
ture may flow off, when the film will adhere to the glass
of its own accord. Next, pick out a piece of film which
fits the first, treat it as the last, and bring it roughly into
position. Do the same with the remainder of the pieces.
Place the glass on a modelling-desk, and, with a large,
soft brush, moisten piece afterpiece ; drag each into closer
juxtaposition with the piece above it ; and when- the edges
just overlap and nothing more, partially dry the brush,
and drag the point or heel along the two edges. This will
cause them to adhere more firmly to the glass, and prevent
the tendency to slip down. It is much better to have a
slight overlap than to have an exact meeting of the edges
at first, or to leave a gap between, and for the following
reason : as the films dry they contract, each towards its
own centre ; consequently the edges of neighbouring
pieces are dragged away from each other, and unless some
allowance is made for this, it is difficult to bring them
exactly together ultimately. When the films are very
nearly dry take a smaller brush, and with its heel drag
gently along the finer junctions. In most cases this will
be sufficient to bring the edges into simple contact with-
out any overlap. Where the overlap is more marked, wet
the brush, and with it moisten the two films slightly near,
and at that part of their edges. When the gelatine is
moist enough it becomes pliable, and contracts or expands
at the slightest touch of the brush. If the film be too
moist it will be too elastic, and will regain its former posi-
tion the moment the controlling pressure is withdrawn.
If, on the other hand, it be too dry, it will not budge one
jot from its place. Therefore the simplest way to bring
the edges loosely together without overlapping is to moisten
the film, pretty freely at first, from an eighth to a quarter
of an inch from the edge, and with the heel of the dry
brush to drag it towards the centre, and at the same time
by withdrawing the moisture cause the film to adhere to
the glass in the desired position. The final touch to each
junction should be a soft, dry scrape along the crack.
If the last operation has been performed perfectly and
with sufficient judgment, the negative when dry will be
ready to print from, or to intensify. But it is seldom —
except in the case of very simple fractures — that no over-
lap or gap is visible when the film is hard-dry. Conse-
quently a final treatment is generally necessitated. This
varies : with an overlap, no matter how thin, a white line
will result in the print ; therefore the edges must be again
moistened and dragged asunder. But with a gap, which
would print as a black fine, the piece of the film should be
moistened at first near the centre, and then gradually to-
wards the edge, and when amenable to expansion, dragged
or stretched gently with a dry brush away from the centre
towards the edge. Should the gap be wide, it may be
necessary to work on two pieces of film, but in all cases
the drawing of the picture should determine which piece
should be moved, and in what direction. The best posi-
tion of the edges of the moist films when the centres are
dry is that of an inverted V, thus \ : when the edges take
this shape they had better not be pressed fiat, unless they
are very nearly dry indeed. Blisters caused by air-bells
may be led from under the surface with a wet brush,
January 10, 1S90.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
i>l
This is a rough skeleton outline of the operations most
commonly required, but occasionally the negative is too
thin ; sometimes an edge gets broken, and now and again
a piece gets lost. As the application of an aqueous solu-
tion of mercuric chloride would simply cause all the pieces
of film to float off, the mended negative should receive a
coating of quickly setting gelatine before being intensified,
or the broken negative itself might be slightly intensified
before stripping. Where the edges are broken or frayed,
the remedy is a touch of gelatine and a few strokes of the
modelling pencil. When pieces are lost the same treat-
ment may be adopted, but I have personally found it pre-
ferable to cut out a piece of another negative — worthless
otherwise — of the same shape, but somewhat smaller than
the space to be filled, and then fit it in after soaking it.
Where a very faint bright line marks the junction of the
films, the raised portion of the negative may easily be
pared down with a sharp lancet or round-pointed knife
blade. When this is overdone the modelling pencil again
comes into requisition.
In conclusion, I may add that I have only once failed
to make a very passable bit of work of any mending 1 have
undertaken, and on that occasion the fracture took the
form of a glittering star, and the number of pieces was
exactly fifty-two.
forgotten process ; remembered more with a kind of reve-
rence than for the results it is capable of producing. It
is, then, almost against the grain that I have to
advocate what is, to a certain extent, akin to the auto-
matism which I am more inclined to deprecate. It is
necessary, however, to march with the times, and while I
think the evil of our too rapid progress is manifest and
unavoidable, the very evil itself is productive of good by
the inducements it holds out for thousands to the study of
practical art which they would otherwise not undertake.
Of these the feeble and insincere will fall out of the race,
or at least will remain unnoticed, heroes only to their
immediate circle ; a few will come to the front to illustrate
the page of photographic history.
Formula;.
Paris Photo. Club. — Boil a litre distilled water ; put equally
divided into two litre bottles ; while warm, put into one 75
grammes sulphite of soda, in the other 150 grammes sodium
carbonate, powdered immediately before using. Shake till
dissolved. To the sodium sulphite solution add 10 grammes
quinol, and shake well till dissolved ; to this add 8 to 10 drops
acetic acid crystallised, heave all to cool. When cold, mix
by pouring rapidly the quinol solution into the carbonate, and
filter the whole into a third litre bottle. The solution should
be perfectly clear.
For Instantaneous Work :
the progress of quinol development.*
1SY AI.1KED MASKKLI.
In conclusion, l may say that it would appear that we
have not yet come to the end of newly-proposed de-
velopers. New re-agents will, in all probability, continue
for a considerable time to be brought forward ; unless—
and this perhaps is not beyond the bounds of probability
— the time should arrive when the sensitive plate is im-
pressed in the camera and requires only to be rendered
permanent; going back, in fact, to some extent to earlier
methods. For myself I would wish for a truce. I should
consider it as a relief that things for a time might remain
as they are ; no new discoveries in the shape of developers,
printing methods, detective cameras, and so on. Then
we might apply ourselves seriously and with greater calm-
ness to the means we have at present at our disposal —
which are great indeed — and perfect some systems which
have been neglected. I dread the arrival of the automatic
penny photographic machine, which it is promised we are
soon to see at all the railway stations. I am not pleased
as a rule with the discovery of any new device for saving
time and trouble, and I do not look forward to the time
when photography will become such an easy process that
any child may work it. I believe that in our art, as in all
other arts of the best periods, the finest results are to be
produced when time is considered as no object. In it, as
in all arts, machinery and automatic appliances encourage
the production of shoddy and clap-trap imitation. I will
scarcely hesitate to say, in fact, that I would gladly almost
j. o back to the days of Daguerreotype: had not one dis-
covery followed so fast on the heels of another, it is pos-
sible, indeed, that that process, beautiful as it was, admir-
able for the very defect in some eyes of producing only
one copy of a picture, and for certain subjects never since
surpassed, it is possible, I think, that the Daguerreotype
might have been so modified and improved in the method
of working as to have held still at the present day a higher
place in the public favour than it holds now as an almost
Concentrated solution of sod. carb. (pure)...
. 000 c.c.
Concentrated solution of sod. sulph. (pure)..,
. 150 „
10 per cent, alcoholic solution of quinol ...
50 „
Rain or distilled water
500 „
r. Sira it’s : —
A. — Quinol ...
80 grains
Citric acid
10 „
Bod. sulph.
80 „
Distilled water
20 ounces
B.— Caustic potash...
1 00 grains
Sod. sulph.
160 „
Distilled water
20 ounces
C.- — Bromide pot. ... ... ...
24 grains
Distilled water
1 ounce
D. — Caustic potash
160 grains
Distilled water
20 ounces
For normal exposures use equal parts of A and B, adding
5 minims of C for every ounce of solution. For over-exposed
plates use D instead of B, with an extra quantity of C. For
under-exposed plates omit C, and, in extreme cases, add 6 or
8 grains more of sulphite to every ounce of developer.
r. Vogel : —
Quinol ...
... ... 5 grammes
Sodium carb. ...
75 ,,
Sodium sulph....
10 „
Water ...
... ... 900 c.c.
or carbonate of potash 75 grammes instead of carb. soda.
Addition of about 5 per cent, of a 40 per cent, solution of
caustic potash shortly before developing accelerates better
than applying pure caustic potash
With Metabisulphite of Potassium as Preservative : —
A. — Quinol
.. ... 10 parts
Metabisulphite
4 „
Water
^50 „
C. — Caustic soda ...
.. ... 50 ,,
Water
.. ... 500 ,,
'or every 100 parts of water take 10 parts A and 10 parts
Concentrated Solution : —
Quinol
... 1 gramme
Citric acid ... ... ...
... 5 decigrammes
Sodium sulph.
... 4 grammes
Water to make ... ...
... 100 c.c.
Five c.c. of this contain 1 deeij
jraumie of quinol,
• Concluded from page 12.
'22
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 10, 1890.
10 parts
4 ,,
250 „
50 ,,
400 „
5 parts
40 „
00 grains
1 ounce
12 grains
60 ,,
1 ounce
With Acetatatc of Soda : —
A. — Quinol ... ... ...
Metabisulphite
Water
15. — Sodium acetate
Water
ds a Further Accelerator : —
Sod. acetate
Water
For Bromide Paper: — ■
(Thomas) A. — Sodium carb. ...
Water
B. — Quinol
Sod. sulph... ...
Water ... ...
Mix equal parts, and add the same quantity of water ; oi
better, use hintokinone 1 to 12 of water. Alum bath is good :
no acid bath.
Mr. Victor Corbould’s Method of Producin' / Warm Tones in
f n liter n Slides. — Make up your normal quinol developer, and
having previously over-exposed your plate, develop until the
image just appears ; then immerse in a solution of caustic pot-
ash 5 grains, water 2 ounces, when the image will come up
quickly, but will not be too dense. The colour obtained by
over-exposing about six times the normal exposure with
Thomas’s plates is a warm sepia.
General Notes.
Contrary to early instructions, it is advisable to rock the
bath during development.
Mr. De St. Priest says that with a bath three times as
diluted as the ordinary formula, the time of exposure may be
shorter than with a more concentrated bath, the development
being, however, slower.
From time to time take the plate out of the developer and
leave development to proceed for a minute or so ; the action is
more rapid.
For yellow stain, try, after fixing, washing, and drying, a
bath of water 100 c.c., hypo 1 0 to 20 grammes, alum 5 grammes,
hydrochloric acid or gallic acid 2 to 5 c.c. Let stand and filter.
In using quinol with carbonate of potash or soda, the colour,
says Dr. Vogel, is considerably influenced. This depends on
the quantity and kind of salt added. With the formula, sulph.
sod. 40 grammes, quinol 5 grammes, carbonate of soda 50
to 150^ grammes, water 900 c.c., green pictures result
up to 75 grammes carb. sod. ; tone gradually improves to
black as more is added. Carbonate of potash does not give
green tones.
The method of soaking plate in quinol solution for one
minute, taking out and completing the development in the
alkali solution, is recommended. Once set going, plates can be
passed on from dish to dish, saving time with large batches.
The soda solution should always be used with a portion of
already used bath.
1 apier-machc trays should be kept clean and full of water,
otherwise the action of the developing solution breaks up and
dissolves the surface. If left in glass measures, funnels, &c.,
to dry, it causes a hard deposit ; leave them full of water with
a drop or two of hydrochloric acid. The hypo bath, if
exposed to air for any length of time, throws down a thick,
muddy deposit if plates are not washed between development and
fixing.
M ith chloride plates a small quantity of bromide of am-
monium or potassium is advisable, the action on these plates
being very energetic, and liable to cause fog.
For yellow fog, sometimes produced by accidentally leaving
negative in developer for a very long time, put, after fixing an
washing, into a bath of
Sol. of red prussiate of potash ... J, per cent. 1 part
... Sol. of hypo. ... ... ... ] Oper cent. 1 ,,
Mix at tune of using only, and use in subdued daylight.
‘ Al,” for January contains an article on “ Photograph v,”
by Walter K. Woodbury, in which, among the illustrations,
arc two designed to show, respectively, the difference between a
photographer’s impedimenta now, and years ago.
PHOTOGRAPHING LIGHTNING.
In our issue of July 26th, we printed a paper entitled
“ Instructions for Taking Photographs of Lightning,’’ read
at a meeting of the Photographic Club by Mr. William
Marriott. We give now some extracts from a communi-
cation by the same writer, taken from the Quarterly
Journal of the Hoi/al Meteorological Society for October.
Speaking of the storm which passed over London on
June 6th, Mr. Marriott says : —
The storm was remarkable for the brilliant and continuous
display of lightning, and was without doubt the grandest storm
that has been witnessed in the metropolis for many years.
Occurring just after sunset, the conditions were very favourable
for carefully watching the storm and for photographs to be
taken of the lightning.
One of the most remarkable features of the storm was the
persistent and repeating character of the lightning. Many of
the flashes appeared to remain visible for a perceptible length
of time, some people being able to count 6, 7, 8, and even 1 0
before the flash disappeared. There were numerous instances
in which the lightning appeared to repeat itself three, four, or
more times. It isprobable that these were distinct flashes follow-
ing precisely the same path. This supposition is confirmed by
some of the photographs of lightning which were taken during
the storm. Mr. Ninnies, of Balham, obtained two photo-
graphs, each with four distinct flashes following precisely the
same path and sinuosities, and only separated from each other
by a very small amount of space. These appeared at the time to
Mr. Ninnies as one Hash. Fortunately the photographic
views include some railway signals, and an examination of these
reveals the fact that there are four distinct images of the
signals. The space between the images of the signals agrees
precisely with the space between the flashes of lightning. As
the camera was held in the hand and not clamped to a tripod,
it is clear that the camera was moved slightly during the
exjwsure, and what appeared to the eye as one flash was in
reality a succession of four flashes. A similar repetition of
flashes is shown on several other photographs, and in each case
the camera was held in the hand.
A most interesting photograph was taken by Dr. Hoifert at
Ealing. This was obtained while the camera was being
swayed to and fro. It shows three similar parallel flashes which
took place during the movement of the camera in one direc-
tion. The space between the flashes is traversed by faint bands
of light parallel to the direction of motion, which appear to
indicate the existence of a residual illumination of a phos-
phorescent character in the intervals between the successive
flashes. A second series of three flashes is shown in the
upper part of the photograph, as well as a dark flash ; while a
third series of two flashes, but with a wider interval between
them, is also shown on the plate.
Some photographs showing flashes like a broad band or
curtain ot light were also obtained during this storm ; but in
each case it has been ascertained that the camera was either
held in the hand or not securely fixed. These seem all to lead
to the conclusion that a lightning flash is not instantaneous, but
has a much longer duration than has generally been supposed
to be the case.
Three or four photographs showing dark flashes were
obtained during this storm, the most notable being those taken
by the Rev. A. Rose, at Emanuel College, Cambridge, and by
Mr. A. \V, Clayden, at Tulse Hill, London. The latter gentle-
man has since made a number of experiments in photograph*
ing the sparks from an electric machine, which tend to show
that the dark flashes were due to photographic reversal.
In the discussion which followed the reading of the
paper, the following expressions of experience and opinion
were elicited : —
The President (Dr. Marcct) remarked that Mr. Wimshurst
had photographed the sparks from his electric machine wliile
the photographic plate in his camera was revolving between 3,000
and 4.000 times per minute, and had obtained a sharp image
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SEWS.
January lo, 1890.]
of the spark. Mr. Wimshurst believed from these experiments
that no movement of the camera during the process of photo-
graphing a flash of lightning could in any way fog or blur the
image.
Mr. Whipple said he had attributed the double images shown
in the lightning photographs previously received by the Society
to the fact that the cameras had lieen exposed behind a window.
He had made experiments which had tended to confirm his
supposition, having drawn chalk lines upon a blackboard and
photographed them at various angles through plate-glass. The
photographs obtained exhibited very similar appearances to
those shown in the lightning photographs. The dark flashes,
too, had appeared to him to be due to internal reflection, but
on this point he had been unable to make experiments. In the
present series of photographs both the dark and ribbon flashes
were shown ; and in the case of the ribbon flashes he felt com-
pelled to abandon his idea of their being the effect of refraction
through a window, as both l)r. Hoffert' s and Mr. Shepherd’s
pictures, in which latter a flash was splendidly doubled, were
taken without the intervention of a window between the
camera and the flash. It was exceedingly difficult to reconcile
these lightning photographs with Mr. Wimshurst’s photographs
of the electric spark, especially supposing the flash lasted so
short a time as it was usually stated. It certainly seemed that
lightning flashes, instead of being so rapid in their movement,
were very persistent. In the storm on June 6th lie distinctly
saw a beaded flash, and, like Dr. Tripe, he found himself much
better able to follow the course of the lightning than he hail
I>een hitherto, ljeoause his eyes had now become educated, and
lie knew what to look for.
Dr. Hoffert said that in one case he noticed the lightning had
a distinct fluttering appearance, showing that the lightning was
sufficiently slow to make its movements apparent. He did not
think that Mr. Wimshurst’s photographs of electric sparks
could be taken as an analogy, as the conditions in nature were
so different. It was difficult to understand that any oscillation
of the flash could have taken place, as the forms of the flashes
in the photograph taken by himself were similar. He was
unable to explain the dark flash, but from experiments he had
made he had been led to believe that the phenomenon was not
due to excess of exposure.
Dr. Green suggested that the dark flashes in the photographs
were produced by yellow flashes, as intense yellow gave a nega-
tive effect.
Mr. Kailyard said : If we assume the ribbon flashes to have
a real existence, the photographs seem to show that the ribbon
never curls or turns to one side ; all the turns are made so that
the cross lines of the ribbon remain parallel to a fixed line. It
follows from this that each edge of the ribbon is a plane curve,
and the ribbon always remains between two parallel planes. A
ribbon flash seen from any point between these planes would
appear to project into a straight ribbon. Mr. Marriott and he
ha<l wished to determine whether there was any connection
between the direction of the wind and the cross lines of the
ribbon, or whether the cross lines were parallel to some fixed
line in space, such as the earth's magnetic axis. He had
therefore tried to observe the curvature of the lightning
flashes seen in different directions during the great storm, but
he had not been able to recognize any direction in which t hey
appeared to be all straight flashes, and he had not seen any
ribbon flashes or dark flashes. When he came to see the photo-
graphs taken during the great storm, his faith as to the real
existence of ribbon flashes was still further shaken. There
were some photographs which showed three or four parallel
flashes of lightning, and three or four separate images of a
railway signal post lit up by the lightning, proving that the
plate must have shifted between the flashes, which were
absolutely alike, turn for turn. The images of the signal post
were separated by distances which corresponded with the dis-
tances between the lightning flashes, and we must consequently
assume that the three lightning flashes all followed the same
course in the air. This is what might theoretical ly be expected,
for the first flash would heat the air and form a path of least
resistance which subsequent flashes would travel along, as water
follows the turns of a pipe. A somewhat similar photograph
had been taken by Dr. Hoffert, who had intentionally moved
his camera from side to side, proving that recurrent flashes
occupied a considerable portion of a second, and that between
each flash there was a phosphorescence which left a trace on
the plate very similar to the gauge-like traces with which we
were already familiar in the ribbon flash photographs. It was
a very significant fact that all the photographsof ribbon flashes,
as far as he was aware, had been taken with cameras held in
the hands, or, at all events, with cameras which were not
screwed to a fixed support, but were only held against a
window-sill by the hand of the operator. And he thought that
we have in these photographs evidence of the nervous condition
of the operator, and of the magnit ude of the jump or start which
the flash gave rise to. Dr. Hoffert’s photograph, as well as the
other photographs of multiple flashes, showed that all the flashes
took place in the same direction, for all the flashes thinned out
in the same direction. There was no evidence of lightning
striking first backwards and then forwards, as had been suggested.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN' FRANCE.
UV l.LUN VIDA L,
Jl’BII.Ki; BANqlLT Mi tt At, AtD ASSOCIATION — IsoclIRu-
math; I’i.atks — Flash Torch — Micro-Photographs —
Monochromatic r .tght — Photographic Gun- -Coloura-
tion op Negatives— Bibliography.
Si ronil Haii'/iul >J the Fiftieth . I iinireivari/ <j Pholoyi ttplti/.
— A fete, commemorative of the invention of photography,
took place outlie Kith of last month under the auspices of
the Syndical Chamber of Photography. The idea was to
give to those persons prevented from attending the ban-
quet on the 19 th of August, the opportunity of taking part
in a manifestation organised with the same view. The
fete, which was particularly attended by professional pho-
tographers, was of the most cordial character. The
President of the banquet, in drinking to the fraternal and
solid union of photographic corporations, explained the
necessity for creating amongst the whole of photographers
an association of mutual aid, which would come to the
help of unfortunate members or of their widows and chil-
dren. The appeal of Leon Vidal was taken up, and
generous offers were spontaneously made. The associa-
tion was created, and on its foundation it is necessary to
constitute itself formally by adoption of statutes of asso-
ciation. The invested funds are to be permanently in-
alienable, pensions and other aid being taken only from
the revenues. The annual subscription is fixed at six
francs, and perpetual membership — that is to say, freedom
from any subsequent contribution, at 100 francs. The
association includes foreign as well as French photo-
graphers. This useful work was wanting to the photo-
graphic body, and it is a good thing to have filled up the
gap. The sitting of the French Photographic Society of
the 3rd inst. presented nothing of great interest. Below
we sum up the principal events.
lid-wards' s Txochromatic Flutes. — The photographs from
these plates, accompanied by those obtained on ordinary
plates, were defective as examples from a cause which was
pointed out. The impression prevailed that the ordinary
plate had been taken in a bail light, whilst the iso-
chromatic photograph is better, being more directly lighted.
We are not ignorant of the difference shown by two re-
productions, one of which is taken upon an ordinary, and
the other on an isochromatic plate ; but we like, when the
two results are produced together, that they should possess
a character of ingenuousness such that the observations
called forth by Mr. Edwards’s proofs could not be made.
24
The photographic news.
M. Attout Tailfer, who, according to his own state-
ment, has better formula) than others for isochromatising
plates, endeavoured to demonstrate that the proofs com-
municated had been reproduced under identical conditions;
but he did not succeed in convincing anyone. It is time
to have done with the myth of pretended patents relating
to isochromatic preparations, and it appears to us to carry
simplicity and complaisance to excess for persons to tell
us that certain patents prevent them from practising
orthochromatic photography. The truth is that this
method belongs to all the infinite variety of colouring pro-
ducts, of coloured screens, and of processes and formula)
capable of leading to the same result, and it is no more in
the power of a connnercialist to place himself as a barrier
against the application of orthochromatism, than it is in
the power of a colour-merchant to prevent a painter from
using red or any other colour. Such commercial preten-
sions are of an unworthy stamp, and based upon the
ignorance of the greater number, and the timidity of the
few. It is time, we repeat, to have done with such tram-
mels to the progress of photography.
Flash-Torch for Producing the Magnesium Flash. — This
little apparatus, conceived by MM Merville and Lausiaux,
looks exactly like one of those fuse boxes which smokers
use for lighting their cigars. Tt consists of a metal reser-
voir of the size of a small match-box. On this reservoir
are two small tubes, one to take a rubber pipe connected
with an elastic ball, the other receives a blazing match.
The air and the magnesium powder, projected by the
rubber ball, come out enveloping the blazing torch, and
the magnesium flash is thus produced. The little box in
question will contain twelve charges — that is to say,
enough pure magnesium for twelve flashes. Simple and
exceedingly portable, this little apparatus is destined to be
a success.
Micro-photographs of Wood Sections. — A very interesting
communication on this subject was made by MM Thil
and Thouronde. Micro-photographs, to the number of
about 400, were executed to the order of the Minister of
Agriculture. Mona Thil, Inspector of Government
Forests, has, in very precise language, pointed out the
reach of this application of photography, which permits
of the classification of woods in families and species,
thanks to the comparison alone of the intimate structure
of the fibres and cellular network. By this means we
are enabled, with the help of simply thin cuttings, to give,
so to say, a complete anatomy of each species, and to
notice easily the essential differences which exist between
wood of different species, although belonging to the same
family ; all the more, therefore, can we recognise classifi-
cation in families. Micro-photographic pictures, pro-
jected by the lantern, served to demonstrate clearly the
truth of the propositions affirmed. This is a new example,
and one of the most conclusive kind, of the numerous
services that photography may render to the sciences.
I his considerable work does the more honour to Mous.
rhouronde that his preliminary studies of micro-photo-
graphy naturally indicated him to the choice of the
Minister in view of the present important application.
Paths for Holding Liquids for Mono-Cliroinatising Light. —
It is to Mens, rhouronde th.at is due a presentation of
these baths formed of two sheets of glass and a third with
a round aperture ; against this the outer plates are cemented,
a small hole being left for the introduction of coloured
liquid, sulphate of copper, or whatever it may be. The
[January i0, 1890.
advantage presented by this arrangement is that of giving
dishes with vertical sides, very sound, and convenient to
use. There is no danger of any injury to the instruments
from flic escape of a liquid which is often injurious to
them.
Hand Apparatus. — Photographic (inn. — Mons. Carette
described the action of this little apparatus, which we had
already seen at the Universal Exhibition. It is essentially
a small camera mounted on a handle like the stock of a
pistol, the exposure being made by pulling the trigger. It
is also fitted with two short telescopic legs in front, by
means of which it may be used standing on a table or
other support, and levelled if need be. This well-schemed
instrument must be added to the collection, already so
numerous, of photographic vade-mecum.
Yellow Colouration of Negatives. — Mons. llervc, who had
not clearly understood what M. Balagny had desired to
express at the previous sitting of the Society, delivered a
long dissertation upon the yellowing of gelatine plates in
pyrogallic acid. The misfortune was that he had missed
the point of the question, and that an hour was lost from
his not having listened. Mons. Balagny replied that he
only spoke of the canary yellow veil which is produced on
plates after their immersion in hyposulphite of soda. He
stated afresh that the preliminary washing of the negative
in water acidulated with citric acid constitutes a preven-
tive means, permitting us to avoid with certainly all yellow
veil. We think for our own part th.at all that is necessary
is washing with plain water ; a negative sufficiently washed
is freed from all trace of alkaline salts, carbonate of soda
or of potash, and remains clear and without the slightest
colouration. When the development has been long wc
must insist more strongly still upon thorough washing, in
order to better penetrate the film of gelatine which has
been more deeply impregnated with alkaline salts.
Bibliography. — MM. Gauthier- Villars and Son have just
brought out a treatise on photography with pellicular
processes by Mons. G. Balagny. This work includes two
vols. The first is dedicated to generalities — flexible films,
theory and practice of the three developments, iron, pyro-
gallic acid, and hydroquinone. The second includes
pellicular papers, the general application of pellicular pro-
cesses, phototype, contretype, and transparencies. There
are in this work many things pointed out which it is useful
to consult.
Hastings and .St. Leonard’s Photographic Society. — The
annual general meeting will be held January 13, in the large
room of the Brassey Institute, when Mr. A. R. Dresser will
give a paper, with illustrations by lime light. An exhibition of
photographs, lantern slides, transparencies, photographic
appliances, and apparatus, will be held in the Public Hall,
Hastings, on February 25 th, 26 th, and 27 th. The
following will be the classes and awards : — Class I. (Photo-
graphs), gold medal for the best photograph in the exhibition ;
silver medal for the best landscape or seascape, interior or
genre subject, not enlarged ; silver medal for the best portrait,
not enlarged ; silver medal for the best enlargement ; six bronze
medals to be distributed at the discretion of the judges.
Class 11. (Lantern Slides), silver medal for best set of six
lantern slides ; two bronze medals for the next best sets.
Class HI. (Scientific — Photo-micrography and Stellar Photo-
graphy), bronze medal. Messrs. H. P. Robinson, J. Gale, and
J. B. B. Wellington will be the judges. The proceeds of the
exhibition, after paying expenses, will be given to the Hastings,
St. Leonard’s, and East Sussex Hospital. Further particulars
may be obtained from the Hon. Secretary, Mr. A. Brooker,
Memorial Buildings, Manchester.
January 10, 1890.}-
e>t
'THE PHOfOGRAEllIC NEWS.
25
COLD WEATHER NOTES.
BY C. BRANGWIN BARNES.
Notwithstanding the oft-repeated announcement to the
public of “ weather no object,” it is still a fact acknow-
ledged by photographers, amongst themselves, that photo-
graphs produced in the winter are not so good as those
produced during what is generally termed “the season.”
There are many reasons why such should be the case, but
it should be borne in mind that there are ways and means
of getting over — or, at any rate, minimising— the troubles
to which operators and printers are heirs in the winter of
their discontent. T do not suppose, for a single instant,
that the few hints I am about to make will convert that
“winter” into “glorious summer,” but they may per-
chance be of some slight assistance to some fellow worker,
and it is with this hope that 1 am sending them forth. Of
course, the old hand will say that I am giving him nothing
new ; that my notes are merely old wheezes that he was
aware of long ago ; but there are still many new workers
in the profession who may not have been so blessed, and
it is for their benefit that I am now writing.
To commence with the studio, it will be found that if
the lens be left therein over night, the glasses will be
covered with moisture in the morning, which moisture
should always be carefully removed before using the lens.
The same will be found on both focussing screen and
eye-piece. 1 have found that a short focus lens, as a rule,
is better to use in winter than a long focus, as there is
usually a certain amount of mist in the atmosphere, which,
interposing between the sitter and the camera, is often the
cause of a foggy image. Although it is the rule to keep
the studio at a fair temperature during the day, the fire is
usually let out when the hours of operating are over.
This should not be the case, as, if the stove is kept burning
until retiring time, and then filled up with small coke, so
as to keep just alight till morning, there will be no trouble
with the snow, which would otherwise settle on the roof,
anil cause some trouble to clear off, to say nothing of the
risk of a pane or two being broken, or of an early sitter
having to be taken with side-light only. The small fire
burning all night will also render it a possibility to keep
plants alive in the studio all through the winter, which is
a decided advantage.
It is not only the studio that requires to be kept warm,
but the dark room also, as many a weak and misty image
owes its defects to the coldness of the room and the deve-
loper. If the dark room be kept warm, the various
solutions will be in better working order, and, what is
more, so will the operator. It is far from pleasant to have
to thaw the tap to get at the water with which to mix the
developer, nor is the pleasure at all enhanced by the use
of that same developer for some twenty minutes or half
an hour, especially if the fixing solution has just been
mixed with some more of the same ice-cold water. If
there be no means of warming the dark room, the solution
should be kept elsewhere, as a developer only a few degrees
removed from freezing-point will never yield so good
a result as one at a normal temperature, and the temptation
to increase its rapidity by strengthening it is not only
more costly, but of very little use. When the water is
supplied direct from the main, without the intervention
of a cistern, no amount of warmth in the dark room will
be of any use, unless a quantity is drawn off from the tap
and allowed to stand for an hour or so.
The following developer is, l find, a very useful one for
winter purposes, as the main body of the solution, being
ready mixed, can be kept in a warm place until wanted
for use, added to which, it gives negatives of a colour very
close to that of the wet collodion process : — A. To. | lb.
of sulphite of soda (pure) add 50 ounces of boiling water,
and .J lb. of common washing soda ; when cool, make up
to 100 ounces with water. Ik 1 ounce of pyrogallic acid;
make up to 7 ounces with rain or distilled water, and add
4 drops of nitric acid. To develop, take 30 parts of A to
1 of lk Some operators object to the use of soda. When
such is the case, the sulphite should be mixed with the
boiling water, and 2j- ounces of liquid ammonia added
thereto when cool. This developer is merely an adaptation
of that issued by Messrs. Pollard and Graham with their
plates, such adaptation acting well with me, but may
require some further modifications in other hands. I
would in no case advise the addition of bromide, although
a bottle containing the following solution should always
be at hand ready for an emergency, such as an over-
exposed plate : —
Bromide of potassium ... ... ... 1 ounce
Water ... ... ... ... ... 10 ounces
One or two drops of this added to the developer will be
found to have a marvellous effect. When ammonia is
used in place of soda bromide of ammonium will be found
preferable to bromide of potassium.
All negatives should be varnished before a single print is
taken from them, but if it is necessary to take a print in
order to test the density of a doubtful plate, a thin sheet
of mica should be inserted between the film aud the albu-
men paper, as at the present season of the year the gelatine
film is very apt to take up some silver from the paper, and
so ruin the negative, or at any rate cause considerable
waste of time and trouble. In a former article I recom-
mended the use of an old, untoned print to back up the
fresh paper during printing, and would now again draw
attention to the same, as it will be found to have a really
marvellous effect in preserving the colour of the print, and
every tyro knows that a yellowed print never tones up like
a good one. The practice of warming the toning bath is
one I am unable to commend, as it has a tendency to cause
mealiness in the prints. If the bottle containing the solu-
tion is kept in a warm room, the toning will be found to
proceed as regularly and as rapidly as in summer. The
hypo bath should bo mixed with warm water aud used
when cold, and chilled water used for the first washing or
two after fixation. By this means blisters will be avoided.
Saturday’s prints should be left over until the Monday to
tone, as the prolonged washing they would otherwise get
tends not only to rot the paper, but to eat away the albu-
men, and so cause premature fading of the prints.
Crystal Palace Photographic Exhibition. — A special
class will be formed in addition to the published schedule, and
a silver medal will be awarded for the best picture, irrespective
of subject, to be selected by the judges from amongst those
pictures which have never been previously shown at a public
exhibition. Pictures entered for this prize will be equally
eligible for award in their several classes. Two additional
silver medals will be given : one for the best picture, irrespec-
tive of class, in the amateur section ; and one for the best
picture, irrespective of class, in the professional section, neither
picture having taken any other award in this exhibition. The
whole of the exhibitors in the apparatus division will be asked
to adjudicate upon these supplementary awards. The applica-
tions for space this year, we are informed, are already far ahead
of previous shows,
2G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
j£0tCS.
Mr. Ralph Robinson, in his letter last week entitled
“ Reproduction and Copyright,” has contrived to miss
the point of our contention. Our proposition was not
that the principal of a newspaper snould consider he
had the right to dispose of the block made from a
photograph, but whether a certain firm of photo-
graphers should place a prohibitive fee upon the
right to produce electros from that block for sale to
other papers. The whole qestion is one of market
value, and while, as we said, the firm in question knows
its own business, we still maintain that it loses
rather than gains by its high charges.
Mr. Robinson appears to have in his mind photo-
graphs which involve a good deal of time and expense,
and which aro intended to be pictures in the highest
sense of the term. If not, it is hard to understand
the relevancy of his remark that “There is very
exceptionally any encouragement to professional
photographers to produce pictures except the love of it,
and the expense is to many a very serious considera-
tion ; and surely anything which makes the practice
of art less burdersome to the pocket of the photo-
grapher should receive the support of the photographic
press.” But all this is wholly outside the point at
issue. It is very desirable that portrait photographers
should make their pictures as artistic as they can, but
we presume no professional photographer can afford to
ignore the fact that he is engaged in a business which
must be made to pay if he values his peace of mind.
The manufacture of as many negatives as possible in
one day is the aim of the average portrait photo-
grapher, and if he wishes to increase his business,
advertisements are not to be despised. We therefore
contend that the advertising of a photographer’s name
in a newspaper is a quid pro quo in the cases we have
in our mind, namely, where the portraits of nonentities
are taken in the ordinary way of business, and the photo-
grapher has been already paid for making the negative.
To descend from theory to practice. It has become
the custom of late years for both the Illustrated London
News and the Graphic to go in extensively for portraits,
not merely of celebrities, but of the rank and file who
have obtained mention, perhaps for the first and last
time in their lives, in the newspapers. Among these
may be classed a large proportion of the members of a
new House of Commons, and, descending in the scale,
we come to the members of the London County Council,
the London School Board, and other organizations.
Most of these portraits have absolutely no market value ;
but if, through any accidental circumstance, one of the
common-places takes the chair, say, at a local meeting,
the editor of the local paper may contemplate the
advisability of giving his portrait. For cheapness and
convenience, he goes to the agency which acts for the
illustrated papers, and selects the portrait. In every
case but that of the firm he mentions, he finds that au
[January 10, i890.
acknowledgment of the photographer beyond the price
paid for the electro is all that is demanded. But if
the portrait happens to have been taken by the Stereo-
scopic Company a fee of 10s. is demanded. Thus
he may find that, while the electro itself is but 5s., the
right to use it costs double as much. We do not
question the right of the Company to charge what
they like ; we only question the policy.
The matter per sc is one wholly of pounds, shillings,
and pence ; but we have dealt with it at some length,
because of its importance, and also because out of it
arises a new aspect of the ancient question, which has
always troubled the minds of photographers — thcowner-
ship of the negative. The law on the point is not so
settled as some suppose. The custom of the trade is
that the ownership and copyright are vested in the
producer, but that, to quote the words of Mr. W. E.
Debenham in an article on the subj ect which appeared
in the Photo&eaphic News of December 7th, 1888,
“ the right to the possession of the negative ought not
to imply any right to the use of the negative, otherwise
than by permission or desire of the sitter.” Of course
the permission to reproduce by an illustrated paper is
given in every instance by the sitter to the Stereoscopic
Company, but if the Company makes money out of
copyright charges, ought not the sitter in equity to
claim a portion ? Whether anybody under the circum-
stances would so claim has nothing to do with the
matter ; the point is, that the fee, whenever it is ob-
tained, is a comfortable addition to the price paid for
making the negative. The growing tendency to illus-
trate newspapers and journals of every class, especially
in regard to portraiture, has made the photographer an
important factor, and his policy surely should be rather
to give facilities than check them.
The miuing prospector is just now a very important
personage. His mission is to go roaming about all
over the world in search of auriferous properties.
He is obliged to be very astute, and not disclose his
real object, so as to get the property for “a mere song,”
after which he proceeds to plant it on the London in-
vestment market at an enormous profit. In order to do
this, he makes an extensive use of photography. Why
photographs of the surface of the ground should be
a proof of gold contained beneath is not for us to
say, but purchasers of gold mining shares find a com-
fort in gazing at such pictures, and therefore the pros-
pector takes care to indulge them. Thus we read in a
financial paper that “Mr. — is, according to American
advices, roaming around the Candelaria mine, and
taking photographic views, in order to once again
appear before English investors with pretty views of a
‘ splendid property.’ ” This is an advance ; hitherto
the prospector has been content to employ a photo-
grapher ; he now takes the photographs himself. It is
the safer plan.
The camera is an object of dread to the untutored
savage. It is not so much the uncanny look of the
January 10, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
2 1
thing when it is planted on its three legs, with the
operator’s head beneath the focussing cloth, which
frightens him, as the picture itself. One can quite
understand the innocence which prompts the child of
nature to imagine, when he sees the counterfeit pre-
sentment of himself and his companions, that a portion
of his actual being has actually been transferred to the
glass. In the days of witchcraft a photographer most
assuredly would have been hanged as a wizard. After a
while the savage gets reconciled to the phenomenon,
especially when he finds he has not come to much
harm, but further acquaintance with photography it-
self does not always remove his suspicions. A curious
instance of this comes from Afghanistan.
Some traveller in the country of the l’athans beyond
Quetta, who had a camera with him, gave the natives
their first knowledge of photography, aud this appears
to have been received with much disfavour, for, on the
surveyor of the Madras Government Department pro-
ceeding thither on a professional mission, he met w.th
a hostile reception. It is true he had not got a camera,
but he was in possession of a theodolite, and this, in
the eyes of the Pathans, was much the same thing.
The dislike to the camera, it appears, spriugs from the
fact that it takes pictures upside down. But, in addi-
tion, the Pathans imagine, when the surveyor is using
his theodolite, that he cau see through the walls of
houses, with the appalling result that the ladies of the
household arc photographed standing on their heads by
the infidel ! It was a mistake for the first photo-
grapher in the Pathan country to allow the natives to
look at the ground glass screen of the camera. He
forgot that a little learning is a dangerous thing.
Rejlander, as Mr. H. P. Robinson pointed out last
week, read but one paper before a photographic society.
He was not given to rushing into print, and, as Mr.
Robinson has said, preferred to convey his thoughts by
means of his art. It was in conversation with him
that one was able to obtain his ideas on the possibilities
of photography, and fresh, original, and valuable they
were. At a dinner of the South London Photographic
Society he made a speech full of home truths, expressed
in a quaint racy fashion. It was so difficult to get any
of Rejlander’s opinions on paper, that a member who
was present who wrote shorthand, hailed the oppor-
tunity and took down his speech, which made its appear-
ance iu the Year-Book for that year. It is rather curious
to see in some memoranda found after his death how he
foreshadowed the detective camera. “ Except truth of
drawing,” he wrote, “ expression is, I think, the most
important thing in a portrait, and the expression which
is unpremeditated and unconscious the best. I should
be very glad to possess a lens that did not need
focussing. I should carry it in my pocket, and with a
dry collodion process I would catch positions and
expressions in a crowd far better than with my own
eyes, for those poor orbs have to obey fixed laws ; they
cannot even see a man clearly in the street while
looking at a spot iu the window frame.”
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Toning Albumen Prints — Magnesium Flash-Light
Studio — Winter Pictures — Developers for Prints
on Gelatino-Ciiloride Paper.
Toning Albumen Prints. — An entirely reliable formula,
which has been in use for many years with satisfactory re-
sults in one of the most eminent photographic establish-
ments of this country, is the following. Two solutions are
made up : —
Solution No. 1.
Water
... ,
. 1,000 c.c.
Acetate of soda
Solution No. 2.
. 50 grammes
Water
... ... ... •
. 1,000 c.c.
Gold chloride
. 1 gramme
For use take : —
Solution No. 1
... ••• ...
. 100 c.c.
Solution No. 2
... ... ••• •
. 50 c-c.
Water
... ... •
100 c.c.
Carbonate of soda, sufficient to neutralise the bath.
After the bath has been used for toning, one-half of it is
poured into the residues, and every day half a bath of
the above-given proportions is added to the rest remain-
ing in each case. If it is intended to tone in the evening,
then the addition to the toning bath should always be
made in the morning of the same day. This toning bath
can be recommended to the profession in every respect.
A Magnesium Flash Light Studio. — Professor Schirm, of
Breslau, some weeks ago opened a new photographic
studio at Berlin, in which instantaneous pictures are
taken only by magnesium flash light. The well-known
flash lamp, constructed by Professor Schirm himself, is
used. A system of seven to nine lamps for a single por-
trait, and double the number and even more for groups, is
employed. The lamps are suspended from the ceiling, and
can be pushed to and fro on iron rails, which run parallel
to the walls. Four lamps are kept burning nearly along-
side of the sitter, three in front, one behind sideways to
illuminate the background. With the whole set of lamps
a pair of bellows is combined, by the aid of which all the
lamps are lighted at once. Besides, the pair of bellows
are by electrical contact combined with the shutters of
the objective lens; as soon as the cap is removed from the
lens, the pair of bellows .are released by means of elec-
tricity, and the magnesium lights produced. When,
however, the bellows are compressed for about one and a
half inch, the circuit is at once closed, the cap of the lens
being closed at the same time. In this way the expo-
sure amounts only to one-tenth of a second, though the
magnesium lights are burning for a somewhat longer time.
The same arrangement is used for the production of prints
and of enlargements. If a print is to be produced of a
portrait negative a very short time after the exposure,
a piece of wet gelatino-bromide paper is squeegeed on to
the fixed and washed negative whilst still wet, then ex-
posed at a distance of three to four feet from the flash
light, and developed with eikonogen. The new studio is
declared a decided progress by such authorities, for in-
stance, as l’rofessor II. W. Vogel, who devoted to it a
leader in his journal.
Winter Pictures from the Hartz Mountains. — A well-known
meteorologist has on a cold, but splendid winter day, de-
28
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
[January 10, 1890,
scended the Brocken, the celebrated scene of the St. YW1-
purgis Night in Goethe’s “ l'aust," and, by the aid of an
academy camera, taken several highly interestmg photo-
graphs of the snow-covered scenery. A few of them we
reproduce here in block form. Figs. 1, 2, and :> show a
group of scanty pines, standing on the brows of the
mountain, being so completely covered with rune m all
their branches, that they have entirely lost their original
rime has been transformed to a figure something like a
Inure fungus. The wire of the telegraph is now always
removed at the beginning of the winter, because it has
Fig. 1.
form, and look like the strangest forms of animals or
masses of rocks bristling with ice. In bright sunshine
Fig. 3.
formerly been torn by the weight of the adhering ice ;
three years ago, at an occasional research, the wire bc-
cliarge of ice
Fig. 2.
they present a magnificent appearance. The wanderer,
wading with difficulty in the deep snow covering all the
rugged rocks and glens, perceives these ice. blocks only
when he is quite near, and then finds himself surrounded
by white figures, not unlike white bears or praying
nuns. Fig. 1 shows a telegraph pole, which by the
Fig. 4.
tween two poles was found to bear a
amounting to 1,100 pounds.
Dccelojiers fur Prints on ( iehtltito-Chlorhle Paper. Dr. E.
A. Just, of Vienna, the well-known manufacturer of pho-
tographic papers, publishes the following developing for-
mula?, which are also recommended by Dr. Stolze as ex-
cellent.
I . - — 11 yd vox ylu in i nc Developer,
it. Caustic soda 10 parts, water 1,000 parts.
b. Hydroxy latnine liydrochlor. 5 parts, alcohol 100 parts,
water 200 parts.
e. Potassium bromide 1 part, water 50 parts.
For brownish-black tones, are mixed : —
Solution a ... ... ... ••• 1®® parts
„ 6 17 »
e ... ... ... ... ... 1*5 ,i
V
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
20
January 10, 1800.]
For sepia tones, are taken (the time of exposure being
at the same time doubled) : —
Solution a ... ... ... 100 parts
„ b 125 „
» c ••• ••• ••• fd> ,,
For reddish-brown to red tones, are taken (the time of
exposure being four to eight times as long as in the first
formula) : —
Solution a ... ... ... ... ... 100 parts
» b ... ... ... ... ... 8 5 „
»« e ••• ••• ••• f'5 „
11. — Eikonotjcn Developer. Eolation A.
Water
... 300 parts
Sodium sulphite
... 4 „
Potassium meta-bisulphitc
... 1 part
Eikonogen
1 „
Eolation B.
Water... ...
... 300 parts
Soda (crystaU.) ...
... 4 „
Glacial acetic acid ...
... 1 part
With sufficient exposure, equal parts of solution A and
1> give beautiful red to reddish-brown tones. Subse-
quently the prints are treated with an acid bath of water
500, glacial acetic acid 1.
III. — Neutral Citrate Developer.
The neutral citrate of ammonium has the advantage over
the acid one, that it does not mould as quickly as the
latter, COO parts of citric acid are dissolved in 2,000 to
3,000 parts of distilled water, which solution is neutralised
with ammonia in the same manner as in the case of
ammonio-acetate. The following are mixed : — ■
AmmoDio citrate solution ... ... ... 150 parts
Sulphate of iron solution 1:3 ... ... 50 „
The clear greenish solution does not become muddy, even
with sulphate of iron in excess. With short exposures,
beautiful blackish-grey tones are obtained ; with prolonged
exposures, sepia tones, and, if the solution is diluted, red
tones. To prepare a stronger developer, 108 parts of
citric acid are dissolved in 500 parts of water, which solu-
tion is neutralised with ammonia (0'91 spec, weight), and
diluted with water up to 800 parts. Then are mixed : —
Ammonio-citrate solution ... ... ... 100 parts
Sulphate of iron in crystals... .. ... 15 „
After this has completely dissolved, well set, and to some
degree oxidised in the air, the developer is ready for use.
The developer becomes blackish-green by oxydation, but
it may be recovered if, after some iron-wire has been put
into it, it is made slightly acid by means of citric acid, and
exposed to the light.
IV. — Hydroquinone Developer.
This developer is one of the best, especially if it is not
used freshly prepared, the tones resulting being vigorous
and of beautiful gradation. For black tones, are mixed : —
Water...
Hydroquinone
Sodium sulphite
Potassium metabisulphite ...
l’otash
For red tones : —
Water ...
Hydroquinone
Sodium sulphite
Potassium metabisulphite ...
Caustic potassium ... ...
Potash
... 300 parts
... 1 part
.. 6 parts
... 0-33
... 11
n
600 parts
1 part
12 parts
0'33 part
1‘5 parts
A very good formula is also the following by Detaille
Frcres : —
Water...
30 parts
Hydrokiuone ...
1 part
Sodium sulphite
7'5 parts
mixed with
Water
... ... CO parts
Potash ..
15 „
Acetic acid
1-5 „
This developer gives black tones.
iug is recommended : —
For red tones the follt
Water
50 parts
Hydroquinone
... ... 1 part
Sodium sulphite
7 "5 parts
mixed with
Water...
... ... 100 parts
Potash
„
Acetic acid
••• ••• b »
PHOTOGRAPHY OF THE INSANE FOR
POSES OF PSYC1IIATRIA.*
l'Ull-
15V DR. EDEIi.
Instantaneous photography has been employed for some
time in psychiatria, and for the illustration of works on
diseases of the mind ail'd nervous system.
The true-to-life pictures of the sick in their various
phases, convulsive attacks of all kinds, such as Charcot,
for example, takes for his object-teaching, or such as are
to be found in the annual reports of the Insane Asylum
at St. Servolo, point out to us the manner in which the
instantaneous photography of the insane in the various
asylums should be practised.
The professional man is very often able to hit upon the
correct diagnosis from the appearance of an insane person,
from his carriage, his face, the play of his mind. Un-
doubtedly, by photographing a number of carefully
chosen so-called “classical” cases, pictures would be
obtained which would be valuable, either for object
teaching or for the study of the individual cases ; besides,
much would be suggested by the study of the facial
mechanism in the various mind diseases ; for example, in
melancholia, and mania. These instantaneous photo-
graphs furnish such true representations of the circum-
stances that every professional man can recognize from
them the characteristic symptoms of the disease, which
cannot be said in regard to pictures of the insane drawn
by hand.
Especial attention was turned to this work on the part
of the Imperial- Royal Institute and Experimental School
for Photography, and on the invitation of Ur. Krajatsch,
head physician in the Lower Austrian National Insane
Asylum nt Kierling-( lugging, photographsof various insane
patients were made by Dr. Eder and Professor Lenhard.
A Voigtliinder Euryscopc of 66 mm. opening and a
shutter by Thury and Amcy were used. The photographs
were perfectly successful, and the collection was a gather-
ing point for doctors and other visitors at the last exhibi-
tion of the Imperial Royal Institute, and a specimen pic-
ture— reproduced in collotype by the students at the
Institute — was inserted in the illustrated catalogue of the
exhibition.
♦
Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on Jan. 15
will be “The Intensification and Reduction of Negatives.”
* Translated for Wilson's Photographic Magazine from the Photo Archie,
30
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[J.YNUAUY 10, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF WARWICK-
SHIRE.*
BY V. JEROME HARRISON, K.G.S.
Zootuyy of Warwickshire. — In the minute life which
occupies our ponds and ditches there is a never-ending
field of work for the photographer who combines the
camera with the microscope. Some of us know, too, that
it is better fun to hunt with the camera than with the gun ;
and we hope to be able to photograph the local birds, &c.,
in their native haunts, and so to secure pictures which
shail surpass the best efforts of the taxidermist.
Method* of Conductiny the Photographic Survey of a District.
— There are several ways in which the photographic survey
of any district may be carried out.
1. First we have what may be called the “no method.” |
Each member of the society or body by which the survey
is to be carried out wanders at will over the district, photo-
graphing whatever pleases his eye, and sending in his J
negatives or prints to the managing committee. It is not
necessary to point out the demerits of such a scheme.
-. If there is any good, modern, and tolerably cheap I
county history in existence, it might well furnish the
ground-work for a general photo-survey. Lists of all the
places and objects named in its pages should be drawn up,
and grouped according to locality; each division being
then allotted to those workers who have volunteered their
services. For 1\ arwickshire the recent publication of an
admirable county history,! by Mr. Sam. Timmins, offers
a capital opportunity, the more especially as the book it-
self contains no illustrations. Any member who wishes to
form a very valuable and interesting volume can do so by
pulling Mr. 'limminss book to pieces — which is just what
its reviewers have not done — interleaving it with a series
of illustrations such as I have suggested, and then having
it rebound.
Rut for an exhaustive photo-survey of Warwickshire,
or of any other district, I believe the plan must be based
upon a large scale and accurate map ; and we must go to
nature herself for our illustrations. Fortunately we are
now provided with a map or maps — the work of the Gov-
ernment Ordnance Survey — which is in every respect
admirable.
{<i.) The old Ons-mch Ordnance Map. — Warwickshire
uas mapped on the scale of one inch to one mile as long
iigo as 1330. This map is sold in “quarter sheets ” at one
shilling each, each quarter sheet including about 1G0 square
miles. The entire county on this scale makes a map 59in.
by 42in.. which is sold in sheets for 17s. (id.
(h.) 7 he Xrw Onc-incli Ordnance Map. — The map des-
cribed in the last paragraph is now, in some respects, out
ot date. Rut a new one-inch map is being prepared — by
reduction from the six-inch map — which will be a great
improvement. It will be similar in size and price to the
old one-inch map. A\e can hardly expect to have this
map for Warwickshire for a period of several years.
(''■) Tlw Ms-inch Ornunce My.— This is the ideal map
oi the work of a photo-survey. Its large scale — six inches
to every mile— allows every field, and even every tree, to
lie depicted. The orientation of buildings is clearly shown,
so that the photographer can see beforehand when the light
will fall suitably upon any building, ruin, &c., that he may
lave to travel a long distance to photograph. The issue
o t ie \\ arwickshire map on this scale is very nearly com-
Continucd from page 13.
t Published by Elliot Stoek, prioc 7s. <jd.
plete. The county is contained in two hundred quarter
sheets, each measuring 18in. by 12in. , and including six
square miles. They are sold at one shilling each, and 195
have been published.
(d.) The Parish Maps are on the still larger scale of
twenty-five inches to a mile. Four of these parish maps
contain an area equal to one quarter sheet of the six-inch
map, Each parish map measures 38in. by 25|in., and
contains an area of a little more than 11 square miles.
These also are all but complete for Warwickshire ; and in
some cases, as in Stratford, the ruins of Kenilworth, &c.,
they will be very useful to the photo-surveyor.
((.) Lastly, there are the town plans, on the scale of 125
inches to a mile.
Plan non- proposal for the Photo-Survey of Warwickshire: — ■
1. A committee must be appointed, by whom the de-
tails of the plan can be formulated.
2. The ma] >s of the county on the six-inch scale must be
purchased. For each sheet of the map there must also be
a light cardboard box* bearing the same number as the
map. In this box, mounted prints of all the photographs
taken from objects contained in that sheet of the map
should be kept.
A similarly numbered set of negative boxes! would be
needed to contain the negatives belonging to each sheet of
the map.
All photographers who would be willing to place
their services at the disposal of the Society should send
their names — in pairs if preferred — to the committee.
1. 1 lie committee would decide on a certain patch of
country to be surveyed — say that included on twelve sheets
of the six-inch map, if twenty-four names were received.
1 hey would then allot the maps by ballot or otherwise
among the workers, giving one map to each pair.
5. Let us suppose that two friends, A and R, are allotted
a certain area, say that contained in one quarter sheet of
the six-inch map, including an area of six square miles.
I hey carefully study the map and draw up lists of the
promising points. They read up the history of any
churches, ruins, or other monuments of the past included
within it. Then they visit it for the first time, without their
cameras. I hey walk across and across the district, calling
perhaps at the inns, the farm house, or the rectory, gain-
ing information and jotting down places and times when
the light will be favourable. On their next visit they are
accompanied by their cameras, and the negatives neces-
sary to illustrate the area — perhaps only two or three, per-
haps ten or twenty — are soon secured ; or a second and
third visit are paid if necessary. Prints are then taken
and lantern slides made, and the results are handed over to
the committee.
(i. If a sufficient number of subscribers could be ob-
tained, it would be very desirable to publish, perhaps
monthly or quarterly, a selection of the most interesting
photographs obtained, accompanied by descriptive letter-
press. 1 here must be many people in the county who
would prize such a local record.
7. lhe principal books and works of reference upon
the county should be added to the library of the Society,
and lists of the large collections of books, &c. , on the same
subjects contained in the local libraries should be posted
on the walls of the club rooms.
lhose sold for holding pamphlets, papers, &c., by Stone, of Banbury,
would answer Well for this purpose.
i those made by Arundel and Marshall, Ihnn Street Works, lloxlou,
Lou Jon, are recommend od.
ll
Hi
wdl
luu
»J:il q
h
January 10, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
31
8. One night in each week might be considered a “ ren-
dezvous night,” on which all who were interested in the
work of the survey should meet at the club rooms ; and
on (say) one evening in each session of the Society there
might be a more public display of the results which were
being obtained. The year's work in this direction would
naturally form an important feature of the Society's annual
exhibition.
(To be continued.)
patent Intelligence.
Applications for Letters Patent.
20,590. G. Walker, 0, Livery Street, Birmingham, “ l’ictorial
Photographic Earthenware Tiles.” December 23rd.
20,013. L. Davis, 08, Fleet Street, London, “ Photographic
Albums.' December 23rd.
20,002. W. H. Caldwell, 17, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London,
“ Sensitizing and Developing Chloride of Silver for Photo-
graphic Purposes.” — December 23rd.
20.099. W. H. Bath, 128, Colmore Bow, Birmingham,
“ Miniature Photographs.” — December 23rd.
20,700. E. J. Ball, 39, Aynlioe Road, West Kensington Park,
London, “ Photographic Coin-Freed Apparatus.
20,810. B. WillcoX, 47, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, “ Im-
provements in Mirrors.” — December 27th.
20. R. W. Thomas and L. Inger, 38, Holborn Viaduct,
London, “ Focussing Appliance.” — January 1st.
52. L. (». Strangman, 3, Ardenza Terrace, Dublin, ‘ ‘ Camera
Stand.” — January 2nd.
82. R. Slingsby, 115, Cannon Street, London, “Carriers for
Magnesium Flash Lamps.” — January 2nd.
151. J. B. Brooks, 0, Livery Street, Birmingham, “ Photo-
graphic Developing Appliance.” — January 4th.
100. A. J. Joxes, 17, Lawn Road, Haverstock Hill, Loudon,
“ Holding a Bellows Body Camera Rigidly Extended without
a Baseboard.”— January 4th.
173. F. Kitto, 18, Fulham Place, London, “Apparatus for
Holding Photographs.” — January 4th.
Specifications Published.
18.099. — 30t/i November, 1889. “ Improvements in Photo-
graphic Cameras.” Thomas Parsons Watson, 313, High
Holborn, London, W.C., Optical Instrument Maker.
The invention relates to improvements in photographic
cameras of the Kinnear or other collapsible type, particularly
those which are collapsed and folded by laying the camera front
face downwards upon the baseboard. The improvements have
for their object generally to render the camera lighter, more
compact when folded for carrying, and more easily erected and
closed than existing cameras of similar types. In order that
the improvements may be more readily understood, they are
illustrated in drawings accompanying the specification, and
with reference thereto arc described.
The first improvement relates to the pivoting of the frame —
in which the rising front is fitted to slide— to the travelling
frame of the baseboard by means of lateral gudgeons, and it
consists in providing means whereby the said gudgeons will be
securely retained in their bearings when the camera is in use,
but may be readily removed therefrom when required by a
simple backward swinging movement of the camera front,
which may be effected by one hand.
The improvements have secondly for their object to provide
means whereby the rising front will be retained at any height
at which it may be set, whilst free motion of the front in its
guides will be permitted after the front has been laid face
downwards upon the baseboard. The purpose of permitting
this free sliding motion of the front is, that when the bellowa-
body is being collapsed by the back frame of the camera being
folded forwards, the front may be free to adjust itself, so as
to avoid undue strains on the bellows-body.
The invention relates, lastly, to an improved self-engaging
I catch for locking the baseboard and back together when the
{ camera is folded up.
The following are the claims : —
1. The combination with the lateral gudgeons of the front
supporting frame, and with |_-sliaped bearing notches therefor ;
of spring latches adapted to lock the gudgeons in their notches
as described ; and of abutments on the front frame adapted to
act on the spring latches by a backward tilting motion of the
front frame, substantially as and for the purpose specified.
2. The combination with a notched edge of the rising front,
of a spring bolt mounted on the front supporting frame, and
adapted to engage with the front for the purpose of supporting
it at the desired height, and of means, substantially as described,
1 whereby, when the front is laid down on the baseboard, the bolt
will be disengaged, and the front free to slide and adjust itself
in the supporting frame, as specified.
3. Fitting the front to slide in its supporting frame by the
convex edges of the former being received in corresponding
concave grooves in the 1 .tter, and notching the convex edge of
the front for engagement with a spring bolt, substantially as
specified.
4. The self-engaging spring catch for locking the baseboard
and back together, the catch being constructed and operating
in the manner specified.
741. — 30<A November, 1889. “Improvements in the Pro-
duction of Films Sensitive to Light, and of Materials for
Assisting or Continuing the Effect of Light on Photographic
Films.” Alexander Ferdinand York Schwartz, Chemist,
and Dr. Friedrich Hermann Mercklin, Chemist, both of
Hanover, in the German Empire.
In the course of their complete specification, the patentees
say : —
1. If, in the preparation of a photographic film by the
emulsion method, silver oxymethyl-sulphonate — which is also
soluble in alcohol — or a compound of the silver oxymethyl-
sulphonate with the oxymethyl-sulphonate of an alkali or of
ammonia, or a mixture of the said bodies, is added to the
finished emulsion, in the proportion of 1 to 2 parts of the said
oxymethyl-sulphonate or mixture to 100 parts of the halogen
silver contained in the emulsion ; or if the said addition is
made before the ripening of the emulsion ; or if, in the pre-
paration of photographic films by the processes in which the
film, impregnated with metallic chloride, bromide, or iodide, is
dipped into a silver bath, we add silver oxymethyl-sulphonate,
or a double compound of the silver oxymethyl-sulphonate with
j the oxymethyl-sulphonate of an alkali or of ammonia, we
obtain photographic films which are more sensitive to light — -
even to weak light — than the films prepared by the ordinary
, methods.
2. If an ordinary dry plate is bathed before exposure in a
neutral aqueous solution containing from 0'1 to 0 '2 per cent,
of the silver compounds mentioned under 1 for a period of
half to three minutes, according to its sensitiveness, or in an
equally' diluted aqueous and slightly alkaline solution of the
form-aldehyde, or of the para-form-aldehyde, or of the oxy-
methyl-sulphonate of an alkali or of ammonia, or of a mixture
of these salts, and if the plate is then slightly rinsed and again
dried, the photographic results arc similar to those obtained if
the films have been treated by method 1.
Instead of bathing the dry plate before exposure, it may be
bathed after exposure ; or, instead of applying the said com-
pounds in the shape of a special bath, a few drops of a neutral
1 per cent, solution of the alkali, or of the ammonia-oxymethyl-
sulphonate, or of their mixtures, may' be added to one of the
usual developing mixtures.
3. If the ferrous oxylate developer is prepared by means of
the ferrous oxymethyl-sulphonate, or, better still, by means of
the combination of the same with the oxymethyl-sulphonate of
an alkali or of ammonia, only about a quarter of the usual
quantity of iron is necessary in order to obtain equally good
results as with the ordinary iron developer, whereby the dura-
bility or stability of the developer is increased.
4. The oxymethyl-sulphonate of hydroxylamiue in alkaline
solution gives excellent results when used as a developer.
32
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
The claim is : —
The use of form-aldehyde, or of para-form-aldehyde, or of
the compounds of form-aldehyde — which must be considered as
salts of the oxymethyl-sulphouic acid — with an alkali, ammonia,
iron, silver, or of a mixture or combination of the said salts,
either alone or in combination with other suitable substances,
for the preparation of highly-sensitive photographic films, and
for the production of chemicals or solutions which assist or
continue the effect of light on photographic films.
17,198. — 2 6th. November, 1888. “Improvements in Photo-
graphic Shutters.” Edmond Perken, Frederic Louis
Perken, and Arthur Payment, trading as Perken, Son,
and Payment, of 99, Hatton Garden, in the city of London,
Wholesale Opticians, and Walter Pead, of 99, High Street,
Pamsgate, in the county of Kent, Artisan.
The shutter slide is made very thin, of any suitable materials
— advantageously thin sheet metal — which travels loosely in
guides advantageously formed in and by the frame of the
shutter. On the upper end of this slide is a projecting pin or
stud, under which a spring-actuated lever secured to the said
frame is placed, and the end of the said lever is held by a
catch, which may be actuated by a pneumatic releasing appa-
ratus, as is well understood, or otherwise, as desired. The
said lever, on being released by said catch, throws up the
shutter slide, and so gives the exposure, the slide falling again
by its own weight, or, for a very short exposure, assisted by
a spring. A lever, actuated by the pneumatic release, makes
contact with the slide when open, and regulates the length of
exposure, or by any other convenient arrangement.
A break arrangement may also be provided, so as to hold
the shutter open for the purpose of focussing.
The description is accompanied by a sheet of drawings.
The claims are ; —
1. A shutter slide sliding freely in the shutter frame, and
unattached to any other parts of the apparatus, in combination
and acting in conjunction with a spring lever, which throws up
the said shutter slide, and leaves the latter free to fall again
by its own gravity.
2. The combination of the shutter slide and spring lever
with the releasing catch or trigger, one part of which engages
with saiil lever, and the other part having a pin thereon to
engage with a notch on the slide, arranged and acting substan-
tially in the manner and for the purposes hereinbefore described.
18,798. — December '22nd, 1888. “ Heads for Camera Stands.”
James Heber Taylor, Little Trinity, Cambridge, M.A.,
Queen's College, Oxford, M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge,
B.Sc., London.
The objects of this invention are primarily to provide a ready
means by movements of rotation only, of changing the position
of a photographic camera, constructed to take pictures on
oblong plates from the position in which the long side is hori-
zontal to that in which the long side is vertical, so that the
camera in each position shall be in a position of stable equili-
brium over, or nearly over, the centre of the tripod stand.
Secondarily, to enable the camera to be directed upwards or
downwards at any required angle.
The camera is attached to a block which is pivoted hori-
zontally between the ends of two parallel .bars, so as to turn
freely round from one side of the bars to the other. The bars
ure pivoted towards their other extremities about a horizontal
axis parallel to the axis of the block, these pivots being carried
on a stage which is attached to or may form part of the tripod
head. Short extensions of the bars beyond these last-named
pivots are used for the purpose of securing the bars when at
right angles to the stage, i.e., the stage being horizontal when
the bars are vertical.
1 he bars may also be secured at any required angle or incli-
nation by a strut jointed to the bars, and made to engage with
the side of the stage opposite to the pivots which connect the
stage with the bars.
1 he stage forms a Hat surface on which the camera may rest
when the bars are either horizontal or vertical.
1 he camera, when vertical or inclined, can be held in a posi-
tion overhanging the stage and admitting of back focussing*
[January 10, 1890.
The camera may be attached to the block by a base-screw of
the ordinary type. By movement around the base-screw the
camera may be inclined upwards or downwards when the bars
are vertical. A slot in the block, at right angles to its axis,
makes the same apparatus available for different cameras not
differing greatly in dimensions. Or with the same object the
block may be pivoted not directly to the parallel bars, but to an
inner frame which slides between the bars, and is capable of
being clamped at any desired point. Or sometimes I provide a
dove tail projection upon the base of the camera, and parallel
7 -guides are attached to the block at right angles to its axis of
rotation, and suitable means of clamping the camera when in
position are provided. The lengthening of these guides beyond
the length of the side of the projection from the base of the
camera makes the same piece of apparatus available for cameras
differing somewhat in dimensions.
The block may have within it a turn-table to which V- guides
are fixed.
The stage may be rigidly attached to a triangle-head for the
tripod stand, but by preference I attach it by a central pin
which forms a vertical axis, about which the whole stage rotates
as a turn-table on the tripod-head.
The inventor claims : —
1. Constructing a reversing head for camera stands of block
parallel bars and stage substantially as described, so that all
oblong plate may be quickly changed from the horizontal to the
vertical position of the long side, the camera in each position
being above or nearly above the centre of the tripod head.
2. The combination of the parts mentioned in claim 1 with
provision for depressing or elevating the axis of the lens through
any desired angle with the horizontal, and fixing it there by
suitable clamps or other device.
3. The combination of either of the forms described in
claims 1 and 2 with a turn-table for attachment to the triangle
of a tripod stand.
4. The combination of either of the forms described iu
claims 1 and 2 with a triangle head for a tripod stand.
5. The combination of either of the forms described in
claims 1 and 2 with turn-table and triangle head for a tripod
stand.
Albo-Carbox gas-burners increase the light about 30 per
cent., and they can easily be adapted to most enlarging lanterns.
— l’hoto graphic Scraps.
Edinburgh Photographic Society. — The first popular
meeting of the session will be held in Queen Street Hall, on
Wednesday, the 29 th January. A varied series of
transparencies, the work of members, will be shown on the
screen, accompanied with descriptive remarks.
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — On Tuesday,
January 14th, at 8 p m., at the Gallery, 5a, Pall Mall
East, the following papers will be read : — -“ Control in the
Density of Negatives,” by Mr. Chapman Jones, F.C.S., F.I.C.,
“ Distance beyond which all Objects are in Focus with any
given Lens,” by Sir David Salomons; “ Eikonogen as a
Developer,” from Professor W. K. Burton.
Paris Exhibition. — The French Ambassador, it is stated,
will present, in the name of the President of the French
Republic, the decorations conferred upon British subjects iu
connection with the Paris Exhibition, on Saturday, January
25tli, when Sir l’olydore de Keyscr, the president of the
British Section, will entertain his Excellency and the council
of the section, with other guests, at dinner at the Mansion
House, which has been placed at his disposal by the Lord
Mayor.
Very Like. — “ It’s a good picture, but its no likeness,” was
the criticism of his own portrait made by a well-known violinist.
His family had agreed upon this harsh verdict without a
dissenting voice, until the artist appealed to the youngest o
the household, a bright little boy. “ Who is that, Dick ! " he
asked, pointing to the picture. “ Papa,” was the immediate
answer. “ Bo it is my dear. You see, sir, your son is a better
judge of the likeness than you. So you think that you’d know
it was papa, my boy !” “Oh yes, sir,” was the innocent
reply. “ It’s very much like him about the fiddle ! ” — Cassell’s
I Saturday Journal ,
rHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
January 10, 1381*.]
oo
<£orre$ponticnrc.
REPRODUCTION I’tND'TSbPYRIGHT.
Silt, — From a letter of Mr. Ralph Robinson’s in the Photo-
oraphic News of last week, it appears that there is an impres-
sion in the minds of some photographers that it is useless to
register the copyright of a photograph afterit has been published.
This is a misconception. As Mr. Robinson points out, the
copyright is the property of the photographer, whether it has
l>een registered or not, but lie has no power to prevent others
from infringing it until it has been registered, which, however,
he can do at any time. The law relating to copyright in photo-
graphs depends almost entirely upon the Copyright Act of 1862.
By the first section of that Act, the author of every photograph,
provided he retain the negative, is entitled to the copyright in
that photograph, unless it has been executed on commission,
in which case it belongs to the person for whom the photograph
has been taken. Of course nearly all portraits taken by the
professional photographer are taken upon commission, and
therefore the copyright in the negative does not belong to him,
and he cannot register it. By later sections of the same Act,
anyone infringing a copyright is liable to certain penalties, and
if lie continues to do so, he may be restrained by the Court.
And by another section every copyright is to be registered at
Stationers’ Hall, and no action shall be sustainable, nor any
penalty be recoverable in respect of anything done before regis-
tration. But there is nothing in the Act limiting the time
within which the copyright must be registered. Hence, if the
photographer retains the negative, he is entitled to the copy-
right , and can register it whenever he likes, but until he has
done so it is practically of no use to him, as he has no power
to prevent infringement.
There is no provision in the Act or elsewhere requiring photo
graphs, the copyright of which has been registered, to l>e
marked with the word “ copyright,” and legally it has no effect
whatever, the only object being, I suppose, that it may warn
others, and thereby prevent them from copying it. At any
rate there appears with me to be no probability of any person
being held guilty of fraud who so marks a photograph when
it has not been registered.
As to the first part of Mr. Robinson’s letter, here again he
has the law with him. If hegrants a license to a publisher to
reproduce one of his pictures in a certain newspaper, and it is
afterwards reproducedin a second newspaper without his further
persmission, he will have a right to recover damages from the
publisher of the second newspaper for infringement of his
copyright. It is, however, advisable that photographers
should ^not make use of the word “copyright,” when giving
permission to publishers to reproduce their pictures, unless
they really intend to assign the copyright altogether. As a rule
they should merely say that they grant the publisher a license
to reproduce the photograph in a certain specified newspaper.
Such a license to be of any value must be in writing.
C. Fleetwood Pritchard,
3, Paper Buildings, Temple, January 7th, 1890.
ART PHOTOGRAPHY RECOGNIZED AT LAST.
Sir, — For fifty years photography has been struggling against
prejudice, jealousy, and almost overpowering influence, to estab-
lish itself, not only as an art, but as a fine art, and at the end of
that time it may be said to have succeeded, although there per-
haps still linger in some minds those fragments of doubt which
are so difficult to eradicate.
It begins its second century not only hopefully but jubilantly
for its art prospects. To those who are abb to discern the signs
of the times, the indications are most auspicious. Two examples
that appear this month are worth quoting.
The Art Journal has never cared to recognise its claims
heartily from the time it said of one of our exhibitions, “ With
the photographic exhibition it is not necessary to speak of indi-
vidual works as we would of the production of the painter : the
cases are not parallel. The painter employs, or should employ,
eye and hand, governed by a presiding mind ; the photographer
uses a machine, and requires a ‘ little ’ judgment. The artist
works from within to that which is without ; the photographer
employs external agents to do his bidding.”
What a change do we now see ! The volume of the Art
Journal for this year opens with a splendidly illustrated article
on “Winter Photography for the Artist,” by Mr. H. P. Robin-
son, a photographer and writer to whose example and writings
in articles which have appeared principally in the Photographic
News, I think I may say, without fear of contradiction, we are
mainly indebted for the great advance that has taken place in
the art quality of photography of late years. There may be
further improvements and developments, but we shall always
owe to him the solid foundation on which they may rest.
The other auspicious sign appears in the January number of
the Nineteenth Century, in an exhaustive article on the progress
of art during the last decade.
Mr. Marcus B. Huish, the editor of the Art Journal, recognizes
photography as an art, a graceful concession to photography by
the chief representative of the other arts worthy of being put
on record. He says : “ As for photography, no one who has
visited the successive exhibitions held by the various societies
connected with it can have failed to recognize the advance
which has taken pi ice — -an advance which, if continued, must
soon give its professors a claim to admission within the ranks of
artists.” Surely there could be no more satisfactory recognition
of photography as a fine art than that of the editor of the Art
Journal! George Maitland.
SUNDRY NOTES AND CORRECTIONS.
Sir, — I have read with very great interest Mr. H. P.
Robinson's admirable sketch of the life and work of O. G.
Re j lander, whom I had the honour of knowing for many years
as one of the most genial members of the Solar Club. He was
of Swedish origin, and died at the age of sixty-one, the date
given by Mr. Robinson in a foot-note (page 9) being quite
correct — January 18th, 1875. I was present at his burial on
the following Saturday, 23rcl, at Kensal Green Cemetery, when
Mr. J. I). England attended as one of the military epeort or
guard of honour, Artists' Corps, to fire three volleys over his
grave. This leads me on to say that I have a copy of Rejlander s
double — the artist 0. G. R. introducing the volunteer O. G. It.
--and that I remember another use being made of this photo-
graph by way of compliment to Mr. J. E. Mayall, apologising
for coming uninvited to his house at Hove Place, Brighton, on
the occasion of the volunteer review of Easter, 1871, when the
late H. Baden Pritchard and myself were also there as
invited guests. The print was then marked “ Rejlander s
Apology.”
A Correction. — In my article on the new naphthol deve-
lopers in the Year-Book (page 125, end of thirteenth line),
for “Mr. Stenning ” read Mr. J. H. Stebbins, Jnr., of New
York, as being the claimant who first suggested the use of
these naphthol compounds for photographic development (see
the News, last vol., page 733). Further on, I find that my
statement of proportions for mixing the developer ( \ kar-Book,
page 126) has infringed the regulation that the quantities
should be expressed m percentage amounts. The 70 grains of
Meldola’s naphthol acid, being equivalent to 87 i grains of
eikonogen, make, with water one pint, a one per cent, solution
of the latter, and this agrees in strength with that used by
Messrs. Fradelle and Young, E. Yogel, Jnr., and G. Mansfield,
in their experiments, as the following re-calculated table will
show : —
Eikonogen
Sulphite Soda
Water
Yogel.
1
8
100
Spiller.
1
5
100
Fradelle.
1
4
100
Mansfield.
1
2
100
Carb. Potash
12
10
—
—
Carb. Soda
—
—
1
—
Caustic Soda
—
—
—
1
Water
100
100
100
100
I am glad to learn that Mr, Warnerke gives so good an
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jancarv 10, lSSI*
34
aecuuut of the new naphthol developer, out fear lie will find the
use of so much caustic potash rather corrosive for a gelatine
film.
Like Mr. Elder,* I have made a good search at the Patent
Office for any specification bearing the name of Dr. M. Andrcsen,
and claiming the use of eikonogen, but failed to find any such
entry or record. The statement to this effect in the printed
paper of instructions, and the pretended claim to be actual
discoverer, are both alike quite unwarranted.
John Spii.i.er.
PHOTOGRAPHIC TOURISTS’ BAGGAGE.
Sin, — In the course of an interesting article on the above
subject in your issue of January 3rd, the writer, in recom-
mending the use of portmanteaux made of basket work, makes
a statement which may possibly be injurious to an enterprising
and increasing trade. This is, that English workmen are not
competent to make the palm-baskets at present imported from
France, so that they have to be made abroad.
The real reason why these articles are not manufactured in
England is that the demand for them is decreasing, and their
sale comparatively small, baskets made of willow being usually
preferred as being at once lighter, cheaper, and more serviceable.
It is therefore not worth while for English makers to take up
the manufacture of them.
It may not be known to the writer of the article that almost
all the trunks used by travelling theatrical companies arc now
made of a foundation of wicker-work covered with leather,
Ac. , and that trunks made in this way last three or four times
as long as those made of wood, iron, or leather. Several
hundred workmen are employed in England in this industry,
which cannot be approached by foreign competition.
Since 1 have been an amateur photographer, I have often
marvelled at the weighty leather cases photographers carry,
i made a wicker-framed case for my own use to hold a half-plate
set — camera, four slides, lenses, and accessories — which, to-
gether with green-baize lining, only weighed twelve ounces ;
and I am confident that by paying special heed to weight-
saving, a strong and waterproof case of this size might be made
weighing eight ounces complete. The cost would lie perhaps
half that of the usual waterproof cloth or leather case now in
use.
Should you be at all interested in this matter, I will send
for your inspection the case 1 now use. 1 have no trade
interest to serve in this matter, my own business being entirely
wholesale, and lying in quite a different direction ; but I am
moved to pity by the appearance of perspiring photographers,
weary and heavy laden with their leather eases under the
August sun. W. Scaling.
Nottingham, January 4 t/i.
Brixton and Ci.apham Camera Club. — On Friday, 3rd
inst., the President, Mr. A. R. Dresser, gave a new year’s
address, and showed a number of enlargements from hand-
camera negatives taken during a recent tour in Brittany, and
also about a hundred slides which were exhibited by means of
the oxy-liydrogen lantern. A show of photographs, the work
of members, will be held on Monday evening, 20th mat., from
7.30, and also all day on Tuesday, 21st, at the Club Rooms,
35, Bedford Road, Clapham. SAW Visitors are invited.
Father Perry. — A private telegram has V>een received at
Liverpool from the Catholic Bishop of Demerara announcing
the death on Friday last in British Guiana, of dysentery, of the
celebrated Jesuit astronomer, Father Perry. Father Perry,
who was born in London, was in his fifty-eighth year. In
1882 Father Sidgraves, another Jesuit, was delegated by the
Government to report on the transit of Venus, and last year
the services of Father Perry were again requisitioned by the
Government to report on the solar eclipse. It was on this
expedition on the coast of Guiana that Father Perry fell ill
and has now fallen in the midst of his scientific labours. Dai I//
AVim.
* PaoToesAPmc News, p. 835^ of last volume!
ihoccc&mgs of :ronctug.
Camera Ci.itb.
Thursday, January 2nd, was a lantern evening at the
Camera Club, and there was a large attendance of members.
The chief part of the exhibition consisted of a selection from a
number of slides lent by the Birmingham Photographic Society.
After these, other slides were shown by Mr. T. Charters White
(general landscape and microscopic), Mr. Frank Howard (land-
scape and landscape with figure), Mr. Rooper Leventhorpe
(pictures taken in North Italy), Rev. C. F. Fison (English
country scenes), Mr. F. Howlett (a series of views on the
Thames), and in conclusion a set by Mr. J. B. B. Wellington,
of landscape and landscape with figure. Some of Mr. Wel-
lington's slides were especially effective, and attracted much
attention.
The subject for Thursday, January 16th, is “Plane Polari-
zation of Light,” when an address will be given by Mr. R. Tin-
dall. The lecture will be illustrated ; meeting at 8 p.m.
East Dulwich and Peckham Photographic Society.
The above Society held its first annual exhibition on Friday,
3rd inst,, in Shawbury Hall, Lordship Lane, when a large
number of visitors testified their appreciation of the first fruits
of the Society. Running briefly through the exhibits, the
work of Mr. Edwards, the President, of course attracted notice.
His set included the celebrated gold medal picture, “ Wool-
pits,” the residence of Sir Henry Doulton, and a very fine
picture of Lambeth Palace from the river. As, however, Mr.
Edwards refrained from competition, other exhibitors
were able to view the appreciation of his work with becoming
equanimity. The Vice-President, Mr. Howell, showed a series
of forty-year old Talbotypes. Mr. Gardner exhibited a frame
of lantern slides of “bits” at Hastings, which were favourably
received when passed through the lantern later in the evening.
Mr. Rice was represented by a fine collection of platinum
prints — views of the Temple Gardens, Kew Gardens, and
places of local interest — which were admired for their sharp-
ness. Mr. Kelly’s contribution consisted of a series of fine
views of Scottish scenery, most of them in Oban. The cloud
effects in these pictures were admirable. Mr. Kirby showed
very satisfactory results of the summer outings in the shape of
pictures of Surrey scenery. Other members also exhibited
good work.
After time had been allowed for the inspection of the photo-
graphs, the Society's lantern a fine specimen of Pexton’s
Grand Triple was requisitioned, and some effective lantern
slides were shown by Messrs. Gardner, Farmer, Ezner, Dow -
ling, and Bovdell, after which the president announced the
results of the competition. Mr. Kelly secured the silver medal,
and, as Messrs. Rice and Dowling dead-heated for second place,
the former took the bronze trophy, and an extra medal was
awarded to Mr. Dowling. First and second certificates were
awarded to Messrs. Kirby and Bovdell respectively. It was in-
tended to give a certificate for the best set of lantern slides,
but, in the opinion of the judges, the work of the five competitors
mentioned above was so equal in merit that it was decided to
withhold the certificate. The prizes were presented by Mrs.
Banks, wife of the treasurer.
The proceedings were diversified by vocal and instrumental
music.
Edinburgh Photographic Society.
The second ordinary meeting was held in the Professional Hall,
20, George Street, on Wednesday, December 4th, 1889 ; the
chair was occupied by Dr. Drinkwateii.
The following candidates were admitted as members of the
Society : — Messrs. Win. M. Ramsay, Philip R. D. Maelagan,
A illiain Burn, James Hay, Robert Irvine, J. Rymer Paterson,
and William G. Tait. Five gentlemen were nominated for
election at the January meeting.
Mr. Hugh Brf.bner then read a paper on “Repairing Broken
Negatives ” (see page 20) and accompanied it with a demon-
stration.
TIIE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
January 10, 1889.]
Mr. M’Kean said tlmt if the broken negative were covered
with tissue paper, and the light allowed to fall in the direction
of the fracture, the print would be only slightly marked.
While recognising the value of Mr. Brebner’s remarks, he thought
that anegative must be a very valuable one before a photographer
could aft erd to take up so much time in repairing it if it got
broken.
Mr. Mitchell said, with reference to joining the detached pieces
of the film, he found he could scrape a film down more uniformly
at the juncture when he rubbed it over with the retouching
medium before commencing that operation upon it. His diffi-
culty was to intensify a negative which had been treated in the
manner described.
Mr. Ayton said he would be inclined to differ slightly from
Mr. Brebner’s procedure. The most of his (Mr. Brebner’s)
difficulties were caused by the expansion of the gelatine film,
and could be obviated by using methylated spirit, and specially
hardening the film. His own method stated briefly was — if
the broken negative were varnished, remove the varnish with
methylated spirit and ammonia, wash out the spirit, soak in
chrome alum, dry, immerse in a weak solution of fluoric acid to
loosen the film off the broken glass, wash out the acid, put the
loosened film into methylated spirit, and finally place the pieces
in position on a new glass. It would be found that the nega-
tive did not require intensification.
The Chairman called for a vote of thanks to Mr. llrebner, a
motion which was cordially responded to by the members
present.
The specimens of members’ work, which had been hung on
the walls by Mr. Stewart-Smith, were then inspected by the
members present.
Sheffield Photographic Society.
The ordinary meeting was held at the Masonic Hall, Surrey
Street, on Tuesday evening, January 7th, Mr. B. J. Taylor in
the chair. It was agreed, on proposal by Mr. Councillor Thos.
Firth, seconded by Mr. If. Nowill, that a lantern exhibition be
held early in February for the benefit of the public hospital
and dispensary.
Mr. H. Staniforth presented the Society with one of his
patent limelight regulators.
Mr. Prkstox gave a practical demonstration, showing the
different lights for the optical lantern viz., the three-wick
lamp, with luxor oil, the oxy-hydrogen, and the et hero-oxygen.
The two latter were thought to be about equal in brilliancy,
the oxy-hydrogen the best for safety, and the ethero-oxygen
the most convenient for giving exhibitions in country villages
where the ordinary gas is not to be had.
Devon and Cornwall Camera Club.
The Devon and Cornwall Camera Club held their first lantern-
slide competition on Monday evening, at the Club Rooms,
Athemcum, Plymouth. Mr. R. Murray took the chair, and
the hon. treasurer took charge of the club lantern, pro
jecting a fourteen-foot disc upon the screen at the end of the
hall, brilliantly illuminated by limelight. A numerous and
varied assortment of lantern slides was then shown in rapid
succession ; and on examination of the voting papers at the
close, it was found that Mrs. Carnell had been awarded first
prize with til votes; Mr. R. Murray taking the second prize
with forty votes. A number of slides made by Mrs. Carnell,
Messrs. Micklewood, Murray, and others, were afterwards
shown, some being copies of “Leech’s Sketches in Punch,”
creating great amusement.
After the close of the competition, the hon. treasurer, Mr.
A. A. Carnell, was heartily congratulated on being the winner
of the gold medal given by the Britannia Works Company at
the “ photography ” competition, for the best six lantern-slides
on Alpha plates, in Class X., scientific micro-photography, and
for also winning a silver medal (equal first with Mr. F. H.
Exans) at the same competition. This competition, held a few
weeks back, was open to the world, and nearly 18,000 slides
were sent in for competition.
Abney Camera Club.
On 3rd iust., the Vice-President in the chair, Mr. Flack
gave a demonstration on bromide paper printing.
In referring to developers, he said that he preferred hydro-
quinone, it being less trouble to manipulate. For light, he
usually employed magnesium ribbon, burning one inch at about
eighteen inches distance, with a plate of opal glass in front of
the negative.
At the close, he developed several prints, some with
ferrous oxalate, and some with hydroquinone, the opinion
of the members present being that the tone given by the for-
mer on Ilford paper was preferable.
After the usual vote of thanks, the Hon. Sf.c. announced
that on Jan. 17th he had promised to read a paper on the
“ Chemistry of Photography.”
Photographic Society of Philadelphia.
A meeting of the Society was held on December 4th, 188ft,
with Mr. Frederick (i raff in the chair.
After the transaction of routine business a paper was read by
Mr. Theodore H. Luders, “On Development with l’yrogallic
Acid in connection with Ammonia in Vapour,” and Mr. Morris
Marie showed some novelties in photographic appartus, which
he had collected during a trip to England and the Paris Exhibi-
tion. Among these, he described a panoramic view camera
which he had seen in Paris. A film or paper negative was used,
and bent into a semicircle with the lens in the centre. By a
lever on top of the camera the lens could be revolved so as to
cover different portions of the plate successfully. The light was
admitted to the lens (which was of fixed focus) through a
diaphragm in front in the form of a perpendicular slit, the
opening revolving with the lens as it was turned. A unique
feature possessed by the camera was the fact that if in one
portion of the view dark objects predominated, requiring long
exposure, the lens could be allowed to cover that portion of
the view for a greater time, and less exposure be given to the
brighter parts of the view, simply bv properly manipulating
the lever attached to the lens.
Mr. John G. Bullock called attention to the late explosion
of flash powder in this city, with its terrible result in the
death of three persons. He thought it right that the published
minutes of the Society should oiution all to look with distrust
upon flash-powders of a yellow colour, and if they prove upon
examination to contain picric acid along with powdered mag-
nesium to consider them highly dangerous. Picric acid upon
standing in mixture with powdered magnesium for a length of
time is supposed to form picrate of magnesium, a highly
unstable combination more dangerous than dynamite. A
person finding a vial of such flash-powder in his possession had
best dispose of it at once, but with great care. He is advised
against pouring water upon it or burning it, but rather to throw
the whole vial into a river or down some gorge where it would
be scattered without doing harm. The very act of removing
the cork from the bottle might be attended with serious results.
The danger of picric acid flash-powders increases with age.
Dr. Mitchell full}' agreed with Mr. Bullock, and considered
all flash -powders, except those composed of pure magnesium,
more or less dangerous, differing only in degree. Magnesium
has a tendency to absorb moisture, in which state it readily
combines with picric acid, forming the dangerous picrate of
magnesium. Even a single ounce of such powder would be
exceedingly dangerous.
Mr. Rosengarten called attention to a method of preparing
ground glass for focusing screens by the use of hydro-fluoric
acid in combination with carbonate of soda.
Dr. Wallace spoke of the use of a solution of plain boiled
starch spread upon a plate of glass, and allowed to dry, thus
forming a very fine surface for a focussing screen.
Mr. Wood described a method of focusing without the use
of any screen. If the position to be occupied by the plate is
determined by a metal strip located in the usual position of the
ground glass, by placing a focusing glass against this strip it
will show (over a limited area, of course) the image usually
projected on the screen, and a proper focus can thus be readily
36
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 10, 1889.
obtained. A piece of plain glass cau also be used in this
manner as a support against which to place the focussing glass.
Dr. Mitchell asked the experience of members in regard to
films, stating that lie had found some rolls to be very good,
and others not. He had noticed markings like long trans-
parent lines, as though scratched with a needle.
Mr. Lodkrs suggested that they may have been damaged in
unpacking.
Mr. Wood stated that he had lately returned from a trip of
over a thousand miles on which he had used films, and his
feeling was that hereafter he preferred the weight of glass to
the uncertainty of films. He thought nothing had yet been
discovered to equal the perfect surface of glass, and the cer-
tainty of its results.
Society of Amatkou Photographers of New York.
The regular monthly meeting was held on December 10th at
122, West 36th Street, Vice-President David Williams in the
chair.
Mr. A. Pebri.es Smith read a short paper on “ The History
of Flash-Light Photography,” illustrating his remarks with
lantern slides, all of outdoor flash-light pictures and interiors
of theatres. He said that he had invented a safe powder,
especially in bringing out the greens and reds.
Mr. G. D. Milburn took a flash-light picture of the audience,
using the new No. 2 Kodak camera, making a circular picture
of 3 A inches. He also explained the instrument, which has a
very simple shutter, and a fixed focus lens. Before the evening
was over he made a lantern slide from the negative, which was
thrown on the screen.
Miss Catherine Weed Barnes read a paper on “ Photography
from a Woman’s Standpoint.” She is the first woman who has
ever read a paper before a photographic society in the United
States.
Mr. James H. Stebbins, Jnr. showed photographs of a pin-
hole sensitometer device he had used in testing sensitive plates.
His results were very instructive. He also gave the result of
his experiments on the solubility of “ eiko.” in distilled water
at diffeient temperatures.
Mr. F. C. Beach exhibited Eastman’s transparent film nega-
tives (instantaneous exposures) developed with the “Ultimate
Single Solution Eiko.” developer sent by Messrs. Queen and Co.,
of Philadelphia, and of the ordinary eikonogen two-solution deve-
loper. The latter gave more density, and worked more
quickly.
Mr. Henry J. Newton made a few remarks on a mixed liydro-
quinone and eikonogen developer. The eikonogen, lie contended,
was slower than hydroquinone when a caustic alkali was used
with the latter.
A lantern slide exhibition, illustrating New York and Paris
Exposition, is to be given by the Society at Chickering Hall,
New York, February 5th.
The Solar Eclipse Expedition to South America from the
Lick Observatory has telegraphed, we read, that their obser-
vations of the solar eclipse on December 22nd were entirely
successful.
Received. — Sample bottle of Ty tar’s plate backing, which is
to lie applied either with a dabber enclosed, or preferably with
a roller squeegee. When dry — which is the ease in a few
minutes — the plates can be placed in the dark slides. Before
developing the plate, the backing is removed by using a sponge
and warm water. “The Magic Lantern — its Construction
and Use," published by Perken, Son, and Rayment, is a welcome
addition to the instructions on a subject of more especial
inteiest at tliis season of the year. The book is divided into
fourteen short chapters of useful information comprised in small
compass. ‘ Photographic Scraps,” issued monthly, gratis,
by the Britannia Works Company, and from which we have on
several occasions quoted valuable “ bits,” appears as a double
number this month.
London and Provincial. — Report received too late for in-
sertion.
to ©orrcgpontfents*
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper Sc Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All Cimmunications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Elitir of the Pcotooraphic News, 6, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
C. G. — Old ferrous oxalate developer. The thick deposit formed
in your stick-bottle is probably due t> the separation of the
ferrous oxalate itself. If so, you have only to pour off the clear
tip liquid, add just enough of a saturated solution of neutral
potassium oxalate to rodissolve the precipitate, and pour back
again the main bulk of developer into the stock-bottle. Thus
fortified, it only requires to be filtered, and is ready for use.
Alpha. — Zincographic reliefs, See. See answer to E. L. last week ;
there is also Dr. Schnauss’ work recently published (see advertise-
ment on page xii. last week). Two special articles, by Mr. W. T.
Wilkinson, in the Yf.ar-Books, will be of interest to you: these
are “ Photo-Engraving on Zinc,’’ 1887, p. 53, and “ Printing on
Zinc in Bitumen,” 1888, p. 75.
Val. Jackson. — The new general catalogue of Brin’s oxygen and
compressed gas appliances duly to hand. Templeton’s and
Lennox Browne’s oxy-hydrogeu lamps, aud the lime-light pro-
jector, cannot fail to bo useful to photographers.
W. C. IIcghes. — We thank you for sending the particulars
of ether saturator to our correspondent at Charlbury.
W. B. (Reigate). — Meldola’s naphthol acid is only very slightly
soluble in alcohol, but dissolves freely in an aqueous solution of
sulphite of soda. It might be worth while trying to dissolve it in
alcoholic ammonia, but such a solution would not keep very long.
D. O. — We are glad to learn that our efforts were successful.
T. F. — You are probably aware that the ordinary terms for taking
a portrait do not usually cover for possession of the negative.
All will turn upon your having a written or special agreement
about the delivery of negatives. This point sottled, your course
of action is quit 3 clear, but not otherwise.
Collotype. — 1. llusnik's substratum. A mixture of albumen
and silicate of soda cannot be expected to keep good for any
length of time ; it had better be made fresh as wanted, unless you
coat at once a number of plates. 2. This is rather a matter for
experiment. If you must push on the successive stages of the
process as quickly as possible, yju might find it advantageous to
add a small quantity of chrome alum and acetic acid to the other
ingredients when preparing and sensitising the gelatine.
C. S. T. — Letters received and answered by p>st.
E. A. C. — The advertisement, column should be r-sorted to for
announcing your press for sale, and the fact that you give lessors
on the work ng of the photo-mechanical processes.
A. J. S. — The first spools of Eastman tissue on flexible celluloid
were sent out on New Year’s Day. Yours ought to be on the
road, if not actually received by this ti me.
C. M. — An amyl-acetate s'andard lamp, with pure silver wick-
holder (Mr. C. II. Botbamley’s modification), was described in
the News of 9th' August last.
S. W. — It is already to bo h id. See advertisement at head of
page xi. last week.
L. F. — Mr. II. P. Robinson .begins the January number of the
Art Journal with a chapter on the value of photography
^ fur the purposes of Art illustration, and Captain Abnsy is to 9
follow. Now that all the English and American illustrated
magazines and journals are depending so much upon the photo-
graphic processes, the subject assumes great importance. Even
the Vienna Weekly News comes to us beautifully printed in i
English, and with a fine photo-reproduct ion of a Tyrolese scene —
a view of Gries, near Bozen.
A. M. M. — Received ; an answer shall bo sent by post.
J. A. C., J. C. S., and other correspondents received.
f jje Ipbotograpbic Jfatos.
dncluding Postage to any part of the United Kingdom: —
Yearly ... 15s. Od | Half-Yearly... 7s. 8d. | Quarterly ... 3s. lCd
To the United States, the Continent, and the Colonies: —
Yearly ... I7s. 4d. | Half-Yoarly ... 8s. 8d. | Quarterly... 4s. 4d
To India (Yearly) 19s. 6(1.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
r\. ■ C^-'s'P vW
4-4^.^^;.^^.- —
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1637. — January 17, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAO*
Basket-Work in Photography 37
The Photographic Society of Nantes 37
Sending Pictures and WritiDg by the Electric Telegraph. By
F. H. Varley, M.I.E.E., F.K.A.S 38
A Biography of J. H. Schulze. By James Mew 39
Bromide Enlarging and Printing 40
Photographic Survey of Warwickshire. By W. J. Harrison ... 43
Photographing the Baby. By John Wiodersen 45
Notes 40
BASKET-WORK IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
Before this subject is allowed to drop for a time, it
maybe well to point out to those photographic tourists
who have not given attention thereto, some practi-
cal points worthy their attention . A basket-case should
be so made that it can be used like a portmanteau in
towns, and like a knapsack in the country, and should
be furnished with locks and keys, so that it can be left
in cloak-rooms at railway stations. Straps with fasten-
ings and small padlocks are convenient for locking.
The ordinary handles of a basket do not look well when
the latter is carried knapsack fashion ; there is some-
thing incongruous ; like the red tails of the soldier’s
coat which organ-grinders give their monkeys, the
coat-tail and the natui’al tail of the monkey do not har-
monise. An actual maker of knapsacks for some members
of the Alpine Club and others — Mr. Price, of Great
Marylebone Street, London — has devised an excellent
handle, consisting of a piece of bamboo covei’cd with
leather, and with a leather loop at each end ; the straps
supporting the knapsack passthrough the loops. This
round rigid handle gives great ease in carrying the case
as a portmanteau, and can be slipped off and put inside
when the case is used as a knapsack.
The basket case should be narrow, flat, and long, for
the same reason that leather cases for photographic
apparatus are now made narrow and flat. It is con-
venient to have the case long enough to take the folded
legs inside, along the top. The straps should be so
made that the case comes high up on the shoulders,
otherwise a tiring, “dragging” feeling results; and
in front of the shoulders the strap should be very
broad ; in fact, one inventor has patented a kind of web
to come instead of the strap at this particular place.
In knapsacks the straps should never cross or pass in
front of the breast.
One basket-maker told us that the English cannot
make the elegant palm baskets turned out by the
French ; another wrote in these pages last week that
they can do so, but do not. In any event, that is the
class of basket, but of different shape and lighter make,
* which hereafter will come into use with photographic
j apparatus, and who the makers may be concerns the
basket-manufacturing trade more than it does photo-
graphers.
FAQB
The Package ot Photographs for Post. By C. Brangwin Barnes 47
Vapour Development. By T. H. Luders 48
The Exhibition of the West London Photographic Society 49
Patent Intelligence 50
Correspondence.— Reproduction and Copyright — Formation of a
Lantern Club — l60chromatie Photography at the Photo-
graphic Society of France 61
Proceedings of Societies 52
Answers to Correspondents 50
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY OF NANTES.
List week some particulars were published in this
journal in relation to Havre as a place easily reached
from London, and admirably adapted to meet the re-
quirements of landscape and architectural photo-
graphers, so soon as a boat service at regular hours, and
several times a day, shall have been established across
the mouth of the Seine to Trouville. From the latter
place the banks of the Loire and the central French
wine districts are in communication by rail, but chiefly
by local lines, which cross several of the great trunk
railways of France. The only trains at present running
somewhat long distances almost directly south from
Trouville are those between Caen and Le Mans, and
can only be reached from Trouville by waiting about
at junction stations. Were this not the case, and
were Le Mans in direct communication, by boat and
train, with Havre via Trouville, insteadof with Caen, the
route would be an excellent one for those English who
have but a few days to spare, to reach the region of the
lower reaches of the Loire, and to change the fogs and
xains of London at the present season for the bright,
cold, sunshiny weather of the Loire valley. The
stretch of country between Tours and Nantes is so
little visited by English tourists that through tickets
thereto are not issued by British railway companies or
tourists’ agencies.
In the west of France photographic societies are
rare. A photographic club was established at Havre
last year, and Nantes has its photographic society. We
are not aware of the existence of any other photo-
graphic organisation in the extensive region between
these two places.
The Societe Nantaise de Photograpliie has its studio
and laboratory at Passage Raymond 9, Nantes, and was
founded in April, 1881. At its start it had twenty
members, but the number steadily increased. In the
second year of its existence it began to organise a
“regional” photographic exhibition, and in 1886 it
invited all the photographers of France to the Photo-
graphic Exhibition at Nantes, au exhibition which
more than fulfilled the expectations of its promoters.
At the present time the Society has 142 members.
Its laboratory for the free use of its members has been
| established three years, and there is a studi o adjacent
38
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
thereto. The Nantes Society does not publish what
may be strictly termed a bulletin, but every month it
sends to its memhevs a printed report of its meetings,
followed by divers formula;, and a variety of extracts
from photographic journals, all contained in four large
pages. It has an English correspondent, Mr. A. Scou-
man. The president of the Society is M. Baschcr ;
vice-president, M. du Hanlay; treasurer, M. Tassain ;
secretary, M. Tremant; co-secretary, M. Jollan de
Clerville ; librarian, M. du Minehy. Sometimes the
Society issues a photo-meclianical or other print with
its monthly report. We noticed, while looking through
the collection in the bureau a few days ago, that occa-
sionally in past years some aristotype prints have been
so sent out ; how these latter will look nine or ten
years hence is a question the future will solve. The
Nantes Photographic Society works in correspondence
with the Photo-Club of Paris, the Versailles Photo-
graphic Society, the Photographic Society of the North
of France, and the Artistic and Photographic Society
of Limoges.
In its monthly reports we read that a photographic
society has just been formed in Auvergue, with its
establishment at Clermont-Ferrand, cours Sablon 55.
In describing its constitution, M. Felix Gaude, the
president, drew attention to one of the rules which
promised to welcome all photographic tourists at Cler-
mont. Unhappily, says the report of the Nantes
Society, another article informs the said tourists that
they must pay ten shillings towards the expenses of
the Auvergne Society if they desire to make use of the
laboratory. The Nantes journal adds : — “ Hospitality I
is not Scotch at Clermont-Ferrand,” which French ex-
piession of opinion about the Scotch may be interpreted
in two different ways, when compared with the state- j
ments which caused it to be brought forth.
The Nantes Society has just resolved to buy an
optical lantern for a double purpose ; that is to say, it
will be used at the meetings of the Society for the
projection of lantern pictures, and at other times it
will be placed, under certain conditions, at the dis-
position of any individual member who desires to I
exhibit his slides for the amusement of his friends.
A committee of the Nantes Photo gi’aphic Society
has just sent in its report on the Paris Exhibition of
1889. It says that broadly speaking, there were no
great novelties at the Exhibition, no indisputable
advance marking a point of new departure. Improve-
ments, however, were numerous, and the merit of the
pictures exhibited by the great masters in photography
was beyond all praise. Several amateurs also exhibited,
and their work was good enough to satisfy the most
fastidious. The most striking displays made at the
Exhibition by photographers were those of Messrs.
Chalot, Lumiere, Van Boch-Boyer, Perou, Walery
and Nadar. Some platino types upon Japanese paper,
put on view by Chalot, are described by the committee
as “one of the most ravishing exhibitions.” Nadar's
show was the most expensive and elaborate con-
nected with the Paris Exhibition ; it cost the firm
30,000 francs.
SENDING PICTURES AND WRITING BY TIIE
ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH.
I!Y K. II. VARLEY, M.I.K.E., F.R.A.R.
The transmission of autographs anil written messages, I
or portraits, through telegraph circuits, is of itself no 1
new feat. In the early dawn of practical telegraphy we I
have the invention of Bakewell. Those who are more j
particularly interested in this invention will find it described
in the writings of Dr. Gardner, and in Golding Bird’s
“ Natural Philosophy.”
Bakewell’s apparatus consisted of two synchronous ;
clocks, which caused a style made of fine iron wire to
rotate over a plane made of prepared paper supported on
a metal base ; during each revolution a continuous im-
pelling movement was given to the arm carrying the style, '
so that instead of moving in a circle, it traced a series of
gradually expanding volutes whenever a current of elec-
tricity was made to pass. The paper received a mark or
line in Prussian blue, produced by the electro-chemical
action set up between the iron of the style and the paper
chemically treated with a solution of ferrocyanide. To
transmit a message or design, all that had to be done was
to write or scratch with a pointed style upon a varnished
metallic surface in order to remove those portions in a
similar way to preparing a plate for etching. When this
was done, the transmitting plate was fixed down upon the
bed-plate of the transmitting instrument. The clockwork
of both the sending instrument and that of the receiving
instrument at the distant station were started simultan-
eously. As the contact style of the sending instrument
passed on to the bare metal, a current was established :
thiscurrent being conveyed to the iron style of the receiving
instrument passed to earth by conduction through the
chemically-prepared paper, and produced a Prussian blue
mark corresponding to that of the scratched or removed
portion of the varnished surface of the transmitting plate.
As the arms of both the sending and receiving instruments
swung round at equal rates, tracing a series of volutes,
beginning near the axis, and finally ending at the full dia-
meter of the plate, it is readily seen that, as the blue mark
depends upon the electric circuit being closed, such blue
marks will correspond to the removed portions of insulating
varnish of the transmitting plate.
Since the time of Bakewell not much had been done
until 1863, when Casselli made a series of highly interest-
ing experiments with a much improved apparatus. The
chief feature of Casselli’s apparatus consisted mainly in
regulating and controlling the speed of his apparatus, so
that both sending and receiving instruments were made to
beat in unison, also that the ruling was in straight or
parallel lines. This apparatus was established on one of
the London to Liverpool circuits of the Electric and Inter-
national Telegraph Company, and continued to work for
some time very satisfactorily. Music scores, autographs,
portraits, sketches, and bills of lading, were sent with
unerring fidelity. The transmitting plates being mostly
responsible for any of the vagaries, I enclose some of these
pictures, which, as they are the only specimens I possess,
I will ask you to kindly return them after inspection : —
First, a sketch portrait of the late Trince Consort ; second,
a sketch portrait of a Turk ; third, agricultural scene ;
fourth, a note of introduction, with portraits, front view,
and profile of the person to be introduced.
I think it is very desirable to keep these results on re-
cord, as they undoubtedly form very important stepping
January 17, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
SO
A BIOGRAPHY OF J. II. SCHULZE.
BY JAMES MEW.
stones to the advancement of this subject, and from what
I gather from the description of M. Giuochio’s auto-tele-
graph, in your issue of the 3rd inst., I should imagine it to
be actuated by an equivalent mechanism, though whether
it is an improvement upon the work of Casselli, it is im-
possible and premature to judge. But, remembering that
in 1863 photogravure was non-existent, and the artist em-
ployed to make the transmitting plates was only just learn-
ing his work, I think we may say that Casselli made not
only a very practical demonstration, but also an important
step in the advancement of auto-telegraphy.
With improved mechanism and plates prepared by one
of the photogravure processes, I see no difficulty in pro-
ducing and telegraphing highly finished works of art.
Then the next question comes : — What about the com-
mercial aspect? Why did the press not support Casselli in
18C3 ? 'Fhe answer may be that illustrated literature was
not so general as now, and the time not ripe for its full ap-
preciation ; but with the new journalistic ventures, such as
the Daily Graphic , which doubtless will meet with many
competitors, it may become — and doubtless has become —
an absolute necessity of the age, rendering it expedient to
take this work up again from a fresh standpoint, beginning
where Casselli had to leave off from want of proper en-
couragement, appreciation, and support, and to so develop
the process as to make it perfectly reliable and correct in
the minutest details. The undertaking is one involving a
considerable expenditure of time and money, but that
should not be an obstacle to so important an achievement
in these days of advancing enterprise.
Birmingham Photograchic Society. — The Annual Exhibi-
tion will be open for two days only, but it will be very repre-
sentative, as nearly 400 exhibits have been forwarded, ranging
from about 20 by 16 to quarter-plates.
Hastings and St. Leonard’s Photographic Society. — In
a notice last week of the Exhibition to be held in February,
the address of the lion, secretary was incorrectly stated. It
Bhould have been Mr. A. Brooker, Memorial Buildings,
Hastings.
French Economy.— The medal question at the late Paris
exposition seems to be giving no little dissatisfaction. It seems
that the awards were numerous enough to satisfy everyone,
but to get an award was one thing, and to get the medal
awarded another. The managers of the exposition issue ccrti-
cates of the awards, but the lucky (!) exhibitors can only get
the certificate honoured by paying for the article thereby
represented. Every successful exhibitor must pay the full
value of the gold or silver medal which he in his ignorance of
French usage supposed he had honorably gained. — T,te
Beacon, Chicago.
The Swing Back. — Of all the contrivances about a camera,
none perhaps is so often misused as the swing back. Many a
time its employment would have been more honoured in the
breach than in the observance. To have a swing back means
that it must be used on all occasions, whether the taking of
the building demands its employment or not. What is of
more importance than tilting the camera and applying the
swing back, is keeping the camera level wherever possible.
Do not tilt and use the swing back every time. Very often a
better view of a high building can be had by levelling the
camera at the building from a window at a suitable height
opposite. Determination of the proper lens is of the greatest
importance in architectural views — what focal length will best
secure the object in proper proportion. It is well to use a
wide-angle lens which covers a plate the next size above ; for
instance, if the view is to be on a 67 by 8i plate, use a lens
for 8 by 10. With such a lens we can raise the front without
straining. A swing back, however, is like a Texas revolver —
rarely needed ; but when that rare time comes, it is needed
badly. — American Journal of Photography.
The already announced inventor of photography, John
Henry Schulze — or Johann Heinrich Schulze, to give his
exact German name — was one of the most able physicians
and distinguished pliilosophers of the eighteenth century.
He was born — or, as liis German biographer expresses it,
“ first saw the light of this world ” — on the 12th May, 1687,
at Colbitz, in the Duchy of Magdeboui’g in Prussia, in
the house of a poor tailor. His father (Matthaus) supple-
mented a precarious income derived from the reseating of
breeches, with the nurture of bees. It is possible that his
son’s name would never have been enrolled in the blazoned
annals of medical and philosophic fame — for the father’s
purse held no quantity with the son’s abilities — had it not
been for the exertions of a certain Andr. Albr. Corvinus,
the pastor of his native hamlet, who first made John
Henry’s acquaintance at the immature age of six, learning
his accidence in the village school.
Corvinus took young Schulze to himself, and the boy,
besides sitting down at the intellectual feast of the village
pastor, was careful to pick up such stray crumbs of learn-
ing as fell from the table of his children’s education. In
this desultory manner he seems to have taught himself the
rudiments of Greek and Latin. On a day came Corvinus
into his garden, and lo ! his protege, forgetful of fruit and
flower, lost to the outer world of sunshine, was buried
deep in the pages of a Greek Testament behind the paternal
bee-hive ! The good priest, delighted with the sight, made
him a present of the book out of hand ; and who then was
happier among articulately speaking men than John
Henry? All the time he could spare from his regular
course of study he devoted to the Evangelists, collating,
comparing, and criticising with his ’prentice-brain their
textual anomalies and variations ; and, after the fashion of
Browning’s Grammarian, weighing with minutest care the
relative forces of men and de and oun.
At the recommendation of Corvinus, Schulze was re-
ceived as a pupil at the Royal Pmdagogium, in the University
of Halle (Friedrich’s-Universitiit) in 1697. As he was one
of the earliest, so he became one of the most distinguished
scholars of that seat of learning. Afterwards he was
admitted, without pay, a pensioner of the Orphans’ Home
in the same town. The head master of the Psedagogium —
the famous theologian Franke — following the good ex-
ample set by Corvinus in the matter of young Schulze,
loaded him with benefits— moral, intellectual, and physi-
cal— for the full space of twenty years. It is rare, indeed,
to find a Mecamas in this work-a-day world ; the fortu-
nate Schulze found Corvinus and Franke. Without such
happy chance, where would have been our young philo-
sopher and adolescent physician ? Blushing unseen, most
probably, and wasting his sweetness on the desert air, as
so many embryo poets, painters, philosophers, and physi-
cians have done before Agamemnon and after.
In 1701, Schulze seized the forelock of opportunity, and
made acquaintance with a language of the East. One
Solomon Negri, a learned Arab from Damascus, at the
importunate request of Franke, consented to stay a year's
space at Halle to give any pupil who wished it. the profit
of his instruction. Schulze was one of the first volunteers,
and for that whole year learnt nothing but Arabic. After
Negri had returned to his own place, Schulze studied for
some time medicine at the University under the direction
40
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
of the then celebrated Professors Stahl, Richter, and
Eckebrecht.
llis thirst for varied knowledge was not yet assuaged,
lie proceeded to dive into antiquities and philology under
the experienced guidance of Christopher Cellarius. From
time to time, however, he returned to his old Eastern loves,
encouraging these pursuits with an occasional attendance at
the Oriental lectures of Michaelis, and studied Syriac,
Chaldee, Samaritan, iEthiopic, and Rabbinic. He learnt
Romaic at the feet of Anhard Adlung, from Constantinople,
who lent him several rare books in that language published
at Venice and Bucharest. He also learnt Turkish from
the same master.
In due course, Schulze became, in the year 1708, a
Master of the Psedagogium, and in 1715 was employed as a
secretary by the well-known physician Fred. Hoffmann,
the Boerliaave of Germany. This accident seems to have
determined his errant inclinations ultimately in favour of
medicine — though we still find him reading in his intervals
of leisure such erudite fathers of the Church as Gregory
and Nazianzen, whose works, it is said, he studied com-
pletely, adding thereto the greater portion of (hose of
Basil.
Under the guidance of Hoffmann — the Hippocrates of
his period — who treated him with no less liberality than
Corvinus and Franke had done, in the free and cheerful
giving of such intellectual stores as he possessed, and ini-
tiated him, moreover, into all tile valuable secrets of his
art, Schulze felt himself, after two years’ labour, strong
enough to sustain the theses required for his degree of
Doctor. His dissertation on “Athletes, their Habits and
Diet,” obtained for him permission to practise in medicine.
He continued his practice at the University till the year
1720, when he accepted the position of Professor of Ana-
tomy at the University of Altdorf. His old and early
patron, Corvinus, had set the crown on the previous
benefits bestowed on his favourite pupil by giving him his
daughter Johanna Sophia to wife, in the year before his
election to the anatomical chair.
Schulze sat in this chair some dozen years, and
published therefrom his “ History of Medicine,” which at
once placed him in the first rank among his medical com-
peers. This work was, however, never finished. In 1729
he became Professor of Greek, and later on Professor of
Arabic. These professorships interfered much with his
medical duties, and the interference was strengthened by
his appointment in 1732 by the Prussian Government
to the place of Professor of Eloquence and Antiquities in
his old University of Halle. His first exercise in this new
department of literary activity was a treatise on the
much-debated line in Virgil (iEn. xii, 397) : —
‘ ‘ Mutas agitare inglorius artes, ”
which has caused so great disagreement among the learned.
But still Schulze’s circle of study was not sufficiently
wide for his own convenience. Numismatics now engaged
his attention. He collected a large number — some
3,000 — of ancient coins and medals, of which Gottlieb
Agnether published in 1746 a catalogue raisonne with the
title of Numophylacium Schulzianum.
Schulze’s abnormal intellectual energy can best be com-
prehended by an allusion to some of his multifarious
labours. Taking them at haphazard, we meet first with
some philological observations on a Greek verb signifying
to worship. Next we have a treatise on the condition
of the medical slaves (strange expression in the light of
our nineteenth century civilization) belonging to the
Greeks and Romans. Then a little talk about the Goddess
Victory and a particular altar belonging to her ; then a
medical lexicon ; then a translation of Plutarch ; then an
essay on the Ancient’s Hellebore ; and then a literary geo-
graphy, and so on to the number of 166 separate works.
Schulze joined to extraordinary diligence extraordinary
ability. He was continually, as the reader who has gone
through this biographical sketch may readily believe, en-
gaged in reading, writing, and studying, llis excessive
application to his books injured his health, lie contracted
various diseases, of which has been published a minute
and unpleasing description. In the Eastertide of 1744 lie
died, oi', as his German biographer prefers to put it,
“ changed the temporal for the eternal ; a truly unspeak-
able loss for all who knew him.”
BROMIDE ENLARGING AND PRINTING.
Making bromide enlargements is a work so popular
among photographers at this season of the year,
owing to the facility of carrying it on by
artificial light, that the record of experiences
from various sources is sure to be interesting to our
readers. We therefore subjoin extracts from articles
on the topic, the first being by Mr. D. G. Milburn, in
JVilson's Photographic Magazine.
A very practical”business method, as practised by a
New York photographer for introducing large pictures
to the general customer, can here be mentioned, as it
usually leads to a sale of a life-size portrait at a handsome
figure. Every negative of a fairly good quality, after
leaving the retoucher’s hands, is brought to the bromide
operator, and an enlargement is made from it. This plain
print is then inserted in a ready passepartout, and when
the customer calls for his small picture his attention is
called to his enlarged bromide picture. lie is iuformed
by the salesman that said picture can be sold plain as it is,
or can be finished in crayon, oil, or pastel, and specimens
of the ditlerent styles are shown him, and, as before
stated, a sale is usually acc nnplished. In case of no sale,
the print is removed from the passepartout, and all the
firm is out is the cost of the joint, which is not over 69
cents for an 18in. by 22 n. The sam i passepartout will
auswer f< r showing any number of ei.lu.gements in.
A mi take that often occurs with the bromide worker is
over timing, and then to overcome this mistake the addi-
tion of an old developer, or bromide of jiota-sium, is
resortel to. This is something all operators ought to be very
careful to avoid, for an overtime print will never compare
favourably with a print that has been timed correct’y.
A very ji.'actical way of deciding on the right and
proper time of exposure for any sized bromide enlargement
is to adjust a small jnece of bronrde pajier on the easel,
after having focussed the enlarged image shaiply, expose
and develop, then use this as a guide for the final expo-
sure. If daylight is the medium used to enlarge with,
permit as little time as possible to el ipse between the test
and final exposure, as the light may change.
In case the enlargement is to be made from an over-
intense negative, use less bromide of potassium than the
formula calls for. Ou the contrary, if the negative is ton
soft and tlat, an iucrease of bromide of potassium in the
developer will m ike the proper contrast. Old developer
should not be used for that purpose, as it has a tendency
JiSClSf
idtilhf
Jgperbv
iwdep*?
(M
uquuffli
Ellul®
<a diflig
jKomnKod
lariat
hdk ea
jalterjlii
jiiiibi i
Ik 1*
Wt, I
M
9 !^:it
1 ilttll
| iira:.
tlttti)
lujill
liUff
;
fmsi
J?tr
Aids
inti
MS'
mini
tmo
13h
*1 a
IStO:
m
mult
January 17, 1890. )
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
41
'
3.
:ia
■
>581!
wtei
nianiA
rat it
?tal-
ipglo
year
i bt
rate
o our
title
uit
lyi
tsre
an
<on;
alter
an ii
mei
it it
Ian
lit,
tlx
• jfi
will
irii
idi-
■eij
nan
and
M
ik
to*
it;
to leave the print slightly yellow. The oxalate and iron
developer his been proven to be the correct developer for
bromide paper work, and the writer recommends it above
all others. If bromide enlargements are to be made in
large quantities, electric light will be preferable, as there
is less variation in that light ; with it Eastman’s extra
quick bromide paper will work the best.
Enlargements of sizes over 30 by 40 are best produced
with daylight, and Eistman’s standard paper is then
recommended.
Auy amount of crayon, oil, or pastel can be done on a
bromide enlargement, and any one used to crayon work
will require but very little practice to become proficient.
But very little work is required on a good bromide print to
make a highly finished picture.
The following is selected from a paper by Mr. J.
Howson, read before the East Dulwich Photographic
Society, and published in the Photographic Societies'
Reporter : —
For enlargements each man is bounded by his facilities,
and I will only sketch, therefore, the two methods available,
leaving each to be guided by circumstances and surround-
ings which plan he will adopt.
First, daylight work. Here we need a dark room, with
a window blocked up by a shutter ; this shutter must
have in its lowest part an opening the size of the largest
negative to be enlarged from. At the bottom of the
opening must be a shelf, on which to stand our ordinary
camera at full stretch, if the size of our enlargement so
needs it. Outside the window, at an angle of forty-five
degrees, must be a mirror, or a board covered with white
paper, to reflect the daylight iuwards. A north aspect for
this wiudow is preferable, and direct sunlight very unde-
sirable. Inside the room we want an easel ; one of the
most primitive kind will do, cabable of being readily
moved and adjusted so as to be strictly parallel with the
negative. Our lens, with which the original negative was
taken, is in position in the camera, and that is all. Pin a
piece of plain paper on easel, mat k on it the size of enlarge-
ment wanted, put the negative in place of focussing screen,
film towards lens ; change relative positiou of negative,
lens, and easel, untii the image covers the size marked ;
replace the plain paper by bromide, taking care that the
latter is well stretched and evenly level, and expose. There
are exact rules as to the finding of these relative distances
for each size of enlargement, but as they are found in all
year-books, we need not discuss them, ouly mentioning
that the farther from the lens the sensitive surface is, the
larger the image, and vice versa. In practice, a rectilinear
lens gives better enlargements than a single one, and as
large a stop as possible is prtferable, as it facilitates
focussing and shortens exposure ; but, of course, the
larger the plate proportionately to the lens, the greater
the necessity for stopping down. Further, most negatives
are wanting in definition at the edges, and also in most
cases in interest ; it is therefore advisable, in making
an enlargement of, say, 12 by 10, to Irt the image on the
screen be an inch or so larger ; the resulting picture, on
12 by 10 paper, will be more pleasing aud sharper, though
not embracing the whole subject on the negative. Then,
as to size of enlargements, as compared with size of nega-
tive, I think it is admitted that, to obtain most perfect
results, we should not exceed three times — that is, a plate
should be enlarged to 12 by 10, and no further. There
are other opinions expressed on this point, but I am
going with the majority. 1 ought perhaps fo have men-
tioned before the class of negative to be used — a negative
that will give good results on ordinary albumenised paper
will give good results on bromide naturally ; but 1 go
further than this, and endorse the frequently expressed
opinion that bromide is the “ salvation of a poor nega-
tive,” and say that a negative that is too thin to give a
decent print on ordinary paper, will give a capital picture
on bromide, with ordinary care ; aud even if you have a
hard negative, presuming all detail is present, a very passa-
ble bromide print can be got. A negative tending to thin-
nessand full of detail, however, gives thebest results. These
remarks apply, of course, equally to enlargements and con-
tact prints, and, m the proper place, I shall say a few
words as to the methods of correcting in exposure and
development the excess or lack of vigour in the negatives
from which we may be working. Now, as to exposure.
Here we have four points to be considered — the variation
of light ; the density, or, speaking more correctly, the
printing value of the negative ; the focal value of the stop ;
and the size of the enlargement. The two first points are
matters of pure experience, the third and fourth are sub-
ject to well- asceitained laws. As regards the size of pic-
ture, if the distauce between negative and sensitive paper
is two feet, and two seconds is found to be a correct expo-
sure, then, when the distance is four feet, the exposure
will be not double, but four times as long ; the rule is,
not proportionately as the distance, but as the square of
the distance. As regards the focal value of the lens, this
is dependent on the ratio the diaphragm bears to the focal
length ; a lens of Sin. focus, with a diaphragm of Jin.
diameter, would give a fecal value // 1G, because the aper-
ture is one-sixteenth the focal length, and the relative
value of light passing through the several apertures is all
laid down in the year-books.
Whilst it seems almost useless to attempt to give any
standard of exposure, it may help workers to say that one of
the 15 by 12 enlargements on slow paper was made at
mid-day with a lens stopped to // 10, from a 5 by 4 negative,
aud nine minutes’ exposure given. These times may be
remembered as a guide for working. I have spoken first
of daylight work because it entails the use of fewer appli-
ances and less expense, whilst, at the same time, most of the
remarkslhave made apply equally to work done by artificial
light. For this latter kind of enlarging it is impos-ibleto
work without some sort of lantern, or at least a condenser,
for securing an equal diffusion of the light over the whole
negative to be enlarged.
One prime reason why the best results cannot be always
obtained by this method is, that most artificial lights are
of a comparatively low intensity, and do not possess suffi-
cient penetrative power to enable them to give the full
gradation of tone in a vigorous negative. Therefore, a
negative with strong contrasts should be specially avoided
when working by artificial light, except unusual care is
taken to modify results. In using lanterns for enlarging,
it should be borne in mind that the light must be as
intense as possible, and the dime not large — in fact, a
perfect light for this purpose would emanate from a single
point. Then as to coa leasers, these should be at least
half an inch larger ia diameter than the longest side of the
plate to be enlarge I ; that is, a quarter-plate negative
would need a six, or at least a five-inch condenser, aud as
these are expensive articles in the larger sizes, a suggestion
made by a well-known worker is worth bearing in mind.
He has only a four-inch condenser to work wiih, and
therefore reduces his half and whole plates in the camera
to lantern size, prints by contact a negative, from which
12
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
lie enlarges. This is a roundabout way of working, but
the plan is one to be remembered in case of need.
The remarks as to exposure which I made in reference
to daylight apply here also, and I will, with the same re-
serve, say that a negative to be enlarged three times will
need an exposure of two to five seconds, using Ilford rapid
bromide, which is twenty times as fast as the slow kind.
In any ca3e, it is unwise to rely on these time standards
without experience, and the plan usually adopted is to
make tests by means of slips of the sensitive paper. Such
a plan will save much paper and much disappointment.
I will add only that the process is a comparatively simple
one, and any worker who can be fairly certain of produc-
ing a decent negative will not find any difficulty in doing
good work after a very slight practical experience ; and
the advantages of being able to reproduce larger pictures
from good though small negatives are obvious to all, and
need no comment from me.
On the subject of bromide printing, for directions
in which inquiries are frequently made, the editor
of the Photographic Record — the organ of the Ama-
teur Photographic Society — writes the first portion
of an instructive article, from which we make the
following extract : —
For the amateur, bromide printing possesses many ad-
vantages over silver, and although we admit there are
disadvantages also, such as the difficulty of combination
printing, yet the comparison is greatly in favour of the
bromide. One of the mo3t important of these advantages
is that it can bo worked in the evening by gaslight, and,
iu cousequence, is quite independent of the weather.
Winter, with its gloomy days, mikes no difference, except
that the long evenings are a decided gaiu, and can be made
to yield an additional pleasure. There is no necessity
even to use the dark room, which is often a makeshift
arrangement, and is cold and cheerless in the winter
months, for, with the exception of the final washing, all
the operations may be undertaken by the fireside in a
sitting-room, or any other convenient apartment. Let us
suppose that an ordinary sitting-room is used, which is
illuminated by ga3 in the usual way. All that is required
is to allow the fire to buru down to a red glow, to spread a
newspaper or sheet of brown paper over the table, and
place upon it the few bottles of chemicals, three dishes,
aud a measure from the dark room. A re 1 lamp will be
required on the table. Oue of the be3t is obtained by pur-
chasing a small paraffin oil lamp, usually costing sixpence,
and painting the glass chimney with two coats of light red
oil paiut. The light of this cau be turned up or down at
will. Two jugs, one containing clean water, will also be
wanted ; the empty jug is to receive the spent developing
solutions. It will be an improvement if the gaslight
cau be placed low down on the table, by meaus of an india-
rubber tube attached between the chandelier or bracket
and a stmiard, such as is often used for reading purposes,
but this is not a necessity. When all is ready, pour out
some of the clean water into one of the dishes, mix the
developing solutions iu the measure, light the dark room
lamp, and then turn down the gas very low. Place a
watch near the lamp to check the exposures by. A sheet
of the bromide paper should now be placed in contact
with a negative in the printing-frame. The face of the
paper is known by its tendency to curl upwards slightly,
the emulsion with which it is coated causing a contraction
of the surface. After seeing that the stock of bromide
paper is carefully covered, the gas may now be turned up
and the exposure made. For an ordinary negative, with
Eastman or Ilford slow paper, an exposure of 1 to 1 1
minutes at one foot from the gas is about correct; but if
the negative is very dense it should be held closer, say six or
eight inches away. The colour and quality of the negative
must be judged prior to the exposure, or a test made by a
slip of the paper. A stained negative being somewhat
non-actiuic, the light has difficulty in penetrating it, and a
prolonged exposure is necessary. If the negative is thin
aud weak all over, as an ovei’-exposed plate usually is, it
will require to be placed further from the gas. Three
minutes’ exposure, at three feet from the light, will often
give good results from this class of negative, but at times
it is even necessary to considerably exceed this distance
and time. A negative which has been under-exposed, aud
has portions very dense and other parts very thin, will
require special treatment. The weak portion must be
shaded while the dense parts are being held near the gas ;
afterwards it should be removed further from the gas, the
shading material taken away, and the exposure continued
for the thin portion. A piece of paper or cardboard, with
a torn, irregular edge, and kept moving during the ex-
posure, is suitable for shading purposes. Vignetting is
nicely accomplished by cutting the required shape, slightly
reduced, in a piece of cardboard, and, after fixing the nega-
tive at the proper distance, moving the vignetter backwards
and forwards between the negative and the light. This
will produce a soft edge. Daylight is very uncertain, the
light being too intense ; but with gas almost any variation
in colour or density of negative may be successfully dealt
with, by reducing or increasing the flime, the distances, or
the length of exposure. Even the faint details in a thin
negative, which cannot be retained iu a silver print, can
be shown very presentably by the treatment suggested.
After the exposure, the gas should be turned down till
nothing but a small blue flame is seen on the burner ; the
printing frame is opened, and the paper immersed face
downwards in the bath of clean water for about a minute.
So that the water shall act evenly and air-bubbles be
avoided, the paper should be drawn into the water by
the edge, only the extreme edges of the paper being
held by the finger ends. It should then be taken
out and placed face up in an empty bath. The
developing soiution is now poured upon the paper, and the
bath rocked freely to produce equal action of the deve-
loper. The time should be observed, so that an idea may
be gained of the correctness of the exposure. Some deve-
lopers are very slow. This is because the accelerator is
weak and restrained, and, in consequence, it cannot be
considered an ordinary developer, though it makes a pleas-
ing tone. Something quicker is wanted for general prac-
tice if the work is not to become monotonous, and from a
half to oue minute should be sufficient to start the image.
About three minutes should complete the development.
The following is a good iron developer giving a purple-
black colour free from strong contrasts, and is well under
control : —
No. 1. — A saturated solution of potassium oxalate
Ammonium bromide, 3 drops to each 5 ozs.
of the above.
No. 2. — A saturated solution of ferrous sulphate
Citric acid, 20 grains to each 3 ozs. of the above.
To make 2| ounces of the above, take —
No. 1 1 ounce
No. 2 £ „
Water ounces
January 17, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. X 43
\^~ Ckf.V? ~r
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY QE WARWICK-
SHIRE.^
Nos 1 and 2 should always have a few undissolved crystals
at the bottom of the bottles. Whenever any portion of
No. 2 is used, the bottle should be filed up with water so
as to exclude the air, and from time to time a few grains
of citric acid added to prevent the iron from oxidizing.
If the picture shows signs of developing unequally, the
dish should be tilted so that the solution may run off the
fully-printed portion, and remain on the part which
requires the extra development. Another plan is to pour
all the solution from the dish before any part of the image
is fully developed, and then work out the completion with
a camel hair mop dipped in the solution. The dish should
be elevated at one end while this is being done. When
any part is finished, squeeze the moisture from the brush
with the fingers, and pass it over the completed portion so
as to absorb the solution on it and stay further action. The
remaining parts should have additional solution supplied
by the brush until a satisfactory result is obtained. Do not
attempt to stop the development with water, ora degraded
colour will be produced wherever it is applied.
When the development is complete, the print should be
transferred to another dish to be acidified. The removal
of a print from one vessel to another is greatly assisted by
using the handle of a teaspoon to lift the edge of the paper.
Especially if hydroquinone is used will this little help be
appreciated, because this developer imparts a slippery feel
to the print, and softens the texture of the paper. Care
should always be used in haudling, so as to avoid any
abrasion of the surface.
L' Amateur Photoy raphe is in the habit of saying that an illus-
tration accompanies the number in which the said remain is
made ; the publishers, with equal regularity, invariably omit
the illustration from the copy posted to us, and perhaps to
others. This is as economical as the medal system at the Paris
Exhibition.
The Action of Electricity on Iodine. — lu the course of a
memoir on “ The Long-continued Action of the Electric Dis-
charge on Iodine,” Dr. C. Luedeking, of Leipzig, says : — “ In my
experiment the disappearance of the element iodine was not
due to any other cause than its uniting with the constituents of
of the glass. Under the influence of the electric discharge,
iodine certainly acquires superior chemical affinities, attacking
the substance of the glass, and forming iodides, and, from the
disappearance of one-fifth of the volume of gas, I should say also
some iodates. To meet this eventuality, I reduced by sulphur-
etted hydrogen previous to precipitation.”
Self-Luminous Clouds. — I am very sorry that I took no
notes, some six or seven years ago, on the first and only occasion
of my seeing self-luminous clouds, but though 1 can give
neither date nor positions, the following facts are still fresh in
my memory. Passing through Bushey Park after dark, I
noticed an aurora borealis, and, as I had only recently seen the
rather rare phenomena of the rays of the setting sun converg-
ing towards a point in the east, I followed the direction of one
of the principal beams of light towards the south, when, at a
point somewhat south of my zenith, I noticed an equatorial
belt of luminous clouds. I found that each cloud belonged to
a ray, and faded and brightened with it, but was separated by
about (50° of clear sky-. This belt of clouds extended down to
the western horizon, the eastern one was obstructed by trees,
while shortly afterwards small dark clouds appeared on that
side, and the sky soon became overcast. The luminous clouds
were quite transparent, so that even faint stars could be seen
through them when at their brightest. I have heard from
Scandinavian captains that these luminous belts are sometimes
seen in northern latitudes, and are sure signs of bad weather.
I have written these few remarks in the hope that those of your
readers who may have the chance of seeing an aurora borealis,
will also look out for these clouds, and if possible determine
their position. — C. E. Stkombyek, Strawberry Hill, Jan. -lilt ,
BY \V. JEROME HARRISON, F.G.S.
Society Excursions Utilised. — Everybody knows the
routine of an ordinary excursion of a photographic
society. Some well-known spot is selected, the further
away the better, as North Wales, Dovedalc, and Haddon
Hall. If the day is fine, twenty or thirty members attend,
and they go round the place in a crowd, occupying them-
selves to a large extent in getting in, and out of, one an-
other’s way.
I would suggest that the excursions be made local, and
that a routine of work be drawn up beforehand, in which
each detachment of three or four members should be
assigned some particular task to accomplish. Thus, in a
half-day excursion to Warwick, suppose twenty camera-
carriers present themselves ; let this number be divided
into five sets of four members each, the tasks being as
follows: — (1) The Castle and Grounds; (2) St. Mary’s
Church, including the Beauchamp Chapel ; (3) the
Leycestcr Hospital ; (4) the Town of Warwick generally,
its two gates and old buildings; (5) Guy’s Cliff. Given
a fine June afternoon, and the work of the survey for that
town might be accomplished very rapidly on this plan.
But it supposes that a full programme, showing the work
of each section of the party, be drawn up beforehand and
distributed.
Utilisation of Work already done. — There are probably
in existence already some hundreds, or even thousands,
of photographic negatives which would be of service in
the history of Warwickshire. It must be part of our task
to draw up a list of such negatives, showing their sub-
jects and their owners. Some of them may, perhaps, be
acquired by gift, loan, or purchase. A separate reeord
book should be kept for those negatives which are already
in existence ; and a circular asking for information on this
subject might be addressed to the professional photo-
graphers of the county.
Documents, frc., Copied by Photography, — We must photo-
graph not only places, but things — old documents, seals,
plans, maps, various objects of antiquity, rare fossils, &c.
All these will provide food for the camera, and will add
interesting pictures to our stock. One advantage of photo-
graphy in this direction is that it enables us to bring together,
for purposes of comparison, a scries of objects which may
be scattered in many collections. The facsimiles of
documents obtained by photographic processes, are
far more valuable than copies by hand can be, since they
must be literal and unbiassed ; errors in copying are
avoided, and the evidence of the photograph is practically
as good — sometimes, indeed, it is better, because clearer —
than that of the original.
Size of Photographs to be taken. — I fear it will be impossible
to bind ourselves down to any definite size of negative.
Perhaps it would be best to make the whole-plate size (Min.
by GAin.) our standard. By the recent substitution of
celluloid films for glass plates, the weight of the photo-
grapher’s equipment has been greatly diminished ; so that
a whole-plate camera with films weighs no more than a
half -plate camera with glass plates.
By the use of cases or boxes to hold separately mounted
prints, the difficulty of variety of sizes is largely avoided.
If albums are made up, they eoidd be of such a .^ze ifs to
hold one whole-plate print, or two half -plates, on each page.
• Concluded from page 31.
44
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
For hand-camera work the usual size is the quarter-
plate (4{in. by 3jin.); and for pictures of this size sepa-
rate albums might be provided, or they might be mounted
four on a page of the larger albums. It must be remem-
bered, however, that it is easy to enlarge or reduce
negatives, so that they could all be brought to one uni-
form size if that were thought desirable. Or it is even
easier to enlarge or reduce the prints as they are made
from the negatives, if we use bromide paper for
printing upon.
How other Societies (Literary, Artistic, and Scientific) can
Aid in the Work of the County Photographic Survey. — I trust
that it may be assumed that the three photographic
societies already in existence in Warwickshire, viz., the
Birmingham Photographic Society — lion. Secs., Mr. J. H.
Pickard, 361, Moseley Road, Birmingham, and Mr. A. ,T.
Leeson, 20, Cannon Street, Birmingham ; Leamington
Amateur Photographic Society — lion. Sec., .Mr. F. M.
Gowan, 20, Beauchamp Square, Leamington; Coventry
and Midland Photographic Society — Hon. Sec., Mr. F. W.
Dew, The City Studio, Coventry, will do all they can for
the work of a photo, survey. But very valuable assistance
can be rendered by several other societies within the
county, whose aim is the furtherance of literature, science,
and art. Among these I may name the Yesey Club,
Sutton Coldfield — Hon. Sec., Mr. C. II. Marston ; the
Archaeological Section of the Birmingham and Midland
Institute — Secretary of the Section, Mr. Alfred Hayes ;
the Birmingham Natural History and Microscopical Society
— Hon. Secs., Mr. W. II. Wilkinson and Mr. W. P.
Marshall, M.LC.E., The Mason College ; the Birmingham
Philosophical Society (1876) — Hon. Secs., Prof. J. II.
Poynting, F.R.S., 11, St. Augustine’s Road, Edgbaston,
and Prof. Windle, Queen’s College ; the Birmingham and
Midland Institute Scientific Society — Hon. Sec., Mr. W.
E. Weaver, 221, Broad Street (this Society has a Photo-
graphic Section) ; Birmingham Microscopists’ and Natura-
lists’ Union (1880) — Hon. Secs., Messrs. Collins and
White, Broad Street Corner ; Birmingham Architectural
Association (1873) — Hon. Sec., Mr. H. R. Lloyd,
A. R.I.B.A., 26, Corporation Street; Birmingham School
Natural History Society, King Edward’s Grammar School ;
Birmingham Botanical and Horticultural Society, Botani-
cal Gardens, Edgbaston — Curator, Mr. W. B. Latham ;
Warwickshire Field Club (1858) — President, the Rev. P.
B. Brodie, M.A, F.G.S., Rowington Vicarage — Head-
quarters, The Museum, Warwick ; Tamworth Natural
History, Geological, and Antiquarian Society — Hon. Sec.,
; Royal (Birmingham) Society of Artists, New Street
— Secretary, Mr. Jonathan Pratt; Kyrle Society — Hon.
Sec., Miss Gittins, 87, Ilagley Road ; Association for the
Preservation of Ope* Spaces and Public Footpaths — Hon.
Sec., Mr. Grosvenor Lee, 18, Newhall Street ; Art Circle
— Hon. Sec., Mr. E. Chamberlain, Burlington Chambers,
New Street; the Midland Arts Club — lion. Sec., Mr. W.
II. Vernon (meetings at Grand Hotel, Colmore Row) ;
Municipal School of Art, Edmund Street — Head Master,
Mr. E. R. Taylor — Secretary, Mr. E. Preston Hytch.
IIow Antiquarians, Scientists, and others, can Aid in the Work
of a County Photographic Survey. — Now, although we photo-
graphers may know how to photograph, we do not always
know what to photograph. We want the historian and
the antiquary, the literary man, the artist, and the scientist,
to aid us in this. We want these students of the past and
the present to draw up lists of places and objects in each
square of our map which they consider ought to be re-
corded ; and we want them to tell us all about them, so
that the pictures we secure may be of interest to usaswell
as to them.
Assistance from Landowners, Residents, and others. — The
nature of our work ought to secure assistance from occupi-
ers in all parts of the county. Armed with an introduction,
stating the object and plan of this survey, the photographer
may hope to be afforded facilities for his work which he
would otherwise scarcely venture to ask for. Those who
occupy historically interesting or beautifully situated
places, will certainly be willing to aid in such a task, which
may really be called national ; while to the guardians of
our churches — the clergy — our scheme should appeal with
special interest.
Required Funds to he Obtained by Subscriptions and Grants.
— In the work here proposed, it is thought that all the
workers will be willing to help, not only by paying their
own travelling expenses, purchase of dry plates on which
to make negatives, use of apparatus, and so on, but also by
subscribing to raise the funds which will be necessary
for the purchase of maps, albums, cases, and the
defraying of the cost of printing in platinotype, and
making lantern slides.
It does not seem unreasonable, however, to ask for
subscriptions from all who are interested in such a survey.
Our own Society will, it may be hoped, make a grant in
aid ; and, doubtless, if a portion of the work is done as a
sample, and well done, assistance will not be wanting.
The End of a Photographic Survey. — In the way of work
to be done, there could be no end. Every day sees some
change, something of the old order is blotted out, some-
thing new is introduced. A railway is made across our
pet landscape, and we must photograph the trail of black
smoke from the engine, if it be only to send the picture to
Air. Ruskin. How rapidly the features of our towns are
changing must be obvious to the most careless observer,
and anyone who has been absent from the new city for
but a few years has good cause to sing the old song, “ I
can’t find Birmingham ! ”
But the term “ end” may also be considered in the sense
of “ object.” What shall be done with our photographs
when we get them 7 Well, this Society should retain at
least two complete sets — a working set, and one for refer-
ence. Complete sets ought also to be prepared for our
Municipal Reference Library, for the British Museum, and
for any other public institutions who desire a set and are
willing to pay for it.
Our schools would value highly a selection of large
photographs, and enlargements might be made for this and
other special objects — as for exhibition on the walls of our
free libraries, for teaching and for lecturing and other
purposes.
Further, it appears to me that the pursuance of a task
such as 1 have attempted to sketch out would unite the
members of this society as only men arc united who have
a definite object in view, and who work fora common end.
It would attract, it may be hoped, new workers to join
our ranks, and would add to the status of the Society in
the eyes of the public. Much energy which is now frit-
tered away would be diverted into a useful channel, and,
although it may be said that the main benefits of our work
will be reaped by a posterity “ which has never done any-
thing for us,” yet I feel confident that we shall derive as
much pleasure from doing the work, as our descendants
will from its study and examination.
45
January 17, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGRAPHING THE BABY.
BY JOHN W1EDEKSEN.
scepticism.
You want something practical for your magazine. That’s
just what all you editors write ; you can supply the theo-
retical, and the amateurs, 1 suppose, the artistic. They
have elevated photography, don’t you know, to a very
high standard of art, for which we professionals ought to
be so thankful. Wish they had elevated the prices while
they were about it. “ More price, less art,” is my busi-
ness motto ; I do good work, but don't call myself “artist;”
no, I assure you. Well, you want something practical,
you say, and nothing about art. I see you don't take
down all the aesthetic fellows say about posing and com-
position, or perhaps your subscribers arc crying out,
“ Hold, enough !” Well, I shall not give you anything
artistic ; I buy my back-grounds from the dealers, and
don't build up any of the poetic groupings — genre pic-
tures, as you call them. I am always consistent — that is,
make my figures and my grounds congruous; that's a
degree in art, I suppose. As I shall not or cannot give
you anything artistic, will you have something artless ?
I have considerable reputation as a photographer of
babies from knee-high to a bumble-bee up ; though it is
giving away my trade I shall not be stingy, as I have learned
many a good practical hint from your magazine which
some other generous fellow has given to the public free,
gratis, for nothing.
My method with the little ones (recollect 1 am not a
father, and therefore have no fatherly feeling towards
them) is as follows : —
The secret of success is in gaining their attention — to get
their little minds .away from self-consciousness. 1 remem-
ber that one of the writers in your journal gives this as
the key for successful portraiture. Ilis language is flowery,
and I suppose he is an amateur, but for all that there is a
good deal of common sense running all through his paper,
but I did not get my idea from him ; 1 have photographed
babies, some of whom are now grandmothers. To divorce
the mind from self-consciousness is the way to succeed
with babies of all ages. Your writer tells how to secure
this desideratum in the grown folks; I shall tell you how
to secure it with babies.
Suppose we have one of those crying, wriggling young-
sters, about two or three years old. You know how the
minute they get in the chair the commotion begins ; from
sunshine to storm instantaneously. Have about you a
number of noisical toys — not necessarily musical.
Begin at once to blow one of your penny trumpets.
The result is a stare, an inquisition from the little soul
whence came that sound, a desire to investigate ; for all
children not idiots are “newsy.” I)o not blow again on
the trumpet, but ring immediately a bell. A new arrange-
ment of the features takes place. Follow them up with a
chuckle, then a run down of the scale on a mouth organ.
It is the quick succession of events which engages the
mind of the child, and by the time you expend your ener-
gies on four or five differently sounding instruments, you
will be rewarded with a smile ; then press the bulb and
secure the impression. With larger children who are in-
tractable I always have a lively conversation, sometimes a
gentle dispute with them ; telling them I don’t believe
they know what they are talking about. Doubt the story
of Jack the Giant-Killer. Now anyone bold enough to
say that the story of the redoubtable Jack is a fabrication
will receive the gentle anathemas of the little ones for his
The result is a most animated expression.
Sometimes the telling of a fairy tale in a way that conjures
up expectation is just the best way.
It requires tact to get along with children. I sometimes
try similar dodges on grown-up babies who are so dread-
fully self-conscious that they mar everything in the way of
good expression.
You don’t tell them fairy tales, I hope ! I think I hear
you say. Oh, no ; not exactly, but then I have a way of
getting them out of themselves.
1 first of all place on the upright, towards which I direct
them to look, not a black mark that can be shoved up and
down, but an interesting 2>icture, full of incident, about
which they arc sure to ask you something concerning the
topic. I begin work, the story progresses, and when I am
ready I direct attention to a certain figure or object in the
picture which has direct reference to what I am talking
about. Of course interest is excited; the picture is at
the right height on the pole for the eyes, and, moreover,
the eyes, instead of being fixed staringly at one blank spot
till they wink and water, can wanderoveralimited field with-
out actually moving. This kink gives the means for securing
the best expression possible. Some people tell me, of
course, that I have taken them unfairly, and that the ex-
pression must be perfectly horrible. The proof is sent,
and a good order follows ; not only from themselves, but
from their uncles, sisters, and aunts.
The use of the spot on which to fix the eyes is an
invention of the Inquisition. It is a painful operation for
a strong eye, and excruciating for tender eyes. In fact, I
have known people to be almost put in a hypnotic state by
gazing too long on a spot.
Now, as I wind up— or, as a photographer should say,
cap my balk and put in the slide — I would like to know if
you think this paper practical. If not, I shall add a string
of formulae, which neither I nor anybody else ever thought
of trying, and I don’t believe the men who send them to
the magazine ever tried. — ■American Journal of Photography.
The subject at the Camera Club for Thursday, Jan. 23rd,
is “ English Church Architecture as a subject for Photography,”
when a paper will be read by the Rev. T. Perkins, M.A.
Proposed Lantern Club. — As will be seen from our Corre-
spondence column, a project is on foot to establish an association
of those interested in the work of photographic optical lanterns.
We refer readers interested to the letter in question.
The Total Eclipse op December 22nd. — Misfortune has
attended the double expedition sent by the Royal Astronomical
Society to observe the total eclipse of December 22nd. In
Africa observations were made impossible by bad weather.
Observations were secured off the coast of French Guiana, but
at a cost which is deeply to be deplored — the death of Father
Perry. The telegram received from Demcrara is as follows : —
“101 corona American Perry dead dysentery.” With regard
to the part of this telegram which needs explanation, the
Times of January 6th says : — “ 104 is resolvable into the
factors 2, 4, and 13, of which the first number means that the
weather was only moderately good ; the second that successful
exposures were made with the Abney 4-inch lens, but that the
development was not carried out, owing either to unfavourable
climatic conditions, or, possibly, to the illness of Father Perry;
and the third, that successful photographs were obtained with
the 20-inch mirror, but again the development was not com-
pleted. The words corona American signify most probably
that the corona was of the same form as that seen on January
1st, 1889, when a total eclipse was successfully observed in
California, and the form was then that now generally ascribed
to a period of minimum sun-spots, elongated at the sun’s
equator, and radial but short at the poles,” — Nature,
46
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jakoary 17, 1890.
incites.
Photographers who read the Globe of Saturday last
must have rubbed their eyes when they saw a state-
ment therein gravely intimating that photography
must have been known in the thirteenth century.
Mr. John Smyth, who is now ship’s corporal on board
H.M.S. Impregnable, was serving, to quote the Globe,
exactly “J5 years” ago in the Royal Adelaide, and
posted a letter containing a photograph to his mother.
That letter reached its destination only a few days
back. It appears it got into a crevice of the ship’s letter
box, where it has lain undiscovered “since 1274” (!)
But this is not the only wonderful part of the story,
for our contemporary adds: “On being opened the
photograph was found to be in a good state of preserva-
tion.” Clearly the discovery of this photograph, which
must have been produced in the reign of Edward I.,
had a paralyzing effect on both the compositor and the
writer. The “ £5 years ” of the first may thus be
accounted for, and so also the astonishiug information
of the second, that the photograph was “opened,” just
as though it had been a mummy !
To enquire too curiously into this astonishing para-
graph might be hazardous for our own brains and those
of our readers, and to prevent any further catastrophe
let us at once suggest that the figures may be misprints,
the “ £5 ” being probably intended for 15, and the
“ 1274 ” for 1874. But taking this hypothesis as cor-
rect, the statement is yet sufficiently curious. Fifteen
years’ exposure of a photograph to the influence of sea
air at times charged to excess with moisture, and
the photograph still to be in “ a good state of preserva-
tion,” is a marvel indeed. We have always been under
the impression that if anything was calculated to try
the temper of a photograph, it was a sea voyage. This
wonderfully tough specimen ought really to be tried by
a jury of experts, and if found to justify the descrip-
tion of the Globe, to be hung up in some public place
as a refutation of the popular impression that photo-
graphs are not enduring.
Photography has been the subject of a good many
puns, but it is now squeezed perfectly dry. This is
evident when so expert a master of word play as
Mr. Burnand fails to extract a joke from it having
the least scintillation of freshness. A photographer’s
studio and a photographer play an important part in
the new burlesque “ Tra la la Tosca,” but, except to
lead up to the droll mock execution when half a dozen
photographers take aim with their cameras at the
prisoner, it is not easy to find out the reason why
photography is lampooned. Perhaps Mr. Burnand’s
faculty for parodying names may have had something
to do with it. “ Count Cameradossi ” is a happy hit.
Who is the inventor of the latest instantaneous
photographic apparatus, and of what does the latest
apparatus consist ? The question is rather an impor-
tant one, becauso new instantaneous photographic
cameras arc being invented at the rate of at least one
per week. Whoever the inventor in question may be,
we are interested in reading that last week he had the
honour of displaying his invention to the German
Emperor and Empress at the New Palace, Potsdam.
The society journal which chronicles this information
says, “ The inventor claims to be able to take photo-
graphs from life in a manner bordering on the in-
credible, and surpassing all expectations. As a proof
of the power of the machine, the inventor took two
portraitsof their majesties, with which they were greatly
pleased.” Is it such a proof of “ power ” of an instan-
taneous camera that it is able to photograph Royalty ?
A correspondent raises a nice point. Ho wishes to
make some lantern slides from the pictures in Punch,
but is troubled over the copyright question. Is lie in-
fringing the Act by copying them and exhibiting the
slides on the screen, he would like to know ? In the
absence of any precedent, we should fancy there is
nothing to prevent him copying the pictures, but ho
must not attempt to sell the slides. It is also a moot
point whether the exhibition before an audience who
have paid money to see the lantern entertainment
might not constitute publication. Permission probably
would be accorded by the proprietors of Punch. We
know a case where an application was made by a pro-
fessional maker of slides to the proprietor of another
comic journal, and consent was obtained on condition
that the words “ by permission of the proprietor,” and
the name of the paper, were on each slide so as to ho
seen by the audience.
Dr. Vogel, in an article in the Bulletin de l' Asso-
ciation Beige de Photographic on the jubilee of photo-
graphy, points out the influence which photography
has had upon the art critic. lie contends, and with
perfect justice, that photography ha3 given to the
public a more profound knowledge of nature, which
enables it not only to appreciate, but to judge of the
works of painters mu.!i more accurately than was
possible years ago. Painters, on the other hand, have
been compelled to work according to the light which
photography has thrown upon the convcntionalties
of art now shown to be errors. As for the power
of reproduction, photography has worked quite a
revolution, and added materially to the earnings of
the aitist. Dr. Vogel gives an example of a painter
who sold his picture for 1,500 marks, the reproduc-
tion of which brought in at least ten times as much.
But in Germany the reproduction of pictures has
grown into an industry of vast dimensions. In
England. not only artists, but buyers, have occasionally
a curious prejudice against their pictures being repro-
duced by photography. How rarely does one see any
of the hosts of pictures hung every year in the
Academy, the Institute, and the other galleries repro-
duced by photography ! Yet one would think it
would be easy to create a market for photographic
scraps of current art. If it were the custom for
January 17, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
47
painters to have their pictures photographed, the
public would eagerly buy copies. But the latter
must be sold cheaply to make the demand. It has
been urged that if photographs of a picture were sold
at a low rate the sale of engravings would be injured,
but we fail to sec any force in the argument, as the
classes of buyers are totally different.
We are not quite sure whether it needs an Arch-
bishop Whately to prove that half a dozen photographs
identical in every respect are exactly the same, but we
fancy it would puzzle even a logician of Whately’ s
keenness to convince ordinary persons that any number of
similar photographs are collectively one, and vice versa.
This sounds like one of Mr. W. S. Gilbert’s topsy-
turvyisms, and we had better hasten to explain what
we mean, which, fortunately, we are able to do from
a case which recently came before the Surrey magis-
trates. A lady residing at Richmond had occasion to
dismiss her servant summarily. After the goods and
chattels had been packed up and sent away, it was
discovered that a photograph belonging to the maid
was missing. The bereft owner thereupon took the
summary course of walking into her former mistress’s
house, and coolly removing a photograph similar to the
one she had lost from a frame in the drawing-room, and
carrying it away. For this she was charged with
larceny, and the case was taken to the Quarter Ses-
sions. There was no question as to the facts, nor was
it disputed that the girl knew the photograph she took
was not hers, yet the grand jury, directly they heard
that the photographs were similar, threw out the bill
There is something very droll in this, and either both
the girl and the grand jury considered there was no
difference between one and a dozen or more photographs
from the same negative, or that anybody has a right to
look upon a photograph as umbrellas arc regarded —
common property. Certainly, in the first case, a wide
field for speculation is opened up as to any one photo-
graph possessing any identity over another photograph
from the same negative, and a very pretty casuistical
discussion might be raised on the point by any photo-
graphic society hard up for a subject.
Mr. Muybridge gives the palm to Meissonnier for
correct drawing of the horse. This is not to be
wondered at, for a more conscientious worker docs not
exist than the great French artist. He pays large
sums every year to his models, but he is most exacting.
It is said that desiring to paint a horse in a rearing
position, he had one forced to assume the attitude every
morning until he was satisfied ho had got the drawing
correctly. The picture was a triumph, but the un-
fortunate horse was ruined through its enforced
exertions. Rosa Bonheur, Mr. Muybridge considers to
be the worst painter of animals, and ridicules the
drawing in the “ Horse Fair.” It would be interesting
to have his opinion of Mrs. Butler’s “Roll Call,”
which at the time of its exhibition excited so much
discussion in regard to the position of the horse’s legs.
THE PACKAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS FOR POST.
BY C. ISRANGWIN BARNF.S.
When a client lives at a distance beyond which it is possible
to forward his or her portraits by messenger, it is usual to
make use of cither the book or parcels post as a means of
transmission. Photographs so sent are, as a rule, received
with dispatch and in good condition, although, unfortu-
nately, there are exceptions to this rule, and, strange to
say, these exceptions always take place with regard to the
most important parcels. Having recently had occasion to
complain to the postal authorities of damage to several pack-
agesof photographsduring transit, I wasinformed that every
possible care was taken of such parcels, but unless they
were marked “fragile,” no exceptional measures could be
taken. Two or three of the packages- in question con-
sisted of, in some cases, six, and in others twelve cartes-
de-visite, enclosed in cardboard postal wrapper, and
marked on the outside “photographs only,” yet these
packages were not damaged in a slight degree, but broken
right across the centre, every carte being completely
spoiled. In other instances the prints have been so rubbed
as to be worthless, and I am sorry to add that in a few
cases, where twelve portraits have been forwarded, only
eleven have been delivered. All parcels sent by book post
are liable to be opened by the authorities in order to see
that they contain no written matter of the nature of a
letter, and although the package may have been securely
and properly arranged before such opening, it is very
rarely fastened up again in the same style ; it is not to be
supposed that the examiner understands the necessity of
preventing photographs from rubbing against each other,
and even if he does, lie very rarely seems to take any
steps with that end in view. It is usual for photographers
to pack their clients’ portraits face to face, which helps to
prevent rubbing of the albumen surface ; but after the
examiner has done his work, he usually re-arranges all this.
The only way out of the difficulty that presents itself to
my mind is to send all carte and cabinet pictures by letter
post, and all larger sizes by parcels. It may be urged
that the difference in the rates of postage, between book
and letter, would materially affect the petty cash account
in the course of a year ; but I should say any difference
would be more than rectified by the additional satisfaction
given to our clients, and by the fact that we should have
less damaged prints to produce over again. If the margin
of profit is too small to allow of the additional expendi-
ture, then why not charge the postage to the sitter, as
many firms do already? The portraits should then be
packed in a perfectly fitting envelope, so as to allow no
room for their rubbing together, face to face, with a slip
of tissue paper between each pair, and a plain card at eacli
side of the whole, as otherwise the outside pictures will
bear a vivid impress of the sorter’s zeal in the shape of a
deeply indented postmark. A dozen cartes packed in this
manner would cost three-halfpence or twopence for
postage, as against one penny by book post.
The larger sizes should be first packed face to face and
wrapped in thin paper, technically known as small hand,
then placed between two pieces of thin wood (back board-
ing), one of which should be cut the reverse way of the
grain to the other, and the whole packed in thick brown
paper and securely tied. I recommend wood in preference
to strawboardfortwo reasons: firstly, because it is cheaper;
and secondly, because the contents are far less liable to
damage. The reason for the wood being the two different
48
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
ways of the grain is not far to seek, as it increases the
strength of the package at least four-fold. The address
may be attached on a luggage label, which should also
carry the stamps to defray postage.
Unmounted prints should be rolled, albumenized sur-
face outwards, on a thin wooden roller, and enclosed in a
strawboard music roll ; so packed, they cannot be damaged,
unless maliciously, and to prevent any intermeddling with
the contents, letter post, or if the package is heavy, par-
cel post rates should be paid.
Negatives, opals, or opalines should be packed in a
wooden box containing hay or bran — I personally prefer
hay, as it keeps the contents more steadily in one position
— and under no circumstances should the address be
written or stamps stuck upon the box or its covering, the
sudden jar of the stamping machine being often sufficient
to break the negative inside, without damaging the box.
In conclusion, there is no necessity for marking the par-
cels as containing photographs, as the word seems to con-
vey little or no meaning to the postal employes; in its
place the word “fragile” should be substituted, it being
of far greater necessity to impress upon the minds of
those whom it may concern that the contents of the parcel
are capable of receiving injury, than to inform them of the
exact nature of those contents. While on the subject of
packing, it may not perhaps be altogether out of place to
mention the package of framed photographs, more especi-
ally as so many come to grief during transit. All photo-
graphs in frames should be first encased in a good covering
of soft paper, and then again in thicker, and tied firmly
between two boards; or, if the frame be a large one, it is
sometimes advisable to pack it in a box. When such is
the case, care should be taken to thoroughly fill up the
interstices between the frame and the sides of the box
with plenty of old waste paper, the softer the better, and,
in the case of a very heavy frame, it will be found of
advantage to put a couple of stout screws through the
bottom of the box into the back of the frame itself,
which will prevent it from moving and chipping.
— —
Photographing the Hands. — We owe a new and interest-
ing application of photography to M. ISertillon, the well-known
director of the Identification Department at the Paris Prefec-
ture of Police. M. Bertillon has been devoting himself for
some months to the study of the physical peculiarities
engendered by the pursuit of different occupations. The
police have frequently to deal with portions of bodies, and it
would greatly aid their investigations to be able to determine
the calling of the murdered person in each particular case.
The hand is as a rule the part naturally most affected by the
occupation, and M. llertillon has taken a very large series of
photographs, each one showing on a large scale the hands, on
a smaller scale the whole figure of the workman at his work,
so that one may see at a glance the position of the body, and
which are the parts that undergo friction from the tools in use.
From the hands of the navvy all the secondary lines disappear,
and a peculiar callosity is developed where the spade handle
rubs against the hand ; the hands of tin-plate workers arc
covered with little crevasses produced by the acids employed ;
the hands of lace-makers arc smooth, but they have blisters
full of serum on the back and callosities on the front part
of the shoulder, due to the friction of the straps of the loom ;
the thumb and the first joints of the index of metal-workers
show very large blisters, whilst the left hand has scars made by
thc sharp fragments of metal. Experts in forensic medicine
(Vernois among others) have before drawn attention to the
subject, but this is the first time that an investigation has been
carried out oil a large scale, and in M. Bertillon ’s hands it
should lead to the best results. — Nature.
VAPOUR DEVELOPM ENT.
BY T. It. LUDERS.
Tin: use of vapours in picture making was one of the first
methods. The polished silver plate being exposed to
iodine vapour to make it sensitive, and after-exposure to
that of mercury to develop the image, was the process of
early days. Since then there does not seem to have been
any use of vapour, except for fuming silvered albumen
paper.
In the use of ammonia vapour, I have found by a few
crude experiments that the modern dry plate maybe deve-
loped by soaking for a minute or so in a plain solution of
pyro in water, and then exposing to the fumes of ammonia,
again returning it to the pyro bath, followed by the
ammonia vapour, thus alternating until sufficient density
is obtained. There does not seem to be much difference
when the vapour is used before the bath — of course first
wetting the plate — though more careful experiments may
show an advantage. I find that a plain, strong pyro solu-
tion acts most rapidly, but too powerful a vapour acts too
strongly, and is liable to produce red and green fog.
I think that a solution of pyro with any preservative that
could be used with ammonia as the alkali, might also be
used with ammonia vapour, and the alkali having kept
separate from the pyro, it might be used repeatedly, as the
action goes on mostly while under the influence of the
vapour, and it seems to be necessary only to swab the plate
with the pyro solution.
Perhaps the most valuable quality of this process is the
ability it gives to localize and control development, as any
part of a plate may be built up while other parts are left
nearly or entirely undeveloped. By holding the plate film
side down over an open bottle of ammonia, which may be
warmed a little to increase the vapour, the image is slowly
or rapidly developed, according to the distance above the
mouth of the bottle. Four or five inches high diffuses the
vapour sufficiently for uniform action over a five by seven
plate, and for local action down to half-inch, according to
the strength of the vapour. An open dish can be used,
and probably a small hose from the mouth of the bottle
would work for local development with film upwards.
The above process is equally applicable to intensification
with bichloride of mercury solution, and the action can be
carefully watched, so that only those parts needing extra
density need have full exposure to the fumes. It seems
necessary that the plate should be evenly wet or damp all
over to get uniform action, but 1 found no difficulty about
that.
The advantages seem to be especially the local action
without hard lines, and the pyro does not darken even in
plain solution nearly so quickly as when the alkali is mixed
with it, and probably by the use of a swab or brush, with-
out immersing the plate in the solution, it could be pre-
served and used over and over again. — . 1 merican Journal of
Photography.
Nkw( astle-on-Tynk and Northern Counties’ Photo*
on a i'ii ir Association.— An International Photographic Exibi-
tion will be held in the Central Exchange Art Galley, New-
castle-on-Tyne, from April 18th until May 3rd. A supple-
mentary exhibition of photographic apparatus and appliances,
and photo-mechanical printing processes, will be held at the
same time and place, under the auspices of Messrs. Barkas
and Son, Art Gallery, Newcastle-on -Tyne, to whom applica-
tion for space in this section must be made. Further infor-
mation may be had from the lion. Secs. Photographic
Exhibition, Art Gallery, Grainger Street, Newcastle- on- Tyne.
January 17, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
THE EXHIBITION OF THE WEST LONDON
PI I OT< )G R API IlC SOf’IET V .
Last Friday and Saturday the Exhibition of the West
London Photographic Society was open at the Addison
Hall, Addison Hoad, near Uxbridge Road railway station,
and was of an interesting description. This Society of
professionals and amateurs was founded in December, 1 888,
and principally by Messrs. G. F. Blackmore, T. B. March,
I* Bennett, and J. A. Hodges. A preliminary meeting
was held at Chiswick, and the subsequent meetings at
Addison Hall. A new president is appointed for each
year, and the retiring president isnot eligible for re-election.
The first president was Mr. William England, and the pre-
sent president is Mr. Charles Bilton, B. A. The Society
has about seventy members.
East Saturday evening, Mr. Chang, of the Chinese Em-
bassy, took four flash-light pictures of the assembled com-
pany. < )n the platform he had two small came ras, one on
a stand, the other attached to the back of a chair by a
camera clip. The top of a step ladder on the platform he
covered with tufts of gun-cotton, and on this explosive
area of nearly a foot square he distributed a considerable
quantity of magnesium powder out of a bottle ; the flash
was necessarily of a magnificent description, and left be-
hind some little residual bonfires of blazing magnesium.
The Judues’ Report.
We, the undersigned, beg to state that our awards in the
1890 Photographic Competition between members of the West
London Photographic Society are as follows : —
Division I. — Class 1. Frame of six Dutch landscapes (first
medal), W. L. Coolls ; set of three, “Eventide,” “Romney
Lock,” “Silver Lining” (second medal), G. F. Blackmore;
set of three, “Conway Quay,” “A Quiet Pool,” “On the
River Ogwen ” (third medal), J. A. Hodges. This is a very
well contested class, and we have had pleasure in awarding
some of the medals withheld in the other classes. Amongst
other pictures in this class, we would draw attention to “A
Grey Morning, Dovedale,” H. Selby ; “ Blowing up for Rain,”
J. Wilson; “A Coming Storm,” C. Garner Richardson.
Class 2. One photo of set of three, “ Bridge and Stream,”
Walter L. Cooils, medal. Some discussion took place as to any
award at all being given in this class. Class 3. Set of three,
‘Conway Castle,” “Reception Room and Refectory,”
l’las Mawr (medal), J. A. Hodges. A very admirable series.
Class I. Exeter Cath. Choir (medal), Chas. Whiting. Class 5.
Whilst withholding any award in this class, we would indicate
that the “Sister and Brother,” S. S. Chang, is considerably
the best exhibit in the class. Class 0. No award. Class 7, 8,
9, 10. No award. Note. — In Class 8, “ Grey well Tunnell ”
and “ In Cassiobury Park,” Dr. F. H. Low, show good techni-
cal work; “ Kew Bridge,” Dr. F. H. Low, being the best
pictorially, though not held of sufficient merit. In Class 9, the
only distinctive genre picture is “ Spinning the Top,” by J. A.
Hodges ; but it is rather a painting than a photograph. Of
the rest, we would refer to “ Watching the Amateur,” by
L. C. Bennett. Lantern Slides. — Class 12 (landscape), no
award ; the set marked “Bennett” is noted as the best.
Class 13 (marine). Chas. Whiting, medal. Class 14 (archi-
tecture), Chas. Whiting, medal. Class 1 5 (instantaneous), ,
withheld. Class 1*1. The judges prefer to leave this exhibit
to a judge with the requisite technical attainments.
Signed, G. Davison', F. P. Cf.mbrano, F. M. Skipworth.
The annual conversazione of the Society was held at the
Exhibition last Friday.
Mi-. Chas. Bilton congratulated the Society upon the Ex-
hibition ; he also congratulated those members who had been
fortunate enough to gain medals, at the same time reminding
those who had not been so successful that their failure on
that occasion should stimulate them to greater efforts in the
future. He then read the report of the judges, and informed
49
the members that the names of the competitors were not dis-
closed to the judges until after the awards had been made.
The medals were then presented to the successful competitors
by the president.
Dr. F. Harrison Low, in proposing a vote of thanks to the
judges, remarked that curiously enough the awards upon the
present occasion seemed to have met with universal approbation.
The motion having been seconded by Mr. Bennett, and
adopted,
Mr. Davison, responding on behalf of the judges, said that
although it was generally held that the task a judge had to
perform was a thankless one, yet he was glad to find, from the
manner in which the awards had been received, that such was
not the case invariably. There was, however, a thought far
back in the inner recesses of his own mind that there might
be some dissatisfaction at the number of medals withheld.
Although he did not then propose to justify the circumstance,
he had not the slightest doubt but that the exhibitors would,
on calm reflection, feel convinced that the action of the judges
was justifiable. They went through their task with great
care, going over some pictures again and again, and when a
discussion arose as to whether a medal should be awarded or
not, a decision was arrived at by a fair system of give and take.
The Society was to be congratulated on the appearance of
Class 1 , landscape, half- plate, and under. Considering the size
of the collection as a whole he did not think he had ever seen
a better class- Although they had given two extra awards in
that class, there were still three other exhibits well worthy of
mention ; they were photographs which would bear examina-
tion, and although, perhaps, defective in some respects com-
pared with the winning pictures, yet still possessed consider-
able merit ; not merely technical merit, but something approach-
ing “the pictorial and complete.” The architectural class,
half-plate and under, was also an exceptionally good one on
account of the excellence of some of the exhibits, among which
he would refer specially to Conway Castle, Refectory and
Reception Room, and Idas Mawr, a set of three platinotypes
by Mr. Hodges charming in colour, well chosen and beautiful
in subject, and technically of great perfection. Also in Class 1 ,
he would specially refer to the three medalled pictures by
Mr. Blackmore, which were of high artistic merit, and speaking
for himself he would say he hoped to see much more work from
Mr. Blackmore at future exhibitions.
The members and their friends then inspected the pictures
and lantern slides exhibited. Light refreshments were provided
by the president, and the tables were presided over by Mrs.
Low and Mrs. Hodges. A musical programme, in which Messrs.
M. Morgan, H. Selby, Syckelnlore, and Pilgrim took part, contri-
buted to the pleasure of the eveniug.
The next meeting takes place on Friday, 24th June, when an
adjourned discussion on “ Hand-Cameras” will be concluded.
The competition slides will also be shown by means of the
lantern.
A Tenacious Solder. — An account is given in the Berliner
of a soft alloy which adheres so firmly to metallic, glass, and
porcelain surfaces that it can be used as a solder, and which,
in fact, is valuable when the articles to be soldered are of such
nature that they cannot bear a very high degree of tempera-
ture, the composition consisting of finely pulverized copper
dust, which is obtained by shaking a solution of sulphate of
copper with granulated zinc. The temperature of the solution
rises considerably, and the metallic copper is precipitated in
the form of a brownish powder — twenty, thirty, or thirty-six
parts of this copper dust, according to the hardness desired,
being placed in a cast iron or porcelain-lined mortar, and well
mixed with some sulphuric acid having a specific gravity of 1 '85.
To the paste thus formed are added seventy parts by weight of
mercury, with constant stirring, and when thus thoroughly
mixed, the amalgam is rinsed in warm water to remove the
acid, and then set aside to cool ; jin ten or twelve hours it is
hard enough to scratch tin. On being used, it is heated to a
temperature of 375 degrees centigrade, and when kneaded in
an iron mortar becomes as soft as wax. In this ductile state it
can be spread upon any surface, to which, as it cools and
hardens, it adheres with great tenacity.
50
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
Patent Intelligence.
Applications for Letters Patent.
239. \V. S. Rogers, 7, Addison Road, Bedford Park, London,
“ Cameras.” — January 7th.
278. W. H. Walker, 323, High Holborn, London, “ Photo-
graphic Developing Trays.” — January 7th.
292. C. K. Kino, 57, The Grove, Hammersmith, “Illuminating
Pictures.” — January 7th.
304. Frank Bishop and A. Cowan, “Apparatus for Coating
Photographic Plates.” — January 7th.
317. T. N. Armstrong, 154, St. Vincent Street, Glasgow,
“ Arrangements for Photographing by Artificial Light. —
January 8th.
359. A. J. Boui.t, 323, High Holborn, London, “ Cameras.
January 8th.
381. A. Fuhrmann, New Bridge Street, Manchester, “ Re-
volving Stereoscopic Panoramas. January 9th.
401. T. H. Redwood, 57, Chancery Lane, London, “ Producing
a Flash Light.” — January 9th.
511. J. K. Thornton and E. Pickard, St. Mary’s Street,
Deausgate, Manchester, “ Adapting Photographic Shutters
to Lenses.” — January 11th.
547. J. E. Mayai.l, 1, Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London,
“ Colouring Photographic Impressions with Oil Colours.” —
January 11th.
Specifications Published.
494. — January 10 tli, 1889. “ Photographic Apparatus.”
Charles Winter, London, Manager to Messrs. Mawson and
Swan, 33, Soho Square, London.
The principal object of this invention is to provide a photo-
graphic apparatus in which a number of plates or sensitized
surfaces are placed in succession in position for receiving the
photographic image, and are afterwards returned to a receptacle,
in which they are retained without opening the camera or ex-
posing the plates or surfaces to light otherwise than in taking
the picture.
According to my invention, as applied to photographic pur-
poses, I provide a suitable closed box or camera in which there
is a lens provided with a shutter. Inside this camera, opposite
the lens, is a rotary device, into which the sensitized plates or
surfaces are introduced one after the other from a box, and from
which rotary device they are liberated and received into another
box aftei the picture has been taken thereon. This rotary
device constitutes the “ slide ” of the camera, and is hereinafter
referred to as the rotary slide.
The said rotary slide has one end of its axis projecting from
the camera, and is provided with a milled head or other means
for giving rotary movement to it. The box which contains the
unexposed sensitized plates or surfaces, and the box into which
the plates or surfaces are received after exposure, are situated
inside the camera, preferably occupying the space above and
below’ the lens.
The box from which the plates are supplied to the rotary
slide is provided with means by which, when the rotary slide is
operated, the undermost of the plates is moved from off a
support and falls into a position before a slot in the box, through
which the plate can fall or be moved into grooves or guides for
receiving it in the rotary slide. These means may consist of a
piece which is operated by a projection or recess on the rotary
slide, which projection or recess, when movement is given to the
slide, causes the said piece to move inwards a pusher bar or the
like, which dislodge* the undermost plate, and causes it to take
up a position in which it can leave the box, and be received in
the grooves or guides for it in the rotary slide. A rotary move-
ment is then given to the slide, and thereby the sensitized side
of the plate is presented in position to receive the photographic
image, and when the shutter is opened the plate or sensitized
surface receives the said image ; and when, thereafter, the
shutter is closed, the rotary slide has a further movement of
rotation given to it, which brings the guides or grooves con-
taining the plate iuto line with the box which is to receive the
exposed plates. This preferably consists of a box with an
opening in it to admit the plate, and provided with pushers,
which are operated by the rotary slide, to press the plate into
the box until it is received and retained under retainers, when
the pushers return to thir normal position. It is preferred to
make the rotary slide with two sets of grooves or guides, so
that when one is in line with the box from which the unexposed
] dates are to be discharged, the other is in line with the box
into which the exposed plates are to be received. The plates
may be moved from and iuto the boxes respectively by being
caused to fall by gravity, or there may be an endless band or
carrier, or other device for the purpose, operated by the rotary
slide. The shutter may be arranged to be set either by hand
or by a movement derived from the rotary slide, the move-
ment liberating the shutter for the exposure or uncovering of
the lens being actuated by hand. Thus, in the arrangement
wherein there are two receptacles for jdates in the rotary slide,
the said slide is brought into a position to receive a plate from
the box containing the unexposed plates, and in this movement
a plate is brought into position for passing from the box into
the rotary slide as aforesaid. When the plate is received into
the rotary slide, a quarter turn is given to the said slide, and
the plate is then in position for exposure. After exposure a
further quarter turn is given to the rotary slide, when the
plate which has been exposed is brought into line with the box
for receiving the exposed plates, the other guides in the slide
then being in position for receiving a fresh uuexposed plate,
and so on. The axis of the rotary slide, or the head or handle
by which it is operated, may be provided with a catch or spring
bolt engaging with retainers, so that the slide is kept in proper
position, the positions being suitably marked outside the
camera, so that the position of the rotary slide can be readily
ascertained. The portion of the said slide upon which the
plates rest when in position for exposure are made movable,
and are operated by a cam or other suitable device, so as to
move free of the plate when it is to leave the rotary slide.
Although I have mentioned plates, the invention is of course
not limited to the glass plates known as “plates” in photo-
graphy, as other sensitized surfaces may be used.
504. — January 10 tit, 1889. “Apparatus for theDisplayof Illu-
minated Transparencies.” Charles Norman Morris, of
36, Red Lion Street, Holborn, London, W.C., Designer and
Draughtsman.
This invention has reference to an improved means for the
display of illuminated transparencies, such, for instance, as
theatrical notices, scenes from plays which are, at the time,
being performed, trade notices, and the like, as also for re-
creational and other purposes.
The device or appliance, according to the invention, com-
prises an enclosing case of any suitable size and material to
serve as a lantern, within which is arranged a gas burner, oil
lamp, or other means of illumination, a suitable reflector being
provided for the purpose of concentrating the light. In the
roof of the lantern, immediately above the illuminating medium,
is suspended a wheel formed of a number of vanes or wings
disposed within a ring or hoop, which wheel is caused to rotate
by an upward current of air set up by the heat of the illumi-
nant. Upon two sides of the hoop above referred to are
arranged segmental racks which engage with pinions formed
upon two spindles carrying rollers for the purpose hereinafter
to be described. During the rotation of the wheel above
referred to, the spindles rotate therewith until the last tooth
of the first segmental rack has passed beyond the pinion,
when both pinions stop ; the wheel, however, continues to
rotate until the second segment becomes engaged with the
pinion. During the interval when the first segment leaves
the pinion, and the engagement therewith of the second pinion,
the tendency of tiie revolving wheel would be to rotate with
greater speed ; this, however, is checked by a spring which
comes into action at the proper moment, and, pressing upon
the rotating wheel, regulates the speed thereof.
Upon the rollers, above referred to secured to the spindles,
is mounted a web or band of paper or cloth, rendered trans-
parent by any of the well-known methods, upon which w
January 17, 1890."]
rHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
51
printed, painted, or otherwise delineated, facsimiles of theatri-
cal notices, scenes from plays or operas, trade announcements,
posters, and the like ; or, if the improved apparatus is to be
employed for recreational purposes, I may cause to be painted,
lithographed, or otherwise produced upon said web or band,
landscapes, seascapes, or other scenes of interest, such as illus-
trations of domestic, political, historic, and other episodes. In
the representation of theatrical notices, I prefer to surround
such notice with a border, illustrating some of the characters
of the cast, as also scenes emblematic of the play ; or, if tie-
sired, said border may be simply ornamental, either mediicval,
antique, modern, or in any other attractive style.
The web or band above mentioned being fixed to the rollers
is, when the revolving wheel is in motion, rolled upon one roller
and unrolled from the other, each scene dwelling a limited
time determined by the distance between the two segmental
racks upon the wheel aforesaid, and the speed at which the
wheel revolves. Suitable guide-pulleys are employed to keep
the web or band from sagging whilst the latter is moving.
When the winding of the web or band upon either of the
rollers has been completed, the mechanism will cease to operate,
but the current of air impinging against the wheel will cause
the latter to move to the opposite side, where the segmental
racks would engage with the pinion of the roller from which
the web or band had been previously unrolled, setting it in
motion and thus causing the web or band to be rewound upon
the last-referred to roller. In the employment of lanterns for
the display of large transparencies, wherein greater power would
be required than in the case of small lanterns, is employed a hot
air chamber, by means of which may be obtained any
degree of pressure upon the wheel suited to the size and the
special requirements of the lantern ; but the inventor does not
confine himself to the automatic working of the mechanism by
the pressure of a current of hot air, as under some circum-
stances, the same purpose can be effected by mechanical means
or other source of power.
With a view to the protection of the transparency from
injury from the heat of the illuminant, there may be interposed
between a sheet of thick, clear glass, ami in order to guard the
web or band from becoming wet from rain when the appliance is
employed in the open air, the whole is covered with a sheet of
glass fitted into a suitable frame, ornamental or otherwise, as
may be desired, the two sheets of glass forming a chamber
between which the transparency is caused to move.
17,436. — November 2nd, 1889. “Discolouring Tannic Acid
Solutions.” Herbert John Haddan, of the firm of Herbert
I and Co., Patent Agents, of 18, Buckingham Street, Strand,
London, Civil Engineer. A communication from Jui.es
Landini, of Grimm No. 6, Hamburg, in the empire of Ger-
many, Manufacturer.
i The object of this invention is to discolour solutions derived
from wood, plants, and leaves used in tanneries, in order to be
able to obtain transparent and clear liquids. The principal
i , part of the invention consists in treating such solutions with
f nitrate of lead, and subsequently with the addition of alum and
borax. The solutions, according to their respective strength,
are mixed with suitable quantities of nitrate of lead, then heated
or boiled until a complete discolouring has taken place. During
this process samples are withdrawn from time to time, and the
addition of nitrate of lead is increased until the discolouring
is completed.
f As an example of the practice of this process it may be men-
tioned that new decoctions of tannic acids are treated with
about 2 kilogrammes of nitrate of lead for each thousand litres
1. of liquid.
It is convenient to use a diffusion battery during treatment
of the tannic acids into which the solution is introduced ; then
make the above-named addition of nitrate of lead, and boil the
I mixture for some 25 minutes ; then decant the solution into a vessel
or drum provided with some stirring device into which steam is
admitted of about * atmospheric pressure. After stirring for
about 20 minutes a sample is withdrawn and a further supply
, of nitrate of lead is added should this be found necessary, and
the stirring continued until the desired degree is attained. The
solution is now withdrawn, cooled down, neutralized, and
filtered.
17,708. November 6th, 1889. “Photographic Cameras.”
Thomas Rudolph Dallmeyer, of 25, Newman Street,
Oxford Street, London, Optician, and Francis Beauchamp,
of Hope Cottage, Whalebone Lane, Chadwell, Romford,
Essex, Engineer.
The inventors claim : —
1. A photographic camera, the extensible portion of which is
built up upon a wire support.
2. The extensible portion of a camera built up upon a con-
tinuous wire support.
3. The support formed of a series of sections or frames.
4. The improvements relating to the manufacture of the
extensible portions of cameras described and illustrated.
(tfomsponlitnce.
REPRODUCTION AND COPYRIGHT.
Sir, — Mr. Ralph W. Robinson’s letter has elicited replies
which seem to establish two new facts hitherto, 1 fancy,
unsuspected by the majority of photographers, yet of great
value to them.
In the first place, your “Notes” show, what few seem to
have known, that the right to reproduce a photograph by way
of engraving for the use of illustrated pa]>ers is worth a certain
sum of money, and that one firm, at least, demands and obtains
ten shillings for the right to reproduce a portrait in one paper,
and that they demand a further fee if other use is to be made
of the block. Hitherto, the newspapers have patronisingly and
doubtfully repaid the photographer by mentioning his name.
This concession had to be forced from the papers.
The other fact is of still greater importance. It has been
the opinion of the photographic authorities from the beginning,
and stated nearly every week in answers to correspondents in
one or other of the photographic journals, that if a print of a
photograph was sold before it was registered, the copyright
was lost. Nobody seems to have doubted the verdict until
Mr. Robinson asked the question, which has drawn an authori-
tative legal reply from Mr. C. Fleetwood Pritchard, who, I
believe, is not only a barrister, but also an excellent amateur
photographer. He shows us that our trusted leaders have mis-
led us for once, and that a photograph can be effectually
registered at any time, with the drawback, however, that the
registration is not retrospective, and cannot protect from
piracies that have preceded the act of registration.
The photographic world is a gainer for this addition to our
stock of knowledge, and it is to be hoped that now' photo-
graphers know there is a money value in the right to reproduce,
they will insist upon getting it, always remembering that they
can protect their property for the future by registering at any
time. A. D. L.
Sir, — In my letter under the above heading 1 perhaps dwelt
too exclusively on the case of photographs “ which are intended
to be pictures,” as it is from that point of view the subject of
right to reproduce has chiefly affected me. However, in the
case of a great many, probably the majority of portraits used
for reproduction in newspapers, the principle is the same.
You say that the cases you have in your mind are those in which
the photographer has already been paid for making the negative.
In that case the photographer has no copyright, and therefore
no right himself to reproduce, or to give permission to others
to do so. The necessary' permission in this case, as I understand
it, can only be obtained from the sitter. In the majority of
cases the sitter has been invited to sit, and the portrait has
been produced simply for publication purposes, and in this
case it is only reasonable that the photographer should
exact a fee from anyone who wishes to use the portrait for
reproduction.
The principle is the same as charging two shillings or so for
32
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
a published cabinet portrait. It surely would not be contended
that it would be for the good of the profession in the long run
to publish cabinets at threepence each ; yet a photographer can-
not have any better advertisement than the spreading abroad
of good work bearing his name. It appears to me that any of
those means of advertising which tend to cheapen photography
in the eves of the public are detrimental to the best interests
of the profession. Ralph W. Robinson.
FORMATION OF A LANTERN CLUB.
Sir, — Will you permit me to call the attention of your
readers to a step which 1 trust now to see taken, viz., to bring
together, either by means of a club or association, in a practical
form, those who are interested in the work of photographic
optical lanterns.
I will not here detail the advantages that may possibly accrue
from such an association, except to suggest, («) the develop-
ment and improvement of the lantern itself, (6) to help in
popularizing it generally, (c) to enable those who are fond of so
delightful and scientific an amusemeut to become known to each
other, and thus develop their common pursuit, (rf) to hold in
London and the country periodical exhibitions, (c) to facilitate
the interchange of photographic slides, and (/) generally to pro-
mote lantern work.
The basis of such an association and its rules remain to be
formulated. Meanwhile, 1 wish to put plainly through your
columns a very pointed but respectful request, viz., will all
those who are favourable to the idea forward to me at 46,
Chesiltou Road, Munster l’ark, S. W. , or to the Hon. Slingsby
Bethel, at Che'sea Lodge, Chelsea Embankment, their names
and addresses, in order that they may be invited to a meeting,
or informed of any proceedings that may be taken.
46, Chesiltou Road, Fulham, S. W. T. H. Holding.
ISOCHROMATIC PHOTOGRAPHY AT THE PHOTO-
GRAPHIC SOCIETY OF FRANCE.
Sir, — -Will you kindly allow us space for a few words in pro-
test against M. Leon Vidal’s unjust criticism of the prints
from negatives on isochromatic and ordinary plates, which, by
invitation of the president, M. Davanne, we recently presented
to the French Photographic Society'.
M. Vidal says in his report, which appears in the last number
of the News, that the photographs were “defective as examples,”
those on the ordinary plates being “ taken in a bail light,”
while those on the isochromatic plates “ were more directly
lighted.” As a matter of fact, both negatives in every case were
taken under precisely the same conditions, as could easily' be
seen by the most cursory examination of those parts where the
object was of a neutral tint, and which, not being affected by
colour-sensitiveness, were rendered of equal value in both nega-
tivas.
We can quite understand that anyone not conversant with
the subject would, at first sight, imagine that the great differ-
ence shown in some of the proofs could not be produced by
colour-sensitiveness alone ; but surely M. Vidal should know
better. His insinuation that the negatives were dodged in the
lighting does not do him credit, and would seem to show that
he is ignorant of the progress which has been made in isochro-
matic photography.
We shall niily be too pleased to afford M Vidal the means
of testing the matter to his own satisfaction, should he desire
further investigation. MTe are sending to the President of the
French Society conclusive evidence that the specimens shown by
us were not unfairly manipulated in any way, and we trust
that M. A idal will avail himself of the opportunity' of making
us the amende honorable.
It is unfortunate that as soon as any real improvement in
photography is introduced, there are always to be found indi-
viduals who, tailing to understand the matter by their own light
and knowledge, are ready at once to say, “It is not true.”
These same persons a little later, or, as in this instance, almost
in the same breath, rarely fail to raise theory, “ It is not new,
we knew it all along.”
W e opine that M. V idal will find few to agree with him that
[January 17, 1890.
a process which has been worked out with infinite pains and at
great cost by an individual should belong to the community as
soon as it is found to be useful. If this principle were carried
out, it would constitute the greatest barrier to progress which
it is possible to conceive. It is precisely to prevent such a
result, and to encourage research, that the patent laws have
been adopted in all civilised countries. In the present instance
it is extremely probable, except for the wisdom of the legisla-
ture in recognizing and protecting the commercial rights of
inventors, which M. Vidal so coolly ignores, that isochromatic or
colour-sensitive photography would now be numbered among the
lost or forgotten processes of the art.
At the expiration of the existing patent, the process will be
free to all the world ; until that time arrives we arc prepared to
defend our rights in this country by all legal means, and at any
cogt, B. j’. Edwards & Co.
The Grove, Hackney, London, January 1 -ith.
♦
Jihoccctiings of Societies,
Photographic Society ok Great Britain.
At the meeting of this Society, held on the 14th inst., the
President, Mr. James Glaisher, F.R.S., occupied the chair.
A paper was read by Mr. Chapman Jones, F. I.C., F’.C.S.,
“On Control in the Density of Negatives,” in the course of
which the author stated that in consideration of the difficulty
of exactly deciding upon the density of a negative whilst
developing, he considered it best to keep the intensity rather
below than above what was finally required, and complete that
part of the work in a good light after fixation. Then, as to
the process to be used for giving intensity, it was better to
take for the normal process one that increased the deposit in
proportion to the silver already forming the image. There
were processes that did not do this, and for special cases they
might be preferable ; but, starting with the normal require-
ments, he had found it most satisfactorily fulfilled by the
method of using solution of bichloride of mercury, followed by
one of ferrous oxalate. The solutions lie used were : — First,
a saturated solution of bichloride of mercury to which hydro-
chloric acid was added in the proportion of three minims to
every two ounces of solution. After bleaching with this solu-
tion, the negative must be thoroughly washed — an opera-
tion for which an hour to an hour and a half with
frequent changes of water was not too long. It was
then treated with a ferrous oxalate developer composed of
one part of saturated solution of sulphate of iron mixed with
six parts of saturated solution of oxalate of potash. This
developer was made slightly acid with oxalic acid — if consider-
ably acid it was much slower in its action. A process that
had b„en much recommended — that with mercury, followed by
solution of sulphite of soda — he could not advise, except
when only a very limited amount of intensity was required. It
might, however, be used as a starting point, and the negative
would be found to be in as good a condition for taking other
methods afterwards as if it had not been used. The actual
constitution of the image after the use of sulphite had, he
believed, not hitherto been shown. He had found that the
silver and mercury were both of them dissolved to the extent
of one-half by the sulphite, but yet the resulting image was
one which generally gave more density than at first. A claim
that had been made for this method, that a plate might be
treated repeatedly with the solutions, gaining intensity each
time, was one that his experiments did not support.
The process with mercury and oxalate he could recommend as
being clean, having no tendency to frill, even with repeated
operations ; having freedom from choking up of the shadows,
and preserving the gradation of the lights.
Mr. W. E. Debknham considered it very useful to have the
rationale of a process worked out, as had been done by Mr.
Chapman Jones, with the mercury and sulphite process. Ho
had never used that process, except experi men tall v, as the in-
tensifying power was so limited, and there were others that ho
considered better, it had been stated that the sulphite pro*
January 17, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
53
cess might be used to start with, and, if found insufficient,
other processes might be employed without the previous use
of the sulphite being in any way injurious. As, however, it
had been shown that half the original silver had been dissolved
away in the sulphite, he put it as a question whether that did
not leave the plate in a mere unfavourable condition as a
basis for intensifying on, than if the whole of the silver were
present.
Capt. Abney confirmed what Mr. Debenham had said as to
the inutility of the sulphite method of intensifying. Very
foolish things had been written about intensifying processes,
this with sulphite amongst others ; and he thanked Mr. Chapman
Jones for working out the rationale of it. His own predilec-
tion was for the cyanide of silver intensifying process, next to
which he liked the one with mercury, followed by ferrous
oxalate, as recommended in the paper.
Mr. Atkinson asked Captain Abney whether he thought as
perfect gradation was obtainable with the cyanide of silver pro-
cess as with the ferrous oxalate following the mercury.
Capt. Abney replied that it was, and continued, that there
was a great convenience in the process, in the facility with
which too great intensity could be let down just to the desired
point.
Mr. Chapman Jones replied that what he meant by saying
that there was no harm in beginning with the sulphite process,
was that the image left was just as amenable to intensifying
by other processes as the original plate had been. Half the
silver was gone, certainly, but the mercury which had replaced
it was in the condition to form a basis for intensifying by any
known method.
Sir David Salomons then read a paper on “The distance
beyond which all objects will be in focus with any given lens.”
He had constructed a table, taking as a basis that any object was
in focus when the circle >f confusion did not exceed the T^0 of an
inch. French photographers had adopted a different standard,
and took about the 5 of an inch as the standard of defini-
tion ; but, he said, we cannot have detective cameras if the
French measure is adopted.
Mr. Debenham was afraid that the paper might tend to
perpetuate a fallacy about lenses which some photographers
appeared to entertain. He had even read in the photographic
papers about the advantage of a lens with a fixed focus — an
absurdity, as no lens could possibly have a fixed focus. The
assumption on which the paper was based, that a lens was in
focus when there was a circle of confusion of f— of an inch,
was an assumption and not a fact. Taking the example worked
out in the paper of a lens of 10-inch focus, it came out that an
object which, to be in true focus, required racking in the
instrument the 1 of an inch, was still in focus without that
adjustment— a proposition which he thought most practical
photographers would recognize as not being true, even with
the diaphragm of //12 mentioned. As to the statement that
if the French measure of permissible confusion was adopted,
detective cameras could not be used, that would depend upon
the question of the length of focus of the lens. A lens, say, of
3 or 4 inches focus might, while keeping to the French standard,
work as rapidly and with as little proportionate confusion for
equi-distant objects as the one of 10-inch focus supposed by
the paper when giving confusion to the of an inch. Curva-
ture of field such as generally, if not always, existed in detective
lenses, was another element in connection with the amount of
loss of definition in objects at varying and at equal distances —
a loss of definition which might considerably exceed that due
to the difference of distance referred to in the paper.
Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer said that the calculation made by Sir
David Salomons formed a continuation of those made by his
late father, and upon the same basis. If the T^0th of an inch
was considered too much confusion to be tolerated, calculations
might be made adapted to the French or any other standard.
A paper from Mr. W. K. Burton upon “ Eikonogen as a
Developer in Practice ” was read in summary by Mr. Chapman
Jones. The writer said that he had found the keeping quality
of a plain eikonogen solution to be less than that of a plain pyro
solution, but when mixed with sulphite of soda and an alkali
the case was reversed, He found that an image developed with
eikonogen came up more slowly than when pyro was used, but
that eventually more detail was obtainable, probably 25 to 30
per cent., and that might be considered as so much gain in the
exposure.
Mr. Warnerke thought to get the best results, eikonogen
and pyro must be treated differently. He found that he got
the best effect with caustic alkali when using eikonogen, and
that then it was better than pyro. He used : —
Water
Sulphite of soda...
Eikonogen
Caustic potash
100 parts
40 „
20 „
20 „
He made up the solution with boiling water, not merely for
ease in dissolving, but because the air was thereby removed.
This strong solution he diluted with from three to ten parts of
water, the former proportion when gre at vigour was required,
and the latter for softer pictures.
Mr. Wollaston had not succeeded in getting such intensity
with eikonogen as was wanted when copying line work, and
enquired whether Mr. Warnerke had not found this to be the
case.
Mr. Warnerke had found the contrary.
Mr. Lawrence remarked upon the great strength of Mr.
Warnerke’s solution, and said that when he had made a solu-
tion of only sixteen grains to the ounce, some of the eikonogen
had afterwards crystallised out.
Mr. Debenham said that it was understood that eikonogen
dissolved much more freely in alkaline solution, and that Mr.
Warnerke’s formula fulfilled this condition.
It was mentioned that nominations for the approaching elec-
tion of members of council must be sent in by the 21st inst.
The auditors for the year were appointed — Messrs. Scamell
and Samuel ; and scrutineers of voting papers, Messrs. Scamell,
Freshwater, Chas. Sawyer, and Atkinson.
Messrs. H. G. Sheppard, E. E. Corke, and Rajmongee C'huer
were elected members of the Society.
Camera Club.
January 9th. — Bedford Street, Strand, London ; Sir
George Prescott, Bart., in the chair.
Mr. W. H. Walker, who attended to read a paper about the
new reliable celluloid film, said that his memoir was something
like Artemus Ward’s lecture on “Nineveh,” which con-
tained nothing about Nineveh in it. He then went into the
history of film photography and roller slides, and when speaking
of stripping films, said that 25,000 negatives per week were
developed anti stripped for those who had exposed them, by
the Eastman Company, and that ninety j>er cent, of these w ere
fairly good, if not superior, printing negatives. Those who
failed with the stripping- films were persons who did not adhere
closely to the instructions issued by the Company, or who, in
some cases, used inferior materials, such as bad india-rubber
solution. Sheets cut from the new reliable film are not
recommended, since no known device will hold them perfectly
flat in the focal plane ; they should be used in a proper roller
slide. The film will not endure great tension in the direction of
its length, and when old Eastman roller slides give too great
tension for use with them, that tension can readily be reduced
by the possessor of the slide by simple means which the speaker
described. The film should not curl in the developing solution,
but to keep it quite flat, the Eastman Company had devised a
new developing dish. The quantity of liquid required to
develop a negative was then surprisingly small ; still, he
doubted whether those dishes would be necessary. To dry the
negative, it should be pinned to a board by one or more comers ;
should it curl, it should, when dry, be wound in the opposite
direction round a cylinder. He did not recommend the use
of glycerine in this country to reduce curling, but in the dry
atmosphere of some parts of the United States, where the fur-
niture can be heard snapping and cracking like pistol shots, the
conditions are different. The films are not yet upon the
market in this country, but the Company is pushing forward
its English factories with all speed. The speaker then exhibited
specimens of the new film, coated and uncoated, also some film
r>4
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 17, 1890.
negatives ; he likewise exhibited various forms of old and new
roller slides. He then stated that the new film had some pecu-
liarities which, so far as he knew, were not understood. It
sometimes presented markings like branches springing from a
central point, and they seemed to be due to some electrical
condition ; such markings were rare. Also, users would occa-
sionally find what appeared to be a lap or joint of two lengths
of the film ; it was not really a lap, but was due to the method
of manufacture, and Mr. Eastman believed that this drawback
would be corrected in the near future.
Mr. Francis Cobb wished that Mr. Walker had exhibited in
its roller slide a film upon which 1 0 by 8 inch negatives could be
taken ; he had never seen a film of that size which, between
the rollers, would keep perfectly flat in the focal plane.
Hr. Lindsay Johnson had experienced the want of some very
perfect transparent celluloid to mitigate the affliction known as
conical cornea, a defect which prevents the sufferer from seeing
anything clearly. A properly shaped piece of transparent
celluloid laid upon the eye with a drop of oil between was of
considerable advantage in such cases, and helped to throw a
sharper image on the retina. With an English and French
chemist he had been working at the improvement of celluloid,
and had succeeded in pioducing specimens more perfect than
that composing the films before them.
Mr. D. P. Rodgers had been taking photographs upon the
new film, and found it fairly strong. Out of eleven negatives,
he had found the branch-like markings in three. He was not
a shareholder in the Company, but he thought that they all
ought to be very grateful for what the Eastman Co. had done,
and he would prefer to have three faulty negatives out of
twelve, rather than to undertake the manipulation of stripping-
films.
Mr. E. R. Shipton had found that the film, when of whole-
plate size, did not lie quite flat in the slide ; but the general
results were very favourable as compared with the use of glass
plates. Could not the Company mark where the laps would
come ? He also was not a shareholder in the Eastman Company,
but was very grateful for what it had done.
Mr. H. Sturmey had been experimenting with a 10 by 8
roll, and had found no unevenness ; his difficulty was to wind
the film straightly off.
A member remarked that if the films were left to dry
for twelve hours — that is to say, until they were far beyond the
stage of being apparently dry — they did not curl. He thought
that the branch-like markings did not seem to appear when the
films were exposed upon wet days.
Hr. C. S. Patterson wished to know whether the films
would preserve their flexibility when kept for a long time upon
the rolls.
Mr. Lyonei. Clark said that the branch-like markings differ
in appearance from what might be expected in stress-marks,
and that they are distinctly in the film itself, and not in the
celluloid. He thought that they were produced absolutely by
an electrical discharge. When a celluloid comb is drawn I
rapidly through the hair, in dry weather, electrical sparks arc ^
sometimes produced. The electricity is not present at the out- |
set either in the hair or in the comb, but is the result of friction ;
in fact, the mechanical energy put forth by the muscles is
transformed into electrical energy. To avoid the production
of electricity it is well, therefore, to exercise as little mechani-
cal energy as possible, so before exposing the last half of the
length of celluloid in his roller slide, betook care to unwind
that portion with the greatest slowness; the result was, that
the last negatives taken on his length of celluloid were almost
entirely free from the branch-like markings. He thought that
many photographers would like to expose the new film in double
dark slides as usual, rather than to use a roller slide.
Mr. A. Pringle condemned the use of glycerine when deve-
h.ping negatives in this climate. Mr. Clark had the advantage
ot him in being able to perform the comb experiment. He
thought that photographers did not want miniature thunder-
storms inside their roll-liolders.
Mr. 8. Bourne thought that the markings might be due to
a kind of fungus in the film.
Mr. M ai.ker, in the course of his reply, said that Mr. East-
man did not at present intend to put larger films than 12 by 10
inches upon the rollers ; lie (Mr. Walker) did not know wherefore.
Mr. Eastman and those working with him believed that they had
so far surmounted all difficulties as to have reached a point where
they see that they will be able to turn out a perfect film.
Personally, he (Mr. Walker) had had nothing to do with the
invention of the film ; it was the outcome of the investigations
of Mr. Eastman and Mr. Reisenbach. He believed that the
films were permanently flexible, for otherwise Mr. Eastman — )
who had been working at them for a year — would not have put
them on the market. He thought the branch-like markings to
be electrical, and that they could be avoided by some changes
in the mode of manufacture. He believed these films to mark
the dawn of a new era in photography, the end whereof no man
could see.
The Chairman thought that the invention would be of the
greatest possible use to photographers in the future.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 2nd instant Mr. W. E. Debenham occu-
pied the chair.
Mr. A. Cowan showed a mixture of powdered eikonogen and
sulphite of soda that had turned quite black in colour. The
powder contained the following proportions : eikonogen 10
grains, sulphite of soda 40 grains. After mixing, the powder
was put dry into a stoppered bottle. The next day it had
turned quite black. Mr. Cowan said this tended to confirm the
opinion of many photographers who questioned the preservative
nature of the sulphite. On another occasion a mixture of eikon-
ogen, sulphite, and an alkali and sugar in powder the next day
turned to a pasty mass.
Mr. A. Haddon criticised the opinions expressed at
the last meeting as to the cause of the cloudiness on the inside
of the cover glass of a transparency, more especially the
statement that it was due to the mercury left in film from ton-
ing attacking the lead in the glass. He said if such were the
case it was a fact unknown to chemists and physicists. In his
own experience he had never seen any erosion produced from
mercury when in contact with glass. Mercury was in constant
contact with the glass tubes of thermometers and barometers,
and as far as he knew no case was known of its having caused
any erosion of the glass. In his opinion the injury to the slide
was caused by heat acting upon aqueous vapour imprisoned
between the two glasses. He was cognisant of three instances
where heat had caused a frostiness similar to that produced on
the slide in question. In one case it appeared in a retort after
heating over a spirit lamp (retort shown) ; in another a similar
effect was produced iu placing a chimney glass over a burner ;
and in the third instance a bottle, after washing, was placed in
an even to dry. The inner surface of the bottle became curled
and wrinkled. He believed the cover glass referred to cm-
tained no lead at all. Glass makers would not employ expensive
ingredients in cheap sheet or bottle glass. Mr. Hadd in
then read an extract from Watts Dictionary iu support
of his statements, and, as a farther proof, he held the
neck of the retort already referred to over a spirit lamp, which
at once caused a frosted appearance.
Mr. P. Everett asked how Mr. Haddon accounted for the
cleanness of the cover-glass of the transparency in contact with
the mask. Why was not the inside attacked equally all over ?
Mr. Haddon said in all probability the paper mask had, by
absorbing the aqueous vapour, prevented the heat to which the
slide had beeu subjected in India having the same effect upon
the glass.
A Member asked why the outside of the cover-glass had not
equally been affected by heat and moisture.
Mr. Haddon said these conditions did not apply equally to the
inside and outside of the slide. Heat and moisture were never
going on simultaneously on the outside of the glass.
The Hon. Sec. believed the binding of a great many slides
was done before they ware thoroughly dry. In his own prac-
tice, he almost baked his slides before binding.
January 17, 1890."]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
55
Mr. T. E. FresTwater hal seen many Add -glasses returned
from India with the large lens attic'r inside, b. it not on the
outside.
Mr. J. B. B Wellington shewed twe sets of transparencies,
the exposure of the plates in each set being 20, 40, 60, and 80
seconds respectively. I i o is case the pi ite3 were taken out of
the dish imtnedia'ely the development was complete, showing a
range of tone from a warm colour to a H ick. The other set
W13 left in ths developer until the last one was developed;
these developed all one colour.
The Chairman said this guide proved h:s contention, that
a warm colour wis due to an early stage of development.
Mr. Wellington also exhibited a cover-glass of a slide that
had been iu contact for some time. It sh owed, when breathed
upon, the opening of the mask very cleaily. No amouut of
rubbing or polishing s.emel to alter this condition of the glass
At the meeting on the 9th inst. Mr. L. Mbdl.ynd occupied the
chair.
Mr. Conrad Beck showed two lenses — one having brass
mounts, the other aluminium ; the latter being about half the
weight of the brass-mounted lens. Mr. Beck said originally
aluminium was expensive, but was now much reduced in price.
Mr. Beck also exhibited a camera for general out-door work.
Two advantages were claimed forthis camera — -very great rigidity,
and simplicity in setting up, two motions only being necessary
for this purpose. The front of the camera is fixed, the focussing
being accomplished by a rack-and-pinion adjustment to the
back.
The Chairman showed a negative having a curious geometric
marking over the whole of the surface of the film. The plate
after development was bleached with bichloride of mercury and
intensified with ammonia, when the markings appeared. The
piste had been thoroughly washed several times without pro-
ducing any effect upon the markings.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater, referring to the discussions at the
two previous meetings on the erosion of the inner surface of
cover glasses of transparencies, had separated the glasses of
some slides of the Paris Exhibition, 1878. They had only
been through the lantern once, and had been shut up in a box
for ten years. A clouding of the inside of the cover glass had
taken place. This, however, unlike those exhibited at a pre-
vious meeting, yielded readily to rubbing with the finger. A
ciloured French slide, twenty-five years old, when separated,
showed a distinct outline of the picture on the inner surface of
the cover glass. Mr. Freshwater said in his experience French
gtass was much more susceptible of discolouration than
English. He also passed round three prints taken by Mr.
England’s flash-light lamp.
Mr. A. Cowan showed a series of transparencies developed
with a formula given in the current issue of the Photographic
Jlerinc , copied from the American Journal of Photography : -
Water distilled ... ... ... 1 fluid ounce
Tartrate of sodium and potassium ... 25 grains
Sulphite of sodium ... ... ... 25 ,,
Carbonate of lithium ... ... 1 grain
Pyrogallol ... ... ... ... 2 grains
He had found it the most powerful developer in his
experience. The solution remained perfectly colourless after
several plates had been developed.
This being a lantern night, the remainder of the evening was
derated to the exhibition of members’ slides ; Messrs. H. I>.
Atkinson, F. C. Kellon, L. Medland, and T. E. Freshwater,
each contributed a series of transparencies.
Hackney Photographic Society.
A meeting was held on Thursday last, with Dr. Gerard Smith
in the chair.
Mr. F red. II. Evans read his promised paper on “ Photo-
Micrography ” before the members on Thursday last ; after
which, over one hundred slides illustrative of the paper were
shown through the lantern, the most interesting being a series
of subjects taken with dark ground illumination, foraminifera,
polycistina, wood sections, whole insects, corallines, and
ectinus spine sections. The physiological slides were also
regarded by medical members present as of special value. The
usual specimens of insects and parts of insects were clear and
sharp. A formula for development of which the lecturer
spoke highly was a modification of one given by Mr. J. B. B.
Wellington, and consisted of : —
■Quinol ...
462
grains
Meth. spirit
H
ounces
Sulphurous acid
3j
9 f
Brom. potass. ...
84"
grains
Water to make ...
1 o.V
ounces
■Sodium hydrate fused ...
261
grains
Potash ,, ,,
261
99
Sodium sulphite pure ...
462
99
Water to make ...
10.V
ounces
30 minims of each to 8 J, drachms of water.
Messrs. S. H. Barton and J. Reed were nominated members.
The Secretary announced that the album, first year’s
working, was ready for inspection, and that on the 23rd, Mr.
F. W. Hart had promised to give a flash-light demonstration.
Birmingham Photographic Society.
A meeting was held on the 9th inst., at the Club Rooms,
Grand Hotel, Birmingham, Mr. E. H. Jaques in the chair.
It was announced that the council had given an order for
the Society lantern, which is not to exceed thirty guineas ; also
that the annual exhibition would be open to the public on the
21st and 22nd inst., at the Temperance Hall, Temple Street,
Birmingham.
Mr. C. J. Fowler than gave his paper on “ Notes on the
Summer Excursions,” illustrated by a large number of lantern
slides made from the negatives taken by the lecturer and
members.
Mr. W. J. Harrison exhibited some slides made on the new
celluloid film.
Bath Photographic Society.
January 8<A. — Mr. W. Pumphrey, president, in the chair.
Mr. Archibald. C. Coke was elected a member of the Society.
The Hon. Secretary drew attention to a parcel of photo-
graphic journals and books presented to the Society. Circulars
relating to the forthcoming Exhibition at the Crystal Palace
were also laid on the table.
The Chairman welcomed Mr. Sumner Gates, of the Cam-
bridge (lT.S.) Camera Club.
Mr. Gates, after thanking the Society for the kind way in
which they had received him, spoke on t lie subject of flash-light
photography. He had had some experience with magnesium
flash-light exposures in America. As a rule, they worked with a
larger flame than appeared customary here, and more magnesium
was used ; but the light so obtained was diffused through a
screen. By this means the shadows were less heavy. The
Scovill Co. also issue the powder in the form of a cartridge,
which is very effective. Some pictures done in this way he had
already sent to the States for, and the Society might see them
at a future meeting. He hoped to return the hospitality to
some members of the Bath Photographic Society.
The Chairman thought it desirable to say a few words in
connection with flash light work before experiments were made.
In the first place, the process is the complement, though some-
what reversed, to what is usually regarded as instantaneous
photography. Instead of the work being controlled by the
rapidity of closing the camera, it is the rapidity of the light
one has to deal with, as it commences and ceases with an
instantaneous flash. Such a light we find in the combustion
of the metal magnesium. The ordinary form used to be
exhibited as a thin ribbon of the metal, but there was this
disadvantage — that the light came almost from a point ; thus
some portions must be liadlv lighted or be in deep shadow.
The present plan is to spread the metal in the form of powder
over a larger surface, and for a shorter time. The powder,
which should be fine, is burnt in a spirit flame, and, instead of
proceeding from a point, it has a broad and a powerful light.
About a dozen cameras were then brought into requisition,
and successful negatives were made of the Chairman and others,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [January 17, 1890.
StnsUms to (jfoiTCSpon&ents.
Mr. A. Spurge manipulated the flashing apparatus during the
evening, and a convenient dark room was fitted up for those
who desired to use it.
The Secretary exhibited several large photographs lent by
Mr. Rosen, of the Autotype Co. These illustrated the various
coloured tissues in use for carbon printing, and comprised sepia,
ruby brown, terra cotta, blue, and engraving black. Examples
of collotype, auto-earbon, and auto-crayon were also handed
round for inspection.
Lewes Photograph: Society.
An ordinary meeting was held on January 7th, with Mr. J.
Tones in the chair.
The balance sheet of the Lewes and Sussex Photogiaphic
Exhibition was read, showing a balance in hand of £9 lbs. Id.,
and was adopted.
At the conclusion of the usual business, the remainder of the
evening was devoted to the making of lantern slides by con-
tact ; slides were exposed and developed bv Mr. A. H.
Webling, and the Hon. Secretary.
It has been arranged to offer certificate for competition
amongst the members, once a quarter, for various subjects ; the
first competition will be for lantern transparencies.
Dundee and East ok Scotland Photographic Association.
January 9th. — Mr. J. Mathewson in the chair.
The slides of last month’s lantern slide competition were
exhibited by the lantern. The variety of tone and range of
density of the sets of slides was interesting, each set having
been made from the same negatives.
Various detective camera pictures were exhibited. Fallow-
field’s “ Facile ” and Talbot and Earner's “ Diamond ” detec-
tive cameras were on exhibition, and their working was
explained.
Leicester and Leicestershire Photographic Society.
A meeting was held in the Mayor’s Parlour, Old Town Hall,
on January 8th, Mr. S. S. Partridge in the chair.
One member was elected, and one proposed for ballot at next
meeting. Letters of resignation were read from Messrs. Toller
and Eller}’, which were accepted with regret.
The election of officers was next proceeded with, the follow-
ing being the result : — President — Mr. S. S. Partridge ; Vice-
Pesidcnt — Mr. J. T. Cook ; Treasurer — Mr. W. Sculthorp ;
Secretary — Mr. H. Pickering, High Cross Street ; Committee —
Messrs. Sculthorp, Wilson, Pierpoint, Porrett, Leeder, F.
Brown, Blackwell, and Bankart.
It was decided to offer the following medals for competition
among the members for the ensuing session : — Silver and bronze
medals, by the Society, for the two best sets of six lantern
slides ; silver and bronze medals, by the Society, for the best
and second best six prints whole plate ; silver and bronze
medals, by the past President, for prints under whole plate ;
and silver and bronze medals, by the President, for quarter-
plate prints. It was arranged that the competitions take place
as follows : — Lantern-slide competition, at the February meet-
ing ; enlargement competition, at the March meeting ; print
competition, at the April meeting.
Received. — “ Tylar’s Practical Hints and Photographic
Calendar for 1890 ’’ is a skilful combination of useful informa-
tion, handy for reference, and a comprehensive trade catalogue ;
it contains as frontispiece a specimen of Bemrose’s photo-tint,
reproduced from a negative by the Rev. F. C. Lambert, of
the Chapel of St. John's College, Cambridge. “The I’hoto-
giapher’s Diary and Desk Book for 1890 ” is issued by the
proprietors of the Camera, and, like its predecessor, is a handy
quarto diary, interleaved with blotting-paper, and intended
specially for the use of photographers. The formulae are
printed in a size of type that can be read without much
difficulty under red light. Another diary is the little pocket
monthly forwarded by Messrs. Mawson and Swan. Spaces for
daily notes and memoranda are interspersed with pages of price
lists ; this diary is to be obtained gratuitously on appli
cation to the firm.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper £ Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All C immunications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the E iitor of the Photographic News, 6, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
T. C. Selwyn. — To sensitize your rough paper for gas-light
enlargements, coat it with gelatino-bromide emulsion, or try one
of the japers already in the market, such as Eastman’s or the
Ilford bromide paper. See advertisements at page Ixvi, and at
the end of the Year-Book.
J. A. C. — The sulphuric acid test for bromine. Your failure is
altributable to the fact that you operated directly upon the
bromide paper, instead of charring this first to destroy the organic
matter and concentrate the material. It would be well also to
add a grain or two of black oiide of mauganese to the vitriol, and
instead of starch paper use starch paste at the end of a glass rod.
The paragraph from Nature, on page 487, describes the fluorescein
test, which is not so easily put in practice. Flue rescein is a
phthalic acid and resorcein compound (containing no fluorine),
and this body gives a pink eosine when submitted to the vapours
either of bromine or iodine; it will not therefore distinguish
between them, but only enable you to prove that one or the other
is present. Pure nitrite of potash and fluorescein are procurable
from Messrs. Ilopkin and Williams. We accept your thanks ;
no expenses were incurred.
E. L. — Mr. W. T. Wilkinson’s little manual of “ Photo-engraving
and Photo-lithography,” which treats also of the collotype and
heliotype, is published by Messrs. England Bros., 25, Charles
Street, Netting Hill, W. A now edition or a reprint is just now
in course of preparation.
V. W. — The instruments named (the tachyscope and leucoscope)
are not used in photography, but we will endeavour to get you
the information asked for,
A. Read. — 1. The camera mentioned (No. 2 Kodak) is just the
size for lantern negatives, and contains the adjustments you
require. 2. There is no doubt about the new celluloid films
bearing enlargement quite as well as glass.
J. C. — We fail to seo what advantage, even in weight, the new
mode of extension would possess over the ordinary leather bellows
action in cameras. As a temporary adjunct fur enlarging, your
idea would, perhaps, be of most service. The sketches are returned
by post.
A. M. M. — For removing silver stains from the hanls, there is
nothing better than painting with a solution of ioline in iodide of
potassium, and followiog up with a fairly strong hypo solution.
A second application may be necessary in some cases.
W. R. — 1. It is unfortunate that their interests are opposed, but wn
do not think that you should supply B without consent of A.
Fuller particulars by letttr. 2. Husnik’s new enamel transfer
paper is not yet offered for sale here.
Grain. — Set up a square of wire-gauze, and photograph that to get
the reticulated screen required.
Blue Print. — For working formula and full particulars, see the
News of 20th September last, and if you want further informa-
tion, get a copy of “ Modern Heliographic Processes,” a manual
of instruction for engineers, architects, and draughtsmen, by
Ernst Lietze (New York: Van Nostrand Company).
J. M. — Varnish for gelatine negatives. Dissolve in the cold an
ounce of orange shellac in a pint of methylated spirit, and after
a day or two shake up with a small quantity of kaolin or prepared
chalk (crusbel whiting) to help to clarify the varnish. Allow to
settle, and filter. Some operators use .more shellac, but a thin
varnish is all that is required ti protect the negative, if care be
taken to dry the paper well before printing.
A. W. — If you wish to exercise your privilege of nominating offi-
cers and members of council to serve for the ensuing year, remem-
ber that Tuesday next, 21st inst., is the last day for accepting
letters addressed to the secretary, at 5a, Pall Mall East, S.W.
The notice appeared in the December issue of the Society’s
Journal, at the foot of page 38.
C.S.— There is much truth in the remarks about British Art and
the Processes of Reproduction, in the current number of the 7Vi««-
teenih Century, hut some error when the author asser's that all
the photo-mechanical work is being done abroad,
4 -
I
I •
L
THE PTIOTOGRAI >HIO
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1638. — January 24, 1890.
\ -
CONTENTS.
PAOR
Purpose in Photographic Work 57
The Royal Institution 58
The Best Photographer. By Fred. Hart Wilson 61
Table of Sizes of Printing and Writing Papers 65
Notes 66
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 67
Eikonogen. By Raphael Meldola, F.R.8 69
Notices of Books 70
The Late Cuthfcert Bede and his Book “ Photographic
Pleasures." By W. Lang, junr., F.C.S 71
The Daguerre Monument at Washington 72
PAOK
Patent Intelligence 73
Correspondence.— The “ Roll Call ” — Basket-Work in Photo-
graphy — Camera Club Exhibitions — Reproduction and
Copyright — Hackney Photographic Society 73
Proceedings of Societies. — Camera Club — London and Provin-
cial Photographic Association — Ea: t Dulwich and Peekham
Photographic Association — Photographers’ Benevolent
Association — Abney Camera Club— Manchester Amateur
Photographic Association— Glasgow Photographic Associa-
tion-Derby Photographic Society T5
Answers to Correspondents 76
Uf'
ili
b
nr
iik
*
Vi
r*
fi
ilv
w
Jon !
y?. |
ins
if/
:
ti»
til!
II
PURPOSE IN PHOTOGRAPHIC WORK.
Many photographers have purpose enough in their work,
namely, those who are engaged in the art-science pro-
fessionally, so have their well-defined daily duties to the
public before them, and are sometimes limited in those
duties more than is pleasant to themselves by the un-
educated taste of a considerable portion of the populace.
The photographer without a purpose is usually the
professional or the amateur who takes out-door views
occasionally, say of an attractive building or picturesque
landscape, with no more deeply rooted object in view
than that of obtaining a pretty picture. An accumula-
tion of his photographs soon grows large enough to tire
both himself and his friends, however well they may
be executed.
This class of worker will discover that he has a
higher mission in life when he has a definite object in
view in his photographic work. An example has been
set by Warwickshire of a method of utilising these
photographic loafers — a word here used in its respect-
ful sense — by setting them to work to make systematic
historical pictorial records of the county in which
they live. There is no reason why every photographer
should not carve out such a line of action for himself.
Those who live in London and its suburbs would in
most instances be surprised to discover the wealth of
historical subjects ready for photographic delineation to
be found at their very doors. In the British Museum
Library the historical information in relation to all
parts of London and its outlying districts is abun-
dant, and extends over many centuries, so that
the photographer who goes there to read up
the history of the district within a radius of
one mile of his own homestead — or rather the home-
stead in w hich he is a temporary lodger under a lease
— will discover that his immediate surroundings possess
an interest unknown to him before, and as he perse-
veres in his reading and in his photographic work relat-
ing thereto, he will find himself gradually becoming
the oracle of the neighbourhood in all matters of local
history. Such relics of the past as modern improve-
ments have not yet removed, he will photograph ere it
is too late, and feeling the -absurdity of trying to render
his pictorial records more permanent by means of al-
bpmenised paper prints than the original objects them-
selves, he will plunge into higher branches of photo-
graphy, such as relate to ceramic, platinotype, and car-
bon pictures, thereby doing service to the public, and
building for himself a lasting reputation.
The tourist photographer can also go to work with a
purpose. Instead of traversing a country and merely
taking prominent architectural and other views which
others have taken before him, he may devote a portion
of his time to historical reading, and afterwards set to
work to illustrate a particular subject, about which he
will be able to tell a tale whenever he exhibits the
pictures. For example, instead of bringing home a
miscellaneous collection of scenes bearing no relation to
each other, and the history which he does or does not pick
up from guide-books, and soon forgets, he might resolve
to follow in the footsteps of Joan of Arc, and photograph
the scenes devoted to her history. First would come
her birthplace, the little village in the Yosges, of Dom-
remy sur Meuse, with its quiet woods and the ugly
little church so different to the church imagined by the
artists who paint theatrical scenes relating to her
adventures ; but many a tale could be told about the
interesting interior of the ugly building and its time-
honoured contents. He could visit Chinon and its
magnificent ruined castle, in which she first met the
king, and could photograph the portion of the ancient
town which is rotting with age below the cliff on
which the castle stands, the ancient buildings being
preserved as much as possible by the French Govern-
ment as national monuments. Then there is Orleans,
baking under a summer’s sun, with the broad and shal-
low Loire babbling over its stony bed. The city con-
tains a museum all relating to Joan of Arc, but the
objects in it, though ancient, are all ideal and of later
date than her time. Then there is the Cathedral of
Ilheims, the most magnificent specimen of Gothic
architecture north of the Alps, in which she crowned
the king; and lastly, there is the picturesque city of
Rouen, in which she was burnt, as popularly believed,
though historical criticism has thrown some doubt upon
this point. A series of photographs like these would
be of abiding interest to the photographer and his
friends, for children of older and younger growth always
prick up their ears and brighten in the eyes, when he
who shows them beautiful pictures has also a tale to tell.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 24, 18S0.
58
THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
IV.
Before quitting the subject of the photographs brought
under the notice of the Royal Institution by Thomas
Wedgwood in 1802, it may be well to give some
biographical particulars about that photographer him-
self.
He was the third son of Josiah Wedgwood, the
world-renowned improver of English pottery manu-
facture. Josiah was born in July, 1730, and after he
commenced business as a potter, by experimental
research was enabled to produce new descriptions of
ear thernwares and porcelains, of studied forms and
chaste style of decoration, so that after a time, England,
instead of importing the finest goods of this class,
began to export them largely. In 1786 he was the
founder of an early Chamber of Commerce, which bore
the name of “The General Chamber of the Manufac-
turers of Great Britain.” His useful life closed
January 3rd, 1795, in his sixty-fourth year. He had
been for many years a Fellow of the Royal and
Antiquarian Societies.
Nearly all that has hitherto been published about
the life of Thomas Wedgwood will be found in Miss
Julia Wedgwood’s article published in these pages on
the 20th of December last, in the second volume of
Miss Eliza Meteyard’s “Life of Josiah Wedgwood,”
London, 1866, and in another book mentioned farther
on by the same authoress.
Miss Meteyard says, in the 1866 book, that Thomas
Wedgwood was born in April, 1771, and named after his
paternal grandfather, uncle, and cousins ; he was the
fifth Thomas Wedgwood in direct line. She had no par-
ticulars of his infancy. From the first he seems to have 1
been in delicate health, derived probably from both his
parents, who prior to his birth had been in impaired
health. These seeds of organic disease subsequently
rendered the life of Thomas Wedgwood an indescrib-
ably weary burden. At first lie was a merry little
fellow, full of fun, and the life of the household.
Later on he became the hardest of students, and with
his father’s chemist (Alexander Chisholm) rendered the
laboratory at Etruria a place at which, for scientific
reasons, the savants of our day cast back their gaze
to penetrate, if possible, some of the mysteries of
the photographic art carried on there. His pas-
sion for abstract studies was unbounded, even at
the age of sixteen. He studied mathematics under
John Leslie, afterwards Professor in the University of
Edinburgh, and he often worked far into the night,
causing his father on several occasions to deplore that
“ Tom is hurting himself.” Whilst health lasted he
joined in athletic pursuits, and he formed one of a
body of young men known as “ The Staffordshire Bow-
men, who met for regular drill and exerciso with the
bow, and woro a handsome uniform. By instruction
under Webber, ho became a skilful draughtsman.
Miss . Meteyard continues that from love of art he
paid brief visits to Germany, Florence, and Venice, and
at home for a time he seems to have been skilful as a
potter. He designed new patterns, and his scientific
researches led to the invention of what is known as
“ silvered ware,” namely, a pattern of dead or bur-
nished silver upon a black earthenware body. The
earliest record of this ware is dated February, 1791.
Nitrate of silver was sent down to him from the Apo-
thecaries’ Hall at the time of these experiments, and
its properties led to the discovery of the method of
taking photographs nearly forty years before the
announcement of the discoveries of Nicephore Niepce
and Daguerre.
The most detailed biographical particulars extant of
Thomas Wedgwood arc in Miss Meteyard’s “ A Group
of Englishmen” (Longmans: London, 1871). In it
she sets forth that Thomas Wedgwood was born in
May, 1771; he was considered “the humourist” of
the three sons. In 1779 he went as a boarder to the
school of the Rev. Phillip Holland, Unitarian minister,
Bolton. In 1788 a project to send him to Rome was
abandoned, and throughout 1789 Thomas Wedgwood
appears to have pursued his studies at home at Etruria.
In 1790 Leslie, the mathematician, resided in the
house for some time as his tutor. In his sixteenth
year Thomas Wedgwood sent to London for a copy of
“ Newton’s Optics,” for he began to be interested in
the subjects of light and heat, and Priestley encouraged
him in his researches by letters written in 1791-2.
The results were the two papers about light and heat,
by Thomas Wedgwood, which were read before the
Royal Society, and appeared in “The Philosophical
Transactions ” for 1792. Miss Meteyard says: “It
is curious to observe how much the experiments nar-
rated in the earlier paper were made with substances
used in his father’s manufactory, or arranged in his
collection of fossils.” About this time he was in corre-
spondence with Richard Lovell Edgeworth about the im-
provement of prisons in the matter of sanitary arrange-
ments. Thomas Wedgwood passed some portion of
1796 or 1797 at the Pneumatic Institute at Clifton,
for he was nearly always in bad health, and in 1797
he resided occasionally with his brother John, at Cote
House, Westbury, Wiltshire; in fact, he sought relief
from his ailments by change of scene and of society,
and in this year he made the acquaintance of Humphry
Davy at Penzance. In 1798 he was, for a time, at
Stowey, in companionship with Coleridge and other
poets, and in the same year he and his brother Josiah
offered Coleridge an annuity of £150 a year, to relieve
him from the necessity of employing himself as Unitarian
minister; this offer was accepted. In 1799 he bought
an estate near Bridgewater, one portion of which, upon
which he resided, was known as Castle Fleury, where
he gave a little attention to agriculture ; he also this
year bought more landed property at Gunville, near
Biandford, in Dorsetshire. In 1800 he appears to have
travelled a little in France, and the same year, in search
of health, he went to the West Indies and back ; it was
probably thought that he would never return, for before
leaving England he made his will. He then bought
another estate, Eastbury, near Gunville, and about the
same time wrote to Mr. Howship, in York (Street,
I860.
January 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
59
low
Iwh®.
It. Tta
7.1ft.
tit Apo.
oi
letLod ij
lore tk
»%!
atut
A Groij
,). Ii‘
shorn*
amt”
dertotlt
Koine n
iftdgfi
it Etna
d in tii.
siitat
a copy e
nested i
rang*
in 1791%
: aid Is:
before ti
lilosophis
ays: “i
incsts »
abstuia
lied in hi
ru in mb(
boat the it
at Clift*
in 1!S|
hn, at 1
ought reEd
of' sociw
Hampl
a time,
and ot
•
torehf
ajUnitna
9 he bond
’hich,np*
niy
le also ti
A 1!
rk ; i'
,,forbe:J
then ko?
,d aboott
'oik SW
London, to buy for him a book translated from
the German, “ The art of preserving feeble life under
incurable diseases.” In 1801 he visited Paris. In the
beginning of 1802 he was at Gunville, and in March
the same year, about the time when his photographic
discoveries were made known at the Royal Institution,
he was in London for the purpose of consulting Dr.
Baillie and arranging a fresh trip to the Continent, for
both the hypochondriacism and tedium vita: from which
he suffered had increased, and alarming symptoms had
begun to show themselves. Writing at the close of
March to his brother, he says : — “ God knows what
will become of me at present, but I suppose I shall be
driven to travel. I have had many painful conflicts of
mind from imagining that 1 had only to forget that I
was an invalid to be like other people, and get well. I
now know that my body is seriously damaged ; my
feelings and views are undergoing a change in conse-
quence.” During this visit to London he spent his
time occasionally at his club, which met at the “ Crown
and Anchor ” in the Strand. He seems to have taken
little interest in those photographic discoveries which
will for ever render his name famous ; in fact, we do
not know of a single utterance of his own about them,
unless he took part in the writing of the paper on the
subject which was read at the ltoyal Institution, but
the probability is that all the writing and speaking on
this subject were done by Davy. Wedgwood left
London May 7, 1802, for the Continent, and was four
hours in crossing to Calais ; thence he went via Bruges
and Ghent to Brussels. On May 17th, 1802, he wrote
a long letter about his experiences there, and a few
days later he wrote, in much better spirits, from Mons.
Afterwards he seems to have been in Paris and Switzer-
land, and to have returned to England in the autumn
of the same year. He travelled much on horseback ;
indeed, constant motion, whether on the sea or on
horseback, seems to have given him more relief from
his ailments than anything else.
James Watt visited Etruria in 1790, and afterwards,
in the course of a letter to Mr. Josiah Wedgwood,
said : — “ Thank you for your directions for the silver
pictures.” This may either be the first written record
relating to Thomas Wedgwood’s early photographs, or
may bear inference to pictures upon pottery, produced
by the aid of silver salts.
There is no record that Davy and Thomas Wedg-
wood met in 1802, but as Wedgwood was in London
when Davy made known his photographic discoveries
in that year, the assumption is that they saw each
other on the subject, especially as Wedgwood was then
well enough to be frequently riding or driving about
town.
At the end of 1802, Wedgwood was travelling in
South Wales, and buying more landed property ; the
latter habit seemed to bo a kind of mania with him
when his malady was at the worst. This malady was
more of a mental than a bodily nature, and in 1803 he
wrote to Humphry Davy to try to obtain for him some
Indian hemp, fortunately without success. Davy, in
the course of his reply, dated Royal Institution,
February 12th, 1803, said: — “I have always looked
forward with hope towards a time when your health
would permit you to act upon the public by truths
which cannot fail to enlighten and to be useful to all
classes of men. I trust that time will yet arrive.
Believe me, I always look back to the few hours that
I have spent with you with feelings of pleasure, of
gratitude, and of regret. Your opinions have been to
me as a secret treasure, and they have often enabled me
to think rightly, when perhaps, otherwise, I should
have thought wrongly.”
In 1803 Wedgwood was again on the Continent
for a short time, and may have reached Italy, but
was soon back in London, and at the end of the year
was exceedingly ill at Cote, near Bristol. In the
following April he sought relief by taking opium.
He died at Eastbury July 10th, 1805, at the age of
thirty-four. Miss Meteyard says that by his death “ all
the anxieties of many friends and many men on his
behalf were at an end for ever. Dr. Darwin, of Shrews-
bury, had long anticipated that his life would close in
frenzy or paralysis. The last was the merciful ordina-
tion. In an instant the brain was stricken. He
ceased to all outer volition and consciousness, and
calmly died no long while after.”
He is described as having been tall, thin, pale, and
sickly, moving feebly by the aid of a stick about the
grounds at Eastbury; stayiug occasionally to watch
with interest his brother’s children at play, and remark-
ing as he did so that he would give half his fortune if
he could possibly partake of their health and buoyancy
of spirits.
There is no evidence that Thomas Wedgwood did
anything in photography before producing the pic-
tures to which he drew Davy’s attention in 1802, but
he and his father made use of the camera obscura, as
others had done, before that time. Miss Meteyard,
whose utterances are of no scientific value, says in a
letter read at a meeting of the Photographic Society,
November 3rd, 1863, “ You may with safety refer the
first experiments in photography to as early a date as
1790 or 1791. In the latter year I find Thomas
Wedgwood (third surviving son of Josiah Wedgwood)
sending his camera to Birmingham to be mended.”
She does not give her authority for this statement,
and it would have had no bearing on the subject had
she done so.
At the meeting, the two photographs said to be by
Wedgwood were passed round, and the official report
of the Society says that one was “ about 8 by 6, a
view of a breakfast table, having much the appearance
of a fade! silver print; and another similar in
appearance, a small reproduction of a drawing.” In
the discussion, “ Mr. Foster asked by whom the date
1791 had been written ou the frame of the Wedgwood
pictures. It was somewhat singular, if these were
produced in 1791, that Wedgwood should write in
1802 that no means of fixing sun pictures had then
been discovered.” Mr. Malone remarked at the
meeting, “ These pictures certainly, or at least one
of them, appeared to be a photograph, and reminded
60
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jancary 24, 1890.
him of some of Mr. Talbot’s early pictures ; indeed he
had seen some of them with just the same objects.
So far as he could see, there was nothing to connect
the pictures with the early date assigned to them. . . .
Iodine was not discovered until after tbe alleged date
of these pictures.”
At another meeting of the Photographic Society,
held January 5th. 1864, the secretary exhibited a
print which he hal found at home, and executed by
Mr. Fox Talbot, which was very similar to that
exhibited at a former meeting as “The Breakast Table
at Etruria Hall,” by Thomas Wedgwood, photographed
in 1791. He had written to Mr. Fox Talbot on the
subject, who, in the course of a reply dated Milburn
Town, Edinburgh, November 10th, 186-4, said: — “I
beg to inform you that I did make a photograph of
china, knives and forks, &c., disposed upon a round
table, which is seen very obliquely in the photograph.
It was an early attempt, about 1841 or 1842. The
view was taken out of doors, on the grass-plot in the
centre of the cloisters of Lacock Abbey. I have no
doubt I have copies of it still left in my collection
at Lacock. Wedgwood, in his memoir of 1802 (Journal
of the Royal Institution), says that he had thought
of the possibility of making the photographic views
with a camera, but that, on trying the experiment,
he had found that no length of time sufficed to make
any visible impression. Therefore, if any ancient
photographs should be discovered, they will not bo his
production.” In a later letter from the same place,
he expressed the belief that he had the negative of
this picture at Lacock Abbey. At the same meeting
of the Photographic Society, Mr. Malone “ produced
a collection of photographs done twenty years ago by
Mr. Talbot, amongst which was a print which appeared
to him to be identical with that picture shown before
as having been produced by Thomas Wedgwood.
That was the only one of the paper pictures he before
believed to be a photograph ; and he was now able to
settle the matter of its production as belongin'* to Mr
Talbot.”
Altogether, there is no doubt that the two pictures
described in Miss Meteyard’s books as early photo-
graphs by Wedgwood were not such. They con-
demned themselves, for they were positives and not
negatives ; moreover, any photographs taken by his
method and unfixed, could not last long. The break-
fast table picture was published in her “ Life of Josiah
Wedgwood,” and the man with the bagpipes picture as
a frontispiece to her “ Group of Englishmen.” The
latter was a positive copy of an engraving, and probably
not a photograph at all.
Thomas Wedgwood wrote but little for publication.
His first paper, read before the Royal Society, relates
to phenomena of light, phosphorescence, and fluores-
cence, so is appended hereunto in full.
Experiments and Observations on the Production of Lirjht from
Different Bodies, by Heat and by Attrition*
Before I begin to state the experiments which are the subject
• By Mr. Thomas Wedgwood. Communicated
Bart,, P.R.8. Bead December 22nd, 1791.
by Sir Joseph Banks,
of this paper, it may not, perhaps, be improper to give a very
compendious history of the discoveries which have already been
made relative to phosphoric bodies ; omitting, however, the
electrical phosphori, and such as arc evidently consumed or
decomposed in the emission of their light, as these are well
known, and are too numerous and important to be slightly
noticed.
Pliny was well acquainted with the luminous appearance of
rotten wood and of the eyes of dead fish. From this time I
find nothing relative to the phosphorism of bodies till the
beginning of the sixteenth century, when Benvenuto Cellini,
in his Art of Jewellery, mentions his having seen a carbuncle
shine in the dark like coals nearly burnt out, and relates a
story of a coloured carbuncle having been found in a vineyard,
near Rome, by its shining in the night.
About the year 1639, Vincenzo Cascariolo, of Bologna, dis-
covered, by accident, that when a certain stone, found in that
neighbourhood, was calcined in a particular manner, it acquired
the remarkable property of absorbing the light of the sun, of
retaining it for some time, and of emitting it in the dark ;
subsequent experimenters found it to do the same with the
light of a candle.
In 166-3 Mr. Boyle observed a particular diamond to give out
a light almost equal to that of a glow-worm, when heated,
rubbed, or pressed, and investigated very fully the nature of
the light of dead fish, flesh-meat, and rotten wood.
In 1677 Baldwin, of Misnia, discovered in the residuum of
a distillation of chalk and nitrous acid, a phosphorus similar
in its properties to the Bologuian, but not possessing the phos-
phoric virtue in so eminent a degree.
In 1705, Mr. Francis Hawkesbee found that glass rubbed on
glass, in common air, in the vacuum of an air-pum, or under
watei, “exhibited a considerable light.”
In 1724, M. Du Fay discovered that almost all substances
which could be reduced to a calx by fire, or after solution in
the nitrous acid, absorbed and emitted light like the phos-
phorus of Cascariolo and of Baldwin ; and that some diamonds,
emeralds, and many other precious stones emitted light in the
dark after being exposed to the rays of the sun.
About the same time Bucaria, of Turin, found almost every
body in nature to be luminous after a similar exposure ; he
added, too, this very important discovery, that an artificial
phosphorus exposed to the light in a coloured glass vial emits,
in the dark, rays of the identical colour of the vial. Mr. Mar-
graaf, by an analysis of the Bolognian stone, shows that it con-
tains vitriolic acid united to calcarious earth, and that al
gypseous stones treated like the Bolognian, provided they an
pure from iron, become phosphorescent. About the year 1764.
Mr. Canton made a phosphorus of sulphur and oyster-shell.-
calcined together, and distinguished himself by many curiou
experiments made with it. He found that his phosphoru
might be made to shine by heating it after it had ceased to Is
luminous of itself, but that the same heat would have thi
effect for a certain time only. Heat has been observed b;
several of these philosophers to promote the emission, and t
shorten the duration, of the light of phosphori. Fluor ha
been long known to give a fine, bright light when heated. D
Hoffman discovered that red blende and feldspat were luminou
when pieces of either were rubbed together. Pott extende-
this discovery to all pure flints and crystals, and to porcelaii
Keysler found glacier maria: to be luminous when heated. M
de la Mitherie has observed some neutral salts and calcareot
earths to be luminous in the same way. The Count de ltazoi
mowski, in a memoir of the Physical Society of Lausanne, shov
that quartz and glass give out light when struck by almost an
hard body, and that some few other bodies are luminous whe
pieces of the same kind are rubbed upon one another. He fin<
quartz to give out its light under water.
This brief account includes, as far as I am able to collect, tl
chief discoveries which have been made concerning lumino'
bodies. I was led to make the following experiments from o
serving the light which proceeds from two quartz pebbles rubb-
against each other. I searched for this property in many oth
bodies with success, but met with two soft stones, which did n
afford any light upon the most violent attrition, conceiving th
January 24, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
61
heat might probably be the cause of the light emitted by quartz
from attrition. I attributed this failure to a want of sufficient
hardness in these fiiable stones for producing the necessary
heat. Accordingly, sprinkling some of their powder on a plate
of iron nearly red hot, 1 had the satisfaction to observe it
emitting a considerable light. Extending this mode of trial, 1
found that the phosphorism of almost all bodies might be made
apparent either by heat or attrition. 1 shall therefore divide
the subject of this paper into two parts : — 1. Oil the light pro-
duced by heat. 2. On the light produced by attrition.
I.
The best general method of producing the light by heat is,
to reduce the body to a moderately fine powder, and to
sprinkle it, by small portions at a time, on a thick plate of
iron, or mass of burnt luting made of sand and clay, heated
just below visible redness, and removed into a perfectly dark
place.
The following is a list of such bodies as I have found to be
luminous by this treatment, arranged according to the apparent
intensity of their light.
1. Blue fluor from Derbyshire, giving out a fetid smell on
attrition.
2. Black and grey marbles, and fetid white marbles, from
Derbyshire. Common blue fluor, from Derbyshire. Red
feldspat from Saxony.
3. Diamond, oriental ruby, aerated barytes, from Chorley,
in Lancashire, common whiting, Iceland spar, sea shells,
moorstone, from Cornwall, white fluor from Derbyshire.
4. Pure calcareous earth, precipitated from an acid solution
— argillaceous earth (of alum), siliceous earth, — new earth,
from Sydney Cove, common magnesia, vitriolated barytes,
from Scotland. Steatites, from Cornwall, alabaster, porce-
lain of Cornwall. Mother of pearl, black flint, hard white
marble, rock crystal from the East Indies. White quartz,
porcelain, common earthenware, whinstone, emery, coal ashes,
sea sand.
5. Crold, platina, copper, iron, lead, tin, bismuth, cobalt,
zinc. Precipitates by an alkali from acid solutions of gold,
silver, copper, iron, zinc, bismuth, tin, lead, cobalt, mercury,
antimony, manganese. Vitriolated tartar, crystals of tartar,
borax, alum (previously exsiccated), sea-coal. White paper,
white linen, white woollen (in small pieces), white hair powder,
deal sawdust, rotten wood (not otherwise luminous), white
asbestos, red irony mica, deep red porcelain.
tj. Antimony, nickel, oils, lamp, linseed, and olive, white
wax, spermaceti, butter (luminous at and below boiling).
The duration of the light thus produced from different
bodies is very unequal ; in some the light is almost momentary,
in others it lasts for some minutes, and may be prolonged by
stirring the powder on the heater. It soon attains its greatest
brightness, and dies away gradually from that point, never
appearing in a sudden flash, like the light of quartz pebbles
rubbed together. If blown upon, it is suddenly extinguished,
but immediately re-appears on discontinuing the blast.
The light of bodies is, in general, uncoloured ; there are,
however, some exceptions. Blue fluor, of that kind which
gives out a fetid smell when rubbed, first emits a bright green
light resembling that of the glow-worm so exactly that when
placed by the insect, just as it has attained its greatest bright-
ness, there is no sensible difference in the two lights, either of
colour or intensity. This bright green changes into a beautiful
lilac, which gradually fades away. Fetid marbles, and some
kinds of chalk, give a bright reddish or orange light ; pure
calcareous earth, a bluish white light ; Cornish moorstone emits
a fine blue light ; powder of ruby gives a beautiful red light of
short continuance.
The most phosphorescent marble is soft and friable, of a
coarse crystallized grain, and a fetid odour when rubbed ; black
and grey marbles are generally more luminous than the
white.
Most of the common white marbles are hard, and of a fine
grain, and they are not very luminous, nor is their light of an
orange colour- Different chalks vary as much as different mar-
bles in the intensity and colour of their light when no differ-
ence of external structure is perceptible. The most phosphor-
escent chalk loses the brilliancy and redness of its light by being
dissolved in an acid, and precipitated by caustic fixed vegetable
alkali —by being confined with vitriolic or fluor acid — by cal-
cination by heat, or being combined with the aerial acid in the
pellicle formed on the surface of lime-water. Marble would
probably be affected in the same manner. The most phosphor-
escent blue fluor gives the same light after being united to the
vitriolic acid, though gypsum is far less luminous than fluor,
and its light is colourless. Argil precipitated from alum by an
alkali, and magnesia, when combined with fluor acid, give out
the same light as before.
Bodies emit their light when immersed in boiling acid of
vitriol, oi in boiling oils. Small lumps of fluor or of marble
make a singular appearance in the acid, as they are moved up
and down by its action, and rendered brightly luminous by the
heat. They seem equally luminous in pure, fixed inflammable
or atmospheric air.
Feldspat, the fetid fluor, and probably all phosphorescent
bodies, dropt in moderately fine powder, into a flask containing
a small quantity of boiling oil at the bottom, emit a copious flash of
light as soon as the powder touches the surface of the oil. When
the particles of the body have lain at the bottom of the heated
fluid for about a minute, they become but faintly luminous ; if
the flask be then agitated so as to raise some of these particles
out of the oil, and lodge them on its sides, they suddenly re-
kindle into the same brightness as at first, and preserve this
reassumed lustre for some time ; and even after being washed
down again into the oil, they may be readily distinguished from
the particles which have remained at the bottom. This experi-
ment is extremely beautiful, and is not at all obstructed by
the faint light of the oil ; it succeeds best with the stinking
blue of Darbyshire.
Powdered marble, and probably every other body, w'hen
spread upon the heater in the receiver of an air-pump, is
equally luminous during the exhaustion and readmission of the
air.
Bodies are by far the most luminous the first time they are
treated, but cannot, perhaps, be entirely deprived of this pro-
perty by any number of heatings, nor by any degree of heat.
Chalk, fluor, and feldspat, give out a very faint light on the
heater, after having been exposed to a smart red heat in an
open crucible, in small quantities, and kept frequently stirred
for several hours ; the feldspat was equally luminous when
laid hot upon the heater, or first cooled, and then laid on.
Chalk and fluor were not tried in this particular. A bit of
glass, melted in a heat of 120" of my father’s thermometer,
and as soon as it is cold reduced to powder, gives out light
on being thrown upon the heater below redness. Quartz,
from the same original piece, is equally luminous when
the powder is directly thrown upon the heater — when it is pre-
viously made red hot, and then cooled and thrown on — or
when a fragment of some size has been made red hot, then
pounded and thrown on.
For the most part, the softest bodies require the least heat to
become luminous ; marble, chalk, fluor, &c., give a faint light
when sprinkled on melted tin just becoming solid. As the
temperature of the heater is raised, they continue to give out
more and more light.
Vitriols of iron, copper, and zink previously exsiccated,
w'hen thrown on earthenware or metal made nearly red hot,
give minute flashes of light of momentary duration, such as
appear from some of the metallic precipitates, particularly
zink, on a similar treatment ; with this difference, however,
that the light of most of the precipitates is of a reddish hue.
The light of the metals is white, and ex .ctly similar to that
of some earths.
White paper, when dipped in a solution of sal-ammmoniac,
and slowly dried, becomes black upon the heater, and then gives
out much less light than common paper.
If a lump, of the size of a small beau, of fluor, marble,
feldspat, or any other of the most phosphorescent bodies, be
laid upon the heater, the light proceeds gradually upwards
from the part in contact with the heater, till the whole mass is
thoroughly illuminated. If the same piece be heated a second
time it is much less luminous ; nor if it be broken are the
62
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 24, 1890.
fragments at all more luminous, either then, or after having
been exposed for a month to the light and sunshine.
A little boiling oil at the bottom of a glass flask, when agi-
tated in the dark, illuminates the whole of the flask. The
light of boiling oils proceeds, probably, from some kind of
inflammation, as it is scarcely discernible unless the vessel be
agitated ; and, if a little oil be thinly spread on the heater, a
subtle lambent flame of a bluish hue instantly arises. The
same thing takes place if horn, hair, saliva, or any animal
matter be laid upon the heater.
II.
The experiments on the lights produced from different
bodies by attrition were chiefly made by rubbing in the dark
two pieces of the same kind against each other. All that 1
tried, with very few exceptions, were luminous by this treat- j
ment. The following is a list of them, arranged in the order
of the apparent intensity of their light, and as the lights are
cither white or some shade of red, I have affixed figures to
denote these differences. (0) Denoting a pure white light ; !
(1) the faintest tinge of red or flame colour; (2) a deeper
shade of red ; (3) and (-1) still deeper shades.
1. Colourless, transparent, oriental rock crystal ; and sili- i
ccous crystals (0).
2. Diamond (0).
3. White quart/, white transparent agate (1 .
•i. White agate, more opake (2) ; semi-transparent feldspat
from Scotland (2).
Brown opake feldspat from Saxony 4)
Chert, of a dusky white, from North Wales (3).
5. Oriental ruby (4).
6. Topaz, oriental sapphire (0).
7. Agate, deep-coloured, brown and opake (4).
8. Clear, blackish gun-flint (2).
0. Tawney, semi-transparent flint (3).
10. Unglazed white biscuit earthenware (4).
11. Fine, white porcelain (2).
12. Clear, blackish gun-flint made opake by heat (3).
13. Flint glass (0).
1 1. l’late-glass, green bottle glass ( 0).
15. Fine, hard loaf sugar (0).
10. Moorstone from Cornwall (1); Coruue, semi-trans-
parent, from the East Indies (1).
17. leelaud spar (0).
18. White enamel (2) ; tobacco pipe (3).
White mica (0).
19. L nglazed biscuit earthenware, blackened by exposing it,
buried in charcoal, in a close crucible to white heat (4).
20. * Black vitreous mass, made by melting together 5 of
fluor, 1 of lime, and some charcoal powder (4).
21. 1' luor, aerated and vitriolated barytes, white and
black Derbyshire marble, calcareous spar, crystals of borax,
deep blue glass, mother-of-pearl.
Hock crystal, quartz, flint glass, and many other hard bodies,
riming attrition, emit now and then reddish sparks of a vivid
light, which retain their brightness in a passage of one, two, and
even three inches through the air.
A piece of agate applied to the circumference of a wheel of
line grit revolving at a moderate rate, becomes brightly red,
even m daylight, at the touching part ; if the wheel revolve at
a quicker rate, the touching part emits a pure white light. In
both cases glowing sparks are continually emitted, some of
which are not extinguished before they have passed twelve or
fourteen inches through the air ; they explode gunpowder and
inflammable air, and burn the skin ; their brightness is not sen-
sibly increased by passing into pure air. The corner of an
angular piece of window-glass being applied to the wheel in
motion, a full eighth of an inch of the glass above the point of
contact becomes, apparently, red hot, and retains the redness
lor a second or two of time after its removal from the wheel,
urmg (he attrition, large red sparks are continually emitted,
._i;ini0f thi».ml.Xtare» of ‘hi crucible before it wasperfectlj
fused, gave out when rubbed, a strong smell like phosphorus of urine
hew'1 t.hroW‘D? sonle &f “ Pu'vtrised on a plate of iron, heated jusl
and a mixture of softened glass and the sand of the stone wheel
is collected about the touching point.
Quartz, transparent agate, rock crystal, and window glass,
give nearly the same flashing light when rubbed against the
stone wheel, or in the ordinary manner. Excepting the tinge
of red in the former, which it receives from the light of the
grit, the transparent agate becomes red hot for a little way
about the part in contact with the wheel, and is thus deprived
of its transparency as it would be if made red hot in a common
tire ; porcelain is heated to redness by the same treatment. The
red sparks which are emitted by all these bodies during theirattri-
tiou are heated particles about the magnitude of grains of fine
sand, broken off by the friction.
Bodies give out their light the instant they are rubbed against
each other, and cease to be luminous when the attrition is dis-
continued. Colourless, transparent, and semi-transparent
bodies emit a flashing light, their whole masses being for a
moment illuminated. Opake bodies give little more than a
defined speck of red light, and are not luminous below the part
struck. The greatest apparent quantity of light is produced
by hard, uncoloured, transparent, and semi-transparent bodies,
whose surfaces soon acquire an asperity by rubbing together, as
quartz, agate, Ac. From an examination of the table it appears
that white lights are emitted from colourless transparent bodies ;
faint red or flame-coloured from white, semi-transparent bodies ;
deeper ml from more opaque and coloured bodies ; and the
deepest red from opaque and from deep-coloured bodies. Ex-
tremely faint lights, such as those given by Huor, marble, Ac.,
are of a bluish white ; quartz, very lightly rubbed, gives a very
faint light of a bluish hue ; when rubbed a little harder, it
emits a flame-coloured light ; when rubbed with violence, its
light approaches to whiteness. Opaque red feldspat gives a
deep led light by' attrition ; exposed to a strong heat in the fur-
nace, it becomes white, and somewhat transparent ; and when
cool, gives out, on attrition, as white a light as quartz. Clear,
blackish flint, made opaque by heat, gives a redder light than
before ; deep-coloured glass gives out a red defined light with-
out any flash, whilst clear, uncoloured glasses emit a white
flashing light of some brightness.
Bodies are not luminous by simple pressure; the fragments
rubbing on each other produce some light. Mr. Boyle, indeed,
found a particular diamond to emit light when pressed by a
steel bodkin, but the diamond is phosphorescent, in so many
ways, and is so curious and singular a body, both in properties
and constitution, that it can scarcely be expected to exhibit the
same appearances as the common class of earthly bodies.
Alum, indurated by having been kept long in a state of
fusion, and being then much harder than loaf sugar or borax,
both which are luminous from moderate attrition, gives no
light, though rubbed with much violence.*
If two pieces of glass or quartz be strongly rubbed against
each other, and then applied to the fine down of a feather, the
down is not sensibly affected ; if the same glass be rubbed on
woollen cloth, and placed near the feather, the down is
immediately attracted.
Rock crystal, quartz feldspat, white, unglazed earthenware,
Derbyshire black marble, and probably all phosphorescent
bodies insoluble in water, give out their light on rubbing them
under water, as copiously as in air. Hard, white sugar from
the outside of the loaf gives out its light when rubbed in oil.
Bodies seem equally luminous in atmospheric, pure, fixed, and i
inflammable air.
All hard, earthy bodies emit a peculiar smell on attrition.
The most remarkable for this property are chert, quartz, feld-
spat, biscuit earthenware, and rock crystal ; this smell does
not differ much in kind, though it does considerably in intern
The Count de Raioumow.-ki his investigated the luminous property of
bodies in a way which appears to me very unfavourable for the discovery
of their true lights. He rubbed, not one piece agiinst another of the same
body, but alt of them against quartz or glass. He finds several metals
luminous from this treatment, and attempts to draw some curious conclu-
sions from the colour of their lights I tried th-se metals in his own way,
and found that no light was emitted, except « hen the violence of the blow
shattered the quartz < r glass. A piece of the indurated alum will excite
light from rock crystal, but this is the light of the fragments of the crystal
rubbing on each other, and not ol the alum.
January 24, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
03
sity. Many of the softer bodies yield the same smell, but in a
less degree, and probably none are entirely without it. It
appears to be strongest where the friction is greatest; it has
no dependence on the light produced by attrition, as it is often
very strong when no light is emitted.
Bock crystal, quartz, feldspat, white biscuit earthenware,
and probably all such hard bodies, produce this smell under
water.
Quartz stones, violently rubbed upon one another for a few
minutes in a cup of water, communicate this smell and a
peculiar taste to the water. The taste is probably derived from
an impalpable powder, which floats in the water for many days.
Derbyshire black marble, and the stinking blue fluor, give
out, on attrition, a strong smell peculiar to themselves, both in
air and water ; they lose this property by being once made
red hot.
Quartz produces the smell equally strong in fixed, pure, and
common air.
Having now stated all the facts relative to phosphorescent
bodies which I have as yet been able to discover, I shall beg
leave to offer a few reflections, tending to show that heat is the
probable cause of the light produced from bodies by attrition.
The powders of all earthly bodies emit light when heated a
little under redness. Now, when two bodies are rubbed upon
each other it is probable that heat is always generated on their
surfaces ; may not then the light which they yield upon attri-
tion be attributed to a sudden heating of particles in their
surfaces 1 For these particles will be affected in the same
way as if they had been equally heated by any other means ;
they will, therefore, give the same light as if they hail been
laid upon the heater of an equal temperature.
The shining sparks which hard bodies send out during attri-
tion prove that particles in their surfaces are heated at least
to more than 600° of Fahrenheit, for the powders of hard
bodies are not luminous on a heater much below redness.
The heat generated by soft, friable bodies is probably but little,
as the minute particles in their surfaces are not much crushed
by each other, but merely disjointed from the masses ; nor can
this little be easily appreciated, for, as the surfaces continually
crumble away, the heated parts are carried off before they can
warm the masses, and are themselves very quickly cooled by
the surrounding air. But as many soft bodies emit a faint
light on the heater at the low temperature of about 400® of
Fahrenheit, and as it is not a stronger light which they yield
on attrition, little heat is required to render the particles in
their surfaces luminous. It must be observed, too, that though
the absolute quantity of heat generated by one rub be but
inconsiderable, the effects of it may be very striking ; for just
on the instant of attrition its action is confined to the minute
colliding points of the surfaces, and will, consequently, operate
upon them as much as a greater quantity would on larger
points.
The light emitted by bodies in attrition is of momentary
duration, wheras a powder on the heater continues to emit
light for some minutes ; this difference is easily explained.
In the latter case the particles are constantly heated ; in the
former they are instantly cooled by the subjacent mass
to a temperature in which bodies are not luminous, i.c., a little
under 400® of Fahrenheit.
When the uneven surfaces of bodies are rubbed upon each
other, a flashing light is produced at frequent intervals by the
collision of the more prominent parts ; this, in colourless,
transparent, and semi-transparent bodies is copiously reflected
from the whole of the masses, and forms an appearance very
different from what is ever exhibited by bodies on the heater.
It may be well illustrated in the upper part of a candle, by
repeatedly nearly closing and quickly opening the snuffers about
the burning wick, or by sprinkling some powder of fluor, or
marble, on a mass of glass heated just under redness.
Powder of crystal, quartz, agate, &c., is but faintly
luminous on the heater under redness ; accordingly, if the
stones themselves be gently rubbed a faint light is emitted,
resembling that which their powders give on the heater.
Marble and fluor give about the same light on the heater of
the temperature of 400° as they do when rubbed ; and, pro-
bably, attrition heats some particles in their surfaces to that
degree.
It may, at first, seem an objection to the opinion of heat
being the cause of the light produced from bodies by attrition,
that they yield their light when rubbed under water ; but the
water acts differently to the air only as being a stronger con-
ductor of heat, and can nowise impede the actual generation
of the heat. Now, as bodies emit their light on the very instant
of their being heated, the water cannot cool the hot particles
before they have given their light.
It is easy to see why bodies emit light instantly when rubbed,
for they often send out sparks as soon as the attrition com-
mences, which proves that particles in their surfaces are
instantly heated to redness by attrition.
Since hard bodies may be heated to redness by attrition, wo
have an excellent method of discovering the lights they give
out at that temperature, which could not be effected by sprink-
ling their powders on a red hot heater, as the light of the
powder would be mixed with that of the heater. In some
cases of attrition bodies are raised to a temperature beyond
visible heat. The corner of an angular piece of window glass
being applied to the circumference of a revolving wheel of fine
grit, part of its mass is worn away ; but a larger portion,
lying just above the abraded part, is heated to redness. Now,
as all the heat which is there collected, and a great deal more
which is carried away in the abraded part, and conducted off
by the air and by the glass lying up to the red hot portion, has
once occupied a smaller space in the part worn away, it follows
that the abraded portion, or aggregate of heated surfaces, has
been heated to a degree exceeding redness by all the heat
remaining in the red-hot part, and by the quantity of heat
conducted off by the air and adjacent glass ; and, consequently,
that each surface has been heated by the attrition to a degree
as much exceeding redness.
I am aware that this reasoning is founded, in part, on the
supposition that the heat is generated on the surface or outer-
most coat of the body ; some of it may undoubtedly proceed
from an agitation of the parts under the surface, but the emis-
sion of red hot sparks at the instant of attrition proves that
a great heat is generated on the surface ; and as the friction,
or apparent heating cause, is so much greater there that the
parts are forcibly broken and disjointed, whilst just beneath
there is no perceptible alteration in the body, we may venture
to conclude that the heat generated beneath the surface is but
inconsiderable.
After all, it remains entirely problematical, in what manner
heat operates to produce light from bodies ; the air does not
seem to have any concern in its production, as bodies are
equally luminous in almost all kinds of air, and when immersed
in liquids. The phosphorism of sugar is probably of a different
kind from that of the earthy class ; for, although so soft and
friable a substance, it produces its light very copiously upon
gentle attrition.
In speaking of the attrition of bodies upon the stone wheel,
I have said that they became red hot about the touching part ;
I should not have made use of this expression if the luminous
sparks which issued from them hail not kindled gunpowder
and inflammable air, and thus proved that the part from which
they came was raised to a temperature at least equal to what
is usually termed a red heat ; for, till the temperature of the
part touching the wheel had been thus ascertained, I attributed
the whole of the light emitted to the common phosphorism of
bodies. If the velocity of the wheel be much increased the
touching part of the body applied emits a bright, white light,
much more vivid than any which powders ever give out on the
heater, and, probably, the temperature of the luminous part is
equal to what is usually called a \rhite heat.
Having thus made incombustible bodies red-hot without the
aid of fire, I once conceived that all the light which they
emit when heated to redness in the fire, proceeded from their
great phosphorism, for I could not suppose that they absorbed
light from the burning fuel and emitted it again at the same
time, and during a continuance of the same circumstances. It
appeared, however, equally inexplicable why a stone put into
the lire should continue to shine from its own light with
fi 4
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 24, 1890.
undiminished lustre as long as the tire is kept up ; for it has
been shown that if a phosphorescent body remain long upon
the heater, of any temperature between 400° of Fahrenheit
and a red heat, its light diminishes more and more till at
last it is scarcely perceptible ; and then an increase of heat is
necessary to render it more luminous.
Appendix.
After a considerable part of the above paper was printed, I
repeated the experiment with boiling oil, as previously related,
with every possible precaution ; I poured the powder into the
flash through a funnel which reached to the bottom, so that
none of it might be lodged on the sides ; for, not having
attended to this circumstance before, I was apprehensive that
the experiment was delusive, and that the agitation of the hot
oil might have washed down some fresh particles which had not
been before heated ; then slowly pouring in a little oil, I boiled
it for a few minutes and removed it into a dark place. When
the powder had become but faintly luminous upon agitation,
the experiment succeeded exactly. I then boiled anil agitated
the oil for six or seven times successively with the same result,
except that the light of the powder grew something fainter
each time. If anyone has the curiosity to repeat this singular
experiment, he may attend to the foUowing directions Upon
each removal from the fire, stop the neck of the flask with a
cork having a small hole pierced through it ; wrap the neck
round with tow, agitate the liquor by quickly raising and
lowering the flask.
The spark which leaves the surfaces of hard bodies during
attrition may be exactly imitated by burning a bit of dusty
paper ; the particles of dust are carried by the current of air
through the blaze, and are made red hot in their passage.
THE BEST PHOTOGRAPH KB.
BY FRED. HART WIJ.SON.
That to a great many people the photograph gallery is a
place “ hedged about with terrors” is unfortunately in-
disputable. Over its door might be written, “ All hope
(of looking natural) abandon, ye who enter here.” The
reception room may hold gorgeous carpets, and red velvet
and black walnut galore, but is filled and covered with
photographs, photographs, nothing but photographs.
There may be waiting-rooms, full of frames and albums,
and neat little dressing-rooms, “replete with every con-
venience,” as a new hotel ; but the spirit sinks and sinks
till, when the gallery, dreadfully bare and businesslike, in
cold blue and white, is reached, it touches bottom with a
bump. I remember one reception room, very full one
busy day, which was far more abominably desolate than
any funeral I ever saw. The victims sat solemnly around
the walls, every woman, of course, accompanied by two
others nobly standing by their suffering sister in this crisis,
occasionally giving her a little pat or pull till her turn
came to appear. It was a sad hour.
It is unreasonable, and in a way a severe exposure of
poor humanity s vanity and self-consciousness, this photo-
graphing state of mind. But it is undoubtedly vastly
helped by the mechanical anil strictly professional appoint-
ments of many galleries, and the semi-surgical manner of
the operators.
Of course, a man, especially when a busy and nervous
photographer, cannot always be the pink of smiling
courtesy. It is well to bear in mind, nevertheless, that
people expect to be idealized to a certain extent in the
operations of photography, and a little of it before the lens
does its work may save a great deal of it afterwards. Easy,
unhurried motion, and a calm confidence that everything
is going to come out all right, will impart themselves to
the sitter, and a natural expression will replace the nervous
flutter or the defiant glare, whichever his constitution may
have led him to assume. If, in addition, there is a stock
of good temper and untiring patience, we have the ideal
photographer. Such a one studies the face in its different
aspects in various lights, gets an idea of the best effects,
and sure, then, of the material part of the picture, turns
to the spiritual. Quietly talking, or simply waiting, he
persuades the mind of the subject away from himself, until
self-consciousness gradually disappears, the happy moment
comes, a couple of seconds’ pause, and it is done.
Not everyone can do this : but if one cannot change the
furniture of his mind, lie can that of his reception room.
Galleries like those of Rose or Sarouy may not be within
his reach, but lie can sink the shop a little, and make his
rooms a pleasant place to be in. A well-chosen few of the
innumerable fine reproductions, artistically framed and
hung ; a few jars, and screens, and mirrors, if he can go so
far ; anything to make the place less like a shop, and more
like an abode of the arts. Let him suppress the photo-
graph just a little, and endeavour to make the place
artistic.
For the photographer, especially in the smaller towns,
liasa very considerable responsibility in that respect resting
on him. 1 Ie can do a great deal, if lie will, in quietly educa-
ting the people in art. Let him get simply examples of
the best photography, and of the reproductions that are
now so inexpensive, and hang them, changing them when
he can, in his rooms and windows. Let him take a few-
art journals, and try to read a few art books. It will
advantage him, for he will be at the same time educating
himself, and the results will be certain to show in his work ;
and let him coax his patrons on to the appreciation and
demand for this — a demand he will be sure to find in time,
for it is the peculiarity of the really good thing in art, as
elsewhere, to stand wear, to endure and grow upon us.
He w ill find himself forging ahead, and will learn that to
be the artistic photographer of his community means not
only to be the most skilful and intelligent, but also the
most appreciated and the best paid. — lV/ison'ti Pholot/rujthic
Mar/azim .
Photographic Cu n. Wednesday, Jan. 29th, annual lantern
and musical entertainment. Subject for discussion Feb. 5th,
“The Intensification anil Reduction of Negatives.”
Dagikrrk and Taluot. — At the Boston convention it was
resolved to organise a one dollar subscription for the purpose
of erecting somewhere in Washington a monument or memorial
to Daguerre. We could have wished that iu this matter the
name of Talbot could have been associated with that of
Daguerre ; as, although each wrought independently of the
other, their discoveries were given to the world almost simul-
taneously ; and although for-e time the beautiful Daguerreotype
carried all before it, in something like a dozen of years it be-
came little more than a memory, while the process of Talbot,
in many modifications, no doubt, remains with us. — The Bea-
con.
Soaking before Developing. — Photographers are some-
times advised to soak their plates in water before developing.
Speaking from experience we certainly counsel them to do no
such thing. This preliminary soaking has a tendency with
most plates to make the high-lights Hat and dull-looking, whilst
it veils the shadows and half-tones in a most exasperating way.
It is a great mistake also to imagine, as some photographers do,
that a large quantity of developing solution in any way helps to
produce a good negative. The finest negatives we have yet
seen were developed with the smallest amount of solution that
could be used ; and we were assured by the artist by whom they
were made that to this “kink ” he attributed their best quali-
ties. Try it. — Wilton’i Magazine.
January 24, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
63
>>
-|®
1
col®
o
*0
tO
■^1
o
a
n
CO
X
X
X
"oQ
H®
-if
* 7!
co
co
lO
m
rt
i-to
Hf
*C|»
o
CO
CD
»o
C/3
s
X
X
X
O
to
H
m|«M
o
o
00
o
rH
»— <
H
t*w
H<*
Hf
»cfx
r-~
fj
CO
CO
»o
c o
X
X
X
1 a
c <m
c«(»
-In
c«to
o — •
CO
CO
i— i
, ?
O
l-H
rH
r-H
O
O
o,to
eilee
co
CO
to
>>
— 1
to o
X
X
X
1—
g §
MW
HN
—If
•»
O Z3
CO
CM
r i
M ^
H
,-H
rH
new
,*»
d .
o
o
00
Cfc
O
o o
s $
X
X
X
—
S 5
H«
-If
H
CO
CM
»— *
<*
O 0
rH
^H
lH
L-i
— 1
,
Hx
H—
ol«
CO
CO
*o
c °
X
X
X
o
g ej
H|S
-m
£
hh
o
O
M o
CM
CM
H
O
•He*
U
CO
CM
rH
*-H
rH
«*H
»T ■} O
5 X.
X
X
X
-HCI
HM
o
o
o
OI
CM
r-H
o
o
n
1
^-r
o
o
«!W
CO
*3
•4P
6t 3
X
f— 1
X
X
o
X
o
o
o 8S
hJ ^
—H
*4fi*
i-O
HM
CM
•*->
-g
a
pH
(M
CM
CM
s
Pi
c«n
CO
— In
CO
e*m
■ o
i-H
*— 1
3
S "S
C5
X
X
X
pH
fy ,
of
(-
o
c3
HH
t- 2
« H
S«
H
55
— t^l
l—
<M
HN
<M
(M
o
*3
o
f-.
o
'b ^
►— i
«
-In
o
CM
o
CM
-In
(Z5
fy^
•5
o
i-
g Ip
X
X
»o
X
He*
<M
NJ
cc
72
CM
CM
—•’•r
CM
S3
0}
cd
CO
*o
fa
-4->
;; * -
X
X
X
—
o d
w-
— ‘
J o
o
«o
*w
M
CO
fa
H—
-H'O
—In
IV-*
H
H
o
J8
o
t (0
bo T J
1 ^
3 -a
Ci
X
•— i
CO
X
o
X
iO
O
C5
M H
Tfl
■*T>
00
>
03
,jD
«ilf
-In
O
CO
<M
£Q
<L>
I—1
I-H
<3^
bo o
C ^
X
X
X
o o
hq Ph
_(
O
*o
Ch
-f
00
«Hn
r"i
O
<M
GO
o
bl
CM
CM
n3
T5 .
b 9
X
X
X
rO
fig
cs
•H*
O
KO
CO
e^J
hJ
0)
z>
>c
:
;
cc
o
O
ss
w
r— (
£
c
II.
a!
a
Ih
0/
dH
s
3
o
o
o
, •
u
a:
M
p
*f-i
a
w
t— <
o
o
o
p
p
H
ton
Q
«*i_
«!W
Ml®
-I®
e*ln
-In
—1®
ciHt*
cb
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
O'*
M
<M
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
He*
*o
iO
M|»
»o
-If
VO
rtlf
H*
He*
H*
nht
CO
M|7)
CO
He*
*o
Hn
vO
vO
r.J®
VO
Hf
H*
VO
rlf
H*
He*
H*
CO
dfj©
CO
He*
vO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
— r*
l-
N
-}»
iff
CO
o
CD
*o
VO
-In
He*
*o
r.bo
«
«!h
«|x
*o
vO
fH
»o
H
-r
CO
CO
»o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Hfl
c*n
rin
a
a
CO
00
CO
»o
O
— H
vO
vO
Mjii*
Hn
♦ 1 »
t«rr
-to
o;c
-H
■H*
rH
-t*
cd
co
CM
»o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
«Sr
He*
-5*
n'—
^H
O
O
00
o
CS
05
CO
rH
rH
H
— H
He*
-n*
— ;®
MfW
Hf
-m
l-
CO
CO
o
»o
vO
Tf*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
n;w
edw
— H
O
O
cd
o
Ci
o
l-
cd
l-H
*-H
rH
— tn
r|»
rthr
e:|®
He*
VO
■o
VO
H*
vO
-r
rf
CO
CO
*o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
»o
H*e
CM
He*
vO
rt<
CO
(M
o
CO
to
»— 1
—
— H
l-H
l-H
Wf
-m
H.**
«lw
—
o
O
cd
O
05
05
CO
—1
— “ •
T-H
l-H
— H
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VO
O
— If*
(M
— t.
— tn
•w
CO
M
_
O
CO
»o
’ 1
l-H
l-H
HN
Hei
-1*
nlw
H—
-He*
I-
CO
co
w
*o
O
-t*
cd
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
£S
w
X
Ol
Hn
Hn
O
^H
O
C5
to
CO
M
M
M
l-H
CM
—•
l-H
<
Cl
-m
—In
X
pH
O
O
o
a
00
CD
to
o
—H
—I
Cs
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-H
<M
O
^H
O
C5
tO
H
CM
<M
CM
V—
CM
rH
I—*
l-H
l-H
HH
CM
«
— ]H
-HJ*
-o*
-M
*o
»o
rf
c->
CM
o
tO
•—>
^H
rH
■ *
rH
1— 1
CO
i-H
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ol
O
He*
,,
O
G>
to
-HJ*
(M
<M
CM
— H
CM
— H
Cl
He*
r|®
— Iw
nlw
-in
vO
»o
-r
VO
H1
co
CO
tO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O
o
•He*
CO
1 —
»o
■H*
ot
o
1^
O
CO
M
<M
M
CM
CM
r-H
co
-|es
e*ln
c*.n
e*ln
-1®
-in
-In
l'-
CO
vO
CO
CO
tO
H*
1—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O
O
cd
I—
to
H*
CM
O
O
CO
CO
<M
CM
<M
CM
<M
CO
He*
He*
-»*
.-H
o
O
00
o
05
05
l-
CO
rH
i-H
^H
l-H
rH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
—if
o
o
CO
»o
H*
(M
O
O
eo
CO
CM
<M
CM
(M
CM
—H
co
05
Het
M
CM
o
t-
O
CC
>0
CO
Ol
CM
CM
l-H
<M
l—<
<M
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
— !-H
O
O
CO
r-
*o
<M
o
O
CO
co
CM
cM
CM
M
<M
l-H
CO
•
•
j
:
2
2
2
2
;
•
•
•
pt*
*
•
•
"
03
d
CJ
— H
■>
•
o
d
o
2
.
2
2
2
•
Si
tr>
o
•
•
•
•
•
Jcj
O
CD
o
«
Ch
o
B
rH
P*
03
"3
o
Si
o
3
c3
.a
>*
«H
>-
s
o
dH
s*
d
!o
n3
a
*c
p*
a
t-H
O
Q
o
Q
O
Oh
.O
s
<D
Q
H
u
5
fcc
a
HH
e:to
*Sn
J-
ecto
In
«lH
- H
-In
— n
r.l®
—to
co
CO
CO
M
IM
CM
(M
CO
<M
<M
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
«to
us15®
J»
*cp
oto
e»;»
f+®
* H
1
H®
Hf
who
*w*
-3*
Tf*
CO
CO
■’7'
CO
CO
etto
•oto
wjto
— i—
c-to
ri|x
V*
H
— M
t-l®
-|H
«♦»
Hjl
rt*
nj*
CO
CO
CO
co
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
n*»
r£
Hn
o;*
nH*
|H|W
-to
co
cd
CO
»o
to
to
VO
CO
■*3<
«to
r+o
i-to
Hs
e ^
— r*
*s»
-I-
n|»
—
■w
rf*
Ht-
CO
CO
rt*
CO
co
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-to
He*
c»rt
Mf*
c*to
-tn
C5
oo
GO
b-
N
co
CO
05
vO
to
n
le»
c*to
rtiw
-to
esto
HM
oc
niw
-r
rj*
CO
CO
co
CO
-H*
CM
T 1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o X
ceH*
niw
•ato
*H®
»-}®
nlw
He*
«N*
eto
C5
C5
05
CO
CO
i-
CO
CO
CO
to
-to
ce'-H
H
HN
Or®
M
nlw
-lw
—‘X
CO
CO
• CO
to
tO
to
to
CO
n#*
"31
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ot
cow
nto
rf®
*-to
«ff*
He*
«9»
r-
C5
05
CO
00
t-
00
CO
CO
«to
c5
J2
*3to
-to
»H»
H»
rv*
— H
I-/®
— |H
eeto
“h
"t*
-*T*
nr
r?*
H*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
HO*
-to
Hf
-to
—In
— H
—Hr
CO
CM
Ol
H
i— i
o
o
X
X
X
^H
T-H
•-H
rH
—
rH
icto
rtlw
niw
•oto
tS®
r- x
«k*
Hn
Mfa*
cto
C5
05
05
X
X
l'-
X
CO
co
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
— *n
-to
H-r
-to
Hn
Hn
HH
CO
CM
CM
l-H
l-H
o
o
X
X
X
*-*
rH
p—H
to
niw
He*
•moo
rC
CCrf*
Hf*
—to
o
CO
CO
to
vO
to
to
CO
H*
HI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-If*
-vf*
He*
Hh
ntw
ntw
He*
HN
ff
05
05
05
I—
r—
vo
»o
h*
X
X
*— '
i— i
r-H
i-H
H
i-H
rH
r-H
i-H
^le«
—
-to
-le*
eto
niw
neo
H«
05
CO
X
i^i
t>i
co
CO
05
to
tO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-If*
r*CI
-In
—iw
Wf
-o*
He*
— I—
05
05
05
i—
1—
*d
vO
h.
X
x’
l-H
r"H
r-H
r— (
r-H
r-H
r-H
rH
He*
-to
-If*
—to
Hn
Hn
HH
co
Cl
CM
—H
rH
o
o
X
X
X
l-H
rH
—
rn
l-H
1 1
r-H
rH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-If
-tn
He*
Hr
eelw*
«)f
He*
Hn
Hf*
05
05
05
l'*
i>i
vO
‘O
r—
X
X
l-H
rH
—H
i-H
rH
— H
i-H
rH
rto «r .to
H- H* H* I-1 -m -H Hf «to h
'r TJ1 'j' Tf CO CO CO CO
XXXXXXXXXX
ly
Hf
H*
H*
(M
-m
CM
O
—If
O
He*
CO
Ol
CM
CM
M
CM
CM
CM
CM
l-H
rH
<
— tn
HN
n(f*
-hi
Hf
Hc£
«to
He*
*£
CO
co
to
vO
to
*o
to
vo
H*
H*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
i-
Hf
H*
H*
CM
-In
<M
o
—If*
o
t"-
r-
-tn
CO
CM
CM
<M
<M
CM
CM
M
(M
r-H
<ko
«lw
«h*
*r*0
*H»
nlf
He*
eeif
*eho
05
X
Oj
X
X
4—
I-
X
CD
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Hf
H*
Hi
<M
-tn
CM
o
Hf
O
h-
Hft
CO
(M
CM
CM
Ol
CM
<M
CM
CM
rH
Hf
Hn
Hn
Hf
«lf
eeff
He*
HN
Hf
05
05
05
1 —
to
O
I—
co
X
l-H
l-H
r—
rH
r-H
—
l-H
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1-
Hf*
w*
H*
<M
He*
<M
o
Hf
o
i'-
-tn
o
CM
CM
Ol
CM
CM
CM
(M
<M
rH
P
'
‘
•
M
•
PP
»4
h4
p
p
:
«
PQ
P
hP
a
p
M
HH
HH
«
CP
PP
03
O
s'
Hi
*3
>>
s'
*H
w
a
^=}
S
HH
r=i
o
o
n
a
o
«
w
HH
P
w
S
fa
o
o,
c3
Si
<D
Pi
d
"a
&
o*
p
d
*3
<D
Do.
a
<u
o
A
2
d
o
O
~n
O
o
Do.
CO
M
p
A
fa
66
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
V («*
[January 24, 1890.
7
/
iititcs.
Congresses, whether photographic or otherwise, have
a disagreeable knack of not letting well alone. Some
faddist has a pet idea which he trots out, and if no
vital principle is involved, sometimes carries, very often
to his own intense surprise. Something of this kind
seems to have happened at the International Photographic
Congress at Paris, where, at the discussion on “termin-
ology,” resolutions were carried which strike at the very
basis of photography, as the public understand the term.
Thus the first impression, whether on glass or any
other material, whether negative or positive, is to be
called the “ phototype.” The proofs from the “ photo-
type ” are to be designated the “ photo-copies.” The
simple and familiar word “photograph” appears to
have been extinguished.
The Moniteur de la Photographic, discussing the
question, expresses dissent from the conclusions arrived
at, and points out that in England the word “ photo-
type ” is already utilized for a particular process of
reproduction. The word “photo-copy” pleases our
contemporary even less, and it pertinently inquires if
the want of the word has ever been felt. Have we
ever desired to say, “Give me a photo-copy of your
portrait? ” or to exclaim, “ Hero is a beautiful photo-
copy ! ” In speaking of a “ photograph,” everybody
knows what is meant, and “ photo-copy ” is a confusing
and an unnecessary innovation. Besides, to be consistent,
other words would have to be revised. Why not
“litho-copy ” instead of lithograph, or “ tele-copy ” in
the place of telegram ? But we in England need not
disturb ourselves over the matter. Congresses may
come, and Congresses may go, but the word photograph
is likely to go on for ever.
One of the oddest characteristics of photography is
the facility with which men of equal ability and of
equal manipulative skill, in trying the same process,
arrive at totally opposite opinions. For the thousandth
time, more or less, this was exemplified at the last
meeting of the Photographic Society, when Mr. L.
Warnerke was loud in his praises of the eikonogen
developer, while Mr. S. G. B. Wollaston had not been
able to succeed so far as obtaining density was con-
cerned. It is puzzling why there should be these
differences, but they bring with them their consolation,
for if every photographer had exactly the same experi-
ence, where would be the necessity for photographic
societies, and what would photographers find to talk
about ? Ibis latter contingency, we are inclined to
think, would be worse than the former.
The Russian authorities have placed a new tax upon
travellers. New passport regulations came into force
last week, and travellers will now be bound to carry
their photographs annexed to their passes. It has been
sarcastically suggested that ladies must be careful not
. t0 oxhibit Photographs taken ten years previously,
while gentlemen must not be eccentric as to sudden
changes
in the hair on their faces. To save incon-
venience, the bureau where the passport is granted
should be provided with a photographic studio. This
would prevent no end of trouble, as to be obliged to
have your portrait taken (supposing you have not a
photograph— no unlikely thing) just before starting on
a journey would add a new terror to life.
But this is just what the authorities have not done ;
and the only consolation is, that the photographic
profession in Russia will reap the benefit. But even
here, what the Government have given with one hand
they have taken away with the other; for after having
created a trade by forcing people to be photographed,
they proceed to lay a stamp duty of about 2d. on every
carte -de-visite. Such at least is the expressed intention,
and if so, photographers will not gain much, for though
they may make more negatives, they will probably
print less copies.
Illustrated journalism — if we may use the phase —
is full of pitfalls. The journalistic artist is but mor-
tal, and liable to err ; but if he does make a mistake,
and draws the wrong man, the consequences are far
more awful than when a reporter puts words into the
wrong man’s mouth. The Daily Graphic last week
had to apologise for a blunder of this kiud at an illus-
trated report of a concert ; but this was not so bad as a
possible catastrophe in connection with another illus-
trated, averted only because the editor happened to
know the originals. It happened over the blackmailing
case, which has excited so much interest in the city.
The case, though a criminal one, was heard at the
Court of Queen’s Bench, and the three defendants were
not placed in a dock, but sat beside their solicitors.
An artist who was sent to sketch the scene could,
owing to the crush, only get admission to the public
gallery, and therein made his notes. He was correct
in spotting two of the defendants, but for the third
drew the face of a highly respectable solicitor instead !
Fortunately the editor, knowing the man, was able to
put matters straight by cutting out the wrong one ; but
what would have happened had the block gone in?
Surely a' gross libel would have been committed!
One would almost think that Major Wissmann, the
pioneer of German “colonization” in East Africa,
had been to see Mr. Burnand’s “ Tra la la Tosca,”
and had taken a hint from the execution scene, which,
as wc described last week, consists of the prisoner
being photographed. Major Wissmann — who, by the
way, appears to be a military martinet of the school
dear to the heart of Frederick the Great — subjected
Bushiri to much the same torture as that gone through
nightly at the New Royalty. After catching him, we
read, Wissmann dressed him in rags and chains, and
then in holiday clothes, and photographed him in each
costume. He was to have been shot, but he behaved
so treacherously that shooting was considered too good
for him. The inference is clearly that by being photo-
January 24, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
07
gtaplied he was subjected to a punishment more igno-
minious than that which bullets would have inflicted !
We hardly know whether photographers will feel
pleased or annoyed at this.
Knowledge last week gave a full-page reproduction of
a print from a pinhole uegative taken by Professor
Pickering. It represents the rear of the observatory of
Harvard College, and though the sun was setting when
the photograph was taken, the exposure was only six
minutes. The photograph was taken from the roof of
a cottage to the north-west of the observatory, and it
is noticeable that the slates of the roof, the wires, and
other objects in the immediate foreground, with the
exception of the fir trees, which probably moved with
the wind during the exposure, are equally as sharp as
objects at a distance.
Mr. Bignell, the artist who has been selected to
make the latest portrait of Mr. Gladstone, will not
have a very easy task. Mr. Gladstone has sat so many
times to painters and photographers that he is heartily
sick of the operation, and has “struck.” lie flatly
refuses to accommodate himself to a formal sitting, but
has given Mr. Bignell permission to make himself at
home in his library and catch the likeness the best he
may, while Mr. Gladstone writes, or reads, or performs
Iiis many duties, kfter all, this is the best way of
catching the true expression, but it makes great de-
mands on the ability and quickuess of the artist.
Gradually a photographic outfit is being recognised
as a part of any traveller’s outfit, whether he intends
to write books or make pictures. Mr. W. H. Mallock,
who has been rambling among Hungarian castles, will
write an article on the subject in next month’s
Scribner , illustrated by photographs taken by himself.
Mr. Herkomcr is off to Cairo, where he will make
sketches and take photographs for future use ; while
Sir John Millais has recently been on a journey, when
his daughter acted as the photographer. The one man
who, it would be thought, should have been among
the earliest to practise the art, has not touched it — we
mean the descriptive reporter. If the Daily Graphic
succeeds — of which, by the way, we have doubts so long
as it is conducted on its present lines — lie may see the
necessity.
Photography is the barometer of popularity. When
anybody attains the rank of celebrity, the photographic
print dealers arc soon made aware of the fact. Major
Serpa Pinto is the latest lion, not in England, but in
Portugal, and the Lisbon dealers are worried to death
because negatives of the intrepid and patriotic explorer,
or marauding fillibuster, according whether you are
Portugese or English, are scarce. Photographs are,
indeed, at so high a price that an old trick, which used
to be practised at Berlin in regard to the present Em-
peror’s grandfather, has been imitated in Lisbon, and
it is said that a person resembling Major Pinto Iras been
hired to sit, in order to supply the needed negatives.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Formic Aldehyde and its Compounds — A New Flash-
Light — The Photonom— Quinol Intensifies — Com-
bined Toning .and Fixing Bath— Hardening Gela-
tine Prints.
The Use of the Formic Aldehyde and its Compounds in Pho-
tography.— An invention Iras of late beerr patented by Mr.
York Schwartz and Dr. Mercklin, of Hanover, consisting
of the use of formic aldehyde and its compounds for pho-
tographic purposes. The sodium oxymethyl-sulphonate
or formic aldehyde sodium bisulphite works well, especially
with carbonated alkali ; if added to the gelati no -bromide
emulsion it accelerates the ripening, and imparts vigour
and clearness to the negatives ; also if added to the ferrous
oxalate as well as to the pyrogallic and hydryquinone deve-
lopers, it has a preservative action, accelerates develop-
ment, and prevents fog. The keeping qualities of these
developers are materially improved by the addition, and
only about a quarter the usual quantity of iron is neces-
sary to obtain equally good results. The sensitising action
of the formic aldehyde and its compounds depends without
doubt upon the energy with which they absorb bromine
or iodine.
A New Flash-Light. — Professor Max Midler, in his excel-
lent manual on the use of the magnesium light for photo-
graphic purposes, published a few weeks ago by Mr. I\.
Schwier, of Weimar, gives the formula of the flash-light
composition with which lie has obtained the beautiful cave
pictures which were so much admired at the last Berlin
exhibition. The original formula of Gaedickeand Miethe,
who at first introduced the flash-light in its present form,
contained, it will be remembered, crystallised trisulphide
of antimony : 1 part of trisulphide of antimony, 8 parts of
magnesium powder, G parts of potassium chlorate. The
trisulphide of antimony, which has the function of accel-
erating the combustion of the composition, is a very dan-
gerous mixture. For this reason Professor Muller re-
places it by perchlorate of potash, which contains a larger
quantity of oxygen than the potassium chlorate, and causes
more rapid combustion without, he asserts, the production
of a similarly dangerous explosive composition. Iiis for-
mula is the following : potassium chlorate 8 parts, per-
chlorate of potash 3 parts, magnesium powder 4 parts.
The Photonom. — This is the name of an ingenious new
instrument constructed by one of our most eminent
amateur photographers, Ritter von Staudenteim, of Fild-
Kirchen, which was exhibited at the last meeting of the
Photographic Society of Vienna. This instrument, form-
ing part of the objective, has the function during the ex-
posure of distributing automatically the light coming from
the object into the lens, so that, in the case of landscapes,
the sky receives a much shorter exposure than the fore-
ground. The whole arrangement is fixed upon the lens
tube, directly before the diaphragm slit, and it consists
substantially of a shutter, which is moved by clockwork,
and which can be regulated in its rapidity by means of
retarding winged screws. The shutter moves downwards
before the aperture of the lens, covering at first the sky,
then the middle of the scene, and lastly the foreground.
If, for instance, a plate is to be exposed in all for five
seconds, then, by use of the “ photonom,” the sky, the air,
and distant mountains maybe exposed for only one second,
the centre of the landscape for two seconds, and the fore-
ground, in addition to the three seconds it has already re-
68
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 24, 1890.
ceived, two seconds extra. The landscape photographs
taken by means of this instrument are of excellent clear-
ness, and show plenty of detail.
Quinol Intensijier for Collodion Negatives. — Prof. Eder
publishes in the Correspondent a formula for a hydroquinone
intensifier which has been communicated to him by Cap-
tain Baron Hiibl. This experimentalist endeavoured to
find a trustworthy physical intensifying method for collo-
dion negatives to replace the mercurial intensifier, and he
succeeded by the use of quinol-silver intensification, which
acts in the same manner as the well-known pyro-silver in-
tensifier, possessing, however, the advantage that it not only
intensifies the wet plate before being fixed, but that it per-
fects any imperfect details in the negative by continued
development. Captain Hiibl dissolves lOgrammes of hydro-
quinone in 1,000 c.c. of water, and adds so much of an
acid that the solution, with one-third of silver nitrate solu-
tion, 1 : BO, remains clear for five minutes. The iutensi-
fier has been tried by Prof. Eder, and the results obtained
were excellent. The formula used was the following : —
versa, otherwise the bath would be destroyed by the for-
mation of dark brown sulphocyanide of gold. After a
thorough shaking and settling, the bath is ready for use.
If it is preferred to tone the prints, more Vandyke brown or
umbra, also five grammes of pure carbonate of ammonium,
should be added to the bath. A bath made up in the de-
scribed manner, which has been in use for ten months,
works still as if entirely unaltered. The procedure is as
follows: — Of the above 1,000 volumes, 100 volumes are
poured off into a bottle for daily use. The small quantity
which is eliminated by toning is always replaced from the
stock solution. Should the bath, by toning one hundred
cabinets or more, become dark brown, it does not matter;
the precipitate is removed from the prints by means of a
soft brush in the washing water, and the bath is filtered
several times. Care should be taken that the temperature
of the bath is not below 68 to 71“ F.
Hardening Gelatine Prints. — The same experimentalist
gives a good formula for hardening or tanning gelatine
prints. The following solution is made up : —
Solution No. 1.
Hydroquinone... ... ... ... 10 grammes
Water 1,000 c.c.
Citric acid ... ... ... ... 6 grammes
Solution No. 2.
Silver nitrate ... ... ... ... 1 gramme
Water... 30 c.c.
Before use, • > parts of solution No. 1 are mixed with
1 part of solution No. 2. The intensifier gives as excel-
lent results in the reproduction of line drawings for photo-
lithography as in the case of half-tone pictures for collo-
type. The wet collodion plates, after being developed
with sulphate of iron, are rinsed and covered with the
hydroquinone intensifier. When fixed, the negatives are,
for the most part, vigorous enough, but, if necessary, they
can afterwards be intensified also with mercury. If the
negative has been nearly correctly exposed and well deve-
loped, the hydroquinone intensifier is employed after fix-
ing ; the clear lines are thereby perfectly preserved.
Combined Tonimj and Fixing Bath. — Many toning baths
have been recommended of late for prints on gelatino-
ehloride paper, but the following one, given by Ilerr Jos.
Bud. Shatter in the Phot. Naclirichten, seems to be of spe-
cial value, as it contains no alum, but instead thereof
acetate of soda, which compensates for the decompositions
otherwise taking place in the toning baths. The bath
gives excellent tones of great variety. The following
solution is made up at first : —
Solution No 1.
... 1,000 c.c.
... 250 grammes
5 grammes
8 „
20 c.c.
After this solution has stood for twenty-four hours, milky
Hakes of insoluble sodium compounds arc produced in it,
which arc removed by filtering the liquid twice. Then
the following solution is made up : —
Solution No. 2.
Distilled water 100 c.c.
Chloride of gold (yellow crystals) ... 1 gramme
Chloride of ammonium 5 grammes
Solution No. 2 is poured into solution No. 1, not vice
Distilled water...
Hyposulphite of soda ...
Sulphocyanide of ammonium ...
Acetate of soda (crystallised) ...
i o this is added a mixture of : —
Nitrate of silver ... ...
Chloride of sodium ... ...
Water
Distilled water... ... ... ... 1,000 c.c.
Tannin... ... ... ... ... 1 gramme
Chloride of sodium ... ... ... 10 grammes
Saturated solution of potassium alumin-
ium sulphate ... ... ... 100 c.c.
The prints, if pressed between blotting paper, never stick
together, and if squeegeed on to glass plates rubbed with
talc, and dried at a temperature of 77° to 86® F., conic off
after half an hour with an indestructible high gloss. If
they have been touched with wet or greasy fingers, it is
only necessary to rub them with a dry rag to remove every
trace of uncleanness. The whites remain absolutely pure,
and prints treated in this manner can easily be retouched
without the retouching being perceptible.
Mu. W. Darnell, writing to the English Mechanic about
aerial photography, says : — “ Being an aeronaut and photo-
grapher, I have had the opportunity of exposing a few plates,
but have not got them as sharp as I should like. To get good
results it requires one to look after the camera, and one to bring
the balloon down to the altitude required. In the Photograi'UIC
News there were two plates published on April 2nd, 1880, views
of Paris taken from a balloon, which I have by me.”
Mirages. — The article in Nature of November 21st, 1889
(p. 09), recalls to me mirages I saw in March, 1888, while
travelling in the East on the steam yacht Ceylon. On the 29th
we were crossing the Black Sea from Sebastopol. It was a
fine, cool day, and quite calm. In the afternoon a false or
mirage horizon about 3° above the true one was visible for a
few hours. No objects were within range of vision. The
mirage disappeared as the sun declined. The next day was very
much warmer, and we saw' a more marked and interesting
mirage in the afternoon as wTe were steaming across the Sea of
Marmora away from Constantinople. In this case it apj>eared
only in the west, and objects were seen reflected in an inverted
position. A small conical-shaped island was seen with its in-
verted image at times distinct from and at times blending with
the original. The image was distinctly seen of some laud,
which was actually below the horizon. The mirage of the re-
flection of the sun in the sea was, when seen through a glass,
especially beautiful. It resembled a glorious cataract of golden
water. This mirage lasted till quite the dusk of the evening,
and then gradually thinned down and died away. I do not
know whether mirages at sea are uncommon ; but as the officers
on board did not remember seeing one before, I thought these
instances might be worth recording. — Arthur E. Brown,
Thought Cot , Brentwood. December 31sf, 1889.
J ANGARY 24, 1800.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
09
EIKONOGEN.*
BY RAPHAEL MELDOLA, F.R.S.
In 1880, when studying the action of nitroso-compoundson
phenols, I discovered a nitroso-sulphonic acid of fl-naph-
thol, which at that time was the first known representative
of the class of aromatic nitroso-sulphonic acids {Jour.
Chem. Soc. Trans. Jan. 1881, 40). The compound in
question was afterwards utilized as the source of a colour-
ing matter introduced into commerce by the Frankfurter
Anilinfarbenfabrik, Gans and Co., under the name of
“ Naphthol green B.” (Ger. Fat. 28,005, January 19th,
1884.) This compound, which was briefly described by
Otto Hoffmann (Ber. 1885, 40) is the sodium ferrous salt
of the 0-naphthol-nitroso-sulphonie acid referred to, and
may have the formula —
/ NO / N.O fe
C10Hs^-Ofe or Cl0Hs<-0
\ SOjNa \ S03Na
(«■ = ?)
according to the view taken with respect to the presence
of a nitroso-group or an isonitroso-group in the com-
pound. The colouring matter is of considerable technical
value at the present time, and is of interest as being the
only known artificial colouring matter which contains iron
as an essential constituent, excepting, <>f course, the well-
known iron-cyanogen compounds.
Theory indicates the existence of seven isomeric mono-
sulphonic' acids of /3-naphthol. of which only four are known
at the present time. Only one of these is concerned
in the present communication — viz., that modification first
discovered in 18(59 by Schaeffer, and which is best pre-
pared by heating 0-uaphthol with twice its weight of strong
sulphuric acid to the temperature of boiling water till the
naphthol is completely sulphonated. One, if not two
other, monosulphonic acids are produced at the same time,
together with a certain quantity of isomeric disulphonic
acids, but the chief product under the conditions specified
is Schaeffer's monosulphonic .acid. It is the latter acid,
which on a small scale can best be isolated in the form of
its ammonium salt, which gives the nitroso-acid under
consideration. In order to prepare the latter it is only
necessary to dissolve a given weight of the ammonium or
other salt of Schaeffer's acid in cold water together with
the necessary quantity of sodium nitrite, and then, keep-
ing the solution well cooled, gradually add hydrochloric
acid to acid reaction. The litrosulphonic acid is .at once
formed and remains in the solution, imparting to the
latter an orange colour. The acid can, if necessary, be
isolated in a state of purity as a barium or calcium salt
{Jour. ('hem. Soc. Trans. 1881, 44).
By the reduction of the nitrososulphonic acid an amido-
sulphonic acid was prepared, which was isolated and ana-
lysed and described in the paper referred to (foe. at., 47).
This acid was the first amidosulphonic acid of naphthol
ever obtained, and it is the sodium salt of the said acid
which has recently been introduced as a photographic
developer under the name of “ Kikonogen.” As the dis-
coverer of the acid I have been urged to give this note
upon its chemical history for the use of English chemists,
and in doing so, I think it only fair to add that although
the easily oxidisable character of the acid and its salts
* From the Journal of the Soctr'u "f (.’hrmiral Industry, December
Jlst. 1889. No. 12, vol. Tin.
naturally saggested trying it as a photographic developer,
I was not at the time engaged in photographic work, and
the idea was never carried out till the substance was actu-
ally introduced into commerce for this purpose.
Of the advantages of eikonogen as a developer I do not
propose to say anything on the present occasion, since its
qualities have been thoroughly tested by photographers,
and it is becoming very popular for many reasons, which
will be found in the papers dealing with its application.
(See, for instance, papers by Professor G. D. Eiveing,
Photographic News, September 20th, 1889 ; John Spiller,
in the recently-published Year-Book oe Photography
(1890, 124) ; also Lyonel Clark and II. M. Elder in the
Photograhhic News of December 13th, 1889). Some
months after the publication of my paper Griess obtained
an amido-0-naphtholmonosulphonic acid, which was no
doubt identical with the one described by me (Ber. 1881,
2041). lie obtained it by reducing the azo-compound
formed by the action of metadiazobenzoie acid on Shaeffer’s
acid. The whole subject has since been thoroughly in-
vestigated by O. N. Witt (Ber. 1888, 34(58 and 3489), who
has not only confirmed and extended my original observa-
tions, but has also obtained the three other amidosulphonic
acids corresponding to the three jS-naphtholmonosulphonic
acids made known since the time of my investigations.
Witt's amido-sulphonic acids were all prepared by the
reduction of azo-derivatives of the respective /9-naphthol-
monosulphonic acids by means of stannous chloride.
There are thus known at the present time : —
1. Arnido-(8-naphthol-/3-sulphouic acid, from Schaeffer’s acid.
2. A mido-Anaphthol-a sul phonic acid, from Bayer’s (Crocic)
acid.
3. Amido /3-naphthol-!-sulphonic-sulphonic acid, from Ca-
sella’s F-sulpho acid.
4. A mido-£ naphth>'l-7-*ul phonic acid, from Dahl’s acid.
Of these four acids the first appears to be the most
readily oxidisable, and therefore the most suitable for
photographic development. It is possible that some speci-
ments of eikonogen may contain the acids (2), (3) or (4),
but I have not yet met with a preparation in which these
isomerides could be detected. With respect to the consti-
tution of eikonogen, 1 am glad of the present opportunity
of being able to correct my earlier statement, because
more exact information has been obtained by numerous
workers during the nine years which have elapsed since
my own investigation. The constitution of the amido-
sulphonic acid is, in the first place, dependent upon the
constitution of Schaeffer's acid, which was practically
unknown in 1881. It was not even known with certainty
whether the hydroxyl and sulpho-groups were in the same
or in different rings. It has now been shown that this
acid is a heteronuclcal derivative, and the most probable
formula is —
AA OH
I I I
hso3 vv
It is true that by the oxidation of my amido-^-naphthol-
sulphonic acid I obtained phthalic acid, and this led me to
the conclusion that Schaeffer's acid was a homonucleal
compound. There is now no doubt, however, that the
product of oxidation is fl-sulphophthalic acid (llemsenand
Comstock, Amer. Chem. Tonrn. V., p. 106 ; Bee, Inaug.
Diss. Bern, 188(5), and that the phthalic acid obtained by
me from the amido-sulphonic acid was the result of the
hydrolysis of this sulphophthalic acid.
It is well known that in compounds which furnish both
70
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[ January 24, 1890.
azo-and nitroso (isonitroso) derivatives the azo-group and
the nitroso (isonitroso) group occupy the same positiou in
the aromatic ring. In Schaeffer’s acid the most readily
replaceable hydrogen atom is undoubtedly the a-(ortho)-
atom with reference to the hydroxyl, so that the constitu-
tion of these derivatives and of eikonogen is as follows : —
NO
AA OH
I I I
HSOj VV
Nitroso-ierivitive.
N : N— R
AA OH
I I I
1IS03 VV
Azo-derivativj.
NHj
AA OH
I I I
HSOj VV
Eikonogen.
If the first of these compounds be regarded as an
isonitroso-compouud its formula will be : —
_N OH
aa“6
I l I
HSOj VV
Eikonogen may thus be made either by the reduction of
the uitrososulphouic acid or of an azo-derivative of
Schaeffer's acid. 1 >v the action of diazobenzene chloride
upon this last acid an orange colouring matter is obtained,
which is met with in the market under the names of
“ Crocein Orange,” “Brilliant Orange,” “l’oncean -1 G.B.”
<&c. It is one of the oldest known azo-colours, having been
described by Griess in 1878 (Ber. 1878, 21!)7. ) This
compound may be used as a source of eikonogen, using
stannous chloride as a reducing agent: —
C6Hi.N,.CI0H5.HSO3.OH+2 SnCL+4 HC1=C6H&.NH,
+ 2SnCh+C10Hi.HSOj.OH.NH2
It would seem more economical, howevei-, for manufac-
turing purposes to revert to the original method and reduce
the nitroso-0-naphtholsulphonic acid, which need not even
be isolated for this purpose, but can be formed by the
action of nitrous acid in the manner previously described,
and reduced in the same solution. The use of aniline can
thus be dispensed with, and tin replaced by a cheaper re-
ducing agent, such as zinc dust. The raw material is,
moreover, practically a waste product, since the azo-colours
obtained from Schaeffer’s acid are of but little value com-
pared with those obtained from the other monosulphonic
acids of 3-naphthoI, and it is the manufacture of some of
the latter that Schaeffer’s acid is obtained as a by-product.
Owing to the readily oxidisable character of the salts of
eikonogen, it is necessary, after the free acid has been ob-
tained, to convert the latter into the sodium or potassium
salt in the presence of excess of sulphite.
To the numerous coal tar products which have given to
chemical industry such a wealth of technically valuable
compounds, we can now add this new photographic deve-
loper, which threatens to drive the older and related com-
pounds— pyrogallol and hydroquinone — altogether out of
the field.
1* on restoring old papier mache trays a German photogra-
pher recommends a double coating of asphaltum, followed by a
coat of a solution of 1 part of shellac in y parts of alcohol.
1 fcMPKRATUUB ix Development. — Alfred Stuglitz notes in
the Photo. Rundschau, the extreme influence of temperature -on
developers. He states that a developer used too cold is certain
to give hard negatives, while one too warm will give them
quick and weak. He recommends a standard temperature at
which the developer is to be kept all the year round, about
flO Kj and considers that 10® either way make considerable
difference in the action. More especially is this so in the
leisuiely development which is always advisable when finely
graduated soft half-tones are desired in the plate ; with very
rapidly- working development the effects of temperature arc not
so noticeable.
Xottres of £>ook$.
On: IIomi: in' Ayeykox. By C. Christopher Davies and
Mrs. Broughall. ( Blackwood Hons, Loudon : 1890.)
This book consists of studies of peasant life and customs
in Aveyron and The Lot, far down in the south of France,
and is illustrated with copies of photographs taken by Mr.
Davies. lie says that in giving lectures and exhibiting
lantern pictures to rural audiences in England, he found
that much more interest was exhibited in the simple de-
tails of home life, which might easily be compared with
one’s own modest experiences, than in more ambitious tales
of travel. This is true, and were more lantern-slide pic-
tures devoted to illustrating the manners and customs of
other nations than ours, and fewer devoted to mountain
scenery and large public buildings, their interest to the
general public would be increased. The book before us
does not exactly carry out its programme so far as the
illustrations are concerned ; they number but a dozen alto-
gether, and several of these arc not pictures representing
the manners and customs of the people. What, in this
respect, is lacking in the pictures — which, however, are
interesting so far as they go — is made up in the letter-
press, wherein will be found minute details about life and
manners in a French mining village, furnished by perman-
ent English residents, who consequently were well
acquainted with the subject in hand. One of the best
illustrations in the book represents a religious procession,
with the villagers ambling along, and throwing out their
legs, with their hands in their pockets, all resulting in a
realistic effect such as photography alone would be likely
to give, for few painters could or would have grouped
their models in such natural and ungainly attitudes.
The out-of-the-way district described by the authors is
known as the " Lost Country,” the difficulty of access to
and egress from it having given it, say the authors, the
name of the “ Pays Perdu ” among distraction-loving
Frenchmen. “ What will you ? ” they say ; “ There is no-
thing. literally nothing, wherewith to amuse one’s self. It
is a lost country.” On a remark being made to a peasant
woman, •• This is a beautiful country of yours,” she replied,
“ Oui. mademoiselle, mais il est un peu perdu.”
In the schoolroom of the village schoolmaster, who was
the mayor’s secretary. Mr. Davies one nightgave a lantern
entertainment to a crowded house. “Never,” he says,
“ was such a thing heard of in that out-of-the-way village
before. ( hie woman asked another if a lantern magiqae was
like a Chinese lantern. The younger people, like most
young people at a half-dark entertainment, indulged in a
little flirtation, thus giving the pictures an added charm;
while as for the children, they gazed with open-mouthed
wonder upon the enchanted sheet where the views and
figures appeared and disappeared. When the news got
abroad that Monsieur le I)irecteur(of the local mines) had
come, and the entertainment was about to commence, in
came the people, like the rats in the castle on the Rhine ;
they came in at the windows and in at the doors, till the
place was literally crammed. The front row knelt, the
second stood, the third climbed on the desks, and the rest
stood on the window-sills or on the should ere of those
willing to bear the weight.
“The long man of the village bore a friend on his
shoulders, and this friend bore another friend. Then
these three got unsteady and toppled, in their descent
upsetting the belle of the village, who gave the long man a
January 24, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
71
box on the ear by way of recompense. The audience
were delighted with the views shown them of Paris and
Switzerland ; but when a transparency of their village
street, showing a group of familiar figures, was thrown
upon the screen, they were uproarious. We finished up
with a photograph of the director, under which was
written Bonne unit, after which the schoolmaster thanked
us for the entertainment, and the people dispersed,
thoroughly pleased with their evening's amusement. One
poor old woman asked if there would be a collection, and
when told No, expressed her astonishment that any one
should take so much trouble simply to give pleasure to
others. Poor people ! they are so money-grubbing them-
selves, and so used to see those above them money-
grubbing also, that they cannot understand that we should
wish to give them pleasure and charge nothing for it."
The farmers in France are for the most part proprietors j
of the land they cultivate, and they turn out vast quantities
of dairy produce for sale in England, to the great
financial benefit of our (iallic neighbours, Mr. Davies
and some of his English friends were one day invited to
lunch by a wealthy peasant proprietor, M. Pantillac, an
unshaven little mm, in a blue blouse and a shabby felt
hat. As in those parts flower-pots with a lug hole in are
fixed in front of the houses, and the birds of the air
confidingly build their nests therein, and the young birds
are collected and cooked by villagers, an invited guest
fresh from England expected stewed nestlings and dande- 1
lions on the occasion. “ On the contrary." said a friend,
‘•you will get a meal of twenty courses, and most excel-
lent wines. . . . lie wants me to buy a bit of his
land, so he will give us a grand feast.” “That isn't very
flattering to us ; 1 would rather think he means to be
hospitable.” " Ah ! that is not the virtue of a French
peasant."
France is a great country, and what is true of one por-
tion may not be true of another, just as a description of
Yorkshire peasantry would not be applicable to those of
Scotland. The description the authors give of the main
streets of some of the villages being also the main sewers,
all open to sun and air, is not applicable to all parts of
France. In the rural districts of that nation will be found
many homely, hospitable, genuine people.
The authors of the book are Protestants, as they often
inform the readers, and they have much to say about Pro-
testants and Catholics. Some years ago a Government
Inspector asked tiie children at the convent school at
Bouillac, “ What are Protestants?” and was told that they
were black people with tails, and, being little better than
the devil, were all damned. At his last visit the children
were indignant ; they said that they had discovered that the
English Protestants then living in the village had no tails,
were not black, but were very nice people indeed.
Altogether, the book is an interesting one to photo-
graphers and to the general reader. It gives information
about the inner life, and customs, and thoughts of villagers
in some of the provinces of France, such as could only be
given fully by permanent residents in their midst, and not
by casual visitors. Hence the photographic tourist, who
reads it before starting on his travels in France, can gain
a store of useful information, remembering always that
portions of it are true only in relation to the particular
provinces described by the authors.
Rust spots on lenses may be readily removed by placing the
spots in contact with chlorhydric acid diluted with a little
water. — La Nature.
TIIE LATE CUTIIBERT BEDE AND IIIS BOOK
“ PHOTOGRAPHIC PLEASURES.”*
1!Y W. LANG, .1X11., F.C.S.
I think we may safely take it for granted that all of us
have read “The Adventures of Verdant Green, Freshman
at Oxford.” Published more than thirty years ago, it still
enjoys a world-wide popularity. It is not, however, so
generally known that the same author has a work which
appeals more especially to us who are interested in photo-
graphic matters. The title of this work is “ Photographic
Pleasures,” popularly portrayed with pen and pencil, and
I purpose showing you, through the medium of the lan-
tern, some of the more interesting sketches which are to
be found in the volume. Before proceeding to do so,
however, a few details regarding the author may perhaps
be appropriately given. In the first place, we will have
thrown on the screen the portrait of Cuthbert Bede, which
appears as frontispiece to the volume of “ Verdant Green "
which 1 have in my possession, and then we will have the
picture which appeared in the Illustrated London News of
December 28th, 1889. The original is a Meiseubach
photo-block from a photograph taken by Messrs. Hill and
Saunders, of Cambridge. It is almost superfluous to state
the fact that Cuthbert Bede is only a nom de plume, our
author's real name being Edward Bradley, or, rather, the
Rev. Edward Bradlev. At the time of his death, which
took place on the 12th of December last, he was vicar of
Lenton, a village near Grantham. Although his famous
work depicts student life at Oxford, he was not himself an
Oxford graduate. He received his education at Durham
University, where he took his degree. lie was ordained
in 1850, and was successively incumbent of Bobbiugtou,
in Staffordshire (1857), rector of Denton, Hunts (1859),
rector of Stretton, near Oakham (1871), and finally he was
presented in 188:1 to the vicarage of Lenton. “ Verdant
Green ” was published in 1854, and “Photographic Plea-
sures” in 1855. The following are his other works, with
year of publication: — “Nearer and Dearer” (1857);
“Fairy Fables and Happy Hours” (1858); “Glencreg-
gan ” (I860), this being a record of a visit paid to Kin-
tyre ; “Curate of Cranston” (1862) ; “ Tour in Tartan
Land ” (1863) ; “ The White Wife ” (1864) ; “The Rook's
Garden ” (1865) ; “ Matins and Muttons ” ( 1 HOD) ; “ Kor-
theringay and Mary Queen of Scots " (1866) : “ Little Mr.
Bouncer,” a sequel to “Verdant Green" (1878). He
contributed, also, articles to Punch and to the (trophic.
The above list will show that he was a prolific author, and
he not only could write with his pen, but he could draw
with his pencil. The illustrations accompanying the
letterpress were invariably his own. You will be better
able to judge of Ins success in this direction when you see
some of the pictures from his “Photographic Pleasures.”
Here is the title-page. He dedicates the book, “To all
the light-hearted friends of light painting these pages of
light literature are with no light regard dedicated."
The book is divided into twelve chapters: —
Chap.
1. “ Photography regarded as a Light .Subject.”
II. “ Photography in a Legendary Light.”
III. “ Photography in a High Art Light."
IV. “ Photography in an Artistic Light.”
V. “ Photography in a Portrait Painting Light.”
VI. “ Photography in a Love Light.”
VII. “ Photography in an Amateur Light,”
A Coininnication to the Glasgow Photographic Society.
IX. “ Photography in a Negative I aght.
X. “ Photography in a Positive Light.’’
XL “ Photography in a Detective Light. ”
XII. “ Photography in All Manner of Lights.
The illustrations are twenty-four in number, all of them
full-page. The picture which forms the frontispiece has
for its title, “Portrait of a distinguished photographer
who has just succeeded in focussing a view to his entire
satisfaction.” The first illustration in the body of the
book shows a possible contingency which might happen to
the unhappy possessor of a photographic tent ; the letter-
press underneath is as follows: — “An enthusiastic photo-
grapher tries a tent of his own invention. He is dis-
agreeeably interrupted in the pursuit of science by the
entry of a wild Irishman, who forthwith is carried back in
imagination to the pleasures of Donnybrook Fair, and is
unable to resist the temptation that the tented head
presents.” The next illustration represents “ A mediaeval
photographer, from an illumination in the (Gun) Cotton
MSS.,” and “Monsieur Daguerre introducing his pet to
Mr. Bull, with the remark, ‘ My Sun, sir.’ ” Both pictures
are intensely funny. The toy camera on wheels which the
son draws after him is a fine touch of humour.
I may just refer to one or two of the more outrageous
jokes in the chapter, ‘ ; Photography in a Legendary Light. ”
You have had from myself lately a little of the history
regarded seriously : we will see what Cuthbert Bede has to
say on the matter from his point of view, which we may
safely call the comic side of the question: — “Porta was
the gate that indirectly led to photography. It was in the
sunny land of Italy that a philosopher, Baptists Porta by
name — a Porta who thought no small beer of himself —
invented the camera. lie inhabited an apartment to
which (owing, probably, to the oppressive nature of the
window tax) the light wasadmitted through a small aperture.
The whole of the discovery was owing to the hole, for, as
it was of a lenticular shape, the ray of light that passed
through it painted upon the wall, in cheapest of frescoes,
pictures of all that was going on on the outside. The
philosopher saw the ray, cried ‘ Hurrah ! ' and constructed
the camera, that Pandora's box in which photography lay
concealed. Speaking of Sir Humphry Davy’s attempts,
he says, “ His plates were like the hearts of flirts, the
images impressed on them were but faint, and could not
be fixed. Our author is a little mixed when he says,
“Daguerre’s pictures were fixed on paper impregnated
with nitrate of silver ; those of M. Niepce were upon glass,
silver-plated copper, and polished tin.” But let that pass.
He gives Daguerre a side thrust when he says the French-
man delayed the execution of the oflicial document, viz.,
the giving over the process to the French nation, until a
patent had been secured for an agent in England, “thus
being guilty of a deception patent to all.” The dispute
between Lalbotandthe Rev. ,1. B. Heade, as to the use
of gallic acid as a developer is thus disposed of : — “The
Uev. .1. B. lteade addressed to the London Institution an
account of a method for obtaining light pictures by a
process in which infusion of galls was employed. This led
to the infusion of no small amount of gall in a correspon-
dence which took place on the subject between Mr. Reade
and Mr. 1 albot, the latter having, in an affidavit, denied
Mr. Reade’s title to the invention he claimed; the moral
of all this being that Mr. Talbot had leant upon a reed
untii it pierced him. Referring to Scott Archer, we are
told he “shot himself into the temple of fame by the use
of guncotton.”
The next illustration in order, entitled “ Photographic
Tableaux,” embodies two pictures, “ The Infant Photo-
graphy Strangling the Serpents,” these being Daguerre's
and Talbot’s patents, and •• Photography between Love and
Vanity.” This is followed bv a full-page picture, a simple
mode of “ levelling ” a camera. The picture speaks for
itself. 'Flic seventh illustration comprises three subjects,
and are as follows : — “The Fixing Process,” where a bull
is seen chasing a somewhat obese individual who has
arrived at the wicket gate of the field only to find that he
cannot get through ; “An Exciting Process” is represented
by a man being pushed overboard from a ship only to fall
among the sharks who are expectantly waiting for him ;
“ The Sensitive Process ” depicts a pair of lovers in the
conventional attitude, with the motto, “ He to lips that
fondly falter presses his without reproof.”
(To be continued).
THE DAGUERRE MONUMENT AT WASHINGTON.
Mi:. II. McMichael writes, on behalf of the Daguerre
Memorial Committee : — The memorial will be placed in
the Smithsonian Institution at Washington, at the opening
of the next convention, which will be held in that city
some time next summer. A report will be made at the
next convention of the amount raised by each house, and
the name of each person who subscribes one dollar will be
deposited within the monument.
The Committee, composed of the Executive Board of
the Photographic Association of America for 1889, have
spent six or eight weeks in correspondence with different
artists, with reference to style and price of such a me-
morial, and have come to the conclusion that the sketches
submitted by the celebrated sculptor, J. Scott Hartley, of
New Volk, are the most satisfactory. Mr. Hartley sends
four sketches, ranging in price from twenty-five hundred
to six thousand dollars.
Nos. 1 and 2 will cost twenty-five hundred dollars each.
These designs contemplate pedestals three feet six inches
high ; No. 1 to be of richly carved oak, and No. 2 of
granite with bronze bas-relief ; a design of oak or laurel
framing the relief on a wood pedestal, shows Daguerre
experimenting with the camera. Both pedestals are to be
surmounted by a bust of Daguerre in bronze or marble.
No. «> can be executed for three thousand dollars, and
consists of a globe and rough unhewn base in granite ;
globe polished and map incised and encircled with laurel
wreath in bronze and mounted with a cast-bronze bust of
Daguerre, the whole to stand five feet high.
No. 4 contemplates something more elaborate, and con-
sists of a pedestal or base in unpolished granite, the name
of Daguerre in polished letters. This base is mounted by
a globe of polished granite, map incised, with wreath of
laurel, medallion portrait of Daguerre and life-size figure
of Fame in standard bronze.
The design represents Fame taking the laurel, which
encircles the earth, and placing it about Daguerre as a
framework. The whole is to stand nine feet high, and
would certainly present many unusual art possibilities.
There would be little profit to the artist at six thousand
dollars, for which he agrees to erect it.
Photog r a i*h ic Society of Great Britain. - Technical meet-
ing, Tuesday, January 28th, at 3 p.rn., at the Gallery, 5a, Pall
Mall East.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [January 24, 1890.
Chap.
VIII. “ Photography in an Aristocratic Light,
January
PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
patent EntcUtgciuc.
Applications for
Patent.
602. E. Justice, 157, High Ttolborn. London, “Stretchers
and Frames for Pictures.” — January 13th.
611. W. C. Hughes, 4, Little Moorfields, London, “Magic
Lanterns.”— January 13th.
669. E. G. Ballard, 6, Lord Street, Liverpool, “ Ascertaining
the requisite Time of Exposure in Photography."- Jan. 14th.
742. A. Clark, 5, Richmond Road, Basingstoke. “ Bindings
for Photographs.” — January 15th.
763. William Eribse Greene, 321, High Holborn, London,
“Obtaining Photographic Representations.” — January 15th.
782. C. Clark, 18, Buckingham Street, Strand, London,
“ Lifting Thimble for Photographic Use.” — January 15th.
Specifications Published.
1365. — January 25th, 1889. “Lamp for Photographic
Work.” William James Lancaster, trading as J. Lancaster
and Son, of Colmore Row, Birmingham, Manufacturing
Optician.
This invention relates to an improved construction and
arrangement of lamps, principally for photographic work,
although the same may be employed for other purposes.
The said invention consists 1st, in a double reflector, viz., a
primary inside reflector, and a secondary outside one. 2nd,
In a means of retaining or holding the said secondary reflector
in an adjusted position. 3rd. In double folding panes of ruby
light, which open outwardly, and fold inwardly upon each other.
In making a lamp according to my invention, I mount a
pyramidal shaped body part upon a base or pierced support,
and with the said body part surmounted by a perforated
lantern or cowl, through the piercings of which the pro-
ducts of combustion o'" the lamp outwardly pass.
The open front of the lantern is enclosed by two ruby panes
or lights, respectively of about the area of the said open front,
and arc so arranged that when in use they fold and lie flat
light-tight, one upon another.
Thus, the No. 1 ruby light is hinged close to one side of the
open front, and folds flat to its boundary edging, whilst the
other or secondary ruby light is hinged crank like to the other
side of the said open front, and is arranged to fold over
upon, and flat to the No. 1 light aforesaid.
To near the top of the open front, the combined reflector
and lid is jointed, and moves vertically and flap like over the
ruby lights as aforesaid ; so that light radiating from the lamp
falls upon the reflector, which depends at an angle, and is
from thence reflected downwards upon an object as may be
required. This overhanging reflector is provided with a stiff
joint, so that it may rest when adjusted at ail}7 angle.
The affixing after adjustment of the secondary reflector
may be accomplished by a forked or slotted arm, directed from
the top of it, and embracing the stem of a headed screw
which, when turned home, clamps the arm in the said reflector’s
adjusted position.
The secondary reflector also prevents the rays of light from
passing upwards into the operator’s eyes in developing or mani-
pulating a photographic negative.
The purpose of the double ruby panes is that an operator
can decrease or intensify the ruby light at pleasure.
The primary reflector is mounted upon and at the back of
the oil tank or reservoir, which is preferably placed in position
by a sliding movement ; that the removal of the tank
and burner, carried by it, takes away with them the said
reflector.
The wick winder axis is connected to the outside by a
detachable clutch arrangement, consisting of an outside milled
head, whose neck passes inwardly to a clutch or fork, wherein
a crutch end of the said winder axis passes when the tank is
in position.
Thus, when the tank is removed, the crutch end of the
winder axis is taken from the fork or clutch of the turn, and
when the tank is placed in position the winder axis and turn
are as one, and rotate together.
The back of the lamp is preferably made to slope pyramidally
more than the sides, and upon which said back a handles or
handles is or are secured.
It may be further observed that the lid encloses the front
when closed upon it, and that the primary reflector may be made
detachable from the lamp or from the tank, so as to admit of
being readily cleaned.
The inventor claims —
1. — Providing or enclosing the open fronts of lamps for
photographic work, with two or more ruby and orange
coloured panes or lights, which admit of being used indepen-
dently or collectively for the purpose.
2. — Making the hinged sides of the carrying frames
of ruby or orange lights, referred to in the preceding claim,
stand away flange or crank like from the sides of lamp, to
which they are hinged, so as to admit o? the said lights folding
upon each other when closed, and opening out, free of the open
front of the lamp, or of the frame or frames of the inner
light or lights.
3. — Providing lamps employed in photographic work,
as described, with a screen reflector, jointed to the top of the
lamp, and adapted to be employed as a reflector and screen
when open, and as a lid for enclosing the front of the lamp
and cognate parts of it when closed.
4. -— Affixing the combined screen reflector and lid in
a screening and reflecting position, by means of a jointed and
slotted arm and clamping screw.
5. — Providing the interior or oack inside of the lamp
with an upright parabolic reflector, or an upright reflector of
the figure of a parabola, in cross section.
6. — Providing lamps as described, with open bottoms, or
bottoms partially enclosed by the oil tank, and a platform
partition, whereby air for promoting combustion is admitted,
and light from the lamp intercepted.
7. — Operating the wick winder spindle from without by a
clutch or connection.
8. The construction and arrangement of the parts of lamps
for photographic and other work.
18,414. — 19</i November, 1889. “Appliances for Ascertainiug
Distances." Henry Samuel Spillkr Watkin, of the Wilder-
ness. Woolwich, Kent, Major Royal Artillery.
The instrument and appliance consist of three parts : —
a. Au optical square fitted with a telescope and hinged flap.
h. A telemeter by which the distances are read off on a drum.
c. A peculiarly constructed cord which forms a base, at the ends
of which the instruments are worked.
After describing the apparatus, with engravings, the inventor
says : “ To obtain ranges of moving objects, all that is required
is for the observer with the optical square to constantly obtain
coincidence by swaying his body and shifting his position. In
this manner the ranges of artillery, cavalry, and infantry in
motion have been taken ; five or six ranges per minute being
obtained, to an accuracy of one per cent.”
The inventor claims : —
1. The peculiir arrangement of screw and drum.
2. The arrangement whereby the said screw is applied to form
a telemeter.
3. The construction of cord for U3e with the telemeter.
Quick Work. — An unprecedented experiment in photography
was tried at the entertainment of the Lynn Camera Club,
whereby the audience was shown to itself. During the first
part of the meeting, Mr. G. D. Milburn, of Rochester, took a
flash-light picture of the audience from the platform. During
the entertainment he developed the negative, made a lantern
slide, and, while the speaker, Mr. Walter G. Chase, was de-
scribing some instantaneous pictures the view of the audience
was suddenly thrown on the screen without previous notifica-
tion. The effect upon the individual members of the audience,
as each one recognized himself or herself — for every face was dis-
tinct — was somewhat startling. The flash-light exposure,
development of negative, and the exposure and development
of the lantern slide, including washing of both negative and
slide, consumed less than one hour.” — Wilson's Magazine,
74
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 24, 1890.
(£om$pon&ence.
ORTHOCHROMATIC PHOTOGRAPHY.
Sib, — Mr. B. J. Edwards’s proposition that but for the patent
law, “colour-sensitive photography would now be numbered
among the lost or forgotten processes of the art,” appears to me
to be not only so baseless, but in such direct opposition to the
facts, that I think it should not be allowed to pass unchal-
lenged.
Mr. Edwards complains of M. Vidal for ignoring Tailfer,
whilst his own proposition ignores the labours of Waterhouse,
Vogel, Ives, Obernetter, Abney, and others ; labours which
have established colour-sensitive photography. Not only is
this so, but it is the work of one of these inventors that has
put it within the possibility of a patentee, M. Tailfer, to en-
deavour to monopolise one of the principal processes.
In another letter, Mr. Edwards has spoken of the “ eoeinated
silver bromide process patented by Tailfer,” an expression that
might lead to the inference that eosinated silver bromide itself
is claimed in the patent, which, however, is strictly limited to
the use of ammonia with eosine, eosine as a colour-sensitiser
having been some time before discovered by Waterhouse.
Any who may desire to practise orthoehromatic photography,
and do not wish in their own persons to defend public rights at
the risk of threats, at all events, of legal proceedings, may
remember that, according to several experimentalists, eosine
and erythrosine may be used with effect without ammonia,
whilst chlorophyll, cyanine, chinoline, and azaline, and other
sensitisers, are substances that not even the most partisan
scientific witness can be found to class as eosines.
W. E. Debf.nham.
Sib, — Mr. B. J. Edwards has, perhaps, not exactly caught
the sense of my observations relative to his presentation to the
French Photographic Society. I by no means iutended to
criticise the nature of the results obtained upon his orthochro-
matic plates ; J merely said that amongst the proofs submitted
there were some which had been reproduced a jour frisont (those
on ordinary plates), whilst the compared image on an ortho-
chromatic plate had been obtained with another lighting. That
Is a simple statement of fact which does not relate to the
results, well recognised and appreciated by me, obtained on
orthoehromatic plates.
If Mr. Edwards maintains that he lias not operated with dif-
ferent conditions of lighting, I am constrained to avow that I
do not understand it at all ; but I do not the less persist in
finding it astonishing that upon ordinary plates there should be
effects of reflections that do not exist on the orthoehromatic
plates.
I recognize that my ignorance is great upon such matters,
for up to the present I believed that orthochromatism only
modified the tonalities obtained, without having anything to
do with the reflections. To my judgment, as to that of all
who saw the proofs, it appeared evident that they were the
result of different lightings. I intended to say nothing more
than that, and I am not of those who would place a barrier in
the path of progress, from wheresoever it may come, and
whatever may be the means employed to realize it.
Paris, 18f/t January, 1890. Leon Vidal.
THE “ROLL CALL.”
Bm, One of your “ Notes ” in yesterday’s issue treats of
Mr. Muybridge s approval of the manner in which Meissonnier
draws horses in motion, and you remark, “ it would be interest-
ing to have his (Mr. Muybridge's) opinion of Mrs. Butler’s ‘ Roll
Call, which at the time of its exhibition excited so much dis-
cussion in regard to the position of the home’s legs."
It was my pleasure to listen to Mr. Muybridge at the Asso-
ciated Soirt'e held in Liverpool on the 8 th inst. The subject
of his lecture was “The Science of Animal Locomotion in its
Relation to Design in Art.” During the course of the lecture,
reproductions of a picture by Meissonier representing Napoleon
and his staff on horseback, the “ Horse Fair,” and “Ploughing,”
by Rosa Bonheur; and “ The Roll Call,” by Lady Butler, were
projected on the screen. Whilst severely criticising the manner
in which Rosa Bonheur expresses motion in the animals she
paints, Mr. Muybridge had nothing but words of commendation
, for Lady Butler and Meissonnier, both of whom, he said, had,
in the face of adverse criticism, portrayed the walk of a horse
with absolute fidelity to nature. It must be pleasing to all
photographers to know that their “art-science” has been the
means of vindicating the artistic perception of a great English
woman. J- H. Spencer,
36, Bridge Street, Chester, January l&th, 1890.
BASKET-WORK IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
Sir, — I am pleased to see that you are taking up the ques-
tion of basket cases for photographic baggage, and I feel
assured that it will be to the benefit of tourists to adopt this
means of packing their apparatus in place of the usual leather
cases.
I must, however, disagree with your opinion that palm leaf
baskets will be generally adopted by photographers as those
best suited to their requirements. Lightness is the chief
reason of the photographer for using a basket at all. Now,
strength for strength, the weight of a basket properly made of
willow will be only one-half that of a palm leaf basket. As
to appearance, my ideal photographic basket is covered outside
with waterproof cloth, is lined inside with baize, the wicker-
work is not visible, and is merely a skeleton frame-work giving
the needful strength and rigidity. A handle of bamboo would
do excellently, and need not be covered with leather, bamboo
being smooth, and affording a good grip. If it be thought
desirable for the wicker-work to be visible, a basket of willow
can be made so closely worked as to be practically waterproof.
This would add slightly to the weight and cost.
Palm-leaf baskets conld never be made so closely as to be
waterproof or weatherproof of themselves. I am sending for
your inspection a half-plate case made with a skeleton of
wicker-work, and respectfully invite your criticism. Your wide
experience will doubtless suggest improvements in an
article as yet imperfect.
Referring to the concluding paragraph of your article,
photographers may possibly not concern themselves as to who
makes their apparatus and accessories, but quality and price
being equal, 1 venture to think English photographers will
employ English workmen. W. Scaling.
Bash ford , Nottingham, January 18</i, 1890.
CAMERA CLUB EXHIBITIONS.
Silt,— Will you kindly allow me to announce that the exhi-
bition of Rej lander’s photographs at the Camera Club will close
on Thursday, January 30th. Until that date the Exhibition
will be open to visitors, on presentation of card, from 10 a.m.
t o 5 p.m.
On and from Tuesday, February 4th, there will be an exhi-
tion of photographs by members of the Amateur Photo-
graphic Field Club.
This Society is known as one of the earliest devoted to
landscape work. A part of the exhibition will be given up to
showing results of the older processes. The collection will be
open to inspection for about six weeks, under the usual condi-
tions. G. Davison, Hon. Sec.
HACKNEY PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY.
Sir, — Below is our programme for February, 1890 : —
Thursday, 13th — “ Retrospective Photography.” Mr. G. H.
Slight.
Thursday, 27th — “ Exhibition of Members’ Work and
Apparatus.”
Each member is expected to send on apparatus and work,
to reach Morley Hall by 6 p.m. on the 27th.
W. Ff.nton Jones, Hon. Sec.
12, King Edward Hoad, Hackney, N. E.
January 24, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
75
Proceedings of Societies.
The Camera Club.
Ox Thursday, January 16th, Mr. R. Tindall gave an address
upon the “ Plane Polarization of Light.” Mr. H. M. Elder
occupied the chair.
Previous to the lecture the Secretary handed round some in-
teresting silver prints sent to him by Mr. W. K. Burton, and
he announced that Mr. Burton had contributed a paper, which
would lie read hereafter at the Club.
An apparatus called the “ Hibbard Flash Lamp,” sent by
Messrs. Fry k Co., was also exhibited, and later in the evening
experimental flashes were made by it. The light afforded by
it appeared to be unusually brilliant, and two or three flashes
of about equal intensity were obtained with one charge.
Mr. Tindall’s lecture wa3 illustrated throughout by the aid
of a lantern pulariscope.
At the conclusion of his paper Mr. Tindall handed round
two cloud negatives — subject, blue sky and white clouds — one
taken in the ordinary manner, and the other with a Nicol
prism before the lens ; an orthochromatic effect was alleged to be
thus obtained.
On Thursday, January 30th, Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer will read
a paper “On some Practical Deductions from the Law of Con-
jugate Foci.”
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 16th inst., Mr. J. L. Briginshaw
occupied the chair.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater passed round two lenses that had been
sent from India to be renolished, being useless from atmospheric
action on the surface of the glass.
Mr. A. Cowan had continued hii experiments of the previous
week with the devel )per published in the American Journal of
Photography, using alternately acetate, citrate, oxalate, borate,
phosphate, and tartrate of soda ; twenty-five grains to the ounce
were used in each case ; pyro, hydrokinone, and eikonogen
were severally used also in conjunction. With the exception of
borate, all gave excellent results ; with this developer he was
unable to obtain the least trace of an image. Ordinary com-
mercial pi rtes were used, registering about 19 on the sensito-
meter, with an exposure of five second', three feet from a gas
burner.
Mr. Cowan said the degree of deusity in each case was
entirely at the will of the operator. The lesults of the experi-
ments—in all, tweuty-three half-plates— were exhibited ; among
them was a plate developed with pyro and sulphite of soda only.
TbH, Mr. C >wan said, tended to disprove the accepted theory
that sulphite of soda was a restrainer. A’l the plates were fixed
in hyposulphite, to which bisulphite of soda had been added.
Of the various developers used, the oxalate in connection with
pyro was found the most energetic. Mr. Cjwan said it was his
intention to repeat the set of experiments with variations of the
several developers, promising to 1 ly the results before the mem-
bers as soon as complete.
Mr. A. Haddon spoke about the importance of the
various salts used in the developer being as nearly neutral as
possible, and the desirability, in experimenting, of testing each
salt separately. He believed in the set of experiments before
them free alkali in the sulphite of soda to be the developing
agent, and he questioned whether the other salts played any
part at all in the development of the image.
Mr. E. B. Lawford showed two bromide prints of a sepia
tone. After washing and fixing, he had placed them in water
to which a few drops of an intensifier sent out by the Platino-
type Company had been added, which changed the black into
a sepia tint. (It was remarked that the whites had also become
discoloured.) Mr. Lawford believed the paper used was not a
pure white previous to placing the prints in the back referred to.
He intended to repeat the process with pure white paper.
A question from the box was read : — “ Does reversal of image
take place when cullodio-bromide is over-exposed in the same
manner as it does in the case of gelatino-bromide ? ”
None of the members present had experienced any reversal of
image in using collodio-bromide.
East Dulwich and Beckham Photographic Society.
On Friday, Jan. 17th, the President, Mr. F. W. Edwards was
in the chair, and the following new members were elected : —
Messrs. B. Lyon, E. Cann, and Robert Burch.
The subject was “Cameras, Stands, and Shutters” ; among
the shutters on view were Watson’s snap, Kershaw’s, Guerry’s,
Mayfield’s, and Newman’s. Mr. Cadett sent three specimens of
his shutters, in one of which all chance of vibration was exeluded
by the use of a velvet sleeve for attaching the lens to the shutter.
Specimens of the optimus three-fold and four-fold stand were
also shown by the members using them. One of Pumphrey’s
metal stands was also on view.
The discussion on shutters and stands occupied the evening,
so the subject of cameras was postponed.
Mr. W. Rice drew the members’ attention to a specimen of
Messrs. Perken, Son, and Payment's new wide angle eury scope
saying that it worked at F. 9 50.
Photographers’ Benevolent Association.
The Committee of this Association met on the 17th inst.
Mr. Lambert and Mr. Bird, of Bath, and Mr. R. Keene, of
Derby', were elected members.
The Committee considered two applications for assistance ;
in both cases grants were made.
Messrs. W. T. Coventon, F. Haes, H. Newson, and T.
Samuels were appointed arbitrators.
Friday', February 14 th, was fixed for the annual general
meeting.
Mr. H. J. Beasley was elected honorary secretary, and will
take up his duties on the above date.
A special committee meeting was then held, and the proposed
new rules formally passed ; they will be submitted to the
general meeting for confirmation.
Abney Camera Club.
At the weekly meeting of the above, held Jan. 1 7 th, after the
discussion of the questions in the box, the Sec., M. F. H. Leeds,
A.I.C., read a paper entitled “ The Chemistry of Photography,”
in which he discussed, from the theoretical point of view, most
of the ordinary processes of photography. The chemical sym-
bols and equations employed were illustrated by means of a
blackboard.
The discussion was postponed until Jan. 24th.
Manchester Amateur Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting of the Manschester Amateur Photo-
graphic Society' was held in the Athemeum on Tuesday evening,
last week ; Mr. Flower presided. Six new members were
elected. The President stated that the annual exhibition of
the Society would be held in the Manchester Athena?um in the
middle of February'
Mr. M’Keixen exhibited his latest detective camera and a
plate magazine. The magazine is an ingenious piece of
mechanism, fitted inside the camera without increasing thesize
of it. A dozen plates can be stored in the camera, and by
moving a small lever each plate is dropped into a receptacle
after having been exposed, and the next put in position. The
movement of the plate is caused by a small spring, which
makes it impossible for more than one plate to be displaced at
a time. There is no fear of there being two exposures on the
same plate. The whole twelve could be changed in less than a
minute. Each plate is put into a thin shield which is lined
with non-actinic paper, thus saving the trouble of backing the
7C>
TIIE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 24, 1890.
plate. The camera when closed is focused for anything beyond
twenty feet, and can be fixed at will to any distance within
that. T> ere are three speeds to it, and the shutter, working
by a reversib’e motion, obviates all danger of exposing the
plate while being adjusted. Time exposures could also be
made by means of a small lever in front, which draws another
shutter (inside the camera) across the lens, and thus does away
with the cap. Mr. M’Kellen stated that now he never thought
of using a tripod for outdoor work. Several of his friends had
sent him specimens of some excellent work done with this
camera. By means of a “finder” he could take a picture as
well carrying the camera under his arm, or holding it in front of
him.
Three lime-light lantern exhibitions followed. Messrs.
Davenport and Seed showed a large number of familiar views
taken in Manxland. Mr. .1. W. Wade i'lustrated his “ Scamper
in Ho'land,” starting with sea views and a picture of the busy
river M^as at Rotterdam, following with pictures of the
quaint streets of that town, scenes from the canals, the large
arcades, and quaint bits of Dutch life about the quays. He
took his audience through the parks, along the railroad to Dort,
paying special attention to the old city of Delft, with its
cathedral, a heterogeneous pile of conflicting architecture, and
showed various phases of Dutch scenery. Mr. Wade strongly
recommended photographers to pay a visit to Holland. The
country afforded more subjects for a quarter-plate than even
Switzerland and Norway. It was void of mountainous scenery,
but it was full of picturesque views enriched by river and canal
and ancient buildmgs. Following the “Scamper in Holland,”
he exhibited his “ Loiterings in Lakeland.”
Glasgow Photograi-hic Association.
Thf. third general meeting of the session was held on the even-
ing of Thursday, 16th January, in the rooms of the Philosophi-
cal Society, 207, Bath Street, Mr. Wm. L\ng, junr., F.C.S.,
President, in the chair.
Four new members — Messrs. James Gardner, Alf. H. Cade,
Andrew Gibson, and Andrew Boag — were elected.
Mi. John Annan then showed two volumes of Calotypes
printed in 1844-45, and several of the original negatives from
which the prints had been made.
Mr. Fred. Mackenzie gave a demonstration of timing the
speed of a drop shutter by means of a tuning fork.
Mr. W. Lang, junr., read a communication about the late
Cuthbert Bede and his book on “Photographic Pleasures.”
The whole of the various sketches in the volume by the author
were shown by means of the Society’s lantern.
Mr. T. N. Armstrong afterwards exhibited his new illumin-
ating chamber for photographs at night by means of coal gas.
Copies of Mr. Lang’s paper, “ Fifty Years’ Photography,
1839-89,” communicated last session, and printed at the re-
quest of the Association, were afterwards distributed to the
members present ; also tickets for forthcoming popular evening
“ Paris and its Exhibition,” by ex-Provost Clark, of Paisley.
Derby Photographic Society.
The annual meeting was held at the Rooms in Derwent Street,
on the 14th inst. ; Mr. A. B. Hamilton presided.
Mr. T. SCOTTON read a paper on the “ Early History of Pho-
tography,” concluding with a few practical hints to beginners
on the more modern photographic processes.
A discussion followed, in which Messrs. F. Cooper, Cope,
Hamilton, B. Cooper, and Hart took part.
The 13th annual exhibition of bicycles, tricycles, and acces-
sories, which this year takes place at the Crystal Palace,
opens to-day. Not only is the entire floor of the Palace and
courts covered by exhibits, but this year the large Concert
Hall has had to be thrown open to this use.
A Lahore paper mentions as an instance of the advance of
civilisation that Abar Khan, chief of Lalpoora, who recently
sent for a photographer from Peshawar, has signified his inten-
tion to learn pliosography, and has detained the photographer
for the purpose.
^nstoers to (£om$ponticnt$.
All q ieiti in < reiuirinz a rep'v in this column should be aldressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 1, St. Mir/’s Rial, Canonbury, London, N.
J.A.R. — Slow toning of ready sensitized paper. This is a
common experience attributable, as you say, to the use of
citric acid in the final stage of preparation. Add a trace
of ammonia to the last washing water before removing the
prints into the toning bath. 1. The ultimate effect of the
gold solution would be the same, whether the reduced silver
was derived from darkened albuminate or chloride, but the
first usually takes longer to work the change because of the
surrounding organic matter. 2. The complete interchange
of gold for silver is possible, but not desirable, for then
we get the blue-black or greenish tints of overtoiled prints,
and the cost would lie much greater without any compen-
sating advantage.
W. B. (Reigate). — We shall be glad to hear the result of your
comparative trials, and particularly would like to know how
it suits your special style of work.
G. Shaw. — Your welcome letter to hand. We thank you for
giving the desired permission to publish.
T. W. (Blackburn). — The card mounts are very good and the
printed address at foot quite unobjectionable. The edges
are done with pure gold.
('. T. C. The altered time of meeting will be less convenient to
us, but we hope to be present.
Old Photo.— Zerr’s Reliefs in Gelatine. Specification No.
16,677, a.d. 1888. These are moulded in plaster of Paris,
very much in the same way that Mr W. B. Woodbury did
them in 1867, for his process of micro-photo-sculpture
described at the Dundee meeting of the British Association
in that year, at which specimens were shown.
Ligroine Lamp. — We have not yet seen any announcement
offering for sale the new incandescent lamp described at
page 170 of the Year-Book, but we are enquiring about it
of our friends in Vienna, asking whether there is an agent
prepared to deliver them in this country, and will let you
know later or.
J. & B. Dodsworth. — Received a sample of your new unbleached
blotting-paper, which certainly bears out all you say regard-
ing it, perfectly free from sulphates and chlorides, very
absorbent, and yet immensely strong in the fibre, giving off
no fluff to adhere to the prints.
T. E. — Old sulphate of iron crystals. It is doubtful whether
they would be worth the trouble of re-crystallizing, but very
often the ochrey incrustation is only superficial, in which
case they could be rapidly washed with ice-cold water on a
sieve or cullender, well drained, and once more dried.
L. A. M. — There is no fund for the purchase of historical
specimens and apparatus, but an effort is being made to form
such a collection, and provide for their safe custody. The
Photographic Society of Great Britain put out a circular with
this intention on the 24th of August last.
Art-Piioto. — The exhibition of liejlander’s works is still on
view at the Camera Club, Bedford Street, Covent Garden,
and will well repay a visit. Admission is granted on presen-
tation of your address card.
A. Lang worthy. — We never heard of any such process. Be so
good as to repeat the leading details, some of which are not
fully intelligible.
Printer. — The addresses of nil photographers in the United
Kingdom are not yet got together in any single directory,
but you would be able to start with the Post Office Loudon
Directory, and those for the larger provincial towns, in order
to get the names of professional photographers, and then
work from the published lists of members of the Photo-
graphic Society, Camera Club, &c., to pick up some of the
amateurs. Or, finally, make friendly arrangements with the
principal dealers and publishers.
E. J. Wall. — Consult Reimanu’s “ Hand-book of Anilines,”
Chemical Macs Office, Boy Court, Ludgate Hill ; Watts’s
“ Dictionary of Chemistry,” vol iv. pp. 465-473, “Aniline
Dyes ; ” also Slater’s “ Manual of Colours and Dye Wares,”
Crosby Lockwood and Co,
PHOTOGRAPHIC
\ ‘i VgB SO*/
\/< . y.:- y/
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1639. — January 31, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAO*
Magnesium Lamps 77
Obtaining the Critical Focusupon Finely-Ground Glass Screens.
By F. H. Varley, M.I.E.E., F.R.A.3 78
Eikonogen as a Developer in Practice. By W. K. Burton 79
Eikonogen. By Lyonel Clark 83
Amateur Photography in Paris 84
The Late Cuthbert Bede and his Book “ Photographic
Pleasures.” By W. Lang, junr., F.C.S 83
Selecting Focal Distance with Detective Cameras. By W. E.
Debenham 87
PAOE
Note3 86
Photographers' Benevolent Association 89
The Calcutta Photographic Exhibition 89
Photography in Sweden 90
The Distance beyond which all Objects will be in Focus with
any given Lens. By Sir David Salomons, Bart 91
Patent Intelligence 92
Correspondence 91
Proceedings of Societies 94
Answers to Correspondents 96
MAGNESIUM LAMPS.
Messrs. Samuel Fry & Co. have sent us for review a
little magnesium lamp, which, with its store of pow-
dered metal, is not much larger than half an average cigar
box, when all the partsare packed in their card -hoard case.
A peculiarity of it is, that it will give from one to three
or more flashes at will of nearly equal intensity ; this
is due to the magnesium required for immediate use
being held in a small test-tube, out of which it cannot
be blown all at once by a single compression of the
pneumatic ball. The lamp, which is said to be highly
popular in America, requires no stand, but is held in
the hand, and fired off near the ceiling when it is used
in an ordinary room. It gives a horizontal flash of
large area, because it is so constructed as to throw the
powder out in a fan-shaped blast, and the metal is then
ignited by means of a large flame. In some experi-
ments tried with it, it was found that with suitable
management it is tolerably easy to obtain full length
portraits without hard shadows.
Magnesium lamps require more scientific study than
they have yet received. Nearly all of them allow some
powder to escape unburnt ; especially, of course, is this
the case when the powder is blown through the flame
at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the latter.
Even when the powder is blown upwards through the
flame, complete combustion of the magnesium is not
necessarily secured — a faet which has been experiment-
ally proved in public. When the powder is blown out
by a short, violent puff of air, there is a reduction of
the amount of ejected metal burnt, because it then
passes more rapidly through the flame, and with most
of the present lamps it may be wise to incur this loss
sometimes to shorten the time of exposure. Schirm’s
lamp attracted some attention in Germany, because of
its alleged economy in the use of magnesium ; in this
lamp, which was pictured last year in these pages, the
magnesium was first made intensely hot, and then
blown upwards through a long flame. While Schirm’s
lamp was in the hands of our Photographic Society,
it would have been well had its action been submitted
to a series of thoroughly scientific tests. The bringing
together in one instrument of the best features of the
Sehirm and Fry lamps, particularly the abolishing of
the stand used with the former, might possibly result
in the advent of an advanced type of useful magnesium
light.
When magnesium first mentally and physically
dazzled the world, by being produced otherwise than
as an extremely costly chemical curiosity, gclatino-
bromide plates were unknown, and in those revered
good old wet-plate days we tried some of the earliest
experiments in photographic portraiture by the
magnesium light. The lamp invented by Mr. Henry
Larkin answered best, in which sand was mixed with
magnesium powder, to carry the latter downwards
rapidly from a kind of funnel into a flame below ; it
was then found best to do away with the neck of the
brass funnel and to enlarge the orifice thereof, to
obtain a flame of shorter duration, and to reduce it,
if necessary, to a rapid flash. Another objection to
the neck of the funnel was, that the vapour of water
produced by the combustion of the flame employed
to set fire to magnesium, had a tendency to con-
dense inside the metallic neck, and by wetting the
mixed powder to choke the tube, thereby stopping
the action of the lamp. Mr. Larkin, when obliged
to keep up a continuous light, as on the occasion
when he lit up Guildhall Yard by means of gigantic
magnesium lamps, overcame this defect by means of
a “pricker” driven by clockwork. This pricker was
a needle which vibrated longitudinally in the tube of
the funnel. The modification above described of this
lamp, to make it give a light of brief duration, might
be useful at the present time, because the large size of
the flame tends to prevent sharp shadows ; indeed, it is
easy to produce a flame two feet long. The greater
the proportion of magnesium powder to the sand, the
larger is the flame. The duration of the flame is
governed by the size of the orifice through which the
powder falls. The sand gets intensely hot during its
descent, and will char or set fire to wood if allowed to
fall thereupon if much magnesium be used.
In those early days a lamp was invented and publicly
described for burning magnesium ribbon continuously,
yet carrying the smoke away from the face of the
flame by an air-draught from the front. This principle,
with mechanical improvements in addition, has been
78
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 31, 1890.
used iu a lamp which Mr. "W arnerkc purchased some-
where on the Continent, and which will go on burning
for a long time nearly as steadily as a candle. With
proper appliances for carrying off the smoke, this
instrument might prove a formidable rival to the elec-
tric lamp in commercial Avork in the photographic
studio, the electric light being so costly.
When magnesium riband was first made it was
rotten, and broke easily when handled ; this defect
was overcome by alloying it with a trifling proportion
of zinc. As zinc gives a bluish-white light when
burnt, it might be worth while to try experiments for
the production of a large and brief flame of burning
zinc at will, to find out Avhat can and Avhat cannot be
done Avith it in photography. The photographic value
of the combustion of excessively rare and costly metals
yielding the more refrangible rays of the spectrum
might also be tried, for it might be possible to turn
out those metals cheaply now that the electric furnace
and other modern inventions liaA’e placed such great
powers in the hands of metallurgists, and now that
more about the chemistry of high temperatures is
beginning to be understood.
OBTAINING THE CRITICAL FOCUS UPON
FINELY-GROUND GLASS SCREENS.
BY F. H. VAULEY, M.I.E.K, F.R.A.S.
In my article upon grinding glassfocusing screens, published
in your issue of November 8th, 1889, I pointed out the
desirability of a finely-ground surface being obtained. The
purpose of the present communication is to further
develop that idea, and to sIioav a method by which the exact
or critical focus can be obtained Avith facility and precision.
The present method of employing a dark cloth to ex-
clude extraneous light from the focussing screen is at its
best but a fairly efficient expedient. To me it is one far
from being satisfactory. First, as my eyesight is getting
weaker, I require a reading lens to see the image distinctly
or otherwise : secondly, to view the image at a distance
of 16 inches from the screen, Avhen I find it difficult to
clearly discern special minutiae of detail Avith any degree
of confidence that it is in correct focus.
The employment of a lens between the eye and the
surface of the ground glass is also fraught Avith dangers,
unless the ground surface of the glass be kept distinctly
focussed during the Avhole time of racking in or out the
camera lens. When the reading lens has to be employed,
it is quite possible to obtain a sharp image which is not
coincident Avith the ground surface ; it may be formed
either behind or in front of the screen, according to the
relative distances betAveen the lens and the screen and the
eye from the lens.
In a landscape there is always one part of the picture
Avhich it is desirable should be in critical or precise focus,
and from Avhich the foreground and distances may be
more or less perfectly focussed, but not absolutely sharply
defined. 1 o obtain this critical focus I have dcA'ised a
special form of the Ramsden or positive eye-piece, Avhich
insures perfectly precise focussing. This is shown in fig. 1.
A is the field lens, B eye-lens, C centre of ball °and
socket movement, 1) face of the socket to be held close to
the polished side of the glass screen, E clamping screAV to
fix the eye-lens Avhen it is correctly in focus Avith the sur-
face of the ground-glass screen, F the eye-cup for exclud-
ing extraneous light. The two lenses are plano-convex,
Avith their convex sides turned towards each other.
The field lens should be of about 2 inches focal length,
and about 1 inch to 1 \ inch in aperture.
The eye-lens three times the focal length of that of the
fiel(l_viz., 6 inches. The distance between these lenses
is somewhat less than two-thirds of their combined foci,
say 5£ inches. The final adjustment of the eye-lens
depends upon the distance that the ground surface of the
glass is from the field-lens. This arrangement forms a
low-poAver aplanatic microscope on the one hand, by
which the critical focus of the ground glass is obtained,
and becomes at the same time a positive eye-piece for
viewing the image formed by the camera lens ; by this the
exact coincidence of the critical image with surface of the
ground glass is readily determined.
Fig. 2 illustrates its application.
The arroAvs 1 to 3 represent the landscape, Avhilst all
above may be distant mountains or sky.
The arrow fig. 2 is intended to represent that portion
of the landscape which it is desirable to have in critical
focus.
The use of the ball-and-socket movement is then appa-
rent, as it enables the eye-piece to be inclined at such an
angle to the ground glass as to render its optical axis
coincident Avith the ray of light reflected from the arrow 2 ;
this insures a greater brilliancy of illumination, and
although by so tilting the eye-piece the distance of the
field-lens from the surface of the ground glass is increased,
this is readily corrected by sliding in the eye-tube until
the ground-glass surface is in focus at the centre of the
field.
The advantage gained by securing the critical focus at
any desired part of the picture, I think, will be more fully
appreciated as small cameras and enlarging processes come
more extensively into favour ; whilst the facility of focus-
ing afforded by the positive eye-piece, I think, is Avorthy
of the best attention of camera makers and opticians.
The Journal of the Photographic Society. — The last
number of this journal exhibits a great improvement, which
will probably render it more attractive to the public, iu the
shape of a great number of small paragraphs giving practically
useful novel information, culled from recent photographic and ]
other periodicals all the Avorld o\-er.
Javcary 31, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
EIKONOGEN AS A DEVELOPER IX PRACTICE.*
IJY W. K. Bl'KTOK.
It may seem presumptuous in me to write from the other
end of the world on a subject that the members of the
Photographic Society of Great Britain haven much better
opportunity of forming an opinion on than 1 have, and on
a subject that will perhaps have been thoroughly threshed
out before this paper can be read ; but when I consider
for how long new developers have often been in use before
any actual comparative experiments with them and old
developers have been made, or at least before the results
of such experiments have been made public, I am en-
couraged to think that what I have to tell may not be so
very much behind time after all. Moreover, the changes
that may be rung on a developer by varying the propor-
tions of the ingredients are so endless, that every experi-
menter working on lines laid down by himself is likely to
cover some new ground, however much may have been
covered already.
There have been numerous expressions of opinion as to
the value of the new developer. It has been declared “as
good as” and “better than”pyro, and so on. Now I
quite appreciate the value of such opinions when they come
from men of experience ; but, after all, they are of less
value than an actual detailed account of experiments under-
taken for the sake of making a comparison.
There fell into my hands what 1 believe to have been
the very first box of eikonogen that came to Japan, and I
set about to compare its working with that of pyro at once,
and with the most practical object that I could have —
namely, to determine whether or not I should adopt it
instead of my old friend in actual practice. It may take a
little time to detail the principle of the experiments that I
have made, but I think that if this paper is to have any
value, it will be by detailing what I have done before I give
the conclusions that I have drawn.
The eikonogen came into my hands carefully done up in
one of the original tin boxes, on the outside of which were
instructions not to open it in the presence of ammonia
fumes, but in a dry, pure atmosphere. These instructions
were duly attended to. There were no instructions as to
the method of using it, but I had read enough in the
English photographic press to know at least pretty fairly
what to do with it. Briefly, this is what I understood to
be claimed for it. It was intended to be used as a substi-
tute for pyro, and was said to be quicker and more ener-
getic in its action. The alkali recommended was carbonate
of soda, and some had stated that either only very little of
this should be used, or that some restraining bromide
should accompany it, otherwise there was a danger of fog
on account of the excessive energy of the developing
action. The eikonogen was found to be a somewhat heavy,
coarse powder, of a rather dirtyish pinkish colour, readily
soluble in about thirty times its weight of cold water, and
giving a yellow or light brown solution, which rapidly
darkened in the air from the absorption of oxygen. It was
neutral to test papers.
Here, at the very beginning, a series of experiments
was made to test, as well as it could be done without
waiting a long time, the keeping qualities of the solution.
The following were the results : — In aqueous solution with-
out any preservative eikonogen darkens much more quickly
than pyro. If the eikonogen be dissolved in a solution of
sulphite of sodium instead of water, the colour is light green
* Read before the Photographic Society of Great Britain.
79
instead of yellow. If sulphite of soda beadded toan aqueous
solution before it has darkened much, the colour will bo
changed immediately from yellow to green. This ‘ ‘ sulpho-
eikonogen ” solution seems to be very permanent, and does
not stain the hands. It is not necessary to neutralize the
sulphite of soda with acid to get a permanent solution.
The sulphite of soda that I used was a fairly good com-
mercial sample, and was distinctly alkaline to test papers.
The addition of alkali to the aqueous solution accelerates
the discolouration, but not to nearly so marked a degree
as in the case of pyro solution. Even when made strongly
alkaline the ‘ ‘ sulpho-eikonogen ” solution discolours very
slowly. A solution that had been used for development,
and that was put on one side in a measuring glass, was of
a very light brown colour only at the end of several days.
Even the alkaline solution does not stain the hands. If an
aqueous solution has turned deep brown by exposure to
the atmosphere, it will change to a comparatively light brown
by the addition of sulphite of soda.
The first set of experiments with pyro and eikonogen
were intended merely as “ feelers,” so that I might get
some idea of the action of the substance 1 was working
with. I made up a one per cent, aqueous solution of
eikonogen in water, ami a ten per cent, solution of each of
sulphite of soda and common carbonate of soda in crystals.
The first developer that I tried was made up as follows : —
Pyro ... ... ... ... ... 2 grains
Sulphite of soda .. . ... ... ... 10 ,,
Carbonate of soda ... ... ... 10 ,,
to each ounce of water. Another developer was made up
with exactly the same proportions, but replacing the pyro
with eikonogen.
Exposures were made two at a time in the camera, the
subject being chosen to show great contrast and full grada-
tion. A table covered with ornaments was selected, and
over two vases standing side by side was thrown a black velvet
cloth and a white table-napkin. The first two plates were
purposely much under-exposed, the second two received a
little shorter than the first exposure, the third pair a full
exposure. A pair of plates was placed in dishes side by
side, and at the same moment the two developers were
poured over the two plates. The results were as follows : —
In each case the image under pyro began to show consider-
ably before the other, and development was complete, or
had gone as far as it would go, when the plate under eiko-
nogen was not half developed. The development under
eikonogen went on steadily, however, and eventually there
came out, in the first case, apparently the same amount of
detail as with pyro ; in the second, little more ; in the
third case, the eikonogen plate had the appearance of being
somewhat over-exposed, the other of being just rightly
exposed.
Experiments were tried with the carbonate increased by
twice, and eventually by three times, but the results were
exactly the same as in the first cases, except that, both
with pyro and with eikonogen, the development was a little
quicker. In every case the eikonogen proved much the
slower developer, but on the whole there was in the finished
eikonogen-developed plates a very little more detail than
in the case of the others. There was no appearance of
fogging with eikonogen (or with the pyro either), even
when the largest amount of carbonate was used, and the
colour of the image was excellent, whether the alum bath
was used or not.
Further experiments were tried to see the effect of
developing several plates in succession with the eikonogen
80
THE PHOTOGRAFIIIC NEWS.
[January 31, 18£0.
— in all the experiments already described a fresh solution
had been mixed up for each plate. 1'he development
became slower and slower, but on the whole the eikonogen
compared favourably with the pyro, inasmuch as it appeared
to become exhausted more slowly, and certainly became
discoloured much more slowly. In fact, by the time that
a pyro developer had become of the colour of stout, the
eikonogen developer showed little or no discolouration at
all.
The net results of these experiments was to show that
eikonogen had at least as powerful a developing action as
pyro, but that it was a great deal slower. Now 1 am
myself in favour of slow development, and would not con-
sider the tardy action of the eikonogen to be a drawback,
but I know that no developer that is much slower than
pyro with carbonate of soda will find general acceptance.
My next series of experiments were therefore to determine
what was the quickest modification of the eikonogen deve-
loper that I could find. I mixed a stock solution contain-
ing 2 per cent, of eikonogen and 10 per cent, of sulphite
of soda. All the following developers had the same
amount of eikonogen and of sulphite — namely, 2 grains of
the former, and 10 grains of the latter to each ounce, the
alkali and restrainer only being varied. The subject chosen
was a landscape, including dark green foliage and a gate
painted a glaring white, a great range of contrast being
again got. A number of plates were exposed in quick suc-
cession. an exposure a little less than what I should consider
“ normal ” being given.
The first plate was developed with the following deve-
loper : —
Pyro 2 grains
Sulphite of soda ... ... ... ... 10 ,,
Carbonate of soda (crystallized) 20 ,,
My idea in taking this as a standard with which to compare
eikonogen was that, although it is a slower developer than
any common ammonia developer, it is pretty quick as deve-
lopers with alkaline carbonates go. I consider that a
developer is not likely to become generally popular unless
it will work as quickly as does this one. The plate was
watched in this developer, and it was found that the image
made its appearance in 20 seconds, and that development
was finished in 13 minutes. I set myself then to find, if
possible, an eikonogen developer that would work as
quickly as this one. 1 tabulate the results, it being under-
stood that the eikonogen and sulphite of soda were, as
stated above, constant : —
DEVELOPER.
Image Showed.
Development
Finished.
Remarks.
Eikonogen and sulphite without
alkali.
1 min. 30 secs.
20 mins.
Full detail, but thin
image.
1 .
. Carbonate of soda, 5 grains
. 30 secs. ...
... 6 mins. ...
... Very good quality.
2 .
• i> i) 39 >i •••
... 30 „ ...
... 6 ,,
3 •
20
.. ,, ,, ,, ..,
... 30 „ ...
... 4
... Image rather thin and foggy.
4 .
.. Carbonate of soda, 20 grains ; ...
... 1 min. 30 secs.
...lo „ ...
.. Very good quality.
bromide of potassium, 2 grains.
5
.. Carbonate of potassium, 5 grains ...
... 3) secs. ...
... 6 „ ...
... Very good quality.
6
„ 10
... 30 „ ...
... 4 „
7
i s
•• It J» ft *•*
... 25 „ ...
... 3
... Image rather thin and foggy.
8
. Carbonate of potassium, 20 grains ;
... 40 „ ...
... 4 „ ...
... Very good quality.
bromide of potassium, 1 grain.
9 ..
Liquid ammonii. 2 minims; bromide
... 2 mins. ...
...10 „ ...
.. Thin image, with both chem-
of potassium, 1 grain. ical and colour fog.
All quantities are in grains to the < unce.
The only conclusion deductible from these experiments
is that eikonogen will not work as quickly as pyro. It will
be seen that in every case but No. 8, where the rapidity of
development came up to, or even nearly up to, that of the
pyro developer, the image was thin and foggy. Farther
than that, with the above exceptions, the best negatives
were distinctly those that took a considerable time to
develop. It will be seen that of the developers tried, the
quickest contained 20 grains of carbonate of potassium and
1 grain of bromide of potassium to each ounce, and that
this did not come very much short of the pyro developer
in the rapidity of its action. On the whole , as in the first
set of experiments, the eikonogen appeared to bring out a
little more detail than the pyro.
The colour was in all cases— except that of the ammonia
developer— good, but I do not think that it was any
better than that given either by hydroquinone, or pyro
with sulphite and a carbonate, using the alum bath. The
gradation of density— or “tonality,” to use the slang of
artists — was certainly somewhat different from that given
by pyro, but I do not think I am able to judge whether
it was better or worse. There certainly is a certain soft-
ness about the eikonogen developed negatives that must
be an advantage in the case of some subjects.
It will be seen that one plate was developed without
any alkali, except that due to the slight alkalinity of the
sulphite of soda. The fact that this was possible induced
me to try the following experiment : — Three solutions
were made; they were as follows — (1) Eikonogen 2 grains
to the ounce of water; (2) Sulphite of soda 10 grains
to the ounce of water ; (3) Eikonogen 2 grains, sulphite
of soda 10 grains to the ounce of water. Three plates
were flooded with these three solutions at the same
moment ; the results were as follows : — In the case of (3)
the image appeared in two minutes, and development was
finished in twenty minutes. In the case of (1) the image
appeared in two minutes, but at the end of two hours
little more than the high lights had appeared, and the
solution was much discoloured. In the case of (2) no
trace of an image had apppeared at the end of two hours.
A rather curious thing came out of this last set of
experiments. I mixed (1) and (2), and with the result
that a great part of the colour was at once discharged,
and flowed the solution over the plate that had been
under the sulphite of soda solution for two hours with-
out being affected. I intended to see what would be
the result in the way of development, but forgot all about
the plate for two days, when I suddenly remembered it,
January 31, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
81
I expected to find nothing but a mass of fog. but, to my
no small surprise, 1 found in the dish a fully developed
and fixed negative. 1 suppose the fixing was effected by
the sulphite o" soda.
I ought to observe here that all the plates used so far
were of about average rapidity — as so-called rapid plates
of the present day go — giving something about twenty
on the sensitometer, and that they were of a very
“ robust ” kind. That is to say, they gave, with any
ordinary pyro developer, very clear shadows, and would
stand “any amount of forcing.” I wished to try the new
developer on an entirely different kind of plate, and I
had by me a kind that is very common amongst commer-
cial plates, and that is excellent for many kinds of work ;
1 mean a very rapid plate, giving density easily with
pyro, and giving a full, round image, with good gradation,
under a moderately strong, or fairly restrained, developer,
but fogging more or less with a developer strong in alkali
unless duly restrained. I found that with such plates,
using two grains of eikouogen and ten grains of car-
bonate of soda to the ounce, but no restrainer, I could
get nothing but thin images, or. if I prolonged develop-
ment, foggy plates. A corresponding pyro developer gave
excellent results. It was evident that with such plates
and eikouogen a restrainer must be used, and I tried
bromide accordingly. I, however, thoughtlessly used
bromide of ammonia, forgetting for the moment that in
the presence of sulphite of soda free ammonia would be
produced, and that ammonia does not agree with eikouogen
at all. The images came up finely, and in the developer
apparently boldly and strongly, but on fixing I had the
most beautiful sample of almost ruby-red fog that I
have seen. 1 do not think that it would have been
possible to get red fog with these plates, using pyro.
With pyro they would have given grey fog (if any), and
it is my experience that grey fog, whether due to over-
exposure or to forcing, and colour fog, do not appear at
the same time under pyro. The substitution of bromide
of potassium for bromide of ammonium gave quite
satisfactory negatives, but the development was very
tedious. The restraining action of bromide appears to
be greater with eikonogen than with pyro, so that only
a little need be used. In this case I found one grain to
the ounce sufficient.
My next experiments were with the sensitometer. 1 do
not intend to give these in detail, for I fear that 1 have
been intolerably tedious as it is with all the details that I
have brought before you. It will be sufficient to say that
I tried many different kinds of plates, and tried over again
all the developers that have been described above, with the
result that it was certainly possible to get out a little more
with eikonogen than with pyro. 1 think that perhaps there
is an advantage equal to about 20 to 30 per cent, in the
matter of exposure in the case of eikonogen, that is to say,
the exposures might be shortened in the ratio of 6 to 5, or
possibly as I to 3.
Here, however, came in quite a new element. I had
not before tried the use of the preliminary bath of hypo-
sulphite of soda, recommended as an accelerator. I tried
it now, using a solution of 1 part of hypo in 1,000
parts of water, and merely allowing the plate to rest in
this whilst I was mixing up the developer. The result
when the developer was poured on the plate was startling.
The image flashed out with astonishing rapidity ; but 1
found that development soon came to an end, and that not
only did no higher figure come out after the preliminary
bath of hyposulphite of soda, but that it was not possible
to get out quite so much as without it. The difficulty of
quick development, however, was solved, and I went back
to the development of plates exposed in the camera. 1
now found that with a preliminary bath of hyposulphite of
soda, and with a developer containing two grains of
eikonogen and ten grains of carbonate of soda to the
ounce, the image began to show in fifteen seconds, and
development was complete in three minutes — that is to
say, the rapidity on development was up to the arbitrary
standard that I had set up.
This finished the experimental work that I have done
up till the present, and it will be expected that I give the
deductions that I have drawn from it. I am tempted to
do so by taking an advertisement of eikonogen that sets
forth its wonderful properties under ten headings, and to
set opposite each of these the conclusion that I draw from
the experiments that I have just described. I put the
statements of the advertisements and my own conclusions
in parallel columns : —
Superiority
1. One of the principal
features of eikonogen is the
fact that the exposure in the
studio can be reduced to
Half the time required for
hydroquinone or pyro.
2. Eikouogen gives a bluish-
black colour covered by a very
delicate precipitate, which will
bring out the finest details to
a degree that is not even ap-
proached by any other deve-
loper.
3. It makes the task of judg-
ing a negative a very easy one,
as its black colour shows the
contrast and grades of light
and shade much better than a
negative of any other colour.
4. A solution of this deve-
loper can always be kept on
hand ready for use, and will
keep over a month. The de-
veloper can be used several
times, as it does not discolour
in the air.
5. Eikonogen packed in
boxes will keep for years,
while hydroquinone and pyro
in time deteriorate greatly in
quality.
6. Eikonogenis thecheapest
developer, not only in price,
but also because it possesses
more developing power.
7. By using an old develop-
ing solution till all the details
have appeared and then tak-
ing a fresh one, those much-
desired high lights will be
easily obtained. The old de-
veloper may V>c used in this
way three or four times.
e Eikonogen.
This is not the case. The
exposure cannot be reduced
by more than about 25 per
cent.
The colour is good, but not
better than that given by
some other developers.
1 think that it is a little
easier to judge of density in
the case of eikonogen than in
that of other developers, not
for the reason given, but be-
cause the density seems to go
off less in the fixing bath.
This is true.
Eikonogen may keep for
years, although it is rather
difficult to see how this has
been established as yet. It is
not my experience, however,
that pyro, if properly packed,
deteriorates. I believe that
hydroquinone does.
Possibly it is.
This is not very compre-
hensible. Is it intended to
indicate that “ those desirable
high lights ” cannot be ob-
tained working in the ordinary
way 2 If so, it is difficult to
see where the advantage conics
in.
82
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 31, 1890.
8. It is unnecessary with
this developer to maintain a
certain degree of temperature
in winter time.
Low temperature certainly
does not retard development
so much as with pyro.
A preliminary bath of
hyposulphite of soda hastens
development, but does not
bring out more detail than can
be got without it.
There is certainly great
power of compensating for
over-exposure.
9. When plates are under-
exposed, they should be put
for half a minute in a pre-
liminary bath containing some
hyposulphite, and details will
be obtained which neither
pyro, nor hydroquinone nor
iron can give.
10. The greatest over-
exposure can be compensated
by using old developer and
sodium bromide, or by dilut-
ing fresh developer with two
or three times the quantity
of water and a little sodium
bromide.
Just as I have written the above it seems very dogmatic,
but I wish it to be distinctly understood that I am not
laying down what T write as established facts, but merely
as the results of my experience gained from experiments
that have certainly been numerous, and that, have been
carried out with due care, but that have all been done with
one sample only of the substance in question. I think,
however, that it is quite fair to take one sample as typical,
because if it be pleaded that that particular sample was
inferior, the plea will hold good on either one or other of
two assumptions only, namely, that eikouogen is variable
in its efficiency, or that it is liable to deteriorate.
After all, I have not answered, even to myself, the ques-
tion that I started with, namely, shall I prefer eikouogen
to pyro for general work '? It will be seen that I consider
that the claims that have been put forward in its favour
are extravagant. On the other hand, it has certain advan-
ages. One of these is its extreme cleanliness. This will
probably have more weight with most people than with
myself. Then, it is hard to part with old friends that you
do, or at least fondly believe that you do, quite thoroughly
understand. On the whole, I intend to stick to pyro for
at least a little time longer, and this especially considering
that I have, I believe, used up the whole of the store of
eikonogen that there is in Japan, and that it will be seve-
ral months before I can get a further supply.
Postscript.
Some remarks that I read in one of the photographic
journals since the time that my paper on eikonogen was
written remind me that in the comparative experiments
that I made 1 omitted almost the most important of all
comparisons — namely, that of the difference in effect pro-
duced by varying the quantity of the eikonogen itself. I
was led to this omission by having my mind too much bent
on the action of pyro. It is well known that in the case
of this substance the effect of the increase of quantity is
not to accelerate development either in the matter of time
that it takes for detail to appear, or in the matter of the
eventual amount of detail that can be got — that is, work-
ing within pretty wide limits. It did not strike me that it
might be quite different in the case of eikonogen.
I first set myself to establish the statement made above
with regard to pyro, which I had in my mind only as a
general impression, not as the result of any comparative
experiments. Several plates were exposed for the same
length of time in quick succession, and a set of developers
was made up, each precisely the same except in the matter
of the quantity of pyro contained. 1 his was varied from
two to ten grains to the ounce. 1 he plates were placed
side by side, and were developed by pouring the different
solutions simultaneously over them all. lhose images
which were under the strong pyro appeared to come out
a very little before the others. Perhaps there was a dif-
ference of five or six seconds between the one and the
other end of the row of five plates. After a little time,
however, all appeared to be at about the same stage ; that
is to say, so far as the eye could judge, the same bit of de-
tail appeared on all plates at just the same time. The
plates were removed from the solutions at the same time
and fixed together. When they were fixed, those that had
had the greatest amount of pyyo were the densest, but
! the difference was much less than I expected. Those that
had had the most pyro also had the appearance of having
had less exposure than the others, but this was due rather
to a certain harshness of gradation than to the actual absence
of any detail that was visible in the others. The few ex-
periments that I could make with eikonogen immediately
showed that with this substance the effect of increasing the
strength of the solution is quite different from what it is in
the case of a pyro solution. Increase in the quantity re-
sults in very great increase in the rapidity of development.
Unfortunately, by the time that 1 had reached this stage,
1 had too little eikonogen left to enable me to make a set
of thoroughly comparative experiments. '1 he results I did
arrive at, however, were that increasing the quantity of
eikonogen to 5 grains to the ounce, I got with the same
quantity of alkali the same rapidity of development as with
a pyro development. With pyro developer, however, -
grains to the ounce gives as great a speed of development
as does in, and gives more satisfactory negatives. I there-
fore conclude that it takes about 5 grains of eikonogen to
equal 2 of pyro, and this especially as negatives developed
with that amount of eikonogen showed no tendency to
hardness. It will be seen that this knocks on the head
the idea of the comparative cheapness of eikonogen, unless
the manufacturers reduce the price to less than half
that it is at present. I could not make out that the
strong eikonogen had any advantage over the weak in the
actual amount of detail brought out.
The next annual dinner of the Photographic Society of
Great Britain will take place at the Cafe Royal, Regent Street,
on February 10th, at 6.30. ; tickets, six shillings each. Early
applications for tickets should be made to Mr. W . England,
7, St. James’s Square, Xotting Hill, W.
P hints and Drawings. — Those who are interested in the
Egyptian mummy, or the Roman urn, or in the mysteries ot
ancient manuscripts and rare prints, will be glad to know that
some instructive lectures upon these subjects as exemplified in
the British Museum, will be delivered in the coming month at
the Steinway Hall, Portmau Square, by Mr. Louis lagan, o
the Department of Prints and Drawings. The first lecture
will treat of the origin of the Museum collection, through the
bequest of Sir Hans Sloane, nearly a century-and-a-half ago, of
its gradual progress, and of the Egyptian, Assyrian, and -ba )*
Ionian antiquities ; and the second and third lectures will dea
with the Greek and Grteco-Ruman antiquities, the library,
manuscripts, and prints, and the character and constitution o
the Museum. Photographic reproductions of the objects de-
scribed, by the oxy-liydrogen light, will be exhibited, so that
subsequent reference to them may be facilitated. The history
of our national collection in Bloomsbury is one of decided inte-
rest to students of art and science. Xo inconsiderable part o
it existed under the designation of the British 'Museum for
more than threc-score years before the building which now con-
tains it was commenced. — Doily Acim.
January 31, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
83
EIKONOGEN.
BY LYONEL CLARK.
It is, perliaps, beyond the bounds of reason to expect that
every new production should be presented to us only when
it has attained a condition as nearly approaching perfection
as is obtainable by mortals, but still one may be permitted
to express a very decided wish that it might be so. The
series of somewhat exhaustive experiments that I made on
the behaviour of the newest claimant to popular favour as
a developing agent were hardly finished, when a new form
of this same salt is introduced that is manifestly superior
to the old. Wishing, however, was of no good, and there
was nothing else to do but to start again, and repeat
in a form simplified by experience the previous experi-
ments.
In appearance the new sample of eikonogen presents a
great superiority over its more ancient rival ; whereas the
latter was in the form of a palpably discoloured, sand-like
powder, the former is in pure and well-formed crystals of
a slightly yellowish colour. Itsbehaviour when in solution
is also distinctly different. The old sample, when dissolved
in water without the addition of any sulphite, instantly
decomposed, turning of a deep port wine colour, that
rapidly thickened : whereas the new sample only slightly
discolours the water — a similar difference is apparent, even
when sulphite is used, the old sample forming a deep green-
coloured solution, whilst the new one gives a faintly yellow
one. It is cpiite evident from these facts alone that the
discolouration of the older sample was due to an incipient
oxidation of the crystals themselves, which became more
apparent when in solution, and was no doubt the cause
of its so soon becoming muddy, and losing its clear-
ness.
The amount of solubility of the new does not appear to
vary very much from that of the older sample ; as a matter
of fact, it is not very easy to determine the amount of solu-
bility very accurately, as it varies according to the tem-
perature ; in boiling water a large amount is taken up, but
on cooling down to G0Q F. or so a large amount crystal-
lises out. On the whole, I should consider about fifteen
grains to be the maximum amount that can be dissolved
in one ounce of water to which thirty grains of sulphite
of soda have been previously added.
However, my practice at present is to make up a solu-
tion of a less strength than this — that is, one of ten grains
to the ounce — to which I add twice the weight of sulphite
of soda and an equal weight of carbonate of soda : I make
these up with boiling water, in which I first dissolve the
sulphite completely, and then add the eikonogen. I use
boiling water, for by this means all air is expelled, and there
is less discolouration of the solution from the absorption
of the oxygen of the imprisoned air, for a developer so
made up is complete in itself, and will equally as well
oxidize at the expense of the air as it will at the expense of
the partially reduced silver haloid of the negative.
In my first experiments 1 found that the developing
action of eikonogen lay entirely in the salt itself — that is
to say, that it did not require the addition of any alkali to
cause a reduction of the silver, although, at the same time,
the rapidity of its action was increased when either the
fixed or the caustic alkalis were added. But the gain was
not very great, and, beyond a certain point, a further in-
crease of alkali made but little difference ; indeed, if the
added alkali were in a somewhat dilute solution, owing to
the general weakening of the developer, a loss of density
followed, instead of an increase in rapidity of develop-
ment.
It is this behaviour that so markedly defines eikonogen
from the alkaline pyro developers, and makes it much more
analogous to ferrous oxalate. The developing power lies
in the eikonogen almost entirely. If this be present in large
quantities, the development is very rapid, and great density
is obtainable ; if the eikonogen be present in small quanti-
ties, it develops slowly, and no density at all is obtainable
by it ; but in both these oppposite cases it will be found
that the same amount of detail will be brought out, if time
be unlimited. With pyro, on the contrary, an extremely
rapid developing action can be set up, even with a mini-
mum amount of this salt, and, indeed, a further addition of
it will actually tend to slow the development. We can
undoubtedly prepare eikonogen developers that shall be
suitable for any class of work, but they must be prepared
beforehand ; they cannot, like an alkaline pyro developer,
have their character totally and instantaneously altered by
very small additions. This is doubtless due to the insolu-
bility of the salt itself. If we could only add it as we can
pyro in the dry state, its power might be vastly increased ;
but, as it is, we have to make up solutions beforehand, and
we can only modify their action in one direction, unless we
resort to the somewhat bulky expedient of having several
baths of different tendencies.
I think, therefore, that for that class of work where the
exposure, although ample, has been more or less of a hazard,
or where the general scale of lighting has been unsatisfac-
tory— that is to say, for the best class of landscape work —
eikonogen will not displace the alkaline pyro ; but for that
class of work which is usually termed instantaneous — that is
to say, where the exposure has been so short that every
part of the plate has received the minimum of exposure,
and yet every detail must be forced out, and at the same
time, every effort be used to obtain density — for
this class, eikonogen presents most marked and useful
advantages over any other system of development with
which I am acquainted.
To begin with, it is absolutely free from all tendency to
cause green fog, with its unpleasant iridescent stains ; even
when used as strong as possible, no discolouration of the
gelatine is perceived. Secondly, a greater amount of inten-
sity may be given to the slightly exposed portions by eiko-
nogen than by any method of pyro development. I
satisfied myself of this fact when experimenting with the
older sample, and with the newer one I find it still more
accentuated. Lastly, eikonogen has a peculiarly sedate
way of going about development : it never seems to start
things with a rush, causing streaks and stains, but builds
up the silver image as quietly and as surely as the coral
insects build up their atolls. I have had a good experience
of its behaviour in this respect lately, having had to develop
in great haste a spool of the new reliable celluloid film,
containing some sixty exposures. I manipulated them as
if they were prints being toned, putting half a dozen of
them into a dish at once, and simply turning them over
from time to time ; half the spool was developed in this
way with pyro and ammonia, and the other half with
eikonogen. No difference is observable in the results as
regards either the amount of detail brought out. or its den-
sity ; but whereas the pyro-developed negatives are maned
by green fog and local stains, those developed with eikono-
gen are all equally clean and clear. When one considers
the careless and hasty way in which they had to be treated,
this fact speaks very highly for this new developer.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [January 31, 1890.
have now generally adopted for short exposures, was com- !
pounded as follows 2 00 grains of sulphite (crystallized)
were dissolved in ten ounces of boiling water; when
dissolved, 100 grains eikonogen (crystallised), 100 grains
caib. sod. (recrystallized), and 5 grains of bromide
of potassium were added. On cooling, no precipi-
tate should be formed, the solution being of a clear
yellow colour. This clear yellow shade gradually gave
way to a reddish claret colour when a negative was j
developed in it, and subsequently darkened to a full port-
wine colour, remaining, however, clear and free from
muddiness. On the following day some more negatives
were developed, but the bath then began to lose its
power; but on the addition of a little fresh saturated
solution completed its task, and was then thrown away.
From the results obtained — for the whole lot of negatives
were hand camera work taken at the beginning of the
present month, when the light was extremely feeble — I
feel convinced that no better developer for such work
is at present known ; and, considering the number of nega-
tives developed, it works out by no means a costly one.
As I have before now pointed out, when used for solitary
negatives, eikonogen is at least three to four times as
expensive as pyro ; but when a batch of similarly
exposed work is to be done, its cost is considerably and
proportionally diminished. A developer like the above
can be prepared in large quantities, and if stocked in
small bottles filled up to the brim, and tightly corked, it
should keep indefinitely.
The quantity of sulphite used is small, being only twice
the weight of eikonogen present; but since, when kept
protected from the air, it does not appear to go wrong,
and remains sufficiently clear during development, I failed
to see the use of adding more. Of course if it were
desired to keep the once-used developer for subsequent
use, a greater amount might perhaps be advantageously
added ; but I can never advocate such a system, as it is
impossible to guage the strength of a spent solution, and
its use degenerates development from a science to simple
chance. The only other solution that I can tolerate would
be a saturated one — that is, dissolve about 300 grains of
sulphite in 10 ounces of water, and add as much eikonogen
to the boiling solution as it will take up, and also about
150 grains of potash, and let the excess crystallize out on
cooling. Such a developer may be reserved for the most
under-exposed cases, and if it will not give them printing
density, 1 really do not know what will. At the same time,
should— from the light having been better than estimated —
the negatives begin to show signs of hardness, this may be
remedied by diluting the developer with a solution of
carbonate of soda, say of a strength of ten grains to the
ounce, as much as an equal amount or less of which may
be added to the normal developer as the appearance of the
image dictates.
In generally comparing the new and the old samples,
I may say shortly that the new, being clean and free from
oxidation, an equal weight has greater developing power :
and this freedom from oxidation renders practical, what I
found with the old sample impossible, namely, the prepar-
ing and keeping of stock solutions in an unaltered and
unweakened condition. It was this proneness to oxidation,
coupled with its great insolubility, that compelled me to
relinquish with regret the use of the old sample, for I had
already recognised the great power that the developer had
of giving full density to very slightly exposed plates; but
the superiority of the new sample now obviates this, and I
shall certainly have recourse to it for all hand-camera work,
although l do not feel disposed to replace pyro from its use
with my larger and more carefully developed work.
AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHY IN PARIS.
The Daily Telegraph says : — “ The camera, the sensitive plate,
and the developing chamber now reign supreme in Paris. A cer-
tain foreign Count has succeeded in resuscitating the long-languish-
ing method of executing photographic portraits of the carte-
de-visit:: instead of the album size ; while yet another Count,
Primoli by name, said to be a descendant of Lucien Bonaparte,
has, after making a brilliant photographic conquest of the
salons of Rome and Florence, descended on those of Paris,
armed with an apparatus for taking instantaneous light-por-
traits. “ Le revolver-camera” has already been heard of;
but Count Primoli appears to be the first amateur practitioner
who has made the invention fashionable.
“Enterprises of a more exalted artistic nature, however, are
spoken of in connection with the magic art of Daguerre and
Fox Talbot. The Baroness Adolphe de Rothschild has in-
stalled a photographic studio on a superb scale at her Chateau
on the banks of the Lake of Geneva, where she has produced
a series of portraits not only as photographically life-like, but
as artistically vigorous and refined, as those for the painting of
which in water-colours the Princess Mathilde Demidoff, nee
Bonaparte, has acquired such bright celebrity.
“ Naturally the sculptors and the aquarellistes feel little
satisfaction at this new development of practical art among
the ‘ graudes dames de par le monde ’ in France. A very few
lessons will convert any person of average intelligence into a
tolerable amateur photographer ; indeed, with the aid of a
lucidly written manual and an efficient apparatus, the craft is
one which can be self-taught. On the other hand, the studio
of Madame de Rothschild on the Lake of Geneva may be
regarded as a wholly exceptional experiment, and one not more
likely te injure either professional painters or professional
photographers than M. Mollier’s amateur circus is to shut up
the cirque once known as Franconi’s.”
Ox the first of January, 1888, there were 110 members on
the rolls of the Photographic Society of India; now there are
205, an average increase of eight members per month for the
whole year. Twenty-six have been enrolled since November
last, so the average monthly increase is now not less than 13.
Three new members every week is a criterion of the growing
popularity of the Society.
Nationai. Photographic Exhibition. — With the inten-
tion of securing for this Exhibition a thoroughly national
character, the directors of the Crystal Palace Company
have decided to offer a valuable challenge cup, to lie
retained for the current year by that Photographic Club or
Society which, in the opinion of the judges, sends the best
collective exhibit of not less than fifty pictures. The following
are the conditions : — (1) All pictures entered in this competi-
tion will be subject to the general rules of the Exhibition, as
published, where applicable ; (2) There will be no entry fee
charged for the club challenge cup competition ; (3) The pic-
tures included in a joint club exhibit are equally eligible for
awards in their several classes, but a separate application form
must be filled up by the individual exhibitor, and, in the case
of professionals, the stipulated fee enclosed ; (4) The challenge
cup will be handed over to the Mayor or other public function-
ary of the town or district in which the head-quarters of the
successful Society are located, to be held by him, in trust, for
a period of one year, at the expiration of which it shall be
returned to the Crystal Palace Company ; (5) the name of the
successful Society will be engraved upon the cup or i>ede.stal,
with the date of the award ; (6) The challenge cup shall be
confined to Societies within the United Kingdom, and provin-
cial makers and dealers, it is said, will be more fully repre-
sented this year than upon previous occasions, and the Exhibi-
tion is accordingly expected to be more generally interesting.
January 81, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. 85
THE LATE CUTIIBERT BEDE AND 1IIS BOOK
“ PHOTOGRAPHIC PLEASURES.”*
BY \V. LANG, -TN'Ii., F.C.S.
In the next picture we find photographic processes
still further gone into. As each drawing has its title
underneath, you will be able to extract the humour with-
out the aid of any explanation of mine.
A “Photographic Fix” is our next subject. “Mr.
Jones, being on his way to the lakes, embraces the
favourable opportunity of calotyping some fishing boats
on the Ulverstone Sands, Morecambe Bay. The tide
unexpectedly comes up during the time that his head is
beneath the hood ; disagreeable position of Mr. Jones
on emerging from the hood.”
Then we come to a series of photographic fancies : —
Applying the black varnish, best black varnish (a copy of
“ Uncle Tom’s Cabin ”), applying an exciting fluid, Ac.
The following illustration is entitled “ To secure a pleas-
ing portrait is everything. Daguerreotypist to cheerful
sitter: ‘The processwill commence as soon as I lift up this
slide. You will have the goodness to look fixedly at one
object, and call up a pleasant expression to your counten-
ance.’ ”
Another page of photographic facetiae is to be found in
the twelfth illustration, where we find a photographic bath,
photographic abstraction, developing solutions, all por-
trayed from the C'uthbcrt Bede point of view.
In the chapter entitled “Photography in a Love Light,”
we find our author has one or two passages which are
extremely pathetic, and I may be permitted to quote them.
The picture which we find interpolated in the chapter
we have already quoted from, viz., “Photography in a
liove Light,” is representative of “one of the pleasures of
photography,” visiting country houses and calotyping all
the eligible daughters, and the picture in question you now
have thrown upon the screen.
Another illustration of photographic facet he comes after
the foregoing, and we will leave it on the screen for some
little time, so that the details may be studied.
Perhaps one of the most humorous sketches in the book
is the one entitled “A Photographic Positive.” The
picture, which, if I mistake not, appeared in Punch, is self-
explanatory. — Lady Mother (loquitur): “I shall feel
obliged to you, Mr. Squills, if you would remove these
stains from my daughter’s face. I cannot persuade her to
be sufficiently careful with her photographic chemicals,
and she has had a misfortune with her nitrate of silver.
Unless you can do something for her, she will not be fit to
be seen at Lady Mayfair’s to-night.”
Hie appearance of the lady amateur with her mottled
visage is a fine bit of humour, and is portrayed in a
manner worthy of Cruikshank. I fancy our professional
members will rather enjoy this hit at the amateur dabbler
in photography, and perhaps some of them may be going
the length of saying, “ Serve her right!”
The next picture to be thrown on the screen, as you
will sec from reading underneath, is called a photographic
picture. Here you see a man focussing, and an old lady,
who appears suddenly from round a corner, and who is not
used to these new-fangled notions, is made to say, “Please,
sir, don't for goodness’ sake fire, sir ! ”
In his preface the author refers to the fact that four of
the pictures in his book had appeared in Punch , but he
does not, I am sorry to say, indicate which particular ones
these are. I rather think 1 have seen the one which I am
• Concluded from page 72.
now going to showr you in the journal in question. It has
for title, “What it has come to, and, What it may come
to.” In the former we find a young hopeful addressing his
father, an ardent amateur, you may take it for granted.
“ Oh, pa ! me and baby have emptied out all your bottles,
and have cleaned them so nice ! ” and in the latter, What it
may come to ; or, the British nursery in 1865, a nurse is
found asking the child in its chair, “ Did it want its camera
then ? ” and the reply, ‘ ‘ No, I don’t ; I want to go and
print off my negatives ! Boo ! hoo ! hoo ! ”
Passing on, we come to the method prescribed by Bede
for procuring a photographic negative. He says, “ Take
any village, and in its vicinity select a field through which
there is a public way. Focus your view, and make all
ready for the negative. While the process is going on
take your seat upon the next stile — the more distant the
better — and lose yourself in the leaders of the Times. You
will thus be giving an opportunity to children of a specu-
lative turn of mind to solve their doubts as to what your
camera really contains. At the expiration of twenty min-
utes, shut up your Times, and return to your camera.
When you take out your slide you will find that you have
secured a most excellent negative ! ”
Photographic faces comprise the following : Brown sees
his face in the glass, and thinks he is rather an agreeable
looking fellow ; Brown sees his face in the negative, and
his second thoughts are by no means the best. Portrait
of a very beautiful lady, who has had the misfortune to
sneeze at the moment of the removal of the cap. Portrait
of a very unsteady gentleman. Lady, with hood, time of
Elizabeth, and camera, with hood, time of Victoria. Phoe-
bus Apollo, portrait painter to General Earth.
Exciting for the sensitive, has the accompanying letter-
press. Outraged protectionist (whose ideas have not
been developed in proportion with those of the photo-
grapher) : “ IIo, you there ! ’illo ! I'll teach you what it is
to bring your theodderlite ’ere, and come a measurin' for
railroads on my land.”
Photographic people are next hit off. Fancy portrait
of Dr. Diamond. A sitting with Beard. Portrait of Dr.
Diamond in his calico bag. Look on this picture, The
lion. Miss Ilaggis, from the portrait by Chaldon, II. A., and
on this, the Hon. Miss Ilaggis, from a Daguerreotype.
Gems from the Blackguards’ Photographic Portrait Gallery.
Brown is, of course, naturally anxious to see how Smith
looks in the camera. Air. Wedgwood, from a photograph
by himself. Photographer : “ Be pleased to look straight
at me sir ! ” Sitter : “ Why, dang it, I've been a-doing it
these ten minutes ! ”
We come now to a picture which Air. Bell will no doubt
appreciate, the photographic detective, and photographic
focussing anti hocussing. Air. Priggins as he appeared
before the “ Beak,” Air. Priggins as he appeared before the
camera. I’m afraid the conditions are now reversed, and
Air. Priggins will not now look so amiable.
A Photographer Astonishing the Notices. — “Come along,
Betsy Jane, do, and look at the man with the Peep Show.”
This picture, the author tells us in a footnote, appeared in
Punch.
The last sketch in the book is entitled “The Present
Attitude of Photography,” and in the concluding chapter
we find the question asked, “ What is there that our friend
camera will not do ? ” and I may be permitted to quote the
last paragraph or two, and it will be a matter of especial
interest for us as an association to find therein an allusion
to a former president. I refer to Air. Kibble.
86
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 31, 1890.
A French professor of physiology (Dr. "\ erdin) has
compiled a sort of code of human expression, his
theory being that for every weakness or vice there is a
corresponding cast of feature which affords an infallible
index to the character of the man. Dr. Verdin is try-
ing to do what Lavater failed in. Physiognomy is true
enough where broad generalities are concerned, but
when minute subdivisions are made, two professors of
the science are as likely as not to differ. Still experi-
ments in connection with the human face are always
interesting, and this theory of Dr. "N erdin’s is one
where composite photography is likely to prove useful.
If we mistake not, Mr. F. Galton’s composite photo-
graphs of criminals were made from the faces of
prisoners taken indiscriminately. If it be really pos-
sible to localise a vice or weakness, it would be neces-
sary to classify somewhat minutely.
Thus, we might get the typical expression of the.
pickpocket, the burglar, the forger, the poacher, the
“ smasher,” and a host of others. Murderers in Eng-
land are not numerous enough to afford material ; they
therefore must be left alone. So also must the indi-
viduals which the Echo , in commenting on this subject,
wishes to be distinguished. If Dr. Verdin can help
us, says our contemporary, to distinguish an honest
company-promoter from his dishonest brother, or a
well-meaning “outside” stock-broker from his dis-
ingenuous fellow-labourer in the vineyard of finance,
humanity will bo grateful. Doubtless ; but we are
afraid Dr. Verdin protests too much. At present it
would be certainly unsafe to rely upon subtle distinc-
tions of the kind we have referred to.
At the last meeting of the Royal Astronomical
Society, Mr. Maunder incidentally stated that there
was a work about to be begun at Stonyhurst which was
certainly much wanted, seeing that we are entering
upon a new solar period. The work referred to is the
regular photography of sun-spot spectra. A photo-
graphic record of sun-spot spectra will have a great
advantage over eye records, in that it can be referred to
alterwards ; and if there is any difficulty or doubt, the
question can be settled by reference to the photo-
graphs. Mr. Maunder mentioned, as an instance, that
in the earlier observations made at Greenwich of the
spectra of sun-spots, he saw that lines were broadened
over the spots, which were mostly those of well-known
and well-marked F raunhofer lines. As time went on,
he found the broadened lines were lines which could
not be ascribed to any element, nor could they be even
seen on the general disk. At first Mr. Maunder
thought there must be a mistake on his part ; but lie
found that precisely the same observations had been
made at the same time at South Kensington, so there
could be little doubt that there was a genuine change
in the character of the spot-spectra. Rut if his obser-
\ ations had stood alone, it would have been very
possible to have accounted for them by supposing that,
when fresh to the work, he had naturally been attracted
to the more conspicuous lines, but that afterwards,
when he had had more experience, he had been able to
observe less important lines. “ If we have a photo-
graphic record,” observed Mr. Maunder, “ wc can con-
sult old photographs, and no doubt whatever could
arise.”
Photographs have over and over again formed an
important clement in the evidence in divorce cases,
but rarely in so novel a manner as in a Scotch divorce
case trial last week. The respondent, in accordance
with Scotch law, had been cited to appear, but she
took no notice of the order, and a photograph was put
in for purposes of identification, and to show that the
order had been duly served upon the right person. To
this photograph the respondent’s counsel took an initial
objection, and after the evidence had been heard, con-
tended that the Court should find the case “ not
proven,” on the ground that the photograph was not
sufficient. Lord Trayner, however, held that the
photograph was admissible, and not only so, but that
the photograph of the co-respondent, who did not
appear, should be admitted, and pronounced for the
petitioner. It is not every judge who is such a believer
in the faithfulness of photography. Cases might be
cited where the judge absolutely refused to receive
photographs as evidence of identification. A good
deal, perhaps, depends upon the photograph.
If Mr. Brudenhall-Carter’s assertions at the Society
of Arts, as to the fallacy of the tests in use to deter-
mine whether a person is colour-blind or not, be cor-
rect, the sooner an exhaustive series of experiments
be made the better. Dr. Carter points out that a man
may have learnt by experience that the light which
appears to him dull green is called “ red ” by the
majority, and -when that colour is shown he promptly
gives a correct description. But the uselessness of
this test appears with calamitous results sometimes
when the true greeu light is blurred by atmospheric
conditions. The truth seems to be that really very
little is known about colour-blindness. The two colours,
green and red, arc selected as the most important for
accurate observation, as green and red are the danger
signals generally in use ; but may it not be that there
are just as many people unable to distinguish between
blue and orange as between green and red? We have
also never seen it recorded what was the experience of
a person, whose eyes were insensible to the red rays,
when shut up in a photographer’s dark room. Would
he see green ?
It is rather amusing, after visiting the Exhibition
of the Humorous in Art, to find “ Atlas,” in the World,
indignantly protesting against the length to which
caricature is carried now-a-days. To look at Gillray,
Woodward and Rowlandson, and Cruikshank, and com-
pare their gross perversions with the productions of
TIIE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
87
January 31, 1890. ]
“Ape,” “Lib,” and “Spy,” the drawings of the
latter appear absolutely refined. It is by no means
certain that photography has not rather injured cari-
cature, though whether this is to be regretted we need
not enquire. When a comic artist has to caricature a
public man, he buys his photograph, and makes a sort
of fancy distortion. This is not caricature, for the
essence of caricature is truth, but truth, of course, ex-
aggerated. The older caricaturists made their drawings
from the life, and only after much study — hence then-
force. The coarseness was that of the age, and neither
added to nor detracted from the truth of the exaggera-
tion.
Photography has made the work of the lecturer far
more interesting to his audience than used to be the
case. In former days, all that the lecturer could do
when he had any specimens illustrating his lecture, was
to invite the audience to step on the platform at the
conclusion of the proceedings and make an inspection.
As a rule, about half a dozen persons used to respond
to the invitation, and all the rest hurried away in order
to catch their tram or omnibus. We manage things
better now-a-daysby having photographs made where-
cver it is possible, and throwing these on the lantern
screen. The advantage of this plan was admirably
shown this week at a lecture on the history of printing
delivered at the City of London College. The accuracy
and facility with which manuscript and printed books
can now be photographed render such objects peculiarly
suited for lantern slides, and the whole audience
were enabled easily to see Avhat, in the old days, would
have been visible only to a few. The photographic
lantern slide plays the same part in a lecture as illustra-
tions do in a book ; it enables a larger number of people
to take an interest in subjects which otherwise might
seem dry and repellant.
The “ Photographic Union ” of France, described as
a Mutual Help Association, and corresponding very
much to our Photographers’ Benevolent Association,
has started very well. Before even the objects were
formularized, and the basis of the society established,
subscriptions began to flow in, and though the members
are fully conscious that much cannot be done until a
permanent fund has been created, a very respectable
nucleus has been got together. The Association is
founded on the system originated by Baron Tayler,
who created so many associations of a kindred nature,
nil of which are now rich and prosperous. The main
principle of this system is essentially sound, as it in-
volves the inalienability of the capital, all help being
derived from the revenue. At a meeting held recently
the scheme was explained by M. Vidal, and it was
stated that, after an appeal had been made to the photo-
graphic profession generally, steps would be taken to
bring about a public recognition of the utility of the
association. Already subscriptions to the amount of
4,000 francs have been announced, and these will
doubtless be followed by others.
SELECTING FOCAL DISTANCE WITH DETEC-
TIVE CAMERAS.*
BY W. E. DEBENHAM.
The expression forming the title of this paper may be used
with two significations : involving either the choice of the
focal length of lens that it is desirable to use ; or, when
the lens is decided upon, the use of it either at the distance
from the plate which corresponds with its focal length for
objects in the extreme distance, or at some distance which
shall bring into more exact focus some object which is
nearer.
There seems to be a good deal of misapprehension, not,
perhaps, amongst the members of this Society, but amongst
those who derive their principal impressions about photo-
graphy from the statements of dealers, and from their
happening, in their occasional reading, to come across
what may be called pseudo-scientific papers, concerning
the capabilities of a photographic lens for focussing simul-
taneously objects at different distances. Here it may be
well to remark that, owing to curvature of field, almost
any lens will focus simultaneously objects at different dis-
tances, if such objects fall upon parts of the plate, some
nearer and others farther from the centre of the field of
the lens. What, however, is meant is the capability of
focussing at the same time, objects which are either on the
same part of the plate, or at an equal distance from the
axial fine of the lens. As an illustration of the misappre-
hension referred to, may be cited a statement that has been
the subject of comment at this Society, as to the advan-
tage of some lens which was supposed to have a fixed
focus. Another absurdity is that of setting up some stan-
dard of a permissible amount of confusion, such as that
of To o' of an inch, and then proceeding on the assumption
that all parts of the picture in which that amount of con-
fusion is not exceeded, are in focus. The falling off of
focal sharpness is gradual, and there is no definite line of
demarcation where sharpness begins, whether at the , 0 of
an inch, or at any other limit. If, on the one hand, there
were such a distinction line of demarcation ; and if, on the
other hand, we were able in general work to avoid photo-
graphing all distances where confusion due to want of
focus exceeds such limits — if both these conditions were
fulfilled, a table showing distances with particular lenses
where sharpness could be secured would be very useful.
As a matter of fact, neither of the conditions is fulfilled.
Sharpness does not begin at any measurable limit, and we
are constantly meeting with subjects where any such
attempted limit must be exceeded in some part of the pic-
ture. We must minimise our loss of sharpness as much as
the particular circumstances will permit. There is, of course,
a limit to the defining power of lenses, as well as, perhaps, to
the power of the photographic film to register minute de-
tails, and of human observation to appreciate such details
when registered. When these limits are reached, and any
two objects, however much they may differ in distance, arc
rendered simultaneously upon the plate with such defini-
tion that no deficiency is discoverable in the one when
the other is focussed, they may be said to be both in
focus.
This apparent equality of focus of objects at widely
different distances is always reached if the nearest of such
objects is only removed sufficiently far. There is no
photographic lens in the world — I am, of course, not speak-
ing of telescopic objectives — which will show any differ-
' Read at the London and Provincial Photographic Association.
88
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 31, 1890.
ence of focus for objects, the nearest of which is a mile,
whilst the others may include the moon at a distance of
some hundreds of thousandsof miles, and the planets at many
millions, or the fixed stars at still greater distances. If a
lens of twelve-inch focus could be made of such perfect
defining power as to show a difference of adjustment re-
quired when focussing between these limits — that is, at a
mile, and at the greatest conceivable distance respectively
— the adjustment necessary would amount to about
the Ti u of an inch. As, however, that amount of racking
in or out makes no discoverable difference in the sharpness
of the image given by such a lens, objects not requiring
more than that adjustment may be considered to be in
focus. When, however, we come to distances which have
been mentioned as those beyond which all objects are in
focus, such as 100 feet, 50, 30, 20 feet, or even less, the case
is very different. With a lens of 5-in. focus, the difference
of adjustment for objects at 20 feet and beyond will
amount to about the -Jyth of an inch — a difference which, as
a very slight amount of practice will suffice to show, pro-
duces a very appreciable difference of distinctness in the
focus.
Since we cannot hope to focus truly at the same time
near and distant objects upon the same part of the field of
the lens, the question becomes, how shall we proceed so
as to reduce the indistinctness due to imperfect focus to
the smallest amount? What length of focus shall we
choose for our lens, and shall the instrument be set so as to
truly focus the extreme distance, or some nearer point ?
In answer to the first part of the question, both long and
short focus lenses have been advocated, and each with
reason, if a particular class of subject is in question. The
principal argument in favour of long-focus lenses for a
given size of plate, is that as the field of definition is always
more or less curved, and the longer the radius — which means
the less the curvature — the nearer to it will be the flat
surface of the plate. Another argument, relating to a con-
sideration not now under discussion, is that with a long
focus lens any selected object will appear of larger size,
and assume greater importance in the picture. For the
short-focus lens, it may be argued that objects differing in
their distance from the instrument, will be represented as
less removed from the focal plane than with the longer
focussed instrument.
This is a very significant consideration, and one which is
of the greatest importance in detective camera work for
the most part. Let an object at, say, 20 feet distance, be
included in a view taken with two lenses, one of 3-inch
and one of G-iuch focus, each stopped to the same rapidity,
and each focussed for some object in the extreme distance.
The blurring of the near object will be double with the
6-inch lens than it will be with that of shorter focus. It
is not merely that the blurring with the lens of shorter
focus will be reduced to smaller proportions because the
whole photograph is smaller, but that when both are en-
larged to one size, the enlargement from the short-focus
lens will show only half the blurring that the other does —
that is to say, the representation will be as distinct as if the
longer focussed lens had been racked half the distance
required to suit the particular object.
Here, then, is a great advantage for the short focus lens,
against which must be set the disadvantage for the par-
ticular plate, but not for one of proportional size, of want
of focus towards the margin, owing to curvature of field.
There will also be further want of definition towards the
margin from other optical causes ; but taking the curvature
of field alone, that may sometimes be turned to a positive
advantage.
The most common case in which this is seen is in
photographs of interiors, which are not generally detec-
tive work, and in street scenes, and such similar cases,
where the side objects are much nearer than those
occupying the centre of the field. The curvature of field
of the lens is a matter that I think photographers, especially
those who go in for detective work, would do well to
study. If we arc obliged to put up with the drawbacks
attendant upon curvature of field, let us take advantage
of any possible help which it may occasionally render.
It will be found then, with any ordinary detective
lens, that as we approach the margin of the field, an
object to be in the best obtainable focus must be much
nearer to the instrument than the distance which has
been focussed at the centre of the field. Suppose that
we have a lens of 5-inch focus used with a quarter-
plate. We may find that when it is focussed for the dis-
tance at the centre, an object occupying a spot H-incli
distance from the centre of the ground glass will be in
focus, when oidy about twenty-five or thirty feet off. If we
are capable of judging distances tolerably, and have either
previously noticed on the ground glass or with the finder
what part of the scene will be occupied by an object which
comes H-inch from the centre of the plate, we may
sccceed in catching a near object of interest when in
focus, without disturbing the general focus for the dis-
tance. This case is put as an illustration of what may
be done. We may, for instance, note a place in a line of
roadway along which vehicles travel, and by getting a
horse, dog, or foot passenger there when passing a spot at a
certain distance from the centre of the plate, get it just
at the focus for that part of the plate, although at the
centre it would be decidedly out of focus.
We now come in conclusion to the consideration of
whether it is desirable for general detective camera
work to have the lens focussed for the extreme dis-
tance, or some point at the distance, as near as may be,
at which it is anticipated that objects of interest will
appear.
Of course the object of special interest should not be
decidedly out of focus, and therefore it would be better to
focus for that, if there is a ready means of adjustment, or
if that probable distance is known beforehand. If such
object come in the centre of the plate, the lens must be
racked out, and the distant background will be out of
focus. It has, however, been shown that with a short
focus lens and tolerable wide angle of view, it is possible
to get a rather near object in focus without movement of
the lens, provided it is not very near the centre of the
field. When it is desired to obtain objects of a certain
size on the plate, and to cover a plate of given size as
sharply as may be towards the edges, then a lens of long
focus will be selected ; but, in this case, if near and dis-
tant objects are both included, one or other must give way
in the matter of focus. When, on the other hand, actual
size is not important, and it is desired to get objects at
different distances all as nearly focussed .as possible with-
out diminishing the speed of the instrument, this will be
accomplished by using a lens of short focus. The power
of yielding a sufficiently magnified image may, however, as
suggested before, be limited by the capability of the film
of registering, without interference due to structure or
coarseness of grain, details beyond a certain degree of
fineness.
January 31, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
89
PHOTOGRAPHERS’ BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION.
We have received from the Committee, through Mr.
II. Ilarland, secretary, a request for the insertion of the
subjoined report and statement of the future policy of the
above-named Association: —
Your Committee, in . ubmitting their Report for the past
year, consider that it is desirable on the present occasion to give
something more than the customary abstract of receipts and
expenditure. It would be idle to contend that the Association
has, at any period of its existence, completely fulfilled its mis-
sion, and the problem which has at several previous epochs of
its history confronted its management has, during the past
year, again presented itself and appealed for solution.
It will be within the knowledge of all but recent members
that in 1885 the roll of membership had become reduced to
such meagre dimension* that the Association became unwork-
able under the then existing system, and it was thereupon re-
solved to reduce the subscription to 2s. 6d. per annum, with a
view to encourage the poorer members of the profession to join
the Association. At the end of the following year the number
of members had certainly increased, but the greater part of the
increase consisted of persons who would never be likely to
require assistance from the funds. At the Annual Meeting in
1887 two notable alterations were made in the Rules: — Ama-
teurs were allowed to become members, and the Committee
was empowered to consider applications for relief from non-
members if the case had been recommended by a donor of
£1 Is. Under the new conditions the number of members
rapidly increased, but a vast majority of the increase consisted
of amateurs, who were never likely to require aid, even if they
were eligible to receive it ; the class which the Association was
designed to benefit still held aloof, and practically ignored its
existence. One of the chief difficulties your Committee has to
contend with is the fact that the good effected through the
Association is of necessity very little known, those who receive
Ijenefit being, perhaps, naturally the last to talk about it.
Man)’ recently acquired members seemed to have taken a mere
passing interest in our benevolent aims, and have suffered
their subscriptions to fall into arrear, or, perhaps, have
never really' looked upon themselves as permanent sub-
scribers at all. Owing to these circumstances the suc-
cess of the Association has been materially' hindered ;
aud, although it will be recognised that this is no new
difficulty, one of the first points your Committee had to
determine was whether it was worth while, for the sake of a
score of members who practically constitute the Association, to
carry' it on almost solely for their benefit '? They have coinc to
the conclusion that something more than this Is expected from
them, and that they' should rather seek for powers to enable
them to extend its scope and sphere of beneficence still further
in the direction of such as have not hitherto been in a position
to contribute to the funds. The old members, who have all
been consulted on this point, are quite willing, for the general
good, to sink their individual claims, and your Committee have
now formulated a new set of rules embodying the principle on
which they propose that the Association should in future be
conducted. This, while reserving to old members a preferential
claim on the funds, will afford a larger discretion in administer-
ing assistance to any deserving cases of distress, irrespective of
membership, and will consequently' give your Committee a
better standpoint when appealing for funds for the general pur-
poses of the Association. The serious attempt now for the
first time made to initiate an independent Annuity Fund will
be kept prominently in view, ami it is with some confidence
anticipated that it will before long very largely exceed the sum
of £250, at which the new scheme will start it.
It has, from time to time, been brought as a reproach against
the Association that the expenses of management have been too
heavy in comparison with the amount expended in relief. Your
Committee fully recognise the justice of this contention, and it
has several times been considered w hether the work might not
be efficiently performed by an Hon. Secretary ; but wliile they
could reckon upon retaining the services of Mr. Harlaud, whose
energy and experience have been of material service to them in the
past, they' have not thought it expedient to recommend so radi-
cal a change. Mr. Harlaud has, however, now seen fit to resign
his office, and in response to an appeal which wras thereupon
inserted in the photographic papers, a gentleman has come for-
ward and proffered his services as Honorary Secretary to the
Association, and your Committee have, without hesitation,
accepted his generous offer. They confidently trust that a new
era in the affairs of the Association, marked by economy as well
as efficiency of administration, will thus be ushered in, and they
hope that the time is not far distant when the Association will
take its proper position as the recognised channel for the bene-
volence of the profession.
Referring to the balance sheet for the past year, it will be
seen that the funds show the substantial increase of £67 5s. Id.,
and now stand at £375 12s. lid. Members’ subscriptions show
a considerable falling off, being £20 10s., compared with
£30 11s. for 1888; this has been already alluded to. The
donations amounted to £71 18s. 5d., fully £10 more than in
1888, but of this sum £34 16s. lid. was transferred from the
abandoned Orphans’ Fund. The exhibition of the P. S. G. B.
produced £12 5s. 6d. against £14 3s. in 1888. The grants by'
way of relief, which in 1888 amounted to £38 14s., during the
yrear under review amounted only to £18 4s., and this is the
fact which has given your committee most reason for proposing
to re-consider the position of the Association with a view to
extending its sphere of usefulness ; and the result of the long
and anxious consideration they have given to the subject has
been embodied in the new draft of rules which they now intend
to submit for your approval.
A copy of the proposed new rules may be seen at the
office of Mr. W. Benham, lion. Solicitor to the Associa-
tion, at 4, Great James Street, W. C.
THE CALCUTTA PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION.
The Journal of the Photographic Society of India just
received is full of interesting information. The best
Photographic Exhibition ever held in Calcutta is over,
and the judges who awarded the prizes were Sir Comer
Petheram, Chief Justice ; Col. Waterhouse ; and Mr. W.
II. Jobbins, Superintendent of the School of Art. The
decision of the judges was not handed in before the close
of the Exhibition, but the delay was unavoidable. Colonel
Waterhouse did not return until after the Exhibition was
open, aud then, what with arrears of work and other calls
upon his time, he was prevented from doing anything
towards the judging untilafter Christmas week. By that time
Sir Comer Petheram had gone to Darjeeling for the Christ-
mas holidays, but he, at great personal inconvenience,
came down to Calcutta and met Colonel Waterhouse and
Mr. Jobbins at the Exhibition.
The following is an abridgment of the report of the
judges, and contains the names of all the successful candi-
dates : —
The special gold medal presented by His Highness the Bara
Thakur Bahadur of Tipperah for the best platinotype by an
amateur, irrespective of class or section, was awarded to Mr.
F. M. Sutcliffe, for No. 164, and high commendation to his
other pictures.
Class I. — Section 1 (Landscapes, Architecture, and Interiors).
— Gold medal presented by Sir C. Petheram : Mr. R. Keene,
for his series of landscapes and interiors. Society’s silver
medal : Mr. F. P. Cembrano. The award of an extra medal
recommended to Mr. J. P. Gibson for his landscape views.
Honorable mention : Messrs. Bourne and Shepherd, Bremner,
Austin, J. S. Gladstone, Lala Deen Dyal, Pancoast, H. P.
Robinson, Lyddell Sawyer, and Sutcliffe. — Section 2 (Portraits,
Groups, and Studies). — Special medal, presented by H. E. the
Viceroy : Messrs. Johnston and Hoffman. Society’s gold medal :
Mr. 4V. \V. Winter, for “My Mammy',” platinotype print.
Society ’s silver medal recommended to Mr. Lyddell Sawyer,
90
[January 31, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGRAPHY IX SWEDEN.
Honorable mention : Messrs. J. E. Austin, G. M. Elton, J. P.
Gibson, Robert Hot*, Kapp, Klier, Lala Been Dyal, P. Nichol-
son, Lyddell Sawyer, Sutcliffe, and Miss Clarisse Miles.— Sec-
tion 3 (Genre Pictures, Animals, and Still Life). — Gold medal,
presented by H.H. the Maharajah of Kuch Behar : Mr. J. E.
Austin, for his pictures of animals and studies. The Society’s
silver medal : Mr. R. S. Redfield. Extra medal recommended
for the series of little wayside studies exhibited by Mr. M. H.
Harding. Honorable mention : Messrs. D. Barnett, F.
Bremner, Rev. F. C. Lambert, Miss Miles, Messrs, A. Nichol-
son, H. P. Robinson, F. M. Sutcliffe, and J. Walker.— Sec-
tion 4 (Instantaneous Photographs). — Gold medal, presented
by the Nawab of Dacca: Messrs. West and Sons, for photo-
graphs of yachts. The Society’s silver medal : Mr. F. Bremner.
Extra medal recommended to Mr. AY. Parry for instantaneous
views. Honorable mention : Messrs. C. It. Pancoast, Lyddell
Sawyer, and Sutcliffe. — Section 5 (Combination Pictures).—
Silver medal, presented by Col. J. Waterhouse : Mr. F.
AA'haley. — Section 6 (Stereoscopic Pictures). — Messrs. G. AA\
AA'ilson and Co.
Class III.— Section 12 (Photographs on Wood, Glass, Lineui
or China). — Society’s silver medal : Mr. Roliert Hot/., for his
porcelain pictures. — Section 13 (Reproductions and Enlarge-
ments).— Society’s silver medal : Messrs. Kapp and Co., for
group of the Naval Volunteers. Honorable mention : Messrs.
Johnston and Hoffman, Messrs. Bourne and Shepherd, and
Mr. Robert Hot/.
Class IV. — Section 14 (Miscellaneous Processes).— Certifi-
cate : Messrs. Kapp and Co. — Section 15 (Heliotype, Photo-
Engraving, &c.). — Certificate : Mr. J. E. Dumont.— Section It)
(Photographs taken by Artificial Light). — Certificate : Mr.
Robert Hot/.
Indian Amateurs only.
Class I. — Section 1 (Landscapes, Architecture, and Interiors).
— Society’s silver medal : Mr. E. AA\ Stoney. Extra medal
recommended to Mr. T. D. La Touche. Honorable mention :
Mr. G. J. Apcar, Mrs. Currie, Messrs. G. Ewing, S. J. Leslie,
Col. Rogers, His Highness the Bara Thakur Bahadur of Tipperah
— some of whose views in platinotype were specially commended
— and Claude AA’hite, whose No. 18 was also of considerable
excellence. — Section 2 (Portraits, Groups and Studies). —
Society’s silver medal : Mr. G. J. Apcar. The judges men-
tioned the general excellence of Mr. Apcar’s pictures in this
and other sections. Mr. Pope’s group of survey officers,
enlarged and printed in heliogravure, is deserving of notice,
and some of the portraits exhibited by His Highness the Bara
Thakur Bahadur of Tipperah are also good. — Section 3 (Genre
Pictures, Animals, and Still Life). — Society's silver medal :
Mr. A. G. E. Newland, whose pictures in this and other classes,
though not so effective as they might be as photographs, show
considerable originality and skilful grouping. Honorable
mention : Messrs. Apcar and Stoney. — Section 4 (Instantaneous
Photographs). — Society’s silver medal : Mr. E. M. Showers.
Honourable mention : Messrs. Apcar, Stoney, Newland, and
Leslie.
Class II. — Section 8 (Micro-Photography). — Certificate : Mr.
W. M. Osmond.
Class III. — Section 13 (Reproductions and Enlargements). —
Society’s silver medal : Mr. A. L. H. Palmer.
The awards for lantern slides are postponed until the pictures
have been tried in the lantern.
Ihk Royal Institution. — Last Friday the first evening lec-
ture of the session at the Royal Institution was delivered by
Professor Dewar, with Sir Frederick Abel in the chair. The
lecture dealt with the life and discoveries of Joule, and in the
course of it Professor Dewar exhibited an experiment in which
pieces of ice were melted by the heat produced by their friction
against each other. They were rublted against each other in the
exhausted receiver of an air pump, and over strong sulphuric
acid, two conditions by which water can be frozen, so that the
melting was proved to lie due to heat produced by friction, and
not to the temperature of the theatre,
In the first number of the present year's issue of the
Swedish Photographic Journal for Professionals and Ama-
teurs, published at Stockholm, we meet with an interesting
description of a reunion of the Photographic Society,
communicated by the secretary, Alexis llasselquist. The
reunian was held on the 4th of January, 1879, and
forty members of the Photographic Society attended.
Dr. Wolff, the well-known astronomer from Heidelberg,
honoured the assembly with his presence.
After Herr Palmgren, who presided at the meeting, had
welcomed those ladies and gentlemen who were in the room,
with suitable forms of speech, he took occasion to refer in
terms betokening poignant regret to the great and grievous
loss which the Society had lately suffered by the death of its
former much-loved and well-estcemecl president, Pro-
fessor Ilerr Ileymans.
Herr Palmgren then spoke in well-chosen phraseology,
and at some length, of the important advantages which
had been derived from photography by science, art,
and industry, and added that photography's valued
aid was by no means the least among the many aids
which had of late years been offered to education. He
was anxious those who were there present should know, and
that by their means others interested in this matter might
be given to understand, that photography in the hands of
the amateur was no mere idle toy, insignificant plaything,
or harmless amusement, but had its essential use and pur-
pose in furthering the interest of the art student and the
scientist, the physician and the astronomer.
The president concluded his speech, which was heard
with the deepest attention, by a few interesting remarks
about the rich and valuable collection of the products of
photographic art which the members of the society saw
before them, and might afterwards examine at their leisure.
Herr Roosval, the editor and publisher of the Swedish
Photographic Journal, in succession to the president, ad-
dressed the meeting, and gave an account of the begin-
ning of photography, of the early years, so to speak, of the
art’s childhood, when it was as yet scarcely able to walk
alone. From this he passed to its present matured
growth, speaking very highly, by the way, of the great-
ness of the art, and the noble inventions of our own time
which had so much in them due to modern photography.
I Iis remarks were copiously illustrated by a large collec-
tion of Daguerreotypes, paper negatives, glass, and wax
cloth pictures, which he said were fashionable in the
year 1840 before paper pictures were invented. But the
most interesting object in the whole collection for those
assembled at this Swedish reunion was a Daguerreotype
taken after nature at Copenhagen in 1840, for it repre-
sented the world-renowned sculptor Thorvaldsen. The
plate, of the size of 18 by 24cm., was in excellent preser-
vation, and is the property of the photographer, J. Jaeger.
After the admission of many new members, and the
transaction of the usual business of the Society, the visi-
tors busied themselves with the inspection of the various
objects of photographic interest which had been collected
for their amusement.
Among the most noteworthy specimens of artistic work
exhibited at this Swedish reunion may be mentioned
several interiors and landscapes by Major Adelskbld ;
transparencies and landscapes by Doctor Aspelin ; pic*
tures from Panama by Ilerr Bowallius ; heliogravures by
Ilerr Bortzcll ; oil-coloured photographs and magnesium
Hash-light pictures by Ilerr Carlaman ; genre pictures by
f
January 31, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
91
Ilerr Cedergren ; negative pictures of moon-eclipse and
stars by Doctor Charlier ; a rich collection of large pho-
tographs of the environs of Stockholm, also of places in
Germany and Spain, by Professor Curman ; instantaneous
pictures by Herr Feychting ; negative and positive pic-
tures of star groups, lightning (lashes, &c., by Professor
Ilasselberg ; pictures from Gotland and Karlsbarne :
interiors and enlargements on bromide of silver paper by.
Lieutenant Hasselquist : large panoramas from Stockholm
and interiors, mostly taken with wet plates, by Herr Jaeger,
photographer ; a few portraits taken thirty years .ago by
Herr Palmgren ; some platinum pictures by Herr Koosval:
landscape and pictures from Visby by Ilerr Stenquist;
instantaneous pictures, taken with Stirn’s camera, by Herr
Strindberg: two photographs of pictures of Carl Larsson
and Zorn, by Herr Ostlin ; enlargements on bromide of
silver paper, together with large and small landscapes, and
instantaneous pictures of running horses, vessels under
sail, Ac., by Ilerr Blom; landscapes and genre pictures
by Ilerr Carl Johansson; landscapes and instantaneous
pictures of sea waves and breakers by Herr lvallstenius :
photogravures by Hen- Lagrelius ; instantaneous pictures,
landscapes, interiors, photographs of pictures and busts,
with enlargements on bromide of silver paper, and pho-
tographs copied on aristo-paper by Ilerr Siljestrbm ; and
genre and instantaneous pictures of vessels under sail by
Herr Smitt.
THE DISTANCE BEYOND WHICH ALL OBJECTS
WILL BE IN FOCUS WITH ANY GIVEN LENS.*
BY SIR DAVID SALOMONS, BART.
The author found a simple formula for ascertaining the
distance beyond which all objects will be in focus with any
given lens — it is f -f- 100 f ~ It inches — where /'and It have
the same meanings as usual. This formula is very useful
to ascertain the most suitable lenses for detective cameras,
and for other purposes. It is assumed that if points in the
object are represented in the image by circles having
diameters of , ,V0 inch and less, the picture will be sharp.
A special instance will be given to show its use : — 100 /'It
inches may be written 81, f- It feet, since 100 inches = 8A
feet. The addition of /'in the formula may be neglected,
being small compared with 10 O/2 It. Most of the rapid
landscape lenses work at /, so the formula reduces itself to
f - feet approximately. This shows that, with any lens /,
all will be in focus after a distance expressed by the
square of its focal length in feet. Putting the formula in
words, 100 f2 It inches reads: — 100 multiplied by the
ratio, multiplied bv the square of the equivalent focal
length of the lens, expresses in inches the distance beyond
which <dl objects will appear in focus. To give an
example : — After what distance will all objects be in focus
with a lens stopped T. (i. e. , W), the equivalent focus being
10 inches?
. I nsirer —
100 X iV X 10 x 10 = 1 ",'V1" = 833J inches = 09 feet
yi inches. To be strictly accurate, add /' (= 10) to this,
and distance becomes 70 feet inches from optical centre
of lens.
It is a good plan to mark the stops for the distance
after which all will be in focus, as well as the standard
number. In practice this is invaluable, for when a subject
is to be taken requiring a particular stop to get the focus
right, and it is found that this stop has a number requiring
too long an exposure, a plate is saved.
Read before the Photographic Society of Great Britain.
o
o
to
CG
a
o
p
o
o
0
*
01
a>
CO
O
&
S3
Sft
-
§
O
Qj
f.
S3
O
rO
-2
be
©
o
si
H
a ~ o
o £ a -c
o o
^*3 .2
—
-h -f hji lO 4© 4© © © © ©
rJl
O .2
t
\
©
©
S
©
— < ©
©
1“H
r-H O 00 © ©
T* *P
©
v.
r |e.
h. t- 05 C5 ©
— ft »o o
ft ©
p-H
T— <
^ rH ^ «
pH p— <
Ol
_ 1#
-
co co
CO
r—t
cp » cc i.-
© 9
©
i—
X CI
©
oi pf r »-
© o
Ol
*“H p-H r^, r-H f—4
r-H Ol
Ol
©
5
00
CC Cl
— •
w ».o © Ol ^
>H I'-
oo
S:
V
l'.
00 Cl
©
ft
ft ft ,*fc tft ft
©
ft
— « r-1 r-. ^
CM Ol
Ol
#
pH
©
s
M *N CO ‘O 00
7“ co cp 7^ ^
CO
O
V
cc
Cl ©
.
Ol
oo ft ft ft ©
nCl-f
o
*-•
•-H ^H l-H ^H
Ol ^
Ol
.5
*
©
00
Cl — ■
»o
© oi x co t*
9 o5
^’c
CC
X
Cl ©
Cl
ft
ft ft © ©
Cl Vt*
ft
aJ
— 1
pH
HH « r- N
Ol CM
Ol
-P
o
V-H
©
©
tn
3
w
1"
•—
ep
©MphCCIO-
©
Ch
o
-
© ft
Ol
ft
iCO I'- 00 © 'Cl
1 0
ft
i— < r-H
I—*
pH M H Cl N
Ol OJ
Ol
c n
u>
o
0
©
© — <
o
c3
*
r-i o Cl
CO
7 » p 7 - r. cp x
©
v,1*
WJ
©
— Cl
CO
ft ft © ft ft ft ft
©
rc
o
«— » r-H
»—*
— p- Ol OI Ol Ol C'l
Ol
o
S
o
—
a
©
©
©
-c
l>
CO
r— 1
4.0
— — 1 X © © 1"* ©
7*
§
. w
©
— co
CC © ~- TO »0
1- ©
— H
O
P
CJ
r-^
iH
— • Ol CM Ol
Ol Ol CO
-*->
©
©
ft
a>
©
©
© »0 Owl-
r-H CM
1 —
©
ft
di ft
cc
ft
© ft do ft ft
© di
—Hr
t| |
p— f—i
•—*
— Ol Ol CM Ol oi CO
CO
o
u
»o
© x » o
CO H- © © ^
o ©
cp
a»
di
^ %o
1 -
Cl
ft ft ft ft ft
di ft
ft
£>
g
~ r"'
(M .N Jl fl M M S3
CO
S
hr
CC -vt* co
Ol
CO r#-c0©0©©©^
s*‘j2
co
»o 1-
©
—
CO lO CO © CO
•O X
—
H
O
^ H - r-Ol (M f 1 (N !
v -'O-HfOO-iO-H
i- © —
' M H Cl N
O
1 ^ 7*
l h f 1 S'!
o
1 h O M O'!
i ft ft ft ©
i ?l W N W
to cc —
M 'M CO
o — •
•— < cc © T*
co o oi »o
CO X x h*
~-77©oi©©*7
oftftdoftp*doft
Cl CO CO CO Tt« •i*
© © _
CO »p *-• -t* © 7 © 7
xftftftftoftdo
cococo^’^»o»o»o
S3 .
© © ■
© —« © © ph ,
« O X © © pH © ©
sJ
©
rM «-H »-H p-H
p-H
l-H
PH
PH CM
Wr
pH
©
0
•— <
lO
pH
s
40
^ >0 CO X PH Cl
©
pH
X
© 7
— ■
CO
,
ft
X ©
0 ft Ol X 4©
© ©
© 01
to
Jh
1—H ^H p-H HH r-H
pH
r-H CM O l
S—
is
pP
a
o
c
©
— H
X 40 © © *0
X
pH
x x
P
©
co
pp
V
do
©
©
ft di x »© © 1^ © ©
Ol ft
&
55
r-H *-H r-H P-H »-H
r“'
pH
01 01 Ol
w1
o
Oh
O
UJ
tH
a>
«HH
©
©
r-H
pH
»- © 40 — <
X
01
©
op cp
25
Ol
cfl
cc ©
ft
Ol ft 40 CO N ©
ft
Ol
-H ft
u
o
*•*
* t-H p— ! r-H i-H
Ol
Ol Ol Ol
b
Oj
pp
o
©
©
P-H
a
©
a
7^
7*
40 © x ' *0
r— •
©
cc
X ©
ce
Ol
-
©
ft
Ol ft 4© ft OO ©
ft
ft
»©
TJ
p
r— 1
hhhhCI
Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol Ol
13
B
lO
c3
O
O)
-
»p
^H
©
7- »p © © 0 »© »o 0 *7
di ft ft ft © ft ft ft ft
©
p-H
©
01 *7
di 'H*
*5
«4H
p— r
r-H |H pH ©1 CM
Ol
Ol
Ol X x
P
©
UH
o
X
co
Ol X X ©
x ©
©
O 4©
w
X 4C
ft
© — • X 4© CO ©
X
»© X pH
QJ
— »
~H 01 CM Ol Ol
X X x
X ^
rP
i
©
©
©
r-H
UJ
p
4©
x 01 x 4© 7
©
© 7
55
©
ft
ft
ft 0 ft ft ©
X
©
ft X
r-H
Ol
M
01 x x x x
H* 4©
4© 4©
i± a v.
Zji
O o
ft *g a
t* ■*?• -** nf l.© *0 >0 © © © © *”■•
92
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 31, 1890.
patent Entdltgcncc.
Applications for Letters Patent.
964. W. C. Chipper, 39, Highgate Hill, London, “Camera
Fittings.” — January 20th.
1,098. H. H. Lake, 45, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Photographic Apparatus.” — January 21st.
1,117. J. Massioxon and E. Watel, 45, Southampton Build-
ings, London, “Manufacture of Bichromates.” — January
21st.
1,115. W. K. Baker, 9, Belmont Villas, Wallingtou, “Camera
Stands.”— January 22nd.
1,203. D. Cakteh, 15, Gerrard Street, Warwick, “Cameras,
Finder, and Shutter.” — January 23rd.
1,267. W. T. Watson, 20, Ocean Place, Hull, “ Line or Grain-
Effect for Photo-mechanical Printing.” — January 24th.
Specifications Published.
1,543. — 29<A January, 1389. “ Photographic Camera Shut-
ters.” William James Lancaster, trading as J. Lan-
caster and Son, of Colmore Row, Birmingham, Manufac-
turing Optician.
This invention relates to photographic camera shutters, or
apparatus for obtaining instantaneous or protracted exposure
within certain limits, whereby light is allowed to pass
momentarily, or otherwise as aforesaid, through the lens, or
exposure aperture, at the will of the operator — thus, the
shutter may be made to act instantaneously, or may be made
to acquire varying speeds, according to the length of exposure
required.
The apparatus consists, first, of a double shutter arrange-
ment, which, for instantaneous exposure, acts in unison, but
for protracted or varying exposure they act independently
of each other ; secondly, in shutter-holding means ; thirdly,
in shutter-releasing means ; fourthly, in suspending and oper-
ating the shutters ; fifthly, in clock or running-down
mechanism, which operates a short arm, and removes the
holding catch of the secondary shutter, after a period of time
has elapsed since the raising of the primary shutter ; sixthly,
in time stop mechanism and other accessory parts in connection
with the apparatus.
In carrying out my invention, I take a rectangular box-like
frame, with an exposure aperture made through it ; and sliding
and working within guides contained within the said frame, I
arrange two shutters, viz., a primary shutter and a secondary
shutter, which alternately come in front of the exposure
aperture.
The primary shutter works in juxtaposition to the inside
back of the front of the enclosing casing, and with its upper
end connected to the outer end of a flexible cord, whose inner
end is connected to a hollow or box pulley, wherein a coiled
spring is enclosed — this spring is the motive power for raising
the shutter from before the aperture on exposure.
The primary shutter is held in position by a spring catch,
working upon and through one side of the framing, in a
manner that the bolt part of the said catch takes within a like
notch or cut away part in the side of the shutter ; so that on
the shutter being lowered, or brought in front of the aperture,
the catch is moved away by an incline, and then snaps into
the notch.
The spring catch of the primary shutter is cranked at its
lower end ; and between it and the end of a leleaser con-
ducting tube, a small flexible bellows is enclosed ; so that by
pressing a pneumatic releaser, in the form of a flexible tube
and ball, the bellows is expanded, and the catch taken out of
action.
The secondary shutter works upon the back, or near the
back of the primary one, and is held in position at two points,
viz., on the side and at the top, whilst it is taken into its
aperture covering position by a flat spring acting upon a stud ;
and further, it is taken into its raised position by the down-
ward movement of the primary shutter, whose upper end is
connected to that of the secondary one by a flexible cord
passing over a pulley mounted at the upper end of the enclosing
casing.
The side fastening is effected by a tumbler catch, in the
form of a bell crank lex er, with one arm directed vertically,
and the other horizontally ; and upon the latter, the time arm
which is on the principal axis of the time mechanism comes,
on the said mechanism having run down.
The upright or vertical arm carries a knife-edged catch or
pivot, which engages with a side notch in the said shutter.
The secondary holding point of this said shutter consists of
a spring catch, whose nose and inclined plane protrudes through
the outercasing. This catch f irms both a supplementary holder
for the secondary shutter, and a buffer stop to the primary I
shutter.
The time mechanism, which consists of a barrel with a
volute spring enclosed within it, a ratchet and pawl arrange-
ment, a large toothed wheel gearing with a pinion on another
axis, and which pinion axis carries a large toothed wheel, which
gears with a second pinion on an axis which carries a third
toothed wheel, which meshes with the teeth of a third pinion,
and whose axis carries a fourth toothed wheel, with the teeth
of which a knife edged stop engages, consisting of a fork-like
arm pressed home by a spring, is arranged as aforesaid.
The axis which carries the drum, ratchet wheel, and primary
tooth wheel as first named, is the same axis as carries the time
arm. Thus, the moving of a turn carries on the said time
arm axis through a portion of a circle, winds the spring up to 1
an extent equivalent to a unit of time, which, when released,
is allowed to run down only at a certain rate by the reduction |
gear or train of wheels as aforesaid.
The turn for giving varying speeds to the shutters, or rather
to the secondary shutter, is provided with a pointer, which
traverses in front of a graduated and set out dial, indicating
one, two, three or more seconds, and portions of them.
The action of the apparatus or shutter for instantaneous
exposure is as follows: —
The exposure aperture is covered by the pulling down of the
primary si utter, which is held by its catch, while the secondaiy
shutter is held by the top catch, which is the buffer stop to the
primary one.
When the parts are in the positions as indicated — that is, the
primary shutter down, and the secondary one up — the ball end
of the pneumatic releaser is pressed, when the bellows at its
other end is distended, and the spring catch released from the
primary shutter, which now being free, is instantly drawn
upwards, by the spring enclosed within the pulley, to which I
the flexible cord of the shutter is attached.
The rising and striking of the said shutter against the buffer
stop catch liberates the said shutter, which is pressed down in
front of the aperture by a spring.
For a greater exposure, the time required is fixed by placing
the pointer in front of one of the markings on the dial, which i
determines the exposure required ; this is done after the primary I
shutter has been brought before the aperture. Thus the primary I
shutter has been pulled down, and there held by its catch, and ,
the secondary shutter pulled upwards, and held by the buffer
stop catch ; this done, the time for exposure is determined by
moving the turn and pointer to the required position, when the 1
secondary shutter holding stop carried by the bell-cranked arm
passes into the notch on side of the said shutter, anti holds it
there.
The affixing of the shutter by the lower and side catch is
done by a spring acting upon it when the time arm on the time I
axis mechanism is removed by the rotation of the turn and |
finger.
The pressing of the pneumatic releaser distends the bellows,
removes the catch from the primary shutter, which is raised by I
the coiled spring from in front of the exposure aperture, and i
releases the buffer stop-catch from the secondary shutter, and i
also takes the knife-edged stop from the teeth of the top wheels '
of the train of wheels, which now being free, run down at a
determinate rate, and bring the time-arm upon the top side of
the horizontal arm of the bell crank catch, liberating the
secondary shutter, which is now pressed down by the spring,
January 31, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
93
*8*
■•'-Vi
ie
i i
■J
and conies in front of, and closes up light-tight, the exposure
aperture.
It will he thus observed that the secondary plate follows the
movement of the first one, after a certain definite period of
time, and that the time-stop is released by the primary shutter
coming against it.
1,439. January 2<5th, 1889. “Photographic Cameras.”
John William Turner, Heathfield Street, Liverpool,
Photographic Apparatus Manufacturer.
The invention relates to photographic detective or hand
cameras, in which a number of dry sensitive plates are stored,
are successively submitted to the action of light, and are then
deposited in a suitable receptacle until they are required for
development.
The object is to so make such cameras that the plates are
readily and easily placed therein and removed therefrom, and
are with certainty moved into the required positions by simple
and efficient mechanism.
The invention consists essentially in providing first, rack or
equivalent mechanism by which the plates are fed with cer-
tainty and regularity one after the other into position to
receive the focussed image ; and second, oscillating grippers by
which the plates are removed from the focal centre and
deposited in a container or receptacle.
A sliding rack operated by a pinion answers well to feed the
plates forward intermittently. Each tooth of the rack acts on
a plate, and springs are used to assist in moving the plates for-
ward.
Grippers opened and closed by screw spring or equivalent
mechanism, and moved in an arc by means of a handle or
lever, are advantageously employed for removing the used
plates into the container or receptacle.
12,860. — August 14th, 1889. “Optical Lanterns.” Alfred
Wrench, 50, Grays Inn Hoad, London, Manufacturing Opti-
cian.
This invention relates to improvements in or applicable to
optical or magic-lanterns, whereby both mounted and un-
mounted slides can be more conveniently and easily exhibited
than hitherto, the unmounted slides being automatically
registered ; by these improvements also a curtain or screen is
oj>erated between the exhibition of the slides as hereinafter more
particularly described.
In carrying out my invention I form the lantern with two
compartments in the stage or receptacle for the slides. One of
these compartments is adapted for the reception of mounted
slides, and the other compartment is provided with guides in
which works a carrier operated by a rack-aml-pinion or other
arrangement, and adapted to receive and exhibit unmounted
slides, and to register such slides automatically. The guides
are furnished with spring-lugs, which yield to the upward
pressure of the slide, and imur iiately it has passed them they
spring outwards and hold the slide in position for being ex-
hibited.
The said carrier also actuates a screen or shutter in such a
manner as to produce the effect of a curtain falling after the
exhibition of one slide, and rising to exhibit to view a new
picture.
In a modification of my invention, I employ a shifting stage
operated by a rack-aml-pinion or other arrangement, whereby
mounted slides and mechanical slides can be exhibited and
registered automatically, in the same way as unmounted slides,
and which shifting stage also actuates a screen or shutter to
produce the curtain effect hereinbefore mentioned.
Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on Feb. 5th
will be “ The Intensification and Reduction of; Negatives ” ;
and on Feb. 12th, “ Illuminants for the Optical Lantern.”
Messrs. Shib, Churn, Dutt, & Co. seem to carry on a mixed
kind of business. In their advertisement in The Journal of the
Photograph ic Society of India the first column gives the prices of
beers and wines in bottles, and the second column the prices of
photographic apparatus. They also mention that they sell oil-
man’s stores and provisions, hardware, and all sorts of tea and
indigo garden implements.
(»?onc$pontintrc.
THE 1890 CAMERA CLUB CONFERENCE.
Sir, — I am requested by my Committee to ask your assist-
ance in announcing the following outline of the Camera Club
Conference for 1890: —
The 1890 Conference will be held in the Theatre of the
Society of Arts (by kind permission of the Council) on Thurs-
day and Friday, March 20th and 21st, under the Presidency
of Capt. IV. de IV. Abney, C.B., R.E., F.R.S.
On Wednesday, March 19th, at 8.30 p.m., there will be a
special Smoking Concert at the Club Rooms, and the Mem-
bers’ Annual Exhibition of Pictures will be opened.
On Thursday, March 20th, at 2 p.m., the President will
open the Conference and Exhibition of Apparatus at the Society
of Arts, and papers will be read from 2 to 5.30 p.m. In
the evening a lantern slide exhibition will be given in the
Theatre of the Society of Arts, for which special tickets may
be obtained.
On Friday, March 21st, the apparatus will be on show from
10 a.m., and at 2 p.m. the Conference will be renewed.
At 7.30 the annual dinner for members and friends will
take place.
A complete programme will be issued later and distributed.
All photographers will be cordially invited to the Conference.
George Davison, Hon. Sec.
Camera Club, 21, Bedford Street, 1V.C., January 27th.
ISOCHROMATIC PHOTOGRAPHS AT THE FRENCH
SOCIETY.
Sir, — We are glad to find that M. Vidal’s error in supposing
that the photographs on isochromatic and ordinary plates which
we presented to the French Photographic Society were lighted in
different ways was. as we surmised, simply owing to his want of
knowledge in such matters. Had he been better acquainted with
the isochromatic process as now employed in copying oil paint-
ings, he would have been aware of the fact that the reflections
from the rough surface of the canvas, which show so conspicu-
ously in copies taken by the ordinary process, are usually scarcely
noticeable in those taken on colour-sensitive plates. This is one
of the peculiarities of the process, and is well recognized by those
who practise it.
No alteration in the lighting is necessary to produce results
such as we have shown, nor, in this instance, would such a thing
have been possible, all the negatives being taken in the National
Gallery from the paintings in the positions they occupy, and
from which they are not allowed to be removed.
That our every-day results should be received with incredu-
lity by experienced photographers says much for the capabilities
of the process, and, except for the suggestion of unfairness
which has been made, would have been perhaps the highest
compliment we could receive.
We have forwarded to the President of the French Society
conclusive evidence in support of our statements, and we shall
now trust to M. Vidal’s sense of honour and justice to aid us in
removing the erroneous impression which seems to have pre-
vailed with regard to the photographs presented by us to the
Society. B. J. Edwards & Co.
The Grove, Hackney, London.
Camera Club Notices. — Monday, February 3rd, 8 p.m. :
Opening of Exhibition of photographs by members of the
Amateur Photographic Field Club ; 8.30 p.m. : smoking con-
cert. Thursday, February 6th, 8 p.m. : Paper by Sir David
Salomons, “ Rule for ascertaining Size of Disc at a Given
Distance for Lantern Work ” ; lantern exhibition of Dutch
views by Messrs. Elder and W. A. Greene, and of slides by
other members. Thursday, February 13th, 8 p.m. : Mr.
Graham Balfour, “ Landscape.” Thursday, February 20th,
5 p.m. : Annual general meeting ;. 8 p.m. : Paper communi-
cated by Mr. W. K. Burton, “ On one or two of the Tenets of
the ‘Naturalists,’” with notes in reply by Mr. G. Davison.
Thursday, February 27th, 8 p.m. : Dr. C. S. Patterson, “The
Camera as Applied to Medicine.” Monday, March 3rd,
8.30 p.m. : smoking concert,
04
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jan cary 31, 18fc0.
Ilrortetting# of Societies.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
At the technical meeting of this Society held on the 28th inst.,
the chair was occupied by Mr. T. Sebastian Davis.
Mr. Chapman Jones read a short paper on “Marks on the
Plate, due to the Hinges of the Dark Slides.” He said that
the effect of the near presence of the leather hinge was recog-
nised as sometimes causing fogging, and sometimes a certain
amount of iusensitiveuess. In a case that he had recently met
with the effect seemed to be that of increasing the sensitive-
ness. He had had a plate in a dark slide for about four months,
and upon exposing it late one dark afternoon he found the
image to be very much under-exposed generally, but opposite
the hinge of the dark slide the image appeared to have received
two or three times as much exposure as the rest of the plate.
The slide in question was one which had some time since been
sent to the manufacturers, who had replaced the oiiginal leather
hinge with one of a material that they now employed instead,
and which was jean of a particular kind. They had adopted
this material because of the fogging which had so often been
complained of when leather was used. The manufacturers
assured him that they had never found any evil effect to result
from the use of this material, and this was so far confirmed by
his own experience, that he had kept plates for two years in
slides thus fitted without their sustaining any injury. It might
be that instead of the hinge material conferring additional
sensitiveness, the rest of the plate had lost that quality.
Mr. A. Cowan believed that the last suggestion was the real
explanation of the case. It had been found by the late Mr.
Collins that some kind of black — that mixed with oil — caused
insensitiveness in the plates.
Mr. A. MaCKIE said that turpentine black produced that
result ; the wood of which some slides were made also had
the same effect. He treated such slides with melted paraffin.
Mr. Cowan showed some plates that he had exposed in illus-
tration of the characteristics of a developer recently introduced
in an American annual, consisting of 25 grains each
of sodium sulphite and Rochelle salt, 2 grains of pyro, and
1 grain of lithium carbonate to the ounce. He expressed his
opinion that this formula constituted an advance in pyrogallic
development. He had tested it against the standard formula
of 2 grains each of pyro and bromide, and 4 minims of
ammonia to the ounce. The lithium-developed plate did not
come up so rapidly at first as that developed with ammonia,
but it afterwards overtook it, and would give a higher number
on the sensitomer than could be got with the ammonia plate,
unless the latter was so pushed as to lose the clearness of the
shadows. It seemed to him that it was not necessary to con-
fine oneself to Rochelle salt, as almost any organic salt of soda or
potash appeared to have similar action. He had used acetate,
phosphate, citrate, and valerianate with much the same result.
He also showed a plate developed with pyro and one grain of
lithium carbonate to the ounce without other addition, and
this gave a very vigorous image. The use of ten times as
much carbonate of potash in place of lithium gave a very weak
image.
Mr. A. Mackie said that Mr. Brooks used acetate of soda
in the developer for collodio-bromide. He (Mr. Mackie) had
tried it, but could not find that it made any difference.
Mr. tY. E. Df,benham said that there was another use in
Mr. Cowan’s experiments, that is, in showing the great
variations of density that could be obtained with the same
plates and similar exposure. Were the plates used those of
ordinary rapidity?
Mr. Cowan replied that they were, and gave 19 or 20 on
Warnerke’s sensitometer.
Mr. Mackie, referring to a recent paper on intensifying, by
Mr. Chapman Jones, asked the author whether he had tried
the method of gaining intensity which consisted of applying
a solution of sulphate of iron, slightly acid, before immersing
the negative in the hypo bath.
Mr. Chapman Jones thought that the method indicated
resembled Mr. Howard Farmer’s intensifying process. He had
not tried it.
Mr. Mackie did not think that there was any fresh dei»osit
of silver, as an acid bath completely removed the density
that had been gained by the use of the iron solution. As to
reduction of intensity by the use of acid in cases where the
sulphate of iron bath was not used, he thought that was due to
the change of colour of deposit, and might therefore be con-
siderable in the case of a negative developed with pyro, but
not with one developed with ferrous oxalate.
Mr. Chapman Jones said that a photographer of great
experience had told him that he always reduced intensity by
an acid bath, and that he developed with ferrous oxalate.
He further stated that a negative originally too dense would
become flat if left too long in the acid.
Mr. Hollyer had never found that the acid bath made any
difference in the density of negatives that had been developed
with ferrous oxalate.
Mr. \Y. Bedford had found the same absence of reducing
power upon negatives that had been developed with hydro-
quinone.
Mr. Mackie had seen developed bromide prints reduced con-
siderably by leaving some of the acid wash in them when placed
in the hypo fixing solution.
Mr. IJebbnham suggested that the difference of experience
as to the reducing power of an acid bath upon negatives
already of a grey or purplish colour might be due to the pre-
sence in some cases of a little iron in the acid used.
Mr. J. Desire England wished to know why the yellow
stain that occurred on pyro negatives, particularly when soda
was used in development, and that was removed by acid,
returned if the acid was thoroughly washed out.
Mr. Mackif. thought that the compound which showed itself
as yellow stain was not removed by acid, but changed in
colour, and that on the removal of all the acid the original
yellow colour showed itself again.
The use of eikonogen as a developer was referred to, and
some of the members spoke well of Mr. Warnerke’s formula, in
which it is used very strong ; but Mr. Cowan thought that there
was no advantage in using more than five or six grains of tliis
substance to the ounce.
The Chairman had found great difficulty in getting
density with eikonogen. He thought it very useful in practice
to begin development with eikonogen, and when the details
were well out, to add a solution of hydroquinone to the de-
veloper. A very superior quality of image was thus obtained,
and density came easily.
Mr. Mackie complained of the tendency of hydroquinone
to start development at one place, and to get density there
before the rest of the plate was developed.
Mr. Chapman Jones never liked hydroquinone. He always
got more stains with it than with any other developer.
Mr. Cowan said the large quantities of Rochelle salts
and sulphite of soda used with lithium in the American
formula answered equally well w ith eikonogen and hydro-
quinone, as it did with pyro.
The Camera Club.
January 23rd, Bedford Street, Strand, London ; the Rev. A.
B. Whatton, M.A., in the chair.
The Rev. T. Perkins, M.A., read a paper on “English
Church Architecture as a Subject for Photography,” in the
course of which he said that the man who is born an artist will
produce artistic photographs, but no man who is not bora an
artist can be made one by means of rules. Even photo-
graphers who are not artists may make themselves use-
ful by taking pictures of Church architecture, which pictures,
after the lapse of time, may prove to be very valuable,
for almost everywhere the “restorer” is at work
destroying beautiful old buildings. He wished that
they would erect new buildings instead, but spoiling old ones is
cheaper, so memorials of them should be taken and preserved,
ere it is too late. Whenever amateur photographers hear that
a church in their neighbourhood is about to be restored, they
should at once set to work to photograph the old one inside and
out, and they should combine with this duty some study of
architecture. Before 1018 most of the churches in this country
January 31, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
95
seem to have been built of wood ; at present only about a hun-
dred of our churches built before the Conquest are to be
found, and they represent Saxon work, after which came
the Norman period. In photographing churches sur-
rounded by other buildings, a suitable point of view is
frequently obtainable from the south-east, and with
a lens of moderately long focus, so as not to destroy the
perspective, it is then sometimes possible to get in the tower ;
people generally do not like to be buried on the north side of
a church, hence the graveyard has a tendency to extend to the
south-east. He deprecated the use of wide-angle lenses,
unless the photographer were absolutely forced to use them ;
even interiors were better if taken with narrow angle lenses
at the cost of reducing the amount of subject included. He
then projected upon the screen lantern pictures of a great
number of British churches,, including one of a church erected
about the year 800 at Bradford-on -A von, and now preserved as
a national monument ; he also gave an interesting and architec-
tural description of each church represented.
The Chairman thought that if photographers gave attention
to church architecture as recommended, they would not alone
be doing good historical service, but their work might promote
the art or science of architecture itself. Their work might
also result in many churches being kept open on week days,
instead of closed while the photographer went in search of a
lazy verger. He had been told of one verger who was
asked, “ Do not people come sometimes out of service hours
to this hallowed sanctuary, for peaceful meditation and silent
prayer?” “Yes,” replied the official, “ I ketches ’em at it
sometimes behind a pillar, and tells ’em service hours is eleven
in the morning, and half past three in the afternoon.” Vergers
like that should be improved off the face of the earth.
Mr. Gale remarked that very few churches were built from
the time of Henry VIII. to about the time of Wren, and he
si>oke of some points of resemblance between the towers of
Somerset churches, as shown by Mr. Perkins’s pictures, and
others he had studied in Brittany.
Mr. J. S. \\ hatton believed that there was a wooden church
somewhere in the eastern suburban district of London, the
name and situation of which he should much like to discover.
Mr. Avent remarked that there was one at Oreenstead, near
Ongar.
Mr. Davison urged that all photographers of a practical
bent should devote themselves to some connected work with
a definite aim — as Mr. Perkins had done — but he maintained
that such work, admirable in itself, led in quite a different
direction from that in which the art student would find his
development and prosecute his study. In regard to the City
churches which had been mentioned, he drew attention to the
good work done by Mr S. H. R. Salmon, of East Putney. In
treating of the practical points raised, he stated that a lens of
focal length equal to the longest side of the plate used, would
not give a natural angle ; the perspective would be unnaturally
violent.
On Thursday, February 6th, the lantern will be employed
to exhibit some Dutch views by Messrs. Elder, \V. A. Greene,
and others ; some general subjects will also be shown.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 23rd inst., Mr. A. Haddon occupied the
chair.
Mr F. P. Cembrano passed round a brass binder for lantern
slides for use in place of paper strips. He also showed eight
negatives, four of which had received a time camera exposure ;
the others had been exposed in a hand camera with a quick
shutter. Pyro and eikonogen with various alkalies were
severally used for development, and similar set of developers was
used for each set of exposures. A comparison of the results
exhibited showed that for a time-exposure pyro, sulphite, and
ammonia proved the best developer, but with the instantaneous
exposures eikonogen, sulphite, and carbonate of soda gave the
best negative.
Mr. W. H. Prestwich had tried eikonogen in comparison
with pyro, using the same alkalies in each case ; he found no
appreciable difference with either developer.
The Chairman remarked that eikonogen gave greater trans-
parency in the shadows of a negative than the pyro developer.
Mr. Cembrano said that plates developed with eikonogen had
a greater tendency to frill than when developed with pyro.
Mr \Y. E. Debenham read a paper on “Selecting Focal
Distance with Detective Cameras ” (see page 87).
Mr. F. P. Cembrano said that it was not easy to determine
whether a long or short focus lens was best for a hand
camera. If only one class of work were required, then a lens
could be chosen best suited for that work. Both long and
short focus lenses had their advantages and disadvantages.
He had been using a 6j-inch lens, but he believed a lens of
about 5|-iuch focus would be more generally useful. He con-
sidered that a short focus lens rendered distances more truly,
and for general work was most useful ; on the other hand, if
pictures of animals were wanted, then a long focus lens was
to be preferred.
Mr. \V. Cole thought that some means might be devised
whereby the lenses of a hand camera could be changed quickly,
either by a rotating front or a microscopic nose-piece.
Mr. P. Everitt said that he held that the rule of using a
lens the focus of which was double the length of the plate,
applied equally to hand cameras ; this would give for a lantern
picture about 5-| inches focus.
Mr. \Y. E. Debenham said that when used in connexion with
a fine film, the advantage lay on the side of a short focus lens ;
better definition also was obtained with this lens. If the
register were fixed for the principal object in the centre of the
field, the curvature of the lens might prove an advantage from
the shorter distance of objects on either side.
Mr. J. J. Bhiginshaw remarked that it was unusual for the
principal object of the picture to be placed in the centre.
Mr. P. Everett said that with a very round field, would
the lecturer fix the register for the centre, or midway between
the centre and side ?
Mr. Debenham would fix the register to agree with the
principal subject of interest in the picture.
North Middlesex Photographic Club.
The following have been elected as officers for the ensuing year :
— President — Mr. J. Humphries, F.S.A. ; Vice-Presidents —
Messrs. H. Beckett, W. T. Goodhew ; Curator — Mr. F. Da vail ;
Council — Messrs. C. Beadle, F. Cherry, T. C. Latlibridge, W. A.
Lavanchy, F. L. Pither, J. Saville, J. Steuart, H. Walker,
E. T. Hiscock ; Treasurer — Mr. E. Seymour Paul ; Hon. Sec. —
Mr. Geo. R. Martin, Harringay Park Granary, Green Lanes,
Finsbury Park.
On Monday, January 27th, Mr. L. Medlandgavea lecture en-
titled “ In Northern Latitudes with a Camera,” illustrated by
lantern slides shown through the optical lantern ; the slides were
made on collodio-bromide by himself, from negatives taken dur-
ing his tour.
The following have been elected honorary members : — Messrs.
S. Herbert Fry, Chas. W. Hastings, and E. F. C. Damant.
On Monday, February 10th, Mr. Humphries will open a dis-
cussion on “ Dark-room Illumination,” and illustrate by several
practical tests. Any photographer having lamps which they con-
sider especially safe while giving a maximum of light, are invited
to bring the same for the purpose of experiment.
West London Photographic Society.
A meeting was held at the Addison Hall on 24th January,
Mr. Charles Bilton in the chair, when Messrs. Frogbrook and
Eydman were nominated for election ; after winch the adjourned
discussion upon hand cameras was proceeded with.
Mr. Stein, in summing up his previous remarks, said a per-
fect detective camera must be unobtrusive in appearance, have
some mechanical means of changing plates, and at the same
time be as simple as possible ; the shutter must also be a good
one, and work without jar or shake. In regard to the lens,
he preferred one of short focus. With a 6-inch lens everything
beyond thirty feet was in focus, but it was often necessary to
get nearer to the object, and with a 3-inch lens everything
beyond eight feet was practically sharp. He used in his de-
96
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[January 31, 1890.
tective a 3|-inch wide angle lens, by Wray, and found it
worked well.
Mr. Lesley Selby, explaining the artist’s hand camera, said
that it could scarcely be called a detective, because it was not
what Mr. Stein had called unobtrusive. However, all he
wished to do with it was to get views, and for that work it
answered admirably, as it could be very easily and quickly
manipulated ; moreover, it was light though strong, and would
stand rough usage ; he had taken it up Scawfell Pike without
experiencing any fatigue.
The President announced that Mr. Wyndham ltickford and
Mr. Garner Richardson had presented the Society with a lantern
and screen, with accessories for using the limelight.
Hackney Photographic Society.
A meeting was held on the 23rd inst., when the chair was
occupied by Mr. Grant.
Mr. Hart gave a flash-light demonstration, and prefaced his
demonstration by an interesting lecture on “ Magnesium and
its I'se in Flash-Light Photography.” Two groups were
taken, with a dozen mem tiers in each ; six lamps were
used connected pneumatically. After the demonstration the
lamp was described.
Mr. Ha dole then showed neatly constructed detective
camera of his own making. The weight was claimed to be
less, and the camera more hidden, than the general run of
“detectives,” but the great novelty was a self-setting time and
instantaneous shutter, which he had patented.
The Secretary announced that on the 27th February there
would be an exhibition of apparatus.
Messrs. Barton and Reed were elected members.
Birmingham Photographic Society.
A meeting was held at the club rooms, Grand Hotel, Jan. 23.
The Chairman, Mr. E. H. Jaques, announced that the presi-
dent, Mr. J. B. Stone, J.P., had offered a prize for the best
set of six views taken within a radius of ten miles round Bir-
mingham.
Mr. Godfp.ee exhibited a very handy bichromate battery fo
producing an electric light suitable for the developing room.
Dr. W. W. J. Nicol then gave his paper on “Iron
Printing,” which was illustrated with chemical experiments.
Mention was made of the different forms of iron printing, the
“dusting-on” and blue processes, sepiatype, platinotype, and
particularly his new process, the “Kalotype.” In this the
paper is coated with —
Ferric oxalate ... ... ... ... 5 percent.
Ferric tartrate ... ... ... ... 5 ,,
and in exposure the ferric salt is reduced to the ferrous salt,
and is then developed with —
Potassic oxalate ... ... ... 10 percent.
Nitrate of silver ... ... 1^ to 2 ,,
Ammonia ... ... ... ... sufficient to clear.
The print is developed by floating the same as platinotype. K
is then washed in three baths of —
Ammonia ... ... ... ... 1 ounce
Citrate of soda ... ... ... ... £ ,,
Water ... ... ... ... ... ] gallon
The advantage claimed for this process is fixing without hypo,
thus securing greater permanence.
The Birmingham Geological Society. -Mr. W. J. Harri-
son, F.G.S., the Science Demonstrator of the Birmingham
School Board, has just received intimation from the Secretary
of the Geological Society that the Council have awarded him
the proceeds of the “ Barlow- Jameson Fund,” in recognition of
his “valuable contributions to geological science,” and he is
invited to attend the anniversary meeting of the Society on
21st 1* ebruary next to receive the award. The former recipients
of the “Barlow- Jameson Fund” were, in 1882, Dr. James
Croll ; 1884, Baron von Ettingshausen ; 1886, Professor Leo
Lesquereux ; and in 1888, Dr. Johnston-Lavis. The income
of the fund is “to be applied every two or three years, as may
be approved by the Council, to or for the advancement of geo-
logical science.” — Birmingham Daily Post.
to ^ovrcgpontieMg.
All questims requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C 8, 2, St. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
Photargus. — We sympathise with you in your desire to find
fairly good water in your island home. For the better pur-
poses, such as the removal of the silver nitrate and last
washing of your finished prints, it would seem necessary to use
distilled water, the preparation of which is tedious rather
than difficult, and there are now several kinds of tin stills to
choose from. Instead of using permanganate of potash, which
will only remove organic matter, and none of the saline im-
purities, we should advise you to rely upon a prolonged
washing in frequent changes of well water, and then finally
remove these soluble salts from the paper by distilled water.
The use of permanganate as a test for hypo yet remaining in
alliumenized prints does not work satisfactorily, because of its
ultimate reduction by the albumen. How do you manage to
get drinking water on the island ; and have you any trouble
in finishing off your gelatine negatives 1
C. E. E. — The Key camera was exhibited last summer at the
St. James’s Hall meeting of the Photographic Convention.
For a description of it see the News of August 30th last,
“ Convention Notes,” p. 573.
A. and G. T. — The cards are of exceptionally good quality,
and there is no bronze powder in the printing ink. Those
not used (three) are returned to you by post.
Old Hand. — Dextro-maltose is very soluble in water, and may
answer your purpose. Enquire of the Manbrfc Saccharine
Company, Hammersmith, W.
W. T. 1). — Would like to communicate with Mr. Frederick
Winterlioff, who took out a patent last year for a “ Process
of etching and engraving on glass.” The address given in the
specification is reported to be merely London, Middlesex.
Can any of our correspondents oblige us by furnishing the
desired information as to present address ?
Photographer. — Slow toning of ready-sensitized paper. See
reply to J. A. R. last week, and try the effect of a last wash-
ing with very dilute ammonia before toning. Having tried
without success the carbonate and borax toning baths, it
might be well to experiment with the tungstate or with the
very active chloride of lime toning bath, as prescribed at page
202 of the Year-Book. Two grains of gold per sheet ought
to lie amply sufficient.
Flux. — Reduction of silver residues. The chloride and sul-
phide precipitates had 1 letter be tieated separately. For the
first, dry well and mix with an equal weight of carbonate of
soda, and project this mixture, by small portions at a time,
into a clay crucible containing fused carbonates of potash and
soda. As oxygen and carbonic acid are given off, be on your
guard against loss by frothing. When all is introduced,
allow time for tranquil fusion, let cool, and break the
crucible to extract the lump or button of pure silver. Gold
residues are treated in the same way, but the metal usually
contains a little silver, and sometimes enough to whiten the
alloy. Paper ashes are also treated like the chloride, but in
a more capacious crucible, to provide for lively effervescence.
The sulphide of silver residues had better be roasted to get
rid of much sulphur, then fused with dry carbonate of soda,
and occasional addition of nitre to burn off the rest of the
sulphur. Proceed cautiously for fear of the action becoming
too violent. Some operators add, finally, a little dry borax,
which helps to refine the metal.
T. M. K. (Jersey).— Studio construction. Your sketch gives
only the end view of proposed iron building, without details
of sides and roof. The window 12 by 6 feet ought to be
placed horizontally instead of vertically, for it would be of no
use carried down so low to the ground. Why not avail
yourself of the full width of the gable wall, and so get more
light ? You have not indicated the aspect, or given sufficient
data to enable us to advise you on several points ; in fact, the
sketch is altogether too rough to properly represent your
ideas.
F. Gow. — Shall we return your money, or send out collotype
prints to the value ?
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
I a '
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1610. — February 7, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOF
Lights from Explosions or Detonations 97
The Royal Institution 98
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 99
The Retoucher’s Point. By Jennie R. Skidmore 100
On Control in the Density of Negatives. By Chapman Jones,
F.I.C., P.C.S 100
The New Rollable Celluloid Film. By W. H. Walker 103
Ernst 3chering 104
International Copyright. By William Benhnm 103
Self-Luminous Transparencies 105
P AO R
Notes 190
Some Experiments with Eikonogen. By C. Brangwin Barnes 107
A Photographic Fiend 108
Dangers of Flash-light Compounds. By John G. Bullock, and
Charles L. Mitchell, M.D 109
A Camera with the Lushia Field Force. By Tom de la Touche 111
Correspondence Ill
Patent Intelligence 112
Proceedings of Societies 113
Answers to Correspondents 116
LIGHTS FROM EXPLOSIONS OR
DETONATIONS.
A great point in taking photographs by bright flashes
of light of short duration is, that those flashes shall be
short enough to obtain the portrait before the sitter
has time to move or to blink his eyes ; what he does
after the illumination is over is of no moment.
In a large proportion of the flash-light photographs
from various sources which have been publicly
exhibited, the curious appearance of the eyes of
the sitters is usually noteworthy, more especially
in groups. Excellent flash-light photographs taken
in their own homes of single sitters are
easily obtainable by giving the subject a book to read,
so that the eyelids are naturally somewhat drawn
down. In a group of half-a-dozen sitters this plan
does not answer, for rarely in real life are so many
persons seen all desperately studious at once, and the
smirk and other expressions on the countenances of
some of them reveal obviously that they are not
reading, but being photographed, so the whole picture
is grotesque. Single sitters can be trained to steadiness
of the eyes under the flash light, but the professional
photographer does not desire to use up plates or to
give the time necessary for the educating process.
Explosive mixtures containing magnesium were
largely experimented with some two or three years
ago, to overcome this difficulty, and good compounds
effected their object in this respect. They now seem
to have been generally abandoned, in this country at
least, because of their danger, and some frightful
accidents have occurred in consequence of their com-
mercial introduction in other lands than ours. Chlorate
of potash is usually the oxygen-imparting substance
in such powders, and our Government, fortunately, will
not give permission for the sale of any explosive con-
taining chlorate of potash. The would-be introducers
of such a new explosive once complained at a meeting
of the Society of Chemical Industry of this action of
the Government, whose officials had said that the mix-
ture would explode under the glancing blow of a broom-
stick on a floor. The complainant then industriously
hammered away with a wooden mallet at some of it
placed on a wooden anvil, and no explosion resulted.
Dr. Debus, who was present, quietly remarked that the
operator had been careful to strike along and not across
the grain of the wood of the anvil. He added that
explosives were like horses ; they knew when they had
a good rider, and might be safe enough in the hands of
their scientific advocates. The Government, however,
had the duty of considering the safety of the lives of the
poor and ignorant who might have to use them.
Our idea is, that the trial of such explosives in pho-
tography has been prematurely abandoned, because the
materials ordinarily used in them are safe enough when
kept in powder in separate bottles, and when a few
grains of explosive mixture are wanted, that small
quantity alone may be prepared immediately before
using, and gently mixed with the feather end of a quill
pen. An objection to the light produced by the explo-
sion is that it is small and star-like, therefore throws
harsh shadows. Another objection is that the smoke
is thrown out at the moment tolerably equally in all
directions, so obscures some of the light. Magnesium,
however, is now so cheap, that the latter objection is of
small importance, even if it be not overcome.
To diffuse the light, suitable translucent screens
and suitable reflectors have been used, but with these
the percentage of light lost is heavy. The better way
of overcoming the difficulty seems to be to fire off
several of the little charges at once by means of elec-
tricity, so that the light shall come from several
different points. The late Mr. Donkin suggested the
use of a galvanic battery, to send a current through
minute lengths of platinum wire wherever the powder
was placed, so that the powder charges should be
ignited by the lengths becoming red hot. A simpler
and much cheaper method seems to us to be, igniting
them by means of a Wimshursts electrical machine,
arranged to give sparks at will bet ween disconnected
pai-ts of an otherwise complete metallic circuit. Some
explosive powders such sparks will scatter and not
ignite, but placing a piece of wet string in the circuit
usually overcomes this difficulty,
08
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Fkbruarv 7, 1890.
THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
Y.
Da. Thomas Young's Discoveries and Photographs.
The researches and discoveries of Dr. Thomas Young
next claim attention. He was one of the early photo-
graphers, and held an appointment at the Royal Insti-
tution when, in 1802, Wedgwood made known his
discoveries there, and Davy took the first micro-photo-
graphs. Young was born at Milverton, in Somerset-
shire, on the 13th of June, 1773, and his parents were
members of the Society of Friends. In March, 1872,
he was sent to a private school at Compton, in Dorset-
shire, and at the age of fourteen was appointed tutor
at Youngsbury, near Ware, to Hudson Gurney, grand-
son of Mr. Barclay. His medical studies began in
1792; he made rapid progress, and after a time he
proved why the eye can see distinctly at different
distances — namely, “ by the alteration of the curvature
of the crystalline lens,” and his memoir on this subject
appeared in the “Philosophical Transactions” of the
Royal Society, of which Society he was next year elected
a member. Subsequently he continued his medical
studies at Edinburgh, and afterwards spent some time in
the Highlands, visiting members of the Scottish aristo-
cracy. In 1879 he went to the University of Gottingen
to pursue his medical studies, and subsequently received
there his degree as doctor of physic, surgery, and mid-
wifery. At Brunswick he was presented at Court,
clothed in other than Quaker costume, and he travelled
a little in Germany. On his return to England he became
a fellow-commoner of Emanuel College, Cambridge, and
when he was about thirty years of age began the prac-
tice of medicine.
Huyghens first broached the wave theory of light,
but the great authority of Newton, who had adopted
the emission theory, and considered that light consisted
of small particles thrown out with immense velocity
by the luminous body, bore down all opponents, so that
the emission theory was then most believed in by scien-
tific men. Young favoured the undulatory theory,
and on the 16th of January, 1800, sent into the Royal
Society a paper entitled, “ Outlines and Experiments
respecting Sound and Light.” In it he points out
some difficulties in the emission theory. The first is
the uniform velocity with which light is supposed to
be projected from all luminous bodies. How is it, he
asks, that whether the projecting force be electricity,
the friction of two pebbles, the lowest degree of visible
ignition, the white heat of a blast furnace, or the in-
tense heat of the sun itself, these wonderful corpuscles
are always projected through the same medium with
uniform velocity ? Another objection which he urged
was the partial reflection from every refracting surface.
One of hi ewton’s objections to the wave theory was, that
waves, say of water, will go round any opposing
obstacle, such as a rock, and be found behind it as well
as before. Young’s argument was that, “ in a medium
so highly elastic as the luminous ether must be sup-
posed to be, the tendency to diverge may be considered
infinitely small,” an explanation now known to be the
true one. Lord Brougham also opposed Young’s
arguments, and abused him unmercifully.
Wedgwood’s photographic discoveries were made
known at the Royal Institution in 1802, so it may be
well here to restate a fact or two, and to show what
men of science were engaged on the premises at the
time, and we state the position in the words of Pro-
fessor Tyndall, who says : “ The Royal Institution was
founded by Count Rumford, supported by many of the
foremost men in England. The King was its patron,
the Earl of Winchilsea its first president, while Lord
Morton, Lord Egremont, and Sir Joseph Banks were
its vice-presidents. On the 13th of January, 1800,
the Royal Seal was attached to the charter of the
Royal Institution. Dr. Thomas Garnet was appointed
Professor of Natural Philosophy andChemistry. During
his previous residence in Bavaria, Rumford had ruled
with beneficent but despotic sway, and the habit of
mind thus engendered may have made itself felt in his
behaviour to Dr. Garnet. At all events, they did not
get on well together. On the 16th Febuary, 1801,
Davy was appointed Assistant Lecturer in Chemistry,
Director of the Chemical Laboratory, and Assistant
Editor of the Journals of the Institution. The post of
Professor of Natural Philosophy was offered to Young,
and he accepted it. The salary was to be £300 a year.
On the 3rd of August, 1801, tliG following resolution
was passed : — ‘ Resolved that the Managers approve of
the measures taken by Count Rumford, and that the
appointment of Dr. Young be confirmed.’ ”
One of the best proofs ever given of the wave theory
of light was advanced by Young. Suppose two stones
to be dropped at some distance apart into a pond,
each stone will send out rings of waves, and the two
series of water-waves will meet. If the elevations of
one series of waves then tend to coincide in position
with the elevations of the other series of waves, in-
creased wave motion will be the result of their meeting ;
but if the depressions of the one series of waves tend
to coincide with the elevations of the other series, as in
the accompanying cut, the two actions will neutralize
each other, and still water is the result. So, argued
Young, should it be with light ; it ought to be pos-
sible, by mixing two lights of the same wave-length,
to produce stillness or darkness. This can be done
experimentally. If two beams of monochromatic light —
say the pure red of the spectrum — are made to fall
upon each other at a narrow angle, instead of pro-
ducing an area of unbroken red light upon the screen,
the arrangement, when properly made, gives alternate
bands of red light and darkness upon the screen, the
darkness being due to two series of waves of light
neutralizing each other. Young called this 11 the
general law of the interference of light.”
(To be continued).
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
February 7, 1890.]
99
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Stellar-Photography — Litho - Photogravure — Gelatine
Plates for Photo-Mechanical Purposes.
Stellar -Photography. — One of the most talented and ardent
amateur astronomers in this country, Mr. Eugen von
Gothard, of Hereny, Hungary, has of late produced a
number of highly interesting photographs of nebulae.
These beautiful pictures show that it is possible, with
comparatively very limited instrumental resources, by the
aid of photography, to obtain results which by far sur-
pass what has been gained even with the largest instru-
ments by means of ocular observations. E. von Gothard
possesses a ten-inch reflecting telescope of a comparatively
short focus (about six feet). Reflecting telescopes are,
however, in the case of stellar photography, in many
instances superior to the refractors, since, with the
former, light-waves of every wave-length are united in
one point ; whilst with refractors each sort of ray pos-
sesses a different focus. With reflecting telescopes it is,
therefore, also possible advantageously to make use of
orthochromatic plates. The renowned astronomer, Pro-
fessor II. C. Vogel, of Potsdam, has of late published
enlarged lithographic reproductions of some of the photo-
graphs of M. Gothard, rendering most exactly the photo-
graphic originals, showing, however, at the same time,
much more detail than the drawings produced after
direct ocular observations. Vogel speaks very highly of
these photographs. Especially beautiful is one photo-
graph of the well-known spiral nebula in the “Hunters,”
which has been taken with an exposure of two hours and
thirty-five minutes. It is remarkable that this picture
admits a strict discernment between light-knots — i.e.,
stellar-like condensations in the nebulosity — and stars,
the silver deposit on the negative, if examined at high
powers, being a materially different one in the case of a
star, than in the case of a light-knot. With regard to the
very remarkable success with which this photograph of the
nebula has been achieved, Prof. Vogel recommends a
very special study of it by means of exposures of different
lengths of time. Not only that with shorter exposures,
by which only the brightest parts of the nebula will be
apparent, and exact measuring of their position will be
possible, but also a photographic determination of the
relative intensities of the different parts of the nebula will
be given by a number of differently long-exposed plates.
It will be remembered that in stellar photography the
inferior rapidity of the instrument is compensated for by
a longer time of exposure, which enables the rendering of
objects which are too feeble to affect the eye.
Litho-Photogravure. — Herr Ottomar Volckmer, chairman
of the Photographic Society of Vienna, gives in the Cor-
respondenz an interesting description of a peculiar, very
perfect photo-mechanical process, which has been in-
vented by his friend Carl Eckstein, of the staff at
the Hague. At first, a lithographic stone of the finest
quality is polished with oxalic acid and water, and then
covered by means of a roller very eveidy with a very
diluted asphaltum solution, which is prepared by boding
five parts of asphaltum, six parts of white wax, six parts
of stearine, adding to it two parts of soda solution, dis-
solving the whole, after cooling, in turpentine oil, filter-
ing, and keeping in well-stoppered bottles. Into the thin,
light-brownish film are now, by means of a diamond with
the ruling machine, scratched very fine lines, from eight
to ten to one millimetre (l-2Gth of an inch), until the stone
is all over evenly covered with them. The latter is then pro-
vided with a wax border one-fifth of an inch high, and
well levelled within a trough. An etching liquid is now
poured over the stone, consisting of one-sixth part of
chemically pure nitric acid, six parts of alcohol of 363,
and 350 parts of distilled water. After half-a-minute the
stone is quickly washed, dried, oiled, the asphaltum
washed off with turpentine, and then inked up ; it is then
ready for being printed from, and forms the so-called
mother-stone. Now, one or a number of transfers are
made from it on a well-polished, and afterwards with
oxalic acid repolished stone, by slightly moistening the
back of the print on the transfer paper, squeegeeing it onto
the stone, and, when almost dry, by treating it with warm
water, until the paper comes off. After well washing with
warm water, other transfers can be applied to the same
stone, so that the lines cross themselves with the former
ones from one to four times. The latter is especially to
be recommended for litho-photogravure work. The
stone is then dusted with finest resin powder, the sur-
plus removed by means of a camel’s hair brush, and the
resin melted on to the transfer by ether vapours. A
carbon transparency on glass is now produced from a
good, clear negative, ordinary pigment paper exposed
behind it, slightly moistened, squeegeed on to the ruled
stone, and developed with water of 104° to 113° F., until
the paper, and afterwards the excessive colour, by con-
stantly rocking the stone in warm water, begins to loosen.
The picture is now a negative copy. The stone should
then be dried spontaneously with care, which requires from
five to six hours. The etching is done with ferric
chloride of 40-37® F., 33° and 30° Beaum6, respec-
tively, beginning with 40° and finishing- with 30®. This
requires skill and practice. The strong solution etches at
first through the thinnest parts of the relief, after some
time also through the thick ones. The etching fluid of
30® dissolves at last in its wfater the wdiole of the pigment
film still remaining. As soon as the required depth of
etching is attained, the stone is removed to a trough and
thoroughly washed in running w-ater, then the asphalt is
washed off with turpentine, washed again in several
changes of wrater, and dried. The image is now deeply
etched in the stone. Finally, it is oiled, inked up, and
treated otherwise as any other engraved stone. Should it
be desired to print from the stone in more than one
colour, it is at first inked with a local tone — grey,
violet, or brown — according to the required character of
the picture, and then by marking out the other parts.
The single colours are imposed upon the ground tone. A
very slight touch will deposit a sufficient amount of
colour. As soon as the different colours have been
applied, a print can be made at once. The colour effect
is excellent.
Gelatine Plates for Photo-Mechanical Purposes. — It is
generally known that negatives which are to be used for
photographic transfers from line subjects should show the
ines quite clear, and the rest of the film very dense and
opaque. Many operators suppose that gelatine dry plates
are not at all applicable for this purpose, and, therefore,
prefer the wet collodion process, which they find to be
the best for producing such negatives. Gelatine plates
are, however, by no means quite useless for this class of
work, for, w-ithout mentioning that there are a few manu-
facturers who produce a sort of slow gelatine plate which
gives satisfactory results, there is no doubt that also
100
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Fef.ru ary 7, 1890.
ordinary gelatine dry plates may successfully be employe'
for photo-mechanical work, provided they are correctly
treated. In the case of reproductions from drawings an<l
other line subjects, clearness, and especially vigour, is
obtained more easily and with more certainty, without
intensifying, than with collodion plates, if the following
method, as recommended by Herr F. Wilde, be employed :
— The plate is exposed twice as long as would be
required for ordinary photographs, and to the develop-
ing solution is added from the beginning the following
iodo-bromide restrainer, in the proportion of 20cc. to
25cc. to each 200cc. of developer.
Solution 1.
Iodine, sublimed ... 1 gramme
Alcohol ... ... ... ... 200 cc.
Solution 2.
Potassium bromide ... ... ... 14 grammes
Water ... ... ... 200 cc.
Solutions one and two are mixed, and the mixture is
added to the developer in the above given proportion.
By prolonged development negatives of such a vigour and
density may be obtained, as are very difficult and
not always with equal certainty obtainable on wet collo-
dion plates, even with subsequent intensification. If these
directions are carefully observed, the gelatine dry plates
are decidedly preferable to the wet collodion plates for
this special purpose.
THE RETOUCHER’S POINT.
BY JENNIE R. SKIDMORE.
I watched her pencil glide about,
I also watched the hand that hid it,
I paused a moment, half in doubt,
Then boldly asked her how she did it.
She laughed, and gave a gay retort,
As still her fingers kept their pace,
Yet while she crushed my heart in sport,
She deftly rounded out my face.
And cleared my brow of every care,
And put such fire within my eyes !
And squared my chin and smoothed my hair —
I gazed upon her in surprise.
And when ’twas done, I said to her,
“An easy thing ’twould be to live
If shown by some philosopher
That Life is like a Negative.”
Then, smiling, cried the pretty maid :
“ I’ll prove it to you very pat ;
There’s naught in life but ‘ light ’ and ‘ shade,’
Though sometimes we pronounce it ‘ flat.’ ”
“And then again we find it ‘ sharp,’
Or * blank ’ or ‘ clouded ’ — men have rhymed
Of youths the gods take to their heart,
And then you see its ' under- timed.’ ”
“ And then — ” “ I yield the palm to you ;
Your doctrine’s sound at every joint. ”
She tossed her head— “ That’s nothing new ;
Retouchers often make a point.”
American Times.
Photographing a Duel. — A correspondent of the T
I ork Herald, in an account of the recent duel between
Marquis de Mores and M. Camille Dreyfus, says-— “I stoo<
few dozen yards away watching every detail, and from tim<
time taking instantaneous photographs with the aid of a detect
camera stowed beneath my waistcoat. These photographs i
be reproduced in the Herald within a few days.”
ON CONTROL IN THE DENSITY OF NEGATIVES*
BY CHAPMAN JONES, F.I.C., F.C.S.
It is universally allowed that the practical density of the deposit
obtained in a gelatino-bromide negative is difficult to estimate
during development, probably on account of the variable print-
ing value of negatives that have the same apparent densities,
and certainly because of the opacity of the film. This last
difficulty is increased when the sensitive salt is in suitable
quantity to prevent light passing through the film, so as to
make the best possible gradation, and avoid the evils of hala-
tion.
The photographer who aims at something higher than to
simply take what comes on his plate and make the best of it in
printing, has a choice of three principles of action in controlling
the densities of his negatives. He may get as close as he can
to the desirable condition by development, and trust to pro-
cesses of reduction if his plate is too dense, and to intensification
if it is not dense enough ; or he may get density at all risks,
and endeavour if necessary to reduce his negatives to what he
wants ; or, lastly, he may take care that the density got by
development shall never be too great, so that the error may be
corrected by intensification alone. Each method has its advo-
cates, and is doubtless occasionally useful ; but the amount of
control obtained by the usual processes is so small, and the un-
certainty of the various operations so great, that many expert
workers prefer to either print from or else altogether reject their
negatives as produced by simple development. It is the aim of
the author to do away with this'uncertainty, and to show how
— what is for all practical purposes — a perfect control may be
realised in the densities of negatives.
It has been shown by Captain Abney that in all probability
the amount of silver deposited in a film by development, after
exposures within the ordinary limits, is proportional to the
actinic power of the light acting upon the sensitive salt, though
the opacity is not strictly proportional. It will lie convenient
to speak of the gradation in such a negative as “ normal.” In
methods for altering the densities of negatives it is important
that the gradation shall remain normal, being either increased
or diminished throughout the scale in a proportional manner.
An alteration of the gradation may sometimes be good, but it
will lie allowed by all that a standard process working with
exactness is desirable, if only as a point from which departures
may be made.
In seeking for methods by which the control of density may
be obtained without destroying the normal character of the
gradation, it is necessary to remember the very appreciable
thickness of the sensitive film, and that in almost every case the
reagent employed begins to act at its outer surface. Thisdemon- g
strates at once that to get with certainty a normal alteration of
density, the changes produced must be such as may be allowed to
work thoroughly and through the film. A thorough reduction
by any of the usual processes would lead to a complete removal
of the image, and methods of reduction are, therefore, useless for
the normal control of density. It may, perhaps, be possible,
by employing a very dilute reducing solution, to get the re-
agent to work so slowly that it penetrates the film before it
appreciably acts, and so by beginning to produce its effect on
the whole image at the same time, to work normally ; but there
can lie no guarantee that the action is not irregular. It may,
perhaps, in a somewhat similar manner, lie possible to get a nor-
mal intensification by the use of a reagent that first intensifies
and then reduces, but in practical work it is not possible to be
sure that the reducing effect has not begun at the surface before
the intensification has reached its maximum in the high lights
that extend deep into the film. Such irregular processes may
have their uses, in which their characteristic irregularities are
taken advantage of, but as standard methods of work in which
certainty is important, they can only be regarded as treacherous
and unsuitable.
It remains, therefore, in getting control of density with cer-
tainty, and without producing abnormal results, to take care
that the negative as developed is not too dense, and to seek for
methods of intensification that shall give increase of density in
’ Read before the Photographic Society of Great Britain,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
id
February 7, 1890.]
easy stages, and arc free from the faults above-named. Taking
into consideration also such matters as permanency of result,
it appears that, by the use of mercuric chloride, sodium sul-
phite, and ferrous oxalate, in the manner hereafter described,
the control sought for may be realized.
It will be convenient to consider the subject under the follow-
ing divisions : — Historical references ; chemistry of the changes ;
action of mercuric chloride ; action of sodium sulphite ; action
of ferrous oxalate ; practical methods.
Historical References. — In a letter addressed to the editor of
the Photographic News, in 1878, Mr. J. W. Swan stated that
“ ferrous oxalate advantageously replaces the nitrate of silver,
Scldippe’s salts, or other of the chemicals now commonly used
for blackening the image after treatment with bromide of
copper.” In 1881, Messrs. C. I. Burton and A. P. Laurie des-
cribed before the Edinburgh Photographic Society (Photo-
graphic News, XXV., 269) some experiments with intensifies.
After bleaching with mercuric chloride, they sought to blacken
the negative by exposure to light, and failed. They therefore
used mercuric bromide in saturated solution instead of the
chloride, washed the plate, exposed it to sunshine for about a
minute at least — the longer the better — and then applied a
developer. They preferred ferrous oxalate as developer, but
stated that pyrogallie acid w'as also serviceable. They found
that the process might be repeated several times on the same
negative. Scolik’s method of intensification by treatment with
mercuric chloride or bromide followed by sodium sulphite, was
introduced in 1884 ( Photographische Correspondent, XXI., 265),
and Dr. Eder, in the Year-Book ok Photography for 1885
(page 100), states that “the white and insoluble mercurous
chloride which is deposited upon the plate is rapidly reduced to
the metallic state by the sulphite.” He says, in addition, that
mercury forms a stable image.
Chemistry of the Changes : 7'hc Action of Mercuric Chloride.
—As mercuric chloride is the first reagent employed, it ap-
peared to be important to discover the ehauge that it brings
about. It is generally stated that when mercuric chloride reacts
with the silver of the image, silver chloride and mercurous
chloride result.
Ag + HgCl2 = HgCl + AgCl.
As I have not been able to find any record of a specific proof
of the truth of this reaction, I treated a quantity of pure pre-
cipitated silver by grinding it with mercuric chloride and water,
and repeating the grinding at intervals during a few' days. The
product wras washed, and consisted chiefly of a pure, white pow-
tler, but mixed with a coarse, grey powder of probably unacted-
on silver. As much of the white product as was deemed advis-
able was separated by elutriation, dried at steam heat, and
found analytically to contain 37 '75 percent, of silver chloride,
the amount needed by the above equation being 3 7 ‘86 percent.
This result was confirmed by other methods, such as the quan-
tity of mercury salt taken up, and the weight of product
obtained from a given weight of silver ; therefore there is no
room for doubt that the commonly accepted reaction is correct
so far as the matter of proportion goes. The properties of the
product, however, both chemical and physical, point to the
conclusion that it is not a mixture of the two chlorides, but a
definite double chloride. This matter is still under investiga-
tion, but, acting in the light of evidence already to hand, I will,
for present purposes, regard the substance as a definite com-
pound, writing the equation that represents its production —
Ag + HgCl2 = HgAgClj,
and postpone any further consideration of the matter.
The Action of Sodium Sulphite. — The action of sodium sul-
phite upon mercurous silver chloride is commonly stated to
result in the solution of the silver chloride and the reduction of
the mercurous chloride to the metallic state. This I believe to
be entirely incorrect, though there appears to be sufficient
ground for having provisionally accepted the idea. In the
quotation given above from Dr. Eder, one would naturally infer
that this was the change, and test-books of chemistry very
commonly state that sodium sulphite reduces mercurous chloride
to the metal. It is also well known that silver chloride is dis-
solved by sodium sulphite. But the reaction before us is not
equal to the result of the action of sodium sulphite upon mer-
curous chloride and silver chloride separately ; the silver is not
dissolved, the mercury is not reduced, and the sodium sulphite
apparently does not play the part of a reducing agent.
Concerning the action of sodium sulphite on silver chloride
alone, there is little that calls for remark. The silver chloride
is dissolved, and there seems no reason to doubt the commonly
accepted statement that a double sulphite is produced, or per-
haps more than one.
The action of sodium sulphite upon mercurous chloride has
been studied conjointly by Dr. Divers and Mr. Schmidzu
( Journal of the Chemical Society, XLIX, 533). They found
that there wras at first a transient blackening due to the forma-
tion of what they call hypomercurosic sulphite, and formulate
thus : — Hg(S03)2Hg3. This formula halved and written
empirically becomes identical with mercurous sulphite, Hg2S03,
and there appears to be no conclusive reason why the produc-
tion of this compound should not be expressed by the simple
equation 2 HgCl + Na2So3 = Hg2S03 + 2NaCl . But excess of
sodium sulphite so readily attacks the mercury salt that it can-
not be prepared by taking any precautions from mercurous
chloride, the final products of the change being mercuric sodium
sulphite, which dissolves, and a residue of metallic mercury,
thus : —
Hg2S03 + Na2S03 = Hg + Hg( NaS03)2.
For practical ’purposes, therefore, the action of sodium sulphite
upon mercurous chloride may be stated to produce mercuric
sodium sulphite and metallic mercury, and the whole change
may be expressed thus : —
2 HgCl + 2 NajSO, = Hg(NaS03)2 + Hg + 2 NaCl.
It is important to notice that the sodium sulphite does not
play the part of a reducing agent at all, for it is not oxidized ;
and that half the mercury is dissolved, the other half remain-
ing as metal. I have confirmed the truth of this reaction so
far as identifying the mercuric sodium sulphite in the solution
by the properties it is stated to possess, and I have proved
analytically that half the mercury is dissolved, and that the
other half remains as metal. If, therefore, it were possible to
exchange the silver image of a negative for mercury, it would
not be possible to increase the amount of metal by
the action of mercuric chloride followed by sodium sulphite.
The contrary of this has been stated by some writers on photo-
graphic subjects.
The action of sodium sulphite upon mercurous silver chloride
does not appear to have been investigated. The current and
incorrect idea has been referred to above. My investigation of
the reaction is not yet so complete that I can give a proved
equation to represent it, but it is not likely that further work
will discover results of practical interest to the photographer.
When sodium sulphite reacts upon mercurous silver chloride,
the whole of the chlorine goes into the solution ; three-fourths
of the mercury and half the silver are also dissolved, and one-
fourth of the mercury and half the silver remain in the
metallic condition to form the image. The action may be
represented thus : —
4 HgAgCl., = 3 HgCl2 + 2 AgCl + AgjHg.
-c '
Dissolved by the sodium
sulphite.
The Ag2Hg remains to form the image, and the mercuric chlo-
ride and silver chloride are taken up and doubtless changed by
the sodium sulphite in a way that might easily be conjectured ;
but, as I have not yet proved by experiment the compounds
that are formed, it is better to leave it an open question for
the present. I have also proved that the silver and mercury
are actually present in the above proportion in a negative
intensified by mercuric chloride followed by sodium sulphite,
by an estimation of the metals present in the film. It will be
observed that this method of intensification results in an
exchange of half the silver of the image for mercury, four
atoms of silver (4 Ag) yielding after the action two atoms of
silver and one of mercury (Ag2Hg). This generally results in
a slight increase of density, but not always ; it appears to
depend upon the physical condition of the film and its image
102
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, 1890.
whether or not the exchange of half the silver for less than
its own weight of mercury (216 : 200) will give increased
density ; but personally, I have found that there is an intensi-
fication effect in the vast majority of cases.
There are statements conerning this method of intensification
that 1 have not been able to confirm. First, that by repeating
the operation any density can be obtained. This is probably
the assertion of a mere theoretician who argued from false
premises. I have repeated the process six times on a plate,
and the density is greatest where it has received only one treat-
ment. It has been pointed out above that so far as mercury
itself is concerned, the action of these re-agents does not
increase its quantity. Secondly, that a negative intensified by
this process may be reduced by immersion in a solution of
sodium hyposulphite. I have never found this to be the case,
even by prolonged treatment (one hour), nor can I see any
reason to expect reduction under these circumstances.
There is what at first appears to be an anomalous property of
the image resulting after the application of this intensifier,
namely, that it is invariably darkened to a slight extent by the
application of ferrous oxalate to it. As the solution of the
chloride of silver in sodium sulphite, as shown in the above
equation, is not very stable, it may be that a little silver chlo-
ride remains attached to the image, and that this is reduced to
the metallic state by the ferrous oxalate, but the fact remains
that, even by prolonged treatment with fresh sodium sulphite
solution, I have been unable to eliminate whatever it is that
leads to this effect.
It may be worth while recording here that if mercurous silver
chloride and sodium sulphite are allowed to remain in contact
for some days, the residue is chiefly silver instead of Ag2Hg.
This fact has probably no photographic significance.
The Action of Ferrous Oxalate. — In order to make quite sure
of the processes that I am about to recommend, I have proved
experimentally that a solution of ferrous oxalate reduces both
silver chloride and mercurous chloride to the metallic state ;
and that ferrous oxalate solution removes all the chlorine from
mercurous silver chloride and leaves the whole of both the
metals as such.
Practical Methods. — The method of getting control in density
that I wish mo3t urgently to recommend to those who aim at
getting good negatives with certainty is, to take care that in
development the density of deposit never exceeds what is
required, and then to work up the negative to the best condi-
tion by the action of mercuric chloride followed by ferrous
oxalate, repeating this process if necessary ; or, if the intensi-
fication that would be given by these re-agents is conjectured to
be too great, following, under certain conditions, the mercury
solution with sodium sulphite. The important matter is that
every effect shall be thorough, that every atom of silver in the
negative may be acted upon in the same way and to the same
extent.
I first recommended the use of mercuric chloride, followed
by ferrous oxalate, in 1888, in the Photographic News (Vol.
XXXII., p. 18), and in my “ Introduction to the Science and
Practice of Photography.” During the last two or three years
I have had considerable experience in the application of this
process, and could have shown many negatives treated by it,
but so far as appearance goes it is very doubtful whether
anyone could distinguish a negative so intensified from one
not changed after development. To illustrate the effect, I
have treated various parts of a thin landscape negative, which
includes sky, sea, distance, middle distance, and foreground, up
to four times. 1
The solutions that it is advisable to use are —
1. A saturated solution of mercuric chloride, to which has
been added two or three cubic centimetres of strong hydro-
chloric acid to each litre (or half a dram to each pint). No
ammonium chloride or other salt should be added. There is
no need to use mercuric bromide, as stated by Burton and
Laurie, nor is the subsequent exposure to light specified by
these gentlemen at all requisite. The operations may be
carried on by daylight or gaslight, and, indeed, I have not
found it necessary to pay any attention whatever to the light
that falls upon the plate. After the mercuric chloride the
washing must be thorough, generally about an hour or an hour
and a half, with constant changes of water.
2. The ferrous oxalate is conveniently prepared by adding
one part by volume of a saturated solution of ferrous sulphate
to about six parts by volume of a saturated solution of neutral
potassium oxalate. The potassium oxalate may be just acidi-
fied with oxalic acid, but acid tends to retard the action of the
oxalate. The solution may be used weaker than above, but
then it acts more slowly. The action of the ferrous oxalate is
retarded if all the mercuric chloride is not washed away from
the negative, though the addition of mercuric chloride to the
ferrous oxalate solution does not appear to have any appreciable
effect. If the action of the ferrous oxalate is made unduly
slow, the reduced silver and mercury will tend to whiteness, as
is also the case in a very slowly developed negative. The slaty
colour of the metals produced in extreme cases, especially at
the glass side of the film, may load an inexperienced operator to
consider the action of the ferrous oxalate unfinished, .although
the reduction is complete.
3. The solution of sodium sulphite may vary as to strength
within wide limits ; a five to ten per cent, solution is conveni-
ent. A little acid should be added to it, preferably sulphurous,
until the solution ceases to give a red colour to a dilute solution
of phenol-phthalein. Litmus paper is useless in this case. For
ordinary work it is sufficient to take advantage of the fact that
if a good sample of crystallized sodium sulphite is dissolved with
one-thousandth of its weight of citric acid, the alkali in it will
probably be neutralized. To be on the safe side, five times this
amount may be taken, say half a gram of citric acid to one
hundred grams of sodium sulphite, or two and a half grains of
acid to one ounce of sulphite. It is a mistake to say that a
negative should be only just rinsed after treatment with mer-
curic chloride when sodium sulphite is to be used. The wash-
ing need not be so thorough as in other cases, but the more
complete it is the more rapidly will the sulphite produce its
effect.
We have already seen that mercuric chloride, followed by
sodium sulphite, will not add to a mercury image, the opera-
tion leaving exactly as much mercury as there was originally ;
and as the effect of mercuric chloride, followed by ferrous
oxalate, is simply to accumulate mercury upon the original
silver of the negative, the intensifying action of the sulphite
method becomes inappreciable after two or three applications
of the oxalate method. This gives an additional uncertainty
as to the intensifying effect of mercuric chloride followed by
sodium sulphite ; but the small amount of added density given
by this method is often valuable, and the process has the
advantage that if it does no good it does no harm, for the
negative, after a thorough washing, is just as amenable to
the mercury and ferrous oxalate as if the sulphite had not
been used.
It will be observed that the reducing power (using the ex-
pression in a chemical sense) of the image is lessened by the
application of mercuric chloride and sodium sulphite, the Ag2Hg
being able to take to itself only three atoms of mercury by
one application of mercuric chloride and ferrous oxalate, while
the original four atoms of silver could take four atoms of
mercury. But the difference in density given by mercury and
ferrous oxalate when applied to a negative before and after the
use of the sulphite method is not practically appreciable.
I had hoped to have been able to give a more or less exact
idea of the densities of negatives as varied by such treatments
as have been described, but the visual opacity sometimes proves
different from the retardation of printing processes. It appears
that this may always be so ; but, whether or not, it is wrong in
principle to attempt to estimate one effect by the measurement
of another, when the two are not of necessity proportional. I
have found also that the increase of printing density produced
by the same operation varies somewhat according to the condi-
tions under which the changes are effected. It may, however,
be stated in practical language that one treatment with mer-
curic chloride and ferrous oxalate generally about doubles the
opacity ; that after a second treatment the result is about equal
to that produced by the application of mercuric chloride fol-
lowed by ammonia upon the original negative ; and that mer-
February 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
103
curio chloride and sodium sulphite on the original gives a
density about half way between the original and that treated
once by the oxalate method.
Doubtless, if the manner of controlling density here
advocated is adopted, some operators will find troubles ; and
in order, as far as possible, to forewarn those who appear to
have a predisposition to fail, I have endeavoured to discover all
the drawbacks that beset the operations. If the plate darkens
very slowly under the ferrous oxalate, and the oxalate is not
unduly diluted or acid, the washing after the mercury salt
has been insufficient. But at the same time it may be
remarked that ferrous oxalate is much slower in action than
ammonia or sodium sulphite. If the finished negative has a
black looking stain upon it, the ferrous oxalate has not been
washed away, and a further washing will rectify it. The
removal of the excess of mercuric chloride is greatly facili-
tated if the mercury solution is poured off when the glass side
of the film is grey, then a sufficient quantity of the solution
is probably in the film to complete the bleaching. It is, how-
ever, important to make the bleaching thorough in the end, if
a truly proportional effect is sought after.
The minor advantages of the use of the methods recom-
mended might be set out in a formidable list. There is no
tendency to frill, even with repeated treatments, the operations
are clean, the negative is in no way stained, the shadows are
not choked up, and the lights do not lose their gradation.
The operations are reliable, and the results are permanent.
In order to test this last matter, I heated an amalgam of
silver, containing an equal number of atoms of each metal, at
the temperature of boiling water for about twelve hours,
with occasional weighing, and found that the volatilization of
the mercury gave a loss equal to nearly one part in two
hundred per hour — indicating a want of permanence. But a
part of a developed plate that hail been intensified by the
mercuric chloride and ferrous oxalate method until it pro-
bably contained more than ten times as much mercury as
silver, after heating in a steam oven for six days (forty hours)
showed no sign of diminished density either on a varnished
or an unvarnished part. The density, indeed, seems lather
increased by the treatment, and this may be due to a shrink-
age of the film brought about by the prolonged heating. Thus
the gelatine confers an extraordinary permanence upon the
otherwise slightly volatile mercury. It may be noted as a fact,
though hardly an advantage, that after intensification by the
methods advocated, anegative is as amenable to intensification by
many and probably by all other processes as it was originally.
But the greatest advantage of all is that these processes
enable the photographer to work step by step up to the
(tensity he desires, with the full conviction that the. character
of the gradation of the negative is not altered.
Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
Wednesday, February 12, will be “Artificial Light for Portrait-
ure” ; on February 17, “ Lantern Illuminants.”
Incandescent Lamp. — Kuhlow’s Review is responsible for the
following curious paragraph : — “ It has hitherto only been
possible to produce incandescent lamps of a comparatively
inferior light-strength, and hence it has not been practicable to
use them everywhere, such as in large rooms and open spaces.
This disadvantage has now been overcome, as it has been possi-
ble to produce incandescent lamps of 3,000 candle power.
These lamps, which have been named high candle-powder in-
candescent lamps, like all incandescent lamps, have a uniform
clear, j-ellow light, whereas the arc lamps, which are at present
alone employed in illuminating great spaces, have the well-known
unpleasant bluish light, and burn very unsteadily. The incan-
descent 'amps hardly require any maintenance ; they burn for
1,000 hours without supervision, and they are therefore much
cheaper than the arc lamps, which require constant attention,
besides causing great expense for charcoal. The high candle-
power incandescent lamps are therefore likely to soon drive out
entirely the arc lamps, and the electric light will then become
still cheaper and more popular, as the incandescent lamps yield
a perfectly natural light, and now also a light in sufficient
volume to meet all requirements. — Invention.
THE NEW ROLL ABLE CELLULOID FILM.*
BY W. H. WALKER.
Fortunately the new film does not require exceptionally
skilful manipulation. Probably no radically new product
of similar importance was ever more simple in construc-
tion, or more tractable when intelligently manipulated ;
but such peculiarities as do exist require reasonable atten-
tion and provision. Without these requirements, the
film may be a needless cause of vexation and loss, while
a little precaution will enable it to be manipulated with
the utmost ease and certainty.
As has been repeatedly stated with reference to the
stripping film, a cut sheet is never recommended excepting
for single exposures with small stops, as no practicable
device has yet been produced which will hold a cut or free
sheet sufficiently flat within the focal plane ; but a roller
slide, if properly made and adjusted in conjunction with
a proper film, will perform the feat sufficiently well for all
practical purposes.
The roller slides sold by the Eastman Company during
the past five years vary somewhat in detail, but all have
certain fundamental devices, some of which require with
the new film not alteration, but adjustment, which any one
possessed of an ordinary pocket-knife may accomplish in
five minutes.
1st, The Tollable transparent film does not require and
will not endure an excessive tension in the direction of
its length, and in some cases, where the resistance-brake
is too powerful, the film willl be stretched out of its
normally flat condition.
Therefore, to reduce this tension in all the roller-
slides — excepting those originally made with the internal
metallic frame — spring open the crescent-shaped wire
which causes the resistance, by inserting the edge o f a
knife-blade between it and the circular groove within
which it lies, and also place within the groove a single
drop of salad oil.
2nd. By far the largest number of the Company's slides
are of the wooden frame variety, and have on the outside
of the case a brass spriug alarm actuated by a projection
on the periphery of the indicator dial. This alarm spring
is fastened securely at one end of the wood by two screw's,
w'hile near the dial there is a third screw by which the resist-
ance off ered to the revolutions of the dial may be increased by
running the screw further into the wood, and the contrary
effect obtained by partially withdrawing it.
Therefore, if by any chance the resistance-brake within
the instrument case should be too weak, and thereby per-
mit the film to slip over the measuring roll (i.e., the roll
having the perforating pins at its ends), we obviously have
another means of correcting an error.
Development. — Nothing could be simpler than the de-
velopment of the new film ; it is so thin that it should,
wrhen properly soaked, adhere to the flat bottom of any
ordinary developing-dish ; but if for any reason any diffi-
culty occurs, it is evident there are many simple devices
which will cause it to remain perfectly flat. For this pur-
pose has been invented a cheap and simple developing
tray, which fully answers any conceivable requirement,
and which will reduce the amount of developer ordinarily
used to such an extent as to more than pay for its cost
with the first spool of film used with it.
Development may be conducted with any approved
•From The Journal of (he Camera Club,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, 1890.
104
formula, but we must recommend that contained in the
printed instructions which accompany each packet.
In drying, we have not found it necessary to resort to
any other expedient than simply suspending the negative
by one or more of its four corners from ordinary pins. In
drying the negatives may curl inwards, but when dry
simply roll them, film side out, over any cylindrical sur-
face, and there allow them to remain for about an hour,
after which they will remain flat.
In damp climates, like that of England, the use of a
bath of glycerine to ensure flexibility is not recommended.
When not in use, the films should be kept flat between
the leaves of books or in the Company’s film negative
boxes, which will soon be ready for sale. These boxes
will enable many thousands of negatives to be stored within
a remarkably small compass, and by a simple classification
any one of the series may be obtained without displacing
any of the others.
The Company’s factory in America, specially designed
for the manufacture of this film, is daily increasing its
output, which at present is a serious task, as there are
fully 25,000 instruments of its production requiring
supplies.
The English company, however, are pushing forward
with all possible speed their proposed English factories,
which will be planned upon such lines as will ensure a
continuous supply, while both companies will work in
entire harmony with each other other to prevent undue
shortage.
In closing, may I say that it is not for one moment
assumed that the experience of the future will not be
fully as valuable as that of the past, and that the Company
continue to rely upon the kind forbearance of its friends
to aid it in determining the true cause of any alleged
defects, for without this information progress is greatly
retarded.
Photographic Library Catalogue. — We have received the
proof-sheets of the Catalogue of the Library of the Photographic
Society of Philadelphia. It is high time indeed that this valu-
able collection of books had been put in order and classified.
The Society having started to accumulate these books in 1862,
will account for the numerous antiquated volumes pertaining to
early processes that are to be found on its shelves. A large
portion of these books may thus be said to be quite obsolete in so
far as modern practice is concerned ; but they are still interest-
ing historically, and will often be found useful to those closer
students of the art who endeavour to trace the growth or deve-
lopment of one process from another. We understand that the
present executive committee of the Society intend to make the
Library a chief feature of usefulness, and to add numerous
treatises and text-books to the collection, besides supplying all
the best journals for daily reference. Journals pertaining to
photography are now in the table cases, and they may lie con-
sidered as the representative ones of present times ; beside the
American and English, there are also the German and one
1* rencli j the latter being the official organ of the Photographic
Society of Paris. The preface to the Catalogue reads as fol-
lows : “ It is hoped that the following Catalogue will be useful
in aiding those who desire to refer to the valuable Library
liclonging to the Society, its contents being now for the first
time arranged in alphabetical order. A noteworthy feature in
the Library is the number of complete sets of journals, dating
from the earliest days of the art down to the present time. Al-
though separate text-books of the various branches of photo-
graphic science are not wanting in the Society’s collection, the
journals— which detail the progress of the art from day today
still remain the most useful sources of information.”
American Journal of Photography,
ERNST SCHERING.
In alluding to the death recently of Mr. Hugo Sobering, the
senior member of the firm of Scheriug and Glatz, of Maiden
Lane, the Oil, Point, and Bruy Reporter gives some interest-
ing particulars about his uncle, Mr. Ernst Scheriug, the well-
known manufacturing chemist of Berlin, whose death occurred
about three weeks prior to that of his nephew. From this
account we append an extract.
Mr. Ernst Scheriug, the celebrated founder of the firm
Chemische Fabrik auf Aetien (vorm. E. Sobering) was born at
Prenzlau, May 31st, 1824. After attaining his school educa-
tion he entered for apprenticeship at Berlin, in 1840. Though
this term was to be for four years, he had shown such ambition
in the execution of practical chemistry that after eighteen
months lie was consulted in the production of chemicals when
such were contemplated.
The art of photography, originating from the method of
Daguerre for the production of light pictures, induced Mr.
Scheriug to devote his attention to the production of the
chemicals required therefor, such as iodine and its salts, silver
and gold salts, and pyrogallic acid. He recognized that the un-
satisfactory results in photographic duplication were in greater
part due to the irregular purity of the chemicals used, and con-
sequently devoted his energy to the production of the purest
chemicals for photographic purposes. In course of time the
number of chemicals produced by Sobering’ s factory continually
increased. It was, however, the motto of the owner to keep
the qualities of his preparations at the highest possible stan-
dard, and never to have them impaired by the manufacture of
larger quantities. Encouraged by his successes, Sobering under-
took, at the first Paris exhibition, in 1855, to show his iodine
salts and resublimed iodine, as also some few other preparations,
in great purity and beautiful crystallization. The manufacturer,
then practically unknown, was honourably rewarded, and from
that time on his preparations received considerable attention
from all consumers. With the extension of business came
the creating of agencies in the principal commercial cities of
Europe and also America. The relations with the trade in this
country became so important, that Mr. Sobering always
exercised the greatest care in the preparation of goods for this
market. His restless and uninterrupted activity at the labora-
tory for many years had its evil effects on his physical con-
stitution, and only after the most ardent and repeated sug-
gestions of his physicians could he be induced to seek rest at
intervals. After visiting Teplitz, to effect a cure of his ail-
ments, which, however, failed to give the desired results, he
concluded to form a stock company whereby he could increase
his facilities. This transfer took place October 31st, 1871,
when the firm of E. Sobering was converted into the Chemische
Fabrik auf Aetien, vorm. E. Scheriug, in which he consented
to be one of the leading directors.
Gestures and Speech Mechanically Reproduced. —
Edison has been developing his great idea of making use of
photography as an adjunct to the phonograph in order to
bring a speaker’s personality before the eye. The result of
Edson’s experiments has been a wonderful machine. In front
of the speaker are placed two small machines, one a phono-
graph, and the other an ingenious piece of mechanism by
which photographs of the speaker are taken in succession
with enormous rapidity at intervals of from one-eighth to one-
twentieth of a second, and both these machines are at work
silently recording both the uttered speech and the personal
appearance of the speaker at each fractional part of a second.
The results thus obtained may be sent to any desired point,
and the photographs thrown on a screen by an ingeniously-
contrived piece of mechanism. Thus the exact appearance of
a speaker, with all his gestures and play of features, is exactly
reproduced, while the phonograph simultaneously delivers the
speech. The interval between the successive photographs is
so infinitesimal that the screen picture is apparently a living
one, moving, gesticulating, and apparently uttering the wonls
which in fact are spoken by the phonograph. — New York
Herald.
February 7, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
105
INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT.
SELF-LUMINOUS TRANSPARENCIES.
BY WILLIAM HEXHAM.
Perhaps no branch of the law is in a more confused state
than the above, as will be seen by the following.
Probably most of your readers are aware that photo-
graphs were not protected until 1862, when the Act of
Parliament (25 and 26 Viet. 68) was passed which vested
in photographers the copyright of their negatives, prints,
tfce., and the right of reproducing the same during their
own lives and seven years afterwards, or for a term of
forty-two years, whichever should be the longer. So far
a photographic copyright was placed on exactly the same
terms as the literary copyright, except that literary copy-
right was protected in several foreign countries provided
certain conditions were observed as contained in two Acts
of Parliament which will afterwards be referred to. By
the Act of 1862 registration was imperative if the owner
of the copyright wished to protect himself against piracies,
as he was unable to properly found his action or suit until
after registration, which had to be done within three
months of the date of first publication.
By Acts of Parliament passed in 1843 (7 and 8 Viet,
c. 12) and in 1852 (15 Vicv. c. 12), it was enacted that
authors in any foreign countries which had by convention
or treaty with this country given reciprocal rights to a
British author should have a copyright in his literary com-
position according to the laws of this country. Bv the
before mentioned Act of 1862, the above two mentioned
Acts were re-enacted, and the same was to have effect
with such countries as should from time to time be named
in an Order in Council.
On the 10th day of January, 1852, an Order in
Council was published in the London Gazelle giving
British subjects international copyright in their literary
works with France, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Prussia,
and Spain. It will be seen that the above Order in Coun-
cil was issued twelve years before the passing of the Pho-
tographic Copyright Act, but as this Act re-enacted the
two International Acts, it has been successfully argued
that the Order in Council was also taken to be republished.
If any readers contemplate taking proceedings for
infringement of their photographs, it is first of all neces-
sary to make sure that the same are registered in the
country of origin, and that they have complied with the
conditions of the Treaty or Convention with the country
where the same are being infringed. The usual conditions
in all countries arc that they should be registered there as
well as here within the period of three months from their
first production.
The certificate of registration in foreign countries re-
quires to be authenticated by one of its Ministers before it
can be given in evidence in a court here. With regard to
the remedies in this country, they are threefold: an action for
damages, an injunction to restrain the wrongdoer, and
proceedings for penalties upon a summons before a
magistrate. International copyright in music has by an
Act passed in 1888 been much simplified, and now the
author or composer of a musical composition or song has
only to register in the country of origin ; proof of such
registration is sufficient to perfect the title for all purposes
connected with proceedings in our courts so far as the
copyright is concerned.
-♦
Dbveloi’eks kor Films. — Major J. F. Nott says that soda
is the only alkali which can be used with advantage with
stripping films. Quinol is an excellent developer, but it
destroys the gelatine film. — Journal of the Camera Club.
Photographers are always on the look-out for something
new or attractive, and yet many excellent suggestions are
made and immediately forgotten, simply because they fail
to reach the eye or ear of the man with sufficient fore-
sight and enterprise to take advantage of them. What,
for instance, would be more attractive to, well, a large
portion of creation at a certain period of life, and under
certain circumstances, not only to have a picture of the
loved one that may be gazed upon during the day, but
that in the darkness and during the silent watches of the
night may be taken from under the pillow, and, self-
luminous, every feature of the beloved countenance
traced ? This, and many other equally useful applications
of what was at one time well known, Balmain’s paint, may
be made by any photographer with profit to himself and
pleasure to his customers.
Balmain’s paint is a sulphide of calcium or barium, or
a mixture of both, and, as is well known, possesses the
property of absorbing certain of the more refrangible rays
of the spectrum, and continuing to give them off again
for a considerable time in the dark. When the material
was first popularised by Balmain it was largely employed
in coating clock faces, candlesticks, match boxes, and
other articles likely to be required in the dark, and, as
evidence of the durability of the material, we have a match
box on the cover of which is a tablet so coated, that has
been in constant use for at least eight years, and which,
if exposed to light during the day, is as luminous at night
as it was when it came into our possession.
From time to time suggestions to employ the sulphides
in connection with photography have been made without
attracting attention, and more recently the matter has
been taken up by the American Lithographer and Printer ,
which recommends the rendering of suitable lithographs
or photographs translucent, and laying them down on a
card that has been coated by dusting the luminous powder
over a varnished surface.
No doubt fairly good effects may be produced in this
way, but we think we can suggest one that for photo-
graphs, at least, is very much better. It is to print on
glass a transparency of any desired size from a negative,
and when dry, coat it on the film side with an emulsion of
the sulphide in gelatine or other suitable vehicle. Bal-
main’s paint was at one time, and may be yet for all we
know, sold in bottles, in a dry powder mixed with gela-
tine, so that it was only necessary to add water to the con-
sistence of cream to make it ready for use. We are under
the impression that Warnerke, in coating the tablets for
his well-known sensitometer, employs melted paraffin, in
which case the picture would require to be gently warmed
to allow of the mixture being evenly spread.
We think the size of picture most likely to take, and
most conveniently made, would be one made on the or-
dinary lantern slide plate ; and in reducing by copying in
the camera, the negative should be placed so that the pic-
ture will be correct when seen through the glass. They
should be backed with some impervious material, or, bet-
ter still, put into the old-fashioned leather cases, if they
are still to be found ; and if any of our readers are enter-
prising enough to make a few from some of their best
negatives and show them to their customers, we feel fully
warranted in promising them a ready side and many
orders.
Who will be the first to advertise “The new night-
blooming photograph? ” — The Beacon.
10G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, 1890.
i&otcs*
The general public, ignorant of photographic advance,
cannot quite understand the reproduction of photo-
graphs in newspapers. They are about as advanced
as the illiterate family who, when one of its members
•with an artistic turn got a drawing accepted by an
editor, refused to believe that the drawing was his,
because it was in print. These good people had a
vague idea that a picture was produced in piint very
much as the reading matter is, and they could not
realize that it had to be drawn first. Reproductions
of portrait photographs the public accept without
asking any questions as to how the photographs get
converted into blocks which can be used in a printing
press, but a photograph of a landscape fairly puzzles
them.
A case in point occurred the other day. An
illustrated paper contained some reproductions by the
Meisenbach, ora kindred process, of some instantaneous
photographs. One, a bit of river scenery, was parti-
cularly charming, and it had the effect of causing the
editor to receive several letters asking from what
painting the copy was made. This was a great com-
pliment to the photographer, and in addition to illus-
trating the point we have advanced, shows that the
public have not yet fully grasped the fact that a
photograph from nature can be as artistic as a painting.
An odd example of combining two hobbies came
under our notice the other day. One of these hobbies,
we need scarcely say, was photography ; the other was
a mania for collecting old suits of armour and old
weapons. Where the combination comes in, is seen in
the album, which the owner exhibits with great pride,
containing a number of photographs of himself attired
in the various suits of armour forming his collection.
The fad is a harmless one, but the duty of looking
through the album is rather trying to those with a
sense of humour, for although the armour itself is seen
to advantage, the wearer possesses a most pacific
countenance, while the pose is not in every instance
that which one imagines a Crusader would assume.
The insurance offices, so far as we know, still main-
tain their stolid indifference to the altered conditions
under which photography is carried on. Some time
ago, we drew attention to the fact that, despite the
absence of all danger of fire, photographic studios
were classed under the head of “ extra risk.” There
was justification for this charge in the old collodion
days, but surely dry plates have now been sufficiently
long in use to warrant the premiums being fixed on
the ordinary scale. If any photographer has of late
made any effort to get his insurance reduced, it would
be interesting to know his experience.
No one would wish to lessen the glory of Daguerre
by a jot, but is there not rather a tendency to overdo
the homage which is being paid to his memory all over
the world? In the universal pman of praise which is being
sung, one is apt to forget the name of Talbot. It is no
question of rivalry between Talbot and Daguerre which
we desire to raise, but rather a reminder that, while
Daguerre’s process is practically extinct, the germ of the
Talbotype yet remains incorporated in our everyday work.
The proposal by the Boston Convention to raise a
memorial to Daguerre in Washington, by means of a
one dollar subscription, has drawn forth a comment
similar to that which we have raised above.
Whether from its costliness, or from some practical
difficulty, luminous paint has not fulfilled the future
held out for it. We now learn that a firm in Austria
has discovered a mode of preparation which will lessen
its cost of production to about one-sixth of its present
price in England. What reliance may be placed upon
this statement we cannot say, but if true, a great
demand will spring up for the paint, for which there
arc a hundred uses.
A reaction, it is prophesied, will before long set in
against the huge, unwieldy sizes which the majority of
American newspapers affect. People, we are told, are
beginning to cry out for smaller papers, less padding,
less trash. One authority declares that a one cent
paper is wanted, somewhat larger than a lady’s hand-
kerchief, printed in leaded nonpareil, containing the
news up to twelve, one, or two o’clock last night, in
two, three, or four line items. He recommends type-
writing in nonpareil style of type-writing type, photo-
graphing it, and dashing it off in sixty minutes. All
this sounds very go-ahead, but the authority omits to
say how long the preparation of the photographic block
will take. We fancy that when the details are gone
into, the old-fashioned way of setting up type will be
found the speedier.
The French police are nothing if not scientific.
They have now obtained, by means of photography,
large cartoons of the hands of various artisans, artists,
and professionals, so as to carry out their speculations
as to the fact of the hand proving the occupation.
This selection does not seem very complimentary to
the artisans, artists, and professionals. The latter
term, by the way, is rather a wide one; does it include
professional thieves? Apropos of the hand, what a
pity it is that some student of Desbarolles and D’Ar-
pentigny does not issue a new edition of the former’s
great work on Palmistry, illustrated by photographs ?
The hand is admittedly the most difficult member of
the body to draw, and the illustrations in these volumes,
instead of elucidating the divisions and subdivisions of
the subject, rather tend to confuse them. The pro-
fessor, no doubt, has definite ideas on the distinction
he draws between various hands, but when these ideas
have to be translated by an artist, we get something
very often totally different. Now about photographs
there could be no mistake. Any one who has tried to
master D’Arpentigny will admit the truth of this.
February 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
107
SOME EXPERIMENTS WITH EIKONOGEX.
BY C. BRANGWIX BARNES.
As the new developer seems to have created some little
stir in the profession and to act in an entirely different
manner in different hands, it may not be uninteresting to
detail some experiments which I have recently made with
a view of comparing the qualities of eikonogen as a deve-
loper with those of pyrogallol and ferrous oxalate. The
experiments in question were made with a sample of what
is termed “ white crystalline eikonogen ” (probably fox-
some reason known to the manufacturer), although in
reality it is of a delicate yellow tint. This 1 received in a
capsuled bottle containing one-tenth of a kilo of crystals
about the size of peas. In order to give the developer a
fair trial, I decided to fii-st follow implicitly the instructions
I received therewith, and as I imagined that, even when
powdered in a mortar, the solubility would not be so perfect
in cold water as in hot, I chose the latter and made up my
developer with four parts of sulphite of soda, one part of
eikonogen, and ten parts of boiling water. I thoroughly
stirred this with a glass rod until the whole of the eikono-
gen was dissolved, which dissolution occupied about ten
minutes, and I now had a somewhat murky liquid of a pale
primrose tint, which I poured into a bottle, and proceeded to
mix three parts of pure crystallized carbonate of soda with
twenty parts of hot water, which I poured into another
bottle, and allowed both to cool.
On proceeding to develop a plate, I took three ounces
of the eikonogen solution, and .added thereto one ounce
of the soda, and placed the plate in the mixture without
the previous bath of water usually adopted with the
pyrogallol developer. In order to compare the time of
development, I rocked the bath as with the pyro. The
negative commenced to develop almost immediately, and
had all the detail out in three minutes, but was sadly
lacking in density. I therefore continued the develop-
ment for another minute and a half, with the result
that the plate obtained a good printing density,
without in any way fogging or damaging the shadows. I
then substituted a second plate without changing or
strengthening the developer, and again obtained an
equally good result ; 1 then attempted a third, and was
again successful, although in this case the development
was prolonged to five minutes, and the negative was
i-ather thinner. I fixed in the combined hyposulphite
and bisulphite of soda bath without using alum, and
found I had three good printing negatives. Between the
two first developed there was no perceivable difference,
but the third was certaiidy slightly inferior. Pouring
back the used developer into a glass measure I examined
it in the light, but failed to find any pronounced signs of
oxidation, so put it aside until the following day, when it
appeared but a trifle darker in colour, and I again
attempted to use it; the result, though not altogether
satisfactory, far exceeded my most sanguine anticipations,
as it yielded me a negative full of detail, though
requii-ing intensification.
My second experiment was with an opal plate, and here
again the new developing agent came out with flying
colours. I should have mentioned that the three plates
used for the first experiment were No. 1 Derwent rapid,
No. 2 Britannia ordinary, and No. 3 Ilford white label.
My third experiment was with an isochromatic plate,
which required six minutes to complete development. The
result was, however, good, with the exception that there
was a slight veiling of the deepest shadows ; the detail
was fully brought out, and the density all that could be
wished for. So far, my experiments had all been con-
ducted with what I have reason to believe were properly
exposed plates ; the next, however, was one which I knew to
be much under-exposed, having been taken with a Stirn's
detective camera on a not over-bright winter’s day, the
exposure being about one-tenth of a second. To my sur-
prise and gratification I was enabled to develop out a con-
siderable amount of detail, far i n excess of that which I
obtained on another plate exposed under identical circum-
stances and developed with pyro and ammonia. The
difference between the two was most marked, the eikono-
gen yielding a negative with a fair amount of detail, but
needing intensification, while the pyro gave me one with-
out any detail whatever, only the high lights developing at
all. An attempt to develop an over-exposed plate resulted
in failure, although it might undoubtedly have been saved
by the addition of a little bromide to the developer; but
this was not tried, as my intention was, on this occasion,
to test the merits of the developer according to the formula
issued therewith, and having done so, I proceeded to con-
duct further experiments with an altered or modified
developer. In the first place, I substituted ordinary wash-
ing soda for the pure crystallized carbonate, and must con-
fess that I was unable to distinguish between the resulting
negatives. I next attempted the use of ammonia as an
accelerator, but do not consider it necessary to detail the
individual trials, as it did ixot seem to yield such good re-
sults as the soda, although the time occupied in develop-
ment was materially shortened. Such being the case, I
again reverted to the first or published formulae, with the
exception that I added half a dram of bromide of potassium
to the eikonogen in solution, which has the effect of pro-
longing the development and lessening the detail.
In conclusion, I must give my vote on the side of the
friends of eikonogen, as I find it, in conjunction with
soda, to be a quicker developer than pyro and soda,
though, perhaps, a trifle slower than pyro and ammonia ;
the addition of bromide is very rarely required ; the
minute detail is more marked, the half-tones are better,
and, to crown all, the colour, which closely resembles that
obtained with ferrous-oxalate, is such that at least one-
third the time is saved in printing as compared with the
old and still popular pyro and ammonia. So far as cost is
concerned, I must confess I can see very little difference
between the two agents, though if one is cheaper in the
long run I should opine it is eikonogen, added to which
there is no doubt the present price will decrease as the
demand inci’eases. It is, perhaps, an additional advantage
that the new developer does not stain the fingers, and that
the dishes and measures are far more easily kept clean.
The foi’egoing notes merely i-epresent my experiments
up to the time of writing, but I am still engaged in a
further comparative series.
Mix. Stanley, wi-iting to a friend some particulai-s of his
forthcoming book, which he hopes will be ready in May, states
that he has a number of most interesting photographs of
scenei-y, and sketches of interest, and that maps will be a
prominent featui-e.
Royal Institution. — The Rev. Canon Ainger will begin a
course of three lectures on “ The Three Stages of Shakespeare’s
Art ” on Thursday, the 13th of February ; and Lord Rayleigh
will begin a course of seven lectui-es on “ Electricity and Mag-
netism ” on Saturday, the 15th of February.
108
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, 1890.
A PHOTOGRAPHIC FIEND.
While we were sitting at our desk working hard to get out a
leader for the front page of the Pirate, a timid rap sounded on
the door, and at our yelling “ Come in ! " the most comical
specimen of humanity that ever drifted into our sanctum
appeared. How he ever managed to walk through the street
from the Puma Hotel to the Pirate office without being riddled
with bullets is more than we can understand. The boys must
have all been sitting in a game over at the Dew Drop Inn at the
time. He was tall, thin, and homely, with hair the colour of
a ripe carrot, and on his long, narrow feet were a pair of yellow
shoes that might have been called handsome in the effete East,
but they looked very ratty in our town. On his head he wore
a little tourist’s cap with a fore-and-aft visor, and on his lower
limbs he wore a pair of short pants, which were held up by a
yellow and black bandage which encircled his stomach. We
endeavoured to be polite, but little Pete, our office boy, fell
into a fit at sight of the freak, and we were obliged to stuff an
exchange into our mouth to keep from laughing in his face.
“ I beg pawdon, deah fellaw,” said the man, as he entered
and looked us all over through a little round piece of glass,
“but I am er-aw-a tourist, don’t ye know.”
Of course we were glad to see him ; we had to be, as it was
our place.
“A tourist, did you say ? ” we asked, not knowing what else
to say ; and Pete had another fit, during which he pied a galley
of solid nonpareil.
“ Er, yaws, I’m travelling through the country, don’t ycr
know, securing photographs of natives ; and having heard that
you had some particularly romantically dressed cliaractaws of
the cow-boy type in this place, I thought 1 would see what
success I would have in securing a few negatives.”
“ Well,” said we, “ the town is full of queer characters, and
all that is necessary to bring them forth is to tire off a gun in
the street.”
“ Why, how perfectly odd!” exclaimed the man ; and step-
ping outside, he brought in a box and a bundle of sticks, which
he set up inside of three minutes, and there had as pretty a
camera as one could wish for. When we saw this our respect
for the man rose several degrees, and we began to get interested.
At first it was our intention to let the boys have some fun with
him, but now we changed our mind, and decided to warn him.
“ Aren’t you afraid to aim that at some of these rough
men ?” we asked. “ You see, they are liable to take you and
your machine for a target, and indulge in a little revolver
practice.”
“ Y ell, er, aw, to tell the truth, ye kuaw, I am rawther
timid, but I always aw-sk one’s permission, don’t ye knaw,
er, before taking their photo.”
“ Well, take the advice of a friend and be careful,” said we,
as we sized him up again, and thought of the risk he was
running.
“Thanks, er, awfully,” said he ; and carrying his camera to
the door, he stepped out on the walk, and reaching into his hip
pocket, pulled out the ugliest gun that it was ever our lot to
behold. He aimed it into the air, and a report like a small
cannon followed. Hardly had he replaced the revolver in his
pocket when the boys came pouring out of the Dew Drop Inn,
and, when their eyes rested on the tourist, they looked at each
other, first in surprise, and then mischievously. Locking arms,
they all faced the party with the abbreviated pants, and com-
menced to march on him. On they came, keeping perfect time,
walking straight at him, and almost any other man would have
turned pale and run, but not so with the dude. He pulled out
a cigarette, lit it, and, after taking a few puffs, commenced to
mark time. We could see plainly that the crowd were a trifle
staggered at the man’s nerve, and did not know whether to
keep on and walk right over him, or try some other scheme to
frighten him. Finally they decided to stop and hear what he
had to say for himself, and they were not kept long iu suspense.
“ Gentlemen,” said the dude; “if you don’t mind, there
being so many handsome fellows among you, I should like to
lake youah photographs.” This knocked the boys all in a heap,
but Col. Juo. Watkins was the first to collect his seuses, aud
said :
“All right, pardner, briug out year photygraffin machine,
an’ we’ll try ter look pleasant.” At this the dude stepped in-
side the office, and, opening a valise which he had previously
brought in, he took out another camera, laying it tenderly on
a chair while he removed the one from the tripod. “ I find,”
said lie, as he glanced out of the window, “ that in case the
crowd is very rough, that, er, iu ordah, aw, to successfully get
their pictures, it is first necessary to thoroughly frighten them.
Now, they will undoubtedly tire at the camera the moment it
is aimed in their direction, anil 1 must, er, aw, fool them, don’t
ye know. Observe me, and you will see how it is done.”
Thereupon, he took up the camera which he had handled so
carefully, and screwed it on to the tripod, and, going out into
the road, aimed it at the crowd, who were patiently waiting with
drawn revolvers.
“ Aw, are you ready, gentlemen ? ”
“ We are,” they replied in chorus.
“Then wait one moment, till I, aw, return, and I will take
your photos.”
Hastily entering the office, the man commanded us to lie
down flat upon the floor. We did as we were ordered, gazing
through a knot hole in the wall the while, and we must own
that what followed startled us. Col. J no. Watkins gave the
order to take steady aim at the camera, and at the word fire,
twenty bullets entered the box, which exploded in its turn,
tearing up the ground for twenty feet, and shattering every
window within the block.
“ That, aw, was twenty-five pounds of dynamite,” coolly ex-
plained the dude, as he lit a fresh cigarette. Taking another
tripod from his valise, he fastened it to his camera, and going
out on the side- walk, addressed the frightened gang.
“ Gentlemen, aw, you were very unwise, er, don’t ye know,
to risk your lives in that mannaw, and 1 would advise you not
to fire at this one, as it would blow up the whole town.” Every
mother's son in that crowd turned pale at this, and Col. Jno.
Watkins was upon the point of running away. “One moment,
er, deah boy,” said the dude, as he observed the colonel’s
action, “ 1 desire youah photograph.” Then pulling out that
ugly gun, which had a bore nearly big enough for a jack rabbit
to crawl into, he said : “ Gentlemen, 1 want you, aw, one at a
time, don't ye know, and as I point this aw, little revolver at
a man, I, aw, want him to come forward and look pleasant.”
In this manner every one in the crowd was photographed, and
told to skip a soon as the o[>eratinn was over. The dude left
that night on the stage, but we have since learned that he is a
member of a private detective agency, and would warn our good
citizens to Ire in constant readiness to take to the sage bush. —
American paper.
— ♦
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — The annual
meeting will Ire held on Tuesday next, February lltli, at
8 p.m., at the Gallery, 5a, Pall Mall East.
Copying Drawings. — A new method for copying drawings
which may be found of service is described by Build iny. Any
kind of opaque drawing paper iu ordinary use may be employed
for this purpose, stretched in the usual way over the drawing
to be copied or traced. Then the paper is soaked with benzine
by the aid of a cotton pad. The pad causes the benzine to
enter the pores of the paper, rendering the latter more trans-
parent than t lie finest tracing paper. The most delicate lines
and tints show through the paper so treated, and may lie copied
with the greatest ease, for pencil, Indian ink, or water-colours,
take equally well on the benzinised surface. The paper is
neither creased nor torn, remaining whole and supple. Indeed,
pencil marks and water-colour tinting last better upon paper
treated in this way than on any kind of tracing pajier, the for-
mer being rather difficult to remove by rubber. When large
drawings are to be dealt with, the benzine treatment is only-
applied to parts at a time, thus keeping pace with the rapidity
of advancement with the work. When the copy is completed
the benzine rapidly evaporates, and the paper resumes its
original opaque appearance without betraying the faintest trace
of benzine. If it is desired to fix lead pencil marks on ordinary
drawing or tracing paper, this may be done by wetting it with
milk, and drying iu the air.
February 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
109
DANGERS OE FLASH-LIGHT COMPOUNDS.*
BY JOHN G. BULLOCK AND CHARLES L. MITCHELL, M.D.
Within the last two years the community of Philadelphia
has been startled by a series of fatal accidents occurring
during the manufacture of magnesium flash-powder, a
compound well known to photographers, whereby in all
five human lives have been lost. On three several occa-
sions explosions have taken place, eacli with fatal results,
the last and most recent of all resulting in the death of
three persons. As a natural consequence considerable
attention and inquiry have been attracted to the subject of
flash-powders ami their probable dangers, and the writers
of this paper were requested at a recent meeting of the
Photographic Society of Philadelphia to prepare a report
upon the subject.
The composition of the particular powder which was the
cause of this disastrous loss of life is understood to have
been powdered magnesium, chlorate of potash, picric acid,
and bichromate of potash. No one of these ingredients is
in itself explosive except under extraordinary circum-
stances, and may be considered as safe ; but the moment
that they are mixed an element of danger is introduced.
Many finely-powdered metals are prone to rapid
oxidation ; give them the oxygen and the reaction takes
place rapidly, and is frequently accompanied by heat and
flame. Powdered magnesium and powdered zinc have
been known to become sufficiently hot to ignite material
in contact with them, on being wet with water.
The addition to magnesium of a chemical rich in
oxygen, or holding oxygen loosely, so to speak, increases
its susceptibility to rapid change.
For instance, a match applied to some of the powdered
metal will fail to ignite it, or occasions a mere glow from
slow ignition ; but let the magnesium be mixed with
chlorate of potash or nitrate of potash to furnish it with
oxygen, and the whole mass will flash witli almost explosive
violence. Again, mix with the magnesium and chlorate of
potash some carbon, and under some conditions a
dangerous explosive will be formed. For instance, oxygen
gas is made safely from the heating together of chlorate
of potash and oxide of manganese ; allow some carbon to
be accidentally mixed with the two ingredients and heated,
and a violent explosion will probably ensue. The rubbing
together of chlorate of potash and some organic substances
is accompanied with a crackling noise and frequently
explosion, as instanced in the combination 'with sugar or
tannin.
Such compounds as we have spoken of are known as
explosives, as typically illustrated by gunpowder — a mix-
ture of nitrate of potash, carbon, and sulphur. Another
and more dangerous class of chemical compounds which
may be formed under some circumstances are known as
detonators ; that is, compounds the component parts of
which are held together under so strained a condition of
high tension, that a very slight cause, such as a light, sharp
blow, will occasion them to fly apart violently with a sharp,
loud report ; in other words, they detonate. The force of
an explosion is felt at a greater distance than that of a detona-
tion, but the disruption of surrounding bodies is greater
and more complex with the detonation than the explosion.
An explosion is generally accompanied by fire and smoke ;
a detonation is not.
Many detonating compounds may be heated and burned
until consumed without discharge, whereas the detonation
* Head before the Photographic Society of Philadelphia.
or snapping of a common pistol cap in contact with or near
them may detonate the entire mass ; such is the method
adopted in the explosion of mines, &c.
Picric acid is, in itself, we might say, perfectly safe, as
it can be burned without danger, and will detonate only
when confined. In compound, however, with some other
bodies, it produces a class of very dangerous substances,
notably picrate of potassium, picrate of sodium, picratc of
barium, picrate of strontium, picrate of magnesium, and
picrate of lead. These substances are extremely unstable
in character, and liable to explode with slight percussion
or friction with the liberation of immense volume of gas.
Sarran states the relative force of picrate of potassium,
when exploded, as compared with gunpowder, is as 1 '98
to 1 -00 — almost twice as great. A mixture of 0'5 kilo-
grams of potassium picrate and 0'5 kilograms of potas-
sium chlorate evolves through its combustion 352 litres
of gases. One kilogram of gunpowder evolves but 200
litres under the same circumstances.
Picrate of magnesium is, when dry, one of the most
unstable of its compounds, and therefore highly dangerous
to handle. It may be made in a wet way by double de-
composition, or by the intimate mixture of the powdered
ingredients. Time is, of course, an important factor in
the latter process of manufacture, but a microscopical
examination of the mixture, after long standing, will show
that the metal has entirely disappeared, and the explosive
compound been formed. There is no doubt but that this
combination may be greatly assisted by the presence of
atmospheric moisture. Powdered magnesium is quite
hygroscopic, and has a tendency to cake together in loose
masses, or adhere to the sides of a bottle, if exposed to a
moist atmosphere. Picric acid, when powdered, is also
rather sticky in character, and it can be readily seen how,
if these two substances existed together in a mixture, they
would be attracted to one another; then, given the
elements of time, moisture, and perhaps some slight
warmth, and a chemical combination would inevitably
occur. That this is not simply theory, but fact, can be
substantiated by a fact lately mentioned to one of the
writers of this article by Prof. Henry Leffmaun, of this
city, in a personal conversation. He stated that some time
previous, while microscopically examining a sample of
flash-powder which contained picric acid, he was surprised
to notice an entire absence of metallic magnesium, the
yellow crystals of picric acid being alone prominent. On
dropping the powder into water, however, an abundant
sediment of metallic magnesium was deposited, showing its
presence, and a closer examination of the powder showed
that the particles of magnesium were completely enveloped
in a yellow coating of picric acid. Of course these cir-
cumstances afforded a most fruitful opportunity for the
conversion of these two substances into the explosive pic-
rate of magnesium.
Here is the probable explanation of the late calamity at
the laboratory of Wiley and Wallace. A bottle containing
in the neighbourhood of several pounds of flash powder,
made, after the before-mentioned formula, some eighteeu
months previous, was being emptied into a drain for the
purpose of getting rid of it. No fire or other chemicals
were known to have been present. Water had been
thrown upon some of it to aid in its being carried down
the drain. Experiments subsequently made proved that
the presence of water would not occasion sufficient heat
to ignite it. The most reasonable supposition is, there-
fore, that a small portion of the powder was detonated by an
110
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, 1890.
accidental blow, and from thence the entire mass was deto-
nated. No smoke or burns appeared upon the bodies of those
killed, or surrounding objects, thus proving the absence
of fire. For the preceding disasters by the same powder
another theory must be advanced, as they occurred
at the time of the mixing of the ingredients, and
previous to the probable formation of the picrate of
magnesium. In the first case there was an explosion
during the process of grinding the material ; in the second
case, while the powder was being sifted. In the first
case it can readily be seen that an explosion would
be the natural sequence. In the second case it is
probable that some clogging of the sieve occurred
during the mixture of the materials. The loss of these
five lives is a terrible caution against the use of the especial
compound which caused the explosion, and a sufficient
reason to regard with suspicion any powder the formula of
which is not made public and known to be safe. This
especial formula produced a compound which was alike
unsafe to make, to use, or to keep. To sell such an article,
therefore, for ignorant and unskilled persons to use, or to
induce anyoue to attempt its manufacture, places a fearful
responsibility upon those who knowingly undertook such
a risk.
It is much to be regretted that the formula! of most of
this class of preparations are not published, and it is highly
probable, in many cases, that their ingredients have been
combined with but little regard to their chemical properties
and the chemical reactions which might occur from their
admixture. The fact that the compound may bear a label
proclaiming it “ safe” is but a very slight guarantee when
its composition is altogether unknown.
It seems hardly necessary now, in view of all that has
been said, to raise a note of warning in regard to the use
of all these flash-powders, but the statement has been
already made that while this one particular compound was
unsafe, other compounds are harmless. The writers wish
to state, therefore, that they consider all forms of flash-
powder dangerous, the difference between them being only
in the degree of danger involved. As has been said, they
are all composed of substances liable to rapid decomposition
when in contact with each other ; they are liable to form
new compounds often possessing dangerous and unknown
properties, their combustion is attended with an intense
degree of heat, involving risks from severe burns, and they
are liable to spontaneous explosion or ignition. This
danger is greatly augmented when they are made or kept
in mass, and the probable reason why a greater number of
fatal accidents have not occurred is because the powders
have mostly been made in comparatively small quantitiesand
put up in separate packages, each containing butafew grains
of the mixture. They contain, in most cases, chlorate of
potash, bichromate of potash, permanganate of potash, fcrro-
cyanide of potassium, nitrate of potash, amorphous phos-
phorus, and other highly organized compounds, the very
purpose of their admixture with the magnesium bcingto in-
< i ease its inflammability and the rapidity of its combustion.
I his can only be done by making the combination more
unstable, and thus introducing at once a large element of
danger. A simple mixture of magnesium and chlorate of
potash, which has been claimed to be harmless, if placed
in a confined situation, as in a pistol, and discharged by a
cap, will detonate, and there is probably no compound of
this character which does not possess some elements of
danger.
Since the introduction of the different forms of the
magnesium lamp, in which pure metallic magnesium can
be burned with absolute safety, there seems to be but
little reason why the use of flash-powder should be con-
tinued, and as the only possible advantage in their use
over that of the lamp is that a slight amount more of
speed may be obtained, the question may well be asked
whether the possible advantages to be gained are worth
the additional risk involved in the use of the flash-powder.
In conclusion, the following quotation from Eissler's
work on “The Modern High Explosives ” may well be
cited here, more particularly in reference to combinations
into which chlorate enters: —
“In mixing these compounds great danger is atten-
dant, and too much circumspection cannot be used.
They explode instantly upon any violent stroke, very often
by friction alone ; sometimes spontaneously, as when in a
state of rest, and no known cause for their combustion
can be assigned. Many are deluded as to its safety by
so-called experiments with freshly-made powder. Manu-
facturers of the compound may attempt to show its safety
by hammering it and cutting it, and similar tests; but let
the powder be exposed to the natural atmospheric action,
attract some moisture, then get dry, and the least friction
or blow will cause an explosion.”
The writers hope that the knowledge of the dangers
attending the use of flash-powders is now so diffused that
no farther accidents will result from their use, and that
their manufacture will eventually be abandoned.
The first number of the Art World, a weekly art newspaper,
is announced for February 22nd. It is to be devoted chiefly
to the pictorial and plastic arts, and to the interests of artists of
all denominations. It will not be illustrated.
Next Monday, Mr. Douglas Freslifield will give a full
account before the Itoyal Geographical Society of the search
expedition undertaken by Mr. C. Dent and him.- elf, which
solved the problem of the fate of the two English moun-
taineers, Mr. Donkin and Mr. Fox, who were lost in the
Caucasus in 1888. Mr. Freslifield’s paper will be illus-
trated by photographs taken by Signor V. Sella, one of
several travellers who succeeded last year in the ascent of
Mount El brass, and by Mr. H. Woolley, who accompanied Mr.
Freslifield in his search expedition.
The following experiment showing how primary colours pro
duce white is of interest. Cut a circle of pasteboard nine
inches across, pencil it into four parts, then again each of
these into seven. With bright, clear water-colours paint these
narrow, pie-shaped slips with red, orange, yellow, green, blue,
violet, indigo, in this order ; then begin, and do this in each
quarter, l’ut a round, smooth nail or pin through the centre
of the disc where the points of the colours meet ; drive this into
a heavy board edge, and whirl it around as fast as you can.
The colours disappear, and you see a round but rather dirty
white circle. If the colours were pure it would lie pure white ;
if they were really prismatic you would have a little shining
white moon of light. — Invention.
Messrs. Perken, Son, and Raiment. — Our attention is drawn
to the subjoined extract from the London Gazette of January
28th: — “Notice is hereby given that the partnership here-
tofore subsisting between us the undersigned, Louis Edmond
Perken, Frederic Louis Perken, and Arthur Payment, carrying
on business as Manufacturers and Importers of Optical and
Scientific Instruments at No. 99, Hatton Garden, and elsewhere
in the County of London, under the style or firm of Perken,
Son, and Payment, has been dissolved by mutual consent, as
from the 31st day of December, 1889. All debts due to and
owing by the said late firm will be received and paid by the said
Frederic Louis Perken and Arthur Payment, who, with
Edgar Theodore Perken, the younger son of the said Louis
Edmond Perken, will continue to carry on the same business at
No. 99, Hatton Garden aforesaid, in partnersliip, under the
same style or firm.”
February 7, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
Ill
A CAMERA WITH THE LUSHIA FIELD FORCE *
BY TOM. DE LA TOUCHE.
We left Calcutta on the eve of a cyclone, and the weather was
so gloomy that no pictures of the embarkation of troops or
views of the river were possible ; but as these have been often
photographed, perhaps it was just as well not to be tempted
to waste plates ou them. Arriving at Chittagong, let us draw
a veil over the events of the intervening two days. I tried a
picture of the I. G. S. Da! ho us ic, which had brought us across ;
but having just before been showing off the beauties of the
camera to some friends on board, and having left it on a sky-
light for a short time, one of these friends had taken the
opportunity to set the lever that keeps the shutter open,
and consequently, on releasing it, the shutter stuck halfway.
The result was a picture that showed the Dcdhousie as she
might have appeared in the height of the cyclone, and which
even a hardened sailor could hardly have contemplated with-
out its bringing on an attack of sea-sickness. A view of the
shipping in the river with boats in the foreground preparing to
embark troops turned out better ; but away from the river
Chittagong is uninteresting, and does not lend itself well to
the camera. Proceeding up the river, the little station of
Rangamati, built on a ridge high above the river, makes a
fairly good picture, but below this place and for a long distance
above it the banks are monotonous, low hills covered with dense
jungle to the water’s edge extending for miles. At Burkul,
however, two days above Rangamati, where the river cuts
through a lofty range of hills, and is broken by a series of
rapids, the scenery becomes finer, and several good views may
be obtained. This is a grand place for fishing, and a rod should
be included in one’s kit, but the strongest kind of tackle,
especially hooks, will be required. All the fish that I hooked
broke away, sometimes straightening out the hooks or bend-
ing them into a ring. Above Burkul there is another long
stretch of still water, and few good subjects for pictures are
met with till Demagiri is reached, where one or two fine views
may be obtained, especially of the rapids and hills above the
station, and the rod may again be used with effect. There is
a Kulsi village ou the heights opposite Demagiri ; and if one
does not object to a steep climb of about 1,000 feet, a group of
the inhabitants and their bamboo huts will repay the trouble
of getting to it.
As far as Demagiri the journey is easy enough ; and, as a
police post has been established there for several years, it may
be v.sited at any time. A steamer leaves Chittagong for
Rangamati once a week, and, beyond this, dug out boats are
easily procurable, which are fairly large and comfortable, and
may be slept in at night, but a mosquito net is indispensable.
Beyond Demagiri it would not be safer to proceed, at any rate
for the present, without an escort ; but in a few years, let us
hope, these hills will be as free to the seeker after the pic-
turesque as any part of the hills of Assam.
Camp Demagiri ; 20th December, 1889.
♦
PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION WITH OTHER
PICTORIAL ARTS.
The Daily Telegraph says : — There is no great probability, for-
tunately, of any development of the art, or rather scientific craft,
of photography doing any harm to water-colour painting. What
harm photography has been capable of inflicting on art has
already been perpetrated, and it must be confessed that the
mischief effected has beeu prodigious. It has killed litho-
graphy— the chalk branch at least ; chromo-lithography has
escaped, and will enjoy immunity until the secret of producing
I photographs in colour is discovered. It is killing the beautiful
craft of drawing upon wood, and, allied with all kinds of
electro “processes,” it is killing the art of wood-engraving
itself. It has nearly slain the art of portrait-drawing in
crayons ; although a good many French and a few English
portraitists are fighting a valiant fight in the production of
drawings in charcoal, and in “sanguine” or red chalk ; while
the enterprise and taste of Sir Coutts Lindsay have succeeded
* From The Journal of the Photographic Society of India.
in giving fresh life to the beautiful, but almost moribund, art
of pastel. Photography, however, has utterly and, it is to
be feared, irrevocably slain the art of miniature-painting. The
names of Carpenter, of Mee, of Margaret Gillies, of Thor-
burn, of Ross, of Karl Schiller, seem almost to belong to
ancient history, and at the summer exhibitions of the Royal
Academy miniatures have become almost as rare as enamels.
Yet it is questionable whether the good deeds done by photo-
graphy have not very far surpassed the artistic evil which it
has undoubtedly wrought. The services it has rendered to
the cause of archeology and architecture have been immense.
Photography has lightened the labours of the botanist, the
ornithologist, the comparative anatomist, the decipherer of
manuscripts, the entomologist, the aeronaut, and the meteoro-
logist. It has given material assistance to those whose calling
is the detection of crime. It has been literally the travel-
ler’s joy and the solace of those who have never been able to
wander to far-distant lands, of the scenery of which they arc
able, through the medium of the camera, to view exact and
picturesque transcripts. Photographic portraiture, again, as a
means of pleasant intercommunication between widely separated
kinsfolk and friends, and as an agent for the cultivation of the
domestic affections, has been productive in degree of compara-
tively as much social benefit to the community at large as
cheap postage itself. Who are so poor and lowly, “ so
accursed by fate, so utterly desolate,” as not to have been
able to afford at some time or another a photographic portrait
of themselves or of those they have loved, even though the
counterfeit presentment has been taken for a few pence on the
sands at a watering-place ?
(tfoiTcsjpon&enrc.
PHOTOGRAPHY AND ILLUSTRATED PAPERS.
Sir, — My attention has just been called to a paragraph in
your “Notes” of January 24th, in which you remark, referring
to photography, that “The one man who, it would bethought,
should have been among the earliest to practise the art, has
not touched it ; we mean the descriptive reporter.” And then,
referring to the new venture of the Daily Graphic, you add,
“ He may see the necessity.”
Now, sir, I have seen the same, or similar assertions, made
repeatedly in the photographic press ; but, from personal ex-
perience, I feel bound to dissent from them. I happen to be
on the staff of one of the leading trade journals, and some
years ago, seeing the importance and usefulness of learning the
art of photography, I did so, and although my work with the
camera, and also with the “detective,” has become my chief
hobby, and I have so improved myself that no branch of the
art comes amiss, yet I find it of no use whatever ; certainly,
for our own journal, I sometimes take a photo for reproductive
purposes, but although I have offered my services to most of
the leading papers, including the Daily Graphic, 1 am met
with the stereotyped reply that they prefer pencil artists, who
are capable of making rough sketches. As to my descriptive
powers, they are fully appreciated by some half-a-dozen periodi-
cals that I contribute to, but whenever photography is men-
tioned it is pooh-poohed. Practically, the only use I have as
yet been able to put it to has beeu the illustration of some of my
own stories ; but for the newspaper proper — daily or weekly — it
has as yet failed to grasp the use of descriptive writer and pho-
tographer combined.
I merely write this letter to give you the experience of one
who has endeavoured to push himself forward on the lines you
recommend fot some years past, but finds there is no opening.
George Brown.
25, Sturgeon lload, Walworth, S. E. , February 1st.
Manchester Amateur Photographic Society. — A Photo-
graphic Exhibition will be held at the Manchester A then scum
on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, February 13th, 14tli, and
15th. Open Thursday, 6 to 10 p.m., Friday and Saturday,
10 a.m. to 10 p.m. The Council have arranged for a lantern
exhibition at 8 o’clock each evening.
J’A
112
HE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, 1890.
patent Intelligence.
Applications for Letters Patent.
1,388. A. Watkins, Imperial Flour Mills, Hereford, “ Instru
’ meut for Calculating Photographic Exposures.” — Janu-
ary 27th.
1,394. G. J. Heaton, 2, Coburg Villas, Windsor, “Levelling
Instrument for Cameras.” — January 2/tli.
1,489. J. J. E. Mayall, 1, Quality Court, London, “Colour-
ing Photographic Impressions, and a Varnish or Enamel for
the same. ” — January 28th.
1,501. W. W. Bagally, 3, Poet’s Corner, Westminster,
“ Optical Illusion.” — January 28th.
1,560. Jane Mathers, 41, Reform Street, Dundee, “Fan for
Displaying Photographs.” — January 29th.
1,562. T. Stanway, 24, Cauldon Road, Hanley, Stafford-
shire, “Supports for Photographs while under Manipula-
tion.”— January 29th.
1,600. E. T. Perken, F. L. Perkbn, and A. Rayment, 34,
Southampton Buildings, London, “Magic Lanterns.”
— January 30 th.
1,631 J. J. Atkinson and R. W. Barnes, 6, Lord Street,
Liverpool, “Displaying Photographic Backgrounds.”
— January 30th.
1,715. M. A. Wish, 3, Palace Grove, Upper Norwood,
“Exposing a Succession of Films.” — February 1st.
1,747. W. Herbert, Waltham House, Suffolk Road, Chelten-
ham, “Time-piece Regulator to Turn on and Lower Gas at
any Time Required.” — February 1st.
Specifications Published.
2,623. — 14</i February, 1889. “Flash Lamp.” John Leisk,
169, Commercial Street, Lerwick, Shetland, Merchant.
My invention relates to a new or improved form of flash lamp,
for the rapid or instantaneous combustion of magnesium
powder applicable to photographic or other purposes, whereby
the powder is propelled by centrifugal force outwards, equally
all round, from the surface of a circular horizontal rapidly
revolving disc, into a suitable flame or flames completely sur-
rounding the said revolving disc, thus securing the total com-
bustion of the metallic powder under conditions favourable to
obtaining the maximum of incandescence, the result being an
instantaneous flash of actinic light circular or globular in form
and many inches in diameter, which, from its large area and
diffusive power, is eminently suitable for photographic purposes.
All in contra-distinction to the methods heretofore used of
projecting the magnesium powder by means of an air current
into a suitable flame, either horizontally, obliquely, or verti-
cally, by which mode, in some instances part of the metallic
powder passes through the flame unconsumed, and in all the
cold air introduced into the flame tends to disturb the same,
lowers the temperature, and prevents the maximum incan-
descence of the magnesium powder used.
By one arrangement my invention may be constructed as
follows : —
A bed plate of metal or other suitable material, and which
may be five inches square, is prepared, and on each corner of
the same is erected rigidly a stout pillar one and a quarter
inches high. A second plate, of same size as the first, is now
placed on the top of these pillars, to which it is attached by
screws or otherwise.
Pivoted to the centre of the lower or bed plate, and rising
perpendicularly through an opening in the centre of the
upper plate, is an arbor or spindle, about three inches long, on
the upper end of which is rigidly fixed, at right angles by its
centre, a circular metal disc about one and a half inches in
diameter, the said arbor being fitted so as to revolve easily,
and being provided with the necessary collars or shoulders to
prevent it leaving its bearings.
To the lower part of the said arbor is attached a coiled
spring for revolving the same, and also a ratchet wheel and
suitable detent for stopping the spring when wound up.
By another method an india-rubber band may be substituted
for the coiled spring.
There is also attached to the bed plate a suitable trigger
arrangement, brought by pneumatic or other means under the
control of the person using the lamp, by which the detent can
be instantly removed from the teeth of the ratchet wheel
when a flash is required to be made.
Resting upon the upper plate is a circular spirit lamp or
burner, made of metal in the form of a flat, hollow ring two
and a half inches in diameter, one and a quarter inch broad,
and one eighth of an inch or more in thickness. The wick of
this lamp, preferably of asbestos, protrudes from the upper
open edge of the ring aforesaid, the other edge being closed
and resting upon the plate, while a small capped reservoir at
the side, connected to the ring or burner by a short tube, sup-
plies the wick with spirit. This circular lamp or burner is
attached to the upper plate in such a manner that it shall
surround equidistantly the circular disc and arbor before
mentioned, with the surface of the wick at a level one half of
an inch below the upper surface of the said circular disc, the
part of the top plate thus enclosed being freely perforated so
as to admit a free current of air from below between the
circular disc and the spirit lamp wick. An annula cap for
extinguishing the spirit lamp is also provided.
By another arrangement a circular Bunsen burner or circle
of gas or other flames may be substituted for the spirit
lamp in conjunction with the revolving mechanism before
described for igniting magnesium powder and producing a
flash.
To use a flash lamp as before specified : the lamp is first
filled with methylated spirit. The spring is then wound up by
turning the circular disc at the top of the arbor. The charge
of magnesium powder, which may be three grains or more, is
then spread on the upper surface of the aforesaid disc, and
the spirit lamp lit ; the detent is now withdrawn from the
ratchet wheel, when the coil spring thus suddenly released,
causes the arbor and disc instantly to rapidly revolve on its
axis, and by the centrifugal force thus generated to scatter the
charge of magnesium powder into the adjacent flame of the
lamp, thereby producing an instantaneous flash of maximum
size and brilliancy with a minimum of powder used.
Havingthus described myinvention, the chief feature of novelty
of which consists in utilizing centrifugal force to project the
magnesium powder into one or more suitable flames, the
mechanism here described for carrying out that principle may
be somewhat varied in details or size ; the measurements be-
fore given being merely relative, must be varied to suit other
sizes of flash lamps.
When used for taking photographic portraits a suitable
reflector and diffusing screen should be used in conjuction with
the lamp herein described.
2,723. — February 16tA, 1889. “ Controlling Exposures when
Using- Flash Lamps.” Frederic William Haiit, 8 and 9,
Kingsland Green, London, Manufacturer of Scientific In-
struments.
The object of this invention is for controlling the exposure
of the sensitive photographic plate or plates, in lighting single
or grouped objects to be photographed by flashing light or
lights ; it has been found that some persons and lower animals
involuntarily move either the body or more frequently close
the eyelids very shortly after the flash commences; to render
this movemement of little or no moment I employ a stop-
cock with two separate ways, or two separate stop-cocks
actuated simultaneously by one lever or turnkey ; each way
is connected with a separate air chamber in which is air or
gas under pressure ; one conducting tube for air goes to the
flash-lamp, and the other to the pneumatic release of an
exposing shutter ; their relative times of discharge are so
adjusted that the shutter exposures take place at the early
part of the flash or combination of flashes, and according to
the volume of light provided so the actual exposure of the
plates may be reduced to a very small fraction. It has been
found impracticable for many to accomplish the double move-
ment for flash and shutter by simple hand pressure on balls
at the right instant of time. It has also been suggested to
connect the exposing shutter-release with the same air-l>all
or chamber that discharges the magnesium, but as the air
does not escape at the shutter’s release, but exerts pressure, and
February 7, 1890.]
rHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
113
on the other hand the tube to the flash-lamp is practically
| open, it is seen that such an arrangement could exert no prac-
tical pressure at the shutter-release.
The inventor claims : —
1st. The combination of a two-way stopcock, pneumatic
release-shutter, and flash-lamp or lamps.
2nd. The combination of two air or gas chambers and stop
cocks in line, the discharge ports of the plugs being adjust-
able one to the other by means of a graduated disk and
index.
3rd. The combination of a two-way stopcock with separate
air chamljers, valves, and air compressing balls or pumps.
4th. The combination of two separate air chambers, each
with stopcock and their plugs in line, their axes connected
through a prolongation and set screw, or the stopcocks placed
parallel, and worked by an intermediate tooth wheel.
p 15,289. — 28th September, 1889. “Shutters for Photographic
Apparatas.” Newnham Browne, 73, Cheapside, London,
Fellow of the Institute of Patent Agents, communicated from
abroad by Richard Kiindler, Friedrich Str. 29, Dresden,
Mechanician and Optician.
The invention relates to shutters for photographic apparatus,
which contain two plates, one placed over the other, and
It capable of longitudinal motion with reference to one another,
I each plate having an aperture, and which two plates in their
[! positions at the end of their stroke close or cover the lens,
I! whilst when the plates travel from one extreme end of their
I motion towards the other, they uncover or expose the lens
i for an instant at the time when the .apertures in the two
I; plates are coincident
The improvements relate partly to the mechanism and ad-
I justing devices causing and controlling the motion of the
shutter-plates, and partly to the arrangement of the plates
themselves, whereby the manner in which the exposure is
I effected is controlled.
Mr. E. Muybridge will, we understand, shortly give a second
ij lecture in Manchester on “ Animal Locomotion. ”
Specimen's of the late Mr. ltejlander’s photographs can be
l obtained made up in albums from Mrs. Rejlander, 2, Waverley
Villas, Bruce Grove, Tottenham.
A contemporary says that a mother whose sons were tending
. cattle on her estate, named the estate “ Focus,” because, she
said, it is where the sons raise meat.
A light basket-case for a lialf-plate camera has been
I received for inspection. Shortly we shall return to the sub-
i ject of basket-work for photographic purposes, to bring for-
ward some fresh points.
The annual dinner of the Photographic Society will be held
I on February 10th, at 6.30 p.m., at the Cafe Itoyal, Regent
I; Street, London. Tickets, six shillings each, may be obtained
from Mr. William Eogland, 7, St. James’s Square, Notting
Hill, London. Evening dress optional. Ladies will be present.
In our last number, we stated, in a paragraph about illus-
t strated journalism, that The Daily Graphic had to apologise
for a blunder in regard to one of its illustrations. We find
that this statement is not correct, and accordingly express our
regret at its insertion, and offer to our contemporary our
* sincere apology.
Proposed Lantern Club. — Mr. T. H. Holding, whose letter
■ respecting this project appeared in our issue of January 17th,
writes as follows : — “ Permit me to notify that a meeting will
I be held in the Upper Regent Saloon of the St. James’s Hall
Restaurant, (Regent Street and Piccadilly), on Thursday,
February 20th, at 8 p.m. I have to ask those who can attend
I to send in their names either to the Hon. Slingsby Bethell,
Chelsea Lodge, Chelsea, or to myself, before that dav.
Possibly there are those who will have engagements, and,
nevertheless, are in sympathy. We shall be glad also to have a
1 word from them before the 20th, as it will be useful. Any
i suggestions which any gentleman may have and will embody in
a brief letter, shall be put before the meeting. — T. H. Holding,
46, Chesilton Road, Fulham, S. IF., 7, Maddox Street, IF.”
Jj)voccctftng$s of £octcttcg.
The Camera Club.
On January 30th, Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer read a paper entitled
“Practical Interpretations of the Law of Conjugate Foci.”
Mr. Lyonel Clark occupied the chair.
The Hon. Secretary handed round a matt surface silver
print, sent by Mr. Quick, in which the note paper on which his
letter was written had been sensitised and printed upon with
good results.
Mr. Dallmeyer showed a graphic method of illustrating the
equation representing the law of conjugate foci, by the proper-
ties of lines drawn within the circumference of a circle. He
also showed applications of the law of conjugate foci, whereby
the purposes of a view-meter were served, and also to give
indications of the object focussed for being actually in focus.
These included one by Mr. Berthon, one mentioned by Mr. Traill
Taylor, and one described and illustrated by an instrument by
Mr. Dallmeyer himself.
The subject on Thursday, February 13th, is “Landscape,”
when a paper will be read by Mr. Graham Balfour.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 30th ult., Mr. T. E. Freshwater occu-
pied the chair.
Mr. A. Cowan said that he had continued his experiments with
a view to test what part the alkaline salts played in the developer
in connection with and without sulphite of soda. Two plates
were shown, one developed with a ten per cent, solution of sul-
phite, and the other with a twenty per cent, solution of sulphite,
two grains of pyro being used in each case. The increased
strength of sulphite added considerably to the density of the
image.
Mr. A. Haddon was still of opinion that the developing power
of sulphite was due to its degree of alkalinity. Three solutions
he had tested, all indicated the presence of excess of alkali.
Mr. J. B. B. Wellington exhibited a 15 by 12 collodio-bromide
plate, showing after development innumerable black spots ; these
spots were absent in small plates coated with the same emul-
sion.
Mr. W. E. Debenham thought the spots might be caused by
the plate not having been thoroughly clean.
The Chairman drew attention to a report in one of the jour-
nals of the bursting of a gas cylinder. Remarking upon the
daager of sending out both oxygen and hydrogen in black
bottles, which in many instances was done, he would urge
upon all users of the two gases to insist upon having these gases
delivered in red and black bottles.
Dundee and East op Scotland Photographic Association.
February 6th. — The first popular lecture this season, under the
auspices of the above Association, was given in the KinDaird
Hall on Wednesday by Mr. J. W. McCall. The scenery illus-
trated was that of Orkney, Shetland, and Greenland ; the pictures
had been prepared by Messrs. Valentine and Sons. A large
screen was used, some thirty feet square, and special lantern
arrangements had to be made.
Starting from Kirkwall, with its celebrated cathedral, the
various islands were visited in turn, and the Orkney group was
next shown, besides views of Lerwick, Stromness, and Scalloway,
the old castles and ruins found on the various islands, and
scenes illustrative of the habits and customs of the natives. The
stries closed with views of the Tay and Foith Bridges; several
other large structures were also shown by way of contrast.
Sheffield Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held on Tuesday evening, the 4th
inst., at the Masonic Hall, Mr. B. J. Taylor in the chair.
A series of 180 slides wis passed through the lantern, which
was manipulated by Mr. G. Bromley.
On the table were laid the competitive enlargement pictures,
prizes for which had been given.
114
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 7, lSI'O.
Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association.
At the meeting held on the 30th January, at 3, Lord Street,
Mr. Paul Lange occupied the chair.
Messrs. J. AV. Warburton, M.D., John Price, M.I.C.E., Rev.
G. F. Wills, H. Cope West, E. S. Gladstone, B. Cookson, and
J. Watkins were elected members.
Mr. P. Lange spoke at some considerable length as to the
benefit derived from Conventions generally, more particularly
when attention was drawn to something really practical. He
advocated that a better feeling should be cultivated with kindred
Societies, and drew attention to the Chester Conference to be
held shortly, of which Mr. F. Evans was the Secretary.
A short discussion on the subject of “The Best Lenses for
Detective Work ” then followed, in which Messrs. Sayce, Wil-
kinson, Earp, Lange, Kirby, Williams, Tomkinson, and Swinden
took part. It was pretty generally allowed that an ordinary
French lens, working at//ll with a rapid shutter, gave good
results ; especially so when working with a lens covering the
next larger sized plate than the one used.
Mr. W. J. Archer exhibited a selection of Woodbury lantern
slides and a series of views of the Paris Exhibition, including a
few panoramic slides, which gave great satisfaction.
The exhibits consisted of snap shots by W. Wilkinson, on
glass and film ; new lantern slide carrier, by W. J. Chadwick
(Manchester) ; and Mawson and Swan’s transparency and photo-
graph frame.
The twenty-sixth report of the above Association sets forth
that the President and Council have much pleasure in congratu-
lating the members on the continued prosperity of the Associa-
tion. In previous reports the attention of the latter had been
drawn to the years 1883 and 1884 as phenomenally prosperous
ones, showing in the former 32 new members and in the latter
37 — an increase of 69, and accounted for by the increased
facilities offered to amateurs by the introduction of the gelatine
dry plates.
In the years 1888 and 1889, there has been a yet greater
increase ; in the year 1888 there were 49 new members, and in
this year 74, showing an accession of 123, or an increase as
compared with 1883 and 1884 of 78 per cent. In 1889 alone
the number exceeds that in 1883 and 1884 together. The
accession to the roll of membership has been the highest yet
attained, and the total number of members 238. There can
be little doubt that this increase is in a great measure due to
the prominence the Association secured in connection with its
exhibition held in the Walker Art Gallery in 1888, and to the
securing of club rooms situated in the centre of the city',
giving members such convenience, comfort, and advantages of
association as cannot be surpassed by any similar photographic
society' in the Kingdom.
The following is a record of the numbers joining the Asso-
ciation during each year of its existence, viz. : — 1863, 17 ;
1864,4; 1865,1 ; 1866,0; 1867, 1 ; 1868,0; 1869, 3;
1870, 1 ; 1871, 1 ; 1872, 3 ; 1873, 2 ; 1874, 4 ; 1875, 2 ;
1876,2 ; 1877,7 ; 1878,7; 1879,6; 1880,6; 1881,8;
1882, 19 ; 1883, 32 ; 1884, 37 ; 1885, 23 ; 1886, 18 ; 1887,
19 ; 1888, 49 ; 1889, 74.
The number of members at the commencement of the year
1889 was 181, and 17 have left the Association, thus making
the net number at the present time 238. The numbers on the
books for the last six years are as follows: — In 1884, 138 ;
1885, 134; 1886, 140; 1887, 144 ; 1888, 181 ; 1889, 238.’
There have been two removals by death, viz. : — W. P. Riley, a
member of the Council, and one of the most promising and
active members ; and C. J. Renfrey’, who had but recently
joined the Association. The Association has also lost the ser-
vices of two valued members of the Executive, owing to busi-
ness appointments removing them from this part of the country,
viz. H. N. Atkins, Vice-President ; andW. A. Watts, M.A.,
Hon. Secretary. These vacancies have been filled by P. Lange
to the former, and W. Hughes to the latter. W. H. Tyerman
and C. A. Timmins have been elected to fill the other vacan-
cies. The year 1889 is prominent in the records of the Society'
on account of the permanent club rooms which have been so
happily acquired. The committee appointed to select and
furnish suitable premises for the club rooms consisted of the
following members: — Messrs. J. H. Day, J. Earp, A. IV.
Cornish, A. W. Beer, B. J. Sayce, and G. H. Rutter ; but
before any action was taken Messrs. B. J. Sayce and G. H.
Rutter retired from the Committee, and Mr. H. Lupton was
elected in their place. The Committee thus formed was subse-
quently appointed as the “House Committe.” Owing to the
substantial balance from the Exhibition account of £257 18s.,
and the ordinary balance on the 24th November, 1888, of
£77 8s. 5d., making £335 6s. 5d., the long-desired wish of
many members has been attained. Thanks to the House Com-
mittee and to Mr. Day, their Secretary, a number of works of
art have been secured for the adornment of the room from
Messrs. H. P. Robinson, “Carolling,” and own etching ; F. M.
Sutcliffe, “Water Rats;” R. Keene, “ Tissington Spires;”
A. Pringle, “Dove Dale;” Rev. H. B. Hare, “Thirsty Mo-
ments; W, W. Winter, J. P. Gibson, B.Wyles, H. S. Mendels-
sohn, M. Auty, Rev. H. J. Palmer, and F. Whalley. The
rooms have been well furnished, and the comfort and con-
veniencc of members have, as far as practicable, been attended
to. An enlarging camera has also been provided for the con-
venience of members, and has been of service to many. The
entrance fee on membership has been increased to £1 Is. The
Treasurer’s account shows a balance remaining to the credit of
the Association of £48 13s. 8d. after investing the sum of
£194 14s., and writing off £14 5s. 4d. as depreciation on
club room furniture, &c. There has been a great increase and
improvement in photographic work done by the members this
year, and it is encouraging to note that, instead of the higher
class of results coming only from a limited few as heretofore,
there is now a fair distribution amongst the younger members.
Nothing of a very startling character has been submitted to
photographic workers generally during the year. Developers
are now fairly divided in numbers of their respective adherents
— pyro-ammonia and hydrokinone ; yet another “ Richmond ”
has appeared in the shape of Dr. Andresen’s “ Eikonogen,” of
which we may' hear more next year. Celluloid films have appa-
rently displaced “paper ’’-work to a great extent, and have
recently been much improved. Platinotype has been increas-
ingly adopted, the process being simple, results artistic and per-
manent, and the price of the paper has been greatly' reduced.
Much attention has been directed to “ detective ” or hand-
camera work, though, as yet, with but limited success ; still,
the difficulties attendant upon this interesting branch of photo-
graphy have been met with praiseworthy determination, and
many ingenious devices and improvements have been affected,
notably the camera invented by two of our members — Messrs.
Swinden and Earp — which obtained the only medal given for
apparatus by the Photographic Society of Great Britain at the
recent Exhibition at Pall Mall, keeping up the traditions and
prestiqc of this Society’ in the advancement of photographic art.
Early in the year we received from the Boston (U.S.) Camera
Club a series of lantern slides, in trust, for exchange with other
societies, entitled “ Illustrated Boston,” and which has been
entour during the year. The series was carefully prepared, and
reflects the highest credit on the Boston Camera Club for the
manner in which the slides were completed as a representative
set. The idea was one worthy of following, and the Council
has requested the members of this Association to make up a
Liverpool set as a “ return ” series for the Boston Club, and
also a representative set for reciprocal exchange with other
societies in our own country', especially as so many’ societies
have already adopted the plan as a great incentive to individual
work, and an encouragement to the respective societies in a new
branch of activity. The meetings have maintained their interest
throughout the year. Papers have been read and demonstra-
tions given by Messrs. W. Tomkinson, on “An Easter Trip to
the South of France and Northern Italy ” ; F. A. Bartlett, M.A.,
on “ A Mouth in Normandy and Brittany ” ; J. Earp, on “ Ten
Days in Holland and Belgium with a Hand Camera” ; S. J. H.
Dearie, on “English River Scenery”; P. Lange, the repre-
sentative series of lantern slides sent by the Birmingham
Society; AY. A. AAratts, M.A., the “Illustrated Boston”
slides sent by’ the Boston (U.S.) Camera Club; F. T. Paul,
February 7. 1890.'
TIIF. PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
ll'>
F.R.C.S. , a demonstration on “Micro-Photography”; Yero
C. Driffield, paper on the “ Actinograpli ” ; G. A. Kenyon,
M.D., on “Film Photography”; P. Lange, demonstration on
“Enlarging”; H. Wilkinson, paper on “The Intelligent Use of
the Detective Camera ;” G. E. Thompson, on “ Rambles along
the Riviera, from Marseilles to Genoa ;” J. S. Brown, “ From
Cairo to the Cataract ;” Messrs. Sinclair, Tomkinson, and Tun-
stall, on “Normandy and Brittany ;” while discussions have
taken place upon “Cloud Negatives,” “Warm Tones by De-
velopment in Lantern Slides,” “ Eikonogen as a Developer,”
and also upon the various demonstrations, papers, and novelties
submitted to the meetings. Much interesting work has been
shown and other exhibits brought forward by Messrs. W. Rogers,
E. Roberts, S. J. H. Dearie, P. Lange, .1. Comber, II. Wilkin-
son, A. W. Beer, W. Tomkinson, T. S. Mayne, C. A. Timmins,
E. M. Tunstall, J. I,. Mackrell, J. A. Forrest, H. Holt, 1L
Crowe, 15. J. Sayee, W. C. Bustard, A. F. Stainstreet, and
others. The social element has also received attention. Four
smoking concerts have been held, and largely attended.
The annual competition for Prints, Enlargements, and for
Lantern Slides has received increased attention from the mem-
bers this year, and some excellent work has been submitted.
The thanks of the Association are due to the following
judges, viz. : — For Prints and Enlargements — G. Watmough
Webster, -F.C.S., John Finnic, and E. Rimbault Dilxlin. For
Lantern Slides — G. E. Thompson, Paul Lange, W. D. Mead,
and E. Landseer Grundy.
The judges’ award is as follows : —
Sets No. Name.
Set of six prints, half-/ Stiver Medal > (T. B. Sutton.
plate and under... ( Bronze Medal •) < W. Tomkinson.
fiet of six prints, over J Silver Medal > U. L. Mackrei.l.
half-plate ... {Bronze Medal) (1). Cunningham.
Set of two enlarge- f Silver Medal ) . (F. K. Glazeruook.
ments ... ... ( bronze Medal) <J. L. Mackrell.
Set of six lantern/ Silver Medal ) (A. J. Cleaver.
slides ... ...{Bronze Medal) (T. B. Sutton.
The excursions arranged for out-door photography this year
have been numerous, and the following table of particulars of
attendance and results will no doubt be interesting : —
Date. Place. Attendance. Exposures.
April 22 Ludlow and District ... *
May
4
Rossett
15
56
18
Instantaneous — River ...
7
60
27
H addon Hall and Bakewell
19
150
June
1
Burton and Ness
15
102
10
Dolgelly
*
15
Speke Hall and Old Hutto
49
229
26
Emral Hall and Wrexham
*
___
29
Bollin Valley ...
16
106
July
13
Chester
7
20
22
Pont-y-Pant ...
6
50
29
Knowsley Park
*
August
5
Boscobel, Tonge, and Lilleshall
Abbey ...
• • •
5
20
10
Eastham Rake...
17
60
24
Raby Mere
12
60
Sept,
2
Sandbach and Moreton
*
—
—
1 1 Excursions
168
913
Last year ... 3 ,,
49
362
Increase ... 8 ,,
...
119
551
Arrangements were made for sixteen excursions, but five
(*) had to 1 >e abandoned ; the attendance at the eleven ex-
cursions was 168, and the number of exposures made was
P13. As compared with last year, there is an increase in
the number of those present of 119, and in the exposures
The following are the officers of the Association for 1890
President , Mr. Paul Lange ; Vice-presidents , Messrs. Wm.
Tomkinson, W. D. Mead ; Treasurer, Mr. Joseph Earp, c/o
Edward Thin, 3, Rumford Place ; Council, Messrs. W. H.
Tyerman, D. Lewis, C. A, Timmins, G. H. Rutter (to serve
one year) ; R. Crowe, E. Roberts, B. J. Sayce, J. H. Sin-
clair (to serve two years) ; A. W. Beer, J. H. Day, E. M.
Tunstall, J. L. Mackrell (to serve three years) ; Librarian, Mr.
J. McDonald Bell ; Auditor, Mr. A. Bradbury ; lion. Secretary,
Walter Hughes, 3, Lord Street, Liverpool.
Derby Photographic Society.
On Wednesday night the members of the Derby Photographic
Society held their annual conversazione at the St. James’s Hall.
The work of some of the members of the Society was exhibited
in the room. Among the exhibits, many of which consisted of
well-known local scenes, prints were shown by Messrs. Winter,
Keene, Thomas Scotton, A. B. Hamilton, C. J. Chadwick,
C. Bourdin, W. Hart, and others. In addition a competition
had been organised by the Society, three prizes l>eing offered
for the best work by amateurs, for which the following seven
entered : Messrs. F. Bemrose, C. Bourdin, C. J. Chadwick,
Cope, A. B. Hamilton, T. A. Scotton, jun., and G. Walker.
The judges (Messrs. Simmonds and Arthur Cox) had some diffi-
culty in making their awards. Eventually, Mr. T. A. Scotton,
jun., took the first prize with a photograph of a country lane
near Birmingham. Mr. Bourdin was awarded the second prize ;
the scene of his photograph was “Derby from Exeter Bridge,”
and the third prize fell to Mr. C. J. Chadwick, wrhose picture
was a scene at “ King’s Mills.” The judges also highly com-
mended the work of Mr. A. B. Hamilton, who from a lady’s
photograph had taken the head as a statue.
In opening the proceedings, Mr. Herbert Strutt, J.P.,
delivered a brief address, and said that in an assembly like that,
he should be the last person to introduce any controvertial
matter or technicality, because he was fully awaie of the fact
that he was speaking to gentlemen who knew more about art
than he did himself, and he should only display his ignorance.
He thought no one present needed to be told that during the
past ten years the number of amateur photographers had
greatly increased, the reasons having been the great reduction
which had taken place in the cost of the outfit and the simplifi-
cation of the process. The result was that the number of
amateur photographers was about 500 per cent, larger than it
was ten years ago. He looked upon the art as one of the most
fascinating that could be taken up, not only because it led one
to the most interesting places, but when they had taken the
photographs they could enjoy the sight of them for the rest of
their lives. He had spoken of the increase of amateur photo-
graphers, and he might say that their Society, which was estab-
lished in 1884, had now about sixty-five members.
During the evening Mr. F. G. Pierpoint, of Leicester, gave
an exhibition of lantern slides, executed by the members of the
Society, and Mons. Julien Lachapelle a shadowgraph. In addi-
tion, Mrs. Sim, Mrs. Hamilton, Capt. Sim, and Mr. Drury
took part in a musical programme.
Photographic Society op Philadelphia.
A meeting of the Society was held January 1st, President
Frederick Graff in the chair.
The secretary read a communication inviting entries to the
exhibition of the Worcestershire Camera Club at Kidderminster,
to be held from March 1st to 15th. A prospectus accom-
panied the communication.
The annual report of the treasurer was presented, showing a
cash balance on hand of 820.68 dollars.
The annual report of the Executive Committee was read, giv-
ing a resume of the work of the Society for the past year. A
number of valuable additions to the library had been made, and
a considerable sum expended for binding of journals.
Reference was made to various papers read before the Society,
to the Third Annual Joint Exhibition held under the auspices of
the Society during the month of April, and to the Fall Competi-
tive Exhibition, now in progress, from which the Honour pic-
tures for 1889 would be selected.
The Committee on Lantern Slides reported as follows : At
the Conversational Meeting, held December 18tli, the inter-
change slides shown were those of the Syracuse Camera Club.
This organization was admitted to the American Lantern Slide
Interchange only this year, and their first contribution was
11(5
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Fkisrcaby 7, 1810.
creditable to the members of the Club, and a pleasure to the
members of this Society who saw them. There were seventy -six
slides in all, most of them on gelatine dry plates, and repre-
sented a wide stage of subjects, including some fine studies in
Europe.
Dr. Charles L. Mitchell showed fifty slides, on gelatine plates
developed by eikonogen. The views were chiefly marine stu-
dies, made with a Hawkeye Detective Camera, and the cloud
effects in most of the views were excellent.
The election for officers and committee for 1890 resulted as
follows : — President — Frederic Graff ; Vice-Presidents — John
G. Bullock, Joseph H. Burroughs ; Secretary — Robert S. Red-
field ; Treasurer — Samuel M. Fox ; Executive Committee —
Kllerslie Wallace, M.D., Charles L. Mitchell, M.D., Edmund
Stirling.
A paper prepared by Dr. Charles L. Mitchell and Mr. John
G. Bullock on the “ Dangers of Flash-Light Compounds,” was
read by Mr. Bullock (see p. 109).
Bath Photographic Society.
January 29<A.— Meeting at 10, Quiet Street, Mr. W. Pumphrey
in the chair. Messrs. H. J. Lewis, H. G. P. Wells, D. Swain,
and J. S. Gibbs were elected ordinary members. Messrs.
Ernest Pitman and J. Day were appointed auditors.
A circular letter was read from Dr. P. H. Emerson, offering
a copy of his work, “ East Anglian Life,” to the Society. This
generous proposal was accepted with thanks.
Messrs. Dug dale and Davis then, by means of the oxy-etho
light, showed a series of views representing places visited by
the Society during the summer excursion.
Dr. Dutton passed round developed prints on celluloid, opal,
and cardboard. He remarked that the percentage of failures
with celluloid was high.
The annual meeting will be held on February 26th.
Manchester Amateur Photographic Society.
The fifth annual report was presented at the annual general
meeting held at the Manchester Athenaium, Princess Street, on
Tuesday, January 28th, from which we give the following : —
Eighty-six new members have joined since the fourth annual
meeting, and during the year there have been no fewer than 353
members on the books. The present actual numerical strength
stands at 293 members.
The Treasurer’s account shows a balance in hand of £44 8s. 10d„
as against £41 3s. 9d. last year.
An addition of 17 volumes has been made to the library dur-
ing the year, making a total of 171 volumes. The number of
books issued to the members was upwards of 250.
Since the issue of the last report there have been added to
the apparatus belonging to the Society a fine lime-light
enlarging lantern, at a cost of £13 (exclusive of the condensers,
which were presented by a member), a lime-light lantern,
costing £20 8s., and a screen. In addition to the lanterns,
the Society has a slide cabinet containing upwards of 300 slides
contributed by members, which slides have been in much request
during the year.
J he Camera Club. — The Camera Club Journal says about
the probable new premises of the Club “ Provided that the
details now under arrangement can be settled to our satisfac-
tion, these premises will lie erected to comprise five floors and
a spacious basement, the entrance to the building belonging
solely to the Club. The divisions into rooms will probably be
as follow s : Eight or nine separate small dark rooms, work-
room and storage, a waiting-room and porter’s lobby, large
meeting-room, still-room and offices, library, billiard-room,
workshop fitted with lathe, &c., committee and secretaries’
looms, grill-room, kitchen, resident porter’s rooms, studio and
enlarging room, and lead flats.”
Received. From Messrs. Perken, Son, aud Raymeut, a
simple and inexpensive magnesium-ribbon lamp — an improve-
ment on one figured and favourably noticed in these columns
about a twelvemonth since,
to eromgponBcnts*
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 6, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
Ligroine Lamp. — A correspondent in Vienna has been good
enough to seek out the maker of this incandescent lamp, which
costs 22 gulden (about £1 18s.) all complete, with benzoline
boiler, gas burner, and a spare Welsbach gauze. Our friend
saw it in action. The power is said to be 100 candle-light,
aud it works very efficiently, bearing out Dr. Eder’s report of
it. The maker is Herr C. Fabricius, II Erzherzog Karl Platz,
No. 16, Vienna. Benzoline vapour mixed with air is burnt
at a jet surmounted with a Welsbach incandescent gauze,
giving a brilliant white light. See Year-Book, page 170.
Pr. O. S. — The best hand camera. If you are intent upon
using glass plates, the camera mentioned is as good as any,
but the most portable form is now the new Kodak No. 2,
worked with a roller of flexible celluloid. This gives circular
pictures of 3i inches diameter, very suitable for lantern trans-
parencies, but of course not answering your requirement of
taking negatives 3g by 5 inches.
Noriam. — Plate-glass for studio roof. Under the special cir-
cumstances of your case, being already in possession of a large
square of plate-glass, it might be well to make it do duty as
part of the roof of your studio. The lower slope, and not
the top light, is certainly the best place to put it, for in this
position it may rest on a faced iron horizontal ledge fixed
directly on the iron support as sketched. With regard to the
probability of its changing colour, examine carefully the edges
with a white card behind to see whether, in the protected parts
under the rabbet, where it was originally screened from sun-
light exposure, there is the slightest indication of a paler tint
than in the rest of the glass, and be guided accordingly.
M. W. — Your letter was duly received and acted upon a fort-
night ago. You will know the result next week in ordinary
course.
W. T. D. — The back numbers of the Photographic Times
(1889) are not just now accessible at the Patent Office
Library ; they have been sent away to be bound. There is
no English patent in the name of F. Winterhoff. You
probably saw a notice in this column last week, asking for in-
formation as to present address.
Residues. — You are using vastly too much chrome alum in
your fixing bath, and every fresh addition of potassium sul-
phide merely precipitates the oxide of chromium along with
the sulphur. But the silver is thrown down first, and this
with a moderate quantity. When you smell sulphuretted
hydrogen in the liquor you have added enough, or you can
tell by the colour of the precipitate. The zinc method of
reduction is slow and unsatisfactory.
W. H. L. — Gelatino- Chloride Printing-Out Process. Dr. Barker’s
formula : —
Nelson’s No. 1 gelatine
... 175 grains
Coignet’s gelatine ...
... 175 „
Sal ammoniac
... 36 „
Rochelle salts
... 100 „
Nitrate of silver ...
... 150 „
Alcohol
. i . 1 ounce
Water
... 10 ounces
Soak the gelatine in part of the cold
water, then heat
to 100" Fahr. with all ingredients added, and maintain at this
temperature for ten or fifteen minutes after everything is dis-
solved. See also page 201 of the Year-Book, for Ashman
and Offord’s formula for a Citro-Chloride paper.
Flux. — In addition to the details given last week, we may refer
you to “ The Reducer’s Manual and Gold and Silver Worker’s
Guide,” by Victor G. Bloede, published in New York (J. U,
Ladd), and to be had of Messrs. Trubner and Co. The little
book is full of practical details which cannot fail to be of
service to you.
Other correspondents in our next.
/Supplement to the “ Photographic JSews.”
February lj+th, 1&9G. 1
Repiociu cod by Waterluw <£. Horn Limited, from a photograph by Cot. W Nouerre.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
■ \zj-y
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1641. — February 14, 1890.
CONTENTS.
P AO K
focussing Appliances 117
Athanasius Kircher, the Inventor of the Magic Lantern. By
James Mew 118
Photography in France. By Leon Vidnl 120
Dr. Otto Just 121
The Solubility of Glass Bottles 121
The Royal Institution 122
Schirm’s New Flash-light Gallery. By Dr. H. W. Vogel 123
Some Further Application of the Ramsden Eyepiece to Photo-
graphy. By F. H. Varley, M.I.E.E , F.R.A.S 125
PACK
Notes 126
The Late Dr. E. Hornig ... 127
Photographic Waste Products 128
A New Eye. By Camille Flammarion 129
A Wife's View of Amateur Photography 130
The New Photographic Developers. By Prof. Charles F. Himes 131
Correspondence 132
Patent Intelligence 133
Proceedings of Societies 134
Answers to Correspondents 136
FOCUSSING APPLIANCES.
Plexty of room exists for improvements in focussing
appliances for photographic cameras, and a recent in-
vention in connection therewith made by Mr. Frank
Bishop, of the firm of Messrs Marion and Co., may be
explained by the aid of the accompanying diagrams.
It consists of an ordinary focussing glass and tube,
and to this larger tube
a smaller one is sol-
dered, as in Fig. 1.
The smaller tube ends
in a small india-
rubber cup, which,
when wetted, will
hold on by the pressure
of the atmosphere to
the polished side of
the glass focussing Fig. 1.
screen, and can readily be pushed about with an easy,
sliding motion, to any part of the surface ; in short,
it is on the principle of the “sucker” used by
schoolboys. The object
of the invention is to
allow the photographer
the free use of both his
hands while focussing,
instead of employing
one of them to retain
the focussing glass in
position, and this pur-
pose it achieves ad-
mirably. Fig. 2 repre-
sents the focussing glass
holding on, limpet-like, 2.
to the screen, as it does when in use. It adheres with
considerable tenacity.
The method recommended in another column by Mr.
Varley of using ground glass to ascertain the exact
amount of subject upon the plate, and afterwards a
plain piece of glass with scratches upon it to get a
critical image, is often employed in photo-micrographic
work ; but it is doubtful whether it will ever come
into general use with ordinary cameras, especially those
for outdoor purposes ; in the latter case it would form
an item adding somewhat to the weight of the instru-
ment, and be a step in the direction of complexity
rather than of simplification. Probably what may
be called a (l piebald ” screen would answer better,
that is to say, a screen of finely ground glass, with
perfectly transparent spots a quarter or a third of
an inch in diameter scattered over its surface. The
ground glass would give the general view, and the
spots would favour the easy focussing of a critical
image.
A good focussing screen made on the principle of those
now in common use would consist of much finer ground
glass than such as is ordinarily employed, and more
approaching in appearance unground glass. With two
lenses on Ramsden’s principle mounted in one tube, a
focussing glass is formed transmitting much more light
to the eye than those at present in use, and when
employed to view the image upon exceptionally fine
ground glass there is a pleasure and ease in focussing
to which the majority of photographers are entirely
unaccustomed ; when once they have tasted the luxury
they will never return to the present appliances.
Now that the magnesium light is coming into more
general use, and that the operators have usually to
focus beforehand by gaslight or lamplight, the desira-
bility of being able to get a brilliantly illuminated
critical image when focussing, is all the more
palpable .
THE “ PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS” SUPPLE-
MENT.
To-day we issue as a Supplement a photo-mcchanical
reproduction, on a reduced scale, of the photograph of
Penzance Harbour, by Col. W. Noverre, which wa9 so
much admired at the last Photographic Exhibition.
The original was upon very rough drawing paper, and
was of a terra-cotta red colour,
m
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Ff.brua.rv 14, 1890.
ATHANASIUS KIRCHER, THE INVENTOR OF
THE MAGIC LANTERN.— No. I.
BY JAMES MEW.
Some years ago* au occasion was taken to notice in the
columns of this paper a communication made to the Lon-
don and Provincial Photographic Association by Mr. V .
II. Harrison, containing many interesting and historical
notes on the optical or magic lantern. In this communi-
cation we learnt that the magic lantern was invented by
Athanasius lurcher in the year 10 46. A few lines, which
many of the present readers of the Photographic Nkw»i
have never seen, and many others perhaps forgotten, may
be here copied out of that interesting and ably conceived
communication. “ There are,” says Mr. W. II. Harrison,
“ speculations that the magic lantern may have been known
before lurcher’s time. Some have ascribed its invention
to Roger Bacon, who, in his 1 Discovery of the Miracles
of Art, Nature, and Magic,’ written about the year 12G0,
displays knowledge of the uses of lenses. Others have
speculated that it may have been known to Egyptian
hierophants, because they understood the properties of
concave mirrors. Cellini, who died about 1570, describes
spectres which had been seen in ascending smoke, and it
has been said that these must have been produced by an
optical lantern. All this is but speculation. The one
thing which can be clearly seen by us when peering into
the mists of antiquity is that lurcher gave the first clear
description of an optical lantern, and was personally proud
of its invention.” But whether lurcher be the inventor of
the magic lantern or not, supposing even it could be de-
monstratively proved that this machine — which, in the
English Patent Office, is not entered under the heading of
Optics, but, curiously enough, by a strange system of
governmental classification, under that of Toys — was the
invention of another, and not Kircher, lurcher would
still be of the greatest interest to photographers from his
remarkab'e work, written in Latin at Rome, in the middle
of the seventeenth century, entitled “The Great Art of
Light and Shade.” This large folio volume, digested into
ten books, contains so many matters of interest to photo-
graphic artists that we propose to reproduce a portion of
it in these pages. We will preface this reproduction with
a short biography of the author.
“In the year 1602, on the second day of May, on the
third hour after midnight,” says Kircher in the story of
his own life, entitled by him ‘ The Life of the very reve-
rend bather Athanasius Kircher, of the Society of Jesus,
a man most celebrated throughout all the world, ’ on the fes-
tal day of Saint Athanasius, was I by my parents, John
Kircher and Anna Garsekiu, catholic persons and most
devoted to divine worship and pious works, brought forth
into this common air of calamity in the town of Geyssen.
distant some three hours’ journey from Fulda. ” He speak?
of his father as a high-souled person who, refusing all gifts
from the governing Prince, constantly asserted that one
ounce of liberty, the wise man’s true delight, was ol
moie value than kingly honours of many thousand pounds,
Athanasius was the youngest of nine children. His
name was derived from the great veneration in which his
father held that saint on account of his constancy and im-
perturbable fortitude in the Arian persecution. In hii
tenth year the young Kircher learnt music, Latin, auc
geography, and afterwards was sent to the Jesuit Collegi
at I ulda, where he also acquired Greek and Hebrew.
“ Histo“cal Notefl on the Optical Lantern,” by W. II. Harrison ; Pn
TooRtrmc News, Dec. 23, 1887, p. 803.
Kircher speaks at some length of the weekly purgation
of his conscience by confession, and of the Diviue aid by
which he was encouraged to fight against all the enticements
of puerile play, and all the idle occupations which are
wont, in ill-conditioned bosoms, to constitute childhood's
chiefest charm. The Divine clemency preserved him. he
tells us, from manifold dangers. On one occasion — it was
on a bathing excursion, chosen with some apparent heed-
lessness in the vicinity of a water mill — lurcher was sucked
under the wheel by the current, but emerged uninjured on the
other side, to the astonishment of himself and of his com-
panions. Another miracle happened in his favour on the day
of Pentecost, on which a procession took place to consecrate
certain fields by sacerdotal aid from satanic storms. This
solemn lustration was succeeded by a horse race. Kir-
cher, being in the first rank of the spectators, was pressed
by a sudden impulse of those behind him into the middle
of the racecourse just as the horses were about to pass.
“ I lay," complains the unhappy Kircher, “having com-
mended myself to Supernal protection, with a contracted
body and prone till all the horses had passed over me, after
which 1 arose safe and sound.” On being asked how lie had
managed to escape, he replied that there was no diminution
in the power of Him who delivered Jonah from the ingur-
gitating whale, Tobias from the devouring fish, and Daniel
from the ravening lions. On a third occasion Kircher
was lost in a wood at night, and was so terribly frightened
in consequence that he determined to renounce this wicked
world and enter a religious order. He chose that of the
Jesuits, and was admitted a novice at Paderborn on the
2nd October. 1618. Ilerehestudied logic, physics, mathe-
matics, and philology.
The greater part of lurcher's autobiography is made up
of most disastrous chances, of moving accidents by flood
and field, from all of which he, like the Moor, escaped
scot free. His descriptions of his dangers, from which
he considers himself liberated by Divine intervention, are
sometimes highly picturesque. He gives, for instance, a
very graphic account of how he avoided on one occasion
his enemies by a flight in the wintertime. The ways were
deep with snow, which covered his knees ; dire hunger
assailed his stomach, a cold wind froze his extremities.
His sole food was a loaf of barley bread mixed with a
great quantity of bran which, not without difficulty, had
been extorted from a surly peasant ; bread of the very
worst condition, and yet to him in his famished state, de-
licious beyond all compare. It is a long story, but it ends
well. He escapes his foes after persistent prayer, though
his knees are trembling, the rest of his body — Kircher
writes “ my whole body,” but this must be an error arising
from some mental confusion induced by a reminiscence of
his agony — rigid, and his face a livid blue. One more of
these disastrous chances will probably suffice the reader's
curiosity. It is told at some length by Kircher, who in-
sists on every circumstance of his peril with naive minute-
ness. We can. find room here only for an abstract or a
digest of this particular danger, a danger so formidable
that he cannot call it to mind without much horror. It
happened in a garden of the Jesuits’ College at Avignon,
to which he had retired in 1635 after the celebrated thirty
years’ war which Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden had
carried on in Germany, where Kircher was professor of
philosophy and oriental languages at the College of Wirtz-
burg, in Franconia.
In the garden of the Jesuits’ College at Avignon was a
large water wheel, placed between two high walls, and
Fkiiroarv 14, 1800.]
THE l'lrOTOGHAlMirC NEWS.
11!
driven round by horse power. The wheel stood in a
narrow pit of deep water, and, raising the fluid in
buckets, cast it into a stone basin, from which it was
distributed by channels through the whole garden.
The ill-starred Kircher, while standing near this water
machine involved in thought, was suddenly knocked
down by the pole to which the horse was attached,
and became, by some untoward destiny, inextricably in-
volved with the machinery. “The wheel continually
moving, I was,” says Kircher, “ nowhere able to fix my
foot, nor was it allowed me to escape sideways, on account
of the close proximity of the walls which, within a little,
touched the wheel. Being in this extreme necessity of
peril I implored the assistance of my companion ; but lie,
being occupied in a remote part of the garden, gave no
heed to my clamour, what time I was revolving with the
wheel, and was expecting death with every moment.”
Then, says this victim of accidents, solita fiducia ad
Deiparam confugi, whereupon the wheel incontinently
stood still, and Kircher, who by this time was up to his
neck in the water, managed to clamber out of his difficulty
and find a way to escape.
With the good Jesuits at Avignon lie passed two years,
occupied entirely with the study of antiquities. It was
during his sojourn here that he became acquainted with
the learned Peiresc, who advised him to apply himself to
the explication of Egyptiau hieroglyphics. Elected to a
Professorship of Mathematics at Vienna, he was about to
return to Germany when he received an oi’der to journey
to the Vatican. He was charged by the Pope in 1637 to visit
Malta. He went afterwards to Sicily and Naples, and
ultimately taught mathematics for eight years in a college
at Rome. Here he had a dispute with Father Maignan on
the subject of the invention of an optical instrument.
Kircher, on seeing it, said, “ Quod stupes, an non hoc est
figura mei libri?" What do you wonder at? Is not this
the figure of my book? Whereupon one who was pre-
sent, comprehending that Kircher was for taking to himself
all the credit of the invention, replied, “ On the contrary,
it is the book of your figure (Into, hie cst liber tux fgurx. ”)
This account is given by Bayle, who adds that the matter
would have rested there had it not been that the honour
of two nations French and German was supposed to be
involved. After all, each mathematician may have invented
the machine independently.
Kircher died at Rome on 28th November, 1680. He was a
man of immense erudition, but ill-digested and uncritical,
endowed with the wildest imagination, a most retentive
memory, and an untiring patience. He composed twenty-
two folio, eleven quarto, and three octavo volumes. It is
not to be supposed that from such a mass of literature
error could be excluded. One of Iris books, “ Musurgia
Universalis ,” published in 1650 in two heavy folios, treats
of the principles of music. The celebrated Ur. Burney,
in his criticism of this composition, speaks of it as a large
work which might give occasion to one yet larger, if all
the errors contained therein were duly annotated and cor-
rected. Not only was Kircher on some occasions inaccu-
rate— as who, indeed, is not? — but he has also been charged
with too careless credulity. How far this charge is borne
out by what the reader has already perused, is for him
to determine ; but in a story commonly adduced to sup-
port it we can find nothing to lurcher’s discredit.
The Jesuit was more than ordinarily addicted to
the study of hieroglyphical characters. Mystery is
pleasing to most of us; for Kircher it had an especial
charm. Some gentlemen — as the term was then, per-
haps is now, generally understood — proposed to divert
themselves at the scholar’s expense. With this ex-
cellent view they caused to be cut by a common stone-
cutter some fantastic, unmeaning marks and figures upon
a rude block of stone, and had it buried in a spot which
Kircher had been commissioned to excavate and explore.
The learned antiquarian stumbled on this stone, regarded
it in the light of a singular curiosity, and, enraptured
with his discovery, set himself at once to work to ascer-
tain its meaning. After several days’ assiduous study,
he lighted upon an elucidation satisfactory to himself,
and — here the jest came in. As to whether any of the
gentlemen apologised to the student for having made him
their laughing stock, we consult history in vain.
Perhaps the whole account, of which there is another
version, is apocryphal. In the other tale we learn that
one Andre Muller did some scribblings on a parchment,
and forwarded them to Kircher as antique records ; that
the unsuspecting savant replied that they were true hiero-
glyphics, and sent Muller the translation.
This prefatory article cannot be concluded in justice to
Kircher without a short notice of his manifold works.
Casting aside some religious compositions, these may be
divided into historical, antiquarian, linguistic, hieroglyphic,
mathematical, and physical. Of all these the last are
chiefly our concern. One of the first and rarest of his
works, which, by the way, are nearly all written in Latin,
was called “ Magnetic Art, or Experiments on the Opera-
tions of the Magnet,” published at Wirtzburg, 1631, in
quarto. In an extension of this same subject he pub-
lished in 1641, also in quarto, a book entitled the
“Magnet,” in the third part of which is a description of
the Tarantula, with two portraits of him, one exhibiting
his belly, the other his back, and a legend underneath
declaring in a Latin hexameter that music is the only
potion against the poison of his bite. Above is a
geographical sketch of the places where the beast is
mostly to be met with, and again above that on this full-
page plate is the musical composition in which Kircher
confides as a certain cure.
‘ 1 The Subteranean World, in which is shown the
Majesty and Riches of Nature,” was published in two
folio volumes at Amsterdam, in 1668. Kircher, being-
anxious to discover the interior of Vesuvius to see, in
fact, if there was anything in it, let down a man hired for
a price into the principal crater, and held him suspended
there until he had fully satisfied his curiosity. In this
book will be found many bizarre and apocryphal accounts
of giants, dragons, devils, and men all living underground,
with the secret of palingenesis, or the way to resuscitate
a plant from its ashes. But lvircber’s greatest work for
the photographer is his 1 1 Great Art of Light and
Shade,” already mentioned, published at Rome in 1645. Of
this -book, from which it is proposed to extract much
which will be interesting, there has already appeared
a short notice in the Photographic News (December
23rd, 1887), where we read that in Ivircher’s pre-
face to a portion of the book devoted to optical
instruments and peculiar kinds of cameras, he says
that the secrets contained therein are by no means
Satanic work, but the result of study and contemplation.
He adds that he has to tell of some of the rarest marvels
in nature, such as will excite admiration in the minds of
those who behold them, that nobody has done anything
of the kind before, and that he, Kircher. made his first
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [February 14, 1890.
the effect, to exaggerate the contrast, the fact shows that
the desired quality of scientific inter-comparability is
experiments before any one else knew anything about
the matter. There is evidently here a little side-wind
directed against his worthy colleague above mentioned,
Father Maignan. Other people (Father Maignan?)
sometimes promised rare wonderful and unheard of things
which afterwards proved all wrong, but what he (F ather
Kircher) had to tell would prove all right. It is at least
clear that the worthy priest stood upon excellent terms
with himself, and was not devoid of that self-confidence
which has been said by an excellent authority to be essen-
tially requisite to all great undertakings.
(To be con tinned).
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FRANCE.
BY LEON VIDAL.
French Photographic Society— International Photo-
graphic Laboratories — Orthochromatism applied to
the Reproduction of Pictures — Positive Paper with
Chloride of Iridium — New Engraving Process —
Proofs from Orthochp.omatic Collodion — Theory of
Contretypf.s— Lantern Images.
The district photographic club of the south-east of France
at Lyons has written to the French Photographic Society
to announce that its photographic laboratory is at the
service of members of the Paris Society on presentation
of card. A similar notice comes from the Italian Photo-
graphic Society in Florence. This movement in a direction
so useful to amateur photographers appears to be spreading.
It is to be desired that in every part of the civilised world
there were international laboratories of this kind, at the
service of members, duly accredited, of all the photographic
societies.
Mr. Edwards has just presented to the French Photo-
graphic Society some fresh specimens in support of the
results that he obtains upon his orthochromatic plates in
the reproduction of pictures. He sends an interesting
note on this subject, and the specimens presented are
generally speaking good. We are not the less con-
vinced, however, that orthochromatism does not suppress
the effects of reflection, for in that case it would be
necessary to suppose that what the eye sees, and to the
degree to which it sees it, is not rendered on the ortho-
chromatic plate. Let us commence by saying that both
here and in the Society, we discuss the matter from the
purely technical point of view only. We do not know
Mr. Edwards; we have no interest in being disagreeable
to him, still less to speak ill of him, and when we said
that the presentation was not candid (sincere), we merely
made allusion to the proofs placed in our hands without
questioning the good faith of the author of those proofs,
without having the slightest intention to injure him. What
interest could we have in doing so ? The word sincere in
the present case signifies real, true (vrai). We can make
plain by an example furnished to us by Mr. Edwards him-
self, what we understand by the word. The example is as
follows: — Mr. Edwards displayed various photographs on
ordinary and isochromatic plates ; amongst these photo-
graphs were two representing a vase of jonquils (a
beautiful yellow flower). On the ordinary plate these
flowers came out as rich black, almost velvet black; in the
isochromatic plate the same flowers were a beautiful white
velvet in appearance.
Well, this is not real ; if the intention has been to force
wanting. The ordinary plate, of whatever make, will
yield in the hands of any photographer a reproduction of
these flowers that shall be less black. It suffices to expose
a little longer, in order that in place of a degree of black-
ness answering to 100, we have, for example, a middle
tone of grey of the degree 50. Now it seems to us that
the ordinary plate is bad, defective in consequence of
insufficient exposure; it might have been less black by
half ; then it ought so to have been in order that a tech-
nical comparison fulfilling the desired conditions of scien-
tific candour might be made. As for the photograph on
the isochromatic plate, it is too white. The plate should
represent yellow more with its true value — that is
to say of a light grey — evidently more closely
reproducing the effect produced upon the eye by
the tonality of yellow. As an orthochromatic result
it is therefore defective ; we should give to this too-
white proof the designation 0 (Zero), answering to com-
plete absence of black. There is thus between the two
proofs exhibited a range of from 0 to 100, but if each had
been made with the exact value that it might have yielded,
the ordinary plate might be represented by 50 (half as dark
as it ap/waretl), and the isochromatic plate by 15 (the shade of
grey about equalling the apparent tonality of the yellow jonquil), and
the relation of one to the other would then not have exceeded
that of 15 to 50. The effect of contrast has thus been ex-
aggerated by 65, since it is 100 in the one case, and 35 in the
other. We have set out, thus, exactly our impressions, and
that is the explanation of the expresssion absence de sincerite,
regarding only certain results that were exhibited, and going
no farther. We wish to say shortly that, in order that
results of this character should be comparable with each
other, it is necessary to show the best that can be done
with the ordinary plate as well as with the isochromatic
plate, in which case the contrast would have been less,
and the result not less favourable to the employment of
isochromatic plates.
In so far as concerns the reproduction of pictures, that
which we criticised represents the Doge Loredano, by Jean
Bel in ; here, again, we have not called in question
the faith of Mr. Edwards in our criticism, but we
have the conviction that with a longer exposure
the photograph upon the ordinary plate would have
beer, better, less harsh, less violent ; with less
exposure the photograph upon the isochromatic plate
would have shown more pronounced relief ; it would then
have been less soft, less harmonious, but more true. Thus,
to our thinking, the contrast has been forced in this case
as in that of the flowers before mentioned. The ordinary
plate is not so good as it might have been, the isochro-
matic one also ; we have not, therefore, been shown the
best possible result in the two cases ; that is the origin of
our impression that the true conditions of inter-compara-
bility have not been obtained, but that is all we desire to
say, using the right of scientific criticism which absolutely
belongs to us.
M. Berthiot presented some beautiful prints obtained on
paper containing chloride of iridium. This product
promises stability in the prints, but as yet the value of the
process is scarcely settled.
M. Chas. Guillaume Petit has perfected a process of
typographic engraving which insures with skill the ab-.ol.’.tc
purity of the whites. This is the process : — The photo-
graph is printed on a copper plate, covered with
February 14, 1890.]
lthe photographic news.
121
bitumen, and developed with essential oil, which
leaves the copper bare in the absolute lights. It is
washed, dried, and finally covered with powdered
resin. It is then heated until a grain is perfectly
formed. This dressing of resin on the insoluble bitumen
has the property of rendering the bitumen soluble
wherever the grain is formed. By plunging the plate again
into the turpentine bath, the dissolved resin leaves a deep
perforation iu the bitumen. The plate is then re-coated
with a solution of bichromatised gelatine ; it is then exposed
under the same negative by the aid of registration stops
previously arranged, and is developed with perchloride of
iron. In the pure whites there is no grain, and we have a
plate where there is no need to have recourse to a tool in
order to obtain the whites. Prints were shown in support
of this process, which is very interesting, and may lead to
other applications. M. Petit says that the dressing of
resin has the effect of de-oxidising the bitumen rendered
insoluble by light. We ought to know, in the first place,
whether this insolubility proceeds from oxidation. Messrs.
Chevreul and Kaiser have demonstrated that the effect
caused by light is produced without the presence of oxygen,
but with this reserve concerning a detail only affecting the
theoretical question, we recognise the truly practical and
very interesting communication of M. Petit.
M. Vallot, whose patriotism — like ours — will doubtless be
attacked, presents proofs obtained with the isochromatic
collodion emulsion of l)r. Albert, of Munich. As to
the isochromatic properties of this emulsion M. Vallot
says textually “ above all, without the employment of a
yellow screen before the lens, the effect is much more
pronounced than with the best gelatino-bromide plates
prepared either with cosine or with azaline.” M. Vallot
insists upon this point, which is of very great importance
in his opinion, as in the reproduction of pictures the
operator has a facility for varying at his will the effects of
isochromatism by adding to the emulsion, as the case may
require, divers colouring matters, such as cyanine, erythro-
sine, aud chlorophyl.
M. Bordet explains how a coutretype is formed when
using the process with a bichromated gelatino-bromide
plate, indicated by Mr. Bolas in the News in 1880, and
afterwards by Capt. Biuy in 1882, and studied afresh by
M. Balagny in 1889. According to him the theory is as
follows: Bichromate in presence of light renders the
penetration of solutions difficult in the insolated portions,
from which fact arises the phenomenon of reversal of the
image. He has verified his statements by dispensing with
bromide of silver, and has obtained just the same a con-
tretype by plunging the film of insolated bichromated
gelatine into a colouring bath. From the fact of a more
or less profound imbibition, according to the degree of the
action of fight, he obtains all the values of the negative,
and the coutretypes are equal to those obtained in the
same way on gelatino-bromide plates. M. Vallot has also
studied this question, but he has arrived, he tells us, at a
different conclusion regarding the theoretical explana-
tion.
M. Molteni presented transparencies of various tones
obtained upon Ilford gelatino-chloride plates, and pointed
out the different modes of development. M. Audra has
done the same for the Perron plates. Shall we be accused
of defamation if we timidly suggest that, in spite of all the
improvements brought to bear on sensitive films of gelatine
for transparencies, we have not yet found them to equal
what has been obtained on albumen or collodion '!
DR. OTTO JUST.*
Our club has to mourn the loss of an active member in
Dr. Otto Just, the owner of an ocular institution in Zittau,
Saxony, who died suddenly on the 5th of January last.
The deceased was born in Zittau on the 7th of September,
1836, and was educated in the Gymnasium there, and after-
wards at the University of Leipzig, after which he studied
diseases relating to the eye under Professor Arlt in Vienna,
and Professor Graefe in Berlin. In 1861 he established
himself at Zittau as a surgeon and specialist for eye
diseases, and a year later founded on a very small scale an
institute for the cure of eye diseases. This undertaking
succeeded so well that in 1869-70 he built a large house in
which the Institute remained until his death. The skilful
surgeon enjoyed a high place in the profession,
and his reputation extended far from his own
abode. Since 1886 Dr. Just occupied himself much with
photography, and he joined the Club of Amateur Pho-
tography in 1887. At the Exhibition of Amateur
Photographers in Vienna in the autumn of 1888, he
showed a beautiful collection of landscapes, groups, in-
stantaneous pictures, and reproductions. Dr. Just wTote
articles for the Photographische Rundschau, having for their
subject his varied experiments with Eastman’s negative
paper. In an early number we propose to issue one of
his works as a supplement.
Although not personally acquainted with Dr. Just, we
lament not the less his sudden death, which has deprived
photography of so earnest an adherent.
THE SOLUBILITY OF GLASS BOTTLES.
Dr. Thresch said at the British Pharmaceutical Conference,
some years ago he was investigating the action of rain in cer-
tain districts on vegetation. It was supposed that some lime
kilns, which had been recently erected, materially affected
vegetation, and he had collected the rainfall at many different
points. When he collected the rain on litmus and other papers
he almost invariably found that it had an acid reaction ; but,
strange to say, when collected in bottles, it was either neutra
or distinctly alkaline. On investigating the cause of this, he
discovered that iu all the bottles he employed — he tried all
kinds and found the results the same— some decomposition took
place in a very short time, and the free acid disappeared. His
impression was that it was a decomposition of silicate of soda
or of lime, in which the acid combined with the base, and the
silica was thrown down. That this was the case was the more
probable, because in evaporating samples of rain water he found
that when collected in platinum dishes the solid residue per
gallon was 1 to 4 grains less than when collected in glass, and
this residue was chiefly silica. He also noticed, in making
further experiments, that in titrating an acid solution, if the
acid w'ere run in until a faint tint was produced with litmus,
aud then the liquid w'ere boiled for a few minutes in a glass
vessel, the colour would disappear. Upon adding acid, the
colour would again be obtained, which would again disappear
on boiling, and so on ; and he had seen students in the exami-
nation room go on repeating that process for an hour, thinking
they were increasing the accuracy of the result, evidently not
having observed that this naturally occurred when these solu-
tions w’ere boiled iu glass flasks. Another thing still more
interesting w'as this : if in one of these bottles — and they
varied considerably, though they w’ere all acted upon — a mix-
ture practically neutral and containing tincture of cardamoms,
were placed and kept in it for some time, it would vary con-
siderably in colour in the course of, say, a month, and it was
quite possible that the complaints sometimes made as to the
colour of such a mixture were due to this cause.
* Translated for the Photoorahic News from the Photographische
Rundschau, organ of the Amateur Photographic Club in Vienpa.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 14, 18P0.
122
THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
VI.
Dk. Thomas Young’s Drscovr.iUES and Photographs.
Young’s researches on light were ably and briefly
summarised on the 22nd of January, 886, at the last
Friday evening lecture which Professor Tyndall de-
livered at the Royal Institution, and whose utterances
on the subject are here quoted : —
The physical meaning of all the terms applied to light was
soon fixed. Intensity depended upon the amplitudes of the
waves. Colour depended on the lengths of the waves.
Two series of waves coalesced and helped each other when
one was any number of complete undulations, or, in other
words, any even number of half-undulations, behind the other.
Two series of waves extinguished each other when the one series
was any odd number of semi-undulations behind the other.
But inasmuch as white light is made up of innumerable waves of
different lengths, such waves cannot all interfere at the same
time. Some interfere totally', and destroy each other; some
partially ; while some add themselves together and enhance the
effect. Thus, by interference, a portion only of the white
light is withdrawn, and the remaining portion is, as a general
rule, coloured. Indeed the most glowing and brilliant effects
of colouration are thus produced. Young applied the theory
successfully to explain the colours of striated surfaces which,
in the hands of Mr. Rutherfurd and others, have been made to
produce such splendid effects. The iridescences on the polished
surfaces of mother-of-pearl are due to the stri;e produced by
the edges of the shell-layers, which are of infinitesimal tliick-
ness ; the fine lines drawn by Coventry, Wollaston, and Barton
upon glass also showed these colours. Barton afterwards suc-
ceeded in transferring the lines to steel and brass. Most of
you are acquainted with the iridescence of Barton’s buttons.
A descendant of Mr. Barton has, I believe, succeeded in repro-
ducing the instrument wherewith his grandfather produced his
brilliant effects.
But the greatest triumph of Young in this field was the
explanation of the beautiful phenomenon known as Newton’s
rings. The colours of thin plates were profusely illustrated by
the experiments of Hooke and Boyle, but Newton longed for
more than illustrations. He desired quantitative measurement.
The colour of the film was known to depend upon its thickness.
Can this thickness be measured ? Here the uuparalleled penetra-
tion of Newton came into play. He took a lens consisting of
a slice of a sphere of a diameter so large that the curved sur-
face of the lens approximated to a plane surface. Upon this
slightly convex surface he placed a plate of glass whose surface
was accurately plane. Squeezing them together, and allowing
light to fall upon them, he observed those beautiful iris-circles
with which his name will be for ever identified. The iris-
colours were obtained when he employed white light. When
monochromatic light was used he had simply successive circles
of light and darkness. Here then, from the central point
where the two glasses touched each other, Newton obtained a
film of air which gradually increased in thickness as he retreated
from the point of contact. A\ hence this wonderful recurrence
of light and darkness ? The very constitution of light itself
must be involved in the answer. His desire was now to ascer-
tain the thickness of the film of air corresponding to the
respective rings. Knowing the curvature of his lens, this was
a matter of easy calculation. He measured the diameter of
the fifth ring of the series. This might l>c accurately done
with a pair of fine compasses, for the diameter was over the
fifth of an inch in length. But it was the interval between
the glasses corresponding to this distance that Newton required
to know, and this he found by calculation to be 1-37, 000th of
.an inch. 1 his, be it remembered, is the distance corresponding
to the fifth ring. The interval corresponding to the first ring
would be only a fifth of this, or, in other words, about
1 -1 80, 000th of an inch. Such are the magnitudes with which
we have to deal before the question “ What is Light ?” can be
scientifically answered.
Newton’s explanation of the rings, which he was the first
to discover, though artificial in the highest degree, is marked
by his profound sagacity. He was hampered by the notion of
the “corporeity” of light. He could not get over the objec-
tion raised by himself as to the existence of shadows in a fluid
medium. He held, therefore, that light was due to the darting
forth of minute particles in straight lines ; and he threw out
the idea that colour might be due to the difference of bigness
in the particles. He endowed these particles with what he
called fits of easy transmission and reflection. The dark rings
in his immortal experiment were produced where the light-
particles were in their transmissive “ fit.” They went through
both surfaces of the film of air, and were not thrown back to
the eye. The bright rings occurred where the light- particles
were in their reflective fit, and where, on reaching the second
surface of the film, they were thrown back to the eye. The
cardinal point here is, that Newton regarded the recurrence of
light and darkness as due to an action confined to the second
surface of the film. And here it was that Young came into
irreconcilable collision with him, proving to demonstration that
the dark rings occurred where the portions of light reflected
from both sides of the film extinguished each other by inter-
ference, while the bright rings occurred where the light
reflected from the two surfaces coalesced to enhance the in-
tensity.
Young next applied the wave theory to account for the dif-
fraction or inflection of light, that is to say, the effects produced
by its bending round the edges of bodies. When a cone of rays
issuing from a very minute point impinges on an opaque body
so as to embrace it wholly, the shadow of the body, if received
upon a screen, exhibits fringes of colour. They follow so
closely the contour of the opaque body, that Sir John Herschcl
compared them to the lines along the sea-coast in a map. If a
very thin slip of card, or a hair, be placed within such a cone,
it is noticed that besides the fringes outside the shadow,
bands of colour occur within it ; the central or brighest band
being always white when white light is employed. It is a
singular and somewhat startling fact that, by the interi>osition
of an opaque body, say a small circle of tinfoil, the point on
which we should expect the centre of the shadow to fall is, by
the joint action of diffraction and interference, illuminated in
precisely the same degree as it is when the opaque circle is with-
drawn.* In reference to the interior fringes, Young made the
observation, which is of primary importance, that, if you inter-
cept the light passing by one of the edges of the strip of card,
or of the hair, the fringes disappear. It requires the inflection
of the waves round both edges of the object, and their conse-
quent interference, to produce the fringes.
Young's attempt to explain the phenomena of diffraction was
a distinct advance on the extremely artificial hypothesis of
Newton. Still, his attempt was not so successful as his explana-
tion of the colours of striated surfaces and of thin, thick, and
mixed plates. Here the young officer of engineers to whom I
have already referred, Fresnel, entered the field. He presented
in 1815, to the French Institute, a memoir on diffraction, which
marks an epoch in the history of the wave theory. It is usual
when such a paper is presented to refer it to a “Commission,”
who consider it, and report upon its merits. The commission-
aires in this instance were Arago and Prony.
Arago had read the memoirs of Young in the “ Philosophical
Transactions,” but had not understood their full significance.
The study of Fresnel's memoir caused the full truth to flash
upon him that his young countryman had been anticipated
thirteen years previously by Dr. Young. Fresnel had re-dis-
covered the principle of interference independently, and had
applied it, with profound insight and unrivalled ex]«rimental
skill, to the phenomena of diffraction. It was no light thing to
Fresnel to find himself, as regards the principle of interference,
suddenly shorn of his glory. He, however, bore the shock with
resignation. He might have readily made claims which would
have found favour with his countrymen and with the world at
large ; but he did nothing of the kind. The history of science,
indeed, furnishes no brighter example of honourable fairness
* A simitar diffraction has been proved by I ■ r i Rayleigh to occur in the
case of sound.— J. T.
February 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
123
than that exhibited throughout his too short life by the illustrious
young Frenchman. Once assured that he had been anticipated
— whatever might have been the extent of his own labours,
however independently he might have arrived at his results, he
unreservedly withdrew all claim to the discovery. There is, 1
repeat, no fairer example of scientific honour than that mani-
fested by Augustin Fresnel.
Fresnel was a powerful mathematician, and well versed in the
best mathematical methods of his day. With enormous labour
he calculated the positions where the phenomena of interference
must display themselves in a definite way. He was, moreover,
a most refined experimentalist, and, having made his calculations,
he devised instrumental means of the most exquisite delicacy
with a view of verifying his results. In this way he swept the
field of diffraction practically clear of difficulty, solving its
problems where even Young had failed.
Truly these were minds possessing gifts not purchasable with
money, and round about the central labours of both of them,
minor achievements of genius are to be found, which would be
a fortune to less opulent men. I hardly know a finer example
of Young’s penetration than his account of the spurious or
supernumary bows, observed within the true primary rainbow.
These interior bows are produced by interference. It is not
difficult, by artificial means, to form these bows in great num-
ber and beauty. This is a subject on which, as you are aware,
I worked a couple of years ago myself. And often, when look-
ing at these bows, the words of Young seemed to me like the
words of prophesy. The bows were the physical transcript of
what Young stated must occur ; a transcript, moreover, which,
when compared with his words, was far more complete and
impressive than any ever exhibited by the rainbow in nature.
Many of you are acquainted with the beautiful rings of colour
observed when a point of light is looked at through the seeds
of lycopodium shaken over a piece of glass, or shaken in the
air so as to form a ckud whose particles are all of the same
size. The iridescence of clouds that I have once or twice
seen in great splendour in the Isle of Wight, but more
frequently in the Alps, is due to this equality in the size of
the cloud -particles. Now the smaller the particles, the wider
are the coloured rings, and Young devised an instrument called
the Eriometer, which enabled him, from the measurement of
the rings, to infer the size of the particles. Again, Hitter had
discovered the ultra-violet rays of the spectrum, while
Wollaston had noticed the darkening effect produced by these
rays when permitted to fall on paper or leather which had
lieen dipped in a solution of muriate of silver. Employing
these invisible rays to produce invisible Newton’s rings,
Young projected an image of the rings upon the chemically
prepared paper. He thus obtained a distinct photographic
image of the rings. This was one of the earliest experiments
wherein a true photographic picture was successfully obtained.
Young had little notion at the time of the vast expansions
which the art of photography was subsequently to undergo.
But Young was not permitted to pursue his great researches
in peace. The Edinburgh Jlevicw had at that time among its
chief contributors a young man of vast energy of brain and
vast power of sarcasm, without the commensurate sense of
responsibility which might have checked and guided his
powers. His intellect was not for a moment to be measured
with that of Young ; but as a writer appealing to a large class
of the public, he was, at that time, an athlete without a rival.
He afterwards became Lord Chancellor of England. Young,
it may be admitted, had given him some annoyance, but
his retaliation, if such it were, was out of all pro-
portion to Young’s offence. Besides, whatever his personal
feelings were, it was not Young that he assailed so much as
those sublime natural truths of which Young at the time was
the foremost exponent. Through the undulatory theory he
attacked Young without scruple or remorse. He sneered at
his position in the Royal Institution, and tried hard to have
his papers excluded from the Philosophical Transactions.
“Has the Royal Society,” he says, “degraded its publications
into bulletins of new and fashionable theories for the ladies
of the Royal Institution? Let the Professor continue to
amuse his audieuce with an endless variety of such harmless
trifles, but in the name of science let them not find admittance
into that venerable repository which contains the works of
Newton and Boyle, Cavendish and Maskelyne, and Herschel.”
The profound, complicated, and novel researches on which
Young was then engaged, rendered an occasional change of
view necesssary. How does the reviewer interpret this praise-
worthy loyalty to truth ? “ It is difficult,” he says, “ to deal
with an author filled with a medium of so fickle and vibratory
a nature. Were we to take the trouble of refuting him he
might tell us, ‘ my opinion is changed, and I have abandoned
that hypothesis. But here is another for you.’ We demand if
the world of science which Newton once illuminated is to be
as changeable in its modes as the world of fashion, which is
directed by the nod of a silly woman or a pampered fop ?
.... We have a right to demand that the hypothesis shall
be so consistent with itself as not to require perpetual mending
and patching ; that the child we stoop to play with shall be
tolerably healthy, and not of the puny and sickly nature of
Dr. Young’s productions, which have scarcely stamina to sub-
sist until the fruitful parent has furnished us with a new
litter, to make way for which he knocks on the head, or more
barbarously exposes, the first.” He taunts Young with
claiming the inheritance of Newton’s queries, “vainly
imagining that he fulfils this destination by ringing changes
on these hypotheses, arguing from them, as if they were
experiments or demonstrations, twisting them into a partial
coincidence with the clumsy imaginations of his own brain, and
pompously parading what Newton left as hints, in a series of
propositions, with all the affectation of system.”
To Brougham’s coarse invective Young replied in a masterly
and exhaustive letter. A single copy, and one only, was sold
by its publisher. There were at that time in the ranks of
science no minds competent to understand controversy. The
poison worked without an antidote, and for thirteen years
Young and his researches on light had no place in public
thought. His discoveries remained absolutely unnoticed until
their re-discovery by Fresnel lifted the pall which for so many
years had been thrown over this splendid genius.
SCHIRM’S NEW FLASH-LIGHT GALLERY.
BY DR. H. W. VOGEL.
What is the latest novelty in German photography?
Answer: The lightning gallery of Professor Schirm in
Berlin. The event hinted at by us repeatedly of the
establishment of a Blitz gallery dispensing entirely with
daylight has at last become a fact, and immense progress
in photography has been made thereby, which cannot be
estimated highly enough, particularly during the present
dark days of winter and the holiday season. The Instan-
taneous Blitz Gallery has been open since December 1st,
under the modest title of “ Gallery for Artistic Portraits,”
Potsdam Str. 20. This Blitz light is employed not only
for taking negatives, but also for the production of prints.
This is a still greater progress, the negatives being of not
much advantage if the cloudy winter days make printing
an impossibility.
Our advice to apply the Blitz light, if not rejected, at
least met with indifferent consideration, and thousands of
reasons were brought against it. We have here an artist,
one of the best in his profession, and at the same time a
clever amateur of photography, and he accomplishes what
professionals would not risk to touch, and in such a
masterly manner, that every one who has seen his estab-
lishment must be at once convinced.
It was no easy matter for Air. C. 0. Schirm to train his
operators for this entirely new mode of photography. lie
has succeeded because lie is not easily disconcerted.
Schirm’s gallery is one of the usual elegant dwellings on
the first floor, with a small hall and ante-chamber serving
124
The photographic news.
[February 14, 1890.
as a reception room, two rooms which are arranged as Blitz
galleries, and a large passage-room with one window, into
which daylight penetrates only from one corner, and which
bears the name of “ Berlin room,” as an authorised Berlin
peculiarity.
This ordinarily partly-dark Berlin room forms the large
Blitz gallery for groups. Each of these rooms has, so to
speak, a firmament of Blitz lamps.
Schirm’s lightning apparatus is known, lie works, as
Piffard has done before him, by blowing magnesium pow-
der through the flame with an apparatus ; but while Piffard
applies large quantities — more than 1 gram — he proves
that a minimum quantity, 0‘03 gram (l, grain) is sufficient
for one sitting, and that more is rather injurious than use-
ful. This apparatus is excellent for single pictures, but
not sufficient for larger views in grand style. Here it is
oftentimes necessary to apply 7, 8, and even 15 to 20 lamps,
and to ignite these simultaneously, the latter being of great
importance. It is also important not to let the lamps be
too near to the subject.
In Schirm’s gallery they move therefore on rails, about
four meters from the floor and near to the ceiling. Each
lamp consists of a Bunsen flame, through which the mag-
nesium is blown, and an illuminating flame, which serves
for studying the light effect of the lamp. Some of the
lamps are ignited in front of the subject, others from the
side. The arrangement is such that the ceiling contains a
system of rails, which might remind one of the game
called “ Mill.” An exterior square of rails is placed
round the four walls, and in the small room an additional
inner square of about half the size. In the Berlin room,
intended for groups, is a third and still smaller one.
Upon these rails the lamps can be moved at will. Each
lamp carries gas tubing and a tube for blowing, which are
connected with the main gas pipe and also with the bellows.
This rather complicated system of tubing swinging
from the ceiling leaves a peculiar, still not disturbing, im-
pression at first sight. In the small room I counted four-
teen on the exterior square, eight on the inner one. In
the large room there were sixteen lamps outside. Each
lamp (illuminating burner as well as Bunsen burner)
had a cock with a long lever, which from the floor
could be opened and closed with a pole-hook. Above
each lamp burns continually a small igniting flame, from
which the gas will ignite by opening the cock. The Bun-
sen burner is in connection with a small magnesium powder
reservoir, which, on being closed, after ignition of the
powder, will drop a new, small quantity of 1 j centigram
of magnesium into the blow-pipe for the next view. A
larger quantity of magnesium has not been found effective ;
if more light is required, more lamps should be used.
At a single sitting we saw nine lamps in activity — four
from the side, four in front, and one from the other side
almost behind the sitter. Most of the negatives are taken
on old, extra blue sensitive plates, the magnesium light
containing mostly blue rays. A mechanical electrical
arrangement is used for the exposure, which, after the
subject has been posed, opens first the flap on the objec-
tive, and immediately afterwards sets the blowing apparatus
to work, which bloWs the magnesium powder through the
flame, after which it closes again the objective flap, all by
electrical movement.
1 he whole system is so neat and well executed that we
cannot sufficiently praise the inventor.
The blow-light itself is not instantaneous, and lasts about
quo -half second, but the time of the objective shutter is
only about one -tenth second, so that the exposure can be
considered as instantaneous. It is remarkable that all brands
of dry plates have not proved equally good and effective.
The sensitive Beernaert plates cannot be used at all.
Voigtlander's Euryscope, Series III, second diaphragm,
was used as an objective. It remains a fact that a well-
exposed negative was obtained. It may have had a pretty
strong top light character, according to the judgment of
some ; but that pictures can be obtained of faultless
illumination is proved by Delden's magnesium Blitz pic-
tures, Photograpliisclie Miltheilungen, 1889, May 2. It is
also evident that in such a room one is enabled to utilize
every place, under the window, the piano, the stove, near
the door or in any corner, for posing the subject, so that
more change in the artistic arrangement is possible. The
decoration of the whole room should of course be selected
and graduated photographically, and if this has not been
done, it is an error which can easily be remedied.
The Blitz printing process is also interesting. This
is executed on bromide paper. To prove that paper
copies could be obtained at once, Professor Schirm
pressed a piece of paper upon a gelatine negative, quite
wet, and washed only for ten minutes, placed this upon a
table arranged with a measure (rule) opposite a vertical
ground glass at a distance of about 120 cm., and ignited
behind it, with his military Blitz lamp — which is commonly
used for signalling, — a flash of li centigrams of magne-
sium powder. This was sufficient to obtain, with
eikonogen development, a well-exposed print It is
peculiar how the character of the pictures and their tone
changed by placing the negative nearer to the light or
further off. Those near-by appeared browner and softer.
Ordinarily the prints are made after the negative is
thoroughly dry and has been retouched, and a dozen
cartes-de-visite can easily be printed with one flash. The
tone of the prints I saw was perhaps a little too cold,
but warmer tones can easily be obtained by a change in
the lighting and development. Dr. .lust’s book, “Guide
for Positive Developing Processes,” gives the desired in-
formation. By the powerful action of the Blitz light it is
shown that two flashes were sufficient to obtain a very
intense positive from a drawing on bromide paper. Prints
from these flash negatives can, of course, also be made by
any of the other processes, so that in this respect no
objection can be made to them.
Mr. Van Delden is fitting up another Blitz gallery in
Breslau, but Mr. Schirm deserves the merit of having been
the first to introduce this new kind of Blitz gallery. This
is certainly a new step forward in photography — emanci-
pation from daylight and emancipation from time, and I
am convinced that it will have considerable influence on
the progress of our beautiful art, — Anthony's Bulletin.
“They have been having tableaux viva tits at Osborne,” says
a daily contemporary, “and the Royal photographer of the Isle
of Wight has been busy. A photographer of Ryde has been
nearly a dozen times to t lie Court, and the other day Princess
Beatrice, on her way back from visiting the scene of the Needles
wreck, called at his establishment and left her likeness in the
costume of Mary Queen of Scots.”
For a lantern slide, a special negative should be taken, or,
in other words, if a lantern slide of a view or object is
desired, it should be taken and manipulated all through with
reference thereto. That it should be sharp, clear, and brilliant,
is a sine qua non. But it is not enough that this alone should
be obtained, for there is an enemy lurking in your every sur-
younding, against which you must be on constant guard, and
that is dust. — Mosaics.
February 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
125
SOME FURTHER APPLICATION OF THE
RAMSDEN EYEPIECE TO PHOTOGRAPHY.
BY F. H. VARLEY, M.I.E.E., F.K.A.S.
There is nothing like having a hobby, and riding that
hobby ; it is a cheerful exercise, and does no one except
the rider any harm, unless the hobby be ridden down to
the death.
The Ramsden eyepiece as a hobby I do not think has been
made to run the heedless course. We find it employed in
the double capacity of a microscope and an eyepiece in
surveying levels, theodolites, transit instruments, and
micrometers for telescopes ; .also as a microscope for read-
ing off the fine divisions of the vernier and the divided
circle. The eyepiece micrometer of telescopes, the eye-
piece of the surveying level, the theodolite, and the transit
instrument are all positive eyepieces — that is to say, that
the image is formed in front of the field lens. The reason
for using the positive eyepiece is obvious. These instru-
ments require the cross hairs, or spider lines, to be in dis-
tinct focus whilst viewing the correctly focussed image
produced by the object glass; or, in other words, the
image formed by the object glass falls exactly upon the
same plane as that occupied by the spider lines. Thus, if
we make the adjustment of the Ramsden eyepiece to be in
correct focus with these spider lines, and then adjust the
object glass to correctly focus the image, both will be in
critical or precise focus. Now if we make the adjustment
of the Ramsden eyepiece as described in my communica-
tion of the 31st idt. , to be coincident with the image
focussed on the ground-glass screen, but employing a plane
of clear glass of equal thickness crossed at right angles
with parallel rulings inserted in the camera at the same
position as the ground screen, a transparent critical focus-
sing plane is secured. The use of this transparent plane
shows at once how very much detail is really lost by dis-
persion from the ground surface. The image formed by
the camera lens, instead of appearing with a woolly indis-
tinctness, comes out much sharper, brighter, and clearer.
This facilitates focussiig, as it dismisses all fear and doubt
from the mind as to whether the best possible focus has
been obtained. When using the focussing apparatus,
already described in my former communication, at an angle
to the ruled glass plane, there is a small amount of error
due to refraction of the incident ray falling at an angle to
the glass surfaces. Practically, however, this may be dis-
regarded, so long as the rulings on the glass are in distinct
focus at the centre of the field of the eyepiece. I should
therefore recommend, first, focussing with the ground-glass
screen in the usual way. For the general effect apply the
focussing apparatus to that part of the picture which it is
desired to be critically focussed, and obtain the correct
adjustment ; remove the ground sceeen, and insert the
clear glass with rulings, and verify the focussing.
Those who have not tried the difference of effect pro-
duced by the interference and diffusion created by the
numerous prismatic points of the ground glass surface, will
be astonished at the clearness of the detail and brilliancy
of the image obtained by means of the Ramsden eyepiece.
There is one more use to which this eyepiece can be
applied with advantage, and that is as an illuminator for the
microscope in place of the achromatic condenser, especially
as it can be employed for micro-photography, and is less
costly.
The eyepiece I have employed for this purpose is con-
structed with a field lens, §-iuch focus, eye-lens "-inch,
both plano-convex, placed about £ths of an inch apart,
with their convex side turned toward each other. In front
of the field lens I place a diaphragm with an aperture of
■,:A-inch diameter. The distance of this diaphragm from
the field lens is so adjusted that if the eyepiece is held at
a distance of two or three inches from the eye, upon look-
ing through, the margin of the hole is seen sharply defined ;
it is ready then to be placed in the secondary stage of the
microscope. I prefer to turn the microscope so that the
body is in a horizontal position, and place it in a direct
line with the source of light, then focus the object, after
which I adjust, by means of the secondary stage, the
illuminator, so that the margin of the diaphragm is distinctly
focussed ; next I place a condensing lens between the
light and the diaphragm, and so adjust the distances of
both that the image of the light is focussed upon the dia-
phragm. The image should be just large enough to uni-
formly cover the aperture and the fringe of the light
caught upon the margin. In this way an uniform and
perfect disc of light is obtained, and but little difference
between this mode of illumination and that from an
achromatic condenser is discernible.
I do not remember having seen the llamsden eyepiece
so applied as a condenser for the microscope except when
I adopted it myself as a convenient expedient upon occa-
sions when an achromatic condenser has not been available.
By its means 1 have obtained, with a one-third of an inch
objective and a high-power eye-piece, the markings of
Navicula, Formosa, and Podura scales perfectly resolved.
The reason for employing it as a condenser is identical
with that of focussing the image on the ground-glass
screen — viz., to obtaiu a critical image of the flame — or
surface of the incandescent lime when the oxyhydrogen
light is employed — coincident with the object focussed. I
believe it will be found to be of considerable utility when
photographing by artificial light. I may here state that
when a condensing lens is employed for throwing the
image of the light upon the diaphragm, it is very desirable,
and for photographing I believe it is absolutely necessary
that this condensing lens should be achromatic. The
two objectives of an opera glass whose combined foci is
about two or three inches, answer this purpose admirably.
If they are not available, place the light as near to the
diaphragm as possible, but do not employ a monochro-
matic lens. The Ramsden eyepiece and an achromatic
lens for producing the luminous image on the diaphragm
give the most perfect combination, as well as greater
brilliancy of illumination.
If the microscope has the achromatic illuminator
fitted to it, always use it directed to the light. To obtain
the critical image, if this image is too small to cover the
whole of the field of view, a condensing lens has to be
employed ; it is very important that this lens be achromatic.
So that, .after all, the Ramsden eye-piece is practically as
perfect as the more elaborate and costly achromatic illumi-
natorsgenerally employed ; I am referring to the use of artifi-
cial light. The most perfect, of course, though very seldom
attainable in this country, is to direct the achromatic
illuminator to a well-lighted cloud. In this case also the
Ramsden eyepiece can be applied, if the image of the
cloud is focussed, or the diaphragm by means of an achro-
matic lens.
A partnership has been airanged, we are informed, between
Mr. M. Auty, of Tynemouth, and Mr. Richard E. Ruddock,
late of Messrs. W. and D. Downey's Studio, London. The
style of the firm will be Auty and Ruddock.
126
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 14, 1890.
An astronomical photographic curiosity was exhibited
at the last meeting of the lloyal Society in the way of
a photograph, by Mr. IsaacRobcrts, of theOrion nebulae,
on which two exposures of two hours and two and a
half hours respectively, at an interval of five days, had
been juxtaposed. While the pairs of discs for most stars
were sensibly equal, the pairs for at least ten faint
stars showed great differences in intensity. Mr. Roberts
considers that this indicates the variability of these
stars in a few days. But, as the Observatory points
out, confirmation of this view is eminently desirable.
A similar pair of exposures should show the same ten
stars as variable, if we are to exclude the possibility
of accidental appearances. Indeed, this principle of
duplicate exposures might be carried much further.
Despite delicacy of manipulation in the preparation and
development of negatives, films may behave with eccen-
tricity, and minute imperfections may be taken for
stars, and vice versa. This system of duplication would,
however, entail enormous expense, and at the present
moment is impossible.
Pinhole negatives are attracting much attention just
now, and the study is gradually taking form in regard
to the principles of working. Captain R. Colson has
given to the French Photographic Society some curious
calculations apropos of the relationship which exists
between the size and clearness of the picture and the
dimensions of the pinhole that takes the place of the
lens, and those who are curious on the subject will
find his figures in the Transactions of the Society.
With regard to the time of exposure, Captain Colson
is of opinion that it is impossible to give exact figures,
as the circumstances differ. Ilis own experience on a
particular brand of plates furnishes, however, the
following data: — For distant objects, four seconds;
for objects in sunlight, at a distance of ten to a hundred
metres, fifteen seconds, and for portraits well lighted,
twenty seconds.
A graceful allusion to the late Father Perry is made
in the Observatory by Mr. H. Turner. In regard to
the special photographic work of the expedition, Mr.
Turner says the sudden illness of the chief member of
the expedition made it advisable not to attempt deve-
lopment ot the photographs so obtained. These were
brought by Mr. Rooney to England, and have recently
been developed. Those actually taken by Father Perry
show the very great care he must have taken to focus
his instrument, and the results generally are successful.
The exhibition to be held in March, promoted'by the
Royal Meteorological Society, promises to be exceed-
ingly interesting from a photographic point of view.
Meteorological science, we understand, will be illus-
trated by the largest and most complete collection of
instruments and photographs which can be got together
So many uses have been found of late years for photo-
graphy in connection with meteorology, from sunshine
recorders to M. Janssen’s photographs of mists, and
the recent pictures of lightning, that the exhibition
promises to be altogether unique.
An appreciative biographical sketch of the President
of the Photographic Society appears in the Popular
Science Monthly (New York), accompanied by a very
excellent portrait. Mr. Glaisher’s labours in connection
with astronomical and meteorological work are well
known, and of these labours the writer of the sketch
gives a very complete epitome. It is sufficient to say
that Mr. Glaisher is the author of more than one
hundred books and papers relating to astronomy,
meteorology, and the theory of numbers, to indicate his
untiring industry. Although entering upon his eighty-
first year, he retains all his old vigour and energy, as
was evident at the dinner of the Society on Monday.
The Japanese arc enthusiastic over photography.
The Minister of public instruction in Japan has an-
nounced that at the next term, photography will be
taught in most superior schools, notably at the Archeo-
logical Institute, at the Forester’s Institute, and in the
Military Academies. La Nature enquires when it will
be that the same course of instruction is organised in
the special large schools of France, and in those of art
and drawing, and the same question might be asked in
England were it not that amateurs are so numerous and
so diligent as to almost render unnecessary any stimulus
from the legislature.
The ter-centenary of the invention of the compound
microscope, which is to be celebrated this year at Ant-
werp, reminds us of the respectable age to which this
instrument has attained. Of late years, microscopical
appliances have been vastly improved, and the applica-
tion of photography has given to microscopical study
fresh interest and fresh power. Photographic attach-
ments will make a large show at the exhibition pro-
posed to be held, and among the subjects to be discussed
at the inevitable conference will be photo-micrography.
The annual report of the Harvard College Astro-
nomical Observatory just issued gives much interesting
information as to the valuable work performed under
the direction of Professor Pickering. The handsome
gift of 50,000 dollars by Miss Bruce for the construc-
tion of a photographic tele-cope of novel form is specially
alluded to, and it is foreshadowed that, when com-
pleted, the instrument will effect a total change in the
work of the observatory. For instance, in 1885 it
was proposed to photograph the entire sky with the
eight-inch telescope, enlarging the plates three times,
but the generous aid of Miss Bruce will permit this
result to be attained in the original photographs without
enlargement — an enormous gain both in time and
economy. A contract has been made with Messrs.
Alvan Clark and Sons for a telescope having an aper-
ture of 2 1 inches, and a focal length of 1 1 feet.
February 14, 1890. )
rHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
127
THE LATE DR. E. IIORNIG.
Hon. President of the Photo irap/tic Society of Vienna.
From a report of the speech of Professor Fritz Luckhardt,
delivered at the January meeting of the Photographic
Society of Vienna, in the Phntojraphische Cwrespomlenz, we
abstract the following account of the life and labours of
the late Dr. Emil Homig.
We have lost, says Prof. Luckhardt, in Dr. Homig one of
our best friends — one whose heart was full of warmth to-
wards the Association and its members, llornig was one
of those men who, with the appearance of a somewhat
rough exterior, possessed a kernel of noble quality. Those
who knew him well, recognised him as one of the best of
men. lie was born in the year 1828, the son of the Royal
Counsellor Josef llornig, who, at that time, was professor
of Roman law at the University of Vienna, lie was edu-
cated from hisfourteeuth yearat the Academic Gymnasium,
and after studying philosophy and, for some time, juris-
prudence, lie applied himself with the greatest diligence to
the study of chemistry .and physics at the Polytechnic
Institute, lie was one of the most industrious students
at the Laboratory of the Institute, where he interested him-
self in all matters concerned with applied chemistry, and
diligently occupied himself with analysis — both qualitative
and quantitative.
In the year 1851 he was appointed provisionally in-
structor in the high school, and some years afterwards
prepared himself for obtaining the grade of professor. As
a teacher he understood, as few do, how to combine
necessary firmness vith kindly forbearance. lie was at
the same time the instructor and friend of his numerous
students, as is evidenced by many examples communicated
to me by those who, as pupils, drew their inspiration from
him — the councillor Dr. IV. Exner amongst ■ others.
Shortly after attaining his professorship, he was ap-
pointed corresponding member of the Imperial Geological
Institute, and the College of Doctors of the Philosophical
Faculty elected him as Dean. He acted for some time as
counsellor of the administration of the Lower Austria
Industrial Guilds, and edited its weekly journal. Dr.
llornig instructed himself in all the domains entered upon
in connection with this work, and was on that account a
many-sided man. When his excellency llaron Schwarz-
Senborn was intrusted with the guidance of the Universal
Exhibition of 1873, llornig was one of the first whom he
called to his side to assist in the undertaking. For his
successful activity in this matter he received the title of
royal councillor, and was decorated with the Swedish order
of the Northern Star.
The experiences thereby gained caused him to be
selected in connection with the Philadelphia Exhibition
of 1876, after which he was decorated with the order of
Francis Joseph, and in 1878 he was appointed as Royal
and Imperial Commissioner for the Paris Exhibition. I
had the opportunity in Paris to learn the pre-eminently
superior, though little known side of our friend’s character.
I have seen how he struggled on behalf of those who felt
that they had been overlooked or not fairly appreciated,
and especially how he always stood up for his own country-
men. France recognised his merits by conferring on him
the title of the Legion of Honour, whilst his Majesty the
Emperor distinguished him with the Order of the Iron
Crown, a distinction which awakened much jealousy and
envy in some quarters. lie now applied his whole ener-
gies to the advancement of our Association, the Photo-
graphic Union, to which he had belonged from its founda-
tion. He was now chosen for the chief office in our
Society, and under his thoughtful care discord vanished
and the Association grew and prospered. lie took over
the Corresponded from the then editor. Herr L. Schranck,
and advanced the undertaking by attracting notable writers
in technical matters and at considerable pecuniary sacrifice.
He devoted his time from early till late to the work of the
Association, and, as far as possible, concentrated in his
own person the labours connected with it. A new era
was thereby inaugurated in the life of the Society.
In his own family he was the best of sons ; it was
touching to see the tenderness of his attachment to his
mother. The worthy matron died the preceding year at
the age of ninety years. It is a happy circumstance that
llornig, in his illness, knew nothing of the pain of this
loss ; he could not have endured it. Four years since
llornig suffered from a paralytic seizure from which he
never recovered. His faculties became more and more
dimmed, until at last his tongue could no longer move,
and he was unable to pronounce a word. I shall never
forget how, when I last visited him a few months since,
his eyes seemed to lighten, and he appeared to recognise
me, and to endeavour to say something, but in vain.
llornig was an acute observer, such as is seldom met
with ; on this account he was often applied to as an
expert. He was president of the Association of Gas
Industries ; especially he was a many-sided man, and it
was never in vain to knock at his door when advice or aid
was wanted. It was he whom the council of the Voight-
lander Institute employed to give the impulse to scientific
enquiry into the action of chromium salts upon gelatine,
albumen, and such like substances. The selection fell
upon a young man whose talents llornig had recognised,
and who he expected would be able to trace out the
kernel of the question. The prize was won by Dr. Eder.
It was Ilornig’s constant idea to create an institute for
photographic research, and he worked at it incessantly
until that object was reached ; the idea was even enlarged,
and a school erected for instruction in combination •with
the institute for research.
I Iornig’s literary ability was shown amongst other things
in technical chemical works, of which may be noted a trea-
tise on glycerine, one on cheesemaking, and one on
mineral analysis. lie also contributed many treatises in
the technical journals, and was on that account made cor-
responding member of the Austrian Museum of Art and
Industry, and honorary member of many societies.
From the year 1871, with but little interruption until
1885, Dr. llornig, without any payment, edited a photo-
graphic annual which he presented to the members of the
society. This included a note-book for photographers
and amateurs, with exposure tables and negative register.
In 1880, Gerot, in Vienna, published Hornig’s “ Hand-
book of Technical Chemistry for High Schools and Tech-
nical Institutes of Instruction.” In 1882 Homig pub-
lished under the title “ Photographica ” sheets illustrating
photographic processes in four series.
Dr. E. llornig was elected President of the Association
in 1871, and presided for the last time in February, 1885.
In the following May he was appointed Honorary Presi-
dent, and at the same time was awarded the gold medal of
the Society.
In the beginning of the year 1870 he commenced a
course of lectures upon photographic chemistry at the
Polytechnic Institute, which, however, was abandoned in
128
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 14, 1890.
consequence of the unequal preparatory schooling of the
hearers.
It is in our loving remembrance that our journal —
the Photographische Corresjxmdenz, was presented by him to
the Society. As llaron Burg has said, “ The loveliest
attribute of mankind is gratitude.” Our grateful remem-
brances are given to the memory of Dr. Emil Ilornig.
PHOTOGRAPHIC WASTE PRODUCTS.
Mu. John Young, of 84, Market Street, Chicago, has
issued the following circular to photographers : —
1st. Paper Clippings, all Untoned or Over-Exposed Prints,
Blotters, Fillers, $r., should be introduced by degrees into
an ordinary stove and burned to ashes in the most thorough
manner. It is important that the ashes be not withdrawn
from the stove until the whole of the carbonaceous portion
of the paper is entirely consumed. The paper should be
kept free from admixture with tin-type clippings, glass,
nails, and other extraneous matter, which is a positive
injury to the waste. Before burning see that the draught is
completely shut off, otherwise much loss of silver will be
occasioned.
2nd. Print Washings and Old Positive and Negative Baths.
— To save the above waste in the easiest and most
economical manner, procure a good sound cask, of dimen-
sions suitable to your needs, loosen the top hoops in order
to remove the head, and replace the hoop tightly. Next
have a hole bored through the side of the cask about seven
or eight inches from the bottom ; into this insert a wooden
faucet, and the barrel is ready to receive the waste solu-
tions referred to. To precipitate the silver from these,
proceed as follows : Make a saturated solution of common
salt, and add it to the liquid in the barrel ; the precipi-
tate which forms is chloride of silver. An ounce of
common sulphuric acid, added occasionally, acts bene-
ficially, keeping the solution in an acid condition. Should
the liquid, after standing twenty-four hours, refuse to
clear up, a wine-glass full of a saturated solution of
common alum or proto-sulphate of iron will bring about
the desired result. When the precipitate has subsided,
the waste water can be drawn off by the faucet and thrown
away.
3rd. Fixing Solutions from Prints and Dry Plates, and
Cyanide. Solutions from Tin-Types. — These should be in-
troduced into a barrel similar in every respect to that
referred to in No. 2. Instead of salt, however, the
savory compound known as sulphide of potassium must be
dissolved and added so long as it forms a precipitate. The
latter is of a very dark colour, and in this case is termed
sulphide of silver. In these, and indeed all waste solutions,
large stoneware crocks may be advantageously substituted
for barrels, should the volume of waste not be too large.
4th. Wet Plate Developer Washings. — These may be intro-
duced into a large stoneware crock, and allowed to stand
untouched for twenty-four hours or so. No re-agent for
precipitating the silver need be added, as the proto-sul-
phate of iron necessarily present accomplishes this in the
most thorough manner, more especially if an ounce of
common sulphuric acid be added. The latter prevents the
formation of a useless deposit of iron along with the
silver, and the refining as a natural sequence is rendered
less difficult. A few drops of any “light oil ” sprinkled
on the surface likewise retards oxidation.
5th. Gelatine Emulsions. — To recover the bromide and
iodide of silver which are present in the above waste, intro-
duce the emulsions into a large stoneware crock to a height
of one-third; a quantity of common sulphuric acid, say
one or two quarts, must now be added. This in a few
hours will result in the degelatinization of the gelatine, the
latter losing its setting qualities. A large amount of
boiling water must now be added, so as to make the solu-
tion as attenuated as possible. The silver will now, by
reason of its superior specific gravity, gradually subside,
forming a pale yellow deposit at the bottom of the vessel.
Allow the crock to stand several days, and then decant off
the supernatant liquid, and throw it away. Dry the pre-
cipitate spontaneously, or by filtration, through very fine
bleached muslin, and it will be ready for treatment by the
refiner.
Gth. Gold Solutions. — Old “ spent” toning baths some-
times contain a small amount of gold. To recover this
proceed as follows: — Pour all these solutions into a stone-
ware crock ; next add an ounce or two of common
sulphuric acid, and finally, also, a strong solution of
freshly dissolved protosulphate of iron. The precipitate
will soon subside, and in time form a brownish-black
deposit at the bottom of the vessel. The deposits, also,
which invariably form while the toning bath is being
neutralized by carbonate of soda or other alkali, should be
saved and thrown into the crock.
7th. Concluding Remarks. — If absolutely necessary,
the wet plate developer waste may be thrown into the
barrel containing the print washings, but it is best kept
separate.
8th. Should space be limited, the print washings and
fixing solutions, &c., may be kept in the same barrel, and
sulphide of potassium only used to precipitate the sil-
ver. We do not recommend this, however, if it can be
avoided.
9th. A piece of very tine bleached muslin makes a good
filter for all the wastes we have alluded to. An old felt
hat or chamois leather skin is also very good, but acts
slowly.
10th. In sending wastes, mark each lot with its appro-
priate designation, and observe that no gold will be sought
for in silver residue, unless specially desired. Do not fail
to mark on outside of package the name of the firm on
whose account the waste is to be refined, and endeavour
to allow at least fourteen days to elapse before asking
about returns. Very large sacks or boxes of waste may be
forwarded by freight ; smaller and more valuable parcels
by express, and very small lots by parcel post. If sent
by freight, invariably forward a bill of lading, or delay will
certainly occur.
Water for PnoTOCRArHic Purposes. — Ordinary tap water is
generally to be recommended for washing operations and for
preparing solutions. For a stock solution of gold, however,
and for nitrate of silver when that is required, distilled water
should be employed. In solutions containing oxalates, such as
the ferrous oxalate developer, and the solution for developing
platinum prints, it is well to avoid the presence of lime salts,
as these give a turbidity with oxalates. If distilled water is
not at hand in sufficient quantity for these purposes, tap water
may be made almost as good by removing the lime from it.
This maj' be done by adding a little potassium oxalate, and
allowing the precipitate formed to settle down. The quantity
of oxalate to be added will depend upon the quality of the
water ; and it may be a guide to say that for New River water
about thirty grains of potassium oxalate to the gallon would
probably be a suitable amount. — Chapman JoNEs in Abraham's
Photographic Annual,
February 14, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
129
A NEW EYE.
BY CAMILLE FLAMMARIOX.
It cannot be gainsaid that the human eye is an admirable
optical instrument. What transparency in this living
crystal : what delicious shades of colour in this iris ; what
depth, and what charm ! It is life, it is passion, it is a de-
sire, it is the will, it is light! Close all these eyes : what
would remain of creation? And, nevertheless, we
have here a new eye — complementing our own and excel-
ling it — still more marvellous. This eye, whose visions 1
have just admired, measures more than a metre in dia-
meter, and fifteen metres in depth. Its crystalline lens is
formed of an immense piece of glass, and its retina of a
highly sensitive chemical plate. The eye of a giant, in
verity, as the man possessing it should measure in our
organic proportions 100 metres in height, and he would
not be able to pass under the EiffelTower without humbly
bending. A gigantic eye, possessing four marked advan-
ages over ours : It sees (/nicker, farther, longer, and, pre-
cious faculty, it fixes, prints, and preserves what it sees.
Quicker: In the millionth of a second it photographs
the sun, its spots, its vortices, its flames, its mountains of
tire, and gives them to us in the form of an imperishable
document. Farther: Directed toward any point of the
heavens, in the darkest night it discovers in the abysses of
the infinite, stars, worlds, universes, creations which our
eye could never see with the aid of the best telescope.
Longer : That which we have not been .able to see after a
few seconds’ attention, we shall never see. This eye only
has to look long enough : at the end of a half hour it will
distinguish what it did not see ; at the end of an hour it will
see still better, and the longer it remains fixed upon un-
known space, the better it will possess it — without fatigue,
and always better ; and it preserves on the plate . serving
as its retina all that it has seen : our eye retains images
but a moment.
Let us suppose, for example, that a man is killed at a
moment when quietly seated in his arm-chair, and having
his eyes open before a brilliantly-lighted window, and that
his eyes should be removed and immersed in a solution of
alum. These eyes would preserve the image of the
window, with its transversal bars and its illuminated
openings. But in the normal condition of things, our eyes
do not retain images — there would be too many. The
giant eye of which we speak retains all that it has seen :
we have only to change the retina.
This new eye is the photographic eye. The principal
astronomers of the world have just met at the Paris Obser-
vatory in order to decide on its immediate application to a
new and complete study of the starry heavens. Magni-
ficent specimens of photographs of the moon, the sun,
the stars, the nebulae, and even of the planets, were pre-
sented to the congress, and showed what may be ex-
pected from the new processes. Some photographs
among them show us the lunar mountains and craters,
such as they would be seen at a distance of forty leagues.
Yes, this artificial retina sees quicker and better, and
by an absolutely different faculty it can penetrate into
abysses into which we cannot see, and will never be
able to see anything. We have here, perhaps, its most
extraordinary feature.
Let us place our eye, for example, to the eye-piece of
a telescope whose objective has an opening of thirty
centimetres — these are the best instruments now in prac-
;cal use in observatories. In this telescope of thirty
centimetres in diameter and of three and a half metres in
length, we discover stars up to the fourteenth magnitude —
that is to say, about 44,000,000 of worlds of all kinds.
Now, instead of our eye, let us use the photographic retina.
Instantly the most brilliant stars will imprint their image
on the plate. Five-thousandths of a second suffice for
stars of the first magnitude, one-hundredth of a second
for stars of the second magnitude, three-hundredths of a
second for those of the third, one-tenth of a second for
those of the fourth order, two-tenths for those of the
fifth order, and five-tenths of a second for stars of the
sixth magnitude. Thus, in less than one second, the pho-
tographic eye has seen all that we can perceive with the
naked eye. But this is yet nothing. The telescopic stars
visible in the instrument will also imprint their image on
the plate. Those of the seventh magnitude require one
and one-third second, those of the eighth magnitude three
seconds, those of the ninth magnitude eight seconds, those
of the tenth twenty seconds, those of the eleventh magni-
tude fifty seconds, those of the twelfth require two
minutes, those of the thirteenth five minutes, and, finally,
those of the fourteenth, thirteen minutes. It follows that,
if we have given our plate an exposure of one-quarter
of an hour, we will find imprinted on this plate all that
portion of the heavens towards which the glass had been
directed, and all that that region possesses — all that which
with infinite trouble we might have been able to discover,
to measure by a series of laborious and very lengthy ob-
servations. A sufficient number of instruments pointed
so as to embrace the whole of the heavens will fix on
an immense chart all that astronomical observations can
study, and which could only have been obtained after a
lapse of several centuries.
But here is only the commencement of the marvellous.
Let us allow the photographic eye to look instead of our
own ; it will penetrate into the unknown. Stars invisible
to us become visible to it. At the end of an exposure
of thirty-three minutes, the stars of the fifteenth magni-
tude will have impressed the chemical retina and formed
their image. The same instrument which shows to the
human eye stars of the fourteenth magnitude, and which
in the entire heavens would register about 44,000,000 of
stars, shows to the photographic eye 134,000,000 at the
first requisition for obtaining the fifteenth magnitude. It
would reach the sixteenth at the second requisition, in an
exposure of one hour and twenty minutes, and throw be-
fore the astonished gaze of the beholder a luminous dust
of four hundred millions of stars.
Never before, in all the history of humanity, has man
possessed the power of penetrating so profoundly into the
depths of the infinite. With the new improvements,
photography gives us clearly the image of each star, what-
ever its distance, and fixes it on a document where it may
afterwards be studied at leisure. Who knows, if at some
future day, in the photographic views of Venus or of Mars,
a new method of analysis will not enable us to discover
the inhabitants ! — and its power extends as far as the in-
finite. Ilereisa star of the fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth
magnitude, a sun like our own, at such a distance from us
that its light requires thousands, perhaps millions, of years
to reach us, notwithstanding its prodigious velocity of
300,000 kilometres in a second ; and this sun lies at such a
depth that its light, so to speak, no longer reaches us.
The natural eye of man would never have seen it, the
hnman mind would never have guessed its existence with
the instruments of modern optics ; and yet this feeble fight,
130
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 14, 1890.
coming from so far, is sufficient to impress a chemical
plate, which will indelibly preserve itsimage. And this star
might be of the eighteenth, of the twentieth order, and
still smaller, so small that never human eyes, assisted even
by telescopes of the highest power, will see it — for there
will always be stars beyond our vision ; and, nevertheless,
with its little ethereal arrow it will reach the chemical plate
exposed to await its coming and to receive it. Yes, its
light will have travelled for millions of miles. When it
started the earth did not exist — the present world with its
inhabitants ; there was not a thinking being on our planet ;
the geuesis of our world was about being developed ; per-
haps only in the primordial seas which enveloped the globe
before the upheaval of the first continents. The elemen-
tary primitive organisms were being formed in the bosom
of the waters, slowly preparing the evolution of future ages.
This photographic plate sends us back to the past history
of the universe.
During the ethereal voyage of this luminous ray, which
to-day reaches this plate, the entire history of the world
was accomplished, and in this history that of humanity is
but a ripple — but a moment. And during this time the
history of this distant sun, whose photograph we now see,
may also have been accomplished ; perhaps it has long been
extinguished, perhaps it no longer exists !
This new eye that carries us through the infinite causes
us at the same time to ascend the stages of a past eternity.
Eternity! The Infinite! Contemporaneous astronomy
plunges us into their depth and overwhelms us. IIow can
we measure them V Flying with the quickness of the
lightning, it would require millions of years to reach the
regions in which these distant universes shine ; but carried
thither, we would not really have advanced a single step
toward the limits of space — as space is without boundaries,
the infinite without measures ; and everywhere, in all
directions, there are so many worlds, so many consecutive
suns, that if we were to give the photographic plate the
sufficient exposure, it would be covered with contiguous
luminous points, so close as to only show one heaven of
dazzling light ; as everywhere, to whatever point we may
direct the visual ray, there is an infinity of suns back of
each other.
And we live on one of these worlds, on one of the most
insignificant, at some point of the limitless immensity, re-
ceiving the light from one of these innumerable suns, in a
limited horizon, a veritable cocoon of the silk-worm, igno-
rant of all the causes ; ephemeral of a moment, imbued
with an illusory view of the world, hardly seeing anything
insignificant enough to imagine that we know something,
even flattering ourselves with a sanctimonious sentiment of
pride to be able to dominate nature ; proud of an illu-
sion mistaken for reality, we solve all questions. We call
ourselves materialists without knowing one word of the
essence of matter ; spiritualists, without knowing a word
of the nature of the spirit ; but at the bottom of all think-
ing beings scepticism resides, because we are incapable of
appreciating anything. Our lost little planet is still too
vast for our conception, as we have invented local
patriotism and the whole organisation of the divers social
groups which divide the world between them is founded
on the force of arms. Ah ! the astronomer would wish
that tlie leaders of the people, the legislators, the politi-
cians, had the faculty to look at a celestial chart and to
understand it. i'hiscahn contemplation might perhaps be
more useful to humanity than all the congresses of sove-
reigns, and all the speeches of diplomacy. If it were
known how small the earth is, perhaps man would cease
cutting it to pieces. Peace would reign over the world,
social wealth would take the place of the ruinousand shame-
ful military craze, political divisions would be obliterated,
and then only would men freely rise to the study of the
universe, to the knowledge of nature, and enjoy the plea-
sures of an intellectual life. But we have not yet reached
this point, and the photographic eye will reveal many
celestial mysteries before the human eye sees reason and
science establish their reign on our revolving ball. — Paris
Figaro.
A WIFE’S VIEW OF AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHY.
Gentlemen’, — A letter from you addressed to my husband
lias come to hand. You ask him to write you an article
for your photographic annual that is to be published next
year, and you put in some taffy about his being a well-
known amateur, and some stuff about what he writes
being of interest, and that sort of thing. My husband is
now on a photographic tour, as he calls it, and, of course,
I open all his letters, It is not likely that my husband
will be back in time to write the article you wish. When
he goes off until that confounded camera of his you never
know when he will come home. So 1 am very pleased to
give you a woman’s view of amateur photography, and if
you print it in your annual I think you will not have
another article just like it.
My unfortunate husband was stricken with the amateur
photographic plague about three years ago. Up to that
time 1 always considered him reasonably sane. I made
no objection at the time to his joining the army of pho-
tographic cranks, because, you see, I knew nothing of
the subject. I have done everything I could since that
time, but, although lie has quit smoking at my request, he
refuses to give up the camera habit. At the time he
began this so-called recreation my house, or perhaps I
should say our house, was one of the neatert in the
neighbourhood. You ought to go through it now. My
carpets have been ruined with those abominable chemicals
which he uses. I don’t pretend to know their names, but
I know well the effect they have. Then the bath room is
something frightful to behold. He uses that for what he
calls his dark-room, and has contrivances for shutting
out the light.
I notice that, in one of the books you sent him,
Daguerre was the inventor of photography. He may have
been the inventor of photography, but I think it was
another sulphurous gentleman with the same initial who
was the inventor of amateur photography.
My husband was reasonably good tempered until he
took up your diabolical art. I one time opened the door
of the room in which he was working. It was all dark
inside except a fearful red lamp, which threw a ruddy
glow on his face, and made him look as if he were going
to have an epileptic fit. The moment I opened the door
and let some light into the room that man went perfectly
crazy, lie claimed 1 had spoiled a dozen of his plates,
although 1 had touched nothing, and I came near suing
for a divorce because of his awful remarks. If the evil
one was not the inventor of amateur photography then I
would like to know who was. Then the pictures he does
turn out when he gets them finished are perfectly awful.
He has tried at different times to photograph the children,
but the poor little dears looked like wooden images in the
pictures. I went into the bath-room once with the baby
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
131
February 14, 1390.]
and put him in the bath tub. There was some water there
already, and it looked clear enough, but in it was some
horrible solution of silver, that turned most of the baby
jet black, and we haven’t been able to get out the colour
to this day.
Then the cost of the thing is something frightful,
although my husband carefully conceals what he spends on
it. I came across one of the photographic dealer's bills
the other day, and it was enough to make one’s hair
stand on end. Pyrogallic acid, whatever that is, was
lifty cents an ounce.
Just think, if I had to pay that price for sugar! Eight
dollars a pound instead of ten cents.
Fifty cents an ounce ! And that wasn’t the worst of it.
Now what do you think chloride of gold costs V For
fifteen grains he is charged fifty cents. Now that, as you
know well enough, is very near twenty dollars an ounce, and
twenty dollars an ounce is over three hundred dollars a
pound ! I don’t know how many pounds of the wretched
stuff he uses every week, but if lie uses ten pounds of it, and
I am sure ten pounds of sugar don’t go very far in a house
with a large family like ours, you would see that that is
3,000 dols. for that one thing alone, not to mention the
dozens of other chemicals he uses, and 1 am sure 1 don’t
know what the price of them is.
I tell you that amateur photography was invented to
drive a poor woman crazy who has a husband that is a
victim of the villainous practice. No wonder he says lie
can’t afford a new dress for me when I ask him for it. The
house is stained with horrible solutions from cellar to
garret, and I am always afraid to use any cups or glasses
for fear there is some dreadful poison in them. The cat
took some milk out of a saucer that had something or
other of potassium in it, and it just curled up and
died.
1 m always afraid to sweep in any part of the house for
fear it will raise a dust that will spoil something that he
has tacked up on a board to dry. I wouldn’t mind all this
so much if he ever took a picture that was worth looking
at ; but, as I said before, he never does. There, now,
print that in your miserable photograph book if you want
to- Mrs. .John Tripod.
N.B. — If you ever write to my husband again telling
him that his articles on photography will be appreciated, I
will burn your letter, and you will lose your postage
stamp. So just remember that. — Mrs. J. T. — Detroit Free
Press.
THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPERS.
BY PROF. CHARLES F. HIMES.
For bromide paper, according to General Brown, eikonogen
is undoubtedly the developer of the future, affording
warmer tones than the oxalate, and beautifully clear whites,
without acid flushing, with simple rinsing with water before
fixing. A\ ldlst the appearance of the picture is slow,
especially as a used developer, preferably twenty-four
hours old, is preferred, the development is regular and
uniform to every detail, without risk of staining ; and the
same solution can be used for a number of prints. It is
said to be unaffected in its action by variation in tempera-
ture, and therefore adapted to all climates. It is non-
poisonous, docs not stain the fingers, will keep over a
month mixed, acts so energetically that only half the ex-
posure is required as that with pyrogallol, and development
occupies a much shorter time. The solution can be us)d
over and over again without staining until its reducing
power is exhausted. It is, on the other hand, especially
adapted to development of over-exposures. With all its
excellences it is a cheap developer, and will keep indefinitely
as a dry powder. Its slight solubility, however, will
prevent its use in concentrated stock solutions, as pyro-
gallol.
The commercial article is accompanied by formula for
its use, and the recommendation by some to reduce the
strength of these does not seem to be approved by the
most successful experimenters with it. The following
formula by General Brown, for a normal developer,
will serve to indicate the general character of solutions
used : —
No. 1. — Sodium sulphite
Eikonogen . . .
Water
1 5 grains
n „
1 ounce
No. 2. — Carbonate of potassium
Water
80 grains
1 ounce
For use, mix three pai-ts of 1, one-half to one part of 2.
according to exposure.
Pi/rocatcchin. — Orthodihydroxybenzol, an isomer of
hydroquinone, with the formula C#IIj(OH)2 is at present
a subject of careful investigation as a developing agent
for dry plates. The results thus far are quite promising.
Its use as a photographic developer was suggested as early
as 1859 by Wagner. Eder and Toth announced its deve-
loping power in alkaline solution in 1880. Prof. Benoist,
of Toulouse, last year published results of considerable
experience with it. Dr. Arnold pronounces it fifteen times
as energetic as hydroquinone, and enumerates among its
chief excellences the excellent tone and good qualities of
the negatives produced by it, the absence of fog, loss
of sensitiveness to light of the plates after immersion
in the developer, so that development may be con-
tinued, after immersion, in ordinary gaslight, or even in
diffused daylight without injury ; great latitude of expo-
sure, as development proceeds slowly, but uniformly;
freedom from stain to the hands ; simplicity of formula)
for solutions, and possibility, on account of its solubility,
of preparing concentrated stock solutions which will
keep well if the pyrocatechin is chemically pure, and
which can be used by the drop ; convenience in carrying
the small quantities of ingredients required for develop-
ment ; development without motion ; and withal, on
account of its high reducing power, the expense, .at
twenty-five cents per gramme, is not exorbitant, as that
quantity will develop 100 to 150 plates 13 by 18 cm. lie
employs the following stock solutions : a, one per cent,
solution of pyrocatechin ; b, twrenty per cent, solution of
potassium carbonate. Sodium carbonate he does not
find to answrer as well. For development of a well-
exposed plate, 7 by 9 inches, one cc. of a and five to ten
cc. of b are mixed with sixty to eighty cc. of water.
Sulphite of soda does not seem necessary or desirable.
The mixed developer will not keep, and should be used
only once. Carl Srna, employing it with carbonate of
soda and sodium sulphite, as in Balaguy’s formula for
hydroquinone, found it more energetic than the latter,
whilst others have found it less so. Dr. Eder, in his more
recent experiments, was particular to employ it in its
purest form, as was Dr. Arnold, and found it a rapid,
energetic developer, yielding coffee-brown negatives
132
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 14, 1890.
of good quality. lie employed the following solu-
tions : —
A. — Pyrocatechin
Sulphite of soda
Water
B. — Carbonate of potash
Water
1 part
4 parts
.. 40
mixing for use one volume of .1 with two of B. The sul-
phite of soda is not absolutely necessary, but with it the
solution will keep clear much longer.
Paraphenylendiamin — C6H.|(IINS) has been found by Dr.
Edcr to act well as a developer for dry plates, having
about the same energy as pyrogallol or hydroquinone.
As far as experiments have been conducted, the develop-
ment with it is regular, and negatives produced are
delicate and soft. It was used with potash, without sul-
phite, which retards the development greatly, but pre-
vents the solution from becoming coloured. — Franklin
Institute Journal.
THE DINNER OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY.
Last Monday night the annual dinner of the Photographic
Society took place at the Cafe Royal, London, under the chair-
manship of Mr. James Glaisher, F.R.S., President. There
was a large attendance.
Mr. W. S. Bird, Treasurer, proposed success, and pros-
perity, and usefulness to the Photographic Society of Great
Britain, coupled with the name of Mr. Glaisher. He spoke of
the high influence of its Journal in times past, until affected
by the advent of weekly newspapers, and how great improve-
ments had been made in its last two numbers by the Honorary
Secretary. The last exhibition of the Society he considered
to be, perhaps, the best ever held in this country. Their
President was more than fourscore years of age, and gave to
his duties in the Society, as to everything else he undertook,
his best work.
The President felt honoured by the trust reposed in him ;
he had tried to be faithful in his work, and to hold the scales
of justice evenly. He wished to see the Society placed in a firm
permanent position, and hoped that it would be one day known as
the Royal Photographic Society ; he also expected that before
long it would have a good library.
Mr. Sebastian Davis stated that there are now about 400
photographic societies in different parts of the world. He
sjKike highly of Rejlander, and the way in which he had pro-
moted the artistic side of photography, and proposed pros-
perity to the photographic societies throughout the world,
coupled with the name of Mr. George Davison, of the Camera
Club.
The President thought that every society in this country
should be connected with the Photographic Society ■; the parent
society was proud of its children.
Mr. G. Davison said that the photographic societies of the
country looked to the Photographic Society to keep photography
up to the highest standard from a scientific point of view. It
was also desirable that photography should have high
standards from a tiue-ai t point of view. He returned thanks
on behalf of the photographic societies, and of himself indi-
vidually.
The President then proposed the toast of the photographic
press, coupled with the name of Mr. W. H. Harrison, who had
been known to him at the British Association meetings years
before his reappearance in photographic circles.
Mr. ". H. Harrison resi>onded, and in the course of his
remarks said that he ventured to suggest that the photo-
giaphic societies of this country should enter into closer
lelationship with foreign societies, and not, as was sometimes
the case, act as if the latter had no existence.
Di. ( Harters f\ HITE responded to the toast of the ladies,
and narrated some mistakes made by girls at Board School
examinations. One girl said that some food was flesh-lormiug,
and other food bone-formiug ; if they ate tog much of the
latter they would grow too many bones, and would look
funny.
Mr. \Y. S. Bird spoke of the admirable photographic work
done by Mbs. Cameron and other ladies.
Songs, recitations, and music were given by Miss l’riesc
Greene, and Messrs. Wilson, Brain, Braharn, Lowe, Protheroe,
and Cowan (senr. and junr. ).
Mr. Glaisher had to leave somewhat early, after which
Mr. Bird and Mr. W. England presided in turn.
(tfonespontrenre.
GAS CYLINDERS.
Sir, — A good deal of unnecessary alarm has been caused by
the lamentable accident which occurred rather more than a
week ago at Glasgow through the bursting of a cylinder.
There is no occasion either for alarm or surprise when the
facts of the case are known. If we hear of a man who deli-
berately throws a lighted match into a barrel of gunpowder,
we are neither alarmed nor surprised at the results. This is
exactly what has occurred at Glasgow ; the unfortunate man
who lost his life charged hydrogen into a black cylinder — in
direct contravention of the Company’s rules — and afterwards,
forgetting that he had done so,- put oxygen into the same
vessel ; the result was an explosion, which took place at the
first slight concussion which the cylinder received. A piece of
the cylinder which was picked up four yards from where the
accident occurred was quite hot, showing conclusively that
ignition had taken place, and there could have been no sponta-
neous ignition if the two gases had not been present.
Every precaution is taken by the Companies to prevent the
possibility of O and H getting mixed ; under no circumstances
will they fill hydrogen or coal gas into black cylinders, or oxygen
into a red one ; neither will they put the one gas into a cylinder
which they even suspect has ever contained the other.
With a view, however, of making it absolutely impossible for
two gases to be put into the same cylinder, it has been decided
by this Company, and also by the Scotch and Irish Oxygen Co.,
and the Manchester Oxygen Co., to fit all hydrogen cylinders
with a left-hand thread, so that they cannot be filled at the
oxygen pump, and, in the same way, it will be impossible to fill
oxygen cylinders at the hydrogen pump. All consumers arc
earnestly requested to send their hydrogen cylinders either to
the Companies, or to the agents through whom they obtain their
supplies of gas, to have the alteration made, and the smallest
possible charge will be made for taking off the present valves
and fitting on new ones. After a certain limit of time, of
which notice will be given, no hydrogen or coal gas cylinders not
provided with the new thread will be filled.
In some quarters the fear has been expressed that the acci-
dent at Glasgow occurred through over-pressure. Any such
apprehension may be immediately dismissed from the mind ;
explosion from such a cause is impossible. The cylinders are
tested to double the pressure at which they are ever filled, and
it is impossible to exceed the standard filling pressure of one
hundred and twenty atmospheres. They are also re-tested
periodically. For years past the Government have been using
high-pressure cylinders for ballooning purposes similar to those
in use at present ; they had them in the Egyptian and Boer
campaigns, and they have frequently been rolled from the top
of a hill to the bottom, bounding from point to point, and in no
single instance has an accident occurred, or a cylinder burst.
In conclusion, I would remind you of the fact that since
oxygen and hydrogen have been supplied in high-pressure cylin-
ders— now some three or four years — only two accidents have
occurred, and these at the Works ; whereas when bags were in
vogue, accidents, in many cases fatal, frequently took place.
Only last week in America, a lecturer on chemistry and ten or
twelve of his pupils were seriously injured by the bursting of a
retort in which oxygen was being made by the old-fashioned
chlorate of potash process.
T. N. Hester, Secretary to Brin's Oxygen Co., Ltd.
Connaught Mansions, Victoria Strut, Westminster, Feb. 7th.
February 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPH fC NEWS.
133
PHOTOGRAPHY AND FIRE INSURANCE.
Sir, — 't may interest you to know we have just had our
insurance premium reduced 10 per cent, by pointing out to
our Insurance Company that no collodion or other such inflam-
mables are stored on the premises. Norman May & Co.
12 <(■ 13, Church Street, Malvern, and at Cheltenham, Feb. 8th.
PHOTOGRAVURE.
Sin, — Referring to Dr. Gunther on photogravure, page 99
of the Photographic News this week, can )ou tell me at what
part of the preparation of the secoml stone is the asphalt
applied ? There is no mention of its application to the second
stone, but yet it says at the end of the article, clean it off with
turps. If you can give me any information on this point I. shall
feel obliged, as I intend trying the process to the end. I
thoroughly understand a great deal of it already, but cannot
see where the asplialtum is applied to the second stone. If suc-
cessful, it must be a very good process. E. Frewing.
26, Eden Street, Kingston-on-Thames, Feb. 7th.
patent £ntdltgcna\
Applications for Letters Patent.
1,854. H. L. Young, St. John’s Vicarage, Portsea, “Combina-
tion Hand Camera.” — Februaiy 4th.
1,857. J. V. Hidden, Storrington, I’ulborough, Sussex, “ Ex-
hibiting Photographic Transparencies in an Ordinary Lamp-
Shade.” — February 4th.
1,938. F. Kitto, 18, Fulham Place, Paddington, London,
“ Apparatus for Exhibiting Photographs.” — February 5th.
1,950. J. Swift, 81, Tottenham Court Road, London, “Iris
Diaphragm.” — February 5th.
1,956. E. and C. Ireland, 8, Quality Court, London, “ Pro-
ducing Coloured Photographs.” — Februaiy 5th.
1,998. G. W. Secretan, 22, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Producing Magic Photographs.” — February 6th.
2,034. A. G. Rider, 323, High Holborn, London, “ Walking-
Stick Tripods.” — Februaiy 7th.
2,039. A. F. Bannister, 67, St. George’s Avenue, Holloway,
London, “ Hand Cameras.” — February 7th.
2.100. T. P. Watson and W. Moscrop, 53, Chancery Lane,
London, “Cameras.” — February 7th.
2.101. G. Bishop, F. Bishop, and J. P. Kirk, trading as
Marion and Co., 53, Chancery Lane, London, “Reflectors
Used in Photographic Portraiture.” — February 7th.
Specifications Published.
18,357. — December 15 th, 1888. “Changing Camera Slides.”
Henry Herbert, 119, Hartfield Road, Wimbledon, Elec-
trical and Photographic Instrument Maker.
The object of this invention is to provide means whereby a
considerable number of plates, say, for example, a dozen, can be
carried, exposed, and changed, in one apparatus, instead of the
two plates usually carried in the ordinary dark back.
In carrying this invention into effect, I provide a suitable
box or case which may be adapted to slide in the back of the
camera, or in a separate frame of its own which may be
attachable to the camera in the ordinary way, or may be used
separately where required. The sliding box is made of suitable
size and shape, and contains the required number of plates,
whether exposed or not, and is preferably provided with a
closing shutter and a narrow slit or opening at the inner end,
through which each plate as it is required for use can pass.
This opening may be closed with an automatic shutter, which,
upon the removal of the case from its frame or the camera, at
once closes the opening and prevents the entrance of light
into the case. In the back of the camera or frame I prefer
to provide a spring-controlled hinged plate or equivalent
device, preferably of wood, which is pressed back into a suitable
recess or reeeptable upon the insertion of the sliding case, and
upon the withdrawal of the case springs forward.
In using this apparatus, the sliding case is first charged in
the usual manner with the sensitised plates, and is then inserted
into the frame or camera, the automatic shutter withdrawing
from the aperture in the end of the case as it enters. The case
having been pressed home, and it being desired to place the
plate in position for exposure, the case is withdrawn, the bottom
plate passing through the slit in the casing and remaining in
the camera or frame as the case is withdrawn. The spring back
is locked by a suitable detent, but when the sliding case is with-
drawn sufficiently far from the frame or camera, the detent is
automatically released, and the spring back then moves the plate
forward to its proper position for exposure, where it is held
securely by the sliding case, which is now returned into the
frame or camera. After exposure, the sliding shutter is with-
drawn, and the plate falls back into the sliding case with the
other plates ; the shutteris then closed again. To expose the next
plate the sliding case is withdrawn as before, leaving the next
plate in the frame ; this is brought forward as already dc<-
cribed, and the sliding case is again returned, and, after
exposure, the second plate is replaced in the case by the with-
drawal of the sliding shutter as before, and so on until all the
plates have been exposed, when the sliding case may be removed
and a new one already charged substituted, or the sliding case
can be relieved of the exposed plates in the dark room, re-charged
with fresh plates, and replaced as before.
In the frame or camera, at the opposite end to that by which
the sliding case enters, I prefer to have a spring controlled,
rising bottom, carrying two suitable guides so arranged that,
when the plate is pushed forward by the hinged back, it must
of necessity come into the right position for exposure. "When
the sliding case is inserted, it pushes back the rising bottom.
1,261. — Jan. 23rd, 1889. “Photographic Lenses.” Hugh
Blackwood, Sidney Cottage, Beckenham, Kent, Gentleman.
In order to take portraits or views by photography in a
proper and effective manner, the essential points to be attained
are, the option of rapidity, width of angle, combined with flat-
ness of field, clearness of definition, and depth of focus (or
field), with a comparatively large stop (or wide orifice).
It has, however, hitherto proved exceedingly difficult to satis-
factorily attain all these points in one lens. An improvement
has been effected on one point, with a more or less contrary
effect upon another point.
Even the lenses of Dallmeyer, Ross, Voigtlander, and other
well-known makeis, which have been produced with the object
of obviating these defects, have not entirely done so, but the
improvement is so great that these lenses are much sought
after, notwithstanding the great cost of the same ; and at this
very heavy expense (with added weight when travelling) dif-
ferent lenses have to be used, and have hitherto had to be pur-
chased separately from these makers, for the various subjects
to be photographed ; thus, for instantaneous and general out-
door work, a comparatively narrow’ angle lens is used, wffiilst
for indoor work and confined situations a wide angle lens is
required, and for indoor portraits a portrait lens.
Now the object of my invention is to entirely overcome the
difficulties above mentioned, by simple means, at a small cost.
In carrying out my invention, I employ an extra lens, which
I place just in front of the rear lens, or it may be inserted in
the stop itself, different sizes and strengths being thus optional.
This extra lens, by preference, consists of a bi-convex and a
bi-concave, which may be cemented together, or arranged with
a small air space between. I prefer the latter arrangement, as
I can thereby substitute for one or both a stronger or weaker
glass according to the effect it is desired to produce, as by the
addition of stronger bi-convex lenses, the focal length may be
shortened down to such an extent that the sensitised plate
may almost touch the lens.
The glasses which I employ for my extra lens are ordinary
eye glasses that can lie purchased for a small sum almost any-
where.
The strength of glass which I find most suitable varies from
No. 5 to No. 16 (French Nos.), according to the class of lens
to lie used ; thus, for a whole plate rapid rectilinear, or half-
plate Lancastei meniscus lens, Nos. 7 or 8 are most suitable,
while, for a portrait lens, the strength may vary from Nos. 5
to 16, according to results required. By the addition of my
134
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [February 14, 18&0.
over them, they may be readily counted, and the aperture thus
ascertained in a dark place.
The inventors claim : —
1st. In diaphragms or stops of the kind described, the
actuating ring having a strengthening rim or ring and radial
slots therein, opening from the inner circumference of the ring
or thereabouts, with which slots engage pins on the leaves,
members, or strips of the diaphragm or stop.
2nd. In diaphragms or stops of the kind described, the com-
bination with an indicator or scale of a spring engaging with a
notched ring for indicating the degree of aperture, and retaining
the leaves, members, or strips of the diaphragm or stop in their
adjusted position.
3rd. The arrangement and combination of parts constituting
a lens tube or mounting, provided with a diaphragm or stop of
the kind shown in the drawings accompanjiug the specification.
extra lens, a narrow angle Ross, or other maker s narrow angle
lens is converted into a wide angle ; whilst a Dallmeyer, or other
maker's wide angle lens, may be converted into a narrower
angle of any required degree by substitution of a stronger bi-
concave. Also, if objects at a great distance are to be photo-
graphed— say from the top of a hill — flatness of field and depth
of focus — with a large stop or orifice, enabling instantaneous
effects— will be attained. A Voigtliinder or other portrait lens
becomes, by addition of my lens, applicable for all known pur-
poses, as the good qualities previously sacrificed, to get the
greatest possible rapidity, are regained. Similarly, any ordi-
nary lens, with addition of my lens, becomes incre vsedly effi-
cient for purposes of enlargement.
I also find that, whilst with the lenses of Dallmeyer, Ross,
Lancaster, and other well-known makers, my adaptation pro-
duces greatly improved results, it with some French and other
lenses acts as a detective, in case such glasses are badly paired,
or the lenses be of poor marginal definition, though at the same
time it practically removes this defect, as it permits of the lens
being stopped down to overcome the defect, but with a larger
stop than could be otherwise used.
I have found that with mail}' meniscus lenses, by the mere
addition of one bi-convex glass of No. 8 strength, I obtain
rapidity (shortened focal length) width of angle, clear definition,
and flatness of field, but in most cases I prefer to use the com-
pound lens.
Similarly, with an addition of one No. 1 or 2 short-sight
eye-glass inserted in the stop, an ordinary | -plate portrait lens
will cover a | or 7" by 5" plate at the same focal length (viz., 6 4")
as before with a large (J") stop, yet with flatness of field and
depth of focus, or a Dallmeyer 2C. Baby lens will cover from
a J to a 12" by 10" plate, with a larger orifice than at present,
and attaining increased rapidity and brilliant effect.
In all cases a diaphragm will be placed between the extra
lens and the rear lens in the combination.
1,331. — 21</i, January, 1889. “ Lens Diaphragms.” John
Stuart, The Hollies, Clapham Common, Surrey, Optician, and
George Harrop, 30, Russell Road, Holloway, London,
Engineer.
This invention relates to the stops or diaphragms known as
the “ Iris,” and has for its objects to enable the diaphragm or
stop and its holding and operating rings to he contained entirely
within a lens tube or mounting of the usual size, and also to
provide means whereby the operator can (without necessitating
reference to a scale), with great facility and certainty, adjust
the diaphragm or stop definitely to any set size of aperture,
without danger of its accidentally becoming altered. To effect
this, the ring to which one end of the component members)
leaves, or strips are centred is made of a size to fit in the lens
tube or mounting, aud the ring to which the other ends of the
said members, leaves, or strips are centred is provided with
slots extending from the inner circumference to near the outer
circumference, where the said ring is strengthened by a supple-
mentary ring or annulus, preferably at right angles thereto.
A stem attached to this si >tted ring, or the supplementary ring,
projects through a slot in the tube or mounting for enabling the
operator to adjust the aperture.
In a suitable part — for instance, in a ring secured within the
casing which contains the diaphragm — notches or recefeses are
made, with which engages a spring or catch secured to any
suitable part — for instance, to the ring which is slotted as
aforesaid. The free end of the spring catch that enters the
recesses or divisions in the ring allows the ring to be rotated ;
but as it comes opposite the notches or recesses, the operator is
aw ire that the diaphragm or stop then presents a certain known
and definite aperture, in accord mce with the recess or notch
with which the catch is • ngaged.
The tube or mounting of the lens may be provided with
divisions marked so that the position of the stem corresponding
with any given aperture may be ascertained by reference to the
scale or projections ; recesses or the like may be used instead of
the scale, or in addition thereto, so that by running the finger
IDrocee&mgs of ^octettes.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
The annual general meeting of this Society was held on
Tuesday evening last, the President, Mr. James Glaisher,
F. R. S. , in the chair.
The report of the Council was taken as read, and Mr. J.
Spieler proposed its adoption ; Mr. Scamell seconded this
motion.
Mr. A. Mackie made some strictures ui>on portions of the
report, and was followed by Mr. W. Bedford, who, while not
altogether approving of Mr. Mackie’s remarks, thought there
was more that might have been done. The question of affilia-
tion with other societies had not been advanced, neither had
that of establishing a photographic museum.
Mr. S. G. B. Wollaston considered that the papers that
had been presented to the Society were, on the whole, of too
scientific and abstruse a character.
Mr. G. Davison held the contrary view, and thought that the
dignity of the Society was best upheld by papers of an abstruse
and scientific character. As to affiliation with other societies,
directly they went into details to see how it would work, they
got into difficulties. If the affiliated societies made any pay-
ment, their members would expect to enjoy as a right all the
privileges that belonged to the present members, who each paid
his subscription.
After a few other observations, the report of the Council
was adopted nem. con.
The Hon. Treasurer then read his report, in which it was
stated that the capital of the Society had been increased by
carrying forward a sum of £139. The profits on the exhibi-
tion had been £161. The cost of the Society’s Journal for
the number printed was about 7s. a page, and the last number
was a very full one. There had been a considerable altera-
tion in the character of the Journal, and it was a matter for
consideration whether steps should be taken to secure a con-
tinuance of similar abstracts of the various photographic sub-
jects. Several members spoke in terms of high praise of the
recent change in the character of the Journal, and hopes were
expressed that it might be continued, or even further extended.
The adoption of the Treasurer’s report was proposed by Mr.
Montcfiore, and seconded by Mr. Mackie, and was carried nem
con.
The President then handed the progress medal to the son
of Capt. Abney, who was unable to be present aud receive
the award in person.
Mr. Wollaston and Mr. Mackie thought that under the
new rules, the Council had not the power to award medals,
and a motion to this effect was put to the meeting, without,
however, finding more than two supporters, whilst fifteen voted
against it.
Mr. Warnerke proposed a resolution, which was carried by
twenty against three, to the effect that the phrase “ Manage-
ment of the Society ” occurring in the rules, included everything
that assists in the advancement of photography and the
branches of art connected therewith.
i
February 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
135
The election of officers was then declared as follows : — Pre-
sident— Mr. James Glaisher, F.lt.S. , kc. ; Vice-Presidents —
Capt. Abney, C.B., Messrs. T. Sebastian Davis, H. P. Robinson,
and John Spiller ; Treasurer — Mr. W. S. Bird; Members of
Council — Messrs. G. L. Addenbrooke, \Y. Bedford, Valentine
Blanchard, Lyonel Clark, Francis Cobb, A. Cowan, T. R.
Dallmeyer, Major L. Darwin, George Davison, \V. E. Debenham,
W. England, J. Gale, H. Chapman Jones, Capt. A. M. Mantell,
Sir T. Prescott, Sir D. Salomons, J. \V. Swan, J. T. Taylor,
Leon Warnerke, and H. Trueman Wood.
After the customary votes of thanks, Dr. Lindsay Johnson
read a paper, in which he pressed upon the notice of the members
of the Society the advantages that would lie derived from the
formation of a museum, and of an institute for instruction and
research. Some months since, he said, there had been an-
nounced a sale of some very valuable historical objects of great
photographic interest. When he heard of the sale he wrote to
the Society to see if they could not see their way to purchasing
them for the benefit of the Society. Some friends offered to assist
with money, but the scheme fell through, and, if he recollected
rightly, many of the things were bought for the museum at Bath.
As the Society existed at present, it was liable to be turned
out of its place at any time. He proposed several alternative
schemes, the chief of which was that the Society should obtain
premises of its own, where a permanent museum could be
established in connection with an institute for instruction and
research in photography. This had been done by the Govern-
ments in France and Germany, but it would not do to expect as
much from the Government here. He thought, however, that
the aid of the Common Council might be asked for with a pro-
bability of success if the Photographic Society were provided
with a place and a programme calculated to inspire confidence.
He thought that a place might beobtained in the vicinity of Shaftes-
bury Avenue, and that if a design for a building were prepared
by a competent architect, a building to cost £20,000 to
£ 10,000, the Court of Common Council might be induced to
assist, supposing, that is, that it could be shown to be for the
advantage of the metropolis that the scheme, as a whole,
should be carried. Other alternatives were to apply for space
for a museum at South Kensington, which, however, he con-
sidered to be too far off, and to hire a flat in a convenient
locality, where part of the programme at least could be carried
out.
The consideration of Dr. Lindsay Johnson’s paper was de-
ferred till the next ordinary meeting, March 11th.
Mr. Enrico Resta was balloted for and duly elected a member
of the Society.
Camera Club.
On Thursday, February 6th, a paper contributed by Sir David
Salomons. was read, with Mr. E. R. Shipton in the chair. The
paper contained formulae for ascertaining the exact distance of
the lantern from screen when a particular amplification with a
given lens is desired, and for findiug the focal length of lens to
employ for a fixed distance and enlargement. An exhibition of
lantern slides followed of views in the Netherlands, by Messrs.
H. M. Elder, E. G. Spiers, and W. A. Greene. These were
succeeded by a set of New Zealand scenes by Mr. Wray Palliser,
and the first club loan collection of slides, sixty in number,
contributed by various members. Other sets were shown by
Messrs. Andreae, Dresser, Harding, Tidey, Payne, and A. Ship-
ton. Nearly 300 slides in all were brought by members for
exhibition.
At the commencement of the meeting the Hon. Sec. handed
round an instrument sent by Mr. Dresser called the “ Lantern-
scope,” an apparatus devised for the effective viewing of lantern
slides. The lanternscope exteriorly is a little like the stereo-
scope, but without the means of securing stereoscopic effect.
The transparency is viewed through a magnifying eye-piece, the
picture having behind it a piece of ground glass for diffusing
the light from the lamp. It strongly resembles the instrument
devised by Mr. Bow, C.F..
A photograph of the Eiffel Tower, taken by M. A. Pepper,
of Paris, was sent for inspection by Messrs. Hinton and Co.
The paper on Thursday, February 20th, will be one com-
municated by Mr. W. lv. Burton, “ On One or Two of the
Tenets of the Naturalists.” The meeting opens at 8 p.m.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 7th inst., Mr. J. Zaehnsdore occupied
the chair.
Mr. A. C. Pemberton was elected a member of the Asso-
ciation.
A negative was handed round marked throughout the film
in a similar way to one exhibited at a recent meeting ; the
negative had been varnished.
Mr. A. Haddon believed the defect arose from particles of
dust in the varnish, causing the gelatine film to be imperfectly
protected. Moisture eventually finding its way through the
varnish, caused the gelatine film to swell and so split up the
varnish, each particle of dust in this way forming a nucleus of
the geometrical markings.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater read a letter received from the Scotch
and Irish Oxygen Company alien t the recent explosion, from
which it appears that the bottle, at the time of the accident,
was filled with a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen ; the cylinder
was marked H. A portion of the bottle found proved that
it had received a test pressure of 240 atmospheres, dated July
2nd, 1889. The letter further stated that it had been deter-
mined in future to adopt entirely different fittings for oxygen
and hydrogen bottles, to prevent any mistake in the filling of
the cylinder, and make it impossible to put the two gases in one
bottle.
Mr. J. >S. Teape showed a stoppered bottle of eikonogen ; the
crystals had turned quite black. The bottle had only
been opened once. Some eikonogen kept in paper a similar
length of time was only slightly discoloured.
Mr. W. E. Debenham had kept a sample in paper for some
time. It had scarcely changed colour.
Mr. A. Cowan believed the changing of colour of the eikono-
gen shown by Mr. Teape was due to its having been put in
a damp bottle.
Some crystals were taken out of the bottle and placed in
water, when it was found that the black colour was only on
their surfaces.
In reference to a question asked at the last meeting for
particulars as to the photographic inventions of the late Dr.
Joule, mentioned in a letter to the Daily Standard, Mr. A.
Haddon brought down to the meeting a volume of Dr. Joule’s
scientific papers, collected by the Physical Society of London,
in which no trace could be found of any reference to any
photographic discoveries.
Mr. J. B. B. Wellington asked what material was consi-
dered the best for a lantern screen, and whether bamboo or
pine w'ould be bestfor the frame.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater said bamboo of course was the lightest,
but it was difficult to get it quite straight, and it was very
unequal in thickness ; each ferrule w'ould in consequence have to
be marked. These objections did not apply to pine wood, to which
he would give preference.
Mr. F. A. Bridge said that a medium thick calico was the best
material for the screen. It was resolved that at the next
lantern meeting in March a slide competition should take place.
Glasgow Photographic Association.
The fourth general meeting of the session was held on Feb. 6th
at 207, Bath Street, Mr. William Lang, Jnr., in the chair.
The following new members were elected : — Messrs. Paul
Rottenburg, James Richardson, C. J. Anderson, J. T. Darling.
Ex-Provost Clark was elected an honorary member.
In the question-box the following questions were found : —
(1) “ Can anyone give any information about the explosion at
Polmadic? Is there to be any public or scientific report to be
made regarding the same ? ” (2) “ What method of varnish-
ing celluloid films is the best?” (3) “Can anyone mention a
formula for toning Alpha lantern plates ? ”
Regarding the first question, after some discussion, it was
A
186
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [February 14, 1890.
EnsUm# to eTomgpon&ents.
thought that the authorities would be sure to investigate the
matter. The second question was, to a large extent, unanswer-
able. It was understood that the Eastman Company were
working to produce a suitable varnish.
Professor E. J. Mills then gave a communication, “ Some
Practical Notes,” in which reference was made to eikonogen, its
discovery, chemical constitution, and its role as a developer.
Several interesting novelties were shown by Dr. Mills, notably
a lens mounted in aluminium.
Mr. H. M. Smith, representing the Eastman Company, ex-
hibited the new Kodak, celluloid film negatives, new glass tray
for developing same, and other apparatus.
Specimens of a new glass etching process (Mallodi’s patent)
were next passed round, and the proceedings closed with a
series of photographs illustrative of the various photographic
conventions, forwarded bv Mr. A. Pringle, and some micrographs
by him were shown by means of the Society’s lantern.
Sheffield Camera Club.
At the meeting of the Club on January 27th, the following
were elected officers : —
President — Mi. G. T. W. Newsholme, F.C.S.
Vice-Presidents — Messrs. J. H. Merton, M.D., and J. H.
Rawson.
Treasurer — Mr. B. W. Winder, K.C.S., F.R.M.S.
lion. Secretary — Mr. G. E. Maleham.
Council — Messrs. Wm. Gillig, junr., W. Genkinson, Prof.
Arnold, H. Morrell, J. A. Wanton, F.R.C.P., M.R.C.S., T.
S. Yeomans.
The inaugural meeting of the new session takes place on
Feb. 26th.
Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on Feb. 19
will be “ Lantern Illuminants, including the New Benzoline
Limelight.”
East Dulwich and Peckham Photographic Society. — A
lantern entertainment was given by this Society at the Collyer
Hall, Peckham, on the 17th inst., when a large number of
slides, the work of various members, was shown.
A New Chemical Society, it is said by the Monthly Maga-
zine, is likely to be formed before long on the other side of the
Atlantic. It is to be called the American Chemical Society, and
is to have local sections at Boston, New York, Philadelphia,
Washington, Baltimore, and other towns. The new society
will, it is anticipated, be an imitation of the English Society of
Chemical Industry — that is, a national organisation with local
sections.
Fluid Measure. — The Monthly Magazine describes and
illustrates what it terms the “ Excelsior” fluid measure, which
consists of a well-made tin can or pot of the ordinary shape, with
spout and handle, the capacity of which is exactly one imperial
quart. Up the side of this vessel are fitted in four glass discs
— looking something like the port-holes of a toy merchantman
or frigate — duly protected from a chance blow by cross-bars of
metal. In this way the level of the interior liquid can be seen,
and the quantity graduated into pints, half-pints, and so on.
Received. — “ Abraham’s Photographic Annual,” though in
the main a catalogue of photographic goods, includes some
sixty pages of original articles contributed by Messrs. Lyonel
Clark, George Davison, A. R. Dresser, E. A. Golledge, W.
Jerome Harrison, Chapman Jones, Major J. W. Nott, Andrew
Pringle, E. J. Wall, W. Willis, and others ; it contains also
formula;, statements of processes, and other useful items
well worth the outlay of the few pence charged for this com-
bination of guide-book and trade list. From Mr. A. R.
Wormald, a specimen box of assorted coloured lantern slide
masks, which are made in any desired colour, and in
gold and silver paper. They are supplied in various shapes
assorted, five shapes in each box. With the foregoing is
also forwarded a sample sheet of twenty-four colours.
The list of awards at the Royton Exhibition was not
received by us.
All Alvertisements and communications reliting to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furniva! Street, London.
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photogkaphic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, f.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
Histobicus. — Early history of photography. Consult the Rev.
T. F. Hardwich’s “ Manual of Photographic Chemistry,” or
pages 18 to 20 of Chapman Jones’s “ Science and Practice of
Photography ; ” or, lastly, look up the dates for yourself in
the early copies of the News, and the first few volumes of
the Photographic Journal.
Nature Printing does not come within the province of photo-
graphy. Henry Bradbury’s lecture on the subject was
delivered at the Royal Institution in May, 1855, The results
were certainly very beautiful, but they have been to some
extent superseded by photo-mechanical methods, and we do
not hear of the process being in actual use at the present
time.
E. P. — The print and sensitized paper both show markings, such
as would be caused by fine particles of pyrogallic acid or other
reducing agent becoming accidentally dusted over the paper
either before or during the silver treatment. See page 84 of
the Year-Book. Another batch, you say, does not show this
defect when sensitized on the same (filtered) baths and blotted
off on the same pads. It would seem, therefore, to be due
to some such impurity in this particular delivery of albumeu-
ized paper. Get some witness to overlook your work and
certify to these particular defects, if your own affirmation is
distrusted.
Colour (Exeter). — “ The Art of Photographic Painting,” by
A. H. Bool— a little shilling manual to be had of our pub-
lishers— gives all the information required to make a start.
H. C. S. — When ordering the rapid plates of Messrs. Marion
and Co., be sure to advise them of your special requirement
of extreme rapidity. If these should not succeed, try Messrs.
Wratten and Wainwright’s instantaneous plates.
Photargus. — Removal of brown silver spots from gelatine nega-
tives. Immersion in excessively weak cyanide of potassium,
after removal of the varnish, will sometimes answer, but it
is apt to pull down the intensity of the negative. Remem-
ber to wash well afterwards. Valuable negatives are often
printed with a film of mica between, but the new Eastman
celluloid ought to be tried, as it is cheaper. Goldbeaters’
skin would not be sufficiently transparent. It is a well-known
fact that gelatine negatives are more liable to stains in the
printing than were the old collodion plates when treated
with the same varnish. In the latter case, the shellac gets
through the film down to the glass, but not so with the gela-
tine, which stands, moreover, in higher relief, and is especially
sensitive to the most minute traces of silver. Some advise a
preliminary coating of plain collodion before varnishing.
E. F. — Partly answered by post; the other enquiry is pro-
ceeding, and your letter inserted.
Ignoramus (Dublin). — Formula for collodio-chloride is given at
page 203 of the Year-Book. Chloride of strontium, being
more soluble in spirit, is sometimes preferred to chloride of
calcium, and may be used in the same proportion.
S. V. W. — Silver washings. — In cold weather the precipitated
chloride does not settle down so quickly. An acid reaction
favours its separation, so you should use hydrochloric acid
instead of salt at this season, and take care to stir well.
Your remark about short returns from silver residues may
admit of another explanation, and be accounted for by the
fact that less silver nitrate is commonly employed in the
ready sensitized papers.
F. R.A.S. — An excellent portrait of the late FatherS. J. Perry,
F.R.S., appeared in the IllustratedLondonNeu's of 18th ult.
It is a Meisenbach block from a photograph by Messrs. Maull
and Fox, 187, Piccadilly, from whom an original copy may
very probably be obtained.
Spots and another letter received,
THE
PHOTOGRAPHIC
£
~\y v.v'"/
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1642.— February 21, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOl
The Report of the International Photographic Congress 137
Filins on Olass Surfaces 133
Photography in Holland 139
The Action of Heat on Sodium Carbonate 140
Athanasius Kircher, the Inventor of the Magic Lantern. By
James Mew 141
An Iso-Radial Focussing Eyepiece. By W. E. Debenham... 143
The Temperature of Photographic Manipulations 144
Photography in Switzerland 143
Notes 146
Photo-Lithography and the New Albert Photo-Lithographic
Transfer Paper. By Hermann E. Gunther 147
PAO*
Destruction of Dry Plates by Insects 148
Dr. Andresen’s Eikonogen Patent 150
Photographing Church Architecture. By Rev. T. Perkins,
M.A 150
Four Different Printing Processes Suitable for Copying
Tracings. By J. E. Qoold 151
Stereoscopic Photography 152
Isochromatic or Orthocbromatic 152
Correspondence 153
Patent Intelligence 153
Proceedings of Societies 153
Answers to Correspondents 156
THE REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL
PHOTOGRAPHIC CONGRESS.
The official report of the International Photographic
Congress held last year in Paris has been issued this
■week by the Minister of Commerce, Industry, and the
Colonies. It contains a report of the opening speech
of Dr. Janssen, the President, also brief reports of each
of the sittings of the Congress, and, finally, the con-
clusions at which the Congress arrived in relation to
the various subjects brought under its notice. The
report is published by the Imprimerie Rationale, of
Paris. »
Some of the resolutions adopted by the Congress have
already been criticised in detail by the photographic
press, because of the official abstract of them published
last autumn. Among those now given in detail, that
relating to the terms used in photography is of much
interest, for there is no doubt that the variety of words
now sometimes employed to denote one and the same
process is objectionable. The Congress proposed to
lay down a basis for a rational nomenclature, by means
of the following rules : —
1. The expression photo shall be employed, to the
exclusion of the word helio, to indicate processes due
to the action of light from any source whatever, and
not alone to the action of solar liglit. The expression
helio is exclusively reserved to indicate those processes
only in which solar light is used.
2. The expressions^o-siffm and negatives are reserved
to indicate respectively the images in which the effects
of light and shade resemble those of nature, or in which
those effects are reversed.
3. In that which concerns photographs obtained
solely by the chemical action of light, the name of
phototypes will distinguish those produced directly by
the use of the camera. The name photocopies will be
given to the reproductions of these by a new photo-
graphic operation by means of a sensitive surface acted
upon by light.
The name photocalgues (photosketches ?) will be given
to reproductions made in the same way from non-
photographic original designs.
4. Photomechanical prints, or phototirages, which
may also be called photoprints, will be differentiated
by the following appellations : —
To designate these different processes, an insertion
will be made between the two radicals which form the
word photography, and which will indicate the principal
characteristics of the particular process.
According to this rule the word photocollograpky will
indicate reproductions in various inks by processes in
which colloids (gelatine, albumen, bitumen, and so on)
are spread upon various supports, and rendered fit for
inking by the action of light.
The word photoplastography will be employed to in-
dicate processes in which a plastic substance changes
its form because of the action of light, and returns to
a thickness suitable for a coloured gelatinous ink.
The word photoglyptography will be used for pro-
cesses of engraving in intaglio by photography.
The word phototypography will be employed for
photographic processes of engraving in relief for use
in the type-high letter printing press.
The word photochromography will be applied to
printing processes for the reproduction of photographic
images of several colours.
5. More extended designations of photographic pro-
cesses or operations may be applied, so far as the French
language is concerned, by introducing generic words
preceding the necessary indications of the nature of
the processes or operations.
For instance, the preposition « or par (by), accord-
ing to the case, will precede the words indicating the
nature of the sensitive substance employed, or that
of the mode of operation ; and the preposition upon
precede the words indicating the nature of the sup-
port of the preparations. The names of inventors,
if they have to be used, can be placed at the end.
Examples: — Photographs. — 1. Positive phototype ;
iodide of silver on a metallic plate (Daguerre’s process).
2, Positive photo-type ; collodion on a metallic plate
138
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 1890.
(Ad. Martin’s process). 3. Negative photo-type, col-
lodio-bromide of silver on glass. 4. Positive photo-
copy, gelatino-chloride of silver on paper. 5. Positive
photo-copy, in mixed colours (Poitevin’s process). 6.
Negative photo-sketch, ferro-prussiate blue paper
(Motileff’s process). 7. Positive photo-sketch, gallute
of iron. Photo -prints. — 8. Photo-oollography, bichro-
mated gelatine on ground glass. 9. Photo-plastography ,
coloured gelatinous inks (Woodbury’s process). 10.
Photoglyptography, by bitumen of Judea on steel
(Niepce’s process). 11. Phototypography, by bitumen
of Judea on zinc.
6th. — For the designation of the divers applications
of photography to special purposes, are reserved com-
pound words obtained by prefacing the word photo-
graphy, with radicals indicating by abbreviation the
particular applications. Examples : — Chronophoto-
graphy ; the photographic production of successive
images taken at accurately measured intervals of time.
Microphotography ; the photographing of microscopic
objects. Heliophotography; the photographing of
the solar surface. Spectrophotography ; the photo-
graphy of the spectra given by luminous sources.
Uranophotography ; the photography of celestial
spaces. Chromophotography ; the direct obtaining of
the reproduction of colours by photography.
Such is the substance of the decisions of the Con-
gress on this particular question. It will be noticed
that the Congress has not vainly attempted to intro-
duce French terms into photographic circles all
the world over, but has culled, as customary
in the scientific world, from the Greek. The
Congress has, in this matter, accomplished some
useful work, in attempting to bring chaotic nomen-
clature into something more resembling law and order.
How far the improvements it advocates will — either
before or after their revision by other Congresses — be
brought into general use is another question. The
higher the education of any scientific fraternity, the
easier is it to introduce more accurate terms ; indeed,
chemistry and physics have seen vast improvements in
this respect within the memories of many persons now
living. The lower the education of any scientific
fraternity, the more conservatively does that fraternity
hold on to words it has once adopted, however unsuit-
able those words may be. Photography includes all
sorts and conditions of men, so how any attempt to
revise its scientific nomenclature will succeed, remains
to be seen.
This year an International Congress, an out-
come and continuation of that at Paris, will be
held in Brussels, in which city also an Inter-
national Photographic Exhibition will take place
at the same time. At the Brussels Congress the
late Paris Congress will be represented by a com-
mittee it has appointed, consisting of MM. Alex, de
Blochouse (Belgium), the Prince de Molfetta (Italy),
and Gylden (Sweden), honorary presidents ; Dr.
Janssen, president; MM. Davannc, Marey, and Wolf,
French vice-presidents; MM. de Yylder (Belgium)
and Petersen (Denmark), foreign vice-presidents ; M.
S. Pector, general secretary ; M. Leon Vidal and A.
Lcnde, French secretaries; MM. AVada (Japan), and
Stanoiewitch (Servia), foreign secretaries ; Col. Sebert,
and MM. A. Martin, Cornu, de Villechole, Bordet,
Perrot de Chaumeux, Warnerke, and Fabre, members.
M. Maes, of Ant werp, the President of the Belgian Photo-
graphic Association, was present at the Paris Congress,
and said that Belgium would be delighted to receive
the Congress this year. M. H. Gylden, of Sweden,
returned thanks at the Paris Congress for the warm
welcome which had been given thereat to foreign
visitors, after which the Congress came to an end at
five o’clock, August 17th, 1889.
It is a remarkable circumstance that three photo-
graphic exhibitions will be held this year on the Conti-
nent, within easy distance of London and the larger
part of England, by the night service of boats via
Harwich. In the course of the year Brussels, as
already stated, will hold its International Photographic
Exhibition ; another Photographic Exhibition will take
place at Amsterdam, and at Antweqi will be an Exhi-
bition specially devoted to Photomicrography.
FILMS ON GLASS SURFACES.
Last Saturday, at the Royal Institution, Lord Rayleigh, in
the first of a series of lectures on “ Electricity and Mag-
netism,” stated that glass has a great power of condensing
moisture upon its surface. Some German observers, he
added, have of late years discovered that it depends in a
great degree upon the condition of the glass itself, and
upon the alkali which the glass contains. The alkali
causes it to attract moisture from the air around, even
when the air is not saturated with aqueous vapour. Glass
can be cured of this habit for a time by boiling it for five
minutes. Much depends upon the kind of glass; for
instance, Hint glass behaves better in resisting the forma-
tion of these films than do the softer glasses usually
employed for chemical apparatus.
In the course of the same lecture, Lord Rayleigh exhi-
bited by means of the optical lantern some slides from
negatives, which he had had to take by exposures of
excessive rapidity even for what is called “ instantaneous”
work. lie had photographed some falling drops of water
so quickly that they appeared quite globular and not
elongated in form, and had sharp, well-defined edges.
The exposure and illumination were effected by means of a
single electrical spark, given by the discharge of a battery
of Leyden jars.
Photographic Club. — Wednesday, February 26th, monthly
lantern night — ethoxo versus the new benzoline light. March
5th, “Artificial Light as an Auxiliary to Daylight.”
The Instantaneous Photograph, says the Washington Post,
bids fair to become a very potent aid to artists who seek to
teach their pupils that reproduction is not art ; for it is clearly
demonstrated by this means that the real is in nowise like the
apparent. For example, an instantaneous photograph of a
man in the act of running never looks as much like a man in
the act of running as the pen-drawing of a true artist does.
The reason is that the photograph reproduces the one exact
position of the runner at the instant the picture is made,
while the artist pictures several positions in one, and makes
his man appear to be moving.
February 21, 181)0. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
130
PHOTOGRAPHY IX HOLLAND.
Amateurs and Professionals.
In the February number of the current year of Lux — an
illustrated monthly journal devoted to photographic
interest, and published at Amsterdam under the able
guidance of its editors, A. D. Loman, jr., and Chr. J.
Schuver, for the furtherance of photography and all arts
and sciences thereto related — we find an able article by
Photophotos on “Amateurs and Professionals.”
Were I, says Photophotos, a zoologist instead of a
photographer, and supposing I was required to draw a
distinction between the two above-named persons, this
distinction would probably run as follows : —
Type : Animalia Vertebra ta.
Class : Mammalia.
Order: Bimana.
Genus ; Homo.
Species : Fotogrgficns.
Varietas (1) : Amateur.
Yarietas (2) : Professional.
The difference between the individuals composing the
first variety and those composing the second can. in the
opinion of Photophotos, be confirmed by several distinctive
marks and characteristics. For example, it will be gene-
rally allowed that the amateur is accustomed to make raids
when he wishes to capture spoil or booty ; the professional,
on the other hand, lies, as a spider, in wait for his prey,
and has generally a horror of the traitorous means em-
ployed by the amateur to accomplish his nefarious purposes.
It is, moreover, to be noticed that the amateur is generally
sociable — indeed, he might be called gregarious ; wliile
the professional, on the contrary, affects isolation, and
loves to remain alone. One, however, of the most pro-
nounced characteristics of divergency is undoubtedly the
winter sleep or hybernation of the amateur what time the
professional, though feeling the season’s difference, and by
no means insensible to the rude attacks of Jack Frost
and his cold confederates, nevertheless loses not his
wonted wakefulness, and accosts with equal alertness,
activity, and zeal the probable customer, whether that
customer’s waistcoat is unbuttoned in sultry August, or
his teeth chatter in cold December. But the amateur,
falling to sleep, poetically, with the fading rose and the
exodus of the swallow, awakens not again for any care of
customer till the rose returns, till the flowers again appear
on the earth, till the time of the singing of birds is come,
and the winter is past, and the rain is over and gone.
Cases, indeed, have been known — but they are rare — in
which the amateur has been aroused from his wintry sleep
by the sunny brilliancy of a magnesium flash-light, when
he will, on occasions, feebly partake of a little nourishment
in the form of lantern plates of bromide of silver for
sciopticon exhibitions.
The relation of these two interesting varieties to each
other is mostly of an inimical and sometimes a malig-
nant character, though, in some instances of perfect neu-
trality on both sides, a sound and lasting friendship may be
found to subsist.
It is a sufficiently well known fact that photography,
which was formerly practised only by professionals, has, in
the course of a comparatively short period, spread itself
widely among the most different ranks of society inte-
rested in it, partially from a scientific and partially from a
business point of view. From the nature of things it
must necessarily follow that the branch of photography
to which the amateur directs his attention is very di fferent
from that which engages the thoughts of the professions 1.
The latter has, we will say, a well appointed studio, and
devotes himself exclusively to the study and practice of
portrait photography in the widest sense of the word ; the
former, intimidated by the costly apparatus neoessary to
procure a really good portrait, and anxious in no small
degree to avoid the labour — the normally requisite labour
— of retouching, turns his ’prentice hand mainly to such
outlying subjects as landscapes, genre pictures, instan-
taneous pictures, detective exposures, and photo-micro-
gravures.
Although Photophotos is by no means prepared to deny
that portrait photography may be, and is, occasionally
practised with no inconsiderable success by amateurs, it
is, he thinks, as a general rule, advisable for them to busy
themselves therewith only in a small degree, or still better,
not at all. For this opinion he gives the following reason.
The condition of those who pursue photography as a
profession is, no one will perhaps venture to deny, far from
satisfactory. It has not been a favourable condition for
some little time. Although this may doubtless in a great
measure be ascribed to the increased facility in photo-
graphic manipulation — a fact which has brought studios
and ateliers from the ground like mushrooms or Jonah’s
gourd — still the amateur photographers, or at least some
of them, are mainly accountable for this unsatisfactory
condition of their brother professionals.
What is indeed too often the case ?
Take a respectable family rejoicing — or the reverse — in a
youth, one of its members, with a passion for photography.
This youth has managed to secure for himself some area
of space, a courtyard — a garden, be it said, for politeness'
sake — or even a chamber where, with the assistance of a
friend who can retouch, he is able to take the portrait,
always made ship-shape by the said friend, of some one or
other of his associates ; or suppose him visited by a nephew,
a niece — a more dangerous visitant — in short, by any rela-
tion or acquaintance, but above all, by an aunt with small
children, all of whom, with unmistakable signs, declare
their desire, their ardent desire, to have their portraits taken
by this able amateur. Then comes his moment of peril.
He takes a negative, good or bad, as the case may be ; they
with one accord beg a copy to send home ; they obtain it,
send it, and no harm ensues. But if the plate pleases, if
they long, like the daughters of the horse leech, or the
unhappy Oliver, for more, then must the amateur at once
put himself in a position of defence, and make use of such
artillery of refusal as his experience has collected, or his
imagination can suggest. If no better safeguards are pro-
curable, such common forms of denial will serve as failure
of time, pressure of business, inability as a mere amateur.
Let him profess himself content with his work, but
let him also add that if a really good portrait is required,
the applicant must at once betake himself, and especially
herself, to a professional artist. If the negative is really
worth the trouble, the applicant will surely not grudge the
payment of a reasonable price for as many copies as may be
chosen to an accomplished workman.
But the case is considerably altered if the amateur, for
divine charity’s sake, or any other motive, is weak enough
to bestow a dozen or more copies on the applicant. For
the recipient, beguiled by this cheap method of acquisition,
and totally blind to the errors and imperfections which
swarm in the amateurish gift, conceives at once an anti-
pathy to the professional photographer, who makes worthy
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [February 21, 1890.
140
people pay for their portraits through the nose. He for-
gets that the labourer is worthy of his hire, and that the
professional workman must be recompensed for his pain-
fully acquired proficiency of skill, and the consequence is
that he either ceases to visit the professional altogether, or
visits him only to find fault with his prices, to cheapen a
bargain, or to return pictures with which he is displeased.
Some people may think the foregoing description ex-
aggerated, but its truth will be acknowledged by everyone
who is practically acquainted with this subject, and is alone,
therefore, able to give an opinion of value.
A portion of photography which may be cultivated with
success by amateurs is the grouping of companies at festive
gatherings, such as picnics, concerts, marriage breakfasts,
cricket matches, and other diversions of a like nature,
little or no need is here of such technical knowledge and
appliances as are indispensable to the photography of por-
traits. Besides, and in a measure owing to this, the artist
will be far more satisfied with his work, and will, in addition,
accumulate for his later years a fund of pleasing recollec-
tions which he may draw upon without let or hindrance
at his own sweet will.
The dilettante must never forget that he pursues photo-
graphy as a plaything, or, if this term be not sufficiently
dignified, as a science or as an art, but not as a means of
earning a livelihood ; and such as devote themselves to this
occupation for amusement should not complain hastily of
the expenses or trouble which it necessitates or involves.
“He who keeps a monkey,” says an old adage, “ must be
ready and willing to make good any damage which may
arise from his malfeasance. ” He must pay, like the amateur
photographer, for the glasses he breaks.
It is only fair to add that some of the essential and most
important services to photography have been rendered by
amateurs, and from them will doubtless be stretched out
in the proximate future many hands of support and assist-
ance to this seductive art. Its varied fields of labour are
indeed large enough for all.
It has been in several times and places asserted, with such
degree of confidence as the absence of experience and
knowledge can alone inspire, that the amateur will in the
end destroy the professional, and survive alone as the
fittest when the New Zealander acts according to
Macaulay's imagination. Hitherto, however, there has
been but slight sign of the professional’s decadence, and it
must also be borne in mind that the amateur is too
frequently an amateur not in name only, but in deed.
Witness, for instance, him who goes in summer to the
Baarnsche Bosch to photograph and — drink Bittertjes.
No ! we need hardly make ourselves uneasy as yet con-
cerning the future condition of the skilled and capable
professional.
The existence of the amateur has in this article been
considered as an important factor in the present evil con-
dition of photography as a trade and calling. It is only
just to mention also the far more important and deterio-
rating effect of the exceedingly low prices which are asked
for portraits in several small studios. It is indeed
unfortunate that the majority of people, who probably find
even these prices sufficiently high, are unable to discover
the low quality of such low-priced wares, wares which may
well be called photographic offscourings and rubbish. It
is through the existence of this trash that the intelligent
artist suffers, and the grass, so to speak, grows on the
threshold of his door. A radical medicine for this evil
could be dispensed and made up with successful result
if photographers would but unite and establish a definite
minimum price for a dozen portraits.
Since the above was written, it has been ascertained
that M. van Os has set such a plan in operation. In a late
number of the Fotograaf some of the principal photo-
graphers of Amsterdam, as Woodbury and Page, Max
Cosman and Koene, and Buttinghausen ; of the Hague, as
J. Ch. Mirande ; of the Bosch, as Pierre Weynen ; and
of Nijmegen, as van Wens, have been reported as express-
ing their adhesion to the formation of a committee with
such an object in view.
THE ACTION OF HE. AT ON SODIUM CARBONATE.
Fresenius and other analytical authorities teach that, when
sodium carbonate is moderately ignited and has lost all excess
of water, Ac. , it undergoes scarcely any further loss ; but that
it loses materially if it is heated — even moderately — to in-
cipient fusion.
Dr. Richard Kiessling lias studied this subject more in detail,
since the use of sodium carbonate as one of the fundamental
chemicals in preparing volumetric solutions would become
objectionable if its absolute stability were shown to be fallacious*
In making his experiments, he started from a bicarbonate
which had the following composition : —
Sodium carbonate ... ... ... 64-4 per cent.
Water... ... ... ... ... 11 ‘6 ,,
Excess of C02 ... ... ... 24-0 ,,
A pure sodium bicarbonate of the formula NaHCO. has the
following composition ; —
Sodium carbonate ... ... 63 *1 1 4 per cent.
Water ... ... ... ... 10*711 ,,
Extra CO, 26-175
Of the former a quantity of 6-170 gm. was subjected, on a
watch glass, in a drying oven, to a gradually increasing tempera-
ture. At 60° C. there was no loss ; at 70’ C. the loss was very
trifling ; at 90° C. it had become quite material, and all of the
extra carbonic acid was dissipated by heating to 125 C. The
residue weighed .3-982 Gm., or 64-54 percent. This consisted
of sodium carbonate, absolutely free from caustic soda. It was
now heated to 200° C., which caused no further loss. On
raising the temperature to 400q C., however, a loss of 0'02gm.
(0 33 per cent.) was incurred, and the residue gave a decided
reaction of caustic alkali.
On repeating the experiments in a platinum crucible, which
permitted the employment of higher temperatures, the above
results were confirmed. By increasing the heat to incipient
melting, the residue gave a strong reaction of caustic soda.
It follows from these experiments that a ]>erfectly homo-
geneous and standard sodium carbonate may be obtained by
exposiug the pure bicarbonate to a temperature of 150° C.
until it no longer loses weight.
The author suggests to control the purity of the sodium car-
bonate by using potassium tetroxalate (KHC,04.H,C,04.2H,O)
as a control-basis for volumetric purposes. — Zcitsch. f. angew.
Chem., 1889, 332.
♦
Camera Club Notices for March, 1890. — Monday,
March 3rd, 8.30 p.m., smoking concert ; Thursday, March 6th,
8 p.m., Mr. Andrew Pringle on “The Optical Lantern”;
Thursday, March 13th, 8 p.m., lantern evening; Monday,
March 17th, 8.30 p.m., lantern in operation (evening for
testing slides) ; Wednesday, March 19th, 8.30 p.m., special
smoking concert, and opening of members annual exhibition
of photographs ; Thursday, March 20th, 2 p.m., <q>eniug of
conference and exhibition of apparatus at the Society of
Arts by the President, Captain W. de W. Abney, C.B.,
R.E., F.R.S., papers from 2 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. ; Friday,
March 21st, 10 a.m., exhibition of apparatus in library of
Society of Arts ; 2 p.m., renewal of conference, papers
from 2 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. ; 7.30 p.m., annual dinner at Fras-
cati Restaurant, Oxford Street (near Tottenham Court Road) ;
Thursday, March 27th, 8 p.m., Mr. W. 'Willis on “Platino-
type Possibilities”; Thursday, April 3rd, 8 p.m., lantern
evening ; Monday, April 7th, 8.30 p.m., smoking concert.
February 2l, 1890. }
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
141
ATHANASIUS KIRCHER, THE INVEN TOR OF THE
MAGIC LANTERN.
II."'
BY JAMES MEW.
Before coming to a consideration of lurcher's already
mentioned work, the work most important and interesting
for the photographer, the “ Great Art of Light and Shade,”
some more of the celebrated Jesuit’s compositions merit
attention as not only in themselves curious, but as bearing
rich testimony to the wide and varied character of lurcher's
intellectual study and attainments. No regard will be had
of date in the enumeration of these books ; concerning their
size, it has been already said that they are mostly in ponder-
ous folios. Dipping, then, our hand into this learned lucky
bag at a venture, we draw out first what may well be con-
sidered a prize, bearing the title of “ Polygraphy, or the
Artifice of Tongues,” a marvellous volume expounding a
project of universal writing, and containing instructions
for the composition and unravelment of secret ciphers.
After this we light upon the “ Egyptian (Edipus,” a work
in three volumes, the fruit of the arduous toil of twenty
years, now read by linguists only with a strange sensation
of wonder. Two more works, almost equally astonishing
in their different respects, follow the “ (Edipus ; ” one the
first scientific work on the Coptic language, under the
title of “ Prodromus Coptus ; ” the other, “ China Illus-
trated by its Monuments, Sacred and Profane.” It has
been said that both these books abound in errors. How
far this statement is accurate the learned reader can, if
he chooses, decide for himself. Next we have the “ Specula
Meliteusis, or Watch Tower of Malta,” a work dedicated
to the Knights of St. John, and containing a description
of rare physico-mathematical instruments. It is worth
while noticing in passing that a curious misconception has
arisen with regard to this work from a confusion between
specula and sjteculum, which has led many to suppose that
it is a treatise on burning glasses, with which instruments,
indeed, Kircher was much concerned during his residence
at Malta. The “ Ecstatic Heavenly Itinerary ” gives an
exposition of the planets and fixed stars. The “Noah’s
Ark,” in three books, treats of matter before, during, and
after the deluge. Then we have a “ Diatribe " on some
wonderful crosses which appeared on men’s garments and
elsewhere, an “ Arithmetology " or treatise on the hidden
mysteries of numbers, a “ Phonurgia,” a “Physiologia,”
a “ Mystagogic Sphinx,” a “ Tower of Babel,” a “ Subter-
ranean AVorld,” and a “ Great Art of Knowledge.” The
titles alone of these works will surprise the reader, though
they give but a faint idea of Kircher’s intellectual activity.
Ilis literary correspondence extends to fourteen volumes.
We find in these volumes letters addressed to him from
the principal men of his day. Turning then over at hap-
hazard we come upon one from the celebrated Leibnitz,
who speaks of Kircher’s enduring merit, and, punning on
his name Athanasius, prays for him the immortality he
deserves.
But it is high time to take in hand that book which
chiefly interests us.
The first edition of Ivircher’s “ Great Art of Light and
Shade ” was published at Rome in 1646. The second edition,
much more copious than the former, at Amsterdam in 1671.
The whole title of the work runs thus : — “ Athanasius Kir-
cher’s Great Artof Light and Shade, digested in ten books,
in which are shown for many uses of mortals the wonderful
powersandcffectsof lightand shade in the world of universal
nature, by a new and varied exhibition of novel and recondite
instances and ensamples.” The title page bears the mystic
figure of a sun with a Hebrew quotation taken from the
Psalms (139, 12), which, being literally translated, signifies,
As its darkness is, so is its light. The author, after saluting
the Philomath, or learning loving reader in his preface, thus
addresses him : — “The same thing appears, O reader, to
have happened to me as happened to that young man
mentioned by Crassus in Cicero's work, Dr ( 'laris Oratoribus.
For he, walking one day and meditating idly by the sea-
side, lit by chance upon a thole, or peg to which the oar
was commonly strapped, lying half hid amidst the sea-
weed and the sand. Taking it up and finding it unbroken,
complete, and fit for service, he procured for himself, so
that the little instrument might not remain useless, an oar,
and having attached the oar to the thole, and being de-
lighted with the contemplation of what he had done, went
on to purchase a mast, and after that sailyards, which he
set crosswise on his mast in due order. Not content, how-
ever with thole and oar, with mast and sailyards, he
got sails and ropes, and so, by degrees, continually adding
to his incomplete endeavour, at last fitted out a perfect
ship, in which he saibd over sea and acquired much riches.”
Thus, says Kircher, have 1 also acted. For my little work
of ten small pages has grown gradually into a large volume
of ten big books. Starting from the thole of a stray re-
mark suggested to me in the course of my precedent study,
I have furnished out a ship which has sailed, so far as it is
permitted to the frailty of the human mind to guide its
course, through the immense ocean of aerial space, and so
have I found and exposed as common merchandize to the
world treasures of light and shade as yet unknown, in this
my work divided into ten parts, as a ship furnished with
ten banks of oars ; and this division into ten parts has been
suggested to me by the analogy of the ten divine rays
which the Hebrews call Sejihiroth, and the Latins Emana-
tiones. And just as the wise Jews affirm the world to have
been built by the ten rays of the divinity, so have we con-
structed upon our ten foundations of books our own little
world of light and shade.
Kircher’s first book is concerned with what he is pleased
to call Sciagnomics and Chromatics. “Having ridden,” he
says, in a chariot far more sublime than that drawn by two
dragons which wras presented by Ceres to Triptolemus,
through the varied orders and classes of nature, “ I was
astonished by the admirable marriage of the sidereal and
the terrestrial world, in which ceremony Light officiated as
a bridesmaid. I Iavingafterwards discovered that there exists
nothing in the innermost recesses of the mundane mass
save that which has the principles and elements of its com-
position from light and shade, I succeeded, by varied
combinations of these, in building up a new Photosophg ,
which, of its own natural fecundity, produced two
daughters, Sciagnomicc and Chromatice, whichagainproduced
wondrous births, described at large in my first book.”
The second book of the Ars Magna treats of Radiations,
or, as Kircher calls them. Actinobolisms. “When,” he says,
“I perceived that all things are affected by the wide-extend-
ed dominion of light, owing to a certain spherical diffusion
of its forces, I built up at once the art of actinobolisms of
things in nature, which again in their turn produced Echo-
camptice, or the radiation of sound ; Osmetice , or the radia-
tion of smell ; and Optice, or the radiation of sight, besides
other matters of rare doctrine and curious experiment,
which are fully set forth in my second book."
The third book introduces the reader to the doctrine
142
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 1890.
of Coirc Section*, ancl comprehends an apparatus of
Gnomon'u s. “ When I considered,” says the author, “ that
shade is constant, whereas light affects motion, and that
this motion of light is the sole base and foundation of all
astronomy, the gnomon became my pen, any assumed
plane my paper, shade my ink, and the Sun the artificer's
hand, and the several natures of gnomon, plane, and
shade, or pen, paper, and ink, are declared in my third
book.’’
The fourth book is wholly concerned with sun-dials or
horologes, Italian, Babylonian, and others.
The fifth is divided into Gnomonic Oaranography and
Gnomonic Geography. Oaranography, or the description of
the heaven, originally the title of a work by Democritus,
comprehends the doctrine of the Primum Mobile, the des-
cription of Alniucantars aud Azimuths, and of the zodiacal
arc on polar, meridian, vertical, and horizontal planes ;
with the whole system of fixed stars so described as to
show both their risings and their settings.
The sixth book is called by Kircher the Sciutheric Proteus.
Some of the readers of this paper may stumble at the
word sciatlieric, but this will become clear to them by the
consideration that sciatheras, or shadow-catcher, is the Greek
term for the gnomon of a sun-dial. Another title given
to this book by the author, who rejoices in long words,
many of which are his own invention, is the Figured Astro-
lobiography. It treats at great length of the mechanical
construction of horologes, horoscopes, astroscopes, horo-
labes, astrolabes, and gnomonic globes.
And now, says lurcher, in his preface to the seventh book,
which he calls the Anacamptic or Reflected, as he calls his
eighth the Anaclaslic or Refracted Art, and now we shall be-
hold light instinct with some Promethean skill, delineating
with its golden pencil the immense volumes of the heavens
in the dark lurking-places of our homes so deftly that we,
though shut up in a narrow hovel, may feel ourselves placed
in the open fields of air, and wander over the universal
ways of the sidereal world, and behold sacramental
mysteries hitherto unseen. And this is our Anacamptic
Art or Reflected Astronomy.
And again I observed that where light or shade passes
into the recesses of a denser medium, it fallaciously with-
draws itself, and affects manners altogether exotic, now
stretching itself longitudinally, and now curving itself
into I know not what of curvature after the fashion of a
hedgehog or land-urchin. On thishintof occasion, I built
Up my Anaclastic art, or Refracted Astronomy through
which it is given to all to hunt after heaven’s unap-
proached riches with the weaving of an astronomic net
beneath the water by an artifice singular, and hitherto
unknown. In this book are tables for the compilation of
refractions, an anaclastic table of rays incident in wine,
oil, &c. , after the author’s observation. A paragraph on
the refractions of the atmosphere is succeeded by a table of
the refraction of the stars. We also meet with the con-
struction of vertical and horizontal anaclastic astro-
labes ; the construction of an astrolabe in a concave
hemicycle or hemisphere, showing nothing unless pre-
viously filled with fluid, which he calls the horologe, or
deal of Aliaz ; and the construction of an anacamptic-
anaclastic horoscope.
Kircher s ninth book is called “ Gnomonic Cosmometry,”
.and is occupied with an investigation by means of light and
shade of the position, magnitude, quantity, and altitude of
the various mundane bodies, or parts of the world, and their
distance from the earth. “Conceiving,” says the author,
•• of light and shade as the most absolute geometer, and that
the ingenious doctrine of conic sections came from no other
school, and that the first elements and foundations of
practical geometry arose from the proportions of shade to
the unshaded, I concluded that nothing in this sensible
theatre of the world was so remote that an approach to it
could not be made by means of fight and shade. Going
therefore by their direction I attained the tops of the
highest mountains and clouds, I climbed up to the tents
of heaven, I measured by a new invention (absit jactantia
recto, let me be excused the boast), the quantities, distances,
and depths of all heavenly bodies. lastly, from this
above mentioned supply of fight and shade, as from a
cornucopia filled to the brim, having selected some of the
rarer and more recondite secrets by a certain hidden
application of the active to the passive, I have con-
structed my “Magic of Light and Shade,” by which is gained
the threefold result of wonderful horolabes, parastases, or
representations of things unseen, and by the aid of
mirrors paradoxical matamorphoses, which new and rare
matters have been deservedly reserved as the comple-
ment of all the books for the tenth and last of them.”
It is this book on the “ Magic of Light and Shade ” which
is the most interesting of all to the photographer, treating
as it docs of the application of their more hidden effects
to the various uses of mankind. Of this book the first
part is chiefly concerned with marvellous horologes, such
as catoptric, heliocaustic, magnetic, sympathic, botanic,
zoologic, rotatile, hydraulic, aquatic, and sympathetico-
magnetic horologes. The second part treats of Parastatic
Magic, or prodigious representations of things by means of
fight and shade. Under this part is included the artificial
exhibition of aerial spectres ; the wondrous paintings of
nature on plants and stones ; the exhibition of things by
rays refracted in water ; the construction of a machine by
which images may be made suddenly to appear and dis-
appear ; the exhibition of wondrous spectacles by glass
prisms ; a disquisition of the author as to whether accord-
ing to Anaxilaus, Albertus, and Porta, houses full of
serpents and other animals can be represented, and the
display of fiery spectacles or pyroparastases. There are
several experiments belonging to this last head, as the pro-
duction of a fountain of fire, and of a dragon flying in the
air, followed by a short discourse on the eagle of Regio-
montanus and Architas’ dove. Then comes a chapter on
Dioptrics and the place and effect of lenses. The third part
of this book deals with Catoptric Magic, or the marvellous
representation of things by mirrors, and herein of mirrors,
spherico-convex and spherico-concave, cylindrical, conic
— as parabolic, hyperbolic, and elliptic — and caustic or
burning. Then we find how to construct an artificial
machine by which writings can be read at a remote dis-
tance, and then finally how to construct a Thaumaturge or
magic lantern.
We have received from Mr. Martin a specimen of his Autocrat
Magnesium Magazine, in shape like a powder flask, intended to
contain magnesium powder, and to measure out, by a spring
opening slide, a given quantity for the purposes of the flash-light.
Photographers’ Benevolent Association. — The annual
meeting of the above Association was held on the 14th inst.
The questions of reducing the subscription of professional
photographers, and amateurs being allowed to serve on the
committee, having been discussed, the report was adopted, as
was also the balance sheet. Mr. Spiller was elected treasurer,
aud votes of thanks were passed to the late treasurer, to Mr.
Harland, aud to the president.
February 21, 1890.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
: —
143
AN ISORADIAL FOCUSSING EYEPIECE.
BY W. E. DEBENITAM.
As the subject of eyepieces for use upon the focussing
screen of a camera has been recently brought forward in
the columns of the Photographic Nfws, I send a descrip-
tion of one which, like that of Mr. Varley, described in
the Photographic News of the 31st ult., has been con-
trived for the purpose of examining portions of the field
other than the centre, but which does not require fresh
adjustment of the focus for each change of position.
In the eyepiece described by Mr. Varley the inclination
of the instrument is effected by means of a ball-and-socket
joint. As the centre of rotation is in the body of the
instrument itself, the distance from the ground glass varies
with each inclination. If a rather rough ground glass is
used, the image will be focussed thereon, and slight dif-
ferences of distance caused by varying but small angles of
inclination may not place the image at a distance greater
or less than the accommodation of the eye will make up for.
When, however, a very fine surface is employed, it is, as
pointed out by Mr. Varley, possible to obtain a sharp
image which is not coincident with the ground surface,
and, of course, with a focussing screen in which there are
clear patches of unground glass, this will be still more
easily done. With a smooth or semi-smooth surface,
therefore, it becomes necessary to confine the plane of
focus of the eyepiece strictly to the surface of the glass
coincident with the plate, and to do this with a ball-and-
socket arrangement requires continual adjustment of the
focus of the eye-p;ece itself, as will be seen from the
following diagram. This refocussing of the eyepiece will
be found, if not quite impracticable, a difficult thing to
accomplish on a fine surface covered with an image.
Let a, fig. 1, represent the centre of rotation. . As the
Fial.
eyepiece is inclined, the focus, instead of remaining upon
the plane of the ground glass, follows the arc h c, until at
the latter point, which is distant only 20° from the vertical
line a l>, it is removed from the flat surface by the length
of the versed sine c <7. Supposing the distance « 1> to be
II inch, which is about what would be indicated by Mr.
Varley’s dimensions, the versed sine for 20" with that
length of radius being represented by -06 X 1'25 of an
inch, = -075, or about the thirteenth of an inch — quite
enough to put the image out of focus.
The accompanying sketch, fig. 2, shows a Ramsden
eyepiece, A, of the construction in general use. There
is the usual tightening nut, 13, acting upon the thread on
the jacket C. This jacket, however, is enlarged at I) into a
cup-like form, which slides between the surfaces of other
cups, E and F. The latter are united at the bottom, as
shown in the drawing. The dot at G indicates the centre
of rotation, with which the surfaces of the cups are made
concentric. The screw-ring II is for the purpose of
distancing the whole system, according to the thickness
of the ground glass, so that the centre of rotation may be
in the proper plane.
It might be supposed that this centre of rotation should
be on the ground surface of the focussing screen. This
would be the case if the ground surface were outwards,
Fig-2.
but as it is, the focus is interfered with, and lengthened
by passing through the substance of the glass itself. It is
owing to not taking this factor into consideration that
photographers sometimes fall into an error when taking a
negative through the glass, in order to obtain a non-
reversed image, in supposing that, when focussing, an
allowance must be made equal to the thickness of the glass
upon which the sensitive film is spread, so as to keep the
film at the same distance from the lens as that occupied
by the focussing screen. If half the thickness of the
plate is allowed, it will be nearly enough true for most
purposes.
The objection to the use of the eyepiece, as figured, is
the size of the cup or bell — about 8^ inches in diameter —
necessary. It might be reduced by making the whole
thing on a smaller scale, but I am afraid is not likely to
find much favour with those tourists who carry small
cameras only. The convenience of examining parts other
than the centre of the image, by the help of all the light
available, should render it very serviceable not only to
those who may be engaged in examining and testing lenses,
but for many other purposes, such as that of focussing
large groups, dark interiors, copies of paintings, and such
subjects generally.
Halfpenny Inland Postage. — Messrs. Erdmann and Selianz
forward us a letter ou this subject, from which the following is
extracted : — “ For the financial year ending 31st March, 1889,
the Chancellor of the Exchequer received from the Postmaster-
General £3,199,000. This represents 271 per cent, on the
gross revenue, but the actual profit on the sale of stamps which
are used for the transmission of letters within the British Islands
is much larger. Happily, Mr. Goschen is likely to have a sur-
plus by the 31st March next, and for this reason, among others,
the time is particularly opportune for suggesting the introduc-
tion of a halfpenny postage for letters weighing less than a half
ounce. The postage on letters to nearly all countries is calcu-
lated by the half-ounce. Why, therefore, should we be excluded
from the benefit of being able to send half-ounce letters to resi-
dents within the British Islands at a lower charge than is now
levied for an ouuce letter '! ”
144
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 1890.
the temperature of photographic
MANIPULATIONS.
About this time every winter season we get our regular
line of letters containing questions involving difficulties
in photographic working, that are due directly or indi-
rectly to a total disregard of temperature. The old, old
questions : — My developer stock bottle contains a number
of crystals at the bottom ; will these make any important
difference in developing? My toning-bath works slowly,
and after going a certain distance the prints refuse to
tone ; what shall I do to overcome the difficulty ? I have
had quite a good deal of trouble lately with my fixing
bath ; the same brand of plates that I used several months
ago, and out of the same box, take twice or three times
as long to fix as formerly, and I use the same formula
for bath ; please tell me the cause of the trouble — have
the makers of the plates changed their formula of manu-
facture ?
To all these questions, and a score of others, there is
but one answer. Don’t forget that the difference in tem-
perature between June and January, for this latitude,
may be as much as 96°, and that a difference of 25* may
occur within twelve hours on any day in January. In
summer, the fall of temperature from the heat of daytime
to the cool of night has no harmful effect upon photo-
graphic processes, but in winter, when the day tempera-
ture is only 40* or 50* at best, a drop of 25* means a
reduction of temperature below the freezing point of
water.
As some of the results of these low temperatures in
photographic operations, we may mention the crystallizing
out of the salts in the stock solution of developers ; the
mottling and blistering of albumen paper ; slow and
obstinate toning solutions, together with hard negatives
containing too much contrast.
In the case of developing solutions which deposit
crystals it is very important that these crystals should be
made to go into solution again, or the character and
working qualities of the developer will be entirely changed.
A change of temperature such as we have indicated above
as possible at this time of year, would cause the separation
of much of the alkaline ingredients of the developer, and
a consequent slowing of its action from this cause alone.
In case the developer bottle has become chilled and
crystals have deposited, place the bottle in some warm
(not hot) water for a short time, and then into water
that is quite hot. Do not try to raise the temperature too
quickly, or you will surely lose the solution from the
fracture of the bottle.
I he mottling and blistering of albumen paper can only be
overcome by one method of working : always have the
silver bath, the toning bath, and the fixing bath as near
the same temperature as possible ; and be careful that
this temperature is between 60* and 70* Fahr. Slow
toning is also due to the use of baths at too low a tem-
perature ; 7U* Fahr., or even a little warmer in winter
time, will be found to give the best results.
As to the character of the negatives produced in cold
weather, they are usually hard from want of activity in the
developer. Some writers have suggested that stronger
developers should be used in winter ; but it appears to us
that the best course to pursue is to keep up the tempera-
ture of the developer. Alfred Stieglitz, writing in the
Photographische Rundschau, says “ The temperature of the
developer in slow development is particularly important ;
for rapid development deviations are not so important.”
If the development is slow (and everybody should follow
this method, as only by slow development the finest half
tones can be realised) the developer must be kept at a
pretty constant temperature 15* C. (60* F.) preferred,
which degrees can be easily obtained in winter by addition
of warm, and in summer by cold water.
By applying a developer of constant temperature, the
time of exposure can be regulated much better. The
first appearance of the image, after the plate is in the
developer, depends always upon the following three con-
ditions : — Time of exposure, concentration of developer,
and temperature of the same.
A developer of about 13* C. (55* F.) acts ordinarily
three to five times slower than it would at 15* C. (60 F.),
that is, at a so-called normal exposure ; the plate would
thereby become hard, while by an increase of temperature
of the same developer to 17* C. (65 F. ) with the same
time of exposure quite a weak negative would be the
result.
Cold developer gives hard negatives with correct expo-
sure. For under-exposed plates it is, therefore, best to
develop them with warm developer, as .already proposed
for instantaneous views ; care has to be exercised, of
course, or the plate will become foggy.
The assertion that more detail could be obtained from
a warm than a cold developer is erroneous ; the de-
veloper applied warm accelerates only the development of
the shadows — that is, the negative remains soft, and will,
therefore, furnish harmonious and handsome prints.
In short, I would recommend to everybody not to dis-
regard the thermometer during the development of the
plate.
To the above timely suggestions we would add that it
is equally important to be sure that the fixing bath for the
negative is not too cold, in order to secure negatives free
from stain and that do not turn yellow with time. A cold
fixing batli is slow-working, and although it may dissolve
out the silver haloid, it may not cause the complete solu-
tion of the hyposulphite of silver, and a decomposition of
the latter will make the negative turn yellow with age.
Therefore, maintain a fair average of temperature (60°
to 70* Fahr.) for all photographic manipulations, and very
many if not all your difficulties in winter will disappear.
— Anthony's Photographic Bulletin.
Enterprising Photographers. — There are some enterprising
photographers in Munich, as a well-known artist discovered
the other day. He had seen some photographs which took his
fancy greatly, one of the fairy-like palaces built by the crazy
King Louis. Nothing would satisfy him but a visit to the spot
for the purpose of making some sketches. Accordingly he set
out for liis destination, arrived at the romantic place where the
castle is situated, and toiled up a mountain which he imagined
commanded the view of the castle he had seen in the photograph.
But when he reached the top of the mountaiu and looked at
the castle, it did not seem the same as it had appeared in the
photograph. He was greatly puzzled, for there was the front
of the castle taken in the photograph staring him in the face,
and no other part save the top of the mountain available for
the planting of a camera. Yet the picture was different. He
made enquiries, and discovered the reason. The photographer
had had himself tied to a rope, and had l>een lowered a
hundred feet or so down the ]>erpendicular side of the huge
rock, and so had obtained the view he wanted.- -The Picture
and Art Trade.
Continental photographic societies will be busy this year,
as no less than three exhibitions will be held, namely, at
Brussels, Amsterdam, aud at Antwerp.
February 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
145
PHOTOGRAPHY IN SWITZERLAND.
The Swiss Photographic Review , bearing the motto Omnia luce,
published monthly under the direction of Dr. E. Demole,
at Geneva, is the chief exponent of several photographic
societies, as, for instance, of the Society of Geneva, of
Lausanne, of Zurich, and of the Photo. Club of Xeuehatel.
This Review, which is now in its second year, contains
an interesting article on some meetings of the Photographic
Society of Zurich from July to December, 1889.
The author of the article, after alluding to a previous
description of the transactions of the Society till the
month of June last, notices the increased interest in the
last six sittings of the bygone year, evidenced by the
attendance on every occasion of more than half the
members. In these sittings, the chief objects of curiosity
and debate were the orthochromatic plates, and the new
developers, hydrochinon and eikonogen, and many speci-
mens and experiments of the working of these materials
were submitted to the congress.
It will doubtless be of some interest to other amateurs
to learn the several results of these varied experiments.
By far the greater number of members had tried their
hand with orthochromatic plates, and the outcome of their
endeavours was so far satisfactory that the author asserts
that the use of these will probably become more common,
perhaps universal.
The experiments were chiefly concerned with Vogel
and Obernetter’s eosin silver plates, which certainly possess
remarkable orthochromatic properties. It was, however,
unhappily agreed upon by all the members who had
meddled with these plates that, in a comparatively short
time, a strange marginal veil was formed, developing a
tendency to become even broader, so that, for instance, on a
plate 13 by 18, after a short period, a picture of the dimen-
sions 10 by 15 was with difficulty to be obtained. The
author concludes that this defect has been occasioned
probably by the use of unsuitable packing paper, and con-
fidently hopes that the manufacturers will in future remedy
this evil. The article says, Herr Scheuermeier, of Zurich,
has lately manufactured orthochromatic plates of excel-
lent quality, and such as show, even after the lapse of
three months, no kind or sort of defect or alteration.
No good yellow screen is procurable in Geneva ; those to
be met with in the glass factories, made of coloured glass,
are all far too thick and uneven ; the glass plates covered
with yellow collodion, and the yellow gelatine films display
too clearly the injury arising from dust and other causes.
As far as regards developers, experiments were made
by the great majority of the members with hydrochinon
and eikonogen, which, as a rule, were sufficiently successful.
It was, however, found that the hydrochinon developer
procured from an emporium was not durable, and that
the composition, after the flask had been once opened,
without being further called into use, within the space of
two or three weeks acquired a brown tint, and became
utterly useless for the purposes of photography,
Even with the pulverized eikonogen, like results were
attained. Many of the members, however, spoke in high
terms of eikonogen developers made with good chemicals
as quick and clean workers. In opposition to these newly
christened agents, the ammonio-pyrogallol developer of the
formula of Dr. Barbieri and his fellow-workers was praised
as most successful and of the highest value.
In the positive process, aristo paper has now been for
about a year principally employed, and this paper, says
the author, is highly to be recommended to every amateur,
not only on account of its durability, but for the reason of
its many other good qualities. For toning, the combined
toning and fixing bath is commonly used. But it does
not invariably act as might be desired, and we give our
readers the following gold bath recommended by Dr.
Barbieri with the addition of a few drops of hyposulphite
of soda — 4 gr. sulphocyanide of ammonium, 200 c.m.
water, 10 drops hyposulphite of soda, solvent (1 : 10), 10 c.m.,
chloride of gold 1 ’50, and as a solvent 100 c.m. water. The
addition of the hyposulphite of soda produces colder
tones. This bath is not durable.
Platinum paper cannot as yet claim the right of full
citizenship in the photographic burgh. The experiments
shown on this material seem not to have been taken with
sufficient care ; in every case the cautions as to the con-
servation of this paper appear to have been neglected.
It was resolved early in the spring of 1889 to make an
attempt to facilitate the passage through the Custom Houses
of photographers with highly sensitive preparations, as, for
example, by the formation of dark-rooms at the principal
seats of Custom, or by some course of instruction of the
minor officers. As, however, no instance of damage or
loss accruing from the want of such provisions was brought
forward, the Custom House authorities declined to interfere
with the matter for the present, but gave an assurance
that they would not hesitate, as far as lay in their power,
to put a stop to any impropriety of action on the part of
their officers which should be brought before their notice.
The International Photographic Congress at Paris has
interested itself particularly in this matter, and has resolved,
as we are informed, to procure the erection of dark-rooms
at the principal Custom Houses. It would, however, be a
great help to any effort of this nature, if notice was at once
taken by the Swiss Photographic Union of any ill or damage,
so that later on, when a society fouud it advisable or neces-
sary to take further steps in the business, the material
evidence might be close at hand.
In the course of the meeting, several exceedingly
interesting photographic novelties were displayed : objec-
tives with iris diaphragms, detective cameras, instantaneous
shutters, &c. In the November meeting, Dr. Barbieri
showed a large collection, chiefly of objects of practical
interest which he had collected and gathered together
during his summer journey.
Dit. Weyl, of Berlin, has just discovered that the anaerobic
bacteria exert a powerful reducing influence. They will reduce
indigo blue to indigo white.
Lustrous Surfaces on Glass. — Tiie following method of
preparation of lustrous metallic surfaces on glass and glazed
ceramic ware is described in the Journal of the Society of
Chemical Industry. An aqueous solution of silver nitrate is
mixed with a paste which when heated in a muffle at a low
temperature will not fuse to the glass or porcelain, but can be
readily detached from it. Suitable pastes may be made from
chalk, earth, lamp-black, sulphur, madder lake, manganese
dioxide, and oxide of iron. During the heating in the muffle
the silver passes from the paste to the surface of the glass or
porcelain, the paste is then carefully removed, and the article
heated gently for a few minutes in a reducing atmosphere,
preferably in carbonic oxide. An adherent lustrous metallic
coating is produced which in transmitted light appears light
yellow to dark green white, while the lustre varies in appearance
from that of silver to greenish gold. Three parts of paste
are used for one part of silver nitrate. Chloride or sulphide of
silver may also be used, the former imparting a greenish and the
latter a yellow colour.
14G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 18S0.
j^otcg.
Most photographers have noticed the common resem-
blance which exists between middle-aged and elderly
married couples, but they will scarcely be prepared to
hear that this resemblance is also just as marked in
the case of youthful husbands and wives. Professor
H. Eol, a German savant, has been making some experi-
ments on the subject, and out of seventy-eight young
couples whom he photographed, he found that twenty-
four bore a stronger resemblance to each other than
that of brother to sister. In thirty the likeness was
marked, and in twenty-four only was there a total
absence of resemblance. What bearing this fact, if it
be established, has upon the great question, “is marriage
a failure?” is difficult to say without further data.
If the history of these seventy-eight couples could be
closely followed up, and it was found that the twenty-
four pairs who were like each other were “ happy ever
afterwards,” as the old story-books used to say, and
that the twenty-four unlike had to seek the assistance
of the German equivalent of Sir James Hannen, we
should arrive at a decidedly valuable conclusion.
Unfortunately for the present generation, at least half
a century would be required to test the theory fairly.
In the meantime it would be decidedly rash to advise two
young people to marry simply because their photographs
resemble each other.
The universal application of the electric light would
be an enormous boon to photographers. Could the
light be supplied cheaply, they would be rendered
independent of fog and dark days, and in addition be
able to work as well in the night as in the daytime.
We believe that most of the leading photographers
who introduced the electric light, working it from their
own engines, have relinquished this method, not only
on account of the expense, but by reason of the un-
certainty. Those who do use the light take the
current from the mains, but this can only be done in
exceptional cases. Were the electric light pretty
general, a dozen photographers would employ it where
only one does so at the present time.
Another important branch of photographic industry
would also greatly benefit ; we refer to photo-zinco-
graphy. The electric light here is indispensable, if a
business is to be carried on satisfactorily. The
enormous increase of illustrated papers, and the exigen-
cies of competition, have brought the time allowed the
photo-zincographer for the photography of drawings
and the production of blocks within very narrow limits,
and unless the electric light were used, business could
not be carried on. The electric light can be obtained
easily enough in the great printing centre of London,
Fleet Street, but there is a serious drawback to success-
ful results in the constant vibration. The use of the
electric light in the suburbs would give enormous
facilities to photo-ziucographers, us here they would be
able to work without the risk of doubling or thickening
of the lines of a drawing.
The Turkish authorities have a strange horror of
photography. A year or so ago all the photographs
in the Pera shops of the Sultan’s brother were seized,
because it was suspected the prince was conspiring
against the Commander of the Faithful. Two months
after, the death took place in prison of a young Arme-
nian whose only offence was that he photographed the
pictures of the old Armenian kings, and now a German
photographer has paid the penalty of a rash attempt to
take an instantaneous portrait of the Sultan as he
was going to the mosque. The gendarmes fell upon
the unlucky man, smashed his camera, and carried him
off to prison, where he lay three weeks. After that he
was bidden to depart from the Turkish coasts, and was
not allowed so much as twenty-four hours in which to
wind up his business. Amateur photographers who
think of going to Turkey had certainly better leave
their cameras behind.
Painters will have a fresh grivance against photo-
graphers. At one time the painter was an indispen-
sable official at all great ceremonial functions, such as
royal marriages, christenings, funerals, and the like,
and terrible work it used to be for the unfortuate man,
as Mr. W. P. Frith, R.A., in his “Reminiscences,”
graphically relates. The difficulties of securing a
separate portrait of each actor in the scene were
enormous, and the wonder is that any artist could be
got to undertake the commission. We manage things
better now-a-days. When the Princess Louise of
Wales was married to the Earl of Fife, the ceremony
was photographed by Messrs. Byrne, of Richmond,
and this photograph, we read, has now formed the basis
of a painting also executed by the same firm. The
transaction has a commercial ring about it, and artists
may lament the decadence of the times in such
matters, but on the whole the new order of things is
much more comfortable for everybody concerned.
One peculiarity of photography is that in many cases
it acts as a sort of barometer of public taste. An
attentive study of the principal photographic print
dealers’ windows will generally disclose what is the
fleeting fancy. Very recently there has been a sort of
worship of muscle. All the strong men who have
been exhibiting themselves on the music hall stage
have had their torsos and biceps photographed, and
that these photographs attract is shown by the gaping
crowds. The pictures of the strong men certainly
have an advantage over the photographs of prize
fighters, who are generally posed in'the most ungainly
and vapid of attitudes, with the muscles'inactive and
flaccid, and suggesting anything but strength. Per-
haps the photographing of Samson’s and Sandow’s arms
will lead to the photographing of some famous pedes-
trian’s legs, or the pectoral and spinal muscles of a con-
tortionist. We do not say that such photographs are
desirable, wo only suggest what is likely to happen.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
147
February 21, 1890.]
PHOTO-LITHOGRAPHY AND THE NEW ALBERT
PIIOTO-LITHOGRAPII LC TRANSFER PAPER.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
The following is a detailed description of the photo-
lithographic process as it is in practical use in the most
eminent printing establishments in Austria and Germany.
I have very often had opportunity of seeing how success-
fully it is worked, and can therefore state that the firm of
E. Jaffe and A. Albert, of Vienna, deserves much credit
for having introduced the new transfer paper, which is a
boon to all photo-lithographic workers.
The bichromate bath consists of : —
Water ... ... ... ... 1,000 c.c.
Bichromate of potash ... ... 50 grammes
To this solution, caustic ammonia is added until the
reddish colour of the bath turns to a light yellow colour ;
an excess of ammonia does no harm. The temperature of
the bichromate bath should be about 66° F. It is filtered
into a flat dish of sufficient size, and the paper, with the
prepared surface up, entirely immersed, and allowed to
remain in the bath until it is quite soft. This is of
importance, for, if it is not soaked long enough, also if the
temperature of the bath is below 66° F., the bichromate
solution will not enter sufficiently into the prepared film,
and consequently, at the subsequent inking up of the
copies, the colour will .adhere but badly to the exposed
parts, especially to the broader lines and surfaces of the
picture.
If sufficiently soaxed, the paper is removed, held over
the dish so that the fluid flows off only at one of the lower
corners, and allowed to drain until the liquid only drops.
Then the two corners of the paper, which have been held,
are given to a second person, who now holds the sheet
over a plate glass a little larger than the paper. This
plate-glass must previously be well cleaned, then rubbed
in with talc powder, and the surplus of the latter dusted
off with a broad, soft brush. On this glass plate the sheet
is placed with its lower edge of the prepared surface, and
smoothed down by means of a soft cloth. During this
operation the person assisting holds fast the corners of the
paper until the mounting is finished, and only gives slowly
way to the pressure of the smoothing down.
If too much of the talc powder has been dusted off the
plate glass, it may happen that the paper, after drying, partly
adheres to the glass, and even tears here and there ; it is
therefore necessary that a certain amount of the talc pow-
der remains on the plate, and better a little too much than
too little. Should the paper, after entirely drying, still
adhere to some parts of the glass, then the latter has been
badly cleaned.
Care should also be taken that in smoothing down the
paper no air-bubbles arise between the glass and the paper,
since they will appear on the dry paper in the form of
matt spots, which will interfere in the case of fine work.
As soon as the sheet lies quite flat on the glass, the back
of it is well rubbed with a soft cloth, applying thereby a
certain degree of pressure to suck up the fluid on the back
of the paper, and also to squeeze out the bichromate bath
between the paper and the glass, and by this means
to accelerate the drying process.
The glass plate, together with the paper on it, is now
placed in a darkened, not too warm room, and dried spon-
taneously ; after six to twelve hours it will be dried. This
may be ascertained by touching the back of the sheet, and
by the paper easily stripping off.
After stripping, the paper shows a beautiful, high gloss ;
it is now ready for copying, and must, of course, be kept
in the dark. The sensitised paper should be used up
within twenty-four hours, because if it is kept for a longer
time it is more difficult to work. In the stripped state
the paper should be kept in a not too dry place, for if it is
too dry, or even brittle, no sharp copies are to be obtained
with it, since it does not join closely to the negative. Be-
sides, it is important to preserve in the paper a certain
degree of flexibility, because it will then be possible to
open one half of the printing frame in order to control
the progress of the printing process, without fear of ob-
taining a doubled print. Should it, however, occur that
the paper is too brittle, it may be placed between slightly
moistened blotting-paper, but care must be taken that
the transfer paper does not become too damp.
In printing, it is not necessary to use a photometer,
since, as we have mentioned above, it is possible to watch
the progress by opening one side of the back of the frame,
provided that the paper is sufficiently smooth. The print
should have a brown tone, and appear in visible relief
from the ground. Over-printing is very injurious, because
the lines and points of the image become thereby broader,
and the development of the copy becomes difficult. If,
however, it is under-printed, the colour does not adhere
to the image in development, or, at least, it adheres only
to the vigorous parts of the print.
Care should also be taken that the backs in the printing
frame are not damp, because this is obnoxious to the
sharpness of the print. Sometimes it will happen, especi-
ally in the case of copies from densely-drawn originals, and
in the case of copper engravings, that certain parts of the
negative will print too quickly ; parts of this kind are var-
nished on the back with carmine, as it is usually done in
the case of negatives with half-tones.
The inking of the transfer may be carried on in different
manners, but in all cases it is essential to lay on a light
colour-tone evenly over the whole of the copy. This may
be done by means of a sponge or a rag, as well as with a
velvet roller ; the main point is always the result. The
manipulations are as follows: — The smooth face of a litho-
graphic stone is, by means of an ordinary lithographic
leather roller, inked up with good transfer ink. and the
velvet roller, which perhaps serves the purpose best, care-
fully charged with a thin coating of the ink ; then the copy,
which has been placed on an even, smooth surface, is inked
up with the velvet roller until it is evenly covered with a
middle grey tone. The vigorous parts of the image should
still be visible through the colour, otherwise too much ink
has been applied. When the transfer is successfully inked
up, it is placed in clean, cold water, but care should be
taken that no air-bubbles adhere to the copy in the water,
and that the back of the paper remains completely covered
with the water. After ten to fifteen minutes the transfer
is removed, the water allowed to drain, the copy laid once
more with its back on the smooth plate, and the water
squeezed out from the film side by means of fine tissue
paper, which is done best by rolling over it with an old,
clean lithographic roller, avoiding, however, carefully the
formation of wrinkles, because, otherwise, the film will
probably be damaged. The moistened transferis now once
more inked up with the velvet roller charged with colour.
If, after some rolling, the image comes out quite distinctly,
the paper, at the same tune, being clear of the yellow
colour produced by the bichromate bath, it is only neces-
sary to wash off with a clean, very fine, and soft sponge
148
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 1890.
moistened with water the colour which still adheres to the
imexposed parts of the impression. If, however, the
transfer, after being inked up, appears still yellow, it must
be placed, before the application of the sponge, once more
in the water, and the inking up with the velvet roller must
be repeated.
The ready developed transfers are placed between dry,
clean, and perfectly smooth blotting-paper, and by gentle
pressure freed from the still adhering water. Then they
are fastened by means of drawing pins on a board, and
dried spontaneously on a slightly warmed place free from
dust.
The dry copy is placed between damp blotting-paper.
In the case of grained or stippled impressions, tissue
paper must be used instead of the ordinary blotting-paper.
In pulling through the press for the first time, only a
slight pressure should be applied, it being increased at
each stroke. As usually, the transfer is several times wetted
with water. After the last pulling through, the transfer is
removed without again being wetted; if there is any
difficulty in doing so, the stone may be taken out of the
press, and placed for a short time in a cold room, or the
transfer may be dried spontaneously. In both cases the
removing of the transfer is facilitated.
The “ rubbing-in ” or intensifying of the image on the
stone is done as usual, but in the case of very fine draw-
ings, grained or stippled images, a very slow procedure
will be necessary. The sponge which is used in intensify-
ing should contain only a small quantity of the colour.
The etching may be done in the ordinary manner with
slightly acid gum- water ; in the case of fine drawings, how-
ever, it is recommended to apply a “sharp or high-etch-
ing ” bath, it offering also otherwise some advantages.
For this purpose the transfer is dusted in at first with
resin powder, then with talc powder, and the excessive
powder carefully removed with a pad of cotton. Then
two narrow, long strips of wood, about one-eighth of an
inch thick, are placed on the two longitudinal edges of the
stone, clear of the impression, and fastened at one end in
any convenient way. Then a wooden lath, about three
inches wide, 1^ inches thick, and a little longer than the
stone is wide, is taken, covered with cloth, and moistened
with sulphuric ether ; it is then placed on the two wooden
strips, at the end that has been fastened to the stone, and
slowly pulled over the strips at f till length of the stone. It
is sufficient to go once over the stone in the manner des-
cribed in order to melt the resin powder, together with
the colour, by means of the ether vapours. Then the
stone is etched for about one minute with the gum etching
bath, which should be strong enough, so that it slightly
scums if poured on the stone. The stone is then ready to
be printed from.
4Y ith the same paper, transfers can also be made on zinc
to produce relief blocks, and, indeed, it is used for this
purpose by many large establishments. This process,
however, we shall describe on another occasion.
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — Technical meet-
ing, Tuesday, February 25th, at 8 p.m., at the Gallery, 5a,
Pall Mall East.
London and Provincial Photographic Association. — On
Thursday, Feb. 27, Mr. A. Haddon will give a leeturette and
practical demonstration of “ Glass Blowing as Used in the
Chemical and Physical Laboratories.” Visitors are invited.
‘ How shall we move the masses ? ” cried the Chicago
anarchist on Christmas day. Just then an amateur photo-
grapher was seen pointing his camera out of a window — and
the masses moved. — II thou’ a Photographic Magazine.
DESTRUCTION OF DRY PLATES BY INSECTS*
Once more an American industry is menaced and in
danger of being proscribed in Continental Europe; this
time it is the American dry plate that comes under the
ban. The current number of the Photographisches Wochen-
blatt sounds the note of warning, and urges all amateur
and professional photographers, under the circumstances,
to beware of the purchase of any “ Amerekanische
Trocken-platten ” (dry-plates), or keeping any upon their
premises. The cause of this agitation is said to be the
discovery of an insect which breeds in the emulsion on
the dry-plates and films, and is said to prove as destructive
to the jjlates as the potato-bug is to vines of that tuber ;
and if the pest once gains a foothold in any gallery, every
plate and negative will soon be destroyed, and the place
become infested as a barn or granary with weevil.
Since the above-mentioned urgent note of warning was
issued to all Continental photographers, further particulars
have reached us, together with the circumstantial account
connected with the alleged discovery of one of the much-
dreaded insects.
It appears that the sou of Ilerr Isidore von Duukel-
kammer, K. K. Geheim-Commerzien-rath, in Berlin, pur-
chased from a local dealer a box of dry-plates of a cele-
brated American maker. On opening his purchase in his
dark room, he found securely entrenched between the two
packages of plates a nondescript bug or insect. The
youth, who is an active member of the “ Sonntags-Photo-
graphischcr Jager-Verein,” at once surmised that here
was one of the much-dreaded insects, against which the
note of warning had been sounded in the Fa ch -bliitter.
lie reported the matter to his father, who, as an officer of
the Government, felt the weight of the situation which
rested upon him ; repairing to the dark-room, von Dun-
kelhammer ordered that the animal be put in a vial and
hermetically sealed, and sent to the “K. K. Academic der
Naturlichen Wissenschaften. ” A special meeting was
called for the occasion, when the extreme thinness or
flatness of the specimen was much commented on, where-
by it would be able to force its way between the sheets of
glass or film as they were packed in merchantable pack-
ages. The vial containing the specimen, as an extra
precaution, was enclosed in another bottle, which was also
sealed, and was ordered to be made the special subject for
the next regular meeting of the faculty' a week hence.
When the day arrived Professor Raupe von G'assetten-
schieber opened the subject by stating that it was his
sorrowful duty to inform the Academy that another Ameri-
can pest had appeared at the threshold of Europe, and
threatened the ruin of one of the Fatherland’s most
beautiful professions and amusements, viz. , die Kunst der
Photographie, but that he had positive assurance that the
G overument would at once take the most radical steps to
prohibit the introduction of any photographic material
from America ; in fact, that the Imperial Council would
place the same interdict on American films and dry plates,
as the Imperial Chancellor had placed on the American
hog. The learned Professor was seconded in his remarks
by Ilerr K. K. Ilof-Photograf Weitwinkel; after which
Dr. Aaron Eisenoxolat, inspector der Deutschen-reiclis-
Trocken-pliitten, offered a resolution of thanks to all
editors who had given publicity to the new danger which
threatened to ruin every photographer within the realm,
which was passed unanimously ; after which Hen’
* American Journal of Photography.
February 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
149
lludolphsohn von Momentverschluss, who was also “ In-
tendant und Geheim-Inspector des Staats-Detective
l’olizei,” stilted that by order of the Imperial Chancellor
his department would at once take measures to seize all
American dry-plates and films wherever found within
the Empire, and that the confiscated material would
immediately be taken to the Imperial Crematorium
at Spandau, and there subjected to a heat of at least
2,400° Fahrenheit, which the Sanitats Behrbde had judged
to be ample to destroy any molecules or germs which
might escape from the packages during the operation.
A further resolution of thanks was passed compliment-
ing Geheim-Commerzien Rath von Duukelkammer for his
courage and diligence in capturing the dreaded insect, and
his disposition of the same.
The members then adjourned to the Laboratory of the
Academy for the purpose of making a thorough and
scientific examination of the captive specimen, so that an
exact description could be published for the information
of the public in general. Special preparation had been
made. Dry-plates of all known makers, domestic and
foreign, were placed side by side, so as to allow the insect
to pass over them consecutively, to see if any one make
offered special attraction to the destroyer. It was con-
cluded not to experiment on the subject with the various
poisons, as in case any should prove fatal it would un-
doubtedly interfere with further investigation.
Not the least results were expected from the micro-
scopic examination ; this was to take place by the great
bi-ocular-plauo-clectro-objective. For this occasion the
subject was to be illuminated by an electric light gene-
rated by a purified current of electricity of at least 3,000
volts, Siemen measurement ; this part of the investigation
to be under the immediate supervision of the celebrated
specialist, Herr Baron Natron-Ritter v. Fixirlbsung, and
“ Reichs-Staats-Geheim-Insecten Anatanom ” der Kaiser-
lichen Academie, who was himself an enthusiastic amateur
photographer of no mean pretensions. After the specimen
was brought forth, and taken out of its double receptacle,
it was carefully laid under the objective of the great micro-
scope. As an extra precaution, the receptacles which had
come in contact with the insect were all treated with a
99 per cent, solution of the new disinfectant, “ Eiko-
Galliol.”
‘After the focus had been properly adjusted, the learned
Professor ordered the following description of the speci-
men to be inscribed on the bulletin : —
Genus. — Epizoa.
Order. — Ilemiptera.
Head. — Small, from which project two Jong antennae.
Eyes. — Compound, behind which are two transparent
flaps covered with bristles, which are the rudiments of
wings.
Thorax. — Broad and short.
Abdominal Segment. — Very large, broad, and extremely
flat.
Colour. — Reddish brown.
It was further ordered that Herr Grobschmidt, the
Librarian and Archivar, should properly classify and
enter the subject as “Der Americanische-Gelatin-Brom-
Trockeu-pliitten-zerstreungs-Kaffer.
The members now in turn examined the subject under
the microscope. Something of a sensation was caused
when one Griffelschaber. a schoolmaster, and who was
only a member by courtesy, ventured the opinion that
possibly the learned President was mistaken in his diag-
nosis, as in his humble judgment the specimen under
examination certainly bore a strong resemblance to the
Cimex lectularius vulg. The schoolmaster was at once called
to order and threatened with expulsion if he did not
remember his position.
After the ripple caused by the above interruption had
subsided, the specimen Kiiffer was subjected to a current
of electricity of fully 8,500 volts, to insure its destruction,
after which it was suspended in a vial of 95 per cent,
alcohol, properly sealed and attested, and placed on exhi-
bition in the “Museo der Academie.”
When the action of the faculty was brought to the
attention of the Imperial Chancellor, he at once entered
upon the suggestions and issued the necessary edict, and
as a sequence American dry plates will soon be excluded
from Europe.
That this manifestly unjust action will be resisted to the
bitter end by interested parties in this country, as the
matter becomes known, may be taken as a foregone con-
clusion. It is hard to state what complications may arise
if the German government persist in its course in the
premises.
The initiative in the matter of retaliation was taken at
the last meeting of the “ Leopard ville Camera and Tripod
Club,” where a resolution was passed : “Not to use any
chemicals or photographic paper imported from Germany
until the obnoxious edict reflecting on American dry
plates be repealed.”
A communication was also sent to the State Department
at Washington, with the request that the matter receive
immediate attention. In response, the Consul General at
Berlin has been telegraphed to, and several messages have
passed to and fro on the subject.
Personally, we have no doubt that taking into considera-
tion the fact that the squadron of evolution is now in
European waters, the whole matter will be amicably
adjusted without delay.
There is some talk of a committee of the Royal Society
being appointed to investigate the subject of colour-blindness,
and the proper methods of testing the colour-vision of employes
on railways.
Oxygen in Water. — At a meeting of the Chemical Society
a paper was read on “ A New Method of Estimating the Oxygen
Dissolved in Water,” by Mr. J. C. Thresh, M.B. The process
is based on the observation that whereas, in absence of oxygen,
nitrous acid and hydrogen iodide interact to form iodine, water,
and nitric acid ; in presence of oxygen the nitric oxide becomes
re-oxidised, and, serving as a carrier of the oxygen, an amount
of iodine equivalent to the oxygen present is liberated, in
addition to that resulting from the initial action of the nitric
acid ; hence, deducting the amount liberated by the nitrous
acid and by the oxygen disso'ved in the solutions used from the
total amount, the difference will be that corresponding to the
oxygen dissolved in the water examined. The solutions used
are : — (1) A solution containing '5 gram sodium nitrate, and
20 grams potassium iodide in 100 c.c. ; (2) a solution of
7 -75 grams sodium thiosulphate in 1 litre, 1 c.c. of which
corresponds to 0-25 milligram of oxygen ; (3) a clear solution
of starch ; and (4) diluted pure sulphuric acid (1 : 3). The
apparatus required is a simple one.
Hypo in Negatives. — An American writer says that he finds
that a good way to remove hypo from negatives is to lay them
facedown in a dish or trough with a concave bottom. “If
you make but few,” he says, “ an agate-ware wash basin does
first-rate. The hypo falls from the film by its own weight, it
being heavier than water, and in five minutes will be cleaner
even in still water, than in ten minutes running water with
face up.”
150
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [February 21, 1890.
DR. AND RESEN’S EIKONOGEN PATENT.
No. 5,207. Mar. 26th, 1889. — The following is the complete
specification of Dr. Andresen’s patent entitled, “ Improve-
ments relating to the Development of Photographic
Pictures” : —
I, Momme Andresen, of 44, Melchiorstrasse, Berlin, in
the empire of Germany, chemist, do hereby declare the
nature of this invention, and in what manner the same is
to be performed, to be particularly described and ascer-
tained in and by the following statement : —
My invention relates to the development of photographic
(NIP
pictures by means of diamidonaphthaline C10 II6
amidonaphthol C° 1IC and dioxynaphthaline
C'° IP as well as their sulpho acids : —
Diamidonaphthaline monosulphonic acid
Diamidonaphthaline disulphonic acid
Amidonaphthol monosulphonic acid
Amidonaphthol disulphonic acid
Dioxynaphthaliue monosulphonic acid
Dioxynaphthaline disulphonic acid
C10 h5 -j
C10 H4 ■
NH3
NH3
SOs OH
NH3
NH3
C10 Hs ■
(SO3 OH)3
OH
NH3
SO3 OH
C10 H4
C10 H5
C10 H4
(OH
1
{
NH3
(SO3 OH)3
(O H3),
SO3 OH
(OH
OH
l (SO3 OH)3
As is well known in photography, it is the practice to
treat the sensitive plates (prepared with chloride, bromide,
or iodide of silver, or with two or all of the salts) after
exposure with a developing solution, in order to bring
to view the image produced on the sensitive plate. The
developing solution hitherto employed for this purpose
has usually consisted of a solution of oxalate of iron, pyro-
gallic acid, or hydrochinoue.
Now, I have found by experiment that the before-men-
tioned substances, diamidonaphthaline, amidonaphthol,
and dioxynaphthaline, as well as their sulpho-acids, are ex-
ceptionally suitable for developing photographic pictures
produced on the said sensitive plates, and give better results
than can be obtained with an alkaline pyrogallol developer,
and excel the latter by giving the plates a blue black tint
similar to that produced when developing in a bath of
oxalate of iron, without in the least colouring the sensitive
plate, but enabling the plate to better resist the alkaline
action of the bath. I thus obtain the advantages pos-
sessed by known developing baths without their disadvan-
tages.
A developing bath prepared with my naphthol-developer
in which it is intended to immerse the sensitive plate after
having been exposed, for the purpose of producing a
visible picture is, for instantaneous photography, advanta-
geously composed of the following ingredients : —
5 grammes of the hereinbefore described napthol de-
veloper.
15 grammes of sulphide of soda.
250 grammes of distilled water ; and
5 grammes of potash.
I he above proportions can, however, be varied, or one
or the other of the ingredients can be substituted by others
providing the essential part, namely, the before-men-
tioned naphthol developer is contained in the developing
bath.
Instead of potash soda-carbonate, soda lye or potash
may be used, in which case it is preferable to replace the
before-mentioned 5 grammes of potash by 20 drops
of a concentrated or saturated soda or potash lye,
and this is especially recommended when diamidonaphtha-
line or its sulphonic acids are used. In the same propor-
tion the quantity of sulphide of soda can be advantage-
ously increased when alphanaphthol derivatives (such as
amidoalphanaphthol) or their sulpho-acids as mentioned
above, are used.
The before mentioned five grammes ‘"napthol developer”
may be used with any of the above combinations.
As any one of the “ naphthol developers” is suitable for
the present purpose, I find it is not absolutely necessary
to restrict myself to the use of only one of the “ naphthol
developers ” for the bath , so that the quantity of “naphthol
developer ” to be used refers also to mixtures of the above-
named “ naphthol developers.”
After having immersed the photographic plate in this
bath till the picture becomes completely developed, it is
then fixed in the usual way.
Having now particularly described and ascertained the
nature of my said invention, and in what manner the same
is to be performed, I declare that what I claim is : —
The process herein described of developing photographic
pictures on coatings of chloride of silver, bromide of silver,
or iodide of silver, or of any two, or of all three of them
in combination, such process consisting in treating such
coatings in a developing bath containing diamidonaphtha-
line, amidonaphthol, or dioxynaphthaline, or their sulpho-
acids. t
♦
PHOTOGRAPHING CHURCH ARCHITECTURE*
BY THE REV. T. PERKINS, SI. A.
We often find difficulty in getting general views of churches
and cathedrals, on account of adjoining buildings. Still,
in many cases of parish churches we are enabled to get
the best general view from the south-east. People did not
like to be buried on the north side of a church, so that
the grave-yards often extend furthest on the south side
(the chief entrance generally being the south porch),
and this allows us often to get sufficiently far away to the
south-east to get in the whole of the church, tower and
all, with a lens of moderately long focus. This is a thing
to be aimed at, as if we get too close and use a lens of
short focus in comparison to the plate, the tower is dwarfed,
and the chancel roof rises too high on the picture, and
the chancel itself is exaggerated in size from our being so
much closer to it than to the tower. A sunny day, shortly
after midday, when the eastern side of the tower is in
shade, is the best time to choose for a view from the south-
east, When we wish to make the tower the chief object,
the best position is from the western side, but a little
either towards the south or north ; the church, however,
itself does not generally look well from this position. In
the case of cathedrals, the north side is generally to be
preferred, the cloisters, the bishop’s palace, or the deanery
often proving obstacles on the south side. If we take a
cathedral from the north-east, we must choose early morn-
ing or late evening in summer, as the whole of the building
will be in shadow in our picture. The west front of a
* A portion of a paper read before the Camera Club, and published in
its Journal.
t In the patent, “ sulphide"’ seems to be a misprint for “ sulphite.”— Em
February 21, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
151
cathedral is often well worth a plate. Generally speaking,
the use of a wide-angled lens used to its full extent is to
be avoided. It is often better to take a view of a portion
only of the building than to endeavour to get the whole
in at the risk of exaggerated perspective. In taking an
interior, windows are often troublesome, as halation spoils
the effect. Films, backed plates, or plates thickly coated
on ground glass, should be used, as these decrease
halation. A lens with a somewhat curved field is useful,
as with it, if we are taking a view from either end, we can
get the distant end and the nearer pillars and roof in fair
focus together with a comparatively large stop ; a lens
whose focal length is about equal to the length of the
longer side of the plate is generally the best. It is a mis-
take to endeavour to get too much in. I would strongly
deprecate the use of wide-angled lenses for interiors ; for
general views of exteriors they are sometimes a necessary
evil, but for interiors I would scarcely if ever use them.
In the first place, the exaggerated perspective due to
including too much on the plate is painfully obtrusive in
an interior ; and in the second place, the falling-off of
illumination towards the margins is a serious drawback,
as it generally happens that those parts included towards
the top of the plate are the worst lighted. As I said just
now, a lens with focus equal to the length of the plate,
with the front raised so that the lens is opposite to a
point about two-thirds up the plate, will be the best ; a
lens of the portable symmetrical type is the one I always
use for this work.
A day when the light is diffused is better than one on
which the sun, shining through the windows, throws
patches of light on the floor and pillars. There is little
fear of giving too long an exposure, as our object should
be to get pleuty of detail in the shadows. It is well, in
fact, to over-expose, and develop slowly with a' weak
developer until all detail is out, and then to strengthen
the developer or trust to subsequent intensification. It
is often useful, if time is a consideration, to begin the
exposure with stop //3 2, and after a time to carefully
change it to//16 without shaking or moving the camera ;
the former gives sharpness, the latter shortens the time of
exposure. In baking a general view from the nave it is
well to get as far back as possible, and to place the
camera a little to one side, say to the north, and to turn
it somewhat to the south, so as to get the east window
somewhat to the left of the centre of the picture. An
artist making a drawing of an interior looking to the east
would, I believe, construct his outline according to the
rules of perspective, imagining himself to be standing
outside the building, and drawing it as it would appear
if the west wall were removed. The photographer can-
not do this. He must be content, I think, if lie desires
to have a picture with pleasing perspective, to embrace
only perhaps the eastern half of the nave, and not to
attempt to get in his picture that part of the roof which
he can only see by turning his eyes upwards. But not
oidy is it worth while to take a general view of the
interior ; many charming bits may be got in most of our
cathedrals looking up or down the aisles, or diagonally
across the transepts, and individual monuments, and
chapels, and screens are also often worthy of the ex-
posure of a plate.
Tub Crystal Palace Photographic Exhibition will be
opened on the 11th of March ; the last day for receiving intended
exhibits will be March 1st.
FOUR DIFFERENT PRINTING PROCESSES
SUITABLE FOR COPYING TRACINGS*
BY ,T. E. GOOLD.
I will briefly describe four different processes by which
an exact copy of a drawing on tracing paper can be made.
Colon's Process, which gives a black fine on a white
ground, is now greatly in use for copying tracings ; it
prints quickly, and is very simple to work. The exposure
ranges from five to ten minutes in the sunlight, and from
twenty to forty minutes in the shade. I find the best
results are got on a bright day, and printing in the
strongest light. I have very often to reduce large drawings
made on yellow tracing paper to a small scale to transfer
to a stone for lithographic purposes, and use this process
to get a more suitable copy to photograph from. To make
a print, you put the tracing face downwards in the
printing-frame, and place the sensitive paper on the top
of it, then a piece of thick felt, and then the backs, and
put a good pressure on by means of screws, which are
much better than springs, as you are able to get a more
even pressure. To ascertain if sufficiently printed, lift up
one corner, and if the greenish-yellow tint has disappeared,
except where covered by the lines, it should be taken out
and immersed, face upwards, in a bath composed of gallic
acid, 20 parts ; alcohol (methylated), 200 parts ; and
water, 1,000 parts ; and remain for about three minutes ;
at end of time, the lines will be up strong and black ; it
should then be thoroughly washed in running water for a
quarter of an hour, and surface rubbed with soft sponge ;
then taken out and hung up to dry. The following will
be found a good formula for sensitising the paper: —
Water
Gelatine ... ...
Perchloride of iron
Tartaric acid
Persulphate of zinc
Apply this by means of
brush, or a fine sponge,
parts
300
10
20 „
10 „
10 „
either a broad, flat camel-hair
to a hard, well-sized paper, then
hang up to dry in a dark room. To over-expose a print
means losing the lines, and under-exposure gives a very
dirty, neutral tint ground, and very faint lines.
Pellet's Process. — This is the best process I know of for
copying tracings, it being much quicker than any other,
and giving a brighter result, although there is more trouble
in finishing the print, as it requires developing on a satu-
rated solution of yellow prussiate of potash. The print
must be allowed to remain for half a minute, then lifted
out of the bath and hung up by means of American clips
until the lines have developed up to a strong dark blue ;
then immediately lay face down in a tray of water to stop
the action of the developer, and by means of an india-
rubber pipe splash water on the back of the print. It must
then be placed, and completely covered, in a bath
composed of one part hydrochloric acid to ten of
water for five minutes ; now take out and well wash the
surface, and rub with a broad camel-hair brush to remove
the loose blue sediment that would otherwise remain ;
after again rinsing, hang up to dry, and the result will
be a beautiful clean white ground with strong blue
lines.
Ferro-prussiate Process gives a white line on a blue ground,
but is not so suitable for copying tracings — (1) because
you cannot very well alter anything on the print, and (2)
a mechanical or architectural drawing cannot be tinted as
* A Communication to the Newcastle-on-Tyne and Northern Counties’
Photographic Association.
152
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
in the other processes previously described, although it is
a cheap and rapid method of printing from negatives of
drawings, giving a blue line on a white ground, the expo-
sure only taking from five to ten minutes in a good light.
The great advantage is, the prints require neither toning
nor fixing; all that is needed is to wash in a plentiful
supply of clean water until the lines are dark, and the ground
perfectly white. Or if a copy from a tracing, the lines
should be quite white, and the ground a good dark blue.
Messrs. Halden, of Manchester, supply a paper which
gives a similar result to Pellet's, and only requires to be
immersed in one bath containing red and yellow prussiate
of potash, and then rinsing in clean water. I have not
been able to give this paper a fair trial since it was intro-
duced to me, but have made one or two very fair prints.
STEREOSCOPIC PHOTOGRAPHY.
The following is a portion of a paper delivered a few days
ago by Mr. G. I). Macdougald before the Dundee and
East of Scotland Photographic Association : —
In what does stereoscopic vision consist? That is a very
difficult question to answer. We know the conditions, or some
of the conditions, under which we have such vision, and can
only say it is the natural state of matters set up in the brain
itself by the combination of two distinct impressions. When
we look at a stereoscopic photograph we become aware that we
are imitating nature, we feel we have a near approach to natural
vision. By the well-known device of taking two pictures
little distance apart we take another step forward. In viewing
such pictures we become aware of very perfect stereoscopic im-
pression. There is greater solidness and relief.
I can only speak to my own impressions, and I say that a
good stereoscopic view gives me very great satisfaction indeed.
Mr. Pringle says that stereoscopic impressions are only fit to
amuse children or savages a few times.
One might be tempted to think that, having two pictures
photographed at about the average distance of the eyes apart,
hardly any difference would be observable between nature and
the delightful representation as seen in the stereoscope, yet
there is considerable difference. In looking at nature the eye
has to adjust itself in focus for the near and the far-away
objects. Every photographer knows that while photographing
a near object the back of the camera has to be drawn out
farther than in the case of a far-away object. Some have gone
the length of maintaining that our knowledge of distance
when looking at a view is mainly due to the brains interpreting
the continuous stream of telegrams intimating the various focus-
sings of the eye. That, however, will hardly hold good, as in
a stereoscopic picture all the focussing is already accomplished.
The picture being really flat, the eye has no focussing to do.
Any one possessed of a stereoscopic picture of some place to
which he can get access may easily carry out an experiment on
this point. Comparing his impressions of nature with the im-
pressions as derived from the stereoscope, one quickly finds that
the action of the eyes is decidedly different in each case. In
looking at nature the eye has work to do, and feels the distance,
so to speak, between each object. No such action takes place
in the stereoscope.
But one may explain stereoscopic vision to his heart’s content,
and, after all, there remains the element of the wonderful in it.
We confess to as much of the child or savage as to permit of a
feeling of wonder at the possibility of combining two impres-
sions by the mechanism of the brain itself. It appears to me
there is something so many-sided about this fact as to indicate
its being a fruitful starting-point for many investigations —
anatomical, physiological, psychological, and metaphysical. It
at least permits of a slight insight into the working of the
occult mechanism v'hich lies between the action of the eye and
the final translation of the eye’s messages to our conscious-
ness.
In conclusion, is stereoscopic work suitable for the amateur ?
[Eemiuary 21, 1890.
I venture to say it is eminently suitable. While it allows of
the exercise of as high art as any other branch of photography,
it gives an undoubted helping hand to the worker who does not
aim high, who may work under circumstances where high photo-
graphic art can hardly be looked for. In shorter language, its
range is wider, and it gives hope of more return for labour.
The amateur rank and file do not aim at large work. The con-
veniences necessary for large work are not to be lightly esti-
mated by any one limited in one way or other by space, time, or
cash ; and one or other of these things, in the case of three
out of four amateurs, conies in to limit his effort.
I shall state the advantages of a stereoscopic outfit from the
amateur's point of view : —
(1) Compactness of apparatus. (2) Great certainty of pro-
ducing a pleasure-giving result under disadvantageous circum-
stances. (3) Suitability for production of lantern slides directly.
(4) Suitability of apparatus for taking single pictures of artistic
proportions, and large enough for most amateurs.
IKOCIIROMATIC OR ORTHOCIIROMATIC.
A writer in the Swiss Photographic Review objects to the
words orthochromatic and isochromatic, as signifying a
different thing from the meaning they are intended to
convey. “ Now, what is to be defined ? A process by
which we correct the incapacity of the ordinary plate to
render exactly the value of colours. According to the
dictionaries, isochromatic means of uniform tint ; as to
the word orthochromatic, it seems to have been invented
for the purpose of commercial competition with the first,
d’lie two Greek adjectives isos and orthos are nearly
synonymous, and signify both of them “ equal, light, true ” ;
the two words in question would, therefore, be translated
by: a process giving the exact colour. Now, as the
artifice thus qualified does not give colour, it is necessary
to have recourse to a cumbersome paraphrase in order to
translate the thought of the coiners of these words: a
process by which the colours of the objects do not prevent
them from being reproduced with their proper luminous
value. I would therefore propose the use of a better
word — orthophotic — that is to say, a process giving the
exact rays.”
To these remarks the editor of the Swiss Review replies
as follows :
“ We are happy that our correspondent has raised this
interesting question. It is true the vocables iso- and ortho-
chromatic have but an erroneous and conventional significa-
tion. The word orthophotic seems preferable, but is it very
correct V Our eye classifies the seven colours of the
spectrum, according to the luminous intensity proper
to each ; the photographic plate is impressioned by these
same colours, not in the ratio of their luminous intensity,
but in accordance with the chemical property which each
possesses, more or less, of decomposing the silver salts.
The physical action of shining which strikes our eye, and
the chemical action of destroying which impressions the
plate, do not move in parallel directions. Our eye is ortho-
chromatic, the ordinary plate is orthoactinic. Does the word
orthophotic well convey the meaning of the chemical proper-
ties of the rays of light which are alone to be considered
in photography ? This does not seem to be so, and we
have here, we think, something wanting, It is not the
luminous action that the word should recall, it is the chemical
action. We have just said that the ordinary plate is also
orthoactinic, as it exactly renders the relative powers of the
diverse rays to decompose the bromide of silver. A plate
that did not express this relative power, a plate in which
the actinism of the rays was palsied, in which the green
February 21, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. 153
and the red would end by attracting the bromide of silver
in a certain measure, would possess properties outside of
those of the ordinary plate ; it would no longer be ortho-
actinic, but rather paractinic. Now this is the property of
iso- and orthochromatic plates. We ask our correspondent
if this word suits him.”
(ftoiwpontfence.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN NATURAL COLOURS ON SILVER
PLATES.
Sir, — In your article on “ Photography in Natural Colours
on Silver Plates,” in the Year-Book, you mention only one
name connected with the development of the method which may
be termed composite heliochromy, and only to remark that his
(Hauron’s) method “ is occasionally re-invented,” &c. Inasmuch
as I have done more actual work in this line, and written more
upon this branch of the subject than anyone else, you will no
doubt allow me to call attention to the fact that my own
method is a more radical departure from that proposed by
Hauron, than was Hauron's from that proposed by Henry Collen
in 1865. This must be admitted if it is true, as I assert it to
be, that my method is the first and only one which is based
upon, or which is consistent with, or which in any way recog-
nizes the modern theory of colour vision which distinguishes
l>e tween primary spectrum colours and primary colour sensa-
tions. Hauron and Cros would have made photographs by
orange, green, and violet light, for projection by orange, green,
and violet light, or for pigment prints in exactly complemen-
tary colours. A recognition of the theoretical distinction I
have mentioned involves the production of a photograph by the
joint action of red, orange, yellow, and vellow-green spectrum
rays, in definite proportions ; for projection by red light, a
photograph by the joint action of orange, yellow, yellow-green,
green, and green-blue s]>ectrum rays, in definite proportions ;
for projection by green light, &c.
It seems to me that nobod)' who knows this can help admit-
ting that there is a radical difference in the methods, as well as
in the principles involved, and that this difference is of exceed-
ing importance. Fred. E. Ives.
911, Filbert Street, Philadelphia, Fel>. 7th.
PHOTOGRAVURE.
Sir, — In reply to Mr. E. Frewing’s letter in yours of the
14th inst., I am sorry that a slight error had slipped into my
description of Mr. Carl Eckstein’s litho-photogravure process.
There is, of course, no asphalt at all applied to the second stone,
and the passage in my letter, page 99, should therefore run
thus : — “ As soon as the desired depth of etching is attained,
the stone is removed to a trough and thoroughly washed in
running water ; then the gelatine film and the colour of the stippled
image is washed off with turpentine,” &c.
Dr. Hermann E. Gunther.
patent Entclltgtwe.
Applications for Letters Patent.
2,122. \V. Bentley, M. H. Smith, and F. Walsh, Crossley
Street, Halifax, “Securing Caps to Lenses.” — Feb. 10.
2,124. A. E. Lewis, 70, Wellington Street, Glasgow, “Magic
Lantern.” — Feb. 10.
2,178. S. Gurney and C. P. Small, 55, Chancery Lane,
London, “ Decorating Looking-glass by Photography.” —
Feb. 11.
2,211. G. Mackmurdie, 8, James Street, Goswell Road, Lon-
don, “An Optical Toy.” — Feb. 11.
2,260. J. Martyn, High Street, Southwold, Suffolk,
“Cameras.” — Feb. 12.
2,333. J. T. Thompson, 7, Battenberg Street, Liverpool,
“Flash Light.”— Feb. 13.
2,425. E. Galopin, 20, High Holborn, London, “ Photographic
Shutter,” — Feb. 14.
2,444. E, K. Purchase, 166, Fleet Street, London, “Dis-
playing Pictures by Rotation." — Feb. 14.
2.484. J. Martyn, Southwold, Suffolk, “Flash Light.” —
Feb. 1 5.
2.485. W. H. Humphries and E. A. King, 268, Upper Street,
Islington, London, “ Apparatus for Holding Photographs
during Development.” — Feb. 15.
^rorec&tnga: of Societies;.
Camera Club.
Thursday, February 1 3th. — The Rev. A. B. W. Whatton in the
chair.
Previous to the lecture the Hon. Sec. read an extract from
an alleged old book entitled “ Giphantia,” published in 1761.
This extract, which had been sent up by a member, Mr. A. C.
Lyster, gave an account of a vision relating to photographic
agency, said to have been experienced in Central Africa. A
viscous substance received images which became fixed on removal
to a dark chamber.
Mr. Graham Balfour read a memoir on “Landscape,” in
which he dealt with the relative artistic merits of pure land-
scape and landscape with figures, and stated that he felt inclined
to recommend the former ; he preferred work done to satisfy
the sense of beauty or art for art's sake. When figures are
omitted where their presence might seem most desirable, their
absence may be compensated by the introduction of well-chosen
articles of human use. The effect of a desolate scene is usually
enhanced by the absence of the human form, although there
are exceptions : a solitary human figure in the vast expanse of
the Great Sahara increases the feeling of desolateness, but
such an adjunct is best left out in a landscape wherein its pre-
sence would be incongruous with the spirit of the scene. Mr.
Andrew Pringle maintains that figures in landscape photographs
are scarcely ever in the right place, and that it is letter to
leave them out. The old masters almost invariably introduced
figures of men and animals, or suitable substitutes, into land-
scapes ; but in these latter days painters no longer feel that
course necessary, the truth being that in the olden time the
feeling for beauty in landscape had not been born in the human
race, for we live in days of new ideas and new conditions The
great appreciation of the external world, which has grown up
within the last hundred years, is due to ideas externalised by
modern painters and pCets ; also to the wonderful discoveries
of science. In short, he denied the supremacy of ancient
authority on this subject, and Itelieved that we should not wor-
ship our ancestors as do the Chinese. Besides, painters have an
object, which photographic workers in monochrome have not, of
sometimes introducing figures to get a few bright points of
positive colour in suitable positions. He thought beauty to be
a sufficient quality for any picture to possess.
Mr. Humphery considered the seeking for beauty to lie
one of the greatest curses of photography at the present day,
for the human mind required something grander, something
more suggestive than prettiness ; it wanted soul, and soul
could not be found in mere beauty. As to figures, the in-
troduction of them would utterly spoil certain pictures, su,ch,
for instance, as those of the wild waves of the ocean break-
ing over the rocks ; but there were other scenes, such as
some of those of a rural nature described by Wordsworth
and by Gray, in which the introduction of human and other
figures enhanced the effect.
Mr. Ashbury Greene agreed with all that Mr. Balfour
had said in his paper. Beauty should not be confounded
with prettiness, for it includes scenes of grandeur and
majesty, and in a beautiful scene he considered figures to
be incongruous. It is absurd to use the term “ beauty ”
as including only subjects which are merely pretty.
Mr. George Davison believed that there might be as
much beauty in a simple landscape, or a tree, or a bit of
a pond, as in grand scenery, and he did not think figures
to be essential to pure artistic work. In the past, those
who have posed figures in the attempt to represent them
in motion, have usually failed, but the resulting un-
154
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 1890.
naturalness is not seen when a hand-camera with a lens of
long focus is used upon a figure in action not specially
posed. Fine art cannot he governed by any didactic
reason of any description, for then it would become more
or less a science.
Mr. E. R. Shipton remarked that in the old photographs
upon the wall of the room in which the meeting was held,
figures had been introduced largely into the landscapes, and
those pictures taken in the old collodion days proved that
photographers had not advanced as much as they ought to
have done. He did not think that Mr. Pringle’s attempts
to introduce figures into landscapes had been generally suc-
cessful, judging from the lantern pictures he had recently ex-
hibited. He thought a thorough grounding in art principles
to be essential to good artistic work, and did not think
that more than one photograph in five hundred was worth
calling a picture.
Dr. C. S. Patterson said that the objection made that
figures are usually placed wrongly in landscapes is no argument
against their being put in right positions therein.
The Chairman would ask, “ What is beauty ? ” If the reply
were that it is truth, then they were driven back to the old
question, “ What is truth ? ” He was utterly unable to grasp
the idea of pure beauty. He could imagine the beauty of
ideas ; for instance, the idea of the mathematician about the
fourth dimension in space, and could become lost in admira-
tion thereat, and he thought that pictures are beautiful only
when they start a train of ideas, for beauty cannot be reduced
to mere symmetry. Early Greek sculpture began with the
idea of pure beauty, or of art for art’s sake, but, as it improved,
it tried to convey ideas to the mind ; in its early stages, Phidias
and Praxiteles produced nothing but Venuses and forms due to
“ art for art’s sake,” but later on Grecian art tried to convey
ideas, by representing wrestlers and other subjects full of
action. Any picture, he thought, which had motive in it must
include figures.
Mr. William England was of opinion that it is desirable to
introduce figures into landscapes wdiere it can be judiciously
done, and that in some cases it is absolutely necessary. He
had seen American stereoscopic pictures in which the introduc-
tion of the human figure gave an idea of the approximate height
of the geysers in the Yellowstone Park. Sometimes the intro-
duction of a figure will help to suitably break up a landscape
foreground, and in the instance of a trout stream, the intro-
duction of a man fishing was an improvement.
Mr. Balfour, in the course of his reply, said that in the
term beauty he included grandeur, and that he considered
prettiness to be about the greatest curse which could be called
art. When figures were introduced, he strongly advocated the
use of the instantaneous shutter. The great experience of Mr.
England made his utterances welcome and valuable, but that
evening they were rather outside the range of the subjects dealt
with in his paper. When figures were introduced to give the
scale of the dimensions of a geyser, he should consider the
result to be more properly classified with diagrams than with
works of art.
The subject on Thursday, Feb. 27th, is “ Photography as
Applied to Medicine,” when a paper will be read by Dr. C. S.
Patterson.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 13th inst. Mr. G. W, Atkins occupied
the chair.
AY ith a view to test the question asked at a previous meeting,
whether plates coated with collodio- bromide emulsion were sub-
ject to reversal of image, Mr. J. B. B. Wellington had during
the week tried three plates, exposing for one minute, twenty-
five minutes, and one hour respectively — the latter in bright
sunshine. Although all showed more or less over-exposure, no
trace of any reversal of image was observable.
Mr. AY . E. Dbbenham said the resistance to reversal of image
might be due to the vehicle or the molecular condition of the
film. It was a question whether a plate coated with gelatine
emulsion made as slow as collodio-bromide would not offer the
same resistance to reversal.
A question from the box was read, “ AY'hen developing a
plate which is known to be over-exposed, is it 1 letter to begin
with the usual amount of pyro and bromide and a very small
quantity of ammonia, and as the development proceeds to add
more ammonia, or to use a solution weak in ammonia and bro-
mide, and to add the pyro by degrees, beginning with only a
very small quantity of pyro, and finishing with the usual deve-
loper ! ”
Mr. A. Haddon referred to Captain Abney’s remarks, published
in the Year-Book, endorsing the system of obtaining detail first
and density afterwards, this method of procedure proving
particularly successful in developing negatives of Swiss scenes.
By commencing with a minimum quantity of pyro, details of
distant snow-covered mountains, as well as the foreground,
were obtained in the same negative.
Another question from the box : “ Does anyone know of a
formula for polish suitable for cameras, that can be put on
rather thickly and finished at once ? ”
Mr. A. C. Pemberton said adding ether to French polish
caused it to dry very quickly, but the article coated was not so
satisfactory in apjiearance as when the French polish was used
without the ether.
The Chairman said a good black for brass articles was made
by dissolving copper turnings in nitric acid. The article, freed
entirely from grease, was dipped into this solution, then passed
through the flame of a Bunsen burner, and afterwards washed
in water.
Mr. J. J. Briginshaw exhibited two prints from negatives of
the moon, taken recently with the great Lick telescope. He
believed this telescope was provided with a second lens for photo-
graphic work.
A Member asked the focus of the objective the negative was
taken with.
Mr. A. Haddon said from the size of the image in the prints
passed round he should say from 50 to 60 feet.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater referred to the excellent negatives,
full of detail, obtained of the moon by Mr. Lewis M. Rutherfurd,
of New York, in 1863-5, with very rude apparatus.
The remainder of the evening was devoted to the optical lan-
tern. A varied and interesting selection of slides was pro-
jected on the screen, contributed by Messrs. G. Y\r. Atkins,
A. C. Pemberton, T. E. Freshwater, R. P. Drage, J. Teape,
and J. B. B. Wellington.
West London Photographic Societv.
An ordinary meeting of the above Society was held at the
Addison Hall on the 14th inst., Mr. F. H. Low, M.B., in the
chair.
The members were informed that Mr. AATilson intended to
present the Club with a selection of photographic works for the
library.
Mr. Ronald AA’hiting read a paper on “Reducing aud Inten-
sifying Negatives.”
Mr. C. YY’hiting remarked that negatives which had been
dried quickly by immersion in spirit, to drive the water off, are
generally much denser than those dried in the ordinary way,
and that a negative which was dry in some parts and not in
others, on being put into the spirit and dried, was found to be
almost twice as dense in the parts which had not been dry on
immersion in the spirit. He also mentioned that if a very much
under-exposed negative were simply bleached with mercury
and then used, it would be found to be decidedly improved, for
although the contrasts before were too violent, the bleaching
remedied that to a large extent.
Mr. Blackmokk said that he did not approve intensifying a
badly under-exposed negative. It had its proper place, which
was certainly not in the printing-frame.
Mr. R. Waiting, in replying to questions, remarked that
the different processes of intensification he had described could
be used with films, aud he did not think there would be found
to be any action on the celluloid backing.
The Chairman requested those members who had won medals
at the late exhibition to send them to the secretary, as they
were to be engraved with names and date, and he announced
that a special general meeting would be held on the 8th of
February 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
155
March to consider matters relating to the Exhibition, except
that the subject of the awards must not be touched upon in
the sense of questioning any of them. The meeting of
the 8th of March is not to interfere with the holding of the
next ordinary meeting on the 28th inst.
Hackney Photographic Society.
Mr. G. H. Slight read a paper on “ Retrospective Photo-
graphy, from Personal Recollection,” on Thursday last, going
back over forty years. He illustrated his paper by showing
some old wet plate negatives, positives, and prints. He liked
the old process, and was loath to leave it in favour of the
present dry plates.
Dr. Gerard Smith, who began photography twenty years
ago, said he liked it better, and it was admitted by a number of
people to be better, seeing some plates were advertised “like
the wet plate in results. ”
The Secretary announced that on the 27th an exhibition of
“Apparatus” would be held, and invited members to send
apparatus by six o’clock on that day. He said all the mem-
bers would be pleased to hear that Mr. Hubert had secured a
silver medal at tire Roy ton Exhibition.
Mr. Dean showed some micro-enlargements.
Mr. Hart showed the photograph he had taken of the mem-
Iters at the preceding meeting. Owing to the camera being a
new one, the drawing of the slide had caused it to shift, thus
getting it a trifle out of focus.
The Secretary said he had l>een trying pyrocatechin (Dr.
Arnold's formula), but could not recommend it, as it was too
slow, anti had no advantage over any of the developers now in
use.
Mr. Reynolds wanted to know how to remove films off useless
negatives.
Dr. Gerard Smith advised salt and water.
Mr. Birt Acres was nominated as a member.
Newcastle and Northern Counties Photographic
Association.
The annual meeting was held on Tuesday, the 11th inst., in
the Mosley Street Caf<5, Newcastle-on-Tync, Mr. J. P. Gibson
in the chair.
The election of officers was as follows : — President — Mr. A. S.
Stevenson, J.P. ; Vice-Presidents — Messrs. J. P. Gibson and
H. R. Procter ; Council — Messrs. M. Auty, James Brown,
T. Galloway, J. E. Goold, W. Parry, G. Proud, H. G. Ridg-
way, J. Hedley Robinson, H. Shand, and L. Williamson ;
Hon. Treasurer — Mr. J. W. Robson ; lion. Secretary — Mr.
Edgar G. Lee, 11, Beverley Terrace, Cullercoats.
The Treasurer’s report showed a balance in hand of
£2 13s. 3d.
The following were elected as members of the Association :
Miss Annie Philipson, Messrs. W. R. Ferguson, \V. W. Fry,
A. E. Harris, W. Milburn, and Lyddell Sawyer.
Mr. J. E. Goold read a paper on “Four Different Printing
Processes suitable for Copying Tracings ” (see page 151).
Other printing processes were described by Messrs. M. Auty,
Jas. Brown, J. P. Gibson, W. Parry, and J. Pike.
Some very fine photographs by Mr. Robert S. Redfield,
Philadelphia, were exhibited by Mr. J. P. Gibson.
Messrs. M. Auty, Jas. Brown, J. P. Gibson, J. E. Goold,
and W. Parry exhibited a number of photographs, the work of
the past season.
Leicester and Leicestershire Photographic Society.
A meeting was held in the Mayor’s Parlour, Old Town Hall, on
Wednesday, Feb. 12th, Mr. J. T. Cook in the chair. One
member was elected, and oiie proposed for ballot at the next
meeting.
The exhibition of lantern slides for competition in class A
was then proceeded with, Mr. F. Pierpoint manipulating the
lantern. Eight members sent in six slides each, which, after
being passed through the lantern, were voted for by ballot by
the members present, with the result that the first prize silver
medal was awarded to Mr. Porrit, and the bronze medal for
the second prize to Mr. W, Joliffe.
North Middlesex Photographic Club.
On Feb. 10th the members of the above Club discussed the
best light for use in the dark room, and submitted the
several samples of glass to a practical test. For this purpose,
pieces of Ilford rapid bromide paper were used, and an exposure
of ten minutes was given. The following were the results ob-
tained : — That exposed to the light of one thickness of cathedral
green, after being in the developer for about one minute,
was quite black, while that with two thicknesses was of a
dark grey ; that exposed to the yellow and ruby was still quite
white ; in about two and a half minutes longer, that exposed
to the yellow began to show a grey, the ruby — the darkest
procurable — following one minute later.
Mr. Paul remarked that at previous meetings when he had
recommended cathedral green to be used, he had never advised
that it be used alone, but in conjunction with a screen of
canary medium, and expressed his belief that if forty thick-
nesses were used, it would still be easy to fog a plate.
Mr. Goodhew remarked that the safety, or otherwise, of a
particular screen was largely influenced by the make of lamp,
for one in which the burner was six or eight inches
from the glass would be found much safer than one with the
burner only two inches from it ; also that one with two screens
placed a few inches apart would be found much safer than
with the same screens placed close together, although they
apparently gave the same light.
The Secretary said that in choosing a light to work by we
had the choice of two evils : either it was necessary to have a
light that was practically if not absolutely no light — if it
was desired to have one that would have no effect upon the
sensitive film, however long exposed — or a light which, while
promoting ease of working, would cause fog, if allowed to act
for a comparatively short time. And, therefore, it was neces-
sary under these conditions to choose one which hit the middle
course ; that is, a medium which would not show any trace of
fog with the longest necessary exposure on the most sensitive
plates. Anything which cut off more light than this was not only
needless, but was an actual disadvantage, and detrimental to
the best results, as nothing was more necessary than a good
light to judge the negative by in developing, and for this
reason he objected to such screens as had a mottled appearance
(as cathedral green), as he opined that it made the judging
of fine detail more difficult, and remarked that all knew the
nuisance of emulsion on the back of a negative.
The vote of the meeting was taken, when it was found that
canary medium and yellow glass were the favourites.
Next Monday, February 24th, Mr. George Davison (of the
Camera Club) will give a lecture entitled “A Chat on Pictures
by Photography.” Visitors are invited to attend.
Brighton Photographic Society.
The first annual meeting was held on February 11th., the
President (Dr. Rean) in the chair.
The Secretary read the committee’s report, which stated
that the Society now numbered sixty members. It also
referred to the papers read during the year, which have been
of a high class, and evoked considerable discussion. The
lantern evenings have also been a feature, and have proved
entertaining. During the summer months excursions have
taken place to the most picturesque spots in the vicinity ;
these have been thoroughly appreciated. Two interesting
competitions have also taken place, one for the best set of
lantern slides being keenly contested.
The officers for the current year were then elected as
follows : — President — Mr. W. H. Rean ; Vice-President — Mr.
W. Jage ; Treasurer — Mr. J. P. Slingsby Roberts ; Committee
— Messrs. Bedford, Caush, Hardcastle, Graham, Perren,
Mitchell, Tate, Webbing, and Wicks ; Hon. Secretary — Mr. A.
H. C. Corder, 42, Montpelier Road, Brighton.
The prints sent in for competition were on view during the
evening. The judges, Messrs. Allen, Fry, Hunter, Graham, and
Rean, awarded^ tJie_bronze medal to Mr. W. Duddell. The silver
medal was withheld, as, in the opinion of the judges, there were
no exliibits of sufficient merit to justify their awarding it.
15C
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 21, 1890.
Dundee and East of Scotland Photographic Association.
February 6th.— General meeting ; Dr. Tulloch, President, iu
the chair.
Mr. G. D. Macdougald read a paper on “ Stereoscopic Photo-
graphy ” (see page 152). Mr. Macdougald then gave a descrip-
tion of the lime-light jet used at the Society’s lantern exhibition'
on the 29th ult.
Dr. Tulloch exhibited an apparatus for magnifying lantern
slides he had made from a design published in the current Year-
Book. It consisted of a cardboard box with a plano-convex
lens mounted at one end, the other end being made of ground
glass. The lantern slide is placed in a groove sufficiently far
into the box to throw the ground glass out of focus when the
instrument is held up to the light to view the slide.
Beck’s new camera, the “ Pecrops,” was on exhibition.
Messrs. Beck had also two of their “ Autograph ” lenses on view ;
one mounted, as usual, in brass, the other in aluminium.
Birmingham Photographic Society.
At the meeting held on the 13th inst., Mr. W. Jerome Harri-
son, F.G.S., occupied the chair.
The Birkenhead Photo. Survey slides were advertised to be
shown, but as these were not ready, a very good substitute was
given through the kindness of the following photographers and
societies, who sent a number of slides for exhibition ; vix.,
Messrs. C. W. Hastings and H. Sturmey, the Camera Club,
and the Leicester, Wolverhampton, and Coventry Societies.
Those from the Camera Club were the new set of animal studies,
and were sent out with very appropriate readings of particulars.
The new club lantern was on view, and, at the close, some pic-
tures were passed through.
It was announced that Prof. Muybridge would give his ex-
hibition at the Birmingham Town Hall during March.
Society of Amateur Photographers of New York.
The regular monthly meeting was held on the evening of
Jan. 14th, President C. W. Canfield in the chair.
Mr. F. C. Beach read a paper on “Camera Shutters,” and
exhibited a number of different models. He thought almost
all shutters were operated either by gravity, spring power, or
pneumatic power.
Mr. Cyrus Prosch exhibited a skeleton model of his present
triplex shutter, and a model of the first one he invented.
Prof. L. H. Laudy thought the word “instantaneous”
should not be used, as there was not, and could not be, an instan-
taneous shutter. All required time to operate.
Mr. Wm. T. Gregg preferred a shutter operating between
the lenses, and exhibited a model of his diamond shutter,
called such because of the diamond-shaped diaphragm it made.
Very few shutters worked quicker than the yi^th part of a
second, and the average about the Sgth of a second.
Mr. H. M. Grisdale showed a combination drop and door
flap shutter having attached spring hinges, designed to prevent
the jar of the doors as they fly open. He also explained a model
of a shutter (sector-shaped), in which a simple movement of
one lever actuated by a spring operated two blades in opposite
directions. He believed in having the apertures in the shutters
considerably longer than the actual area of the lens, in order
that a large amount of light may enter it.
Mr. F. C. Beach exhibited a German prayer-book camera
made on Mr. J. A. Harrison’s principle.
Mr. A. Peebles Smith made a flash-light exposure of the
audience early iu the evening, developed the negative, dried it,
placed it in Dr. Just’s automatic exposing and photo-printing
machine, sent by the United States Photographic Supply Co.,
and exposed, by the aid of an incandescent electric lamp, thirty
impiessions on a continuous band of bromide paper. These
were quickly developed with the eikonogen developer iu large
trays, fixed, cut off, and the prints presented to each member
of the audience before the meeting broke up.
Experimentalist. — Your letter affects a known person, yet
you do not append your own name and address for publication.
to <£om$pontfnttg.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
Spots (Buxton).— Small blue marks on silver prints. We have
seen several instances of late very like yours, but of more
pronounced character. If correct in our surmise, they are
really small blisters, or places of loose attachment, where the
gold" toning solution has got underneath, and so acted in
advance, or more powerfully than on the rest of the photo-
graph. By soaking in water we expected to see correspond-
ing blisters rise up, but no such result was apparent even
when examined with a magnifier. Avoid the use of a freshly-
made toning bath, and keep a look-out for anything in the
shape of blisters.
A. M. M. — Inks for india-rubber stamps. No fatty or oily
matter should ever lie used, for they are apt to corrode the
face of the stamp. Spirit solutions applied from a stretched
flannel pad are commonly employed, the most suitable colours
being extra dahlia for a violet ink, spirit induline for black,
or this latter tempered by the addition of a little Atlas blue.
All these colours may be procured of Messrs. Brooke, Simp-
son and Co., Atlas Works, Hackney Wick, E.
F. S. A. — The photograph of the Rosetta Stone, plate 278 in
the British Museum series, will be of no use to you, for the
inscriptions are not legible on account of the stone being
covered with its protecting plate of glass. Apply to Messrs.
W. A. Mansell and Co., 271, Oxford Street, W., to know
whether they can supply you with any photograph showing
the actual inscriptions. Even then you would require an
enlarged copy to exhibit the details properly, or they might
be sufficiently apparent if a transparency were produced and
thrown upon a screen.
R. L.— Testing the speed of shutters. This problem would
appear to be solved in a very simple and satisfactory manner
by Mr. H. 0. Hughes, who describes his apparatus in the
Year-Book, page 109. He uses the swing of a second’s
pendulum, painted white against a black background, ujion
which a graduated arc is described, and lets go the
mechanism of the shutter when the bob is oscillating regu-
larly. The plate, when developed, will show how far the
blurred image extends, and, consequently, the period during
which the aperture of the lens remained uncovered. For
further details, see the author’s published account.
L. P. C. A pamphlet entitled “ Some Recent Advances in
Photography,” by Frederick E. Ives, reprinted from the
Journal of the Franklin Institute, May, 1888, can lie seen in
the Patent Office Library, Southampton Buildings, Chancery
Lane.
p, b. A. The distinction between “ professional” and “ ama
teur ” is not easily defined. Many so-called “amateurs
have at times sold their negatives, or furnished photo-sketches
of passing events, ceremonials, &c., for which they have been
paid. Others, again, may have filled temporary engagements,
accepting pay, and yet long since discontinued to make any
profit by photography. Another large class, of uncertain
qualification, may be photo- mechanical printers, opticians,
and makers of apparatus, or of various specialities demanded
by photographers. The itinerant operator, who practises
only during the season, and carries on another trade in the
winter months, is, we suppose, a legitimate ‘ ‘ professional.
But, for an authoritative answer to these points, we must
refer you to the newly appointed honorary secretary, whose
advent to office at the annual meeting was hailed as a very
satisfactory omen for the future prosperity of the Association.
\y. M. — 1. \\Tiere many copies are required, and in all really
important cases, it is usual to print from reproduced negatives.
2. Varnish for negatives on Eastman’s new Tollable celluloid.
Mr. \V. H. Walker recently stated that his Company were
experimenting with several kinds of elastic varnish, and that
he hoped very shortly to introduce that which proved the
most suitable for general use.
Received copy of the regulations of third annual Photographic
Exhibition at the Crystal Palace, to be opened on March 11th.
A. C., T. S., J. C., and Photargus, in our next.
THE
Vol. No^%3 .—Fe^.
NEWS.
1890.
Detective Cameras. By C. Brangwin Barnes 165
A Machine Camera Taking Ten Photographs a Second 157
The Royal Institution 159
An Old Photograph Book 160
An Institute of Photography. ByG. Lindsay Johnson, M.A.,
M.B., B.Sc., F.R.C.S 162
A Printing Machine of the Future 164
Platinum and Palladium Toning. By Frank P. Perkins, F.I.C. 164
The Hinges of Dark Slide Shutters. By Chapman Jones,
F.I.C., F.C.8 164
PAOK
Notes loo
Thomas Wedgwood's Experiments on Light... 107
A New Lithographic Transfer Ink. By Dr. J. M. Eder 169
Patent Intelligence 170
Correspondence — Stereoscopic Vision — Amateurs and Pro-
fessionals—Hackney Photographic Society — Photographic
Survey of Warwickshire — Focussing Appliances— Patents
and Photographic Progress 172
Proceedings of Societies 474
Answers to Correspondents 170
A MACHINE CAMERA TAKING TEN PHOTO-
GRAPHS A SECOND.
Foa some months past rumours have been published
in various photographic journals in England and
America, about the advent of an automatic camera to
make a large number of consecutive exposures in a
second, by the act of merely turning a handle. This
camera has been invented by Air. Friese Greene and
Mr. Mortimer Evans, civil engineer. The object of
it is to obtain consecutive pictures of things in motion,
which can afterwards he rapidly consecutively pro-
jected on a screen, so as to reproduce, say, . street
scenes, with the horses, human beings, and other
living things, moving as in nature. For instance,
a cab may be seen passing in one direction, and a dog
in the other. Mr. Muybridge, to produce something
yielding approximately the same results, used from
two to three dozen cameras, and made the exposures
by means of a wheel electric commutator ; these
cameras took the moving objects from either two or
three different points of view, so that, practically, he
obtained but a dozen or two pictures of a continuous
series of motions. The camera now under notice,
however, can take a continuous series of three hundred
photographs, so as to represent a long stream of street
life as it is to-day. What would we not now give for
a series of similar pictures representing street life in
the days of Queen Elizabeth, with the dress and gait
of the citizens of that time, and their antique streets
and houses as a background ?
In the scientific world such an instrument is likely
to be useful. One well-known naturalist— not of the
Camera Club, but a real naturalist — has suggested that
by means of this camera, the actual motions of the
legs of the centipede may be followed ; with the eye
this is difficult, because the animal has too many legs,
and it is difficult for the observer to keep the reckon-
ing, unless he be a Zerah Colburn or other “ calcula-
ting boy.” To the meteorologist it may be useful,
when more or less rapidly worked, for showing the for-
mation and dissipation of clouds. Air. Friese Greene
has already, by its means, photographed a spider making
its web. This may interest Mr. C. V. Boys, who has also
studied the characteristics of the spider, by placing
the prong of a vibrating tuning fork, instead of a fly,
in the centre of the web ; the spider valorously laid
hold of it, but observed that he had never seized such
a muscular fly before. Next Air. Boys tried a hot
tuning fork, but as a hot fly was outside the
experience of the spider, the spider at last took to his
heels — supposing him to possess such — and looked on
from a distance, with palpitating heart, at his demoni-
acal visitor. All this, and more, can the new camera
photograph ; but now it is high time to describe the
instrument itself.
Fig. 1 represents the exterior of the machine camera,
which is simply a box with a lens attached, and has
also a winch handle
protruding at the
back. Its exterior
dimensions are 8 in.
by 9in. by 9^ in.
Mr. Alortimer Evans
has recently improved
upon this, by making
a modified form of
the instrument for
popular rather than
scientific use ; this
smaller camera is
little larger than a
“ kodak,” and will
take a hundred consecutive pictures by the turning
of a handle.
Fig. 2, on next page, represents the working parts
of the larger instrument as seen from above, and Fig. 3
the working parts of the machine camera as seen from
below.
Messrs. Greene and Evans provide a main shaft,
which is actuated by a winch turned by hand. To
this shaft are attached wheel work and counter shafts,
158
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
by which the whole apparatus is driven. The rotation
of the shaft pays out the prepared film, and places it
in position to receive the photographic impression, in
which it is automatically exposed to the action of light.
The light is then cut off, and the exposed fnm, which
was motionless at the instant of exposure, is passed on,
and wound on a receiving roller on the lower part of
the machine. The pictures continue to be taken so
long as the main shaft is rotated, and so long as any
film remains to be paid out. The inventors wind a
long roll on one of the spindles or countershafts,
and this spindle is so arranged that ns it rotates
it pays out the film as fast as necessary. To
another spindle the free end of the film is attached,
and by suitable arrangement the second countershaft
is caused to rotate in a reversed direction, and to wind
up the film.
Between the two rollers is arranged an exposure
screen conveying the sensitive film to the rolling-up
shaft, and when on this exposure screen, the film is
subjected to the action of the uncovered lens.
As both the paying-out and rolling-up rollers have
a continuous motion communicated to them by the
driven shaft, and as it is desirous that the film, during
its exposure to the light, should be at rest, an arrange-
ment to effect this is provided as follows, and this is
the cleverest part of the invention : — Immediately
beyond the exposure screen, and between it and the
up- winding roller, is an intermittently-acting drum of
such diameter or circumference as that each turn
thereof will take up and roll forward the exact amount
of film required for each picture ; in passing this film
forward, the drum also draws into the exposure
position a fresh length of film ready to be exposed.
To effect this intermittent motion, the aforesaid drum
has a single, long escapement tooth, which, when the
drum is not in motion, rests on the cylindrical surface
of a slotted pinion, which gears into, and is driven by,
the main shaft with a continuous motion. The slot in
this pinion is so arranged that once only during each
revolution of the pinion does it allow the escape tooth
to pass, and when this occurs, the drum, under the
action of a driving spring, with which it is provided,
makes one full turn, when the escape-
ment tooth, coming round again, rests
on the cylindrical portion of the slotted
pinion as before. The spindle on which
the drum revolves also gears into, and
is driven with a uniform motion from,
the main shaft, and to this shaft is
attached the one end of a coiled spring,
the other end of which is fixed to the
inner circumference of the drum itself.
As the spindle revolves, this spring
winds up, and, on the release of the
escape tooth and drum, the spring un-
winds, carrying both the drum and
escape tooth with it. Then the film is
passed forward between the winding
and unwinding rollers at this point
only, with the necessary intermittent
motion. The constant uniform motion
of the paying out spindle as it unwinds,
causes a certain uniform length of the
film to pass forward towards the ex-
posure screen, when it collects into a
kind of loop in readiness for use. It
cannot, however, pass into the position
of actual exposure until that portion of
the film occupying such position has
been withdrawn. As soon, however,
as the detent tooth attached to the drum
escapes through the slot in the pinion,
the drum makes a single revolution, and in so doing
both removes the exposed film from the screen,
and, at the same time, draws a loop of fresh film which
has been gathering, into the exposed position, and, at
the same time, passes forward the already exposed
film into the form of another loop in readiness to be
wound up on the winding roller. The latter is provided
with a similar uniform continuous motion, from the
main shaft in the paying out roller, and proceeds
gradually to wind up the loop, so that the loop is
wholly taken up by the time the escape tooth again
rotates, when a fresh loop of film is passed forward.
The shutter for exposing the film to the action of
light is made in two portions, each provided with an
aperture or slot, which in one position only allows the
light from the lens to pass, and it is only by this
simultaneous action of these two shutters — that is, when
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
159
the apertures in each coincide at a given moment — that
any action of light on the film can take place. One
portion of this shutter is caused to revolve with a
uniform motion as it is driven from the main shaft ;
the other portion is worked by a rocker, or slide,
actuated by a cam ; to this latter portion of the shutter
is attached a spring, with a tension screw to regulate
its speed of action. In this way the duration of
exposure is rendered entirely independent of the speed
of the driving shaft, because by the turning of this
screw a somewhat longer or shorter exposure within
limits can be ensured, whatever the number of expo-
sures per minute may be. The moment the aperture
in the revolving shutter comes into position with the
lens, the cam lets the sliding shutter go, and by means
of its attached spring the aperture in the sliding shutter
also crosses, and the exposure is effected. The action
of this shutter is so arranged that each exposure occurs
simultaneously with the “ at rest ” position of the drum,
escape tooth, and the film on the exposed screen.
Mr. Friese Greene thinks this machine camera to be
likely to be useful for military purposes. For instance,
several of them might be employed, driven by any
suitable motive power, to automatically photograph
the leading features of a battle. Some years ago he
exhibited to the Photographic Society a little optical
lantern which cast four pictures in succession upon the
screen, and, before the one was quite removed, the
next was superimposed ; thus he showed the change
of a countenance from grave to gay, and the very
motions of the skin of the face could be seen, without
the presence of any of the unpleasant “jerkiness”
incidental to a series of pictures automatically projected
by apparatus made on the old-fashioned principle. In
Mr. Greene’s lantern demonstration, colour gradually
came into the moving face and into the dress, because
he had washed different parts of the portrait on the
slide with various “ sympathetic inks,” as they are
called, consisting of suitable solutions of cobaltic and
other salts. The heat of the lantern caused the
colours to come out. Mr. Greene stated to the meeting
that the lantern had been invented by an acquaintance
of his in the west of England. By an improvement
upon that lantern, now in course of manufacture,
Mr. Greene hopes to be able to reproduce upon the
screen, by means of photographs taken with his
machine camera, street scenes full of life and motion ;
also to represent a man making a speech, with all the
changes in his countenance, and, at the same time, to
give the speech itself in the actual tones of the man’s
voice by means of a loud-speaking phonograph.
A camera is, it is said, among the presents with which
Miss Amy Fowler has left New York for Molokai ; she has also
received gifts of 2,200 dollars, a type-writer, piano, and music.
Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association. — The
executive have, we are informed, decided on holding in 1891
another large photographic exhibition. At their club rooms
the exhibition of Mr. H. P. Robinson’s pictures will close to-day.
Over 1,200 visitors, it is said, have attended. The work of Mr.
Harry Tolley will be the next feature at the Liverpool
rooms,
THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
VII.
Dr. Thomas Yocng’s Discoveries and Photographs.
On the 24th of November, 1803, Young delivered the
Bakerian lecture of the Royal Society, and in the memoir
published in The Philosophical Transactions of 1804, ho
records how he photographed Newton’s rings, so that
he had his share in some of the photographic work
which Wedgwood originated at the Royal Institution.
The following are his own words on the subject, copied
from the original printed memoir, for in this series of
articles we are careful to doal only, wherever possible,
with the oldest records extant, and not to quote at
second-hand from books of later date ; thus the chance
of error is reduced to a minimum. He says : —
“ The existence of solar rays accompanying light,
more refrangible than the violet rays, was first ascer-
tained by Mr. Ritter : but Dr. Wollaston made the same
experiments a very short time afterwards, without
having been informed of what had been done on the
Continent. These rays appear to extend beyond the
violet rays of the prismatic spectrum, through a space
nearly equal to that which is occupied by the violet-
In order to complete the comparison of their pro-
perties with those of visible light, I was desirous of
examining the effect of their reflection from a thin
plate of air, capable of producing the well-known
rings of colours. For this purpose, I formed an
image of the rings, by means of the solar microscope,
with the apparatus which I have described in the
Journals of the Royal Institution, and I threw this
image on paper dipped in a solution of nitrate of silver,
placed at the distance of about nine inches from the
microscope. In the course of an hour, portions of
three dark rings were very distinctly visible, much
smaller than the brightest rings of the coloured
image, and coinciding very nearly in, their dimensions,
with the rings of violot light that appeared upon the
interposition of violet glass. I thought the dark
rings were a little smaller than the violet rings, but
the difference was not sufficiently great to be accurately
ascertained ; it might be as much as -sV or of the
diameters, but not greater. It is the less surprising
that the difference should be so small, as the dimen-
sions of the coloured rings do not by any means vary
at the violet end of the spectrum, so rapidly as at the
red end. For performing this experiment with very
great accuracy, a heliostato would be necessary, since
the motion of the sun causes a slight change in the
place of the image ; and leather, impregnated with
the muriate of silver, would indicate the effect with
greater delicacy. The experiment, however, in its
present state, is sufficient to complete the analogy of
the invisible with the visible rays, and to show that
they are equally liable to the general law which is the
principal subject of this Paper. If we had ther-
mometers sufficiently delicate, it is probable that we
might acquire, by similar means, information still more
interesting, with respect to the rays of invisible heat
discovered by Dr, Herschel ; but at present there is
1G0
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
great reason to doubt of tbe practicability of such an
experiment.”
In the first volume of The Journals of the Royal
Institution , London, 1802, pp. 241-45, is Vouug’s
description of his arrangement for photographing
Newton’s rings by means of the solar microscope.
Newton had observed that the colours are more vivid
when a plate of a rarer medium is interposed between
two denser mediums. Young thought the apparent
difference to be due to the quantity of diffused light
present, and, to remove this foreign light, he employed
one glass in the form of a prism, and coated the lower
surface of the other with black sealing-wax. The light
reflected by the oblique surface of the first was thus
thrown in another direction, and the reflection of the
inferior surface of the second was so reduced that it
could be disregarded. In fact, this device of Young’s
is the same in principle as that sold by opticians at the
present day to produce Newton’s rings.
The most perfectly plane glass Young could obtain
was that used in Hadley’s quadrants, one side of which
he had ground, so that the plate became a thin wedge ;
the surface of the lens employed was a portion of a
sphere of from five to ten feet radius. The glasses
were thick, as they had to sustain considerable pressure,
which was applied by means of three screws. For
adjusting the glasses to the microscope, he fixed them
in a cylinder, so that they could be easily turned “ so
as to reflect the light coming from the speculum into
the direction of the axis of the microscope : it is obvious
that in this case they must be somewhat inclined to
the light, so that the focus of the whole image will
never be equally perfect ; and, instead of being circular
like the rings themselves, their images on the screen
will be oval.”
In one of his experiments he placed a prism a few
feet from the microscope, and cut off most of the image
of the lings by means of a diaphragm with a central
slit in it, whereby he was enabled on the screen to
analyse the light of the different rings. Young said,
as other Royal Institution lecturers have often said
after him, that “ the colours of thin plates, as seen by
transmission, are also easily exhibited in the solar
microscope ; but since it is utterly impossible to exclude
the very great proportion of the light which is not
concerned in their formation, they never appear so
brilliant as the colours seen by reflection.”
Photography and Electioneering. — A daily paper says that,
at a political meeting on Saturday last, the crowd gathered
together “ had more than verbal eloquence to speak to them,
for, by the aid of a series of limelight pictures, the chief
features of Balfourism in Ireland weie illustrated. Mr. Har-
mer, of the Home Rule Union, gave graphic little descriptions
of the scenes and incidents represented, and the whole lecture
was a highly useful object lesson to the large number of electors
present. The magic lantern ought to be requisitioned for the
rest of the campaign. Judging by its stirring effect on Satur-
day it would prove a very powerful ally to the speeches of the
coming week and more. Those who see it will remember that,
though orators may be accused of exaggeration, a photograph
does not lie,”
AN OLD PHOTOGRAPH BOOK.
Only .an old photograph book, found in the dusty lumber
closet of an old country cottage, when the death of the
farmer tenant has suddenly introduced strange faces into the
old home, and necessitated an examination of the property
of which the deceased in legal language stood possessed.
The deceased stands no longer ; he lies now in the village
churchyard, possessing nothing, but among sundry articles
which erst belonged to him, is found, with his name care-
fully and laboriously written in a vignette, on the title
page, an old photograph book. Let us look at it before it
is cast aside as rubbish. For who can tell with what soli-
citude this book wras once preserved ? May it not contain
the portraits of his parents, his wife in the days when
she was his sweetheart, the young woman he kept com-
pany with, the one woman in all the world for him ; her
portrait and the portrait of her children ? Of Homer’s
heroes we know nothing but the name, either of Trojans
or well -greaved Greeks, of Antiloclius or Ablerus, of Lei-
tus or Phylacus, of Eurypylus or Melauthius, of Poly-
poetes or Astyalus, of Teucer or the divine Aretaon.
The sixth book of the Iliad gives the names of these com-
batants and of many others — the names and nothing more,
save the distinction between the conqueror and the
conquered, the slayer aud the slain. It is all one in some
of our most important Biblical genealogies ; we know that
Matthew' records that Eliakim begat Azor, and Azor begat
Sadoc, and Sadoc begat Achirn, and Achim begat Eliud ;
but how little do we know of Eliud, or of Achim, or of
their progenitors ?
Our old photograph book can do more for us than the
great Epic poet or the Evangelist. Therein, as in a
Nigaristan, or silent Valhalla, we see in their habits, as
they lived, the family and the friends, humble folk, the
common delf of human kind, which, so many years ago,
made merry or mourned with them on summer afternoons
and in the winter fire-light in the old and now deserted
cottage home.
Photography, like the grave, has, in one respect,
made the poor and the rich equal. Formerly, it was only
the wealthy who could hand down conventional present-
ments of themselves to their descendants. The labours
of Gainsborough aud Reynolds, and of many succeeding
portrait painters and miniaturists, demanded a hire far
beyond the capacity of the poor little purses of the poor.
Nor has the present, in this respect only, an advantage
over the past. Phoebus is an artist who cannot flatter.
But all this is by way of preface to our book — our old
book of photographs. It is of the common almost cubical
shape, with the embossed leather covers, and the metal
clasps long ago oxidised into a rusty green.
A pleasing feature in this old photograph book, which
is observable also in other books of the same nature, is
the subordination of the private to the public, of love to
loyalty, of the ties of kindred to the exigencies of caste.
The first portrait we meet is that of Her Most Gracious
Majesty. She looks, however, neither happy nor glorious ;
the carte, like most of those in the book, is considerably
faded, and suggests a suspicion of a reproduction from
a positive, a branch of dishonest piracy. Next after Her
Majesty follows in stereotyped and toast-like succession the
photograph of the Prince and Princess of Wales. This
was evidently taken just after their marriage, when they
were both young and fresh in this grey w'orld. The pic-
ture of their life’s spring is presented to us by Ghemar
February 28, 1890.]
TIIE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEAVS.
161
Fnres, Photographes du Hoi, Bruxelles. The Prince lias
a slim appearance, with an abundance of curly locks.
The Princess wears her hair in a net, .and is encased in a
crinoline which occupies fully one half of the carte. She
leans on the Prince in what is doubtless intended to repre-
sent an affectionate attitude, with her hands lightly
touching his omoplates, but the impression produced on
the non-artistic eye is that she is taking his measure for
a coat, and observing with interest the narrowness of his
shoulders. After these portraits, succeed in due order
portraits we may suppose of the rustic family, and portraits
of their friends. I5ut .all of them suffer from the same
disability. Whether from rural nervousness, or a deter-
mination to follow the prevailing fashion, they are,
without exception, unable to stand alone. One lady,
to save herself apparently from falling, clasps spas-
modically, and with both hands, as a drowning man is
proverbially supposed to clutch at a straw, the back
of an antique, elaborately carved chair, such a chair as
we might hope to meet in an old baronial hall, but would
certainly never expect to find in a country cottage.
Another lady of more mature age, and therefore, perhaps,
of a more sedate and pious turn of mind, rests one hand on
a portion of what appears to be a sepulchral monument,
or the construction of a tomb, lacking, indeed, nothing
but the usual “ Here lies,’’ to complete the resemblance.
Several gentlemen who have evidently doffed the rustic
blouse and assumed their suit of Sunday black for the
occasion, place a weather-beaten hand, accustomed to
drive the plough, on a portion — usually supported by one
leg — of a chiffonier or bureau, which exhibits such
exquisite wood carving as reminds us of the work of
Grinling Gibbons, to be seen at Chatsworth and St.
Paul's. Ladies and gentlemen alike, who, even with
the assistance above mentioned, are yet wholly
unable to maintain that erect position which is
supposed to be the privilege of humanity, are
represented seated, usually with a table on which
a vase of flowers is commonly placed by their
side. If the sitter be a gentleman, the table not
infrequently supports his hat, which he is, apparently —
like the nervous member of a club, who will not make use
of the hat-stand in that case made and provided —
extremely anxious should not for a moment be out of his
sight. The old photographic chair is rarely of the
ordinary pattern; it is either of the ancient, high-backed,
intricately turned style, or of that style which is termed
rustic, and supposed to be suitable to a country landscape.
The sitter is evidently uncomfortable in it, but his dis-
comfort we may hope is mitigated by the elegance of his
surroundings. In the background on one side of him is a
marble column ; on the other, a curtain of deftly- worked
tapestry. Through a window appears a view of gardens,
such as might have belonged to the chateau of a French
marquis. What can a man desire more ?
All these portraits of rustic men and maidens have pre-
cedence over such distinguished statesmen and humani-
tarians as Lord Derby and Mrs. Fry, who follow mixed up
with such unlikely companions in real life as Agnes
Willoughby and Tom Sayers. This confusion of persons in
our old photograph book reminds us of that democratic
disregard of rank, that supreme negligence of order
of any kind, which prevails in our. National Portrait
Gallery (free) of the present day — the stationer’s
shop window — where gaping crowds are delighted at one
View with such discordant elements of the social fabric
as Nellie Farren and Lord Napier, Sandow and Damiens,
the Due d'Orleans and Lilley Langtry, Mr. Chamber-
lain and Miss Lctty Lind, and the Bishop of Manchester
and Miss Mabel Love. Our old photograph book con-
cludes with such accidental varieties — comets in this
system, padding in this magazine — as a fat baby, with
“ ketchy-wetchy,” or some other infantile language,
probably alone intelligible to the mother and the monthly
nurse, printed beneath it ; one or two landscapes of moor
and fell ; a display of architecture (most likely the village
high street) ; two dwarfs, male and female, propped up by
two chairs, the former holding a hat which, from its
undue prominence, is big enough to cover much more
than his head ; and on the last two pages, two Welsh-
women, each with her conical and hideous head gear,
each with her coloured apron, and each with her parti-
cular umbrella.
More than a quarter of a century ago, Schubert, a
painter of Berlin, laid down some rules for posture in
taking portraits. Of these, more than one rule survives
still. For example, the rule which, embodied in the
form of a direction, was once almost invariably heard
by the person who wished a portrait taken as soon
as the camera was suitably adjusted. “Let,” we may
suppose the photographer saying to the originals of
the portraits in our old photograph book, “let your
position be easy and unconstrained ” — and here was
the rub, or the beginning thereof. They tried,
doubtless, their best to throw themselves into a careless
degage' attitude, but their efforts were not crowned with
success. “ Oh, dear me ! ” we can imagine the artist saying,
“this will never do; your feet are too forward ; your hands
are not sufficiently drawn back. This hand,” he takes it
with all due delicacy, “should rest on the side table thus,
clasping this book thus ; ” he suits his action to his word,
introducing the hand to the well-worn volume, and steps
back the ligitimate number of paces to watch the effect.
“ No,” he says with a puzzled expression, having arranged the
matter, as he conceives, satisfactorily; “no, this won't do !
The thumb should be shown in the foreground, and the
fingers should be bent more inwards ; yes, and you must
show more of the back of yonr hand. ” They conscientiously
endeavoured — this rustic company — to follow out, so far
as they understood them, these varied directions, not
without some danger of a sprained muscle, owing to such
unusual contortions, and achieved finally, after effort, what
they hoped was a successful result. But they were doomed
to disappointment. “No,” says the photographer, “ no,”
adding with a vexed air, “ Didn’t I begin by suggesting to
you that your position should be easy and unconstrained?
and,” as one of the martyr band glances at the professional
behind his apparatus, “ pray don’t look at the camera ” (or,
as he probably called it, the apparatus) ; “it will tend to
impart to your face an expression in the highest degree
dolorous and dissatisfied.” The martyr thinks at once
how well such a photograph would express his feelings, but
is unwilling to follow the example of Oliver Cromwell, who
charged young Lely to paint him as he was, with all
his pimples, warts, protuberances, and other deformities,
and, failing this, threatened not to pay him for his picture
a single farthing, and so directs his wearied glance to the
door, perhaps thinking in this evil moment of suddenly
making his escape. “ That is quite right,” murmurs the
photographer; “the position of the eyes is excellent, and
now please call up a ‘ pleasant ’ look.”
Alas! this “pleasant” look and this “easy and un-
162
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
constrained” position— seemingly so simple, practically
so difficult. A few only, a very few, of these old
portraits have successfully managed both. The pleasant
look has lapsed far too often into a fatuous simper,
or, in cases where we may suppose the sitter's patience
has been supremely tried, into a stern scowl of Spartan
endurance, or even a truculent expression of internecine
hatred ; the easy and unconstrained position has become
so strange and forced an attitude that it communicates
a feeling of discomfort even to the casual spectator,
and makes him wish that the hands especially had been
hidden in the sitter's pockets, or anywhere out of the pic-
ture, instead of being ruthlessly brought to the front by
that favourite old photographic expedient of a book, a table,
or a high-backed chair.
SUtnarjj Xottrc,
Sun Artists, No. II. ( Kegan Paul, Trench, and Co.,
London.)
The second number of this excellent quarterly periodical
— just published, although dated January — contains some
good photo-mechanical reproductions of four of Mr.
II. P. Robinson’s photographs, namely, “Carolling,”
“ A Merry Tale,” “Dawn and Sunset,” and “When the
Day’s Work is Done.” It also contains an article by
Mr. Andrew Pringle upon Mr. II. P. Robinson and his
works. Mr. Pringle says: “Mr. Robinson was born in
1830 at the pretty little town of Ludlow, in Shropshire.
Art seems to have claimed him for her own at a very early
period of his life, for he ‘ cannot remember the time when
he was not drawing. ’ ” He also says : “ The greatest
service that Mr. Robinson has rendered to photography
has been, in our opinion, his bringing under our notice,
in an orderly and categorical way, many of the principles
which guide artists in their work. It is hopeless to argue
that art has no rules.”
Last week a newspaper adversely criticised the prints
issued in this number of Sun Artists, and expressed the
opinion that Mr. Robinson would not like them. He has,
however, written a letter expressing his thorough approval
of them.
Mr. W. Arthur Boord is the honorary editor of Sun
Artists, and the periodical is a credit both to him and the
printers and publishers.
The Photographic Society. — The Manchester Courier of
February 13th published the following paragraph about the
recent dinner of the Photographic Society, written by its
London correspondent, who was among the guests: — “The
Photographic Society of Great Britain has celebrated its annual
dinner at the Cafd ltoyal, Regent Street, under the chairman-
ship of its President, Mr. James Glaisher, F.R.S., and was
remarkable for the varied races and conditions of men, and of
the regions of the earth which it represented. Persons from
nearly every quarter of the globe met together on the common
ground of devotion to the science and art of photography.
On the chairman's right hand, for instance, sat Mr. Chang, of
the Cliinese Embassy, a member of nearly all the photographic
societies in London, and whose speciality is the production of
pictures by magnesium flash-light. On Mr. Chang’s right
hand, again, sat Mr. Leon Warnerke, a Russian artist, founder
of the Photographic Societies of Moscow and St. Petersburg,
in which latter capital he inaugurated the first photographic
exhibition. This was visited by the Emperor and his family,
and won for its promoter the Order of St. Stanislas.”
AN INSTITUTE OF PHOTOGRAPHY.*
BY G. LINDSAY JOHNSON, SLA., M.B., B.SC., F.R.C.S.
Some months ago a notable sale of photographic relics in
connection with Daguerre, Talbot, and other fathers of
heard of it, I wrote a letter to the Society urging them to
do what they could to collect sufficient money to purchase
the collection for the Society. Many of the members sent
cheques, but notwithstanding, the scheme fell through, and
the collection was distributed, a portion going to the
Museum at Bath. Now, as we arc told to-night that the
Society is likely to be turned out from its present home,
the future will have to be discussed.
As far as I can see at present the position is this : — A
museum and collection of photographic materials and
views is a scheme which has been received with more or
less approval by the Society. To attain this object three
ways appear open : either to get a permanent building, or
at least a suite of rooms of our own to arrange them in, or
we must place ourselves in the hands of the Directors of
the South Kensington Museum, or the Imperial Institute.
This latter scheme would certainly be financially the
easiest, as I am (unofficially) informed the Government
would probably be disposed to grant a suite of rooms to
the Society in return for equivalent benefits on our side.
On the other hand, Kensington is too far from the majority
of the members to be altogether desirable. The Institute
would not be finished for eighteen months or more. A
more central place near Charing Cross would doubtless
meet the views of the majority; but the scheme that would
comprise a building in the City must fall through unless
we can gain the support of the City magnates. Before
February I hope to have sufficiently sounded several
influential City men to be able to form an idea how far
they would lend their aid.
The third and last way would be to endeavour to come
to some arrangement with an Institute like the School of
Mines or Society of Arts ; but here again the question
arises (apart from the feasibility of the scheme, which is
also open to question) whether the sacrifice of individuality
is not too high a price to pay for the benefits to be gained.
It is clear the Goventment will only help us just as far as
it can see an immediate advantage or return for so doing.
It is also clear that anything in the nature of a permanent
collection can only be obtained when we have already a
place of our own to arrange it in.
Now, a building suitable for the purpose would cost far
more money than the resources of the Society can hope to
reach, even if we abandon the scheme I proposed to you
of having an institution where the higher branches of art
photography can be taught and practised, as well as origi-
nal researches conducted.
How arc we to get these necessary funds, for I con-
sider, at a rough guess, that at least £10,000 or £15,000
would be required for the mere building, apart from the
ground value ? It seems to me the only practical way will
be to try to convince the leading men in the City that
the Institute and Society will be of permanent value to the
City of London. Considering the fact that almost every
branch of art and science is enriched by the aid of photo-
graphy, and that newspapers, books, and literature gene-
* A paper read before the Photographic Society, and entitled by its
author, “ A Scheme for the Formation and Establishment of a Central
Institute of Photography in Connection with the Photographic Society of
Great Britain.”
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
163
rally, not to speak of calico printing and pottery, is becom-
ing daily more and more dependent on it, it may be
possible to receive much of the support we want from this
source. Much has been done in other directions to en-
courage us. There is the proposed Battersea Polytechnic,
under the management of Mr. Spicer and his colleagues.
Here the public has supplied more than £150,000 demanded
by the Charity Commissioners as a condition of their pro-
viding a like sum. The Goldsmiths’ Company are provid-
inga magnificent budding at their own expense. There are
besides the People’s Palace, the Birkbeck Institution,
the llegent Street Polytechnic, and the Guilds’ Institute
in Finsbury. This shows that the public are not averse to
giving their support to such objects.
I, for one, would like to see the Society raised from the
position of a mere debating club, relieved by an annual
soiree and exhibition, to a permanent institution like the
Society of Arts, where not only could the trophies of our
art be exhibited to an admiring public, but where daily
instruction in every department of photography, including
the mechanical processes, could be given under suitable in-
structors, and where, moreover, asm the Royal Institution,
a complete laboratory could be at the disposal of members
who were desirous of pursuing original research.
I am aware that such a scheme borders on the visionary,
but something is surely needed to supply the wants of a
properly organised Photographic Technical Institute.
Both France and Germany have had them for some years.
We, as usual, are behindhand. I admit that in neither
country is the institute a part of a photographic society,
and I see no reason why it should not be connected with it.
If people, in reply, say we have no need for it, or such
a scheme is without precedent, I could at once point to the
•‘Apothecaries’ Ilall,” to the building of the Pharma-
ceutical Society, to the School of Mines, or, to giye a better
example, the Royal College of Surgeons, which, on a large
scale, comprises everything that I ask for — classes,
lectures, practical instruction, reading room, laboratory,
museum, and meetings. As in a Law Court when suing a
company for damages, it is perhaps better to ask for too
much than too little, and although the scheme may
evaporate down to a smaller nucleus by asking for too
much, I do not think we shall get too little. If the scheme
is too premature to be appreciated by the general public
at present — although I think you will agree with me it is
more practical than, say, the Channel Tunnel — we may be
assured of one thing, that photography is progressing by
such leaps and bounds that a scheme which appears pre-
posterous now will, in a few years, become a necessity, and
by our taking the chief rule on the stage we may hope to
claim the privilege of leading the way.
I can only hope the Council will be induced to take the
matter up, and not to give up working until we have suc-
ceeded in establishing an institution which shall be a model
to other countries. With regard to this matter, I have
been at some trouble to try to feel the pulse of the
public. I have seen several members of the County Coun-
cil, the Common Council, and I have also interviewed
several prominent men in the City of London, and with
scarcely an exception 1 have had a most favourable and
encouraging ear lent to me, and have received promisesfrom
several that, if they saw that others would fall in with the
idea, they themselves would be only too willing to help.
If we find it impossible to accomplish the above scheme,
I do not think it altogether impossible to procure a flat in
some accessible part of the city which should comprise
at least one large room which could be used for exhibi-
tion purposes, soirees, and the like, and the results
of our art could be shown, and two smaller rooms, one
of which could be used as a library and tea room, a
committee room, and a cloak room. A double room
attached would naturally be a great convenience.
I may add that there are some suitable buildings and
flats to be seen about Shaftesbury Avenue, which the
Committee might deem it worth their while to enquire
into. There is no doubt, in my opinion, that a per-
manent building would greatly raise the character of the
Society in the eyes of the public, and, in consequence,
raise its income.
From Royalty downwards the public have always a
great weakness for photographs and photogravures, and
even if the support of the City Guilds so fell to the
ground, I cannot help thinking that an energetic appeal
to the public coming from the Council and members of
the Photographic Society, and backed up by the Press,
who are depending more and more every day upon pho-
tography to illustrate their sheets, would answer, for we
have only to compare the number of illustrations obtained
by means of photography in the daily papers, with the
occasional illustrations which now and then, as a kind of
phenomenon, appeared in journals as a wonderful exhibition.
Illustrations are becoming a sine qua non if a book now-
adays is to sell at all ; the knowledge of that fact cannot
fail to have influence with the public. But if the public
are sufficiently interested to prefer inferior papers only
illustrated with miserable daubs, who can doubt that a per-
manent gallery adorned with the choicest works of art
drawn from all parts of the civilised world, will not fail to
cause a continual attraction to the public ?
This is not the time to enter into details. My object
is to sec whether it would not be possible for us to pass
some resolution in furtherance of the purpose in view. I
might say 1 have been making enquiries with regard to
the Imperial Institute in .South Kensington, and have
spoken to Sir Henry Roscoe and several other prominent
gentlemen in connection with the Institute, and I have been
assured by them that it is not improbable, if the council
were to meet certain members of the Government, assist-
ance might be received in connection with South Ken-
sington. A member of the Common Council, who is very
enthusiastic on the idea of a central institute in London,
told me that he thought if we got a sketch plan of
the building, such as would be suitable, and brought it to
the Common Council, together with an estimate of the
cost, that it would be favourably considered, and pos-
sibly the money might be forthcoming. Another gen-
tleman suggested that we might have a building or a por-
tion of a building in London, where we might have a sort
of gallery of photographs and photographic materials
drawn from all sources, and to which we might invite pho-
tographers to send works which had gained prizes, for
exhibition on the walls. There is also a possibility that wo
might get a loan exhibition from the works at South
Kensington placed upon the walls. Thus, while we have
the exhibition here, we might have the technical part
going on at South Kensington. But whatever decision
is come to, it must be arrived at speedily, because our
lease has run out, and we shall be without a place of
meeting at all. Therefore, I would ask whether it would
not be wise to raise a little enthusiasm in the public mind,
and get some money together so as to procure a room
which we might call our own, and where wc could do
104
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
what we like. We find that various technical institutes
are growing up like mushrooms in and around London ;
and we ought to do our best to bring forward some practi-
cal scheme which would benefit the Society and photo-
graphy generally.
A PRINTING MACHINE OF THE FUTURE.
To-day wc give the first precise public description of a
machine camera, rumours about which have interested
photographers on both sides of the Atlantic for some months.
Our idea is, that the chief value of the machine, or of a
modification thereof, may hereafter be found to be in a
direction not contemplated by the inventors — at least,
they have said nothing to us on the point — namely, in the
printing of positives for book illustration, and as another
step beyond that taken by Mr. Uric, in the direction of
printing newspapers by photography. Years ago, by a
kind of prophetic instinct, one of the greatest inventors of j
daily newspaper printing machines, opined that perhaps
photography would hereafter be the successful competitor j
in such work.
The machine of Messrs. Greene and Evans, depicted j
in another column, will take from five to ten or even more
impressions in a second, according to the rapidity with [
which the handle is turned, and Mr. Greene says that one
can be made to give a large additional number of exposures
if necessary. In positive printing through a negative, the
amount of light can be made to vastly exceed that present
in the photographing of street views, so the limit to speed,
especially with improved machines as yet unborn, is at i
present beyond calculation.
One can imagine the possibility of a practically endless
band of paper being covered with some sensitive prepara- j
tiou as it unrolls, then passing on to the exposure plat- 1
form, and afterwards into devevoping and fixing baths.
At the present speed, exposing a negative on a travelling
band three thousand times in five minutes would not be
bad work.
PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM TONING*
BY FRANK I'. PERKINS, F.l.C.
1 have observed that it is sufficient to add to a slightly
acidulated solution of platinic chloride a fragment of sodium
sulphite, and then brush the liquid over a well-washed
silver print produced on plain salted paper, for the silver
to be almost immediately displaced by platinum. This is
a simple method of “ toning ” for such as have not the
ready-formed platinous salt at hand.
1 have also noticed that a slightly acidulated solution of
palladious chloride may be used in the same way, and with
similar results.
Lantern Club. — A meeting of those interested in the for-
mation of a lantern society was held at St. James’s Hall, Upper
Regent Saloon, on Thursday the 20th, when it was decided to
form such a society, and it was resolved that it should be known
as “ 1 he Lantern Society. ” The Hon. Slingsby Bethell, of
Chelsea Lodge, Chelsea Embankment, was elected Provisional
Chairman, and Mr. T. H. Holding, 46, Chesilton Road,
Munster Park, S.W., as Secretary pro. tern., together with a
committee — to frame rules— consisting of Messrs. E. R.
Shipton, A. Mackie, G. R. Croswell, Lieut. C. E. Gladstone,
lt.N., Mr. A. R. Shophee, together with the chairman and
secretary.
This brief article from 'l he Chemical AVirj contains information
likely to be of couMtlcrable use in photography, as we krow from past ex- I
periments.— Ei>.
THE HINGES OF DARK-SLIDE SHUTTERS*
BY CHAPMAN JONES, F.l.C. , K.C.S.
The deleterious effect of the hinges of the shutters of
dark slides has often been observed, the results varying
considerably, and showing sometimes as fogging on
development, and sometimes as a loss of sensitiveness.
But I have not known until lately of a large increase of
sensitiveness produced iu this way. The dark slide in this
instance was bought second-hand ; it liatl leather hinges
to its shutters, the effect of which was rapid enough to
give a well-marked fog across plates that remained in the
slide for a few days. It was sent to Messrs. Watson and
Sons to be cured of the defect, and they replaced the
leather by the material they have specially made for this
purpose. After a few weeks, during which the back
appeared to behave in a thoroughly satisfactory manner,
it was left with plates in it for about four months, and on
a dark December afternoon they were used for making
an enlargement, and, as afterwards proved, considerably
under-exposed. One plate was developed with pyro and
sodium carbonate, and the other with eikouogen, and in
both cases that part of the plate that had been opposite
the hinge appeared as if it had received two or three
times as much exposure as the rest of the plate, but with
no tendency to fog, even on forcing the development.
The plates were about two years old when exposed.
On mentioning the matter to Messrs. Watson and Sous,
they were good enough to give me all the information they
had. They say, that having found leather not always
reliable for the hinges of dark slides, they “came to the
conclusion that some kinds of leather were dressed with
ammonia, and that when this was the case the chemical
was never thoroughly got out of it, and, therefore, when
the leather was used, it fogged the plate in the portion
that came immediately underneath it.*’ They continue,
“ We then gave lip using leather altogether, and substi-
tuted forita speciesof jean, which we have specially made for
us, exceedingly thick and strong, and since we have used
this we have had a total absence of complaints. When we
altered your slide we merely took away the old hinges and
replaced them by our new material.”
As I happened to have a plate that had been in a back
of Watson's make with hinges as described for about two
years, the plate itself about three years old, I tested it by
exposure and development, and found no sign of any
irregularity.
It is not impossible that the increase of sensitiveness
now shown is apparent only, and due to a loss of sensi-
tiveness of the plate except where the hinges are ; but
judging from the exposures given, the result on another
plate exposed at the same time, and the behaviour of the
back before the hinges were changed, I do not think this
is probable.
White DbaJ’ehy. — The weak or diluted developer, with less
pyro, is the only one 1 have ever been successful with in white
drapery. Try the slow develoi>cr once, and I feel sure you will
never use any other. It does not pay to be in a hurry in deve-
loping ; leave it until evening, when there is no danger of being
disturbed, then go slow. — IT. li. Glints.
A Photographic Society for Exeter. — A meeting to inaugu-
rate the above will be held at the New London Hotel, Exeter,
on Thursday, at 8 o’clock. Any information respecting the
proposed Society may be obtained of Rev. Jolm Sparshott,
Fairfield House, Alphington Road ; or Mr. Ernest F. C.
Dauiant, 32, Longbrook Street.
* A paper read before tfic Fhotographie Society.
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
1 ) ETECT I VE CAM E HAS.
BY C. BRANGW1N BARNES.
During the last two years there has been a continual
advertisement of so-called hand and detective cameras.
Each camera maker and dealer in photographic requisites
has been competing with the others as to which should
bring out the best. They have appeared in all shapes and
sizes, from the book camera, taking plates about 1 j inches
square, to the larger box or parcel camera, biking quarter
and half plates. Amongst the varying shapes may be
mentioned the brown papcrparcel, the leather portmanteau,
and the camera which is concealed under the waistcoat or
in a hat.
That there must be a considerable demand for these
articles goes without saying, but I fancy that the buyer
usually belongs to the amateur ranks. Most things that
are made and sold have a use, and perhaps the detective
camera has one ; but I must confess that, so far as 1 have
seen, 1 have been unable to discover it. The great dilli-
eulty seems to me to be that of obtaining a sharp negative.
If the camera is held in the hand it is very rarely that an
exposure can be made without moving the instrument, and
with the buttonhole apparatus the very motion of the
chest caused by breathing is sufficient to give a blurred
image, to say nothing of the necessary pull at the cord
that releases the shutter. I am myself the happy possessor
of one of the latter description, but it came to me in the
shape of a prize in a literary competition, for l certainly
should never have bought one. A cheap detective camera
of the buttonhole class has recently been introduced, and
in the advertisement recording its various and manifold
merits the following passage occurs: — “Can be used on
the promenade, in liw courts, churches, awl railway car-
riages, also in braidi of promise and divorce cases — in fact, at
all awkward moments when least expected. The- artful
maiden, the wily detective, the wronged wife, will now be
collecting evidence. The bad boy will levy blackmail
upon his sisters by illustrating family squabbles instead of
angelic sweetness, and happiness will be within the reach of
allf
Now every photographer of any experience must be
aware that this is mostly “ highfalutin,” as “law courts and
churches " are not usually such abodes of light as to ren-
der the production of a shutter negative a possibility,
although the advertisement goes on to inform us that
“ every negative is a perfect gem,” and I must confess to
being somewhat cynical as to the universal happiness which
is to be effected by the means of the detective camera
when used for the purpose of levying blackmail by the bad
boy of the family. We arc further informed that the
camera “ works the same in fog or rain,” that “ no move-
ment is too quick for it — the racehorse at greatest speed,
the flight of birds, or the lightning flash itself.”
The Paul Pry character of the detective camera is, in
my opinion, one of its greatest drawbacks, although we are
well aware that we must bike a grain — nay, a whole drachm
— of salt with most of the wondrous tales that are told
as to what has been done. In the hands of a true gentle-
man or lady the camera would not be out of place, but I
certainly object to it in the possession of the “artful
maiden ” or the “ bad boy.” Seriously speaking, I fancy
that the hand camera can be made of far more utility if
stood down for exposure. A parcel would attract no more
attention if placed on a window-sill, or any convenient rest-
ing place, for a moment or so. than it would in the hand,
1(35
and it would certainly give the operator a much better
chance of obtaining a fair result. The main advantage
of the detective camera lies in the fact of its having a fixed
focus, as it enables one to transfer to the photographic
plate many things that he would never get the chance of
doing if he had to set up an ordinary camera and go through
the operations of focussing and exchanging the focussing
screen for the dark slide. This renders it especially suit-
able for animal photography, and during the coming summer
I hope to obtain some pictures of deer and cattle by its
means.
For indoor work, the small lens puts one at a disadvan-
tage, unless a time exposure can be given, and that of
course does away with the secrecy of the business. On
the whole, I do not think that the introduction is an uu-
mixed advantage. The sporting papers have lately been
printing much about photographing the finishes of races,
but the time which would have to necessarily be wasted in
developing operations would undoubtedly prevent the
camera ever taking the place of the judge’s eye in deciding
which horse was the winner, added to which it would be
very unpleasant for the judge to give a verdict in favour
of one horse, and the plate, when developed, to reverse it.
The usual run of detective cameras would be far too small
j for this class of work, as the negatives would have to be
enlarged, especially in the case of a very close finish. One
paper goes so far as to state that, in its opinion, there
never was a genuine dead-heat run yet, and that if a photo-
graph had been taken of, say, the Derby finish between
Harvester and St. Gatien, the owner of one of the pair
would have taken all the stakes instead of half. If some
enterprising experimentalist can discover a method of
taking a photograph which can be shown immediately, a
nice little fortune awaits him on the race course ; but until
that desirable consummation is arrived at, 1 am afraid
Judge Robinson will not be deprived of his berth by the
detective or any other camera.
Warming Solutions. - Snne professionals as well as amateurs
are troubled at this time of the year to obtaiu sufficient density
in their negatives, and it is owing to the coldness of the solutions,
plates and pans, which they may not think of as the cause.
By warming them this difficulty is overcome. A dark room and
all its contents should be constantly kept at au even and warm
temperature. Mr. S. Wing says that he remembers a season of
unusual success in getting line results, in a room where a
chimney passed up directly through his darkroom, and his silver
bath was placed close to this chimney, which was uniformly
warm all through the cold weather. Better work he never
performed, and he gives the chimney due credit for its valuable
assistance. — Boston Photographic Review.
Edmond V. Boissdnas. — Anthony's Photographic Bulletin
records the death of this photographer on January 25th, of typhoid
fever, after a short illness, and at the early age of twenty-seven
and a-half years. Mr. Cramer, with whom the deceased had
been associated since last spring, says of him : “He was a young
man of remarkable talent, rare abilities, and a highly honourable
character — a worthy son of his father, who gave the name
Boissonas a world-spread reputation amongst photographers.
His sudden death will bo one more great bereavement to his
family, and particularly to his aged mother, the father having
died one year ago.” “ His greatest achievements,” says the
Bulletin, “ were in the line of orthochromatic photography ;
and we have in our posssssiou a fine series of pictures illustrating
this interesting branch of our art, that we shall treasure now
more highly siuce he who gave them will never more be able to
give us such evidences of his genius and skill.”
166
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Fkbkuary 28, 1890.
iftotfisL
The latest use of photography in medical science is
seen in a new medical publication. The author of a
paper on the peptones made some experiments as to
the power of various pepsins in digesting albumen, and,
desirous of showing his readers the results, he had the
flasks in which the experiments were made photo-
graphed, and the photographs reproduced for publication.
The pictures show the exact relation and proportion of
the various residues, and lay the experiments before
the mind in a very vivid way. The idea is a capital
one, and is capable of much expansion.
The Queen observes that there is no reason why a
lady should not establish a photographic studio in
the ordinary way of business. At present ladies are
more frequently employed as touchers up than as
operators. For touching up, fifteen to twenty-five
shillings per week is an average payment, says our
contemporary, and for specially good work thirty to
sixty weekly may be earned. These prices are pro-
bably correct, though wc doubt if the cases of ladies
earning as much as three pounds a week are suffi-
ciently numerous to encourage any one to take up
this vocation in the expectation of obtaining this
sum. The Queen recommends any lady desiring to
join the photographic profession to enter one of the
large photographic firms as a pupil or an apprentice,
as it would be quite worth while to pay a high pre-
mium to obtain the requisite training, and it would
be wiser to pay £100 for entrance into a first rate
firm than £30 to a less successful one. The Queen
has rather high notions ; we know plenty of first rate
photographers who would be glad to initiate any lady
into the mysteries of photography from the beginning
to the end for a much less sum than £100.
The most original application of luminous paint is
that described and illustrated in the Scientific American.
The illustration represents an escutcheon for keyholes,
designed to be especially convenient on closets and
chests in dark places. The escutcheon is formed with
glass, and has a concave or recessed back, to which is
applied a coat of phosphorescent paint, and this paint is
covered with a coat of cheaper or ordinary paint. The
escutcheon maybe carried by an ornamental metal or other
plate secured to the door or other surface in the ordinary
way, theshapeof the escutcheon protecting the phosphor-
escent paint. One obvious use of the luminous keyhole
the inventor discreetly omits to mention. It would
occur to everybody. A luminous keyhole on a street
door would certainly be an enormous boon to members
of festive clubs. Freemasons’ lodges, and the like. The
only drawback is that the luminous keyhole would too
publicly advertise the propensities of the householder.
Of course all invidious reflections would be done away
with if every house had a luminous keyhole, but
this is too much to hope for.
Photography is the source of a very comfortable
income to those privileged persons who, by long usage,
acquire a sort of vested interest in “ show places.”
From St. Lawrence in the Isle of Wight, the smallest
church in England, to York Minster, every ancient
building of importance furnishes work for the photo-
grapher. Fhotographs, indeed, enjoy a relation to
sacred edifices accorded to nothing else, as there are
few vergers who have not a bundle of photographs of
the cathedral to which they are attached about them,
and these they do not mind selling within the building
itself. We see no particular harm in this, but the
vergers would probably be horrified if they were asked
to sell anything else. The lowest depth of this kind
of thing seems to have been reached in Scotland, where
the Burns’ Mausoleum has been let to a grave-digger
as a shop for the sale of curiosities. The tenant pays
a small rent, and disposes of photographs and books
over the poet’s ashes. This does not look much like
reverence.
A capital use has been found for the series of photo-
graphs which the firm of Braun and Co. took of the
principal pictures in the National Gallery some two or
three years ago. Last week Dr. J. G. Fitch delivered
a lecture at the Working Men’s College on the
National Gallery, and provided himself with a series
of the photographs just named, which were placed on
a stand in view of the audience in the order mentioned
by the lecturer, and when required to illustrate his
remarks. A further development of this plan of art
instruction might be made by exhibiting lantern slides
of the pictures. Though Braun’s photographs are of a
fairly large size, they could not have been seen to advan-
tage by any of the audience save those seated on the
front benches. An image on the screen is of course
visible all over the room.
Advertisers are always sighing for new worlds to
conquer. Perhaps the tallest notion yet put forward
is that of constructing an optical lantern of sufficient
capacity to throw an image on the clouds. The inventor
proposes to use photographic lantern slides of such
objects as “You dirty boy ! ” of Pears’ soap fame, and
similar subjects. No doubt the project would be a
splendid one from an advertising point of view, but we
have strong doubts as to its feasibility. Nor does the
projector of the plan help us ; he fails to tell the world
whether he has constructed the necessary apparatus.
When this is accomplished, discussion will be possible.
At a meeting of the Chemical Society, a point inter-
esting to photographers was raised by Mr. W. Thorpe,
who remarked that people were very apt to think that
uncoloured glass was permanent, yet probably most of
the members had seen specimens which had begun their
existence colourless, yet had before long acquired an
appreciable colour. This is a common experience in
photographic studios, but is one which is apt to be
overlooked.
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
1G7
THOMAS WEDGWOOD’S EXPERIMENTS OX
LIGHT.
In the series of Royal Institution articles in these pages,
one of Thomas Wedgwood’s memoirs on “Light,” read
before the Royal Society, was introduced. The second
and last is appended hereto, to assist in the completion of
our summary of the life and works of the first English
photographer.
XIII. — Continuation of a Paper on the Production of Light
awl Heat from different Bodies .*
Experiment 1.
In order to discover what effect the light of the burning fuel
has ui>on incombustible bodies, I fixed into the end of a tube
of earthenwaret two equal cylinders of silver, with polished
surfaces, half-an-inch in length, and a quarter of an inch in
diameter (see figure 1) ; one of the cylinders was painted
Fir/s. 1 and 2.
over, except the tube, with a thin coat of incombustible
black colour, to make it absorb the incident light ; the
other, intended to refect, was left with its polished surface.
Applying my eye to the opposite extremity of the tube (which
it fitted exactly, so that no extraneous light could enter),
and directing it towards the two polished ends of the cylinders,
I held the tube within a red hot crucible, surrounded by burn-
ing coaks, and continually turned it round, that both
cylinders might be equally exposed to the light and heat.
The result was, that the end of the blackened cylinder l>egan
to shine a considerable time before that of the polished one,
and remained constantly somewhat brighter ; on removing the
tube from the crucible, still looking within it, I was surprised
to see the appearance reversed, the polished cylinder continuing
to shine for some time after the blackened one had ceased.
Cylinders of gold and of iron treated in the same manner
gave the same general result ; but the differences between the
polished and the blackened ones were not so remarkable in
these as in the silver,
I repeated this experiment many times and found, by obser-
vations with a stop-watch, that the blackened silver cylinder
began to shine, at a medium, in two-thirds of the time which
*87 Mr. Thomas Wedgwood. Communicated by Sir Joseph Banks,
Bart., P R.S. Read May 10th, 1592.
t When earthenware is mentioned in this piper, the cream-col. ured or
queen’s ware is meant.
} The line A B, in fig. 1, rej resents the position of the screen for shading
the face.— En.
the polished one required ; and that after its removal from
the crucible, it continued to shine only two-thirds of tlie time
that the other did. For this latter observation I was
obliged to make a little variation in the apparatus ; the tubo
itself becoming frequently so hot as to make the cylinders
continue longer red than they otherwise would have done. I
therefore took them out of the tube, to suspend them by a
fine wire, and then, heating them in the ignited crucible as
equally as possible (for they cannot be made to exhibit to
the eye the same precise tinge of redness), 1 removed them
immediately into a dark place.
From this experiment it would seem that a great part of the
light emitted by the cylinders was absorbed from the red hot
crucible, as the blackened one, which absorbs most rays, not
only became first red, but likewise shone brightest. The follow-
ing experiment, however, affords a different conclusion.
Experiment 2.
An earthenware pipe of a zig-zag form (fig. 2) was placed in
a crucible, which was filled up with sand, the two open ends of
the pipe being left uncovered ; one of them was of a proper
form for receiving the nozzle of a pair of bellow's, the other bent
into angles of the form of the letter Z. On this last was
fastened a globular vessel A, with a lateral bent pipe to let out
air, but exclude all external light, and with a neck in which
was inserted a circular plate of glass. The crucible with the
sand and the part of the pipe contained in it w'as then heated
to redness. Having my eye fixed in the neck of the vessel A,
and observing it perfectly dark within, I directed an assistant
to blow with the bellows. The stream of air sent through the
red-hot tube not being at all luminous, I fixed a small strip of
gold into the orifice of the tube at 1!, which, after two or three
blasts, became faintly red ; thus proving that the air, though
not luminous, was equal in temperature to what is usually called
red heat. I then heated the crucible to a brighter redness ;
the stream of air blown through the brighter red hot tube still
came out perfectly dark, but the strip of gold exposed to it
shone both sooner and brighter than before.
Hence, it appears, that the greater brightness of the blackened
cylinder, in the first experiment, was owing to its being of
higher temperature, and that it would have been equally bright
had it been raised to the same temperature by any other means
than the absorption of light, the metal being here brought to a
faint and to a bright ignition without the access of any visible
light.
But perhaps another consequence may be drawn from this
experiment. As the gold may be made to emit light for any
length of time by being supplied with heat from the dark air of
the temperature of red heat, neither the gold nor the air suffer-
ing any chemical change whatever, is not the light emitted
identical with the heat received? This identity appears to be
confirmed by the following observation : — That if the solar rays
be made to converge upon one end of a blackened cylinder of
metal, the other parts will become red hot, and emit light ; or,
if the rays l>e converged upon the tube blackened, and air passed
through it, the gold placed in the dark current will yield a con-
stant light.
The simultaneous absorption and emission of light in a red
hot body is a subject of very difficult and abstruse investigation,
as it involves the nature of the constituent parts of matter,
and of their relative actions and arrangements. I shall not
attempt any hypothesis for explaining the various phenomena,
as I have not been able to form one at all sat isfactory to myself ;
but shall proceed to state a few miscellaneous experiments and
observations which, though apparently unconnected, may yet
be of some assistance to the speculation of some abler theorist.
Experiment 3.
A quart of oil was poured into a bright tin vessel, which had
a Fahrenheit’s thermometer fixed in its neck. The mercury
standing at 45°, the vessel was plunged into boiling water, and
the time which elapsed before the mercury rose to 1 808 was
exactly noted. I then blackened the exterior surface of the
tin vessel, and, repeating the experiment, found the ther-
mometer to require exactly the same time as before to rise to
the same degree.
168
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
' From the foregoing experiment it appears that black matter
has no particular attraction to light in a quiescent state — that
is, when combined as heat with other matter.
Experiment 4.
Three equal cylinders of glazed earthenware were fixed in
the end of a tube (like the two silver ones in fig. 1) ; one of
them blackened, another gilt, all but the ends within the tube,
and the third with its glassy surface. These, treated in the
same manner as the silver cylinders in the first experiment, all
became red at the same time.
Without taking them out of the tube, I removed the whole
from the fire, and, still keeping my eye upon their ends, ob-
served them all to disappear together.
To account, for the simultaneous ignition of these three
cylinders, it must be considered that earthenware, being a very
slow conductor of heat, the surfaces of all of them are pro-
bably heated to redness some time before any such appearance
takes place in the ends between the tube. Now it is not
unlikely that the black matter, the gold, and the glaze, when
red hot, may reflect light equally ; and, in that case there
should be no perceptible difference in the time of the ignition
of the ends within the tube, except the little advantage gained
by the blackened one before its black coat becomes red hot,
which is partly counter-balanced by the powdery matter, of
which the coat consists, obstructing the transmission of heat.
The surfaces of the silver cylinders (Experiment 1) on the con-
trary, do not become red any sensible time before the ends
within the tube, the metal conducting the heat rapidly through
its whole mass.
An earthenware cylinder, fastened in the end of an earthen-
ware tube along with a gold one, and plunged into melted
glass, is much longer in heating than the gold one. This is
easily explained upou a well-known principle, namely, that in
two bodies of unequal temperature, the colder body conducts
the heat from the hotter at a rate proportionate to their differ-
ence of temperature. Now the surface of the earthenware
cylinder, as the heat is conducted very slowly from it by the
interior mass, soon becomes very nearly of the temperature of
the hot glass contiguous to it. The surface of the gold cylinder,
on the contrary, having its heat conducted from it much faster
by the interior mass, is of consequence disposed to receive the
heat with greater rapidity.
Experiment 5.
Equal pieces of gold, silver, copper, and iron, blackened all
over, and suspended by a wire in a red hot crucible, became
led in the order in which they are here set down ; and when
made equally red, and removed into the dark, they disappear
in the same order. When just brought out of the fire they all
looked equally red ; but when they had cooled a little the iron
was much the brightest.
An earthen cylinder tried with the metals disappeared much
sooner than any of them, the interior part not communicating
its heat quick enough to keep the surface of the temperature of
red heat ; accordingly, when broken, though the surface gave
no light, the mass was luminous internally.
From a parity of reasoning, a gilt earthenware cylinder, sus-
pended in a red hot crucible along with a gold one, would
probably become red on the surface before the gold one.
Experiment 6.
A tube of unglazed earthenware, open at top, and having
one half of its bottom blackened on the outside, was placed in
a red hot crucible, and the eye directed as before to the in-
side : the part which was externally blackened became always
red before the other.
The experiment was repeated with a metalline tube, but no
difference could here be perceived between the blackened and
unblackened half of the bottom. The reason is obvious from
the foregoing observations.
Experiment 7.
To ascertain whether metals and earthy bodies beyin to shine
at the same temperature, I gilded, in lines running across a
thin piece of earthenware of the specific gravity of about 2,000,
and luted it to the end of a tube, the gilt side being inwards ;
then directing my eye into the tube, I held it within a crucible,
which was gradually made red hot ; but I could not after many
trials perceive that either the gold or the earthenware began to
shine first.
As it appears from this experiment that gold and earthen-
ware begin to shine at the same temperature, and as no two
bodies can well be more different in all their sensible properties,
may it not be inferred that almost all "bodies begin to shine at
the same temperature ?
Experiment 8.
Observing that colourless transparent glass had a paler hue
when red hot than most other bodies, I conceived that it might
not be luminous at so low a temperature. I therefore took a
circular piece of glass, about ^th of an inch thick, and, having
gilt one side of it, exposed the ungilt side to a stream of air
passed through a red hot tube, but did not perceive that the
gold shone at all before the glass. This experiment, however,
is not decisive ; glass being so slow a conductor of heat that its
exterior surface might have been heated some time before the
interior, and thus have deceived the eye. I could not meet
with any glass sufficiently thin for this purpose, nor think of
any other possible mode of trial.
Experiment 9.
Having often remarked that the surfaces of red hot metals
had an appearance different from what they present by reflected
light when cold, 1 had an idea that this peculiar appearance
might be derived from a transmission of the light through
the superficial parts of the ignited body. To ascertain whether
they acquired any degree of transparency by heat, I fixed a
circular plate of fine gold, about u\,th of an inch thick, on the
end of a tube, which was perfectly closed by it ; then, having
heated it to redness, and, looking down into the tube, 1 pressed
the outer surface of the gold against single grains of gunpowder.
The red light of the gold looked whiter on every flash. To be
satisfied that no light found admission through the sides of the
tube (which were of thick earthenware), I covered the exterior
surface of the gold plate with a thick coat of clay luting, and
again making it red hot, fired gunpowder with it as before, but
no increase of light was perceptible from the flash, which proves
that the sides of the tube were impervious to the light. When
this gold was cold, 1 struck a few grains of gunpowder on its
surface, and, looking within the tube, fired them by pressing
them against a hot iron, but the light of the explosion was not
then sensible.
Plates of silver and of iron gave the same results.
Experiment 10.
A lump of the most luminous marble and an equal lump of
the same marble blackened over were placed together upon a
mass of iron heated just under redness ; the former gave out
much light, the latter none. Upon a second exposure, the
lump not blackened gave a faint light ; the blackened one, a*
before, none at all. Then wiping off the black, and placing
them together upon the heater, 1 found the one which had been
blackened to emit as little light as the other ; thus the phos-
phorescent property was nearly destroyed without any visible
light leaving the body.
Experiment 1 1 .
If apiece of glass, or glazed or unglazcd earthenware, with
any enamel, painting, gilding, or writing upon it, be made red
hot, the coloured parts appear considerably more red than the
others, and continue longer visible. Iron wire within a red hot
glass tube looks much more red than the glass. Mack matter
upon a large polished mass of fine gold did not remain any longer
red than the gold.
Experiment 12.
A bit of iron wire becomes visibly red hot when immersed in
melted glass. Air, therefore, is not necessary to the shining of
ignited bodies. ‘
Experiment 13.
A piece of red hot metal continues to shine for some time
after its removal from the fire, which proves that constant
accessions of light or heat arc not necessary to the shining of
ignited bodies. If the piece be strongly blown upon, it instantly
ceases to shine, for the cold air continually applied unites with
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
169
the light as fast as it leaves the body, and which otherwise
would have passed to the eye.
I shall now close this paper with two or three miscellaneous
observations.
Red hot bodies, though ignited by white light, give out only
the red rays. Perhaps the other more refrangible rays, from
their greater attraction to matter, may be circulating as heat,
whilst the red ones, having a less attraction, yield sooner to that
force which propels the light of red hot bodies. If the intensity
of the incident white light lx: much increased, so as to raise the
body to a white heat, the more refrangible rays then come out
with the others, constituting together a white light.
The flash of a grain of gunpowder is a pure white light ; but
if the explosion be made within a thin, unglazed earthenware
tube, closed at both ends, all the light that pervades the sides
of the tube is red ; the other rays must, therefore, remain
united with the matter of the tube, whilst the less attractive
red ones are transmitted. Thus, also, on looking at the sun
through the thin bottom of an earthenware tea-cup, only the
red rays are transmitted, so that the others must be retained by
the matter of the cup.
It would, perhaps, be worth trying whether a body can be
made red hot by concentrated rays of other colours.
The light produced from bodies by attrition consists of a
double light : that which their powder would give out on the
heater under redness, and that which particles in their surfaces
give out by being made red hot. The sudden heating of a
body to redness by a single blow or rub is a remarkable phe-
nomenon, and deserves to be investigated. One effect produced
upon a body by attrition is a compression or condensation of
the parts on its surface ; and it appears from general observa-
tion that a condensation of the parts occasions a diminution of
its capacity for heat. Iron may be made red hot by repeated
blow's of a hammer, and l have found that if red hot iron be
forcibly struck by a heavy hammer, with a sharp edge to con-
centrate the action, the part so struck emits a white light for a
sensible time, and is probably raised to a white heat ; also that
my father’s thermometer clay has its capacity for heat di-
minished one-third by being burnt to 120° of his scale, and
thus reduced to about one half of its bulk ; and as it -loses in
weight little more than two grains on a pound, the diminution
of capacity can only be attributed to condensation. Many
other analogous instances might be adduced if necessary ; but
these will, perhaps, be deemed sufficient to render it probable
that the sudden ignition of the particles by attrition proceeds
from the compression and consequent diminution of the capa-
city for heat.
I am not certain that the increase of brightness in the gold
plate (Experiment 9) must be attributed to its transparency ;
it may arise from the gold being suddenly raised to a white
heat by the light of the explosion ; or the force of the
explosion may condense its parts, and diminish its capacity for
heat or light. There is, however, a strong analogical argument
for the transparency of the gold ; every body whatever, when
extremely thin, is pervious to light in such quantity as to be
perceptible to our eyesight; thus gold, perhaps the most opaque
of all bodies, platina excepted, when beaten into leaf gold is
so ]>ervious to the green rays that, if held close to the eye,
all objects are seen through it with considerable distinctness,
appearing of a deepish green hue. Now the particles of
matter in the gold plate being much separated from one an-
other, if not more regularly arranged by the heat, and the
intensity of the light in the explosion of the gunpowder being
so great, it is not improbable that some few rays may be
transmitted through the gold.
5*After some reflection upon the curious resultof Experiment 1,
I am inclined to think that the blackened cylinder does not
begin to shine at so low a temperature as the polished one ; and,
consequently, that the commencement of ignition is not, in all
cases, a certain indication of a particular temperature. For,
when the two cylinders were removed from the ignited crucible
(see fig. 1), the blackened one looked of a brighter red than
the polished, and yet, in the course of cooling, disappeared in
about two- thirds of the time that the polished one continued
to shine, without any apparent reason for its cooling at a
faster rate. Should it not, therefore, seem that it requires a
greater heat to make it shine ?
I am well aware that these appearances may be differently
explained ; and, to determine this point, I would propose the
following experiment : Fut larger cylinders into the tube ; and,
having made them red hot, drop them separately, each at the
instant of its disappearing, into cups of weighed water of the
temperature of between 211° and 212° of Fahrenheit ; then, as
any addition of heat will expand the water into steam, the loss
of weight of each vessel will give an exact measure of the heat
of the cylinders at the time of immersion.
A NEW LITHOGRAPHIC TRANSFER INK.
BY DR. J. M. EDER.
As every one knows, the process of lithography depends
on the formation upon the stone of two films or surfaces,
with different properties, one of which, secured by fatty
chalk or crayon, is of a greasy surface, repels water,
and takes fatty inks ; the other, secured by etching, is
acid and open-textured, absorbs water, and so repels
grease.
Good prints depend on the degree of success in securing
these different surfaces ; the more greasy the one, the more
acid the other, the better the lithograph. Up to the pre-
sent, only two substances have been used to give the
greasy surface — soap and fat, brought with wax or shel-
lac to the right consistency for use as paint, crayon,
or transfer ink. They fulfil two objects — first, to estab-
lish the greasy surfaces ; second, to protect those parts
of the stone from the subsequent etching action of the
acid.
Lithographic ink and crayon have already been
brought practically to perfection ; but the preparation of
a good transfer ink still offers a wide field for experiment ;
and the transfer inks, often very costly, in the market arc
still susceptible of improvement. It is still more desirable
to find a good transfer ink for working on metal. All are
liable to weaken, partly dissolve in the acid, or leave the
stone under certain circumstances.
Working from a thorough knowledge of the defects of
the existing inks, I have found in gum elemi the most
favourable characteristics and consistence of all the sub-
stances expei'imented on ; and after several years’ use and
testing, I believe I have found in it a satisfactory product;
which, with the addition of soap and other somewhat
fatty substances, such as suet and varnish, on one side
takes the ink excellently and transfers well, and on the
other is utterly unaffected by the etching acid.
Gum elemi is, according to Valenta, a mixture of acid
and neutral gums containing the elemic acid first described
by Buri. My own researches prove that this acid acts
just like soap and similar fatty substances as a species of
cement ; hence is evident the possibility of the prepara-
tion of a transfer ink upon a basis of gum elemi in place
of soap.
The printing qualities of the ink, prepared by me after
a well-tested formula, I find in no wise inferior to any of
the commercial transfer inks in the market, whose com-
position is a secret. It is a so-called stiff ink, as every
transfer ink must be ; but, nevertheless, it may be easily
spread in a cold room or on cold stones, holds well, does
not smear, and gives most satisfactory prints.
This is my recipe : —
Asphalt 20 grammes
Colophony ... ... ... ... 100 ,,
Oil of turpentine ... ... ... 40 ,,
170
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
Dissolve by warming, and add —
Yellow wax ...
Suet ...
Gum elemi ...
Marseilles soap
Linseed oil varnish
Finest soot . . .
... ... ... 20 grammes
140 „
230 ,,
30 „
(medium strength) 60-80 ,,
80-100 „
Another method substitutes ready-prepared transfer
colour for soap, leaving out that, and using instead
40 grammes of transfer colour and 200 grammes Venetian
turpentine. These arc well cooked and rubbed together.
The transfer ink works equally well on stone or zinc.
The successful commingling of the ingredients is a
manipulation in itself, and requires considerable practice.
All must be free from water, and care should be taken
not to burn them or set them on fire. The latter part of
the heating should be done with the vessel uncovered. —
Photo. Correspondent.
patent EntcUtgcnce.
Applications for Letters Patent.
2,537. A. G. Speight, 257, Liverpool Road, Islington, “Machine
for Corrugating Paper.”— February 17th.
2,628. A. J. Boult, 323, High Holboru, London ; C. Lansi-
aux, and C. Merville, France, “ Magnesium Flash-Light.” —
February 18 th.
2,636. E. Maitre, 45, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Transparent Case for Pictures.” — February 18th.
2,671. W. Foster, 14, Clement’s Inn, London, “ Improve-
ments in Photometry.” — February 19th.
2,776. Frank Bishop, of the firm of Marion and Co., 53,
Chancery Lane, London, “Photographic Lens Shutters.”
Yoigtliinder and Sou, Germany. — February 20th.
2,781. G. Ott, 142, Fleet Street, London, “Apparatus for
Glueing Picture Frames and Compressing Mitred Quoins.” —
February 21st.
2,812. O. Freeworth, 41, Eastcheap, London, “ Cameras.” —
February 21st.
2,820. A. Hester, 41, Cheapside, London, “ Picture Holders.”
— February 21st.
Amended Specification.
8,722. McKellen, “Exposing Photographic Paper,” 1885.
Specifications Published.
2,295.— 8th February , 1889. “Optical Illusions.” Charles
Emile Reynaud, No. 58, Rue Rodier, Paris, Optician.
The object of this invention is to produce the illusion of
continuous or indefinitely prolonged motion of the subjects in
apparatus of the “ praxinoscope ” class patented by the inven-
tor in the year 1877, under No. 4,244, in which, as in the
‘‘Zootrope” and other analagous combinations, the illusion of
motion has hitherto been necessarily limited to a repetition of
the same sequence of positions at each rotation of the instru-
ment.
The present improvements may be applied to apparatus
carrying either opaque or transparent pictures, the former
illuminated by reflected light for direct view, and the latter
by transmitted light for projection on a screen.
After describing the mechanical details of his invention, M.
Reynaud says : —
The “illusion of motion’’ is produced as in the original
praxinoscope and other like instruments, but with this essential
difference, that the successive phases of action of the figures,
instead of being limited to those comprised in a single revolution,
may be varied and prolonged to a practically indefinite extent,
dependent only on the length of the flexible band, thus permit-
ting, for instance, the reproduction of a continuous theatre scene,
comprising an almost infinite variety of actors in their successive
positions on the stage.
3,347. — 25 th February, 1889. “ Books for Exhibiting Photo-
graphs.” Henry William Taunt, 9 and 10, Broad Street,
Oxford, Photographer.
My invention consists of an improved method of constructing
show books for photographs by which the photograph with its
supporting leaf can at once be delivered to the purchaser.
My plan is to make one or more perforations in the leaf so
that it can be at once detached, such perforations being free,
or protected by an additional backing of thin paper or other
material so as to guard it from accidental removal.
4,047. — 7th March, 1889. “Apparatus for Changing Plates
or Films.” Enrico Ferrero, Riva Inglemere Road, Forest
Hill, Merchant.
The inventor claims : —
1st. A combined dark-slide and changing-box provided with
a flexible bag having a hole or holes for permitting the insertion
of the hand or the thumb and one or more fingers, whilst
excluding light.
2nd. A changing-box provided with a flexible bag having a
hole or holes for permitting the insertion of the hand or the
thumb and one or more fingers, whilst excluding light, and with
a lid or cover which can be opened and closed within the said bag.
3rd. The pressure-board provided with means whereby it
will be drawn back in the operation of opening the lid or cover
of the changing-box, and will, when the said lid or cover is
closed, press the film or plate against the edges of the exposure-
aperture in the dark-slide.
4th. The combination, with the dark-slide, of the changing-
box, the pressure-board, and a suitable spring or springs for
forcing the said pressure-board and the plates or films against
the back of the dark-slide.
5th. The changing-box having the spring lid or cover and
the jointed or toggle arms for preventing accidental closing of
the said lid or cover.
6th. The improved apparatus constructed substantially as
described with reference to the drawings accompanying the
specification.
4,131. — March 9th, 1889. “Detective or other Cameras.”
Frank Miall, Photographic Apparatus Maker, 13, Shelgate
Road, Northcote Road, Battersea Rise, Surrey.
My improvement in detective or other cameras consists of
the use of two grooved boxes superposed on each other, with
parallel racks on the sides or ends of each box, the said racks
to be actuated by a pinion at right angles to and between them,
having on its end either a square (to be used with a key) or a
milled head, on turning which the one box containing the un-
exposed plates or films (each in a suitable carrier) advances as
the other recedes, and drops a plate or film from the upper box
into the lower one, through a fixed slot, thus always ensuring
each plate or film to be exposed in a fixed plane to the lens.
The said grooved boxes to slide in or on suitable grooves or
runners formed in or on an outer case or box, in the front of
which said box, and oscillating at will, is a segment of a circle
(of metal or other suitable material) either in a vertical or hori-
zontal position, and forming the exposing shutter, the said
segment having an opening for the light to pass through the
lens to the sensitive plate or film ; the outer ends of the said
segment to be opaque, so that before and after exposure the
lens will be covered. On the centre of the segment from which
the radius is struck is fixed a pinion, which engages in an
oscillating rack, which can be actuated from any part of the
camera either by hand or pneumatic influence.
The camera takes the form of a box of such varied shape as
may be found most convenient, and can be covered with paper
or other material to suit the individual tastes of the users, and
either carried by a strap, or handle, or the like.
The inventor claims : —
1. The use of two grooved boxes superposed on each other,
and actuated by racks and pinion substantially as described, so
that the boxes move simultaneously in opposite directions.
2. The use of a segment of a circle having an opening in
the centre, and with opaque ends actuated substantially as
described, and forming an exposing shutter.
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
171
3,790. — March 4th, 1889. “Photographic Cameras.” Henry
John Gray, 225, Piccadilly, London, Truss Maker.
My invention relates to photographic cameras, and has for its
object to provide an improved camera which is especially
adapted for use by detectives, and which is more compact than
cameras of the same kind as heretofore constructed.
According to my said invention, the box of the camera is
divided by a partition into two compartments, one of which
forms the camera proper, while the other serves for the recep-
tion of plates, papers, or other media for carrying sensitised
surfaces. The said plates or the like are arranged to lie hori-
zontally one upon another in a stack, and are successively
transferred from the bottom of the stack into position for the
exposure, and thence to the top of the stack.
The transfer is effected by means of two pivotted lever
carriers, and a slide or plunger. The said slide or plunger
serves to push the lowermost plate of the stack on to the first
lever carrier, which latter then delivers the plate on to the
second lever carrier into position for the exposure. After the
exposure, the second lever carrier is operated to return the
plate to the top of the stack.
The slide or plunger is provided with an auxiliary plunger
which serves to push the plate entirely on to the first lever
carrier.
The lever carriers are provided with spring clips for holding
the plates thereon.
In order to prevent the films of the plates or the like from
being rubbed, the said plates or the like are carried in frames or
holders.
4,264. — llt/i March, 1889. “Tissue Transfer Paper.”
Thomas Phcenix. Liverpool lload, Newcastle-under-Lyme,
Taper Maker, and George Kirk (administrator of the per-
sonal estate and effects of Mary Ann Lamb, Widow, Paper
Manufacturer, deceased), of Uttoxeter, Gentleman.
The inventors claim : —
1. The preparation of tissue paper for printing transfers
thereon by sizing the tissue paper by causing it to pass into
contact with the upper part of a sizing roller, the lower part of
which dips into a trough containing size, and then to pass be-
tween the surface of the sizing roller and that of a soft pressure
roller.
2. The preparation of tissue paper for printing transfers
thereon by sizing the same by causing the paper to pass into
contact with a sizing roller, and to be carried down thereby
through a trough containing size, into which the lower part of
the cylinder dips, and then to pass between the surface of the
siziug roller and that of a soft pressure roller.
3. The preparation of printed transfers for transferring
designs on to pottery ware by causing tissue paper to pass in
contact with a roller, and whilst on the roller to receive size,
and then to travel on continuously between an engraved print-
ing roll and a soft impression roll.
4. The preparation of tissue paper for printing transfers
thereon by arranging the roll of tissue paper to bear upon the
surface of a revolving roller, and so to be driven, and as the
paper unwinds causing size to be applied to it, and causing the
sized paper to be carried on the sizing roller between the sur-
face of the said roller and a soft pressure roller.
5. A machine for the preparation of printed transfers for
transferring designs on to pottery ware consisting of a roll
from which the tissue paper is unwound ; a sizing roller ; a
soft pressure and impression roller ; and an engraved printing
roller ; the whole revolving at the same surface speed, and the
paper passing in contact with these rollers successively.
4,261. — 1HA March, 1889. “Photographic Lens Shutter.”
Thomas Rudolph Dallmeyer, 25, Newman Street, Oxford
Street, London, Optician, and F hancis Beauchamp, Hope
Cottage, Whalebone Lane, Chadwell Heath, Kssex, Engineer.
This invention relates to improvements in photographic lens
shutters of the kind described in the specification of a patent
granted to us, dated the 12th day of October, a.d. 1887, No.
13,844.
In the invention described in the specification of the aforesaid
patent, the shutters are opened more or less gradually, aud, as
soon as opened, they begin to close again more or less gradually,
so that the quantity of light reaching the photographic film
gradually increases as the shutters open, and gradually decreases
as the shutters close, the closing commencing immediately after
the maximum opening has been obtained, the result being that
the plate receives the maximum quantity of light for an instant
only. The object of one part of our invention is to cause the
shutters to open as instantaneously as possible, to remain wide
open for a definite length of time, and then to close as instan-
taneously as possible, whereby the plate receives the maximum
quantity of light during a longer portion of the time occupied
in the opening and closing of the shutters than in the arrange-
ments described in the aforesaid specification.
In order to effect this object, we move the shutters to and
from each other by means of two levers somewhat in the manner
described in the aforesaid specification, but preferably so
arranged that each lever is operated independent! y of the other,
instead of one lever being operated by the other, as in that
case. We operate the said levers by means of a crank pin
rotated by means of a coiled spring. This crank pin engages in
a curved slot in each of the shorter arms of the levers, the said
slots being so shaped that the crank pin acting upon them for
a very small portion of its revolution suffices to move the two
levers far enough to open the shutters to their fullest extent ;
when that is effected the crank pin passes along portions of the
slots in the levers which are concentric with the path of the
crank pin for another and larger part of its revolution, whereby
the levers are not acted on by the crank pin, and the shutters
are consequently held wide open while the crank pin is traversing
these concentric parts of the slots. The crank then reaches and
acts upon parts of the slots which are not concentric with its path,
and move the levers so as to close the shutters during another very
small portion of its revolution. The axis of the crank or crank
plate carrying the crank pin, \v hicli is actuated by a coiled spring
as before explained, carries a disc furnished with three stops.
Two of these stops come in the line of a catch or pawl on a
releasing lever. When the axis is turned, winding up the
coiled spring until the catch or pawl drops behind the first
of these stops, the shutters are wide open, and are held so
by the said catch and first stop, so that the necessary focu -
sing can be effected. When the axis is turned further, so
that the catch or pawl drops behind the second of the stops,
the shutters are closed again and are held so by the said catch
and second stop until the catch is withdrawn from behind the
said stop, when the coiled spring acts, turning the crank pin
and causing the practically instantaneous opening of the
shutters, their retention wide open for a definite time, and
then their practically instantaneous closing as before explained.
The third stop on the aforesaid disc has a twofold function :
firstly, when the shutters are in the closed position it comes
against a suitable stop, so as to prevent rotation of the crank
pin beyond a certain point, whereby the said crank pin is pre-
vented from pressing unduly on the slots in the levers ; and
secondly, it forms a means in conjunction with an adjustable
stop on the releasing lever, or with a stop on a separate lever,
whereby the shutters can be held open any required length of
time when a long exposure is desired.
Another part of our invention consists of improved means of
guiding the two shutters in their horizontal movements to aud
from each other. Instead of the shutters sliding in grooves
made in the upper and lower parts of the lens mount, we
arrange them to slide at their upper or lower ends on a guide
rod or spindle placed at the upper or lower part of the lens
mount, and we leave them free at their other ends, the points
of connection of the actuating levers with the sliding shutters
being preferably placed near the aforesaid guide, rod, orspindle.
By these means the possibility of the shutters jamming in their
guides is avoided.
17,998. — November 12th, 1889. “Cameras and Dark Slides.”
Thomas (Archdeacon) Colley, 18, Landsdowne Circus,
Leamington, Warwickshire, Archdeacon of Pietermaritzburg
in Natal.
The inventor claims : —
1. A plate-holder or dark slide for photographic cameras,
172
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
the lid of which plate-holder is so weighted that it shall,
when placed at the proper angle, fall open of its own weight.
2. A swing-frame for the said plate-holder, which, when
placed in the camera made or adapted for its use, shall so
rotate upon its axis that the lid of the plate-liolder which it
carries may be opened and closed at pleasure.
3. An indicator outside the camera that shall show the
position and govern the action of the swing-frame and plate-
holder inside the camera when the camera is closed, and every-
thing is ready for immediate and unobserved use.
4,649 .—March 16</i, 1889. “Shutters for Photographic
Cameras.” Thomas Wright Green all, The Grammar
School, Hartlebury, near Kidderminster, Clerk in Holy
Orders, and Frank Bishop, of the Firm of Marion and Co.,
of 22 and 23, Soho Square, in the County of Middlesex,
Dealers in Photographic Materials.
This invention relates to an improved so-called “Instan-
taneous ” shutter for photographic lenses. The shutter is of
that kind which opens and closes upon a diametrical line, by
the motion in opposite directions from the centre to the sides
of a pair of plates or wings pivoted upon a common centre,
and overlapping when closed.
The invention relates essentially to the mechanism whereby
the plates or wings are operated, and the object of the inven-
tion is to simplify this mechanism and reduce the cost of manu-
facture. The plates or wings are operated by a pin moving
in a curved angular or bi-angular slot in each of them, the
slots lying in a direction such that the two extremities of each
slot are in a line about radial to the centre of motion of the
plate or wing, and the slots being oppositely bent or curved
so that motion of the pin from one end to the other of the
two slots will cause simultaneous motion of the two plates or
wings in opposite directions, the motion of the pin through
the first half of the slots causing an outward separating or
opening motion of the plates, and the motion of the pin
through the second half of the slots causing an inward or
closing motion of the plates. This actuating pin is carried or
actuated by a lever pivoted to the frame, and acted on by a
spring provided with means of varying its tension for the pur-
pose of regulating the velocity of motion of the plates accord-
ing to the length of exposure required, a spring trigger being
also provided having notches or shoulders adapted to engage
with the lever, and hold the plates either in the closed or open
position as required, said trigger being released either directly
by hand or by pneumatic agency, as well understood. The
pin through which the plates are actuated projects through a
slot in the frame, and serves as the medium through which the
shutter may be brought to the open position for focussing for
a prolonged exposure, or “ set ” for a short or “ instantaneous ”
exposure.
19,770. — December 9 th, 1889. “Photographic Carriers or
Sheaths.” Frank Miaul, 13, Shelgate Road, Battersea
Rise, Surrey, Manufacturer of Photographic Apparatus.
The inventor claims : —
1. In the construction of carriers or sheaths for the holding
of sensitive photographic plates or films, the use of retaining
catches or clips.
2. The use of retaining catches or clips in connection with
carriers or sheaths for holding sensitive photographic plates
or films.
Photographic Club. — The subject for consideration on March
5th will be “ Artificial Light as an Auxiliary to Daylight,”
followed by a selection of lantern slides of Norway, by Mr.
J. B. B. Wellington. March 12th, “Sterescopic Photography.”
A Simple View Meter. — For time exposures carry a light,
compact tripod. Ascertain by calculation or experiment the
number of inches that at arm’s length from the eye will include,
with the lens used, the view upon the plate. A small rule, or
its equivalent, held with extended arm at right angles to the
line of vision, will then always give instant information, re-
quired before every exposure. — A. W. Dimock.
Cfomspontinue.
STEREOSCOPIC VISION.
Sir, — Mr. G. Macdougald, in his communication to the
Dundee and East of Scotland Photographic Association, has,
while trying to combat some statements alleged to have been
made by me, so completely overlooked my real position in the
matter, and has made so many statements, the absurdity of
which he might have seen had he consulted the most element-
ary class-books, that I might well pass his remarks unheeded.
Still, it may be well to point out some matters, not of opinion
at all, but perfectly well known to every beginner in optical
science, and perfectly clearly laid down by every writer who,
within many years, has treated the subject of stereoscopic
vision.
In the first place, I suppose I must once more point out
that the origin of the discussion was a remark by “ F. M. S.”
in Photography, May 9, 1889, touching stereoscopic photo-
graphy in its relation to art. I have never denied the scientific
uses of the stereoscoi>e ; on the contrary’, I did them full
justice. My point all along has been that stereoscopicity is
no attribute, much less an essential, of art. But to turn to Mr.
Macdougald’s optical utterances.
He begins with the old story of stereoscopic vision by
squinting. That is right enough for those who can do it,
probably not one in 1,000 without being educated up to it.
Mr. Macdougald’s alternative method is to “ look at the right
picture with the right eye, and the left in like manner with
the left.” He admits that personally he cannot do it ; well,
so far as goes stereoscopicity, iu which his soul delights, his
inability is no loss, for there is no stereoscopic vision in such a
case. (Text-books passim.)
“ It is surely more natural to look at a double pictorial repre-
sentation than at a single.” (Macdougald.) “When a body
of moderate size, ascertained by touch to be solid, is viewed
with both eyes, the images of it formed by the two eyes are
necessarily different. . . Nevertheless, they coalesce into a
common image which gives the impression of solidity.” (Hux-
ley, Elementary Physioloyy.) “We have two eyes, most of
us, but we do not, under normal conditions of diet, see dou-
ble.” (l’ringle.)
Mr. Macdougald writes that it appears that “ Mr. Pringle
labours under the impression that binocular vision — that is,
vision giving the appearance of solidity’ — requires that each eye
looks at the object from a different standpoint.” I confess I
am under that impression, but find no “labour” iu compre-
hending the truth, nor in agreeing with every text-book on the
subject that I can find. Without the sense of touch, and
without two eyes, we cannot have the impression of solidity,
nor of relative distances. I should like Mr. Macdougald to ex-
plain how two eyes can look at an object simultaneously from
the same standpoint. “ One may mount two prints from the
same negative,” says Mr. Macdougald, “ and such prints will
give the appearance of solidity when viewed either by the
unaided eye in the manner above mentioned, or through the
stereoscope.” Here is news indeed ; but if there were the
slightest foundation for such an assertion, who so foolish as to
carry a stereo-camera and make stereo-negatives when single
ones* will do? If Mr. Macdougald will consult “ Hardwich and
Taylor,” or indeed any class-book on optics, he may derive some
benefit.
On the binocular miscroscope, as proof of his theory, Mr.
Macdougald surpasses himself. “The binocular microscope,”
he says, makes it “ at once apparent that the appearance of
solidity or stereoscopic impression does not rest on the fact of
each eye having a picture for itself. M ell, 1 always thought
it did exactly rest on that fact. If Mr. Macdougald ever
used a binocular microscope, it is very strange that he did not
notice that not only does each eye see the image projected by
one-half of the objective, but by means of a prism the image
projected by the right half of the objective is projected to
the left eye, while the right eye views the image projected by
the left portion of the objective ; and further, when the in-
strument is so arranged that the right eye looks through the
February 28, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
173
right' half of the objective, and vice versa, the image is not
seen stereoscopically, but pseudoscopically. (Another death-
blow to the second alternative method of seeing sterescopically
with the unaided eye mentioned above.) The binocular micro-
scope, in fact, furnishes a complete refutation of nearly every
sentence on stereoscopic vision in Mr. Maedougald’s paper with
which he regaled the Dundee Society. (See “ Carpenter,” and
any other text-book on the microscope.)
Mr. Macdougald says I “dislike the small hole trick.” This
is proof that he has not carefully read what I wrote. I ex-
pressed neither liking nor dislike of it. He refers the impression
of solidity obtained by the “small hole trick ” to suppression of
surface on the picture. I do not believe in this theory of his
at all ; I attribute the illusion to brain action chiefly. But till
the elements are mastered there is not much use discussing more
difficult matters. Mr. Macdougald says, “ In what, then, does
stereoscopic vision consist ? That is a very difficult question to
answer.” Possibly, but it is answered for us, even if we are
incompetent to work it out for ourselves, in every treatise on
elementary optics with any pretension to completeness.
I omit notice of the bantering tone of Mr. Macdougald’s
paper. No doubt it may have amused such of his hearers as
were unaware of the extraordinary weakness of his arguments,
and his entire misapprehension of stereoscopic optics.
I also reserve further comment on the fact that in my ori-
ginal article ( Photoyraphy , June 13, 1889,) I dealt with stereo-
scopicity as related to art. I said, and I say, solidity is not
art, nor is art illusion. Andrew Pringle.
AMATEURS AND PROFESSIONALS.
Sir, — There is one consideration that has escaped the
notice of “Photophotos” in his critical review of Amateurs
and Professionals in Holland (see page 139 of last week’s News).
The definitions are good and humorous, and the shallow fear
that the amateur is likely to supplant the professional is fairly
stated and disposed of. Another aspect of the case has, how-
ever, been entirety overlooked — namely, the fact that the wide-
spread practice of photography by numerous amateurs tends
to elevate the status of the professional, and inspire'a higher
appreciation for the generally superior character of his work.
His claims thus become more widely recognised, and those who
seek for experience, especially in portraiture, must needs avail
themselves of special talent, training, and appliances. To
borrow a simile :--The regular forces of the British army were
never so popular or so well appreciated until the volunteers
sprang into existence, and then came a laudable feeling of
rivalry in shooting and drilling, which has since proved most
beneficial both to the regular and auxiliary services. Old
methods and weapons were criticised, and the army gained
more by friendly competition and healthy rivalry than was
possible formerly without such occasional stimulus and review.
In fact, the volunteers have popularised and vastly improved
the efficiency of the regular army. There is no question about
this ; and so it may be with the mutual relations of the ama-
teur and professional photographer ; the latter gains much by
securing a wider appreciation of his highest aims by an edu-
cated public, and reaps the benefit of more extended patronage.
If the army of professionals is occasionally recruited from the
ranks of trained amateurs, so much the better for all concerned ;
real progress cannot be in any way imperilled, but, on the con-
trary, assisted, and a wider clientele created.
Resecting definitions : There is an old adage, “ Once a cap-
tain, always a captain.” Does this stand true of the professional
photographer ? I know a man who, a quarter of a century ago,
took pay for several years as an instructor and photographer in
the Government service, but now he only uses his camera as an
amateur. To which class does he belong ? Again, your Dutch
correspondent says, “ One, however, of the most pronounced
characteristics of divergency is undoubtedly the winter sleep or
hybernation of the amateur.” But if this be true, what shall
be said of the large class of quasi-professionals, like those
having studios at suburban or watering places, who regularly
“ hybernate,” or practise photography only during the season,
and follow- some other occupation during the winter ?
Is there any “hard and fast rule” applicable to such cases?
I for one w-ould like to know what answer to give to these and
similar enquiries. John Spiller.
HACKNEY PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY.
Sir, — Below is our programme for March, 1890, at Morley
Hall, Hackney, Room No. 4: — Thursday, 13th, “ A Talk on
Photographic Optics,” by Mr. .1. Traill Taylor. Thursday,
27th, “Photograph}-.” Prize lantern slides.
W. Fenton Jones, Hon, Sec.
12, Kino HI ward Road, Hackney, N.E.
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF WARWICKSHIRE.
Sir, — So many applications have been received for copies of
my pamphlet on “ Methods of conducting a local photo-
graphic Survey of Warwickshire ” (methods which are equally
applicable to other districts) that I have had it reprinted, and
copies can be obtained post free, sixpence each, from Mr. A.
J. Leeson, 20, Cannon Street, Birmingham (Hon. Secretary,
Birmingham Photographic Society), or from
W. Jerome Harrison,
Science Laboratory, Board School, Icknield Street, Binniny
ham.
PS. — The price named just about pays for printing and
postage, but any profit will go to the Society’s funds.
FOCUSSING APPLIANCES.
Sir, — In reference to the above — vide the leader in your
impression of February 14th — for about the twentieth time
I recommend my brother amateurs to adopt for a focussing
screen the plan I have had in use for some years, viz. , a circle
or strip of plain glass in the centre of the screen. I made
mine, and have made a few for friends since, by cleaning and
varnishing an old negative plate, when cool rubbing it with
the ball of the thumb, to get a very fine tooth, much finer
than any ground glass, then removing a small circle or strip of
the varnish in the centre of the plate. This gives a bright
picture quite up to the edges of the plate ; and in the centre
on the plain glass, with a focussing glass, absolute microscopic
sharpness. Lastly, if you should have the misfortune w-hen
away on a tour to break your screen it is easily replaced. A
quarter of an hour will make it. W. T. F. M. Ingall.
Greenhithe, Kent.
PATENTS AND PHOTOGRAPHIC PROGRESS.
Sir, — There is no doubt that the protection afforded by the
patent to the outcome of the labour and ingenuity of the
actual inventor is an advantage to scientific progress, inasmuch
as it acts as a spur and incentive to experimental research ;
on the other hand, there is no greater bar to advance and im-
provements in any direction of progress than the practice of
claiming a monopoly of manufacture on the ground of novelty
where no such novelty exists. It would be well if claims for
invention were more carefully scrutinised than appears to be
the case, although every facility has been lately given by the
photographic journals which record the applications made in
their department. It may be said that the public have a means
of redress in cases of invalidity of patents by opposing or dis-
regarding the claims which are made. This may be true in
theory, but practically it is well known that the irrecoverable
expenses, and annoyance, and loss of time involved, even in
cases of successful issue, deter many from taking that step.
There may be some of your readers, interested like myself in the
special subject of actinometry, to whom the following references
to some passages in a work by a well-known writer may, per-
haps, be of benefit.
Capt. Abney, in the 1884 edition of his “Instructions in
Photography,” gives a figure and description of the “Wood-
bury Photometer,” the principle of which is the determination
of the actinic power of light by the exposure of a strip of
sensitised paper, coiled in a small box, in the form of a com-
pass. The actinic light is measured by the darkening of the
exposed paper in comparison with a standard tint or tints
174
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1820.
provided for that purpose. The writer goes on to say, “ I
believe it would be an improvement to use bromised paper for
the aetinometer," and in a former part of the work a formula is
given for the use of nitrites with the bromised silver solution,
the well-known salts by which the bromised paper is made to
darken in the light without development.
Since the publication of this edition of the “ Instructions ”
two applications have been made for patents for actinometers,
which may now be compared with the above extracts.
I need not point out that the matter has a wider significance
than the invalidity or validity of these patents. It is a public,
not a personal <|uestion, and on the solution of it depends our
conclusion as to whether the results of research and experiment
given to us by public writers in works of general reference are
for the full and free use of the public, or only for the benefit
of individual monopoly. Experimentalist.
♦
Theodor Prumm. — The German Photographic papers an-
nounce the death, on the 11th inst., of this well-known and
ski'ful portrait photographer, at the age of forty-nine.
Albemarle Amateur Photographic Society — Mr. Walter
Pilkington, of St. Margaret’s, Newlands Park, Sydenham, asks us
to record the formation of this Society, established for the
“ social discussion of the technicality of photography.”
Camera Club Conference, 1890. — The Conference, as
already announced, will take place at the Society of Arts on
Thursday and Friday, March 20th and 21st, under the presi-
dency of Captain Abney. Amongst the papers to be read and
discussed will be the following : — “ The Art of Drawing and
Photography,” by Mr. A. M. Itossi ; “ Photography by the
Light of the Electric Spark,” by Lord Rayleigh ; “ The Latent
Image,” by Mr. C. H. Bothamley ; “ Limitations in the Treat-
ment of Subjects by Focus,” by Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer ; “ Collo-
type and Photo-Etching,” with practical illustrations, by Mr.
W. T. Wilkinson ; and other papers by the President, Mr.
Lyonel Clark, and others. It is further proposed to bring for-
ward, in as complete a manner as possible, the subject of photo-
graphic exhibitions and their regulations. The exhibition of
apparatus will be as usual in the library of the Society of Arts.
All photographers or others interested in the subjects under
discussion are invited to be present.
The Photographic Convention. — The 1890 meeting of the
Photographic Convention will take place at Chester, from the
23rd June to the 28th inclusive. The proceedings will open
on the evening of June 23rd with a conversazione, at
which the President’s address will be delivered, and
there will be a lantern exhibition. Excursions have
been arranged for each day during the week. The even-
ings will be devoted to the reading of papers and discussions.
An exhibition will be held of novelties in apparatus, and no
charge will be made for space. The Convention dinner will
take place on the evening of the 27th June. Arrangements
are being made for excursions to the following places : — Moreton
Old Hall, Conway, Bettwys-y-Coed, Carnarvon, Harwarden,
Llongollen, and other places. Also a trip on the Mersey to
witness the regatta of the Mersey Yacht Club. Cheap railway
tickets to these places will be issued by the railway companies
upon production of membership tickets.
Photographic Novelties.— From Mr. Robert Talbot, of
Berlin, we receive the first number of Photographische Neu-
heiten, or “Photographic Novelties,” the object of which is
stated to be to furnish the amateur and professional photo-
grapher, the photographic printer, the zinc and copper etcher,
and the photo-lithographer — all those, in fact, who are directly
or indirectly interested in photographic experiment or research —
with the latest news in the photographic world, in the quickest,
clearest, and most concise fashion. It is proposed by the
editorial staff to give a comprehensive description of all the
photographic novelties which may be transmitted to them,
both from Germany and elsewhere, with their prices attached,
and illustrations in such cases as make them desirable or con-
venient. The editorial staff, through its intimate association with
the well-known firm of Romain Talbot, claims to be in a posi-
tion to give the very earliest notice of all novelties of inte-
rest or importance.
Pioccc&tngs of .Societies,
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
At the technical meeting of this Society, held on the 25th
inst., the chair was occupied by Mr. \V. E. Debexham.
A letter from the Secretary of the Royal Geographical Society
was read, in which it was stated that the photographs of Cau-
casian scenery, taken by Signor Sella, would be on view until
the end of the month.
A shutter that had been sent by the manufacturer was
shown and handed round. The arrangement for resetting
after each exposure was effected by the pressure of the pneu-
matic ball that actuated the release, so that it was always
ready for use without resetting. If wanted as a time shutter,
there was an arrangement by which two pressures of the ball
were used, one for opening and one for closing. A dark-room
lamp was also shown ; it was for use with benzoline, and
resembled a brass candlestick in appearance. There was a
ruby chimney surrounding the flame.
The Chairman remarked that manufacturers of these things
were rather conservative in keeping to red instead of using
deep yellow.
A letter was read accompanying some photographs sent by a
photographer in the provinces, who asked for an explanation
of some peculiar markings that covered about half the plate.
The photographs had been taken in a hall at night, and one of
them showed a row of gas jets. It was noticed that the mark-
ings were parallel, and proceeded from the direction in which
the gas jets appeared, and the opinion was expressed that the
marks were in reality photographs of the gas jets spread across
the plate by a movement of the camera, probably caused by
opening or closing the dark slide.
Mr. H. Chapman Jones allowed a lens and camera, which he
called the memorandum camera, for taking photographic notes of
any subjects of which it might be required to obtain a reproduc-
tion. As it was desired that it should lie available under all
practicable conditions of light, the lens was of the rapidity taken
as unity in the Photographic Society’s standard, //4. It was
fitted with Swift’s iris diaphragm, which was so arranged that
there was literally no projection from the tube. The size of
plate used was half of the quarter-plate, or 3| by 2j inches.
The lens for the purpose was of about 34 in. focus. It was
graduated so as to be fixed for objects at certain distances from
two feet upwards. At the two feet distance it was practicable
to get quite a readable negative from a page of a book, which
might be easily done by setting up the book on an ordinary
table at the distance mentioned, and adjusting the diaphragm
to the smallest opening. The shutter was of the roller
kind, and had a long opening in proportion to the
diameter of the lens, being more than three times
as long as the diameter. The rollers were made one inch thick,
so that violent speed of rotation was not necessary in order
to obtain a quick exposure. He had found a difficulty in ob-
taining a material strong enough to bear the strain of the
strong spring necessary, but had overcome the difficulty by
using black tape at the ends of the rollers, and attaching the
blind itself to those tapes. The blinds and tapes passed com-
pletely round the rollers at both ends, so as to distribute the
pull, and render them less liable to be torn off. Mr. Samuels’s
arrangement of plates was adopted, although of course a roller
slide could be used if desired. The camera, with twelve plates
complete, weighed thirty-five ounces. He used a view meter
and finder, which was furnished with a square ground glass, on
which lines were ruled, which indicated both positions, vertical
and horizontal, in which the plate could be used, so that a choice
might be made from actual ius[>ection of the two positions.
With the shutter working with its full opening, it was fitted
for ordinary instantaneous work, but if desired, by narrowing
and opening, and placing it next to the plate, a rapidity
exceeding that mentioned by Anschutz for photographing
such objects as bullets in motion could be obtained. The
camera being narrow, could be employed as a secret camera
more easily than most others, but he did not personally
desire to use it as a secret camera. In order to show that
February 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
175
one need scarcely ever fail to secure a photographic record,
whatever the light or time of day. He had taken some street
scenes on the 21st of December, at various hours of the day.
The day itself was a dull one. These photographs were
exhibited, as well as one of a printed page which, under a
Ramsden eye piece, could be easily read. For developing he
used a dish of eikonogen, and had another dish at hand con-
taining a weak solution of bromide, into which any plates
were removed that gave signs of over-exposure. After a
stay in this solution they were, if necessary, returned to the
eikonogen bath to gain density.
‘The Chairman noted that a lens of / /4 aperture was used,
although, doubtless, it would generally be stopped down to//8
or less. When this stopping had to be doue, it was, according
to his experience, better to use a lens originally not of so rapid
a character, as the field might be, and was, made flatter than
was practicable with the more rapid lens. Was that in accord-
ance with Mr. Chapman Jones’s experience ?
Mr. Chapman Jones replied that , in so far as flatness of field
is concerned, that was so, but as occasions did arise for using
the utmost available rapidity, he had decided to have a lens
which would give that when required. The curvature of
field with this lens was equal to r'5th of an inch at the
margin of the plate of the size indicated.
Mr. W. Bedford noted particularly the smooth, spiral
movement of the lens tube for focussing.
Mr. W. England would use the roller shutter next to the
plate.
Mr. Chapman Jones said that that was the worst position
for the shutter, although, for specific purjwses, like that of
photographing a bullet, it might be necessary.
Mr. Cowan exhibited three bromide paper photographs of cabi-
net size to show the effect of a very small quantity of bromide
in an eikonogen developing solution. The first had received a
certain exposure, and been placed in four ounces of a fresh solu-
tion of eikonogen to develop. It came up grey and flat, and
the next print therefore received only half the exposure. This
came out bright and powerful, but a third print that hail re-
ceived the same exposure as the first one came out best of all.
The only difference between this print and the first one was that
it was the third to be developed, and the eikonogen had, ‘there-
fore, accumulated a small quantity of bromide given out in the
development of the first two.
Mr. Atkinson showed a print thirty-two years old, printed
upon salted paper, and not mounted. It appeared to be
quite free from fading.
The Chairman said that unmounted prints notoriously had
a longer average life than mounted ones. The print shown
looked, too, as if it had been toned with sel d’or. Was
that so ?
Mr. Atkinson replied that it had been toned in that way.
The Chairman continued that that process conduced very
much to permanency. It was to be regretted that it had
not been found practicable to use it generally for albumen
prints. Many unmounted, and some mounted, albumen prints
certainly existed which had been printed for many years
without showing any signs of fading, but the sel d’or bath
deposited so much gold on the print that there was considerably
more probability of permanency in prints so produced.
Camera Club.
On Thursday, February 20th, a paper communicated by Mr. W.
K. Burton, on “One or Two of the Tenets of the Xaturalistics,”
was read by Mr. A. Pringle ; Mr. W. A. Greene occupied the
chair.
Mr. Burton, in his paper, took the view that any want of
sharpness in the principal objects or planes, and any falling off
away from the centre of interest in the different planes, could
not be defended upon optical principles, but that, on the other
hand, these principles would appear to demand that planes other
than the plane of chief interest should be less perfectly defined.
He further dealt with the subject of imagination in the pictorial
arts, and the possibility of introducing it in photographic work.
The discussion was opened by Mr. Davison, who observed
that the variation in focus of different planes admitted and
argued by Mr. Burton was one of the chief contentions of
those called “ Xaturalistics.” He thought it was more a matter
of the mental attitude whether representations should be
sharp or not. A definite detailed examination of nature was
the scientific, not the artistic attitude. He thought imagina-
tion could not be expected to supply the truth of representa-
tion, in which lay the thrilling charm experienced by an artistic
perception of a beautiful scene in nature.
On Thursday, March 6th, Mr. A. Pringle will treat of the
subject “ The Optical Lantern.” Meeting at 8 p.m.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 20th Mr. A. Haddon occupied the
chair.
Mr. J. B. B. Wellington showed two bottles of eikonogen
recently received from the manufacturers. In one of the 1 Kittles
the crystals had become quite dark ; there was no trace of any
discolouration of the crystals in the other bottle. Both bottles
had been received at the same time.
The Chairman had exposed a mixture of powdered eikonogen
and sulphite to the air, and had also enclosed some of the powder
in a sealed tube, raising the temperature to boiling heat for half
an hour ; but little change of colour was noticeable in the samples
passed round. He had also taken —
Eikonogen ... ... ... ... ... 1 part
Carb. soda ... ... ... ... ... 2 parts
Sulphite ... ... ... ... ... 4 ,,
A portion of this was kept in paper, and the remainder placed
in a sealed tube. In both cases considerable discolouration had
taken place. The Chairman said, from his experiments, he was
of opinion that the sample of sulphite used by Mr. Cowan,
when he succeeded in developing plates with pyro and sulphite,
and also eikonogen and sulphite alone, contained a large excess
of carbonate.
A question was asked whether any member had used anglol.
Mr. J. B. B. Wellington said he had found it a rather slow
developer. The results were very similar to those by eikonogen
development.
Mr. A. Cowan exhibited a series of bromide prints developed
with various developers— ferrous oxalate, eikonogen and car-
bonate of lithium, with and without bromide, pyro and car-
bonate of lithium, pyro and eikonogen mixed, eikonogen, both
with weak and strong alkalies, hydrokinone of different
strengths, and eikonogen with caustic alkali. Two of the
prints were selected, which were generally acknowledged by the
members present to be excellent both in detail and quality of
image. The prints had been developed by use of the following
formula) respectively : —
Eikonogen... ... ... ... ... 4 grains
Sulphite ... ... ... ... ... 32 ,,
Carbonate of lithium ... ... ... 2 „
Hydrokinone ... ... ... ... 2 grains
Sulphite ... ... ... ... ... 8 ,,
Carbonate of potassium ... ... ... 10 ,,
Mr. Cowan said his chief object was to find a good developer
that did not require to be followed by the acid bath. Hydro-
kinone gave extreme density, consequently it would be found a
good developer for prints from thin negatives.
Mr. P. P. Drage showed a negative with some peculiar
transparent markings on it. The negative had been developed
with washing soda and dry pyro ; it took a long time to
come out.
Several members gave it as their opinion that the markings
were due to air-bubbles.
Photographic Society of Japan.
A meeting was held at the Chamber of Commerce Rooms,
Tokyo, on December 12th, when the following were elected
members of the Society : — Mr. Tamamura, Dr. G. Wagener,
and Messrs. Katzuzo Takenouchi, E, H, R. Manley, and J. B,
Coulson,
176
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[February 28, 1890.
Objection had been taken to a certain proposed member on
account of his having copied without permission, and sold, the
pictures of a member of the Society. An explanation which
was satisfactory both to the objecting member and to the
Society was given, but the following resolution, proposed by
Mr. E. R. Holmes, and seconded by Mr. Pallister, was unani-
mously passed : — “ That this Society discountenances, by all
means in its power, the practice of copying the photographs
of other artists for sale, and that, if the practice be continued,
the Society will take into consideration the desirability of making
a bye-law whereby such practice shall ipso facto exclude from
membership of the Society.”
Mr. K. Ogawa exhibited the colossal camera with which he
had made photographs direct, measuring 38 by 30 inches, for
the forthcoming exhibition, and an enormous tripod intended
to be used with it in photographing interiors. The top of the
tripod reached the roof of the hall. A monster printing
frame for making the pictures on paper measuring 4ft. 6in. by
3ft. 6in. was also shown.
Mr. Konishi showed the “ Kodak,” the smallest of the
numerous hand cameras now so popular, and Mr. Kajima some
very beautiful opalotypes done on opal glass that had been
coated with emulsion in Japan.
Mr. W. K. Burton read a paper on “ Eikonogen,” the new
developer. The results of his experiments had certainly been
to make him conclude that the developer had good qualities,
but he considered the claims made by the makers to be quite
extravagant. On the whole, Mr. Burton doubted if it would
oust our old friend pyrogallic acid.
After the ordinary meeting was concluded a special meeting
was held, and Messrs. J Johnston and F. Walkinshaw were
elected members of Committee. Mr. A. J. Hare was elected
Foreign Treasurer.
Abney Camera Club.
At the meeting on the 21st inst, Mr. A. J. Adkins gave a
demonstration on “ Carbon Printing,” showing the processes
of single and double transfer.
A series of club competitions was arranged for ; the first
was for gelatine lantern plates, to be held on March 28th.
On March 7th there will be an exhibition and discussion on
“ Detective Cameras.”
Genre Pictures. — Mr. J. Hubert, of Hackney, who has
been studying art principles for some time past, has shown us
a series of three photographs illustrating incidents described
in Longfellow’s poem “The Happiest Land,” in which four
“hale and hearty fellows ” by “an alehouse on the Rhine," argue
as to the locality of the happy country : —
And then the landlord's daughter
Up to heaven raised her hand,
And said, “Ye may no more contend—
There lies the happiest land.”
At the Royton exhibition these three pictures formed the only
entry in the special genre class, but the judges, after due con-
sideration, decided that the pictures were so good that they
awarded Mr. Hubert the silver medal, despite the absence of
competition.
Received. — Pallowfield’ s Photographic Remembrancer for
quarter ending March. It contains four illustrations of snap
shots with the “l"acile ” hand camera, for the use of which very
explicit directions are given. It contains also useful and in-
teresting photographic tit-bits, interspersed among the adver-
tisements of which the paper mainly consists. The Art
Weekly, “an independent art newspaper,” which, we learn, was
to have been called “ The Art World,” but that the latter title
belonged to others. Its object is claimed to be sufficiently set
forth upon its title-page. From The Photographic Times, of
New \ork, per the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company, a
calendar for the year 1890, neatly framed, and containing
moveable parts.
^Ingfoerg to ©orrespontrentg.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.8., 2, 8t. Mary’s Roai, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photoorapbic Nkws, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication!
should be addressed to the Editor of the Puotografhic News, 6, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
Artist (Bangor.) — Obscuring top lights without blinds. Papier
mineral might do, or tissue paper pasted on ; but if you
want a paint for this purpose we should advise you to try
the whitest quality of Aspinall’s enamel, which dries
quickly, and is not affected by light. White lead is not
permanent, and zinc white is so slow in drying. Or, try a
warm, thin gelatine mixed with zinc white brushed on the
glass.
J. C. (Edinburgh.) — Definition of an “ AnuUeur Photographer.'*
See reply to P. B. A., last week. A dealer in photo*
graphic chemicals and apparatus, who uses his camera
habitually for his own pleasure, and makes no profit by the
sale of his photographs, is, we think, a bond fide amateur.
T. S. — Wishes to communicate with Ignoramus (post mark
Dublin), who sent us an enquiry about collodio-cliloride a
fortnight ago. By forwarding his name and address to our
office, or to Canonbury, he will oblige our Carlisle correspon-
dent.
Photargus. — Stained collodion for orthochromatic screens.
Our correspondent finds it difficult to strip tinted collodion
films successfully. We would suggest the use of East-
man’s reliable celluloid as a foundation, or a plate of mica,
if he is not prepared to adopt Captain Abney’s plan of
applying the stained collodion direct to the back lens.
Gelatine skins are not sufficiently tranparent. Or, would a
coating of india-rubber in benzol stiffen the collodion up to
the point of stripping ?
Samson. — Blue tones in silver prints. Your complaint that the
acetate toning bath works so slowly in giving you the
required result may be answered by advising you to use a
stronger and freshly mixed carbonate or acetate bath ; but
you must bear in mind that speed is not always desirable
when you look for uniformity of action, and push the toning
process to extremities. Prints of this kind will, of course,
require more gold than the chocolate shades.
W. Morgan. — 1. Removal of varnish from old negatives.
There is nothing better than prolonged immersion in two or
three changes of methylated spirit, which, in cold weather,
may be slightly warmed. Mr. W. T. Wilkinson's manual of
photo-lithograpliy and half-tone processes is just now being
reprinted. Apply to Messrs. England Bros., 25, Charles
Street, Notting Hill, W.
W. W. J. N. — Robert Hunt's early photographs. These were
shown at the Photographic Exhibition of 1888, and again
fully described at page 193 of the Year-Book. The ferric
salt used was ammonio- tartrate (or citrate) of iron, applied
as a single wash ; this becomes partially reduced to ferrous
salt by exposure to light in the printing frame, and the pic-
ture is developed by subsequent treatment with a gold or
silver salt, and fixed with hypo. The image being unques-
tionably composed of reduced silver (or gold) should, if pro-
perly washed, lie permanent, as our specimens appear to be,
and they bear the date of 1852.
Artistic. — It is not clear from your note whether or not you
have read Mr. H. P. Robinson’s article on “ Winter Photo-
graphy for the Artist.” You will find that he recommends
the use of isochromatie plates for general purposes, and these
to be of fairly large size, so as to get foreground details
without the necessity of subsequent enlarging. We agree in
your estimate of the reproduction of Mr. J. Gale’s “ Home-
wards,” which is simply superb. For snow pictures, “as a
rule choose sunlight,” says the author.
E. O. C. (Boston, U.S.A.) — We thank you for the formula of
collodion suitable for black-and-white reproductions, and also
for your generous offer in the matter of collotype.
y£\
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
J)
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1644. — March 7, 1890.
CONTENTS.
F AO K
An Unsolved Problem in the History of Photography 177
Photography in Belgium 178
The Belgian International Photographic Inhibition 178
Some Relations between Fine Art and Photography. By
Philip H. Newman 179
Vocation of an Amateur Photographer. By H. Pocklington,
F.R.M.S 181
Photographing the Forth Bridge 182
Photography in an Age of Movement. By Friese Greene 183
Reactions of Various Developers. By L. Van Neck 184
Toning with Metals of the Platinum Group 185
A New Photo-Lithographic Transfer Paper 186
FAO K
Notes 186
Photography in Germany. By Dr. H. W. Vogel 187
Professor Piazzi Smyth on Fignres in Photographs 188
More Experiments with Eikonogen. By P. C. Duchochois... 189
Mr. Ruskin on “ Beauty ” 190
Flash Powder Explosions. By Charles L. Mitchell, M.D.,
Philadelphia, Pa 191
Notices of Books 192
The Camera Club Conference 193
Patent Intelligence 193
Proceedings of Societies 194
Answers to Correspondents 196
AX UNSOLVED PROBLEM IN THE HISTORY
OF PHOTOGRAPHY.
In historical matter which has been published in
these pages during the last four months, it has been
made clear that the first publication of Wedgwood’s
discoveries in photography was made at the Royal
Institution in 1802, but the question remains how
long before that time Thomas Wedgwood had found
out his process. The claim has been advanced that
his discoveries were made at least as early as 1799,
because a sentence in a letter from James Watt,
written in that year, seems possibly to bear reference
thereto. In this relation the following paragraph
appears in Miss Meteyard’s Group of Englishmen,
London, 1871, page 150 : —
“ When James Watt visited Etruria in 1799, on
business relative to a hand-mill he and Boulton were
supplying to the firm, the subject of Thomas Wedg-
wood’s extraordinary discovery seems to have been
discussed; and a few days later Watt received a
letter (probably a promised one) from Josiah Wedg-
wood, in which were given the details necessary to
experiment. To this Watt replied : ‘ Dear Sir, I
thank you for your directions for the silver pictures,
on which, when at home, I shall try some experi-
ments. I was thinking of your mill after I left you,
and fear the motion of the spindle is too slow, &c.’
James Watt to Josiah Wedgwood , docketed Hand Mill,
1799. Wedgwood MS. S.’”
Additional examination, however, shows that before
that time Thomas Wedgwood was using nitrate of silver
at Etruria ; at least, such was the case if we assume
the accuracy of Miss Meteyard’s statements and dates.
The silver salt is said by her to have been used in
relation to the ornamentation of pottery, and if some-
times applied as sketches for burning-in, Watt might
possibly apply to them the term “pictures.” Miss
Meteyard’s statement, given in her Life of Josiah
Wedgwood, vol. 2, London, 1866, page 685, is: — “To
solve some problems connected with light he used silver
differently prepared, and his observations thereon led
to the invention of what was termed * silvered ware,’
namely, a pattern of dead and burnished silver upon a
black earthenware body. We first hear of this ware
in February, 1791. Thomas Wedgwood to Byerley,
February, 1791, Mayer MS.S .”
The question therefore is — Did Watt’s remark refer to
designs for pottery, or to the earliest English photo-
graphs ?
A few days ago we received a private letter from
Mr. Hensleigh Wedgwood on this and other subjects,
and, with his permission, now give its contents, a3
follows : —
“ Many thanks for the last News, which completely
settles the question. It is clear that Thomas Wedg-
wood never got beyond the unfixed figure on silver
salts in a camera. After 1802 he was in such a
wretched state of health as to be quite incapable of
research of any kind. If in the nineties he had been
capable of producing a true Daguerreotype, it is certain
that he would have brought forward that process before
the Royal Society, and not the fugitive photographs of
1802. I have no doubt that the silver pictures men-
tioned by Watt in his letter to my father were the
photographs in question. Miss Meteyard’s assertions
are worth nothing. She could give me no authority
for attributing the photographs in her book to Thomas
Wedgwood. As a proof of her carelessness and in-
accuracy, I may cite her assertion that Thomas Wedg-
wood bought an estate at Castle Flory and lived there
for a year. The truth was that the brothers had it in
contemplation to purchase an estate at Combe Flory,
but the plan was never carried into execution, nor did
they ever live there at all. No silver pictures were
ever made upon earthenware at all.”
Possibly some light may be thrown upon the main
point at issue by an examination of the documents on
which Miss Meteyard founded her statements, to see
that she has made no mistakes in dates or facts. Was
James AVatt engaged in any experiments relating to
ceramic art about 1799?
A well-known and popular writer has an article in
178
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Marcii 7, 1890.
tlie last Photographic Quarterly, the title of which
pushes Wedgwood’s discoveries in photography back to
the year 1790, but no evidence is given in support
thereof ; indeed, the author says in the article, “ photo-
graphy was not discovered during the eighteenth cen-
tury.” The title of his memoir is, “ Wedgwood and
Davy : What they did for Photography a Hundred
Years Ago.”
They did nothing for photography a hundred years
ago, and Dr. Eder has unearthed evidence that photo-
graphy was discovered during the eighteenth century,
as published recently in these pages.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN BELGIUM.
The Bulletin of the Association Beige de Photographic,
just received, is full of interesting matter, and has for
its frontispiece an exquisite specimen of heliogravure
by J. Lowy, of Vienna, and some good photo-mechani-
cal prints by M. J. Maes.
At a meeting of the Brussels Section of the Belgium
Association, at which Mr. 0. Campo occupied the chair,
Mr. Van Eechout suggested that the Section should
fit up a laboratory for the use of members, and should
apply to the city authorities for permission to hold its
meetings in the Industrial School, and Mr. W. Janssens
undertook to take preliminary steps for the attainment
of the object. M. Geruzet brought under the notice of
the meeting his method of taking photographs by means
of an explosive magnesium compound consisting of : —
Magnesium powder... ... ... ... 4 parts
Chlorate of potash .. . ... ... ... 6 ,,
Sulphide of antimony ... ... ... 1 part
To obtain diffusion of the light, he, by pneumatic
means and the use of spirit flames, fired two small
charges of this powder for each exposure, and it was
found that there was an appreciable interval between
the ignition of the two mixtures ; nevertheless, he
obtained a good group photograph of the membeis pre-
sent. M. Geruzet would probably find it better to fire
the charges by electricity. A dangerous compound, !
such as that described, should not be kept ready mixed.
A few grains only of the powders should be mixed just
before use, otherwise a deadly accident may take place
at some unexpected moment.
At a meeting of the Ghent Section of the Belgian
Association, M. Coupe recommended for the develop-
ment of lantern slides that the plate should be im-
mersed in a mixture of three parts of a 10 per cent,
solution of oxalate of potash with one part of a 10 per
cent, solution of bromide of potassium, before the
application of the usual iron developer ; he said that
by this method the high-lights of the image come out
absolutely transparent. At this meeting Mr. De
Keyzer distributed some platinum prints of a picture
which had been much admired at the Exhibition of the
Section ; it was a view of the banks of the Zwralm, in
Flanders.
At the meeting of the Antwerp Section, M. Maes,
President of the Belgian Photographic Association,
occupied the chair, and he read a report about the work
done by this comparatively new Section since its
foundation. Three years ago it began with thirteen
members ; their number has since increased to seventy-
two. M. Raymond Storms remarked truly, that much
of the prosperity of the Section was due to the
devotedness of M. Maes. The President then
proposed that the Section should occasionally have
demonstrations of ancient photographic processes,
practically unknown to most workers who first
took up photography in the dry plate era. M. Lunden
said that a good way to obtain a matt surface with
aristotype paper is to rub a sheet of glass with a solu-
tion of green soap ( savon vert), then gently wash it
under a rose tap to get rid of the excess of soap, then
apply the print to the glass by means of an india-rubber
roller. 'When dry the print will have a fine matt surface.
Mr. Hansen drew attention to a letter from the
Minister of Finance, dated November 9th last, saying
that positives on glass can enter Belgium duty free,
when they are declared as objects of art and collection.
The Ghent Photographic Exhibition, to which allusion
has previously been made, was held in the grand
salon of the Cercle Artistique. The salon itself,
says the Bulletin, was coquettishly decorated with
dried flowers prepared by M. Schmitz. Mr.
Edgar de Keyser was among the exhibitors. M.
D’Hoy, a veteran Belgian photographer, exhibited
specimens of photo-mechanical printing processes,
dating from the time of Fox Talbot down to the present
day. Mr. A. Sacre-Smits exhibited large carbon prints
of flowers, reminding the Bulletin reviewer, Mr. 0.
Campo, of a similar type of photographs on view at the
Brussels Exhibition in 1883, and exhibited there by
an English amateur, “Mr. Stevens, of Loudon.”
THE BELGLVN INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC
EXHIBITION.
“ Because of circumstances beyond its control,” the Com-
mittee of the Belgian Photographic Association has decided
to postpone until 1891 the International Exhibition which
it intended to hold in Brussels in August, 1890. The
cause of the postponement is said to be the tardiness of
the replies of the Belgian Government officials to letters
about suitable buildings for the proposed Exhibition.
Mexican Fireflies. — A gentleman travelling from Cali-
fornia to Vera Cruz came across millions of fireflies near
Jalapa, one of the most beautiful cities in Mexico. He says
that the road from this point was lined with a dense chaparral,
which was brilliantly illuminated with myriads of fireflies.
These are a bug about the size of an ordinary roach, and emit
a light almost equal to that of a small wax taper. It is not
the occasional sparkle of the little firefly of our country, but
a continual blaze, proceeding from the eyes, as well as from
two points beneath the wings. Several of these insects,
placed in a glass jar, will give sufficient light by which to read
the smallest print, and when one rises in the air to any con-
siderable height, it resembles a beautiful meteor slowly cross-
ing the heavens. Numbers of them flying through the air in
different directions on a dark night present a very pretty
appearance, well calculated to excite the wonder, if not the
superstitious fears, of a person unacquainted with the cause of
so strange a phenomenon. — American Druggist,
March 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
179
SOME RELATIONS BETWEEN FINE ART ANI)
PHOTOGRAPHY.*
BY PIIILir H. NEWMAN.
I say “ some ” advisedly, because I could not, in anything
like the time at our disposal, make even a catalogue satis-
factorily of all the relations these two subjects bear to
one another ; so rapid of late years has been the growth
and progress of the science which, for good or ill, must
affect in some degree every branch of the fine arts in the
future. There are doubtless those here who would like,
and possibly expect, me to describe and enlarge upon the
multiform processes of photogravure, whereby elaborate
reproductions of works of fine art have been made in such
quantities, and of such quality, as to rival, if not to quite
revolutionise, most of the engraving processes. Drawing
on wood, for example, seems going the road of lost arts,
while chromo-lithography trembles at the advance science
is making in the direction of chromo-photography. But
however much I may regret I may be disappointing
some of my audience in barely noting these important
changes, I conceive that my business this evening is with
something of greater importance still, namely, with the
bearing photography has had, and may be expected to
have, not only on the fine art of to-day itself, but upon
public taste and criticism, and how that sense of appre-
ciation has been and will be affected in us, without which
fine art can have no existence at all, and by which appre-
ciation it has lived and had its being in every period, and
thriven under conditions of such exact ratio that its re-
mains constitute for ”s an intellectual reflex of the ages.
Making due allowance for much exaggeration and the
enthusiasm natural to new-born hopes but only partially
realised, no one, I suppose, more than myself will acknow-
ledge the many benefits and advantages photography has
conferred on the artist, in permanently registering with
the rapidity of a flash those effects in nature that are as
evanescent in mountain, sea, ®r cloud; the crisp-cast sha-
dow of the sun-lit snow, the thundering breaker on the
storm-lashed beach, or wandering wavelets of a silent
strand ; the lightning-laden cumulus, the tempest’s rack,
the myriad-leaved copse, and the bewildering detail of
hedgerow and flowering dale : all are brought home to us
in light and line, half-tone and shade, in an exactitude no
pencil could imitate, and no lifetime be long enough to
master. Yet, in acknowledging all this and much more,
I am not blinded to the fact that photography is not an
unmixed blessing, and that it has exercised, and will exer-
cise, an influence not altogether for good, unless our eyes
are opened in time, and a great effort is made to minimise
the evil. Should any photographer be here who fears
from the foregoing that I am intending to follow any other
artist’s lead, and run a tilt against the camera, let him be
assured I have no such quixotic intention, as I recognise
both its stability and its use too well.
But there are photographers and photographers ; photo-
graphers that are artists, and photographers who never will
be artists. Now-a-days, everybody is a photographer,
from duchesses downwards, and this increases the
danger, because it is in the nature of things that, though
photographers be many, artists will always be few. I will
go further than this, and say at once there are some people
no more to be trusted with a camera than they are to be
trusted with a six-shooter ; indeed, far less, for he who
Head February 27th, before the Society for the Encouragement of
Fine Art.
misused the six-shooter and killed someone, would probably
be sorry for it, but those who misuse cameras, and blaze
away, pot-shotting — so to speak — anything and everything
that turns up, are hardened sinners, and usually very
boastful of their enormities. For this reason I look —
perhaps with suspicion — upon some recent inventions in
photographic apparatus, as offering, by their extreme
simplicity, premiums to this sort of people to commit
something worse than homicide, for they kill their mother
Nature, and glory in the crime. Then there is another
class — a class that ought to know, and perhaps does know,
better ; indeed, its members can often appreciate a work
of art when they see one ; who, while they are quite able
to take a good photograph, will not use their brains when
finding a subject, will not bear in mind that detail will
never compensate for faulty composition. These people
take a view when, if they had simply moved their tripod-
stand twenty yards perhaps to right or to left, they might
have taken a picture. Here, then, I think is one of the
relations of fine art to photography that we may, I hope,
profitably talk about to-night, for you know there are
those in these highly artistic and aesthetic times who look
upon every photograph as a picture. One hears them say :
“ It must be a picture, you know ; it is nature itself, and
the detail comes out sharp all over.” So like a picture !
But absurd as this is, the feeling that prompts this kind of
criticism is far wider spread amongst us than we are
inclined to allow, and besides affecting photography, from
which it has sprung, it has affected fine art in a very
marked manner ; for while a very great advance must be
noted in our drawing and painting, and in the public
appreciation of drawing and painting of late years, yet the
exhibition of the intellectual qualities of composition and
breadth is rarer among us, and not so keenly sought for
as it should be by an art loving people ; and I have no
hesitation whatever in saying that the insidious influence
of bad photography has much to answer for in this respect.
There is good cause, then, for us to use our utmost
endeavour to guard against the growth of an evil that i3
likely to bear so seriously upon the art of the future ; and
where there are so many photographers, the greater reason
for the multiplication of critics, and the furtherance of the
study of art based on the just contemplation of that of
past ages — a study now within the reach of everyone ; a
study that everyone with any pretension to culture and
refinement ought and might make their own. Now I
know perfectly well that I shall be met on the very
threshold of this argument by the answer, “ Oh, don’t you
think that we have far too many studies already ? ” Alas !
every schoolboy knows that ; but with the view of each
becoming an admirable Crichton, we do, as a rule, too
much of everything, and too little of any one thing to
succeed. A bit of Latin, a bit of Greek, a bit of painting,
a bit of fiddling, a bit of banjoing, a bit of photography —
bits of everything by turns, and nothing long. This is
an age of “bits,” as regards culture — little “ bits,” Vage tie
morceaux. One of our most prosperous periodicals is, you
know, called Tit-Bits. I have no digression to apologise
for, as the curse of pretty trifling often follows the photo-
grapher into the field, where perforce he goes in for bits
— lovely bits forsooth though they be, and full of detail,
don’t-cher-know. Let me warn him, however, if he in-
dulges much in this sort of thing artistically, he is a lost
creature, for he will neglect, and gradually ignore, the
higher claims of something greater — the subtle charm of
distance midst the rounded hills, the solemn stillness of
180
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
the darkening woods, the noble sentiment of landscape,
the mystery of light and space. In his hunger for detail
his camera so readily gratifies, he is in danger, I repeat,
of overlooking the main elements of a grand picture.
Pity, indeed, if in this search after ever so enchanting
“ bits,-’ he and his following become blinded to higher in-
tellectual claims. Surely it were idolatry to worship a
goddess at every corner, and forget a uniting and over-
ruling divinity.
From this it will be gathered that I am not of those who
think it is in “the very nature of photography to degrade
natural appearances ” ; indeed, it should be known to the
merest tyro in the art that where this is the case, the
photographer has but himself to blame for having taken
his picture with a wrong lens, altering the perspective of
the scene, widening his foreground to the sacrifice of his
distance. Of course your one-lens man is constantly
doing this, and it would seem as though he were often
one-eyed, as he does not himself see the distortion. It
is, however, when he comes to photograph animals, or the
human figure, that these considerations first dawn upon
him seriously, especially when he finds a photograph of a
horse, for instance, with a head and neck of monstrous
dimensions, but with the legs and hind-quarters of a pony.
Then, of course, it is admitted that something is wrong
somewhere. Only the other day I saw exhibited in the
Strand a photograph of this description, certainly not
quite so exaggerated, but still defective in proportion,
while in all other respects it was really a beautiful work ;
but it is precisely this beauty that misleads our taste, for,
as Pope says : —
“ Vice is a monster of such frightful mien,
That to be hated needs but to be seen ;
Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,
We first endure, then pity, then embrace.”
That there are difficulties to overcome to obtain a good
photograph goes without saying, and those who cannot, or
■will not, draw, but rely on the camera as their means of
expression in fine art, must be prepared to meet with some
disappointment. The camera is a great mannerist in art,
and it needs not only very great technical skill, but
adaptive artistic capacity of no mean order, to become
facile princeps with it, and to rise above mannerism ; hence
the reason why, though photographers are many, really
fine photographic pictures are so few.
It has been said that “ photography is an operation of
chemistry more or less directed by taste.” Quite so ; this
is no disparagement, however, for art of all kinds is brought
about by operations, either chemical or mechanical, more
or less directed by taste, and it must be admitted that
where some of these operations are more difficult of control
than others, it simply makes them, when successful,
redound the more to the credit of the operator. But we
are not now talking so much about the operations as of
the taste that directs them. And again, we are face to
face with the relation between fine art and photography,
for if you set out to take a photograph, unless as
a mere topographical memorandum, it is presumably
with the idea of obtaining what, for want of a more
accurate definition, we term a picture. But to get a
picture presupposes a large amount of the artistic
faculty, either inborn, or developed by wide education
and knowledge of art. The mere use of the camera will
not give you what you want, any more than the use, how-
ever mechanically excellent, of the pencil. Nature is
not art ; it must be seen with artistic eyes, or presented
by artistic means. Children and naked savages have an
advantage over us here : they make nature artistic, because
they invest it with their superabundant imagination,
untrammelled by the conventions of the artificial and the
commonplace. They are the true impressionists, and
make a clean sweep of all that detail that we so much
require to help our halting fancy. Suppose, for a moment,
it were possible to bring back a Viking cruiser, some early
hardy Norseman, and give him half an hour’s run on the
underground railway; if he survived, we know precisely
what he would do when he got back to his crags and
peaks or native swamp : he would take a deep, deep
draught of something ; he would free his mind from all
considerations of block systems, Westinghouse brakes,
and times of trains ; he would string his harp as it had
ne'er been strung before, and he would sing, until his eyes
were bleared and his beard like a waterfall, a saga that,
both in artistic truth and poetic intensity, would ring
the world through till the crack of doom. Now I do not
believe there are many season-ticket holders who could
do that. No ; as civilization advances, imagination recedes,
in many minds “great conjuration,” and very “mighty
magic ” is needed to call up in them the ghost of an idea
outside the actual facts of a scene, commonplace or other-
wise. This conjuration it is the function and privilege
of the artist to supply ; he may do it by pen or pencil,
chisel or graver, or with the camera to a certain extent,
if he choose, but he never can do it at all unless he
possess the abracadabra of his art, call it genius, divine
afflatus, what you will : merely focussing a view and
developing a plate will never succeed in charming a be-
holder with the result, unless something of this sort has
guided the photographer, and been present with him
throughout all the operations — that something that you
may get a smattering of, at least, in the National Gallery,
but which is never learnt in the dark room.
Coleridge has called painting “something between a
thought and a thing.” I think it would not be amiss if
photographers, professional or amateur, would always
remember this definition when they focus a view or
subject. In these days of perfect appliances, dry plates,
and ready-made developers, they are, as a rule, pretty
well sure of the “thing” they focus; but how about the
thought ?
Ladies and gentlemen, the photographers are not all
to blame, be they amateurs or professionals. We members
of the Society for the Encouragement of the Fine Arts —
have we not sinned also ? Have we not looked too much
for the thing, and gloated over it in our picture exhibitions?
Of course we have. Our art training throughout the
country is one persistent effort to get the thing, at any
rate, and not to trouble much about the thought, leaving
it very much to chance, and to come, perhaps, of its own
accord. But it does not come. Year after year goes by ;
the thing increases and multiplies, but the thought, even
when it presents itself at all, is snubbed and passed over
for the most part almost as an impertinence.
No, this is not an imaginative, but a localizing age. A
writer, in a recent number of the Athenxum, instances and
comments on this very ably. He says : “ Lord Tennyson
informed a recent visitor to Farringford that Locksley
Hall is no particular hall, and the Moated Grange is no
particular grange. But the localizing craze is already
busy upon them. So profoundly undramatic is the temper
of our times, that a poet is not considered capable of
imagining any dramatic action.” Had a “ Midsummer’s
March- 7, 1890. )
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
181
Night’s Dream ” been written by a contemporary poet, the
public would have demanded, and the literary and artistic
providers would have provided, a photograph from life of
Titania, and an accurate water-colour drawing ‘ of the
bank whereon the wild thyme blows.”'
Let us, then, try and encourage both the “ thought and
the thing ” — the idea and its realization — in future, and,
above all, never encourage the thing without an adequate
proportion of thought ; we shall then do a great deal to
stop reckless pot-shotting in photography. The dry-plate
makers will suffer a little, indeed, as they will sell a few
thousand dozen less plates each year ; but not only will
there be a much nearer alliance between Fine Art and
photography than there has ever been, but Fine Art itself
will be beuefitted in every branch, as we shall have the
ineffable satisfaction of seeing all picture exhibitions
reduced to reasonable proportions, and even sculpture in
England may reveal another Galatea. The thing will be
inspired with a thought.
In saying thus much on the intellectual side of the
question, let me not be considered to ignore what has
already been accomplished by photographers and amateurs
who have really been artists. An exhibition of the works
of the late Mi-. O. G. Rejlander, shown in the rooms of
the Camera Club, sufficiently indicates, among many
failures, many successes in an earnest endeavour and hope
to make the camera subserve a very high art ideal indeed ;
and when we consider that these works were taken under
the disadvantages and with the extra Labour of the wet or
collodion process, we must allow them the greater ac-
knowledgment and praise. At the same time, we cannot
help wondering the more, that this higher art ideal has
been, so to speak, lost sight of in figure composition,
excepting by a few well known names, and this, too, in
an age of manipulative simplicity that Rejlander could
hardly have dreamt of. All praise, then, to them and he
if, ever persevering, they seem to have borne in mind, with
Browning, “A man’s reach should exceed his grasp, or
what’s a Heaven for?”
It must always be borne in mind, however, in a material-
istic age, that the spread of artistic capacity can never be
expected to keep pace with scientific progress, and this
has, doubtless, been an obstacle to the higher successes in
photographic art ; for while there are all manner of aids
to scientific research, and the accumulation of scientific
fact has contributed to the continuous and progressive
excellence in the production of what we have termed the
“thing,” the thoughtful part of the subject, as we have
seen, is a matter of individual effort, and of course of a
much slower and laborious cultivation, dependent on a
multitude of contributive and, at first sight perhaps,
irrelevant studies, besides the divine afflatus, or genius,
as it rarely occurs ; and where it does not occur, the per-
sonal trouble and observation necessary arc all the more
laborious, before arriving at the most mediocre capacity for
compiling or creating the elements that shall stir that
something in a spectator which assures him he is in the
presence of a work of art.
Now let us see where we are arrived. Firstly, I have
endeavoured to show that photography has exercised, and
is exercising, for good or ill, an influence on fine art, and
that this influence has not been altogether for good in the
past, more especially as having occasioned an attention to
detail to the prejudice of unity and breadth. Secondly, 1
express a confident belief that an increasing love of frag-
mentary studies by photography and painting is tending
to narrow the scope of art generally. Thirdly, I insist that,
in regard to Coleridge’s definition of painting as being
“ something between a thought and a thing,” the thought in
this country is too often a minus quantity. Moreover,
although we have seen that very earnest endeavours have
been made from time to time to achieve a very high art
ideal indeed with the camera, yet much carelessness and
want of training, external to technique, have brought it into
artistic disrepute, and made it very productive, in an artis-
tic sense, of bad work. For this reason it behoves us to
be more eclectic, not only for the sake of the future of
photography, but for the sake of art itself, and it would be
well were the photographic societies to offer more prizes
for really artistic work, and obtain, where necessary,
acknowledged artistic assistance in making the awards.
I have admitted already that the camera has a place
among art methods as a means of expression, if photo-
graphers choose to make it so. This has been often dis-
puted, and not without great show of reason, and it must
be allowed that, while as a means of illustration it is
boundless in scope and detail, as a means of expression it
is very limited indeed, and can never, in that sense, hold
an equal place with brush, pencil, chisel, or graver,
implements which, in the nature of things, mostly being
moved directly by the artist’s hand, in nervous continuity
with his brain, express his thoughts more directly. Thus
an etching, equal in breadth and light and shade generally
with a photograph of the same subject, though the photo-
graph shows an unquestionably greater veracity in detail,
the etching will always command our greater interest as
being far and away the greater work of art. Another
important disadvantage in photography is the inalterability
(in general) of the model, susceptible always of modifica-
tion in other artistic modes of expression.
To show the great appreciation I have for what photo-
graphy has already done as an assistant to art, I cannot do
better now than afford you a few more glimpses of some
of my own studies, and those of gentlemen who have
kindly lent me some of theirs for the same purpose, not,
however, pretending for a moment that they (at least mine)
at all adequately illustrate the possibilities the camera may
have.
VOCATION OF AN AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHER.
BY H. VOCKLINGTON, F.R.M.S.
The paper defined an amateur photographer as one who
practised photography from his love of it. A man did
not cease to be an amateur because he chanced to sell a
few prints now and then, or become one through photo-
graphing for exhibition purposes with the single hope of
coming prizes.
The vocation to which an amateur photographer was
called consisted : — 1st, in following up the line of the
history of the relation between amateurs and photo-
graphy by doing what he could to improve our knowledge
of the principles underlying photographic practice, per-
fecting the technique, and devising new methods ; and
2nd, in doing practical work, such as photographing old
buildings, historic remains, incidents of daily life, which
though of no great interest now, would be excessively
valuable to posterity, and especially in photographing care-
fully year by year those phases of our national life, such
as peasant life, which were slowly passing away. In brief,
the paper said that the true vocation of an amateur pho-
tographer lay in helpfulness.
' Abstract of a paper read at the Yorkshire College, Leeds.
182
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHING THE FORTH BRIDGE.
Last Tuesday the Forth Bridge was opened by the Prince
of Wales, and just at the time that this great struc-
ture has been completed, the following account of the
photographing thereof, written by the editor of The
Journal of the Photographic Society of India , and pub-
lished in the Journal, will be of additional interest : —
When at home the other day, I remember being pro-
foundly impressed with the truth of this moral whilst
attempting to take within the limits of a 7 by 5 plate some
photographs indicative of the colossal proportions of the
Forth Bridge.
The resident engineer, Mr. Cooper, had kindly allowed
me to photograph the bridge from any part I chose ; and
no sooner had I landed on one of its enormous piers than
my difficulties began. There was no getting far enough
away from any part of it. Looking up through the thicket
of cross bracings and girders branching out from the
gigantic booms, I could see the busy workmen far above
me clinging about them like bees. To the naked eye the
immensity and grandeur of the noble structure was all
present ; but when I attempted to focus anything which
required much tilting of the camera upwards, the picture
on the ground glass became like the stereoscopic puzzle T
have been describing, exaggerated and unmeaning. So,
wisely refraining from the impossible, I took all I could
see from eye level which afforded the chance of a view.
A westerly gale was sweeping the rain clouds down the
Firth and screaming through the great bridge on the
morning of my visit, rendering it impossible for good
photography. But it was my only chance of securing
pictures, so, having taken some from the pier level, I was
spirited aloft, bag and baggage, in a cage hung from a
wire rope, and swiftly deposited on the landing stage at
rail level 150 feet high. Here I was conducted by an
obliging official to the extreme bed of the cantilever, where
the workmen were engaged in adding girder to beam and
beam to girder, every day lessening the gulf intervening
between the cantilevers. Amidst the hissing of steam
cranes, the clanking of the rivetters, the cries of the
workmen, and the roaring of the wind, I set up my camera
iu a sheltered nook to leeward of a huge boom, and,
having focussed across the chasm, waited impatiently for
a lift in the clouds.
“ I low would it be,’’ shouted my guide through the tem-
porary fog horn he made of his hands, u were one of the
workmen to get out there in the foreground? ” pointing to
the very outermost cross girder, under which 150ft. below
could be seen the muddy water rushing like a mill stream.
A magnificent idea,’ roared I incredulously in return —
“if his life is insured ! Before I could expostulate, he
addressed one of the workmen near— “ 1 say, Wullie, just
slip along that girder a bit, and let the gentleman take
your portrait.’ Wullie, who was bolting together a piece
of the ironwork, laid down his tools with an “ Aye, aye
sir, quietly walked out on one of the overhanging beams.
Reaching the extreme end, this amateur Blondin then
deliberately buttoned up his pea-jacket, and, cramming
his peaked cap well down on his head, got astride of the
gilder, propelling himself with hands and legs right out
to the centre. Wullie was now exposed to the full force
of the wind and rain ; but turning his bearded face
towards us with a good-humoured smile, he signified his
sense of being photographed by stiffening himself into an
attitude of muscular rigidity too dreadful to see. How-
ever, there was neither time nor opportunity to get him to
look less like the girder on which he sat, so, holding up a
warning hand, I gave him twenty seconds’ exposure, and
he was soon back, working away with his tools again. But
in my endeavour to pierce the murky atmosphere, this
bearded son of Anak is, I regret to say, a mere smudge.
After several attempts at photographing the long vistas
of the bridge at rail level I was personally conducted
by my obliging companion to the extreme top of the can-
tilever. To get there we entered a lift similar to the one
below, and, on the signal being given, up we went at a
great pace, swaying through the keen wind and pene-
trating rain. I would have given much to have had a good
hand camera and a clear day, for the opportunities for pic-
tures on that upward journey, now that the bridge is com-
pleted, are gone for ever. On reaching the top, a fresh
surprise awaited me. I had been cogitating as to how
I could possibly take pictures in such a howling wind,
and was astonished to find that I stepped out of the
cage into a comparative calm. Here we were with the
clouds within arm’s length, so to speak. I could hear
the wind blowing, and see the rain swishing about. We
were in it all, and yet sheltered from it! This pheno-
menon was presently explained by my companion going
to the windward side of the staging, and holding his
handkerchief over the rail. There it snapped and wriggled
about in a strong upward wind current induced by the
obstruction which the structure offered to the blast. This,
rushing upwards, formed an invisible arch of shelter over
us before speeding on its way. Under this strange refuge
and in spite of the rain, I managed to secure some fairly
good negatives of the bridge and surrounding country,
precious not only for the reminiscences they recall, but
also because no photograjdi, now the bridge is finished,
can ever be taken again from its summit.
The painting of this enormous mass of steel is a work
the magnitude of which may be faintly estimated from the
fact that there are some forty-eight acres of surface to go
over with the brush ; and parlous besides, seeing the paint
has to be applied after the removal of the fixed stagings.
Hence the painters have to be raised and lowered on mov-
able stagings hung wherever required. From the summit
where I stood, looking down through the forest of frame-
work, I could see the painters no bigger than ants working
far below. Here I had pointed out to me the scene of one
of the many thrilling incidents attendant on the construc-
tion of the Forth Bridge, which I consider appropriate to
relate in these pages, seeing the hero of it was a professional
photographer, and the story is quite true.
Five painters were painting down one of the colossal
booms which radiate from the base of the cantilevers.
The stage they were on was suspended near the very top,
when, without warning, it suddenly gave way. Three of
the poor fellows, long before they reached the bottom, were
literally smashed to pieces against the interlacing frame-
work which lay in their way. The other two providen-
tially caught at some of the cross bracings immediately
underneath them. There, suspended by their hands, they
clung witli all the energy of despair. The resident engi-
neer, Mr. Cooper, saw the accident from another part of
the bridge, and rushed with others to the rescue. Now,
to get at the poor fellows, some of the heavy planking of
the overhead staging had to be ripped off. This was done
as quickly as a hundred nervous hands couldttear it away,
and presently, down far underneath, could be seen one
March 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
183
of the men. The other was out of sight, and, to get at
him, still another piece of heavy staging had to be cut
away. Meanwhile, hasty preparations were made to rescue
the one in view ; but he, looking up at them, cried out,
“ Leave me, and save the other man. He is done ; I can
hold out a bit longer.” Thus re-assured, they ran, and
lowered down a man with a rope, to which the exhausted
painter, on the point of letting go his hold, was securely
fastened and hauled up into safety. They then returned
and rescued in like manner the brave fellow who had so
gallantly risked his life for his comrade. The hero of
this adventure was a poor photographer's assistant, called
Toddy, who, being out of work, had to accept this perilous
painter’s work to keep him from starving.
Perhaps the most touching part of the tale was its sequel.
Toddy, after this miraculous escape, went to Edinburgh,
where he found work in a photographer’s studio ; but, it
having transpired that he had been working on the Forth
Bridge, his employer actually turned him into the streets,
on the plea that he dared not entertain the services of an
artist who had been known to work as a common labourer
on the Forth Bridge! Mr. Benjamin Baker, the eminent
engineer and designer of the Forth Bridge, has told this
story in one of his lectures, and a subscription was being
raised for the brave Toddy when I left for India.
PHOTOGRAPHY IX AX AGE OF MOVEMENT.*
BY FRIESE GREENE.
Oi"R age is not on’y an age of movement, but of move-
ments. Xone of us who aspire to the keeping pace with
the times can afford to be indifferent to photography — it
is something which sharpens our intellects, and brings
things to our notice whith we arc always passing, but
never would have noticed but for the knowledge of photo-
graphy. Besides, there are heaps of things we could
never notice — because we never see them — without the
aid of photography ; so we will call photography an extra
bit of sight and an extra bit of intellect, which no doubt
it is. And it is not easy to foretell the future of photo-
graphy offhand, nor yet any other way, so we will
keep to the present uneasiness (which is a sure sign of
advancement), and dwell upon one or two subjects
which are shaping its future.
Now the first is, the interest taken in it by all classes —
high, low, rich, and poor ; the second is its thrusting its
prying eye into everything within the world and, 1 may
say, outside of it too, for it affords the means of depicting
the magnitudes and the places of stars which must other-
wise have been quite unknown to us. There are still
other more marvellous applications which the camera I am
about to bring before you this evening, or at least some-
thing akin to the camera. It will be able to investigate
all the movements of the spider making its web, or a
cloud as it forms, and thousands of other things too
numerous to mention, because you can take 600 pictures
a minute, on one continuous roll of film, by merely turning
a handle. When I first saw a roll of paper go through at
the rate of ten a second, and stop an instant when each
exposure was made, I felt like a child over new toys, though
I was as sanguine as possible, notwithstanding that there
was a slight feeling within me of doubt if it would really
go on doing it. I think my enthusiasm was more than
* A communication to the Bath Photographic Society.
usual over such things. Mr. Mortimer Evans has improved
and improved upon it so much that I am positive the
results will have a tendency to bring forward a new
kind of photography; in fact, it will make an epoch which
will be immensely interesting, for the movements of the
centipede, the vibrations of the heart, will have to submit
to its power of rapid delineation.
Now the next subject I shall connect with this paper,
or at least the movement or movements of photography, is
the ladies, for they are pushing themselves forward in a
marked manner. The interest they take in photography,
the patience with which they work, and the amount of
pains bestowed by them in the different departments, is
something alarming, and we men must look to our laurels
when we bring the words comparison and competition
into notice, for all advancement is brought -within the
scope of those two words — two words, I should say,
that are shaping a future in photography. The ordinary
view held by the majority of people as to the intellectual
power of women as compared with men is not very
encouraging to the fair sex (still, this is comparatively a
bygone notion), whose smaller brain is held to be positive
evidence of smaller mind, or of no mind at all. This
idea is still cherished by some, though in the face of
everything tending to show the opposite it has taken a
long time to convince others that women are truly
capable of rising to any position above that of slavery,
socially and physically. In my opinion it will not be long
before we shall be convinced of the fact that women,
when given the same intellectual advantages and educa-
tion as men, will prove intellectually equal I know it is
difficult to realise in the increasing battle for existence
that men can be confronted by rivals. An argument
may be brought forward that these smaller, delicate beings,
with whiter hands and long hair, are physically and there-
fore mentally incapable of taking an equal place with men
in the intellectual world. Well, what they may be I do not
know, but I do know this, as regards their intellect in
connection with the fascinating art of photography, we
shall find a hot competition, and one in which, if we do not
help them to win a place, they will win a place for them-
selves. If you watch closely you can see women’s intel-
lect brought into use day by day in connection with photo-
graphy.
Women, having had greater educational advantages in
the last few years, have proved themselves able to
appreciate and to bring their refined and cultivated
intellect to bear upon the art of photography, and we
only want another Mrs. Cameron to set the ball rolling.
She was one who was earnest in her work in photography,
as her results show. I wish I had some here to-night
to bring before you. She was one evidently who knew
that true knowledge can but make the learner more
humble and more willing to learn. A weakness may
hinder, but we must all bear in mind it does not crush
mental effort. So let me impress upon you, the mem-
bers of the Bath Photographic Society, to encourage
ladies to join the Society, and, whatever you do, do not
ignore their work. Look at it two or three times, com-
pare your ideas with theirs, and you will find you will
have soon other ideas cropping up.
Now, a few concluding words to this Society. Can
you not begin a museum of photographic relics? and
within this museum can you not start a weekly class for
young ladies and gentlemen to learn photography, and
let some of the members teach them?
x'r\
184
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
REACTIONS OF VARIOUS DEVELOPERS.— Bv L. van Neck.
Hvdroquinone.
l)r. Byck's
Yellowish
crystals-
Pyrogallol.
White
sublimate.
Pyrocatechin.
Greyish.
Hydroquinone.
White
needles.
EikonogeD.
Yellowish
crystals.
Rf-sorcine
sublimed.
Hydroxy lmnine
> ydrochlorate.
White crystals.
Taste
Sweet ;
Slightly
Bitter.
Sweet ;
Saline.
Sweet.
Acid.
slightly
bitter.
slightly
bitter.
bitter.
Solution
Colourless.
Colourless,
Colourless,
Colourless,
Colourless,
Colourless.
Colourless.
becoming
becoming
becoming
turning
brown.
greenish.
slightly
rapidly dark
brownish.
brown.
Reaction
Neutral.
Acid.
Acid.
Neutral.
Neutral.
Neutral.
Very acid.
Act ion of lleat.
Fusible and
Fusible and
Fusible and
Fusible and
Fixed residue,
Fusible and
Fusible and
volatile.
volatile.
volatile at
volatile.
carbonises
volatile.
volatile.
240° C.
and becomes
incandes-
cent, leaving
a white saline
residue.
Solution of
Nil.
Blue coloura-
Nil, turns
Nil.
Violet
Nil.
Nil.
Ferrous
tion.
green after
colouration.
Sulphate.
long stand-
ing.
Solution of
Nil.
Dark brown
Emerald
Nil.
Yellowish
Violet blue.
Nil, decolour-
Ferric
colouration,
green,
green, be-
ises the ferric
Chloride.
becoming
becoming
coming
chloride.
violet with
violet with
rapidly
excess of
a little
yellowish
sodium car-
sodium
brown,
bonate.
carbonate,
and then
and red with
dirty-brown
excess of
with sodium
same salt.
carbonate.
Tincture of
Decolourises
lled-brown
Nil.
Decolourisa-
Reddish-
Instantaneous
Decolourisa-
Iodine.
the tincture.
colouration.
tion.
brown
decolourisa-
tion.
colouration.
tion.
Solution of
Nil.
White pre-
White pre-
Nil.
White pre-
Nil.
At first no-
Flu ml lie
cipitate.
cipitate.
cipitate,
thing; then a
Acetate.
turning
precipitate
black.
forms.
Solution of
Yellowish
Yellow,
Yellow,
Yellow,
Yellow, turn-
Nil.
Nil.
Potassium
colouration.
turning
becoming
turning
iug brown
Carbonate.
turning
blackish
brown.
brown
very rapidly
brown in
the air.
brown.
rapidly.
on shaking.
Solution of
After a time a
Slow reduc-
Very slow
Slow reduc-
Instantaneous
Nil.
White pre-
Silver
grey precipi-
tion to
reduction ;
tion.
reduction.
cipitate.
Nitrate.
tate; solution
metal ;
solution
colourless.
solution
brown.
yellowish.
Dilute lhjdro-
Nil.
Nil.
Violet
Nil.
Rose coloura-
Nil.
Nil.
chloric Acid.
colouration.
tion in dilu-
ted solution,
becoming
greenish on
addition of
ammonia.
These reactions take place in a solution containing i per cent, of the developing agent. — Bulletin Belye.
Makch 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
185
TONING WITH METALS OF THE I ’LATENT .0
GROUP.
The attempts heretofore made to tone silver prints with
platinum have not yielded satisfactory results. In solu-
tions of platinic chloride, the silver image rapidly becomes
pale and disappears, for the silver is converted into chloride,
and is not replaced bv platinum, that metal being simply
reduced to platinous chloride. But if a solution of platin-
ous chloride be employed, and, contrary to the require-
ments of a gold toning bath, this bath be rendered acid
with mineral or vegetable acid, the silver prints immersed
in it quickly acquire a black tone, passing through inter-
mediate shades of an agreeable purple. Two atoms of
silver are then replaced by one of platinum.
Palladium, iridium, and osmium, under the same con-
ditions as the platinum, furnish characteristic tones, and
the general method of preparation of the baths appears to
be based on the principle that toning by metals of the
platinum group must be conducted in acid baths, and the
metal must be in the lowest form of combination.
Platinum Toning. — The soluble and very stable chloro-
platinites make excellent toning baths. Any of the
alkaline chloroplatinites can be employed, the following
formula serving as a type : —
Potassium chloroplatinite ... ... ... 1
Sulphuric acid ... ... ... ... ... 5
Water 1,000
The sulphuric acid may be replaced by hydrochloric acid,
but since the latter renders the chloroplatinites more stable,
its quantity should not be greater than 3 in 1,000, or, by
organic acids, excepting such as formic, tartaric, or oxa-
lic, which exert a reducing action on the platinum salt,
especially under the influence of light.
The toning bath may be prepared directly from platinic
chloride by boiling it in the light with an appropriate
reducing agent in the exact quantity required to reduce
the salt to the platinous condition.
An excellent toning bath may be thus prepared by
boiling in a glass flask a mixture of two grams platinic
chloride in solution, with one gram sodium neutral tartrate,
until the yellow liquid assumes a dull grey colour, then
making up the solution to one litre, and adding the proper
quantity of acid.
Rutheiiiiim and Osminin. — I have not succeeded in ob-
taining with ruthenium and osmium other tones than
yellow, differing but little from the untoned prints.
Palladium. — A solution containing one gram sodium
chloride, two grams palladious chloride, and 200 grams
acetic acid to the litre of water, rapidly blackens silver
tones, but the paper takes a yellow tint, which, even after
bleaching by five per cent, ammonia water, reappears more
or less rapidly after fixing, and destroys the value of the
prints.
Iridium. — The iridium tone resembles that of gold. The
bath may be prepared by dissolving one or two grams of
iridium and platinum double chloride in one litre of water,
and acidifying as with platinum. Silver prints tone slowly
in this bath, but the whites remain pure and hard : some
soft, violet tones are obtained.
Osmium. — This metal gives tones quite characteristic.
The bath may be made by dissolving one or two grams of
ammonia chlorosmite and twenty grams .acetic acid in a
litre of water. Prints immersed in this bath take first a
sienna brown tint; this colour soon becomes modified,
first, in the half tones of the image, and changes to a more
or less intense sky blue, which affects the whole print. If.
instead of allowing the prints to become blue, they are
withdrawn from the bath as soon as the blue begins to
appear in the whites, a very curious result is obtained after
the fixing. Besides the whites of the photograph, two
tones are present — alight brown in the deep shadows, and
a blue in the half-tones. With mineral acids, the final tone
obtained by the use of osmium is not blue, but violet, and
this tint appears even in the whites of the print. — Com/itrs
Rend ns.
A NEW PHOTO-LIT IIO GRAPHIC TRANSFER
PAPER.
This new transfer paper has been used with good results
in the ^ ienna Royal Institute of Photography and Repro-
duction. A colour is used on it, prepared by .Mr. Adalbert
Franz, which is put up in foil tubes, like oil colours. The
paper carries, as usual, a thin coating of gelatine. The
colour is thin and very fatty. Mr. Franz gives the follow-
ing directions for its preparation : — The sensitising solu-
tion is made up of 50 gin. (in winter GO) of bichromate of
potash, dissolved in 1,000 gm. of water. After this is
completely dissolved, add aqua ammonia until the solution
is a bright yellow. The paper is soaked in this solution
in a dark room until it is thoroughly impregnated and
soft, and then hung up in the same room to dry.
For fine drawings and autotypes, the paper should bo
squeegeed on to a thoroughly cleaned glass plate ; a sheet
of waxed tracing cloth or rubber should be laid between
the wet paper and the squeegee to avoid rubbing away the
former. The exposure should be ample. After exposing,
the sheet is fastened on a board with thumb-tacks, and
the colour applied as directed below. It should be spread
all over the print, very thinly and equally. After about
three minutes’ immersion in the water the highest reliefs
begin to appear, and washing is then continued until all
the detail is out, the print finally being laid upon a glass
plate and rubbed with a soft sponge or a tuft of cotton-
wool until completely developed. Care should be taken
that everything is very clean, in order to avoid spotting
the whites of the print.
For transfer to zinc the paper must be soaked in a two
per cent, solution of alum and washed again. Tf the colour
leaves the print in washing, exposure has been too short.
A property of this paper is to be noted — the formation of
a hard film cm the gelatine in case any of the solutions are
too warm, which repels the colour. The sheet may be
anchored at the corners by little bits of lead, to prevent
its rolling up during development. The colour is squeezed
out of its tube in a semi-fluid condition, and is dissolved
in a solution, kept ready, of equal parts of benzine and
turpentine. Then, with a broad brush or a very soft
sponge, it is evenly spread over the print in a thin and
equal coating. It should only be used well thinned down
with the oils.
Before transferring, the print is laid between sheets of
wet blotting-paper until it is soft enough. It should be
run through the press under considerable pressure. The
colour, it is said, transfers well to zinc, as well as upon
stone. — Photo. Com-spondenz.
Views Wanted. --Mr. R. E. Mack, 24, St. Bride Street,
E.C., writes : — “I am wanting some good views of beautiful
scenes and landscapes. Could any of your readers recommend
one or two really good photographers of these subjects ? ”
186
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Mabcii 7, 1890.
iflotcg,
A city contemporary is rather behind the times. In
referring to some old houses near Crutchcd Friars, it
suggests that these are subjects which the “ Society
for Photographing llelics of Old London ’’ should interest
itself in. This Society has now been extinct some two
or three years, as has been regretted more than once in
these columns. As for the scries of photographs, the
result of some years working, we understand, they — or
a selection of the most interesting— will shortly be
issued to the public in the form of reproductions. The
size will be much reduced, and the idea is to form a
kind of gift book of an ornamental and tasteful charac-
ter. Mr. Monks, the secretary of the defunct society,
will, we believe, edit the series. With appropriate
letterpress well done, the volume should prove very
attractive.
Photography, we suppose, has been productive of more
verbal quips and cranks than any science one could
mention. A pun by Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes is the
latest instance. He used to be an amateur photo-
grapher, and whenever he presented a picture to a
friend, he wrote on the back of it “ Taken by 0. W.
Holmes and Sun.” Perhaps the neatest example of
word play is that furnished by the late William
Brough, who, when shown a photograph of a friend
taken by a photographer named Death, exclaimed,
“ Ah, taken from life, of course ! ”
Mr. Yicat Cole is painting the Thames from the
point of view which fifty years ago or so used to be
considered the only one ; at least it always figured in
the illustrated topographical books of London of the
period when steel engravings were most in vogue.
We refer to the view as seen from the Observatory
Hill, in Greenwich Park. It is rather curious that of
late years this singularly picturesque view of London,
with St. Paul’s as the conspicuously central object,
should have been so neglected by photographers.
Possibly the reason is that with the enormous steam
boat traffic, and the multiplication of factories on the
river side, the atmosphere is never free from smoke.
This view of London without St. Paul’s would be
worthless, and it is probable that the times in a year
when St. Paul’s is visible from the Observatory Hill
could be counted on one’s fingers. Mr. Cole’s experi-
ence is, wc understand, of this nature. He is anxious
to secure an afternoon effect, but though he has visited
the place many times, on only two occasions, and then
for a very brief space, has he seen the cathedral.
Photography in France still keeps up its character
as a political barometer. Those who regarded the es-
capade of the Due d’Orleans as the outcome of a boyish
impulse must have been somewhat undeceived when
they saw the shower of portraits — mostly photographs
— with which Paris has been deluged. The inference
is that the so-called escapade was the result of a Royalist
organization, as these portraits must have taken a long
time preparing, and the sudden avalanche can only have
had for its object apolitical demonstration. To anyone
ignorant of party tactics the appearance of these photo-
graphs might seem an indication of public feeling, but
of course it means nothing of the kind.
We have not the slightest objection to supplying
our non-photographic contemporaries with information,
but wc are inclined to raise a protest when our para-
graphs are appropriated in wholesale fashion and made
to pass as original. In the Artist, a sixpenny monthly
magazine, for February is a special column headed
“Photographic Notes,” consistingentircly of unacknow-
ledged paragraphs clipped nolens volens from our issue of
January 1 7th.
Jan Van Beers is as lucky over his law suits as he is
over his paintings, some of which have made remark-
able hits. He was once accused of producing his well-
known picture, “ La Sirene,” by painting over a
photographic basis. He brought an action against his
slanderer, and won his case. Since then certain art
workmen, once in his employ, accused him of signing
paintings made by him and others, and selling them as
his own. He went to law, but was defeated, one
result being that Sedelmeyer, the American art dealer,
who exploited Munkacsy’s “Christ before Filate,” in
the United States, repudiated the contract he had made
with Van Beers to allow him the use of his gallery in
Paris for an exhibition of his pictures. The artist,
however, carried his case to a superior court, and there
the judgment of the court below was reversed. On
being cleared of the charge of manufacturing spurious
“ Van Beers,” he immediately commenced an action
against Sedelmeyer, and has just won the day, the art
dealer being compelled to pay damages and costs.
Piobably these legal proceedings have prevented the
holding in London the usual exhibition of Van Beers’
artistic eccentricities and horrors, which had come to
be quite a metropolitan institution. Of course it is
annoying to be charged with forging one’s own produc-
tions, but the system of employing others to do the
minor details, the characteristic touches being reserved
for the master, is by no means an uncommon one.
Vandyck, as a writer in the Times proved the other
day, was really a wholesale manufacturer of portraits.
Indeed, in no other plan than by a subdivision of labour
could lie have executed the enormous number of com-
missions which flowed in upon him. How much of his
own work and how much that of his assistants is to be
discovered iu his various paintings, only experts can
decide ; but it may be taken, as a rule, that the
arrangement of the figures, the lighting of the hands
and face were his, the drapery being left to others.
In this respect the system is analogous to that pursued
by the busy photographer, who interests himself only
in the posiug and lighting, his assistant performing the
other operations.
March 7, 1890.]
TIIE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
187
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY DR. H. W. VOGEL.
Water Liciitdruck: Process —Magnesium Flash-Light—
Police and Jury — New Magnesium Flash-Light- —
The Grammophone and Photography— Restoring Yel-
low Albumen Prints — Yellow Fog on Dry Plates.
In my letter, published December 28th, page 7-13, I men-
tioned Husuik's water Liciitdruck process. This process
is a curious one. The Liciitdruck process is based upon
the principle that a gelatine chromated film becomes in-
soluble in water by the action of light, but obtains the
capability of absorbing fatty ink. If, therefore, a chrome
gelatine film is copied under a negative, the parts through
which the light can penetrate will absorb fatty ink, whereas
the parts on which the light has not acted will not absorb
ink. They remain, however, pervious to water, e.<j., for
water-colours.
If, therefore, a copy has been made under a positive,
and the film is rolled with water-colour, this will adhere
to the parts which were not acted on by light. This is
the principle of the water Liciitdruck process. This has
not yet been applied practically as far as I know.
In my last letter I wrote to you about the new mag-
nesium blitz studio. Such a one has now been fitted up
at the head quarters of our police to take the portraits of
criminals instantaneously. They are taken to this studio,
which has the appearance of an ordinary room, and asked
to take a seat. Before they are aware of it the proper
focus is taken, the magnesium flashes, and their pictures
are ready to adorn the album for criminals.
A still more extensive application of photography in
the judiciary department is intended to be made.
The many murder cases which have occurred lately
point to the necessity of photographing the locality where
the murder took place. These photographic pictures are
to give not only a true description of the locality, but to
reproduce the original position of the corpse, &c., as far
as obtainable. They should be made in sufficient num-
bers to serve at the preliminary investigation as well as
during the jury trial, and be handy to judge, jury, experts,
and defence. This arrangement would furnish the most
correct proof, as such representations would facilitate very
much the comprehension of the records and the testimony
of witnesses, while otherwise incorrect ideas as to position
and locality might often be formed. The photographic
pictures seem to be of particular advantage to the jury,
who, with their aid, are much better enabled to follow the
proceedings. It might, therefore, be recommended to
take views of external wounds which are discovered on
the corpse for the better understanding of medical experts.
If photography is introduced for the purpose above-
mentioned, it would have to be applied the same as in
railroad accidents and conflagrations. Wherever such a
photograph could be handed to the jury, it would simplify
the proceedings considerably, as a good many questions
might be avoided thereby. The photographic picture
woidd also be of particular advantage in complicated law-
suits.
That the magnesium light is here of importance for
'lews of dark interiors need hardly be questioned. The
latest now is the simplifying of the magnesium lamps, so
that any common oil lamp can be easily arranged to serve
as a magnesium flash-light. This has been accomplished
by the "Fulgur” apparatus of Dr. Leonhard. This new
flash arrangement is such that it can be attached to any
lamp with a chimney, and that here the magnesium is not
blown by a cooling forced air-pressure into the lamp in
the direction of the escaping gas from the lamp, but, on
the contrary, in an opposite direction, and is thrown in by
a mechanical appliance. The magnesium is completely
burned up with an intense flame ; no unburned magnesium
powder can fill the air. Black spots on silvered paper are
oftentimes caused by the magnesium powder. The
arrangement consists of a kind of sling, fastened by
means of a spring and pneumatic release, and can be
attached to the upper end of any oil lamp or gas burner
chimney. If several flashes are to be produced at the
same time — in groups, for instance — the several lamps
containing the arrangement are connected with tubing
and bulb ; thus all the lights of a large chandelier can be
set off with a single pressure for an instantaneous flash.
The apparatus may remain on the lamp for hours be-
fore and after use without the slightest injury. As the
burnt magnesium will only adhere to the inside of the
chimney as an easily removable dust, one is enabled to
take photographs at any time of the day or night in the
most luxuriously fitted up salons without the least dis-
turbance to the occupants.
The flashes produfced in oil lamps are not so powerful
as those from gas burners. Still, two oil lamps are
sufficient to produce a single portrait just as good in
every respect as one taken by daylight, and they can
hardly be distinguished from each other.
It may be mentioned here expressly that it is of no
advantage to use too large a quantity of the powder. A
few centigrams are sufficient.
To photograph by magnesium light, not too large a
room with light walls is the most suitable, saving con-
siderable light in such a place. Portraits of one or two
persons can be well exposed with two or three oil lamps or
one or two gas lamps, even with a not very rapid objec-
tive. Both lamps should be placed on the light side,
about j m. above the height of the eyes; at a distance of
14 m. for bust pictures, and for two-thirds or full figures
a little further off, so that objective, object, and lamp form
an angle of about 45 degrees. The shadow side is lit up by a
white screen, to be placed at more or less distance from the
object. In this way all light effects can be obtained
easily ; for instance, by placing the lamp near by, an illu-
mination of plastic effect can be had. An attentive
operator can easily regulate the effect of his illumination
by the previous picture.
For groups, four or more lamps should be employed,
according to the size and condition of the room and the
number of persons. They are divided in about the
following proportion : — With four lamps — three on the
light side, and one on the shadow side, all about 4 in.
above the eyes, the distance to be in proportion of how
much of the object is to be taken. If the lamps are
so placed that no direct light will fall into the objective,
then the holder and objective may be opened without
the slightest danger of fogging the plate, and, bulb in
hand, the suitable moment may be waited for, when the
picture is taken. I have observed, oftentimes, how a
jovial party was taken at night with this “ fulgur
apparatus, using the same lamp that served to light the
room. The mirror hanging on the chimney protects the
objective from directly penetrating light.
Everybody knows Edison’s phonograph. This has now
a competitor in the grammophone of Jacob Berliner, which
admits the application of photography.
188
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
The grammophone reproduces the sound — the human
voice as well as music — faithfully, but not always without
a disturbing noise. The grammophone is particularly
successful in the reproduction of pieces of music of several
instruments, which arc rendered with an almost faultless
expression. In Berliner's grammophone the wax cylinder
of the Edison phonograph is replaced by a zinc plate,
covered with some protecting coating, into which a point,
fastened by a membrane, draws undulating lines corres-
ponding with the vibrations of the membrane, which is set
in motion by the undulating sound.
Those metal plates are then treated with acids like etch-
ings, and one obtains therewith an imperishable plate,
which can be multiplied at pleasure by the gal va no -plastic
process ; yes, it is even possible to make enlarged photo-
graphic copies from the original plate, from which new
and larger plates of correspondingly stronger sound can
be produced. The sound-funnel arrangement of the
grammophone, by which the tunes can be so increased
thata greater number of people can hear it at the same time,
has been more successful than the arrangement with which
Edison tried to attain the same effect.
At the last meeting of our Society several questions
were asked, which might also be of interest to foreign
readers. They are the following : — Ts there an effective
intensifier for yellow albumen prints, and what is the
treatment ?
According to Davanne, the picture is removed from the
cardboard by soaking in water; it is then plunged into a
neutral gold bath with 0’2 to 0-5 chloride of gold and
potassium to 100 parts of water, left therein until it has
assumed the desired tone, washed in a partly dark room,
and is fixed again. We have not obtained very satisfactory
results with this method.
How is a heavy yellow fog on the erythrosin bath plate
to be removed or to be avoided.
Yellow fog on erythrosin, or erythrosin silver bath
plates, has never happened to us. If the pyro developer
should be the cause of the yellow fog, it can be removed
easily by bathing the plate in aqueous sulphurous acid. A
solution of sulphite of soda (10 per cent.), to which is
added muriatic acid, or diluted sulphuric acid, until it
smells strongly of sulphurous oxide, acts just as well.
Another kind of yellow fog, which, if looked at sideways,
shows a metallic gloss, forms easily if the developer has
been contaminated with fixing soda. The latter dissolves
small quantities of bromide of silver, which, being reduced
by the developer to metallic silver, settles in the gelatine
film. This fog can sometimes be removed from the moist
plate by careful rubbing with the fingers, or a cotton tuft.
Both kinds of fog appear just as much on ordinary as on
colour sensitive plates. — Anthony's Photographic Bulletin.
Royal Institution ok Cheat Britain. — The following are
among the arrangements for the lectures after Easter : — Louis
Fagan, Esq., Assistant Keeper of Prints and Drawings, British
Museum — Three lectures on “ The Art of Engraving ” : 1. Line
Engraving ; 2. Wood Engraving ; 3. Mezzotint Engraving;
on Tuesdays, May 6, 13, 20. C. V. Boys, Esq., A.R.S.M.,
F.R.S., M. R.L, Assistant Professor of Physics, Normal School
of Science, South Kensington — Three lectures on “ The Heat
of the Moon and Stars ” (the Tyndall lectures) ; on Thursdays,
April 17, 24, May 1. Professor Dewar, M.A., F.R.S., M.R.I.,
Fullerian Professor of Chemistry, R.I., Jacksonian Professor of
Natural Experimental Philosophy, Cambridge — Six lectures on
“Flame and Explosives” ; on Thursdays, May 8, 15, 22, 29,
June 5, 12. Captain W. de W. Abney, R.E., C.B., F.R.S.,
M.R.I. — Three lectures on “ Colour and its Chemical Action ” ;
on Saturdays, April 19, 26, May 3.
PROF. PIAZZI SMYTH ON FIGURES IN
PHOTOGRAPHS,
Komi-; time ago we selected some American views, and
especially some of natural clouds caught in the White
Mountain region, and sent them to our esteemed friend.
Prof. < '. Piazzi Smyth, the learned astronomer and Egypto-
logist. Ilis return remarks upon some of them have so
interested us that we are impelled to share them with our
readers. The learned critic says : —
“And the top one of the parcel (no name) struck me at
first speechless in admiration of the clouds, with all the
silvery brightness and effective shading they should have
in a hand and head painted picture, yet accompanied by
trees in the foreground, bright and variously tinted, instead
of masses of midnight darkness. Those trees I still
admire for those qualities of brightness and illumination,
and wonder whether Prof. Vogel's 4 orthochromatic ’
plates could do anything of the kind better, or even so
good : but, alas ! for the beautiful clouds, and the tops of
the hills too, now that I sec what I regard as symptoms of
their being a printing-in from a second negative of clouds,
and clouds alone : taken, too, probably at another place
and time.
“ Another view, where there is a large, diagonal burst
of light coming down from the upper right-hand corner,
and forming a central light amongst the clouds, and where
the earth part of the view is almost entirely composed of
distant aeriform and air-tinted hills, valleys, and plains,
and where the dark-green foreground has been, most
judiciously, almost entirely cut away, gives a better pic-
torial representation of earth and sky meeting in a most
harmonious embrace of beautiful infinities.
“But what shall I say of the last of the set? A lake
and mountain scene, of a larger kind than our Scottish
lochs ; more like Swiss lakes, but spoilt by that steam
yacht lying broadside along parallel to the silvery distance
on the water, without any of the beautiful curves which
the perspectives of other directions would have given, and
all the seven gentlemen on board caring nothing about the
grandeur of the scenery, but keeping watch on the photo-
grapher to see that he pictures their beautiful physiog-
nomies, little thinking all the time that nobody cares for
them when they are indulging in idleness and cultivating
vanity !
“ This is a maltreatment of the very powers of photo-
graphy itself, to make it depict what, as a fine art, it must
eschew : as bad as the accusation against a Persian king,
that he had made the fire, which he worshipped, consume
some nasty, stinking stuff — he put it in his way, and the
fire-god could not help himself, but was obliged to eat
it up.
14 It is an unhappy feature, too, in all unartistical minds,
whether of the world at large or photographers in particu-
lar, which I had hoped the birth of extra-sensitive dry
plates, and Kodak, detective, and other instantaneous por-
table cameras would have been the means of correcting,
by furnishing innumerable subjects of figures in action,
in their own duties in life, taken unawares to themselves.
‘ ‘ I am glad you will soon use the late Mr. Front’s studies
to show your readers how figures may be introduced into
views, both large and small, so as to add to their interest,
instead of causing any real artist to objurgate their un-
happy intrusion.” — 1 1 7 i l son's Photographic Magazine.
At the anniversary meeting of the Institute of Chemistry of
Great Britain and Ireland, on the 1st inst., Dr. James Bell was
re-elected president.
March 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
189
MORE EXPERIMENTS WITH El KO NOG EX.
BY P. C. DUCHOCHOIS.
Continuing my experiments with eikonogen. I was led to
use a more energetic compound to counteract the
tendency of this developer to yield flat negatives. It is
as follows : —
rt.
Sodium sulphite, cryst. . . .
20
grains ..
4
grammes
Eikonogen
25
i)
5
grammes*
Water
1
ounce . .
. 100
cub. cent.
Potassium bromide, 1:10
Dissolved by the aid of heat.
2
drops . .
6 drops
b.
Sodium sulphite, cryst....
60
grains ..
.. 12
grammes
Potassium carbonate, pure
30
if
6
i f
Water ...
1
ounce . .
,. 100
cub. cent.
These solutions keep well. For use, equal volumes.
In this formula the percentage of sulphite is much
larger than that previously given. The reason is that I
found the gelatine film liable to be stained yellow by long
development. Even a fog, greenish by reflection, pink by
transparency, occurred in one of the experiments made by
Dr. Charles Ehrmann. This fog, or better, this dye, was
peculiar, being intenser in the great shadows and clear
parts of the plate, and melting to yellow in the lights.
Now, as to the capacity of eikonogen. With a view
lens 11| inches equivalent focus, stop// 60, exposure less
than one-half of one second, good negatives were obtained
on Carbutt’s B plates, sensitometer 16, with the above
developer. This exposure may be considered as rapid as
those by the drop-shutter, when using more rapid plates
and the usual // 22 "617 or //32 stop, according to the
subject. The image in these experiments appeared rapidly,
requiring from five to six minutes to obtain sufficient
intensity.
Carbutt s plates “Keystone special,” sensitometer 25,
exposed simultaneously with the B, sensitometer 16,
developed slowly with potassium pyrogallate, giving, how-
ever, good negatives, although they were evidently some-
what under-exposed.
I made oidy a few instantaneous views, so-called, the
persistence of bad weather and the poor quality of light in
this season not being favourable. The pictures I obtained
— mostly street views — developed much more rapidly with
eikonogen than with pyrogallol, and were the best, but
none of them were very good. I must say that the
days I made them the light was yellowish and variable.
I did not find much difference in the results when treat-
ing the plates before development with the preliminary or
accelerating bath. I do not deny its usefulness, however,
for I did not make special tests for it. I must confess I
do not understand its action, mercuric chloride being con-
verted into sulphide by sodium thiosulphate. Perhaps it
may be explained by an action similar to that occurring in
the curious experiments made years ago by Mr. Carey
Lea, which consisted of developing an image in mercury by
substituting the nitrate of this metal to that of silver in an
acidified pyrogallol developer.
The preliminary bath is compounded thus : —
Sodium thiosulphate)
(hyposulphite) / 5 &rams - 0 2 grammes
Water... ... ... 25 ounces ... 100 cub. cent.
Bi-chloride of mercury, )
1 : ioo | - 30 mmims... 1-2 cub. cent.
Tint is the mutimum tha. can be <li-s:>lved with the sulphite. By
increasing the percentage of the 1 itter, eikonogen, being much less soluble,
is precipitated.
The plate is immersed in this for a minute, and then
developed without washing.
The following experiments in portraiture were done with
the kind collaboration of Dr. Charles Ehrmann : —
Simultaneous exposures were made on Cramer’s plate,
sensitometer 30, with a Gundlach’s rectigraphic lens,
6) by 8£, stop //15-7, and developed side by side, some
with eikonogen, and others with pyrogallol. All the plates
yielded good negatives, those developed with pyrogallol
being more brilliant than the eikonogen developed plates,
which we thought were over-exposed. Therefore, other
plates were exposed with stop //22, giving exactly the
same time, 2£ seconds, expecting that they would be
under-exposed. To our surprise the image came out
regularly with eikonogen, while the plates treated with
pyrogallol developed slowly, being under-exposed and,
consequently, deficient in the shadows.
Theoretically, the increase of exposure between // 15*7
and // 22 is about twice as long; but we know that in
practice it is not so, being much less. One second more
exposure would likely have been sufficient to bring out a
good portrait with pyrogallol when taking the usual care.
The developers employed in these experiments were
compounded by Dr. Ehrmann. They are as follows : —
Ready-made Eikonogen Developer.
Sodium sulphite, cryst. ... 4 ounces ... 11 -3 grammes
Eikonogen ... ... 1 ounce ... 2'8 ,,
Potassium carbonate ... 1 ,, ... 2'8 ,,
Water ... ... ... 34 ounces ... 100 cub. cent.
Dissolved by heat.
During the development a few drops of a solution of
potassium bromide were added.
Pyrogallol Developer.
a. Sodium sulphite, cryst. ... 4 ounces ... 1 1 "3 grammes
Pyrogallol ... ... 1 ounce ... 2-8 „
Water ... ... ... 34 ounces ... 100 cub. cent.
b. Sodium carbonate, cryst.... 8 ounces ... 22 -6 grammes
Potassium carbonate, pure 4 ,, ... 11-3 ,,
Water ... ... ... 34 ,, ... 100 cub. cent.
For use, two drams of a and one dram of b in one ounce
of water, or 24 cub. cent, of a and 12 of b in 100 cub. cent,
of water.
The above results bring me to this question : What is a
normal exposure ? Under the conditions Dr. Ehrmann and
I were working, 2) seconds with stop //2 2 was a correct or
normal exposure for Cramer's plate, sens. 30, by developing
with eikonogen, but a short exposure by developing with
pyrogallol. Hence a normal exposure can be defined
thus : The minimum of exposure which will yield a per-
fect image on a given plate developed with a certain
developer. But that teaches us nothing about compara-
tive exposures so long as there is not a standard com-
pound for each of the reducing agents employed, and the
plate manufacturers do not use the same sensitometer,
one graduated something like the United States stops.
The image in all the experiments came out more rapidly
with eikonogen than with pyrogallol, but intensity was
with the latter more easily obtained.
For over-exposures the development is restrained, as
usual, with potassium bromide, using less alkali. Hydroxy-
lamine is said to be an effective restrainer. How can a
reducing agent exert a restraining action V It may be so ;
I did not try it. In cases of short exposures I found it
sufficient to use a warm solution — 75° F. , 19° C. Im-
pressions by drop shutter exposures — stop //22, time /"
— were developed thus by somewhat diluting the developer
190
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
with hot water. No frilling occurs with good plates.
This manner of operating I found necessary to force out
the details, for, as said before, the days I could spare for
experimenting were not propitious for rapid exposures,
the light being poor. The negatives were weak, and had
to be intensified.
The number of plates that can be developed in the same
solution depends, of course, upon the subject photo-
graphed and the time of exposure, the contrasts increasing
gradually with each plate from the accession of more
alkaline bromide and the oxidation of eikonogen, which
latter diminishes reducing power. The solution, in the
meantime, discolours to a greenish tint by reflection, and
a yellowish brown by transparency. By adding a small
quantity of sodium bisulphite, it clears up to a brownish
yellow in a day or two — more rapidly by heating — and
deposits a brown substance, which is the dye staining the
gelatine film.
The old solution can be used again for the development
of over-exposed plates, and to begin that of those normally
exposed. For short and even normal exposures, I advise
a new solution for each plate, in order to work in the
same conditions, which is important to obtain good uniform
results ; indeed, I never could understand that economy
of using the same solution strengthened over and over
again, recommended by some authors. That soi-disanl
economy certainly does not compensate the risk of spoiling
a negative, or that of obtaining an imperfect one.
As to the compared merit of pyrogallol, hydroquinoue,
and eikonogen, I will repeat what I have said : each one
has properties of its own which the photographer must
know how to apply. For myself I do not care whether in
time exposures I expose one second more or one second
less. What I aim at is to obtain a good negative by being
able to control the development at will. Now eikonogen
works quite rapidly, brings out the details easily, but in
my experience is not so well under control as pyrogallol.
For this reason I prefer the latter for time exposures,
eikonogen for instantaneousphotography, and hydroquinone
for diapositives, on account of the colour of reduction. —
The Photographic Times.
A Cemejtt. — A new cement for securing iron into stone is
described in some of the foreign papers. The cement is made
by melting resin and stirring in brick-dust, which must be
finely ground and sifted, until a sort of putty is formed, which,
however, runs easily while hot. In using, the iron is set into
the hole in the stone prepared to receive it, and the melted
putty poured in until the space is filled ; then, if desired, bits
of brick previously warmed may be pushed into the mass, and
a little of the cement thus saved. As soon as the whole is
cool the iron will be firmly held to the stone, and the cement
is quite durable and uninjured by the weather ; unlike lead
and sulphur, it has no injurious effect on the iron.
Cutting Photogkaphic Paper. — Can the following machine
be utilised for cutting sheets of photographic paper ? — Mr W.
Hanlon, of Cohassett, Mass., has obtained a patent, dated
November 26th, 1889, for a beheading block and axe. There
are five claims; the fifth runs thus : — “ 5. In an executioner’s
head-block, the combination, with the body of the block, of a
neck-rest composed of parallel uprights and opposing flexible
strips secured at their upper ends and bridging the space
between them, of a headsman’s axe the blade of which is bifur-
cated and flexibly covered, substantially as described, whereby
when brought down upon the neck-rest the forks of said blade
will strike upon the posts thereof, and the flexible covering
bridge the space between the said posts, and have a yielding
contact with the object to be beheaded, substantially as
described.”
MR. RUSKIN ON “BEAUTY.”
Mr. Buskin’s rule for the judgment of beauty is this : —
“ Any material object which can give us pleasure in the
simple contemplation of its outward qualities, without
any direct and definite exertion of the intellect, I call in
some way, or in some degree, beautiful. Why we receive
pleasure from some forms and colours, and not from
others, is no more to be asked or answered than why we
like sugar, and dislike •wormwood. The utmost subtility
of investigation will only lead us to ultimate instincts and
principles of human nature, for which no farther reason
can be given than the simple will of the Deity that we
should be so created. We may, indeed, perceive, as far
as we are acquainted with His nature, that we have been
so constructed as, when in a healthy and cultivated state
of mind, to derive pleasure from whatever things are
illustrative of that nature ; but we do not receive
pleasure from them because they are illustrative of it, nor
from any perception that they arc illustrative of it, but
instinctively and necessarily, as we derive sensual
pleasure from the scent of a rose. On these primary
principles of our nature, education and accident operate
to an unlimited extent ; they may be cultivated or
checked, directed or diverted, gifted by right guidance
with the most acute and faultless sense, or subjected by
neglect to every phase of error and disease. He who
has followed up these natural laws of aversion and desire,
rendering them more and more authoritative by constant
obedience, so as to derive pleasure always from that which
God originally intended should give him pleasure, and
who derives the greatest possible sum of pleasure from
any given object, is a man of taste.
‘ ‘ This, then, is the real meaning of this disputed word.
Perfect taste is the faculty of receiving the greatest
possible pleasure from those material sources which are
attractive to our moral nature in its purity and perfec-
tion. He who receives little pleasure from these sources,
wants taste ; he who receives pleasure from any other
sources, has false or bad taste.
“ And it is thus that the term ‘taste’ is to be distin-
guished from that of ‘ judgment,’ with which it is con-
stantly confounded. Judgment is a general term,
expressing definite action of the intellect, and is appli-
cable to every kind of subject which can be submitted to
it. There may be judgment of congruity, judgment of
truth, judgment of justice, and judgment of difficulty and
excellence. But all these exertions of the intellect are
totally distinct from taste, properly so-called, which is the
instinctive and instant preferring of one material object
to another without any obvious reason, except that it is
proper to human nature in its perfection to do so.”
Celluloid may be mended, it is said, by wetting the edges
with glacial acetic acid, and pressing them together for a short
time.
A New Test for Albumen. — Salicysulphonic acid has been
recommended by Mr. Roch as a certain, delicate, and con-
venient test for albumen ( Pharm . Centralb., September 19th,
page 519). The albumen is said to be thrown down by the
acid as a white powder, having an acid reaction, and giving with
ferric chloride an intense red colour. The separation of albu-
men from a liquid is stated to be complete, 0-0005 gm. in
10 c.c. being distinctly recognizable. On examining urine, it
is recommended to introduce a fewr crystals of the acid into a
cubic centimeter of the liquid, and shake, when the occurrence
of turbidity may be taken as evidence of the presence of albu-
men, since the reaction is not affected by the presence of urea,
uric acid, peptones, or glucose. — Pharm. Journ.
March 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
191
FLASH POWDER EXPLOSIONS.
BY CHARLES L. MITCHELL, M.D., PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Within the last two years the community of Philadelphia
has been startled by a series of fatal accidents, occurring
during the manufacture of a compound used in photo-
graphy, called magnesium flash powder, whereby, in all,
five human lives have been lost.
The first accident occurred about two years ago at the
drug milling establishment of Mcllvaine Brothers, where,
while a workman was engaged in grinding this powder in a
peculiar form of mill known as a “ chaser,” the compound
suddenly ignited and exploded, burning him fatally. The
second accident occurred at the chemical laboratory of
Messrs. Wiley and Wallace, some months later. While a
lad in their employ, named John I). Cruice, was engaged
in sieving this powder, it suddenly burst into a flame,
burning him so severely about the face and body that he
died within a few hours. The third and last accident, and
the most fatal of all, the memory of which is still fresh in
the mind of the public, occurred a little more than a month
ago, and, singular to note, at the same place where the
preceding accident had taken place. In this occurrence
three persons lost their lives, Mr. Joseph Wiley, the senior
member of the firm, and two of his assistants in the chemi-
cal laboratory. W bile handling some of this flash powder,
it suddenly exjiloded with terrific force, killing them in-
stantly, and badly wrecking the building. This series of
lamentable and fatal accidents has served to direct public
attention to the subject of “flash powders,” and it has
revealed dangers attending their manufacture and use
which have been but little known and comparatively un-
suspected.
Magnesium flash powder is a compound used in photo-
graphy for the purpose of portraiture at night, and in
photographing dark interiors and underground localities,
in which, owing to scanty light or even absolute darkness,
it has been impossible to obtain an image on the sensi-
tive silver plate.
The introduction of magnesium flash powder as a
means of photographic illumination dates back now some
three years, when Gsedicke, of Berlin, introduced to pub-
lic notice a compound containing metallic magnesium,
which, when ignited, gave a sudden brilliant and intense
white light, possessing high actinic properties. Metallic
magnesium alone had been used for this purpose for some
time previous, being burnt in the form of wire or ribbon ;
but it was slow, expensive, and uncertain, and was but
seldom employed. Gsedicke’s invention, however, em-
ployed the magnesium in the powdered form, and com-
bined it with highly oxygenising substances, such as
potassium chlorate and nitrate, for the purpose of increas-
ing the rapidity and intensity of the combustion of the
metal. The new compound sprang into immediate and
extended favour, for it afforded a convenient and satisfac-
tory means for accomplishing many results hitherto either
very difficult or utterly impossible for photographers.
The photographic amateur also took hold of it with
his accustomed vigour, and all over the land he
exercised his skill in “taking” the company
assembled at many an entertainment, supper, or ball, while,
on more informal occasions, he burnt his own fingers, and
astonished his admiring relatives with the sudden and
brilliant flashes of the compound in his endeavour to suc-
cessfully accomplish home portraiture by night. A note
of warning was soon sounded, however, and the first fatal
accident, occurring during its manufacture, demonstrated
that this new compound possessed properties which ren-
dered it under many circumstances extremely dangerous.
Magnesium flash powder, specifically considered, comes
under the heading of pyrotechnic compounds. While
metallic magnesium will burn by itself when ignited, it
does so with but moderate rapidity. It is necessary,
therefore, in order to produce the sudden and brilliant
flash of white light so desirable for photographic purposes,
that the activity and intensity of its combustion be very
much increased. The ingredients used for this purpose
have been the same as usually enter into the composition
of other forms of fireworks, namely, potassium chlorate,
nitrate, permanganate or bichromate, amorphous phos-
phorus, picric acid, sulphur, and antimony sulphide.
Gaxlicke’s formula has always been a secret, and conse-
quently those who manufactured flash powder have been
obliged to devise formulae of their own. The composi-
tion of these different powders has been kept secret, and
it is highly probable that in many cases the ingredients
have been combined with but little regard to their chem-
ical properties, and the chemical reactions which might
occur from their admixture. The inventor of the parti-
cular brand of flash powder which caused the deaths of
the five persons previously noted, testified at the coroner’s
inquest, and subsequently in court, that “he was not a
chemist,” and the terrible results which accompanied this
flash powder, which he had 1 ‘ invented, ” showed very
clearly that it was formulated in utter ignorance of the
dangerous properties of its several ingredients.
The chemical composition of many of the different flash
powders in the market has been such that the resulting
compounds were exceedingly dangerous in character ; in
fact equally, if not even more so, than gunpowder, or the
fulminates, and for this reason : that a flash powder, to
meet with the requirements of many photographers, must
not only burn rapidly, but must “flash ; .” that is, the com-
bustion must take place with such rapidity that it must be
almost instantaneous in duration of time, so as to avoid
the movement of the eyelids, or the changes in expres-
sion of the person being photographed. Such combus-
tion must necessarily, for chemical reasons, be exceedingly
intense, and to produce this result, chemical agents
have to be employed which will liberate oxygen gas
freely and in large quantities, so as to supply to the
burning metallic magnesium the amount required for rapid
and complete incandescence. A compound of this cha-
racter is a gunpowder to all intents and purposes. When
ignited with a match it bursts violently into flame, often
with a puff or partial report, showing that its component
gases are liberated so quickly as to produce, if the com-
pound were in a confined space, all the effects of an explo-
sion. These compounds are liable from their chemical
nature, and from the presence of potassium chlorate, to
accidentally explode or ignite under certain conditions,
and may, indeed, do so spontaneously, for reasons unkown
to chemical science.
The particular make of flash powder which caused the
five deaths previously mentioned was known as the
“yellow flash powder,” or “brutem fulmen,” and was
manufactured for and sold by the firm of Buchanan,
Bromley, and Co., of Philadelphia, general photographic
stock merchants. This firm made two kinds of flash
powder: the “yellow,” which was composed of magnesium,
potassium chlorate, picric acid, bichromate potassium,
&c. ; and the “ violet,” which was similar in composition,
192
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
excepting that the picric acid was omitted. It was
claimed that the death of the boy, John D. Cruice,
occurred while preparing the “violet” flash powder;
but from the fact that the death of Mr. Wiley and his
assistants resulted while endeavouring to destroy, some
months later, some of this dangerous compound, it is
highly probable that it was in reality the “ yellow ’’powder
which the boy was engaged in mixing when he met his
death. Be that as it may, the combination of ingredients
in each of these powders is sufficiently dangerous to
render them articles exceedingly unsafe to handle, the
most perilous being probably the yellow powder. This
powder, as before stated, contained picric acid, magnesium,
and the chlorate, nitrate, and bichromate of potassium.
No one of these agents would in itself be explosive,
except under extraordinary circumstances ; but the com-
bination of these different substances introduces at once
a large element of danger. It is a well-known chemical
fact that many metals, when in a state of fine subdivision,
become rapidly oxidized — so rapidly, indeed, that the
absorption of the oxygen is attended with both light and
heat, particularly if the element of moisture be added.
Powdered magnesium and powdered zinc, after being
wet with water, have been known to become sufficiently
hot to ignite material in contact with them. The admix-
ture, therefore, of any chemical substance rich in oxygen,
or holding it loosely in combination, with a readily
oxidizable metal like magnesium in a state of fine powder,
renders the compound exceedingly susceptible to rapid
changes, and certain physical conditions, such as mois-
ture, heat, light, and perhaps electricity, will greatly
assist such decomposition. Picric acid, another element
in this particular compound, is, when in a pure condition,
comparatively safe, as it will burn without danger, and
explodes only when heated in a confined space. That
of the market is often impure and contaminated with
the picrates of sodium or potassium, by-products of its
manufacture, thus considerably increasing its dangerous
qualities. The salts of picric acid — namely, the picrates
of potassium, sodium, ammonium, lead, barium, mag-
nesium, &c. — are extremely dangerous in character, be-
longing to the class of fulminates or detonators, a series
of compounds unstable in character, and liable to explode
with slight percussion or friction, ■with the liberation of
immense volumes of gas. Sarrau states that the relative
force of picrate of potassium when exploded, as com-
pared with gunpowder, is as 1*98 to l’OO, almost twice as
great, A mixture of 0-5 kilograms of potassium picrate
and 05 kilograms of potassium chlorate evolves through
its combustion 352 litres of gas; 1 kilogram of gun-
powder evolves but 200 litres under the same circum-
stances.
( To be continued).
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — At the meeting
on Tuesday, March 11th, at 5a, Pall Mall East, at 8 p.m., the
adjourned discussion will take place on the paper read by Dr.
Lindsay Johnson at the annual meeting ; and Mr. John Spiller,
F.C.S., F.I.C., will read a paper, “ Experiments by Dr. Percy
and Mr. George Shaw on the Chemical Phenomena of Light.”
Photographers’ Benevolent Association. — The address of
the above has been changed to 65 and 66, Chancery Lane,
W. C. , and all communications respecting the Association should
be forwarded so addressed to the honorary secretary, Mr. H.
J. Beasley. We are requested to state that the annual meeting,
which was adjourned till the 7th inst., cannot take place on
this date, as the Registrar lias not passed the new rules.
Xoticcs of Books.
Jaiirbucii fur Photografhie und Reproductioxstechnic
fur 1890. Edited by Dr. Joseph M. vou Eder. (Knapp:
Halle).
The appearance of the fourth of Dr. Eder’s annuals will
be hailed with satisfaction by lovers of photographic
science. Germany has become so much the home of
original research in photographic matters, that we expect
to find in such a work as that before us, which includes
articles by so many leading experts, a wealth of original
matter carrying our knowledge in several points a step
farther than before, and our expectation is not disap-
pointed. A feature of the work, which might be inferred
from the title, is the attention which is bestowed upon
giving the latest advances in the arts of photographic
reproduction by printing-press methods. Amongst others,
we find original articles on these matters by Ilubl and
Jaffe, as well as detailed accounts of processes or methods
in use by Volkmcr, Strasila, J. G. Albert, Husnik, and
Koese, the latter referring to chromo-zincotype.
Amongst the illustrations produced by various photo-
ink methods, is one in chromo-lithography, with a set of
the tints used, of which there are no less than eighteen,
printed underneath. The register has been wonderfully
well kept, and the picture is very bright and airy.
There are about a score of these photo-ink illustra-
tions printed by various methods and from different
establishments, most of them reaching a high standard
of excellence, and possessing a special interest in con-
nection with some photographic process.
One very curious page represents fish — sturgeon and
gold fish — swimming in an aquarium, and photographed
by the magnesium flash. There are also several which
are the work of students — they might very well be the
productions of masters — at the Institute for Instruction
and Research in Photography and Reproduction Processes
in Vienna. A copy of an oil painting which forms one
of these supplements, taken with orthochromatic collodion
emulsion, is particularly charming in softness and har-
mony of gradation. Samples of work by the Reporter
camera serve to show what really interesting pictures may
be obtained in such a small compass, the photographs
being only about the size of one-fourth of a quarter-
plate, or half that of those recently shown by Mr.
Chapman Jones as taken with his Memorandum camera.
Such works illustrate the fact that there are optical
reasons why that may be done with a small image which
it is impossible to obtain relatively sharp with a larger one.
There are some papers of special interest on varnishes
for photographic use ; onartificial light, particularly various
details connected with magnesium flash lamps ; and on
orthochromatic processes.
We do not pretend in this rapid summary to have
exhausted the mention of what is useful and interesting
to photographers in Dr. Eder's Annual, and the best
advice we can give to those who can avail themselves of
the store of information contained in the work is, to get it.
A paper on the perception of luminous radiations by the
skin, as exemplified by the blind Proteus of the grottos of
Carniola, has been read before the Academy of Sciences by M.
Raphael Dubois. By a number of experiments upon Proteus
anyuinis, the author demonstrates that the sensibility of its
skin to light is about half of the sensibility of its rudimentary
eyes, and further, that this sensibility varies with the colour
of the light employed, and is greatest for yellow light.
March 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
198
THE CAMERA CLUB CONFERENCE.
The Journal of the Camera Club gives the following full
programme of the Conference : — Wednesday, March 19th,
8. 30 p. m. — Smoking Concert at the Camera Club Rooms,
21, Bedford Street, W.C. Thursday, March 20th. —
Conference and Exhibition of Apparatus at the Society of
Arts, 18, John Street, Adelphi, to be opened by the Presi-
dent at 2 p.m. Papers to be read from 2 p.m. to 5.30 p.m.
in the Theatre : — 1. Capt. W. de W. Abney, C.B., D.C.L.,
RE., F.R.S., Presidential Address; 2. Mr. A. M. Rossi,
“The Art of Drawing and Photography;” 3. Mr. T. R.
Pallmeyer, “ Limitations in the Treatment of Subjects by
Focus;” 4. Mr. Lyonel Clark, “The Influence of
Stops on Exposure ;” 5. Mr. A. A. Common, F.R.S. ,
“Eclipse Photography;” 6. Mr. W. T. Wilkinson,
“Collotype Practically Illustrated.” At 8 p.m. — Exhi-
bition of Lantern Slides in the Theatre. Friday,
March 21st, 10 a.m. — Apparatus on view at the
Society of Arts, and exhibition of photographs by
members at the Club Rooms, 21, Bedford Street. 2 p.m.
— Renewal of conference in the Theatre, Society of
Arts. Papers to be read from 2 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. : —
I. Official communication upon the subject of Regula-
tions for Photographic Exhibitions; 2. Lord Rayleigh,
“ Photography by the Light of the Electric Spark;” 3.
Captain Abney, “A Photographic Untruth;” 4. Mr. C.
II. Bothamley, “The Intent Image;” 5. Mr. W. T.
Wilkinson, “Photogravure, Practically Illustrated.” 7.30
p.m. — Annual club dinner for members and friends at
the Frascati Restaurant, Oxford Street (near Tottenham
Court Road). All photographers are cordially invited to
the Conference and Exhibitions. The meetings (except
the smoking concert) will be open to ladies.
patent EnteUtgcnre*
Applications for Letters Patent.
2.916. E. Underwood and T. A. Undf.iiwood, 128, Colmore
Row, Birmingham, “ Detective and other Cameras.” — Feb-
ruary 24th.
2,920. H. Campbell, 52, Chancery Lane, London, “ Flash
Lamps.” — February 24th.
2,989. IV. L. Hare, 7, Bride Court, Fleet Street, London,
“ Zinc Plates for Printing by Letter Press, and from Copper-
plates by Intaglio Process.” — February 25th.
3,155. F. A. Gregory and H. F. Ainley, 6, Bream’s Buildings,
Chancery Lane, Loudon, “Camera Slides.” — February 27th.
3,203. C. Leigh, 128, High Street, Homerton, “Tinting Opal
Glass.” — February 28th.
3,281. E. J. Wake LING, 3, Poet’s Corner, Westminster,
“Displaying Photographs.” — March 1st.
3,300. R. Wells, 114, High Street, Kingsland, London,
“ Frames for Optical Glasses.” — March 1st.
Specifications Published.
4,955. — March 21 at, 1889. “Apparatus for Automatically
Operating Valves.!’ Brin's Oxygen Company, Limited, of
Connaught Mansions, Westminster, and Kenneth Suther-
land Murray, of 21, Redburn Street, Chelsea, London,
Engineer.
This invention is intended more particular!}' for use with
apparatus employed in producing oxygen known as the Brin
process, but is not restricted thereto, and has for its object to
provide means for readily reversing one or several of a series
of cocks or valves used in the said process so as to produce
suction or pressure as required in a series of pipes with which
they are connected without stopping, reversing, or setting in
motion any additional machinery. In order to abstract
oxygen from the atmosphere by what is commonly known as
the Brin process it is necessary to pump or otherwise deliver
air through a series of pipes and retorts for a given period.
It is then necessary, by means of cocks or valves, to divert the
current in pipes and retorts to prevent any further admission
of air, to exhaust said pipes and retorts of all air which they
contain, and finally, having obtained the required quality of
oxygen, to deliver it to a gasholder or other suitable receptacle.
To accomplish this automatically according to this inven-
tion it is proposed to utilize the motion of some rotating or
reciprocating portion of a pump or any other suitable piece
of machinery that may be employed in connection with the
process, by means of ■which motion of rotation is imparted by
means of an adjustable pawl and ratchet gearing or equiva-
lent mechauism to a shaft either in a vertical or horizontal
plane, as may be most convenient. Connected direct to this
shaft, or by means of worm and worm wheel or other suitable
gearing, are a series of pairs of adjustable cams arranged to
act on back pressure or other valves so as to cause them to
admit steam or other motive fluid to a cylinder to exert pres-
sure on a piston, and move it either forward or backward as the
case may be.
5,373. — 29</i March, 1889. “Wooden Vessels for Holding
Corrosive Substances.” I’kt'kr Wardlaw Turner, 38, Gar-
turk Street, Crosshill, Glasgow, Merchant.
The separate parts of which the wooden vessel is composed
(staves or other pieces) are steeped in a warm solution of melted
paraffin wax, which contains enough of a foreign substance or
substances to destroy the crystalline nature of the paraffin wax
when cool, such as a small quantity of india-rubber or gutta
percha, or both together, either of these substances, or both
together, being preferable to any others. The wooden pieces,
when fully saturated with the mixture, are taken out of the
bath and put together to form a liquid-tight vessel, which is
then shaken up with a quantity of the liquid mixture so as to
form an inside skin for the purpose of further protecting the
wooden vessel.
5,920. — April 6th, 1889. “ Photographic Cameras. ” Claude
Raymond, of 23, Boulevard de Strasbourg, Paris, Mer-
chant.
My invention has reference to photographic cameras of the
kind generally called bellows cameras, and it consists in improved
means whereby these cameras can be made to expand or con-
tract as required.
For this purpose I fit the camera with two levers or rods
crossing each other in the form of the letter X> and jointed
together at the middle. One end of each lever is jointed to a
pivot, and the other end slides in a grooved guide. For easier
manipulation of these levers one or both of the sliding ends is
or are preferably fitted with a milled button carrying a pinion
which gears with a rack on the guide.
The manner in which my invention can be best carried into
effect will depend partly upon the size of the camera. For a
small portable camera I would have one pair of the crossing
levers at the top and another pair at the bottom of the camera.
For a larger camera I would have a pair of crossing levers at
each side, and in order to give additional strength and to dis-
pense with the bed portion, a third pair can be placed at the
bottom, but without a pinion and rack. The levers of this
third pair can be ribbed to make them stronger, and there
may be a boss at their crossing point to serve as a foot.
One or other of the side pairs of level's can be more or less
extended so as to slightly incline to one side the plate holder
or front part of the camera carrying the object glass. The
levers can also have screw' threaded or extensible parts so as to
allow of inclining the plate holder in a vertical direction.
At the meeting of the Society for the Encouragement of
Fine Art last week, at which Mr. Newman’s paper, printed in
this issue, was read, the slides w'ere exhibited by means of one
of Messrs. Watson and Sons’ lanterns. Mr. Gale, Mr. G.
Davison, and Mr. George Smith were among the photographers
present,
194
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
i^roccetitngs of Societies;.
Camera Club.
On Thursday, 27th February, Dr. C. S. Patterson read a
paper on ‘ ‘ Photography as applied to Medicine and Surgery. ”
Mr. T. Charters White occupied the chair.
The lecturer began by stating the qualities which he con-
sidered indispensable in a good medical photographer. He
then gave a short resumd of the history and literature of the
subject, and going on to its present development, he gave the
three great directions in which it was used, viz. (1) as an in-
vestigator, (2) as a recorder, (3) as a demonstrator, giving many
examples. He then considered it under its various medical
departments, illustrated by lantern slides. He said that before
a general audience it would be absurd to go into the photo-
graphic details of manipulation, but he would like to lay great
stress upon two points, isochromatic plates and the magnesium
flash lamp, both of which he found almost indispensable. He
impressed on the audience, moreover, the important aid they
could render to the medical photographer by influencing
hospital authorities to give proper facilities for medical appli-
cation of photography. The paper concluded by a short
notice of the way in which this work was now gaining ground.
In the discussion which followed, Messrs. Pringle, Elder,
Cooper, Andreae, Dr. Massey, and the Chairman took part.
Thursday, March 13th, will be a lantern evening. Meeting
at 8 p.m.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the weekly meeting on the 27th ult. Mr. H. M. Hastings
occupied the chair.
Mr. Birt Acres was elected a member of the Association.
Mr. A. Haddon, at the last meeting, suggested a delicate test
for grease in water, which he was unable to demonstrate then
from the impurities of the water. He had brought a bottle of
distilled water to the meeting. The scrapings from a piece of
camphor were allowed to fall on the surface of the water,
motion being at once imparted to them. By simply drawing
the finger across the forehead or face, and then dipping the fin-
ger in the water, the particles of camphor instantly ceased to
have movement, from the grease imparted by the finger.
Mr. F. P. Cembrano showed a foreign postcard illustrated
by photography, under government sanction.
Mr. A. Haddon gave a demonstration of glass-blowing,
remarking upon the usefulness of being able to make the various
small glass articles required for the dark room and laboratory.
The lecturer proceeded to explain the composition and varieties
of glass, of which there are four kinds, German glass, soft and
hard, ordinary English soda glass, lead glass, and combustion
tubing. Of these the best for all ordinary work is the soft
German. It is necessary to select that special variety that
will stand heating and reheating. By diagrams on the black
board the zones of a candle flame were explained, followed by
a description of the several blowpipes in use, worked either
by the foot, or blown by a tube held in the mouth. Illus-
trating the manipulation of the blow-pipe, the lecturer com-
menced by making a simple but indispensable article of
dark-room use, a stirring rod. A piece of glass rod of the
requisite size was cut, and one end held at the point of the flame,
and fused. By revolving the rod at the same time, the end
became hemispherical ; the other end was then fused and
flattened. If the object is simply to bend a piece of glass, an
ordinary fishtail or batswing is useful. All that is necessary is
to hold the tubing in the flame until sufficiently soft to bend to
the required angle. A wash bottle, delivering tube, and
pressure guage were then made. A piece of glass tube was
taken, one end closed and rounded, and the edges of the other
end rounded ; this formed a test tube. The sealing of solids
and liquids in tubes was next shown. For the latter, a piece
of glass tubing is taken, one end closed by fusing, and rounded.
This tube is then heated in the centre, and drawn out, the
upper part forming a funnel to receive the liquid. To
get this into the reservoir below, the bottom part of
the tube is held for a short time over a flame, causing
the air to expand, the liquid being drawn into the lower
tube as it cools. The top part is then broken off,
and the neck sealed. To weld two pieces of glass of different
diameters together successfully, both pieces of glass should be
j from the same pot. How to make a T joint, blow a bulb,
make a minim glass and bulb pipettes was next shown. The
determination of the specific gravity of solutions in use, the
lecturer held to be of the greatest importance to photographers.
This was easily ascertained. Small glass bulbs are blown,
water inserted, the neck fused and sealed, and then adjusted
so that they just sink in any liquid of known strength. Am-
monia, used in every dark room, was instanced. How was it
! possible to know its strength after the bottle in which it
) was kept had been opened, perhaps, as in the case of an
amateur, several times ? By using a specific gravity bulb, its
| determination was exceedingly simple. A ten per cent, solu-
tion is made up from ammonia of known full strength 880°.
A glass bulb is weighted to just sink in the solution. In mak-
ing up subsequent solutions, the bulb has only to be placed in
a measure of water, and ammonia of any unknown strength
poured in carefully until the bulb commences to sink ; a ten
per cent, solution can thus always be guaranteed.
In answer to the question as to the method adopted for
creating the vacuum in an incandescent lamp, the lecturer, by
a diagram on the blackboard, explained the principle of one of
the most effective pumps known for this purpose. A glass
tube is bent in the form of a syphon. At the top bend is a
stopcock, to which is attached the glass bulb to be exhausted
containing the filament. The vertical column is filled with
mercury until it rises to the top bend ; passing over this it
descends by small globules to a receptacle placed to receive it.
Each globule as it descends carries with it by its own weight a
certain amount of air imprisoned between it and the globule
following. By this means a vacuum in the bulb is almost per-
fectly formed. This is the Sprengel pump, in fact
The demonstration concluding at a late hour, admitted of
but little discussion.
Hackney Photographic Society.
This Society held its first exhibition on Thursday last at the
Morley Hall. Dr. Roland Smith opened the exhibition, and
hoped it would prove of use to those present.
During the evening a “ flash-light ” group was taken by Mr.
J. Hubert with his oxygen blow-through lamp. Among those
present were Messrs. J. Traill Taylor, Henry Sturmey, G. J.
Clark, and W. L. Beurle.
The members had a good show of apparatus and work,
Messrs. Clarke, Hoddle, Houghton, Hubert, Dean, Roder,
Gosling, Reynolds, Barton, Acres, W. Fenton Jones, Grant,
and others exhibiting.
The professional element was represented in a large exhibi-
tion by dealers of apparatus.
West London Photographic Society.
At the last ordinary meeting Mr. G. F. Blackmore occupied
the chair. Mr. Roe was elected a member of the Society,
and Mr. Wilmer was nominated for election.
After the disposal of the formal business, Mr. Clias. Dixon’s
paper on “Holland House,” was read by Mr. Hodges. Mr.
Dixon superintended the exhibition of slides.
The paper was prefaced by a short description of the process
employed in the production of the slides. They were, with
the exception of a few on chloride dry plates, produced by the
wet collodion process by reduction in the camera from 9 by 7
negatives, which also owed their origin to the same wet-
plate method. In the case of some of the interiors,
exposures of two hours had been given, and the plates were
backed with wet blotting paper to keep the films moist. The
lecturer then traced the history of the house from the time
it first came into the possession of the Holland family in 1600
down to the present time, illustrating his remarks with a large
number of interior and exterior views of the house, and of the
park and grounds.
Mr. Wilson presented the Society with a number of photo-
March 7, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
195
graphic works of reference .as a nucleus for the formation of
the Society’s library. After some discussion it was decided to
refer the appointment of the Librarian to the Council for
further consideration.
On the 14 th March, Mr. H. Selby is to read a paper on
“ Stripping Films.”
North Middlesex Photographic Cluii.
Ox February 24th Mr. G. Davison delivered a lecture upon
“Pictures by Photography,” illustrating it by about one hun-
dred photographs taken by himself.
After speaking of the advances that photography had made
and the restrictions which it imposed, lie proceeded to review
what are generally considered the rules of art, and remarked
that exceptions to these were almost as much the practice as
not, and instanced Mr. Robinson and others, who had taken
some of their best pictures with the sun in front of the camera,
in direct contradiction to one of the best known rules. Again,
another rule was that the horizon line should not be in the
centre of the picture ; this, and many other rules he referred
to, and had one or more pictures to prove that they might
sometimes be departed from, and advised that the simplest
subjects be chosen — namely, those with as little in them as
possible — so that the interest might be centred upon the prin-
cipal feature, and to endeavour to introduce originality and
boldness into their pictures. He then referred to the faults to
be avoided and merits to be sought, giving force to his words by
a photograph showing each particular feature.
Monday, March 10th, will be members’ lantern night.
Visitors invited ; ladies admitted.
Bristol and West of England Amateur Photographic
Association.
On January 3rd a meeting of the Association was held in the
Queen’s Hotel for the lantern exhibition of slides by various
members. In the absence of the president, the proceedings
were conducted informally.
Several members were present, including Messrs. W. L.
Rernard, J. W. Evens, M. Lavington, F. B. Bond, W. Norgrove,
and W. W. Boyden, all of whom exhibited work. Mr. Boyden
showed some slides on chloride plates developed with “ photo-
pel,” the vivid red colour of which is quite a departure
from the usual scale of tints.
The annual business meeting for 1890 was held Feb. 7th,
when the President, Mr. H. A. H. Daniel, took the chair.
The president, vice-presidents, and secretary and treasurer for
tiie past year were re-elected.
It was agreed that the Secretary be asked to write to Dr.
Emerson, thanking him for and accepting his offer of “ Life
on the Norfolk Broads.”
Mr. Brightman was requested to obtain a lantern for the
Society’s use from Messrs. Perken, Son, and Rayment.
Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association.
A meeting was held on the 27th of February, with Mr. Paul
Lange in the chair.
The following were elected members of the Association, viz. ,
Messrs. Hugh R. Jones, M.A., John H. Welsh, H. F. Tiklesley,
Geoffrey Cather, William Rock, junr., and William T. Bell.
The President announced that letters of resignation had
been received from Messrs. T. H. Day and G. H. Rutter as
members of the Council, and from Mr. Walter Hughes, the
Hon. Secretary, and that Mr. Edward M. Tunstall had been
appointed Hon. Secretary. The attention of members was
drawn to the extra meeting to be held at the City Hall, Everle
Street, on Thursday, March 20th, for which evening a concert
was being arranged, to be followed by the President’s illustrated
lecture on “ Norway.” The President also announced that the
Council had arranged for a series of practical demonstrations
in photography for the special benefit of beginners.
The Council had also arranged to exhibit the pictures (sixty
in number), 15 by 12, of Mr. H. Tolley, the gold medalist, of
Nottingham. These would be on exhibition for a short period
in the club rooms. It was hoped they would prove an attrac-
tion, as, through the exhibition of Mr. H. P. Robinson’s series,
thirteen new members had been induced to join the Associa-
tion.
Mr. T. Sayce submitted a most ingenious hand-camera,
made at a very trifling cost, and meeting all the require-
ments of the amateur photographer.
Other business being concluded, the general public gained
admittance, and Mr. D. Lewis gave his paper on “ A Fortnight
in the Netherlands with a Camera,” followed by Mr. W. P.
Christian with “Moor and Don, or Studies in Algeria and
Spain.” Both lectures were illustrated with the lantern.
The Manchester Lantern Competition slides lent to the
Association were then exhibited.
Sheffield Camera Club.
The first soiree in connection with this club was held last
evening at the Masonic Hall. Among those who attended
were Mr. G. T. W. Newsholme, F.C.S. (president), Dr. T. H.
Morton (vice-president), Mr. B. W. Winder, F.C.S., F.R.M.S.
(treasurer), Mr. G. E. Maleham (secretary), Dr. Manton, and
Mr. Wm. Gilley, junr. A considerable quantity of photo-
graphic apparatus was displayed. Messrs. Marion and Co.,
and R. and J. Beck, of London, contributed lenses, and the
Eastman Company furnished some very interesting enlarge-
ments.
The President, in the course of a short address, referred to
the origin of the Club, and said some of the members when
they joined were novices in the art, but others were men of
great experience and ability, ready at all times to give advice
and valuable help to the recruits. In their Club the profes-
sional element did not enter, not that he would say one word
in disparagement of the professional photographer ; but he
felt strongly that a society could not do well which had both
the professional and amateur within its ranks. To the amateur
photographer was due the credit for the great and rapid
advancement of the art of photography during the last few
years. Still, although there had been that advancement, the
art was now only well advanced in infancy. If such rapid
progress had been made in the past, who could predict what
its progress would be in the future ? Who could measure the
great value it must become to the microscopist, the chemist,
and the physiologist ?
During the evening Mr. Winder, with the aid of a lantern,
showed some of the members’ slides. A flash-light photo-
graph of a group was also taken by Prof. Arnold.
Bath Photographic Society.
February 25. — Annual meeting ; Mr. W. Pumphrey in the
chair.
Messrs. Baldwin, Cloakley, Christopher Morris, Charles
Terry, and W. S. Wilkins were elected members.
The Treasurer’s balance sheet showed a balance in favour of
the Society, and in all respects was a most satisfactory one.
The Hon. Secretary and Treasurer, Mr. W. Middleton Ash-
man, read a carefully prepared and exhaustive report of the
Society’s proceedings.
The Chairman, in moving the adoption of the account, said
the Society had cause to be very well satisfied. The principal
expenses would not have to be incurred again ; part was met
out of the income, and the rest by a loan from officers of the
Society.
The election of officers was then proceeded with, and all who
served during the past year were unanimously re-elected.
Mr. Greene read a paper entitled “ Photography in an Age
of Movement” (see page 183). Both the instruments and
examples shown were regarded with much interest.
The Secretary exhibited one of the “Collins” detective
cameras, and explained the details of working it. The neatness
and simplicity of this instrument were remarked upon.
The Chairman then explained the method of producing
photo- micrographs. He exhibited a number of specimens and
the apparatus used to produce the same.
The leading points requiring attention having been dealt
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 7, 1890.
196
with, a brief discussion followed, in which Messrs. Rrnest Pit-
man, Greene, and the Secretary took part.
Mr. Kino, in moving thanks for the papers, spoke of the
advantages of such a process for obtaining permanent records
in microscopy, and the work could be done of a winter evening.
He also referred to the more certain determinations of astro-
nomers to-day than before photography was employed in their
calculations.
There will be a lantern competition on March 26th. Slides
and particulars of process should be in the hands of the Secre-
tary the day previous.
Photographic Society of Ireland.
A few evenings ago the members had a practical demonstra-
tion given them by Mr. James Carson, C.E. He introduced
the subject by showing the utility of the several parts of the
lanterns and their accessories, such as gas bottles, valves, and
gauge; the differences between the “ blow-through ” and
mixed gas jets ; how to properly centre the light for disc illu-
mination ; methods of introducing slides into the lantern for
both single and double lantern exhibitions. Mr. Carson was
thanked by the members present, and desired to place the
matter on paper to be read at some ordinary meeting of the
Society.
On March 3rd Mr. J. H. Hargrave, C.E., gave a lecturette
on “Lantern Slides, and how to make them.” He directed
attention to the methods — (a) by contact ; (6) by reduction.
In the first class he demonstrated the remarks made by exposing
and developing two slides. In the class (6) he submitted a
home-made reducing arrangement, by means of which the
ordinary camera was brought into play, being fixed on a
substantial base-board, and focussed roughly by moving by
hand, but finely in the usual manner. The negative was
placed at a measured distance from the lens in a slot cut
in card-board, and suitably safe-guarded. He gave much
information as to his experience with plates by several
makers, first dividing these plates into two classes — “chloride”
and “bromide.” The developing he favoured was “pyro.”
He devoted time to demonstrate the mounting of slides, and
referred to various masks.
Dr. J. Alfred Scott added remarks as to intensification,
showing a distinct preference for Monckhoven’s. He exhibited
a printing frame made by himself for use with quarter-plates
in contact lantern plate exposure. It was so constructed as to
admit of so much of the lantern plate projecting over any
part of the edge of a quarter-plate as might be covered by a
mask, when it would be advantageous to include or exclude a
part of the subject in the quarter-plate as the case might be.
♦ '
Photographic Club — The subject for discussion on March
12th will be “ Stereoscopic Photography on March 19th, the
adjourned discussion on ‘ 1 Artifical Light as an Adjunct to
Daylight,” will take place.
On the question of which is best for dark-room windows,
paper or coloured glass, it may be said that if a satisfactory
coloured glass can be got it is preferable, as the colour of paper
is apt to be discharged by the continued action of daylight. —
Photographic Scraps.
Gold Bath. — In an article communicated by E. Kiewning
to the Dutch photographic journal Lux, there is a notice of
what the author holds to be a remarkable receipt for a toning
bath which is not liable to deterioration : —
Water ... ... ... ... 600 grams.
Chlor. gold ... ... ... ... 4 ,,
Chlor. potass. ... ... ... 60 ,,
After the solution is effected, 20 grs. of chemically pure chalk
in the form of powder are added. Let this mixture stand for
three or four days protected from the light ; the bath
is then ready for use. The tones produced by this bath
are brown and blue, with all the intermediate tints, according
to the concentration and duration of the toning. The above-
mentioned bath is, says E. Kiewning, of the chiefest importance
in the summer, when the temperature is high, and the employ-
ment of carbonate of soda in the gold bath is, in consequence
of its reduction-accelerating powers, by no means desirable.
Bnstocrg: to (tfoiTtspntJcntg.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5,Furnival Street, London-
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 6, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
J. D. — The Ligroine Lamp was sent -off to you, per L. and
N. W. R., on Monday morning. We shall be glad to hear
of its safe arrival and successful employment. The Wels-
bach incandescent cones are easily procurable in this country,
and you need not wait long for extra supplies. When using
part of the apparatus as a blow-pipe, a special air-jet will be
required, and then silver can be easily melted.
M. P. S. — Council Elections. There is a mistake somewhere,
twenty-one names appearing on the cover of the Journal.
Your friend was duly nominated, but declined to serve on
the council.
A. F. (Warwick). — Gelatine brands. Information already given
by post ; let us hear in the event of your having any further
difficulty.
Litho. — Albert Transfer Paper and Zincography . It is
hardly likely that the new transfer paper would be already
procurable in this country. For reversing plant, apply to
any optician ; all you want is a good plane mirror. For
etching troughs use wood, well dried and coated with
melted paraffine ; glass bottoms would be of no particulai
advantage. The sensitising bath of —
Bichromate of potash ... ... 50 grammes
Water ... ... ... ... 1,000 c.c.
is equivalent to a five per cent, solution, which you cat
make by disolving one ounce in a pint of water, if you have
not gramme weights and litre measures. Remember to adc
the ammonia.
L. M. A. — See “ Concise Instructions in the Art of Retouch
mg,’’ by Burrows and Colton — Messrs. Marion and Co
Somewhat old, but a very good book, with full descriptions
and pair of negatives as frontispiece.
Collodio-Chloride. — There is no reply from Dublin.
F. C. S. — Inactivity of Developing Solutions in Cold Weather
We can quite confirm all you say, having tried to work thi
week at an uncomfortably low temperature. The image
preferred to remain latent, and the naphthol developer wa
far behind pyro in power of development. From our ow
and Mr. W. K. Burton’s comparative experiments, w-e kno\
that there is no disadvantage of this kind in summer time.
Graphic. — Photo Waste of the NoUc Metals. There is an era
of calculation, or misprint, in the American statement, h
on the data given there is an 0 too many. £2,500,00
should read £250,000. Even then it is a big estimate.
pjiotograplnc lottos.
SUBSCRIPTIONS.
Including Postage to any part of the United Kingdom : —
Yearly... 1 5s. Od. | Half-Yearly. .. 7s. 8d. | Quarterly... 3s. 10
To the United States, the Continent, and the Colonies : —
Yearly. ..17s. 4d. | Half- Yearly... 8s. 8d. | Quarterly... 4s. 4
To India (Yearly) ... ... ... ... 19s. 6d.
For Advertisement Scale see page v.
Advertisements should be forwarded (prepaid) to Pipf.r and Oarti
5, Furnival Street, llolborn, E C., to reach the office r ot later than noon
Thursday. A fee of 6d. must be forwarded when the Publishers
expected to receive and forwarded replies to Advertisements ; and wl
they undertake the receipt of replies, they must be entrusted with
name and address of advertiser, for revelation to applicants, in case tl
may deem it necessary.
Supplement
to the fJiotof/mphiiQ Xt irs, March
/■■ —
1 4 lit ,
1890
jfrtis M Liber X. \fagja (dtoftnc.t.
F ‘3 2-
Alphdbrtu
irai rr/um
ulo
Alphabetum Cateptneutn
BCDEFGHIKLMNOP 0_R S T V X Y Z
Y B CD E L G H I }: r W M O t (fir U An s
AlpHab : Htzbrerutn D P H *1 3 V ^ N D D ^ 3 ’ O n 11 HI J J X
imierjian in xjpeeuh JJ J fa /. F. tlD^DlDDDjljDtDUIJDJ'/D
Alptbhifrreurectu A g p ^ 2 H 0 I K A M N Z O fl P I T Y (P X f fl
muerjum mjpefulo yypvE^HQ I K V n M Z O 11 1) 2 J. A (I) X * U
THE FIRST MAGIC LANTERNS.
Invented uy ATHANASIUS KIRCIIEK,
Supplement to the Photographic Xuos, JfAkcn 14th, 1330.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1645. — March 14, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOX
The First Optical Lantern 197
The “ Photographic News” Supplement 197
Athanasius Kirchcr, the Inventor of the Magic Lantern. By
James Mew 198
Buies for Photographic Exhibitions 201
Chromo-Photography in the Printing Press 202
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 203
PAOl
Notes 204
The Crystal Palace Photographic Exhibition 205
French Correspondence. By Leon Vidal 206
Patent Intelligence 207
Correspondence 209
Proceedings of Societies ' 209
Answers to Correspondents 212
THE FIRST OPTICAL LANTERN.
An able article by Mr. James Mew appears in the
present issue of this journal, and includes a translation
of Kircher’s own description of the magic lantern, of
which popular instrument he was the inventor. Mr.
Pringle, at the Camera Club last week, as will be seen
by the report in another column, gave currency to a
rumour which had reached him that the magic lantern
was first invented, as he put it, by John the Baptist,
otherwise Giambatista Porta, the inventor of the
camera ; but any such claim can probably be sustained
only by special pleading, and will not shake the title
to the honour, almost universally admitted from time
immemorial, to belong to Athanasius Kircher, the good
and self-confident Jesuit priest. The truth 6eems to
be that it is not easy in some cases to draw a line of
demarcation between the camera and magic lantern ;
for instance, the largest photozincograpliic print in our
pictorial supplement issued this week represents such
a transition instrument, invented by Kircher. The
solar beams are received upon pictures or inscriptions
painted upon polished plates made of some not readily
oxidizable metallic alloy, the composition of which is
not on record ; then, by means of one double convex
lens for each picture, the images are projected on the
walls and roof of a darkened chamber. The instrument
bears a strong resemblance to a camera, and, at the
same time, a strong resemblance to that optical lantern
of modern times, in which the image of a brilliantly
illuminated inverted opaque object is projected on a
screen in a darkened room. Kircher, it will be seen,
for use with this instrument, took the trouble to have
the letters of the alphabet engraved bottom upwards,
and then called them a “ catoptric” alphabet, instead
of simply telling his readers to take ordinary printed
letters and turn them upside down. The other two
pictures in the supplement represent a magic lantern
beyond all mistake ; one of them differs only in
principle from the other, being fitted up, Polytechnic
Institution fashion, in a second chamber. The pictures
prove that Kircher mounted rows of lantern slides in
long rectangular frames, as they are mounted and
sold in shops at the present day.
Kircher used a reflector behind the oil light, but it
was not truly optically centred, if the Italian draughts-
man who shared in the production of one of Kircher’s
blocks can be trusted ; probably, however, he cannot
be trusted, for throughout the whole of the ponderous
old Latin book, there are, occasionally, small dis-
crepancies between the engravings and the letter-press.
The position and description of the projecting lens are •
neither clearly pictured nor clearly described, perhaps
intentionally ; even in modern times we find inventors
sometimes secretive on essential points. Some of the
earliest pictures of magic lanterns in old books repre-
sent a bull’s-eye lens in front of the slide, and a light
behind the slide ; this, there is little question, was
Kircher’s arrangement. The first lantern slide
pictures of which any information has come down to
us were not, it will be seen, of a cheerful nature ; the
one picture represented Father Time as a skeleton
with scythe and hour-glass ; the other picture repre-
sented one of the units of poor humanity roasting in
eternal flames. They took life sadly in those days.
The small cut from Kircher’s book, represented on
page 198, in Mr. Mew’s article, has been by some
modern writers mistaken for a drawing by Kircher
of the optical system of his lantern, but it is not so.
The oval in front is not intended to represent a lens,
but a piece of flat glass. The opening behind it is
not intended for the passage of a lantern slide, but
for the passage of air to the flame. In fact, the cut
is meant to represent a lamp for illuminating objects
at great distances, by means of a light suitably
directed by parabolic or other reflectors.
Lord Rayleigh once said that few persons now-a-
days read Newton’s “ Optics,” yet that they are well
worth perusal, and contain records of devices which are
occasionally re-invented in modern times. The same
remark might also be applied to Kircher’s ‘‘Great
Art of Light and Shade.”
THE “PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS” SUPPLEMENT.
With the present number of this journal is issued a pic-
torial two-page supplement, representing the first magic
lantern invented by Kircher, and a transition instrument
half-way between an optical lantern and a camera. These
are photo-zincographic copies, on a somewhat reduced
scale, of Kircher’s original engravings, published in Rome
in 1646, and in Amsterdam in 1671. The latter seems to
be the date of the first printed publication of a description
of a true magic lantern.
198
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
ATHANASIUS KIRCHER, THE INVENTOR OF THE
MAGIC LANTERN.
m.
nr JAMES MEW.
In the third and last part of the tenth and last book of his
“ Great Art of Light and Shade,” Kircher deals, it lias been
already said in the preceding article, with Catoptric Magic,
or the wonderful representations of objects by means of
mirrors. Commencing with explanations of the construc-
tion of mirrors in their many varieties — such as spherical,
cylindrical, and conical — the reader next meets with a series
of problems, as Kircher calls them, or propositions con-
cerning the formation of several mechanical instruments.
The first of these propositions is how to construct an
alembic which, by the sole assistance of burning mirrors,
can effect distillation better than by the aid of a fire. The
second is how to make a machine which can light a fire
on an altar at any given hour, ignite also the holy candles,
and, after that, cause a fountain to rise which will turn the
sacrificial flame to ashes.
The tim'd problem will be given at full length. Its sub-
ject is how to construct an artificial lantern, by means of
which any writings may be read at a long distance.
“ Let,” says the author, “a lantern (see fig. 1) be con-
Fiff. 1.
structed of the cylindrical figure which is here shown in the
picture, in whose base A B there must be set a concave
mirror as nearly as possible parabolic, and within the focus
of this mirror let there be placed the flame of a candle F,
and you will have at once what you desire.
“ For the light wall then shine with such unusual splen-
dour as to show without any difficulty, and by night, even
the minutest letters, oidy to be otherwise seen by the aid
of a telescope, while those who behold the flame from a
distance will surely suppose it to be a mighty fire. The
light will be increased if the interior of the cylinder be
formed out of shining tin into an ellipse, but the figure
will sufficiently explain the invention. E designates the
handle, D the window opening or outlet for the light, and
C the chimney.”
Kircher, after referring to a chapter in a previous portion
of his work, which will be given hereafter, in which an
instrument, a peculiar camera, conducive to the birth of
the magic lantern, is shown, goes on to say, “Since this
singular invention wasleft byus to be amplified and adorned
by other greater inventions, it has happened that many,
enticed by the novelty of the matter, applied their minds to
its perfection. And among the first of men to do this was a
certain Dane — whom Kircher calls, somewhat strangely,
Thomas Walgensten — a mathematician of no mean repute,
who, after a consideration of my invention described by me
as aforesaid, of the magic lantern, effected some improve-
ments therein, and then, to his own great pecuniary advan-
tage, sold it to different men of rank in Italy, so that in a
short time the lantern was fairly well known through the
whole of Rome. The only difference between this lantern
of Walgensten’s and my own invention was that the former
showed the forms of many objects very clearly in a dark
room, to the extreme admiration of the beholders. ” Kircher,
however, also exhibited in his own Jesuit College in a dark
room with equal surprise on the part of the spectators.
“ And it is indeed a thing well worthy of being seen,” says
Kircher, “ when by its aid whole tragic, satiric, or other
scenes are exhibited to the life.”
The catoptric artifice, previously described, differs from
the new lantern only in this, that in the latter case a
movable light is called into use, while Kircher utilized the
rays of the sun. “ Everything that could be shown by
the movable lantern was,” says Kircher, “shown by me
in colours to the life by means of the sun’s rays falling on
a mirror on which the forms of objects were described,
and reflecting them on the wall of an inner chamber ; and
we also taught in the same place how, without the aid of
the sun’s rays, to represent objects by a concave mirror or
a transparent lens. And,” says Kircher, “I enter into
these matters the more fully in order to make clear to the
reader whence these new mysteries of the lantern have
derived their origin, a lantern not undeservedly, in our
own opinion, called magic and thaumaturgic, from its
wondrous representations of all conceivable objects in a
dark-room or in the deep silence of night.” And now
nothing remains but to explain in a few words the fabrica-
tion of this instrument — an instrument which, as the date
is important, it is proper to say was not shown to the public
in the edition published at Rome in 1646, but first
appeared in that published at Amsterdam in 1671, which
date, therefore, may be considered that of the birth of the
magic lantern.
Let a box (sec fig. 2 in supplement) be made of wood,
A B C D, with an opening at L for a chimney, through which
the smoke of the lantern may pass. Let the lantern K be set
in midst, either suspended by a wire or on a stand M, oppo-
site to the aperture at H, in which let a tube be fixed, and at
one end of the tube, I, let there be inserted a good lens; at
the other end of the tube, at II, let a plane, clear piece of
good glass be fixed, on which whatever you choose has
been painted in diaphanous water-colours.
This being accomplished in the chamber V X, and on
its white wall the light of the lantern passing through the
lens will exhibit the image painted on the plain clear glass
at II (which must be drawn on the glass upside down),
with the right side up. and magnified and expressed with
all its different colours to the life. Note, however, that
the light of the lantern must be intense, and in order to
ensure this, we place the concave steel mirror before the
flame, by which means the power of the light will be
increased in a wonderful manner.
It remains to explain the manner of multiplying images.
Between two boards neatly formed in the shape of a
parallelogram let a piece of polished glass be inserted, equal
in size to the opening at II ; upon this glass let images of
whatever kind and number you wish be painted in dia-
phanous water-colours, as may be seen in the parallelogran:
M N. This being inserted between the fissures II 1J, N R.’
* The letter P is not in the picture, and N seems to have been writtei
for o;
MAKCn 14, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
199
and its pictures moved one after the other to the opening II,
will exhibit eight different images upon the wall, whence it
is clear that, if you have ready four or five parallelograms
of this kind, of which every one gives different images, by
help of these you may easily, in a darkened room, show
the spectators whatever you will.
The exhibition will affect the beholders with greater
wonder if the lantern be placed in a separate chamber,
A B C P (see fig. 3 in supplement), and the little tube
insertediu the wall B Datthe place II, in the manner already
mentioned, for then in the adjoining chamber, BED F, on
the opposite wall G, will appear as many images as have been
inscribed on the parallelogram— joyful, sad, dreadful, horri-
ble, and, to spectators ignorant of their cause, miraculous —
together with such sentences and writings as have been
delineated on the glass, all of which the reader will best
and most readily understand from the illustration.
In the conclusion of Kircher’s “ Great Art of Light and
Shade,” is a short treatise entitled a New Cryptology,
a catoptric art by which two friends, being at a distance
from one another, may manifest mutually, without any
obstacle or inconvenience, their hidden conceptions, and
in addition thereto, show their personal presentments
reciprocally by a kind of catoptric replication, and exhibit
such other matters as they may desire.
This treatise is divided into two parts, of which the one
part is concerned with the projection of figures to any
distance by means of the sun, the other with catoptric
steganography by means of a caudle.
It is, says Kireher, in his preface to his new Cryptology,
part of the nature of the human intellect to aspire to the
attributes of the divinity, and to prosecute their attain-
ment by daring and almost gigantic endeavour. Of these
attributes, the two chief are the following, the one to pene-
trate into the future, and the other to manifest to those who
are absent mental conceptions without, it must be under-
stood, the aid of any human medium. Both of these, as they
seem at first sight to be far beyond the bounds of natural
possibility, deservedly occupy a front place in the ranks
of the hidden and the mysterious. With the former,
astrology is busied, of which it is unnecessary to speak here ;
with the latter, steganography ; that is to say, the secret
means of speaking at a distance. In this art, the author
informs us, monarchs of the world have considered them-
selves especially blessed, having regard to its convenience
for ready counsel, and the expeditious dispatch of
necessary business. The love of the emperor Maximilian
for the abbot Trithemius, at that time the sole proprietor
of such a secret, is sufficiently well known.
Our concern here is with Catoptric Steganography, an
art, says Kireher, entirely of our own invention, since we
remember not to have read anything of the kind in any
other author. An admirable art is this, and indeed worthy
of the curiosity of kings, an art by which friends at the
distance even of three miles may converse together un-
heard with security and ease. But leaving the wanderings
of words, let us come at once, says the author, lest the
reader should suppose we are gulfing him, to our grand
secret. And so we come at once, though Kireher does
not, to his second chapter.
Concerning the Mirrors Necessary for Catoptric Stegano-
graphy.— In Catoptric Steganography, according to the
industrious Jesuit, three things are required — a mirror, a
mesoptic glass or lens, and a support or stand. The
mirror must be plane, not made of glass, nor of steel, but
molten of metallic material. In the first place it may not
be of glass or crystal, on account of the profundity of
the matter rendering the mirror opaque, from which it
follows that the reflected ray being refracted in too dense
a medium falls upon the wall doubled — an accident which
not only renders the characters indecorous, but causes
also, amongst them, no insignificant confusion. Steel it
may not be, for steel is well known to be impatient of all
humidity. And therefore a mirror of the above-mentioned
material must not be chosen as the base and foundation of
our steganographic operations, for when we proceed to
write thereon our mental concepts, such a mirror becomes
easily infected and befouled with the juice of the corro-
sive ink, and will contract rust, and by no means com-
modiously respond to our design. And so the most suit-
able of all for our purpose will be a plane mirror molten
of metallic material, for this will sustain the ink without
any injury, and may also be polished with the least amount
of inconvenience.
In the next place will be required a mesoptic glass of a
hyperbolic or of a lens-shaped figure ; an obtuse section
as far as may be, with a diameter of half -a -palm's breadth ;
and happy may that man consider himself who can attain
unto a hyperbolic glass after the fashion of the pupil of
his own eye, for he will behold an effect ten times that of
a particular lens, and thereby be astonied. The fashion
of both of these glasses — the lens-shaped, and the hyper-
bolic— has been .already treated of at considerable length,*
and we know that while the hyperbolic can be used for
the most remote distances, the lens will only have its
effect within a limited radius, and the greater the distance,
the greater also must be the hyperbole ; and thus much
with regard to the glass in general. For the present
experiment, an ordinary lens of somewhat obtuse con-
vexity will amply suffice.
In the third place, the support has to be considered.
This should be made (see Iconism xxxiv, fig. 1) of an
oblong piece of wood C D, having a fissure in its midst
G II, within which the mirror A may move. The glass B
and the mirror A are so furnished with joints, that they
may be fixed in any part or position by versatile craft.
F is the foot, or pedestal sustaining the whole machine ; and
F is of such a size as may be easily set in the valves of a
window. This is an instrument which will be found
exactly suited to the performance of any work in catoptric
steganography, as will, from what follows, more clearly
appear.
Of Concave Mirrors. — Concave mirrors may also prove
of the greatest service in this experiment, for they in-
crease in a marvellous manner the images of objects,
and set them forth in the most perspicuous fashion. But
since it is not every one who possesses mirrors of this
kind, we rather use plane mirrors which are of more
easy attainment. Mirrors made with a section of eighteen
degrees have in this art of ours a prodigious effect, and
project the shadows of things to a much greater distance.
But, says Kireher, I have communicated only to a few
skilled friends and acquaintances the art of applying such
mirrors.
Kircher’s third chapter treats
Of the distances which are required for the projection of the
forms of objects. — Since no natural agent can act to an infinite
distance, it follows necessarily that it must have a certain
and determinate sphere for its activity, the semi-diameter of
which sphere may be called the distance of the agent and
* In Book X.,Part II., Chapter 8, where the matter, forms, varieties,
collocations, and effects of lenses are admirably illustrated and explained.
200
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
patient, since within this distance all sensible actions o*
natural things are concluded. A sphere of this fashion
throws off a sensible light, whilst it continually diffuses itself
through a mean by uniform propagation, until, when the
sensible forms of light at last are lost, it finally ceases in
shade, and this sphere extends itself so much the more as
the intermediate body more increases the light ; but that
which increases the light in the greatest degree is a lens in
the form of a hyperbola, and others of this kind, as has been
already described, arranged in a proportionate degree of
distance between the light itself and its boundary. Reflected
forms, with which we are here particularly concerned, are
allotted a smaller distance than direct forms, which, having
been laid down, we have the following problem presented
to us.
It is required to know to what distance the reflected
forms of objects may be projected. The answer is that
since light is multifold, it has also a multifold reflected
sphere of its diffusion. The rays of the sun diffuse
reflected forms to the greatest distance, a candle less
remotely. “ I, myself, ’’ the author informs us, ‘ 1 have
proved that a glass (mirror) of a half palm’s size will project
the forms of objects to a distance of five hundred feet, so
that such forms projected into a dark room can be easily
and distinctly interpreted by the bystanders.” The plane
mirror was, as has been said, of the magnitude of half a
palm, the diameter of the round lens of one-third of a
palm, and so with a proportional increment of both mirror
and glass (lens) the reflected forms of objects may be still
further projected in exact accordance with the additional
magnitude of mirror and lens.
“Therefore, if the mirror and lens be both of eight
palms, I affirm,” says Kircher, “that in this case sensible
forms of objects may be projected to the distance of
twelve thousand feet, nor can this matter admit of the
smallest degree of doubt ; and this being so, I can
imagine nothing more divine. For is it not a paradox,
and a matter in the opinion of all incredible, that a man
should speak with his friend by means only of a mirror
at a distance of three leagues, should exhibit to him any
figures he may desire, and send him, if he so choose, a
long letter for his perusal ? But that these things are as
I have said, that mortal alone knows to whom alone in all
the world I have communicated this, my secret.”
As, however, nothing is altogether perfect in this best
of worlds, so even Kircher’s steganographic system is
attended by some slight inconveniencea Of these the
author mentions two only. They are that the forms of
the reflected objects are immensely increased — so that, for
example, one letter may attain the magnitude of a tower,
the other that, in proportion to the distance of the images
of the objects, their appearance is weaker ; indeed, they
wax so feeble that unless the whole room be dark, nothing
whatever will be seen. If, therefore, anyone shall be able
to hit upon a means by which he may reduce the propor-
tion of these figures when seen at a great distance, and
yet at the same time exhibit them clearly, he may con-
gratulate himself on having discovered a secret well
worthy of self-glorification, As for me, says Kircher,
who am without the necessary leisure for such an under-
taking, and destitute of the wealth which it would be
likely to consume, I have hitherto failed in bringing the
matter to this satisfactory conclusion. But let no man
doubt that such a desirable end may be attained by the
proper disposition of intermediate concave mirrors. And,
concludes Kircher, I think that I have for the nonce
sufficiently explained, as it were, in a preface the nature
of my secret.
The next chapter — chapter four — is headed,
Of Steganographic Praxis. — We will first teach how to
transmit the letters ; but before doing so, it is to be noted
that nothing can be writt en by this art of ours save upon
the walls of some shady and obscure place. In a mani-
fest light no reflected ray can be well perceived, and so
neither the forms of inscriptions reflected from a mirror ;
but wherever a place is somewhat dark, the shadows of
objects may be perceived, and they will appear with so
much the more exquisiteness and minuteness as the place
in which they are represented is more shady or more
obscure. Whosoever therefore will desire to practise
himself in this matter, before all things it is necessary
(see Iconism xxxiv., figure 1), that he should inscribe
with common ink, and upon a plane mirror A, whatso-
ever he would have appear in reflection. But since the
letters he employs cannot be portrayed in their ordinary
fashion, and have their erect natural and proper position
upon the plane mirror, we have thought it right to J
append to this article an alphabet constructed as if
must necessarily be to procure for him the result
required. And we trust that by means of the use thereof
every stumbling block which may offend him in his firsi
essay will be wholly removed out of his path.
The letters must he inscribed on the mirror in the position ii
which they appear in the Latin alphabet displayed in the ad
joined Iconism.
Iu the present Iconism we have displayed the alphabet!
of three tongues — Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. In thest
different alphabets, the upper series of every alphabet i
that which is natural. The lower series represents th<
same alphabet written inversely, or turned upside down
and the letters are to be inscribed on the mirror in tin
fashion in which they are here represented.
This then is to be the position of the characters in whic!
we must write what we wish to express upon the mirror
for then they will appear in their right order and positioi
projected upon the distant wall. Suppose you are desirou
to communicate a matter to a friend at an appointe'
hour, you will first inscribe the matter on the plan
mirror in the conceived words, in letters upside down, a
here are shown. Let, for instance, your communicatio
to your friend written on the mirror be conceived in th
following words: —
AD MAJOREM DEI GLORIAM.
You will write these words in the manner displayed o
the mirror AS.
The words PAX VOBIS should (see Iconism xxxiv
figure 2) be inscribed so that they may appear as on tb
plane mirror V. The figures to be projected are also <
be drawn upside down, as is clearly shown in the mirroi
R and N.
After the inscription of the letters in the mann<
indicated, the plane mirror must be continually turne
about until the reflected ray falls exactly on the dark plac
whereon the letters are to appear. If the reflected rf
cannot be seen on account of the distauce, the visual ra
following the path of the reflected ray, will quick
demonstrate the line of steganographic direction. T1
incidence of the reflected ray having been determined 1
this artifice, a lens must next be interposed between tl
mirror and the dark place or terminus in such a mann
that the reflected light may cover the whole superficies
March 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
201
the glass. The lens must also be set in an exactly propor-
tioned distance, which distance must be beforehand
determined by observation — that is to say, by approximating
or elongating the glass (lens) from the mirror, until the
reflected forms of the letters appear as distinctly as may
be in the position desired. And after all this has been
achieved, there will be beheld within the walls of the
room, if the terminus be of that nature, the whole of your
concept projected, not without the astonishment of those
who gaze thereon, in letters a foot and a half in magnitude,
so that the whole wall of the room will be occupied there-
with. for these letters will appear so much the larger as
the space is more distant between the mirror and the
terminus.
It is also here to be noted, that, by some unexplained
artifice of Nature, the master-painter, the letters will be
seen depicted with every variety of colour, which matter,
as it is indeed unusual, will -work the greater admiration in
the minds of those who behold it.
The figure on the left-hand side of the Ieonism, repre-
senting the popular idea of an angel, bears a tablet
containing a Hebrew quotation, a little misspelt, from
Proverbs xv. 15, which is, being translated in the English
version, “ lie that is of a merry heart hath a continual
feast.”
Kircher’s fifth chapter treats of the projection of
figures. This is virtually the same as that of the letters.
It is written, he says, in the Book of Magic, that Solomon,
to inspire awe in his subjects, exhibited his figure in places
from which he was himself far away. Many interpret
this as a fiction of the Kabbis, but by the catoptric art, an
image of oneself may be projected to a distance as easily
as that of any other person. It is necessary only to draw
the extreme lineaments, commonly called the profile.
But experience will teach here more than many words.
By Catoptrics may be explained marvellous matters in his-
tory, hitherto supposed to be the works of devils. Roger
Bachon, as Kircher spells his name, was, owing to his
knowledge of catoptrics, considered a necromancer.
Chapter VI. deals with coloured images. The only point
of variation in the directions for producing them is, that
the figure desired to be projected must be painted in
transparent colours. The result is so extraordinary, that
many calling themselves acute philosophers accused more
than once the unhappy Kircher of dealing with the black
art
In the seventh chapter Kircher explains how motion may
be communicated to his catoptric semblances. Profiles
must be cut out in paper, and legs, arms, feet, hands, and
head are to be attached by joints, so that they may be
moved by means of strings. The bodies must be fastened
by glue to the surface of the mirror. Then the shadows will
be seen to move on the wall to the trepidation of all
beholders. If you wish to represent flies, you must smear
the edges of the mirror with honey, and you will see flies
like giants crawling upon the wall. These attached to steel
"ill follow a magnet moved behind the mirror in any
direction desired.
Chapter VHL contains the mechanism of a stegano-
graphic horologe, with which it is unnecessary to trouble
the reader.
A short Second Part deals with steganographic catoptrics
by means of a candle. Here the praxis is the same, but
the mirror different. It should be, says Kircher, of an
obtuse section of eighteen degrees, or parabolic, with a
lens-shaped tube in the form of an hyperbola, proportioned
to the concavity of the mirror. The fantasms produced
in this manner are much more formidable, and with this
machine an impious man may, by means of devils described
upon the mirrors, be easily restrained from the perpetra-
tion of atrocities.
Another method of presenting images by a candle is to
write upon the convex superficies of a glass sphere having
as large a diameter as may conveniently be gotten. Behind
the sphere is set a burning torch. Images are obtained in
this way more deftly, with greater certainty, and at a far-
ther distance than by the use of the concave mirror.
“ But,” says the author, “to leave others some room for
their experiments, and to prevent our work growing to an
excessive size, we willingly break off the thread of our
machinations, mindful of that of Menander —
O crofbs wuKKk oAlyots roTs \iyois.
RULES FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
Last week the programme of the papers to be read at the
Camera Club Conference was published in these pages.
It is proposed to have a discussion upon the regulations
for photographic exhibitions, at the Conference, at the
Society of Arts, on Friday next, with Captain W. de W.
Abney in the chair.
The Club has informed a large number of photographic
societies that in continuation of the Conference upon this
subject, held at the Camera Club in 1888, and in view of
the special interest attaching to the question at the present
time, it is felt to be advisable to gather together as many
views as possible upon certain leading points in exhibition
regulations, with the ultimate object of removing some of
the disadvantages which are generally held to attend the
systems now in vogue. At the Camera Club Conference
the Camera Club will bring forward a set of regulations
and recommendations as a basis for discussion.
It is believed that there are at least some few points of
reform upon which all who are accustomed to exhibit, or
are called upon to manage exhibitions, are agreed. Much
good would accrue if these conditions could be settled
with some definiteness, and be adopted by the leading
societies.
The following are set out as points on which there
appears to be fair general agreement ; upon these and all
the submissions criticism is desired : — 1. That exhibition
authorities and societies should decline prizes placed at
their disposal for the purposes of advertising. 2. That
some restriction as to the number of awards is required ;
suggest a basis for a limitation. 3. That awards should
be all of equal value. 4. That if any farther division than
Art and Scientific Sections be required, the classification
be of the simplest — say, in the Art Sections : (a) landscape
and landscape with figure ; ( b ) figure subjects ; (c) por-
traiture ; ( d ) architectural.
Other points upon which agreement is desirable are as follows: —
1. Selection and constitution of Board of Judges for Art
and Scientific Sections. 2. Announcement of judges’
names as early as possible, and before entries are due.
3. The working of the system of champion classes.
4. Exhibition in competition of work by a firm, in which
work several hands have had a share. 5. An intimation
in the regulations that the judges are requested to withhold
awards in cases of insufficient merit in a class or classes.
Other points: — Retouching? One picture, one frame?
Diplomas or medals ? Separate amateur and professional
classes? Hanging committee ?
202
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
Since the foregoing was in type, we have received the
following communication on the same subject from Mr.
Ralph W. Robinson : —
“ A very able and interesting article, by Mr. G. Davi-
son, in a contemporary, deals sensibly, I think, with the
present degraded state of photographic exhibitions.
“As Mr. Davison suggests, it is time that exhibitors
should speak with no uncertain voice their opinions in
the matter. It appears there was once a time when it
was an honour to receive an award ; but now, alas ! on
how few of the medals scattered about with such profu-
sion can the photographer with common sense honestly
set any value. As trade advertisements, perhaps they are
useful as a guarantee that the recipient has obtained a
certain degree of proficiency, but to those who really
know the state of affairs, what are they ? The very bad-
ness of design and inferiority of workmanship of many of
them are a slight on the artistic perception of the recipient,
or an only too faithful testimonial to the want of taste on
the part of those responsible for their issue. How long,
I wonder, will the long-suffering exhibitor continue to
enter his pictures for competition and allow them to be
adjudicated upon by journalists and others, however
eminent in their own profession, unless — which is rarely the
case — they have the education and experience necessary
for the true art critic ? The deliberations of the Camera
Club next week should do good in giving us the carefully
considered views of the amateurs. Have not the leading
professionals, too, something to say? It should be
possible, I think — so self-evident is the undignified state
into which exhibitions have fallen — for a combination to be
brought about, of the principal exhibitors, to protest against
present abuses. If only a dozen or twenty of the most
representative men would make up their minds to united
action, and refuse to exhibit, except where men of
acknowledged ability as artists, either in painting or
photography, will be judges, the exhibition committees
would soon see the advisability and, indeed, necessity of
reform.
“For my own part I would willingly see medals
abolished entirely, and only the best of the photographs
sent in hung. Of course, the proportion rejected would
depend on the quality of work, and space at the disposal
of the committee, but the standard should be a high one ;
and I think Mr. Davison goes under rather than over
the mark, when he suggests the rejection of forty per
cent. I most emphatically agree with Mr. Davison that
there should be no division between professional and
amateur, and no classification except into art and science
divisions, and perhaps a technical division should be
added to include .all photographs not shown as works of
art, or as of a scientific character. Most interiors,
photographs of machinery, copies of paintings and other
works of art, and similar subjects, would be included in
this division. With regard to the fusion of amateur
and professional classes, I believe it is fallacious to argue,
as some do, that it is unfair to the amateur to make him
compete on equal terms with the professional On
the contrary, the professional has many disadvan-
tages, except in portraiture. lie must attend to business
for the greater part of his time — which many amateurs
need not do — and can devote his leisure only to art
study. I believe, too, that it has been an invariable
result of the mixture of commercialism and art that
one or the other has had to suffer.
“ I would suggest that instead of awarding medals, the
judges should weed out all inferior work and reject it,
and from the photographs exhibited select a few of the
very best, to be purchased by the Society holding the
exhibition, to form a permanent collection, to the lasting
honour of the producer, an encouragement to do good
work, and, as time goes on, to form invaluable historical
records of the art progress of photography."
CIIROMO-PIIOTOGRAPIIY IN THE PRINTING
PRESS.
Ix our notice of Dr. Eder's annual in last week’s issue we
had occasion to refer to one of the supplements or illus-
trations with which it is enriched, an illustration printed
in coloured inks, and resembling in all respects a bright
and airy sketch in water colours. The fact of producing
a coloured illustration by means of selecting portions of a
negative for printing each with a separate tint, or in some
parts with several tints overlaid on the same part is, of
course, not new ; but when any particularly striking pro-
duction is seen, there are naturally enough enquiries as to
the means by which it has been accomplished, and as in
the subject of the present notice, the process is one
which is scarcely known in this country, some details of
it may be interesting to our readers.
We gather from the annual containing the illustration,
and from other sources, that the plates employed by Messrs.
Wezel and Naumann, of Leipzig, are prepared as follows :
— Lithographic stone is partly dissolved and partly
reduced to a pulp by digestion in hydrochloric and sul-
phuric acids. To this pulp is added a mixture of solu-
tion of asphaltum and resin and a small quantity of oil.
By this means a mixture of fatty or resinous salts of
lime and sulphate of lime is formed. After evaporating
the excess of acid a dilute solution of soda is added, and
warm zinc plates are covered with a fine spray of the mix-
ture. The plate thus coated with a film of artificial litho-
stone, is afterwards treated in the same way as an ordinary
lithographic stone, except that in place of nitric or
hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid mixed with dilute
gum arabic is employed.
Plates thus prepared have yielded as many as 6,000
impressions, and we learn that the process is used to the
almost entire exclusion of other processes by Messrs Wezel
and Naumann, who have over thirty steam presses doing
various lithographic work.
As the film of stone is thin it is recommended to avoid
as much as possible having to make corrections. If,
however, any are necessary, the place is washed with tur-
pentine, and is then lightly rubbed with pumice powder
and water. When dry it is again lightly rubbed with dry
pumice powder, care being taken not to lay the zinc bare.
If any correction has to be made after etching, a solu-
tion of citric acid, of about one-third strength of that used
for stone, is employed, and the spot may then be worked
upon again. Dirty corners or patches are best rubbed
away with oxalic acid. If by any mischance a place
has been laid bare on the zinc it is treated with
gallic or tannic acid.
The process as described, it will be seen, is applicable
to all lithographic work. In the example before us, the
registering of the different plates is so perfectly performed
that we cannot detect any fault in that respect, and the
total result is the production of a charming chromo-litho-
graph from a photographic negative.
March 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
203
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Electro-Chemical Etching Process for Hard Metals —
Retouching Negatives — Developers for Flashlight
Negatives — Fixing with Magnesium Chloride.
Electro-Chemical Etching Process. — For the production of
photo-mechanical blocks, zinc plates are almost exclusively
used to receive the transferred image, which is etched into
them by means of acids. This process has been very much
perfected of late, as it is well known ; but where harder
metals have been tried for the same purpose, it has always
been found exceedingly difficult to etch them as cleanly as
required for the various photo-mechanical printing pro-
cesses. To attain the desired effect, it was necessary to
use very strong etching solutions, which attacked the
metal unequally, destroyed the fine lines, and produced
rough edges. This is now obviated by a new patented
“electro-chemical hard metal etching process,” which is
worked commercially by a trading company at Berlin under
the firm of “ Electrochemische Graviranstalt.” The ad-
vantages of this process consist in the fact that it is not
only possible to readily work hard metals useless for the
ordinary etching process, but that also very good etchings
may be produced on curved or cylindrical surfaces. A
short description of the modus operandi of this establish-
ment may be interesting to some of your readers. The
etching is done in a stoneware trough ; the etching fluid
is a diluted solution of an acid, rendered a good con-
ductor of electricity. For the production of the electrical
current a dynamo machine of about 200 amperes is used.
The hard metal plate is first well polished, and then the
transfer is made on it. The latter is dusted with resin
powder in the ordinary way. The surplus of the powder
is first wiped off and blown away, and then the rest of
it, adhering to the lines and surfaces of the transfer, is
melted. This is done by placing the plate on a roasting
iron and heating it by means of a Bunsen’s burner until, by
an evenly black colour of the transferred impression, it is
evident that the whole of the remaining resin powder has
been melted. The metal plate, the back of which has
been protected by asphalt varnish, is now placed in the
bath, the composition of which is a different one
according to the metallic alloy used. As an electrode
on the one hand the hard metal plate itself is used ;
on the other hand a carbon plate is arranged
parallel to the metal plate. The surface of the hard
metal plate is of course directed to the counter-plate.
If the circuit be now completed, the unprotected spaces
of the metal arc attacked by influence of electro-chemical
decomposition. Where the metal plate dips in the liquid,
small bubbles arise, and on the plate bubbles appear,
forming a whitish scum. If after a short time the
plate is removed, it will be found covered on the un-
protected parts with a whitish mass, i.e., a metallic com-
pound. If the latter is rinsed off under the tap, it will be
observed that the pure metal is already bitten-in to the
thickness of a sheet of paper. As in the case of ordinary
zinc etching, the plate is removed from time to time, dried,
re-inked with fatty ink, dusted with resin, and the latter
melted superficially. After the electrolytic etching pro-
cess is finished, the asphalt film is removed from the back
and the edges of the plate, and the latter made ready for
use by sawing, filing, and cutting.
Retouching Negatives from Lead-Pencil Drawings. — The
following method has been devised, and is a thoroughly cer-
tain and excellent one, by an experienced retoucher, Mr.
1 1. Lenhard. It will be of special value to those retouchers
who work in collotype and zincography, as they have in
hand many lead-pencil drawings. To make the ren-
dering of such a drawing true to nature, and upon a purely
white ground, the following method should be used.
Zinc-white, finely rubbed down with water— to which some
albumen or gum solution is added, in order to insure to
the colour a certain degree of permanence — is applied to
the varnished film of the negative, which may be either a
wet collodion plate, or a gelatine dry plate, and the colour
is spread by means of two badger-hair brushes (so-
called dabbers) by even strokes downward and from
right to left, or vice versa, so as to form an entirely
equal and well-covering layer over the varnish film. After
drying, the negative is placed on the retouching desk, and
a mirror is placed beneath it, in order to enable the
retoucher at work to see the most delicate fines of the
drawing, and by means of a pointed wooden pencil (beech-
wood), the drawing is touched up in all its lines. By this
means every line becomes uncovered and remains sharp,
whilst the ground retains its full covering power. Of
course the printer must treat such negatives delicately,
because the zinc-white film is easily damaged by rubbing.
The Laying on of the covering ground requires some prac-
tice.
Developers for Flashlight Negatives. — We learn from the
Wochenhlatt that Professor Eder, in his new book, “ Photo-
graphy by Magnesium Light,” recommends the following
developers for flash-light pictures : —
1. — Pyro Developer.
\. — Sodium sulphite ...
Pyro
Water
Concentrated sulphuric acid
13, — Cryst. soda...
Water
100 grammes
H
500 c.c.
6 drops
50 grammes
500 c.c.
Just before use, not sooner, 20 c.c. of solution A and
20 c.c. of solution B are mixed witli 20 c.c. of water.
2. — Ilydroq u inone Developer.
A. — Hydroquinone ... ... ... 10 grammes
Sodium sulphite ... ... ... 40 ,,
Water ... ... ... ... 400 c.c.
B. — Potassium carbonate ... ... 20 grammes
Water ... ... ... ... 20 ,,
Before development 20 c.c. of solution A are mixed with
20 c.c. of solution B. This developer can be used re-
peatedly. and it is recommended to add a small quantity
of fresh developer, but not before the development has
been nearly finished.
Fixing with Magnesium Chloride.— Magnesium chloride
(Mg Cl,), which, as the older operators will remember,
served as a useful addition to the collodion, by which the
vigour of the negative was increased, and the solarisation
of the sky prevented, lias of late been tried by Herr
R. E. Liesegang as a fixing agent for gelatino-chloride
paper. This experimenter found that prints on this paper
were completely fixed if treated with a diluted solution of
this salt, and that they were not at all reduced in vigour,
as is the case with hypo, ammonia, and sulphocyanide of
ammonia. The fixed prints kept well ; but as the
gelatine of the film is slightly attacked by the salt, it is
advisable to add a small quantity of alum to the bath.
“Perhaps,” says the author, “the magnesium chloride,
on account of these properties, can be used for fixing
photographs in natural colours.”
204
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
JlOtCS*
The latest photographic curiosity is the rhombohedral
camera of Professor Cohu, of Breslau, by which a
picture can be taken while the eye is regarding it in
the glass screen. This is effected in the following
way : — Two rhombohedra of glass are placed in a
special chamber just behind the camera lens, by which
means two images are thrown upon the upper and
lower halves respectively of the ground glass screen,
the eye looking along a path between the two rhombo-
hedra. To use the instrument a sensitive plate is put
in place of the upper half of the ground glass. When
a sharply defined image has been obtained upon the
lower glass, an instantaneous shutter is released in the
interior of the camera in front of the upper rhombo-
hedron, and the picture is obtained on the sensitive
plate.
The competition in the insuiance world to obtain
new “lives” is so keen that many contrivances ai-e
adopted on the part of agents to ingratiate themselves
with possible insurers. The great point is to get an
introduction, and, after a little agreeable conversation,
to artfully bring up the subject of life insurance and
its incalculable benefits by a sort of side wind. One
of the most successful agents, who does a large busi-
ness in the provinces, finds a photographic outfit one of
the most useful baits he has ever tried. In calling
upon the various farmers, what can be easier than to
talk to the farmer’s wife or daughters about photo-
graphy ? The matter once started, the next thing is
to produce the camera from the gig, and proceed then
and there to photograph the members of the farmer’s
family. “ If,” as the agent shrewdly remarks, “ the
farmer has got no family, then I commence talking
about his favourite horse, dog, or cow, and the photo-
graphs, so far as I am concerned, are quite as good as
those of human beings.”
Of course the photograph once taken, a second visit
is a necessity in order to exhibit the proof, and in this
way friendly relations are built up. But one thing
the agent informs us is indispensable. The ladies must
be flattered ; hence an arrangement with a skilful re-
toucher is indispensable. This makes photography
rather a heavy outlay, but the commission paid by
insurance offices is now-a-days so large that, though
the enterprise is purely speculative, it pays in the long
run.
Professor ltomyn Hitchcock, in the American
Monthly Microscopical Journal , gives some valuable
hints as to the use of coloured screens in photo-
micrography. The blue produced by ammonio-sulphate
of copper was formerly used, but when colour sensi-
tive plates were introduced yellow screens took the
place of blue, because it was found that many speci-
mens had yellow, red, and brown parts which were
not well photographed with blue light. The colour
and thickness of the screen both require attention.
If it be too thin the blue light is not sufficiently cut
off. In particular cases an almost monochromatic
yellow light is desirable, as when it is desired to
obtain sharp outlines of deeply stained objects regard-
ess of structural details.
But generally a rather broader spectrum range is
desirable, for the light employed should correspond
to the different colours or shades of colour of the
object. It is owing to neglect of this consideration
l;hat we often see photo-micrographs which are mere
silhouettes, while the objects show much more
structure to the eye. This is frequently observed in
photographs of such structures as the tongue and
sting of a bee, and legs of insects. In other prepara-
tions, in which the colour is a stain-brown or red, for
example, the fault lies partly in the exposure, which,
in many cases, is insufficient to give more than out-
lines and blank interiors. This is frequently notice-
able in photographs of bacteria. By a proper choice
of a screen, if a screen is required, a photograph
should show any object as clearly as we can see it in
the microscope. Colour-sensitive plates may be said to
be indispensable in the photography of rock sections
with polarized light.
It is curious to read in Mr. W. P. Frith’s “Reminis-
cences” how photography, now used so extensively by
the police in the detection of criminals, was antici-
pated by the pencil. Mr. Frith gives two examples.
The first relates to an experience of Mulready, who,
while walking down the Bayswater Road in 1805, was
stopped by a foot-pad armed with a pistol. The artist
had no choice but to comply, and, on reaching home,
drew the man’s face very carefully, taking the drawing
to Bow Street. Within a fortnight the man was cap-
tured, his apprehension being due entirely to the pic-
ture. The second instance relates to Mr. G. B. O’Neil,
who was robbed of his watch while looking at the
time under a gas lamp near Kensington Church. The
time for observation was very short, but the artist was
able to make a drawing, which he gave to the police.
The man was soon after caught, and at his trial the
drawing was produced, and the likeness, together with
Mr. O’Neil’s recognition, was sufficient to convict him.
Mr. Augustus Egg, R.A., also made a drawing in con-
nection with a robbery at his house. Unfortunately
the drawing was not that of the thief, but of his dis-
mantled room, with himself standing ruefully gazing
at the scene.
From a discussion on a paper read by Mr. W. Lovi-
bond at the Chemical Society on a new method of
colour analysis by means of the tintometer, it appears
that women, in regard to eyesight, are vastly superior
to men. Mr. David Howard, who presided, remarked
that in all his experience he had never met with a
colour-blind woman, and did not believe that one
existed. This opens up a new sphere of woman’s
work. Where nicety of vision in regard to tints is
required, women certainly should be employed.
March 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
205
THE CRYSTAL PALACE PHOTOGRAPHIC
EXHIBITION.— I.
The Photographic Exhibition this year at the Crystal
Palace contains more pictures than did the Exhibition of
1889, and a smaller show of photographic apparatus. The
pronounced novelties in apparatus placed on view are not
numerous, but the most interesting feature to the land-
scape photographer is the evidence of a growing tendency
to substitute aluminium for brass, wherever possible, in
lens mounts and cameras. The recent improvements in
the manufacture of aluminium on a large scale have, accord-
ing to a statement made some months ago by Sir Henry
Roscoe at the Royal Institution, reduced the price of
aluminium to twenty shillings a pound.
Messrs. Watson and Son have fitted up an aluminium
turn-table to some of their well-known “ Acme ” cameras,
thereby obtaining a palpably great reduction in weight ;
this reduction, they state, amounts to three-quarters of a
pound in a half-plate camera ; and in a whole-plate camera,
to seventeen ounces.
The same firm has also on view a heavy studio camera
and stand, with exceptionally quick screw focussing
motions, and fig. 1 will
help to explain the princi-
ple on which the ponderous
camera can be tilted up-
wards or downwards by
the operator. The base
of the camera is repre-
sented by N K, and W V represent the ends of two
wooden bars affixed thereto. A E represents an angular
piece of wood, which by a screw motion can be made to
slide backwards or forwards horizontally along the top of
the stand, whilst the camera base N K is so hinged that
it cannot move horizontally. Under these conditions,
when A E is moved in the direction indicated by the
arrow in the cut, the bar V rises and the bar W falls, and
the camera is tilted accordingly ; if they be moved in the
Fig. 1.
opposite direction, the end N of the camera will rise, and
K will fall. The camera has a large turntable, with
spanners of suitable dimensions, and works firmly.
The chief feature of the exhibit of Mr. Fox Shew is, of
course, his well-known hand-camera, but he has two
novelties in the shape of lens shutters. One of these,
which he calls “The Eclipse Repeating Shutter,” is
represented in fig. 2. It has an adjunct which is a
Fig, 2. Fig. 3.
blessing, namely, an arrangement by which it can befitted
on to lens hoods of different diameters ; this arrangement
consists of a compressing ring and an india-rubber washer.
The shutter has a pneumatic release, does not require
setting, and will work in any position.
The other shutter, fig. 3, exhibited by Mr. Shew, is
the invention of an Italian, Signor Mattioli. Mr. Shew
calls it “ The 1890 Eclipse Shutter.” Its mechanism con-
sists chiefly of three sectors, which open concentrically,
and are actuated by a revolving flat ring, which travels
round and opens or closes them. The shutter has a strong
spiral spring with little play ; each moving part of the shut-
ter has little work to do, and this principle favours rapi-
dity of action. The following are some of the advantages
which Mr. Shew states to belong to the shutter : —
(1) It can be fitted in the centre of the lenses, at the
back, or on the hood as required ; (2) It is of very high
rate of speed, due to an entirely new system of propelling
disc ; (3) It can be adjusted to eight different speeds as
well as for time exposures ; (4) It is perfectly smooth
and free from vibration in its action, whether at full speed
or slow ; (5) It is smaller and more compact than any
shutter in the market, being at the same time very strong,
and not liable to be affected by any change of climate — a
shutter uncovering a lens for 8 by 5 measuring only 3£
inches diameter by £ inch in thickness ; (6) It is provided
with a rotating diaphragm plate corresponding with the
stops of the lens ; (7) Owing to an improved method of
releasing valve, the ball or pear of the pneumatic release
is considerably smaller than usual, and instantly refills
itself ; (8) It is provided with a trigger, which may be
used in lieu of the pneumatic release for box detective
and other hand cameras ; (9) The mode of manipulating
the shutter is engraved on the face, thus dispensing with
loose instructions.
Messrs. Smith and Beck exhibit their recently intro-
duced aluminium mounts for lenses, and which will effect
a considerable reduction in the weight of the apparatus of
landscape photographers, more especially of those who
adopt the wise system of travelling with plenty of lens
power. The aluminium mounts are one-third the weight
of brass mounts. There are difficulties in working alu-
minium. It ‘ ‘ drags ” under the tool, as does pure copper,
so has to be turned slowly under some lubricating medium ;
for aluminium, paraffin is the medium selected. There
is a difficulty in soldering it, which has been partially
overcome by Cowles and others. Messrs. Beck and Co.
inform us that, “under certain conditions the metal can
be soldered ; but joints cannot be made sufficiently sound
to bear tube drawing. Where tubes are required, they
must be drawn out of solid castings, and the results are not
even then always as satisfactory as might be wished.
Another difficulty in working the metal is that of obtaininga
good surface.” Aluminium is reasonably free from liability
to attack by any chemical substances it is likely to meet when
it is in the form of fairly cared-for lens mounts. The
lenses, mounted as described by Messrs. Smith and Beck,
have iris diaphragms, graduated to indicate the apertures
recommended by the Photographic Society. The same
firm exhibits its “Pecrops” tourists’ camera, one of the
features of which is, that it does not rack out, but pulls
out, and can then be clamped at once, so that time is saved
by the user.
Mr. Stanley exhibits a convenient combined rocker and
developing-room lantern, the principle of which may
be explained by the aid of fig. 4. In this cut, E E E
20G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
represent the red glass front of a developing-room
lamp, through the bottom and inclined
window of which the rays from the light
A fall upon the mirror N M, and are
reflected upwards through the glass
platform F II F ; on this platform the
glass developing dish is placed ; red
light thus passes from below through
the negative in course of development,
so that the amount of density it is gain-
ing can be continuously watched.
Some light from the upper part of the
lamp falls at the same time upon the
upper surface of the plate in the dish.
A rocking motion is given to the plat-
form by means of the pendulum II K.
* At M the mirror is held by a hinge ; a
little chain is attached to the other end
of the mirror, N, by the aid of which chain the mirror
can be raised or lowered, and hooked so as to rest at any
required angle.
Mr. Stanley also exhibits a new magnesium lamp, in-
vented by Mr. Ferrero, intended for the illumination of
negatives which have to
be copied in the camera,
and for other purposes.
Fig. 5 will help to explain
its principle. In this cut,
H N is a sheet of ground
glass, closing the major
opening of a horizontal
pyramidal chamber made
of tin, whitened inside.
A is a wheel carrying a
coil of magnesium ribbon, which is paid out by hand.
W W is a small sheet of glass, with a small circular piece
of white paper affixed to it at K to prevent the direct rays
of the light M falling upon the sheet of glass II N. The
rays can thus reach it only by reflection from -white sur-
faces, by which means the illumination is more equalised.
When in use. a spirit-flame is constantly burning at the
mouth of the tube whence the magnesium ribbon enters
the lamp, so that should the magnesium light go out, it is
soon re -lit.
Fig. 5.
The tops of Mr. Stanley’s folding-stands are made on
the principle indicated by fig. 6, in which
D is the wooden top of the fork of one
leg, and Iv E the brass slip attached
thereto. B is a part of the stand head,
and A B a brass cone on which the fork
of the leg bears in use. This conical
form is given to the brass peg A B, we
are told, to prevent K E from springing to B, and in pro-
longed use the latter always finds a part of the peg to bear
against, instead of touching a flat portion of the stand
head proper, in which latter case the stand would be less
rigid.
[Fig. 6.
Photographic Society of Ireland. — A lantern meeting
will be held on March 27th, and on April 11th Prof. J. H.
Stewart wll take as his topic, “The Stop, and the Optical
Centre.”
Last Friday night the machine camera invented by Mr.
I'riese Greene and Mr. Mortimer Evans was exhibited in the
library of the Royal Institution after the close of the usual
Friday evening lecture. The instrument attracted much atten-
tion.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FRANCE.
French Photographic Society — Exposure Shutter —
Developer in Tablets — Halo and Means of Pre-
venting it— Orthochromatism.
Exposure Shutter. — A communication was received from
MM. Marillier and Robelet, introducing the instantaneous
shutter of R. Bliinsdorf. This instrument is truly simple
and ingenious. The length of exposure is regulated by a
fan which may be changed at will for one of larger or
smaller size, as the exposure is desired to be comparatively
long or short. The resistance offered by the air to the
speed of the fan is greater or less as the surface of the vanes
is more or less extended. If the apparatus is well con-
structed, apparently it should not alone work with almost
| chronometric exactitude, but should be free from the
danger of getting out of order.
Developer in Tablets. — This developer, the composition
of which is not stated, is presented in the form of tablets,
or pastilles. No weighing is required ; it is sufficient to
know that for a given quantity of -water a certain number
of the pastilles will be necessary. Several members of the
Society have experimented with these tablets and find
them very satisfactory.
Theoretical Explanation of Halo , and the Means of Pre-
venting It. — By a singular coincidence communications
have been received at the same time from M. Cornu, of
the Institute, and from Messrs. Lumiere and Son, of
Lyons, relating to the same subject, “The Cause of Halo.’’
From the explanations given, it appears that there are rays
which arc totally reflected after falling upon the inner
surface of the glass. The fact is verified by using a lumin-
ous point on a black background. This spot is photo-
graphed, and the image shows an aureole or halo round
the luminous spot. M. Cornu endeavoured to suppress the
halo by covering the back of the glass with a varnish
composed of essences of cinnamon or of clove in which a
piece of glass is placed, and other essences are gradually
added until the glass ceases to be visible. AVe have then
a liquid the refraction index of which is the same as that
of the glass. This varnish is blackened with lamp black,
and is applied to the back of the plates with a brush. The
rays traversing the thickness of the glass are thus entirely
absorbed ; there are no longer any reflections, and the halo
is suppressed. The unfortunate thing connected with this
remedy is, that it is not very practicable in application.
It is unfortunately difficult to replace this coating by a
sheet of paper or by any other black surface, for optical
contact is indispensible in order to suppress the halo. To
arrive at the desideratum, we ought to be able to manufac-
ture an adhesive black material, the index of which is
equal to that of glass, and which might be applied
immediately to the back of the glass, thus realising optical
contact. In this way the employment of the proposed
remedy would be easy.
Contretgpes in China Ink. — M. E. A'allot showed a very
successful contretype obtained with liquid China ink. It
had been produced in the following way. A glass plate
covered with bichromated gelatine had been exposed to
the action of light under a negative for the desired time,
and then developed in water blackened by liquid China
ink. The gelatine not indurated by the light imbibed the
liquid, and finally an excellent negative was obtained.
The same operations may be gone through by immersing
the exposed gelatine in a colouring bath of any tint, but it
is necessary to use permanent colours if the negative is not
March 14, 1890.]
HIE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
207
to be liable to fading. This process shows that there is no
necessity to use a plate containing silver bromide in gela-
tine ; certainly such a plate may be used if the silver com-
pound is first dissolved in hyposulphite of soda. The plate
is then well washed, sensitised in solution of bichromate of
potassium, and, after drying, exposed under a negative, and
developed in a colouring bath. A perfect contretype is
thus obtained.
Practical Orthochromatism. — M. Leon Vidal — in view of
the interest excited amongst the members of the Society
by divers presentations relating to orthochromatism —
thought it desirable to explain that this art, which consists
in reproducing in grey tones (monochrome) the various
tonalities of coloured objects, is practically easy of applica-
tion provided that one is somewhat initiated in the know-
ledge of the question. In the first place, we should
know what are the cases in which orthochromatism is
necessary. Generally, he said, it is useless, when working
from nature in taking landscapes and buildings, to employ
orthochromatic plates. It is sufficient to be furnished
with pellicular screens coloured with aurantia of different
degrees according to the subject, and a little practice soon
teaches what is the depth required for the particular case.
In photographing interiors, orthochromatic plates are often
necessary, especially for such subjects as fruits, flowers,
pictures, and designs in coloured material. In this case,
however, the employment of screens is still indispensable,
and it is very rarely that their use can be omitted. Xow,
it is inexact to say that for coloured objects we may use
with success one sole orthochromatic preparation.
Preparation of eosine, erythrosine, and chrysaniUne, may
do for reproductions where yellow, green, and orange arc
the dominant colours; but where red i3 dominant, it is
absolutely necessary to have recourse to other preparations,
notably chlorophylla cyanine, or to a mixture of erythrosine
and cyanine. The best thing to do,. then, when not engaged
in some definite work for which ordinary commercial plates
may be suitable, is to make orthochromatic plates oneself,
by preparing them for the particular kind of work to be
done. Nothing is easier or simpler than the preparation by
the bath method, and he asked himself in vain
how it happens that so few persons have, up to the
present, thought of preparing their photographic palette.
For our own part, says the author of the communication,
we continue to make various preparations for the purposes
of our work, and we succeed with the most complete
facility. The conclusion arrived at is, that except for
special cases, it is better worth while to prepare oneself the
plates that may be required, than to use commercial ones,
and that it should be remembered that more often than
not the screen alone suffices, and that its use is indispen-
sable for correcting tonality, even when using orthochro-
matic plates. By the aid of lantern slides M. Vidal showed
results obtained with and without screens on orthochro-
matic plates, as well as on ordinary ones, and called atten-
tion to the very feeble difference existing between views
of the same subject taken by him on ordinary and on ortho-
chromatic plates when used without a screen.
The meeting terminated with the exhibition of some very
fine lantern slides by M. Bagnet and M. Balagny.
Leon Vidal.
♦
The Earl of Crawford and Balcarres has closed and dismantled
the observatory at Dun Echt, which has been so well-known to
all astronomers for many years past, and has presented all the
instruments and the astronomical library to the Royal Obser-
vatory at Edinburgh,
patent £ntcUtgcncc*
Applications for Letters Patent.
3,329. J. Clegg, Connaught Mansions, Victoria Street, West-
minster, “Light Emitters for Lamps.” — March 3rd.
3,338. W. H. Prestwich and E. P. Prestwich, High Road,
Tottenham, “ Bicycles and Tricycles.” — March 3rd.
3.392. W. Griffiths, King’s Heath, “ Detective Camera. ” —
March 4th.
3.393. E. W. Foxi.ee, 22, Goldsmith Road, Acton, London,
“Flexible Film.” — Marth 4th.
3,403. C. Hudson and J. S. Hudson, 3, Langdale Terrace,
Stockton-on-Tees, “ Applying Mucilaginous Substances to
Paper.” — March 4th.
3,446. A. P. Riley, 77, Chancery Lane, London, “Camera
and Receptacle.” — March 4th.
3,482. L. Van Neck, 45, Southampton Buildings, London,
“Cameras.” — March 4th.
3,494. E. W. Parish, 19, Bowling Green Street, Leicester,
“ Cleaning Prints.” — March 5th.
3,546. M. E. Banger, 98, Salisbury' Road, High Barnet,
Herts, “Automatic Continuous Flashlight.” — March 6th.
3,571. R. Slinosby, 115, Cannon Street, Loudon, “Dis-
charging Flash Lamps and Photographic Shutters.” — March
6th.
3,597. A. Penhiro, 22, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Cameras.” — March 6th.
3,718. R. W. Thomas, 181, Chcapsidc, London, “Portable
Artificial Light Studio.” — March 8th.
3,730. M. Evans, 321, High Holborn, London, “ Cameras.”
— March 8th.
Specifications Published.
5,374. — March 29 th, 1889. “Photographic Printing.”
William Walker James Nicol, Mason College, Birming-
ham, Doctor of Science, Lecturer on Chemistry.
My invention has for its object the production of photo-
graphic pictures or images in silver on paper, wood, or other
surfaces.
For this purpose I apply to paper or other suitable
material, a coating of a ferric salt, alone or mixed with the
other salts hereinafter specially mentioned ; the surface thus
prepared is sensitive to light. The ferric salt used may be
that of any of the organic acids afterwards mentioned, which
prevent the precipitation of iron by ammonia ; or it may be
any other ferric salt sensitive to light, and the precipitation of
the iron is in this case prevented by the addition of a sodium,
ammonium, or potassium salt of one of the organic acids,
which prevents the precipitation of iron by ammonia, and
this may be employed either in the solution with which the
paper or other material is coated, or it may be added to one
or other of the solutions subsequently used. The surface
sensitive to light is then exposed to the action of light under
a negative or other screen of similar character, when after
some time a faint image becomes visible. It is then brought in
contact with a solution containing silver nitrate or the other
sales of silver (subsequently mentioned) dissolved in ammonia,
to which has been added potassium oxalate, or the other
salts mentioned later, which may tend to increase the rapidity
and vigour of the development, alter the tone of the finished
picture, or prevent the precipitation of the iron by the
ammonia. The print is then washed in water to which has
been added ammonia, and a salt of one of the organic acids,
which prevents the precipitation of iron by ammonia. A
subsequent washing in water, followed by drying, completes
the operation.
Hitherto no means have been known by which, when using
ferric salts as sensitisers (i.e., for coating the paper), and
developing with solutions containing silver salts, a print could
be obtained, the tone of which was such that toning with
gold or other metals, followed by the use of sodium-thio-sul-
phate, could be dispensed with; I therefore greatly simplify the
operations involved, and add to the permanency of the finished
print. According to my invention, I use paper, wood, glass,
woven or other material, the surface of which I prepare and
208
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
render sensitive, by applying to it in any convenient manner
a solution prepared in one of the following ways : —
1. I make a solution of normal feme sodium citrate
(Fe Na3 (C6 H5 07) 2) containing twenty per cent, of the salt
as expressed by the above formula, and add to it five per cent,
of normal potassium oxalate (K2 C„ 04), but I do not confine
myself to these exact proportions ; they may be altered accord-
ing to the vigour and tone desired in the resulting picture. In
place of the ferric sodium citrate mentioned above I sometimes
use other salts as follows : — Ferric ammonium citrate or ferric
potassium citrate or the corresponding salts of tartaric acid,
also ferric tartrate and ferric citrate, and I sometimes use a
mixture of these ferric salts with citric or tartaric or oxalic
acid, or the salts of these acids with potassium, sodium, or
ammonium. I have also been very successful with solutions
of ferric salts which are precipitated by ammonia either alone
or with one or other of the above salts and acids. Thus I
have obtained excellent results with the following : —
2. I make a solution containing five per cent, of normal
ferric oxalate (Fe4 (Cs Oi) 3), and five per cent, normal ferric
tartrate (Fe2 (C, H4, 06) 3), and one per cent, of tartaric or
oxalic acid ; in this case the precipitation of the iron is pre-
vented by modifying the developer or subsequent solutions as
stated below. 1 do not, however, confine myself to these
exact proportions, as they may be altered according to the
effect desired, as stated above. In general, however, I prefer
to use one or other of these solutions, the composition of
which I have stated in full. In some cases depending on the
nature of the surface to be coated : if, for instance, it be glass,
wood, or cloth, thickening material, such as gelatine, starch,
arrowroot, or gum-arabic may be added to the above solutions ;
usually this is not required for paper. The paper or other sur-
face prepared with one or other of the foregoing solutions is
dried, and is then ready for use. After exposure to light in
the usual manner I apply to it the developing solution.
I use solutions of various soluble salts of the metals of the
alkalies or ammonium. I have been most successful with the
following — viz., potassium, sodium, or ammonium, oxalate,
acetate, borate, citrate, or tartrate, either alone or mixed
together.
1. Thus, with paper sensitised with No. 1 solution, for cold
blue-black tones I prefer a solution containing — (a) 20 per cent,
potassium oxalate ; 1 •» per cent, silver nitrate,' the precipitate
formed being nearly dissolved by theaddition of ammonia. (6) For
black neutral tones : — 10 per cent, potassium oxalate ; 1*5 per
cent, silver nitrate, (c) For sepia tones : — 7 per cent, borax ;
1 ‘5 per cent, silver nitrate. In both cases ammonia is added
as above.
2. When the paper is sensitised with No. 2 solution I prefer
a solution containing — (a) 15 per cent, potassium citrate ;
10 per cent, sodium acetate ; 1*5 per cent, silver nitrate ; or
(6) 15 per cent, potassium citrate ; 10 per cent, potassium
oxalate; l-5 per cent, silver nitrate; ammonia being added
in both cases as above.
The developing solutions 1, a, b, or c, may be used with
paper prepared with sensitising solution 2, if the prints, after
removal from the developing solution, are placed for a short
time in a solution prepared thus : —
Clearing solution — 20 per cent, solution of citrate or tartrate
of potassium, sodium or ammonium rendered distinctly alka-
line with ammonia. When greater contrast is desired in the
print I obtain this by adding an oxidising agent to the developer,
preferably a salt of chromic acid in quantities of from 2 to
10 c.cms. of a 5 percent, solution of potassium chromate to
the litre of developer. I do not confine myself to any definite
temperature of the developer, though I prefer to use this at
the temperature of the air. The developer may be applied to
the printed surface in any convenient way.
After treatment with the developer the print is washed in
successive changes (i.c., till iron and silver salts are removed) of
the washing solution. I prepare this as follows : — Washing
solution — A 25 per cent, solution of sodium citrate is mixed
with an equal volume of strong ammonia solution. This is
then diluted with ordinary water in the proportion of 150 c.cms.
to every 10 litres of water. Potassium or ammonium, citrate,
or potassium, sodium or ammonium, tartrate, or sodium, potas-
sium tartrate, may be used in place of the sodium citrate in
the above.
The prints are then washed in water and dried.
Having now particularly described and ascertained the nature
of my said invention, I wish it understood that I do not con-
fine myself to the mixtures mentioned, or to the exact propor-
tions of the ingredients given therein, but employ on occasion
other mixtures and proportions of the salts particularly men-
tioned as suitable for my purpose, nor do I confine myself to
aqueous solutions of the said salts, but may for the purposes of
preparing the sensitising and developing solutions use other
solvents where these are permitted by the chemical nature of
the salts employed, and I therefore claim as my invention as
follows : —
1. The use of paper or other surfaces coated with ferric salts
as described above, to be used for the production of photo-
graphic images in silver, along with the class of developing
solutions already given and particularly referred to in my second
claim.
2. The use of solutions of silver salts dissolved in ammonia
in conjunction with salts of the alkalies or ammonium with
oxalic, acetic, boric, citric, or tartaric acids, for the pur pose of
producing on paper or other surfaces previously coated with
ferric salts sensitive to light, images in silver which arc of such
a colour as not to require toning with gold or other metals.
3. The combined use of ammonia and a potassium, sodium,
or ammonium salt of citric or tartaric acid, in a solution used
for washing prints obtained on surfaces coated with ferric salts,
and developed with solutions of silver salts in ammonia.
4. The use of the solutions — sensitising solutions 1 and 2.
Developing solutions 1 a, b, and c ; 2 a, b, and c. Clearing
solution ; washing solution in the way and manner substanti-
ally as described and set forth in the foregoing.
5. The use of an oxydising agent, such as chromic acids or
any of its salts, in a developer prepared as described and set
forth.
4,716. March 18th, 1889. “ Photographic Cameras.” James
Yate Johnson, 47, Lincolns Inn Fields, Loudon, Gentle-
man, communicated from abroad by Henri Pusset, of 48,
Rue de Bondy, Paris.
An improved photographic camera, according to this inven-
tion, is provided with a magazine containing a number of
sensitive plates which are capable of being pushed towards the
front by a spring. These sensitive plates are separated from
each other by plates of ebonite or other material not liable to
be affected by the chemicals employed in the developing
process, which may be performed in the interior of the camera,
as hereinafter explained. The plates are pressed together by
the action of the spring, and a partition working in suitable
guides so as to push forward the plates without inclining or
tilting them may be interposed between the plates and the
spring at the back.
To charge the magazine with plates a slide at the back is
drawn out so as to disengage a sliding cover which, being drawn
back, horizontally exposes the interior of the magazine so that
the plates can be inserted, after which the magazine is closed
by returning the slides to their original position. When a
plate has been exposed, it is pushed by means of a flexible
slide or curtain into a light-tight bag underneath the magazine.
The plate can then be passed through an opening in the lower
part of the back into a dish on the bottom of the camera, in
which it can be developed, the process being watched through
an opening covered with ruby glass in the top of the camera.
The interior of the camera is lighted during this operation by
means of one or more ruby glass windows or openings in the
side or sides. These openings may be provided with dark slides
or shutters.
The developer is introduced into the dish through a rubber
tube fitted to a short tube attached to the bottom of the dish.
This short tube protrudes through an opening in the bottom of
the camera so arranged as to admit of the necessary movements
of the dish.
The camera is provided with a sliding shutter, which is
March 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
209
retained in the closed position by a spring catch. A rubber
spring tends to pull down the shutter and uncover the lens.
By means of a rod the spring catch can be caused to release the
shutter, which thereupon descends and uncovers the lens. A
pin on the shutter then comes in contact with a horizontal
rubber spring or band, the elasticity of which causes the shutter
to rebound and return to the closed position, where it is retained
by the spring catch. The shock is absorbed by a spring pro-
vided for the purpose.
To exclude light from the magazine the flexible slide or cur-
tain hereinbefore referred to is arranged to close the opening
between the magazine and the camera, and extends downwards
tlirough an opening in the bottom of the magazine sufficiently
to cover the opening hereinbefore referred to in the lower part
of the back of the camera. The opening in the bottom of the
magazine for the passage of the shutter is closed by a spring
shutter when the slide or curtain is drawn up. This flexible
slide works in a vertical groove in the front of the magazine,
and in a horizontal groove in the top of the latter.
The camera may be provided with two focus finders, in which
the image is projected by a lens on to a mirror which reflects
it on to ground glass screen in the usual way. One of these
focus finders is used for pictures taken with the longer axis of
the plate vertical, the other serving for pictures taken with this
axis horizontal. The apparatus is further provided with a
focus finder of special construction, composed of a convex
mirror receiving light through an opening in the front of the
camera, and which can be seen through an opening in the top
of the camera. A small hole is formed in the centre of this
mirror, and a thread or wire extending diagonally across the
opening in the front carries a register mark, such as a small
glass bead. In order to direct the camera on an object it is
held under the arm in such a position that the register or
bead coincides with the hole in the centre of the mirror. This
mirror may be made of glass tinned or simply blackened at the
back.
On Thursday, March 20th, there will be an exhibition of
lantern slides at the Society of Arts in connection with the
Camera Club Conference.
Photographic Club. — On Wednesday, March 19th, the
adjourned discussion will be held on ‘ ‘ Artificial Light as an
Adjunct to Daylight ” ; March 26th will be the monthly
lantern meeting.
Travellers in Russia are now obliged to have their photo-
graphs annexed to their passports. The photographer, how-
ever, rarely lias any good fall to his lot without having to pay
some compensation for it. The Russian law’ will soon impose
a stamp duty upon cartes-de-visite.
Shefield Photographic Society. — An exhibition of photo-
graphic slides has been given at the Montgomery Hall, in aid of
the building fund of the Public Hospital and Dispensary.
The slides were mostly the work of members of the Society,
the majority being of local interest, and w’ere exhibited by
means of a powerful lantern belonging to Mr. W. D.
Forsdike. The slides were described and commented upon by
Mr. Alleyne Reynolds. The first series of photographs con-
sisted of views in Sheffield, and most of them instantaneous
street scenes. Following these were a number of pictures
taken in the suburbs, and afterwards photographs of Derby-
shire views were exhibited. The exhibitions concluded with a
number of miscellaneous views.
A London Summer Photographic Exhibition. — Mr.
Kenric B. Murray, Secretary to the London Chamber of Com-
merce, sends us information about a proposed city summer
photographic exhibition, under the auspices of the Photo-
graphic Trade Section of the London Chamber of Commerce.
He says that it has been decided by the Photographic Trade
Section to organise an exhibition of photographic apparatus
and pictures, to take place in the centre of the City of London
from the 1st to the loth June next, and that it is believed that
one of the largest of the City Companies will kindly give the
Section the free use of its hall and rooms for this purpose.
The undertaking has a long list of “ patrons,” headed by the
Lord Mayor.
(Forrcspontfcncc.
THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY.
Sir, — At the ordinary meeting of the Society to be held by
kind permission of the Council of the Institution of Civil
Engineers at 25, Great George Street, Westminster, on Wed-
nesday, the 19th inst., at 7 p.m., the following papers will be
read : —
“A Brief Notice respecting Photography in Relation to
Meteorological Work,” by G. M. Whipple, B.Sc. , F.R.Met.Soc. ;
“ Application of Photography to Meteorological Phenomena,”
by William Marriott, F.R.Met.Soc. These papers will be
illustrated with lantern slides.
After the reading of these papers the meeting will be ad-
journed, in order to afford the Fellows and their friends an
opportunity of inspecting the exhibition of instruments illus-
trating the application of photography to meteorology, and of
such new instruments as have been invented and first con-
structed since the last Exhibition.
The Exhibition will, at the request of the Secretary of the
Institution of Civil Engineers, be open in readiness for their
meeting on Tuesday evening, the 18th inst., and will remain
open till Friday, the 21st inst.
William Marriott, Assistant Secretary.
30, Great George Street, Westminster, .S'. II'., March, 1890.
THE LANTERN SOCIETY.
Sir, — The adjourned general meeting of the above Society
will be held in the Regent Street Saloon of the St. James’s
Hall on Wednesday, March 19th, at 7.30 p.m., for the purpose
of considering the rules drawn up by the provisional committee.
T. H. Holding, Secretary pro. tern.
46, ChesUton Road, Munster Park-.
JjJvoccctftngs: of £octtttcg.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
At the meeting of this Society held on Tuesday evening, the
11 tli inst., the chair was occupied by Mr. J. Glaisher, F. R.S.,
President.
Mr. G. L. Addenbrooke, who had been announced, to open the
discussion on Dr. Lindsay Johnson’s paper, adjourned from the
previous meeting, sent a letter regretting his inability to be
present, and giving his views on the subject. He thought
that the scheme for an Institute proposed by Dr. Johnson
could only be accomplished either by obtaining a charter for
the Society, and granting diplomas for which fees could be
charged, or by munificence of private donors.
A letter from Dr. Emerson was also read, in which he said
that he thought the proposed Institute ought to be indepen-
dent of any other body, such as the authorities of South
Kensington. He had no idea of sharing rooms with any
other Society, but would like the Institute to have its own pre-
mises, in which there ought to be a library, a laboratory, space
for exhibitions, a dark room, &e. , as well as a museum. There
should be courses of lectures, and those who attended them
should be furnished with diplomas of the Society, but for the
first year or so members of the photographic societies should
receive diplomas without qualification. As to the Society’s
Journal, he thought that in it the art side of photography
had been sadly neglected, and that there should be associated
with the Editor some one specially qualified and interested
in that department. The management of the proposed In-
stitute should be entrusted to amateurs and professionals who
were practical men, and those who merely took up photography
in a diUetante spirit should be excluded from office.
Mr. W. S. Bird said that they had to consider whether a
scheme could be drafted that would be capable of being put
into effect. He thought that in the first instance a subscrip-
tion list should be opened. If members came forward so that
they could start with £2,000, they could appeal with much
better grace either to the City Companies or to the public. Dr.
Johnson, he knew, felt strongly that with a proper programme
help might be obtained from the City Companies,
210
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 14, 1890.
Mr. T. Scamell thought that before going to the public for
money they ought to have some notion of the probable cost of
the building. It seemed to him that £10 a head from every
member of the Society would go but very little way towards
the expense necessary. If, however, he were furnished with
details as to the size and number of rooms required, he would
calculate something like what the cost might be expected to
be.
Mr. IV. E. Debenham thought that it was not desirable to
offer a bait to persons to join the Institute by proposing to
confer diplomas without examination or qualification. Diplomas
were supposed to represent some ascertained competency, and
he thought it not dignified to use them in the way proposed.
Mr. W. Bedford said that an ideal had been placed before
them, and if that ideal was pitched rather high, -it was perhaps
as well that it should be so. The first question was whether a
charter could be and should be obtained. Before any appeal
was made either to the public or to the City Companies, the
Society ought to be in a position to show that the Institute
proposed to be formed would really advance photography.
Photography, he thought, might very well lay claim to a share
in the public munificence, although for his own part he would
rather work on the basis of improving the present position of
the Society.
Mr. Chapman’ Jones understood that some of the speeches
implied that the Institute was to have power to license photo-
graphers.
Mr. Bird said that it must not be supposed that any com-
pulsory powers would be vested in the Institute, but he was
quite certain that traders and photographers would consider
the diplomas valuable, and would obtain them. In any case,
it would take several years to carry out such a programme as
had been sketched out.
Mr. T. Sebastian Davis said that although it was desirable
to have the Exhibition premises and the meeting and other
rooms in the same building, it might not be absolutely so, and
it might be found more practicable to get the premises they
required separately.
The Chairman said that it might be an instruction to the
council to ascertain the cost and the probability of obtaining a
charter, and this course was approved.
Mr. John Spiller, F.I.C., F.C.S., read a paper on “Early
Experiments by Dr. Percy and Mr. George Shaw on the Chemi-
cal Phenomena of Light.” Having been a pupil, assistant,
and friend of Dr. Percy, he had been trusted by his executors
with his photographic note-book. Mr. Shaw, too, had given
free permission to use the notes. Mr. Spiller w'rote on the
blackboard the following table, showing the direction of the
experiments made, some of which dated back as far as 1844 : —
First Set of Exper iments,
a AgCl in air
b ,, „ hydrogen
c Moist AgCl in air
d „ ,, ,, nitrogen-K in tube
c „ ,, „ ether vapour ;
Second Series.
1 Dry AgCl in dry chlorine
2 ,, ,, ,, ,, nitrogen — K aud CaCl in tube
3 ,, ,, ,, iodine vapour
4 ,, ,, ,, air wTith phosphorus
5 Silver foil in dry chlorine
Third Series.
I. — Dry AgCl in dry Cl
II. — AgCl in moist Cl
III. — Dry AgCl in dry air
The expressions Iv in tube, K and CaCl in tube, meant that
there was potassium to absorb oxygen, and chloride of calcium
to absorb moisture sealed up in the same tube as the silver
chloride. These substances were not, however, in contact
with the sensitive substance, but were enclosed in a sort
of chamber in the tube, and packed in with asbestos.
The result of these experiments was, that after exposure to
light, the AgCl in the tube marked a of the first series had
undergone the least change of the set, whilst if there was any
difference in the others, that in the hydrogen had been the
most affected. In the second series, it was noted that the
silver chloride, which was reduced by the action of light,
became reconverted into the original compound when put away
in the dark. The chloride in tubes 2 and 3 became chocolate
brown, and the iodine present in No. 3 did not retard this
change. In No. 4 tube, the chloride darkened considerably,
and to some extent even in the dark. In No. 5, the silver foil
acquired a beautiful iridescence by exposure to light. In the
third series, the last tube No. III. rapidly changed colour, aud
of the others, No. 2 (that containing moist chlorine), was more
quickly darkened in the light, and more rapidly bleached in the
dark than No. I.
The Chairman called attention to the fact that the April
meeting would be held on the 15 th, and not on the customary
second Tuesday in the month.
Mr. F. F. Baggalloy was elected a member of the Society.
Camera Club.
On Thursday, March 6th, Mr. Andrew Pringle gave an
address on “The Optical Lantern.” Mr. Francis Cobb
occupied the chair.
Before the lecture a handsome testimonial, consisting of a
silver jug and three goblets, was presented by the members to
Mr. E. G. Spiers, as a friendly recognition of Ills valuable
services as late Hon. Secretary to the Camera Club Company.
The Secretary handed round a copy of the work called
tiiphantia, bearing the date 1761, in which was found the
singular forecast of photography read at a previous meeting.
The book, which had been lent by Mr. A. C. Lyster, is a
translation from the French work Giphantic, by Tiphaigne
de la Roche, published at Cherbourg. The Secretary also
handed round a convenient little actinometer, arranged as a
small printing frame, in which a little scale of letters of
different densities, printed on silver paper, served as the in-
dication of sufficient exposure for printing in platinum. He
believed that the instrument would be brought out by the
Platinotype Company.
Mr. Charles White also exhibited a series of photographs
bearing on the subject treated of at the previous meeting,
“Photography applied to Medicine and Surgery.” The
photographs showed in succession the means adopted for
patching up and giving artificially a normal appearance to the
face, in the case of a patient who had suffered severe ravages
from cancer.
Mr. Andrew Pringle said that for some years he had made
a variety of experiments in relation to the optical lantern, and
had gained a certain amount of experience, especially in regard
to the lime light. He would not deal with the historical part
of the subject that evening, but would remark, in passing,
that he had been told that the optical lantern was first invented
of John the Baptist — that is to say, by Giambatista Porta.
The condenser, provided it be large enough for the slide, can-
not be too small ; a 34-inch condenser will cover an ordinary
lantern slide with a circular mask, but not if the slide have
an oblong mask. The diameter of the condenser should be
slightly greater than the diagonal of the mask. The smaller a
condenser can be made, the shorter will be its focal limit, aud
about 2| or 2| inches is about the nearest a lime light can be
brought to it with a reasonable amount of safety. Nine out of
ten of the condensers now in the market consist of two plano-
convex lenses, mounted with their curved sides towards each
other. Herschel’s condenser consisted of a slightly meniscus
and a double convex lens ; the double convex lens was mounted
in front, and the meniscus behind, with its concave surface
towards the light. He did not know that one of these con-
densers was better than the other. Then there was the triple
condenser, due to the optical ingenuity of Mi-. John Traill
Taylor, and which picked up a considerable percentage of the
rays from the source of light, which percentage would other-
wise have been lost in space. This plan, however, lengthened
the focus of the system. Mr. Dallmeyer had made a condenser
which he (Mr. Pringle) had not tested against any other, and
the Camera Club possessed one of them. Any person using the
lantern would not be far wrong in using the first and commonest
of the condensers he had mentioned, for it was the best all-
March 14, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
211
round condenser, and the one lie almost always used. The
projection lenses should give a flat field, and he of sufficient
diameter to transmit plenty of light ; lenses for ordinary lan-
tern views work at not less than // 4. As everywhere in optics
it is a case of compromise : as the aperture is enlarged, defini-
tion is sacrificed ; and as the lens is stopped down, light is
sacrificed, and better definition obtained. When oil is used
in the lantern a good draught of air is necessary, and the air
channels must be of larger size than necessary when the lime
light is employed. He knew no reason why lanterns should be
made of such enormous size as at present, whereby they had
become so bulky to carry anywhere, as to make life not worth
living. Here the speaker exhibited a small lantern made by
Messrs. Newton and Son ; also another and smaller one made
by Mr. Beard. As to the cottages sold by some makers to pro-
duce dissolving effects, he felt great respect for those who could
afford to buy them ; as for himself, he did not feel inclined
to use these enormous edifices ; they might lie useful to pro-
fessional lecturers, for to give dissolving views the register
must be everywhere perfect, and great care taken beforehand
in preparation. Mr. .1. Malden had the most perfect lime light
arrangement for such lanterns that he had ever seen, but a vast
amount of preparation was necessary, and lus (Mr. Pringle’s)
remarks that evening were not intended for professional lecturers
at all, but for those who used lanterns for home purposes. The
speaker then said a little about the history of jets, beginning with
that invented by Canon Beechy, in which oxygen was driven up
through the centre of an argandoil flame, and acted upon a ball of
lime suspended within the flame. He next described the blow-
through and mixed gas jets, and he spoke of a mixed jet in which
he used common gas from the main at the ordinary pressure
thereof ; in this he used a specially small nipple, and obtained
quite as much light as from a blow-through jet, and the light
was concentrated on a smaller area. He next exhibited a
mechanical device, consisting of a cut-off for economising gas ;
he said that one of the same kind, but slightly differing in
form, is made by Mr. Steward. The gas in jets, he continued,
must not travel round any sharp corners, or the flame will roar,
and the “way” inside the pipe must be smooth everywhere.
He believed that there were, practically speaking, only two
kinds of lime cylinders in the market, namely, Nottingham
limes and the composition limes ; the first is the best except
for blow-through jets, which require a softer lime. The
composition limes are usually very truly turned ; but
the Nottingham limes are badly turned as a rule, so
lose much of the advantage they would naturally pos-
sess, otherwise they would be the best for mixing jets,
lie had tried various substitutes for limes, but, in his hands,
they had all been utter failures. The oxygen obtained direct
from chlorate of potash was usually the best ; but within the
last month or two Brin’s had been improving a great deal. He
hail found Beard’s regulators to be excellent, and said that
they are now in use nearly everywhere ; he had never used
the early ones, but spoke of those with recent improvements.
As for lantern-slide carriers, lie would rather have none of
them ; he did not know any better than Chadwick’s for the
■single lantern ; he thought Beard's to be the best for the
dissolving lantern. Mr. Cembrauo had brought a carrier
that evening to the meeting, and which had been invented
by Mr. Cowan ; he had never seen it before, and no
doubt it would be examined by the members present.
The nature of the screen used is very important ;
with a bad screen at least twenty-five per cent, of the
light may be lost to the observers ; if any light can be seen
liehind the screen, that is so much light lost to the spectators.
A properly plastered wall is the best screen. For a flexible
screen he recommended one coated with a size charged with
zinc white ; it must not be a shining screen, neither must it
be too thin, for then much of the light will be lost by absorp-
tion. For darkening a room in daylight, Clarke’s patent
shutters are the best. An open stage to the lantern is
almost a necessity. Mr. Newton has made a lantern which
can be turned up in a moment, if necessary, so as to point to
the ceiling, and the image can then be thrown on the wall by
means of a mirror or prism ; this device is useful to show
bjects which must be kept in a horizontal position.
Mr. Beard then exhibited Hardwich’s ether tank at work.
Mr. J. Traill Taylor said that the triple condenser caused
an enormous increase in the illumination of the projected image,
and that all the best American lanterns had triple or quadruple
condensers. He was having apparatus constructed to make
oxygen on the spot, and to supply it automatically to the lan-
tern at proper pressure and in proper quantity directly it was
evolved. He was aware that apparatus to do so had been
invented in Manchester, but it was large and cumbrous. He
then described means he had devised to get a parallel beam for
polarisation by a reflecting bundle of glass plates ; he placed a
concave lens in the conical beam from the condensers.
After some remarks from other speakers, and a reply from
Mr. Pringle, a vote of thanks was passed to the latter.
The Chairman said that the tilting of the lantern was
nothing new ; he had seen it done some years ago at the
Society of Arts.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 6th inst., Mr. R. P. Dragb occupied
the chair.
Mr. F. York sent to the meeting some lantern slides of
French make, showing an opaque deposit on the inside of the
cover glasses, which were detached for inspection. A letter from
Mr. York accompanying the slides stated that he had received
them from an old lanternist in Trinidad, who attributed
erosion to the extreme humidity of the climate during the
summer montlis. Government lenses were similarly affected,
and had to be repolished. Mr. York also stated in his letter
that during his stay in the West Indies he saw some plates
packed face to face separated by pieces of cardboard at each
end ; between the plates a network of fungoid growth had
sprung up, due to the same cause.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater stated that he had seen a great many
lenses that had been sent from Barbadoes to this country to be
repolished. In every case they were of foreign manufacture.
He knew of no instance of English glasses being affected in
the same way.
On the subject of a remedy for condensation on lantern
slides, Mr. A. Haddon suggested the removal of the free alkali
from the surface of glass by boiling. Glass so treated would
not be so liable to condense moisture with change of tempera-
ture.
The Chairman asked for the best method of removing car-
bon images from opal plates.
The general opinion was in favour of rubbing with very fine
silver sand or emery powder.
Mr. A. Haddon would soak the plate in hot water, then
pour over it strong hydrochloric acid, giving the plate a good
wash afterwards.
Mr. F. P. Cembrano showed a lantern carrier made in brass,
from a model designed by Mr. A. Cowan, and exhibited by him
at one of the meetings of the Association.
The competition pictures were exhibited. The conditions,
as previously announced, were that the prints should all be
from three negatives selected by the members, and that any
printing process might be employed. All the members present,
except the exhibitors, acted as judges, each member having
three votes, with the result that two awards fell to Mr. F. P.
Cembrano, and one to Mr. J. B. B. Wellington.
Sheffield Photographic Society.
At the last monthly meeting, held at the Mason Hall, on Tuesday
evening, Mr. B. J. Taylor occupied the chair.
The judges’ awards in lantern competition for the best series
of six slides was announced as follows : — “In the opinion of the
judges no set of slides was of sufficient merit to take the first
prize ; the same was, therefore, withheld.” The second was
awarded to Mr. W. T. Furniss, who also secured the prize for
the best slide in the competition. The whole of the slides
were afterwards passed through the lantern.
Mr. G. Bromley gave a demonstration and lecture
on the new benzoline saturator, as an adjunct to the opti-
cal lantern. He commenced by showing the working of the
oxy-hydrogeu mixed jet light. Having explained the details
212
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
and points requiring care and attention, lie passed on to the
ether light, explaining the method of charging the saturator
and connecting the tubes. The lecturer showed that no fear of
explosion need be entertained ; that a “ suck-back ” could not
happen, providing pressure was maintained on the oxygen gas,
and the chance of firing the saturator minimised again by care
fully draining away the fluid not soaked up by the stuffing in
the saturator tubes. The best light was obtained when just
short of hissing at the jet, and it could be maintained at equal
brilliancy by slight attention from time to time to the cylinder key
and turning the lime. Attention was next drawn to the benzole
and benzine saturator — firstly, the method of charging was
shown, next the warming appliance for increasing the volatilisa-
tion of the fluid, and lastly the connection with the gas and lan-
tern jet. It was explained that a jet with larger aperture could
be used with this light than was practicable with ether, but on
application little, if any, difference was seen in the brilliancy.
Gasoline could, with advantage, be used in place of benzine,
and altogether the process, as compared with ether, was more
economical ; if anything, the light was more intense and pene-
trating, and certainly, in the hands of the operator, produced
the best results, the ordinary mixed jet being inferior to ether,
although it had many good points in its favour. The same
slides were used in each case, so that the comparison should be
equal and fair.
Lewes Photographic Society.
A meeting was held on the 4th inst.,the President in the
chair. Two new members were elected.
A vote of condolence with the widow and family of the late
Mr. Simon Norman was passed.
The slides sent in for the first quarterly competition were
passed through the lantern, and the awards of the judges were
as follows : — Class 1 (landscape) — Mr. A. H. Webling ; Class 2
(architecture) — Mr. Percy Morris ; Class 3 (any other subject)
— Mr. G. E. Constable. There were fourteen sets sent in from
seven competitors.
A special general meeting is to be held to-day, to consider
the question of carrying out a photographic survey of the dis-
trict, when a paper on the subject will be read by the Hon.
Secretary.
East Dulwich and Pf.ckham Photographic Society.
A meeting was held on March 7th, Mr. F. W. Edwards in the
chair, when hand and detective cameras were the topic for con-
sideration.
Amongst the specimens on view were Fallowfield’s “ Facile ”
and Abraham’s “Ideal.” Another exhibit was a shutter, for
which the advantage was claimed that it could be regulated for
speed, as the setting was automatic. A camera which was
introduced resembled, in appearance, a walking stick. It was
made entirely of metal, was light, and yet, when set up, very
rigid. Furnished with a ball and socket joint at the top, it is
easily opened and closed.
The Society having decided to exhibit at the Crystal Palace
Exhibition, the members brought a good number of photo-
graphs to the meeting.
Dundee and East ok Scotland Photographic Association.
March 6 th. — General meeting, Mr. D. Ireland in the chair.
Eleven competitors entered for a lantern-slide competition.
The votes having been scrutinised, the following were declared
the prize-winners : — First, Mr. D. Ireland ; equal seconds,
Messrs. J. R. Stewart and A. Wilson ; third, Mr. V. C.
Baird.
Mr. A. Stewart gave an account of his visit to Western Nor-
way in the s.s. St. Sunniva. After a few introductory remarks
he showed a number of lantern slides, with descriptions.
G. D. 51. — Your reply to Mr. Pringle includes answers to
criticisms, by different persons, of your utterances made in
another journal, which criticisms many of our readers have not
seen.
[March 14, 1890.
Hustons to (JTomsponticnts*
All questims requiring a reply iu this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C 3., 2, St. Miry’s Roll, Cinonbury, London, N.
AH Aivertisements and comrauni rations relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5,Furnival Street, London.
All C imm inications, except advertisements, intended for publicationl
should be adlreised to the E liter of the Photographic News, 5, Furniva
Street, London, E.C.
Senoj. (Malvern). — Exhibition Announcements. If you are a
member or exhibitor of any one of the leading photographic
societies, especially those publishing a list of members like
the Parent Society, you will be sure to receive a notification
of all forthcoming exhibitions. Without being so, you must
take the trouble of watching the advertisements and special
announcements. The Pall Mall Exhibition always receives
at Michaelmas, and opens a week later.
D. — Fuel for the Liyroine La mp. Ordinary benzoline is the
liquid now recommended for charging the boiler ; it is not
necessary, therefore, to look about for a product of exception-
ally low boiling point, such as gasoline, although this was
specified in the first published account. We are glad to hear
of the apparatus coming safely to hand, and regret that your
second letter could not be answered last week.
C. J. (Nice.) — Developers for Prints on Gclalino-Chloridc
Paper. The hydroxy lamine developer (seepage 197 of the
Year-Book) answers very well for the alpha paper of the
Britannia Company, Ilford. You have the choice of two
qualities, rough or smooth.
L. — Flash Powder Explosions. The dangers to which we
J.
R.
directed attention some months ago have received an awful
exemplification in the article on page 191 of last week’s
News. By the incautious admixture of magnesium powder
with picric acid, chlorate of potash, sulphide of antimony,
&c., five lives in all have been sacrificed in America, enough
to preach a warning to those who ignorantly deal with such
detonating substances. With magnesium alone projected
through a spirit flame, all such terrible disasters may be
avoided, but it is well, even then, to keep a vigilant look-out
for dropping fire.
L. T. — Price of Platinum. Owing to the demand for elec-
trical purposes, superadded to the use of this metal in
photography, the price of platinum has recently advanced.
At the sale of Dr. Percy’s effects last week twenty-eight
ounces realized £55 3s., and this included some scrap; so
that £2 per ounce is about the lowest quotation at the
present time.
A. M. (Bootle). — Test for Alums. It is, perhaps, imma-
terial whether you employ potash or ammonia alum ; but
they may be distinguished by warming up the solution
with caustic soda, when the latter will give off the odour of
ammonia. A negative result is here sufficient to indicate
potash alum. The sulphate of alumina is more strongly acid.
D. H. M. — Blisters on Bromide Paper. The fault is most
likely inherent to this particular lot of paper, which was
coated too dry, and so the attachment of the gelatino-
bromide coating is imperfect. From your description there
is nothing wrong either in the chemicals or manipulation.
Albumenized paper sometimes fails from the same cause.
C. J. — Collotype Films. Gelatine sensitized with a five per
cent, bichromate solution, and if you want extra insolu-
bility add a small quantity of chrome alum dissolved in
acetic acid to the softened gelatine. Read up Mr. Bolas’s
Cantor Lectures, of 1884 (Society of Arts Journal), or get
Mr. W. T. Wilkinson’s book, published by Messrs. England
Brothers, Charles Street, Notting Hill, W.
J. W. — Surfacing Carbon Prints. Finding that the lustre is
too great when transferred and dried upon glass, could you
not squeegee down upon a slightly grained zinc plate, or
even try a very finely ground glass ?
Received. — The Prods Verbaux et Resolutions of the Paris Con-
ference, and Programme of the Fourth Annual Conference
of the Camera Club, to be held on the 20th and 21st inst.,
at the Society of Arts, under the Presidency of Captain
Abney,
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1646. — March 21, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PACK
Aluminium in Photoprxpbic Apparatus 213
The Crystal Palace Photographic Exhibition 214
Photography at the Royal Meteorological Society 215
Tht Camera Club Conference 2)0
Photography in Natural Colours 217
Photography iu Rome 218
Chromo-Photography by Block Printing 219
Another Photographic 8urrey 219
The Sizes of Photographic Plates. By J. Craig Annan 220
People with Double Faces 220
P AO R
Modified Collodion Emulsion. By A. Peebles Smith 221
Notes 222
Grade in Professional Photography. By II. Colebrook 223
Celluloid or Ce’lonite ? 224
Plash Powder Explosions. By Charles L. Mitchell, I I) 225
The First Optical Lantern 226
Patent Intelligence 227
Correspondence— A Photographic Scholarship 209
Proceedings of Societies 230
Answers to Correspondents 232
ALUMINIUM IN PHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS.
Aluminium, which was first isolated by Wohler, in
1827, seems destined to play an important part in the
photographic apparatus of the future, because of its
lightness as compared with brass, and because of its
recent fall in price, due to improved methods of manu-
facture on a large scale.
Aluminium does not rank with noble metals, such
as gold and platinum, since it is more easily attacked
by chemical reagents ; for instance, it is acted upon by
acetic and several other vegetable acids ; this, how-
ever, is not particularly in its disfavour, for the same
may be said of brass, the alloy with which it will have
to compete. Pure air, wet or dry, has no action
upon it, but the same cannot be said of wet
air containing ammonia, and it must be remem-
bered that ammonia is practically always present-
in the air of towns, also in the country over manured
land. If any traces of chloride of aluminium be left
in the metal, due to its method of manufacture, the
metal is less stable and more easily attacked by damp
and by certain chemical reagents. According to De-
ville, neither sulphur nor sulphuretted hydrogen has
any action upon pure aluminium, either at ordinary or at
somewhat high temperatures ; but according to Fremy,
aluminium decomposes sulphide of silver by uniting
with the silver and setting free the sulphur. Sul-
phuric acid, concentrated or diluted, has little or no
action upon aluminium, especially when the metal is
pure, neither does nitric acid act upon it at normal
temperatures; at the boiling temperature it dissolves
it slowly. Hydrochloric acid dissolves the pure metal
slowly, and the impure aluminium rapidly ; alkaline
solutions act upon aluminium rapidly, at the same time
liberating hydrogen. When the sample of aluminium
contains traces of iron or sodium, it is more readily
attacked than otherwise by the solutions of certain
metallic salts. A solution of common salt, hot or cold,
has little or no action upon aluminium. The metal is
attacked somewhat by soap. Commercial aluminium
is never chemically pure, but usually contains a little
silicon and iron ; of late manufacturers have been more
successful in eliminating the iron, the presence of
which deteriorates its colour. Certain gases are oc-
cluded by aluminium, and from it carbonic acid and
hydrogen have been extracted.
Aluminium has a bluish white colour, will take a
beautiful matt surface, and can be polished and bur-
nished under a suitable lubricant; when pure it has
no smell, but when rich in silicon exhales the odour
of silicuretted hydrogen. It is easily forged, rolled,
or beaten into leaves, and the leaves will burn with a
most brilliant light in oxygen gas. Aluminium is
easily drawn into wire or tubes, but requires anneal-
ing afterwards to become flexible once more ; the
tenacity of the wire, according to Fremy, is half way
between that of zinc and tin, but increases when the
metal is hammered. Barlow found the tensile
strength of aluminium to be twelve tons to the
square inch. It is exceedingly sonorous, and some
of its alloys are particularly suitable for church bells.
Its melting point is between those of zinc and
silver.
At present, the most useful alloy of aluminium in
the arts is that with copper, namely, the well-known
aluminium bronze, which is tougher than gun-metal,
and takes a polish resembling that of gold. The alloy
likely to be most useful in photographic apparatus
must be one not seriously above the weight of pure
aluminium, and a good one for the purpose consists of
ninety-five per cent, aluminium and five per cent,
silver. We have reason to suppose that some of the
aluminium now used in photographic goods on sale in
the market is slightly alloyed with another metal,
which we guess to be possibly silver. Au aluminium-
silver alloy in the proportions just stated possesses,
according to Tissier, an elasticity which is wanting in
the pure metal, also a greater hardness and capability
of being polished. An alloy of aluminium with German
silver has excellent physical properties, and as this
alloy is in the market, it may probably be that used in
the portions of photographic apparatus. Any alloy of
real silver and aluminium is attacked somewhat by
sulphur.
At present, we know of no evidence that aluminium
will prove less durable than brass in photographic
apparatus, especially if the apparatus be kept dry, and
in as pure an atmosphere as possible. Should any
214
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
evidence be found, after lapse of time, of galvanic
action between an aluminium milled head and an
interior brass screw, the action ran probably be stopped
by keeping the camera in a dry place.
THE CRYSTAL PALACE PHOTOGRAPHIC
EXHIBITION.
IT.
Before closing the notice of Mr. W. F. Stanley's exhibits,
Mr Ferrero's dark slide and changing box combined, for
celluloid films, represented in fig. 7, claims attention as a
Fit). 7.
useful appliance for the photographer, provided extended
experience in working with it should prove that it has all
the merits claimed for it by those who place it on public
view ; so far as can be ascertained from a passing inspec-
tion, we sec no reason why it should not fulfil their claims,
which are : — (1) Extreme simplicity and absence of any-
thing liable to get out of order ; (2) the films are put
into the carrier just as they are taken from the packet, no
sliields or metal frames being required ; (ft) the films are
moved by the fingers — no reliance is placed on springs or
the action of gravity, which so often fail to act in changing
boxes for glass plates ; (4) two qualities of films can be
carried in one carrier, and either can be picked out for
exposure as required ; (•'>) the operation of changing the
films is done in a few seconds, whilst the filling or empty-
ing of the carrier is infinitely more simple than with
roller slides.
This Ferrero's film carrier is intended to enable the pho-
tographer to carry and to expose two or even three dozen
films without having recourse to a dark room. It con-
sists of a box, the front of which is fitted as a dark slide.
Inside box a loose board, actuated by a spring, presses the
films towards the rebate, whilst a light papier-mache board
divides the film which is being exposed from the others,
and a similar board placed behind the unexposed films
divides them from those which have been exposed. When
the film has to be changed, the opening of the lid causes
the pressure board to be drawn back to the bottom of the
box, thus leaving ample space in which the films can be
changed. Attached to the carrier is a bag having two
holes, in which the thumb and forefinger are inserted for
changing the films. The two finger holes are provided
with elastic bands, which exclude all light from the
interior of the teg when the fingers are inserted.
Messrs. D. Noakes and Co. have a good show at the
Exhibition, and some men at work in the actual manufac-
ture of the mounts of lenses, and other varieties of brass
portions of instruments. Moreover, in the evening, when
the great display of lantern slides is going on in the
adjoining theatre, Mr. Noakes gives a small show of his
own at his stall, and employs the limelight for the purpose.
This firm exhibits the simple little gas regulator pictured
in fig. 8. It is virtually
a fine-adjustment tap,
which, when in use, is
screwed into the back
of the ordinary jet-
cock ; the rough adjust-
ment is first made with
the latter, and the fine
ad j ustment afterwards
made with the little re-
gulator ; when the re-
gulators are once set to
suitably and delicately
balance the gases, operations can be carried on for a long
time with the ordinary cocks before a fresh adjustment of
the regulators becomes necessary. The object of the regu-
lator is to economise gas, and to stop any hissing of the
flame. Interiorly it consists of an acute cone working
within a similar cone.
The “key camera,” fig. 9, as sold by Messrs. Noakes
and by the Platinotypc Company, is also on view. Some
Fig. 9.
improvements have been made in it since it was first
exhibited at St. James's Hall last year, as described in
these pages at the time. The improvements consist of
small mollifications to prevent, within certain limits, its
getting out of orrhr when carelessly manipulated. The
main principle of this ingenious instrument is, it may be
remembered, that the plates are kept in little cases which
may be carried in the pocket ; the plates are introduced into
the camera and removed therefrom by passing through a
kind of “ tap” with an excessively long slot in it.
Fig. 10 may interest lovers of the ideal who have never
been behind the scenes
at theatres, to see by
what methods fairy-land
is brought within the
view of ordinary mortals,
and to give some glimpses,
in this matter-of-fact,
vulgar age, of the times
when fairies danced in
the forest glades, and imps
swung upon the aspen
sprays. It is a limelight
lantern, of not particu-
larly romantic form, with
a disc in front, carrying
circlesof glass of different
colours. By turning the perforated disc, the stage canbeillu-
Fig. 8.
Fn. 10.
March 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
215
minated with any desired colour at the will of the
operator.
Messrs. B. J. Edwards and Co. have a stall at the Exhi-
bition in illustration of the results obtainable by ortho-
chromatic photography, and among the most remarkable
are yellow daffodils, blue hyacinths, violets, and lilies of
the valley, in a yellow vase, taken on isochromatic and
ordinary plates. They also exhibit photographs of paint-
ings. in which orthochromatic methods are so valuable, and
their isochromatic specimens on view include portraiture,
landscapes, and copies of paintings, by leading photo-
graphers : also transparencies, lantern slides, and negatives
showing difference between isochromatic and ordinary
processes. Among these are copies of a painting in the
National Gallery, “Bacchus and Ariadne,” by Titian
(Signor Morelli), and of an oil painting, “Grapes and
Oranges.”
Messrs. G. Houghton and Son exhibit dark-room speci-
alities, and give occasional demonstrations of the working
of Mr. Friese Greene’s sensitised cards, in which the posi-
tive image is developed upon the card itself, so that no
mounting is necessary, and all the operations are finished
expeditiously.
Messrs. Sands and Hunter have an exhibit of good
photographic apparatus, but no special novelty this year.
They have a permanent stand at the Crystal Palace, con-
sisting of a glass case full of photographic appliances.
Sir David Salomons exhibits a rocking-table of a com-
pact nature, with the weight ingeniously placed altogether
out of the way of the operator when the latter is perform-
ng developing work. Mr. E. G. Platt exhibits photo-
graphic brass work ; Messrs. Pearson and Denham a reduc-
ug camera and circular bellows camera ; Mr. W. P. Baker
i satchel camera and walking-stick stands; Messrs,
rrevor and Co. , photographic wrappers ; Messrs. Benham
md Proud, a dark room lamp with parabolic reflector ; Mr.
W. F. Slater, picture frames ; Mr. A. Clarkson, limelight
ipparatus ; and Messrs. T. Riley and Son, a detective
amera. Mr. Ilenry Crouch exhibits a four-fold stand,
vith thumb-screws to tighten up the parts ; these are
asy to manipulate, but are sometimes absent in this
lass of stand to gain an advantage in packing. Mr. W.
mks exhibits albums, screens, and frames; Mr. W.
icorer, cameras and lenses; Messrs. T. W. Couch and Co.,
rames and mounts; Messrs. E. Mander and Son, frames
nd screens; Messrs. Taylor, Taylor, and Hobson, lenses;
he Platinotype Co., platinum prints with demonstrations
'f the process; Messrs. J. Theobald and Co., lithographic
intern slides with operators at work ; Messrs. Justin,
>ros., a camera stand of spiral metallic ribbon, which
■acks into a small case measuring about S by 4 inches ;
nd Messrs. Sharp and Ilitchmough, photographic
pparatusin large variety.
Every evening a lantern entertainment is given at the
’alace, with the powerful limelight lantern in charge of
lr W . Brooks. As the screen is a long way off, a pro-
action combination of longer focus and larger aperture
ian usual is employed. All through the evening last
uesday the jets were worked without any “ roaring,” nor
as there a hitch of any description.
The following is the list of prizes awarded at this Crystal
alace Photographic Exhibition of 1890 : —
doll Medal for Best Alcove. — Lafayette, Dublin.
Chd, Challenge Cup. — The Birmingham Photographic
aciety.
1 h*11 >o Professional and Amateur Photographers. — Class A.
(Sec. 1) Green Bros., Grasmere — Silver medal for alcove,
bronze medals, Class A — (Sec. 1), Auty and Ruddock,
Tynemouth, for 560 and series ; (Sec. 2) Lyd. Sawyer,
Newcastle, for 469; (Sec. 0) Richard Keene. Derby, for
948 and series: (Sec. 8) Henry W. Reeve, for 1,186 and
1,179 ; (Sec. 5) James E. Goold, Newcastle-on-Tyne, for
568 : (Sec. 5) Symonds and Co., Portsmouth, for 1.176:
(Sec. 7) Gambier Bolton, Camera Club, for screen, 12 ;
(Sec. 8) ,1. Pattison Gibson, Hexham, for 470 and series,
f lass B (Sec. 1), AY. AY. AYinter. Derby, for 199 ;
R. Faulkner, Baker Street, Portman Square, AY., for
I, 170 ; B. Scott and Co., Carlisle, for 1,177 ; T.
I'. Goodwin, 68, Anerlcy Road, S.E., for 489 and series ;
(Sec. 2) AY. J. Byrne, Richmond, for 517 ; (Sec. 6) F. AAr.
Edwards, Peckham Rye, S.E., for 616. Class C (Sec. 1),
Frank Sutcliffe, AYhitby, for 1,164; R. H. Lord, Cam-
bridge, for 1,148 ; (Sec. 3) Arthur II. Carnell, Plymouth,
for 1,057 ; (Sec. 7) AA'alter L. Colls, Barnes, for 1,139 ;
(Sec. 8) Thomas Scotton, Derby, for 1,001 ; (Sec. 9) H.
J. Godbold, St. Leonard’s-on-Sea, for 1,166. General
— George Thompson. Liverpool, for 222.
Open to Amateurs Only. — Lady Amateur Class (Silver
medal) — Miss Clarissa Miles, Malmesbury, for 80, 81, and
82. Bronze medals — Class A A (Sec. 1), G. II. Catt, Spet-
tisbury, Dorset, for 1,225 ; (Sec. 3) Court Cole, Folly
Bridge, Oxford, for 891 and 892 ; Rev. AAr. Mann, M.A.,
S. C.L., Bristol, for 1,322 ; (Sec. 5) Martin .1. Harding,
Shrewsbury, for 870; T. J. Bright, Gipsy Hill, for 862 ;
Surgeon A. G. Xewlaud, I.M.S., for 1,035 (for photographs
taken under great difficulty) ; (Sec. 8) J. L. Mackrell,
Fairfield, Liverpool, for 256 and 257. Class AB (Sec. 2),
J. E. Austin, West Court, Detling, Maidstone, for 814 and
815. Class AC (Sec. 1), E. C. Middleton, Birmingham,
for 414. General— AV. Jerome Harrison, Birmingham, for
401 to 406.
The judges also recommend that a complimentary
medal be awarded to Mrs. Rejlander for the exhibit of her
late husband’s art studies.
Owing to the large number of lantern slides in compe-
tition, awards in the Lantern Division cannot be published
this week.
PHOTOGRAPHY AT THE ROA'AL METEOROLOGICAL
SOCIETAL
Last AArednesday night a meeting of the Royal Meteorological
Society was held in the theatre of the Institution of Civil
Engineers, Great George Street, AVestminster, with Mr. Blan-
ford, F.R.S., in the chair. In another part of the building was
an exhibition of instruments illustrating the application of
photography to meteorological purposes ; also an exhibition of
photographs of meteorological phenomena.
Air. G. M. AVhipple, Superintendent of Kew Observatory,
read a paper on “ Photography in Relation to Meteorological
VYork,” which was much to the same effect as the memoir he
read some months ago before the Photographic Society, and
the same illustrations were given by means of the optical
lantern, which last Thursday was worked by Mr. AA'aiuwright.
Mr. AYilliam Marriott then gave an address on “The Appli-
cation of Photography to Meteorological Phenomena,” during
which lantern views from the same negatives from which the
chief prints in the adjoining exhibition were taken, were pro-
jected on the screen, so that the facts represented could easily
be explained to all the listeners present before they inspected
the exhibition itself. Some of these photographs were exceed-
ingly curious. One represented hanging against a parti-
tion the clothes of two men who had been struck by
lightning, but fortunately not killed ; one man’s trousers had
been torn to shreds, whilst one leg of the nether garments of
211?
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
the other man, simply was less injured, but had the knee
taken out, and showed indications of the flash having passed
zig-zag fashion from one leg to the other. Some boots
burst in all directions formed pitiable objects in the fore-
ground. The old story of lightning sometimes impressing
the picture of an adjoining tree upon the body of a person
struck by the flash seems to have been founded upon an
actual natural fact, for the photograph of the arm of a boy
who had been struck by lightning was shown, and it had
picturesque arborescent markings burnt on the skin, such
markings as inaccurate observers might hastily conclude to
represent the branches of a real tree. An excellent photo-
graph representing gigantic icicles hanging from the branches
of trees was shown ; it had been taken by the Rev. F. W.
Stow. Some photographs of clouds taken by M. Paul
Gamier, at the Observatory, Boulogne-sur-Seine, near Paris,
were also shown, and were considered by the speaker to be
the finest specimens of that class of photographic work which
the Meteorological Society had yet seen. Photographs of
floods, tornados, lightning Hashes, and of trees broken by rime
frost were among those shown. One photograph showed how
a broken tree carried by a tornado had with its stem speared
a horse in the side and killed the poor animal ;
and another, how pieces of straw carried “end on”
by a tornado had been partially driven into trees, so as to
stick therein like nails. Dr. A. Riggenbach, of Bale, had sent
some photographs of cirrus clouds, which he had taken by means
of their reflection from the surface of Lake Sarnen, when he
could not get them so well by direct means. He attributed
the greater ease in photographing to the partial polarisation of
the light by water ; this we think to be an error, and that no
evidence has yet been produced that polarised light acts differ-
ently from other light on photographic films.
THE CAMEBA CLUB CONFERENCE.
Yesterday afternoon the third annual Camera Club Conference
apened in the hall of the Society of Arts.
Capt. W. de W. Abney, in the course of his presidential
address, stated the fact that colour-vision is three-fold with a
normal eye, and he thought that the same principle may, per-
haps, apply to the sensitive photographic plate. The eye is
sensitive to red, green, and violet, and many intermediate
visual colours may be compounded of two or more of these
three colours. A sensitive plate may be said to take the place
of the retina, and the sensitive salts used, to a colour perception.
He thought that the photographic spectrum norms of sensitive-
ness are analogous to the spectrum norms of colour-perception in
the eye, or, in other words, that a photographic plate has, in
reality, only one, two, or three colour-perceptions, and
that all sensitiveness to other colours is due to only
partial response of this vibrating molecule to wave-lengths,
which differ slightly from those with which it is in accord. A
study of the simple mixture of the natural salts favours this
view, and he believed that by using this as a working hypo-
thesis, a better understanding of the apparent vagaries in the
extent of sensitiveness will be attained. Recently, in The
Standard, an announcement had been published that the prob-
lem of photography in natural colours had just been solved,
and that, too, by a printing process. Dr. Eder’s name was
coupled with this statement as endorsing the discovery, other-
wise he (the speaker) would more readily have supposed it to be
a specimen of journalistic credulity. Photography in natural
colours has long been a fact. He argued that a printed photo-
graphic image in natural colours cannot be produced on
an elemental substance, so a compound substance must
be used. With chloride of silver, as he had proved and pub-
lished long ago, the spectrum exercised reducing action at one
of its ends, and an oxidising action at the other. When
photographs in natural colours are obtained, the difficult pro-
blem of how to fix them remains. Fixing means the removal of
something still sensitive to light, and this removal must at once
change the colour, if the colour has been produced by chemical
change. If the colour is produced by altered molecular
arrangement, that molecular arrangement must also be destroyed
by white light. The existence of the power of fixing such
images is therefore improbable. He did not believe in the
discovery of any really practical method of producing per-
manent photographs in natural colours.
Mr. A. M. Rossi then read a paper on “ The Art of Drawing
and Photography,” which was followed by a brief discussion,
in which Messrs. Adcock, Davison, Dresser, Newman, and
Major Nott took part.
Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer then read a paper entitled “ Limitations
in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus,” in the course of which
he argued that two of the points set forth in the memoir of
Mr. W. K. Burton, read recently before the Camera Club,
were erroneous. He said that it is a scientific mistake to
state that a photographic lens cannot give a sharper image than
does th? eye. The authority of Helmholtz was against the
assertion, and so were his (Mr. Dallmeyer’s) experiments.
In testing the matter, it is necessary that the photograph and
the view shall be examined under the same angle. Mr. Burton
had also stated in effect that the eye will give as perfect a
representation as a lens of a near and distant object when
viewed at the same time. Mr. Dallmeyer disputed this, and
said it was impossible, except bv artificial means. To try the
experiment fairly, the eye and lens must be placed under the
same conditions, and if the eye be stopped down by placing in
front of it a moderately large piuhole in a screen, near and
distant objects can be seen at the same time with considerable
sharpness.
In the course of the discussion upon this paper, Captaii
Abney expressed the opinion that a good photograph must lx
sharp all over, and be viewed at the same angle as was the
original subject ; the eye will then, when viewing one part o i
the photograph, see the rest of it with the same “ fuzziness’ ll
as in nature under like conditions.
Mr. A. A. Common, F.R.S., gave a summary of his pape:
upon “ Eclipse Photography,” in the course of which h
expressed the opinion that eclipses in the future can be ob
served and photographed by much simpler appliances thai
heretofore. He suggested the use of one large heliostat, whicl
then would be the only instrument requiring astronomical ad
justment, and with it but one driving clock would be necessar t
for the purposes of the whole expedition. The whole of th
different observations could then be made by the aid of th
heliostat. The idea, he said, is not new, for small heliostat *
have been used for somewhat similar purposes, but the imped
ment of so working on a large scale has been the difficulty < il
obtaining a plane mirror of sufficiently large size. Now, it
possible to construct a mirror to serve the whole of the instrt t
ments. By the adoption of this plan the enormous weigh 1
and quantity of packages now taken out by eclipse observe)
would be greatly reduced.
Mr. Albert Taylor said that during the recent eclipse of tl
sun, the Americans took out some interesting instrument
Professor Todd took out a large polar axis, eleven feet loni
composed of two great tubes side by side, and provided wit
several supports. On this great polar axis he fixed all h
twenty-seven instruments.
The President remarked that Mr. Common had for son
time past been using mirrors in which the proportion j
aperture to focal length was greater than had ever been set
before ; he tested his own mirrors, and they were perfects
itself. He had just been talking in a jaunty way of makii
a twenty-inch flat mirror ; the difficulties in the way we
enormous, but if Mr. Common were to say that he wou
make a three feet plane mirror, he would afterwards do i
He (('apt. Abney) believed that Mr. Common had found ot
how to overcome one of the greatest difficulties opticians h:
in making large flat surfaces.
Mr. H. Trueman Wood then took the chair, and Mr. W. '
Wilkinson gave a demonstration of the working of the colloty
process, and gave explanations of the chief points connect
therewith.
To-day (Friday) the Conference will be resumed in the H
of the Society of Arts at two o’clock. One of the papers is
Lord Rayleigh, on “ Photography by the Light of the Elect
Spark,” relating chiefly, in all probability, to some expe
March 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
217
m ents of his recently performed at the Royal Institution,
iu w hich the drops into which a large vertical jet of
water burst, at some distance above the nozzle of the
delivery pipe, were proved to amalgamate to a certain
extent by the proximity of a neighbouring electrified glass rod.
The great water- jet is exceedingly sensitive to electrical action,
indeed more so than a gold-leaf electroscope ; the drops showed
a tendency to amalgamate even when the rod was excited at a
distance from it of several yards. To photograph the varied di-
mensions of these drops, an extraordinarily short exposure was
necessary, and this was effected by means of a single spark from
a powerful battery of Leyden jars — the means, indeed, by
which Fox Talbot half a generation ago, in the same theatre,
photographed printed matter upon the rim of a rapidly-revolving
wheel.
This evening the annual dinner of the members and friends
of the Club will take place at the Frascati Restaurant, Oxford
Street, London.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN NATURAL COLOURS.
Last Tuesday's Stamlard contains the following telegram
from its Vienna correspondent : —
Dr. Eder, Professor of the Photographic Institute of
Vienna, has announced that a photographer named Verescz,
living iu Klausenburg, Transylvania, has succeeded in solving
the problem of photographing in natural colours. Up to the
present, only the shades between deep red and orange can be
retained, and even these, if exposed to the light, fade in from
two to three days ; but the experiments are being continued,
with good prospects of complete success.
The Stamlard has a leading article upon this telegram, in
which, on the face of it, there may be nothing which
photographers have not known for years ; the only thing
which suggests that there is something new in the inven-
tion but missing in the telegram is, that Dr. Eder gives
the weight of his name to something which has been done.
Some correspondence about this telegram has since been
going on in the Standard, 'in which journal, on Wednesday,
the following letter appeared over the initials A. J. M. : —
I have read with much interest your leader on “ Photo-
graphing Natural Colours,” as well as the telegram from your
Vienna correspondent, and, comparing the two, I cannot help
feeling that you think rather too much of Herr Vercscz’s dis-
covery, for it appears that all he has done as yet is to get red
aud orange, which may be only a lighter or brighter shade of
red. Now, if this is the extent of his “discovery,” I can
claim to have done as much, and more, in time so remote as to
make me feel that I must have passed the “bloom of youth.”
In the early days of photography, I had much experience in
the Daguerreotype process, and have often produced portraits in
which, while the black coat has been black, the face has been
a natural flesh tint, and the background or sky a clear light blue.
This has occurred mostly when the light was particularly actinic ;
it was the result of no discovery, but came naturally, and if
there should be any others still living who practised that ancient
art, they can doubtless testify to a similar experience. It is my
belief that the only way in which photographing natural colours
can ever become an accomplished fact is by the discovery, not
of a method of producing mere colour by light, for that has
been done again and again, but of a sensitive film that will give
the complementary colours, so that the red would give in the
negative an equally decided or undecided green, aud the blue a
corresponding orange ; then in printing from such a negative
the colours would be again reversed, and so faithfully portray
the original natural colours. But of such a discovery your
correspondent gives not a hint. You refer in your article to
our greatest authority iu these matters, Captain Abney, and one
would much like to know what he thinks of the “ discovery.”
Yesterday the following letter from Capt. Abney
appeared in the Standard:—
In your Leader of yesterday, and iu your Correspondent’s
letter signed “ A. J. M.” of to-day, a reference has been
made to myself as regards Photography in Natural Colours.
May I be allowed to say that the description given by your
Vienna Correspondent of the discovery made by Herr Verescz
is not such as to favour the idea of any advance in such a
branch of photography having been made ? Photography in
natural colours has been an accomplished fact for years past ;
but to render such colour permanent and unaffected by expo-
sure to white light is a problem which is almost, if not quite,
on a par with that of perpetual motion from a physical point
of view. I am dealing more fully with the question to-
morrow in my Presidential Address at the opening of the
Camera Club Conference at the Society of Arts, and will not
anticipate my remarks.
Yesterday also, J. T. wrote to the Standard as follows: —
I have shared iu “ J. M.’s ” experience. A really good
Daguerreotype always seemed to bear a suspicion of colour,
and once, . by purely accidental circumstances, 1 obtained
veritable colours. I remember it was an Autumn day, one-
half the overhead sky was bright, but angry clouds, from
which came frequent electric discharges, obscured the rest.
My sitter was gaily attired in a black silk gown, checked with
green, red, and a narrow yellow stripe. All being ready, the
then rather impertinent warning was given, “ Now,
madam, sit still if you please, and don’t wink.” The roar of
the rain was at hand, the cap was removed, when the light-
ning and thunder crash came simultaneously. My subject
jumped up with a squeal, and ran away to the house. I had
little thought of anything but a failure, the exposure having
been interrupted. My astonishment was great, on ‘ 1 bringing
out ” the picture, to find 1 had a beautifully delicate, naturally
coloured Daguerreotype. I kept my treasure, and many saw it ;
but after some months the colours faded away. On mentioning
these circumstances toa clergyman, he told me that, whilst receiv-
ing lessons iu photography at the Polytechnic Institution, Lon-
don, during a violent thunderstorm, a coloured image was
imprinted, not upon the plate, but upon the lens of the instru-
ment. These, and other facts with which I am acquainted,
seem to point to electricity as a means of producing naturally-
coloured pictures.
Yesterday we received a letter on various subjects from
Dr. Eder, in which he said nothing about any recent great
discovery in photography.
A New American Photographic Journal. — We have
received No. 1 of The Photographic Globe, a monthly journal,
devoted to the artistic and scientific advancement of photo-
graphy, edited by Maximilian Tocli, and published by the
Photo. Globe Publishing Co., New York. The editor says : —
“In adding another journal to the sterling issues of its kind,
we beg to make our obeisance, and repeat the words of the
old proverb : ‘ There can never be a superfluity of good
things.’ . . . It will be our aim to publish succinctly the
discoveries and inventions as they are produced, and to lay
aside those intricate, abstruse, and subtle topics which to the
majority of the profession aie unintelligible.” The frontis-
piece is a print on “Diamond Extra Brilliant Peuse Albumen
Paper,” from a negative by E. C'. Dana.
Exeter Hall Camera Club. — A photographic society thus
entitled has been formed iu connection with the Central
Y.M.C.A. The Club has been divided into two sections, to one
of which ladies will be eligible for membership. The follow-
ing advantages aud privileges, amongst others, are offered to
members: — Use of dark rooms to be constructed in basement
at Exeter Hall ; popular and instructive lectures on photo-
graphy ; out-door excursions for the study of landscape photo-
graphy ; facilities for exchanging photographs, and purchasing
apparatus and chemicals at cost price ; and periodical exhibi-
tions by members, besides ordinary meetings from time to time.
Those desirous of becoming members should communicate
with Mr. G. J. Ingram, Hon. Sec., Exeter Hall Camera
Club, Exeter Hall, Strand, from whom also full particulais
may be obtained on enclosing a stamped directed envelope.
218
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN ROME.
The Association of Amateurs of Photography in Rome, I
located in Via l’oli, 25, publishes every two months a
Bulletin of photographic news interesting both to the
amateur and the professional. The Bulletin was born on
the 15th May of last year. The number for January of
the present year contains a photographic illustration by
Carlo Rocchi, of a highly picturesque character, taken
from the plantations of chestnut trees which surround
Rocca di Papa — of this the heliotype has been executed by
Martelli. The number also gives a report of the proceed-
ings of the genera! assembly held on 2Gth January in the
present year, an article on orthochromatic plates by
E. anti F. Boissonas, some photographic c nuserie or chit-
chat by Giovanni Gorgiolli, together with a bibliography
and occasional notes of a varied character.
The assembly held on 2Gth January was presided over
by Augusto Ducros, the vice-president of the Association.
Carlo Rocchi read a paper in which, after mentioning the
friendly relations which subsisted between the Society at
Rome and the Societies of Florence, Naples, and Milan, he
stated that strangers interested in photography passing
through Rome might avail themselves of the hospitality of
the society of which he was a member, and obtain photo-
graphic assistance and appliances of which, as travellers,
they might be destitute. The following were then
formally elected members of the council of administra-
tion of the Association: — Don Antonio Ruffo, Augusto
Ducros, Ing. Giovanni Gargiolli, Carlo Rocchi, Don
Prospero Colonna, Cav. Enrico Valenziani, Edoardo
Kowalsky, Conte Guiseppe Primoli, Ilruto Marini.
The article which its author, with sufficient modesty, calls
Photographic Chit-chat, is the continuation of another
which treated of the relations of photography to painting and
sculpture. That architecture also may be profited by the
camera is, says the author, sufficiently clear. The repro-
duction of monuments, with their details of geometric
design and accurate perspective, may be of the greatest
service to the architect ; but careless pictures, such as those
too often seen in the shop windows, are worse than useless.
Before all things, it is necessary that the photographic
artist should be an adept. “ How often,” says Gargiolli,
“is an eyesore found in a falling monument, in hanging
columns, in a disfigured capital, in a door or window larger
below than above, not to mention false and badly arranged
effects of light and shadow, defects not indeed of photo-
graphy, but of the photographer.”
To enumerate all the useful applications of the photo-
graphic art to the reproduction of machines and instruments
of every kind, and the many advantages it might lead to in
the industrial arts — as, for instance, in the matter of
furniture and decoration — would, says the author of the
article, be too long a matter for the present Bulletin. He
particularises, however, the great use of photography in
obtaining enlargements of pictures of microscopic prepara-
tions. The secrets of the world of the infinitely little are
hereby laid bare to the interested spectator. Medicine,
surgery, anatomy, botany, mineralogy, and all the natural
sciences have in the application of photography their
firmest and most useful support. Suppose, says Gargiolli,
we have a case of building ; suppose the engineer lias to
furnish the directorate with a relation of his monthly
progress. What could do this better than a photograph
of the edifice at the end of every month? This would
show at a glance its exact state and advancement, and
[March 2l, 1890.
| finally, when all these pictures were collected together at
the conclusion of the work, they would give an exact
! chronological story of the whole construction.
In the army, photography would be of the greatest ser-
vice if the principal officers were previously instructed in
a special photographic school. It would afford an exact
and complete view of forts, bridges, trenches, and other
military appliances, of the position of the troops, and of
the different localities, for the Ministry to consider at
home. 1 am of opinion, says the author, “ that the
army would derive no small advantages from a rational
! exercise of photography, a fact which is demonstrated by
the dispensations made in this regard already by the military
councils of many nations. What has been said of the army
applies equally well , in the author's opinion, to the navy.
Buthe says, photography is with us in no great credit;
it is considered generally a mere trade if exercised by the
professional, or if by an amateur a mere diversion for idle
people. “This,” says he, “is false, aye, most false.”
And, lie adds, the absolute negligence of our Govern-
ment in this respect is deeply to be deplored. In Vienna,
Berlin, and other great towns, institutions for teaching
photography are provided by their governments, universi-
ties, so to speak, furnished with cabinets, laboratories, and
everything which is theoretically or practically necessary
to the development of the art, while we Romans have
nothing. Such instruction cannot, in the opinion of Gar-
giolli, be given adequately by the professors of physics in
the lyceums and universities. Their pupils could obtain
little more than a superficial smattering, a collection of
wandering, disconnected ideas from the few lectures on
photography that any professors would be able, having
regard to their other duties, to deliver. But if the govern-
ment were to establish a school of photography the dif-
ferent parts of the Ministry — as those connected with war,
the navy, public works, agriculture and commerce — would
all be interested in its maintenance. All these might avail
themselves of its services. Even the police might gain
something by the detection, through its means, of a
criminal, a “ person wanted.”
“Then could the Government,” says Gargiolli, “have such
photographs as it desires properly executed, and not be
obliged to content itself with such daubs and enormities
as are at present too often the result of the labours of the
first photographer who happens to be at hand. The
Ministry of Public Instruction would find their advantage
therein with the production of ably executed works, which
might serve for schools of industrial art and academies of
design.”
The author concludes this interesting article with two
scenes from his own experience. lie wanted to obtain,
on one occasion, permission from the Ministry of Public
Instruction to execute photographs of certain monuments
for his own private use and gratification, lie obtained,
after some little delay, a reply that it was impossible to
give him a general licence, but that lie would be allowed
to copy any specified objects if he would first give notice
of such objects to the Ministry, and afterwards send them
copies of the photographs taken. “ I had,” says Gargiolli,
“ no objection to parting with the photographs, but was not
altogether content with the other condition, not being a
photographer by profession, but a mere amateur who
desired the beautiful without any prospect of profit." On
another occasion, seeking a photograph of some object of
public art which pleased him, several were brought to him
by the seller, but all so vilely done, either from a bad
March 21, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
219
position or a bad light, or a deflection of the vertical lines,
that he proposed to take a picture for himself ; but as this
was strictly forbidden, he departed, shaking the dust off
his feet against all monopolies of professionals.
C II ROMO-P 1IOTOG It AP 1 1 Y 15V IILOCK
PRINTING.
Referring again to the illustrations in Dr. Eder's annual,
we And — in addition to the zincographic print from
18 plates, which we described last week — two further
examples of printing in several colours on the same paper.
In both of these cases there is the important fact that
block printing in high relief is the process employed, and
some interesting details concerning each method are to be
found i i the work in which they are contained.
The first example to be noted is a copy of a subject printed
in red — or rather a sort of terra-cotta colour — and black.
It represents a figure in arms on horseback, and is a very
effective production. There are three impressions — one of
the subject in black outline; one of the general terra-cotta
tone, which in the finished print covers all but the high
lights ; and one of the two combined. The method by
which the separate negatives are obtained from the parti-
coloured original is ingenious though simple, and is
described by Professor lloese, of the Imperial Printing
Establishment in Berlin, from whose account we extract
the following details.
For coloured reproductions, as many negatives are
taken as there are colours to be used. For the purpose of
producing the particular illustration under discussion, two
negatives are made. The one negative — that for repro-
ducing the black outlines — receives a very long exposure,
and is best effected with an orthochromatic plate. By
this means the red terra-cotta colour produces so much
effect on the negative that it classes with the white, and
leaves the black lines remaining wherewith to produce the
zinc plate that is to print black. For the “tone plate,’’
on the other hand, such a short exposure is given that
only the white lights show distinctly, and the red is classed
with the black.
In this way are made facsimile reproductions cither of
the original size, or on a smaller scale, from coloured
wood engravings. In the Imperial Printing Office in Berlin
there is a large collection of reproductions from coloured
works, as well as black and whites, of the old masters in
wood engraving: — Jan Livens, Hans Balding Grien, II.
Burgkmaier, Albert Durer, Job. Vechtliu, Lucas Cranach,
Andrea Andreani, Tobias Stimmer, Urse Graf, II. S.
Beham, Schauenfeleiu, Altdiirfer, &c.
The other example of chromo-zincotype contained
in the book is a print in four colours, reproduced from
a sketch in oil colour by Kotschenreiter. The print is by
Meisenbach and Schmaedel, of Munich, who use the word
“autotype ” in connection with the ziuc-ctching processes
that they employ. The picture represents a weather-
beaten head, and is very effective both in drawing and
suggestive colouring.
On the subject of autotype colour printing — by which,
as above mentioned, the idea associated in the minds of
English readers with the word autotype must not be con-
nected— we have an article in Dr. Eder’s book by G. Fritz,
technical Inspector of the State Printing Office in Vienna.
Much more highly than black and white reproduction, says
lie, must be esteemed prints in chromo-autotype, for by its
application it is possible to secure a truer representation
of the originals, both in drawing and correct rendering of
colour, than by any other method hitherto known. Water
colour drawings, however, lend themselves better to repro-
ductions, by the block photo processes, than do oil paint-
ings. The latter often require a large number of colour
plates, and to represent their solid effect many tones must
be overlaid on the same place, whilst water colour paint-
ings and other pictures that are painted in a similar style,
are, on account of the generally transparent character of
the tones, much better within the reach of the typographic
printer’s art. Each method of printing has its own cha-
racteristic, and typographic or block printing is less suited
than the copper etching, lithographic, or collotype methods
for representing the deep, powerful, solid effects commonly
found in oil paintings.
-*■
ANOTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY.
Tiie Manchester Amateur Photographic Society has in-
augurated a photographic survey of Manchester and
Salford, and its Secretary has sent the following letter
to each of the members of the Society : —
“Dear Silt, — I beg to inform you that the Committee are
now making arrangements for carrying out this scheme.
April and May being considered the best months for
taking street scenes and some of the objects suitable for
the survey, it is imperative that operations should begin
at once. At the present stage I cannot give you details
of our plans, as these will depend upon the number of
volunteers we get to assist us. It is intended to photo-
graph street scenes, prominent buildings, market places,
railway stations, churches, interiors and exteriors, old bits
of architecture, interesting nooks and corners, especially
those doomed to early demolition, parks, historical
residences, including those in the surrounding neigh-
bourhood of Manchester and Salford, and having connect-
ing associations ; also instantaneous views, such as Fairs
and * High Change;' in short, anything that will record
the city and borough and the habits of the people, as they
are to-day.
“ I need not point out to you that this is a vast under-
taking, and one that will require our full strength. But
we arc a large Society, and if every member will take his
share of the work, the divisions will be very small. If,
however, it be left to a few to perform, the survey will be
a burden. I hope you will do your best to obviate this
by helping us.
“ To take an ordnance map and cut it up into slips,
giving a piece to each member to mark his circuit, would
be rather arbitrary in a voluntary work of this kind. It
is considered better to leave it to the members to photo-
graph whatever and wherever they choose, and to send
in the results for selection by the Committee. But apart
from this, the Committee will collect the names of all the
places and objects to be taken, and make an allotment to
each member, for which he will be held responsible to
photograph at his earliest convenience.
“In the binding of the survey, the artist’s name will be
written under the print, and at the completion the
negatives will be returned to their respective owners. I
shall be glad to communicate with any member respecting
the scheme, and hope to give fuller information in the
next number of the Recurd.
“Will you kindly give your best consideration to the
questions at foot, and let me liave your replies not later
than Monday’s post, and oblige,
“John Wilcock, Hon. Secretary,
“odd, Moss Lane East, Manchester, March 6tA.’’
220
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
THE SIZES OF PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATES*
BY J. CRAIG ANNAN.
The question whether the sizes of plates and papers at
present adopted by British manufacturers are the most
economical that could be devised, is a subject worthy of
careful consideration.
How the present sizes came to be fixed I do not precisely
know. The terms whole-plate, half-plate, and quarter-
plate have the ring of a convention about them, and may
have been fixed by some photographic parliament in days
long gone by. Plates 81X(H were the largest size prepared
for Daguerreotypes, and probably were then known as full
plates, and this may be the origin of the term. Other sizes
appear to have been designed by the makers of cameras in
a haphazard way, as their fancy or expectancy of custom
led them. What I wish to discuss to-night is, whether
the proportions of length and breadth in the standard sizes
of British plates are the most economical that could be
devised? I think most certainly they are not, and I would
like very much to see this subject taken up by the Inter-
national Congress which is to meet this year in Brussels ;
for the double reason that an international series of sizes
might be fixed, and that they should be arranged on some
reasonable basis.
In a communication to this Society about five or six
years ago, the late Mr. Norman Macbeth, R.S.A., laid
down a rule to find the best proportions of length and
breadth for a picture, the resulting proportions being
V2X1.
Now, while maintaining that the ultimate proportions of
a print must depend entirely on the composition of the
picture, I have become firmly convinced that this shape is
the most useful and economical that could be found for
general work.
Compare this size with those in use.
a/2x 1 =1-41X1 8.|X6£ = l-31Xl
15*12 = 1-25X1 71X5=1-5X1
12X10=12 XI 6^X43=1 37X1
10X8 =125X1 61X41 = 1-53X1
A glance at the list shows that nearly all the sizes are
less oblong than the Macbeth proportions, the modified
half-plate 6J-X4J beingnearer it than any other. Consider
for a moment, and I think you will find that in nine cases
out of ten in trimming a print from a 15X12, 12X10, or
even whole-plate negative, you have to cut more off the
breadth than the length to make the shape look pleasant,
and that a half-plate oftcner than any other size is a suitable
shape as it stands.
Compare this size also with the artists’ canvasses which
have the largest sale.
/2xl =1-41X1 10X7 =1-43X1
18X12=1-5 XI
14x10=1-4 XI
12x8 =1-5 xl
These two last sizes are for portraits, head and shoulders,
and are of course squarer than an average picture would
be.
And now I wish to point out the most interesting and
useful feature of this shape, which is that, when it is
doubled, the relative proportions are precisely maintained.
1 : ^2:: ^2 : 2.
20X16=1-25X1
18x14 = 1-28x1
paper is not intended to go fully into the subject, but is
written more for the purpose of raising a discussion on
what I consider a most important matter, I will conclude
by giving a list of sizes on the lines which I woidd like to
see carried out. Of course if an international series were
fixed, they would be worked out in the metric system.
4^X3 12X 8i
6 X4£ 17X12
8JX6 24X17
As the sizes become large, the difference between them
is too great, and intermediate sizes would be required.
7X 5 20X14
10X 7 28X20
14x10
PEOPLE WITH DOUBLE FACES.
Mi:. Napoleon S a pony's observations on the human
countenance, to a New York World reporter, run thus : —
“Perhaps you are not aware of the fact, but, unless
you are entirely different from the rest of humanity, one
side of your face is unlike the other. Doubtless nine
persons out of ten would not notice the difference, but it
is there, and if you make a careful study of the profiles of
your friends’ faces you will find it in a more or less marked
degree in every instance.
“ This peculiarity of nature was called to my attention
when I entered the practice of photography. Previous
to this time I had been an artist and lithographer, and
naturally had been led to study the human figure with
more or less care. I had discovered this incongruity of
nature, if it may be so called, but it was not until I began
posing models before the camera, and had every line of
the face emphasized, that this idiosyncrasy became more
apparent to me, and I set to work to discover the cause ;
for, of course, there is a cause for everything, the human
face included.
“My first discovery was that the difference in outline
lay almost invariably on the two opposite sides of the
nose. The right side, for instance, might be pure aqui-
line, and the left show a decided inward curving line.
This difference I found in many instances had been caused
by accidents, such as had been received in wrestling, fall-
ing, being struck by a ball, or other misfortunes which
youth is heir to. There is an indentation on one side of
my own nose, caused by a blow from a ball, and it renders
the expression of one side of my face almost entirely
different from the other.
“ But accident is not the principal cause of these facial
differences in humanity. Not by a great deal. It traces
way back to the cradle. Mothers find that their infants
will remain quieter when they are sucking their thumbs,
and for peace in the household they very often lay the
foundation for what becomes a deformity in after life.
“ Let me explain : Baby lies in her cradle as still as a
mouse. Her chubby little thumb is held between her
rosy lips, and the forefinger is pressing the cartilages of
the nose on one side. It is that little forefinger that is
doing all the mischief, for it is slowly, but surely, pressing
the cartilage out of shape. If drops of water wear away
a stone, surely constant pressure will indent a human
face.”
You will at once see the manifold advantages of a series
of plates based on a principle such as this. And as this
* A communication to the Glasgow Photographic Association.
Photographic Club. — March ‘26th, monthly lantern night j
April 2nd, “Standard Solution and the Expression of Photo-
graphic Formulse.”
March 21, 1890.]
HOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
221
A MODIFIED COLLODION E
BY A.
That collodion methods arc bntiittlr used in the produc-
tion of lantern slides by amateurs goes without saying.
■■ Takes too much time — costs too much." < >ne might
say that emulsion making was the thief of time, and
chemicals. It is not only this ; but time is the thief of
emulsion, especially in the amateur’s hands, as lie can only
use a small portion at a time, and the emulsion becomes
of the consistency of water with age — entirely useless.
To gain time and prevent collodion emulsion from sinking
into the silver waste, or oblivion, and to show its cheap-
ness, is the purport of this article.
Before acquainting the reader with the rapid ten-minute
method, possibly a description of the actual practice here-
tofore indulged in. and its subsequent cutting down in
time, and the preserving of one's good nature would be of
interest.
In the first place, to make an emulsion by collodion
methods, it is essential we have some broino-iodised collo-
dion. The formula in use is as follows : —
Collodion.
... ... ... ... li ounces
Alcohol ... ... ... •••
Ether ... ••• ••• >>
Gun-cotton 40 grains
Iodide of ammonia ... ... ... 15 ,,
Bromide of cadmium 54 ,,
First take the alcohol and dissolve the iodide in it. Take
next your bromide and grind it in a mortar, adding a few
drops of distilled water. Now pour the combined alcohol
and iodide gradually into it, grinding constantly until
nearly all the bromide is taken up. A slight precipitation
occurs, but if well ground will be very small, and of no
serious consequence. Gradually add the ether to the
alcohol, iodide, and bromide, shaking it with a kind of
circular motion. Add the gun-cotton ; filter it through a
tuft of cotton saturat'd with alcohol, and put away to
ripen for a week. If white iodide is used, and the col-
lodion does not become a deep cherry colour, by adding
two or three drops oc iolinc the collodion will be in
prime condition for sensitising.
Sensitising. — Dissolve in a test tube by gentle heat To
grains of nitrate of silver in one dram of distilled water,
adding 4 drams of alcohol, which has previously been
heated in another test tube. Now go into your dark-
room, and by orange light gradually add the alcoholic
solution of silver, giving it a vigorous shaking after each
addition, finally rinsing the test tube with 2 drams of
alcohol and adding it to the emulsion. After shaking well,
add to the finished emulsion three drops of nitric acid.
Care must be observed to keep silver solution heated, else
precipitation will be the result, and though it may not
spoil the emulsion, the bromide of silver formed will be in
a very coarse state, making it useless for lantern positives.
It will be observed from the foregoing that to make an
emulsion we merely make bromo-iodised collodion and
sensitise it. In other words, we take the collodion of the
old wet process and fire the silver bath into it. \\ ell-
ripened bromo-iodised collodion can be obtained in eight-
ounce bottles from any of the leading photographic stock-
houses. at a less cost to the purchaser than the amount of
bromides, iodides, ether, and alcohol, necessary to the
making of the same amount of collodion. Provided with
an eight-ounce bottle as above, take four ounces of its
contents and follow the instructions given in this article
about sensitising, and the result is a collodion emul-
sion which should not have taken more than ten minutes to
[complete. Emulsion so made does not keep for any
length of time : nor does the amateur so wish it, as he is
compelled to work spasmodically.
Make the emulsion the evening before the day you intend
using it. Secure a slab of plate glass ; level it. covei'ing
its surface with well cleaned alhumenized glass. by 4.
Measure out 1 i drams of emulsion ; pour in the centre of
each plate. When the surface becomes tacky, wash in
two or three changes of distilled water ; allow the plates
to soak for two minutes in a tincture of quinine of the
following strength : —
Water 5 ounces
Tincture quinine ... ... ... ... 2 drams
Wash again in distilled water, and dry bv gentle heat.
When dry the plates are ready for exposure. The
albumen solution is made by dissolving the white of an
egg in three pints of water, and filtering through cotton
saturated with alcohol. Tt is best to filter the emulsion at
the time of coating the plates. If four ounces of collo-
dion make more emulsion than can conveniently be
coated for use the following day, cut down the formula,
preserving the proportions, thereby saving loss of emulsion
and time in coating plates.
I laving exposed the plate, we now take up its develop-
ment. The exposure should be about four times as long
as that given a very slow gelatine plate*. One point to be
remembered in the development of collodion emulsion is
that it cannot stand a very great amount of alkali. The
slides shown at the Society of Amateur Photographers
were developed with eikonogen in the following pro-
portions : —
Eikonogen... ... ... ••• 2 grains
Water 1 ounce
The alkali was one drop of a saturated solution of carbonate
of soda. Previously to applying the developer, the plate
was soaked in a solution of alcohol two parts, water one
part. After fixing and washing, the plate is intensified
with pyro and silver, as used in wet process, with proportions
as follows : —
A. — Pyro ... ... ••• ••• ••• 24
Citric acid ... ••• ••• ... 21
Acetic acid, X<>. 8 ... ... ••• 4
B. — Nitrate of silver ... ... ... 40
Citric acid ... ••• ••• ... 10 ,,
Water 8 ounces
If old ferrous oxalate developer is used, no intensifica-
tion is necessary : but eikonogen tones are unsurpassed,
even by the carbon process. — ■American Amateur Photo-
grapher.
grains
ounce
grains
North Middlesex Photographic Club. — On Monday next,
March 24tli, Mr. Smith will give a lecture on “ Micro- Photo-
graphy,” and illustrate it by means of the optical lantern.
Visitors invited to attend.
Brighton Photographic Society’s Syllabus. — Address by
the President, March 25. Excursions — Shoreham, April 26 ;
Newick, May 26 ; Steyning, June 28 ; Isfield, July 26 ; Hay-
ward’s Heath for Balcombe, August 30 ; Lancing for Sompting
and Broadwater, September 13. Lantern nights — April 8,
November 11, December 9. Papers — Mr. Jago, April 22;
Mr. A. H. ('order, “ Platinotype,” May 13; Mr. Hethton
Lewis, June 10 ; Mr. E. J. Bedford, “Composition, Light and
Shade,” July 8 ; Rev. H. G. Day, “ Photography considered
iu its Relation to Art,” August 12; Mr. A. Welding, “On
Exposures,” September 9 ; Mr. F. Tate, October 14 ; Mr. D.
E. Causli, “Failures,” October 28. Social evening, Nov. 25.
222
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
In France the study of composite photography has
been taken up with great enthusiasm, the specimens
exhibited in the International Exhibition giving some
remarkable results, as we mentioned some time ago.
A veiv thoughtful article appeared in La Nature
recently, and is well worth perusing by those
interested in the subject. The method pursued in
France differs considerably from that first put forward
by Mr. Francis Galton. Mr. Galton produced his com-
posites in the printing-frame; the French workers
produce theirs in the camera by a succession of ex-
posures. The writer’s theory is this : — The variations in
the features of each photograph being given an in-
sufficient exposure, do not print ; the features which
are common to all the photographs receive the proper
exposure because they occur again and again. Hence
these salient lines alone printing, we get the type of
the particular collection of individuals. An objection
has been raised to this method on the ground that the
plate becomes more sensitive the more often it is struck
by feeble light ; consequently those portraits last
exposed will have a predominant influence in the final
res ult.
This objection, the author shows, by a series of
experiments difficult to explain without the diagrams
and pictures which accompany the article, has no force
if the operations be conducted properly. The conclu-
sion the writer comes to is that the larger the number
of subjects in each composite, the greater the proba-
bility of obtaining a real type. When a small number —
say three — is taken, there is a risk of generalising too
much, and as the exposure in each case is but a third
of the normal exposure, it is sufficiently long to give
details which are not common to these faces, and the
consequence is we get not a combined result, but a
super-imposing of the three. A very brief exposure
is insisted upon as indispensable to obtaining a trust-
worthy result.
A new work on London is about to be brought out
by the Religious Tract Society, and the editor has
made an application for permission to inspect and photo-
graph certain of the charters and documents in the
Guildhall Library. The application was granted by
the Court of Common Council at its meeting last
week, and under the directions of the town clerk such
charters and records as may be desirable will be photo-
graphed. This application suggests the propriety at
some time of setting up a proper studio at the Guild-
hall Library, and of appointing an efficient photo-
grapher. At the present moment we know of more
than one illustrated paper which would be glad to
have photographs of old engravings and wood-cuts
for reproduction, were it not for the trouble and
expense of employing a photographer. If an ordinary
business charge were made for such copies as might be
required, the expenses of a Corporation photographer
would soon be paid. There are many other useful
things which such an official could perform, and the
City might do worse with its superfluous cash than
devote a portion to such a purpose.
The question is sometimes asked, why do some photo-
graphers so excessively retouch the negative as to in
many cases effectually destroy the likeness? An
excellent answer is to be found in a little story which
has found its way here from America. A lady of an
uncertain age, and still more uncertain looks, inter-
views a photographer’s youthful assistant on the subject
of being photographed, upon which there is the usual
stipulation made that payment must be in advance.
Lady: “ But suppose I pay for them and don’t like
them, what am I to do?” “Don’t know, ma’am ; Mr.
Blank is out just now, but he’ll be in soon, and will
tell you.” “That seems to me a very queer rule;
you ought at least to guarantee satisfaction.” “Yes,
but you see, ma’am, there ain’t no way to keep pictures
from lookin’ like the people.” Truthful lad! But
this was in the old days. It is now quite possible to
keep the pictures from looking like the sitters. We
retouch.
The Oberammcrgau Passion Play is enacted the first
year of every decade, and thousands will flock to the
Bavarian Hochland in May, on the 26th of which
month the performance — we presume we must call it
—takes place. Whatever may be the feelings of the
audience, the performers at least conscientiously regard
the affair in a religious light, and so sacred do they
think it that they will not allow the Crucifixion scene
to be photographed or otherwise depicted. In this
they show better taste than did the American minister
who lately preached on Mars Hill — where St. Paul
preached his sermon to the Athenians — and had himself
photographed in the act !
According to the Globe, the head waiter at a long-
established and well-known restaurant is a capable
amateur photographer. The fact has come out
apropos of some pictures which appeared in the New
York Herald, “by which William’s genial coun-
tenance was grievously libelled in six several pictures.”
The Globe recommends the “ waiter-photographer ”
to have his revenge on the Herald artist when he
comes to the restaurant again, and “shoot” him —
photographically, of course — on the feed. We may
remark, apropos of that mysterious man the waiter, that
the oddest discoveries are apt to be made concerning him.
We recollect finding in the head waiter at a quaint old
inn at Canterbury an accomplished microscopist, and
an authority on infusoria. With all his scientific
reputation — for he was well known in London — he was
modest, and gratefully took his tip in the proper pro-
fessional manner.
March 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
223
GRADE IX PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY.
BY H. COLE BROOK.
Scarcely another business can show so many widely dis-
tinct and varied grades as photography, and a study of no
mean interest may be found— -to those who care about
such things — in the links and connections which bind the
highest to the lowest, the Court photographer to the beach-
man, wide as is the difference between them. It would
almost seem, from the countless numbers of existing
grades, that each professor of the art finds for himself an
original position, so forming a grade of his own ; and
further, were it possible for a man to ascend, by gradual
progression, through these many divisions, from the lowest
degree to the highest points, it may be imagined that the
extent of his improvement would scarcely be patent to
himself. It is only by selecting, for comparison, points
fairly wide apart, that any real difference can be appreci-
ated. The comparison of the two extremes would pre-
sent something truly striking, but the gradual course
through all would give little or no idea of progress in
photography. There is the difference of taste, the differ-
ence of education, the difference of position, opportunity,
capital, all influencing that widest difference of all between
good and bad photography. For illustration take four
representatives from the two extremes, and two inter-
mediate stages.
The “ beach-man,” as lie has already been called in this
article — though merely for distinction — will perhaps be
better recognised from his description than from his
name. There is nothing extraordinary in his being found
by the sad sea waves, there !s something even appropriate
in it. lie has many points in common with the seafaring
man. Ilis general appearance hardy and weather-beaten, his
most prominent feature partakingof the beacon description,
his eyes bearing that almost barometrical indication of too
much ‘•wet,’' the effect of shingle and sand giving him a
walk peculiarly his own, all proclaim the man. Ills general
standpoint is between two bars — viz., the harbour-bar,
if there be one, and the refreshment bar, which there is
sure to be. He moves amongst the crowd of pleasure-
seekers, bearing in his hand a specimen of work — to the
public, a beautiful collodion positive ; to the initiated, a
silver print set off by a remarkably bright brass mat and
tray. Ilis voice, though husky, is skilled in smooth
phrases; he is also skilled in argument. He need be, for
though his specimen meets with general admiration, the
completion of an order is generally accompanied by a
little altercation and a large amount of abuse on the part
of the customer. Ilis posing is simplicity itself, and the
adjustment of his instrument perfectly bewildering in its
celerity. The number of his journies to the inland bar
would require a clever mathematician to calculate. This
is such an undoubted fact, that the ordinary Table of
Solubilities appears incomplete without the following
item : —
I T,-rap. | Water I Temp. | Alcohol. |
Cash Receipts. | Immaterial, j Insol. j At all T’s. | Highly Sol |
His education, taste, and capital may be algebraically
expressed as x, y, z, an equation with three unknowns ;
but whatever else may be urged against him, it cannot be
said he lets his opportunities go by. Ilis position must
be represented in the trade as zero. The above, of
course, is a specimen of the lowest of his class. To say
that an honest, conscientious positive worker is not to be
found would be extreme, but they are unique in their
rarity, and generally seek a quiet spot, where their names
cannot be tarnished by the juxtaposition of their
unworthier brethren, who, as a class, must be mildly con-
sidered as degenerate. Leaving the beach-worker to
revel in his alcoholic propensities, and ascending to the
nearest quiet street, the representative of the second
grade makes his appearance in rather an eccentric
manner. Advertisements varying in number from ten
to thirty appear in every available space, in shop-window,
door, and on the walls of the building, setting forth that
artistic portraits can be had beautifully finished at
5s. Gd. a dozen. It is said that a romance repeatedly
told becomes gospel in time, even to the romancer. It
may be so with these advertisements, the proprietor
really believing that what he is continually advertising
is indisputably correct. Ilis window is a marvel of
uniformity and variety, both. Rows of cartes and
cabinets, tier upon tier in symmetrical profusion, lay
claim to the one, while the other is evidenced by the
wide range of tones, the faces ranging from ghastly to
tropical; the mixture of subjects from the sweep to the
ballet-dancer ; and lastly, the positions, many and easy,
the ballet-dancer in particular looking excessively com-
fortable with one foot on a very high chair. Within we
have a good example of that style of unarrangement
known as unstudied. Framed pictures lie about as
specimens of “ Our Club Portrait.” The proprietor is
suave and polite ; his beiug no grammarian forms not the
slightest check to his volubility. The studio is a trifle
bare, but with everythiugin its place — in fact, everything
seems to have taken root and grown there. The instru-
ments are in the fullest sense of the word adjustable,
though seemingly of an automatic adjustment. Leaving
the pose to the operator, it becomes merely a question
as to whether you shall hold a lean pedestal up, or
whether the pedestal shall hold you up. The pedestal
being the shakiest, you take the safest course, and after
a few mystic “ passes ” the operator retires to develop.
The result is more than successful — it always is — so after
a few business formalities have been gone through, and
you have resisted the temptation to “Try our Club,” you
leave, a happy man. In a few weeks’ time you are pro-
bably a wiser man, and if there is any inclination left to
try the effect of any sort of club, without doubt it will
be a war club.
Doubling the price of the foregoing example will give
us a representative of the third grade, but luckily price
will not form the only distinction here. A strong impres-
sion that a plain reproduction of a face is not the sum
total of artistic portraiture, will be found to exist. The
uniformity and variety of the window may be nearly
gone, but, strangely enough, there remains something
attractive in its arrangement. The quantity of specimens
beiug considerably diminished, the quality is the more
apparent. The work shows signs of careful finish, and
there is a softness, and roundness, that the eye rests on
with pleasure, after its former experience. There is still
a uniformity — a pleasing one — in the tone and depth of
printing, and a decided taste in the selection and
character of the specimens shown. The same principles
are found to exist inside. You are not told what a
splendid portrait you are sure to obtain, but there is an
evident anxiety to prove it, and when you see that there
are few or no “ clubs ” about, you feel there is a possibi-
bility, or even a probability of it. Politeness and suavity
still exist, but of a more intelligent and educated order,
224
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
and this with the trouble and pains that are taken, cause
you to breathe as though in a purer atmosphere. There
is. perhaps, an eyesore here and there ; a straining after
unnatural effect, a tendency to bury the sitter in acces-
sories, a want of character, a want of simplicity and
greater breadth, but on the whole there seems an upward
tendency, and the impression left is certainly more com-
plimentary to the photographer and his art.
The fourth grade has already been spoken of as the
“Court” photographer, though this is also merely for
distinction, for although many high class photographers
have had something of Court work, yet there are many
who have not. As I speak of a class, Court must, there-
fore, be understood in a general sense. There is, or
ought to be, a sensation amounting almost to awe in
approaching this class, who have reached the summit of
many a lesser man’s ambition — a feeling that patent leather,
and a little more polish, will not be inappropriate. 1 will
endeavour to step lightly and with circumspection.
The first point that would strike an outsider would be
the fact that advertisement is either entirely absent, or
nearly so. This may prove many things, but amongst
others, certainly a sense of security and prosperity, it being
unnecessary to attract custom by anything approaching
vulgar display, an excellent guarantee that this class do
not seek, but are sought. To say that their show rooms,
reception rooms, dressing rooms, and studio exhibit taste
of the highest order; that even fashion finds its way into
their sacred precincts — that everything is of the com-
pletest — all this would be superfluous ; and to hint at the
presence of anything partaking of ordinary vulgarity
would be simply to call into requisition sal volatile and eau-
de-cologne, and other revivifying necessaries. Though
many a lesson might be learnt from these things, they do
not form the fairest subject for comparison. The work
itself is. of course, the actual test, and this may be seen
by all in the form of pictures of celebrities. 1 do not
mean to say that this work is of the highest order of
artistic merit — far from it ; but as I am speaking of the
work of a class, 1 wish to take a general sample. Some-
thing even the reverse of artistic might be found in
many, but there is one grand point, that as a whole they
exhibit judicious use of the materials of a picture ; there
is that combination of tasteful simplicity and worth that
stamps the photo as coming from one who has an intelli-
gent appreciation of the powers of photography. Much
might be claimed in favour of their subjects, but
were these subjects submitted to the ordinary retoucher,
photographs of very ordinary mortals would be the result
in nine cases out of ten. Posing in the hands of this class
becomes easy and natural, even though in some cases it
be rather studied ; but the same pose on an unsuitable
subject, in the hands of one of the lower orders, becomes
such an awful and horrible perpetration, that it is a wonder
that the friends of the latter subject do not take sudden
and immediate revenge. The imitator doubtless has the
same idea, but without the feeling that prompted it, and
herein lies the strongest distinction of all, for were there
no room for the influence of thought and feeling, then a
distinct line might be drawn to represent the limit within
the reach of all, bearing little or no room for comparisons.
Now, by joining these four examples, and carefully
filling in the space between each, an uninterrupted
succession of degrees will be shown from first to last, each
degree at the same time possessing somethin// original and
distinct. From this I want to show that, collectively,
progress is evidenced ; individually, the reverse. Take,
for example, the case of a man starting a business in one
of the intermediate stages. lie will naturally open
according to his ability, but will have still more regard for
his capital and surroundings, this point governing his
charges. If he be a conscientious worker, he will give
full value for money. Having established a connection —
which, needless to say, will take time— can he advance his
prices so as to improve his work? for he cannot do it
otherwise. But rarely; for lie cannot do this without
a general upset of his whole business, and a fresh start, as
it were, on a new basis. On the other hand, there are
many things likely to influence him in lowering his prices,
and unfortunately the work does not at first follow (it
must eventually), thereby bringing his downward influence
to bear on his brethren of the same degree. Thus a
process of filtration is continually going on. swelling the
lower ranks enormously, and leaving the higher ones clear
and free, with every prospect of a brilliant future. And
then — well, for the peace of mind of the many — “ When
things get to the worst, they generally mend.”
OKT,H'L< dll OR CELLONITE ?
A sen that t lie Celluloid Manufacturing Company, of New York
and Newark, began a year ago against the Cellonite Manufac-
turing Company, Wilmington, for infringement of copyright,
has been decided by Justice Bradley, of the United States
Circuit Court of New Jersey, in favour of the plaintiffs. What
makes the suit remarkable is that it has caused the respective
publishers of Webster’s and Worcester’s dictionaries, and of
Chamber’s “ Encyclopaedia,” to remove the word “celluloid”
from the class of words that were heretofore considered public
property. The Wilmington Company makes a substance that
is similar to celluloid, and have put it on the market under
the somewhat similar name of cellonite. The New York and
Newark concern at once brought suit to restrain the rival firm
from using the word, asserting that the word “celluloid” was a
noun of its own creation ; that it had copyrighted the word as
a trade mark, and that the use of a word in any way similar i
was an infringement of this copyright. The Wilmington Com- <
pany offered the dictionaries as evidence that the word was
public property. Lawyer Cox, for the plaintiffs, set up the
claim that the dictioners had no right to include the word in
their publications, and that such unlawful publication could not
affect the copyright rights of the plaintiff. He meantime laid
the matter before the publishers of the dictionaries, and the
latter promptly revised their latest editions. They published
the word in its alphabetical place, but with an explanation that
it was a private trade mark. Lawyer Cox and the publishers
are now trying to introduce a substitute word that may be used
by anybody without affecting the copyright, and that will
enable the dictionary publishers to continue to print a descrip-
tion of what the substance called celluloid in trade is. Justice
Bradley’s decision gives the plaintiff exclusive use of the word
“celluloid ” as a trade mark, and also of its corporate name,
au«l gi ants a perpetual injunction against the use by anybody
of any name in any manner resembling celluloid. A suit is
now pending against a prominent retail business house in New
York for selling cellonite for celluloid, and also for permitting
customers to leave the shop under the impression that cellonite
was celluloid. The Celluloid Company assert that this also is an
infringement of their copyright. — Invention.
To Wash Negatives Quickly. — Place the negative under
the tap, and turn the water on so that it will fall with con-
siderable force. Hold the plate diagonally, and turn it round
occasionally. While the water is falling on it, go over the
surface with a camel-hair brush or a soft sponge, always
moving from centre outwards to margin. In a few minutes
he hypo will lie eliminated. — Pltotoijraphic Scraps.
March 21, 1890.]
rHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
225
FLASH POWDER EXPLOSIONS.*
Bi' CHARLES L. MITCHELL, M.D., PHILADELPHIA, l’A.
Explosive compounds are defined to be certain bodies
which possess the property, when heated or set on fire, or
from some other cause, of being converted from their
solid or liquid state into gases in an almost immeasurably
short space of time, such gases during their chemical
conversion liberating heat, and in consequence highly ex-
panding, and through this expansion exerting a great
pressure on their surroundings. This conversion is
accompanied by a detonation, which in its proper sense is
called an explosion. Explosive compounds are divided
into two classes. In the first class, designated as ‘‘deton-
ators” or “shattering compounds,” of which nitro-
glycerine is an example, the explosion is effected in an
immeasurably short space of time, and all parts of the
substance decompose simultaneously, thus making the
initial pressure of evolved gases the maximum one, and
producing the most powerful impression upon closely
adjacent bodies. The second class, of which gunpowder
and blasting powder are illustrations, are called “disin-
tegrating compounds.” The explosion of these proceeds
progressively by combustion, and their gases gradually
accumulate until the resistance to them gives way.
Of all the salts formed by picric acid, the picrate of
magnesium is probably one of the most dangerous, and, no
doubt, caused the last explosion of the series mentioned.
It is a well-known fact that chemical combination and de-
composition will take place when two different substances
are simply mechanically mixed together, and allowed to
remain undisturbed for a period of time. Considering
these facts, there is no doubt that, if picric acid and mag-
nesium were placed in intimate contact with each other,
as would occur when used as component parts of this flash
powder, and then allowed to remain undisturbed for some
time, chemical combination would ensue, with the formation
of picrate of magnesium. Another fact in connection
with this is that powdered magnesium is quite hygx-oscopic,
and has a tendency to cake together in loose masses, or
adhere to the sides of a bottle, if exposed to a moist atmos-
phere. Picric acid, when powdered, is also rather sticky
in character, and it can be readily seen how, if these two
substances existed together in a mixture, they would be
attracted to one another; then, given the elements of
time, moisture, and perhaps some slight warmth, and
chemical combination would inevitably occur. That this
is not pure theory, but fact, can be substantiated by a
fact lately mentioned to the writer by Professor Ilenry
Leffman, of this city, in a personal conversation. He
stated that some time previously, while microscopically
examining a sample of this “ yellow ” flash powder, he was
surprised to notice an entire absence of metallic magnesium
the yellow crystals of picric acid being alone prominent.
On dropping the powder into water, however, an abun-
dant sediment of metallic magnesium was deposited,
showing its presence; and a closer examination of the
powder showed that particles of magnesium were completely
enveloped in a yellow coating of picric acid. Of course
these circumstances afforded a most fruitful opportunity
for the conversion of the two substances into the explosive
picrate of magnesium, and there is no doubt whatever in
the mind of the writer that such combination actually
took place.
rhe presence of this dangerous ehemical, probably
in considerable quantity, was undoubtedly the cause
of the last accident at the laboratory of Wiley and
Wallace. It was testified at the coroner’s inquest
that the victims of the accident were engaged at the
time it occurred in emptying some of this “ yellow” flash
powder into a drain, for the purpose of getting rid of it.
They had just returned from court, where Mr. Wiley
was defendant in a suit for damages brought by the rela-
tives of the boy, John I). Cruice, and his assistants
were witnesses, and no doubt impressed by the evidence
of the dangerous character of this powder, as brought
out during the trial, determined to remove it out of harm's
way as soon as possible. There were some seven or
eight pounds of this powder, contained in a large bottle,
still remaining in their cellar, which had been made some
eighteen months previously, and had remained undisturbed
all that time. It is not known to a certainty what was
the immediate cause of the explosion. Neither fire nor
chemicals were known to have been present. Water had
been thrown upon some of it ; but experiments subse-
quently made proved that the addition of water to the
compound would not generate sufficient heat to ignite it.
The most reasonable explanation, therefore, and probably
the only one that can be offered, is that the picric acid
and magnesium had, through long standing, become con-
verted into their resulting salt, and that by some acci-
dental jar, or perhaps in shaking or knocking the bottle
to loosen its contents, a portion of the picrate was de-
tonated, causing the detonation of the entire mass, and
the consequent terrific explosion. That it was a detona-
tion, and not merely a sudden ignition of the mass, is
proved by the fact that the bodies of those killed were not
in the least burned or charred, but of course greatly
mangled from the force of the explosion. Mr. Wiley’s
body in particular was found only after some search, and
then it was discovered tightly wedged in an empty barrel,
dismembered and horribly mangled. In the two previous
accidents the victims were simply burned through the
sudden ignition and partial explosion of the compound,
and their bodies accordingly were marked by great eschars
where the flames had reached them ; but in the last acci-
dent a perfect detonation occurred. This was due probably
to the fact that thorough chemical combination of the
picric acid had occurred through length of time. The
other accidents occurred during the mixing of the fresh
powder, and the injury caused was more due to an intense
combustion of the magnesium and chlorate, an explosion
of the second class only taking place.
It is evident from these fatal accidents that this par-
ticular compound, the “yellow " flash powder of
Buchanan, Bromley, and Co., was a substance possessing
properties even more dangerous than dynamite, and one
that was alike unsafe to make, to use, or to keep. To
sell such an article, therefore, for ignorant and unskilled
persons to use, or to induce anyone to attempt its
manufacture, places a terrible responsibility upon those
who knowingly undertook such a risk. The testimony
at the coroner’s inquest upon the first victim revealed fully
the dangerous character of this compound, and if its
vendors had possessed but an ordinary regard for
human life and safety, they would have promptly with-
drawn it from the market. A plea of ignorance is, there-
fore, useless, and they stand convicted before the bar of
public opinion of causing, through cupidity and reckless
defiance and disregard of public safety, the death of
five human beings, with its attendant train of widowed
• Concluded from page l»2.
220
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Makcii 21, 1890.
wives and orphaned children. Not many men would con-
sider this a satisfactory exchange for a few paltry dollars.
The death of Mr. Wiley and his associates, though
greatly to be deplored, was largely the result of their own
imprudence, and sadly illustrates the fact that men will,
through familiarity and frequent handling of dangerous
substances, often become almost insensible to the risks of
their occupation, and take chances that they would pro-
bably counsel others to avoid.
As before mentioned, a curious fact is, that at the time
this accident occurred, the firm of Wiley and Wallace
were engaged as defendants in Court of Common Pleas,
No. 2, in a suit for damages brought by the relatives of
the boy John D. Cruice. The case of Cruice v. Wiley et
al, will long be a “ cause celebre” in judicial records, not
so much from the legal features attending its trial,
although the case was somewhat unique, but from the
tragic features which brought it to such a sudden termi-
nation. It is almost unprecedented in the annals of
medical jurisprudence, and a very extraordinary fact, that
the three individuals who had testified in open court that
this flash powder compound was not dangerous and not
explosive, should, within a few hours after so testifying,
and within a short time after leaving the court-room, be
hurled into eternity by the explosion of the very mixture
they had endeavoured to prove harmless. As an expert
witness for the prosecution, it became necessary for the
writer to express a decided and positive opinion upon the
dangerous nature of this flash-powder mixture, and dur-
ing cross-examination the following quotation from Eissler's
work on “The Modern High Explosives,” was cited, more
particularly in reference to such combinations with potas-
sium chlorate :
“ In mixing these compounds great danger is attendant,
and too much circumspection cannot be used. They
explode instantly upon any violent stroke, very often by
friction alone ; sometimes spontaneously, as when in a
state of rest, and no known cause for their combustion
can be ascertained. Many are deluded as to its safety by
so-called experiments with freshly-made powder. Manu-
facturers of the compound may attempt to show its safety
by hammering it and cutting, and similar tests ; but let
the powder be exposed to the natural atmospheric action,
attract some moisture, then get dry, and the least friction
or blow will cause an explosion.”
Viewed in the light of the subsequent tragedy, these
words seem almost prophetic ; yet little did the writer
think, at the time when he cited them as evidence, that
so soon and so impressively would their truth be demon-
strated. Verily, “truth is often stranger than fiction.”
It seems hardly necessary now, in view of all that has
been cited, to raise a note of warning in regard to the use
of these flash-powders, but the statement has already been
made that, whilst this particular compound was unsafe,
other compounds are harmless. The writer wishes to state
emphatically, therefore, that in his opinion all forms of
flash-powders are dangerous , the difference between them
being only in the degree of danger involved. As had
been said, they are composed of substances prone to rapid
decomposition when in contact with each other ; they are
liable to form new compounds, often possessing danger-
ous and unknown properties. Their combustion is
attended with an intense amount of heat, involving risk
from severe burns, and they are liable to spontaneous
explosion or ignition. This danger is greatly augmented
when they arc made or kept iu mass, and the probable
reason why a greater number of fatal accidents have not
occurred is because the powders have been mostly made
in comparatively small quantities and put up in separate
packages, each containing but a few grains of the mixture.
A simple mixture of magnesium and potassium chlorate,
which has been claimed to be harmless, has been known to
explode under percussion, and there is probably no com-
pound of this character which does not possess some
elements of danger.
T he use of these powders will and should be entirely
abandoned, for there are now equally satisfactory and
much more safe methods of producing the same result.
The different forms of magnesium lamps now on the
market, in which the powdered metallic magnesium is
thrown into the flame of an alcohol lamp, gives a form
of illumination which is quite as efficient photographically,
and, what is equally to the purpose, if is perfectly safe ;
it has been claimed by some that the combustion of the
magnesium, when used with this lamp, was not as rapid
as when the flash powder was employed, and in conse-
quence certain instantaneous effects could not be obtained.
In the writer’s opinion, it would be much better, then, to
abandon this class of work entirely, rather than
run the risk attending the employment of such dan-
gerous compounds ; moreover, he considers that
these objections are mostly imaginary. In Charles
Lamb's “ History of lloast Pig,” it is related that the
inhabitants of the country deemed it necessary at first
to burn down a house in order to roast a pig. In
course of time they discovered, however, that much
simpler and less dangerous methods would answer equally
as well. It is hoped, therefore, that the time will soon
arrive when the photographic public will discover that
magnesium can be employed for purposes of illumination
without using compounds which are akin to gunpowder
and dynamite in their dangerous properties.
THE FIRST OPTICAL LANTERN.
Kiucheu knew the use of projection lenses for the optical
lantern, because, in his older book, he pictured such lenses
in the plate representing the apparatus in which the solar
rays were used for the illumination. Yet in his later
work, printed at Amsterdam, he pictures his magic lantern
without projection lenses in front; hence, last week we
hazarded the guess that perhaps he left such lenses out of
the diagram on purpose, especially as there is evidence
that over some of his discoveries lie had a somewhat
secretive disposition. However, this supposition is rather
hard upon lvircher, for no first-rate man of science or
man of fine feeling would give, under the guise of
publication, a method which would not work to the
best advantage so far as his knowledge went. More
probably the true explanation of the matter is,
that Kircher’s projection lenses were not of suitable
focal length for the new conditions under which he
worked with the whole apparatus in a small room, so he
then threw shadows of lantern pictures upon the wall by
means of an optical system entirely behind them, as repre-
sented in these pages last week ; if so, the means he used
were not unlike the optical system of the lantern of the
London policeman. Kircher’s pictures had never before
been published in this country, nor had Kircher’s detailed
description of his magic lanterns been previously circulated
in the English language.
March 21, 181)
la
PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
227
patent Intelligence.
Spoeiflcation3 Published.
2,983. — February "20th, 1889. “ An Improved Lantern.” Tom]
Bell Kuhns, C.imelford, Corawa.ll, Ironmonger and Manu-
facturer.
This improved lantern can be made of any shape and fitted
with gla<s, mica, or horn panes, or glass globes, or any other
contrivance for allowing the light to pass through ; the upper
part of the lantern having an opening for inserting a kettle,
can, bottle, or any other receptacle for holding fluids or food,
and which is heated by means of a candle, lamp, or other heat-
ing apparatus. The can, bottle, kettle, or other receptacle
cau be carried inside the lantern, if re [uired, for the purpose
of keeping the fluid or food warm. The opening in the upper
part of the lantern is fitted with a door either hinged or
slidiug, or other suitable contrivance to prevent the wind from
blowing out the lamp or candle.
3,279. — February 23rd, 1889. “ Flashing or Continuous
Lights.” Frederic William Hart, 8 and 9, Kingslaud
Green, London, N.E. , Manufacturer of Scientific Instru-
ments.
I would here premise that in Patent No. 356, January 9th,
1888, there is described by me in reference to fig. 3, a cham-
bered plug into which falls the magnesium or other inflam-
mable powder from the hopper above, and on turning the plug
half-way round, the contents are discharged into a container
below ; one, two, or more charges could be introduced, accord-
ing to the volume of light required, the volume and power of
the air blast being regulated as set forth by figs. 4 and 5 of
the said Patent. Now in the apparatus about to be described,
instead of the chambered plug discharging the powder into a
container for holding one or more measured charges, 1 dis-
charge the powder direct from a plug, tube, or other container,
•surrounded by a barrel or sleeve, to which is attached a hopper
or reservoir of the powder communicating with the chambered
plug, tube, or other container, or the two fittings may work
together over a port or ports, after the manner of the slide
valve of a cylinder, so that alternate flashes of light can be
given like the discharge from the exhausl tube of an engine, or
the hopper can be allowed to remain over one port, and thus
give forth a continuous stream of inflammable powder through
the aid of air from a fan, beiiows, or gas bottle under a regu-
lated pressure. In the ease of circular plugs or tubes, instead
of the plug or tube turning, the barrel or sleeve with a covered
hopper may turn on the plug or tube ; the hopper or sleeve is
fitted with means to ascertain when the reservoir of material
is becoming exhausted. In cases where india-rubber injection
balls or bottles are used for compressing air for the discharge of
| the inflammable matter, the valves of the Patent No. 356,
1888, are used for the purpose therein set forth. For igniting
the inflammable matter the pairs of flames are arranged in
line thus = = = =, one, two, or more, with intervals so that
there is free access of air or oxygen in all directions. When
gas is employed the burners are disposed on an adjustable frame
also movable on a joint for fixing, so that the light can be
directed at any angle from the horizontal to the vertical posi-
tion, the hopper and container for the inflammable material
travel' ing therewith, so that the discharge tube remains always
in line with the igniting burners, so as to produce at pleasure
innumerable combinations for dot and dash signals.
In combination with a flashing lamp or lamps for photo-
graphic, scenic, signal and other purposes, I employ portable
reservoirs of inflammable gas for igniting purposes, and where
numbers of separate flashes are required simultaneously, also
separate chambers of air or oxygen gas, each under regulated
pressure adjusted to the number of lamps and resistance to be
overcome.
3>465.. February 2 6th, 1889. “ Reproducing Pictures and
Designs. Henri Jules Le Boulch, Versailles, France.
By my invention a simple sheet of paper is used in place of
stones, or copper, or other plates ordinarily used for the repro-
duction and multiplication of designs of different sorts, such
stones or plates only being required to obtain, in the first
instance, the design upon the simple sheet of paper.
1 take a sheet of transparent paper or other sufficiently trans-
parent material, and I print upon it from the original stone or
plate containing the design, and I retain this printed sheet
until copies are required, when I transfer the design upon it to
the surface of a stone or other suitable support. For printed
or lithographed composition or designs, I make the print upon
paper coated with a gelatinous layer, and I then pass it through
a hath of solution of bichromate of potash, or other suitable
bichromate having the property of rendering gelatine insoluble ;
and I dry the sheet, expose it to light, then soak it in water
until the parts forming the original design completely disappear,
then dry it and treat it as a photographic negative. Or,
instead of the process just described, the design may be put
upon a sheet of paper coated with bichromated gelatine, then
exposed to light, developed in water, dried, and then treated
as a photographic negative. The gelatinised paper may be
replaced by any other kind of sensitised paper capable of giving
a negative in the same w'ay.
Or the design may be printed upon a sheet of paper with
gelatinous or mucilaginous ink, the sheet being then placed
face downward upon a surface of stone or zinc well covered
with black ink, which adheres to all the sheet except the gela-
tinous or mucilaginous design, and passed through a press, the
print being then dried and developed in water, the gelatinous
or mucilaginous design being washed away, and a negative being
thus obtained from which proofs can be produced.
By writing upon ordinary paper w ith ink of the same kind,
and treating the sheet in the way just described, a facsimile
negative is obtained, from which proofs can be obtained in the
same way.
Or a negative may be obtained by writing directly upon the
paper or other material with gelatinous or mucilaginous ink
slightly acidulated, treating the surface with greasy matter,
then washing and inking the surface, and printing from it.
Or a sheet of glass or paper may be coated with white
varnish, the print or sheet carrying the design being laid in
contact with the varnish, and the other side of the paper sup-
port being oiled ; the whole is then soaked in water, and a
positive is obtained from which a negative may be made in the
manner already described.
What I claim is : —
The methods of reproducing pictures and other designs sub-
stantially as described.
4,169. — March 9th, 1889. “ The Manufacture of Aluminium.”
John Leman Eckersley Daniel, 3, Victoria Street, West-
minster, Electrical Engineer.
My improved process, which is based on the well-known
laboratory experiments of Bunsen and St. Claire Deville, has
for its object the manufacture of aluminium on a commercial
scale, certain improvements being made in such experiments,
as hereinafter described, to enable the manufacture to be suc-
cessfully carried out.
In this process aluminium is produced by electrolysing the
double chloride of aluminium and sodium, and means are pro-
vided for maintaining the bath at all times in a uniform state
or condition.
The inventor claims : —
1. Maintaining a constant and continuous replenishment ov
regeneration of the bath with chloride of aluminium as fast as
it loses the same while undergoing electrolysis.
2. The construction aud use of apparatus, substantially as
described aud shown by drawings, for the continuous manu-
facture of aluminium on a commercial scale.
5,067. — 23rd March, 1889. “ Photometric Apparatus.” John
Methven, of the Gas Light and Coke Company’s Works, Nine
Elms, Surrey, Associate Member Institute of Civil Engineers.
My invention relates to that class of photometric apparatus
which are known as jet photometers, the object of the invention
being to render these apparatus more accurate and reliable than
heretofore.
It is a well kuown and accepted fact that jet photometers, as
at present constructed, are not to be relied upon to give an
228
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
accurate indication of the quality of the gas to be tested, and
the reason for this is, that not only the apparatus, but the gas
itself, are more or less seriously affected by changes in the con-
dition of the atmosphere, both as regards variations in tempera-
ture, and in the barometrical pressure.
It will be evident, then, that to obtain perfect accuracy in
indicating the illuminating power of the gas, two conditions are
necessary, viz., a constant temperature and a constant baro-
metrical pressure.
Now, my invention consists in the means whereby these two
conditions are practically provided for.
In carrying out my invention, 1 make use of the ordinary jet
photometers, whether they are constructed to indicate che
quality of the gas used by maintaining a constant height of
flame, and observing the pressure required to produce that
height of flame ; whether they are of a construction to indicate
the quality of the gas used by maintaining a constant pressure,
and observing the height of the flame produced by such constant
pressure ; or of any other form or description of jet photometer,
where a jet flame is used for the purpose of a photometer.
For the purpose of maintaining an uniform temperature of
and within the apparatus, I enclose in a water jacket the whole
of the gas way and the tank or vessel containing the water used
for indicating the pressure of the gas within the instrument,
and which is commonly known as a King’s gauge. The water
within the jacket I keep at a constant temperature by means
of circulating tubes attached to the water jacket, and heated by
a jet or jets of gas. These tubes project- through the box in
which the instruments are generally placed for the protection
from draughts, and the heating jets may be brought into con-
tact with them when desired.
A thermometer is inserted in the water jacket and in the gas
way of the instrument, so that the temperature can be always
ascertained.
In this way, the temperature of the gas in the gas ways, or
measuring parts of the apparatus, can always be maintained
constant.
A thermometer will also be placed in the box, so that the
general temperature in the box may be the same as the water
jacket.
Alterations in the barometrical pressure of the atmosphere
affect not only the volume of the gas in the measuring chamber
of the instrument, but also the combustion of the jet flame.
For instance, with a prevailing high barometer, the volume
of gas within the measuring chamber, or, m other words, the
volume of gas passing through the instrument, as indicated
by the pressure recorded by the “ King’s gauge,” is compressed ;
consequently, the quantity of combustible material passing
through the jet to form the flame is such that a longer flame
is required to consume it. The reverse is the action of a pre-
vailing low barometer. The volume of gas passing through
the instrument, as indicated by the pressure recorded by the
gauge, is expanded ; consequently, the quantity of combustible
material which forms the flame is less, and the flame is of
necessity shorter.
The means which I use to provide for changes in the baro-
metrical pressure consist of a movable scale, by means of which
I am enabled to ascertain what should be the height of the
flame, according to the barometrical pressure for the time
being.
The scale is attached to a frame secured to the top of the
instrument just beneath the socket of the jet burner, and which
extends upwards in front of and behind the jet flame. The
back of the frame is fixed at about two inches from the centre
of the flame, and the front portion at any distance being a
multiple of the distance the back is from the centre of the
flame. On the front portion of the frame is engraved the scale.
The centre portion of the front of the frame, which is made of
coloured glass, arranged to be adjusted by a screw arrangement,
is moved up or down the frame in guides provided for the pur-
pose, so that the top edge of the glass may be brought to the
mark on the scale indicating the height of the barometer for
the time being.
The height of the flame will be ascertained in the usual way,
by sighting the top edge of the movable blue glass, the top of
the flame, and the line fixed on the back of the frame. The
position of the line on the back of the frame is arrived at when
the instrument is rated by comparison with the results of the
standard photometer. Having adjusted the height of the flame,
the readings of the instrument may be regarded as indicating
the correct illuminating power of the gas by observing the pres-
sure necessary to give the adjusted length of flame. When
the instruments are designed to indicate the quality of the gas
by maintaining a fixed pressure, and observing the height of
the flame produced by such constant or fixed pressure, the scale
indicating the length of the flame may be marked on the mov-
able blue glass, and which may be adjusted in like manner to
the scale indicating the barometer for the time being ; the
length of flame will thus have the necessary correction for the
barometer prevailing.
I may also use, to provide for changes in the barometrical
pressure, a scale which I apply outside the ordinary scale on the
dial of the instrument, and which supplemental scale maybe
worked round the dial by means of a screw which projects
through the side of the box.
The supplemental scales 1 use result from observations ex-
tending over a long period of time, and, by taking a reading of
the barometer, anil bringing zero on the scale to the division at
which the pointer of the instrument is arrested, the exact
quality of the gas in caudle power can be read off.
Instead of moving the scale, 1 may secure it on the dial,
with zero point on the scale corresponding to zero on the dial.
Then, taking the reading of the barometer, I make the corre-
sponding reading on the scale zero for the time being, and
adjust the quantity of float water in the instrument to bring
the pointer opposite such division. In this manner I start
with the proper correction according to circumstances.
In these last-named means for providing for variations in
barometrical pressure, in which the scale is used as a supple-
mental scale to the dial of the instrument, or is attached to
the zero end of the dial, the results obtained .are equivalent
to those obtained by altering the height of the flame, but in
the latter case the correction is made on the pressure indicated
by the pointer of the “ King’s gauge.”
5,218. Marc. i 26 lit, 1889. “ Expansible Opera and like
Glasses.” Caroline Spilsbury Pocock, 2, The Elms, St.
Anns Hiil, Wandsworth, Surrey, Gentlewoman.
So far as can be judged by the drawings, this instrument
closes in an exceedingly neat manner, and the mounting
might possibly be made to suit a miniature binocular camera.
The inventress thus describes the arrangement.
According to the usual construction or arrangement of
opera glasses, field glasses, and the like, whether used alone or
in combination with views, boxes, or cases, the cases have been
of circular form telescoping one within the other to close them
to reduce their bulk or occupy less space than when drawn out.
Now the object of my invention is to dispense with these
cases which telescope within one another, and use a flexible or
yielding body which is compressible, such as leather, or water-
proof canvas, or other similar material affixed to the frame
composing the object glass and field glass ends, said leather
or canvas connection being of tapered form, so that when the
object glass frame is expanded or drawn away from the field
glass end, the article has the appearance of an ordinary leather
or canvas bound metal frame.
To the field or large glass end 1 arrange a hinge joint to each
half of the opera glass, and by leaves or strips hinged thereto,
and slotted, I can by a pin connected to the frames of the
object glasses retain the object glasses at the required distance,
or expanded from the field or larger glass end, the end of the
slot in the side strips having a kink in which the pin becomes
lodged to retain the article in an expanded form.
The object glasses may be carried in a separate frame to
that carrying the pins, and by means of a central screw the
focussing can be adjusted.
The parts betw'een the object glasses and the field or larger
glasses may be provided with springs to push the object glasses
into an expanded condition, and the slotted frames which
would limit the extent of expansion can also be arranged for
retaining the article in a closed stale.
March 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
229
5,525. April 1st, 1889. “ Photographic Hand Cameras.”
Denis McNamara, 25, South Terrace, Inchicore, Dublin,
Engine Fitter.
Its novel features are, first, a dry plate is changed and placed
in focal position and the shutter set, by the one movement,
thereby preventing the possibility of exposing the same plate
twice over through inadvertence or otherwise ; secondly, the
one button or knob serves .all purposes, viz., for changing dry
plate, for setting and discharging the shutter. Hence the
advantage by which a number of dry plates may be exposed in
very rapid succession.
In outward shape it consists of a rectangular box or case,
one end of which is recessed to receive the lens. Within said
case is a grooved box open at the side next to the lens, its
depth a little more than double that of the sensitised plates,
of which it is capable of holding twelve or more ; each of the
latter is inserted in a thin metallic sheath ; midway on the
inside of the two opposite walls of said box is formed a
horizontal groove parallel to the axis of the lens, through which
is passed a thin metallic plate or partition dividing it into two
compartments, the upper for the unexposed, and the lower
for the exposed plates, and on which it is capable of sliding ;
the ends of said partition are attached to the walls of outer
casing, and a slot is cut in the foimer sufficiently large to
allow one plate with its sheath to drop through at a time from
top to bottom compartment. Immediately beneath par-
tition and in said bottom compartment is a rod, one end
crossing said slot, so as to prevent a plate from dropping
through, and is kept in position by a spiral spring ; the other
end passes through wall of outer case at the end opposite to 1
the lens, and terminates in a joint, to which is attached a
lever actuated by a bar placed longitudinally on the outside
of camera, one end bearing at right angles against said lever ; j
the other terminates in a knob or button, which is used for
setting and discharging the shutter, and also for changing the
dry plates. On the bottom of the outer case is a sliding
cover through which the grooved box is charged with dry
plates. In doing so the plates are placed in their grooves in
the lower chamber, the camera being inverted according as
grooved box is moved along the partition ; each time a plate
comes over the said slot it drops through into the upper com-
partment, the rod being kept back so as to clear the slot by
pressing upon the knob during this operation.
The instantaneous shutter is inside the camera. A nozzle
or rim is formed at the back of the lens, on which is fitted a
cap capable of opening by a hinged joint at the bottom, and
actuated by a spindle, one end of which passes through the
outer wall of camera, terminating in a cross-piece forming a T
with said spindle. At one end of said cross-piece, at right
angles to it, and parallel with wall of outer ease, is secured
or formed a thin flexible arm of spring steel, the end of said
arm resting upon a ledge or stud when the shutter is closed ;
the other end of cross-piece, forming a crank with said spindle,
is used for the purpose of opening the cap by means of a
hook hinged on to a sleeve, and kept in position by a flat
spring. Said sleeve is capable of sliding upon the bar, to
which is attached knob or button heretofore mentioned, and
is actuated by a spiral spring slipped over said bar, one end
bearing against the sleeve, the other against a movable pin for
regulating the speed of the shutter. When said bar is
pushed forward by the knob the sleeve and hook are carried
with it, the spiral spring becomes compressed, the hook coming
into contact with cross-piece, and having a wedge-shaped end,
loops on to it ; when the finger is removed from said knob the
latter returns to its original position, being acted upon by the
spiral spring in grooved box, the hook retaining its hold upon
the cross-piece ; the shutter is now set.
To discharge the shutter, the knob is pushed in the
opposite direction, thereby bringing a thin flat projecting
piece secured to said bar into contact with flexible arm resting
upon projecting ledge, which yields by its flexibity, and is
pushed off said ledge ; the spiral spring now acting on the
hook shoots it forward, thereby turning round the cross-piece
with it, and opening the cap ; when said cross-piece arrives at
a certain angle the hook slips off, but the momentum
imparted to the cap causes the latter to strike an elastic band
or spring which causes it to rebound and lock itself once
more on projecting ledge.
To change a plate, the knob is pushed forward, the shutter
becomes set as before, the bar bearing against the end of
lever draws out the rod in grooved box, and a plate is dropped
into bottom compartment ; the pressure of the finger is now
removed from said knob, and the spiral spring brings back
said rod into its original position, but the latter, when
returning, comes into contact with the top edge of plate which
has just dropped, and pushes it forward, and being in its
groove it carries the entire grooved box along the sliding
partition until the next plate following up drops a short
distance down into slot in partition, and rests on top of rod ;
said plate becomes jammed in the slot by the pressure of the
rod still bearing on top edge of plate in bottom compartment,
thereby keeping the plate steady for exposing.
The plates when dropping would be liable to stick after
being jammed in the manner described. To overcome this,
the partition where it is attached at both ends to camera is
made to slide longitudinally through a short distance. A
lever Ls hinged on inside to wall of camera, one end bearing
against a stud on partition, the other end against a similar
stud on rod ; when the latter is drawn out the said lever
moves the partition, the grooved box remaining stationary, and
liberates the plate which had been jammed in the slot, thereby
allowing it to drop freely, said partition being brought back
again to position by a spring.
An indicator is attached to camera for the purpose of
[ registering the number of exposed plates. It consists of a
flat graduated bar connected to grooved box, and capable of
moving in a guide on the inside of camera, with a hole in the
, latter, forming light-tight communication with said guide, and
through which the number of exposed plate can be read from
the outside.
5,287. — March 27th, 1889. “ Focussing Field, Marine, and
Opera Glasses.” Samuel Joseph Levi, Optician, and Ernest
Carre, Clerk, of 40, Furnival Street, Holborn, London.
Our invention relates to an improved focussing motion for
field, marine, and opera glasses ; and it has for its object to
enable the glass to be more quickly and easily adjusted, which
is of importance, especially when, as in the case of a hore race,
the object viewed is in rapid motion, and its distance from the
observer is therefore constantly and quickly varying.
The invention consists in substituting for the ordinary screw
motion, a motion worked by a wheel, or preferably a pair of
wheels, turning on a transverse axis at right angles to the line
of motion of the central sliding spindle, and of such diameter
as to be readily worked by the pressure of the thumbs when
the instrument is held by both hands, as race glasses are usu-
ally held. Each wheel acts on the sliding spindle through a pin
or stud projecting laterally from the sliding spindle through a
longitudinal slot in its guide tube, the said pin or stud engag-
ing in a radial slot in the inner face of the wheel. Or instead
of a slot, each wheel may have a crank pin fixed to its inner
face, the said crank pin being connected with the stud on the
sliding spindle by a short connecting link. Instead of wheels
small levers may be used.
6,353. — April 1 3<A, 1889. “Photographic Apparatus for
Tourists.” Samson Albert Darier-Gide, 4, Rue Ilellot,
Geneva, Switzerland.
This invention can be adequately explained only by the aid
of diagrams.
19,691. — December 7th, 1889. “Photographic Cameras.”
Oscar Freeworth, of Lenkerbad, County Wallis, Switzer-
land, Gentleman.
The inventor claims : —
1 . In photographic cameras the arrangement consisting essen-
tially of a prism and eccentric discs which, when the prism is
turned, force the bellows, which are held firmly against the
prism by means of springs, away from the prism.
2. In connection with the arrangement described in the above
claim, the employment either of plate or film-frames connected
with each other, or, in case of sensitive paper, of rollers,
230
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
/ . . , lv.' . \
[March 21 , 1890.
(^oiTcsponticncc.
A PHOTOGRAPHIC SCHOLARSHIP.
Sih( May I beg you will insert enclosed correspondence
your next issue ? The matter appears of sufficient interest to
require public discussion, in order to arrive at the best method
of disposing of the gift in question.
I may say that my own feeling is to offer the sum as a
scholarship, to be competed for by examination amongst the
students of the schools of photography at the Polytechnic,
South Kensington, &c., and that the earning of such scholarship
should carry with it the necessity for a year’s residence and
study at one of the best schools of photography on the Continent.
I venture to think this method would tend to elevate the
art-science, and place it on a level with other special subjects
which are already similarly endowed. John Howson.
Mv deah Sir, — In looking over the programme of the
Conference I see amongst the agenda, a proposal to abolish trade
medals at exhibitions. Now, though I hold views on this
subject opposed to yours, I am quite ready to admit that
general feeling is against me ; and that being so, it is
manifestly for the benefit of photography that my views should
be put aside, and trade medals should disappear. Therefore
the Britannia Works Company will, in future, abstain from
offering any such medals. This I hope will be some little
help in clearing the way for a prompt and easy settlement of
the question, as my firm is one of the principal offenders.
I take this opportunity of recording my earnest conviction
that, however ripe the time may be now for such a sweeping
change, in the past the giving of trade medals has served a
good purpose, by stimulating competition, and bringing to
exhibitions good work which would have been absent in many
eases without such inducement. I claim, moreover, to have
credit given us for a real desire to further the art of photo-
graphy, as well as our own ends, in what we have done in the
past. To prove that we have been and are to a great extent
disinterested in our motives, I am pleased to inform you
that the Britannia Works Company have generously placed at my
disposal the sum of £100 per annum for three years as a
scholarship to be used as may best seem adapted to further
the interests of either the art or science side of photography,
with an expression of preference for the science side. To the
Camera Club, as the leading spirit in all forward movements
in the art, I desire to transfer this generous gift, and I trust
the Conference will see their way to accept it, and that we
may conjointly be able to dispose of it in a fitting way.
Jirokenhurst, Ilford, March 10th. John Howson.
G. Davison, Esq.
Dear Sir, — The Committee of the Club discussed the sub-
ject of your kind offer at their last meeting on Thursday last,
and requested me to thank you for your generous proposition.
At the same time it was thought that the best way of applying
the gift — or, rather, the best course to adopt — would be to
place the fund entirely at the disposal of a committee or trustees
formed independently of any one society, but rather from the
Photographic Society of Great Britain and other leading societies
conjointly. A representative committee formed in this way
would probably be able to suggest a method of applying such a
fund to advantage, either by offering inducement for research
and experiments in certain directions, or for original work of
value in any way bearing on the advancement of the science or
art of photography. G. Davison.
Camera Club, March 14f/i.
To John Howson, Esq.
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — Technical meet-
ing, Tuesday, March 25th, at 8 p.m., at the Gallery, 5a, Pall
Mall East.
Sheffield Camera Club. — At a meeting held on March
12th, Mr. H. W. Smith, representative of the Eastman Com-
pany, Ltd., gave a lecture on “Enlargements on Bromide
Paper.” After detailing the most suitable lights and deve-
lopers, he gave a practical demonstration on the Kastman
paper, explaining the process step by step.
Hvocectttncjs of Societies.
Camera Club.
ffThursday, March 13th, lantern slides were shown at the
Camera Club. Mr. Webber occupied the chair.
The Hon. Sec. handed round some collotype prints on
Japanese paper and satin by Mr. W. K. Burton. Some fine
Japanese paper, intended for experiment, were distributed to
those desiring pieces.
Professor Stebbing exhibited some collotype prints brought
from Paris, which had been produced by M. Balagny. Some
of these were on rough-surfaced papers. Mr. Stebbing stated
that within three-quarters of an hour of giving a negative to
M. Balagny, about twenty prints were given to him. He
thought that M. Balagny would introduce his method into
England, and he saw no reason why the amateur should not
have his own machine at a cost of about £4, and make his own
collotype reproductions.
A show of lantern slides was then given ; altogether, about
200 slides were brought or sent up by Messrs. W. M. Robertson,
Lane, Elder, Seyd, Ellis, Laurie, Fitz-Payne, Howlett, and
Grimshaw.
The subject on Thursday, March 27tli, will be “ Platiuotyi>e
Possibilities,” when Mr. W. Willis will read a paper. Meeting
at 8 p.m.
London University College Photographic Society.
March 1 1th. — Dr. R. T. Plimpton in the chair.
Dr. N. Collie, F.R.S.E., read a paper on “ The Chemistry
of Photographic Developers.” The simplest form of develop-
ment was first noticed, where a ferric salt has been reduced
by light to a ferrous salt, when the nearly invisible image can
be made visible by washing with ferricyanide of potassium, or
treating with a silver or gold salt, which metals are deposited
where the iron has been reduced, thus developing the image.
The development of the visible image on the photographic
plate was then noticed, and it was pointed out that in this
case, as only an infinitesimal quantity of haloid salt of silver
undergoes change during exposure to light, development has
to be carried on in a different way from that already noticed.
The alkaline developers — pyrogallic acid, liydroquinone, and
others — were next mentioned. These developers are charac-
terised by their great affinity for oxygen, and differ from
ferrous sulphate, the reaction of which with nitrate of silver
was discussed, in being able to reduce the haloid salts of silver.
The actual chemical change which takes place when a plate is
developed by any of these substances was shown to be the
same. It is a case of reduction of the silver salt by the
developer, but, as the developer contains no silver, the only
way in which the image can be built up is by the further
reduction of the silver salt in the film. The question why
silver is deposited on one part of the film and not on another,
thus forming the image, is explained by the assumption that
electro-chemical decomposition occurs. It was finally
pointed out that in all ordinary cases of development a
reducing substance was necessary, and usually the greater the
reducing power the more powerful the developer ; and, as
there are numberless substances amongst organic compounds
which possess this reducing power in a greater or less degree
(phenyl hydrazine was shown as an example), the choice of new
developers is, probably, by no means limited.
In the discussion which ensued, Mr. E. S. Worrall
criticised eikonogen as being admirably adapted for certain
kinds of work, but, to get a good negative, he preferred the
yellow image obtained by using the old-fashioned pyro developer.
The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 25th,
which will be a lantern night, and the last meeting this term.
Derby Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held at the Rooms in Derwent Street
on Thursday last ; Mr. A. B. Hamilton presided.
Mr. Bankart, of Leicester, gave a lecture on “ Development,”
and exhibited a number of his negatives.
March 21, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
231
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 13th inst. Mr. L. Medland occupied the
chair.
The evening was devoted to judging lantern slides put in for
competition by the members. The slides were all made from
three quarter-plate negatives chosen for the purpose, which
were passed to each intending competitor in turn. The sub-
jects were : — “Land’s End, Seascape,” “Old Houses at New
Lyn,” and “Children Gathering Seaweed.” The slides were
projected on the screen side by side from two lanterns supplied
and manipulated by Mr. T. E. Freshwater, the slide judged to
be the best being left on the screen until displaced by one voted
to be better.
At the conclusion it was found that Mr. J. I!. 15. Wellington’s
slides had taken first place in all three subjects, and also the
second place with two of the subjects, Mr. 1). W. Atkins taking
the other. Mr. Wellington’s slides were made from collodio-
bromide plates. Mr. I). W. Atkins used gelatine plates. The
competition was an exceedingly close one in several cases, and
.-rested a great amount of interest among the members.
West London Photographic Society.
A meeting was held 14th March, Mr. E. W. Foxi.ee in the
chair.
Mr. H. Sei.by gave a paper and demonstration on “ Eastman
Stripping Films.” The lecturer said although condemned to
die a natural death, owing to the introduction of celluloid films,
yet stripping films, in the hands of careful workers, presented
few difficulties, and were undoubtedly superior to glass in the
matter of portability, storage, and immunity from damage if
dropped. He attributed his early failures to neglect of the
instructions issued by the Company. He seldom dealt with
more than two films at a time. The great point was not to
leave the film more than ten minutes in washing water after
development and fixing. After that time he placed them in an
aeid bath composed of acetic acid 1 0 minims, water 1 0 ounces,
in which they were left all night. Films so treated always
stripped without trouble. It was very essential to have clean
glass. He did not use rubber solution, but polished the glass
with French chalk, employing a thin collodion made by the
Company. His mode of working differed from that recom-
mended by the Company in the following particulars : he did
not strip the same evening as he developed ; he never used
rubber solution ; he did not place the film on glass support
under water, it being easy to avoid bubbles without so doing ;
he never used glycerine and alcohol, and did not varnish the
gelatine skin.
In the course of the discussion which ensued, Mr. Hazeon said
he had developed only five films, given him by a friend. He had
used neither skins, collodion, or rubber solution, but he suc-
ceeded in stripping all of them without mishap.
Mr. Wilson, in developing Kodak films, used a weak solution
of sulphuric acid and water. He sometimes left them several
hours under pressure, not allowing them to dry ; they then
always stripped. He rather liked the operation of collodion-
ising and coating with rubber, and therefore employed both
solutions, although sometimes with the rubber there was a
tendency of the film to stick locally.
Mr. Stein had found the film negative detach itself from its
skin sometimes, and that when collodion had been employed.
Mr. Rickford wished to know why hydroquinone rotted the
film. It did not seem to do so in all cases.
Mr. W ILSON had found the films melt away in a hydrokinone
developer, which, however, contained caustic soda.
Mr. Hodges considered a roll-holder and films far more con-
venient on tour than plates ; the negatives, owing to the
absence of halation, were full}’ equal, if not superior, to those
on glass. They also were very suitable for enlarging, the
mat surface backing producing a very soft effect. By copying
a small transparency in the enlarging camera the film side out,
and enlarging on transferotype paper, or a stripping film,
enlarged negatives could be readily and cheaply produced.
Mr. Roland 'Whiting wished to know’ whether the film
would give a good bite to the retouching pencil. The collodion
surface seemed to be very glossy.
Mr. Foxi.ee thought the collodion film a very valuable part of
the process, and Mr. Hazeon ought to attribute his success to
sheer good luck. The collodion not only protects the stripped
film, but holds it together while upon the glass, and to avoid
risk it was better to employ a preliminary coating of rubber
solution. In very refractory cases lie had used boiling water
with success, which could have done without a rubber sub-
stratum. Damp sometimes caused the insoluble ehromated
emulsion to affect the soluble substratum of gelatine ; difficulty
in stripping them occurred ; the weak acid solution, however,
remedied this defect. He did not leave the films under pres-
sure more than ten minutes. It was a mistake to leave them
soaking after fixing, because the pyro exercised a tanning
action on the soluble gelatine, and if the film were allowed to
dry before stripping, the difficulty of stripping would be greater.
He had never found the films become detached, and was at a
loss to assign a reason.
Mr. Hodges thought it might be due to the presence of
grease, or to careless squeegeeing.
The next meeting will be on March 28th, a lantern night,
when friends are invited.
Glasgow Photographic Association.
March 6th. — Mr. William Lang, jun., F.C.S., in the
chair.
A paper on “The Sizes of Plates” (see page 220), by Mr.
J. Craig Annan, was read, and a discussion followed, the
general outcome of which was that if an adjustment should
be made, it should be done on an international basis.
A picture taken by an automatic photographic apparatus
was afterwards shown to the members. It had evidently been
tiken on a wet plate, but particulars of the apparatus itself
had not been given in sufficient detail to explain the modus
operand i.
Mr. Patrick Falconer followed with a communication —
“A Neglected Dry-plate Process,” showing results obtained by
the method, both transparencies and negatives. The process
in question is one put forw’ard by Mr. Hannaford in 1861,
where the sensitised collodion plate, after being washed, is
coated with a preservative of white of egg to which a
certain amount of nitrate of silver has been added, and the
albuminate of silver formed dissolved in ammonia. Mr.
Falconer has worked the process for twenty-five years. The
speed of the plate would appear to be very rapid, Mr.
Falconer and the President having made transparencies
shown at the meeting on the screen by means of the Asso-
ciation’s lantern, when the exposure behind a negative did not
amount to more than a second or two in front of an
ordinary batswing burner. The image was brought out by
means of eikonogen, and afterwards strengthened by means of
pyro, citric and glacial acetic acids, and silver.
Several photographic novelties were shown, and an exhibi-
tion of transparencies by means of the Association’s lantern
concluded the evening’s programe.
Photographic Society of Ireland.
A meeting was held at the Rooms, Dawson Street, Dublin, on
the 14th inst., with Mr. Greenwood Pim in the chair. After
election of four new members,
Mr. Louis Meldon read a paper on “Shutters.” He said
that he would confine himself to observations on instantaneous
work, and the lenses most suitable. Having explained the
working of the Wilson chronograph, which he used as his
timing apparatus, he went on to say that shutters might best
be classified relatively to the position they occupy when used
with the ordinary form of doublet lens : 1st, on the hood of
the lens ; 2nd, between the two combinations ; 3rd, imme-
diately behind the lens ; 4 th, immediately in front of the
plate. The fourth class he intended at once to dismiss, for,
although its position was in many respects the most favourable
of all, the advantages were much out-balanced by the incon-
venience due to the large size of the apparatus needed. An
ideal shutter, he said, was one which, if it were possible, would
open to its full aperture suddenly, and without lapse of time,
and, having remained open a certain time, would close suddenly
232
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 21, 1890.
again. Mr. Meldon, having considered most of the instan-
taneous shutters in general use amongst photographers, pro-
ceeded to describe his own, and passed through the lantern some
specimens of its work.
Leicester and Leicestershire Photographic Society.
A meeting was held in the Mayor’s Parlour, Old Town Hall, on
March 12th, Mr. S. S. Partridge in the chair. Mr. Thos.
Scotton was elected a member of the Society.
The silver and bronze medals were presented to the successful
competitors in the lantern slide competition— Mr. Porritt and
Mr. Joliffe respectively. The competition for silver and bronze
medals for enlargements offered by Mr. F. Pierpoint was
declared void, in consequence of the number of entries not
complying with the conditions. The competition was postponed
until the October meeting, when silver and bronze medals will
be offered by Mr. Pierpoint for the best enlargement, members
to enter not more than three specimens for competition. The
medals are offered on condition that not less than three compete
for the silver, and five for the silver and bronze medals.
North Middlesex Photographic Club.
The annual dinner was held at Beale’s Restaurant, Holloway,
on the 15tli inst., Mr. J. Humphries, F.S.A., in the chair.
The usual loyal toasts having been honoured,
Mr. J. W. Marchant proposed the toast of the evening,
“The North Middlesex Photographic Club and its Officers,”
which w as responded to by the
Chairman, who briefly sketched the position of the Club,
and alluded to the ability and energy displayed by the council
and lion, secretary (Mr. G. R. Martin) in the past year, and to
the successful maimer in which the arrangements in connection
with the recent exhibition of photographs and soiree had been
carried out by them. The roll of membership had increased,
as also had the finances of the Club. The lectures and demon-
strations had been well attended.
Mr. Brocas (Holborn Camera Club) acknowledged the toast
of “ Kindred Societies.”
Mr. G. R. Martin (hon. secretary), who replied to the toast
of “ The Press,” said he was glad of the opportunity of stating
how much the Club was indebted to the Press in reporting
their meetings.
Mr. Davall, senr., responding for “The Visitors,” referred
to the wonderful advances made in photography, particularly
in the astronomical direction.
During the evening, a varied series of vocal and instrumental
music added to the entertainment.
The menu card consisted of an original design by Mr. Saville,
photographed and finished by Mr. Beckett, both members of
the Club.
♦
The Photo-Nephograph. — In the exhibition at the Meteoro-
logical Society, w'as Captain Abney’s photo-nephograph, or
cloud camera, which Mr. Whipple described as an apparatus
not yet fully developed. He said that its object is to
obtain simultaneous instantaneous photographs of the same cloud
from two or three stations situated at a distance from half
a mile and upwards from each other. These simultaneous pic-
tures are then utilised for determining the positions of clouds
above the surface of the earth, and so obtaining a knowledge
of the upper currents of the air, their direction and motion at
heights far above those at which anemometers can be placed,
and in places where they may be supposed to be unaffected by
the irregularities and eddies formed by excrescences, such as
hills and valleys, which modify the contour of the earth’s sur-
face. At Kew, two cameras fitted to theodolites are erected
on stands half a mile apart, but electrically connected by an
underground telegraph wire. Each camera is provided with an
adjustable instantaneous shutter, which can be manipulated by
an electric current at the will of the directing operator. The
modus operand! is as follows : — A first points his camera at a
selected cloud, and then having instructed the observer at the
remote station B, through a telephone, as to the direction in
which he should place his instrument, releases both shutters at
the same instant of time, so obtaining a pair of pictures in
which the stereoscopic effect affords the required data.
to ('Tomspontfcnta!.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
All A ivertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic Nkws, Messrs Piper <fe Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London
M. E. — Asbestos Wicks. We have had no experience with
asbestos wicks, but imagine that they would not be less
liable to clog, for a carbon deposit would be formed at the
top, and entail the necessity of occasionally igniting the
.asbestos to get rid of it. Try the experiment for yourself,
either with the loose fibres or a strip of asbestos cloth.
C. N. W. — Photogravure Details. Try to attend the prac-
tical demonstration to be given at the Camera Club Con-
ference this afternoon, about 5 p.m., at the Society of Arts.
You will be admitted on signing the visitors' book.
Retoucher. — The Address of Herr Fritz Luckardt is Hotel
National, Vienna. You will find an account of his studio
and special device for glazing the roof in the article, “ Fritz
Luckardt at Home,” at page 400 of our vol. xxv.
R. B. B. (Dennistown). — Etching of Glass. There are two i
methods: the first, producing “satin effects,” is done by
hydrofluoric acid alone. For a dead-white etching, make a
mixture, in a gutta-percha or lead bottle, of very finely
powdered fluor-spar with enough strong oil of vitriol to
form a thin paste, and allow time for the acid to decompose
the calcium fluoride. Write with a quill pen or small brush
dipped in the fluoric ink on the glass direct, without either
wax or varnish for protection. After a few minutes’ contact,
wash off and dry with filter-paper. A small proportion of
precipitated sulphate of baryta is sometimes added to thicken
the ink before use, and give more opacity.
V. R. (Malta). — Method of Reviving Daguerreotypes. The best
process is by immersion in a very weak solution of cyanide
of potassium, watching carefully until the image is just
cleared, and then quickly washing under a tap, with final
rinse in distilled water. Allow’ to dry spontaneously in
the air.
M. F. — A Small Studio. The information you require is given
in Mr. H. P. Robinson’s little book entitled “ The Studio ; j
and what to do in it,” published by Messrs. Piper and
Carter. A very compact form of studio was described by
Dr. John Anthony, at the April, 1870, meeting of the
Photographic Society. See the Journal of that date. But
the details of construction must always be to some extent
governed by local circumstances. You might be able to
build one for the sum named, but the calculation v’ould be
rather close.
H. B. — Your letter received, signed, and passed on to the
Kingsland Branch.
M. E. P. — The Crystal Palace Exhibition remains open until
Saturday, 29th inst. The lantern display is better than
ever ; two new lenses, of three inches clear aperture, with big
lime lights, project the image upon the screen, which is said
to be 35 feet in diameter. The amplification is therefore
about 140 times. Ask Mr. Brooks to let you see the
apparatus.
D. W. — Received the four cabinet vignettes. They are,
indeed, excellent, and we will write you respecting them in
the course of a few days.
F. S. — Iris Diaphragm. The only objection arises from the
chance of grit getting into the working parts ; but against
this you may put down the loss of time in changing the
sliding diaphragms, and the possibility of leaving them
behind, or of dropping them into long grass or heather in
the field.
E. P. — Fading of Silver Prints. The liabity to change has
been vastly over-rated, for if carefully fixed and thoroughly
well washed, finishing off with hot v’ater, the longevity is
quite remarkable. \Ye have seen some notable instances
lately of good prints not appreciably affected in thirty
years.
Several other corespondents in our next.
THE
PHOTOGRAPHIC
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1647. — March 28, 1890.
CONTENTS.
P AO K
The Invisible Photographic Image 233
Tht Camera Club Conference 234
Mr. Rossi on “ Photography and Drawing” 234
Regulations for Photographic Exhibitions 234
Lord Rayleigh on “ Photography by the Light of the
Electric Spaik ” 230
Capt. Abney on “ A Photographic Untruth ” 237
Mr. C. II. Bothamley on “The Latent Image'’ 237
Mr. W. T. Wilkinson on “ Photo-Mechanical Printing” ... 237
The Club Dinner 237
On Differences of Colour-Sensitiveness at Different Times. By
Professor II. W. Vogel 239
PAOX
Severe Tests of Compressed Gas Cylinders 239
Photographing a Speaker’s Gestures 240
Mounting Lantern Slides 241
Notes 242
Children. By A Photographer 243
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 245
What Photography will Not Do 24C
Patent Intelligence 247
Correspondence— A Photographic Scholarship— Challenge Cup
Competition at the Crystal Palace 250
Proceedings of Societies 25#
Answers to Correspondents 252
THE INVISIBLE PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE.
The nature of the invisible photographic image being
unknown, the wisest course is to weigh all the different
hypotheses at present in existence, and not to try to
raise any one of them to the level of a kind of Athana-
sian Creed which must not be denied without the in-
dividual falling under the ban of heresy. Mr.
Bothamley did not do this in his paper read before the
Camera Club Conference, still there may be no harm
in pointing out some of the arguments in favour of
the dynamical hypothesis of the nature of the in-
visible image .
The chemical hypothesis is that the molecule of
bromide of silver is decomposed by the action of light.
The dynamical hypothesis is that it perhaps is not
decomposed, but that the interatomic vibrations of the
molecule are modified, and that the affinity of the
bromine for the silver is thereby somewhat weakened
by the action of light, so that the developer acts more
easily thereupon, and decomposes the modified molecule
more quickly than if it had not been acted upon by light.
The initial effect of the light is undoubtedly of this
kind, because an instantaneous action is unknown to
science ; every decomposition requires time, for all
nature works as if upon springs. A bottle of mixed
hydrogen and oxygen gases, for instance, cannot be
exploded all at once ; experiment has proved that a
portion of the mixed gases remains unburnt. On these
principles the dynamical hypothesis is certainly to
[ some extent true, even if the chemical hypothesis
should be the true one in relation to the final
phenomenon of an invisible image on the plate when
the latter is ready for development.
In the abstract of the paper given last Friday by
Mr. Bothamley, the main argument against the
dynamic hypothesis was, that if light merely modified
the motions of the constituents of the molecule, in
the course of months or years the motions would
resume their original character, and the fact would be i
indicated by the dying out of the invisible image on
the plate, so that no picture could be brought out by
development.
For the sake of simplicity in illustration, two atoms
only may be assumed to be in a state of some kind of
vibration in relation to each other, and to place a de-
finite picture in the mind’s eye, we will compare these
two atoms with the sun and the earth, calling the sun
an atom of silver, and the earth an atom of bromine.
Leverrier first proved that the orbit of the earth
varies with time, in consequence of perturbations set
up by the planets. At the present time the path of
the earth round the sun is nearly circular, and at mid-
winter the earth is nearly ninety-one millions of miles
from the sun ; but when the orbit was at its greatest
eccentricity the earth was nearly ninety -nine millions of
miles from the sun at midwinter. One period of great
eccentricity began 240,000 and ended 80,000 years ago,
and is one which is quoted by Dr. Croll and others in
support of the astronomical theory of glacial epochs, a
theory more generally accepted by scientific men than
any other. In the thousands of consecutive years dur-
ing which the earth is at midwinter more than, say,
four millions of miles from the sun than at present, it
neither breaks away from the sun, which would corres-
pond to the decomposition of our imaginary molecule,
nor does it come back in a few months or years, or
hundreds of years, to its present path round the sun .
The objection may be raised that in the matters of
weight and speed it is not fair to compare the infinitely
great with the infinitely small, but the response is that
little is known about atoms ; nobody has ever seen one,
nor is much known about the immense forces which
control their motions. Professor Tyndall often amused
Royal Institution observers by bursting bombshells by
means of the molecular force exercised by water when
in the act of freezing.
The argument was put forth at last week’s Con-
ference that there is no doubt as to the decomposition
of the molecule, because of the smell emitted by large
IT
234
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
numbers of bromide plates when exposed to strong
daylight at works where they have been spoilt in the
course of manufacture. Nobody denies, however, that
light, when it acts long enough, may set up chemical
decomposition, though this is not so clear in the case
of absolutely pure iodide of silver when not in contact
with any other chemical substance, so far as man can
surround it with such conditions.
Mr. Carey Lea, who accepted the dynamic hypo-
thesis soon after it was first published by its two origi-
nators, has changed his opinion at least three times as
to the nature of the invisible image, and there would
be nothing surprising if he changed it again next
week. This is to his credit; it proves him to be a
philosopher who does not dogmatise, but changes his
opinions from time to time as newly revealed facts
come under his notice.
One of the functions of trained scientific men is that
of experimentally investigating such problems as these,
and much chemical and mathematical investigation
will have to be brought to bear upon the particular
question now under notice. The chemist may hereafter
tell us what is given off by bromide plates when
exposed to sunlight, and the mathematician may bring
evidence to bear as to the possible duration of modified
interatomic motions, assuming such to exist. Professor
Dewar took up safe ground when he stated that it is
an exceedingly difficult task to determine what takes
place when light first strikes a photographic film.
Professor Meldola is to lecture on this subject a few
weeks hence at the Royal Institution, and what he has
to say thereupon cannot fail to be of interest.
THE CAMERA. CLUB CONFERENCE.
The Fibst Day’s Proceedings.
A report of the first day’s proceedings of the Camera
Club Conference was published in these pages last
week, and to-day we add a brief portion of Mr. Rossi’s
paper read thereat, as follows : —
Mr. Rossi on “Photography and Drawing.”
Mr. Rossi, in the course of a paper on the above subject,
said : —
The marvellous perfection to which photography has
risen, and the facilities that she offers us, have so minimised
the long and tedious years of an art education, that a youth
born an artist can now accomplish, in as many months,
that which would have taken him so many years to learn
before photography.
The three great components that constitute an artist are
design, drawing, colouring. By design we understand the
idea, the scheme, the conception that an artist wishes to
express. This is a creative faculty, and, like colour,
cannot be taught; if it is to some extent acquired by
tuition, it will be destitute of individuality and void of
originality. Drawing is the necessary foundation of paint-
ing, without which it is impossible to obtain the images of
things or their action, their just proportions, expressions, or
animation.
This knowledge, though infinitely easier to some than
to others, can be sooner or later acquired, and by practice
can be perfected. Colouring, as we said before, is an
instinct born with us. Every man has a genius— the evil,
the dormant, the sluggish, and the bright genius that in-
spires in our works that mysterious breath of the spirit
that makes us see lovely images. Unfortunately for many,
their mind has been unable to carry them beyond the
borders of the boundless area of mediocrity to get a glimpse
of the glorious fields of immortality. Nevertheless, their
academical education has not been lost, for it has given
them experience, which has convinced them that a true
artist now is not made at an academy, or in any of the
numberless schools where young people flock by the hun-
dred to the destruction of art, but by going to nature ; and
if such youths who can from nature’s inexhaustible book
get inspiration and learning, devoted themselves to art, it
would be a blessing for all connected with it. Michael
Angelo called with Vasari one day on Titian, at the Belvi-
dere at Rome, to see a picture of a naked figure of Dauea.
Many of the guests began to praise the work highly, as do
people when the artist is present, and Michael Angelo,
when all had left, declared that the manner and colouring
of Titian pleased him greatly, but that it was a pity that the
Venetian did not study drawing more, for if, he added, the
artist had been as aided by art and knowledge of design as
he had by nature, he would have produced works that
none would surpass.
I would ask you, if an artist of Titian's gigantic powers
lived now, and had produced a picture of a naked figure,
would he have incurred the criticism that his great
brother artist passed upon him ? I think not ; for
conscious, as great men generally are, of the weak point
in their works, he would be sure to use all the legitimate
means in his power to secure a correct outline before
applying to it his fascinating powers of painting. 1 can
therefore well imagine a nineteenth century Titian taking a
good photograph of that lie has conceived with his imagi-
nation, and tracing it on his canvas to his size before
painting from his model, and thus he would be sure to
produce that which the modern Michael Angelo would
admire, not only in the manner and colouring, but also in
the drawing. It is indisputable that photography has
destroyed all conventionality and mannerism in art, and
has shown us the correct way of drawing, by placing
before our eyes the true forms of lovely things and of all
things.
Mr. Rossi concluded his paper by expressing his firm
belief that the only teachable part of art, which is draw-
ing, is sinking with the rising of photography, and, in his
humble belief, the days are not far off when a youth, born
with artistic instincts, in a few months of mechanical in-
struction can be his own teacher, and photography will be
his academy.
The Second Day’s Proceedings.
The second and last day’s proceedings of the Con-
ference began last Friday morning in the hall of the
Society of Arts, London, under the presidency of Capt.
W. de VV. Abney.
Discussion on Regulations for Photographic
Exhibitions.
Mr. George Davison read a variety of papers and letters
upon photographic exhibitions, in the course of which he
stated that the following opinions had been expressed by
various societies and exhibitors at a representative con-
ference in 1888 : —
1. Length of Notice. —Unanimous that long notice should
be given.
March 28, 1890.]
235
rHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
2. Previous Announcement of Judges. — The meeting at the
Camera Club in 1888 was unanimous in favour of early
announcement of judges’ names, and there was a large
preponderance of replies from influential exhibitors con-
sulted in which the same view was definitely taken.
3. As to Classification. — Opinions divided, but consider-
ably in favour of classification by “ subject.”
4. Awards or no Awards. — A large majority of opinion
that awards are generally desirable at photographic exhibi-
tions.
5. As to Frequent Exhibition of Prize Pictures. — The 1888
meeting decided by a large majority in favour of a
champion class ; but there was a very large preponderance
of opinions from leading exhibitors that medalled pictures
should only be restricted by a time limit varying from one
to three years from date of first exhibition.
6. As to the Amount of Work to be Performed by the Exhi-
bitor.— All the written opinions urged the necessity of
selection, exposure, development, and printing being the
work of a competitor, a fair sprinkling making an excep-
tion as regards mounting. The meeting added a unani-
mous resolution that where competitive exhibits were the
work of more than one operator, the same should be noti-
fied in the catalogue.
7. Judges for Art Section. — The 1888 meeting preferred,
by a majority, that the judges in the Art section should
be “ photographers, admitted authorities on the artistic
side of photography,” rather than solely “ artists recognised
in the artistic world. ”
8. Judges for Scientific Classes. — Unanimous that experts
only be adjudicators.
Other points which were unanimously agreed upon were
as follows : —
9. All awards should be of equal value.
10. The granting of large numbers of awards, and the
acceptance by exhibition authorities of prizes offered for
the purposes of advertising, greatly to be deprecated.
11. That some limit be imposed upon the number of
photographs to be accepted from one exhibitor.
He added that opinions on some of these points had
since been modified, and that the discussion thereof would
be useful.
As recommendations the Club put forward the follow-
ing suggestions: — (a) That the power of rejection of infe-
rior entries should be rigidly exercised ; ( b ) that with
reference to Rule 6 greater effort should be made to
encourage the exhibition of photographs, specimens, and
other things illustrating the application of photography to
various sciences and industries ; (e) that retouching be
declared; (d) that proper and full provision be made for
re-packing pictures for transit ; (?) that a small charge
for wall space — minimum 2s. 6d. for 10 square feet — be
made ; (/) that the number of photographs sent in to any
one section by each exhibitor be limited ; ( g ) that each
photograph in the Art section shall be separately framed.
Any distinction between amateur and professional in
photographic exhibitions is considered absolutely unneces-
sary, and greatly to be deprecated.
The Club looks forward to a time when it may be possi-
ble to dispense with awards entirely, and would approve
of an exhibition in which no medals were offered, but in
which greater stringency was exercised by the committee
of selection, so that the honour of being hung would con-
stitute an award.
Mr. Mansfield, president of the Dublin Photographic Society,
objected to the formation of a champion class at exhibitions.
Mr. Davison found the objection to a champion class to be
general. He added that Mr. Robinson had written, stating
the best exhibition system to be that of the Photographic
Society of Great Britain, that champion classes are objection-
able, and that he thought that the disqualification of photo-
graphs which have previously taken one prize would amount to
giving place to second-rate pictures. He objected to a division
between amateurs and professionals, but thought that if one
were made, it should be absolute. He likewise thought that
excessive retouching should be discouraged. Mr. F. Hollyer
wrote that the champion demon should be knocked out ; he
had known many champions in his time, and they all drank
themselves to death. Mr. Sutcliffe wrote that all prizes should
be declined which savoured of trade, and that a total of about
ten medals should be given to each five hundred exhibits.
Judges’ names should be published from the outset, that
photographers might know whether to exhibit or not. He was
in favour of separating amateur and professional work at
exhibitions. Messrs. Cembrano, F. Evans, and others had also
written on the subject. The Camera Club found the number
of awards to be out of all proportion to the number of photo-
graphs exhibited, and that they were seldom withheld. The
secretary to the Photographic Society of Great Britain wrote
that the council hoped that the step taken by the Club would
lead to some general agreement, and hoped that the suggested
regulations for exhibitions would be drawn up somewhat on
the lines of the annual exhibition of the Photographic
Society.
The Rev. F. C. Lambert would like to gather general
opinions on several points, and thought that rules and recom-
mendations should be separated. He did not wish the idea
of classification to be suppressed for photographs which were
not upon attractive subjects, for then the latter would have
little chance of being recognised. He thought it to be
undesirable that editors should be judges, and that all the
work over the photographs on view should be done by the
exhibitor or exhibitors. On the principle of “one day’s
work one day’s pay,” he hoped that no picture would receive a
second award, and that there should be some time limit ; for
instance, it might be a rule that photographs exhibited should
have been taken within the previous twelve months. There
might be one champion class once a year, but he should prefer
the abolition of champion classes altogether. He thought
that in judging, technical excellence should weigh somewhat,
but artistic excellence chiefly.
Mr. C. W. Hastings said that it was all very well for the
Camera Club to lay down rules, but could provincial societies
adhere to them ? He suggested that a permanent photographic
exhibition committee should be formed in London, that the
councils of the Camera Club and Photographic Society should
be drawn upon for such committee, and that the presidents of
provincial photographic societies should be members thereof ;
there should also be local provincial exhibitions and sub-com-
mittees. No picture should take a second prize, and perma-
nent judges should be appointed. All medals and diplomas
should come from the permanent committee. Champion classes
had been established to keep out “pot hunters.”
Mr. W. D. Welford wished to try to represent the feelings
of the provinces in the matter. He agreed with the principles
expressed by the Camera Club, but thought that it would not
be safe to pass the rules and recommendations as they stood,
because they would be thought impracticable, for exhibitions
in the provinces ran on different ground to those in London.
One of the aims of provincial exhibitions is to educate the
public as to the claims of artistic photography ; it is also
necessary that they should pay, and the rules before them
would prevent exhibitions being held. Practical and not
ideal rules were required, especially as there are more exhibi-
tions in the provinces than in London. Everything seemed to
depend on the judges, and that the exhibitors should have
confidence in them. He thought that editors should not be
judges, because they might have to express opinions else-
where on the exhibits ; he also thought that technique should
not be entirely lost sight of in judging. To abolish all classi-
fication was too sweeping a change, and he did not see what
236
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
gain there would be to art by making a distinction between the
amateur and the professional photographer.
Mr. A. Mask ell was opposed to any system of prizes,
awards, or judges, and if the Camera Club did not have them,
he could not see why it should try to lay down rules on these
subjects for others. He objected to advertising prizes. He
should like to see an annual salon or academy, at which it
would be an honour to have pictures hung on its walls, and
the judges — that is to say, the hanging committee — should be
mainly sought from without. In the arts, much work is done
by assistants ; and in photography, in which so much of the
work is mechanical, he did not think this matter was one which
need be inquired into. He hoped that the term “ amateur ”
would soon be disused. At all international exhibitions
photography has been placed in the background, and the
exhibits put in any out-of-the-way places ; and photographic
meetings seem to be recognised by an ignoring press as dealing
neither with mechanics nor with art.
Sir David Salomons objected to landscapes and portraits
being classified under the same heading ; he did not see how
they could be compared in giving one award. As for those
firms who offered trade medals, he never bought goods of them,
and he advised his friends to take the same line of action. If
judging went only upon artistic merits, technical photography
would soon go down hill. Nine out of ten photographers
admitted retouching to be necessary in portraiture whenever
there was no power to select the subject, and landscapes could
often be improved by introducing clouds ; so photographs
produced on such lines ought not to be disqualified.
Mr. H. Trueman Wood thought the classification of the
Photographic Society to be good, and that it had worked well.
The rules before them, he thought, should be referred back to
the Camera Club Committee, which could thenjbe guided by
the light thrown upon them by that discussion.
Mr. Davison then gave his persona' views, which were, in
reply to Mr. Lambert, that he thought it to be far easier for
the judges if there were no classification. As to Sir David
Salomon’s objection, there was a provision in the rules, for the
judges had the power of deciding how many awards should be
made. Some workers produced but one or two artistic pictures
in a year, and the competition system prevented some of the
best work being exhibited. A suggestion had been made that
in judging, attention should be “chiefly” instead of entirely
given to artistic merit. He thought that the two things —
technical and artistic merit — could not be separated. Some of
the suggestions of Mr. Hastings deserved consideration. Mr.
Welford had argued that classification would interfere with the
success of local exhibitions, but he (the speaker) did not see
that at all ; he agreed with the ideas of Mr. Masked, and was
of Mr. Trueman Wood’s opinion that the matter had better be
postponed.
Mr. Macey Wright wished to know if all editors were to be
excluded from being appointed judges.
The President replied that the rule was meant to apply to
the editors of photographic newspapers. As to Mr. Maskell’s
remarks, if the Photographic Society was not recognised by the
scientific press, it was entirely its own fault, for when scientific
papers were read before it, some of the members said that they
were too abstruse and had better be taken somewhere else.
The report was then referred back to the Camera Club
Committee.
Lord Rayleigh on “Photography by the Light of the
Electric Spark.”
Lord Rayleigh, Secretary to the Royal Society, and Pro-
fessor of Natural Philosophy at the Royal Institution, said
that in response to an invitation from their Hon. Sec., he
had attended to describe his experiments upon the above
subject. He had had occasion to photograph the drops into
which jets of water burst soon after issuing from a nozzle or
from a hole in a plate, and the jets under examination varied
from \ inch to inch in diameter. They were in a state of
unstable equilibrium, for the tendency of such cylindrical
bodies of water is, to separate into drops bearing a tolerably
definite relation to the diameter of the particular jet.
He then projected upon the screen by means of the lantern
a photographic picture of that part of the jet at which
it breaks into drops. As the drops are sometimes
at the rate of about 100 per second, to photograph them sharply
the time of exposure must be limited to a great deal less than
liiVo a second, and in some cases to of a second. A
very great degree of luminous intensity in the images thrown
upon the plate is therefore necessary, and he did not think that
this could be obtained by means of ordinary photographic appli-
ances. He added that “ the spark is taken between brass balls
enclosed in a magic lantern. The light issuing from the con-
denser, still slightly divergent, falls at a distance of sixteen feet
upon a large single lens of about ten inches diameter, which
plays the part of a field-glass. The photographic lens, a large
portrait combination by Dallmeyer, is situated about seven feet
behind in the image of the lantern condenser as formed by the
field-glass, and is just large enough to include it. The jet to
be photographed is placed parallel to the field-lens, and as near
as conveniently may be upon the side next the photographic
camera. The preliminary focussing of the image upon the
ground glass cannot well be effected by the light of
the sparks. For this purpose a candle, which may stand
in front of the lantern condenser, is substituted.” To get
the spark, he used the large battery of Leyden jars at the
Royal Institution, charged by a powerful Wimshurst’s electrical
machine. All along, his principal difficulty had been that of
getting enough light, for, in these very rapid exposures, the
effect of the light upon the eye seems altogether greater than,
and out of proportion to, its effect upon the photographic plate.
A great deal, however, can be done by varying the development,
and by subsequent intensification. Each drop, as it comes off,
is connected by a ligament to the main jet ; this ligament then
breaks, and forms itself into a little drop behind the big one,
and, as it travels faster than the larger one, comes into collision
with it. He described the effect of weak electrical action upon
the sensitive part of these nearly vertical fountains, which is
where they break into drops, and how electricity caused a
number of the drops to coalesce into one large blob.
Mr. Charlton Wollaston thought that perhaps the
experiments revealed the cause of the large size of drops of
rain during a thunderstorm, and that electrical influences might
have something to do with the formation of waterspouts.
Mr. Trueman Wood had seen the experiments at the Royal
Institution ; he had also tried to repeat the experiments at
home, and he had been struck by the small amount of light
available ; he had been much struck by the feebleness of
the photographic effect, as compared with the brightness of the
image on the screen. A great amount of concentrated light
was necessary to get any image at all. Could any estimate lie
made of the length of time of duration of the spark ?
Another speaker asked if Lord Rayleigh had photographed
drops when falling on a surface and breaking into splashes.
Mr. Elder thought that the brightness of the spark increased
with the amount of self-induction in the circuit.
Sir David Salomons said that the spider, in spinning its
web, exuded a viscous substance which aggregated into beads ;
he thought that perhaps by the means described such facts
could be photographed, and additional information obtained
about insects and animals.
Lord Rayleigh replied that no doubt electrical influence had
to do with the big drops in which rain fell during thunder-
storms. If, instead of placing a weakly-electrified body near
the jet, a strongly-electrified one were used, the dispersion of
the jet was increased instead of diminished, for the drops, being
similarly electrified, then repelled each other, and did not
collide. When moderately electrified, they united instead of
rebounded, and it seemed as if some kind of a disruptive
discharge took place. It is not clear to which of these causes
the big drops of rain during thunderstorms are due. He had
not yet attempted the photographing of drops splashing upon
a plate, for to make the exposure at the precise moment when
a drop fell on a plate was a difficult matter. He doubted if
increased induction would give a brighter light, but had not
tried it. He had not exact measures of the periods of the
electrical sparks he used. An American professor had done
some work in estimating the period of electrical sparks, and
March 28, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
237
had proved that very small sparks had periods going down to
one-millionth of a second, or less.
The President said that photographing by the electric spark
had been done in the old Daguerreotype days, and that he had
repeated the experiment at the Royal Institution, but lie used
a reflector instead of a condenser to concentrate the light from
the flash. He had also tried to ascertain the duration of the
light, and made out that it was certainly less than i„gVon Part
of a second. The late Professor Guthrie and himself had
begun the investigation of splashes ; but the death of the
former broke off the experiments.
Captain Abney on “ A Photographic Untruth.”
Mr. H. Trueman Wood then took the chair, while the Presi-
dent read a paper on the above subject.
Captain Abney said that the particular photographic untruth
with which he had to deal was the untruth in form which a
photograph gives when judged by the effect of light and shade.
He had placed a white cylinder in a perfectly dark room, then
had illuminated it from one direction only, and had found that
the effect varied, according to the angle at which the light, fell.
Such illumination made the photograph of a man’s face longer
from front to back than it should be, and photographers, by a
kind of instinct, seemed to try to get rid of this by extra
illumination of the side. He had used exact measurements in
his experiments, and had come to the conclusion that photo-
graphic gradation is never right. Photographers had long
ago found out that they could not use the same mode of light-
ing as the painter.
Mr. C. H. Bothamley on “The Latent Image.”
Mr. C. H. Bothamley gave an abstract of his paper on the
above subject. He said that the physical theory of the latent
image is, that when light falls on a sensitive plate, the mole-
cules on which it acts are thrown into a state of unstable equi-
librium, so as to be afterwards more readily affected by a
reducing agent. If so, the disappearance of the latent image
ought to be spontaneous, and he took it that the disappearance
of the latent image is not spontaneous. Carey Lea, once one
of the foremost supporters of the physical theory, had recently
thrown over the last vestige of evidence in its favour by show-
ing that silver iodide has the power of absorbing a con-
siderable quantity of free iodine. After the exposure
of the plate to light, the iodine is re-absorbed, and
the plate comes back to its normal state. The per-
fectly pure haloids are not changed by light, but in the
presence of moisture they are decomposed under luminous
action. The dark solid substance formed under such conditions
is probably not metallic silver, because it is difficultly attacked
by nitric acid. He thought that the chlorine and the bromine
liberated by light united with the gelatine, for he had failed
to obtain evidence of the liberation of bromine in the free
state upon the exposure of the plate to light. Exposed plates
had been kept for months in some cases, and in some other
instances for two or three years before development ; if,
then, the change set up by light had been merely throwing
molecules into a state of unstable equilibrium, it was highly
probable that in all that time the plate would have
gone back to its original condition. He had repeated
the experiments of others, and had found that bromine
destroyed the latent image, but that it was extremely doubtful
if even the strongest nitric acid would do so. Mr. Carey Lea
had proved that marking a plate with a weak solution of hypo-
phosphite of soda, also of certain other salts, would produce a
latent image which could be made visible by development.
He (Mr. Bothamley) had found that a plate so treated acted in
every way the same under chemical reagents as a normally
exposed plate. Pressure, or rather shearing stress, will produce
a latent image, which is destroyed by bromine and certain
other reagents ; evidently stress produced the same substance
in the film as did light. He thought Hodgkinson’s and
Meldola’s views as to the chemical constitution of this substance
to be extremely improbable ; he thought that no oxychloride
was present, but some reduction compound of silver. The
investigations of Mr. Spring, of Liege, might have some bearing
upon the problem of the effect of shearing stress upon a photo-
graphic plate, for Mr. Spring had found that substances which
expand when they combine, form a compound which is decom-
posed under pressure.
Mr. John Spiller said that free bromine is given out when
dry plates are exposed to light. Last summer he was near a
stack of condensed plates exposed to sunshine, and the smell of
bromine was nearly strong enough to knock a man over. He
thought that experiments as to how long a Daguerreotype plate
would keep between exposure and development would have some
bearing on the subject.
Another speaker stated that Dr. Eder had recently published
that the effect of shearing stress can be reversed by exposure of
the plate to light.
Captain Abney had had more than nasal proof that
the substance liberated by light from photographic plates
is bromine. Nitric acid was the most doubtful of the oxidising
agents for destroying the image. In the old wet plate process
it was easy to develop an image on iodide of silver, then to dis-
solve it with nitric acid, and afterwards to develop the image
again upon the same plate, and so on for a long time. The
term “ latent image ” should not be used, for there is no latent
image ; the term “ photographic image” would be better.
Mr. Bothamley thought smell to be an unsafe guide as to
the substance thrown off by dry plates exposed to sunshine ; it
might possibly not be pure bromine, but a compound containing
bromine.
Mr. W. T. Wilkinson on “ Photomechanical Printing.”
As the lastitem of the Camera Club Conference programme,
Mr. W. T. Wilkinson gave a practical demonstration of the
photogravure process. From the nature of the case demanding
excessive care at each stage of the operation, and the late hour
at which Mr. Wilkinson was called upon to give his explanations,
the circumstances were not favourable to the production of a
good result, and so it happened that the final printing process
was never reached. Commencing with a clean copper
plate, the speaker said that the first step was to
lay the ground or “ grain ” the surface ; this he did by shaking
up a quantity of finely-powdered resin in a capacious box,
lifting the lid to insert the plate, and allowing the resinous
particles to settle like so much dust upon its surface. The
attachment was secured by a spray producer, or the newly -
invented “air-brush,’’ finishing off on a hot plate. Upon
this grained surface a reversed carbon print from a transparency
was laid down, and then developed with hot water in the usual
manner, the paper backing being removed, and all the soluble
gelatine washed away in water heated to as high a temperature
as the hand could conveniently bear. This done, the surface' was
rinsed with methylated spirit to quicken the drying, and then a
resist varnish of gum dammar in benzole was applied. Now' the
plate was ready to be etched, and for this purpose it was laid
face upwards in a dish and treated with an alcoholic solution of
perchloride of iron. This latter salt slowly attacked the copper
through the varnish layer, the iron salt having the effect of
hardening or tanning the gelatine film, and the spirit induced
a more regular action than could be got by the use
of an aqueous solution. It required some experience to know
how far to carry this etching process, and the margins had,
of course, to be protected by asphalte during this operation.
The plate was now ready, after washing off the ferric salt and
cleaning away the carbon pictures and resinous coating, to be
inked up and mounted for the production of successive impres-
sions. This part of the process waa “taken for granted,”
inasmuch as time had not permitted the operator to get a
sufficiently deep etching ; but Mr. Wilkinson showed some other
plates, previously manipulated, which, in this respect, lie
regarded as perfectly satisfactory.
The Camera Club Dinner.
Last Friday night the annual dinner of the members of the
Camera Club, and their friends, was held at the Frascati
Restaurant, Oxford Street, London, under the Presidency of
Captain Abney.
After the toasts of the Queen, the Prince of Wales, and the
members of the Royal Family, Professor Meldola proposed
that of “ Success to the Camera Club,” coupled with the name
238
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
of the President of the Club, Captain Abney, upon which the
company struck up “ For he’s a j ally good fellow,” and they
gave him their emphatic assurance that there was no division of
opinion upon that point.
Captain Abney, in response, said nobody could accuse him of
too much partiality for the Club, for his attendances at its
meetings had been few and far between, and he felt that he had
not done his duty. The Club had been prospering ; it had now
nearly 600 members, and more papers were read before it than
at any other ten photographic societies in Great Britain put
together. Through the action of the Camera Club the Cus-
toms’ examination of dry plates had been greatly facilitated,
and now dark rooms for the proper examination of such plates
had been provided at our various seaport towns. That day it
had been seen that the Club had taken a step in relation to
photographic exhibitions, and the Club had started the one man
exhibitions. He hoped to see the time when no medals would
be given at exhibitions, and that the simple fact of permitting
photographs to be suspended on the walls would be considered
sufficient honour. Soon the Club would enter into new pre-
mises with full accommodation, with eight or nine well-fitted dark
rooms, also with workshop, laboratory, studio, enlarging room,
and last, but not least, a billiard room. Nothing went into its
journal but original matter ; he had been editor of the journal
of another society for several years, but had never found any
committee or anyone to aid him with original matter. He
would propose the toast of “ The Photographic Societies of
Great Britain and Ireland,” coupled with the names of Mr.
Mansfield, president of the Photographic Society of Ireland ;
Capt. Mantel], honorary secretary of the Photographic Society
of Great Britain ; and Surgeon-General Ranking, the represen-
tative of the Photographic Society of Leamington. He thought
that the improvements, if any, in the Photographic Society of
Great Britain had been due to the action of the Camera
Club ; he felt this to be a rather doubtful compliment, but
he meant it.
Mr. Mansfield, in response, remarked that he thought all
the photographic societies at a distance from London were
grateful to the Camera Club for bringing them together ;
otherwise they would have been less able to make their voices
heard in the management of photographic affairs, as exemplified
in the discussion on exhibitions that day.
Capt. Mantell stated that an unexpected honour had been
thrust upon him that evening, and had he known it before-
hand he should not have enjoyed his dinner so thoroughly,
but he was sure that all wrho had attended the Conference that
day must have been thankful for all the work it had done.
Mr. M. Smith said that the Camera Club was a social
organisation, and had social gatherings each year to which it
invited a certain number of visitors. Among their visitors that
evening were Professor Meldola, M. Paul Nadar, of Paris, M.
Lafort, Mr. Rossi, Mr. Chapman Jones, Mr. H. Botliamley,
Mr. W. T. Wilkinson, Mr. W. H. Harrison, Mr. Welford,
Professor Stebbing, of Paris, Mr. H. Harriden, Mr. A. Cowan,
Mr. Turner, Deputy Astronomer-Royal, Mr. O. Smith, of
Stockholm, also the manager of the Nobel Explosive Co.,
and Mr. Mead, of the Alpine Club. He would couple with
this toast the names of M. Nadar, Mr. Mead, and Mr. Frank
Braine.
M. Nadar, who spoke in French, said that it was difficult for
him to speak English, and that he wished success to the Camera
Club.
Mr. Mead responded that his knowledge of photo-
graphy in Switzerland for many years consisted in stumbling
over the legs of camera men at Swiss Hotels ; of late years,
however, he had stumbled on higher ground, and photo-
graphed several Swiss peaks.
Mr. Braine explained that he was a bashful and retiring man,
and that he had brought a friend to return thanks for him ;
that friend was Mr. Edwards. He had met Mr. Edwards on board
the French steamboat between St. Malo and Dinan. The
friend then told a story, not strictly photographic, about a
man with a pickaxe.
Sir David Salomons then proposed “ The Press,” coupled
with the names of Messrs Harrison, Hastings, Sturmey,
Wright and Horsley Hinton. He was not in favour of anony-
mous journalism, and thought that every article should have
the name of the writer appended thereto.
Mr. Macey Wright responded, that in making a speech
he felt like the mau who, when going to bury his wife,
remarked, “ I cannot go in that carriage with my mother-in-
law ; if I must, I must, but you will quite spoil my day’s plea-
sure. ” He was glad to hear that the Camera Club was going
into new premises, and thought that the Provincial Press would
be ready to aid it in giving publicity to its ideas if country
newspapers were regularly made acquainted with its desires in
that respect.
Mr. W. H. Harrison agreed with Sir David Salomons in
not being in favour of anonymous journalism ; he also thought,
with the Camera Club, that the editors of photographic
journals should have nothing to do with exhibitions or other
executive work in photography, on which they might afterwards
have to comment in another capacity ; they should stand out-
side such work as free and independent spectators. In like
manner, he thought that public workers in photography, who
posed before the public as men submitting to free and impartial
criticism, should not in their private capacity be shareholders
in newspapers. He was glad to see the culture and education
which characterised the proceedings of the Camera Club, and
that it had an excellent honorary secretary, for those experienced
in the working of organised bodies were aware to what a large
extent their prosperity is due to the capacity of the working
secretary.
Mr. Hastings was pleased to hear about the new premises,
and hoped that the new home of the members would be in
every way a credit to the Club.
Mr. Sturmey’s connection with photography had been a
short one ; he, too, thought that articles should be signed. He
then told some anecdotes about the errors of amateurs, and
entered into some details relating to his journal.
Mr. Horsley Hinton made some brief remarks, which were
imperfectly heard at the other end of the room.
Mr. Herbert Harraden then sang a song, “The Photo-
graphic Fiend.”
The President next gave the toast of “The Officers of the
Camera Club,” coupled with the names of Mr. Ferrero, man-
aging director of the Camera Club ; Mr. George Davison, hon-
orary secretary ; and Mr. Asbury Greene.
Mr. Ferrero felt more at home in reminding memlrers
about arrears of subscription, than in making after-dinner
speeches, but the greatest pleasure next to doing one’s duty was
to know that it was appreciated. He spoke highly of the
work done by his predecessor, Mr Spiers.
Mr. Davison said that without such work for the Club as
that given by Mr. Ferrero, all would come to a standstill. His
(Mr. Davison’s) own work was easier because more interesting ;
he had an interest in his kind friends of the Camera Club, but
regretted being kept somewhat from the study of photography.
The summer months, however, for which they were pining,
were coming.
Mr. Asbury Greene, as one of the original members of the
Club, would be glad to do all he could for it in the future.
Mr Charters White told a humorous anecdote or two, after
which the company separated,
Cleanliness in Photography. — On one occasion Lord
Palmerston was asked for his definition of dirt. He
promptly replied that it was matter in the wrong place ; so
if, after a peep into your neighbour’s dark-room, you sec pyro,
soda, and other chemical stains in stream-like courses on the
outsides of bottles and graduates, then you can draw a direct
conclusion that the operator or his assistant is negligent, and it
is impossible for him to get perfect negatives. The matter on
the outside of his bottles will, while handling, drop into his
developer, thereby causing streaks, stains, pin-holes, and an
endless train of other evils which will sometimes work an
irreparable injury to a properly posed and well-lighted negative.
— B. F. M’Manus.
March 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
239
OX DIFFERENCES OF COLOUR-SENSITIVENESS
AT DIFFERENT TIMES.*
BY PROF. H. \V. VOGEL.
It is recognised that the quality of the light varies con-
siderably in the course of a day. According to the height
of the sun and the more or less murky condition of the
atmosphere, a greater or smaller proportion of light is
received direct from the sun on the one hand, or reflected
from the sky on the other hand. As one or other of these
sources of illumination comes into play, the character of
the light changes in a noteworthy manner. So long as we
worked with collodion plates and iodide of silver, it was the
indigo coloured light that was essentially important
(spectrum line G). Violet and ultra-violet light, which
would also come into the reckoning, are, in fact, so little
reflected by solid bodies, that the said rays need not for
ordinary subjects be taken into account, although in photo-
graphing heavenly bodies they play an important part.
Since the introduction of dry plate photography, the
maximum of activity is removed towards the bright blue
(half-way between the lines F and G), and at present the
photographic intensity of the light depends upon the
quantity of bright blue existing in it.
With the introduction of colour-sensitive plates the
matter again undergoes an important change. Since it has
become possible to prepare plates which arc from six to
ten times as sensitive to yellow as to blue, the amount of
yellow and yellowish green present plays a most important
part. I made the observation so long ago as the year 1874
that the chemical action of the solar spectrum varies con-
siderably at different times, especially towards the ends—
that is to say, the violet and the red and yellow. I was
working with colour-sensitive plates, and found this effect
even with the sun at the same height and the weather
apparently similar.
In the year 1875, during my voyage to the East Indies,
I made a set of spectrum experiments in the Red Sea and
Indian Ocean with collodion plates, the sensitiveness of
which was about equal to yellow and blue. Five photo-
graphs of the spectrum were taken daily. On one day I
found that the action of the yellow greatly exceeded that
of the blue, and this in the afternoon and at midday, as
well as in the morning. This can only be explained on
the assumption that on that particular day the yellow
light in the atmosphere was very overpowering, for what
reason I know not.
Since colour-sensitive plates have come into regular use,
it has happened to me that in photographing the same
object under apparently similar conditions as to weather,
the colour-sensitiveness of the same plates has shown
decided variations. It has happened that a bouquet of
flowers, which, at the Imperial Technical High School, has
served as a test object for colour-sensitive (eosine silver)
plates, against the ordinary plate, would sometimes show
a very striking difference between the action of the two,
whilst at other times the difference would be exceedingly
slight.
Finally, I observed that colour-sensitiveness showed to
least advantage on those days when, with a half-veiled
sun, a sort of greyish light prevailed, in which objects
appeared without brilliancy. All the phenomena con-
sidered, it seems that the intensity of different coloured
light in the atmosphere, even when there is no difference
perceptible to the eye, varies considerably. Sometimes
Translated from the Juhrbuch fur rhotogranhie, 1890, for the Photo-
graphic Nkws.
the red and yellow predominate ; sometimes blue. In the
latter case, the effect of colour-sensitiveness is least
noticeable. Further experiments on the subject are in
course of being made.
SEVERE TESTS OF COMPRESSED GAS
CYLINDERS.
The Scotch and Irish Oxygen Co., of Polmadie,
Glasgow, ask us to publish the following interesting
account of the severe testing of compressed gas
cylinders, which appeared in The Glasgow Herald of
March 13 th:—
A series of experiments was conducted yesterday at
Stevcnston by the Scotch and Irish Oxygen Company,
Limited (Brin’s Process), for the purpose of demonstrating
the absolute safety of their cylinders for containing com-
pressed gases. It will be remembered that a fatal accident
occurred to the foreman of their Works at Polmadie by
the bursting of a cylinder some six weeks ago, and the
impression was conveyed to the public that the explosion
was due either to some defect in the cylinder, or to its
strength being overtaxed by being charged to an excessive
pressure.
A thorough investigation was, however, made into the
cause of the accident, and the facts disclosed left no doubt
that it occurred through a mistake on the part of the
unfortunate man himself. It was clear that he had in-
troduced oxygen into a cylinder which was already partly
charged with hydrogen, these gases forming an explosive
mixture when brought together. One fact especially
which pointed at once to this conclusion was that the main
portion of the exploded cylinder, found almost on the spot
where the accident occurred, was almost too hot to be
touched ; whereas, the portions of cylinders which have
since been intentionally burst by being subjected to
excessively severe treatment were found to be perfectly
cold. In consequence of this erroneous impression it was
thought advisable to subject the cylinders to an exhaustive
series of tests, so as to prove beyond dispute that they are
thoroughly adapted for the purpose of carrying the gases,
and capable of withstanding the most extreme amount of
rough usage to which they can possibly be subjected
during transit from place to place.
The cylinders used are of different sizes, varying from
1 foot long by 3£ inches diameter to 6 feet 6 inches long
by 51 inches diameter. They are made of mild wrought
steel j- of an inch in thickness, and before being used each
cylinder is subjected to a hydraulic test of at least twice
its working pressure, and is afterwards stamped with the
pressure to which it was subjected, the date of the test,
and the test mark. The cylinders are re-tested periodi-
cally, and for the purpose of safety the custom of the
Company has been to paint those for the different gases in
distinctive colours, so as to avoid the danger of mixing.
As a further precaution, every cylinder which is brought
into the works after having been in use, is at once
emptied.
To make the recurrence of such a misfortune as the
recent accident absolutely impossible, it has been decided
to adopt a left-handed thread for the valves on the hydro-
gen and coal gas cylinders, so that by no possible inad-
vertency can they be filled at the oxygen pump. A num-
ber of experiments were made about ten days ago which
gave excellent results. A 6 feet 6 inch cylinder, weighing
about 1 cwt., was twice raised to a height of 35 feet, and
210
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
dropped horizontally upon a solid iron block 12 inches
square and weighing 31 ewt., each blow bending it to the
extent of about three-quarters of an inch. It was then
dropped vertically on to its round end, having a clear fall
of 31 feet, when it was found that the impact had only
flattened a part of about the size of a pennypiece. It was
next placed across the iron block, and an iron weight of
cwt. dropped on to its centre from a height of 35 feet,
the blow crushing in the side to the extent of J of an inch.
The cyliuder was subsequently placed on two iron blocks,
set 1 feet 1 inch apart, so as to support the ends, and the
same weight again let fall upon it from the same height,
with the result that it was bent 4 1 inches from the straight,
but did not explode.
Another cylinder was afterwards tried in the same
manner, with the exception of the crushing blow, and in
this case even a more satisfactory result was obtained, as
it was bent to the extent of 7yV inches by the bending blow,
and still remained intact. A smaller cylinder, measuring
31 inches long by 5^ inches diameter, containing 171b, lique-
fied carbonic acid gas, was also dropped crossways and
vertically from the same height, and was afterwards flatt ened
to the extent of If inches by dropping the 6£cwt. weight upon
it, without injuring it otherwise than in shape. Each of
these tested cylinders was subsequently found to contain
the full quantity of gas, and to be perfectly sound.
Yesterday’s experiments were of a similar character, and
were equally satisfactory. A Gft. 6inch cylinder, weighing
1071b. including the contents, was dropped four times
across the iron block from a height of 35ft., these trials
producing a bend of 2£ inches. It was also allowed to
fall on its end, with little perceptible result. A smaller
cylinder was treated in the same manner, and sustained no
greater injury than a few dents.
From these particulars it will be seen that the tests were
eminently satisfactory, for it is inconceivable that such
cylinders during transit could undergo anything like the
severe treatment to which they were subjected, while it
was evident that they still possessed a considerable reserve
of strength.
PHOTOGRAPHING A SPEAKER’S GESTURES.
About a year ago, Mr. Edison became intensely interested
in instantaneous photography in its possible availability in
connection with the phonograph, and at once began an
exhaustive series of experiments in that direction. The
first thing was to develop the possibilities of the camera
as to rapidity of exposure, and an elaborate system of
experiments was begun to try if possible to photograph
a rifle bullet in its passage through the air at its maximum
initial velocity of 5,000 feet a second. To do this success-
fully no known mechanical means were adequate — 5,000
feet means 60,000 inches, an inch being about the length
of a rifle bullet. But to secure a perfect picture of a
bullet moving at this extraordinary velocity it must
apparently be at rest, and hence the actual time of
exposure must be brought down to incredibly infini-
tesimal limits.
The great inventor at once harnessed the lightning to
do the work, and before the camera arranged a series of
vertical wires so fine as to be practically invisible, and so
connected that the breaking of any one of them would com-
plete an electrical circuit and furnish an illuminating
spark for the two-hundredth of a second. At first the
experiments seemed to be fruitless, as the rapidity was
such as to exceed the limits of sensitiveness of the plate
[Makcii 28, 1890.
in the camera ; but weeks of careful experiment brought
a solution in a new combination of sensitising chemicals
by which even this infinitesimal period of time sufficed
for a perfect image.
But a new difficulty arose. The slight imperceptible
tremor of the room in which the experiments were con-
ducted, caused by the motion of the machinery and ]
dynamos in another part of the building, was sufficient
to destroy the sharpness and value of the photographic *]
image. This was overcome by erecting a special building
for the purpose, and placing the camera on a pier of solid
masonry running down to the primitive rock. Then, j
and then only, it was that success attended the experiments.
But the reader will doubtless ask the question, i
Cut bono ? — what possible good was it to get a picture of a
rifle bullet showing the condensation of air in front of it, 1
the vacuum behind, and the air eddies that were thus I
created ? Much every way ! Not only as a practical
means of studying the best form for a bullet in over- '
coming the resistance of the air, but more especially as i
a means of developing the great idea that Mr. Edison had 1
in his mind of bringing photography to bear as au adjunct 1
to the phonograph. He thought that if a speaker’s per-
sonality could be brought before the eye by means of
photography and the stercopticon while the phonograph
was bringing the subject-matter before the ear, that an
important end would be gained, and to accomplish this
the elaborate series of experiments was planned and
carried out. The result has been the most marvellous i
success and the most wonderful machine it is possible to
conceive.
Let the reader imagine a popular lecturer, preacher, or
orator delivering an address. In front of him, at the so-
called reporters’ table, are two small machines, one the
well-known phonograph, and the otheran ingenious piece !
of mechanism by which photographs of the speaker are (
taken in succession with enormous rapidity — at intervals,
let us say, of from one-eighth to one-twentieth of a second,
and suppose both these machines to be at work silently
recording both the uttered speech and the personal
appearance of the speaker at each fractional part of a
second. The results thus obtained may be sent to any
desired point, and the photographs thrown on a screen by
an ingeniously contrived piece of mechanism. Thus the
exact appearance of the speaker, with all his gestures and
play of features, are exactly reproduced, while the phono-
graph simultaneously delivers the speech. The interval
between the successive photographs is so infinitesimal
that the screen picture is apparently a living one, moving,
gesticulating, and apparently uttering the words which,
in fact, are spoken by the phonograph. The greatest i
difficulty experienced by Mr. Edison in his experiments
was the synchronization of the two instruments, so that
the utterances of the phonograph should exactly coincide
with the gesticulations ; but this was finally overcome, and
the experiments were crowned with the most perfect
success. What the commercial value of the invention
may be is yet to be decided. It cannot fail to be intensely
interesting as an exhibition feature, but whether it will
fill a useful niche in the every-day life of the world is
another question entirely.
Mr. Edison is not pushing the matter at present, being
absorbed in his experiments on electrical traction for
street cars. When that problem is decided he may bring
this new invention prominently before the public. We
wait. — Netv YurL Herald.
March 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
241
MOUNTING LANTERN SLIDES.
So far as we can gather, there are only two reasons for,
or advantages to be gained by, the system of what is
generally called uniform mounting : facility in carrying
on the operation consequent on the use of mats already
cut, and the pretty appearance of a set when so mounted.
The first is unworthy a moment’s consideration ; and
anyone who would let it influence him had better at once
turn to some other hobby, or wait till he can mount his
slides by a “ drop a nickel in the slot machine.” A good
deal can be said in favour of the other reason, as the chief
aim and object of at least a large quantity of the photo-
graphy of the present is to satisfy the craving for the
beautiful ; and if the disadvantages of uniformity under
circumstances where it should not be sought, were not out
of all proportion greater than its advantages, we should
not have so much to say against it.
So long as the results of photography were merely
curiosities, people were content with simply wondering
how such things could be, and even the initiated were too
much intent on improving the technical to give much con-
sideration to the artistic ; but now that the technical has
reached a stage only a little short of perfection, photo-
graphy is more and more assuming in men’s minds its true
position — not itself an art, but only the means by which
artistic results may be produced. In other words, and
words more especially applicable to our purpose, lantern
slides are gradually becoming less and less looked at
and thought of as photographs, and more and more
regarded as a means of producing on a large scale
projections that shall be in the truest sense of the
word pictures. We are aware that there is at present
a school, or a few weak enthusiasts who would fain
be considered such, which sneers at rules of composi-
tion and canons of art ; and, perhaps, for them, and the
kind of work they show, when they do show anything,
rules, laws, and canons are not needed. Hut the great
body of sober-minded artists, the men of light and leading,
both ancient and modern, have given, and are giving,'
ample evidence of their faith in what may be said to be
the great principles of light and shade, and composition.
We may take it for granted that a very large majority of
the lantern slides that are made, except by those profes-
sionally engaged in their production, are from negatives
not especially taken for the purpose, and, consequently,
better suited for either upright or horizontal pictures.
From negatives of 4 by 5 and under, the positives, as a
rule, are printed by superposition and, of course, by re-
duction in the camera from larger sizes. Now, it will be
evident that if the composition has been good for an up-
right ora horizontal picture, and the whole plate filled, an
equally good composition cannot be made to fill the square
opening of the regulation mat, and the attempt to do so
can only result in the cutting out of material necessary to
proper balance, excessive and often, in consequence, offen-
sive foregrounds, weakly-placed horizon lines or vanishing
points, and other equally objectionable faults.
Hut we may ask. why should lantern pictures be square,
•or nearly so? Artists of the brush are deservedly credited
with a fairly good appreciative taste in such matters, and
we are within the mark in saying that less than one per
cent, of the frames that adorn our galleries, either public
or private, are of that form, and even of those few, for
most of them there is some special reason for the choice
■of the direct square.
The true artist, then, in making lantern slides from his
ordinary negatives, will arrange so that the longest side of
the composition shall come just within the regulation
mount, as uniformity in the length or height is easily
obtainable, and of course let the sky and foreground take
care of themselves. In mounting he will, of course, see
that the mat is suitable to the horizontal or upright so
made, and although the slides may not look so pretty when
simply looked at, they will, when on the screen, fully
reward him for all the extra trouble he has taken.
Hut, notwithstanding those facts which “are chiels
that winna ding,” we know that there are some who,
octopus-like, will continue to cling to “ the good old size
and shape,” and as they, if they are not to fall behind, must
cease to be content with photographs and strive after
pictures, the following suggestion may help them to make
a fairly satisfactory compromise.
If the stickler for the regulation mount believes in the
adage, “ whatever is worth doing, is worth doing well,”
he will not mind a little additional trouble and a little
extra expense in carrying out his desires. Before going
to the field, he should mark off, by a heavy pencil line, a
direct square on his focussing screen. If, say, his camera
is an Hr by G.l, a square of six inches will be suitable. He
should then take all his pictures in duplicate, the first fil-
ling the full size of the plate, and the second confined
within the limits of the square. lie should remember
also that faults in composition are more noticeable on a
large than on a small scale, and take especial care in the
arrangement of the second exposure. In this no pains
should be spared, and no time grudged or thought mis-
spent, and an exposure should never be made on a subject
that is not in every way satisfactory. Better a clean plate
than a picture that needs to be apologised for. — The
Beacon.
Devon and Cornwall Camera Club. — On Monday, 17th,
at the Athenaeum, Plymouth, Mr. S. Weekes passed through
the Club lantern about two hundred slides of his own making
and from his own negatives, making appropriate remarks upon
each. The lecturer led the company from Plymouth to the
South of France, thence to Venice, Home, the Italian Lakes,
Switzerland, and back to Devon and Cornwall, winding up with
groups of persons associated with the Club either as members
or friends.
The Sizes of Ph&tographic Plates. — In one part of the
final report of the International Photographic Congress at Paris,
dealing with the question of “ Uniformity of Dimensions of
Plates,” a normal international plate 18 by 24 centimeters
(71 by 9 j inches about) was adopted. The division 12 by 18
centimeters was also adopted, and the divisions and multiples
of 18 by 24 centimeters. In the matter of sizes of lantern
slides, the form 8i by 10 centimeters (3| by 4 inches about)
was adopted by a "vote of 18 to 13. Another size proposed
was 9 by 12 centimeters, but was not adopted because it
was thought to be too large. The screw for attaching the
camera to the tripod was also considered, and the following
size was adopted : lbs diameter shall be 9 ‘5 millimeters, with
a thread cut an isosceles triangle of 55 degrees opening running
to the summit, not more than 1 '3 millimeters deep, and having
a pitch of one-sixth of its height. This is the g-inch screw of
the English system of Whitworth, adopted by the Photo-
graphic Society of Great Britain in 1882. For the attach-
ment of lenses of different sizes to the same camera, a system
of universal screws was adopted upon the same system as that
mentioned above, and with sufficient play to allow easy work-
ing. The screw flanges for all new lenses made in the future
are recommended to be cut with exterior openings having
10, 50, 75, 100, 125 millimeters. — Anthony’s Bulletin.
242
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 26, 1890.
The likeness of the new German Chancellor, General
von Caprivi, to his predecessor, Prince Bismarck, is a
happy coincidence. Prince Bismarck used to have
a double, who was accustomed to sit to unscrupulous
photographers in Berlin, and whose photographs were
sold as those of the Chancellor. This fraud went on for
some time, but was at length discovered, and the
“double” found his way to durance vile. Those who
wish to turn — we will not sayan honest penny — will
probably be tempted to pass off the photographs of the
old Chancellor for those of the new one. We mention
this so that purchasers may be on their guard.
A lady correspondent of an evening paper has made
the astonishing discovery that the portraits of curates
and other smaller religious lights are not only exhibited
in suburban shop windows, but command a ready sale.
The announcement is rather late in the day, as from
the earliest photographic times a suburban photographer
invariably seized upon the countenances (if he could
get them) of the local ministry, both of the Church
and Dissent, as a good advertisement. But the lady
writer goes a little further; in fact, she has a “ good
idea,” and has come forward to assist ladies of limited
means. Her suggestion is that a number of ladies
should form themselves into a company for the sale of
curates’ photos. She is confident the profits would
exceed all expectations, as the number of ladies of all
ages who are ready to expend their spare cash in pur-
chasing the photos of their pet parsons is very large*
Moreover, the young ecclesiastics themselves, in so1 good
a cause, would willingly “ countenance” the work.
There is, unfortunately, a frivolity about this last
observation which makes one doubt the sincerity of
“A Feminine Observer,” for so the writer signs her-
self. We are really afraid she is having, under the
guise of philanthropy, a quiet laugh at the curates.
At last the automatic drop-a-penny-in-thc-slot
photographic apparatus is an accomplished fact. At
present it has its habitat at West Bromwich, where a
demonstration took place the other day, and as the
circumstance has been narrated in all its details in the
financial papers, we may take it that the patent will
occupy the attention of a limited liability company.
Mr. G. A. Sala — who, like a true journalist, has always
his imagination on tap — sees possible drawbacks in
the invention. He entreats the patentees very pro-
perly to guard against the following contingencies : —
First, the malevolent small boy suddenly crying out,
“Shove in your mouldy coppers!” or “Hi, there
Mister! ” just as you have begun to stand motionless;
second, a violent fit of sneezing or coughing ; third,
the uncalled-for interposition of an entire stranger,
» who, at the critical moment, pops his head over your
shoulder, grinning horribly, and gets photographed for >
nothing on the unhandsome and untradesmanlike plea
that it is “ the same concern.” Mr. Sala has really
spotted the initial difficulties in the way of the
success of the apparatus, and it will be interesting to
see how they will be overcome.
A photographer in one of the large provincial
towns has found his business greatly increase, and
his photographs more pleasing to his customers, since he
has employed a young lady of prepossessing appearance
to assist him in the studio. When a nearly full face
is required, and the eyes are to be turned in the
direction of the camera, he gets the young lady to
take off the cap. If the best view of the features
necessitates looking away from the camera, the lady
assistant plants herself at the required spot, and with
pneumatic attachment makes the exposure all the
same. The essential point is that the sitter shall turn
his eyes towards the fair asistant. We use the word
“his” advisedly, as we are not ready to believe the
plan would answer so well with feminine sitters.
Sterne’s oft-quoted sentiment, “they order these
things better in France,” has received a fresh
exemplification from a photographic point of view.
In a recent murder case which has just excited some
attention in Paris, the victim, Hippolyte Richard, was
by profession a canvasser for photographers. With
that nice discrimination and attention to details
so peculiar to the French mind, his arrangement
with his employers was based upon the distinctions
which exist between the representatives of various
classes ; that is to say, a customer was not a customer
and nothing more, but varied considerably in value
according to his or her position and notoriety. In fact,
a sort of tariff appears to have been established, of
which the following formed the leading items : — For
every deputy he introduced he was to receive 5 francs ;
for a senator, 3 francs ; for a negro potentate, 10 francs ;
for an actress taken in ordinary costume, 20 francs ;
and for an actress taken decollete, 20 francs. We in
England have not yet approached this perfection of
tabulation.
It is impossible to'exaggerate the future importance
of photography in regard to astronomical observations.
At no distant date the world will be spotted with ob-
servatories all filled with photographic appliances, and
all collecting records of the heavens, which will be of
the utmost service when compared together. The
latest additions to the world’s observatories comprise
one at the Vatican and one recently established by the
Catholic Mission at Madagascar, where a building has
been erected on a hill about 4,000 feet in height, and
situated a short distance to the east of Tnnanarivo.
The first-named, so far as astronomy is concerned, will
concern itself principally with celestial photography.
In the second a photographic telescope for solar obser-
vations will be provided.
March 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
243 7
CHILDREN.
BY A PHOTOGRAPHER.
M. Legouve, writing of Madame de Stael, informs us that
she died talking. When her friends were nervously
solicitous to exclude visitors who, moved by affection, or
fashion, or curiosity, or, lastly, by a common but ghoulish
gluttony of distress and agony, pressed for admission to
the bed-chamber in which the accomplished authoress lay
dying, she is reported to have rebuked them, and to have
insisted on her visitors' admission. “ Let them come in,”
she cried, “let them corns in; I thirst for the human
face — J'ai soif du visar/e humain /”
This thirst for the human face, which Robinson Crusoe
must have felt in its deep desire and insatiable longing,
expresses, undoubtedly, one of the most ardent passions
of humanity throughout all time. AVe have all a thirst for
the human face ; but the photographer is perhaps possessed
by it in an exceptional degree, and has been known, whether
as professional or as amateur, to undergo considerable
risks in his attempts to quench it. Our memories are
green of the gentleman who proposed, in defiance — or
rather, perhaps, in ignorance —of the Koranic law, to take
a portrait of the Sultan of Turkey.
In what considerable measure this thirst is shared at the
present day by the general public, any reflecting observer
may find out by taking up his position in front of a
stationer's shop in a popular thoroughfare — say, for
example, in Regent Street — where the photographs of
celebrities of the season are exposed for sale. There the
hero or heroine of the hour, strong man or fashionable
woman, convicted murderer or military chief, draws the
noses of the crowd in such close proximity to the glass of
the shop window, that a greasy film soon settles upon the
pane, only to be rubbed off by a fresh band of inquisitive
investigators. “ No mere curiosity, however, is this,” say
the arniabb apologists of human nature ; no silly love of
distraction, no empty frivolity of idleness. No ! the
street crowd of which the component elements are only
too familiar, is thirsting for the human face, because it is
thirsting for the human soul ! It may be so ; but is the
photographer similarly affected ? It is extremely doubtful.
In the case of children, the contrary has been too often
the case with him. lie has thirsted for the human soul,
because he has thirsted for, and failed to obtain, the
human face. Failing to take the child from life, he has
yearned to tike life from the child.
The charms of infancy have been in every age and
country a subject on which prose writers and poets have
been allowed to dilate without let or reprehension. Euri-
pides, in his “Meleager,” a piece which the public, and
especially the male adolescent portion thereof, will regret
to hear has been lost in the lapse of time, has not omitted
to give vent in verse to the following ideas, which Stobseus,
the author of the Latin Anthology, has been kind enough
to preserve: “Sweet is the sun’s light, sweet is the sight
of a calm sea, or a mighty river, or a land in spring — a
thousand other things are sweet — but believe me, there is
nought sweeter than to see, after a life of celibacy, beau-
tiful children flourishing in our home.” This sentence
seems somewhat strange — strange enough, indeed, to casta
doubt on the authenticity of the fragment — when it is re-
membered that Euripides was a confirmed misogynist, and
“said things” about women which it would be painful to
repeat in any publication laying claim to an iota of respec-
tability.
The charms of infancy and of childhood have inspired
poets of imagination all compact to sing of the fair heads,
the curly hair, the sparkling looks, the rosy lips, and the
smiling cheeks — poets apparently oblivious or ignorant of
the constant worry, the strange perversity, the nocturnal
peevishness, the mulish obstinacy, and the congenital
deceit — from the days of Euripides till the days of Victor
Hugo, who lias distinguished himself in some degree as the
children’s poet. The Orientates and the Contemplations savour
much of this simple theme, and a poem of two dozen lines is
devoted to the description of a child dreaming of sand full
of diamonds, and other strange matters — perhaps the result
of an overburdened stomach — in a soft cradle set in the
secure shadow of the maternal bed. There have been
photographers, it is whispered, who devoutly wished that
the condition of the poet’s child was chronic in the infantile
world — that children, if not dreaming, might at least be
continually asleep. They would not, they believe, under
these conditions, have been called upon to take their por-
traits, or if they were, it might have been done with ease.
Rut to photograph a child awake ! This is the work,
this is the labour. A man must be to the manner born to
accomplish this. I speak of the past rather than the
present, but the present is not all plain sailing. The
strange difficulty of the undertaking, the indomitable
perseverance which it requires, can scarcely be conceived
by the outside world. It is hidden from all save those
unhappy ones who have experienced it.
The greatest reverence, says a celebrated satirist, is due to
the child. I fully concur with the justice of this observa-
tion in the abstract — but Juvenal was not a photographer.
If he had been, and had been asked — we will suppose — to
take the portrait of his friend Sempronius’s little boy, and
had maintained his reverence for that child unimpaired
after the operation, I should hold a higher opinion of
Juvenal. Job is commonly credited with the virtue of
patience ; lie did not, indeed, manifest this virtue to any
very great extent when he cursed his day — nevertheless,
the patience of Job has passed into a proverb. I trust I
shall not be accused of irreverence when I say that to take
the portrait of a child requires something more than the
patience of Job.
Bairns, says a Scotch proverb invented before the days
of photography, are a blessing; to the photographer they
are only too commonly — well, to avoid any strong
language, I will say — the reverse. 'They cannot and will
not be taken, and, like the child of Themistocles who
governed his mother, who governed her husband, who
governed Greece, their will is supreme. Not that there is
not plenty of counsel on the subject how the thing is
to be managed ; but it is like that of the conjuror who
professes to tell you how to do it. In the moment of
need the counsel pierces your hand, or slips from you
like uncertain quicksilver. For instance, there are some
counsellors who will talk of an infant, wholly for-
getting the great reverence due to it, as if it were a dog
or a horse. You must study — say these wise ones —
its points ; you must approach it gradually, or like an
old acquaintance (imagine any child of ordinary capacity
being deceived by so transparent a device) ; you must
show a love for it ; this is indeed a trial ; and you must
stroke it down, and talk sympathetically to it.
A gentleman who speaks, as it were, ex cathedra, says :
“ I find the following method most successful in dealing
with this difficulty. On the arrival of the youthf ul sitters in
the studio, I place them at once in the proper focus, and,
214
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
after a general adjustment, leave them to themselves
during the time I make the requisite preparations.” Now,
as to the proper focus, it is quite certain that those children,
unless children of a wholly abnormal character, would
quickly move out of it ; and as to leaving them to them-
selves— well, I have had my own experiences. There is a
tale of a child, who, being left to itself, was incontinently
poisoned by drinking a solution of cyanide of potassium.
“ Then,” says the gentleman, “ I finally adjust the children
according to my already preconceived ideas, and attract
their attention.” Quite so ! Various methods of doing
this have been suggested and proved in practice futile.
One will tell you to move about some showy toy or other,
a certain way of putting the child on wires throughout the
sitting ; another will counsel you to imitate the mooing of
a cow, the buzzing of a bluebottle, or the barking of a dog,
careless of the ridiculous loss of dignity which is thereby
incurred by the artist, and all too frequently to no purpose.
The ordinarily lively child will, by such ill-judged pro-
ceedings, be transformed, as by some unholy spell, into
stone ; it will regard all your dramatic endeavours with,
concealed indifference, or with a calm and open con-
tempt ; it will assume a suspicious, if not a sulky
expression. The graceful forms which we arc told
all children unconsciously assume will, by some pre-
pense malice, some instigation of Satan, be wholly absent
in this child ; and when, after endeavours frittered away,
and wasted energy, after much loss of time and more loss
of temper, you at last, in sheer despair, say, “ Now is the
time ! ” and uncover the lens, the probability, amounting
almost to a certainty, is that the child will have moved,
and a satisfactory picture will not have been obtained.
There is a photographer, an intimate friend of mine — a
man of considerable skill — a man, I may say, for I knew him
well, of genius, kind, amiable, gentle, and long-suffering,
whose evil lot it was, some years ago, to be asked to take a
picture of oh, such a sweet child ! But a difficulty occurred at
the very outset which should have been, but unfortunately
was not, a warning to that artist. The sweet child, the dear
artless little thing, a boy in his tender nonage, stoutly
refused to go to the photographer's studio, and insisted,
like a young sultan, on that artist being brought to his
own apartment. A doting mother, to whom the child’s
will was law, in her earnest desire to possess a picture of
her darling, gave way to this arrangement, not, indeed,
being able to do otherwise ; for as soon as an expedition
was proposed to the studio, the little tyrant filled the neigh-
bourhood with loud lamentations. And so the photo-
grapher came, with all appliances and means to boot, into
the nursery. Trailing, not, indeed, as Wordsworth
imagines, clouds of glory, but a little go-cart attached to
a string from an adjoining apartment, this interesting child
approached the artist, and leisurely examined him with
much the same kind of sympathetic and interested curi-
osity as is shown to the student of human nature by that
portion of the public which, on a Bank Holiday, delights
itself with a prolonged examination of the monkeys in the
Zoological Gardens. After this examination was concluded
the photographer, anxious to propitiate the subject of his
future proceedings, fumbled in his pocket and produced a
parcel. ‘ ‘ What is that ?” said the infant. “ That, my dear, is
a box of sweets, which I shall have the pleasure of giving
you if you are a good boy” — and here he arranged his
camera — “ when I go.” “ Give it me, then,” said f he boy,
“and go at once !” “There arc,” says Cicero, “ children
who need the bridle, there are others who require the spur.”
Evidently this child was not to be included under the
latter category. My friend — my injured friend — never
confided to me whether he was in a pet at this precocious
entamure, or whether lie had some doubt as to the pro-
priety of giving to posterity the portrait of so impolite an
infant ; but it is certain that he then and there collected
his chattels together and took his departure, probably
with the indignant Gloster, in Lear, saying, sotto voce —
“ I shall see
The winged vengeance overtake such children !”
There was a piece of mechanism — not yet quite extinct —
employed in photography known as the head-rest. It
was probably so named on the Incus a non lucendo principle.
Now this is an instrument which even adults arc not
altogether disposed to look upon with delight. Its
screws and articulations give it an uncanny appearance ;
it is suggestive in some remote way of a dentist s chair.
The child, as a rule, rebels against it at once. Instances
have been known in which children have been thrown
into strong convulsions by an injudicious appliance
of this machine. Some kindly intentioned French
person once patented a special head-rest for their
proper use. Its distinctive feature was the greater
curvature of those long thin branches, which convey to
the fanciful observer the idea of the tentacles of a squid.
These branches, by a neatly worked movement like that of
calipers, embraced both sides of the infant's head, under-
neath its hair. The writer — lie mentions the fact witli a
feeling of fervent gratitude — has had no experience of the
effect upon the child of this mechanical construction, but
the inventor thereof was clearly not altogether sanguine
about its success. lie speaks with no manner of certainty,
but he speaks as one who has suffered, and he speaks
without the reverence recommended by the Roman satirist.
By the use of this instrument, he says, the portraits of these
little devils (res diablotins), who are the curse of the photo-
grapher of every country and of every time, may perhaps
be taken successfully.
It is told in the “ Memoirs” of Alexander Dumas, con-
cerning the savages of Florida, that when they were espe-
cially wroth with a prisoner, and anxious to torture him in
the most prolonged and painful manner, they committed
him to the care of a select circle of women and children,
who, in the cruel subtilty of their devices for ensuring the
highest amount of agony, left nothing whatever to be de-
sired. It is the unhappy experience of a large number of
professional photographers that the children of savages are
not by many lengths in advance of the children of civili-
zation in the capacity of the latter to inflict mental pain.
The Daguerre Monument. — We have received several letters
criticising rather severely the design for the Daguerre monu-
ment. The general tenor of these communications is that
Daguerre is placed in too subordinate a position, and that the
female figure and the sphere are too prominent. In regard to
these critics, we would state that we agree with them as far
as the published designs are concerned ; but we understand
that we must withhold our judgment until Mr. Hartley has
| finished the large clay model which he is now working upon at
his studio. This model is soon to be placed on public exhibition
in New York, and all interested will have an opport unity of
seeing it. The changes made in the model are : reduction of the
size of the sphere, elevation of the sphere, an increase of the
size of the head of Daguerre to one and a-half life-size, and the
total height of the monument will be sixteen feet from the
ground. — Anthony's I’kotoyraphic Bulletin.
March 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
245
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Professional Development— Flat and Greyish Platino-
types— Price of Albumen Paper — Influence of
Development on the Deposit on Negatives— Quinol
Developer with (^vlcium Bisulphite — Platinum
Toning for Gklatino-Cjiloride Paper.
Professional Development. — In order to ascertain what
developer is chiefly used by the German professional
photographers, and to give a correct idea of the mode of
development in general every-day practice, the editors
of Liesegang's Photoyraphisches Archiv have sent round
inquiries among the most eminent photographers in
Germany and Austria, and the results of these investiga-
tions have been published in the last few issues of that
interesting journal. In the first place, the following two
facts have come out : that the ferrous oxalate developer
is still used by about two-thirds of the German photo-
graphers, and that next to it the new eikonogen developer
has found the most numerous and most exalted followers.
The pyro developer seems to be employed by only a small
number of practitioners. As to the eikonogen developer,
the following communications are of special interest. A
court photographer of M’iesbaden says: “It allows a
shorter exposure than any other I know of ; it gives fine
details, works neither too monotonously nor too hard, and
develops quickly. In the studio, I expose, even on dull
winter days, with an aplanatic lens, full aperture, for less
than one second, and in summer a quarter of a second is
enough. I use the following composition : —
A. — Distilled water (hot) 1,500 c.c.
Chem. pure sodium sulphite ... 100 grammes
Eikonogen ... ... ... ... 50 ,,
This stock solution must be kept in a dark-coloured
bottle with glass stopper, and in a dark room in which no
acids and no ammonia are kept.
B. — Distilled water ... ... ... 500 c.c.
Chem. pure potassium carbonate ... 75 grammes
(Stock solution 2). Mix 3 parts of A with one part of 15
just before use. This developer can be applied to from
three to five plates the same day, if well protected against
air and light. Wash the plate, if sufficiently developed,
under the tap by means of the ball of the hand ; harden
it in a five per cent, alum bath for one minute, wash again
thoroughly under the rose by means of the ball of the
hand, and fix in —
Water 800 c.c.
Hypo ... ... ... ... ... 200 grammes
Bisulphite of soda (chem. pure) ... 40 ,,
Another court photographer, of Altenbourg, proceeds
as follows: — 12 grammes of eikonogen in crystals
are finely pulverised in a porcelain mortar, and
the resulting powder is poured into a funnel
the aperture of which is plugged with cotton,
neither too loosely nor too firmly. On it are poured
60 grammes of sodium sulphite, also pulverised, and the
funnel is filled up with 750 c.c. of distilled water. During
filtering the sediment in the funnel is repeatedly stirred
with a glass rod, and, after the liquid has run through,
about 8 to 10 c.c. of bisulphite lye of 1 18*^ F. are added
to it, by which its colour is almost entirely destroyed.
I hen into the same funnel, directly on the slight sediment
left, 38 grammes of chemically pure soda (calcium) are
poured, and the funnel is filled up with 250 c.c. of distilled
water, which dissolve the last traces of the eikonogen,
sodium sulphite, and soda. This second filtered liquid is
then poured into the first one, and the whole well shaken.
In this way the developer (in all 1,000 c.c.) is ready for
use within fifteen minutes without the u«e of boiling water.
It keeps well for a long time. If applied when freshly
prepared, it works a little Softer than when it has been
kept for some time. A third photographer, of Hirschberg,
says : “ The eikonogen developer usually gives beautifully
clear, though vigorous, negatives, with perfect details in
the deepest shadows ; indeed, such as are hardly obtain-
able by means of any other developer. I proceed as
followrs : —
I. — Sodium sulphite ...
Distilled water ...
Eikonogen
II. — Carbonate of soda
Distilled water ...
I mix 3 parts of solution I
The fixing bath consists of :-
200 grammes
3.000 c.c.
50 grammes
150 grammes
1.000 c.c.
with 1 part of solution II.
Hypo ... ... ... ... 2o0 grammes
Sodium sulphite ... ... ... 50 ,,
Water 1,000 c.c.
Concentrated sulphuric acid ...8 to 10 ,,
For developing, I take at first an old solution, and allow
the plate to remain in it until the image has come out
about thirty to thirty-five seconds ; then the old solution
is poured off, and replaced by a fresh one. The image
must be rather vigorously developed, because it is reduced
a little in the fixing bath.
A Reined// for Flat and Greyish Platinotypes. — Those
who work the platinotype process with hot development
will from time to time make the unpleasant discovery that
the prints, though they appear vigorous in the fixing bath
and in the washing water, become flat and grey after dry-
ing, at least if looked at by reflected light ; by transmitted
light they appear vigorous, as before. This is probably
caused by the fact that the hot solution of oxalate of
potash, and, later on, the hydrochloric acid of the fixing
bath, destroy the size of the paper, and the platinotype
is consequently caused to sink into the paper. In this
case the following method, recommended by I Ians Lenhard,
of Yienua, can be used with good results : — In 1,000 c.c.
of water 125 grammes of pure gelatine are melted as
usual, and the solution is gradually brought up to the
boiling point. After the gelatine solution has been taken
from the fire, 125 grammes of pulverized alum are added,
and dissolved in it with perpetual stirring. Of this solu-
tion one part is diluted with two parts of water ; the
mixture is poured into a flat dish, and the latter kept warm
in the water bath. In this warm solution the platinotypes
are immersed, and allowed to remain for some minutes.
They are then put for some time in a dish with cold water,
and afterwards dried between sheets of blotting-paper.
It w ill be found that after this treatment the prints appear
vigorous again by reflected light. This additional sizing
of the platinotype paper has, besides, the advantage that to
the positive retoucher the work is made easy, because in
this state the paper does not suck up the colour so eagerly
as before.
Rise in the Price of Albumen Paper. — Some weeks ago
several manufacturers of albumen paper — among these the
“ Yereinigte Fabriken photographischer Papiere,” of Dres-
den-sent out a circular, in which was announced that on
accouut of innovations requiring the utmost care in the
production of photographic plain paper, as well as of the
albumenised paper, the price of this latter would be raised
246
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
in future ten per cent., i.e., by ten marks the ream. This
announcement seems to have influenced the fraternity very
disagreeably, for in the last meeting of the Photographic
Association of Berlin, where the affair came on for dis-
cussion, reference was made to a business report of the
“ Yereinigte Fabriken,” according to which the financial
result for the year 1889 allowed the distribution of a
dividend of 19 per cent., whilst the dividend which
has been paid to the shareholders for the year 1888
amounted only to 10 per cent. The question was
raised, “How do the two facts harmonize, and
wherefore the rise in the price of a jjroduct after a
dividend last year raised by 9 per cent. ? ” It was
recommended to professional photographers to turn them-
selves more and more to the gelatino-chloride papers.
Influence of Development on the Fineness of the Deposit on
the Negative. — To ascertain whether the mode of developing
exerts any influence on the fineness of the deposit or grain
of the negative, Dr. Miethe made the following experiment :
A gelatine plate was exposed at a distance of thirty-eight
inches from a stearine light for ten seconds, and then cut
into eight pieces, which were developed separately in eight
different solutions, consisting of ferrous oxalate, pyro,
and quinol developers of varied proportions. All the
plates were developed until they began to turn grey when
looked at from the back, and were then fixed in the acid
fixing bath. After drying, the single strips were compared
under the microscope. It was not observed that the
fineness of the deposit was different on the various plates;
on the contrary, in all the films about the same quantity
of coarse grain was found intermixed with the finer grain.
It is, however, just this coarse grain to which the greater
sensitiveness to light must be attributed. This may be
perceived by the fact that if a very briefly exposed plate is
forced in development, the image will be formed almost
entirely of the coarser grain. Now, since in the case of
instantaneous exposures generally strong developing solu-
tions are used, it appears that this has given rise to the
error that the size of the grain depends on the composition
of the developer, and that a finely-grained negative might
be produced by slow development. An over-exposed
plate, the coarse grain of which has been already ‘ ‘ solarised, ”
will therefore, however it has been developed, always
show a finer grain than a briefly exposed one.
Quinol Developer with Calcium Bisulphite. — Photographic
tourists will always find it a great convenience to be able
to carry a large quantity of developing solution in a con-
centrated condition sufficient for a large number of plates.
The following method is recommended by A. von Loehr.
Four small bottles are filled with the following ingredi-
ents:— 1. A small bottle with 100 c.c. of a concentrated
solution of calcium bisulphite. 2. A small bottle with
100 c.c. of a solution of caustic soda, 1 : 10. 3. A small
bottle with 25 grammes of quinol. 4. A small bottle with
10 c.c. of a solution of potassium bromide, 1 : 10. This
quantity is sufficient for one hundred quarter-plates.
Development is carried on in the following manner. To
100 c.c. of water, 4 c.c. of calcium bisulphite solution are
added, and 1 gramme of hydroquinone is dissolved in it.
On the other hand, 4 c.c. of caustic soda solution are
diluted with 100 c. c. of water. The two solutions can be
kept for a long time, and are to be mixed in equal parts
just before development.
Platinum Toning Bath for Gelatino-Chloride Paper. — Mr.
A. Stieglitz gives in the photographic Year-Book (Eder)
for 1890 the following directions relating to the platinum
toning bath, which has been mentioned in this journal on
a former occasion. The following solution is made up : —
Solution A.
Oxalate of potash ... ... ... 90 grammes
Monopotassic orthophosphate ... 45 ,,
Distilled water ... ... ... 1,000 c.c.
Solution B.
Potassium chloroplatinite ... ... 1 gramme
Distilled water ... ... ... 20 c.c.
Before toning, three parts of solution A are mixed with
two parts of distilled water and one part of solution B.
The bath keeps for one hour, but after half an hour it
should be intensified by the addition of a few cc. of solu-
tion B. The prints, which should be barely over-printed,
are washed two or three times, and then jflaced in the
bath, film side up, until they show a violet tint by trans-
mitted light. This requires one or two minutes in sum-
mer. Then they must at once be thoroughly washed,
since otherwise the whites will appear yellow after fixing.
Fixing and washing performed as usual. To impart
to the prints a matt surface, they are squeezed on to
ground-glass, which they will leave, after drying, with a
matt surface of sepia tone. To attain black tones, a few
cubic centimetres of a saturated solution of nitrate of
lead should be added to the toning bath, and the prints
must be printed very deeply.
WIIAT PHOTOGRAPHY WILL NOT DO.
Under the above heading Captain Abney writes as follows
to the Daily Graphic of March 24th : —
The jubilee of photography is past, and we have had recounted
in public journals, almost ad nauseam, what photography has
already done, and there has been a little prophesying of what
we may expect it to do in the next fifty years, but there has been
no one bold enough to tell us what it can’t do. 1 am going
to take upon myself the r6lc of prophet, and mention one or
two advances which photography cannot make, although it is
popularly believed that these will become fails accomplis in
the not too-immediate future.
Photograp.iy in Natural Colours. — The question is often
asked, “When will photography in natural colours be found
out?” Had the question been put, “When will photography
in natural colours be commercially practicable?" or, “When
will portraits in natural colours be feasible ? ” the answer to be
given is, “Not before the centenary.” Photography in natural
colours has been effected, but by a process so tedious and long
in operation that it can never become of the least practical
value. Becquerel, Ni6pce de St. Victor, and others have pro-
duced photographs on silver plates in the camera approximating
to the colours of objects, and the writer has produced the whole
spectrum in its hues, though dim, on collodion plates, but all
have been effected by means of what is known as the printing-
out method, i.e., by making light itself do the whole of
the work on the plate, instead of merely imitating it,
and obtaining the final result by means of development.
Such a process, when used in the camera, is necessarily
extremely slow — so slow, indeed, that only with a very bright
light illuminating the object, and by an exposure some-
times extended over days, any coloured image at all can be
produced. This method is, therefore, completely out of court
as a practical process for obtaining portraits, and is many
times worse than the Daguerreotype process in its early days,
when a sitter had to endure being screwed up in a head-rest
for an hour or so in bright sunshine. From a theoretical
point of view, what has been done is interesting, but at
present, at all events, it remains only as a scientific curiosity.
To enable it to be of any practical value, exposures must be
short, and this entails the after process of development. Light
may so sift and shake the matter on which it falls that it
aggregates or disintegrates into minute particles of such a size
March 28, 1890. “[
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
247
that the light reflected from them shall be of that particular
colour which falls upon them ; but it can scarcely be con-
ceived, though a short exposure may so change some small
portion of the matter on which it falls, that a subsequent
action produced by purely chemical means, as is the case in
development, can continu^ to produce the same necessary
aggregations or disintegrations of the particles. Again, with
the results that have been obtained, the permanency of the
images is but short, as they will bear no subsequent exposure
to white light, the colours vanishing rapidly. From what has
been said, it is apparent that photography in natural colours is
out of the range of practicability with the present known
substances which are sensitive to light, and it is unlikely that
any substance will be discovered sufficiently sensitive to
enable it to be carried out by a printing-out process, and we have
seen how unlikely it is that any developing process can succeed.
Transmitting the Photographic Image to a Distance. — The
transmission of photographic images to a distance by electrical
means is also popularly believed to be within the range of
practicability. The transmission of sounds by a telephone, and
their reproduction by the phonograph, have seemed to the lay
mind, and even to minds which are not lay, to be akin to the
transmission and reproduction of photographic images. Had a
little more thought, however, been expended on the subject, it
would have been seen that the conditions of the two were totally
different. The phonograph enables sound to be reproduced
by means of lines or points marked on a sheet of foil, the depth
of sound being indicated by variations in depth and breadth of
the furrowed line. In a photographic image one is not dealing
with anything that can be represented by a line, but only by a
surface. There are two systems which may be employed to
produce the effect of light and shade lying on a surface, but
even then the two systems blend together by the fact that the
continuous surface at one end of a telegraph wire has to be
represented at the other by lines more or less closely ruled
parallel to each other. Bains’s system of the transmission of
handwriting by telegraph may be modified to reproduce a photo-
graphic image. In this system, the paper, with the writing to
be transmitted, was placed beneath a pointer connected with
the telegraph wire, and made, or broke, electrical contact,
according as the blank paper or the writing came beneath it.
The paper at one end moved at a fixed rate, and at the other
the paper was made to pass beneath a pointer at a similar rate.
At the other end, and when contact was made, or broken, at
the one station, similar contacts were made at the other, mark-
ing the paper when contacts were made. By passing the sheet
of paper on which the writing was made in parallel lines beneath
the pointer, evidently a sort of facsimile of the writing was
produced. By a modification of this plan, a photographic
print might be, in a measure, reproduced ; for instance, by
causing the lights and shades of a photograph to offer more or
less resistance to the passage of the current. By this means,
greater or less blackening of a properly prepared paper might
1)e caused, and produce lights and shades represented by parallel
lines.
A Dream and Nothing More. — The use of selenium, which
alters its resistance to the passage of a current according to
the intensity of light acting on its surface, has also been sug-
gested as a sensitive surface. This sounds very nice, but
unfortunately, a telegraph wire will not discriminate between
the currents transmitted from one part of a surface and
another. Hence, its connection with the telegraph wire for
this purpose is useless. By acting somewhat on the same plan
as that adopted by Bains, an image thrown on such a surface
might be roughly transmitted, but it would bear but little
resemblance to a proper photograph, and it is doubtful whether
it would be practically, or even scientifically, of any use.
Other plans based on the same principles might be suggested,
but they all must fail, and until such a time arrives that one
small wire will transmit an infinite number of small currents
coming from different parts of a surface, and record them
simultaneously on a surface at the other end of the wire, in
proper order and magnitude, the idea of practical photography
at a distance is a dream, and nothing more.
Light and Shade, — One more point is that photography can
never be strictly truthful as regards light and shade. If the
high-liglits in a photograph be accurately depicted on a paper
print, the shades will be found wanting in correctness. This
is an inherent defect in photography, even when black-and-
white have only to be reproduced. But besides this we have
another inherent defect, in the difficulty in portraying colours
in proper relation to one another. A photographic plate is
more sensitive to some colours than it is to others ; and although
modern improvements have lessened this defect, and may still
further minimise it, yet the want of truth ill rendering shades
correctly must always remain.” Perpetual motion will probably
be a thing of the past when truth in photography is still non-
existing.
XottCCS Of
Platinum Toning. By Lyonel Clark, C.E. (London:
Tlazell, Watson, and Viney , 1890.)
This little book, which is clearly written, and contains
instructions put into good form for practical purposes,
consists partly of information which has already been
published in the Journal of the Camera Club. The only
thing publicly wanting in relation to Mr. Lyonel Clark’s
method of toning, seems to be some series of exact
experiments from which some idea can be gained as to
the comparative resistance of platinum-toned and gold-
toned photographs to destructive chemical reagents, all
other conditions being equal. At present no figures on
this point are before the world.
In an appendix to the book Mr. Clark gives the follow-
ing useful details from French sources, about photographic
residues : —
“ I advise all photographers, however humble their out-
put, to save their residues — not that that they can expect
to recover the whole 97 per cent., but they would cer-
tainly get a return of something like 80 per cent.
“ From the following table, the result of careful
analysis made by MM. Davanne and Girard, we can see
exactly where the different losses take place : —
Draining papers
Silver
per cent.
1-028
First and second washing waters
before
toning
... 52-860
Hypo bath ...
... 32100
Washing water of fixed proofs
4-110
Cuttings and clippings
4-570
Remaining on proofs
... 3-100
Loss...
2-232
100-000
‘ 1 It will be at once seen that the majority of the silver is
found in the preliminary washing waters and the hypo
bath, being about 85 per cent, of the whole ; so that if we
only manage to save a fair proportion of this, we shall
effect a notable economy in our nitrate of silver bill.
“ A sheet of paper measuring 17 J by 22 will take up
about 37 grains of silver — say 36 ; and we should easily be
able to recover of this about 27 grains; or, in intrinsic
value, for every ten shillings’ worth of silver we should
get back seven-and-sixpence from our residues — on the
whole, not a bad return.”
After giving one of the methods of recoving silver from
washing waters and clippings, Mr. Clark says : —
“ The old hypo baths cannot of course be treated in the
same way, since chloride of silver is soluble in this men-
struum ; neither can zinc very well be used to precipitate
silver, as sulphide of zinc appears to be formed in the
248
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
operation. The usually adopted plan is to add liver of
sulphur, and throw down the silver in the form of the
sulphide, which is next roasted to free it from the sulphur,
and then fused. There are two drawbacks to this method :
the stench produced thereby is beastly and even injurious,
and the roasting of the residue is nearly as inodorous,
and if not properly carried out — that is to say, if any free
sulphur is left — explosions may occur when the mass is
fused. If this system of treatment be resorted to, the pre-
cipitated sulphide should be sent direct to the refiner’s.
“ But the simplest and perhaps best way is Davanne’s
method. This simply consists in immersing a plate of
copper in the hypo bath, and letting it stand for about
four days. Silver is gradually deposited on the copper,
whilst the copper is dissolved in the liquid. From time
to time, therefore, the copper plates, which are simply
stood up against the side of the tub, should be brushed ;
the metallic silver will then gradually settle to the bottom,
and when sufficient has been collected it can be fdtered and
washed. The dried filtrate consists of metallic silver mixed
with a little copper, and can of course be at once converted
into silver nitrate, contaminated with a little copper, giving
it a bluish colour. This colour will cause no harm to the
print, as it is soluble ; but if it is very strongly present, it can
be got rid of by adding gently silver oxide in the manner
described in the preparation of silver nitrate.”
patent Entclltcjnuf.
Applications for Letters Patent.
3,736. J. C. Shenstone, 13, High Street, Colchester, “ Hori-
zontally Elongating Easel for Photographic Enlarging and
Copying.” — March 10th.
3,743. W. Scorer, North Street, Havant, Hants, “Improve-
ments in Cameras, Slides, and Stands.” — March 10th.
3,763. H. Horsey, 38, Chancery Lane, London, “Glazing
Skylights and Lanterns.” — March 10th.
3,765. A. P. Riley, 77, Chancery Lane, London, “Telescopic
Camera Stands.” — March 10th.
3,775. W. Langdon-Davies, 45, Redcliffe Square, South
Kensington, “Apparatus for Developing Photographic Plates
without a Dark Room.” — March 10th.
3,833. F. W. Hart, 8, Ivingsland Green, London, “Stands for
Flash Lamps, Backgrounds, and Screens.” — March 11th.
3,880. A. Watt and C. Symes, 14, Hardman Street, Liver-
pool, “ The Production of Light for Photographic Purposes.”
— March 12 th.
3,898. L. G. Strangman, St. Albans, Monkstown, Dublin,
“ Camera Stand.” — March 12th.
3,958. J. W. Clarke, 37, Chancery Lane, London, “Repro-
ducing Photographs.” — March 13th.
3,968. T. W. Snagge, 14, Courtfield Gardens, London,
“Facsimile Autograph ‘Keys’ for Portrait Groups.” —
March 13 th.
4.035. A. T. Clarkson, 28, Bartlett’s Buildings, Holborn
Circus, London, “Apparatus for Facilitating the Production
of the Lime Light.” — March 14th.
4.036. A. T. Clarkson, 28, Bartlett’s Buildings, London,
“ Storing Lime Points for Lime Lights.” — March 14th.
4.037. A. T. Clarkson, 28, Bartlett's Buildings, London,
“Pressure Gauges.” — March 14th.
4.134. A. D. Loman, 186, Fleet Street, London, “Cameras.”
— March 17 th.
4.135. A. D. Loman, 186, Fleet Street, London, “ Portable
Cameras.”— March 17th.
4,178. G. Balagny, 323, High Holborn, London, “Flexible
Phototype Plates.” — March 17th.
4,269. W. W. J. Nicol and J. Lewis, Mason College, Birming-
ham, “Improvements in Photographic Printing.” — March
19 th.
4,364. Catherine E. Bissmire, 37, Chancery Lane, London,
“ Device for Theatrical Performances for Dissolving Living
Statues from View.” — March 20th.
Specifications Published.
6,385. — April 13 th, 1889. “Stereoscopes and Cameras.”
Harry Ransom, 47, Friars Street, Sudbury, Suffolk, Cabinet
Maker.
The inventor claims : —
1 . A photographic camera adapted to take stereoscopic pic-
tures and to be used also as a stereoscope.
2. In a combined camera and stereoscope a chamber adapted
to hold a screen of ground glass or the like in either of two
positions, according as the screen is being used as a focussing
screen for the camera, or a light-diffusing medium or back for
stereoscopic pictures.
3. In a combined camera and stereoscope having a chamber
as described, providing the said chamber with a pivotted reflec-
tor for reflecting light on to the pictures when the apparatus
is used as a stereoscope, and for closing the said chamber when
the apparatus is used as a camera.
4. In a combined camera and stereoscope, a screen having
springs which serve to maintain the said screen in position,
and, when the apparatus is being used as a stereoscope, as a
holder for the pictures.
5. A combined camera and stereoscope, the lens carrying
sockets of which are adjustable relatively to each other.
6. The combination with the apparatus hereinbefore de-
scribed of the dark slide or plate-holder, haviug a central slide
or partition adapted to press against the backs of the sensitised
plates and hold them firmly in position in the slide, the plates
being introduced into and removed from the slide at one end.
6,585. 17 th April, 1889. — “A New Use for Gelatine.”
Richard Henry Brunton, 21, Wellington Street, Strand,
London, Civil Engineer.
The object of this invention is to manufacture tablets suit-
able for advertising purposes, whereby the tablets are produced
in relief.
The inventor takes a model of the tablet he wishes to repro-
duce, such model having whatever undercut or relief may be
required in the tablet ; from this model he obtains a mould in
gelatine ; he then takes fine plaster of Paris reduced to a liquid
state, to which he adds a small quantity of alum, which tends
to produce a hardness of surface in the cast. Liquid plaster
thus prepared is then inserted into the various interstices in
the mould (which is conveniently effected by a brush), and sub-
sequently (with the fingers) tow or other fibrous material as
near the surface of the mould as may be found practicable ;
layers of canvas or equivalent material are then placed over
the whole surface and a framework of wood. Liquid plaster
is now washed over the surface, and when it sets all the mate-
rials become incorporated, and the tablet is removed from the
mould in one piece, and then painted and decorated to suit
requirements, as fancy or taste may dictate.
6,686. — April 18 th, 1889. “ Photographic Cameras and
Lenses. ” Thomas Rudolph Dallmeyeil 25, Newman Street,
Oxford Street, Loudon, Optician, and Francis Beauchamp,
Hope College, Whalebone Lane, Chadwell Heath, Essex,
Engineer.
Our invention relates to photographic cameras and lenses.
Heretofore in applying a lens to a camera for which it has
not been specially fitted, it has frequently happened that the
diaphragm slot does not occupy its proper position, owing to
the fact that the lens, when screwed up, has not been turned
quite far enough, or has been turned too far, and in order to
remedy this defect it has been necessary to alter the lens mount
to adapt it for the camera. The same difficulty has also existed
when applying a shutter to a lens.
The object of our invention is to provide means whereby a
lens or shutter can always be caused to assume its proper posi-
tion without the necessity for special adjustment, and to this
end it comprises the improvements hereinafter described.
According to our invention the flange on the camera into
which the lens is screwed is provided with an adjustable ring or
collar, haviug a slight longitudinal movement upon the said
March 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
249
flange, so that it 'can be adjusted to the proper position to cause
the diaphragm slot of the lens to occupy its proper position
when screwed up.
In practice we prefer to adjust the ring or collar upon the
exterior of the flange by means of screw threads, but it may
be provided with a series of inclined teeth, or arranged in any
other suitable manner.
In cases where a shutter is to be screwed into the front cell
of a lens, the latter can be provided with a ring or collar of
similar construction.
The inventors claim : —
1. The combination with a photographic camera or lens of an
adjustable ring.
2. A photographic camera, the lens carrying flange of which
is provided with an adjustable ring.
3. A lens having an adjustable ring or rings thereon sub-
stantially as described.
6,999. — April 26 th, 1889. “Magic Lanterns.” Charles
Gray, 11, Crooked Lane, King William Street, and Henry
Kemp, 7 and 8, Thavies Inn, both in the city of London,
Opticians.
Our invention relates to magic lanterns for producing dis-
solving view effects. In dissolving view lanterns as heretofore
constructed, it has been usual to provide each set of lenses
with independent illuminating apparatus, which arrangement,
when oil lamps are used for effecting the illumination, renders
it necessary to place the lenses side by side.
According to our invention, we employ one set of illuminating
apparatus in connection with two or more sets of lenses, where-
by we are enabled to place the said lenses one over the other,
and thus produce an oil illuminated lantern which is more
compact than those heretofore constructed.
In carrying out our invention, we advantageously place the
lamp or other illuminating apparatus upon a movable platform
or stage, by means of which the said illuminating apparatus
can be placed in connection with either set of lenses. The said
platform is advantageously moved by means of a rack and
pinion, but any other suitable mechanism may be employed for
the purpose.
In some cases we use only a single condenser, which is placed
on the platform with the illuminating apparatus, and is moved
therewith so as to operate in conjunction with either set of
magnifying lenses.
Although we prefer to arrange our improvements in a lantern
in which the several sets of lenses are arranged in a vertical line,
it is to be understood that our said improvements are equally
applicable to lanterns the lenses of which are placed in a hori-
zontal line.
The inventors claim : —
1. A magic lantern having two or more lenses, and a single
lamp or illuminating apparatus, the said illuminating appara-
tus being mounted upon a platform adapted to be moved so as
to bring it opposite to either lens.
2. In a magic lantern, the illuminating apparatus of which
is adapted to be moved to bring it opposite to either lens,
mounting the condenser so that it will move with the said
illuminating apparatus.
3. In a magic lantern, mounting the lamp or other illumin-
ating apparatus uj>on a platform adapted to be moved verti-
cally in guides by means of a rack and pinion, so that the said
illuminating apparatus can be placed opposite either lens.
7,905. May 11 th, 1889. — “Measuring Distances of Objects.”
Charles Francis Martin, of the 2nd Battalion The High-
land Light Infantry, Depot Hamilton, Lanark, Lieutenant.
My invention relates to means of measuring distance > of
objects, as for range finding, topographical surveying, and such
like purposes. By means of a suitable mirror or prism, I
determine a station whence the distant object sppears at or
about right angles to a second object. I then pace or measure
a base in the direction of the second object until I come to
another station whence some other distant third objeet is at or
about right angles to the second object. At this last station
I hold a double sight of known width at such a distance from
the eye, that I see both the first and the third objects coinciding
respectively with the two slits or points of the double sight ;
then, by a simple proportion, I compute the distance of the
first object from the first station, for, as the known width of
the two sights is to the ascertained distance of the sight from
the eye, so i3 the paced or measured base to the distance
required. The prism or mirror, the double sight, and a tape
or other measure for ascertaining the distance of the sight from
the eye, may all be accommodated in compact form for the
pocket.
173. 4 th January, - 1890. — “ Holding and Exhibiting Photo-
graphs.” Frederick Kitto, 3, Lower Union Street, Tor-
quay, Devonshire, photographer.
My invention relates to improvements in apparatus for hold-
ing and exhibiting photographs and other like view's, and is
intended for the purpose of using up photographers’ waste
plates by mounting photographs thereon by optical contact or
otherwise.
The invention consists of a frame to receive a photograph,
view, or any picture, with the back portion glued to the frame
to fix the aforesaid photograph or view in its desired position.
The frame is constructed of leather, cloth, linen, wood, metal,
or of any' other suitable material, with any degree of elaboration
on the frame.
The object of my invention is to fix the photograph or view
in the frame, or to fix a view or picture on the glass, after or
before the glass is fixed in the aforesaid frame.
The inventor claims : —
1 . The combination of the apparatus for holding and exhibit-
ing photographs and other like views, and for using up photo-
graphers’ waste plates, by mounting photographs thereon, or
by optical contact ®r otherwise, as described and according to
drawings.
2. The frame to be of any shape or size, and to be construc-
ted of any suitable material.
616. Jan. 13 th, 1890. (Communicated from abroad by
Georgina Newton, of No. 6, Avenue du Bois de Boulogne,
Paris, France, Gentlewoman.) — “ Improved Pocket Lamp.”
Charles Denton Abel, 28, Southampton Buildings,
Chancery Lane, London, Consulting Engineer.
This invention relates to an improved construction of appa-
ratus in which are combined in a compact form a lamp and
means for automatically igniting the same. The cylindrical
lamp vessel is filled with a suitable porous material, such as
cotton wool, which is saturated from time to time with paraffin
on unscrewing the bottom, and the said lamp vessel is so
arranged that on turning the bottom cap in the contrary direc-
tion to that in which it unscrews, it will cause the lamp vessel
to revolve in the casing. At one side of the latter a flat
channel is formed on the outside, and through the open lower
end of the passage is inserted a strip of cardboard or stiff paper,
on one face of which are deposited small quantities or dots of
combustible compound, such as is used for matches or fusees,
situated at equal distances apart. On the top of the lamp is
fixed a piece of wire or strip of metal which, at each rotation of
the lamp vessel, has its projecting end brought sharply against
one of the dots of material, to thus cause its ignition, where-
upon the resulting flame ignites the wick of the lamp.
611. — January 13«A, 1890. “ Magic Lanterns and Apparatus
relating thereto.” William Charles Hughes, Brewster
House, 82, Mortimer Road, Kingsland, Middlesex, Manu-
facturing Optician.
This invention can be adequately explained only by the aid of
diagrams.
765. — January 15 th, 1890. “ Plate- Changing Apparatus.”
Newnham Browne, 73, Cheapside, London, Fellow of the
Institute of Patent Agents. Communicated from abroad by
Friedrich Auguste Fichtner, of Elisenstrasse, 6, Dresden,
Altstadt, Saxony, Cabinet Maker.
The invention relates to an arrangement or apparatus for
application to photographic cameras carrying several plates
simultaneously (such, for instance, as are known as detective
cameras) enabling an exposed plate to be rapidly changed for
a fresh or unexposed plate, so that a fresh exposure may be
made w'ith a loss of a few seconds only.
250
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
(ftomspontienct.
^rocecUtngg! of jrorictteg.
A PHOTOGRAPHIC SCHOLARSHIP.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
Sir, — May I trespass again on your space to make an alter-
native proposal for the disposal of the above. At the Camera
Club Conference on Friday it was proposed that an annual
exhibition of photographs should be held, on the lines of the
Royal Academy or Paris Salon, where the hanging of a picture
would be its own reward. The only difficulty in the way was
want of funds. Now, if such a scheme is carried out, I may
say that the Britannia Works Company will be most happy to
place their gift at the disposal of the committee that might be
formed for the purpose. If others who have hitherto limited
their efforts to raise photography to a higher status to mere
talk, should follow the admirable practical example, there is no
reason why both the suggestions put forward should not be
carried out. Then we may see our art science rank with other
branches of learning which have endowments for the furtherance
of their study, and adequate rewards for those who excel
therein. John Howson.
Ilford, 22nd March, 1890.
CHALLENGE CUP COMPETITION AT THE CRYSTAL
PALACE.
Sir, — Would you kindly insert the enclosed in your next
issue, and oblige James Brown, Edgar G. Lee,
Hon. Secs. Newcastle-on- Tyne and Northern Counties Photo-
graphic Association.
[Copy of a letter sent to Messrs. G. B. Wollaston and
J. F. Peasgood, Photographic Exhibition, Crystal Palace,
London.]
Gentlemen, — Confirming my telegram of the 19th inst., I
am instructed by our exhibitors, whose names are appended at
foot, to formally protest against the award in the Challenge
Cup Competition, on the ground that, from authoritative
information in our possession, a portion only of our exhibits
was brought under the notice of the judges.
A large portion of our pictures having been excluded from
the competition, as we know to be the case, we hereby demand
an explanation, and unless that explanation is satisfactory, we
insist upon the entire Cup Competion being re-judged.
A copy of this letter is being sent to each of the photographic
papers. Edgar G. Lee, Hon. Sec.
Mosley Street Cafe, Neiecastle-on-Tyne, 21s< March, 1890.
Exhibitors' names : — Auty & Ruddock, T. Galloway, J. P.
Gibson, J. E. Goold, Edgar G. Lee, W. Parry, J. Pike, H. R.
Procter, H. G. Ridgway, Lyd. Sawyer.
NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE AND NORTHERN COUNTIES
PHOTOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION.
Sir, — In connection with our forthcoming Photographic
Exhibition, kindly permit us, through your columns, to
announce to intending exhibitors that we have, in their interest,
decided to extend the date for sending in application forms
from April 1st to April 7 th. Pictures must, as previously
advertised, be in our hands by the 1 0th prox.
James Brown j ,,
Edgar G. Lee) Hon' Sect'
The Photographic Society. — The following are the piesent
officers of the Photographic Society. President — James
Glaisher, F.R.S., F.R.A.S. ; Vice-Presidents — Capt. W. de W.
Abney, C.B., R.E., D.C.I., F.lt.S., T. Sebastian Davis, F.C.S.,
II. P. Robinson, John Spiller, F.C.S., F.I.C. ; Treasurer —
Walter S. Bird, 74, New Oxford Street, W.C. ; Members of
Council — G. L. Addenbrooke, W. Bedford, Valentiue Blanchard,
Lyonel Clark, Francis Cobb, Alexander Cowan, Thomas R.
Dallmeyer, Major L. Darwin, R.E., G. Davison, W. E. Debeu-
ham, W. England, J. Gale, H. Chapman Jones, F.I.C., F.C.S.,
Sir George Prescott, Bt., Sir David L. Salomons, Bt., J. W.
Swan, M.A., F.C.S., J. Traill Taylor, Leon Wamcrke, H.
Trueman Wood, M.A. ; Hon. Secretary — Capt. A. M. Mantell,
R.E., 8, Mansion Row, Old Brompton, Chatham ; Assistant
Secretary — Edwin Cocking, 52, Pall Mall East, S.W.
The monthly technical of this Society was held on Tuesday
evening last, the 25th inst. The chair was occupied by Mr
Arnold Spiller, F.C.S.
The Assistant-Secretary, Mr E. Cocking, having noticed that
the subject of the fading of silver prints was under discussion,
and having .an illustrative specimen in his possession, had noti-
fied to members that the subject would be presented, and had
brought the specimen with him. It had been taken only four
years since, and had been printed upon commercial ready sensi-
tised pai>er, and toned with the acetate bath. The print had
faded very badly ; whereas another print made thirty-one
years ago, and toned with the mixed hypo and gold bath — the
print having been mounted in a similar frame to that containing
the faded one, and hung on the same wall — was still in good
condition.
The Chairman believed that there were some makes of cheap
albumen paper which were very conducive to fading. About five
years ago he was using a cheap kind of albumen paper, and had
since found that all the prints that he could trace as having
been printed on that sample had faded considerably. Some of
the prints even showed distinct signs of fading within two
months of then’ being executed. The paper had a strong
smell. Unmounted prints of that lot had not faded so much as
the mounted ones, but the former had the advantage of having
been kept in a drier place.
Mr. Atkinson mentioned that in a part of Spain where the
atmosphere was generally very moist, prints had been found to
fade very rapidly.
The Chairman asked whether it was known, with any cer-
tainty, that encaustic paste has a preservative effect ? He had
a particular collection of photographs, all of which had faded
except three. Of these three, one was a carbon print, ard the
two others had been treated with encaustic paste.
Mr. W. Bedford said that encaustic paste was not a com-
plete protection. He had in his possession three prints that
had been treated in that way, one of them by Adam Salomon,
and they all showed signs of fading.
Mr. A. Mackie said that Mr. A. L. Henderson had used a
sort of varnish consisting of a weak solution of gum dammar in
benzole, and had found that prints so protected and exposed
side by side with others not so treated had stood much
better. He would enquire whether there were not two kinds
of fading, one kind showing itself by partial disappearance of
the image, and the other by a yellowing of the lights.
The Chairman said that the yellowing of the lights was due
to a silver compound not dissolved out in the fixing bath. The
presence of this compound could be detected in a fresh print
by applying a dilute solution of sulphide of ammonium.
Mr. Bedford enquired whether the addition of carbonate of
ammonia to the fixing bath, which had been proposed as a
remedy for the kind of imperfect fixation referred to, had
proved to be a complete success ?
Mr. John Spiller said that ammonia dissolved nearly, but
not quite, the whole of the silver compounds. The only sub-
stance which he had found to completely remove the silver was
cyanide of potassium ; this must be used in a very dilute state
— half a grain to the ounce was sufficient.
Mr. T. Sebastian Davis said that at the present time a great
many negatives were made very thin. That was a condition
which was conducive to fading of prints made from them, as a
good vigorous image could not be obtained. Printing in sun-
light also gave a much more permanent print than could be got
by printing in the shade. The use of sodium acetate in the
toning bath resulted from some experiments made by Mr.
Hannaford and himself. Too much soda had been added when
making up the alkaline bath then in use, and Mr. Hannaford
put in some acetic acid to counteract the alkalinity. He then
observed a characteristic effect upon the tone of the prints, and
afterwards acetate of soda was used direct.
Mr. Mackie enquired whether there was any characteristic
difference of tone obtainable with the different salts added to
March 28, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
251
neutralise the gold. He could not discover any difference
when all were stopped at the same stage. He hail used carbonate,
borate, tungstate, and acetate.
Mr. Davis considered tha^ borax gave a blue tone more
readily than acetate, but there was a great differanee in the
keeping power. A borax bath should be used directly, whereas
an acetate bath was better for being kept for twenty-four
hours.
Mr. W. E. DebenHam said that he found it stated in books
and periodicals that the active condition of gold in a toning
bath lasted until the metal was precipitated. His own
observations, however, led him to the conclusion that the gold
passed by keeping into a state when it would tone, if at all,
only with extreme difficulty, and that whilst still in solution.
On the other hand, even a dilute solution of gold might tone
actively, although partial precipitation had taken place. This
was shown by the alkaline process with carbonate of soda
and citric acid, recommended by Hardwich at about the end of
the year 1858. It was directed to heat the solution until a
bluish colouration showed the commencement of precipitation,
and the bath on cooling down was then found to be in vigorous
toning condition.
The Chairman said that toning baths appeared to get
soonest into condition as the acid of the added salt was weak.
Hypochlorous and carbonic acids were amongst the weakest
acids known, and baths made with carbonate of soda, or hypo-
chlorite of lime, were the soonest ready for use.
Mr. John Spieler then showed a collection of about forty
photographs which had been made from twenty-five to thirty-
one years ago by direction of the War Office ; none of them
showed any fading. They were not a picked lot, but the
whole of the set that he possessed. The practice in making
these prints was to use purchased albumen paper, and to float
it on a fifty-grain bath. The toning was done with bicarbonate
of soda, and the fixing in fresh hypo. Washing was effected by
means of a trough in which the prints were swirled round by
a stream of water, and with an intermittent syphon discharge
they were drained occasionally during the course of the wash-
ing. A false bottom of zinc pierced with holes prevented the
prints from sti. king to the vessel when it was emptied of water.
After a time the prints were taken out, and left to soak in
dishes during the night ; the prints after drying, were mounted
with warm glue beaten into a froth like shaving paste. The
mounts used had been, according to the date, of four different
colours, and were not all from the same manufactory.
Mr. Bedford thought that thorough fixing was of more
importance than long washing. He had two hypo baths in
use ; the first contained a solution of one part of the salt to
five of water. The prints were removed from this bath to one
containing one part hypo to ten of water. Both baths contained
liquid ammonia in the proportion of eight minims to the pint.
It had been said that citric acid in the paper hindered the
toning. In his experience, the effect was just the contrary.
In reply to questions as to the preparation of the paper, he
stated that he first floated upon a fifty-grain bath — which must
be quite neutral — and then, after removing the surface liquid
by (Ira wing the paper over a glass rod, it was floated for half
a minute upon a second bath containing thirty grains of nitrate
of silver, and a like quantity of citric acid, to the ounce.
Paper thus prepared would keep good for months. The second
bath did not require to be replenished with silver, but only
with citric acid, which was added in the proportion of five
grains for every sheet of paper that had been floated.
Mr. England said that a difficulty had been found in keeping
celluloid films, except those of small size, flat in the dark
slides. He had found that if a slight curve were given to the
film it would maintain its position, and he had, therefore, had
strips put in the dark slides, which made the film slightly
concave towards the lens. The ends of the film with a whole
plate were about one-eiglith of an inch in advance of the centre.
This concavity also was useful in bringing the ends more in focus
at the same time as the centre of the field. He had particularly
noticed tliis when using a rapid rectilinear lens.
Mr. D Eli exham said that there was a certain amount of dis-
tortion when a curved plate was used with a non-distorting lens.
In ordinary cases it might not be sufficient to show, but in
architectural subjects, when filling the plate to the margin, it
might do so. With an ordinary single lens the distortion would
be increased, but with an orthoscopic lens the distortions might
be made to nearly correct each other.
It was announced that at the next technical meeting, which
will take place oil the fifth Tuesday in April, the subject of
Celluloid Films will be discussed. Mr. T. S. Davis also pro-
mised to make some experiments on the lines indicated by the
discussion of this evening, and bring up the results on that
occasion.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
March 20 th. — Professor E. Steering, of Paris, in the chair.
The Circular issued by the Camera Club Conference, with
reference to the Regulations for Photographic Exhibitions, was
taken into consideration. The members were of opinion that
it was little use attempting to frame regulations, as each
committee managing an exhibition would make its
own conditions, leaving it to the public to accept them,
or refrain from exhibiting, as the case might be. About
many of the questions asked, it was impossible to give
a decision, as so much depended upon circumstances.
With regard, however, to some of them, they thought that
(1) Exhibition authorities should decline prizes placed at their
disposal for advertising purposes ; (2) That awards should not
be of equal value ; (3) That there should be a class for un-
touched pictures ; (4) That it was not desirable to stipulate
that each picture should be in a separate frame ; (5) That all
pictures should be judged on their merits, and that there should
be no distinction made between amateur and professional ex-
hibitors.
The Chairman exhibited some very good collotype prints by
Balagny, of Paris. The negative of one of the subjects was by
himself, and such was the rapidity of the process, that within
forty-five minutes of placing it in M. Balagny’s hands twelve
collotype proofs were produced. The Chairman also passed
round some photochromic prints by the Zurich Photochrome
Co. They were printed from stone, the bitumen process
being employed.
The “ International Photographic Union ” was referred to by
the Chairman, who said that any members of a photographic
society joining it would be welcomed by their continental
brethen. Ladies were eligible, and there was no subscription.
Replying to a question as to the popularity of eikonogen in
Paris, the Chairman said that it was not in popular favour.
Hydrokinone was the favourite, and was very economical ; he
had developed about nine hundred whole-plate negatives at a
cost of about twelve shillings.
A discussion on orthochromatic photography, and the ease
with which plates could be prepared, brought the meeting to a
close.
Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association.
On the evening of Thursday, 20th March, the members and
friends, to the extent of four hundred and thirty, held their
first “ Ladies’ Social.” Although the Association has been in
existence since 1863, the experiment of a ladies’ evening had
not been before attempted. The large hall — the “ Eberle” —
was occupied to its utmost capacity. The first hour was
devoted to a vocal and instrumental concert, at which some of
the leading local amateurs kindly assisted. This portion of the
entertainment was under the guidance of two musical members,
Messrs. Arnold J. Cleaver and F. K. G’azebrook, who are able
photographic workers ; they both secured medals at the Society’s
last Annual Members’ Competition.
The entertainment concluded with the President’s “Lecture
on Norway.” This included 130 views taken last June by the
speaker, Mr. Paul Lange. The descriptive matter was enter-
taining and instructive. Many of the scenes depicted were
hand-camera exposures, giving the daily life of the people of
Norway, and there were general views of mountain, glacier,
and river scenery. The pictures were shown to advantage on a
16-feet opaque screen, with Messrs. Archer and Sons’ long-
focus 12-inch lenses.
252
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[March 28, 1890.
The Lantern Society.
A representative meeting was held last week at St. James’s
Hall, when a set of rules was adopted. The programme of the
Society’s work is to embrace, amongst other things, the inter-
change or provision for an interchange of slides between members
in town and country, concessions in the shape of special terms
from makers and dealers in slides, lanterns, and apparatus,
together with an interchange between various clubs of ex-
hibitions.
The following is the list of the council as far as appointed : —
Chairman — the Hon. Slingsby Bethell ; Vice-Chairman — Mr.
T. H. Holding ; Secretary and Treasurer — Lieutenant C. E.
Gladstone, R.N., North wood Hall, Rickmansworth, together
with Messrs. G. S. B. Cresswell, E. Hall, N. Mackin, Maw,
A. N. Shepperd, and E. R. Shipton.
The annual subscription is a guinea, the entrance fee a
guinea, and for country members it is 10s., and 10s. ; but all
joining the Society before October 1st are admitted without
entrance fee, and all subscriptions will free members up to
October 1891.
Photographic Society op Ireland.
At a meeting of the Photographic Society of Ireland, held on
the 24th inst., the chair was occupied by Dr. J. Alfred Scott,
Vice-President ; and Mr. J. Joly, M.A., delivered a lecture
entitled “ Among the Alps with a Camera.” The photographs
were taken en tour, commencing at Brunnen, on Lake Lucerne.
The places, heights, and valleys of interest were numerous,
and the chief of them were exhibited either as reductions or
contact lantern slides, and comprised about seventy-two views,
and included w'ell-known mountains, glaciers, and passes. The
exposures were varied from one-eighth of a second, with a small
stop, to whatever the light indicated for the foreground. In this
latter particular assistance had been gained by resorting to the
standard tables now published by various authors. The camera,
7 j by 5, was supplied with a Dallmeyer R R Landscape Lens.
The plates used were Wratten and Wain wright’s. With regard
to development, pyro was first tried, but afterwards discarded,
and hydrokinone entirely used.
To get the best results Mr. Joly developed by the “ partial ”
method, recommended by Dr. P. H. Emerson and Capt. Abney.
The sky and bright lights, as from snow, were first brought up,
and development of them stopped by plunging the plate in
water. The development of the foreground is then proceeded
with by dipping and brushing on a stronger developer, i.e.,
a weak developer is used in the first part of the process ; when
detail is obtained the development is equalised by putting the
plate back into the developer for a moment ; washing and fixing
complete the process.
The details were good, while the snow, glaciers, and skies
were excellent. Instances of passing mists, or mountain tops
peeping through clouds, showed that the lecturer and his
fellow-traveller (Mr. Dixon) had displayed taste in select-
ing their views, and judgment as to exposure and develop-
ment.
Photographic Club. — The subject for consideration on
April 2nd will be “ Standard Solutions, and the Expression
of Photographic Formula!.” Bank Holiday outing at Godai-
ming.
Becquerel is sometimes credited by his friends to be the first
who photographed the solar spectrum. The spectrum was first
photographed by Ritter, and about the same time, quite inde-
pendently, by Wollaston.
M. H., Dublin. — Some parts of your MS. just received are
illegible, and some incomplete.
M. Goupil, Havre. — We hope to publish your interesting
communication nest week.
The publication of some notices of books, apparatus, and other
matters is postponed until our next issue.
The Photographic News will Ire published on Thursday
next, on account of the Easter holidays. All communications
should therefore reach the office not later than Wednesday
morning.
Urnshms! to ©omsponticnts.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photograph ic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5,Furnival Street, London
Ubique (Co. Wexford). — Photographic Trebles and Doubles.
“ How to take a treble image of one and the same person
playing at Chess ?” is your question. All depends upon the
position occupied by the players. If you mean to have three
figures — say, right and left profile and front face (of the
same individual) seated around the table, and supposed to
be playing a two to one game — then we should be inclined to
take the chess board and central figure by one exposure, a
side player against the same background by a second expo-
sure, and reverse this plate for the third figure. Is this
an answer ? For, to reply literally, a Victoria camera with
three lenses would give at once “a treble image of one
and the same person.” But this, surely, is not what you
mean ? There is no difficulty in taking “doubles;” such,
for instance, as “ Rejlander the Artist introducing his friend
Rejlander the Volunteer," or “The Painter and his Critic,”
now in the Crystal Palace Exhibition (screen 20) ; but the
addition of a third figure, at what is ordinarily the point of
junction, is not so easy of accomplishment.
W. S. — Hydrometer Test for Silver Baths. Under ordinary
circumstances it is sufficiently reliable both for the printing
and collodion baths. Take the specific gravity of the newly-
made solutions, and maintain this uniformly by the addition
of fresh nitrate of silver. This is not quite exact, for the
accumulation of alkaline nitrate in the solution is not taken
account of, although it must slightly affect the hydrometer
indications ; but for practical purposes this interference may
be disregarded.
L. T. E. — Chromates versus Bichromates in Gelatine. — We are
not aware of any experiments showing the comparative
sensitiveness of such preparations ; but Mr. W. T. Wilkin-
son asserted last week, at the Camera Club, that it was
desirable to add ammonia to the bichromated gelatine, which
would of course determine the formation of a neutral chro-
mate in the film, and that he, in practice, found this to
be a decided improvement.
M. F. — A Small Studio. Further particulars go to you by post,
together with a letter of introduction.
J. D. — Incandescent Lamp. Received your letter, and we
will bear it in mind. No news since our interview.
Inverness. — We are returning your photographs with a private
letter.
J. E. M. — Photography in Natural Colours. We think the
case has been well stated by Captain Abney ; and, until
further evidence is forthcoming, we must suspend our
judgment. One can hardly say that it has been confirmed
by Dr. Eder.
M. I’. — Blisters on Albumcnized Paper. Have you tried to
overcome this difficulty by adding a small quantity of
methylated spirit to the silver bath ? This might tend to
diminish the solubility of the albumen. Use about one
ounce of spirit per pint of silver nitrate solution, which
hail t >etter be mixed of full strength to compensate for
such dilution.
E. G. (Barnet). — Isochromatic Plates. The evidence is open
to inspection at the Crystal Palace Photographic Exhibition,
Block G ; but bear in mind that to-morrow will be the last
day.
L. A. (Devonport). — Collodio-Chloridc Prints : Want of Density.
This method, like the old Wbthlytype, was always supposed
to be best fitted for the production of delicate prints, and
does not lend itself so well to the printing of dense negatives.
Residues. — Reduction of Silver by Iron. Zinc is a much better
reduciug agent, and the difference of cost is not worth
consideration. Iron only very slowly reduces the nitrate
of silver, whereas zinc does so immediately, being a more
highly electro-positive metal.
THE
PHOTOGRAPHIC
NEW
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1648.— A/»H 4, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOl
“ Giphantia ” Invf stigattd 263
Photography iu Sweden ; 254
Photographic Printing, Outdoor and In. By C. Brangwin
Barnes 255
Photography in Habana 256
The Chemical Phenomena of Light. By John Spiller, F.I.C.,
F.C.S 256
Emulsions. By William Bell 259
The Havre Photographic Club 259
Extraordinary Assertions 260
With the Lushai Field Force. By T. D. Latoucbe 261
P AO X
Notes 262
Photography in Florence 263
A New Printing Process. By General Joseph B. Bro^n 263
Photographic Apparatus 265
The Photographer of the Future 266
The Photographic International Exhibition at Amsterdam ... 26"
Crystal Palace Exhibition 267
The Foaming of Certain Liquids used in Photography 268
Patent Intelligence 26s
Proceedings of Societies 269
Answers to Correspondents 272
“GIPHANTIA” INVESTIGATED.
Some weeks ago, a communication was made to the
Camera Club about photography having been foretold
in an old book called “ Giphantia,” published in 1761.
Long ago, in the old wet-plate days, this matter
attracted the attention of the photographic press, and
one writer, whose utterances we have recently tried to
rediscover, but failed, sent to one of the photographic
journals some strong reasons or statements questioning
the antiquity of “ Giphantia,” or the extract therefrom ; ,
therefore our reports of the statements made at the
Camera Club in relation to the book were cautiously
worded.
As the exceedingly curious matter deserved investi-
gation, we have since, by examination, found that
the British Museum Library contains three editions of
the book, all, so far as antique appearances go, bearing
external evidence of being old and genuine. The first
of these, entitled “ Giphantie,” is in French, and bears
the date of 1760 ; it is anonymous, and purports to be
published at “ Babylon.” The second is also in French,
is dated 1761, and purports to be published at La Uaye
by Daniel Monnier. The third is an English transla-
tion, with the following words on the title page : —
“Giphantia: ora view of what has passed, wliat is
now passing, and, during the present century, what
will pass in the world. Translated from the original
French, with explanatory notes, London. Printed for
Robert Horsfield, in Ludgate Street, 1761.” The
anonymous translator dedicates this edition to “The
Hon. Miss Boss.” On the leaf opposite the title page
is written : — “This book belongs to Twickenham, and
taken from thence .Tune ye 1st, ’99. — F. Howe.”
Some members of the Camera Club state that another
edition of the work was published at Cherbourg.
The authorities of the British Museum ascribe in
their catalogue the authorship of the book to Tiphaigne
de la Roche, and state that the two French editions,
which are first mentioned in the preceding paragraph,
were in reality published in Paris. Barbier’s Diction-
naire des Guvrages Anonymes, vol. ii., page 544,
published in Paris in 1874, ascribes the authorship of
“ Giphantie ” to Ch. Fr. Tiphaigne de la Roche, and
gives the date of the book as 1760, so fully recognises
its genuineness ; and it is probable that, on the authority
of Barbier’s book, the name of Tiphaigne de la Roche
is applied to the work in the British Museum catalogue
of printed books. Vol. III. of the Bibliotheca
Britannica, published in Edinburgh in 1 824, cata-
logues the English edition of “ Giphantia,” so that the
work was certainly in existence before the advent of
the Daguerreotype, collodion, and gelatine processes ;
consequently the work may be regarded as not of recent
date. Under these circumstances, we now quote in
full the remarkable passages contained in the book : —
I saw, out of a window, a sea which seemed to me to
be about a quarter of a mile distant. The air, full of
clouds, transmitted only . that pale light which forebodes a
storm : the raging sea ran mountains high, and the shore
was whitened with the foam of the billows which broke
on the beach.
By what miracle — said I to myself — has the air, serene
a moment ago, been so suddenly obscured? By what
miracle do I see the ocean in the centre of Africa?
Upon saying these words, I hastily ran to convince my
eyes of so improbable a thing. But in trying to put my
head out of the window, I knocked it against something
that felt like a wall. Stunned with the blow, and still
more, with so many mysteries, I drew back a few paces.
“Thy hurry,” said the Prefect, “occasions thy mistake.
That window, that vast horizon, those thick clouds, that
raging sea, are all but a picture.”
From one astonishment I fell into another ; I drew
near with fresh haste ; my eyes were still deceived, and
my hand could hardly convince me that a picture should
have caused such an illusion.
“ The elementary spirits,” continued the Prefect, “are
not so able painters as naturalists ; thou shalt judge by their
way of working. Thou knowest that the rays of light
reflected from different bodies make a picture and paint
254
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, 1890.
the bodies upon all polished surfaces, ou the retina of the
eye, for instance, on water, on glass. The elementary
spirits have studied to fix these transient images ; they
have composed a most subtile matter, very viscous, and
proper to harden and dry, by the help of which a picture
is made in the twinkle of an eye. They do over with this
matter a piece of canvas, and hold it before the objects
they have a mind to paint. The first effect of the canvas
is that of a mirrour ; there are seen upon it all the bodies
far and near, whose image the light can transmit. But
what the glass cannot do, the canvas, by means of the vis-
cous matter, retains the images. The mirrour shows the
objects exactly, but keeps none ; our canvases show them
with the same exactness, and retain them all. This im-
pression of the images is made the first instant they are
received on the canvas, which is immediately carried away
into some dark place. An hour after, the subtile matter
dries, and you have a picture so much the more valuable,
as it cannot be imitated by art, nor damaged by time. We
take, in their purest source, in the luminous bodies, the
colours which painters extract from different materials,
and which time never fails to alter. The justness of the
design, the truth of the expression, the giadation of the
shades, the stronger or weaker strokes, the rules of per-
spective— all these we leave to nature, who, witli a sure
and never-erring hand, draws upon our cauvases images
which deceive the eye, and make reason to doubt whether
what are called real objects are not phantoms which im-
pose upon the sight, the hearing, the feeling, and all the
senses at once.”
The Prefect then entered into some physical discussions,
first, on the nature of the glutinous substance which
intercepted and retained the rays ; secondly, upon the
difficulties of preparing and using it ; thirdly, upon the
struggle between the rays of light and the dried substance ;
three problems which I propose to the naturalists of our
days, and leave to their sagacity.
Meanwhile, I could not take off my eyes from the picture.
A sensible spectator, who from the shore beholds a tem-
pestuous sea, feels not more lively impressions ; such
images are equivalent to the things themselves.
The Prefect interrupted my extasy. “ I keep you too
long,” says he, “ upon this storm, by which the elementary
spirits designed to represent allegorically the troublesome
state of this world, and mankind’s stormy passage through
the same ; turn thy eyes and behold what will feed thy
curiosity and increase thy admiration.”
Charles Francois Tiphaigne de la Roche was born at
Montebourg iu 1729, and died on the 12th August,
1774. He was a doctor of medicine and a literary
man, and chiefly made his mark in the world in the
latter capacity. He took his degrees in the University
of Caen. His works aie little known, and but few
of them preserved in this country ; most of them arc of
an idealistic nature. Gipliantia is the name of an
island which the author supposes to have been given
to supernatural beings one day before Paradise was
closed on the ejection of Adam. He wrote a few
scientific works: one of them, entitled “Physical
Observations on Agriculture, Plants, and Minerals,”
was published in 176.5.
Why does not the Photographic Convention, which meets at
Chester this year, arrange for an excursion to the top of
Snowdon ? It may be years before it is within the same
moderate distance thereof.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN SWEDEN.
The Fotogmfisk ' Tidskrtfi , or Photographic News, published
at Stockholm under the management of Albin Roosval,
presents its readers in last month’s issue with a pictorial
supplement of no mean interest. In the course of every
year six illustrations at the least accompany this publica-
tion. The present picture, says the paper, will show
what we are able to accomplish by aid of the newest and
possibly most important of the means of photographic
printing. The picture is a phototype taken direct from a
negative after nature by a new method elaborated by Axel
Lagrelius, with the assistance of a lithographic institution,
representing a country scene with figures. A man is
shown reclining under a tree by a river-side watching the
approach of a boat containing a man and woman to the
shore. In the foreground are reeds, sedges, and other
water-plants. On the spectator's right is a pier or boat-
house. The whole presentment is soft and delicate, and
the process is said to be quick and cheap.
At a meeting of the Society at Stockholm on the
19th February, under the presidency of II. Gilden, the fol-
lowing were elected members : — John Hojer, Max
Sievert, Henrik Rosen, C. G. Engstrom, C. Johansson,
M. E. Biickstrbm, 15. W. Lundin, A. F. Hdglund,
A. Lindstedt, II. (1. ohrling, K. Salin, O. Lindberg.
Feychting, Victor Berg, E. Lundstrom, C. Akrell. F.
Almgren, Professors Montan and lletzius, C. G. Rude, a
photographer of Christiana, and the Court photographer.
M. Hansen.
Professor Ilasselberg gave a lecture at this meeting on
some experiments of the elder Draper, chiefly derived
from “ Draper’s Scientific Memoirs.” The “Scientific
Memoirs” or experimental contributions to a knowledge
of radiant energy, written by John William Draper, M.D.,
LL.D., the celebrated President of this Faculty of Science
in the University of New York, were published in England
in octavo in 1878, and are sufficiently well-known.
The most interesting part of this work, which engaged
the attention of Professor Ilasselberg, is perhaps “ on the
analogy between the phenomena of the chemical rays and
those of radiant heat,” extracted from the Philosophical
Magazine of September, 1848.
The editor, Albin Roosval, exhibited during the meeting
a collection of photographs, executed and presented to the
Society by Christensen and Sorensen, of Silkeborg, in
Denmark. These photographs were copied on aristo
paper manufactured by that firm, and some specimens of this
paper were submitted to the members of the Society for
experiments.
Numa Petersen showed a flash-lamp of French con-
struction. This apparatus, which has the form of an
ordinary note-book, gives a strong light, sufficient to
illuminate a small group in a room, and will supply twenty
flashes uninterruptedly, one after the other, in the space
of one minute. It contains a benzine lamp, lucifer
matches, and magnesium powder, and is ready for use on
any occasion. The cost for every flash is a mere trifle.
The whole apparatus may be purchased for 10 kronor, or
about 1 Is. l$d.
The rest of the number is made up of the usual
answers to correspondents, reviews of works treating on
photography, an article on composite photography after
J. T. Stoddard, and an announcement of an amateur
photographic exhibition in Buda-Pesth ; this exhibition,
commencing on the 15th of April, will remain open till
the conclusion of May.
Aerie 4, 1800. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
255
PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINTING, OUTDOOR AND IN.
BY C. BRANGWIN BARNES.
It has often been a matter of considerable surprise to me
that so many photographers should still conduct their
printing in the open air. From the earliest days of photo-
graphy it has been a recognised fact that the operating, or
taking the negative, is more likely to prove a success in a
studio than the open, but for some occult reason which I
have never been able to discover, the subsequent operation
of printing from the negative has always been looked upon
as a very minor detail, requiring but little skill and
capable of being conducted anywhere, and preferably on
the leads or in the back yard or garden. Now a very
little consideration will prove that this ideaisan erroneous
one, and that the erection of a studio for printing under
glass, or the conversion of some part of a room into the
same, will amply repay its primary cost, and that in a very
short space of time. The advocates of open air printing will
no doubt allege that prints arc obtained more rapidly out
of doors, and it is a fact that such might be the case if (Oh,
those dreadful if’s !) we had a climate where bright, dry
weather was the rule, and rain, fog, and mist, the excep-
tion ; but such not being the case, I contend that so far
from time being gained by printing out of doors, the boot
is decidedly on the other leg, as more prints can be
obtained under glass, and, what is perhaps more to the
purpose — where such a thoroughly conscientious set of
human beings as photographers are concerned — the number
will not only prove to be greater, but the general quality
better. A terrible amount of time is lost to the out-door
printer in rainy or showery weather ; each little downpour
necessitates the covering up of all the frames, and if the
shower threatens to be prolonged they all have to be rushed
indoors and wiped, and await another glimpse of bright-
ness ; and with such weather as we usually get at this time
of the year, the coveringand uncovering and taking indoors
and out again of two or three hundred frames necessitates
some considerable waste of time. In ioggy or misty
weather the moisture in the air condenses rapidly on the
glass and materially retards printing, added to which the
damp atmosphere also affects the sensitised paper, causing
it to print red and weak. Occasionally a shower comes
on so quickly that the frames are swamped before the
printer can cover them, and a few drops of water find
their way round the glass to the film side of the negative ;
the paper sticks and either necessitates the varnish being
soaked off, or, in the event of the plate not being var-
nished, it requires re-immersion in hyposulphite of soda,
followed by washing and drying: loss of valuable time
again. Add to this the fact that the frames have to be
hurriedly scrambled up, and that occasionally one falls to
the ground and reduces the negative to fragments, such
negative in nine cases out of ten being the most valuable
one in print, and I fancy we have a strong argument in
favour of inside printing.
In the summer, when we have less rain, the dust plays
havoc, entailing constant dusting of the outsides of the
frames, and even then it manages to get inside while the
print is being examined. Then think of the numerous
breakages caused by sudden change of temperature ; a
negative is brought in from a temperature of, say, 28°,
the frame opened and the paper changed in a room warmed
to about 50°, and it is then sent out again to be printed :
there is a sudden ominous click, and the negative displays
a crack from one side to the other.
All this might be avoided by printing under glass, and
a printing studio can be erected at a very trifling cost
when compared with what is cheerfully paid for the one
in which the operating is performed. I have seen an
arrangement which admirably answers the purpose required,
in use at one or two studios I could mention, and which I
may briefly describe as follows : A few boards are run out
level with the sill of a back window to form a sort of floor-
ing, and a glass roof is run from the level of the top of
window sloping down to the end of the boards ; this is
extended about four or five feet on each side of the win-
dow opening, and is capable of receiving a considerable
number of frames, which are thus protected from the rain,
mist, dust, and change of temperature, added to which
the printer is always at hand close to his work, and has not
one half of the running about to do that falls to the lot of
his brother who has to do his printing in the garden or on
the leads. Platinotype and carbon printing benefit from
this method of procedure even more than albumen silver,
or gelatino-bromide.
Should a bright sun glare upon the glass, a covering of
white tissue paper is an advantage, as sun printing soon
damages gelatine negatives. In the little island of Malta
I have seen printing carried on through a covering of
calico, so intense was the power of our best friend, the
sun. However, it is a rare thing to get very much sun-
light here in England, so it is advisable to fix even the
tissue paper in a way that it can be easily removed and
replaced. An excellent way is to stretch it upon little
wooden squares just fitting into each pane of glass, and
fastening with a button on either side, although one or
two panes might always be kept covered during the bright
weather for the purpose of printing the vignettes, which
are always softer through tissue paper than when the
aperture is uncovered. The best man to commission to
erect the printing studio or box is one who is in the habit
of building or glazing greenhouses, as they have a way of
keeping out the water that the ordinary run of builders
seem to be ignorant of, and it is necessary that such an
erection should be water and dust tight.
A I’HOTO negative bath dish has been patented by Mr. John
R. Moeller, Grand Island, Neb. This is a dish with vertical
end and side ribs, integral transverse ledges at the lower end of
the end ribs, and a corrugated partition, to support a number
of negatives in a single dish so that they will not bear against
each other, while their lower edges will be held above the
sediment in the bath. — Invention.
Nature calls attention to an “ Album ” which has been sent
to it, containing reproductions of photographs taken in
Celebes. “ The collection has been formed,” it says, “ by Dr.
A. B. Meyer, director of the Zoological and Ethnographical
Museum of Dresden, and includes thirty-seven plates, on which
about two hundred and fifty reproductions are printed. In
1870 and 1871 Dr. Meyer spent some time in Celebes, and
the greater number of the photographs which have been
reproducer! he brought back with him. Others he has received
from friends. We cannot say that the process employed lias
always yielded perfectly satisfactory results ; nevertheless,
the ‘Album’ contains many representations that cannot fail
to interest students of anthropology and ethnography. There
are groups of portraits from northern, central, and southern
Celebes, and any one who carefully studies them will find that
they give him a very vivid idea of the various types of the
native population. The tables are accompanied by short
explanatory notices, some of the best of which are by Dr.
.1. G. F. Riedel, Utrecht. The work is edited by Dr. Meyer, and
issued by Messrs. Stengel and Markert, Dresden."
25G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN HABANA
The Photographic Bulletin, which is published monthly in
Habana by the well-known depot of photographic effects
superintended by J. S. Lopez and Company, has already
reached the last number of its eighth volume. Of this last
number the most interesting contents are articles on
eikonogen, contretypes, transparencies for the lantern on
gelatine plates, and practical demonstrations.
The author of the article on eikonogen tells of his experi-
ence of this new developer, of its action ou different com-
binations, and of its value, as he conceives it, in comparison
with other agents. On the whole, he is of opinion that
not enough is known of eikonogen to furnish matter for a
definite and conclusive verdict, but so far as he has yet
gone in his experiments, such hopes as he has formed
about it have not been disappointed.
The exact place which eikonogen has to occupy in the
photographic laboratory has yet to be determined ; but
there is no doubt in the mind of the writer of the article
in the Bulletin that it presents brilliant qualities for the
display of the most delicate details in the deepest
shadows, requiring, as a rule, less exposure than is
necessary with hydrokinone.
Discussing the various external forms of eikonogen, he
says it presents itself sometimes as a grey crystalline
powder ; at others it discovers a deep, dark red with inter-
sections ; and again, at others, a colour known as cenizas
ile rosas, or ashes of roses. The colour of the solution
differs, of course, according to the colour of the substance
itself, and the experimentalist may obtain a dark vermilion,
an intense green, and a green primrose, besides other still
paler hues. The article, which is a long and interesting
one, goes on to treat of the solubility of the agent, which,
it says, varies about as much as its colour. As to the
quantity of eikonogen to be employed, the author is of
opinion that the published formula; usually state an excess
of what is actually required. In our own experi-
ments, he says, we have found that a very small quantity
of alkali gives results far superior to those obtained by a
more concentrated solution. The nature of the alkali is
unimportant. A caustic alkali may be used with the
eikonogen, or a carbonate of potash or sodium. A formula
foreikonogen is given by the writer, which, he says, produces
peculiar clearness and brilliancy in the shadows. This
formula is as follows : —
Sulphite of soda (cryst.) ... ... 194 grains
Carbonate of potassium ... ... 15 ,,
Carbonate of sodium ... ... ... 32 ,,
Water ... ... ... ... ... 8 ounces
The solution must be preserved in a well-stoppered
bottle, and when required to be used, to every ounce of
the solution must be added G grains of eikonogen. In place
of the 15 grains of carbonate of potassium and the 32
grains of carbonate of sodium may be substituted, with
excellent effect, 30 grains of carbonate of potassium.
Bromide may also be added. This works very well on the
bromised paper, and gives that crispness to negatives
which is so highly prized by many artists.
The article on contretypes, communicated byM. Balagny,
is of unusual length, and contains much profitable informa-
tion ; but the consideration of space forbids a detailed
examination.
The practical demonstrations of E. de Saint Priest is
another article which, owing to the same consideration,
cannot be otherwise mentioned than as well worthy of
an attentive perusal
[April 4, 1890.
The volume of the Bulletin , which is concluded by the
present number, contains many matters attracting the
attention of the photographer. Especially may be men-
tioned the articles on mosaics, on colours in photography,
on photo-miniature, on landscapes, on photography on
wood, on the reproduction of old engravings, on the
varied applications of photography, on the suppression of
the red light, on impressions on clothes and other textile
materials, and lastly, on the means of obtaining photo-
graphs in true colour relation bv the medium of coloured
crystals.
THE CHEMICAL PHENOMENA OF LIGHT.*
BV JOHN SPIELER, I.C.S., F.I.C.
As a past pupil of the late Dr. Percy, I have been per-
mitted to read, and make extracts from, the photographic
note-book of my old friend and much respected Pro-
fessor, and I commence by acknowledging my obligations
to the executors, who, through Mr. Hilary Bauerman,
F.G.S., entrusted me with this very interesting record,
and to Mr. George Shaw, of Birmingham, whose permis-
sion was freely given.
The account extends to twenty-three pages (quarto)
in the note-book, and two extra pages fastened in, which
are in the handwriting of our member, Mr. George
Shaw ; all the rest being in the clear manuscript of Dr.
Percy, and illstrated by sketches of the apparatus used.
The entries are arranged as a diary, commencing on the
28th October, 1844. and running on consecutively to some
date beyond the 5th November. Then a break occurs,
and there are occasional entries in later years — October
1850, and May 1853 — with other suggestions for experi-
ments, to which no specific date is attached. Further on
the pages become a sort of general note-book, devoted
to the entry of a variety of technical and metallurgical
details, analytical processes, &c., with which Dr. Percy's
subsequent career was so intimately associated. As
showing the original intention, however, it should be
stated that the cover of the book is endorsed “ Light,
October, 1844 ” — at a time when Percy was lecturer
on Chemistry at the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham — and
the first heading runs thus : — “Experimental Investigation
concerning the Chemical Phenomena of Light. Record
of Experiments, by G. S. and J. P., commenced on the
evening of October 28th, 1844/’
Tn some respects it was unfortunate that the work was
begun so late in the year, for the weather on successive
days wjs noted as “overcast and dull,” “cloudy with
slight rain,” “dull November day,” &c., and only on the
31st October and 4th November did the exposures get
the full advantage of sunshine. But. on the other hand,
it should be stated that the bulk of the experiments was
comparative, and sometimes the slower action of the
light enabled more accurate observations to be taken in
the earlier stages than would have been possible under
brighter meteorological conditions.
The first set of experiments was made with pure
chloride of silver, precipitated from the nitrate by a
slight excess of hydrochloric acid, and well washed with
distilled water, by decantation, in the dark. The pro-
duct was dried in a porcelain dish over a sand-bath,
ground to powder, and divided out into several tubes ;
* Read at thi Photographic Society. The full title of this paper is
“Eirly Experiments by Dr. Percy and Mr. Oejrge Shaw, ou the Chemical
Phenomena of Light.**
April 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
257
the object being to expose them all simultaneously under
various conditions, such as dry and moist air, or with dry
hydrogen or ether vapour in sealed tubes; and, in one
case, with potassium enclosed, so as to absorb any
chlorine that might be liberated, as well as most of the
oxygen contained in the air. In other words, this last
tube was exposed in an atmosphere mainly of nitrogen,
with an ingredient capable of taking up any evolved
chloride ; the potassium was not in contact with the silver
chloride, but held back at one end behind a loose plug of
asbestos. Details are given about the mode of drying
the air, hydrogen, or other gas, and a sketch showing the
disposition of the chloride of calcium and caustic potash
tubes is appended. The sealed tubes prepared over
night were left in a perfectly dark place until the next
morning. The results (recorded by J. P.) were as
follows : —
“ October 29th. At half-past ten they were exposed in
the open air to light ; the sun was visible through the
clouds, but the day continued overcast and dull.
Darkening of the chloride rapidly took place in every
tube, but so far as I could observe not more rapidly in
one than another. They were turned round several times
during their exposure to light, which continued until 4.30
the same day. From the fact of every particle of
chloride not having been brought equally under the
influence of light, part of the salt remained white, so
that there was a mixture of black and white particles in
each tube — hence the difficulty of estimating in a per-
fectly correct and satisfactory manner the precise
degree of darkening that had been effected in
each. However, that in a (ordinary dry AgCl,
in a corked test tube) seemed to have undergone the
least change, while that in b, cl, e (hydrogen, nitrogen, and
ether vapour) appeared to have been nearly equally
affected ; if anything, that in b (hydrogen) had been
most altered.”
There is no specific report about the final condition of
tube c (that containing the moist chloride in a sealed tube),
but it is evident that in this clotted state of the white
chloride, the action of light at best must have been very
partial. With regard to the influence of moisture, Dr.
Percy goes on to say : —
“ It must not be omitted that we cannot vouch for the
strict correctness of the term dry chloride, employed in
the preceding description, as we only dried it in a cap-
sule over the sand-bath, and did not ascertain whether
every trace of moisture had been expelled ; so that if
moisture had any influence upon the chloride exposed to
light, the preceding experiments become unsatisfac-
tory.”
A second series of tubes was got ready for exposure to
light on the following day ; as before, five in number,
but somewhat differently constituted. The chloride of
silver was dried for six hours in a hot-water oven, and
rubbed to fine powder for Experiment 1, or dried in the
same way upon slips of glass for Experiments 2, :t, 4.
Then arranged as follows : —
No. 1. Tube charged with dry AgCl in dry chlorine.
No. 2. Dry AgCl in dry nitrogen (/.e., with potassium
at one end of the tube, and fused chloride of calcium at
the other).
No. 3. Dry AgCl in iodine vapour. (Turned yellow at
once by partial formation of iodide of silver.)
No. 4. Dry AgCl in air with phosphorus. (This dark-
ened before exposure.)
No. 5. Silver foil in dry chlorine*. (The metal pre-
viously heated to redness, and dry chlorine gas passed
over it for some time ; the tube being full of chlorine
when hermetically sealed.)
All exposed from 10 till 4 on October 30th (dull and
cloudy day, with slight rain in the forenoon), and again
from 10 till 5 on October 31st (a brighter day, with occa-
sional gleams of sunshine).
Results. — No. 1 Tube. Scarcely perceptible change at
the end of the first day, becoming sensibly darkened in
ten minutes of bright sunshine, ultimately changing to an
‘ * ash grey. ”
Note. — October 31st, 1844. — “ Now we learn from this
experiment that, to a certain extent, the chloride of silver
in chlorine affords an indication of the intensity of the
chemical action of light ; for that which underwent
scarcely any perceptible change yesterday, became rapidly
and sensibly affected to-day.”
When put back again in the dark, the chlorine gas acted
upon the coloured chloride, and in three hours it became
perfectly white, ready to undergo a like change by repeated
exposure. This observation induced Dr. Percy at a later
period to propose the use of such an arrangement as an
actinometer, which he described at the Photographic
Society’s meeting of June, 1853. — See this Journal, Vol. I.,
p. 84.
Nos. 2 and 3 tubes both changed colour to a chocolate
brown, and, contrary to expectation, the iodide formed in
No. 3 did not appear to retard the change, which the
authors then supposed might be accounted for by assum-
ing the existence of a chloro-iodide of silver sensitive to
light, whereas pure iodide per se was known to be quite
unaffected by exposure.
No. 4 tube also darkened considerably, and the phos-
phorous acid probably assisted the change, for it was
bound to have had an influence even in the dark.
No. 5 tube, containing the chlorinated silver foil,
acquired a beautiful iridescence by exposure to light, the
film showing a play of colours, red or green, according to
the direction of the reflected rays. The second day’s
exposure did not alter this appearance, but the under side
of the foil began now to be attacked, and presented a dull
leaden-grey colour. [Mr. Shaw repeated this experiment
in a somewhat modified form, using Daguerreotype plates
acted upon by the fumes arising from chlorine water.
The results are described later on. ]
A third series of tubes was now prepared, all charged
with chloride of silver spread upon little glass plates, with
the object of ascertaining whether the presence of moisture
might have any influence. A pen-and-ink sketch shows
the disposition of apparatus, with spirit lamp to warm the
tube, and exhausting syringe to draw off every trace of
watery vapour.
I. Dry AgCl in dry chlorine gas. Tube hermetically
sealed.
II. AgCl in moist chlorine gas. Tube hermetically
sealed.
III. Dry AgCl in dry air. Partial vacuum and tube
sealed. Exposed simultaneously from 10. 20 until 5 o'clock,
October 31st ; fine day, with gleams of sunshine.
Results. — The last rapidly changed colour (in ten
minutes), and went on darkening. II. was more quickly
discoloured than I., but the atmosphere of chlorine
hindered the change ; and the former (moist chlorine)
proved most operative in bleaching the darkened chloride
when the tubes were taken indoors at 5 p.m., and by nine
253
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Atril 4, 1890.
o’clock, as seen by gaslight, the white chloride was quite
restored.
Iu order to set at rest this question of chlorine hinder-
ing the action of light, other experiments were arranged
in which the white chloride of silver, dried upon a watch
glass and covered with a flat glass plate cemented on with
white wax, was exposed to light under a bell-jar, with
corresponding apparatus beside it in which chlorine (and
afterwards bromine) had access to the chloride of silver.
The results were, as before, that only a slight darkening
occurred when chlorine had access, and the bleaching at
night took place as usual. The authors sum up as fol-
lows:— “ We have now distinct proof that the vapour of
chlorine does either retard, or otherwise modify, the
chemical action of light. Is this owing to the colour of
chlorine ?”
Next came comparative experiments with bromine, in
which a difficulty occurred from the bromine vapours
attacking the wax, so the white chloride of silver was
enclosed in hermetically sealed glass tubes, placed within
bell-jars filled respectively with chlorine and vapour of
bromine. Although the latter manifestly obstructed more
light, it was found that the white chloride in the jar of
bromine was more rapidly and deeply coloured than that con-
tained in the jar of chlorine. “It would appear, then,
(say the authors) that the modification induced in light,
iu its passage through an atmosphere of chlorine, does not
depend upon the colour ; because, if that were true, the
degree of modification should vary directly with the in-
tensity of colour, and should consequently be greater in
the case of light passed through bromine, than in the case
of light passed through chlorine. ”
Finally, the crucial test of exposing chloride of silver
in sealed tubes, placed within a jar of colourless nitric oxide
gas over water, and another one into a large stoppered
bottle of the same gas, with occasional admission of air, so
as to produce the red nitrous acid fumes, showed most
distinctly that with the colourless gas the darkening pro-
ceeded as rapidly as in air ; whilst in the deep red gas
the darkening was completely prevented for some time,
and only very slowly changed to a lead-grey hue as the
ultimate effect of protracted exposure. Here the ob-
served difference could only be accounted for by assuming
that the hignly coloured nitrous acid gases cut off the
chemically active rays, and apparently did so much more
thoroughly than the bromine vapour.
Experiments by Mr. George Skate, November, 1844. — A
couple of Daguerreotype plates was cleaned with dilute
nitric acid and powdered tripoli, rubbed afterwards with
dry cotton wool, and highly polished on a velvet buff
sprinkled with charcoal powder. One of them was ex-
posed, face downwards, for thirty minutes, to the fumes
arising from chlorine water, and the other for twelve hours
to the same treatment. Both were alike in appearance,
coated with a deal-white film of chloride of silver, which
was very compact, had considerable lustre, and reflected
the images of neighbouring objects with tolerable distinct-
ness. So prepared, half of the twenty-four hours’ plate was
covered up to protect it partly from light, and then both
plates were exposed for several hours ou a “very dull
day, the sky thickly clouded.”
The surfaces gradually changed to a moderately dark
slate colour, neither approaching blackness or the tint
assumed by precipitated chloride of silver under like cir-
cumstances. On the next day, November 4th, which was
very much brighter,” the two plates were put out again,
this time the half of the thirty minutes' plate being covered
up, and both exposed for more than an hour to “ hazy
sunlight.” They now suffered a very marked change ; the
slate-colour disappeared, and the surfaces assumed a rich
brown colour, with very metallic lustre, closely resembling
the appearance of old bronze medals, and those parts
which had been longest exposed to light .actually assumed
a much lighter colour than the surfaces that had been
partly protected.
Here the only circumstance calling for notice is the
fact that Daguerreotype plates were sometimes made of
rolled Sheffield plate, the upper layer of which was stand-
ard silver (containing about one-twelfth copper, and the
sensitive surface was, therefore, possibly a mixture of
cuprous and argentic chlorides, in which the latter largely
preponderated).
Amongst other interesting suggestions given in Dr.
l’ercy’s note-book was a proposal to try, as a substitute
for the amalgamation process, the extraction of silver from
its ores by first attacking them with ferric chloride solu-
tion, and then dissolving out the silver chloride so formed
with a solution of hyposulphite of lime. There is no
record of experiments actually performed, but we know
that the process was adopted later in the treatment of cer-
tain silver ores, before other improved methods came into
general use.
“ Indigotic acid in Calotype, Oct., 1850,” is another
entry, but it is not easy to guess the purport of such an
experiment, unless it was an early idea of working with
stained films.
“May 29, 1853. Photography. In the negative or
positive impression in the Talbotype process, in what state
is the silver? If it be metal, mercury should certainly
remove it. Try the experiment. Is AgS soluble in KCy ?
I think not ; if not, then after exposing a positive to IIS it
should not be obliterated by KCy. But is it not so ? ”
At this date I was an assistant in Dr. Percy’s Laboratory
at the Royal School of Mines, Jennyn Street, and I well
remember some experiments being tried with hot and cold
mercury to extract the silver from paper photographs, but
it was found impossible to get contact with the liquid
metal. I do not know whether mercury vapour was ever
tried for the purpose of forming an amalgam, and then
extracting this with the liquid mercury. On the second
point, 1 also remember Dr. Percy toning some silver prints
on plain paper by exposing them to sulphuretted hydrogen,
and these were afterwards shown at one of the Society’s
exhibitions.
About this time Dr. Percy, being on the first Council of
the Society, was frequently engaged in photographic expe-
riments, and testing the permanence of silver prints, on
which later he was invited to report. — See Photo. Journal,
Vol. II. pp. 175, 190, 251.
M. Leon Vidal writes to us that he has just won the ease
in an action at law brought against him in Paris by Mr.
15. J. Edwards, for certain criticisms on isoehromatic photo-
graphs, published in the Moniteur dt Id Photographic, of which
M. Vidal is the editor. The court considered that M. Vidal
had not exceeded his right of criticism.
North Middlesex PHoTouit.mnc Club. — An outing has
been arranged for K aster Monday to Welwyn, by the train leaving
Finsbury Park, G.N.K., at 10.45. Any interested are invited
to join. On Monday, Thomas F. Smith, F.R.M.S., delivered a
lecture on “ Micro-Photography,” illustrating it by means of
lantern slides, and showing the method of making the same.
Both botanical and histological slides of interest were shown ;
some of them were enlarged 2,000 diameters.
April 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
1 a
259
T
EMULSIONS *
BY WILLIAM BELL,
The accompanying formula for the preparation of a
gelatine emulsion for photographic purposes are the result
of several years of constant study and experimentation on
the part of the writer, and it is believed that if the details
of the process are strictly carried out with but an ordinary
degree of ability, plates fully equal to the best brands in
the market can be easily and uniformly prepared.
A mmon ia ■ Nit rate Em ul s ion .
vS>
No. 1— -
| Boiled water
No. 2.—
1 ounce
a grains
20 grains
4 drachms
No.
( Iodide of ammonium
C Chloride of ammonium
I Water
| Acid, nitric, a drop or two to render the solution
{ acid.
(Nitrate of silver ...
60
....... grams
(Water ... ... ... ... 4 drachms
To the nitrate of silver dissolved in the water (No. 8) add,
drop by drop, the solution of iodide of ammonium (No. 1),
until the precipitate of iodide of silver formed ceases to
dissolve in the solution. Then pour in the solution of
chloride of ammonium (No. 2), wash the chloride of silver
formed with three separate waters, draining each time ;
then add some pieces of broken glass to the moist mass,
and then 16 grains of Nelson’s No. 2 gelatine, and dissolve
with gentle heat (temp. 90° — 100°). Shake well, and add
the following solution : —
Water ... ... ... ... ... 4 drachms
Bromide of potassium ... ... ... 43 grains
Liquor ammonia ... ... ... 4 drachm
Pour this solution at one time into the bottle containing
the melted gelatine and chloride of silver ; cork the
bottle to retain the ammonia. Keep at a temperature of
90v for fifteen to twenty minutes. Test the emulsion by
a drop on glass, looking through by transmitted light from
a match to see if all reddish colour is gone. When this
has disappeared, and the emulsion viewed by transmitted
light is greyish blue or green in colour, the heating has
proceeded far enough ; and then 120 grains of Heinrich’s
gelatine (previously softened in water, and melted at a
temperature higher than 90°) are added to the emulsion.
This is to be well shaken, and then allowed to cool by
gelatinizing it slowly upon the sides of the bottle. Let it
stand six hours, lte-melt at a temperature of 100°,
gelatinizing again upon the bottle. Allow to stand six
hours, and melt once more. It is now ready to be mixed
with the boiled acid emulsion (see following formula).
Or, if the ammonia nitrate formula is alone to be used,
the melted emulsion, as just made, is to be poured into a
dish, and allowed to cool and set ; when cold, placed on a
clean cloth (mesh 1-80 inch), squeezed through, the
finely-divided mass well washed, drained, and pressed
under weight to expel excess of water, re-melted, filtered
through white silk, and then coated on glass. The final
amount should not be more than three ounces : if more,
then the gelatine lias absorbed too much water in washing ;
to avoid this, press longer. In preparing this emulsion,
it has been found that the presence of the bromide, with
heat and free ammonia, favours the acid and alkaline
emulsions. When the plates are coated, they can be im-
mediately passed through a small opening into an adjoining
room, kept at a uniform temperature of 50°, with free
circulation of air, and dried either on racks or on nails on
the wall, face outwards.
* Read before the Photographic; Society of Philadelphia.
Glass. — This should be previously cleaned by soaking
it in a mixture of equal parts of nitric acid and water,
well washed, dried on racks, polished with cuttle-fish bone
and water, using a piece of well-washed flannel. This
should be washed with a weak solution of soda, so as to
remove any traces of oil or grease. The plates, after being
dried, should be edged with a thick solution of gum traga-
canth, by means of a small camel’s hair brush tied to a
short thin stick, with the end of the stick projecting a
short distance so as to act as a guide for the brush. The
plates should then be stored in the hot room until wanted.
Filtering. — If this is done in the hot room, it can be
accomplished by passing the melted emulsion through
absorbent cotton ; otherwise a hot-water jacket should be
used for the filtering funnel, and the emulsion passed
through well-washed white silk or cotton.
THE HAVRE PHOTOGRAPHIC CLUB.
In January, attention was invited in these pages to the
circumstance that Havre, and more especially its adjacent
town of Trouville, on the other side of the mouth of the
Seine, offers attractions to those photographers who, when
they have but three or four days’ leisure, desire to spend
that short time upon a foreign shore. Among London
photographers, the popular landing-place for such a holiday
has been Antwerp from time immemorial ; Brussels,
Malines, Ghent, Bruges, and Dinant being one or more of
them also visited. Of late, the stream of brief holiday
seekers has been slightly diverted to Rotterdam and places
adjacent thereto. France alone, which is nearer to our
shores than any other foreign country, seems to have its
nearest seaport towns avoided by the greater throng of
English photographic tourists, although Boulogne-sur-Mer
is but three hours' journey from London, is exceedingly
picturesquely situated, and presents to the photographer
that attraction which he cannot get at watering-places
near London — sunsets at sea. The reason of this disin-
clination of the photographer to make short photographic
excursions to France is, no doubt, the uncertainty whether
he will not unintentionally get into trouble on the plea
that he is taking pictures too near fortifications, or in
some way or other coming into adverse contact with
F rencli officialism. France is over-regulated. The troubles
in which various harmless tourist photographers have
found themselves in France, through not understanding
local regulations and having no means of ascertaining
them without losing half-a-day in the inquiry, have
been from time to time published in the English news-
papers, with the result that the feeling of “ uncer-
tainty ” about having a spoilt holiday induces others to go
as usual to Belgium, where they know that they will be
well received.
We recently mentioned the existence of these deterrent
influences to some of the officers of the Havre Photo-
graphic Club. They stated that, so far as they knew,
anyone could take outdoor photographs of the interior of
Havre, and they thought along the beach also, but would
make inquiry, and send full information on the subject.
The information will be welcomed, and, at the same time,
they can state, perhaps, whether there are any impedi-
ments to photography in llonfleur, Trouville, and Caen.
Recently we found none in photographing at various
places on the lower reaches of the Loire, and found the
people everywhere in that district polite and exceedingly
lriendly.
200
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
M. Goupil, honorary secretary to the Havre Photo-
graphic Club (Photo-Club Havrals), sends us the report of
its Committee of Administration about the work of the
Club during the year 1889. The report sets forth that
the I Iavre Photographic Club was founded at a meeting
held on the 13th of June, 1889, and began to exercise its
functions on July 1st following. The Club is composed
entirely of amateur photographers, and has for its object
the diffusion of the photographic art, and of all its appli-
cations. At the outset the Club had twenty-one members,
and a provisional Committee of Administration, the
functions of which expired at Christmas, 1889. The
members of the committee were: — Mr. Emile Rouge,
president; Dr. Perrichet, vice-president; Mr. David,
treasurer; Mr. Acher, assistant treasurer; Mr. Albert
Goupil, secretary ; Mr. P. de Jonckheere, assistant
secretary ; and Mr. Soret, librarian. The premises of the
Club were and are at 27, Rue de Normandie, and had
been previously occupied by a photographer : the house
has a salon suitable for meetings, a studio, and a laboratory ;
adjoining it is a large garden.
Messrs. Fleury Hermagis presented the Club at the
outset with an excellent portrait lens three inches in
diameter, and Mr. Mackensteiu presented it a well-made
camera. Mr. David, its treasurer, presented to it a
picturesque background, and the Club bought a plain one. !
The studio is appreciated by the members, as most of them
would have had difficulty in fitting up anything of the
same kind at home.
The Club has three classes of members, namely, active, I
corresponding, and honorary. The active members pay
an entrance fee of ten francs, and an annual fee of thirty-
six francs. The corresponding members pay fifteen francs
a year. The fee paid by each honorary member is not
limited, but should not be less than ten francs a year.
The honorary members have the right to a certain number
of proofs, selected fromamong those exhibited by the Club, j
The Club has developed rapidly. At the end of 1889
the number of its active members was 39, of its corres-
ponding members 4, and of its honorary members 68 —
total 111. At a meeting of the Club held Dec. 20th, 1889,
the following officers were appointed for the year 1890 : —
Dr. Perrichet, president ; M. David, vice-president ;
M. P. de Jonckheere, treasurer ; M. L. Poupel, assistant
treasurer ; M. Albert Goupil, secretary ; M. Dorey,
assistant secretary; and M. Soret, librarian. The Havre
Photographic Club is prospering financially, notwithstand-
ing the expenses of starting it. The Club had a public
exhibition in Havre of the work of its members, which
exhibition was open from Dec. 21st to Jan 5th last, in the
Passage Bernardin de St. Pierre ; the premises had been
kindly lent for the purpose by M. Pellot The exhibition
was highly popular, and sometimes visited by more than
1,300 persons in a day.
At several meetings of the Club experiments have been
made which have a bearing upon points in theoretical
photography. M. Soret has made some experimental
investigations in relation to the photographing of the
electric spark. Several photographic excursions have
been made by the Club, but all of them limited to the
neighbourhood of Havre. During the early part of the
present year a course of lectures on practical photo-
graphy is being given every other Sunday, from ten o’clock
until midday, in the rooms of the Club, and it is expected
that these lectures will considerably augment the number
of its members.
[April 4. 1890.
EXTRAORDINARY ASSERTIONS.
A circular has been handed to us entitled, “The New
Colour Process in Photography,” purporting to contain matter
reprinted from Brighton Society of Saturday, August 31st,
1889, as follows : —
“ Plain photography has made rapid advances within the last
few years, and many efforts have been made by the photo-
graphic scientist, both at home and abroad, to produce a com-
bination of the chemical action of light upon the plate and the
colour vibrations that will suit the light and shade of the image.
Further, the aim of experimenters has been to produce these
colour effects upon the negative alone, but not with much suc-
cess. Professor Ives, of Philadelphia, has laboured for years in
this direction, but he has been obliged to confess that the
results are evanescent. I have, therefore, much pleasure in
drawing attention to the discovery of the new colour process in
photography which has been made by Mr. J. E. Mayall, beauti-
ful specimens of which maybe inspected at his studio, 43, Can-
non Place, Brighton.
“ He has started on a new basis. Aided by spectrum analy-
sis, he has produced a film which registers every vibration of
light from the deepest red and green through the whole gamut
of the spectrum to the violet and grey rays of Sir John Her-
schel. When this film is looked ui>on at an angle, the vibra-
tions of light can actually be seen on the negative. In the
process of completing the photograph these vibrations are trans-
ferred to the positive film, which registers with great accuracy
the vibrations of the image. Thus he has sub-divided the sub-
ject into negative and positive photography, and by applying
highly attenuated forms of colour to the delicate vibrations
which the light has made — and which colours assimilate them-
selves to the image — he has succeeded in producing a picture
in which the lights and shades of the original are brought out
with an accuracy unapproachable by any other method. The
colours are attenuated to the 180,000th part of a grain, and
are sufficiently transparent to fill up the interstices of the por-
trait which the light has made. Professor Owen, who has
inspected Mr. Mayall’s new process, says : — 1 It suggests the
conditions whereby the thousandfold varieties of colours are
selected by flowers. I gaze upon my garden as if I had a new
sense. Those conditions had never been the subject of a
thought when I entered with my neighbour Chadwick your
studio. But when I received evidence of the process by which
not only forms, lights, shades, but also tints, in finest grada-
tions, had been secured in the photograph before me — a second
self-living and gazing at me — I began to feel that you were
leading the way to a cognition of the subtle modus opcrandi to
which we are indebted for the countless lieauties of feathers,
scales (of butterflies), and flowers that adorn our world.’
Amongst the specimens I have seen at Mr. Mayall's studio, and
which it should be mentioned are produced in a few minutes,
are several which exhibit all the delicacy and finish of a high-
class miniature by Cosway.
“ Mr. Mayall jxissesses many high testimonials to the im-
portance of his discovery, besides that referred to above by
Professor Owen. Among them is one by Dr. Thudicum, the
organic analyst to the Government. Mr. \V. H. \Y alien, the
expert in the Patents Office, having made an elaborate and
exhaustive report upon Mr. Mayall’s new process, says, ‘ The
conclusion at which I gladly arrive is that Mr. Mayall’s process
is the most jierfect of its kind, both in regard to its i»erfection
of optical form, its selection of the precise colour of the sitter,
and its permaneucy.’ A good deal of Mr. Mayall’s success in
the production of this new artistic process lies in the fact that
he has discovered the way to help Nature, and that l>eing so,
there can scarcely lie a doubt that the result being so beauti-
fully effective, it will soon supersede every other method of
j colouring.”
One would like to be informed if the writer of the foregoing
knows anything about light or photography, and if so, whether
he or anyone else will show the vibrations on the negative of
which he speaks at a meeting of the Photographic Society ;
, also the production of a positive image by the transference of
1 the said vibrations, as stated.
Aruii. 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
201
WITH THE LUSHAI FIELD FORCE.*
DY T. D. LATOl'CHE.
Leaving the Kurnafuli, with the dolcc fur niente of its
dugouts, at Demagiri, and following a bridle-path made by
the expedition of last year, we plunge at once into jungle
as dense as any to be found in India. How the engineers
managed to find their way through it is astonishing, con-
sidering they were seldom able to see more than a few
yards ahead, and the hills are cut up by innumerable
ravines in bewildering fashion. For the greater part of
the distance to Fort Lungleh, forty-three miles, there was
not a vestige of a former path. The immense trees, with
hundreds of huge creepers hanging in festoons from one
to the other in wild confusion, with the path winding
beneath them, present one with pictures of great beauty at
every turn, but it is impossible to transfer these to the
camera, at any rate to a detective, as the dense canopy of
leaves overhead shuts out the greater part of the light, and
an instantaneous exposure results in a blank plate, or one
showing the faintest possible image. Moreover, one view
of such jungle is so like another, though all are beautiful,
that it requires something of the human element to make
such a scene interesting enough for a picture, and it is
only where one can bring in a string of coolies or mules on
the march, or a camp with its background of trees, or a
stream crossed by a bamboo bridge, that one feels inclined
to bring the camera into play. Such scenes are not want-
ing on a march like the present, but at ordinary times the
main attribute of the jungle is its vast loneliness, and silence
too, for it is surprising how few signs of animal life, even
of birds, one can detect.
Fort Lungleh is built on a narrow ridge at an elevation
of :l,500 feet above the sea, near the site of an old Lushai
village, Saipuya’s. It is surrounded by a stockade of
upright timbers, within which the huts occupied by the
force of the Frontier Police, who garrisoned it during the
last rainy season, make a picturesque group, but its
cramped position renders it difficult to get a good view of
the whole work. There is a magnificent view to the north
down the valley of the Dullesarv or Klong river, and to
the east, in which direction lies the goal of our hopes, the
village of Ilaka. which a column from Burma is also mak-
ing for. Hills piled on hills in endless confusion make
up the view, all covered with a uniform expanse of dark-
green jungle, amid which patches of brighter green show
where the ground has been 4i jhiimed,” or cleared for cul-
tivation in former years, these patches being now covered
with a dense growth of bamboos. A few brown patches
also show where the forest is being cut down for this year's
cultivation, and, with a good glass, near these a villager
can generally be discerned. The large, neatly-built bamboo
huts, supported on piles, like most of the hill villages of
Assam, stand well out from the surrounding jungles.
Most of those in sight belong to so-called friendly villagers,
to whose friendship, however, it would not be well to
trust in most instances without an escort at one’s back.
But some of those near Lungleh have shown their sincerity
by assisting in cutting a road through the jungle to the
north, prompted no doubt by self-interest, as the chief
Lieupunga, whose village lies in that direction, is almost
as much an enemy of theirs as of the British.
1 accompanied a reconnaissance party sent out to inspect
this path, which we found was cut along the banks of the
From the March number of the Journal of the Photographic Society
of India,
Klong river, flowing due north towards C'achar, where it
goes by the name of the Dullesary. For two marches we
were able to use bamboo rafts, and numerous were the
pretty views which we came across as we rounded bend
after bend of the river. Some of these, when a raft or a
string of coolies fording the river could be brought into
the picture, were duly transferred to the camera, also a
“jhiim” hut, in which we spent a night, and a group of
friendly Kuki chiefs, who came down to interview their
friend, Mr. Murray, our popular political officer. Al-
together we were away from Lungleh for eight days, and
had a very pleasant time.
After a long delay at Fort Lungleh, waiting until a
sufficient length of the road ahead should be completed to
make it worth while to move on, I came on as far as the
camp I am writing from, which is about twenty miles from
the Fort, and situated on the Mat river, a fair-sized stream
which joins the Koladync some miles below. Here there
is some good fishing to be had. or rather was, for, after the
first few days, when the bag included a 20 and a 1 7-pounder,
the fish have unaccountably stopped running, and not even
the most artfully thrown spoon will now induce them to
leave the depths of the pools they live in. The scenery
on this river is very fine, the hills being more precipitous
and rocky than those on the Klong, and there is plenty of
work for the camera along its banks.
Since coming up here 1 have seen two other forms of
the detective cameras belonging to officers of the expedi-
tion. One of these is the Kodak, which is no doubt a
handy little instrument, and if the paper it contains could
be depended on, would be a capital sort of camera to carry
with one where every extra ounce of baggage has to be
considered ; but, on development, none of the pictures
taken with this one were entirely successful ; in fact, it was
difficult in some cases to make out what the picture was
meant for, and the paper showed the same whitish blotches
that 1 described in a letter written to the journal some time
ago concerning paper negatives. The other camera is one
of those circular “ secret ” affairs, which take six small
pictures in succession on a round plate; I developed one
or two of these for the^owner of the camera, but though
the image came out fairly well in some cases, the plates
frilled so badly that they were of no use whatever. On
the whole, I think that an ordinary detective, in which
plates of an admittedly good description can be used, is
the best to take on an expedition of this kind, and I am
well satisfied with the performance of my “ Optimus."
By the way, I see that Messrs, l’erken and Rayment have
brought out another form of this camera, in which there is
an arrangement for bringing each plate into position for
exposure without opening the camera, but it seems to me
from the diagram given with the advertisement that it
must add considerably to the bulk of the camera. Can
any reader of the journal speak from personal experience
of the performance of this new form, and if so. will he, of
his kindness, publish his opinion of it ?
Camp Mat Hirer, 10/7# February , 1890.
Thk Library Catalogue for 1890 of the Photographic
Society of Philadelphia is to hand. The introductory notice
says that “a noteworthy feature in the Library is the number
of complete sets of journals, dating from the earliest days
of the art down to the present time. Although separate text-
books of the various branches of photographic science are not
wanting in the Society’s collection, the journals — which detail
the progress of the art from day to day — still remain the most
useful sources of information,”
262
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, I860.
jaotcgi.
Photographers who make a speciality of copying 1
pictures have been excessively busy during the past
fortnight, and will continue to be so until “ sending-in
day.” Indeed, it is said such is the desire for artists
to have their pictures photographed, that work has been
turned away. No doubt the fashion of illustrated cata-
logues has led to this rush of business. Unquestion-
ably artists are immensely the gainers by the publica-
tion of copies of their exhibited pictures, and they are
now not contented with the sketch notes made by them-
selves— which were once considered sufficient — but
prefer to have the originals photographed and reproduced
by the Meisenbach or some analogous process. Their
practice, however, of delaying the completion of their
works until the very last moment rather hampers the ,
photographer, who finds himself inundated with com- 1
missions which he is unable to execute in the limits of
time allowed. Very few — if any — artists who arc also
photographers photograph their own pictures. As
eveiyone knows, copying with the camera is a special
study in itself, and a study which requires infinite
judgment and knowledge of the relative value of tints.
Apropos of the illustrated catalogues, the majority of
the artists make no charge, and make no objection to
copies of their pictures appearing. One or two, on the
other hand, take a keener view of the matter, and
stipulate for a fee. We do not see why they should
not. Though the illustration may benefit the artist
from an advertising point of view, the publication of
an illustrated catalogue is purely a business affair, and,
we presume, is not run for the benefit of the artist, but
for the benefit of the publisher. Why, then, should the
latter not pay for his material? Of course, in fixing
the price, the value of the picture to the artist as an
advertisement would be taken into account.
“ The “ International Cyclorama,” the title of a
species of enteitaiument now being given in London,
seems to indicate a revival of the stereoscope, which
for some years has fallen into disfavour so unaccountably.
To see the “ Cyclorama,” the visitor seats himself in
a chair, and looks through a pair of lenses fixed in
a large circular cabinet. A series of instantaneous
views then passes before his eyes, sufficient time being
given to enable him to thoroughly take in the points
of the pictures. The pictures now on view illustrate
the scenery of the 1th ine, and the Paris Exhibition,
and it is intended from time to time to replace them
by other scries illustrating other European countries.
Taking snap shots with an instantaneous dotectivc
camera is very much like shooting a bird on the wing.
We are inclined to think that dependence on “ finders ”
is of not much use, and that to be successful in
“ shooting folly as it Hies,” one must get accustomed to
act almost by instinct. A good instantaneous photo-
grapher is more likely to be born than made. A
writer iu a sporting magazine, relating his experience
in shooting, somewhat bears out the theory. When he
commenced trap shooting he “ thought it was neces-
sary to lay my cheek down on the gun stock and screw
around until I got my eye and the sight iu a line with
the object.” The result was that he was more often
at the foot than at the head of the class. Then he
got reckless and fired without taking all this trouble.
To his surprise he smashed the glass ball at which lie
fired, and having got hold of the idea, he afterwards
seldom saw the sight or even the gun when he pulled
the trigger, and his success was surprising. Applying
the same plan to field shooting, he found it succeeded.
“ Of course,” he remarks, “ allowance must be made for
birds crossing, rising, or falling, but that is instinctive,
and seldom thought of by our most successful shots.
Indeed, thinking has little to do with it. If it had,
one’s bird would be out of range before he could collect
his thoughts.” This puts the matter on all fours with
instantaneous photography. The action of exposure
must be simultaneous with the sight, or the much
desired picture disappears.
The possibility of photographing a horse race at the
winning post has often been talked about. The new
racing club at Hurst Park, shortly to be opened, intends
to try the thing practically. A new “patent camera ” is
spoken of, with which it is proposed to take instan-
taneously the “ finishes,” while additional instruments
will be also stationed at various jumps on the course.
So enthusiastic arc the believers in this “ patent
camera,” that a syndicate of well-known persons has
been formed to work it commercially.
The attention ■which Mr. Herbert Marshall’s studies
of London are exciting shows how attractive and
popular are pictures of life in the great metropolis.
The camera has been employed times out of number,
but although photographs admirable in execution and
artistic in arrangement have been taken, these are very
few compared with the great mass of mediocrities. To
render London properly requires much patience and a
good deal of luck. It is so rare that the traffic takes
the exact disposition necessary for a well-balanced
picture. The murky atmosphere, even on sunny days,
very frequently spoils all the photographer’s efforts.
We believe that the proprietors of one of the illustrated
papers some time ago contemplated a series of repro-
ductions from photographs, but gave up the attempt
because they did not come up to their idea of
what constituted an artistic picture. London has yet to
be photographed . II itherto it has not had j ustice done.
Photography appears to great advantage in connection
with some experiments made on the Continent with
smokeless powder. To show the difference between
a volley fired with the ordinary powder, and the new
variety, photographs were taken at the moment the
commander gave the order to “ fire.” In the case of
the first named, a thick, black cloud is represented,
through which the gunners are barely perceptible,
while, in the second case, only a thin haze is noticeable.
Abkil 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
263
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FLORENCE.
The Camera Oscnra or Monthly Review of the Progress of
Photography, which is published at Prato, near Florence,
under the able supervision of Professor L Borlinetto,
with the calloboration of Professors L. Mei), l’iccioli. A.
Rossi, (i. Jankovick, 1). Ratti, L. Ciardelli, Sac. Sobacchi,
1). Leuzi, Danesi, G. Glisante, Dr. L. Gioppi, and its
energetic editor Genuano Salvi, is now entering its
eighth year of life. No Italian photographic journal
born in Italy can boast of an equally long existence.
It has not, indeed, escaped the sickness and various
maladies which infest, unfortunately, adolescence. There
have been times — disastrous epochs, says its editor —
when this journal has seemed to be threatened with the
adverse fates of the family of Saturn. It has on some
evil days presented the appearance of a child desiring
to devour its own progenitors, but such an accursed
hunger and infuriate longing has been happily stilled
without any sacrifice of artistic life ; and the Camera
Oscura, with its mystic motto taken from the pages of
G. B. Porta. . . Ex qua maxima naturae si nobis
iUucesccre possant, still lives, and is doing well. Resistance
at every cost is, we are told, the motto blazoned on its
ancient banner, and this motto the editor is determined
to Haunt in the face of adversity, and to maintain in its
full significance, undeterred by any expense and undis-
mayed by any sacrifice. As a handsel of this heroic
sentiment the readers of the Camera Oscura arc pro-
mised a carbon photograph with the signature of the
illustrious Italian statesman Quintino Sella, the work of
Luigi Luzzati, a name well known in Italy and elsewhere.
The present number of the Camera opens with an
article by Bettiui on a subject of great interest to every
professional photographer— the artistic property in photo-
graphic works.
A committee, it appears, was formed in Italy in the
year 1855, under the able presidency of Carlo Brogi, of
Florence, for the sake of obtaining from the Government
some legislative disposition for the legal protection of
works of photography. After much expenditure of time
and labour, a letter was received by the committee from
the Minister of Agriculture, Industry, and Commerce, to
the effect that as the law with regard to intellectual labours
included those of photography, any new legislation was j
inexpedient and unnecessary. Like other artistic works,
such as painting and sculpture, photography deserved to
be, and was, in the opinion of the Minister, under the !
tutelary aegis of the law. Like painters, photographers 1
also had their exclusive rights to publish and to reproduce.
The only difficulty was to distinguish counterfeit or
imitations where several photographers possessed a copy
of the same monument, statue, or picture.
This, however, in the opinion of the Minister, was a
question rather of a juridical than of an administrative
nature. A competent jury well acquainted with photo-
graphic details would, in the majority of cases, have amply
sufficient data to pronounce their verdict as to whether
any given photograph was or was not a counterfeit or
imitation. In fine, the Minister assured the President of
the ( ommittee that he had determined to admit registra-
tion in the case of photography for the preservation of the
authors rights, whether in the matter of original works, or
of photographic reproductions.
Notwithstanding all this, Signor llettini declares that
arbitrary reproductions aud counterfeits are as frequent as
ever, lie utters loud lamentations. But if it be any
consolation to him to have companions in misfortune, he
has many. It is not in Italy alone that proprietors, as he
complains, of leading photographic establishments con-
descend to reproduce the work of others solely for the sake
of illicit profit. And indeed it is time, as he affirms, to
put a stop to such abuses and infractions of the law. .Men
who are capable of such dishonesty should, says Signor
Bettini, not only be denounced at the bar of public opinion,
but also legal proceedings should be taken .against them
under the statute which covers with its protecting shield
all intellectual arts and labours, among which photography,
as has been already shown, is to be numbered.
'The next article in the Camera is the continuation of
an instructive communication on Instantaneous Photo-
graphy, giving practical rules about its expedition, rules
which arc at the same time exceedingly simple, and would,
if borne well in mind, prevent the occurrence in the
photographic laboratory of many vexatious mistakes.
They all rest on mathematical considerations, by which
their exactitude may be verified. The concluding article
in this number treats of the Development of Latent Images.
A WRITING INK PRINTING PROCESS.
I1Y GENKKAI, JOSEPH li. BliOW.W
In looking over my note-book to find some subject in
order to comply with your request for an article, I came
upon the appended particulars, which, you will see, were
written for publication quite ten years ago. As I was not
quite satisfied that I might not still farther perfect the
process, or at least render the manipulations so exact as to
ensure uniform and constant results, I deferred making it
public till I had further leisure for working it. But cir-
cumstances prevented my ever taking it up again, till it
was, in the pressure of other duty, absolutely forgotten.
But when I found in an old portfolio some of the prints
then made by the process so well preserved, and so
superior to any specimens which I have ever seen resulting
from the attempt to get black tones from “ blue pictures,”
or to tone or dye the faint but beautiful prints upon plain
bichromated papers, I have thought that this process
deserves some attention and may be of interest, or possibly
lead to a popular process. Samples of the prints then
made I enclose. Remember, these prints were made ten
years ago, and though “ink pictures,” they were but
slightly deteriorated in tone— a slight treatment with a
weak gallic acid solution has brought them up to their
original strength, and 1 see no reason why they should not,
even after the lapse of fifty years, be restored in the same
manner should they become faded, which is more than can
be said of any silver print.
I intend, at my earliest leisure, to work at this process,
according to my original idea, till I can ensure exact
results, for as you will see by an examination of the prints
enclosed, the effect is due to the action of light in render-
ing the chromated albumen insoluble the same as in pig-
mented gelatine in the carbon print, and of course it is
liable to the same mishaps of over-exposure, rendering
the whole insoluble, or of under-exposure when the
carbonate of soda would remove everything, instead of
producing the proper gradation to receive the required
degree of staining or dyeing.
I remember that I had the best results from the use of
a weak solution of gallic acid and a prolonged development
j in the iron bath.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, 1890.
2(54
Since Mr. Mungo Ponton, in 1889 or 1888, published
the method of producing photographic prints by exposing
papers coated with bichromate of potash under a nega-
tive to the action of the light, experimenters have never
ceased their endeavours to render this agent the basis
of some process by which it could be made to take the
place of the salts of silver for positive prints. Its
extreme solubility in plain water, by which the portions
unacted upon by light can be so perfectly removed
from the paper, is its immense advantage, since the
silver salts require a special solvent, which itself is
difficult to remove from the paper after it has done the
like office for the silver, and which is unquestionably one
of the chief causes of the want of permanence of silver
prints. The process of Mr. Ponton gives but feeble
images, and though most beautiful for their minuteness of
detail and exquisite gradation, are of no practical value as
pictures.
Twenty-five years ago Mr. J. Perry, an English gentle-
man, thought he had accomplished the business, and
patented his process, which was exceedingly ingenious,
and made use of some very interesting chemical reactions.
Ilis process was this, briefly : — After the original bichro-
mate print was thoroughly washed, it was placed in a
solution of protosulphate of iron, and then, after washing,
was treated with gallic acid solution, which developed an
“ink picture." It was found impossible in practice, how-
ever, to preserve the purity of the whites of the picture,
or to prevent the paper from being irregularly stained,
and the tone of the “ink picture” was also far from
agreeable.
Innumerable attempts have since that time been made
by French, German, and English experimenters to over-
come these defects without success, till this process and its
allies have been wholly abandoned.
The “Foxtype” was patented, depending upon the
reaction of aniline upon oxide of chromium, but it would
not give half-tones, and was only suitable for map repro-
ductions ami line work, such as the multiplication of
plans. After the fact that bichromated gelatine is made
insoluble by the action of light was known, and the
“ carbon print ” was gradually brought to perfection,
the use of the bichromates as printing agents was wholly
given up, except in connection with some form of
gelatine and pigment printing.
I find, however, in the Photographic News (British)
of October 7th, 1876, a communication from the govern-
ment photographer in Madras, India, describing a process
for developing bichromate and gelatine prints, without
pigment, bv means of protosulphate of iron and pyrogallic
acid, in which he claims to have succeeded in preserving
the purity of the whites by glacial, acetic, and citric
acids. This claim, however, proved fallacious in the
hands of others.
Mr. Wharton Simpson, in an editorial, recapitulates
these failures above-mentioned, as well as his own, and
suggests that the only method by which the staining of
the paper can be prevented would be to combine the
process of dyeing, or developing, with single or double
transfer, as in -Mr. Swan’s carbon process, suggesting
logwood infusion as a promising agent for effecting the
dyeing of the chromic image. No success has met this
plan, it is evident, for nothing has been heard of it since
that time.
In the last number of the Scovil Manufacturing Com-
pany’s Photographic Times (.January, 1890), a very pleasantly
written article appears, by a gentleman who calls attention
to “an unrecognized bichromate process," describing the
old patented process of Mr. .1. Perry, and speaks of it
as “my process"! It is undoubtedly a most interest-
ing adaptation of a well-known chemical reaction, from
the cheapness of the salts used a great acquisition, and.
if it could be freed from its apparently inherent defects,
would be likely to supplant, for many purposes, the
silver print. Its permanence is quite certain.
The platinotype process of Mr. Willis displays reactions
of great beauty, and is, doubtless, all that its inventor
and advocates claim, but it requires rare and expensive
chemicals, and cannot be easily extemporaneously prepared
by the average operator; it entails much extra trouble in
preparing and using the hot developer, and for these
reasons will demand much time and persuasion to super-
sede silver printing. The process, as originally given,
called for silver salts and necessarily for hypo for their
elimination, but the improved method dispenses with both,
and it is therefore the most promising competitor to silver
that has yet been proposed.
The new modification to Mr. Ferry's process, which I
have worked out, requires: — (1) .Double albumenised
paper; (2) saturated solution of bichromate potash; (8)
protosulphate of iron; (4) carbonate of soda (washing
soda) ; (•’>) gallic acid.
Float the paper on the solution of bichromate, with the
albumenized side uppermost, for ten or fifteen minutes,
taking care that nothing soils the upper surface. Drain
and dry, preferably by radiant heat. When dry it is
very sensitive, and must be carefully shielded from the
light. Expose under the negative one-third of the
time required for a silver print under equal con-
ditions.
From printing frame immerse in a large quantity of
pure water for ten minutes. From this time all opera-
tions can be conducted in full daylight. Change water
and soak as before till every trace of unaltered bichromate
is gone. Immerse in a ftan containing a solution of
protosulphate of iron, twenty grains to one ounce of
water, for five minutes. Then place in a moderately
strong solution of carb. soda (washing soda) for one-half
to one minute. Wash thoroughly, and. lastly, place in
the toning bath of gallic acid, three grains to one ounce
water. The colour changes slowly up to full purple
black, and if the soda detergent has been properly pro-
portioned in strength to the action of light in the planting
— i.e. , stronger for over-exposure, or weaker for under-
exposure— every detail of the bichromate print will be
exquisitely preserved, and in any event, the whites of
the print will remain perfectly clear, and the paper be
unstained. Wash in a few changes of water, and hang
up to dry. Should there be any cloudiness of the whites
after drying, the print may be again treated with a weak
solution of soda with advantage. — The Beacon, Chicago.
- m
Hackney Photographic Society. — The annual soiree of this
Society is announced for the 24th inst. : this will conclude the
first year of the Society’s work.
The Calcutta Photographic Exhibition.— The Journal of
the Photographic Society of India states, in relation to the late
Calcutta Photographic Exhibition, that the judges have awarded
a silver medal to Mr. B. G. Wilkinson, London, for his set of
twelve lantern slides, and, in the Indian amateur class, a
certificate of honourable mention to Mr. J. W. Wade, Cochin,
for his set of fourteen lantern slides.
April 4, 1890.]
Til
<\
I IE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
265
zl
PHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS:
Mr. Eastman is now in London, and has been in this
country for a few weeks. With the introduction of the
Eastman Co.'s Tollable celluloid film has been the advent
of several new hand-cameras of the “kodak ” type, which
all put less tension upon the film than was the case when
films supported by paper were alone used. The new
kodaks bike rectilinear instead of circular pictures ; one
camera takes a quarter-plate, and another a 4 in. by 5 in.
plate. Each camera has two finders, one for use when
the plate is vertical, and the other for use when it is hori-
zontal. The camera has a focussing device, and a doublet
lens with three diaphragms. The new cameras are made
in four sizes, and will carry transparent film enough for
either 48 or 100 exposures. For the four sizes of camera,
there are but the two sizes of plates already mentioned.
The new kodak for round pictures carries a film for 100
photographs, has a fixed focus lens, and one finder.
Mr. Eastman has brought with him from America
a new “kodak” for 7 by 5 inch plates, which camera at
some future time will appear
in commerce. It carries
enough film for forty-
eight exposures, and has a
lens of six inches focal length,
with a pointer and scale to
assist in adjusting the lens to
focus. The side of the case
containing this camera opens,
and falls into a horizontal
position, permitting the front
and bellows to be then drawn
out.
Messrs. Mawson and Swan
have sent us a specimen of
the developing - room lamp
shown in fig. 1, the merit of
which lies in its simplicity
and cheapness. The lower
part is a spring candlestick,
which keeps a carriage-lamp
candle flame always at the
same level ; above this is a
cylindrical chimney of ruby
glass, with a conical tin reflector hanging upon its exterior
Mr. J. Fallowfield’s “facile” detective camera is not
quite new, but has not been
previously described in these
pages. The instrument has
been in public use for some
months, and the chief merit of
it is its extreme simplicity.
The plate-changing arrauge-
Fi:. 1.
Fxq. 2.
Fiy. 3.
ment consists, as represented in fig. 2, of two boxes,
one above the other, and as the feeding, or upper box, is
moved forwards, the lower box travels backwards ; thus,
when one plate has been exposed, it is drawn backwards ;
another sheathed plate drops into its place from above,
through a slot, and is then brought to focus ; and so on
until the charge of plates is used up. The shutter of the
“facile,” which is represented in fig. 3, is also extremely
simple ; it consists of a light, fan-shaped piece of metal
with a curved aperture near the top ; this is pushed back-
wards or forwards to make the exposure, by either the one
or the other of two light rods which project outside the
box.
Fallowfield has introduced a light walking-stick
tripod stand, represented in fig. 4.
When the walking-stick has closed,
it carries a long tubular top or lid.
When this tubular top is drawn off,
and turned bottom upwards, it will
screw on the top of the tripod, and
thus add to its height ; by this in-
genious method, which was invented
by Mr. Raker, of Wallington, a fairly
high stand can be closed to form a
walking-stick of but moderate length.
Mr. Fallowfield asks us to announce
that before long he will move his
establishment to new premises in
Charing Cross Road, London.
Messrs. Skinner & Co. have exhibited to us a camera,
fitted with an appliance, represented in fig. 5, by which the
bellows can be racked
out with much greater
speed than usual. A
toothed wheel, instead
of the usual milled
head, is fixed at each
end of the pinion, and
has a folding handle by
which it can be grasped
by the fingers. Several
teeth of this wheel bite
the rack at once, so give
steadiness of motion,
and the large diameter
of the wheel, which is about that of the ordinary milled
head, causes the bellows to be expeditiously racked out.
The camera has also a fine adjustment.
A paper in the Bulletin de la Soctite Chimique dc Paris, by
W. Spring and M. Lucion, says that manganese peroxide should
not be represented by the formula Mn02, but by Mn*04, and it
is very probably a manganous inanganate MnO, MnO,, or a
manganese permanganate Mu20j3Mn0=5(MnO2).
A Detective Pencil. — “Our Celebrities” gives the follow-
ing account of Mr. Harry Furniss’s method of seizing points
for caricatures : — “I take them how, and when, and where I
can. 1 never let my victims know I am on their trail. Some-
times they are riding in the park, sometimes they are just
getting into a train, or they are chatting to a friend in the
lobby, or fast asleep in the House during some very dry
debate. It doesn’t matter to me ; all I strive to avoid is the
conventionality of a photograph You see, a photographer may
often lose all the salient points which go to make a man’s indi-
viduality. I seize them all, and the result is that, in nine
cases out of ten, I will produce by far the best likeness. But,
mind you, it isn’t always easy work, even with the same
men.”
26G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHER OF THE FUTURE.
While not fully sympathizing with those who write and
talk about the alleged state of degradation into which
photography has fallen, we are aware that it is low enough
to make thoughtful photographers anxious, although it
does not appear to deter the thoughtless from entering the
ranks in numbers altogether out of proportion to the
increase of the population, or the enhanced demand which
may be expected from increased culture. In every large
city, and in many of the smaller ones, too, there are men
who do excellent work and get fair prices for it, but it
must be confessed that they are but a few among the many ;
while the rank and tile, or at least a large proportion
thereof, ean command little more than a trading profit on
the material employed, which too often, alas ! is really more
than it is worth.
The alleged causes of this unfortunate state of matters
arc perhaps as varied as the men who proclaim them are
numerous, but a careful consideration of the question will
resolve them all into one — over supply. Photography in
its trade aspects is not different in any essential feature
from other trades, and is influenced as they are by the
relation of supply and demand, and while, to a small
extent, the former may create the latter, the effect will be
small indeed compared with the influence of the latter over
the former.
The cheapest of the so-called “ cheap Johns” is neither
the knave nor the fool that he is sometimes represented to
be. lie is simply a tradesman who has embraced a calling
the members of which are already too numerous, and
realizes the fact that wherever there are more workers than
work, the work will go to the worker who offers the
greatest inducement to the employer. In the case of the
photographic worker the possible inducements are only, or
mainly, two — better quality than the average, or lower
price. Improvement in the quality or style of work is
frequently, perhaps generally, beyond the reach of “ John,”
and he knows that although it were not, the public, or a
large proportion thereof, are not yet sufficiently cultured
to appreciate it, and so has recourse to the other alterna-
tive, and reduces his prices to attract work that would not
come to him without such reduction. In other words, the
photographic labour market is overstocked, and so long as
the trade aspects of photography bulk as largely as they
do at present in the practice of the art, the man or body
of men, by whatever high sounding title they may assume,
that promises t<j cure or even ameliorate this unfortunate
state of matters by secret methods, or methods other than
those that may be legitimately applied to ordinary com-
mercial transactions, should be disregarded as but sound-
ing brass and tinkling cymbals.
In the good old days, when the practice of photography
was profitable, and technical excellence not so easily
reached, the portals by which the business was entered
were either the good and time-honoured apprenticeship, by
which the pupil agreed to give four or more years of
labour, in return for which the master became bound to I
initiate him into all the mysteries of the craft ; or by the
payment of a tolerably large sum for the required practical
instruction, followed by much patient and persevering
practice, until the difficulties and uncertainties of the
various processes had been overcome. Both of these
methods of preparation for the life work were costly, and
involved the ability to spend a considerabls portion of un-
profitable, or rather unpaid for, time, and consequently
the additions to the ranks were rarely in excess of the
work waiting them. Then, too, the general public were
less critical and more easily satisfied, looking on a photo-
graph as simply a photograph, and considering the pro-
ductions of one man just as good as those of another ;
so that the hands of a favoured and abler few were not,
as now, crowded with all that they could do, while the
visitors to the many were and far between.
All this is changed now. The introduction of the dry
plate and simplification of the various processes have made
the acquirement of the ability to make photographs suffi-
ciently good to please a large portion of the community
an easy matter ; ami the cost of apparatus that will, at
least, answer the purpose has been so much reduced that
any one of average ability may, and hundreds during the
last year or two have, after a little reading, or a few
practical lessons, started as full-fledged photographers,
and thereby doubled, or perhaps trebled, the number of
professional photographers actually required to do the
work of the country.
But there is nothing either morally or legally wrong in
this. In a free country the practice of trades and pro-
fessions is open to all who care to qualify themselves, and
although, in the case of professions involving the life or
property of the people, the State justly steps in and
demands evidence of the qualifications of the candidates
for admission, the public are with equal justice left to
judge for themselves of the ability of those who seek only
to minister to their necessities in connection with trade,
commerce, or art ; and our friend “John,” in trying to
attract sitters to his studio by reducing his prices, is as
clearly within his rights as a citizen of a free country, as
are Lehmann of Chicago, or Wanamaker of Philadelphia,
in advertising that they will furnish the public with
crockery or clothing at prices lower than their neigh-
bours.
It should be observed that the question is not as to the
quality of the articles supplied, but as to the rights of the
parties to supply such articles at such prices as will
please themselves and the public. It may be that the
articles supplied by tlm magnates of Chicago and Phila-
delphia and the “John” brotherhood throughout the land
are not quite equal to those dealt in by higher-priced
dealers, but as the magnates in question, and some at
least of the “ John ” family, have amassed tolerably large
fortunes, we may fairly presume that they are not the
round men in the square holes.
The sum of the matter, then, is this : — A certain degree
of proficiency in the practice of photography is easily
attained, and, consequently, the ranks of professional
photographers have been increased far beyond the require-
ments of the people.
The value of this excessive labour has, in accord with
the inevitable laws of supply and demand, been so reduced
in value, as to have inflicted great hardship on consider-
able numbers, and changed the practice of photography,
in all but the hands of a favoured few, from a highly
profitable to a poorly paying profession.
This being the true state of matters, is there any remedy,
or possibility or probability of amendment? We think there
are two movements, which, working together, may effect
a cure, and restore the professional practice of photo-
graphy to even a higher degree of prosperity than it lias
heretofore attained — the education and cultivation of the
public taste and appreciation of art, and the higher educa-
tion, technically amd artistically — especially artistically — of
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
267
April 4, 1890.]
the photographers. We have already said that in many of
the larger cities, and in some of the smaller ones, there
are photographers whose hands are always full, but either
from heredity or patient study they are artists in the true
sense of the term, and find a clientele sufficiently cultured
to appreciate their work. Through the spread of educa-
tion generally, and especially the high-class illustrations
in modern periodicals, and the equally powerful influence
of photography itself, what is now confined to the favoured
few — cultivated artistic taste, and the ability to appreciate
true works of art — will become the heritage of the many ;
and photographs that are accepted by the thousand and
paid for now, will then have no commercial value.
This movement is going on now, and will continue to
go on, independent altogether of the photographer ; but
the other to which we alluded must be carried on by him-
self, or some one for him, and how is it to be done ?
The question is indeed a difficult one — so difficult that,
like the lecturer on temperance, we almost despair of
making any satisfactory impression on the old, and would
fain devote our attention exclusively and hopefully to the
young. The old, the men already struggling with a poorly
paying business, will feel the necessary study somewhat
irksome ; but much may be done by first attempting to
thoroughly realise the possibilities of photography, and
then resolving to reach the highest, or as high as may be
within their power. Careful study of engravings from
the men of mark of former and present times, and
analysis, line by line, of the illustrations in the leading
periodicals, most, if not all, of which may be so studied
with profit. Simultaneous with such study should be
carried on the careful reading of works treating of art
in all its phases, especially its composition and light and
shade ; some of Ruskin’s are good, and Burnet's essays
are simply invaluable. This is about all that the older
men can do for themselves, and any man who asks them
to pay for promises to do more, tries to induce them to
lean on a broken reed.
For the rising generation we think there is a brighter
prospect, or, at least, for those of them who will truly
realize the importance of proper preparation for their life
work. But for that preparation proper opportunities
must be afforded, and that is a desideratum that can only
be accomplished by the united action of those who truly
wish to see photography and photographers occupy the
high position to which they are, or ought to be, entitled.
It would be impracticable to restore the system of
apprenticeship which, so far as ordinary trades are con-
cerned, in spite of all that is said and written of technical
schools, is the only method by which trades can be properly
taught, and if it were, the masters competent to teach are j
too few to meet the requirements. But, properly equipped
and rightly managed, schools of photography could, we
think, be made to answer the purpose. Such a school
should contain all the appliances of an ordinary studio,
facilities for enlarging and copying of all kinds ; a suitably
equipped chemical laboratory and lecture room, with
accommodation for both theoretical and practical instruc-
tion ; and models, specimens, and all necessary appliances
for the proper teaching of the principles applicable to
art.
Those, in the hands of a staff of thoroughly able,
conscientious teachers, selected not only for their know-
ledge of the subjects to be taught, but also for their
ability to communicate that knowledge, would form a
school from which there would periodically issue a baud i
of young men in every way worthy of the much misused
title, photographic artist.
One such school might be established in the principal
city in each state, and a central examining board, or one
in the East and one in the West, who would, after the
passing of a proper examination, confer a diploma, which
will be at once recognised by the profession, and in due
time by the public, as an evidence of qualification on
the part of the holder.
Of course the schools of photography and their in-
fluence could not prevent unqualified men from going
into business as photographers, but qualified employers
would only employ qualified assistants, and, as we said
I before, the general public is gradually approaching to a
state of art culture and appreciation that wjll not tolerate
work that does not come up to a certain standard of
excellence. Then, however loudly the untrained and
unqualified man may pipe, the trained and appreciative
public will refuse to dance. — The Beacon of Chicago.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INTERNATIONAL
EXHIBITION AT AMSTERDAM.
We have just received additional particulars about the
photographic exhibition to be held in Amsterdam in the
spring of next year. This Exhibition will be international,
and for the furtherance of the photographic interest.
The societies principally concerned in it are the Helios, or
Dutch Union of Dilettante Photographers, and the
Amateur Photographic Union of Amsterdam. The com-
mittee is under the presidency of J. G. van Gelder ; and
has for its treasurer D. von Bosse, and its general secre-
tary A. Scheltema Beduin. The local secretaries
are : — For France, II. v. d. Masch Spakler; for Germany,
A. I). Lomau ; and for England, C. II. Grook.
The Exhibition, which is open to all nations, asks
support from all. Its object is to make professionals
and amateurs practically acquainted with the latest photo-
graphic inventions and discoveries. Medals will be awarded
for the best work sent in. A programme will shortly
be published, giving further and more detailed infor-
mation. In the meantime, all persons interested in the
Exhibition are desired to apply to Mr. A. D. Loman, Jnr.,
157, Warmoerstraat, Amsterdam.
CRYSTAL PALACE EXHIBITION.
The following are the additional awards at the Crystal
Palace Exhibition : —
Silver medal given by ill'. S. G. Buchanan Wollaston
for the best picture, irrespective of class, in the amateur
section, not having taken any other award in this
Exhibition: awarded to Paul Lange for 1,431 (“ A Tour
in Norway”).
Silver medal given by Mr. J. F. Peasgood for the best
picture, irrespective of class, in the professional section,
not having taken any other award in this Exhibition :
awarded to F. Whaley for 1,146 (,l A dale of the World ’).
Special silver medal for picture not previously shown
at a public exhibition : awarded to E. C. Middleton for
414 (“Gossips”).
Lantern Section.
Bronze Medals. — Professional (sets of 48 slides) : — •
Section 1, British Subjects, J. Dove ; (2) Foreign, G. *E.
Thompson ; (4) Microscopic, F. Evans ; (5) Statuary,
Seiopticon Co. Amateurs (sets of 6 slides) : — Section 1,
268
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, 1890.
British Landscape, F. Griffiths ; (2) Foreign Views,
A. Heywood ; (3) Seascapes, F. W. Wade ; (4) River
and Lake, J. E. Austen ; (5) Architectural (exterior),
E. A. White ; (6) Architectural (interior), J. A. Sinclair ;
(7) Still Life, J. Carpenter ; (8) Animals, K. L. Reynolds;
(9) Figures in Motion, II. Little ; (10) Microscopic,
A. A. Camel!.
The attendance at the 1890 Exhibition has beaten the
record of previous years by a considerable number.
THE FOAMING OF CERTAIN LIQUIDS USED IN
PHOTOGRAPHY.
Last Friday night Lord Rayleigh lectured to a full house
at the Royal Institution on “ Foam.” He remarked that
he intended the title of the lecture to be “Froth,” only
friends had represented to him that “ foam ” was more
poetical. Pure liquids, he said, will not foam ; those
which do so are essentially dirty or contaminated with
other substances, and he illustrated this point with
several liquids used in photography. Pure alcohol will
not foam, but water containing five per cent, of alcohol
exhibits a stronger tendency to foam than would otherwise
be the case. Glacial acetic acid does not foam ; when
made weaker it foams more, and a ten per cent, solution
of it shows a much stronger tendency to foam. Some
samples of ether, when mixed with water, will cause more
foaming than others when similarly treated, although the
proportions be the same in all cases. That was the case
with two samples before them from the laboratory down-
stairs. Both samples were sold as absolutely pure. Why
one of them should set up in water the tendency to foam
more than the other he did not know ; perhaps one of them
contained a trace of grease. Three parts of gelatine in
100,000 of water favours the formation of foam in large
bubbles, and saponine acts even more strongly. A strong
solution of pure salt does not foam much. He believed
the foaming of the sea to be due to something extracted
from seaweeds in rough weather.
The rest of the lecture bore no relation to photographic
subjects. Sir Frederick Bramwell presided.
patent Intelligence.
Applications for Letters Patent.
10,393a. J. T. Fairfax, 433, Strand, London, “ Photographic
Films. (Frederick Crane, United States). This applica-
tion having been originally included in No. 10,393, dated
26th June, 1889, takes, under Patent rule 23, that date.
4,581. T. Samuels, 53, Chancery Lane, London, “Camera
Backs or Slides.”— March 24th.
4,592. H. T. Parkitt, 55, Chancery Lane, London, “Kilns for
Firing Enamel Ware.” — March 24th.
4,606. J. Leslie, 2, Somerset Terrace, Belfast, “Photographic
Flexible Films.” — March 25th.
4,610. G. Newsum, Bradford, Yorksliire, “Apparatus for Ap-
plying Bronze and other Powders.” — March 25th.
4,622. Friese Greene and F. H. Varley, 92, Piccadilly,
London, “ Improvements in Photometers.” — March 25th.
4,666. J. C. E. Carre, 53, Chancery Lane, London,
“ Cameras.” — March 25th.
1,704. F. H. Varley, 82, Newington Green Road, Loudon,
“Improvements in Cameras for Photographing Objects in
Motion.” — March 26th.
4,863. F. W. Branson, 14, Commercial Street, Leeds, “Light-
ing Developing Rooms.” — March 28th.
4,881. G. H. P. Burne, 19, Bowling Green Street, Leicester,
“ Photographic Shutters.” — March 28th.
4,914. W. Crosland, New Street, Miles Platting, Manchester,
“ Making a Rough Surface on Paper.” — March 29th.
4,918. S. M. Hancocks, 419, Glossop Road, Sheffield, “Stand
for Photographs.” — March 29th.
4,956. Friese Greene and F. H. Varley, 92, Piccadilly, Lon-
don, “ Photographic Printing Apparatus for Producing
Copies at a Rapid Rate.” — March 29th.
Specifications Published.
6,264. April 1 2th, 1889. — “ Cutting Screw Threads.”
William Wilson Hci.se, Ordsal Works, Salford, Lancaster,
Engineer.
Both internal and external screw threads may be cut by
means of revolving radial dies moveable towards or away from
the axis about which they revolve for the purposes of adjust-
ment, and of setting them up to or withdrawing them from
the work as may be required. For cutting external threads,
the dies are held in a die box, and are actuated radially by a
cam action such as commonly employed. The cam block is
rotated by means of a worm (which is by preference made
solid with its spindle) and of a worm wheel formed upon the
back of the cam block of a smaller diameter than that of the
block, in order that the worm and its spindle may lie accom-
modated without increasing the diameter of the die box for the
purpose. The die box is formed or secured upon a spindle,
which is by preference made hollow, and is mounted in liear-
ings in a hcadstock secured upon a bed. Sometimes the dies
may lie arranged in pairs, one of each pair cutting when the
die box rotates in one direction, and the other when it rotates
in the opposite direction. The work is secured in a vice
which is adjustable along the bed, and which holds the work
by means of gripping dies operated similarly to the cutting
dies, and with a similar arrangement of worm and worm wheel.
While the threads are being cut the work remains stationary,
and the cutting die box and spindle have an endwise as well
as a rotary movement, the endwise movement corresjionding to
the advance of the cutting dies along the threads they are
forming.
6,963. April 26<A, 1889. — “ Securing Glass Sheets in Roofs.”
Alexander Drummond, 35, Montrose Street, Glasgow, Glass
Merchant.
This invention relates to and is a further development of
my prior invention for glazing structures No. 5,947, dated 21st
April, 1888.
Iu securing the glass sheets in roofs of structures in accord-
ance with this invention, 1 entirely dispense with the use of
astragals or glazing bars.
The glass sheets are placed edge to edge, or they may over-
lap, and are fitted at their upper ends into grooves or recesses
cut longitudinally in the purline bars. The meeting edges of
the glass sheets are covered by narrow strips of glass, metal,
or wood, which are, at their upper ends, either entered into
recesses in the purline bars, or are held in position by forked
shaped catching devices, which may be of cast or stamped
metal having projections on them capable of being driven
into the purlines to secuie them in position, or they may be
secured thereto by screwing or otherwise. The lower end of
each of said narrow strips of glass is held firmly in position by
a stop piece, which is secured to the purline bars by screwing
or otherwise. Gutters for carrying off moisture are cut in the
upper sides of the purline liars.
The stop piece, as described in my prior specification, con-
sists of a clip or cover which is dovetailed into a rectangular
or other shaped base plate secuied to the purline bars.
Under this invention the head of this clip or cover has two
arms or projections on it, so made as to grip the glass strips and
prevent lateral movement.
The stop piece, instead of being made as described in my
prior specification, may lie made of a base plate or piece
having a thick part at one end through which a hole is bored
or made ; over the thickened part the clip or cover is fitted
by a pin passed through a hole in each of the sides of the
clip, and through the hole in the thickened part of the plate ;
or the clip may be hinged to the base plate, the hinged part
folding over on top of the glass, and being held in position by
April 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
269
a pin passed through a projection on the thickened end of the
ba.se plate. In some cases the clip itself may be narrowed at
one end, and may pass through, and lie secured in a hole made
longitudinally in the thick part of the base plate ; or the clip
may be dovetailed over the thick part of the plate.
In lieu of making the base plate thicker at one end, it
may be bent upwaid.s or stepped instead, and the lower end
of the clip lie made to slip over or to lie bent over the raised
part.
Under another modification the clip may have projections at
its under side which will fit easily into recesses or holes, or
their equivalent, made in the clips ; or rice versa, the clips
may fit or slide on projections made on the base plate. The
base plate and the clip would each have preferably, in all cases,
arms for gripping and holding the glass strips in position.
When the glass sheets overlap each over a different sort of
stop piece from those hereinbefore described would preferably
lie used. This stop piece has only one arm on one side of
both the clip and base plate, and the base plate is further pro-
vided with a raised projection or ridge to prevent the under
sheets of glass from moving laterally.
Instead of being secured by stop pieces as hereinbefore
described, the narrow strips of glass, metal, or wood, may have
flanges or projections made on them which would fit into or
catch on corresponding grooves or projections made on or in
the glass sheets. In some cases the narrow strips may be
T sliaj* in cross section instead of as hereinbefore described.
Strips of tarred cotton, felt, or canvas, may, if desired,
cover the meeting edges of the glass sheets, and on this the
narrow locking strips may be laid.
In some cases the narrow locking strips may be underneath
the glass sheets instead of above them.
My improvements, l>esides being used for glazing purposes,
are equally applicable for securing corrugated metal roofing,
tiles, slates, and sheet metal roofing in position.
JiJrocee&tngs of ^octettes.
The Camera Club.
Thursday, March 20th. — Capt. W. de Abney in the chair.
Mr. Chapman Jones exhibited his “memorandum camera,”
which has already', to some extent, been described in these
pages. He said that it could be used all the year round, and
at anyr time of day, and under very different circumstances, for
the lens worked at//4, which enabled the user to overcome the
disadvantages of bad light. The lens was a portrait one, by
Swift, and had a focal length of 3^ inches, and the camera had
a roller-blind shutter next the plate, giving, an exposure of
about one-twentieth of a second, but it could be tightened so
as to give, perhaps, one-sixtieth of a second. Farther, by a
modification of the conditions, it became possible to give an
exposure of one-tenth the duration of that employed by
Anschutz, and to obtain which he used an 800 lb. weight.
The memorandum camera carried a plate of half the size of a
quarter- plate, and as the latter are always in the market, there
is no difficulty in getting them and cutting them in two. The
camera was fitted with a finder.
Mr. Ferrero exhibited a contrivance to facilitate the taking
of lantern slides from negatives.
Mr. George Davison exhibited some photographs by Mr.
Corbould, showing the distortion produced in portraiture by
wide angle lenses.
Mr. W. Willis then read a paper on “ l’latinotype Possibili-
ties.” He began by speaking of the mixed oxalate and phos-
phate developer for the hot bath process ; with these salts in
the bath, the initial image is less rapidly dissolved from the
paper, so that the developer has longer time to act, and there
are extra crispness and definition in the results, with more
clearness, brilliancy, and transparency. The print should be
removed from the bath the moment the shadows have sufficient
density, and be at once placed in the acid bath. The phos-
phatic salt used is the monopotassic orthophosphate. At a
temperature of 120° F. this bath gives excellent results, but
for hard negatives the heat should be increased. In the course
of his remarks, Mr. Willis said that the object of the final
washing of platinotype prints was to remove the last traces of
acid, which otherwise, in course of time, might attack the
paper ; therefore, the washing should be ample to clear all acid
from the fibres, and it was better that a little alkali should be
added to the last washing water. Few papers in the market
were suitable for platinotype work. Among the prints he
exhibited were some on rough paper ; they presented, he said,
but slight loss of definition, and he did not know that
the results were more artistic than on smooth paper. The
rough paper required exceedingly careful handling in the various
baths, in which also they' must not be allowed to rub against
each other, or the image would be taken from the tops of the
minute hillocks of the paper. The prints before them, on
strongly wire-marked superior writing paper, were remark-
able, he stated, because of the surprisingly small way
in which the wire-marks interfered with the general
appearance of the pictures. Other of the prints be-
fore them presented beautiful results with certain subjects ;
they had been taken upon an exceedingly strong and thin
paper, namely, that used for bank notes. The image went
right through the substance of this paper, and the beauty of
the results did not become apparent until the prints were
mounted upon pure white cardboard. Other prints before
them were upon nansook, a fabric made entirely of cotton ;
one of them — a snow scene — was marvellous in its intensity' ;
he had never seen it surpassed, and the intensity increased
the stronger the light in which it was viewed. He thought
that nansook gave the ideal surface, for it rendered both ends
of the scale and nearly every gradation between them. The
next material, sateen, was also all cotton, and such faults as
were in the prints he thought to be due to that material ; the
results were nearly' but not quite so good as those upon
nansook. Linen worked well in the matters of ease and of
certainty in results, and he thought that it gave better defini-
tion than the other two substances ; the platinum pigment
seemed to attach itself very strongly' to linen. He knew a
man in America who printed in platinum the likenesses of his
lady-loves upon his shirt wristbands — he “wore his heart upon
his sleeve,” so to speak —
Captain Abney interposed “His sweethearts, you mean.”
Mr. Willis continued that the man told him that his shirts
had been washed twenty times by Wall Sing, yet the like-
nesses were as good as ever. He (Mr. Willis) knew the able
Chinaman, Wah Sing, and the way he smashed buttons during
his energetic washing of shirts was amazing. Other prints
before them were upon silk ; it was a troublesome material in
the platinotype process, and he could not say that his results
were very successful ; the results were better when the silk
was not pure, but contained a certain amount of cotton. The
prints on nansook looked very bad while they were wet. The
prints he hail shown that evening on fabrics had all been
brought out by the cold bath developer. In working the
platinotype process with ferrous salts, they would find that
the addition of a very little ferric oxalate had a powerful
restraining effect. To mount the fabrics on card, he used a
stiff cold jelly', applied thinly, and consisting of mixed starch
and gelatine.
Captain Abney asked about the sizing of the fabrics.
Mr. Willis replied that those before them had all been abso-
lutely unsized. The papers were sized with arrowroot.
Mr. Asbury Greene asked if the fabrics could be developed
by' applying the solution with a brush ?
Mr. WlLLIS replied that it might be easily done without
leaving marks ; he hail tried the use of a spray'-producer, but
the results were disappointing ; the liquid then seemed to
settle on the surface in fine drops which did not coalesce, so
that a kind of mottled appearance was the result. A brush, to
answer well, must be broad enough to cover the whole plate
with one sweep, and must be charged with an amply' large
supply of the developer ; it must be a self-feeding brush.
Mr. F. de P. Cembrano, Jr., asked if ferric oxalate could be
so Jused as to save an over-exposed print ?
Mr. Willis replied that it was a bad restrainer, because its
action seemed to be so irregular,
270
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, 1890
Mr. Elder liked warm-toned platinotypes. Once, when
using the hot bath process, he wished to prove to some pupils
how damp injured the sensitive paper ; he cut a print in half,
and placed it over a sink for several hours. To his astonish-
ment, the part of the print which had been made damp deve-
loped better than the other half. Once he had been engaged
on some experiments in the dyeing of silks, and found that
whenever a mineral dye was applied, the silk lost its lustre.
The fabrics he employed were those known as “liberty silks.”
This destruction of lustre might help to explain the difficulties
of Mr. Willis with silks.
Mr. Humph ery had found maps on linen to be excellent when
bicycling.
Captain Abney remarked that some years ago, when he was
in charge of the Photographic School at Chatham, there was
a case of preparing for war — he would not say with what
country — and the War Office wanted copies of maps for use in
the army. He thought that such maps must be useless for
such a purpose if printed on paper, so he turned them out on
linen by means of a special lithographic ink, and, on trial, it
was found that they did not suffer by exposure to weather and
lain in the field. He mentioned this to show that the War
Office was well aware of the value of maps upon linen.
Mr. .1. B. B. Wellington stated that once he had a sample
of platinotype paper which gave flat images, and that when he
put a little gelatine in the oxalate bath, he obtained better
results ; too much, however, must not be added, or it will
coagulate on the surface of the paper.
Mr. Chapman Jones suggested that perhaps the gelatine
filled up the texture of the paper, and made it more transparent.
Mr. Lyonel Clark had experimented mostly with silver
salts ; but there was an analogy between silver and platinum
printing, as exemplified by the results shown that evening.
The fabric which had given him the most pleasing results was
satin jean, which he had sized by means of dextrine ; this kept
the print on the surface, just where it was wanted, and the
dextrine afterwards dissolved off in the washing baths. The
silk used by Mr. Willis was strongly ribbed ; he thought that
the French silk used in the manufacture of fans would answer
better. When prints on fabrics were to be small, he mounted
each piece of fabric on paper with dextrine, and kept the print
on its paper support through all the solutions. As a mountant,
he applied starch to the mount, and, when it was nearly dry,
he placed the print in position upon it, then ran the two
through the rolling press. A great advance had been made in
the adoption of the platinotype process during the past fewr
years, and he was glad to see that of the large number of
prints adorning their walls that evening, only five or six were
photographs by the silver process on albumenized paper.
Mr. Willis had been specially interested in what Mr. Elder
had said about the action of mineral dyes upon silk, for he
thought that it explained some of the phenomena which he had
seen. Mr. Wellington's experiment was of interest ; he had
tried it himself and had failed — perhaps from using too much
gelatine. Gelatine combines with platinum over the whole
image, so perhaps a small proportion of it in the oxalate bath
gives the developer more time to act, by preventing the ferrous
salt getting away before the completion of its work. After a
fabric has been sensitised by ferric oxalate, it became so brittle
as to be not easily distorted in the printing frame when the
size of the print is not too large ; under sucli circumstances
he had never failed to get registration after examination.
Mr. Davison had just handed him some samples of Japanese
paper which had been sent to the former by Mr. W. K. Burton.
He (Mr. Willis) had found that it was possible to sensitise
Japanese papers, but that the difficulty was great — so much so,
that he had given up the attempt, although, on occasions of
success, the results were very lovely.
Southsea Amateur Photographic Society.
A public lantern exhibition was given on the 26th ult. in the
large Victoria Hall, Southsea. The entertainment was in every
way highly satisfactory. A fine collection of pictures, repre-
senting Canadian, Scotch, and English scenery, with various
genre studies, and some good cathedral scenes, were thrown
on the screen by Lieut. Gladstone, R.N., and a short descrip-
tion of each picture was given by Lieut. Cobb, R.N. There
was a large and appreciative audience. The slides were en-
tirely the work of members of the Society, prominent among
whom were Capt. Lamb, Lieut. Gladstone, Dr. Wardrope, and
Messrs. Thornton and Leaventhorpe. The arrangements were
under the direction of Dr. F. Lord and the committee.
Photographic Society of Philadelphia.
A meeting of the Society was held on March 5th, President
Frederic Graff in the chair.
The Secretary read a communication from the President
of the Welsbach Gas Light Co., announcing that the company
had fitted up a room at their factory for photographing with
incandescent gas light, and inviting the members to make use
of the room, and to visit the factory and witness the production
of the light.
Mr. Stirling, chairman of the Lantern Slide Committee,
reported satisfactory progress in the preparation for the
exhibition to be held subsequently, and the prospects of a fine
display of representative work of the members. Mr. Stirling
also announced that forty-three English slides, representing
the Society's share of the hundred sent to this country by
the Camera Club of London on account of the last English
interchange, had been received. They had been selected by
lot impartially, and after the meeting would be distributed in
like manner to the ten members whose slides had been selected
to send aluoad. Mr. Stirling stated that hereafter the Inter-
change slides to be sent abroad Mould be simply loaned, the
idea of permanent exchange having >>een abandoned, so that
eventually each member would get back all slides lent for
interchange.
Mr. Bell presented a paper on “Gelatine Emulsions.” In
introducing the subject, he said he thought that it was the
late president of the Society, Mr. Bates, who was first in this
country to bring into use the gelatine plate. In his frequent
trips to Europe, Mr. Bates had had Mr. Kennett prepare some
of them, and they were brought over. It Mas a long time
before Mr. Bell had heard of anybody using them here. The
next one he heard of making emulsions M’as Mr. George W.
Hewitt. He, himself, had also been more or less engaged in
investigating gelatine emulsions. The next one that Mas
successful was Mr. Carbutt. Not having himself )>een success-
ful, he did not claim anything.
Mr. Bell then proceeded to read his paper, which, he said,
Mas the result of a good many years’ experience. At the con-
clusion of the reading, Mr. Bell said that if any of the members
M'ere ‘ ‘ chemically inclined” he would ask them to take the
No. 1 formula, and test it to see if it was what he claimed for it.
Referring to the sensitiveness of plates, Mr. Carbutt asked
“ What does 40 or 80 mean '! ”
Mr. Coates. — I think it means the gullibility of the buyer,
I have bought “ 40 ” plates, and found “ 20 ” much better.
Mr. Browne. — Mr. Bell, in the early part of his paper,
alluded to Mr. George W. Hewitt’s experiments. So far as I
know, Mr. HeM’itt M’as one of the earliest experimenters Math
gelatine plates, and certainly Mr. Hewitt’s process, and the
results that he succeeded in obtaining, M’ere remarkable.
There was one peculiarity about his plates that I have never
seen in any purchased plates, and that M'as, that the api>earance
of the image M’as more beautiful than I have ever seen in a
commercial plate. The ap|>earance of the image Mas slow, and
remarkably beautiful. I think Mr. Carbutt saw some of them.
I do not know that Mr. Hewitt claims anything original in
that process, but there was one difficulty in his plates M'hich
M’as a very serious one, and M’hich he M’as never able to over-
come, that was the liability to frill. I used many of his plates,
but there M’as that uncertain character in the matter of
frilling M’hich made it to me very disagrcable. I think that in
the future Mr. Hewitt Mill always receive credit as being one
of the earliest experimenters in gelatine dry plates.
Under the head of “Verbal Communications,” Mr. Carbutt
referred to the subject under discussion at the previous meet-
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
27 1
April 4, 1890.]
ing — that of deposits ou the cover glasses of slides, saying that
he had received a number of slides from Mr. Pancoast, accom-
panied by a letter in which he said, “Referring again to the
incrustation on lantern slides, I was looking over some old
slides I made in 1883 (possibly 1882) on some of your A plates,
and find them in A1 order, no discolouring, mould, or incrus-
tation whatever. They were not varnished or protected in any
way, and were subject to the same conditions as the one 1
showed you at the Society.” In another letter of a later date
to Mr. Carbutt, Mr. Pancoast wrote on the same subject ; “I
send you by this mail one of the lot I spoke of in a previous let ter,
in order that you may see how perfectly it has kept. It was
in the same box as the other slides, and subjected to the same
conditions as those which show such a marked incrustation. I
think the glass is B. P. C., at least the plates were your regular
A plates. These slides were made by contact printing, and
developed with oxalate.”
Mr. Bell called attention to a portion of the report of a
previous meeting, in which the words occurred, referring to the
use of turmeric for colour screens for orthochromatie plates,
“ Mr. Bell thought turmeric to be adapted to the work with
orthochromatie plates, and was as good as anything.” He
desired to say that he distinctly stated that turmeric could not
be relied upon unless freshly prepared.
Referring to orthochromatie photography, he showed a screen
of brilliant yellow, prepared by Mr. Ives, and loaned by him.
It was put behind the lens, holding back blue rays, and allowing
the yellow to act more strongly on the plate. It was necessary
to have a plate specially prepared, as the ordinary plates would
not answer. It should bean orthochromatie plate. He showed
two glasses in illustration of his remarks, saying that turmeric
would not answer.
Continuing, Mr. Bell showed the same colour screens he had
obtained in London last year. One was of pot metal, ground
and polished like plate glass, and which, he said, would never
fade. He had three tints, but finding one was too light, he
had cemented two together with balsam of fir.
Mr. Redfield showed a screen similar to that of Mr. Bell’s,
made by Mr. Ives. He also showed the fiont board of his
camera, and the slide in which the screen was placed. It was
a double glass prepared by Mr. Ives. Another method was
a circular piece of glass prepared by Mr. Carbutt, which was
dropped in the front of the lens, and a strip of blackened
leather slipped in front of it, acting as a spring, and keeping
the glass in position. Probably an improvement would be the
introduction of some springs bracing the plate squarely against
the back of the lens, so as to prevent its being at an angle, and
thus producing distortion. A still better way would be to
coat the surface of the lens with some colouring matter, or
have the lens made of some coloured glass, as suggested recently
in one of the English journals.
Mr. Cheyney said he had found it utterly imi>ossible to get
a slurp image by focussing first and putting the screen in after-
wards. If focussing were done without the screen, and then
the screen put in, the focus would be altered and thrown back.
Mr. Supplee asked what would take place if placed in front
of the lens.
Mr. Cheyney said the change would be very slight.
Mr. Carbutt suggested the preparation of thin films of
coloured collodion attached to diaphragms of black cardboard,
and used in place of the usual diaphragms.
Mr. Redfield thought that two pieces of thin black rubber
could be used.
Mr. Carbutt said that he had suggested cardboard because it
could be obtained so easily.
Mr. Bell said that he had already gone over that process,
and found the collodion film was too brittle, and curled all
up.
Mr. Carbutt said that it was not properly prepared, then.
It had a natural tendency to curl, but not to such an extent as
to preclude its use. If 5 i>er cent, of castor oil were put in,
it would remain firm.
Continuing the subject of orthochromatie photography, Mr.
Carbutt showed some prints illustrating the excellent keeping
of the plates, and also a photogravure print made by a pub-
lishing house in Boston from a negative on one of his ortho-
chromatic plates. The print was from an old painting, and had
a remarkable brilliant quality with correct colour tone.
Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association.
The third ordinary meeting of the twenty-seventh session was
held in the Association’s Club Rooms, 3, Lord Street, on
March 27th ; the President, Mr. Paul Lange, occupied the
chair. There was a large attendance.
The following were elected members : — Messrs. T. J. P.
Masters, H. G. Pouting, William Mason, junior, E. M. Rateliffe,
J. A. Knowles, Oswald Harrison, J. H. Pardon, Dr. E. J.
Foulston, and F. H. Dudley.
The President announced that the new Boston slides, entitled
“ The White Mountains,” and Mr. John Hargreaves’ lecture on
the completed survey of the “ Hundred of Wirral,” would
take place in the City Hall, Eberle Street, on Monday, April 14th.
Mr. Fred Evans was then called upon to explain the arrange-
ments that were being made concerning the Convention of
Photographic Societies of Great Britain at Chester in the last
week of June, when, amongst other attractions, special facili-
ties, not hitherto allowed to amateurs, would lie granted by
the Duke of Westminster for photographing both the exterior
and the interior of Eaton Hall.
The principal business of the evening was the contemplated
Photographic Exhibition of 1891. The President entered very
fully into the particulars of the matter ; that it should take
place in the spring of 1891 for the term of one month - that
the offer of the Library and Arts Commit tee of the Corpora-
tion of Liverpool be accepted for the use of the same splendid
apartments in the Walker Art Gallery as used in 1888.
The members unanimously decided that such an exhibition
should be held. The President called on Mr. T. S. Mayne, the
Honorary Secretary appointed for Exhibition matters, who
then explained in detail some fresh features which were in con-
templation. In due time full details will appear on the pro-
spectus.
The meeting concluded with an interesting exhibition of
photographic novelties, of which there were a large collec-
tion.
Colonel Ellison explained a new hand-camera, convertible
into an ordinary camera, of his own invention, working on
an ingenious tripod ball-and-socket arrangement also made by
himself. /
Photographers’ Benevolent Association.
A meeting was held on the 28tli March at 4, St. James’s
Street, Bedford Row, Mr. Bedford in the chair.
The following were elected members: — Misses Barton and
Martin ; Messrs. Skillman, Gottheil, Farrington, Evans, Plum-
mer, Hinks, and Dr. Roland Smith.
An application for assistance was considered and granted.
Mr. Hanbly was appointed lion, local secretary for Lincoln-
shire.
Bath Photographic Society.
March 2 6th. Mr. W. Pumphrey, President, in chair.
Messrs. T. Bush, W. C. Lee, H. Isaccs, and C. O. R. Wood
were elected.
The Hon. Secretary (W. Middleton Ashman) read a com-
munication from the Mayor of Sutton Coldfield, anent the
Norway excursion promoted by the Vesey Club, which starts
in July next.
The Chairman said the Vesey Club desired to associate with
scientists of all kinds in this special tour. The arrangements
were very complete, and as he should be one of the party, he
hoped to report favourably upon his return.
The Secretary exhibited a dark-room candle and reading
lamp known as the “ perfection.”
The following were appointed an excursion committee for
the ensuing season : Messrs, Powell, Perren, Tabsley, Collins,
and the Secretary. The first outing will take place April 24th.
Train 11.25 a.m., G. W. R., to Box and neighbourhood,
272
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 4, 1890.
The Chairman stated that the annual report having been
printed in full in the Bladud newspaper, they had ordered 250
reprints. Copies could be obtained from the Secretary. He
wished to correct an error as to date which appeared therein.
The publication of Daguerre’s process should read 1839, in-
stead of 1840, and it would be more correct to say that the
neighbourhood of Bath was the scene of Fox Talbot researches.
Mr. C. H. Talbot (son of Fox Talbot) said he felt responsible
for these matters mentioned by the chairman being sprung
upon the meeting, he having spoken to Mr. Ashman concerning
them earlier in the day. With regard to date, there certainly
was an error in the committee’s report. He was not then
prepared to say the exact date, but it could be found in the
second edition of Tissandier’s work. His father made an
application fora patent earlier than January, 1839 ; but, on
the 12th of that month, he announced his method of making
camera pictures to avoid being forestalled in case Daguerre’s
process should prove to be similar. This was followed by the
paper his father read on January 81st, 1839, before the Royal
Society. All these experiments were carried on at Lacock
Abbey, thirteen miles from Bath.
The Chairman having read a passage from Mr. Robert Hunt’s
book, showing how the error referred to occurred,
Mr. Talbot said Niepce, in all probability, produced
camera pictures earlier than his father or Daguerre.
The Chairman remarked that the process must have been
very slow if Niepce used bitumen for the purpose.
Mr. Talbot: Niepce’s process was very slow. Daguerre’s
process did not precede my father’s ; it must have been the
other way, otherwise its publication might have been delayed.
No doubt he published to protect himself. He (Mr. Talbot)
was inclined to think Niepce made the earliest camera pictures.
Wedgwood had tried to do so, but he failed.
A lantern exhibition of transparencies, produced by members
of the Society during the past session, then took place ;
Messrs. Pumphrey, Bristow, Peacock, Perren, Powell, Maton,
Wells, and the Rev. E. A. Purvis contributed.
Wet collodion slides, toned with potassium sulphide, were
shown by the President and Mr. Bristow. The remainder
were by gelatine processes, either developed, with ammonia pyro,
or hydroquinone. An oxy-hydrogen apparatus, lent by the
President, was used.
The Chairman hoped that more members would compete next
year, so that all might have an opportunity of seeing each
one’s work. Upon the whole he thought they had a very satis-
factory display of a variety of subjects. It was interesting to
note the different treatment these subjects had received at the
hands of the members.
Photographic Society of Ireland.
On Thursday, the 27tli March, the monthly technical meeting
was held, Dr. J. A. Scott, M.B., Vice-president, in the chair.
After two new members had been balloted for, the evening was
devoted to exhibiting such lantern slides as the members had
brought down with them, and some pictures were put upon
the screen, and elicited discussion as to the various conditions
under which they were produced.
After the lantern exhibition, Dr. J. A. Scott showed Tylar’s
lanternscope, an apparatus designed for placing upon a table
for the purpose of viewing lantern slides, and explained its
working.
-♦
London and Provincial Photographic Association. —
Thursday next, April 10th, will be the last lantern meeting
this season. A special feature will be the exhibition of slide
carriers and slide changing apparatus.
From Messrs. Gauthier- Villars wre receive the tenth part of
the second volume of Ch. Fabre’s “ Traite Fncyclopedique
de Photographic,” which is being issued in parts on the 15th
of each month. The number for March treats, among other
matters, of phototypic negatives on flexible films, and nega-
tive retouching, not only in portraiture, but in landscape
work.
F, Ives. — V e will ■ attend to your letter next week,
^nstoerg to (^orrcsijjon&cttts;.
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 6, Furnival
Sreet, London, E.C.
All Advertisements and c immunisations relating tomoney matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
Cocoa. — The details of Obernetter’s Photo- Engraving Process will
be found in the News for 1884, p. 67, and for 1885, p. 159.
It is there stated that a gelatino-bromide transparency may
be employed, the film of which is converted into chloride of
silver by a mixture of percliloride of iron and chromic acid, or
your method of sulphate of copper and common salt, or any
other solution capable of converting the metallic silver into
chloride. This altered film is then stripped, and laid down
upon the copper surface, which gradually becomes etched,
especially if moistened with a solution of chloride of zinc.
The process is expedited by backing up the film with any
conducting surface, and attaching the positive wire of a voltaic
battery with the metal to be etched, and the negative pole
to the aforesaid conductor at the back. Mr. Pearson’s modifi-
cation (p. 159) consists in the use of zinc plates instead of
copper, when no battery current is required. The trans-
parency should be produced on a gelatino-bromide film
containing a minimum of gelatine, so as to be heavily charged
with silver.
W. J. \V. (Hull). — Grained Metal Plates for Photo- Engraving.
These may probably be obtained from Mr. J. J. Ayling, 12,
Crane Court, Fleet Street. If not procurable from that
quarter, try the method of getting a stippled surface by pho-
togi aphing your subject behind a wire gauze screen, or even
by indenting the metal plate by powerful pressure against a
bed of wire gauze.
Katie. — Spotting Unmounted Prints. Indian ink will, of
course, get washed off when the prints are mounted, but we
arc not acquainted with any medium which could safely be
employed without risk of revealing itself at the time of mount-
ing the prints.
C. T. S. — Vegetable Parchment. The proportions are two parts
by measure of oil of vitriol to one part of water, allowed to
become quite cold, and then the blotting pajier immersed.
As soon as saturated, remove and wash quickly in a large bulk
of water. Fine cambric may be treated, but calico does not
answer so well. We doubt whether you will succeed witli
cotton tape, or any closely woven fabric.
E. G. — Bar of Solder Fallen into the Nitrate Bath. Some
of the silver will doubtless be reduced, and the tin partly
oxidised, but only lead dissolved. Filter off and use the
solution for a printing bath, either concentrating it, or
strengthening by addition of more nitrate of silver.
M. P. S. — Cyanide for Reducing Albumenized Prints and
Taking out the Silver. There is a misprint in last week’s
report, page 250, second column. “ Half a grain to the
ounce,” should read half a grain to the pint of water.
Even with this highly dilute solution the prints will suffer if
left in longer than a minute or two, unless they were
originally much over-printed.
L. M. — Incandescent Gas (Welsbach system.) Enquire
for further particulars at the office, 45a, Piccadilly, W.
Camera. — Either your No. 1 or the “ Acme.” Aluminium fit-
tings make it still lighter. We should advise you to try b,
with the special contrivance for holding it flat, which Mr.
England indicated at the last technical meeting of the Parent
Society. See the News, p. 251.
A. W. — Platinotype. Received at the moment of going to
Press ; we will answer your enquiries next week.
R. B., and other Correspondents, in our next.
oi55g.
v. ^ \
* V..
< Ho
THOMAS WEDGEWOOD.
Producer of the First English Photographs. 1802.
From a Crayon Drawing in the uossession of Miss K. Wedge, rood Negative bg Ralph W. Robinson
' v ^
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1649. — April 11, 1890.
\ . . ;v '*■?*
CONTENTS.
Aluminium in Photographic Apparatus 273
On the Sensitisirg and Conservation of Albumenised Paper.
By C. Cataldi 274
Photography in Natural Colours 276
The Art of Drawing and Photography. By A. M. Rossi 277
Photographic Groups. By Fred. Hart Wilson 278
Notes 280
Ferdinand Adolf Beyersdorff 281
P AO K
Photographic Exhibitions in America 281
The Latent Photographic Image. By C. H. Bothamley 283
Correspondence. — The Photographic Societies’ National
Challenge Cup — The Crystal Palace Challenge Cup Com-
petition— The Crystal Palace Exhibition 264
Patent Intelligence 285
Proceedings of Societies 287
Answers to Correspondents 28s
ALUMINIUM IN PHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS.
The dream of half a generation ago of the advent of
the time in which aluminium should be used, not alone
for lens mounts and the screws of cameras, but for the
cameras themselves, now seems likely to be realised
within a moderate period, for aluminium has been
steadily falling in price, and at the present time can be '
bought, of good quality, at fifteen shillings a pound,
and of superfine quality at twenty shillings a pound. I
Worse qualities can be had at eleven and thirteen
shillings per pound. The lower the quality of the
metal the more brittle it is, and the more likely to be
attacked by various chemical reagents. There are
rumours in commercial circles that aluminium before
long will fall in price to about six shillings a pound, |
but whether there is any substantial foundation for the
report we do not know. Deville, when he was making
it years ago, at the cost of about forty shillings a
pound, calculated on theoretical grounds that the day
was likely to come when it could be sold at about
seven shillings a pound. He attempted to turn it
out on a large scale under the encouragement of
Napoleon III., who hoped thereby to lay the founda-
tion of a new great manufacturing industry for France.
There seems to be no chance of its ever falling so low
as brass in price for equal bulks, although aluminium,
weight for weight, occupies about three times the space
of brass. Bad brass can be bought at sixpence a
pound, good at between eightpence and tenpence, and
the alloy of copper and tin known as gun metal, at
fourteen pence a pound.
The necessary extra cost of aluminium fittings, even
at the present price of the metal, and with the difficulties
incidental to its working, is not a serious question in
relation to their introduction into tourists’ photographic
apparatus for the lightening of the weight thereof, and
perhaps if aluminium milled heads were now in the
market to replace those of brass, there might at once
be a steady demand for them.
In addition to the two or three large London photo-
graphic apparatus firms which, as already stated in these
pages, have begun to turn their attention to aluminium,
Messrs. Perken, Son, and Rayment tell us that they
have been experimenting with it for some months ;
they find it difficult to turn, and that screw-threads on
it are difficult to make, and in such operations they
lubricate it with soap. They find it to work well
under the file, and state that one sample they have been
trying has been alloyed with a slight proportion of
other metal or metals.
From the Alliance Aluminium Company we have
received some interesting information about aluminium,
including the following table relating to the proper-
ties of various metals : —
Specific Weight
Gravity. per Cubic foot
lbs.
Melting
Point
Fahrenheit.
Aluminium
... 2-56 ...
160 ...
about 1600
Antimony
... C-72 ...
420 ...
n
810
Zinc
... 7*
437 ...
736
Iron
... 7-23, ...
451 ...
1 1
2786
Tin
... 7-29 ...
455 ...
442
Steel
... 8-
499 ...
? 1
—
Copper ...
... 8-6 ...
537 ...
>>
1950
Bismuth ...
... 9-82 ...
613 ...
> »
495
Silver
... 10-47 ...
654 ...
1873
Lead
... 11-36 ...
709 ...
612
Mercury ...
... 13-60 ...
849 ...
t >
—
Gold
... 18-41 ...
1150 ...
»»
2100
Platinum...
... 21-53 ...
1344 ...
* »
3080
The Company
tion about castin
also furnishes
g aluminium :
the appended informx
The melting point of aluminium is about 1,600^ F.
The melting is best performed in a plumbago crucible, but
an earthenware crucible may be employed ; no flux should
be used, and only part of the charge be melted at a time,
and added to little by little. The pieces to be melted
should be dipped in benzine previous to being put into the
crucible. In melting the metal the heat should be raised
very gradually to the melting point, which it should not at
any time much exceed. Aluminium can be cast either in
metallic moulds or in sand. If in metallic moulds, the
moulds should Jirst be heated, and coated with an air-
expeller, then thoroughly dried and warmed before using.
If in sand, care should be taken that the mould be dry ; in
either case the moulds should be provided with many
vents. The metal should be poured quickly, and a suit-
able allowance made for shrinkage.
274
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
The Alliance Co. gives the following instructions
for plating aluminium : —
In order to plate aluminium with gold, silver, or other
suitable metal, it is necessary first to cover it with a firm
coating of copper, to obtain which the following process
is recommended : —
Dissolve a certain quantity of copper-sulphate in dis-
tilled water, and add another solution made by dissolving
potassium- cyanide (00 to 6f> per cent.) in water. A green
precipitate will appear, which dissolves by adding more of
the cyanide solution : then add a little potassium-cyanide
of 90 to 95 per cent.; this may be continued until the blue
colour of the liquid has completely disappeared.
The solution thus prepared will generally be too strong,
and it should, therefore, be diluted with water until it
indicates 20 per cent. Tw. — 11 sp. gr. This solution
will only answer well if used at a temperature of 10°
Celsius, care being taken that the aluminium is
thoroughly cleaned immediately before immersing it. The
current must be regulated in such a manner that only
very small bubbles appear on the aluminium ; as soon
as the bubbles get too large the coating becomes imper-
fect, and the current has been too strong.
After obtaining a perfect coating of copper in the
manner described, it may be brushed, or polished, or
simply dried ; the articles may be silvered, gilt bronzed,
or brassed in the ordinary way. For obtaining a second
thick coating of copper, use the acid solution of copper-
sulphate, containing a little tartaric acid, instead of the
sulphuric acid commonly employed.
For polishing aluminium the appended instructions
are given : —
Equal weights of olive oil and rum are shaken in a flask
till emulsified. Dip the burnisher in this mixture, and do
not press heavily on the metal. To clean a soiled surface,
dip the object in benzine, and dry in fine boxwood saw-
dust. Olive oil and pumice make a good grinding mix-
ture for hammered or pressed objects before polishing.
Next we come to the methods of mixing aluminium
with steel or cast iron, for an exceedingly small pro-
portion of it m either of these improves its quality ex-
ceedingly.
The proportion for steel is 0'01 to 0-2 percent,; for
iron, 0-l to 0-2 per cent.
Run the molten iron from the cupola into the ladle ;
then take the right proportion of aluminium in a pair of
tongs, or in a cartridge (iron) full of holes through the
sides to let the gases out freely ; plunge it sharply through
the molten iron to the bottom of the ladle, and stir the
whole thoroughly for at least two minutes. On the intro-
duction of the aluminium, the mixture will be found to
become very lively, and to “ work ” considerably, almost,
so to speak, to boil ; the stirring should be continued until
this agitation begins to subside. If the mixture be not
well stirred, the castings will be found to be spongy, and
to have little air-cells in them. Both the tongs, or car-
tridge, and the aluminium should be heated and dried
before plunging, or the metal may fly. The man who
plunges the aluminium in should be well guarded against
the metal flying.
I HOTOGRAPHic Clcb. — -The subject for discussion on April
16th will be “ Printed-out Opals April 23rd, “ The Develop-
ment of Instantaneous Exposures.”
ON THE SENSITISING AND CONSERVATION OF
ALBUMENISED FABER*
BY C. CATAT.DI.
It is generally allowed that a good negative ought to pro-
duce a good positive, but it must always be carefully
understood that in order to have a good positive a well
prepared paper is essential. The sensitising of the albu-
menised paper is on this account one of the most im-
portant operations of photography, and it may even be
said that, next to the preparation of the sensitive emulsion
for the plates, it ranks, in a descending scale of import-
ance, the first.
A customer who pays a visit to a photographer for the
purpose of having his photograph taken, is anxious to
receive good pictures. He little recks that the photo-
grapher, in order to accomplish his desire, is bound to
obtain a good negative, and to develop such negative with
this rather than with that developer— all that the cus-
tomer requires is a good portrait. This he pays for, and
troubles himself no whit about aught else. It is, there-
fore, clearly to the photographer's interest to select a good
quality of paper, to sensitise it in a proper manner, and
never to entrust, through ignorance or carelessness, this
most delicate of all photographic operations to any inex-
perienced hands.
The foregoing serves to explain why many persons well
known and long experienced in the photographic art have
occupied themselves in the preparation of paper with
serious diligence, and why it is sought to secure, at least
for some time, the preservation of the sensitive state after
sensitising by seeking a remedy against the yellowing of
the paper.
Signor Klary — from whose kindness I have received
much information in regard to my experiments in this
matter — to whom, indeed, any praise which may result from
them is wholly due — has demonstrated incontestably the
necessity of a strict attention to the degree of concentra-
tion of the sensitising bath, and to the duration of the
floating of the paper.
The concentration of the bath determines more or less
rapidly the coagulation of the albumen, and from this it
follows that its density should be delicately adjusted, so
as on the one hand not to hasten the coagulation necessary,
because this would hinder the silver lath from penetrating
the albumen ; and on the other hand, not to retard it
beyond what is necessary, because then the lath would be
very easily absorbed, not only by the albuminous stratum
in which it ought to remain, but also by the paper itself,
entailing thereby a grievous damage.
The duration of the sensitising process ought to be in
exact proportion to the quantity of salts contained in the
albumen, to the concentration of the bath, to its tempera-
ture, and to the temperature of the place where the
process is carried on. As Signor Klary observes, in all
operations having regard to the sensitising of the paper,
an exact and perfect harmony is necessary, to which must
be added, in my opinion, a just criterion, because it is
easy to understand that the floating of the paper over the
sensitising bath has no other end than to cause the trans-
formation of the nitrate of silver into chloride and
albuminate of silver, and this transformation occurs, as I
have already said, relatively to the quantity of chloride of
sodium which the albumen contains, and, therefore, in a
* Translated for the PHOTooHAPHicNEWs^from the Bulletin of the Italian
Photographic Society, published at Florence.
Arim. 11, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
determinate lapse of time. When .all the chloride of
sodium has been transformed, the prolonged contact of
the paper with the silver bath is not only useless, but even
prejudicial, because the nitrate of silver continues to filter
itself into the pores of the paper, which, thus sensitised,
no longer retains in the impressions that transparency of
tints which would be apparent if all the salts of silver were
found on the surface of albumen. In this last case
the image is retained upon this surface, and the paper,
preserving its whiteness unaltered, produces impressions
praiseworthy alike for their transparency and their relief.
More clearly to demonstrate the truth of this assertion,
I will call the reader's attention to the fact that prints
taken upon aristotype paper are generally better than those
upon albumenised [taper in the matters of transparency and
depth of tints, which the former shows in marked
superiority to the latter, and this only because all the
chloride of silver contained in the former paper is dis-
tributed in the gelatinous mass, and the paper itself is
therefore preserved uncontaminated. An impression upon
albumenised paper rendered as translucent as one upon
aristotype by the method of Signor Crozat, fails to acquire the
value of the latter if the sensitising has been excessive.
From my own experiments, I can guarantee as fairly
trustworthy the following formula}, which I here tender
with all good will to such of my honourable fellow-workers
as may desire perchance to prepare in their own labora-
tories a paper which may be satisfactory to them.
Te
rperature.
Percentage of
Silver Bath.
Duration of
Sensitibing.
Notes.
From
2“ to 16“ C.
10 5 Gramme-
From 60 to 70 secs.
These indications
are for aimply alhu.
17° „ 29“ C.
9
»» 35 „ 50 ,,
mcnized paper. For
doubly albumer.izett
30“ „ 35“ C.
»
the duration of the
sensitising must be
-
increased by a few
seconds.
The paper thus sensitised may be kept very well for a
few days, if care be taken to preserve it in a dry place.
If, however, it be desired to keep it for a longer period,
several methods of preservation have been suggested,
which I will here recapitulate for the benefit of those who
may wish to avail themselves of any of them.
I)r. Van Monckhoven advises the addition to the silver
bath of as much nitrate of magnesia as there is nitrate of
silver contained therein. This receipt I have not found
to answer very well.
Mr. William Bedford advises the sensitising of the
paper in the ordinary manner, and after that allowing it to
float for about a minute on the sensitised surface in a bath
composed of —
Distilled water ... ... ... ... 1,000 c.c.
Nitrate of silver... ... ... ... 62,5 gr.
Citric acid ... ... ... ... 62\r> gr.
The Bulletin of the Belgian Association of Photographers
prescribes the use of leaves of blotting-paper impregnated
with carbonate of soda, which are interposed between
the sheets of dried sensitised paper. Rolled up together
with these, the sensitised paper may, says the Bulletin, be
preserved.
Doctor Stoke gives the following method : — The paper is
to be sensitised upon a silver bath of 10 per cent. , and while
not yet completely dry, is to be floated on the side opposite
to the albumen upon a bath of citrate of potassium (1 : 30)
for about four minutes. It is to be then washed with
rain water, and toned, after fixing, with a bath of sulpho-
ryanide of gold.
•>
M. I, eon Vidal, in the Photogruphie ties Debutants, suggests
putting the paper, after the sensitising process, and on
the side opposite to it, for the space of five minutes upon
a bath composed of —
Distilled water ...
Gum arabic
Citric acid
Tartaric acid
Hydrochloric acid
... 1,000 c.c.
... 30 gr.
... 20 „
... 20 „
... 20 „
M. Leon Warnerke counsels the use of nitrate of potassium
in the ratio of 1:4, with which the paper is to be wetted
after the sensitising, and on the side opposite to it.
Mr. Debenham, of London, points out the use of the
perchloric acid of commerce. lie adds ten drops of this
acid to every 30 c.c. of the sensitising bath.
Mr. Taylor declares that his own experiments lead him to
employ tartaric acid rather than citric acid, which is the
acid generally used to preserve the sensitised paper.
Captain Abney asserts that if the sensitised paper be
kept in a place perfectly dry, and otherwise empty, it may
be preserved for an indefinite period.
Herr Liesegang. in his treatise HaniUmch ties Praktischen
Pliotographen, indicates two distinct methods. With the
first of these he prescribes the addition of a small quantity
of citric acid to the silver bath, which is composed as
follows : —
f Nitrate of silver
( Distilled water
Citric acid ...
Distilled water
... 20 gr.
... 100 c.c.
... 2 gr.
... 100 c.c.
After the complete solution of the substances, No. 2 is
poured into No. 1, and five drops are added of phenol
(carbolic acid). The sensitising of the paper is effected
in the ordinary manner.
For the second method we are told to sensitise the paper
with the usual bath of ten per cent., then to let it float,
while yet somewhat moist, on the non-albumenised side, on
a bath composed of one part of citric acid to fifteen parts
of water for about ten seconds.
From my own experience I have found that the best
methods to adopt are those indicated by Herr Liesegang,
with which I sensitised several sheets of paper upon
the 21st of November in last year. These sheets I have
found with pleasure to be well preserved up to the present
time. Printing, toning, and fixing succeed with these
methods well and easily —a result which I have not obtained
after other methods of treatment.
If the advice given by M. Leon Vidal be followed, the
paper w ill not retain its sensitiveness if it be allowed to
float on the second bath for the space of five minutes, as
the author prescribes, whilst, on the other hand, it will be
preserved excellently well if the time be restricted to ten
or twelve seconds. This inconvenience aroused in me the
idea of discovering its cause, and I thought at first that
some endosmosc of the silver had taken place into the
gununy and acidulated water, because, whilst the image
appeared pale on the side of the albumen, it presented
itself in the clearest manner when looked at as a trans-
parency and from the back. But I afterwards considered
that this inconvenience possibly was caused by the trans-
formation into chloride of silver of the excess of nitrate of
silver wdiich remained in excess on the surface of the sheet
— a transformation due to the action of the chlorhydric acid
— and as it is know n by the investigations made in this
matter by MM. Davanne and Girard, that the silver
reduced by the light to the metallic state releases chlorine,
276
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
which, finding itself in the presence of nitrate of silver
forms successively new proportions of chloride upon which
the light continues to exercise its action ; so it seemed to
me clear that, wanting that part of nitrate of silver in
excess, the image remained somewhat faint and pale. I
cannot, however, speak with any certainty, as I have not
had sufficient time to study this phenomenon. Very
probably one of my suppositions may be just, but I appeal
to all my excellent companions and fellow students in the
photographic art to endeavour to give a more exact
explanation of the matter which I submit to them.
For applying the preserving bath to the paper, the
method which I have hitherto found the best is that which
follows : — Every sheet, as soon as it is removed from the
sensitising bath, is to be suspended by two of its coiners,
letting it hang a little on one side, and so drained.
When a certain number of sheets have been sensitised, and
whilst the paper is still moist, the excess of liquid which may
yet remain on the lower margin is to be removed by
placing the sheet between some folds of white blotting-
paper. It is then to be floated on the acidulated bath,
on which it is not to be left more than ten or fifteen
seconds. The object of this second bath being used
whilst the sheet is still moist, is facility of the working,
since the paper is then much more pliant, and in a condi-
dition most favourable for the prevention of that curling
up which would certainly spoil it.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN NATURAL COLOURS.
In the Standard of April 2nd is the following letter on
the above subject from its Vienna correspondent, who
has had an interview with Dr. Eder in relation to the
alleged photographs in natural colours, which attracted
attention at the Camera Club Conference. From the letter
it will be seen that the method of Herr Veress is a secret
one, that Dr. Eder has not been made aware of its nature,
and that so much of the method as lias been made known
is chiefly Becquerel’s process, except that the chloride of
silver is applied emulsified in gelatine or collodion, but
that also is not new. In fact, in such details of the pro-
cess as the Correspondent has been able to obtain, there
is nothing new nor even comparatively recent : —
I have already mentioned, in a former telegram, that the
photos of Herr Franz Veress, of Klausenburg, Transylvania,
were shown to me by Professor Eder at the Photographic In-
stitute. The interesting specimens were sent to the Institute
not by Herr Veress himself, who, perhaps, does not know
German, and was, therefore, not able to write to Professor
Eder, but by the Hungarian landed proprietor, Herr E. von
Gothard, of Heruny, in Hungary, an amateur photographer,
who had heard of the achievements of the unknown Transyl-
vanian artist, and, out of scientific interest, assisted him in
the pursuit of his discovery. The photos are upon glass and
upon paper. The former are diapositives, and if looked
.hrough show, for the most part, a beautiful ruby-red ground
colour, with a picture in bright, sometimes brilliant, colours,
from the deepest hue of ruby-red — far deeper than the ground
colour — to light orange, with several shades of red and yellow,
and from violet to aniline blue, and the intensest, most bril-
liant blue that can be imagined. The same colours prevail
also on the paper positives, which have all a greyish-brown
ground-colour, upon which the red inclines more to purple
than ruby, and the violet is especially brilliant. Green is
missing on all the positives, and it is not known whether Herr
Veress has succeeded in producing it, since the photos now
in Vienna were obtained some four weeks ago. I looked at
the photos, together with Professor Eder, through a magni-
fying glass, and we could not detect a single impurity in the
[April 11, 1890.
drawing or in the pigment of the colours. The outlines of
the pictures are perfectly exact, and each colour stands out
from the other with marvellous distinctness. Professor Eder
told me he did not dare to expose the photos to the direct
sunlight, as he was afraid of their being injured ; but he
was astonished to find that the colours were quite unaffected,
and not changed in the slightest degree, after lieing exposed to
the ordinary daylight in Dr. F.der’s office for fully three weeks,
during which the photos upon glass and paper were examined
by a great number of persons, were lying about uncovered at
different times of the day, and were also shown during a
lecture at the Society for the Propagation of Natural
Science during gas-light. Such permanency of colour on
photos has, Professor Eder says, never lieen known l>efore,
and constitutes the principal achievement of the Transylvanian
discoverer. It will lie necessary to expose the photos .to a
more severe light experiment liefore final judgment can be
passed ; but if we remember that in former cases of photo-
graphing in natural colours a coating of varnish has had to be
applied to protect the colours, as otherwise they would have
faded away within a few days, if not within a few hours, it
must be .admitted that the solution of the problem has been
greatly advanced by Herr Veress, when he has succeeded in
making the natural colours durable for such a long time
in diffused light.
In sending the photos, Herr von Gothard gave the following
details of the applied process. The sensitive preparation is a
silver chloride emulsion in collodion, or in gelatine, and the
solution being prepared in a peculiar way, which is the inven-
tor’s secret, it is jwured upon either the glass or the paper,
where it soon takes a brownish-red colour. The plate is put
into a copying frame and exposed to the rays from a trans-
parent coloured drawing, of which the negative picture is soon
visible, the dark parts appearing, of course, in white. The
exposure has to last in the case of glass negatives two to three
hours, and in the case of paper at least three days, as the
colours come out very slowly, but the picture having been fixed
in an alkaline bath, the colours become brighter and more in-
tense. The process in the camera would require an exposure
lasting several weeks, but even the ordinary process will be
largely reduced if some experiments on which Herr Veress is
at present engaged succeed as well as he hopes, and, according
to the latest information, he has already so changed his original
system as greatly to lessen the time of exposure, esjiecially for
the paper negatives.
Professor Eder has not made the slightest attempt to j>ene-
trate into the secret of Herr Veress’s process, in order not to
deprive him of the ultimate pecuniary benefit of his arduous
labours. All he would say is, that Herr Veress, who must be
a very clever practical photographer, has most likely by some
professional device so changed the process descrilied by Carey
Lea some two years ago, of applying the photo chlorides of sil-
ver in the form of an emulsion, as to achieve what nobody
before him has succeeded in, namely, photographing in several
colours which are permanent. The sulistance he uses is pro-
bably much the same as that experimented with by Herschel in
1840, by Becquerel in 1847, 1848, till 1855, and by Niepce
de St. Victor, 1851 till 1866. But the system is a different
one, and, as it has led to such great results in so short a time,
it may be presumed that Herr Veress is the right man to bring
the solution of the great problem within reach, if enabled to
pursue his studies on the subject.
Professor EJer is not quite sure whether he must regard the
colours on the Transylvanian photos as a real pigment, or as
the effect of very thin layers. He is delighted with the exact-
ness and precision of the coloured picture obtained by Herr
Veress, and although he must, of course, look upon photo-
graphing in natural colours as still in its infancy, and even the
results of Herr Veress as only a crude specimen of what ulti-
mately may lie achieved, the possibility of fixing colours for
such a long time is, in his opinion, so great a step in advance
that minor shortcomings are of small importance. I gave the
professor everything to read that has appeared in the Standard
since the first article on the subject, and after going through
all the letters, he said —
April 1 1 , 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
277
“ Captain Abney’s results in obtaining natural colours by
photography have never teen seen on the Continent. I am,
therefore, not able to say anything about them. The process
of Mr. Ives, of Philadelphia, is printing in colours by the aid
of photography, and not photographing ; it can, therefore, in
no way compare with the discovery of Herr Veress, which is
quite a different thing. The photo-chromic pictures prcxluced
in Philadelphia are also produced in jierfection by Albert, in
Munich, and by Sieger and Lowy, in Vienna, and to my taste
those of Sieger are the test in existence. But, as I said before,
that is chromo-lithography, in which photograph}’ is only an
accessory, and not sun-printing in natural colours. The other
statements in the letters to the Editor of the Standard are
completely negatived by what you have seen yourself, and what
I can vouch for as really achieved — namely, the retention of
the colours for several weeks. Everything else rests with the
future, and the problem is, of course, not even approximately
solved as yet.”
The professor is quite a young man, very energetic, very
cautious in scientific matters, and given heart ar.d soul to
natural science in all its branches. He is the director and
leading spirit of an Institute which has not its equal in the
world. It owes its existence to the energy of Baron Gautsch,
the Minister of Public Instruction, who founded it as a State
Institute with the assistance of the Vienna Town Council,
which placed the greater part of a house in the Wertbahnstraase
at its dis[x>sal, defrayed the cost of the necessary alterations,
and still provides the lighting, heating, and the service in the
four glass-covered studios, nearly forty different rooms, and the
large class-room, which together make up the Institute. The
first expenses for fitting up, and for the purchase of a very
large collection of instruments and appliances, photographic as
well as physical and chemical, were defrayed out of a State
grant, and the current expenses are met by a State subvention
and the fees of the students. These number at present nearly
two hundred, including several ladies, in addition to a great
number of amateurs who do not attend all the lectures given by
the six professors, but only follow special branches, and have the
use of the Institute as far as they need it. The students are,
to a large extent, foreigners, and I spoke to two young gentle-
men, sons of photographers in the vicinity of Chicago, who
have come all the way from America to attain perfection in the
different arts connected with photography. The speciality of
the Vienna Institute consists, mainly, in the union of every art
or profession into which photography enters as an auxiliary,
besides the promotion of studies in photography itself and in
its application to science. The Institute has been in existence
only since the 1st May, 1888, and has already such a reputation
that applications are made from all parts of the world for places
in the different classes, usually half a year before the courses
begin, as the number of seats is limited.
Treatment of Uranium Residues. — Large quantities of
uranium salts are used in the analytical laboratory for the
estimation of phosphoric acid in manures and agricultural pro-
duce. M. Lacete has proposed the following treatment for
recovering the uranium in the residues of this operation
When a sufficiently large quantity of liquid containing its pre-
cipitate of phosphate of uranium has accumulated, the super-
natant liquid is decanted off, and the precipitate is boiled with
soda until dissolved. After cooling, and without filtering,
ammonia is added, and the phosphoric acid eliminated by means
of the ordinary magnesia mixture. Twelve hours later the
liquid over this precipitate of phosphate of magnesia and
ammonia is syphoned off, and the residue washed with ammo-
niacal water. The filtrate from the phosphate of magnesia is
neutralised by means of hydrochloric acid or sulphuric acid, and
the carbonic acid is eliminated by boiling the liquid. The
uranium which the latter contains is now precipitated by
ammonia ; the precipitate is washed with water, to which a
little sulphate of ammonia is added. It is finally dissolved in
nitric acid taken rather in excess, and the solution yields on
evaporation crystals of nitrate of uranium. These are collected
in a filter, and washed with a minute quantity of very cold
water.- — Buryoyncs Monthly Magazine.
THE ART OF DRAWING AND PHOTOGRAPHY.*
BY A. M. ROSSI.
In an article written by me some time ago in the Photographic
Quarterly, I endeavoured to show the preponderating
influence that photography bears on art. I went, perhaps,
a little too far in mentioning certain facts and incidents,
and this brought upon me an avalanche of hostile criticism
from my brother artists. On this occasion I propose,
notwithstanding, to follow on the same track, and try as
best I can to prove that photography, instead of being the
useful servant to art, has almost become its mistress.
When photography was in its infancy, a thorough
academical art education was acquired by long, tedious,
and assiduous study. Drawing, by which is meant not
only an outline, but the inside accentuation and modelling
of the form by means of the correctness of values and
passages in the chiaroscuro, formed without exaggeration
three-fourths of an art education. The rest was occupied
by the student in learning, if learning it could be called,
the art of painting. Students admitted in the academies
began by copying from the flat, and then drawing from the
cast, extremities, and heads, and busts, Ac., attending at
the same time classes in anatomy, geometry, ornamentation,
elementary architecture, and perspective, all considered
necessary for the formation of an art draughtsman, who,
after a period of six or eight years, if he could distinguish
himself by executing an original cartoon of a given subject,
was promoted to the last and to him most fascinating
school, that of painting from life, where he could nestle
until he felt his wings stroDg enough to fly in search of
name and fame. Beyond teaching a few tricks and the
way of holding the pallet and the maulstick, the professors
contented themselves in passing their own private opinion
upon the works. Hence it was that one day Professor A.
would pronounce a painting too hot, and the same would
be too chalky for Professor B. ; an academy from life
would be lacking in transparency for Professor €., and
the same a day or two later on, in too light a key for
Professor I). ; and so on. lie who is not bom a painter
can never become a great one. Some of the best prodigies
in the academies, in emerging into the schools of painting,
have thoroughly flagged, and it is hardly necessary for me
to mention many names of men of modern times who gave
up the pallet, or used it to the detriment of their beautiful
designs. We have an Overbeck, a Kaulbach, a Cornelius,
a Tancrede, almost our contemporaries, great men who
threw the brush away. We find an Ingres in France, a
Maclise in England, who merely smeared their immortal
compositions ; the art of drawing constitutes the longest
and only teachable part of an artist's education. In the
days I am speaking of painters were fewer than now.
Only those who distinguished themselves were recognised,
or even admitted into society ; wonderful transition from
the days of Medicis, Charles, V., of Francis I., of a T.eo X. ,
whose munificence made their courts the centres of genius,
for they loved art and honoured the artist.
Nine-tenths of the art students belonged to the lower
classes of the people, mostly artisans’ or farmers’ sons ;
the academies were, no doubt, well stocked, but not one
in a hundred became an artist at all. Before the second
or third year of their studies some would be caught by the
conscription, others would become shopkeepers’ appren-
tices, and I have known many of my chums accepting
* Abstract of a paper read before the Camera Club Conference, and pub-
lished in the Journal of the Club,
278
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
situations as waiters at a cafe : thus this little illustration’
of which I can bear witness, is, I venture to hope,
sufficient to prove that it was beyond any moral
possibility in those almost pre-photographic days,
for any house-painter’s apprentice, or a boy cow-keeper,
or a cabin lad, or an artists’ colourmau’s sou, to go to bed
one night, in the fulness of his various vocations, and
awake a year or two later a ready-made artist, as has
been the case in this and other countries beyond any
possible dispute within these last twenty years, because
in those days, when artists had to depend solely on their
intellectual efforts and. the training they received from
their masters, who admitted in their ateliers only men of
exceptional talent, the paths of art were comparatively
free from the useless and poisonous weeds that now infest
it. Now, thanks to the facility that photography offers
alike to the strong and the weak, the ranks of art are
overcrowded with aspirants to fortune and to fame. A
few push their way through the crowd and attain excel-
lence, more wrestle with cruel mediocrity, and the
majority are canvas daubers, who glut the market with
rubbish, to the destruction of art, the gradual degeneia-
tion of artists, and the disgust and confusion of the
patron.
With your kind permission, I will now try and put be-
fore you an illustration in support of my forthcoming
assertions. We take two young men, one in good cir-
cumstances with a liking for art, although not an artist,
who, not knowing what else to do, decides to become one.
The other is a boy born in poor circumstances, but a
painter ; within him lies dormant the instincts of a
designer and an artist. Whilst the first goes through his
academical training, the latter goes about with the painter’s
can, being an apprentice to a house-decorator.
Tbe former devotes six or eight weeks in shading the
head of a Yitellius, stippling it with the point of the
crayon and bread putty. The apprentice, with a piece
of chalk, is smearing with forms of all kinds every avail-
able space of wall he can come across. The academy
student is busy trying to win a scholarship for best draw-
ing from the antique, and the little apprentice, getting
hold of a photograph, traces it on a smooth piece of board
at his master's shop, and with his master’s paints he colours
it. It is a portrait of his employer, who, having detected
him, instead of discharging the refractory one, sends him
at his own expense to Ileatherly’s to join the evening
classes. There he learns in six months enough drawing
to enable him to copy with exactness anything from the
fiat. After six months' education he copies from a Christ-
mas number a picture, which he sells for £1 ; next he buys
for 2d. the photo of a pretty lady from a hawker’s wheel-
barrow, makes an enlargement, paints it, and sends it to an
exhibition, where it is hung and sold. Without any
further instruction the boy now devotes every available
minute to painting from nature, and goes to the parks, and
in the country, producing landscapes. Ilis first attempts
are naturally consistent with the slow awakening of his
genius, but steadily progressive, and gradually approaching
that manly and rapid development characteristic to all
men of genius. In that manner he devotes two years,
when he has the courage of submitting one of his land-
scapes to the crucial test of the academical council. It is
accepted, well hung, and sells. This bit of luck gives him
an opportunity of visiting frequently the Royal Academy,
and he uses his keen eye of observation, without, however,
allowing his mind to be influenced by what he sees around
him. Meanwhile the Royal Academy student sends an
ambitious figure-subject, and it is rejected.
Henceforth the humbly-born young man is a regular
exhibitor in the It. A. ; each succeeding picture is better
than its predecessor — his development is surprising to all.
A pastoral subject of ambitious dimensions the following
year attracts great notice, and, to cut a long story short,
the young man is in the enjoyment of a great reputation,
and perhaps an associate of more than one institute of arts.
The R. A. student, discouraged at the repeated rejection
of his works at the hands, most probably, of his teachers,
throws pallet and brushes away, and turns his back on art
for ever.
And yet. gentlemen, the house-painter could not draw,
at this period of my narrative, from nature half so well as
the Academy student, who is very well versed in anatomy,
in geometry, perspective, all occult gifts to our young
prodigy, who, on his part, could, however, produce a pic-
ture redolent with all the charms that only an artist can
give. This little illustration, which. 1 ventui-e to hope, will
not flavour either of improbability or exaggeration, is a
fact within my memory, which, however, could not have
taken place in the days of Titian or Ruonarotti under the
same circumstances, unless the poor boy had a camera and
all the rest of the multifarious appliances that photography
offers us now.
If, therefore, we can trace the career of a brilliant
artist, almost self-taught, how many more similar cases
might we not have amidst us of men who attain the same
results with no better means ? and thus it is that I main-
tain that the cabin lad, and the yeoman's son, and the
artists’ colourman’s boy, if born talented, can all reach the
apex of excellence in art. It is immaterial what means
are used, providing they are legitimate.
An artist must show what he can do and not how he
does it. I conclude my paper by expressing my firm
belief that the only teachable part of art, which is drawing,
is sinking with the rising of photography, and, to my
humble belief, the days are not far off when a youth, born
with artistic instincts, in a few months of mechanical
instruction can be his own teacher, and photography will
be his academy.
PHOTOGRAPHIC GROUPS.
BY FREI) HART WILSON.
The successful “group” marks the top notch in the scale
of photographic achievement. It is certainly the most
difficult problem, exacting and uncertain.
The painters, infinitely less trammelled than the photo-
graphers, themselves feel this ; so much so, that the power
of successful combination of a number of figures into the
unity of a composition has always been the mark of a
master. One has said that to paint one figure is simple,
two very hard to manage, and the difficulty increases in
geometrical ratio with every additional figure introduced.
Another declares that composition is simply a special
faculty, not to be acquired, but inborn ; one either has it,
or has it not.
This, however, is too severe, and we will proceed on
the understanding that composition is not unique among
human accomplishments, but, like other things, may be
attained by intelligent study. The artist’s assertion is
simply a significant tribute to the difficulties of the subject.
In the very first place, a word on the mental side of
composition may not be wasted. It does exact, for
Apkil 11, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
279
thorough success in it, a certain mental power of calling
things up, of projecting the picture on the air, of seeing
with the mind's eye. One must, in fact, see the finished
picture before it is begun. The way to begin the con-
struction of a group is not to get together models and
accessories that seem likely to look well, and then worry
them about until an idea of some kind occurs. The idea
must come first — there must be some distinct notion of
what one is going to do, and the more clean-cut this idea
is the better. After that, of course, there may be infinite
experiment and alteration ; but the thing is to get an
intelligent start, and not take the subject by the tail end
first
It is the faculty the French, as a nation, possess of putting
a thing visibly before one, of seizing and completely em-
bodying the point of an idea, seeing all over and all
around it at once, that makes them so supreme in art.
It may, perhaps, be well to define the group, as we
begin, as a number of persons gathered in one picture,
with some common interest binding them together. The
last clause at once rules out the masses of people who may
be seen in many so-called group pictures, each oue a
separate object, independent and unique. There must be
some rational relation between the figures, and some
reason, besides that of their being photographed, for their
being there together. A pyramidal arrangement of six
people, one on the floor, two seated, and three standing,
all looking straight ahead, vacuous and without any visible
reason for being, is not a group. It is simply six people —
six units, not oue.
And the photographer must realize this difference be-
tween photograph and picture. lie cannot arrange people
like the specimens on the shelves of a museum, and expect
a picture. He cannot show the full faces of all the five
people of a family, for instance, and expect anything but
five separate portraits. Some of them must be sacrificed
to some degree, and must be seen iu profile, or three-
quarter view at most. If he wants to make a picture of
such a family, I think the only solution of the difficulty
will often be to take two photographs, or more, if he can.
In one he may show the full-face photographic portrait
view of two or three, sacrificing the others to the exigen-
cies of composition; in the other, he may make those
thus lost the important heads, and subordinate the first
ones. Any family which has enough artistic sense to care
for a pictorial quality in their photograph, will not object
to the double exposure. Yet it is by no means impossible
that he could get good portraits all on one plate, which is,
after all, the object of the group, lie will very often
find more beautiful aud more characteristic aspects of the
face in the quarter circle, of those from three-quarter view
to full profile, than in the front face view, and by skilfully
using these may safely tread in the thorn-beset path, and
make both a satisfactory photograph and a picture.
A reason for the group must always exist, and be well
in evidence ; in other words, the composition must tell
its own story. The figures composing it must not be there
without a reason, and they must be doing something. It
is not enough to account for their being together, the
mere fact that they are being photographed — as we find
so often in groups of families, associations, clubs, and
societies. Of course, where three hundred men must be
taken on one plate, there is usually nothing to do but
put them there in rows, like figs in a box. But even
this can be avoided in many cases, and with a reasonable
number the devices for giving life and picturesqueness
to the group are as numerous as life itself. The family
may be reading, talking, looking at something, or, if acces-
sories can be brought in, engaged in characteristic occu-
pations. A good example of the success with which even
a large group may be treated, and that within ordinary
limits, is a plate I have seen of the jury for the admission
of pictures into the Salon. All the pictures are good and
sufficient, yet the whole is real and stirring with life, and
does not look arranged or photographic. And this is
done simply by taking a front view, facing them behind
two workmen who hold up a painting for judgment. The
jury is looking at it, crowded rank above rank, in various
attitudes ; the whole thing is a success, both as a picture
and as a series of portraits. Yet though the arrangement
is very subtle and practically unnoticed, it is decidedly
there, and success is not an accident.
And here a word on this topic of arrangement. There
are certain principles, formula; almost, which have found
great popularity and acceptance on account of easy com-
prehension and simplicity of application. The two such
that come in particularly in grouping arc the “ pyramidal
principle," and the principle of circular composition. The
former especially has had a famous career, aud I fear a
good many photographers consider that they have intro-
duced the much-desired touch of “ art” into their work,
and are safe and sure to make a picture, when they have
adopted the “oue, two, three” system of arrangement
referred to above. Yet it is to be remembered that
artistic quality is a delicate aud evasive thing, not by
any means to be secured by definite formulae and
practical receipts. These principles are simply crude
and rough statements of the general experience of
value up to a certain point. They are above all not to
be applied too literally, remembering what “ the aim of
art” is said to be. They must be as well concealed as
the skeleton is concealed by the flesh. They are merely
the framework of a picture, and their corners must not
stick out, but must be very deftly covered and hidden
in the finished composition.
The truly universal principle of good composition, if
there is one, seems to be a certain sinuous sway of lines
and a harmonious connection of things with one another,
that balances mass with mass, and gives that indescribable
sense of satisfaction to the eye iu passing from one to
another. This is what we feel, rather than any cold aud
mathematical arrangement of symmetrical pyramids or
complete aud uniform circles. It must be much more felt
than done by rule. The trouble lies in taking these ab-
stract formula; as rules. Any plate of the Crucifixion, for
instance, by the old masters, will show how thoroughly
covered up, and modified, and transgressed they have
been.
A final hint on illustrative compositions, such as the
Hiawatha and Evangeline. In reading over the subject,
certain passages will strike one as having the graphic quality,
calling up pictures. Let the photographer select a num-
ber of these, and then reading and re-reading them, try to
get all the circumstances in his mind, or at least to embody
his impression as vividly and really as possible, until he
positively sees something. The larger- part of art is
mental, let him remember, and so not be iu haste to get
his models before him until he has something for them to
do. After that let him labour, and alter, and try experi-
ments, and re-arrange a<l infinitum in the details, if he wish.
When the jewel is secured, it may be cut and polished
patiently to perfection. — WiUons Photographic Magazine.
280
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
l^OtCS.
The rumour is that portraits will be more numerous
than ever at the next Academy. Indeed, some have
gone so far as to say that it will be known as “ The
Portrait Year.” The fact cannot be denied that the
most remunerative branch of art which the painter can
take up is portraiture, and it is not surprising, though
it may be regretted, that men who have made their
name through works of imagination and poetic feeling
have turned their talents to the delineation of the
features of merchants, princes, doctors of divinity, and
society ladies. Towards this end, photography has
contributed. Undeniably there has been a rage for
portraits ; the crowds round the shop windows show
the direction of the public taste. The outcome of this
tendency, of course, varies according to means : while
those with limited purses are contented with photo-
graphs, the wealthy patronise the painter. There
cannot be the slightest objection to this so long as the
public who pay their shillings to the Royal Academy
have not to undergo the infliction of having to gaze on
perpetual portraits.
The Stereoscopic Company has had its annual meet-
ing, and declared its annual dividend of five per cent.
This is the fifth year of the Company’s existence, yet
it has never realised the promises held out in the
prospectus. A safe five per cent, is not bad as times
go, and considering that Consols yield now no more
than 2f ; but the general idea is that a photographic
business is an extremely lucrative one, and therefore
the inability of the Stereoscopic Company to get beyond
five per cent, must be a little disappointing to the
shareholders. Nor does it appear that the chairman
was able to give any very definite reason for the falling
off. All he said was: “Five years ago, when we put
this concern into a company, the price that was paid for
the business was a price that would have paid seven
per cent, to the shareholders taking the profits over an
average of the twenty-three preceding years. Now, if
these profits had been realised, that would have given
you seven per cent.” Quite so ; but the discontented
may ask how is it these profits have not been realised ?
Mr. Howard V. Kennard failed to explain this. Indeed,
he left the statement to stand by itself, and the
inference is unavoidable that the Company has not
been doing so much business.
But again the question will again be asked, why ?
The last five years have been almost without parallel
in the growth of photography, and the “ turn over” in
the sale of photographic materials. It is true por-
traiture has fallen off, but the loss here must have been
nearly counterbalanced by the extension of photo-
graphy in directions other than the sale of apparatus
and chemicals. Under the two last heads the returns
must have been very large indeed, for every amateur
five years ago hundreds can now be numbered. It
would have been interesting to the profession, as well
as to the shareholders, if the chairman could have given
his views on this point ; but possibly this would have
involved details of the “ trading account” which few
business companies like to divulge, as it gives informa-
tion to their rivals. Mr. Kennard, however, has hopes
of shortly being able to get back to a six or seven per
cent, dividend.
Mr. Henry Blackburn, the Editor of Academy Notes,
is advertising lectures and classes for instruction in
drawing for the press. It is quite time the principles
were established on some fixed basis, not the least
important being the requirements of photography.
We do not see this specially mentioned in Mr.
Blackburn’s advertisement, but it may not be over-
looked. For want of the most elementary knowledge
of photography, we saw the other day a reproiuction
of a drawing by an experienced and skilful artist
totally spoilt. The artist was chiefly accustomed to
draw on transfer paper, but thiuking to produce a finer
result, he made the drawing on card to be photographed.
Unfortunately, he omitted to cut out the faint pencil
lines, and then was surprised to find the reproductive
print with several curious marks and blemishes, which
were totally inexplicable until the original was ex-
amined. The artist then was amazed to find that lines
which were quite faint to the eye, were reproduced
almost as strongly as those in ink.
A curious theory as to colour-blindness and its cause
under special conditions has been put forward by Mr.
W. A. Sherwood, in a paper read at the Canadian
Institute. He says, in regard to the effect of colour in
nature upon the eye, that in Philadelphia one out of
every five of the children there is found to be colour-
blind or compelled to wear glass es. He alleges that
this is due to the lack of colour in this somewhat prim
and monotonous city. He contends that the greatest
painters the world has produced flourished in lands
where colour was seen on every side. From these
resources of nature the artists drew their inspiration,
and not from shops of fashion. Colour-blindness is
almost unknown in many countries — Japan, Spain, and
Italy, for example. In Philadelphia we have, unfor-
tunately, the reverse of this. Mr. Sherwood believes
this lack of appreciation accounts for the preference
many persons there have for steel engravings and prints
to paintings. This, he holds, is false to the principles
and teachings of nature. Those who favour engravings
do so honestly because of their training in black-and-
white, to which from childhood they have been accus-
tomed. The children of the Quaker City have seen
the sombre attire of tbeir parents, and even worn the
same themselves; their city surroundings show the
white marble residences and the black roadway, and
their books and writing are all black and white. Hence
their sense of colour is limited. There seems to be
some force in this reasoning. A limb, if allowed to
remain inactive, finally grows torpid and useless. Why
not also a sense ?
April It, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
281
FERDINAND ADOLF BEYERSDORFF.
From the Photographische Correspoiulenz we translate the
following account, relating to the death of the well-known
Viennese photographer, 1 lerr Beyersdorff.
With Beyersdorff disappears once more a typical figure
from the familiar artistic circle of professional photo-
graphers in Vienna. Beyersdorff was essentially a self-
taught photographer, skilful extremely in all the manual
functions of his art, and well experienced in modern
delineation, lie was born on the 3rd of May, 1837, at
liimeritz, in the royal district of Frankfurt-on-the-Oder,
and was originally intended for a mercantile career, bnt
apparently not liking this employment, obtained a place
on board a merchant vessel as a sailor, and served after-
wards in the Royal Prussian Marines. An unlucky
accident, by which his breast was seriously injured,
rendered him useless for military service, though he was
discharged in a fairly sound condition from the hospital at
Marseilles.
Beyersdorff s first acquaintance with photography was
made in Berlin in the Gruudner Atelier, and he after-
wards obtained a place in the Studio of Reproduction of
11. Ilirsch, in those days a flourishing institution. Here
he remained for five years, and acquired for himself know-
ledge of the most varied character, hiking especial inte-
rest in the production of portraits on porcelain. At the
age of sixty he left Berlin for Vienna, and was then em-
ployed for various intervals in the studios of Julius Leth,
C. Haack, Victor Angerer, and Pokorny aml Reuter. lie
stayed for some time at Kozmata, in Pesth. Then, for
several years, he possessed a studio of his own. In the
meanwhile Beyersdorff had been actively employed in
reproductions by F. Bruckmann, in Munich, and Rbmmler
and Jonas, at that time Wilhelm Iloffman, in Dresden.
Beyersdorff has made himself known repeatedly to the
readers of the Photographische Con'&tpondenz through his
communications, showing considerable practical knowledge
of photography. He was nevertheless rejected when he
applied for the post of Professional Instructor in the
Royal Institution established for experiment and instruc-
tion in this art.
In the beginning of the current year Beyersdorff began
to sicken ; unlucky financial conditions affecting his
private purse hastened doubtless his deathward career.
As if inspired with some sad presentiment, he with much
labour and difficulty reduced his varied experiences and
experiments to some sort of order, intending to publish
them for the use and gratification of his fellow profes- j
sionals, but in the midst of his toil, in the month of !
March of the present year a pneumoplegea, or paralysis of !
the lung, brought his busy and careful life to a compara- 1
tively sudden end.
A new amateur photographic society entitled “ Freie Photo-
graphische A ereinigung zu Berlin ” has been established under
the presidency of Herr Gustav Fritsch.
The Royal Institution. — The general monthly meeting was
held on Monday, April 7 th, with Sir James Crichton Browne,
M. lb, LL.D. F.R.S., Treasurer and Vice-President, in the
chair. Mr. Arthur Edward Ash, Mr. Robert Dobbie, Mr.
" illiam S. Hall, Major Percy A. Macmahon, R.A., Miss May
Pollock, Mrs. Joseph Shaw, and Major-General C. E. Webber,
C.B., were elected members of the Royal Institution. The
special thanks of the members were returned for the following
donations to the fund for the promotion of exjierimental
research Mr. Ludwig Mond, £100, and Mr. Lachlan M.
Rate, £50.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS IN AMERICA*
There are some things in connection with photography
of which, as a nation, we may well be proud, and there
are some in connection with which we might profitably
take a leaf out of the book of our brethren across the
water. Of the latter, by far the most important, in our
opinion, is the holding of exhibitions of photographs as
frequently as possible, and in as many centres of popu-
lation as may be practicable.
Readers of the various English journals devoted to
photography cannot but be struck with the many exhibi-
tions that are noticed in almost every number as being
held all over Great Britain, even in towns that a few years
ago would have been considered too small to offer a
chance of success, and perhaps even more striking is the
fact that they are successful, not only in so far as really
good displays of photographs are almost invariably got
together, but that they are almost always financially so.
It is true, we have annually one grand — or what ought to
be a grand — exhibition, in connection with the Photo-
grapher’s Association of America, but in consequence of
distance, and other causes, it is seen by comparatively
few, and has little or no influence in the most important
phase of such institutions, the education of public taste.
Exhibitions, less pretentious, but vastly more useful,
have also been occasionally held by several local societies,
but before such influences can be brought to bear on the
whole people, they must become much more numerous ;
be more systematically organized, and especially more
thoroughly popularized.
We have repeatedly expressed the opinion that the
only way by which photography as a profession can be
raised from its present position to the platform which
it ought to occupy, is the elevation of photographers
themselves from photographers merely to artists in the
true sense of the term. Photography will never attain to
its rightful position till those who practise it cease to be
content with pretty, nicely-finished photographs ; and not
only aim at, but succeed in making each photograph a
picture.
In the present state of matters, however, so long as a
certain degree of technical success in photographic
practice is so easily reached, and the general public are
sufficiently ignorant of art as to be satisfied with such
productions, it would be unreasonable to expect much
improvement; and thus we are met face to face with the
fact that photographic advancement really depends on
the art education and culture of the public.
We believe that properly organized and properly
popularized exhibitions would be found among the most
efficient, if not the most efficient, of all means of pro-
moting such education, and therefore urge every photo-
graphic society and club throughout the country to get
up at least one exhibition every year. How best to do
that it is not for ijs to suggest, as the details will pro-
bably require to be different in different localities, but a
few suggestions may not be out of place.
In the first place, and perhaps most important of all,
there should be no question of “ shop ” introduced, and
absolutely no distinction between professional and
amateur. Although we have frequently shown the
impossibility of making satisfactory awards for works of
art, we know that as yet awards must be offered as in-
ducements to photographers to send pictures for exhibi-
• From The Beacon, of Chicago.
282
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
tion, and so medals should be offered, but offered for the
best pictures considered from an art point of view, and
irrespective of process or person. Many of the societies
are too weak to do much in the medal way ; but we are
persuaded that if the thing were fairly started and pro-
perly wrought, each exhibition would not only pay its own
way, but leave a balance in its favour.
Then the Photographers' Association of America might
redeem its character by lending valuable aid. It might
save some of the money now worse than wasted in very
much overpaying officials, and make a suitable die from
which silver and bronze medals could be struck and
offered for competition. The medals would cost little
more than the price of the metal, and be infinitely better
than the fancy, but generally little to be fancied designs
that are selected from year to year. One or more of
each of such medals given to each society, and offered as
the “ Association medal," would be, we believe, eagerly
competed for, and an excellent means of securing large
numbers of exhibits.
Another cardinal point should be the abolition of the
foolish system of charging for wall or exhibition space.
Not only should the exhibits be admitted free, but,
whenever the society can see its way to it, the carriage
should be paid one or both ways, and the hanging com-
mittee should have full power, and exercise it rigorously,
to exclude every frame that does not come up to a cer-
tain standard. By frame we of course mean picture,
and no picture should be admitted without a frame.
'Phe most difficult question is undoubtedly that of the
judges. In selecting them it should be kept in mind
that the object of the exhibition is to promote the
advancement of art, and that fine finish, “ chemical
effect," and all that sort of thing, should be utterly dis-
regarded. At the present time that would almost imply
that the jury should not include a photographer ; or, if
it does, he should be one who would rather give the prize
to a production of Mrs. Cameron or Rejlander, stained
and blotched, and technically imperfect, as they too
often were, than to some pictures to which were awarded
a gold medal at the Boston convention for nothing but
nice finish and technical qualities. But it is difficult for
a photographer to altogether ignore beautiful sharpness”
“delicate detail,” &c., &c., and, therefore, we would
put our trust in a jury of acknowledged artists.
But all this, even if done in the very best way, will be
but labour in vain, so far as the main object is concerned,
unless the public can be induced to come and see. IIow
this is to be achieved each society must decide for itself.
We were once prominently connected with an exhibition
in a city of 250,000 inhabitants, for which we had
gathered together from all quarters of the globe 1,149
flames, sent by 208 exhibitors, and displayed them to
excellent advantage in a suite of six great halls, the
use of which was liberally granted by the government of
the time. The galleries were occupied till 10 o'clock on
the night before the advertised day of opening, but the
pictures were unpacked and standing in corridors and
ante-rooms, and a few minutes after that hour a number
of willing hands carried them in. They were examined
by (lie committee of selection, passed to the hanging com-
mittee, and hence to the walls so rapidly that by 10 o’clock
next day the exhibition was opened and the catalogue in
the hands of the printer, who handed us the proof-
sheets a little after 12 o’clock.
We doubt whether ever so much work was done and
done so well in such a short time, but it should be
remembered that it was not done by paid officers. It
was all a labour of love and could not have been done for
filthy lucre.
But although we had arranged certainly the best photo-
graphic exhibition that had as yet been seen, and had
ticket seller, check taker, and doorkeeper — the latter a
government official in uniform and cocked hat — all ready
to welcome the dear public, that public did not come.
The second day seemed about to pass as unsuccessfully,
and some of us were looking, or at least feeling, very blue.
A meeting of the committee of management was held,
and one of the members said it was quite evident that the
public had no idea of the treat that awaited them, and, con-
sequently, must be brought in to see it. The only way
to do that was to make the exhibition fashionable by
getting the military baud to play during the afternoons.
On its being pointed out that it would cost 35 dols. a day,
or some 875 dols. for the month, and that we had not the
wherewithal to pay it, lie offered to guarantee the payment,
and the offer was accepted on the spot.
Xext day the band marched from the castle through
some of the principal streets and into the galleries, bring-
ing in its train an influx that almost filled the rooms. In
the meantime some of the newspapers were induced to
send art critics, and for others art critisms were written,
so that for a few days every morning paper contained a
glowing account of the treasures to be seen, and thousands
that were crowding to see them. In short, the exhibition
was a great success, and yielded a revenue of nearly
4,000 dols., which not only enabled the committee to pay
all the expenses and give a handsome, but unexpected,
honorarium to each of a few of the most active workers,
but also to place in the bank a good round sum to be
available on a future occasion.
Somewhat Dismal News. — “We have been favoured,” says
Burgoyne’s Monthly Magazine, “ with a copy of the weather
chart of London, compiled by Mr. K. G. Jenkins, F.R.A.S.,
from which we abstract the following particulars concerning our
disgraceful climate for the year of grace we are now in : —
April — Rather wet, esi>ecially for ten days round middle. May
—Rather dry ; wet for about a week round the 2. 1th. June —
Rather wet. July — Wet ; thunderstorms about 3rd, 8th, 15th.
August — Wet ; stormy about 9th and 22nd. September —
Rather wet. October — Dry; but gales about 5 th, 15th, 22nd.
November — Dry ; fog about 12th, 17tli, 19th. December —
Rather dry ; but gales aliout 8th, 20th, 27th.
The Livehfool Amateuk Photographic Association. — This
Association will have an Optical Lantern Evening on Monday,
14th April, when an entertainment will be given at the City
Hall, Eberle Street, Liverpool. — Part I., at 7'30 promptly,
“The Hundred of Wirral,” the Completed Survey, with
Descriptive Lecture by Mr. John Hargraves, when about oue
hundred and fifty lantern slides will be shown, from negatives
taken by the members of the Liverpool and Birkenhead
Societies', l’ait II., at 9T5 promptly, the New Boston (U.S.A.)
Set entitled the “ White Mountains,” with full descriptive
matter supplied by the Boston (U.S.A.) Photographic Society.
An excursion will be made to Raby Mere, on Saturday,
12th April. Members can meet at Club Rooms, at 1-30, or on
the Stage at 2 p.m. The train leaves Birkenhead at 2-20, and
is due at Bromborough at 2 ‘39 ; taking the lanes and cross
country route, finishing up at Itaby Mere. The train leaves in
return at 6*40, due at Landing Stage 7 ‘15, or a later train is
timed from Bromborough 7 ‘45 ; due at the Landing Stage at
8-25. Conductor: Mr. William Tomkinson. The pictures of
Mr. Harry Tolley are now on view. Members can obtain
tickets for the admission of friends on application at the Rooms.
Ai>ril 11, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
280
THE LATENT PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE*
ItY C. H. BOTHAMLEY, F.I.C., F.C.S.
Few questions are of greater interest to the scientific pho-
tographer than the nature and properties of the latent
image, i.e., the result of impact of light on a photographic
plate, invisible to the eye, but quickly revealing its pre-
sence when the plate is treated with a reducing agent in
the form of a developer. It has been the subject of a
considerable number of experiments, and a very large
amount of speculation, and a paper which aims at giving a
complete summary of what is known about the matter, as
distinguished from what is merely guessed or surmised,
may not be without some value. It is often very useful
to realise exactly what point we have reached, and what
problems still remain to be attacked.
We are concerned with the action of light on the haloid
compounds of silver embedded in gelatine or collodion and
surrounded by the aqueous vapour and other gases of the
atmosphere, and are only indirectly interested in the effect
of light on these salts when pure or merely in contact with
water. The changes which take place under the latter
conditions have, however, an important bearing on the
probable nature of the latent image. Briefly, it may be
said that the published experimental evidence shows that
perfectly pure silver haloids in a vacuum are not decom-
posed by light at all, but in the presence of moisture
silver bromide or chloride is altered with formation of
a dark-coloured compound containing a lower percentage
of the halogen than the original salt. At the same time a
substance is formed which has the power of liberating
iodine from potassium iodide, and if the action of light
takes place in presence of liquid water, the solution gives
a precipitate of silver bromide or chloride on addition
of silver nitrate. The nature of the substance which acts
on potassium iodide has never been satisfactorily investi-
gated. The dark, solid product is in all probability not
metallic silver, because the action of light readily takes
place even in the presence of nitric acid so strong that it
readily dissolves the metal. For a long time it has been
supposed that the dark substance is silver-sub-bromide or
sub-chloride, but this point will be discussed later on.
When light acts on the silver haloids in a collodion
film, the halogen which they lose may internet partly with
the moisture which is always present, partly with the
pyroxiline. It is, however, well known that pyroxiline
shows comparatively little tendency to yield chlorine or
bromine derivatives, and hence it is probable that the
part which it plays in the alteration of the silver salts is of
secondary importance.
Gelatine, however, behaves quite differently. It readily
hikes up chlorine and bromine, and if bromine water is
added to a solution of gelatine, a yellowish, curdy precipi-
tate of a bromo -gelatine is formed. Knop found t that
gelatine will take up as much as 50 per cent, of bromine,
forming a yellowish, insoluble compound. There can be
little doubt, therefore, that when light acts on the silver
haloids in presence of gelatine, the bromine or chlorine
which they lose combines with the gelatine. We have,
indeed, direct evidence in the fact that where the light has
acted the gelatine becomes less soluble. The readiness
with which the gelatine takes up the halogen explains its
great efficiency as a sensitiser, and the consequent high
sensitiveness of gelatine plates.
' Read at the Camera Club Conference, and published in the j ournal of
the Club.
t Chun. CentralbMt, 1879.
Three views as to the nature and mode of formation of
the latent image seem to me to deserve attention. Many
hypotheses, and guesses unworthy even of the name of
hypothesis, have been put forward, but have served only
to prove that their promulgators were incompetent to
deal with the question by reason of their want of acquaint-
ance with the established facts of chemistry and physics.
The problem is, in fact, of a high degree of difficulty and
complexity, and its solution will require experimental work
of the same order of accuracy as the work involved in the
determination of the atomic weights of the elements. It
seems almost necessary to point out that work of this
kind involves a certain amount of preliminary training.
The physical theory of the latent image assumes that the
energy of the light rays is transferred to the molecules of
the silver haloid, which are thereby thrown into a state of
unstable equilibrium such that the compound is reduced to
the metallic state by re-agents which, under normal con-
ditions, would have no action on it. The chief evidence
in support of this view was the observation that the latent
image spontaneously disappeared. There is, however, a
considerable amount of evidence to show that the latent
image does not fade spontaneously, but in all cases where
its disappearance is observed it is destroyed by the
action of atmospheric impurities, or by secondary re-
actions with substances retained in the film. Carey Lea,
who was at one time one of the firmest supporters of the
physical theory, showed* that silver iodide will absorb free
iodine, and hence the gradual disappearance of the latent
image on Daguerreotype plates or any other films obtained
by treating silver with an iodising agent may be traced to
the fact that the silver iodide has absorbed an excess of
iodine during its preparation, and this iodine gradually
acts upon the product of the action of light and re-con-
verts it into normal silver iodide. t
Analogy would lead us to expect that if the silver
haloid were thrown into an unstable condition by the
action of light waves, it would gradually and somewhat
rapidly return to its normal condition when the disturb-
ing cause ceased to act. I have myself kept gelatino-
bromide plates for fourteen months after exposure without
observing any reduction in the character of the image on
development. Other workers have kept exposed plates
for twoj and even three§ years. It is in the highest
degree improbable that a mere condition of unstable equili-
brium would persist for so long a time, and these facts,
combined with the fact that the latent image is destroyed
by re-agents of a particular kind, but not by others, seem
to me to be conclusive against the physical theory.
(To be continued.)
A Japanese Photocuapheh. — -In its issue of March 22nd,
Anthony's Photographic Bulletin gives a photogravure repro-
duction of the portrait of K. Ogawa, founder of the Shush in
Shimpo, the only photographic periodical published in Japan.
Prof. \V. K. Burton gives a very interesting personal history
of the Japanese photographer, and recounts the difficulties that
had to be overcome by him in acquiring a knowledge of photo-
graphy. The picture referred to was reproduced from a print
furnished by Mr. Burton.
* A mcr. J. Science, xxx ii. ; I'hotooraphic News, xxxi., p. 380r
t Carey Lea himself (tic. cit.J supposes that the iodine which the silver
iodide loses when exposed to light is absorbed by the adjacent unaltered
silver iodide, and in course of time re-converts the photo-iodide into the
normal iodide. It is doubtful whether silver iodide can act as its own
sensitiser, and it seems to me that the other explanation here given is the
more probable.
} Berwick, Brit. J. l'hot., 1882, pp. 542 and 549.
} Wright, l'hot. Mittheilungen , 1882, p. 16.
281
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE “ PHOTOGRAPHIC
NEWS.”
With the present number of this journal is issued a
portrait of Thomas Wedgwood, who produced in 1802
the first English photographs. The original is a crayon
drawing in the possession of Miss lv. Wedgwood, of which
a negative was taken for us by Mr. Ralph W. Robinson,
and the photogravure work has been done by Messrs.
Waterlow and Sons.
(EormponUcitce.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETIES’ NATIONAL
CHALLENGE CUP.
Sir, — In reply to the letter in your last number, signed by
Mr. Edgar G. Lee, we append the following copy of a letter
addressed to that gentleman some days before the opening of the
Exhibition. We venture to think that your readers will con-
clude that in offering to allow the Newcastle Society to
substitute other pictures for those which had been previously
shown and medalled at the Crystal Palace Exhibitions, we did
even more than they had a right to expect. — Yours faithfully,
S. G. Buchanan Wollaston.
J. F. Peasgood.
Crystal Palace, March 28, 1890.
Edoar O. Lkk, Esu.
Dear Sir,— Your papers duly to hand, and we are much obliged for the
great care you have taken. We must just point out that Mr. Gibson has
included two pictures with the same titles as previously sent; also Mr.
Lyd. 8awyer has sent again “The Boat Builder,” though shown here in
1888, and “ The Castle Garth,” shown here last year. As we cannot admit
pictures more than once, perhaps they would like to substitute others. —
Yours truly, J. F. Peasgood,
Crystal I'alace, JF* b. 26, 1890.
THE CRYSTAL PALACE CHALLENGE CUP COM-
PETITION.
Silt,- — We approach this subject fully aware how unpleasant
the task usually is of championizing our own works, and this
alone would have induced us, under any other circumstances,
to leave matters as they stand in the Crystal Palace Club Cup
Competition, but for the glaring injustice of this extraordinary
award, and the duty it involves of warning the photographic
world against encouraging its repetition.
We have so much proof of the Cup having been misdealt
with in this present case as to amount to a positive embarras
de richesse when it is necessary to reduce it to a sufficiently
compressed space for presentation before your readers.
Previous to determining on entering for this Challenge Cup
Competition, we carefully perused the entire rules appertaining
to it, as forwarded to us for that purpose, and found it to be
thoroughly open, with absolutely no restriction as to amateurs
or professionals only competing, no limitation as to size or class
of photograph, and no mention even that pictures which had
l>een previously exhibited in individual classes at the Crystal
Palace were not eligible. Carefully abiding by these rules, we
selected and sent 75 pictures, more than 45 of which had
already received awards ; 24 lantern slides and 6 stereoscopic
slides, most of which had also previously been medalled.
We received the following acknowledgment and acceptance of
our exhibit, under date of February 26tli. [See letter quoted
above.]
This was, of course, tacitly accepting all our exhibits with the
exception of the four pictures mentioned. These latter were
sent because we found that there teas no rule debarring them,
and because it was as reasouable to acoept pictures for the Chal-
lenge Cup class which bad been shown in individual classes last
year as to accept pictures shown in individual classes this year.
However, on receipt of this letter, Mr. Gibson and Mr. Sawyer
each wrote to the executive separately, requesting that the four
pictures alluded to should be placed aside until the end of the
exhibition, and Mr. Sawyer forwarded two others in place of
those of his objected to.
Subsequently, we received another letter from the same
source, of which the following is a sufficient extract, dated
March 8th : —
Your Club exhibit has arrived sifely, and all pictures are hung. I think
you will be very pleased with the show.
If all our pictures were hung, in face of two separate
requests from us for four of them to be withdrawn, it suggests
that either they were, after all, accepted as admissible by the
executive, or else that they were still hung as a weak plea for
afterwards disqualifying us. Which was it ?
We next hear of our pictures through Photography of
March 20th, which states : —
At the timeof writing this we do not know the awards, but, to our minds,
Newcastle— by reason of having atleast 6ve noted professionals represented
—stands far away ahead. Next must come the Liverpool Amateur, which
is represented by an excellent lot of pictures.
Writing later, in the same number, Photography again
says : —
It will be seen by our report that the Society Challenge Cup Competition
at the Crystal Palace has fallen to Birmingham. It is rather a significant
fact ( side report) that when the award was announced or. the sheet, it
appeared as “Three Cheers for Birmingham.” Before expressing any
further opinion on the matter, we should like to know if any Societies
were disqualified, and why ?
The Amateur Photographer for March 21st contains the
following anent the Cup Competition : —
Next year probably some conditions will be laid down by the manage-
ment, for surely it cannot bean equal competition when one of two alcoves
occupied by the Newcastle Society is filled by the work of two such men as
Gibson of Hexham, and Lyd. Sawyer.
Now, one of the extraordinary parts of this quotation is that
we have reason to believe it was written by one of the
judges of the Cup Competition, and, although it says plainly
that our exhibit was too good for the rest, yet the Cup has
not been awarded us ! We know that we cannot be honestly *
disqualified, and, as stated in our previous letter which
appeared in your columns, we challenged an explanation, and
stated that we had good authority for knowing that only a
portion of our pictures was judged.
The following reply from the Executive, dated March 24th,
was duly received : —
In reply to your letter ol 2lst inst., I have the honour to refer you to
our letter of 2Gth February ult , and to Rules (..'(note to rule) and 16, marked
and enclosed. You can have no authoritative information except through
the hands of the Executive, consisting of Mr. Peasgood and yours faithfully,
S. G. Buchanan Wollaston.
This is very nice and decisive, if we were prepared to accept
it, and if there was no higher tribunal than these same Messrs.
Peasgood and Wollaston to ap)>eal to. But we did not take
the trouble to make and send our exhibit only to lie dealt with
as their whims or interest dictated. There is a higher tribunal,
in the shape of our photographic confreres, to lay the matter
before.
Here, tlieu, let us analyse their lame attempt at justification.
“ Our letter of 26th February ” refers to the one above quoted,
in which they objected to two pictures sent by Mr. Gibson and
two sent by Mr. Sawyer. As Messrs. Gibson and Sawyer each
individually wrote asking for these four pictures to be with-
drawn, this fact ceases to have any liearing ui>on the case.
The “ Note to Rule 6 ” referred to says : —
N.B. — The Executive reserve all rights as regards the hanging of pictures,
and may refuse to display any picture without assigning reasons for so
doing.
This rule in no manner applies to us, as, according to their
own statement of March 8th, all onr pictures were accepted and
hung; but whether or not this includes the four pictures
objected to we cannot say, and as it was a matter entirely
resting in their own bands, we are not legitimately affected
by it.
Rule 16, as underlined by them, says : —
From the decision of the Judges there can be no appeal.
Very proper, so far as it goes ; but more remains liebind.
They continue : —
You can have no authoritative information except through the hands of
the Executive, &c.
* There is no question as to the absolute honesty of intention of the
Crystal Talacc authorities, and of Messrs. Wollaston and Pea good.— Ed.
April 11, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
, , -.t /Z v,\
28.')
That is official-like, but, unfortunately, it is not, or should not ,
be true. The judge* are — or, shall we in this case say, should
he ? — the first authorities in these matters, and it is from one of
the judges we learn that Messrs. Gibson and Sawyer’s pictures
(not the four of them in question, but all, or nearly all) were
left unjudged ; hence, as the judges did not decide ou all our
exhibits, it is not a complete decision, and need not lie final.
Now what can your readers infer from this array of facts
The letter of the judge — a man of known integrity and
eminence — was not sent us for publication, so we refrain from
any possible breach of confidence by further locating it, and
we have an amount of other confidential correspondence
touching on the subject, couched in terms which would make
Messrs. P. and YV.’s ears tingle if they heard it.
We hope your readers will not think that we are still sighing
for “the Cup that cheers ” (?) We did at first intend to
obtain it by legal means, but now feel it to be made of a too
“ base metal ” to touch on any consideration ; and if our
Birmingham confreres — against whom we have no single word
to say — feel that they can hold with honour what they must
now know is not fairly their own, then they are very welcome
to keep it.
It remains for us to apologise to you for the unavoidable
length of our communication, which we trust may come, at all
events, with some nogative appropriateness to the present
discussion on rules and regulations at exhibitions. We, at
least, have arrived at a very unanimous decision from this
experience, which is, that we will individually and collectively
carefully avoid any future exhibition associated with the names
of Messrs. Wollaston and Peasgood, in the event of such a
contingency ever again arising.
Auty & Ruddock,
T. Galloway,
J. P. Gibson,
J. E. Gooi.d,
Edgar G. Lee,
Newcastle-on- Tyne and Northern Counties Photographic Asso-
ciation, Mosley Street Cufe, Neiccastle-on-Tyne, March 31, 1890.
W.
J.
H.
H.
Parry,
Pike,
R. Proctor,
G. Ridgway,
Lyd. Sawyer.
THE CRYSTAL PALACE EXHIBITION.
Sir, — Will you please announce in next issue that the
award in Section 4, Lantern Division, was made to Fred H.
Evans, and that Mr. Wade’s initials should have been “J. W.”
.1. F. Peasgood.
Photographic Society ok Great Britain. — At this Society
on Tuesday, April lath, at 8 p.m., at 5a, Pall Mall East,
London, a paper will lie read by Mr. C. H. Bothainley, F.C.S.,
F. I.C., on “ A Standard Method of Development.”
Salted Paper for Enlargements. — The Bulletin of the
Photographic Sojiety of Italy, published at Florence, gives in
its last number a special formula for salted paper for enlarge-
ments, communicated to it by Signor G. Moretti, a member of
the Society and Director of the Studio for the Dilettanti Pho-
tographers in Florence. The formula is this : —
Water
Gelatine
Chloride of sodium
Citrate of soda
Ammonia chlorhydrate
1,000 gr.
2 „
4 to 6 ,,
21 „
13 to lti ,,
The gelatine, cut up into very small slices, is first dissolved in
the tepid water ; afterwards the other substances are added ;
when all are dissolved the solution is filtered, and placed in
bottles for use. To prepare the paper, the mixture is poured
into a basin, and the sheets are allowed to float for three min-
utes, using the same precautions as in the preparation of albu-
menised paper. After the moisture has been removed from
the sheets prepared with this solution, they are sensitised on
an ordinary 12 per cent, silver bath, and when dry they may at
once be used, and a beautiful tint, imitating perfectly that of
hematite, will be obtained. When the bath above described
is employed, especially if it be fresh and uncontaminated by
any noxious vapours, the sensitised paper may l>e kept in ex-
cellent condition for three days during the summer, and for a
week in the winter season.
patent Entelligcnre.
Specifications Published.
5,337. March 28th, 1889. — “ Photographic Cameras, and
Apparatus in connection therewith.” William Henry Smith,
Upton Villa, Beckenham Road, Kent, Engineer, and William
Willis, Bromley, Kent, Manufacturer.
Our invention relates to photographic apparatus, and one
of its objects is to provide improved means whereby sensitised
plates or films may be conveniently transported, and may at
any time be inserted in and removed from the camera without
liability to exposure of the said plates or films to light. Our
said invention, moreover, comprises an improved shutter,
hereinafter described, for facilitating exposures of short dura-
tion.
For holding the sensitise^ plates and transferring them, as
required, to and from the camera, we employ a holder or dark-
slide, which comprises a metal sheath or case, one end of
which is open, and is firmly attached to one side of a tube
having slots therein through which the plates may be inserted
in and removed from the said sheath. In the said tube is
fitted a plug of shutter of any suitable material. This plug is
so formed that the portion thereof which corresponds with the
slots in the tube is semicircular or of other convenient shape
in tranverse section so that it will, in one position, close the
opening or mouth of the sheath, or case, and thus exclude
light, but, by turning the said plug about its axis through a
greater or less angle, a clear way through the slots and the
open end of the sheath may be made, through which the pho-
tographic plate can be inserted or removed.
Our improved dark-slide is very compact and can be cheaply
manufactured. Moreover, the said dark-slides can be very
closely packed, so that a large number of them may be con-
tained in a comparatively small space.
To provide for the use of our improved dark-slide on a
camera, we attach to the said camera a tube or portion of a
tube with a slot in it through which a plate may pass into or
from the camera ; this tube is of such internal diameter that
the tube on the aforesaid sheath or case will accurately fit and
slide in it. The tube or socket on the camera is, moreover,
provided with a slot throughout or nearly throughout its
length to admit the sheath or case, so that the dark-slide
can be readily applied to or removed from the camera. When
the dark-slide containing the plate is slid into position in
the aforesaid tube or socket, and the plug is turned by a key
or otherwise through the required angle, the plate will fall
through the slot in the said tube or socket into the camera ;
grooves or other suitable means are provided in the camera to
hold the plate in a proper position therein. To remove the
plate from the camera, the latter is inverted, and the opera-
tions above described are performed in the reverse order.
In some instances, we provide a key or other device in one
end of the tube or socket on the camera, so that, by turning
the dark slide through the required angle after it has been
inserted in the said tube or socket, the said dark-slide may be
opened and closed.
Iu other instances, we arrange within the tube or socket on
the camera another slotted tube capable of revolving therein,
and adapted to receive the tube on the sheath. Then, by
arranging in a proper position the key or other device for
opening and closing the dark-slide, we are enabled to insert
the sheath in the tubes on the top or side of the camera in
a plane parallel thereto, and then, by turning the said sheath
about the axis of its tube, the opening of the sheath will
be effected, and the slots in the tubes brought into line with
each other, thus permitting the plate to fall into the camera.
When the plate has been thus transferred to the camera, the
sheath may be turned back so as to lie parallel with the top,
and therefore out of the way, or, when in this position, it may
be altogether withdrawn, the slot in the camera, when the
inner tube is in this position, being closed by the said inner tube.
We sometimes provide the camera with means for attaching
a dark-slide to the top thereof, and another dark-slide to the
bottom thereof, one for the insertion of the unexposed plates
2SC
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
into the camera, and the other for the reception of the exposed
plates from the camera. We can employ with a camera any
desired number of interchangeable dark-slides constructed as
above described.
If desired, we provide means whereby the sliding of the tube
on the sheath into the tube or socket on the camera will
effect the opening of the dark-slide.
We sometimes employ a slotted tube, or socket, similar to
that above described, in combination with a dark-slide of
ordinary construction (or with a receptacle similarly used), so
that plates or films may be inserted therein and removed there-
from by means of our improved dark-slide without risk of
exposure of the said plates to light.
Our improved dark-slide is constructed to contain a single
plate, or is adapted to contain and successively deliver more
than one plate. In the latter case, the dark-slide is provided
with grooves, or other devices, for keeping the plates apart, and
is made reversible in the tube, or socket, on the camera.
We sometimes provide for facilitating the removal of the
camera from a tripod for the purpose of inverting the camera
to change plates by means of our improved dark slide, and for
permitting the removal and replacement of the camera without
risk of altering a position already secured by the tripod. For
this purpose we provide on the underside of the camera a pro-
jection, or block of wood or metal, having parallel sides. This
projection fits into a suitable groove, or opening, in the tripod-
head, or, preferably, in a turntable which is attached to the
tripod-head, capable of being partially closed, so as to tightly
clamp the said projection. The closing of the sides of the
groove against the said projection may be accomplished by
means of a spring, screw, cam, or eccentric, or otherwise.
Our improved shutter for effecting exposures of short
duration comprises two plates, or pieces of metal, or other
suitable material, each having its inner end V 'shaped, and its
outer end provided with a projecting pin or stud. These pins
or studs slide in cam-grooves formed in a disc of ebonite, or
other suitable material, acted upon by a spring whereby it is
partially rotated to open and close the shutter.
If the shutter is applied to a lens of the doublet or recti-
linear type, the slides are preferably arranged to operate
between the lenses, the mount of the lens being cut or
divided for the purpose of admitting them. When the
shutter is closed the V-shaped ends overlap each other, and
when the shutter is opened so far as just to admit light through
the lens, the aperture thus formed should be central in respect
to the lens. These V-shaped shutters slide easily over one
another in grooves, and, on being operated, they first of all
recede from one another until the maximum aperture is
given to the lens, and afterwards approach each other until the
aperture is closed. The aforesaid grooved disc is preferably
fitted to turn on the mount of the lens. A catch with a
trigger forms a convenient means for releasing the spring for
operating the shutter. A suitable device is provided for
winding up the said spring. We prefer to use, for this pur-
pose, a ring or annular piece fitted to turn in a box or case
enclosing the said disc. The duration of the exposure may be
regulated by winding up the spring more or less as may be
required.
Twelve claims are appended to the complete specification,
which specification is accompanied with drawings.
8,085. May 15 th, 1889. — “The Production of Developers.”
Henry William Jones, 1 7, White Street, Coventry (formerly,
and at date of application, residing at 3, Grosvenor Street,
Coventry), Chemist.
The nature of the said invention described as “ Improve-
ments in the Production of Developers for Photographic Use,”
is to produce a portable and permanent photographic develoi>er,
consisting of a specially prepared compound of hydrokinone in
a compressed state. To accomplish this I take crystallised sul-
phite of sodium, or similar alkaline sulphite, but I prefer to
use the ordinary sulphite, and I heat this until it fuses, and
until all water of crystallization has been driven off. The dry
mass is then ground with an equal weightof hydrokinone orother
similar proportion, but I prefer an equal weight, and one-tenth
partof t he whole of bromide of sodium added. The mixture, after
being thus made, is wetted with aqueous sulphurous acid, and
then partially dried ; and whilst still damp forced through a
sieve of forty meshes to the inch, and dried at a gentle heat,
by which means the conij>ound is obtained in small dr}- granules.
' The compound thus formed is made into tablets, or circular
discs, or pellets, by a powerful press.
What I claim is : —
1. The production of a compound, formed from alkaline
sulphite, as sodium sulphite which I employ, hydrokinone and
alkaline bromide, as sodium bromide which I use ; the same
compound l>eing produced in the dry granular form, as and
after the manner described.
2. The formation of the compound hydrokinone, produced
after the manner described, into pellets, or tablets, or discs
by pressure, exerted by a steam or other form of press.
7,939. May 13 th, 1889. — “ Shutters for Cameras.” John
Thomas Daniels, 14, Smith Street, Northampton Square,
London, E.C., Mathematical Instrument Maker.
This invention relates to improvements in shutters for
photographic cameras, the object being to combine simple in-
stantaneous shutting mechanism with equally simple devices
whereby the shutter can be kept open and the lens exposed
for any desired length of time.
The shutter which I propose to use consists of a rectangular
piece of sheet metal, mounted in vertical guides fixed in front
’ of the lens or object glass. On the outer face of the shutter
is a stud or button, and on each of the vertical guides is a
similar stud or button, these latter being placed horizontally
opposite each other and vertically above the stud in the shutter
so that the three studs represent the three corners of a triangle of
which the apex, represented by the stud in the shutter, is the
lowest. For a reason which will be afterwards explained, the
upper studs project further from the guide pieces than the
lower one in the shutter. Around the three studs is stretched
an india-rubber ring which, when free to act, raises the shutter
and exposes the object glass. The shutter is, however, con-
trolled by a notched lever pivotted below the lens tube, the
notch spanning a pin on the bottom of the shut ter, in which
position it is retained by a flat spring. The releasing motion
can lie effected by pneumatic pressure orother device, and the
contraction of the india-rubber ring jerks the shutter quickly
upwards and retains no further hold on the stud in the shutter,
as the latter falls in consequence of the lower stud lying in a
different plane from the two upper ones, and the tendency of
the ring to hang vertically when free to do so. Thus released,
the shutter would fall under the influence of gravitation, but
its downward motion is accelerated by a second india-rubber
spring which is stretched across its upward path, and with which
the stud in the shutter comes in contact, whereby its upward
course is checked, ami a rebounding motion iuqtarted to it.
For “ time ” exposures a vertical lever is pivotted to the shutter
slides or other convenient part, the upper end of which is turned
inwards towards the shutter. To the lower end of this lever is
hinged an arm, which can lie connected to the catch lever
which retains the shut ter in its closed position. As soon as the
latter is disengaged by the pneumatic or other appliance, the
shutter flies upwards, but lieforeit can descend, the turned-in
end of the side lever has advanced sufficiently to intercept its
downward motion, and the operator can thus obtain any desired
period of exposure.
It must be understood that the details above mentioned may
be modified without departing from the main features of the
invention.
7,007. April 26th, 1889. — “Producing Negatives for Mecha-
nical Printing Processes.” Charles Studders and Georg
Kohl, of the firm of .Studders and Kohl, of Leipzig Reudnitz,
Germany.
This invention relates to the production in a camera of
photographic negatives suitable for mechanical printing pro-
cesses, and especially to the process in which the said negatives
are produced by arranging before the sensitive plate a trans-
parent screen having a number of opaque parallel lines or cross
hatchings. Heretofore it has been usual to place the screen
and plate in the dark back, and to expose the same in the
camera for a certain )>eriod, and then to remove the dark back
April 11, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
287
aud replace the screen by another screen, the lines of which
stand generally at an angle of 90° to those of the first screen,
and again expose the plate in the camera for the remainder of
the necessary period of exposure. This twofold insertion of
screens occupies more time and trouble, and the sensitive plate
is liable to be shifted in the process so that the negative is
doubled aud therefore useless.
The object of this invention is to enable one screen to be
used, and to be moved into the second position without removal
from the camera.
To this end they support the said screen in a circular frame,
providing the latter with a fixed l«ad and with a movable bead
adjusted by set screws for holding the screen. This circular
frame is supported in a circular hole in a suitable carrier,
adapted to lie placed in the camera so that the frame may lie
moved to an angle of 90° (or for a greater or less angle if
desired) in its plane. Suitable stops are provided for accurately
limiting this movement, which may be effected by hand by
means of a cord connected to the frame and led out through a
suitable hole in the camera. The screen being set in one
position and the sensitive plate inserted, the lens is uncovered,
a half time exposure given, anil the lens is again covered. The
screen is then revolved by the cord into the second position,
and the remainder of the exposure given.
4,082. March 8 th, 1889. — “ Head for Camera Stands.” Fox
Shew, 88, Newman Street, Oxford Street, London, W.,
Maker of Socialities in Photographic Instruments.
The invention relates to an improved head for portable fold-
ing or non-folding camera or other stands ; to this end the
inventor so constructs the head that the supports may be
removed, and when closed by inserting two of them within the
third, and capping the third with a top, the stand may lie used
as an ordinary walking stick, preferably bamboo.
In practice he makes the head circular mailer at top than
at base, for the purpose of obtaining an angle inside, so that
when the sticks are inserted in their respective positions they
form an extended triangle at base, making a firm support for
the whole apparatus.
The inventor claims : —
The use of one complete circle and two half sections or half
squares, preferably half circles, contained in one large conical
ring, to attain the object shown in the drawings accompany-
ing the provisional specification.
Photography and Wood Kngraving. — Mr. H. Trueman
Wood, in the course of discussion on a paperread at the Society of
Arts by Mr. W. .1. Linton, said that he thought the recent school
of wood-engraving, in great measure, owed its faults and merits
alike to photography and the public taste as influenced by pho-
tography. He had heard a lecturer on photography, holding
up an excellent old woodcut aud a modern one by the side of
it, point out that by means of photography the public taste
hail lieen educated to look for something better than they were
satisfied with twenty years ago. The public had got to look
for minute detail, and the exquisite rendering of tone and
colour effect which they found in photograph}-, and hence were
not. satisfied with the semi-conventionalised older forms of
wood-engraving ; but this public taste for photography had
somewhat avenged itself, for the recent school hail succeeded
mainly in copying the faults of photography, so that many of
their engravings looked like badly exposed photographs. It
seemed to be much easier to copy photographic faults, flatness,
and absence of vigour, than to render that microscopic minute-
ness of detail which was in part one of the beauties and in
part one of the greatest defects of photography. On the other
hand, some of the more recent school of photographers — the
impressionist or naturalistic school, as they were called — tended
to imitate inferior wood-engraving, to strive after effects which
photography was not capable of rendering, whilst dispensing
with those which it would render most satisfactorily. Possibly
by means of photographic methods they might get back again
to a more vigorous style of work. The modern periodical press,
which now depended for its illustrations to a large extent on
photographic methods, demanded a rapidity which was incom-
patible with the finer quality of work.
THE LANTERN SOCIETY.
The new- Lantern Society, under the chairmanship of the
Hon. Slingsby Bethell, C.B., has issued a notice drawn up by
its Council, suggesting that the objects of the Society may be
fittingly attaiued in the following manner : —
1. — By the engaging of premises in some central position in
London, at which the meetings of the council and of the
Society may be held.
2. — By acquiring suitable apparatus for the purpose of giving
exhibitions of general and scientific interest, to both members
and their friends.
3. — By obtaining the services of specialists in every branch
of art or science suited to optical demonstration.
4. — By offering, as far as the funds of the Society will
permit, remuneration or awards for the development of the
optical lantern, and of all apparatus pertaining thereto.
f». — By imparting instruction to those who are desirous of
learning howto effectively manipulate the optical lantern, to
produce slides and apparatus, and to efficiently employ the same
both in private and public.
6. — By securing for the members of the Society special and
advantageous terms from manufacturers and others for the pur-
chase or loan of apparatus and slides.
7. — By forming a large and comprehensive loan collection of
lantern transparencies pertaining to art, science, and kindred
subjects ; such loan collection to be placed at the disposal of
every member upon conditions to be laid down by the council.
8. — By providing a means of inter-communication between
the members of the Society, whereby each member may be
made acquainted with the private collections of his fellow-
members, and may be able to negotiate a mutual loan if so
desired.
9. — By arranging an interchange of demonstrations between
photographic, microscopical, and other societies interested in
optical lantern work.
JjJroccctJingg of £oriettcg.
Sheffield Photoguafhic Society.
The monthly meeting was held at the Masonic Hall on Tues-
day evening, when it was unanimously agreed that the first
excursion be to Bolton Abbey aud Woods, June 11th, or as
near that date as can be arranged.
In reference to the late exhibition for the benefit of the
Sheffield General Hospital Building Fund, it was announced
that the nett amount to be given to the same was £10 10s.,
along with £ 1 2s. 9d. , given by Miss Dorris Taylor.
Mr. T. Hibbert laid on the table some prints produced by
the nerv '■ kallitype ” process, which gave satisfactory
results ; after which Mr. R J. Shields, of Mexbro’, gave a paper,
subject “ Notes on a Tour in Norway.”
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the third inst., Mr. W. Bedford occupied
the chair.
Mr. H. M. Hastings exhibited a print from a negative taken
on an isochromatic plate, and also a print from a negative
taken on an ordinary plate. From a comparison of the prints,
it was generally conceded that the ordinary plate had proved
the more rapid of the two.
Mr. .1. J. Briginshaw showed a lantern slide of a micro-
scopic object, from which the cover glass had been removed ;
the part of the film which had been in contact with the mask
was covered with brown markings.
Mr. A. Haddon thought that the effect might be due to
moisture from the binding strip getting between the glasses,
or to insufficient washing.
Mr. Briginshaw exhibited a “ facile ” camera fitted with
the new patent sheaths for holding the plates, by which any
thickness of plate could lie used.
Mr. A. Haddon, referring to a published article on “ Cellu-
loid and Electricity,” in which a possible danger of electricity
being generated in a celludoid film was suggested, said that he
had made several experiments in coating celluloid films with
emulsion, and he showed a negative in which the ramifications
288
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 11, 1890.
of what was believed to be an electrical discharge could be
clearly traced. Celluloid, he said, is composed of gun-cotton
and camphor, and is known to be highly electrical, therefore as
a support for sensitive emulsion is liable to give off a discharge
with the least friction. Mr. Haddon mentioned an instance of
simply drawing the film through the fingers in the act of
unwinding it from the roller being sufficient to set up an
electrical discharge to the detriment of the film.
Mr. W. Coles, in comparing the results of his experience
with the eikonogen and ordinary pyro developers, said he should
give preference to the latter developer for density of image.
Mr. W. E. Debexham suggested that when reference is made
to density, it should be borne in mind that it is of two kinds,
ocular and printing.
The Chairman said that some makes of plates gave out
during development a greater amount of free bromine than
others, and this would influence the action of the developer,
causing it to be more or less restrained.
Mr. A. Cowan had made many experiments with eikonogen
by itself and also mixed with pyro, and had found no decided
difference.
Lewes Photographic Society.
At the ordinary meeting April 1st, with the President in the
chair, Mr. O. J. Wightman opened a discussion on “ Pinhole
Photography,” and specimen negatives and prints were passed
round for inspection.
The Society is about to commence a photographic survey of
Lewes and environs, to be carried out as far as possible during
the coming summer ; and it is intended to produce a set of
lantern slides which can be sent to any other Society in
exchange for a similar set.
The first excursion of the season will be to Newhaven, on
April 24th.
At the next meeting, on May 6th, Mr. J. J. Holloway will
read a paper on “ Cloud Photography.”
Bolton Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held at the Baths, Bridgeman Street,
on Thursday, April 3rd, Mr. Edmund Naish Ashworth in
the chair.
Mr. R. Harwood gave a lecture on his journey round the
world. Many of the places described by Mr. Harwood were,
by the aid of the optical lantern, worked by Mr. James Leach,
disclosed to view.
Mr. Walter Knowles exhibited an apparatus, actuated by
clockwork, for mechanically rocking the plate during develop-
ment.
Errata. — In our last, the statement that Messrs. Skinner
and Co.’s camera therein described was provided in addition
with a fine adjustment, should have been, was “ not ” so pro-
vided. Mr. Fred. Ives, of Philadelphia, writes that the sense
of the four last lines of the first paragraph of his communication
(page 153) was destroyed by the transposition of punctuation
marks : “ The first semicolon should be a comma, and the next
comma a semicolon ; the last semicolon should be a comma.”
Filtering-Paper from Grycksbo, Sweden. — In his “Trea-
tise on Chemistry,” vol. viii. , p. 222, Berzelius expresses him-
self regarding the valuable qualities of this paper as follows :
— “The best filtering-paper I know of comes from Grycksbo,
in Dalecarlia ; the water with which it is made is so pure
that it does not give any reaction indicating the presence of
foreign substances, nor does it retain any of the earths in
solution. The acid and the water extract from this paper, and
the ash which it leaves when burnt, are not more abundant
nor of any other nature than those which come from the most
unadulterated linen ; that is to say, they do not amount to
more than 0 ■006 of its weight. Latterly they have begun to
make this paper an article of export, and assuredly there are
few localities where nature has combined with so many favour-
able circumstances as at Gryeksl>o for the fabrication of an
excellent filtering-paper.” Kresenius’s “Guide to Quantita-
tive Chemical Analysis” (1862, Fifth Edition, p. 81), on the
subject of filtering-paper, says : — “The best is that known by
the name of ‘The Swedish Filtering- Paper,” and which bears
the water-mark of J. H. Munktell.” — Chemical News.
to ©orrcgpontftntg*
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication
should be addressed to the Eiitor of the Puotookaphic News, 6, Furnival
Sreet, London, E.C.
All A lvertissments and c immunisations relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the pap ;r, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photograph ic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.3., 2, St. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
H. G. P. (Ireland). — Kiewning's Gold Toning Both. Our
correspondent is thanked for calling attention to some errors
that have crept into the formula extracted from Lux, and
printed at the bottom of page 196 of the News for March 7th.
First, that grains and grammes are mixed up together, and
that “chlor. potass.” is ambiguous, for it may mean either
chlorate or chloride of potassium ; it ought to be the latter,
KC1. Furthermore, it should lie stated that the proportions
given furnish a concentrated solution, which requires to lie
diluted with from fifteen to twenty times its bulk of water
liefore use. Employed in this way, our friend says that the
bath produces remarkably fine tones, and that he has used
it also with aristotype paper, getting shades of colour which
he has not seen excelled.
Ubique. — Photographic Triplicates. The difficulty is to get
rid of the lines of junction, and instead of printing the
negative piecemeal, you should try and separate the exposures
by moveable screens within the camera, but out of focus,
as is always done in the case of photographic doubles. It.
may not lie easy to accomplish this at once, but a few pre-
liminary experiments may give you the requisite technical
skill, and you should aim at producing a negative with
uniform density throughout. We understand the problem
by the help of your sketch. It is, as we supposed, two men
playing at chess, and one (full face) looking on, all three
being portraits of the same individual.
R. B. — Portraiture Prices. We are sending you two cards of
terms for London : remember it is easier to make a reduc-
tion than to advance your scale of prices afterwards.
Historicus. — Some Dates. Your list requires rather an
extended search, but we can give you at once the following
dates: — “Two Ways of Life,” O. G. Rejlander, 1857 ;
“ Fading Away,” H. P. Robinson, .1858 ; “Bringing Home
the May,” ditto, 1863 ; “Stolen Moments,” John
Hubbard, 1869 ; “A Wee Customer,” Adam Diston, 1871 ;
“Rebecca at the Fountain,” Valentine Blanchard, 1873 ;
“ Tired Companions,” George Nesbit, 1877.
K. Schwier is thanked for sending us the programme of the Ger-
man Photographic Convention to lie held from 26th to 29th
August, at Eisenach, Saxe-Weimar. To those who can
spare the time to visit this attractive region, seldom seen by
Englishmen, a rich treat is provided, including the usual
business meetings, an evening concert at the Wartburg,
and excursions to Wilhelmsthal, Ruhla, and other places in
the Thuringian Forest. There is likewise to be an exhibi-
tion of photographs, mechanical prints, apparatus and
materials, for which gold, silver, and brouze medals, diplomas,
and money prizes are offered. Full particulars will be duly
announced in our columns.
I’hotargus. — Small Pictures taken with 1st vgc Lenses. Your
questions 1 to 3 may all be answered in the negative ; there
would be no advantage in employing a whole-plate lens for
carte-de-visite work. The / 4 lens would be most suit-
aide for photographing animals and children. Other points
in your letter demand a fuller answer, but this Easter week
is a bad time for making enquiries.
A. W. — Platinotype Patents. 1. All the patents aie protected
in France and the United States, and some of them likewise
in the more important countries of Europe, including those
you named. 2. The Pizzighelli process could not be worked
here without infringing the Company’s patent. 3. But it is
open both in Germany and Belgium. 4. There are two
patents, bearing date 1887, the latest.
Cincinnati and J. H. Ainley. — Received with thanks.
PHOTOGRAPHIC
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1650. — April 18, 1890.
CONTENTS.
P AO K
A Photographic Exhibition in the City of London 289
Photographic Composition. By James Mew 290
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 291
A Photographic Untruth. By Capt. W. de W. Abney, C.B.... 293
Selecting a Lens. By J. K. 'i'ulloeh, M.B 295
On Photography by the Light of the Electric Spark. By Lord
Rayleigh, Sec., R.S 297
Notes 298
Colour Sensation. By Capt. W. de W. Abney, C.B 299
Photographic Apparatus 301
Photography in France. By Leon Vidal 302
The Latent Photogiaphic Image. By C. H. Bothamley F.I.C.,
PAOI
Limitations in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus. By T. R.
Dallmeyer 304
Correspondence 305
Patent Intelligence 305
Proceedings of Societies.— Photographic Society cf Great
Britain— Camera Club— Hackney Photographic Society —
London and Provincial Photographic Association — Leicester
and Leicestershire Photographic Society— Newcastle-on-
Tyne and Northein Counties Photographic Association —
Dundee and East of Scotland Photographic Association —
Croydon Camera Club— Photographic Society of Ireland —
West London Photographic Society S0C
Answers to Correspondents 308
A PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION IN THE
CITY OF LONDON.
The Photographic Section of the London Chamber of
Commerce, which includes among its members several
of the chief merchants connected with the art-science
in the Metropolis, has resolved to hold a trade Photo-
graphic Exhibition in the heart of the city of London.
This Exhibition will open on Friday, May 30th next,
and remain open till June 10th. No charge will be
made to the public for admission. The committee of
management of the Exhibition consists of Mr. W. S.
Bird (Autotype Co.), chairman ; Mr. Frank Bishop
(Messrs. Marion &Co.); Mr. T. Watson (Messrs. W.
AYatson & Sons) ; Air. Payne Jennings, and Mr. Con-
rad Beck (Messis. R. & J. Beck). The Drapers’ Com-
pany, which is one of the great livery companies of
London, has generously lent its hall for the purposes
of the Exhibition, and the Lord Mayor has expressed
his interest in the undertaking.
The Diapers’ Hall, in Throgmorton Street, in which
the Exhibition will be held, is a more luxurious
building than has ever before been used for public
photographic purposes in this country. It is a palatial
establishment, more of the type of the chief salons of
Paris, than of the cold, repellent structures commonly
used for public purposes in London. A range of gilded
chambers will be used for the Exhibition, and the
apparatus will be chiefly displayed in the Banquetting
Hall. The Drapers’ Hall is a quadrangular building,
with a fountain in the centre ; it is rich in statues and
paintings, and belongs to a powerful and wealthy
organisation of high antiquity. The first Drapers’
Hall upon the Throgmorton Street site was bought of
Henry VIII. in 1541, and had formerly been the house
of Cromwell, Earl of Essex. The present magnificent
hall, on the same site, was built in 1869.
The Drapers’ Company was founded before 1252,
and was incorporated in 1439, “the seventeenth year
of the thrice Christian king, Henry VI.,” whose letters
patent gave it the name of “ Masters, AVardens,
Brethren, and Sisters of the Guild or Fraternity of the
Blessed Mary the Arirgin, of the Mystery of Drapers
of the City of London.” Immediately after its founda-
tion, the livery began to expend for charitable purposes
about £4,000 a year. Photographers will be deeply
moved upon learning that the armorial ensigns of their
new friei.ds, the drapers, are three clouds iadiated
proper, each adorned with a treble crown or, the
crest on a helmet and torse ; a ram lodged at the
second, attired as the third. Supporters, two lion’, as
the last, peletee. Motto: “ Unto God only be honour
and glory.” The patroness of the Co npany is, or was,
the Virgin Mary. Those photographers who, on bended
knees, have, duiiug the past two or three years, begged
to be patronised, are thus, it will be seen, supported
by an ancient piecedent, and those other photogruphers
who wish to spend much money for a peacock’s feather
— in shape of. a royal charter — to stick in their hats,
before getting their woik done in establishing a
library, laboratories, and so on, might persevere in
their present principles by going to the Herald Office
for a helmet and torse, as well as for other necessaries
for the promotion of photography as an art and a
science.
The coming Exhibition will no doubt be one of a
first-class nature; it is under the control of good
practical men, and will take place in the greatest centre
of commercial activity in this country.
THE CAMERA CLUB CONFERENCE.
Long reports of the proceedings of the Camera Club
Conference have been published in these pages, and
now, by the courtesy of the Camera Club, which has
lent us the wood-blocks, and permission so to do, we
are enabled to print more or less in full the papers
read at the Conference-
290
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGR API I IC COM POSITION.
BY JAMES MEW.
[April 18, 1890.
Pope, in his Epistle to the Earl of Burlington, which
constitutes the fourth of his so-called .Moral Essiys, after
speaking of the use of riches and the abuse of the word
“ taste,” gives some examples of the latter in horticultural
construction in the following sentence : —
“No pleasing intricacies intervene,
No artful wildness to perplex the scene ;
Grove nods at grove, each alley has a brother,
And half the platform just reflects the other.”
The poet here finds fault in the matter of gardening
with repetition, or that orderly and exact arrangement
which Nature so seldom shows, and is therefore one of
the evils to l>e guarded against by the artist, whether
painter or photographer. Though, however, the sides of
a picture, like those of a garden, should be different from
each other, and though the character of the distance
should not be reproduced in the foreground, or of the
foreground in the distance : in a word, though repetition
is offensive, yet balance is necessary. It would be clearly
a mistake to photograph all the tall people of a group on
one side, and all the short on the other. This would not,
indeed, be repetition ; but in running from one vice, we
should be making our escape into its contrary. If in a
picture there be a large tree on one side, and a vacuity —
or, as Dr. Johnson might have said, a copious negative
catalogue — on the other, the effect will be unpleasing.
This absence of balance — speaking with all possible
deference to a distinguished Dutch artist — seems to be a
defect in a well-known picture by Cuyp in the National
Gallery, catalogued as a landscape with cattle and figures.
Here the left-hand side contains little of importance,
while the principal elements of the picture are grouped on
the right, the figure on horseback, dressed in a coat of
glaring vermilion, throwing additional weight into a por-
tion of the painting which had already too much. On the
contrary, Claude de Lorraine — who is now called Gellee
in the catalogue of the National Gallery, which, indeed,
was his proper name — has given, in a landscape known as
“The Ford,” a very admirable example of balance; and
indeed of .all the best general qualities of composition.
The trees on each side of this picture are different, and
answer well the purpose of their introduction. The right
side is bold, but light ; the left strong, but delicate. The
whole presents that “artful wildness” which seems to
have been as much desired by the painter as by the poet.
Composition in art has been well defined to be an
arrangement of the separate objects represented, which
leads the spectator to conceive that such objects are con-
nected or interested in a subject common to them all.
There must be in a well-composed photograph, whether
of landscapes or figures, some central thought or fact
animating the whole picture. What that central matter
may be is of comparatively small importance, but it must
exist. It is the pictorial raison d'etre of the work. It
is the focus of interest to which all the forms in the
picture converge. It is the string which binds the
scattered sticks together, giving them a force and meaning
which, isolated, they cannot possess. It is the primary
law of what is known as grouping. Digressions from this
rule may be licensed in poetry, but in painting, photo-
graphy, and sculpture, they can never be permitted. The
picture of the photographer who has to represent a num-
ber of persons together must tell some story. It must
not be in the condition of Canning's needy knife-grinder.
The wheel out of order, the hat with the hole in it, and the
breeches in a like condition, the knife or scissors in the
act of being ground — these are all good in themselves, but
say, of a dozen persons, every one of the twelve having
none other connection with his neighbour than this, that
he conceals more or less of that neighbour's figure by his
own, or is himself concealed by more or less of his neigh-
bour— every one of the twelve with a fatuous gaze on a
previously indicated spot, a gaze which reveals only every
one of the twelve's consciousness of having his portrait
taken — every one of the twelve with a full-face aspect of
melancholy resignation, or of smirking conceit — every
one of the twelve so wholly isolated, in conception, from
his fellow as to form no part, save numerically, of the
picture— such a photographer clearly says, with the
knife-grinder,
“ Story ! God bless you ! I have none to tell, sir.”
And, though he meets with no such sad fate as that outcast
met with at the hands of the Friend of Humanity, yet
he seems to merit some shadow thereof, if he calls himself
an artist.
There is no surer proof of failure in any aesthetic com-
position than the fact that it is unable to tell its own story
to the intelligent spectator. A photograph which needs
the help of a commentary, a picture of which the meaning
can be alone explained by a reference to its number in a
printed catdogue — and not always by that— is clearly of
less value than something which he that runs may read.
The essential and fundamental notion of an aesthetic com-
position is an appeal to the senses. Intellectual difficulties
would transfer it into another region, of which it is not an
indigenous growth.
Though the subject of composition is extremely impor-
tant to the photographer, it is, unfortunately, very diffi-
cult to give other than general rules concerning it. Like
so many matters of importance, it cannot be taught by
rule and square. There are audacious folk who have not
hesitated to publish Rules of Politeness, Rules of Letter-
writing, Rules of Etiquette, and many other rules, which
are, doubtless, good enough of their kind so long as they
remain in the region of the abstract and the general, but
whosoever seeks in them a rule of conduct for a particular
occasion will probably never find it, or, having found it
and followed it, will not look back upon his conduct .alto-
gether with satisfaction. Some general hints may, how-
ever, be given, of which the first is of universal applica-
tion. Let the photographer who is about to bike a group
form some clearly defined idea what his work is intended to
express before he attempts to arrange its elements. This
is such a plain, matter-of-fact piece of advice that its in-
sertion would seem to be unnecessary, and so unjustifiable,
were it not for the notorious fact that so many photo-
graphers sin against this, the first of the laws of compo-
sition. It were, indeed, all one for a man to attempt
to paint something which he has not previously
drawn, or to build a house without a scaffold. The
artist must, in the first place, make his work clear
to his own mind, and then it may afford intelli-
gible interest to the minds of others. Having conceived
his idea, he will arrange his characters to correspond with
it. The usual plan is the reverse. He shuttles together
his personages at haphazard, and if the group should turn
out to be something in the nature of a circle or pyramid,
April 18, 1890.]
291
< ‘~s &
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
f\
ETC
the two figures chiefly affected by the ordinary photo-
grapher, he will therewith rest content.
The absence of sameness, or the presence of variety, is
another leading principle of composition. It is probably
for this reason that an old cottage, however inferior to
inhabit, pleases more in a photograph — owing to the many
alterations in it sketched by the hand of time — than a brand
new building, smooth and well adjusted by the builder’s
adze. So, again, a winding road or river delights the eye
more than one which is straight.
Another rule for photographic composition is that the
principal object should never be placed in the centre of
the photograph ; nor again, should several figures be in a
direct line with one another.
Such rules, and others like them, arc commonly
understood by the experienced photographer, but they
are not always followed. The unhappy man is only
too often not allowed to follow them even when he will.
He has to consider his customers. The Cheap Jack and
the Beach-man, with whom public favour is as the very
breath of their nostrils, though they may clearly under-
stand such principles, experience constant difficulties in
carrying them out. Their position is very much that of
the poor playwright, who has too frequently to spoil his
play for the sake of his players. Thoroughly acquainted
with the principles of dramatic proportion, he must never-
theless make his drama lopsided to suit their notions of
their own importance.
As every actor desires what is called in theatrical
slang “fat,” so every person of a group to be photo-
graphed commonly desires to occupy a prominent position.
The idea of sacrificing herself or himself to the interest
of the whole seldom enters the head of any individual
member of a group. For such interest it is, of course,
usually necessary that some faces should be taken in
profile, and some in three-quarter face, but to bring
about such a simple arrangement involves, no ordinary
toil. The pride, envy, jealousy, vanity, and general
ill-feeling evoked on such an occasion is too well-known
to the conscientious artist, and he must succumb in
nine cases out of ten to the wishes of his clients, and
the ordinary photograph of a dozen full-faces looking at
nothing is the melancholy result. Were he to kick against
the pricks his party would go elsewhere, and, after a pre-
liminary fight among themselves, be photographed at last
more or less to their own satisfaction, but with an utter
disregard to the elementary principles of composition,
and in a manner which would seriously shock any photo-
grapher who has received a proper education, or possesses
an innate particle of artistic taste.
The Wklsbach Gas Light Company, Gloucester, New
Jersey, have fitted up a room in connection with their factory,
for the purpose of showing the suitability of the light given
by their burners for photography, and invite photographers to
visit it, and satisfy themselves by experiment or otherwise.
Water-developing Plates. — The following is the formula
used by Dr. Backelaudt for coating the backs of his water-
developing plates : —
Pryogallic acid
Salicylic acid
Gum or dextrine ...
Alcohol
Water
... 154 grains
1 fl. dr. 21 minims
5 fl. drs. 25
This is allowed to dry at the ordinary temperature. Develop-
ment takes place by immersion in water with the addition of a
very small quantity of ammonia.
PHOTOGRAPHY IX GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Washing Apparatus for Emulsions — Acid Eikoxogkn
Developer — Cheap and Effective Flash-Lamp —
Chloride of Iron as a Restrainf.r — Eliminating
Hyposulphite of Soda — Print-Washing Apparatus.
Improved Washing Apparatus for Emulsions. — In most of
the existing pieces of washing apparatus for gelatine emul-
sions the threads of gelatine are, by the pressure of the
water entering from above or from below, pressed tightly
against the outlet tubes, where they stick, pap-like, and
allow only a comparatively small quantity of water to pass.
The washing therein is therefore imperfect, and must be
continued for a comparatively long time. To prevent this,
Herr Alois Brunner has constructed the following arrange-
ment, in which by the inflow of water a constant circular
motion of the threads from
below upwards, and vice
versa , is produced ; the flow
off of the water is not at all
disturbed, and no loss is
caused by the finer particles
of emulsion being washed
away. The arrangement
consists of a sufficiently
large, wide-mouthed glass
vessel, in which a system of
three or more small glass
tubes reaches to the
bottom. The glass tubes
are at the lower end
curved in the direction
of the sides of the glass
vessel, and at the other
end, before they pass
through the top of the vessel, they are cemented in a
stout metal tube. The glass vessel is placed in a some-
what larger vessel of sheet zinc, which can be covered
light-tight by means of an overlapping cover sliding in a
groove. The cover in its centre has an aperture provided
with a short tube, through which the metal tube bearing
the glass tubes projects so far that india-rubber tubing
for the introduction of the water can be attached to it.
In order to prevent the glass tubes from being broken by
pressure in attaching the india-rubber tubing, they are
fixed by an adjusting-screw affixed to the short tube in the
aperture of the cover. At the upper end of the india-
rubber tubing a sufficiently large funnel is placed, which
is suspended by means of cords to the water-tap. The
number and diameter of the glass tubes depend on the
size of the washing bottle, and on the quantity of emulsion
to be regularly worked.
The Acid Eikonogen Developer.— It has been found by
some experimentalists that the keeping qualities of the
eikouogen developer are much improved if it is made acid,
or nearly so. With regard to this, the following formula
is recommended by Mr. T. II. Voigt, chairman of the
Photographic Society of Frankfort-on-Maine : —
Solution No. 1.
Water 500 c.c.
Sodium sulphite 25 grammes
Eikonogen (previously pulverized) ...5 to 6 ,,
As soon as the eikonogen has completely dissolved, 20 c.c.
of a mixture of 500 c.c. of a saturated solution of sodium
292
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
sulphite, and 40 c.c. of hydrochloric acid, are added to
the above (Solution No. 1).
Solution No. 2.
Water 500 c.c.
Carbonate of soda 20 grammes
Carbonate of potash ... ... ... 5 ,,
To develop a cabinet plate, 30 c. c. of solution No. 1 are
poured over the plate in the dish, and the latter is well
rocked, so that the plate is entirely covered by the solution.
Previously 10 c.c. of solution No. 2 have been poured into
a measure ; if it is probable that the plate has been over-
exposed, at first 5 c.c. of solution No. 2 are added to the
developer in the dish ; if, however, it is found that the
plate has been correctly exposed, the remaining 5 c.c. of
the alkali solution are also added. It will be noticed that
with this method of development only about one-third the
quantity of the alkali which is usually taken is used. It
seems that the minute quantities of the chloride of soda
and chloride of potash, which are formed by the addition
of the hydrochloric acid, increase the energy of the deve-
loper.
Cheap anil Inflective Flash-Lamp. — The following instru-
ment, of which I give a sketch, is said by IJerr Sasse to
give as good results as the
more elaborate and expensive
lamps which arc in the market.
It consists simply of a curved
tube provided with a small
spirit reservoir, which is filled
with cotton-wool, and of a
small funnel for dropping
down into the curved tube dry magnesium powder. To
the end of this tube an india-rubber tube, with ball
The size of the spirit flame
attached, should be fitted.
can be regulated by pulling out the cotton-wool more or j
less.
Chloride of Iron as a Restrainer. — A. Einsle has found
that chloride of iron forms an excellent means of saving !
over-exposed plates. If a plate which has been exposed
five times too long is placed before development for two
minutes in a ten per cent, solution of chloride of iron,
then rinsed under the tap, and then developed, a vigorous
negative, full of contrast, is obtained. Dr. Miethe
suggests in the case of hydroquinone and eikonogen
development the washing of the plate thoroughly, in
order to prevent the staining of the negative.
Eliininatinff Hi/posnlphite of Soila. — Dr. A. Bannow pub-
lishes in Prof. Eder's year-book a scries of most careful
and interesting experiments which he has made in order
to ascertain the method by which hyposulphite of soda is
eliminated most efficiently and thoroughly from negatives
and prints. The results of these experiments, which are
too extensive to be reproduced in full, are the following:
— Washing in a current of water is more efficient than
the washing in several changes of water ; the bulk of the
hypo is soon removed, but the last traces stick very
obstinately. After the pictures have been washed in
five to six changes of water after they have been washed
for one to two hours in running water, they may prac-
tically be taken as freed from hypo. Paper prints are
freed from hypo a little sooner than gelatine plates:
they .are, however, more sensitive to its action on account
of the smaller quantity of silver they contain. The
various substances which are from time to time recom-
mended toaccelerate the washing process — as, for instance,
alum, common salt, and chloride of lime- — are unneces-
sary, and even doubtful, inasmuch as it has not yet been
proved that their action upon the small quantity of silver
contained in the pictures is not an injurious one.
Washinj Apparatus for Prints. — A skilled photographer
of Braunau, Mr. .1. F. Klinger, has for his own purposes
constructed the following washing apparatus for paper
prints. It consists of a wooden box <1, about 0 feet high,
:!4 inches broad, 111 inches deep, lined inside with thick
sheet zinc. The box consists of a small water-reservoir
/i, with roses cc attached, and at the bottom it has another
reservoir e, in which the waste water is collected, and
which is provided with a delivery-cock </. The centres of
the side of box support the winch
handle of the rotating paddle-wheel
h. To the shaft of the handle, at
each, of its two ends, are fitted six
wooden carriers provided with a
groove ; , these serve as carriers of
the horse-hair slides//. One of the
horse-hair slides, after it has been
inserted in the apparatus and
covered with prints, is shown in the
sketch by i k. As soon as all of
the six slides have been covered
with prints, they are inserted in
the grooves of the carriers at the
small door y‘; the latter is then
shut, and the apparatus is ready for
use. At first the water is turned
on by means of the tap m ; then the
valves n of the roses re are adjusted,
and the handle is turned. Mr.
Klinger asserts that, by means of
this washing arrangement, the prints are soon entirely freed
from all traces of hypo, and that they are never injured.
Fotografi-Forkningen i UrsALA. — This Society, founded at
the beginning of the year, now numbers thirty-eight members.
Its president is Dr. K. Duner, who informs us that he has just
learned that the Swedish Parliament has afforded the means
for fitting the observatory under his charge with a photo-
graphic refractor of thirteen inches aperture, so that in
1892 he expects to be able to do good astro- photographic
work.
April 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
293
A PHOTOGRAPHIC UNTRUTH.*
BY CAPT. W. DE W. ABNEY, C.B.
When pressed by the Secretary of the Camera Club for the
title of my paper, I was at a loss to know what to give. I
felt that as your President you would have quite enough
of my voice, and thought it hardly fair that I should read
a paper at all. However, on the spur of the moment, I
put down “A Photographic Untruth” as the heading —
not for any sensational purpose, but because I knew that
there were many untruths perpetrated by photography,
.any one of which might well be treated of. The particular
untruth I am going to touch upon to-day is the untruth of
form which a photograph gives when judged by depths of
light and shade. A dead white cylinder standing vertically
and illuminated by horizontal parallel rays of light, or by
what is equivalent, by light projected from a point at a
long distance from it, in a dark room, is a good example
of what I mean. The part of the surface which will be
most strongly illuminated is the line where a plane passing
through the axis of cylinder and parallel to the rays of
light cuts that surface. If the illumination of the vertical
line be expressed by I, then the illumination falling on any
other vertical line can be theoretically expressed by the
formula I' = Icos8 where I' is the illumination required to
be found, 9 is the angle between the plane passing
through the axis and parallel to the direction of
the light and a plane passing through the axis
with the part of the cylinder whose illumination is
have supposed that one side is exactly perpendicular to the
path of the rays of light illuminating it, the other sides
lying symmetrically around it. From the curves of
gradation in a negative, as given in the Photo. Journal of
last November, of which one of the curves in fig. 2 is a
transcript, the transparency of the images of the different
sides, as shown in a negative which could be taken from
it, have been calculated, and then from these transparencies
the amount of white in a resulting platinum print, for every
side exposed to the light, or the amount of white has been
deduced from a curve of the gradation from a platinum
sensitometic print (fig. 1). Taking the amount of white-
ness of the lightest side as unity or 1, 1 have calculated the
angle that the side should make with this side (which is
perpendicular to the direction of thelight), and constructed
the polygon in fig. 2, remembering that the projections of
the angles of the polygon must always be the same.
The following table gives the theoretical illumination.
The side No. 1 is that on the left or right, and is parallel
to the beam : —
TH KORKTICAL ILLUMINATION OF 1I1F. D1FFRRKNT SIDF.S OF THK POLYO'>NAL
PRISM.
No. 1 and 13
„ 2 and 12
„ 3 and 1 1
„ 4 and 10
„ 5 and 9
., 6 and 8
Inclioation. Numerical Value.
C'»S
90
—
0
CC8
75
259
COS
00
=
500
COS
45
n
707
C08
30
. ==
860
C08
15
=
966
COS
0
>• =3
1,000
If in fig. 1, 1,000 be taken as 15 on the scale, that is, the
intensity is 3a/215, the following table is arrived at for the
transparency of the negative for different sides of the
polygon. This number on the scale is chosen as giving a
negative fairly dense for the whitest side.
Value on
Koiatire
No. of sides.
Illumination.
scale > f flg. 1.
transpar* ncj
3 ./ T
v2
ot negative.
1 aDd 13
0
0
800
2 aDd 12
•259
91
340
3 and 11
•500
12-0
18-0
4 and 10
•707
1354
12-5
5 and 9
•866
14-4
9-6
6 and 8
•966
149
8-4
7
1,000
150
8-2
It must be remembered that sides No. 1 and 13 are not
visible, so cannot be taken into account.
From such a negative we can take platinum prints, and
knowing the value of the transparency, we can calculate
the whiteness of each side as it would be rendered.
Fig. 1.
required. This is evident : let All be a section of one
plane of a length unity, BC be the section of another plane
of the same length, but inclined at an angle 9. The light
falling on All in a perpendicular direction is evidently
more than the light falling on HC, though it is the same
length. Simple mathematics show that the light thus
falling on the surface is I1C cos 9t and the illumination of BC
is therefore to that on AB as cos ® : 1 . A little more simple
elementary geometry will show that the inclination of the
surface of any cylinder to a fixed part is the angle made
by the two radii, and therefore this law applies in this
case.
Instead of a cylinder, I have taken a polygonal prism
of twenty-four sides illuminated as described, and calcu-
lated the illumination which is given to each side, and I
* Abstract of a paper read before the Camera Club Conference, and
published in the Journal of the Ciub.
Supposing 80 to be the greatest transparency of the
negative we have produced theoretically, and that we take
the whiteness of the print produced with this transparency
to be 5-G (white being 80), then 80 corresponds to No. 18
hole of the sensitometer, or Vj1*. We then get the
following table : —
.
09
09
*2
<3
Im
O
o
fc
Transparency.
Value on scale
of platinot>pe
curve.
Ob
•M.S
o - -
.5 3
gsi
is £
•c 3 3
>
* ©
* ®
ift •
«C
6CC
•2 o?
M ~
cS JZ
H *
8j .
*
» « o
* f.O
li-2
«§
6 he
Tc. c
2-3 d
a C
o £
.2 £ o
O s
1 and 13
80-
18-
5-6
T20
83°
90°
2 and 12
34-0
14 5
140
•301
72° 30'
75°
3 and 1 1
18-0
116
26-0
•559
56° 0'
60°
4 and 10
125
100
35 0
•762
41°46'
45°
5 and 9
9 6
8-8
42-5
•913
24°30'
30°
6 and 8
8 4
8-3
455
■978
12*25'
15°
7 —
82
8 1
465
1000
0
0°
294
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
Nos. 1 and 13 are not seen, so in constructing the
polygon in the diagram these sides have been shown as the
original lengths. It must be noticed here that the photo-
graph shows the side No. 7 as a mixture of more than half
white with rather less than half black, so the print would
look verv grey.
Fig. 2. — Sections of I’olygons.
In the two outside polygons the lightest side is nearly pure white.
In the two inside calculated curves the lightest sides are dark grey.
We can, however, bike a lighter print. If we take 80
transparency as represented by 12 on the scale of the
platinotype curve, we get the following table : —
80
s
■g
o
6
K
Transparency.
l
Value of scale
of Platinotype
curve.
Amount of
white, 80 being
maximum.
Taking 77 as
white, or 1*000.
Angles whose
cosines are those
in Col. V.
Original angles*
corresponding
to these.
1 and 13
81-
12-
24-
•322
71°12'
90°
2 and 12
34-0
8-2
465
•598
53°50'
75°
3 and 11
180
55
62 5
•812
35°40'
60°
4 and 10
12-5
40
70-5
•916
23°30'
45°
5 and 9
96
2-8
75-5
•981
10° O'
30°
C and 8
8-4
2-25
76'5
•994
6° 0'
15°
7 —
8 2
2-15
77-0
1-000
0°
0°
As before, 1 and 13 are hidden, so are shown of original
length in the diagram.
Here the print is nearly white as regards side No. 7,
but the shading is incorrect as before.
The nearest approach to correctness tried is when 80
is made to be of the value of 21 on the scale of the
platinotype prints, when we get the following results: —
Calculated
Corresponding
Sides.
angles.
angles in original.
1 and 13
84
= 90
2 and 12
... 76-50
= 75
3 and 1 1
6030
= 60
4 and 10
4534
= 45
5 and 9
2855
= 30
6 and 8
11-20
= 15
7 —
0
= 0
But in this case the whiteness of the whitish side No. 7
is only of pure white, and is, consequently, a very
grey dull print, which no one could accept. A model
of the polygon was illuminated as described and photo-
graphed in a dark room, and a print taken from the
negative, which experts judged satisfactory. 'Ihe black-
ness of the different sides was measured, and the results
are given in the following table, and is also shown in
fig. 2.
Three different depths of printing are here given :
No. of riles.
Whiteness
meat uri d.
Wniwr.es
wi h
maximum i.
Angle whose
cot-ines are
those of
Col. III.
1 and 13
0
0
0
2 and 12
6 5
•08
4° 30'
3 and 1 1
10-6
•14
8° 10'
4 and 10
24 0
•32
19° 0
5 and 9
50-0
■07
47° 30'
6 and 8
69 0
•92
67° 0
7 —
75 0
T10
90° 0
Pure white in this case was 80.
The following table gives the values of the curves for
the negative and for the platinum print ; see fig. 1 : —
No. ut hole
of ?tnsito-
meter.
1 1 auap&rem v
of
Pl»tinotvre.
w hite in
l’latino-
t\ pe.
Remarks.
0
80
80
i
79 2
79 3
Each hole of the
o
76 8
770
sensitorneter dimin-
3
73 0
743
isbes 3 V2
4
68
702
5
621
652
The curves of the
0
555
59 6
negative and plati-
7
48-7
53'5
notype print each
8
41-8
473
follow the curve given
9
35 T
412
by I
10
290
35-2
being the intensity
11
23-4
297
of the No. 0 hole, I'
12
18-5
24-6
that to be found, n a
13
144
20T
constant, and * the
14
10-9
160
number of the hole.
15
8-2
12-6
16
59
9-8
For the negative,
17
4-25
75
1=80, m= ‘0101 5.
18
30
5-0
19
20
4 0
For the platino-
20
...
3-0
type print,
21
...
2-5
1 = 80, a* =-0082.
It will thus be seen that, judging by shades, photographs
give no correct rendering of slopes, and no matter how
the light is altered by reflectors and so on, untruth must
always be present. A painter can afford to do with one
light to illuminate his sitter, a photographer uses reflectors
to lighten the shadows. If not lightened, the tendency is
to make the head look deeper than it really is.
A very good plan of demonstrating this untruth in
photography is by photographing discs, some rotating and
some still. The accompanying figure shows what is meant
(Fig. 3). The two outside rings contain each one part of
black and two of white, whilst the two inside ones contain
two parts of black and one of white. It is easy to .arrange
cards so that the two centre ones shall rapidly rotate, and
the innermost and outermost remain fixed. In the nega-
tive representing these and in subsequent prints, we shall
have two grey rings, bounded by rings made up of black
and white segments. If photographic representation were
true, then on rotating the print obtained round its centre
the innermost and outermost rings should give the same
greys as the rings next to them. No variation in the
intensity of the negative nor in the depth of print will give
this result. One ring will always be darker or lighter
than that which it should match, even when the printing
is carried on so far that a match is made in the other. A
April 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
295
further development of the plan is to rotate the original
sectors with the different proportions of black to white,
that containing the two-thirds white outside the photo-
graphed discs, and the other within them. We then have
three rings containing what should be the same propor-
tion of black to white in both cases, and which should
give the same grey. It is found that none of them v ill
probably match, or that if two rings of grey of oue set
Fig. 3.
match, the other one differs from them, and in the other
set of three rings they will all differ.
One word in conclusion : let it not be imagined that the
untruth appears only when one direct light is employed.
The same differences will exist however an object is
lighted, but the lighting may be so modified to the eye
that it may appear fairly correct in the photograph, but
for totally different lightning.
SELECTING A LENS.*
BY J. K. TULLOCH, M. B.
In order to come at the optical aids which the average
amateur requires, let us consider what will be the probable
work he will undertake. First, then, landscape pure and
simple will probably be the chief item ; secondly, he
will ere long want to do a little instantaneous photo-
graphy ; thirdly, architecture, including interior work ;
fourthly, portraiture, either in a common sitting-room,
or perhaps out of doors. Now, the problem to be solved
is this : IIow to provide one’s self with the necessary
lenses at the least cost, and at the same time with no
sacrifice of efficiency. Let it be understood that the
arguments to be advanced hold equally well whatever the
size of plate.
In order, however, that it may be easily followed, let
us say that a half-plate kit is in view. For a half -plate,
opticians generally advise a rapid rectilinear of about
nine inches focus, that is if only one lens is to be sup-
plied. This, to my mind, is a very absurd proceeding,
and for the following four reasons : — First, while, of course,
it is rectilinear for a half-plate, or any other plate it can
cover, a cheap single lens is also rectilinear on a half-
plate, that is if it is about nine inches focus — the same
Abstract of a communication to the Duniec Photographic Asso-
ciation.
focus as the rectilinear. Second, a rectilinear is much
more expensive than a single lens. Third, a recti-
linear of nine inches focus is made up of two achromatic
combinations, each of them so long in the focus that they
cannot be used singly in any ordinary camera; add to this
that they are generally symmetrical, that is, of the same
focus, and even if you can use one the other is never of
any service. And the fourth reason is that the focus is
too long for wide-angle subjects, and you need another
lens to take them.
A much better bargain — so to speak — can be made than
this ; but before propounding my own ideas on this matter,
it might be as well to explain to the uninitiated why lenses
have to be of different lengths of focus.
Since fight travels in straight fines, a certain size of
plate being given, the focus of the lens directly deter-
mines the amount of subject included ; or, to use the
proper expression, the focus of the lens and size of plate
together give the angle included by the lens. A short-
focus lens includes a wide angle, and a long focus lens a
narrow one. A lens which would give a wide angle for
interior work would be of little use in the great bulk of
landscape work, for it would include too many objects at
the expense of the size of these objects. A lens of long
focus, first class for sea or hill subjects, would be useless
for interiors, for a long-focus lens renders the various
objects of such a size that but few of them can be repre-
sented, and in place of getting a representation of a whole
room, one would barely get in the whole of the end wall.
One could do with a great many lenses of different foci,
but practically in landscape work generally, including
exterior and interior architecture, a choice of three lenses
of different foci is sufficient.
Granted, then, that the necessity for different lenses is
allowed, what does experience suggest as to the focus for
each of the three lenses, and is it possible to get one com-
bination to give the whole three? We have seen that to
have a nine-inch rectilinear as an only lens for a half-plate
ties you down to having oniy one focus, for the two
halves of the lens cannot be used singly on account of
their extreme length of focus ; therefore this does not
fulfil the required conditions. If, however, we substi-
tute a wide-angle rectilinear in place of a rapid rectilinear,
we will have attained our object almost at a single step.
Let a wide-angle rectilinear of, say, four and a half inches
focus be chosen for a half-plate, and the following advan-
tages immediately accrue.
First : Used just as it is — that is, both combinations to-
gether— it makes a first-class short-focus lens for a half-
plate, including a wide angle, with great depth of focus
and perfection of detail all over. In this shape it is the
very thing for interiors and cramped exteriors, such as
buildings in closes or narrow streets, and, of course, it is
strictly rectilinear. The two halves used separately (and
the mount is always arranged so that they may be) give
other two foci of about eight and ten inches. Now, on a
half-plate an eight-inch and a ten-inch single lens are to
all intents and purposes rectilinear, so that we have in this
one combination a choice of three different foci, all of
them rectilinear on a half-plate.
liut, it may be said, what are the disadvantages of this
system, for surely everybody would adopt this were there
no equally powerful drawbacks? It has only one draw-
back, and that is its want of rapidity. 1 have two answers
to this: first, the double combination is rapid enough for
all ordinary instantaneous work ; and secondly, even if
206 THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [April 18, 1890.
it were not, a single lens can be purchased for a mere
trifle capable of taking up the instantaneous and portrait
branch of the subject. All the finest professional instan-
taneous work has been done with lenses working no quicker
than this, and I myself find that for street views, including
moving figures, the lens is amply quick enough. For cer-
tain optical reasons a small stop, that is, a comparatively
small stop, has to be used with wide-angle lenses, and this
prevents them being the most rapid form of lens, but their
other good qualities far more than make up for any loss of
rapidity, that is, always supposing the very highest degree
of rapidity is required.
Assuming, however, that it be allowed that this wide-
angle combination is the best for landscape and architec-
tural work, but that a quicker lens is necessary for portraits
and instantaneous views, what lens should be recom-
mended ? During the winter that is past I have been much
pleased with the working of plano-convex lenses. Those
who have not experimented somewhat have no idea how
interesting a field this is. Compared witli the meniscus
form, which is the usual form of single lens, I find that the
plano-convex works with a much larger aperture, giving
excellent definition, but this through a somewhat restricted
field. Given a meniscus and a plano-convex, I find that
if they are of the same focus the plano-convex will give
crisp definition for a certain space, while the meniscus
will give a far blunter image, but not falling off in
defining power so rapidly towards the edges.
But in these days of enlarging from small negatives, the
plano-convex is just what is wanted, for it matters little
what size the negative is if it is very good, what there is of
it. The moving object in instantaneous work generally
occupies only a very small part of the field, and the plano-
convex is the very thing for this. Again, in portraiture,
what though the shoulders and draperies be a little blunt,
if the head, the centre of attraction, be faultlessly rendered.
A good plano-convex lens will work as rapidly as ninety-
nine per cent, of the rapid rectilinears, while the cost is
not a fourth part.
It is perfectly astonishing to me why this most excellent
form of lens has been in abeyance so long, unless on the
assumption that its narrow angle has prejudiced workers
against it. Of course, it must be understood that I
only strongly uphold it in such cases as are of narrow
angle naturally, such as portraiture and instantaneous
work.
But it might be argued that by this system the wide-
angle lens in its double form would be but rarely used,
while one would constantly be working with a single lens.
This, of course, is quite true, but there is no determent in
this. Lantern work, which, of course, requires negatives
of the highest degree of sharpness, is a good test for any
lens, and the whole of my very finest slides are from
negatives taken by a single lens, and leave absolutely
nothing to be desired in fineness of detail.
lo recapitulate, then, I think that an amateur who
would have a thoroughly reliable battery of lenses requires
nothing more than, first, a wide-angle rectilinear with a
focus of about two-thirds the long diameter of the plate,
and secondly, a simple achromatic plano-convex lens with
a focus about one and one half times the long diameter of
plate. Ihe wide-angle lens will give him three different
foci, all practically rectilinear, and as good as can be made
for all kinds of photographic work, except the fastest
instantaneous and portraiture. The plano-convex lens will
give him a fourth focus for landscape, and at the same time
be an instrument second to none for the quickest instan-
taneous work and portraiture.
I am not advising a system which has been imagined
but never tried. The arrangement described is precisely
the one which I have used myself for years, with the excep-
tion of the plano-convex lens, the splendid properties of
which I have only been acquainted with for the last six
months past. With regard to everything else proposed,
I may say that with a photographic experience ranging
through every branch of the subject, I have never once
failed through not having a proper lens. I have since got
a plano-convex suitably mounted, and feel now quite at
ease whatever kind of work I determine to undertake,
although I must say I never had any difficulty in instan-
taneous work, using my wide angle lens at full aperture,
which is about /-16.
It must not be understood that I advise cheap lenses
from second-class makers — nothing is further from my
purpose. I wish rather to point out that a suitable choice
of one first-class lens will do all the work of three equally
expensive instruments ; that the economy comes in in
carefully choosing one good lens that is capable of over-
taking all the work, rather than being at the expense of
three separate instruments that can do no more than the
one, provided it be intelligently chosen.
A few words may be said as to the more material side —
I mean the actual workmanship of a lens. The brass work
should be first-class. In second-class lenses this is
frequently defective. Threads of screws should be clean
cut and not too fine. The diaphragm or diaphragms
should fit the slot accurately, neither too tight nor too easy.
If the diaphragms be the ordinary Waterhouse ones, there
should be guides to the very bottom of the slot, so that
the diaphragm when pushed home may be properly
centred.
The Iris diaphragm is better than Waterhouse, but
inferior to rotating, where this form can be used, which is
not always. I have no special objection to Iris diaphragms
when dealing with larger apertures, but when the light is
shut off from f- 32 to f- 60, a very trifling error in the
adjustment may seriously increase or diminish your
exposure.
A wide-angle rectilinear, such as I have recommended,
is invariably fitted with rotating diaphragms, and in having
it screwed to the camera, care should be taken to have the
diaphragm slot on the under side (not the upper), so as to
prevent or lessen the chance of light getting in where it is
not wanted. When the lens is not in its place in the
camera, it should be kept covered at both ends — a screw
cap being generally provided for the one end, and the
ordinary exposing cap for the other.
Photographic Convention ok the United Kingdom (Lens
Standard Committee). — Opticians and all interested are
invited to a meeting to be held at the Mona Hotel, Henrietta
Street, Covent Garden, on April ‘25th, 1890, at 7‘0 p.m., to
discuss the desirability of adopting and further defining “The
Lens Standards of the Photographic Society of Great Britain.”
— April 14th, 1890, byorderof the Committee, A. Haddon.
At a lecture, by Mr. Henry Blackburn, Kditor of Academy
Notes, to be delivered at the Kensington Town Hall, on Fri-
day, April 18th, at 8 p.m. ; ami at the Eyre Arms Assembly
Booms, St. John s Wood, Loudon, on Friday, April 25th, at
8 p.m., a series of instantaneous photographs, taken lately
in Algeria and Morocco, will be shown by the oxy-hydrogen
light.
April 18, 1890.]
297
/
PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
OX PHOTOGRAPHY BY
ELECTRIC
THE LIGHT OF THE
SPARK*
BY LORD RAYLKIOII, SEC., 1!.S.
T have lonfr wished to illustrate l>y instantaneous photo-
graphy the many curious phenomena attending the
resolution of liquid jets into drops, and the subsequent
behaviour of the drops during collision ; but it is only
recently that I have carried the desire into effect. In
order to secure good definition, the exposure needs to be
large portrait combination by Dallmeyer, is situated about
seven feet behind in the image of the lantern condenser as
formed by the field-glass, and is just large enough to
include it. The jet to be photographed is placed parallel
to the field-lens, and as near as conveniently may be upon
the side next the photographic camera. The preliminary
focussing of the image upon the ground glass cannot Avell
be effected by the light of the sparks. For this purpose
a candle, which may stand before the lantern condenser,
is substituted.
Fig. 1.
less than l-1000th second, and in some cases l-10000th
second. F or this purpose the light attending the discharge
of Leyden jars seemed to be the most promising.
There is no difficulty, of course, in getting a photo-
graphic image of the spark itself, for in this case the light
is concentrated upon a very small area of the films. But
in order to photograph upon a satisfactory scale other
objects by the light of the spark, the Avliole illumination
has to be diffused over an area of several square inches of
sensitive surface. Under these circumstances it requires
special arrangements to secure a sufficient chemical action.
The spark is taken between brass balls enclosed in a
magic lantern. The light issuing from the condenser,
still slightly divergent, falls at a distance of sixteen feet
Fig. 2a.
upon a large single lens of about ten inches diameter, ! which
pkays the part of a field-glass. The photographic lens, a
Abstract of a paper read before the Camera Club Conference, and pub-
lished in the Journal of the Club.
In the earlier experiments, where jars of small capacity
only Avere available, the images were found, on develop-
ment, to be under-exposed, although the impression made
upon the eye by the image upon the ground glass was
sufficiently startling. In later work at the Royal Institu-
Fig. 2b.
tion, I have had the use of a large Leyden battery charged
by a Wimshurst machine, and there has been no difficulty
in securing sufficient exposure.
The photographs illustrate the behaviour of fine, nearly
vertical fountains, and the modifications which they
undergo under feeble electrical influence. In the normal
condition (Fig. 1) the drops on collision rebound, and are
thus scattered about over a considerable space. Under
the action of electricity the drops coalesce upon collision,
and thus in place of a large number of small drops the
photograph shows (Fig. 2a) a smaller number of Avidely-
separated conglomerates. It is evident that the electrifica-
tion has no effect upon the original separation of the liquid
column into drops.
Another set of photographs shows the details of the
resolution of a larger jet (Fig. 2b). In this regularity is
promoted by the operation of a tuning-fork.
The annual dinner of the employees of Messrs. Wm. Watson
and Sons, of 313, High Holborn, took place at the Holborn
Town Hall on Saturday evening, March 12th. Mr. T. P.
Watson occupied the chair, and in the course of his remarks
mentioned that it was was usual for that dinner to be held at
the beginning of the year, but owing to the prevalence of
influenza, which rendered it impossible for many to attend
whom they would not like to be absent, it had been deferred
till the present. In proposing the toast of the cabinet
workshop, the chairman spoke in warm praise of the work it
turned out, although he felt that the microscope shop this year
took the palm. The toast of the visitors was responded to by
Mr. Traill Taylor, who endorsed the chairman’s remarks.
During the evening a capital programme of songs and recita-
tions was gone lirough.
298
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
iloteg.
A picture by Mr. Carl Haag, iu the forthcoming
exhibition of the Royal Society of Painters in Water
Colours, will excite the attention of the photographers
who gather there at the meetings of the Photographic
Society of Great Britain. It represents the portrait
of the chairman of one of the city companies in his
official robes, painted in the full blaze of sunlight — an
effect, it is said, which, as far as the artist knows, has
never been attempted. This assertion is probably
correct so far as portraiture is concerned, but surely
artists have attempted the effect of sunlight on faces
before now. Photographers have gone beyond this,
for experiments with the face in full sunshine have
been made many times with more or less success.
Anyway, Mr. Haag’s picture will be regarded with
some curiosity by those who know the difficulty of the
task.
It is strange to find the naval authorities moving
with the times. They have certainly done so in a new
and unexpected use which they have found for photo-
graphy. The important question of the salute has
been occupying their minds, and they have decided
that for the future there is to be no doffing of hats,
but, from the second-class boy to the post-captain, the
salutation is to be performed by raising the hand to
the cap, somewhat in the military fashion, but with a
slight difference. So that there shall be no mistake
about the matter, they have had a man photographed
in the correct attitude, and a copy has been sent to all
the harbour ships. This is an excellent idea, and one
that wc should not have thought “my Lords” would
have adopted, as it is a total departure from the old
form of issuing instructions. But photography nowa-
days finds its way everywhere.
The latest royal devotee to the art of photography
is the Duke of Aosta. Instantaneous photography is
one of his hobbies, and we read that his small pocket
camera is held in horror by the ladies of the household,
who know that they might be taken at any moment
without time to arrange themselves in a graceful pose.
We trust this is an exaggeration ; but there is this
comfort, that the ladies who are thus tormented have
the means of revenge within their power. The domestic
gimlet or bradawl skilfully applied will at once render
the efforts of the amateur abortive, and send him
distracted.
The Chinese have a knack of anticipating every
European discovery. It might be supposed that
thought-reading was exclusively our property, or, at
least, the property of America; but, according to a
recent traveller, the Chinese have gone a long way
beyond the reading of thoughts, as they have succeeded
in photographing them ! A Mr. Horace Jones tells
how he was taken to a joss house, where prepared papers
were applied to his head. The result was that his
thoughts appeared in pictorial fashion, but unhappily
faded in about half-an-hour. Thus, we are told, though
the art has been known to the Chinese priests for some
3,000 years, yet they have never succeeded in fixing
these thought pictures. Travellers are credited with
telling very wonderful stories, and this certainly is one
of the most wonderful.
Complaints are being made in New York that not
only are prints from portrait negatives of attractive
ladies being sold to the general public, but that the
detective camera is freely used to obtain portraits
surreptitiously. These photographs are afterwards
used for the adornment of advertisements or for the
decoration of packets of cigarettes. A correspondent
of the New York Nation wrote recently in great in-
dignation complaining of the practice, and proposing
that a short statute should be passed prohibiting the
publication of a photograph without the consent of the
subject. We do not know how the law may be in
America, but we should fancy that if such a practice
were at all in vogue in England, some means would be
found to reach the offenders. An inj unction to restrain
the publication would certainly be at once granted by
the Court of Chancery .
A Mr. A. P. Laurie claims that he has solved the
difficulty of preventing paints used by artists from
fading. His experiments have been in the direction
of obtaining a medium which is unaffected by mois-
ture, and he lias made a varnish out of sulphate
of copper which, after drying, remains perfectly colour-
less. No doubt damp is a great factor in the fading
of paintings, as it is in the fading of photographs,
but it is not the only factor. Unquestionably the
action of light causes a reaction between the chemical
constituents of the various pigments, which a colour-
less, damp-proof varnish cannot arrest. What would
seem to require study is the chemistry of pigments,
so as to know the effect of light on two or more
pigmentary compounds when mingled together. In
this direction much has to be done.
M. Leon Brin, whose oxygen-making process is so
well known, and which has proved of such great use
to photographers, has for a few years past been residing
in London, and has been largely engaged in experi-
ments relating to the cheapening of the manufacture
of alloys of aluminium direct from the ore of that
metal. In early times he gave some attention to
photography, and he made some photographic lenses
by specially devised machinery ; in those times, also,
he was acquainted with Niepce dc St. Victor. He
informs us that he was the inventor of butterine, and
considers that compound to be a boon to mankind,
because in it the poor man gets something as good as
butter at a cheap rate, and the rich man obtains
genuine butter at a reduced price.
April 18, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
299
COLOUR SENSATION*
BY CAPT. W. DE W. ABNEY, C.B.
Though wo know not the “ reason why” of colour sensa-
tion, we yet know that there are three distinct colour
sensations, the existence of which I have heard so eminent
a physicist as Lord Rayleigh say is as well proved as the
law of gravitation. I may add that I am one who boldly
accepts the theory of trichromatic vision in a normal eye,
and hold it as being sound physiological physics. But
what has this to do with photography ? Just this, that
the same theory that applies to the sensitive retina may
equally well apply to the sensitive plate. The eye, i.e.,
its retina, is sensitive to three primary colours, red, green,
and violet, and if we take the spectrum we find that any
Fig. !.
intermediate colours can be compounded of two or more
of these three colours. Thus the orange sensation is
caused by a combination of [the red sensation with green
sensation, and the blue of violet and green. Further,
when we come to show graphically on paper the curves of
luminosity of the three different sensations to the spectrum,
we cannot but be struck with the similarity that they bear
to the curves of sensitiveness of the different salts used to
register the photographic image
Fig. 2.
There is no difficulty in taking in the fact that some one
particular wave-length can cause one sensation in the eye,
but it is harder to understand that another wave-length
not differing much from it can give rise not only to the
same sensation, but to one or two others. The theory of
sound, however, helps us in the first case. When one
tuning-fork is not quite in tune with another, the one sound
from one will reinforce the other to a certain extent, but
as the discordance increases the reinforcement becomes
less and less, and finally vanishes altogether. So witli
waves of light ; the waves which are in exact accord witli
* Abstract of a paper read before the Camera Club Conference, and
published in the Juurnal of the Club.
one part of the machinery (whatever it may be) in the eye
will produce a maximum effect, producing eventually a
motion which gives rise to the impression of a primary
colour. The waves which are slightly longer or shorter
than this will be only capable of giving a smaller amplitude
of vibration to the same part of the apparatus existing in
the eye, and consequently less intensity of that particular
colour sensation, till finally, as the wave-lengths become
shorter and longer, the amplitude of vibration in that
machinery becomes nil or imperceptible. But at the same
time that part of the machinery which is exactly in accord
with another wave-length, and is, consequently, another
colour-sensation, may also respond to the same wave-
lengths as those which partially affect the machinery
answering to the first colour sensation, and for the very
same cause, though it may be to a greater or less degree.
Thus the same wave-length, which is not in true accord
with either, may cause both colour-perceptions to respond.
The same argument applies to three colour-perceptions,
and would do so to more if they existed. Now a sensitive
plate may be said to take the place of the retina, and the
sensitive salts used to a colour-perceiving tissue. The
simple salts have but one colour-perception, but where two
salts are mixed, we may have two perceptions, and when
dyed plates are used, we may have two or three colour-
perceptions. Even where one sensitive salt, the silver
bromide, has been used, I have 'traced three distinct
colour-perceptions, or, to speak more accurately, radiation-
perceptions, one situated in the violet, near G, another in
the green, between F and E, and the third in the red, and
extending into the infra-red. The places of maximum
sensitiveness in the three correspond to three simple
colour-perceptions, but not situated in the same place in
the spectrum as those of the eye. These curves, however,
differ from those of the eye colour-perceptions, in that
whilst the curve of luminosity of the spectrum arrived at
by compounding the latter is a smooth curve, the former
is not ; but the curve of photographic sensitiveness is in a
series of hummocks or ridges. We can find something
similar in some eyes ; for instance, where there is a slight
deficiency in the perception of green. Again, there is this
difference, that whilst in the eye the luminosity curves of the
red and green are the greatest, and the violet the smallest,
in the silver bromide, the violet is the largest, aud the green
and red the smallest. In fact, when the colour-percep-
tions of the eye are altered in their proportions, by looking
through a pale blue solution they are very much the same
as those of the photographic film already alluded to. It
may be asked how and what am I driving at, aud my reply
is that I think that the photographic spectrum curves of
sensitiveness arc analogous to the spectrum curves of
colour-perception in the eye, or, in other words, that a
photographic plate has, in reality, only one, two, or three
colour-perceptions, and that all sensitiveness to other
colours is due to only partial response of the vibrating
atoms in the molecule to wave-lengths which differ slightly
from those with which one or more perception is in accord.
A study of the simple mixture of the haloid salts favours
this view, and I believe that by using it as a working
hypothesis, a better understanding of the apparent vagaries
in the extent of sensitiveness will be attained.
I would here .add that the generally adopted physio-
logical interpretation of colour perception is one which is
very open to discussion. It can scarcely be conceived
that even the delicate rods and cones of the retina arc not
much too coarse to be primarily affected by waves of light.
300
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
In the ear there is an equally delicate mechanism which
is affected by vibration in the air ; and we can scarcely
expect the mechanism in the eye to be responsive to vibra-
tions infinitely more rapid, and in a medium infinitely more
subtle. Probably it will eventually be found that light
acts on matter to produce a chemical change in it, and
that the change so produced is capable by electrical
currents to set in motion the mechanism required to give
the sense of colour. This, however, is travelling beyond
the limits I have set myself to keep, and I leave it there.
I have to ask those of you who are interested in theory
to take this hypothesis into your consideration. My late
researches into the sensitiveness of various compounds
recently published by the Royal Society have made me
offer it to this Conference.
Quite recently we have had an announcement that a
Herr Veresczhas achieved photography in natural colours,
and that it is a printing process. In the paragraph which
appeared in the Standard the name of Dr. Eder appears as
supporting the discovery. Were it not that the statement
in some degree has received an imprimatur by such a name
being connected with it, one would at once have discarded
it as one of those periodical outbursts of journalistic
credulity which are so often rife at certain seasons of the
year. There is one thing which is admitted, viz., that
although red and orange have been secured, they fade in
the light.
Now, as I pointed out in my address to section A of the
British Association, photography in natural colours is a
fait accompli of many years’ standing, but the process is so
long, and the results so evanescent in light, that there has
been no practical use of the discovery so long ago made.
Before we can hope to attain the goal which so many
have tried to reach, at least two things have to be accom-
plished— the first, diminution in exposure of the sensitive
surface, and the second, a means of preventing the print
fading in white light, which is commonly called fixing the
print.
That the first may be done I will not deny, but I think
a glance into the physics of the matter will at once demon-
strate that the second desideratum is chimerical, for the
following reasons: —
There is no known element which is capable of taking
on itself three colours, owing to molecular change, and
this would be the least number of states in which it must
exist to reproduce all the spectrum colours. We may,
therefore, at once dismiss from the possibilities that a
printed image in colours can be composed of elemental
matter. This makes the possible image a compound
which has to be acted upon by light. The action that
must take place on such a compound must be either a
reducing action or an oxidizing action (probably both), or
else a molecular re-arrangement. In the case of chloride
of silver, which, after a preliminary exposure to the light,
can be impressed by the spectrum colours, I have found
that the blue end of the spectrum is reproduced by reduc-
tion, and the red end by oxidation, there being a position
where there is a combination of both. We can conceive
matter to be so composed molecularly, that coloured light
may sift out certain molecules, which shall in the .aggregate
reflect red light when the rays acting on them are red, or
when green light acts on them, reflect the green rays, and
so on. Let us fix our attention on the molecular
aggregations which reflect red light. Since red light is
reflected, it follows that all the rays existing in white light
are absorbed except the red rays, and we know that when
absorption takes place then internal work of some kind
must be performed. In the spectrum, where these
colours are produced on the sensitive surface, it must be
recollected that no blue light acts on the part exposed to
the red rays, and is, therefore, during that exposure
incapable of doing any work in the molecules. Now, the
very fact that the molecules are ready to arrange them-
selves into aggregations reflecting different colours, show
that they are very susceptible of taking a new form of
aggregation, and those which had aggregated into red
reflecting masses by the action of the spectrum would be
the first to re-arrange themselves into blue reflecting
aggregations when acted upon by the blue rays which
they absorb. The blue reflecting aggregations would
also be the first to re-arrange themselves as red reflect-
ing aggregations under the action of red light, and so on.
lied, green, and blue reflecting aggregations — arrived at
by exposure of the matter to the spectrum colours on sub-
sequent exposure to white light, which is a combination
of the three colours — must, therefore, rapidly change to a
neutral tint, following out the above reasoning ; and this
is found to be the case in the photographs in natural
colour taken up to the present time. We may take it,
then, that no mere re-arrangement of molecular groupings
by coloured light can remain stable in white light. Let
us see if there is a probability of fixing the colour by
chemical means. Fixing would mean removal of some
matter still sensitive to light. As from the nature of
things such matter is part of the molecular aggregation
which causes the colour to be reflected, it is evident that
the removal of a part of such aggregation must at once
change the colour. If fixing be attempted by adding to
the molecular aggregation, the same reasoning applies.
We therefore are in this quandary as to a printing-out
process in natural colours : If the colour be produced by
change in composition of the matter acted on. it must be
fixed by chemical agencies, which means destruction of
colour. If it be formed by altered molecular arrangement,
white light must of necessity alter its colour.
A process in natural colours which depends on deve-
lopment is out of the range of probability, as I have
already stated in my British Association address. An
embryo photographic image in natural colours might be
possible, but to imagine that a coloured image can be
built up by chemical means, such as by the deposition of
silver on such image, is to endow the depositing atoms
with a discriminative judgment, which, so far as is known,
not one has the slightest symptom of possessing.
It will be seen from this that I am no believer in the
discovery of a really practicable process for producing
photographs in natural colours. We may wish every
success to the gentleman who is making these researches,
but the telegraphic description in the Standard, to my
mind, does not require to be read between the lines to see
that there is a great deal more of hoped for than of accom-
plished success in what has been done.
Crystal Palace Exhibition. — Mr. J. Dore writes that in
the notice of the above, in our issue of the 4 th inst., he was
erroneously described as J. Dove as the winner of the bronze
medal, Section 1 (professional), British subjects, in the lantern
section of the Exhibition.
Croydon Camera Club. — Excursions will take place on
April 19th and on Whit Monday ; and on April 23rd there will
be an exhibition of bromide enlargements. Information may
be had from Mr L. De Clercq, 38, Lansdown Road ; or Mr.
Alfred Underhill, 23a, Clarendon Road, Croydon.
April 18, 1890.“]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
301
PHOTCK GRAPHIC APPARATUS.
The following cuts represent pieces of photographic appa-
ratus which Messrs. Marion and Co. have just introduced
into the English market. Fig. 1 represents a new shutter
by Voigtlander and Son. which is one of that class which
opens and closes from the centre. Its peculiarity is that,
after opening uniformly a small way, the aperture suddenly
assumes somewhat a star-fish form, so in opening and
closing allows more light to reach the plate than would be
the case had it still an approximately circular form. This
shutter works between the lenses. Messrs. Marion and Co.
.also have just introduced a stereoscope and stereoscopic |
camera combined. The ground glass screen is contained in
a rectangular chamber, and when placed on the side nearest
to the lenses, serves forfocussingpurposes, and the chamber
keeps it sufficiently in shadow to render a focussing cloth
unnecessary under ordinary circumstances. "When placed
on the farther side of the chamber it serves as a dif-
fuser ot light when the camera is used as a stereoscope. In
whichever character the instrument is used, the same lenses
are employed, but eye-cups are fitted into their hoods
when the camera is employed for viewing stereoscopic
pictures.
lig. 2 is the camera invented by Mr. Samuels, and the
cut shows one side of its lever arrangement for focussing ;
by the lever motion the lens is brought to focus expediti-
ously. 1 he construction of this camera is extremely
simple, and when it is closed it forms a cubical box,
which looks as if it would bear a kick anywhere
Fig. 4.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 1.
without injury to its contents. Fig. o might be called a
“ bipod ” head-rest ; the additional leg gives great firm-
Levci*
Fig. 2.
speaking, extinguished, and the room becomes illuminated
by the exterior gas jet.
Messrs. Marion and Co. have also exhibited to us a
modified Kershaw shutter, with a “time” arrangement
affixed thereto. The same firm is introducing a new
reflector of light for studio use. It gives the power of
universal adjustment, and consists of an upright iron rod
fixed to a circular base ; this rod is 4 feet 6 inches high,
and on it run two junctions, each carrying a reflecting
screen measuring 4 feet by 2 feet, the one covered with
white calico, and the other with a brownish colour.
These can be turned at any angle, thus allowing of reflec-
tion of light as desired. Another piece of apparatus
Messrs. Marion and Co. have on view, is a portable
stand for four or six or more pieces of flash light
apparatus ; the stand will pack away so compactly as to
be easily transported to private houses for purposes of
portraiture.
ness ; the whole arrangement rests upon castors, which
will roll in a forward, but not in a backward direction.
Fig. 4 is a developing-room lamp ; when the tap is
turned in one direction, the gas-flame rises inside the lamp,
and there is no light in the room ; when it is turned in
the opposite direction the aforesaid flame is, practically
The California Camera Club. — Another photographic
society is proposed for San Francisco, to be entitled the Cali-
forma Camera Club. The objects of the promoters are said to
be the formation of a social, scientific, and art centre for photo-
graphers, and the establishment, in a convenient locality, of
rooms for the use of the Club.
302
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FRANCE.
BY LEON VIDAL.
Halation — Magnesium Flash - Lamp — Developing Cap-
sules— Sulphite of Soda — Use of Flexible Films in
Egypt— Photographic Societies and Clubs in London
— Negatives on Celluloid Pellicle — Lantern Pro-
jections.
The French Photographic Society held its usual monthly
sitting on the 11th inst. ; the following were the principal
questions discussed.
The Commandant Mbessard has occupied himself with
the question of halation ; as for the causes of it, he has
said nothing further than was told us by MM. Cornu
and Lumiere, but he has been seeking for a way to provide
a remedy. lie has not arrived at any practical solution, i
but he thinks suggestions ought to be made to the manu-
facturers of plates. In the first place, he remarked that
if the sensitive film is very transparent, there is no diffusion
of the luminous rays; they pass in a straight line, and con-
sequently there are no reflections produced in the nature
of halation. On the other hand, if the film is absolutely
opaque, halation cannot exist. There is, then, a point of
relative translucence or opacity at which halation is
at its maximum. We must, says the Commandant,
endeavour to arrest the transmission of reflected rays, or
use thin pellicles.
It has been already shown, lie says, that halation exists
to a much less extent with pellicles. As for glass plates, the 1
remedy proposed by M. Cornu appears to be good ; but,
further, could not the sensitive film be stained with some
inert colouring material which would give sufficient opacity
to arrest the light in the film itself? It would appear that
in orthochromatic plates halation is much less pronounced.
In short, these are simply suggestions of principles, and it
is left to experimenters to try them, and choose that which
succeeds the best.
M. Vidal pointed out an objection to staining the film,
as if the film is so coloured as to retain the whole of the rays
of light, it would be insensitive. He thought that the use
of a coloured screen which should greatly diminish the
power of the blues, the violets, and the high-lights, would
contribute to diminish halation. In his opinion, the
introduction of anything into the sensitive compound
except substances capable of bestowing orthochromatic
properties upon it, should be avoided. In this connection,
he mentioned that, if a little too much of the colouring
matter intended to orthochromatise the sensitive product
is added, a general insensitiveness occurs, which must be
avoided. Good orthochromatic plates, whilst containing
a sufficient amount of the colouring principle, are, or
ought to be, almost colourless. In his humble opinion,
the best thing was to follow the path indicated by M. Cornu,
and to seek for an easy means both of covering the back
of the plates with a medium possessing the same refractive
index as glass, and to be able, without trouble, to remove
this coating from the plate at the moment of development.
As pellicle suppresses halation almost completely, we have
again this resource, and it is a question of great interest
to be able to produce images free from this annoyance, this (
defect.
A new magnesium flash-lamp was shown in the
name of M. Vergeot by the Commandant Fribourg. It |
consists simply of a metallic tube of the height of about
ten centimetres, and of the diameter of an ordinary caudle.
It may be placed in a candlestick or chandelier. It con-
sists of two distinct parts, C a spirit lamp, D a reservoir
of pure magnesium powder. At E is seen a tube to which
to attach the flexible pipe from a pneumatic ball. At the
top of the lamp AB is a wire
grating, and below at C is
cotton impregnated with
spirit. The combustion lasts
about a quarter of an hour.
The reservoir I) being filled
with magnesium and the spirit
lighted, if a pressure is given
to the ball the powder is blown
through C ; it is inflamed and
the flash projected. In this
manner a series of very
luminous flashes may be pro-
duced successively and with-
out danger. This lamp is one
of the simplest and the best
which I have seen.
A chemist of Niort, M. Micheliu, has devised capsules
containing each a dose of developer, which are easy of
carriage, and which at the desired moment permit a deve-
loping solution to be rapidly made up. These capsules
contain, the small one pyrogallic acid, and the Large one
the desired mixture of alkaline salts, carbonate and sul-
phite of soda. The contents of these two capsules are
placed in from forty to fifty centilitres of water. M.
Michelin proposes to prepare other portable capsules for
different developers — hydrokinone, pyrocatechin, eikono-
gen, and others. We have already in this direction had
the developing pastilles of Ener.
Another chemist — M. Chicandard, of Lyons — has com-
municated the results of his interesting study of sulphite
of soda. This product, he tells us, is very rarely pure ;
it most frequently contains sulphate of soda in larger or
smaller quantities, and free carbonate of soda. To assure
oneself whether there is any sulphate of soda, it suffices to
produce with excess of chloride of barium a precipitate
in a solution of sulphite of soda. If this precipitate is not
entirely dissolved by hydrochloric acid the sulphite is
impure. To demonstrate the presence of free carbonate,
we have recourse to phenol-phthalein. A drop of an
alcoholic solution of this product becomes red if the sulphite
contains free alkali; if on contact with the sulphite no
colouration takes place, it shows that no free carbonate is
present.
To ascertain the quantity of sulphate which impoverishes
the sulphite, M. Chicandard advises the employment of the
following process. In the first place, a solution of
2 -45 grammes of the sulphite to be tested is made in
100 grammes of distilled water ; secondly, a mixture of
Iodine (in crystals) 2*53 grammes
Iodide of potassium 3-60 ,,
Distilled water ... 100 ,,
Ten c. c. of the first solution are taken, and drop by drop
the second is added from a burette graduated in tenths of
a cubic centimetre until the liquid takes a permanent
yellow colouration. A few drops of thin starch paste
may be added, and in this case it is an intense blue coloura-
tion which indicates the end of the reaction. The
number of tenths of cubic centimetres of the iodine
solution employed indicates the percentage of sulphate
contained.
M. Chicandard recommends keeping bottles of sulphite
April 18, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
303
and of pyrogallic acid in the light, contrary to the prejudice
which insists that light is injurious to pyrogallic acid.
M. Balagny showed a series of negatives, 21 by 27 centi-
metres, on flexible films, obtained in Egypt during a
scientific mission. They number 120, and are very
remarkable. They have undergone for more than three
months a temperature of .about 40° Centigrade. lie
considers this as a new proof of the resistance of these
pellicles to very high temperature, and he adds that, thanks
to this light and unbreakable support, the tourist is always
sure of obtaining negatives, and is exempt from the con-
siderable expense of carriage occasioned by the use of
glass plates.
Mr. Stebbing, on returning from a journey to London,
greatly interested the Society by a description of the
photographic clubs and societies in London ; he also men-
tioned numerous hotels in which amateur photographers
will find a dark-room for their travelling work.
M. David claims to have been among the first to recom-
mend celluloid pellicles for photographic negatives ; he
showed some thus obtained by him from 1883 down-
wards.
Some interesting slides were shown in the lantern,
amongst them reductions from the negatives on flexible
films shown by M. Balagny, and some experiments in
coloured work by M. Maurice Buguet. The latter,
although as yet incomplete, promise good results with
perseverance. A lantern slide gains much by being
coloured, provided that this supplementary work is done
with art and sobriety.
A French Exhibition in London is in course of prepara-
tion for the month of May. There is room for doubt
whether photography will be largely represented in it. A
committee is occupied in organizing this special class.
THE LATENT PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE*
BT C. H. BOTHAMLEY, F.I.C., E.C.S.
A second hypothesis, also physical in its character, was
propounded by Mr H. S. Starnes,! and was based mainly
on the facts that an unexposed gelatino-bromide plate is
not affected by solutions which null reduce ordinary pre-
cipitated silver bromide, and that if a quantity of emul-
sion which has been exposed to light is melted up with a
fresh quantity of emulsion or gelatine, or is simply
re-melted without any addition, the resulting emulsion
shows only a trace of fog on development. It was sug-
gested that each particle of silver bromide is enclosed in a
protective envelope of gelatine, and that the impact of light
waves ruptures this envelope and exposes the contained
silver bromide to the action of the developer. The
destruction of the latent image by potassium bichromate was
supposedto be due to the hardening effect of the bichromate
on the gelatine. It is not easy to see, however, how
bichromate could heal up, so to speak, the ruptured en-
velopes ; nor why the image should be destroyed by
bromine, which tends to destroy or alter the gelatine ; nor
why silver bromide in gelatine should be more sensitive
than silver bromide in collodion, the latter being by far the
more porous medium of the two.
All the evidence indicates that the formation of the
latent image is a photo-chemical operation, the composi-
tion of the material forming the image being different from
that of silver bromide. The difference between the forma-
tion of a visible image and a latent image is, in fact, as our
President, Capt. Abney, has always insisted, a difference
in degree and not in kind.
It is well known that bromine, chlorine, and any sub-
stance which will readily give up bromine or chlorine, will
destroy the latent image, the result being independent of
the mode of manufacture of the emulsion. (Examples
shown.)
Potassium dichromate iu neutral or acid solution has
the same effect. I observed that a mixture of the dichro-
mate and potassium bromide produced this result more
rapidly than the dichromate alone, and, therefore, it seemed
not improbable that the effect is not simply an oxidising
action of the dichromate, but is due to a simultaneous
action of the dichromate and the small quantities of
soluble bromide which are almost invariably present in
gelatine plates.* This point does not seem to have been
investigated before.
It is practically impossible to wash out the last traces
of the bromide, and hence the only course open is to
convert all the soluble bromide into silver bromide, and
this was done by immersing the plates for an hour in a
2 per cent, solution of silver nitrate, slightly acidified
with nitric acid. They were then washed, first with
distilled water containing a little nitric acid, perfectly
free from chlorides, &c., and finally with water alone.
I think it may be taken that they contained no soluble
haloid salt.
Potassium dichromate solution (5 per cent.) was
purified frain haloids by adding a small quantity of silver
nitrate solution and filtering through glass wool previously
well washed.
The plates were exposed to light, and one half was
immersed for five minutes in the dichromate solution,
very thoroughly washed, and developed with ferrous
oxalate containing no bromide. Although there could
not have been any simultaneous action of the dichromate
and a soluble haloid, the latent image was destroyed
(example shown) ; and therefore we may take it, I think,
as established that the destruction of the latent image is
due solely to the action of the dichromate, which pro-
bably exerts an oxidising action, but may .also be effective
because it converts the material of the latent image into _
silver chromate.
Nitric acid is also commonly said to destroy the image,
but I found that the strongest acid that the gelatine would
stand after previous treatment with chrome alum cer-
tainly did not destroy it. (Examples shown.) A washed
collodion emulsion made with excess of silver nitrate and
washed with distilled water in order to avoid introduction
of soluble haloids, was exposed to fight and then treated
for twenty minutes with nitric acid containing 25 per cent,
of real acid. After washing and development it was
evident that the latent image had not been destroyed.
(Example shown.) Other similar experiments gave
similar results, but in all cases the action of the acid on the
gelatine or pyroxiline made it impossible to obtain density.
I am making further experiments, but the results so far
obtained seem to indicate that the nitric acid does not
destroy the latent image, although it may prevent its
development. In this connection we may recall the fact
that even the strongest nitric acid does not prevent the
darkening of silver chloride or bromide when exposed to
light.
It seems to me that it has not been clearly recognised
that the formation of a developed photogr.ipliic image
"* see for example, JSettnow. Phot. Correspondent, 1889, p. 56 et aeq.
• Continued from page 283. + Brit. J. Phot., 1883, p. 6*3, 656, &c.
304
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
takes place in three distinct stages, which may and pro-
bably do differ considerably in the nature ol the changes
which occur. First we have the Intent photo-image formed
solely by the action of light, and therefore of photo-
chemical origin ; secondly, we have what I propose to
call the primary or fundamental image formed from the
latent image by the action of the developer, and there-
fore partly of photo-chemical and partly of chemical
original ; and thirdly, the developed image formed by the
action of the developer from the primary image and the
unaltered silver bromide in the film. This last process is
probably mainly electro-chemical
Potassium iodide is also said to destroy the latent
image, but I find that after immersion in a 5 or 10 per
cent, solution of the iodide for a time sufficient to con-
vert all the silver salts in the film into silver iodide,
there is still left an image which can be seen during
development, and can still be seen after fixing, although
it is then very faint. (Examples shown.) The same
result is obtained with pure bromide or brom-iodide
emulsion. It might be argued that the action of the
iodide had not been continued sufficiently long. Twenty
minutes’ immersion in a 10 per cent, solution of the
iodide was the maximum given, but the conversion of
the silver bromide into silver iodide was certainly com-
plete, and it may be assumed that any action on the
latent image had reached its limit. It seems, then, that
potassium iodide does not destroy the latent image, nor
prevent its conversion into a primary image by the
developer, but does prevent the formation of a developed
image, doubtless because the silver salts in the film are
converted into silver iodide.
Hydrobromic acid and hydrochloric acid are also said
to destroy the latent image. The action of the first acid
I am investigating. Hydrochloric acid containing 12
per cent, of real acid does not destroy the image on a
gelatino-chloride plate after twenty minutes’ immersion.
(Example shown.)
(To be continued .)
LIMITATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS
BY FOCUS.*
BY T. R. DALLMEYER.
That the combined chemical and mechanical process
known as “ Photography ” be admissible in the sciences
must be determined by its exactness. So far as a photo-
graphic lens can be made perfect (speaking technically, this
means that the instrument be aplanatic), the applications to
science are eminently satisfactory in records and investiga-
tions, in that but one plane of the object has to be repre-
sented by one plane in the image, or that the conjugate
points in the object are so situated that they are simul-
taneously received to an accurate focus on the plane of
the photographic plate. These conditions are practically
maintained in stellar photography, micro-photography,
&c. Photography in many such applications is not only
sufficiently truthful, but records on the sensitive plate
more than the most practised eye can ever see, for physio-
logical reasons. Immediately photography is employed to
depict objects in different planes, where the corresponding
points in the image are formed on sensibly different planes,
the representation by receiving them on one plane is no
longer truthful nor exact. A photographic instrument to
• Abstract of a paper read before the Camera Club Conference, and
published in the Journal of the Club.
accomplish this theoretically is simple enough, but never-
theless is a practical impossibility. It would only necessi-
tate the employment of an imaginary “pinhole,” the
aperture of which shall be the section of a mathematical
straight line. In such a case, every plane in the object
would be equally and perfectly rendered, mathematically
true and exact in position on the plane upon which the
image was received, the size of the image itself being
dependent on the distance of this plane (of the plate)
receiving the image from the imaginary “ pinhole.”
From the fact that in pictorial photography it is neces-
sary to depict different planes at once, it follows that,
strictly speaking, the results are untrue in drawing,
although relatively they can be made in so-called sharp
photographs far truer than any artist could ever expect or
would attempt to render them in detailed drawing. Such
approximate precision capable of being produced by a
photographic instrument might be the envy of the mere
still-life painter, and is certainly acknowledged by all
painter artists as a useful elementary means to an end.
I understand the attitude of a painter artist in depicting
a scene to be that of a workman with an artistically
educated sight (with binocular vision), anx'ous to portray
or reproduce the individual feelings and emotions produced
in his mind by the scene before him, and with working
tools at his command that he re'ies upon to help h’m in
giving a truthful impression of what he sees. This in-
dividuality is not capable of any exact definition, although
he may succeed in impressing others with the very same
feel'ngs that his transcript was intended to convey. Im-
pressed by this individuality he wiU emphasise or subdue,
according partly to his own taste, and partly according to
the principles of composition (the latter being mostly
negative principles), which are the result of long study
and practice.
With the photographer the attitude is very different.
Grant that he is perfect in his technique ; the tools at his
disposal are self-acting, recording the image from one
point of sight only, and the individuat’ty of the instrument
is limited and capable of exact definition, but here his own
individuality is restrained by the latter’s artistic capabili-
ties. The question of the production of effects is now one
dependent entirely on scientific laws, and is defined by the
optical construction of the lens itself and the law of con-
jugate foci.
As the camera can only depict what is placed in front of
it, the photographer, to produce work that can be called
artistic, has, or must cultivate, that artistic appreciation
of nature in all her moods which the true artist observer
and admirer of her finds so much pleasure in. The choice
of the subject, its charm or interest, and its more or less
good composition as seen from different points of view,
will indicate the operator’s greater or less artistic apprecia-
tion and individuality ; but having only an inanimate and
unthinking machine, he is bound to look for such phases
of nature as can give that machine the greatest opportunity
of utilising its limited powers. The limited treatment in
point of definition lies in the adjustment of “ focus ” ; the
controversies that have arisen on this point, on the art
side, have certainly done much to raise photography from
a copying process to that of a fine ait.
You have before you a series of photographs that show
the tendencies by various treatments of the focus towards
the destruction of the best possible image as given by a
perfectly corrected lens. They are the result of a series
of accurately performed experiments, and as a record may
April 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
305
prove of value and impress the memory with the tendencies ,
without resort to the theoretical study of the principles
that guarantee the results.
It is probable that you are all well aware that the tsst
for a perfectly aplanatic lens is that when a point of light
is focussed for the image it is seen sharp, and that on wheel-
ing the plane of the best focus in or out the image vanishes
equally on either side : if positive spherical aberration is
present on the inside of the focus, the image vanishes or
loses structure very rapidly, but on the outside lingers for
a considerable distance, and its structure is maintained ;
this becomes more and more remarkable the more positive
spherical aberration is present. The converse of this
occurs when negative spherical aberration is present.
The reason — and it is easily shown mathematically — is,
that in the former case there is an outward concentration
of the image-forming rays inside the focus, and an inward
concentration of the image-forming rays outside the best
focus ; and the converse of this occurs in the latter case.
Again, it must be borne in mind that the least circle of
aberration in a non-aplanatic lens is not the best focus
visually, but at the plane where there is the strongest
inward concentration of the image-forming rays. I have '
intentionally laid some stress on this point now, as objec-
tion has been taken to the fact that spherical aberration
improves the out-of-focus planes, simply from ignoring the
fact that the important element, viz., the measurement of
the longitudinal aberration, lias been lost sight of in com-
parisons made of the transversal measurements of the
circles of confusion as compared to those of an aplanatic lens.
With regard to the illustration, you will note various
regular steps in the alteration of the plane receiving the
image ; if the focus be shortened, or a movement in be
made, you know it corresponds to a more distant object,
and hence the plates in which there has been an inward
movement correspond to foreground tendencies when some
more distant object is focussed for ; and, on the other
hand, if the focus be lengthened, or a movement out be
made, the focus is made for some nearer object, and
hence the plates correspond in these cases to background.
It would be an easy matter with any lens to construct a
table showing the limits of movement of the camera back
permissible, not to exceed a certain definite out-of-focus
circle (deemed consistent with sufficient maintenance of
structure), for planes on either side of the one chosen
that should include such treatment for the extreme
distance and nearest foreground required. If these were
exceeded by a given lens with full aperture, the requisite
limit could be arrived at by reducing the aperture exactly
in the proportion you wish to reduce the out-of-focus
circle produced to that required.
(To be continued).
CTovresponUcnce.
THE CRYSTAL PALACE EXHIBITION AWARDS.
Sir, — I am requested by the Manager, on behalf of the
Company, the Committee of Judges, and the Executive, to
deny unequivocally the allegations contained in a letter signed
by Mr Edgar G. Lee and others, and published in your last
issue, respecting the award of the National Photo. Club
Challenge Cup, and to add that the company is in a position to
prove that such allegations have absolutely no foundation in fact.
I am further desired to thank you for your editorial note
at foot of letter, which is as courteous as it is strictly true.
S. G. Buchanan Wollaston.
Crystal Palace Company, Crystal Palace, S.E., April Hth, 1890.
patent EntclUgcnre.
Applications for Letters Patent.
5,046. W. B. Luce, 321, High Holborn, London, “ Camera.”
— April 1st.
5,075. G. Clulow and A. H. Sale, 55, Chancery Lane,
London, “ Changing Boxes.” — April 1st.
5,158. C. H. Stanbury, 24, Southampton Buildings, London,
“Apparatus for Holding Photographic Plates.” — April 2nd.
5,193. G. Dickinson, 144, Morley Avenue, Noel Park, London,
“ Cameras.” — April 3rd.
5,215. F. Beauchamp, 115, Cannon Street, London, “ In-
stantaneous Shutters.” — April 3rd.
5,227. C. Whitney, 323, High Holborn, London.
“ Cameras.” — April 3rd.
5,436. J. Drive, Hotel Mctropole, London, “ Exhibition of
Photographs.” — April 10 th.
5,439. D. Whyte, 87, St. Vincent Street, Glasgow, “Vignet-
ting Appliances.” — April 10th.
5,458. H. R. Hume and E. W. Parfitt, 19, Southampton
Buildings, Chancery Lane, London, “ Detective Cameras.” —
April 10th.
Specifications Published.
7,659. 7th May, 1889. “The Preparation of Crude Glass.’
Julius Quaolio, 25, Louisenstrasse, Berlin, N.W. Germany,
Engineer.
In the glass industry, the glass used for treatment proceeds
from compounds which are melted in the pots or hearths of
furnaces, serving likewise for working the same throughout.
Separate experiments have been undertaken by various experi-
menters with a view to carry out the melting process in peculiar
furnaces, and to feed the melted mass in a liquid or cooled state
to the working furnaces while endeavouring to free the mode of
proceeding hitherto resorted to from a number of the defects
attending the same.
A series of practical experiments has led to a new process for
the manufacture from a vitreous mass of a middle or inter-
mediate compound ; to this intermediate compound the inventor
has given the name of calcin (crude glass), which calcin can be
fed to the working furnace without any admixture of alkalies,
and in a cold state, in order to be heated therein, and used for the
manufacture of the glass wares of commerce. By these means,
he says, an extraordinary yielding manufacturing mass can lie
continuously supplied as well in pot furnaces as in furnaces pro-
vided with tanks or cisterns (hearths). Oiviug to the use of calcin,
the rapid destruction of the material constituting the furnaces,
whether furnished with pots or cisterns, which is brought about
by the decomposing action of the alkalies when the mass is
directly melted, is, he says, prevented, and a better product
free from threads or streaks, striae, or wreaths is thus obtained,
8,054. May 1 4th, 1889. — “ Photographic Cameras.” John
Henry Skinner and Edwin Jackson Lyth, trading as J. H.
Skinner and Co., East Dereham, Norfolk, Photographic Appa-
ratus Manufacturers.
The object of this invention is to provide photographic
cameras with means whereby they can be quickly extended or
closed as desired.
The extension apparatus of photographic cameras at present
in use consists of a pinion gearing into a rack, the said pinion
being actuated by a milled headed screw.
According to this invention we dispense with the pinion, and
provide a cog wheel of suitable size gearing into the rack on the
frame. This cog wheel is provided with a handle or turn for
actuating the same.
Photographic Club. — The subject for diseussion on April
23rd will be “Development of Instantaneous Exposures ; ” on
the 30th, “ Development of Unknown Exposures.”
The Journal of the Society of Arts announces that the
lectures on “Colour and Colouring,” the last of which was
given by Professor A. H. Church, M.A., F.R.S., on March 31st,
will be printed in the Journal during the summer recess. On
April 30, Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer is to read a paper on “ Photo
graphic Lenses,” at the Society of Arts,
30G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 18, 1890.
^roccrtitngs of ^octettes.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
At the ordinary meeting of this Society held on the 1 5th
inst., the chair was taken by Mr. J. Glaisher, F.R.S., Presi-
dent.
A paper on “ A Standard Method of Development ” was
read by Mr. C. H. Bothamley, F.C.S., and illustrated by a
table showing the sensitometer numbers procurable by various
developers and times of development. In the course of his
observations, Mr. Bothamley said that it would not be pro-
posed to fix one uniform system of development for all subjects.
Generally speaking, the nature of the subject and the inten-
tion of the photographer as well as other circumstances
must be taken into account. If all subjects were to be de-
veloped in the same way photography would be lowered from
the position of a fine art to that of a merely mechanical one.
There was, however, an advantage in adopting some definite
standard for the purpose of comparing results in a scientific
way. In considering what it was desirable to compare, they
might take either the least amount of exposure that would
suffice to bring out a visible image, or they might take the
amount of gradation obtainable. For the latter purpose he
thought no standard developer could be found, as a
different constitution of it would lie required for different
makes of plates, and to suit the tastes of different photo-
graphers. The same developer would not suit the photo-
grapher who delighted in softness and the one who desired
chiefly to get what was called pluck. We might then look upon
the problem as narrowed to the question of obtaining detail, but
such detail must be got without fogging. What was wanted
was to utilise to the utmost the selective power of the
developer in reducing silver where light had acted on the film,
and in not causing reduction independent of the action of light.
One of the things to be considered was that photographers
were dependent upon dealers for the purity of the chemicals
they employed. Several conditions were required to be ful-
filled in a standard developing solution. It should be simple in
composition, and, if possible, should be like what was in general
use. Then only such chemicals should be required as can be
obtained in a fairly pure state. Of the various developers
available, ferrous oxalate was noticeable as failing to fulfil
several of the conditions that had been laid down. Although
potassium oxalate could be obtained tolerably pure, this was not
always the case with ferrous sulphate, and even when pure to
start with, it rapidly changed. The developing solution, too,
soon oxidised, and ferric oxalate, the product of oxidation, was
not only a retarder, but actually a reducing agent. Finally,
it was now but little in use for developing negatives, although
for positive work it was still largely employed. He did not
think that at present eikonogen could be relied upon for purity,
and, therefore, we were reduced to select either pyrogallic or
quinol. Of these, the first-named is to be preferred. It is the
developer most largely used ; in the dry state it keeps w'ell,
and its great solubility makes the preparation of solutions very
easy. With pyro, however, we must not use caustic soda, or
caustic potash, but must select either liquid ammonia or an
alkaline carbonate. With liquid ammonia a restrainer is
generally used, and this may take the form of bromide either of
ammonium or potassium, or of a salt containing an organic
acid. Bromide of ammonium, on the whole, he hail
found to be the best restrainer. With potassium bro-
mide there was commonly present some bromate, and not
unfrequently a little caustic potash. Carbonate of potash is
not so readily obtained pure as carbonate of sodium, and
is, moreover, objectionable from its hygroscopic character.
Carbonate of sodium exists in various forms as regards the
amount of water and consequent value of the salt and propor-
tion of it required to produce a given effect. The anhydrous
variety is that most likely to be pure and definite, and may be
prepared by heating the ordinary carbonate. When obtained
it should be kept in a glass bottle fitted urith an india-rubber
stopper ; a glass stopper is very bail both for keeping air out,
and, in the case of volatile substances — like ammonia — for con-
fining the vapour. When ammonia is used for the standard
developer its strength should be determined by titration. There
is no large amount of apparatus anil no great deal of skill
required for this process. A standard acid is required, and
oxalic acid is found to fulfil the necessary conditions. A little
of a solution of auriue, one in 500 of diluted alcohol, should
be used with it as an indicator of the neutral point. 37 '00
grammes of oxalic acid is dissolved in a litre of distilled water,
and 1 c.c. of this solution is sufficient to neutralise a centi-
gramme of real ammonia, N H,. The pyro for a standard
developer should be dissolved in distilled water just before
required. No acid should be added. It is not admissible to
use sulphites in standard solutions. Not only is it rare to
obtain sulphites pure — samples professing to be sulphite have,
indeed, been found to contain no sulphurous acid at all —
but the action of sulphite upon development is not deter-
mined. An approximation only to purity can be obtained
when using the neutral or anhydrous sulphites. The standard
developer will consist, then, of pyro, with liquid ammonia, and
bromide of ammonium, or of pyro with carbonate of sodium.
The preparation that he had used as a standard for a long
time was composed of —
Pyro ... ... ... ... ... 2 grains
Ammonium bromide ... ... ... 1 grain
Liquid ammonia ... ... ... ... 3 grains
As this proportion of liquid ammonia contains about one-third
of its weight of real ammonia, NH3, the formula may lie put
into parts of 1,000, thus —
Water ... ... ... ... ... 1,000
Pyrogallol ... ... ... ... 5
Ammonia bromide ... ... ... 2*5
Real ammonia ... ... ... ... 2-5
It occurred to the reader of the paper to try various forms
of developers to see whether anything better could be got at as
a standard. To try them he had used a sensitometer exposed
to the light coming through an opening one centimeter square,
placed close in front of the brightest part of the flame of a
Sugg’s Argand burner. He had found that all the detail that
was obtainable would come up in five minutes, but that the
action might be continued up to an hour without much fogging,
and with considerable accession of density. The proportion of
bromide might be doubled without keeping back detail, and
with improved clearness during long development. With carbon-
ate of sodium as the alkali, development was lengthened ; it
[ required ten minutes to get out the detail, and if the plate was
left for an hour in the solution, it was much degi-aded by a
general deposit or chemioal fog. Whenever development
was continued for a period of more than ten minutes, he
advised that it should take place with the air excluded as far
as possible, and this he accomplished by using an upright
| vessel and covering it with a fitted top of india-rubber. The
temperature at which the experiments had been carried on was
60° Fahrenheit.
Captain Abney said that the method of reckoning sensito-
meter numbers by the last one that was just discernible was
very misleading ; it was far better to measure the density of
deposit of some of the numbers.
Mr. W. E. Debenham thought that although the question
of temperature had been touched upon, the difference of result
due to differences in that respect were not sufficiently appre-
ciated. In cold weather a much longer time was occupied
with developer of a given strength, and in hot weather the
amount of alkali or time of development might again be con-
siderably reduced. He had known even experienced photo-
graphers to be misled by this effect at the first coming of cold
in winter.
Mr. John Spiller welcomed a paper in which scientific
bases were established for experiment. As for what Mr.
Debenham had said about the effect of temperature, he could
quite corroborate that. During the cold weather a few weeks
since, he was quite surprised to find the immense difference that
variations of temi>erature caused in the action of the develojier.
Mr T. Sebastian Davis congratulated the reader of the
paper upon its scientific character. He was pleased to find the
system adopted of measuring by 1,000 parts, which he thought
April 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
307
better either than the proportions by ounces or grammes, or
than the per centage method.
The Chairman referred to his own experience some years
since, when more actively engaged in photography, and said
that he had noted the remarkable difference of behaviour of the
developer due to variations of temperature.
Mr. Fhiese Green exhibited the cameia already described in
these pages, fitted with mechanism for producing a seriesof photo-
graphs of moving objects taken in rapid succession. Hv turning a
handle, successive portions of a roll of sensitive film were placed
in position behind the lens, and exposed. It was stated that the
cameia could be worked at the rate of 600 photographs per
minute, or even faster.
Messrs. E. G. Amplett and W. Symon were elected members
of the Society.
Camera Cu n.
On Thursday, April 10th, there was an exhibition of lantern
slides, eight or nine members contributing towards the show.
Mr. Gambier Bolton exhibited a new set of animal slides ; Mr.
Elder some Dutch scenery ; Mr. Ferrero, landscape work ; and
Messrs. Grimshaw, Howson, Robertson, and Noel-Cox, pictures
of various kinds. An interesting set of Arctic subjects lent by
Messrs. Fry was also shown and described, and a variety of
slides by the Woodbury process.
During the evening, proofs of his recent pictures, “The
Haysel” and “ Breezy Marshland,” presented by Dr. Emerson
to the Club, were exhibited.
On Thursday, April 24th, there will be a discussion upon
Mr. Dallmeyer's paper read at the Conference ; the subject was
“The Treatment of Subjects by Focus.”
Hackney Photographic Society.
On Thursday last the ordinary meeting was held at Morley
Hall ; Mr. A. Dean presided.
After confirmation of the minutes, the Secretary drew the
members’ attention to the annual soiree to be held on the 24th,
and announced that the Society’s orchestra would play on that
occasion. Messrs. Cocks and Beurle were elected members,
and Mr E. H. Jones was nominated.
The Secretary handed round the Eclipso lantern carrier,
which Mr. Pringle hail so highly spoken of.
Mr. Gosling wanted to know what were the disadvantages of
a shutter going from side to side.
Mr. Spratt thought it would probably cause vibration, and
he showed Crouch’s detective camera, the spring of which was
taken from a clock. There was, however, no vibration in this.
Mr. J. Carpenter then read his papier on “ Lantern Slide
Making, ” and finally concluded by a demonstration. He generally
masked the margin of the plate, so that if there was any fog it
would show. His favourite lantern plate formula was the fol-
lowing : — Eikonogen, Joz. ; sulphite soda, ioz. ; bromide
potassium, 3 grains ; carbonate of potash, joz. ; making the
whole up to 10 ounces of boiling water. For use he diluted
1 part with 2 to 4 of water, fixing in two baths. Mr. Car-
penter secured a medal at the recent exhibition for this work.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 10th inst., Mr. A. L. Henderson
occupied the chair.
Mr. F. York exhibited a cover glass from a lantern slide
very much clouded, and read a letter he had received in
reference to some from Mr. Pancoast, of Waterbury, Conn.
At a recent meeting of the Photographic Society of Phila-
delphia, the subject of erosion on lantern slide cover glasses
was discussed at some length, and reported in the American
Journal of Photography, a copy of which Mr. York passed
round.
Mr. A. Edwards showed prints from negatives of the Oxford
and Cambridge boat race taken on isochromatic plates.
Mr. J. B. B. Wellington used this kind of plate on the
same occasion, and found them very quick.
A question was asked how to varnish celluloid film negatives.
The Chairman advised rubbing them over with bees-wax
dissolved in turpentine.
The Hon. Secretary recommended gold size and turpis, and
the films hung up by one corner to dry.
Mr. F. P. Cembrano exhibited a lantern slide of a “pellicule,”
showing sixteen pages of printed matter. During the siege of
Paris, attached to a pigeon's wing so as not to interfere with
its flight, these “ piellicules ” were used for the transit of infor-
mation from one place to another.
Mr. Davenport showed a lantern carrier, fitted in a perpen-
dicular position to the lantern ; the slides are pushed upwards,
the same action covering the lens during the changing of the
slides.
Mr. Edwards exhibited a lantern carrier he had constructed.
It consisted of a frame for holding two slides, which were set
at an obtuse angle. The frame worked backwards and for-
wards on a pivot fixed to the front of the lantern.
A collection of members’ slides was then projected on the
screen, the work of Messrs. H. M. Hastings, A. C. Pemberton,
.1. Atkinson, R. P. Drage, P. Kveritt, Teape, Edwards, T. E.
Freshwater, and F. P. Cembrano.
Leicester and Leicestershire Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held on April 15th, when two pro-
positions were received for ballot at next meeting.
The prints sent in for competition were placed on view, and
were considered the best the members have yet sent in. The
members who sent prints were Messrs. Bankart, Pierpoint,
Woodland, Leeder, Wilson, Joliflie, Porritt, Partridge, Cook,
and Squire.
A number of plioto-litho prints, sent by the Graphotono
Company, Enfield, was placed at the disjiosal of the members.
Newcastle-on-Tyne and Northern Counties Photographic
Association.
An exhibition of photographs, apparatus, and photo-mechanical
reproductive processes will be opened in the Central Exchange
Art Gallery in Newcastle. The Mayor of Newcastle will open
the Exhibition on Friday evening, after which a lecture, entitled
“ A Tour in Norway,” illustrated by means of the oxyhydrogen
lantern from slides taken by the lecturer, will lie given by
Mr. Paul Lange, the President of the Liverpool Amateur Photo-
graphic Association. Over 1,200 pictures will be on exhibi-
tion, apart from the section devoted to apparatus. The number
of exhibitors exceeds 1 00. To add to the attractive character
of the Exhibition, special vocal and instrumental concerts will
be held each Saturday, and on the other evenings illustrated
lectures by Messrs. W. Lang, of Glasgow, W. D. Welford, of
Birmingham, J. P. Gibson, of Hexham, and other persons,
besides interesting evenings with the oxyhydrogen lantern.
Dundee and East of Scotland Photographic Association.
April 8th. — General meeting ; Mr. J. D. Cox in the chair.
Excursions were arranged to take place on May 21st, The
Trossachs ; June 28th, Lochearnhead ; and the date of a third
was left open.
The President (Dr. J. K. Tulloch) read a paper entitled,
“Selecting a Lens” (seepage 295).
Specimens of “ Kallitype,” a new printing process, were on
exhibition, and a demonstration of the process was promised
to be given at the May meeting.
Croydon Camera Club.
A meeting was held at the head-quarters, Public Hall, on
April 11th, The President (Mr. H. Maclean, F.G.S.) in the
chair.
The subject for the evening was a demonstration of “ Platino-
type Printing ” by the Platinotype Company’s representative,
Mr. Smith, who gave the history of the platinotype process of
photographic printing, describing the action of the various
chemical substances used. He then developed a number of
prints which had been taken from members’ negatives by the
Platinotype Company, these being distributed among the
members. An interesting discussion followed.
Four new members were elected during the evening.
308
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [April 18, 1890.
Photographic Society of Ireland.
An ordinary meeting was held in the Rooms, 15, Dawson
Street, Dublin, on Friday the 11th inst., Mr. George Mans-
field, J.P., in the chair. After two new members had been
elected,
Prof. Stewart gave a lecture on “ The Stop and the
Optical Centre,” and illustrated his remarks by numerous
diagrams drawn upon the blackboard. In the course of
his lecture he said the optical centre of a lens had impor-
tant properties, and these properties, and how to find the
position of the optical centre, should be understood by every
photographer. In many cases the optical centre was outside the
lens, and this was an important item to remember. In
referring to spherical aberration, he said that all attempts to
grind lenses so as to get rid of spherical aberration had been
failures, but the use of a stop not only got rid of spherical
aberration, but it also cured the curvature of the field of view.
The stop also produced what was known as “ depth of focus.”
Depth of focus was not so much a property of the lens as a
property of the stop ; by using a small stop depth of focus
was obtained. Get the nearest object in a picture well focussed,
put in a small stop, and everything else must be in focus.
Another advantage of the stop was that it produced an
approximately uniform illumination all over the plate. An
ordinary lens was such that if it were used without a stop
it would give unequal illumination over the different parts of
the plate.
A discussion ensued in which the following members took
part, namely : the President, Messrs. L. Meldon, J. H.
Hargrave, J. H. Woodworth, and J. V. Robinson. A vote of
thanks was passed to Prof. Stuart for his interesting and
practical paper, after which Dr. J. Alfred Scott described what
he termed an instantaneous work formula, and explained how
it was possible for a photographer, by making a calculation,
taking the different factors governing instantaneous work into
account, to ascertain beforehand whether it would be possible
to get satisfactory results on any given day.
The meeting then became conversational, and praise of the
Society’s new dark room was freely expressed.
West London Photographic Society.
A technical meeting of this Society' was held at the Addison
Hall on the 1 7 th inst. ; the President, Mr. Charles Bilton,
occupied the chair for the first time since his recovery from
serious illness. There was a goodly attendance of members,
some of whom had brought with them various objects of inte-
rest.
Mr. Selby showed Rouch’s detective, which led to a discus-
sion upon hand-cameras in general. One member, who worked
with a Rouch, had found the lever would not always raise the
plate ; this defect, however, he had managed to set right.
Other speakers testified to the capabilities of the camera.
Mr. Winter kindly offered to allow members to test his
Giah camera. He considered that all instruments should be
practically tested before being issued to the public.
A discussion took place as to the comparative effect of printing
in platinum in the sun and in the shade, in which several
members took part.
Mr. Whiting showed a home-made view-finder, and advo-
cated the more general use of that instrument. Whenever he
went for a walk he put it in his pocket, so that if he came
across a pretty bit he looked through the finder and ascertained
how it would look as a picture, and if he thought it worth
taking, he visited the spo„ subsequently with a camera.
Dr. F. H. Low passed round some blue prints, some of which
had been toned by a process described in a recent almanack,
and the Secretary showed aristotype prints from negatives
taken by flash-light of wine vaults in the Minories.
Mr. Rickford exhibited negatives, some of which had been
intensified, and showed a number of prints from the same by a
variety of processes, illustrating the comparative results which
might be obtained.
The President then announced that the Secretary would
read a pajicr upon “ Lenses ” on the 25th April, and that the
Annual Smoking Concert would be held at the Richmond Hotel
on May 9 th.
to ©orrcgpontieMs*
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 6, Furnival
Sreet, London, E.C.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs Piper ii Carter, S, Furnival 8treet, London.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.8., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
A. W. (Brighton). — Axel Lagreliut’s Phototype Process. For
fuller particulars you should write to Herr Alhin Roosval,
Editor of the Fotogransk Tidskrift, Stockholm, who might
also be able to furnish specimens, by small payment, in addi-
tion to the one issued with the Journal.
A. M. M. — Specification of Copying Apparatus has been sent
on to you. We are always willing to undertake this small
service, the Patent Office being so near our head -quarters.
J. H. Ainley. — Zinc Photo- Block and Prints. We are sending
you a small block which has done duty in the News ; from
this you will see that yours is not etched deeply enough,
but we think you have scarcely done justice to your own
work, as the prints forwarded will show.
Mrs. Cherry. — Old Plates Illustrating Styles of Engraving.
After consulting several old works in the Patent Office
Library, “The History and Art of Engraving,” date 1747,
Senefelder, the Vicomte Henri Delaborde, Thomas Hodgson,
1820, and others, we found nothing answering the descrip-
tion of the two plates referred to in your letter. They may
be valuable, and we will take an early opportunity of making
further search in the Art Library, South Kensington.
Argent. — The Eikonogen Patent covers both the alpha and beta
naphthol compounds. See top of page 3 of the Specification,
where it is stated that the alpha naphthol developers require
more “sulphide,” misprint for sulphite of soda, to keep them
in solution.
R. S. — Plain Paper Prints. An excellent suggestion was
made by Mr. Valentine Blanchard, in 1868, to sensitize and
print on the wrong side of aibumenised paper. By this
scheme one finds already in commerce a paper which has
undergone the salting process, and the action of light is
aided by the presence of a small quantity of albumen which
soaks through, but not enough to glaze the prints.
I.. E. N. — Lime-Light Apparatus. Use coal-gas in place of
hydrogen, and rely upon getting your supply of oxygen from
one of Brin’s cylinders, to save the trouble of making it
for yourself. The lime balls or cylinders are best preserved
in closely fitting tin cases ; they shrink rather than expand
by use, in consequence of the fritting and crystallization of
the lime.
Collodion. — The Preparation of Enamel Collodion. Methy-
lated ether and alcohol will answer sufficiently well. Details
are given in Captain Abney’s “ Instruction in Photography,”
pp. 255 and 256, together with the following formula : —
Soluble guncotton ... ... ... 48 grains
Alcohol ... ... ... ... 4 ounces
Ether ... ... ... ... 4 ,,
M. E. T. — Celluloid Films. Although these undoubtedly con-
tain camphor as one of the ingredients of their composition,
there is no evidence of any prejudicial action being exerted
upon the sensitive emulsion with which they are coated.
R. E. — Blue- Black Ink for Transfers. If you find any
difficulty in procuring the Victoria green for mixing with
magenta to produce the blue-black ink, it is equally jjossible
to employ the common malachite green, which is cheaper
and answers quite as well. Forviolet ink, use 3 B. Hofmann
or extra methyl violet.
YV. Morgan. — Mr. \\'. T. YY’ilkinson’s “ Manual of Photo-
Engraving and 1 ’ho to- Lithography ” is not yet reprinted.
Apply to Messrs. England Brothers, 25, Charles Street,
Notting Hill, W.
Tyro. — Varnish for Gelatine Negatives. Messrs. Burton and
Pringle recommend orange shellac 1 i ounce ; methylated
spirit 1 pint. When dissolved add a tea-spoonful of
powdered chalk (whiting) ; shake up well, allow to subside,
and filter,
PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
\'I
<■ 07>
-t4»
Vox.. XXXTV. No. 16St.— ip-,7 25, 1890.
CONTENTS.
TACK
The Newcastle International Photographic Exhibition 309
Photography in Fiction 313
Detective Photography. By J. HanDyngton 313
Limitations in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus. By T. R.
Dallmeyer 311
Employers and Employed. By C. Brangwin Barnes 317
Notes 318
The Mathematical Calculation of Exposures. By Alfred
Watkins 319
The Latent Photographic Image. By C. II. Bothamley 320
PAO*
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 321
Botanical Photography. By Julius F. Sachse 322
Photo-Mechanical Printing 324
Correspondence 325
Patent Intelligence 325
Proceedings of Societies.— Camera Club— London and Pro-
vincial Photographic Association— Derby Photographic
Society — North Middlesex Photographic Club — Photo-
graphic Society of Japan 327
Answers to Correspondents 328
THE NEWCASTLE INTERNATIONAL PHOTO-
GRAPHIC EXHIBITION.
Last Friday night the Newcastle International Photo-
graphic Exhibition, which is held in the Central
Exchange AH Gallery, was opened by the Mayor of
Newcastle, Mr. Thomas Bell. The Exhibition will
remain open until Saturday, May 3rd.
In the Exhibition nearly a thousand photographs are
upon view, and most of them of excellent quality. As
at other good exhibitions, prints on albumenised paper
are far less numerous than would have been the case
some years ago, yet the proportion of warm-toned
photographs is large, the idea being somewhat pre-
valent that platinum prints are, in some instances, too
cold for artistic portraitur 3. Among the exhibits aie
prints of a pleasing brownish colour, obtained by
Blanchard’s platinum-toning method. Mr. Lafayette,
Mr. F. W. Edwards, Mr. J. P. Gibson, and others,
exhibit many of the photographs which they placed on
view at the recent Crystal Palace Photographic Exhi-
bition. Some fine specimens of artistic photography
produced by photo-mechanical processes are placed on
view by Messrs. Boussod, Valadon, & Co. (Goupil &
Co.), Messrs. Braun and Co., Dr. P. H. Emerson, Mr.
W. L. Colls, Messrs. A i then, Dott, & Son, and the
Autotype Co. Pictures by foreign exhibitors are not
numerous ; they come almost exclusively from Ameiica,
and astliey arehanging upon the same screen as a number
of Rejlander’s photographs, they are subjected to fierce
competition so far as attracting public attention is
concerned, but they are of excellent quality. One
photograph of a little girl drinking out of a large mug,
with her two little black eyes shining over the white
edge of the mug like beads, is specially noteworthy in
the American collection.
There are but three or four stalls devoted to apparatus
in the Exhibition, and they contain nothing particularly
special in the way of novelties. A little tin washing
trough for plates, invented by Mr. Tylar, is on view
in one of them ; it is remarkably simple in construc-
tion, and, when placed under running water from a
tap, is designed to tilt itself over, and empty itself of
water every now and then, resuming, meanwhile, its
normal position.
The Newcastle and Northern Counties Photographic
Association, which has opened the present Exhibition,
was founded in 1881, and has now about 1 10 members.
Its president is Mr. A. S. Stevenson, of Tynemouth,
who also took an active interest in the earliest New-
castle Photographic Society, founded a quarter of a
century ago. One of its vice-presidents is Mr. J. P.
Gibson, of Hexham, a skilled landscape photographer,
who has contributed much excellent work, including
some cloud studies, to the present Exhibition. The
other vice-president is Mr. H. R. Proctor, F.C.S., who
treats photography from a chemist’s point of view.
The secretary to the Association is Mr. Edgar G. Lee,
with whom, for the purposes of the Exhibition, Mr.
James Brown has been appointed adjoint secretary.
The Newcastle Photographic Association has seven
indoor and five outdoor meetings during the year, and
in the winter months it has three or four lantern
demonstrations, open to members and their friends, in
the Lecture Hall of the Newcastle Literary and Philo-
sophical Society. These lantern meetings are found
to be highly popular, and to contribute to the welfare
of the Association to a considerable extent. In New-
castle it is found that, as a general rule, professional
photographers tan afford to pay a higher annual
subscription for membership than can the amateurs,
consequently some time ago the annual fee for member-
ship was reduced to oue-half, to the increase of the
number of the last- mentioned class of workers.
Mr. A. S. Stevenson is a model president, who works
actively, and exerts himself to bring new members to
the Association. He is a veteran in our ranks, for in
1852 and 1853 he lectured on “ The New Art of Photo-
graphy ” in the hall of the Literary and Philosophical
Society at Newcastle. A preliminary meeting to form a
“ Northumberland and Durham Photographic Society ”
was held in the rooms of the Literary and Philosophical
Society of Newcastle-on-Tyne cn the 21st April, 1854.
310
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
Mr. Robert S. Newall was in the chair, and amongst
those present were W. B. Scott, Alex. S. Stevenson,
J. W. Swan, Geo. S. Brady, John Mawson, W. S.
Parry, Dr. Embleton, J. W. Swinburne, John Storey,
G. C. Warren, A. G. Gray, and J. Brown. At an
adjourned meeting Mr. Newall was elected President,
and Messrs. Stevenson and Brady, Secretaries, Mr.
Stevenson to act also as Treasurer. The Committee
consisted of J. W. Swinburne, W. B. Scott, A. G.
Gray, Jun., John Mawson, J. W. Swan, John Brown,
and W. S. Parry. At subsequent meetings various papers
were read ; one of them was by Mr. G. S. Brady, on
“ The Application of Photography to the Delineation
of Microscopic Objects”; Mr. J. W. Swan read a
paper on “ The Province of Photography ” ; and in
February, 1855, the Society held an exhibition of
photographs, in conjunction with a cotiversazione of
the Literary and Philosophic Society. From the
removal of members and other causes the Photographic
Society after a time ceased to exist.
Last Friday evening, before the formal opening of
the Exhibition, a dinner of the members of the Society
and their invited guests took place at the Moseley
Street Cafe, with the President of the Society, Mr.
A. S. Stevenson, in the chair. Upon his right was the
Mayor of Newcastle.
The Chairman read the following letter from an artist, Mr.
Arthur H. Marsh : —
“lam interested in photography for its own sake and for
the sake of art generally. I wish your exhibition every success.
My excuse for writing to you on this subject is that having
done a little in photography myself during the last four years,
I have become convinced that for the artist the ‘ detective ’ is
the camera of the future. I know to my cost the utter impos-
sibility of successfully catching groups of figures in the field
and on the seashore, boats, animals, &c. , that are constantly
moving, and many of which have disappeared altogether before
the operator emerges from under the focussing cloth. But a
‘ detective ’ camera does away with all this by being always in
focus beyond a given distance, and wasting no time in changing
slides, &c. When so many distinguished photographers are
gathered in the neighbourhood I think it would be interesting
and useful certainly to members of my profession if they w'ould
give the benefit of their experience, and tell them which is the
most serviceable instrument of this class for taking instan-
taneous studies out of doors. The American Kodak has one
great advantage in containing the means for taking so large a
a number of pictures. I need not say that for this purpose
the more inexpensive the camera the better.” [The letter was
handed to Mr. Lange for future consideration.]
The Mayor of Newcastle, in response to a toast from the
Chair, said that he had much pleasure in being their guest
that evening and as chief magistrate of the city he had
pleasure in offering the visitors a hearty welcome. The
Society had provided, he was told, an especially interesting
photographic exhibition for the people of Newcastle and its
vicinity, an exhibition which the judges had told him to be of
a high order. He had not yet seen it himself, but was informed
that it was one worthy the position which Newcastle enjoyed
in this country. He was pleased to hear that representatives
of the art of photography were there from the whole country ;
some of them, indeed, had travelled long distances to be
present. Some of the photographs also had come from foreign
countries, and the pictures sent from America were among the
best the art could produce, so he felt sure that the Newcastle
Photographic Exhibition would have all the success it merited.
Newcastle, indeed, always rose equal to the occasion. Exhibi-
tions of late years, now that art and science are making such
great strides in all directions, have become almost a national
necessity, and he hoped that the present one in Newcastle would
prove satisfactory to its promoters and friends. He had much
pleasure in proposing the health of the judges of the pictures
at the exhibition, Messrs. Paul Lange, William Lang, junr.,
and John W. Wade, who had come long distances to give the
benefit of their ability and experience.
Mr. Paul Lange said that when he came to Newcastle he was
not prepared to see all that he had seen, and he thought that
the Exhibition which would be opened that evening was one of
which Newcastle might well be proud. They had, in the
midst of them at Newcastle, workers in the photographic art
such as were equalled at very few places in the United Kingdom.
Among the professional members of the Society were some of
great ability. Such workers tended to raise photography, and
photography had a great future as an art ; he believed that it
would become capable of producing results which would equal
the work of any painter who ever lived. The pursuit of photo-
graphy had an elevating power, and the fathers of families
could have no better desire than for their sons to pick up
photography, not necessarily merely as a hobby, for photography
will become an art some day, and it always improves the mind
of the worker, and his appreciation of the beautiful. None
could portray the beauties of nature without Iseing influenced
for good. Every father who has a son who picks up photo-
graphy should encourage him to live up to it. He considered
photography to be still in its infancy, and that in Newcastle
that evening they would show by their Exhibition that of late
years it had much advanced. Their mayor had been good
enough to undertake to open the Exhibition, and that would
give it prestige. The Society was also greatly indebted to the
actual workers in the undertaking, to the general executive,
to the two secretaries, and to Mr. Gibson (vice-president), who
all deserved to receive gold medals. The only dilemma the
judges were in was that of so distributing the awards as to
please everybody. He did not believe that such judges ever
existed ; but they had tried their utmost ; as far as was in
their power they had gone by merit only, and their decisions
had been unanimous.
Mr. J. P. Gibson, in responding to the toast of the execu-
tive, spoke highly of the work done by the two secretaries, Mr.
Lee and Mr. Brown, and their energy in getting the catalogue
out in time for the opening of the Exhibition.
The Chairman then proposed “ The Press,” coupled with the
names of Messrs. Harrison, Hastings, and Wei ford, who
briefly responded ; after which Mr. William Lang proposed the
health of the President of the Newcastle and Northern
Counties Photographic Association.
Mr. Stevenson, in response, said that few things would give
more pleasure in life than the practice of the art they followed.
There was no art, no employment, which tended more to elevate
the character or give healthy employment than photography,
which combined science and art in a way no other employ-
ment did, and it always gave him the greatest pleasure to
meet photographers. In them he found men of intelligence —
men who had an eye to the beauties of nature, men who
saw with the inner eye where the beauties of nature lay, and
had the great pleasure of revealing them to their fellows. Art
and photography were immediately allied. He did not go so
far as to think that photography would ultimately annihilate
the work of the artist. He believed that it would aid him in
many ways, but would never come up to the transfiguration of
the beauties of nature which artists could depict. They had
been asked there to meet the judges and show kindly apprecia-
tion of the work they had done.
Mr. H. K. Proctor gave the health of the Mayor, a toast
which was received with cheers, after which Mr. Lange called
for “ one cheer more for all the little Mayors.”
The Chairman : “ Well, there’s something in that, for three
of them are photographers.”
The Mayor stated that they had started with the intention
of having but two toasts, and now they were quadrupling
them. (The Chairman: “The mair’ the merrier!”) lie
thanked them, and said that he was extremely pleased to be
with them .all that evening, especially iu connection with pho-
tography, a subject which had taken hold of the minds of the
April 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
311
people to a considerable extent of late years, so that nobody now-
cares to go meandering in the country w ithout taking his camera
with him. In this way photography added a new charm and
interest to life.
The company then adjourned to the Exhibition, and
the following speeches, which we quote from The New-
castle Chronicle , were made : —
The Mayor said that photography interested us and made our
lives much more pleasant than they would otherwise be. In
opening that exhibition, he felt that he was engaged in a very
important work. Their friends, Messrs Barkas and Son, gave
them a great many interesting entertainments, but they never
provided anything so engaging and at the same time so inte-
resting and important as that exhibition was. It was not of
local interest only ; it was of national importance. He under-
stood from the judges, whose acquaintance he had made that
night, that it was a collection which compared favourably with,
and almost surpassed in quality, any exhibition that they had
had an opportunity of witnessing during some years past. The
photographic press in London was also represented there. All
of them who were in the habit of travelling — whether as
tourists, pedestrians, as cyclists, or in any other capacity —
must find that their little tours were much enhanced if they
could carry with them a camera, and bring back with them
pictures of the places they had visited. It was an inexpen-
sive art, an art that was easily acquired, and it was an art that
carried with it a great deal of interest. It had entered into
our every-day life to a most remarkable extent. It had enabled
us to form a most intimate acquaintance with almost all peoples
and all countries. They seemed to know intimately the
Kmperor of China, or the Emperor of Russia, or Prince
Bismarck, or Mr. Gladstone — just as well as they would recog-
nise their friend the Sheriff of Newcastle. And if they cared
to collect landscapes drawn from the centre of America or the
centre of Africa, they' had no difficulty in doing so. Pho-
tography was an art which had made enormous progress during
the last twenty or thirty years. It was an art which was
resorted to by the architect, the artist, and the engineer ; and,
in fact, in pure science it had become almost invaluable. The
astronomer, by' the aid of photography', had been able to map
the stars. They only w'auted now to be able to reproduce
colours. He had very great pleasure in declaring the exhibi-
tion open, and in doing so he desired to mention that the
arranging of the Exhibition hail been largely carried out by the
secretaries, Messrs. Lee and Brown, aided by Mr. Gibson. He
thought that, on behalf of the committee and on behalf of the
visitors, thanks were due to those gentlemen. He concluded
by proposing a vote of thanks to the judges.
The Sheriff seconded the motion, which was carried.
Mr. Paul Lange, in responding on behalf of the judges, said
that in coming to Newcastle they did not quite expect to see
such a treat in the way of an exhibition as they had seen and
judged that day. He thought that the Newcastle people ought
to be proud of the works that had been produced amongst
them. They had among them a contingent of photographic
artists such as very few societies in this kingdom could boast
of. As president of the Liverpool Society — a purely amateur
society — he would be proud if they had there such talent ;
and he hoped that this cultivated and elevating hobby, as
they called it, amongst amateurs, would take root amongst
more of them. They saw around them pictures which very
few towns could show, anl he hoped that the people of New-
castle would appreciate the efforts of their townsmen. He
wished every success to the Newcastle Exhibition.
Mr. Paul Lange then delivered a lecture on “A Tour in
Norway,” illustrated by over 130 slides.
The following arc the awards of the judges : —
Classes (A to Q) open to Professionals and Amateurs.
The gold medal for the best three pictures in the ex-
hibition is awarded to J. Lafayette, of Dublin. The
following were the prize-taking pictures out of twenty-
three exhibits by this contributor : — Portrait of Mrs.
Langtry (211), portrait of Miss Moody (213), portrait of
a lady and child (215). Mr. Lafayette thus secures the
highest award of the exhibition. The gold medal is
awarded by the Association for the best three pictures
irrespective of class. The silver medal, together with a
bronze medal, is presented by Mr. J. P. Gibson, of Hex-
ham, for a series of three portraits. The winner of the
bronze medal is Mr. W. J. Byrne, Richmond, Surrey, with
No. 177 — three portraits “ direct and untouched”; 179,
six “At Home” panels representing the present Emperor
of Germany at Osborne ; and 180, ten “ At Home ” panels
representing various people, taken by daylight at the
sitters’ residences.
The follov'ing is a list of prizewinners according to
classification, excepting, of course, class D, which has been
dealt with in the preceding paragraph : —
Class A. — landscape (above whole-plate). Silver
medal — Green Brothers, Grasmere. Nos. 44, 45, 46.
Yiewsof Stybarrow Crag, Ullcswater; BleaTarn, Langdale;
and Derwent water and Skiddaw from above Lodore.
Bronze medal — Mr. >1. P. Gibson, Ilexham, for “The
Thaw”(18), “Autumn Haze” (21), and “September” (22).
Class B. — Landscape (whole-plate and under). Silver
medal — Mr. J. P. Gibson, Hexham, for three out of a very
remarkable exhibit of forty-seven frames, viz., “ Out for a
Holiday” (65), “The Banks of Tyne” (70), and “A
December Morning” (77). Bronze medal— J. E. Austin,
West Court, Detling, Maidstone, for “ The Last of the
Ebb” (120), “ Listening to the Bells” (121), and “ By the
Tow Path ” (122). Extra bronze medal — J. G. Bullock,
with “Moosehead Lake, from Kinco” (132), “On the
Wawasett” (133), aud “Birch Trees at Kinco” (134).
Medals presented by Mr. Auty, Tynemouth.
Class C. —Silver medal (for best landscape printed on
gelatino-bromide paper, direct or enlarged — both original,
negative and print to be the work of the exhibitor) pre-
sented by J. B. Payne, Newcastle — awarded to Messrs.
Auty and lluddock, Tynemouth, for view on the
Irthing (175).
Class E. — Best portrait printed on gelatino-bromide
paper, direct or enlarged. Silver medal presented by
J. Wilson Swan, M.A., Newcastle — awarded to Messrs.
Auty & Ruddock, Tynemouth, for “ Miss Maudlin" (284).
Class F. — Architecture, interior or exterior. Silver
medal (for series of three) — Richard Keene, All Saints’,
Derby, for frame of six interiors of Derbyshire churches
(318). Bronze medal — W. Parry, South Shields, studies
of St. George’s, Jesmond (Nos. 329, 330, 331).
Class G. — Series of three instantaneous pictures. In
this class a silver and a bronze medal were offered, but the
judges award a silver medal each to W. Parry, of Shields,
and Lyd. Sawyer, Newcastle, whose winning exhibits are
considered equal. Mr. Parry’s pictures are numbered
358, 359, and 860; Mr. Sawyer's, 370, 372, and 376.
Class IF. — Genre. An extra silver and an extra bronze
medal are awarded in this class. Silver medal awarded
to F. Whaley, Doncaster, for “Your Turn Next, Sir!”
(389). Extra silver medal — It. S. ltedfield, Philadelphia,
II. S. A., for “ Victuals and Drink ” (463). Bronze medal
— W. W. Winter, Derby, for “Does Granny like
Butter” (418). Extra bronze medal — F. M. Sutcliffe,
Whitby, for “Excitement” (381).
Class J. — For best enlargement (any subject except
portrait). Silver medal — T. G. Whaite, Carlisle, for a
view of Dinant Cathedral and Market Place (500).
Bronze medal — Green Brothers, Grasmere, for “ Yr Tryfan
aud Llyn Ogwen, North Wales ” (489),
312
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
Class K. — Cattle studies. Silver medal — J. E. Austin,
Detling, Maidstone, for “ Cooling Waters.” Bronze
medal — Ralph W. Robinson, lledhiU, Surrey, for “ Sus-
picions ” (512).
Class L. — A genre competition for the best study
illustrating verse 17, Canto I., of Scott's “Lady of the
Lake.” There were only three entries, and the judges
made no award.
Class ^f. — Best enlargement upon Ilford bromide paper.
Cold and silver medals presented by the Britannia Works
Company. Gold medal — W. W. Fry, Tynemouth, for
view of Cullercoats Bay (539). Silver medal — 11. Dudley
Arnott, Gorleston, Great Yarmouth, for “ Main Entrance,
Somerleyton Hall" (538).
Class M.M. — Best series of three prints on Alpha paper.
Gold and silver medals presented by the Britannia Works
Company. Gold medal — F. W. Edwards, Beckham Rye,
London, for five bas-reliefs after G. Tinworth, the well-
known sculptor, and a reproduction of an old engraving,
‘ ‘ Hector Rebuking Paris ” (554, 555, 558). Silver medal
— J. E. Austin, Detling, Maidstone, for “Rest and
Refreshment ” (550), “ Waiting her Turn ” (551), and
“ Early Spring ” (552).
Lantern Slide Section.
Class N. — Landscape, best series of six. Silver medal
— R. S. Redfield, Philadelphia, U.S.A., for No. 663.
Bronze medal — G. W. Wilson and Co., Aberdeen, for
No. 669.
Class 0. — Series of six instantaneous slides. Silver
medal — Henry Little, Twickenham, London, for No.
681. Bronze medal — W. Parry, South Shields, for No.
683.
Class P. — Series of six architectural slides. Silver
medal — G. W. Wilson and Co., Aberdeen, for No. 696.
Bronze medal — Jas. A. Sinclair, Bootle, Liverpool, for
No. 694.
Class Q. — Best six slides on the Mawson lantern plates.
Gold and silver medals presented by Messrs. Mawson and
Swan. Gold medal — -J. E. Austin, Detling, Maidstone,
for No. 700. Silver medal— W. Parry, South Shields, for
No. 710. Extra silver medal— Edgar G. Lee, Cullercoats,
for No. 708.
Class U. — Stereoscopic slides on glass. Silver and
bronze medals presented by J. Iledley Robinson, Tyne-
mouth. Silver medal — II. G. Ridgway, Sunderland.
Bronze medal — F. Howard, Wallingford, Berks.
Classes Open to Amateurs Oulu.
Class II. — Series of three landscapes, half-plate or under.
Silver and bronze medals presented by Mr. Alex. S.
Stevenson, J.P., Tynemouth. Silver medal — C. Court
Cole, Folley Bridge, Oxford. Bronze medal — J. W. Evans,
Wolverhampton.
Class S. — Series of three architectural studies, interior
or exterior, half-plate or under. Silver medal— C. R.
Pancoast, Waterbury, Conn., U.S.A. Bronze medal —
Ernest Beck, Sheffield.
Class T. — Three instantaneous pictures, half-plate or
under. Silver medal — Ernest Beck, Sheffield. Bronze
medal — Martin J. Harding, Shrewsbury.
Class V. — For best landscape by an amateur member
of the Association. Silver medal — James Brown, New-
casth-on-Tyne. Bronze medal — Geo. Proud, Newcastle-
on-Tyne.
The judges were Messrs. Paul Gauge, William Lang,
Jnr., and John W. Wade.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FICTION.
In a holograph letter preserved among the Cotton MSS. in
the British Museum, written by Henry VIII. to his “owne
good Cardinall Wolsey,” the king, after thanking him for
his many services, beseeches him to “ take some pastime
and comfort, to the intent you may the longer endure to
serve us, for .always pain cannot be endured.” This
somewhat selfish application of the old proverb, “ All
work and no play makes Jack a dull boy,” might also be
used by the general public to the pains-taking photo-
grapher, toiling continually in optical and chemical
research. This good, general public — “ the many-headed
beast,” as it has been called by poets without sufficient
respect — may be conceived as addressing the photographer
thus: “ Do you also take some pastime and comfort in
your scientific labours, to the intent you may the longer
endure to take our portraits !” And such photographers as
will not be moved far away from their camera and their
chemicals may, it is hoped, find a pastime and comfort of
kin to their photographic pains in the present paper.
A certain Octavius Winslow, D.D., the author of many
pious homilies, printed, many years ago, a sermon on
“ The Coming of our Lord, the Hope and Consolation of
the Bereaved.” In this sermon, in the course of what he
calls a cursory reply to the interesting but obscure ques-
tion whether mutual recognition will form part of the
rapture of the glorified saints in heaven, he tells us that
no being and no transaction will be forgotten, and that a
remarkable discovery, said to have been made recently in the
anatomy of the eye, supplies a striking illustration of this
thought. “It has been discovered,” says Dr. OctaviusWin-
slo w, “ that the last image formed upon the retina of the eye of
adying person remains impressed upon it asonaDaguerrean
plate.” Thus, if the last object seen by a murdered per-
son was his murderer, the portrait drawn upon the eye
will remain a fearful witness in death to detect the guilty
and lead to his conviction. “ If,” says the Reverend
Octavius, “ such be the ineffaceable, indestructible im-
pressions of last objects upon the eye, how much more
ineffaceable, unalterable, and indestructible must he the
impressions of the mind.” The fervour of the ecclesiastic
may excuse in the above extraordinary sentence the faults of
the logician.
More than one fiction lias been founded on this
“ remarkable discovery ” in the auatomy of the eye.
Some thirty years ago an extraordinary tale, depend-
ing for its chief interest on a photographic experi-
ment, appeared in a periodical of the period. It is
a tale of two lovers, with whom all proceeds smoothly
for a time. The parents are favourable to the marriage,
and no obstacle arises to oppose their wishes, until un-
fortunately the expectant bride is one day found strangled
in a wood. The lover for a year or more before the
murder has taken a great interest in photography, and
while contemplating the corpse of his mistress an idea —
for perfect love, we are told, excludes every other feeling —
occurs to him that a photograph of the retina of the
eye might be magnified so as to present a distinct image
of the last object depicted upon it. Lpon this idea he
engages a surgeon to remove one of the eyes of his late
beloved from its socket — for perfect love excludes every
other feeling. Having taken a number of negatives
this eye on glass, it is restored to its proper place. By a
judicious combination of lenses, and by very slow degrees,
he finally obtains an enlarged representation of the
April 25, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
313
features of the murderer. The rest of the tale, which is
a long one, is made up with a recital of his adventures
in a single-handed search for the assassin — under the
guiding light of his photographic polar star — through
Paris, Baden, Berlin, Vienna, and other places till he
arrives at Venice, where he at last discovers the object
of his inquiries by a chance encounter at a ball. The
murderer turns out to be the brother of his late be-
trothed, who has assassinated her with a Venetian dagger
for the sake of her money, and is at the time of his
detection married to the amateur photographer's sister.
This introduces a complication. The sister, on hearing
of her husband's delinquencies, becomes insane, the
criminal is suffered to escape, and the author thus con-
cludes his story: “ I have no hesitation whatever in saying
that in all cases where death occurs in broad daylight,
and especially when it is caused by similar means, the
last object on which the eye rests will be found depicted
on the retina after death, and from darkness may be
brought into light.”
In all fictions of this class, and they are many, the
delusion is what Bacon would call an idol of the market.
People not accustomed to inquire with the ancient Bereans
whether these things are so, not uncommonly suppose that
impressions on the retina of the human eye are permanent,
or that final impressions are so, or, at least, that final
impressions endure some considerable time. And so, as
in the tale, we read of reports of the capture of murderers
through their likenesses being left in the eye of their
victims, and afterwards transferred to paper by an ordinary
photographic process, which gives a sort of carte-de-visite,
showing not only the threatening aspect of the assassin,
but also his form and clothes, together with pistol, knife,
dagger, or other lethal weapon which he has employed.
Now, a little consideration would soon expose the fallacy
of this conception. A person entering a room having a
plane mirror opposite the door of entrance is, of course,
reflected therein, but with that person’s disappearance
the reflection also immediately disappears. If it were
possible to photograph from the looking glass the reflec-
tion of that person after he has left the room, then, indeed,
it might be a rational undertaking to attempt to photo-
graph the impression supposed to be left on the retina of
the dead. It may be true that the image on the retina
does not subside and vanish for the fraction of a second,
but that factdoes not altogether justify the doctrine of the
country magistrate who, when consulted as to the advisa-
bility of calling in the aid of the camera for the detection
of a culprit, sagely observed that such a proceeding would
be useless, as the man was already four days murdered,
and the picture on the cornea of the eye vanished, as
scientific men were well aware, after a period of forty-
eight hours. The author of the tale already quoted asserts
that the duration of the image is affected by the con-
dition of the humours contained in the eye, and that when
death is caused by strangulation, the eye becomes charged
with a viscous secretion, whicli is not withdrawn, but
coagulates and hardens, so to speak, as vitality is expelled,
and so the Last image impressed on it is retained precisely
as the picture is retained on the photograph which the light
has printed on it with the most delicate gradations of tone.
(To be continued.)
Photographic Society ok Great Britain. — A technical
meeting will lie held on April 29 th, at 8 p.m., at 5a, Pall
Mall hast, when the subject of “Celluloid Films” will be
brought forward.
DETECTIVE PHOTOGRAPHY.
BY J. C. HANNYNGTON, MADRAS.
To detect or identify the lad who purloins your fruit
whilst you are absent at morning service, is simple work.
The camera, in some unobtrusive form, is concealed in
a position which commands the approach to the forbidden
fruit ; the shutter (a simple drop) is kept fixed for action
by a wedge, which wedge is attached to a hair line (a
single thread of woman’s hair will suffice) which is
stretched across the path along which the approach to
the tree must be made.
As the thief walks along the path he touches the line,
the shutter is released, and the exposure made. When
it is desired, however, to secure a photograph of any per-
son or animal which may pass along a given path by night
in the dark, the procedure is more complicated.
The camera commanding the approach must be placed
as above described. If it is certain from which direction
the approach will take place, one camera will suffice ; but
if the direction of approach is uncertain, two cameras
may be necessary to secure a front view of the subject.
It will be necessary to secure the picture by a flash-
light, and the conditions required are that the lens shall
be uncapped at the moment the flash takes place, and at
the moment the subject reaches a given point within the
range and focus of the lens. It will not do to leave the
lens open all night, lest it should be frosted by dew or
exposed to the morning light.
It is easy to arrange a line and trigger on any path,
so that any creature passing along the path will pull or
release the trigger, and the trigger may be made to fire
a gun, explode a mine, or fire a flash light of any kind.
The following method is simple and effective, and may
be varied according to the ingenuity of the operator. On
the top of a camera, K, or preferably detached from it. is
fixed a rod of wood, A B, with a pivot at B, upon which
a lever DC carrying the lens cap at C, swings easily.
The lever CD is of metal, and is placed in electric com-
munication with one pole of a battery, II, by the wire E.
The wooden rod, A B, carries at the end, A, a metal point
or bar which is in electric communication with the other
pole of the battery through the wire AE’. When the
lever, CD, is depressed so that the metal thereof at D
314
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
touches the point or bar A, the circuit of the battery is
completed, and a fine platinum wire at any interval, F, in
the wires EE', will be made red hot.
There may be any number of intervals, F, each being
constructed of fine platinum wire, and, if the battery be
of sufficient intensity, the wires at all the intervals will be
simultaneously and instantly heated. The lever, CD, is
so arranged that when in its normal position the weight of
the cap C will keep the c.ap C' entirely over the lens of
the camera, and so completely exclude all light or damp
from the lens. GG' represents a line of hair, cord, or
wire, having at the end G' a loop which passes over the
lever, CD.
If the line, GG', is pulled back, it depresses the end D
of the lever CD, and raises the cap, C, until the lens is
wholly uncovered, and finally the end of the lever DC
will come in contact with the point A, the electric circuit
will be completed, and the wires at the intervals, F, will
be heated. The line, GG', is extended round trees, or in
any conveniet manner, until it crosses the route by which
the subject to be photographed will pass, and is then made
just taut, and fastened securely.
It is clear that any person or animal passing along the
route and coming in contact with the line, must stretch
the line so that the loop G' must go back, carrying with it
the lever, CD, until the electric contact is made.
Immediately subsequent to this, the loop, G’, is carried
over the end, D, of the lever, and the cap, C, swings back
by gravity, and re-covers the lens securely. At the
intervals, F, are placed, on the platinum wires, charges of
gun-cotton and magnesium powder, or any other form of
flash-light which may be preferred, and, as these charges
are fired whilst the lens is fully uncapped, a photograph
can be taken. The height of the line should be adapted
to the subject, the height of a man’s knee being most
generally useful. The charges and intervals should be so
arranged that the light of the flashes, whilst fully
illuminating the subject, do not strike on to the lens of
the camera. The system of laying the detector line is
merely a modification of the method of setting alarm guns,
in every-day use for poachers.
In practice, it will be found necessary to pass the line,
G G', through a loop somewhat below the level of the
wooden bar, All, as otherwise the lever CD will not
be sufficiently depressed.
Oldham Photographic Society. — The hon. secretary for-
wards us a list of outdooi meetings for the coming season.
One page of the programme contains tfie photographs of the
officers of the Society by the Vice-President, Mr. W. Thompson,
which are very good.
The Photophane Printing and Publishing Company
send us a prospectus from which it appears that the company
has been formed to take over and further develop the business
now carried on by Mr. Andrew D. Edward and others, together
with the photographic business and plant of Mr. F. W.
Edwards, of Peckham Rye, the president of the East Dulwich
Photographic Society, and the recipient of twelve medals at
photographic exhibitions, the last being a gold one awarded him
at the present Newcastle Exhibition. Photophane is described
in the prospectus as a “ process for mechanically printing photo-
graphic negatives, and is briefly thus described : — “ A negative
being taken in the ordinary way, instead of being printed by
the action of light on sensitized paper — every copy taking
hours to print, and eventually fading by the inlluence of the
same power which printed it— is printed on a sensitized, i.c., a
photophane, plate. The plate is then placed on a machine, and
copies printed off at the average speed of about one thousand
per day. ”
LIMITATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS
BY FOCUS.*
BY T. It. DALLMEYEB.
There are only five treatments of the subject by focus
possible : — First, the pinhole ; second, sharp photographs
throughout ; third, contrasted definition between different
planes with an aplanatic lens ; fourth, the introduction of
positive spherical aberration ; and fifth, the introduction
of negative spherical aberration. The last I do not
intend to speak of, as it is of course the converse of the
fourth, but is a treatment that is hardly ever required in
practice.
First, the pinhole. I have spoken of the imaginary
pinhole for mathematical accuracy, and the practical
pinhole is an instrument that coarsely imitates it, every
mathematical point in the object being represented by a
cone of rays limited by the aperture of the pinhole itself,
and the distance of the sensitive film from the pinhole, the
pencils being represented by a series of small circles,
becoming greater in diameter the greater the obliquity, or
the more the angle of subject included. Theoretically,
the foreground is exaggerated in size in true drawing, and
the distance dwarfed and better defined ; but the pencils
are so small that one would not appreciate it. The
general effect is one of uniform softness through all planes ;
it is seldom art, for the unaided eye cannot receive the
same impression.
Second, sharp photographs throughout. It is well
known that if the nearest object in a picture to be taken is
sufficiently distant that the rays coming from it to the lens
may be considered practically parallel, all planes more
distant will be sharp ; or there is for every lens a plane
at some distance distant, beyond which everything may
be considered as topographically sharp. The nearer
this plane is desired to be for a given lens, the more it
must be stopped down, or the less does its intensity
become ; if this is so arranged that at the normal distance
of vision the out-of-focus circles of indistinctness through-
out the picture do not exceed one-hundredth or less part
of an inch, or the circles subtend an angle of less than
two minutes of a degree at whatever distance the picture
be viewed, such a picture, to all intents and purposes, is
a truthful record in drawing, granting that the angle
included be no more than the eye is capable of taking in ;
or, on the other hand, that it be viewed at a distance of
the focus of the lens itself.
This rigid exactitude, and the brilliant results obtained,
are pleasing and popular mementoes, but can hardly be
termed art. It is the simplest form of all photography, for
the instrument gives an exact copy of what is placed in
front of it, and no personal judgment is wanted to
produce any truthful effect, such as the scene in reality
conveyed to the brain by the eye itself. I will dwell on
this later, and prove the contention.
Under the same heading as universal sharpness naturally
comes the uniform out of best focus treatment with the
aplanatic lens. This effect is easily produced by the
instrument under conditions precisely the same as those
just mentioned, and then to slightly wheel out the camera
back. The evil in such a case to be guarded against is
that this process should not include a foreground nearer
than the first plane to be depicted, or it will have a better
focus, and probably attract undue attention. The distance
at which the picture is eventually to be viewed will, of
* Continued from page 605.
April 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
315
necessity, have a great influence on the amount of out-of"
focus effect allowable. It is a parallel with the pinhole
and (in one way) the uniform sharp treatment, and I
therefore place ii under the same category, pro tem. The
process tends from original definiteness to pass uniformly
to indefiniteness and weakness, from structure to destruc-
tion of structure. The points in the object, instead of
being concentrated to points in the image, have passed
their best focus, and are diffused into uniformly illuminated
circles of a weaker character. It may be said to give a
uniformly broader treatment of a subject, but as it rests
somewhere between perfect concentration and brilliancy,
and destruction of structure and consequent weakness, it
must tend, as a process, to uniformly weaken. It is defined
and determined by the size of the out-of-focus circle of
uniform indistinctness chosen, or ascribed to the pencil,
after having passed the plane of best definition.
Third, contrasted definition with an aplanatic lens.
That this may occur in any photograph, the lens employed
must be of such a focus and intensity (or ratio of aperture
to focus) that the plane in the object that is most favoured
by definition is so situated that planes nearer to or further
from it have conjugate planes distinctly and appreciably
different from that on which the chosen plane is received
by the plane of the plate.
As the plate is a fixture, points in these out-of-focus
planes will be represented by circles of indistinctness,
varying in size according to their distances from the chosen
plane of finest definition.
It follows then that, strictly speaking, for mathematical
measurement on the one plane of the plate, the drawing is
untrue as regards the out-of-focus planes, and increases
in this inexactitude, and, in weakness, the more they arc
removed from the plane of chief interest. I refer you to
the first seven plates as showing the tendencies, but it
must be borne in mind that equal movements of the
camera back inside the focus lose definition more rapidly
for the foreground than the same distances outward would
affect the background.
Under this heading I also include contrast in definition
when the chief feature of interest is not at the best focus
given by the lens, or when this feature is once focussed
for as best, the camera back is slightly wheeled out, as in
the second part of the previous head. This treatment
requires very careful .adjustment and choice of subject, for
if any portion of the picture intervene between the subject
of chief interest and the camera, it must be better defined
than that intended to be of chief interest, and detract
from its value as a work of art by diverting the attention
to objects practically out of the picture.
The difficulties of adjustment between the limits of out-
of -focus effect, so as to subdue certain unimportant planes
without carrying the tendency to destruction of structure
too far, has made this process capable of engaging the skill
and judgment of the artist to a much greater extent than
the more limited methods previously described. This
treatment is undoubtedly far truer in its rendering of what
the eye actually sees, if the treatment of the limiting out-
of-focus planes is not carried to a too extravagant degree.
For truth, as the eye sees, the palm rests with this treatment,
or with —
Fourth, the introduction of spherical aberration. Here
the individuality of the treatment by the instrument is
again different. As stated before, slightly beyond the
least circle of aberration a focus, still more or less definite
but softened, is formed by the inward concentration of the
image-forming rays more pronounced and powerful than
the weaker marginal rays. The latter, not coming to the
same focus, produces a faint halo that tends to soften the
image, but still structure is maintained here. This halo
becomes more and more pronounced the greater the
amount of spherical aberration introduced ; but, at the
same time, the greater become the limits between the
planes (or the measure of longitudinal aberration) through
which the plate can be moved still consistent with partial
definition maintaining the structure of the image. But as
there is an inward tendency on the further side of the
least circle of aberration when positive spherical aberration
is present, there is also an outward concentration of rays
on the nearer side, tending toward a more rapid destruc-
tion of the image than is the case with an aplanatic lens.
However, this detriment is not an important factor : first,
because the best focus with a lens in which spherical
aberration is outstanding is beyond the least circle of
aberration, the definition at the least circle of aberration
itself comparing very favourably with an out-of-focus
circle of the same transversal measurement by an aplanatic
lens; and secondly, this outward concentration corres-
ponds in the image to foreground, or to objects nearer
than that of chief interest, and this, as a rule, is a negligible
quantity compared with the better maintenance of structure
ia the background or receding planes. By spherical
aberration, then, there certainly is depth of definition, and
in portraiture no artist denies the advantages of the result-
ing softness, and blending into background as compared
to the contrasted definition by an aplanatic lens through
such small limiting planes ; the eye certainly never saw
such contrasts in a single figure as the aplanatic lens of
great intensity and long focus gives in a parallel case.
We have now discussed the various treatments possi-
ble, and it now remains to select that or those that most
nearly represent what the eye sees.
I have several times come across the expression that to
produce an artistic photograph we have not to consider
only what the eye can see so much as what we wish it to
see. This is undoubtedly true, but I am not content that
the question of the scientific bearing of vision on this sub-
ject should be waived. I have not read up all the focus
controversies, but propose to discuss and analyse a few
vital points in the most recent contribution on the subject
to the Camera Club by Mr. Burton. 1. One of the tenets
of the naturalistic school is that no part of a photographic
picture should be as sharp as modern photographic lenses
(aplanatic) are capable of making it. Mr. Burton con-
tends that the eye can define equally as well as such a
photographic lens when focussed as sharply as possible,
and says were this not the case the eye would be equally
incapable of defining the reproduction. This is an un-
doubted error. The use of small stops in aplanatic lenses,
even for one plane alone, certainly gives a definition far
finer than the eye ever can reach, cp., the reproduction of
print in a photograph beyond the distance of distinct vision
(explanation on blackboard). “Mr. Burton says the
oft-repeated statement that the eye, having certain opti-
cal defects, does not define as well as a photographic lens,
is a thing simply not true, and recently disproved. ” He
does not quote his authority, but Helmholtz distinctly
contradicts this in facetious and no measured terms. To
make the comparison above referred to fair, both object
and the photographic image must be viewed under the
same angle. The conclusion 1 have come to in cases of
normal good vision is, that the image can be seen much
316
TI1E PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 23, 1890.
sharper than the object would appear to the most perfect
eye. 2. Mr. Burton says that another tenet of the natu-
ralistic school is that only the principal object, or the ob-
ject of greatest interest, should be nearly as sharp as the
lens can make it, and contends that “if an attempt be
made to support it on scientific grounds, that attempt
must of necessity fail, for there is no optical defence for
it.”
This is another error. It can be proved by trying
artificial means to make the eye see what the lens can see.
The same process must be applied to both eye and lens to
place them on an equality in this respect : — Stop them
down ! The eye unaided has a continually varying focus
that adjusts itself to plane after plane as occasion may
require. By giving it a so-called fixed focus, the same
effect of sharpness through all planes is arrived at as with
the stopped-down photographic lens. To prove this to
oneself, look through a pinhole close to the eye — a pretty
large pinhole will do— and hold some object quite near the
eye, with a distant distinct background, and look at the
near object. The background and intermediate planes
will be equally well defined. Now remove the artificial
iris, and the near object alone is distinctly visible. The
reverse of the effect is, of course, the case if the eye be
focussed for the distant plane, the near one then being out
of focus. An artificial diaphragm to the eye of course
enables one to see very much nearer than would otherwise
be possible, and also enables a short-sighted person to see
to a distance. The eyelids, with a short-sighted person,
often almost unconsciously serve the purpose of the
artificial diaphragm when their glasses are not in use.
Binocular vision in sight, too, of course has an important
bearing on this head, particularly in the representation of
near planes. The axes of the eyes are directed con-
vergently towards one particular point in binocular vision,
every other point in the scene producing different images
on each eye, causing indistinct double images. The more
the eyes are directed to distant objects the less noticeable
does this become, the angle subtended by their separation
becoming less and less. The treatment of planes parallel
to the axis, or marginal definition, is more difficult to
attempt on scientific grounds ; but as the eye sees
distinctly only through a small angle, it seems feasible (and
it certainly is noticeable in nature) that there should be a
slight marginal falling off of definition in the lens. If the
lens of the eye gave a flat field throughout the one plane
focussed upon, sharpness through this would undoubtedly
be the desideratum. Mr. Burton is the only writer I have
found who speaks as an authority against the scientific
aspect of the tenets of the school of naturalists, and I
regret that he is not here to argue on his side for, or
concede the points in, the question.
The single eye then, in a fixed position, and more
remarkably in binocular vision, undoubtedly sees nature
under conditions of contrasted definition, and hence any
method that rigidly gives uniform definition throughout
all planes must fail to be artistic.
As to how the method of contrasted definition is carried
out by the lens employed must be a matter of individual
impression, and the focus and aperture of the lens so
adjusted that the image is in effect the nearest possible to
that the artist feels and wishes to convey. In this con-
nection the broader treatments, by slightly out-of-focus
effect, or introduction of spherical aberration, produce
results that artists alone can decide whether or no they
compare favourably or not with the broader treatments
by the pencil or brush. The answer to this question must
decide how far photography may progress as a fine art.
The naturalistic school have shown results that cannot
be denied to be eminently artistic, and there is without
doubt the qualification of greater scope in their rendering.
I)r. Emerson has produced work ranging from the
beautiful in bright results to the sublime in the dreamy
impressions of twilight and the impressionists' school. As
the subject has appealed to the students of this school, so
have they rendered it, within the limits of the definite
powers of their instruments. There is no hard-and-fast
line of one particular treatment, and my object has been to
indicate the ground entered upon by leaving the limited
and narrow treatment of universal sharpness, a treatment
that is a triumph as an instrumental record, but, if takeu
alone into consideration, is detrimental to that art progress
which all of us, anxious for the higher development of
photography, have so earnestly and sincerely at heart.
Books Received. — Photographic Aeriennc, Photogravure tur
Vcrrc, Traiti L'ncyclopidii/uc dc Photographic, Sun Artists for
April, and some new numbers of the Amateur Photographer s
Library , all of which we hope to notice next week.
The American Druggist says that a paste made of rice flour
and water, slowly heated to the boiling point until the proper
consistency is obtained, will not discolour articles pasted to-
gether, and will stick tighter than a poor relation.
The Birmingham Photographic Society. — The presentation
of the Crystal Palace Challenge Cup to the Birmingham Photo-
graphic Society took place on Monday last at a dinner held at
the Colonnade Hotel, New Street. The cup was officially
presented by Mr. Henshaw Russell, who was accompanied by
Messrs. S. G. Wollaston, J. F. Peasgood, and W. Brooks.
Mr. J. B. Stone presided.
Messrs. Thomas’s Prize Competition. — The prize com-
petition inaugurated by Messrs. R. W. Thomas and Co. for
the best photographs taken on their plates was held at Gloucester
Mansions, Cambridge Circus, London, on April 15th, 16th,
17th, and 18th. The judges were Messrs. Valentine Blanchard,
F. de P. Cembrano, J. Gale, Philip H. Newman, and Andrew
Pringle. The following prizes were awarded : — Class I. —
(10) “The Brent, Kingsbury,” silver medal, F. D’Arcis ;
(10) “ Newlyn, Cornwall,” bronze medal, J. B. B. Wellington.
Class II. — (51) “The Pedlar,” special genre class gold medal,
Ralph W. Robinson ; (55) “ An Idle Moment,” bronze medal,
B. H. Lord ; (60) “The Latest News,” silver medal, J. B. B.
Wellington. Class III. — (80) “ St. Anne's Gate, Salisbury,”
silver medal, J. B. B. Wellington. Sub-Class. — (66) “ Reredos,
Salisbury Cathedral,” bronze medal, J. B. B. Wellington ;
(71) Frame, three prints, “ Norwich Cathedral,” silver medal,
H. Dudley Aruott ; (72) “The Great Pillar, Clapham Cave,”
(73) “Eldon Hall,” do., (74) “Beehive,” do., (75) “Pillar
Hall,” do., (76) “Reflections,” do., (77) “ Inverted Forest,” do.,
special silver medal, G. Towler. Class IV. — (89) “ Try again,”
special genre class silver medal, R. H. Lord ; (91) “ Granny
and her Spinning Wheel,” special genre class bionze medal,
W. H. Geddes and Sou. Class V. — (100) “ Ready to Start,”
(101) “Leap Frog,” silver medal, W. Jerome Harrison;
(107) Hand-camera shots, “North Wales Coast,” bronze medal,
M. J. Harding. Class VI. — (113) “Large Marine Engine,”
bronze medal, W. H. Geddes and Son. Class VII. — (118)
“ Smack at Sea, Towing out a Screw Steamer,” bronze medal,
H. Dudley Arnott : (120) “The Land's End,” silver medal,
J. B. B. Wellington. Class VIII. — (125) Set of twelve slides,
certificate of merit, Lieut. -General Dawson, C.B. ; (136) Set
of twelve slides, gold medal, Edgar G. Lee ; (139) Set of twelve
slides, bronze medal, G. E. Thompson ; (141) Set of nine slides,
silver medal, J. B. B. Wellington. Sub-Class I. — (151) Set of
six slides, silver medal, A. A. Carnell. Sub-Class II. — None.
Class IX. — (152) Eight transparencies, silver medal, Auty and
Ruddock ; (153) Eight stereoscopic slides, bronze medal,
H. G. Brierley.
April 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
17
EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYED.
BY C. BRANGWIN BARNES.
An attempt lias recently been made to start a trades
union .amongst photographers, and T cannot but think the
proceeding an ill-advised one, because since the early days
of the art-science, there has up till now been a thorough
entente cordiale between photographers and their assistants,
and until the issue of the trades union manifesto I had
heard of but little, if any, dissatisfaction amongst photo-
graphic employees. Truly, here and there might be found
a stray grumbler, and, for the matter of that, so thei-c
might amongst the ranks of the employers. I have heard
a photographer express an opinion that there is not a tho-
roughly good and efficient printer to be found in the
United Kingdom, and I have also heard a printer state
that there are no employers capable of appreciating a good
man when they have found him. Some employers have an
idea that all their assistants think about is to leave off work
at a certain hour, and to draw their salaries as pay-day
comes round: but I opine that most photographic assistants
have far higher notions of business and honour than that.
One of the most vexed questions between the employer
and his assistants has for some time been that relating to
specimens, and I should personally like to sec the matter
thoroughly threshed out in the light of day — i.e., in the
columns of the Photographic News — to hear what both
sides have to say. When a photographer advertises for
an assistant, he usually requires to see specimens of his
work, and therefrom arises the question, Whence arc
those specimens to come ?
Tn nine cases out of ten, all the specimens an operator,
a printer, or a retoucher can obtain are spoiled prints,
which are hardly the sort of thing required. There has
never been an understanding as to whether an assistant is
entitled to specimens, or if so, to what extent. There are
employers who strictly prohibit their hands from taking
prints, whether spoiled or not, for use as specimens : there
are also a few who, when an assistant is leaving, offer to
provide him with any he may require. Is not the whole
question of specimens a farce? If an operator is seeking
a situation, what is easier than to send specimens taken by
someone else, and purchased by him purely for that pur-
pose ? That this is done every day of the week I quite
believe, and must at the same time admit that, though the
action is reprehensible in the extreme, yet the employer
who advertises for specimens is himself to blame. Where
is the need of specimens at all, if the reference from the
last employer be satisfactory, and that employer be known
to turn out good work? Surely those are sufficient
grounds for giving a man a trial, without expecting him to
send specimens of work, which may be his own or not.
( )ne photographer of standing told me that he never looked
upon specimens he received from applicants for a berth as
samples of what they could do, but merely as samples of
their taste ; if they sent him good and artistic pictures, he
judged that they were artistic themselves, or they would
not have selected them.
If an assistant has no right to specimens of his work. 1
hold that an employer has no right to ask for them : added
to which, they are perfectly unnecessary, and cause con-
siderable trouble. Suppose an operator out of a situation
answers some four advertisements, where are the specimens
to come from to enclose with all his four applications?
At the most he would have only one set, and they would
probably be sent to the advertiser he would be least likely
to suit, and retained by him three or four days, by which
time the other situations would be filled up, and very
likely a berth lost simply because the operator was an honest
man, and did not pilfer from his former employer a suf-
ficient number of prints to send to several persons at one
time. The foregoing is merely my opinion. I am in
hopes that others may speak out on the matter, and that
some arrangement may be definitely arrived at between
employers and employed.
Another point which I wish to advocate is the paymentof
operators by results, in such a way that the best worker may
obtain the best income. An operator may receive a stated
salary every week of the year, whether business be good
or bad, and it is contended that he has a right so to do,
as it is not in his power to influence business. My idea
is that it is vastly in his power so to do, and it will be
found that the operator who is paid by results — that is, a
salary and commission — will not only increase his own
weekly earnings, but will make business to do so. A
word in season, spoken by the operator, will often induce
a sitter who has visited the studio wuth the intention of
taking, say, half-a-dozen cartes, to increase the order to
a dozen, or to have cabinets in preference to the smaller
size, and now and then an order for an enlargement may
be obtained in the studio. I would also respectfully in-
cline to the opinion that the operator who pushes his
employer's business in this manner deserves a percent-
age on that business, and that the employer will find
it materially to his interest to allow him one. There
are times when the operator may fail to obtain
an increased order in the studio, but his trial
will only serve to clear the way for the reception-room
attendant, who may now succeed where he has failed.
This same reception-room attendant, if a man or woman
of business, has many opportunities of pushing trade, and
suggestions as to enamelling, tinting, and so on, often have
the effect of adding to the amount of cash taken from each
sitter. Then there is nothing to prevent him, or her,
from introducing novelticsin the way of frames or albums,
and here, as in the case of the operator, a small commission
on sales would be found to have a stimulating effect. The
mention of the fact that old or faded photographs may be
copied, often reminds a sitter that he has an old portrait
of some deceased relative or friend, of which copies have
been asked for, and, perchance, an enlargement may
follow. It should always be borne in mind that one
enlargement pays better than two or three ordinary sitters
for small work.
In conclusion. 1 would express my opinion that a general
introduction of the system of payment by salary and com-
mission w ould effectively and surely cut the ground from
under the feet of would-be trades unionists, and by so
doing further strengthen the bond of good will which, l
maintain, has always existed between photographic
employers and employed.
On Thursday evening, May 1st, Capt, Abney will read a
paper at the Camera Club.
Number 611 of the Photograph inches Arehiv is accompanied
by an illustration — a woman’s portrait — issuing from the studio
of Herr J. Schmidt, of Fraukfurt-on-M. The extremely care-
ful and exact reproduction of the negative has been furnished
by the Phototype Office of Johannes Beyer, in Zittau. Herr
Beyer, who some years ago purchased the interest of the firm
of Alphons Adolph & Co., has enlarged this concern, and fitted
it with all necessary new appliances. Of the phototypie ability
of the firm a proof is given in the illustration.
L Of.\
318 THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [April 25, 1890.
iaotcs.
The full text of the resolutions passed by the Com-
mittee appointed by the International Congress in con-
nection with the Paris Exhibition appears in the Bulletin
<le la Societe Franeaise for March, so may be now more
readily accessible in this country than the Government
report itself, published some weeks ago. A summary of
the conclusions arrived at with regard to the various
questions submitted has already appeared in these pages,
and we need not go over the ground again. It is worth
while noting, however, thatthe philological studiesof the
Committee appear to have caused them some anxiety.
As will be remembered, one of the questions to be dis-
cussed and settled was a system of photographic nomen-
clature, and if it is an absolute necessity that the rough
and ready and familiar — though, possibly, inaccurate —
terms in daily use should be discarded, then no doubt
the Committee have devised the very best scientific
substitutes possible. Put even science is sometimes
battled, and the word “ photo-collographic ” has been
too hard a nut to crack.
This word has the drawback of being intractable to
all efforts to shorten it. The consequence is that its obsti-
nacy has forced a series of kindred subjects to be termed
“photo-plastographie,” “photo-glyptographie,” “photo-
typographie,” and “ photo- chromographie,” whereas
could an abbreviated equivalent have been found, we
should have got photo-plastic, photo-glyphic, photo-typie,
and photo-chromie. One would have thought that
“ photo-collie” wouldhavcgotoverthedifficulty, butthis
does not seem to have occurred to the Committee, and
so the polysyllabic burden has been borne.
The report of the lecture given at the Anthropo-
logical Institute last Tuesday, by M. Jacques Bertillon,
on the method now practised in France of identify-
ing criminals by comparing their measures with those
of convicted persons in the prison registers, will be
looked forward to with much curiosity by those inte-
rested in the subject. The registers contain the
measures of tens of thousands of persons together with
their photographs, yet M. Bertillon’s method enables
the reference to be rapidly effected. It is now pretty
well acknowledged that a photograph alone is not to
be depended upon as a means of identification, but we
are not quite sure whether a measurement is a safer
guide. What guarantee is there that the measurer
will not make a mistake? Professional measurers who
make clothes frequently fall into an error, and there
is no reason for believing that a police measurer will
be any more accurate than a tailor. Everybody is
familiar with the curious fact that while the memory
sometimes plays tricks in regard to recollection of
faces, it rarely does so in the case of sounds. The
face alters with age, but the voice remains pretty much
the same. This seems to indicate that a system of
identification will not be complete until the phonograph
is made use of. Let the sound of every prisoner’s
voice, and his pronunciation of certain words, be pre-
served, and additional testimony of identification will
be always at hand.
We have on more than one occasion drawn attention
to the difficulties under which artists labour when a
retouched photograph is sent to them to copy. The
grievance is not confined to this country, and we find the
Inland Printer, an American journal, and one especially
noteworthy for the excellence of its photo-mechanical
reproductions, following on the same lines. It is quite
true that the retouched photograph is an abomination
to the artist who has to copy it for newspaper
purposes. When all the salient lines of the face are so
softened as to be almost obliterated, when an artificial
sparkle is given to the eye, and a line of light intro-
duced on the nose, so as to effectually put that feature
out of diawing so far as correctness is concerned ; then
the artist’s task of translation is difficult indeed. It
is, in fact, impossible to convey much of whatever
resemblance the photograph may have to the original,
because everything is so hazy, so nebulous. The best
likenesses are those which seize the characteristic
expression of a face, often conveyed by some little lines
near the mouth or eyes, which the retoucher does
his best to destroy, because he thinks they are not
flattering.
And, unfortunately, this is not the worst. During
the last two or three years a craze has sprung up for
photographs in so-called “natural colours,” ranging
from the crystoleum process to Mr. Mayall’s latest
“ discovery.” These coloured portraits are terribly
misleading, for not only is the expression altered, but
often a totally false idea conveyed. In fact, to use the
words of the Inland Printer, “they are to the artists
like so many portraits of the figures in Madame
Tussaud’s.”
The utilisation of one’s features as an advertisement
is quite a sign of the times. Nothing, in fact, is sacred
to the enterprising advertiser. We have seen in
England portraits of well-known professional ladies
figuring in connection with certain advertisements, but
in these cases, so far as we know, the ladies in question
have derived no benefit from the exhibition of their
features, though it is quite possible that in return for
their testimonials the advertiser may have shown bis
gratitude in a substantial form. They manage these
things better in America, as the face has now a distinct
advertising value. As a case in point, we may cite the
fact that the features of Miss Nellie Bly, who achieved
notoriety by her race round the world, will soon be
known to every smoker of cigarettes in the States,
since a firm of cigarette makers has arranged to pay
h er a very large sum for permission to use her photo-
graph as the trade mark of a new brand of cigarettes.
April 25, 1890."]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
319
THE MATHEMATICAL CALCULATION OF
EXPOSURES*
BV ALFRED WATKINS.
In spite of the imperfections and the jokes levelled at
exposure tables, they have proved an aid to many who
feel the want of certainty, and the weakness of the older
methods. Five axioms maybe laid down as the “ Grammar
of Photographic Exposure ” : —
Axiom I. — Five primary factors, each quite independent
of the others, govern a photographic exposure. They
are: — (A) The actinie force of the light falling upon the
worst-lighted part of the subject. (P) The sensitiveness
of the plate used. (S) The capacity of the subject, or
its most non-actinic part, for reflecting sufficient actinic
light to the lens to form a photographic image of suitable
intensity. (I)) The size of diaphragm in relation to the
focal length of the lens. (5) The distance of the subject
from the lens.
Axiom II. — The value of each of the factors, as affect-
ing the exposure, may be expressed in numerical terms.
Axiom III. — The proper exposure for any given con-
ditions being ascertained, the correct exposure for every
other possible combination of conditions or factors may
be calculated by mathematical means.
Axiom IV. — The quantity of actinie light reaching the
plate, reflected from all parts of the subject, or even
one part of the subject, is no guide to the duration of
the exposure.
Axiom Y. — Two ultimate factors determine the duration
of a photographic exposure on any plate, viz. : — (A) The
quantity of actinic light reaching the plate, reflected from
that part of the subject which reflects least actinic light,
and in which detail is required to be rendered. (S) The
duration of this light necessary to impress upon the plate
an image, approximating as nearly as possible, in inverse
intensity, to the visual image of the object in question, is
the correct exposure.
For factor A a chemical actinometer is best, a photo-
meter in which the eye is used for the estimation, the light
being unsatisfactory for this purpose. The bromide of
silver actinometer, as advised by Captain Abney, is simple
and effective, the number of seconds taken to discolour
it to tint giving the A value.
The only proper way to test the light is just where it
falls upon the subject. An actinometer will soon become
as indispensable to a photographer as a thermometer is to
a chemist, and the usual advice to test the light in the
open, and if you are about to bike an interior, to calculate
what proportion of the light reaches the subject, is just as
absurd as for a chemist wishing to ascertain the temperature
of a mixture he is heating to put a pyrometer in the heat-
ing flame, and then estimate how much of the heat is
absorbed, instead of trying the actual heat of the mixture.
Factor S deals with the error into which all com-
pilers of exposure tables have fallen into in mixing up the
quite independent factors of lighting and subject.
In practice, it is necessary to give a shorter exposure
for white objects in which detail is required than for
objects of average colour, and a longer exposure for dark-
coloured objects ; hence the need for a table of subject
values.
The factor of distance affects the exposure : over dis-
tant objects the atmosphere adds reflected light to the
image and shortens the exposure. In the case of very
Suuimury of u paper road before tbe Hereford I’hotograpliie Society.
near objects the camera has to be racked out, and the
exposure is increased. It is found convenient to draw up
a scale of subject numbers for all coloured objects and
varying distances, thus combining the last two factors.
A set of six prints from negatives of widely varying
subjects, the exposures calculated by the new exposure-
meter, and all developed together in one dish, were
handed round by me. They varied in character from a
cloud picture to a copy of a dark terra-cotta bust in a
room.
My new exposure meter is a small, circular, brass box,
having at one end the actinometer, at the other a chain
pendulum for timing both actinometer and camera ex-
posures, while round the circumference are four movable
rings, each bearing a pointer for the factors A, 1’, S, and
1) ; when these are moved opposite their correct values,
a fifth pointer, E, gives the correct exposure.
The average time taken to test the light, and to find out
the correct exposure, does not exceed thirty seconds.
The approximate plate numbers for different makers of
plates will be given in the instructions, but photographers
are advised to make a test to ascertain for themselves
what plate number gives a negative of the kind they re-
quire with the developer they are in the habit of using.
A rather subtle point is touched upon in axioms IV and
V. More than one photometer is made based upon the
idea that the quantity of light reflected from the object
and reaching the plate is an exact guide to the exposure.
This is quite a mistake, and three different pictures were
thrown by me on the screen, one with a large quantity of
white in it, another with a large quantity of black, and a
third with an average amount; the part of the picture in
each case which determined the proper exposure was a
patch of dark detail, and the exposure for all three would
be the same. Any photometer, however, estimating the
light reflected from these subjects, would give different
and misleading results. Again, if three different shades of
grey paper be copied on three plates, with three exposures
varying in inverse proportion to the quantity of light re-
flected from the papers, the three resulting negatives
would be all of exactly the same intensity, which would
not be the result required.
Mu. W. I. Chadwick, who has been Hon. Sec. of the Man-
chester Photographic Society for fifteen years, is, we are in-
formed, resigning his office.
Exeter Photographic Society'. — President, Dr. Cheese j
Vice-President, Major Dowdall ; Hon. Sec., Rev. J. Sparshatt,
of Fairfield College, Alphington Road, Exeter ; Treasurer, Mr.
Lake, High Street. Meetings, first Tuesday in each month.
Next excursion, May 10th, to Silverton. Headquarters, the
College Hall, South Street. Notices posted at Mr. Lake’s.
Visitors to Exeter requiring use of dark room are requested to
write to secretary or treasurer.
Number 16 of the Deutsche Photographen Zcituwj for the
present year contains a notice of a memorial tablet of the late
Herr J. B. Obernetter. The memorial has been executed at
the cost of the German Photographic Union. Herr Obernetter
died on the 13th April, 1887. The memorial is somewhat late,
indeed, but yet better late than never. The principal movers
in this affair are Herr Fr. Muller, Herr Werner, and Herr
Zschokke. The memorial was presented by these gentlemen
to the deceased’s widow with a suitable verbal accompaniment
in his praise. A laurel crow u was also given on the same occa-
sion by Herr Werner. The tablet bears the following inscrip-
tion suitably displayed : — “ To Herr J. B. Obernetter, Photo-
graphic Chemist, in grateful memory of his services in the fur-
therance of Photography, this memorial tablet is dedicated by
the German Photographic Union, 1890.”
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Arrm. 25, 1890.
:120
THE LATENT PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE* *
1!V c. U. BOT1IAMLEY, I'.I.C., F.C.S.
Very contradictory statements iiave been made respect-
ing the action of alkaline bromides. Many writers have
stated that they destroy the latent image, whilst others
assert that they merely retard development. I immersed
exposed plates of - various kinds in a 10 per cent, solution
of potassium bromide for periods varying from five to
twenty minutes. They were then thoroughly washed
and developed. Potassium bromide does not destroy the
latent image. Of course if the soluble bromide were
not thoroughly washed out of the film, development
might be retarded to such an extent that no image would
appear until after a long time, and possibly this is the
explanation of the erroneous statements referred to.
It follows, therefore, that the latent image is destroyed
by halogenising agents, and also by potassium dichro-
mate, even in complete absence of soluble haloid salts or
of free acids. It is not destroyed by alkaline bromides,
and apparently not by nitric acid, hydrobromic acid, or
hydrochloric acid, but the effect of these substances, as
well as of potassium iodide — which seems to prevent the
production of a developed image without actually destroy-
ing the latent image — requires further investigation. f
Ozone and hydrogen peroxide are also stated to destroy
the latent image ; but the published experiments are very
meagre in details, and there is no evidence that any
special precautions were taken to avoid secondary actions,
or to eliminate the possible influence of minute traces
of impurities. It is worthy of note that, according to
Ilodgkinson, silver chloride darkens readily when exposed
to light in presence of hydrogen peroxide.t I am of
opinion, therefore, that the action of these re-agents also
requires further investigation ; but until the chemistry of
hydrogen peroxide and ozone is better understood, no
very conclusive results are likely to be obtained from
their effects on photographic plates.
In all previous experiments in this connection it is
very doubtful whether sufficient attention has been paid
to the possible influence of minute quantities of impuri-
ties. Probably in some cases all the re-agents or
materials were pure in the usual sense of the term, but
latterly chemists have been learning that substances which
they commonly regard as pure still contain sufficient
foreign matter to exert a most powerful influence on
their behaviour, and in the particular investigations under
discussion the very highest attainable degree of purity
must be aimed at. The quantity of matter composing
the latent image is very minute ; hence the relative (‘fleet
of minute quantites of foreign substances may be very
considerable.
All the decisive evidence at present in our possession
points to the fact that the formation of the latent photo-
image is a process of photo-chemical reduction, the effect
of which can be undone by treatment with halogenising
agents, or with certain substances generally believed to
exert an oxidising action.
About three years § ago Carey Lea showed that latent
images, capable of development and reversal in the same
manner as the latent photo-image, can be obtained by
* Continued from paico 3U4.
i I may add that I am engaged with experiments in this direction.
$ Photo'jrdphic Jietcs. xxxi. 370.
Journal of Science , 1887, and Englnli photographic journals
of the same year.
treating sensitive films of silver salts with a solution of
a hypophosphite, or an alkaline solution of grape sugar or
milk sugar. Nitric acid and solutions of the haloid salts
of the alkalies had the same effect as on latent photo-
images. Carey Lea’s experiments were made with the
silver salts on paper. I have repeated them with ordinary
gelatine plates with precisely similar results. The
reducing agent (sodium hypophosphite or a solution of
milk sugar made alkaline by caustic potash) when
bru-hed on the plate, produces no visible effect; but a
dense deposit can be developed. These latent images
thus formed are destroyed by potassium dichromate, but
not by dilute nitric acid or by alkaline bromides. Potas-
sium iodide affects them in the same way as the latent
photo-image. (Examples shown).
Latent images, capable of development, are also formed
as a result of a shearing stress applied to the sensitive
film. This was observed bv Carey Lea* in the case of
wet plates, but was first carefully investigated by Abney. f
The effect is easily observed by writing on the surface of
an ordinary plate with a clean glass rod, using moderate
pressure, and then placing it in a developer. Abney
found that the material of the rod used for writing has
no influence on the result; the effect, if sufficient
pressure is used, is transmitted through paper. Sensitive
and less sensitive forms of silver bromide behave
similarly ; the latent image formed is destroyed by
potassium dichromate ; the effect is not so much on the
surface on the film as lower down or near to the glass,
for if the film is moistened, superficially melted, allowed
to set and then developed, the sharpness of the image is
scarcely affected ; but if the film is completely melted the
developed markings are blurred. He also was unable to
observe anything of the nature of phosphorescence
when the writing was done.
Several points in connection with these phenomena
seemed worthy of further investigation. Details of the
experiments I shall describe in another place. I found
that with one and the same plate the effect gradually in-
creases with the pressure, but that there is no connection,
as might have been supposed, between the sensitiveness
of the plates to light, and the minimum pressure required
to produce a developable image upon them. (Examples
shown.) At present, I have not been able to trace any
connection between the minimum effective pressure and
the hardness of the film. 1 confirmed Abney's statements
that the material with which the writing or “shearing” is
done is without influence on the result, provided that it
is a sufficiently hard substance : that no phosphorescence
can be observed wliqn the film is scratched ; and that the
latent image is destroyed by potassium dichromate. I
also examined the action of various other re-agents, such
as bromine and potassium bromide and iodide, and found
the results to be identical with those given by the photo-
image. Independent confirmation of Abney’s statement
that the effect is greatest in the lower part of the film,
was obtained by a method quite different from that which
he used. After some plates had been subjected to
various degrees of shearing stress, they were exposed to
light for a very short time. One half of each plate was
then dipped in a very dilute solution of potassium dichro-
mate for a short time, washed, and developed. It was
found that the superficial latent image produced by light
* American Journal of Science [2] xlii. I9S.
* / 'holographic. Journal, 1883 and 1884 ; British Journal of Photography,
xxx. 418 ; xxxi. 167.
April 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
321
had been completely destroyed, whilst the deeper-seated
effect of stress was only slightly affected.
Latent images, which behave in a precisely similar
manner with various re-agents, and are therefore presum-
ably of very similar, if not identical composition, can be
produced in at least three ways: — (1) by the action of
light ; (2) by the action of chemical reducing agents in
the dark ; and (3) by shearing stress. The second mode
of production is easily intelligible ; the production of
chemical change by shearing stress at first sight seems
difficult to understand. The researches of Spring have
shown, however, that many chemical changes in solid
substances can be produced by the application of great
pressure. As a rule, pressure promotes combination, but
there are certain cases where a compound is decomposed
when strongly compressed. According to Spring, if the
volume of the compound is less than the sum of the
volumes of its nncombined constituents, pressure tends
to produce combination ; if, on the other hand, the sum
of the volumes of the uncombined constituents is less
than the volume of the compound which they form, pres-
sure will tend to decompose it. The effect of pressure
on chemical changes is, in fact, strictly analogous to its
effect on the melting point of solids. At present we do
not know the relation between the space occupied by the
materials of the latent image, and that occupied by the
original gelatino-bromide. If the former is less than the
latter, the formation of a latent image by stress is only a
special example of Spring’s second law, and the apparent
difficulty disappears.*
(To be continued.)
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Comparison of Developers— Toning and Fixing Bath.
Comparison of Various Developers. — Much has been
written of late in German periodicals about developers
and developing, the question as to the best method of
bringing out the latent picture, and to the most efficient
reducing agent, seeming to interest at present more than
ever. There is a German proverb, that a good thing can-
not be told too often, and so I shall complete my previous
communications by giving an abstract from a very interest-
ing paper read before a small circle of Berlin professional
photographers by Mr. F. Gaedicke, whose name is
sufficiently well-known in the photographic world.
The four developers now most commonly in use-
ferrous oxalate, pyro, hydroquinone, and eikonogen —
were compared with each other, and the plates to be
treated with the solutions were divided, for experiment,
into three series ; the first of them having received only
one-fifth of the normal exposure, the second the normal
exposure, and the third four times the normal exposure.
Eacli series and eacli developer was treated under its most
favourable conditions, so to the ferrous oxalate developer
two drops of an accelerator consisting of hypo and
potassium bromide were added ; to the hydroquinone
developer, four drops of a 40 per cent, potassium-
lye ; and the eikonogen developer was used as is
recommended for instantaneous exposures, together with
the preliminary bath consisting of hypo and bichloride
* I gave this explanation of the effect of shearing stress in a lecture
before the Leeds Photographic Society early in 1888, but did not publish it
Professor Meldola refers to Spring’s researches in the tame connection,
but less specifically, in his “ Chemistry of Photogiapby,” p. l'J2.
of mercury. The plates were developed until a slight
greyish appearance indicated the first signs of the
approaching fog. The sensitometer consisted of one to
sixteen layers of tissue-paper, and, as source of light, a
flat gas-burner was used, which was turned down until
there was no more roaring of the flame. The results of
the experiments are shown by the following table : —
.1. Under-exposed plates. — Exposure 1 second at a dis-
tance of 28 inches from the plate, i.e., one-fifth of the
normal exposure.
No.
Uevelopment.
The linage
appears
wit* in
Time of
development
SenMto-
meter
No.
Character of
th“ image, and
notes.
1
Ferrous-oxalate,
with addition
9 seconds
5 minutes
14
Yellow fog ;
1 and 2 are
but slightly
different.
2
Pyro-potash
12 „
3
14
Red fog.
3
Hydroquinone
with potash
20 „
3
15
Clear.
4
Eikonogen with
potash and pre-
liminary bath
0 >>
3
14
Yellow fog.
B. Normal-exposed plates. — Exposure 1 second at a dis-
tance of 12| inches from the flame.
Ferrous-oxalate,
plain
12 seconds
3 minutes
16 ‘
The nega-
tives were
all good and
liarmoniou s.
By trans-
parent light,
Pyro-potash
8 „
n
16
the pyro-
negative was
brownish-
» black, the
others
bluish-black,
Hydroquinone
25 „
3g >>
16
therefore of
better print-
ing quality.
The iron
negative was
the least
Eikonogen - soda
12 „
3
16
clear one.
C. Over-exposed plates. —Exposure 4 seconds at a distance
of 124 inches from the flame, i.e. , four times the normal
exposure.
F errous-oxalate,
with 4 drops
potass, brom. ,
1 : 10
18 seconds
3t minutes
16
1 to 8 but
little gradu-
ated ; flat
and useless.
Pj’ro-potash,
with 8 drops
pot. brom.
20 „
ii
16
Better grad-
uated than
No. 9; a little
too hard, but
usable.
Hydroquinone,
only old solu-
tion. with 8
drops potass,
brom.
60 „
5 »
16
Normal
negative, the
best of this
series.
Eikonogen. soda,
with 8 drops
potass, brom.
30 „
OV yy
16
Flat and
useless.
All the developing solutions, of which, in all cases, 40 c.c.
were taken, had been allowed to stand for 24 hours after
the preparation, because pyro acts much more energeti-
cally if freshly prepared, but always older solutions are to
be taken into consideration. To the ferrous-oxalate deve-
loper, in the case of the under-exposed plates, 2 drops of a
322
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
solution of 1 gramme of hypo and 6 grammes of potassium
bromide in 60 c.c. of water were added ; in the case of the
over-exposed plates, 4 drops of potassium bromide, 1 : 10;
in the case of normal exposures no addition was made.
In the case of hjdroquinone development , 20 c.c. of an old
solution, 20 c.c. of a fresh one, and 4 drops of a 40 per
cent, potassium-lye were used for the under-exposed plates ;
for the normal exposures, two-thirds of an old solution,
one-third of a fresh one, and 4 drops of the potassium
lye ; for the over-exposed plates only old developer, with
8 drops of potassium bromide, 1 : 10. In the case of
eikonogen development, the preparation with potash and with
the preliminary bath (hypo and bichloride of mercury)
was used for the under-exposed plates, the preparation
with soda in two solutions for the normal exposed plates,
and the same preparation, with 8 drops of potassium
bromide, 1 : 10, for the over-exposed plates.
As the table shows, all the developers gave good results
in the case of normal exposure ; but as normal
exposures in practice do not form the rule, but, on the
contrary, the exception, the results of over and under
exposure are more important. For over-exposure the
eikonogcn developer was the worst, hydroquinone the
best. In the case of under-exposure only the hydro-
quinone developer gave a clear negative ; all the others
were yellow or red fogged, and inferior for one sensito-
meter number. It follows therefrom that the hydro-
quinone developer is decidedly the best one, as it is also
the cheapest one, because in most cases an old solution
may be used. 1‘yro solution does not keep well, and
it is necessary to work with separate solutions. Also
eikonogen solutions do not keep as well as hydroquinone
solutions, and arc liable to fog the plates after a few days.
In all, the results are the following: — 1. Ferrous oxalate.
Good, bluish-black negatives, which, however, if no pre-
liminary bath is used, are harder than those obtained with
the alkaline developers. The developer is very poisonous.
For the case of heavy over-exposures it is little suitable.
2. Pyro-potash developer. The most energetic developer ;
givesagood, soft, brownish-black negative. Two separate
solutions. In the case of over-exposures it may be used
with potassium bromide. The negatives dry more
readily than all others. 3. Hydroquinone. The image
appears later than with the other developers, but it is
developed out in the same time. The negative is mostly
denser than with pyro and eikonogen. It is bluish-
black, and prints well. If the solution is cold, it develops
very slowly ; it should therefore have an average tempera-
ture. 4. Eikonogen. In the beginning it develops
quickest, but in order to obtain vigour, it requires as
much time as iron and hydroquinone. The keeping
qualites of the mixed solutions are very doubtful, and
even with the separated solutions fog sets in after a j
short time. The developer is about live times as dear as ,
the others. In the case of over-exposure it is less useful I
than pyro and hydroquinone. It is a great disadvantage ;
that the eikonogen is highly sensitive to the influence of
ammonia. The final result of these experiments is there-
fore : that at present the hydroquinone developer is to he pre- |
/erred to all others as decidedly the best one.
The Best Combined Toning and Fixing Bath for Oelatino- |
Chloride Paper. — Mr. R. E. Licsegaug, a young, but very
serious investigator, has made careful experiments in order
to find out the most efficient combined toning and fixing
bath for prints on gelatiuo-chloride paper. lie recom- j
mends the following one : —
Solution No. 1.
Hyposulphite of soda
Alum
Nitrate of lead (pulverised)...
Boiling water
200 grammes
80
2
400 c.c.
>>
a
The solution is allowed to stand for two days ; then once
more 400 c.c. of boiling water arc added, and the solution
is filtered. Meantime, the following solution is prepared
in a bottle : —
Solution No. 2.
Sulphocyanide of ammonia ... ... 160 grammes
Water ... ... ... ... 1,200 c.c.
Solution No. 1 is mixed with solution No. 2, and then
added : —
Solution of gold chloride (1 per cent.) 10 to 20 c.c.
With this bath the prints hike any desired tone within
three to five minutes.
BOTANICAL PHOTOGRAPHY.
BY JULIUS F. SACIISE.
The first three months of the year arc in this latitude
generally supposed to be the least favourable for the
1 amateur photographer, and the exercise of his hobby. The
fields and pastures are black ; hillsides and ravines, so
inviting in summer, are now bleak and desolate ; and the
1 trees, under whose grateful shade we rested during our
summer outings, are now leafless and bare. Christmas-
tide, with its joys, is past and gone ; the various Christmas
trees, with their gaudy dressings, our presents, groups, and
visitors, have been “ taken ” by Blitz or Sun, and most
amateurs count their winter's work completed. Some
enthusiastic votaries have kept their practice alive by
copying pictures, old documents, maps, seals, or objects
of vertu or antiquity, and other subjects, not forgetting
sundry interiors. Still, as such work partakes more of the
dull routine of labour than pleasure, the interest in photo-
graphy has naturally more or less flagged, while the
amateur sets aside his outfit until spring shall come, when
he can again strike out in pastures new, and find food for
his camera.
To the “photographic studiosis,” as a German con-
temporary designates the enthusiastic amateur, there is no
need of waiting until the country is again clothed in
pristine verdure. Our suggestions will apply to the whole
guild of camera carriers.
There are but few persons, if we except the arborist,
who have any idea of the difference existing in tree
structure, or the diversity in shape and growth of the
limbs of the various species.
Nothing will surprise the intelligent observer more than
the marked difference between our common trees, which
we have known since childhood, without taking special
notice of their peculiarities, as can be seen by a comparison
of eight or ten photographs of as many different varieties,
the negatives being made at the present season, while the
subject is bare and leafless.
The wide divergence in characteristics of growth, such
as shape and bark, as shown by such comparison, will
prove a revelation to many a well-informed person, and
opens a wide and interesting field to the amateur photo-
grapher and student.
In our suggestion of this study we would advise a
selection of marked, well-grown specimens, that can be
taken on the plate so as to preserve all the features of the
April 25, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
323
tree without being secondary to any surroundings. It
makes no matter whether the subject be a monarch of our
primitive forest, or some favorite specimen of ornamental
growth, introduced from foreign climes ; each individual
variety has its peculiar characteristics. Photograph the
tree in a strong light, so as to bring out the detail of the
surface. It would be well to carefully note the distance
from the butt of the tree, or the point of the compass, if
there is no other way of locating the spot where the tripod
was set ; this note is for reference in the future, so that
after the spring has opened, and the trees are once more
clad in their verdure, another trip can be made to the
same spot, and a plate made of the same tree in its glory.
This study can be further supplemented by photographing
the tree while the buds are bursting, when the leaves are
out, and then again in the fall, when the leaves are either
in their autumn glory or after they are brown and falling,
using orthochromatic plates; further, if the above sugges-
tion be carried out, after the leaves have again fallen, a fifth
plate can be taken of the same subject, and then compared
with the first plate ; it will show the marked changes and
growth which have taken place within the year, and which
are not perceptible to the eye.
It will be seen that for these comparative plates to be
of value great care should be taken to set the camera at
the same point for the different exposures.
To any amateur having a taste for such research and
experiment, we would point out the interesting groups of
flowering trees, where not alone the tree structure, but
the flowers, the leaves, and the fruit all tend to form an
interesting group of subjects for the camera.
Take, for instance, the common Horse Chestnut (. Esculus
Hippocastanum), a large symmetrical tree. In a photo-
graph taken at the present time, we would have the
structure or framework of the tree ; the next plate we
would suggest when the tree is in blossom, covered with
a wealth of erect spikes or panicles of flowers, which
stand out in bold contrast with the bright green foliage ;
then for a third plate, the same subject after the fruit is
well formed, and the foliage has reached its fullest deve-
lopment.
Any one who takes up the study of this subject will
also find the bursting leaf-bud, the young leaf, the
flowers separate and in panicle, the developed leaf, the
green fruit burr, as well as the burr when opened by the
frost, exposing the ripened fruit, all picturesque subjects
for the camera.* A series of photographic studies of
this kind, carefully executed, would form an album far
more interesting and instructive than the ordinary view
or poi’trit album, so common and so listlessly gone over by
the visitor to whom it is shown, and who, for politeness'
sake, goes over page after page without noticing what the
pictures represent.
In the same group of trees with the example mentioned,
we would call attention to the Gatalpa (C. SyringceJ'olia),
with its large, heart-shaped leaves, and large pyramidal
clusters, a foot long, of white and purple flowers ; the
Paulownia (P. Itnperialis ), a magnificent tropical look-
ing tree, with leaves twelve to fifteen inches in diameter,
and large clusters of lilac flowers ; the magnificent native
lulip l’oplar, so called ( Liriodendron Tulipifera), with
its erect growth, broad, glossy, fiddle-shaped leaves, and
beautiful tulip-shaped flowers and curious seed-pods ; not
• 1 he leaves, buds, flowers, and other detail are pinned against a white
or neutral lint background, and focussed on the plate as large as possible
■without crowding the plate.
forgetting the Magnolias, Conspicua, Acuminata, but
especially the “ Macrophylla,” or large-leaved, with leaves
two feet in length, and a profusion of dull white flowers,
of the size of a man’s hat. These specimens will suffice
for one group.
Then we have the various native forest trees, such as
the Oak ( Quercus ), the Maples (Acer), Ash (Fraxinus),
Locust (Robinid), Elm (Ulmus), Linden (Tilia), Poplar
(Popidus), Gum (Liquidamher Styraciflua), and many others,
all having characteristics which may be plainly shown with
the camera.
The various fruit trees, Cherry, Peach, Plum, and
Apple, all form beautiful subjects. In connection with
this group of subjects, we will state that on one occasion
when we asked a gentleman, who has one of the largest
collections of lantern slides in the country, the question,
which he considered the finest slide in his collection, he
unhesitatingly answered, “An apple tree in full blossom.-’
lie further volunteered the information that he had eight
slides of this subject made from as many different
negatives.
Our field of study can be extended to the large family
of flowering shrubs, or minor trees, as the Dogwood
(Cornus); the weeping trees, as the Ash, Beech, Birch
(Pemluld), &c. , the Rose of Sharon (Hibiscus Syriacus),
Hydrangea (If. Paniculatn (Irandijioru), Lilac (Syringia),
Purple Fringe (Rhus Cotinus), and many others.
It will be seen by reference to above list (although not
a hundredth part of what we might have made it) how
great this field is for study and development, and well
worthy of the attention of all intelligent amateurs,
especially the lady votaries of our art ; and this in-
dependent from the fact that it would be the means of
leading many persons to a closer study of the secrets and
beauty of nature.
At the same time we cannot refrain from cautioning
the neophyte, if he wishes to take up this study as above
suggested, from attempting too much at the start ; it is
better to complete two or three sets thoroughly and
correct, than undertake a dozen or more subjects, and
complete none.
The plan pursued by the writer is first to select the
specimen tree ; then after a satisfactory position for the
camera has been obtained, plumb the camera with apluinb-
line, the same as a surveyor's level, then drive a large peg
directly under the centre,— this securely marks the
location for any subsequent exposures — then level the
camera, pointing as near the centre of the tree as
possible ; the centre can also be marked by tacking a small
piece of white fabric on the tree on a level with the
lens.
A matter of value, in connection with the subject of
photographing leafless trees, is the preservation of the
outlines of historic trees— once landmarks in the history
of our country or of its progress— guide posts, which
are getting less and less every year, as they succumb to
the ravages of time, or fall prey to the rapacity of man.
As yet there is still a number of such trees throughout
this country, and the searching out and tracing the
traditions clinging to these silent monitors by the road-
side, or as they stand alone in the field like a grim sentinel,
will be found an enjoyable divertisement.
I should be pleased to receive and note any results from
our readers who may take up this special line of photo-
graphic study, as outlined in above suggestions. — American
Journal of Photogrophy.
324
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
PHOTO-MECHANICAL PRINTING.
Ir has loug been a hobby of ours to speculate on and
wish for the coming of the “ good time ” when the making
of the negative and the production of prints therefrom
shall be divorced from each other, as much as at the pre-
sent time are the work of the engraver and the plate
printer. We say advisedly “ the good time,” as we fully
believe it will be equally good for the photographer, the
public, and true art itself.
Silver printing has served its purpose, and done more
than anything else in connection with the art to bring
about the great popularity which it has enjoyed during
the last thirty years. It came at a time when art culture
was at a low ebb, at least amongst the great mass of the
people ; and by its beauty and delicacy of detail fasci-
nated, where breadth and true artistic effect would have
fallen flat and remained unheeded.
Now, however, there is a gradually increasing evidence
of a higher degree of art culture, and a daily increasing
appreciation of the more truly artistic qualities of several
at least of the numerous processes of mechanical printing,
some of which have been already brought to a high degree
of perfection.
The “good time coining,” and which we hope will
come soon, will be one in which the photographer will be
relieved from all the drudgery and cost of printing, and
the constant worry incident to blisters, tears, mealiness,
and the thousand-and-one cares and troubles of the print-
ing and finishing departments ; and, free to give his whole
heart to the production of the negative, with the handing
over thereof to the sitter, and the receiving of a handsome
fee therefore, his responsibility will end.
The sitter, in possession of a negative, will, on examin-
ing the results of the various mechanical processes, select
that which pleases him best, or is most suitable for some
special purpose, and hand it to the printer with an order
for such a number of copies as he may require. It is
true that the processes suitable for this kind of work are,
as yet, too expensive ; but those who have watched the
development of mechanical printing, from Talbot’s earliest
efforts through all its various stages to, say, the “ tree
study ” by Ives’ process in the March number of the
American Journal of Photography, or the prints in the
Gutekunst souvenir noticed in our last issue, cannot
doubt but that something equally good and suitably cheap
is but a matter of time, and in the near future.
Of course, we are quite prepared to hear the “ craft in
danger ” cry. No new development or great improve-
ment in mechanical process has escaped that. When it
was proposed to supersede stage coaches by railroads, it
was declared that horses and men would both find their
occupation gone, but the railroads employ hundreds of
both, where tens only were required. In the town in
which our early years were spent, we remember, when it
was proposed to substitute power for handloom wearing,
that five hundred weavers saw nothing but starvation or
the poor-house before them ; and yet, within a very short
time after their introduction, they gave constant and
better paid employment to fully five thousand hands ; and
so it has always been ; wherever a suitable division of
labour has been made and suitable machinery introduced,
the result has been a large increase in the numbers em-
ployed, and better payment for the work.
We have said that the change would benefit the photo-
grapher, the photographed, and art itself. It would bene-
fit the photographer by enabling him to give his undivided
attention to the production of the negative, and by saving
the expense of a staff of assistants and the heavy outlay
for stock, &c. Like his brother artists of the brush and
modelling tool, his work would be done by his own hands,
and imbued with his own individuality, and would be paid
for in at least something like a relation to its artistic value.
The picture-loving public — not the mere photograph-
loving, but the picture-loving public — of the near future
will be able to appreciate the difference between negatives
that are the outcome of genius, either inborn or acquired,
and the work of those who do not possess the one and are
too lazy to study till they obtain the other, and the latter
will deservedly go to the wall.
If the photographer, with no wages to pay and no stock
to buy, who makes even half-a-dozen negatives a day and
gets a minimum price of five dollars for each, does not
think he will be better off then than now, he need not
read any farther, as this is not written for him, but for his
more reasonable brethren.
Then, as for the general public, the patrons of the
photographer, the “ good time coming ” will benefit it by
enabling it to secure pictures impressed by the style and
individuality of those whom it most admires, and printed
in style and colour according to its fancy, and with the
assurance that such prints shall be as permanent as the
paper on which they are made. Nor need they be con-
fined to one particular style. From the one negative they
may have made, at so much an inch, photogravure plates,
tye-priuting blocks, &c., to be kept on hand for such
purposes as may from time to time be required.
Nor will true art itself be less a gainer by the change.
An educated and cultured public will cease to regard a
photograph as an article of manufacture, like a pair of
boots or a spring overcoat, and worth only a tradesman’s
profit over the cost of material and labour ; but will look
upon the negative as a valuable family possession, the
outcome of a combination of artistic ability and technical
skill of their favourite artist photographers.
Under such circumstances it must be that certain men
will make their mark as head and shoulders above their
fellows, and although we may not five to see it, we believe
the time will come when their productions will increase
in value like the works of the old masters, or the fiddles
of the Cremona makers, and, like the “Strides” and
“Amaties,” be worth much more than their weight in
gold.
Photographic Club. — Subject for discussion on April 30th,
“The Development of Unknown Exposures ” ; May 7th,
“ Lenses for Instantaneous Work.” Saturday outing, April
26th, Buckhurst Hill ; train from Liverpool Street at 2.8.
Anhydrous Sulphite of Potassium. — The crystalline sul-
phite of potassium (K2S03.7H20) contains seven molecules of
water, and is rapidly altered on exposure to air, losing water,
and becoming gradually oxidized to sulphate of potassium.
The well-kuown firm of Kahlbaum (Berlin) now puts the salt
on the market in an anhydrous condition. In this form it is
perfectly stable. It would be of advantage to have sulphite
of sodium in the same anhydrous form. — American Druyyist.
Clearing Collodion. — A correspondent of the DrwjyisU’
Bulletin says that a transparent collodion is in use in Paris
which is not only perfectly clear, but remains limpid for an
indefinite time. It is prepared by shaking an officinal collodion
with quartz sand which has previously been washed and care-
fully calcined. The action is purely mechanical, the suspended
particles adhering to the grains of sand, and settling to the
bottom of the container in a gelatinous mass.
Aprii, 2 5, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
025
(tfomgpontJcnce.
THE PROPOSED ILFORD SCHOLARSHIP.
Sin, — I atn sure you will join with me in deploring the con-
clusion reached in this matter, as shown in subjoined letters,
and will allow me to say, through your next issue, that I can
only look forward with hope to the good time to come when
we shall have more cohesion between the various societies,
more unanimity of purpose in the endeavour to add to the
dignity of photography, and less airing of presumed personal
grievances and idiosyncrasies. Then the amateur and profes-
sional, as such, will exist no longer, but all will !>e photo-
graphers without any invidious distinction, other than merit,
ami all will form a race, by training and education, infinitely
superior to their fellows of to-day. The Britannia Works
Company hoped that their offer of a scholarship would have
been the foundation stone of such a Utopia ; but it seems we
are ahead of our times ; no one seems equal to the task of
laying that foundation stone aright.
When any society or committee of leading men see their
way to fitly use the gift, it will be ready for them.
John Howson.
Britannia Worles Company , Ilford, E., April 21.it.
Dear Sir, — With reference to your letter of the 29th ult.,
I am directed by the Council of this Society to send you a
copy of the following resolution which, was passed yesterday
evening : — “ That the Council of the Photographic Society of
Great Britain, while thanking the Britannia Works Company
for their offer, regret that, after the due consideration, they
are unable to accept it.”
Photographic Society of Great Britain. A. M. Manteli., Sec.
To J. Howson, Esq., Ilford.
Dear Sir, — I thank you for your letter of yesterday, and
share the regret of the Committee at the non-acceptance of
the proposed scholarship. If I may be permitted to express an
opinion on the matter, I feel that there is a great want of due
regard to the interests of photography when a free and abso-
lutely unfettered gift of £100 per annum to benefit the art
science cannot find a recipient. John Howson.
To Captain Manteli, Secretary P.S.G. B.
DEVELOPMENT IN TWO SOLUTIONS.
Sir, — At page 152 of the last Year-Book ok Photography
is an interesting article, by B. J. Edwards, on “ Development.”
This article, however, contains one small paragraph which might
be expressed more clearly, and I venture to hope that he will
publish his exact meaning for the benefit of amateurs anxious
to learn. I refer to the last paragraph but one, on page 154,
beginning, “It will be obvious,” &c.
Would Mr. Edwards kindly explain what he means by a
“similar solution,” and how in particular would he recom-
mend “Beach’s Developer” to be used so as to carry out the
same principle ?
Beach's Two- Solution Developer.
Water
Sulphurous acid
Sodium sulphite
Pyro
No. 1.
2 ounces
9
^ > J
2 „
218 grains
i
1 ounce = 437i grs.
No. 2.
Carbonate of potash 3 ounces
Sodium sulphite ... 2 ,,
Water ... ... 7 ,,
The above solutions are recommended to be used for normal
exposures, thus : — -Soak the plate for one minute in a mixture
of 30 minims of No. 1 with 2 ounces of water. Pour off the
mixture, add 40 minims of No. 2, and continue development.
How should the “ second developer or intensifier ” be made ?
Does the “ full dose of pyro ” mean that mentioned at top of
page 154, viz., 16 grains to the ounce ? How much ammonium
bromide or potassium bromide to the ounce, and what increase
(if any) of carbonate of potash to the ounce? X.
THE CRYSTAL PALACE CHALLENGE CUP COMPE-
TITION.
Sir, — We should think that your readers will 1* with us in
feeling very much surprised at the trifling evasions of the
Crystal Palace Executive. It is usually considered that in dis-
putes there are two sides to a question, but here we have appa-
rently an exception to this rule. Spile of the amount of repu-
tation which the management must know they have at stake in
this matter, they have never from the beginning of the corres-
pondence replied with proof to any one of our charges.
They say in their last communication that they “deny
unequivocally the allegations,” and “ that the Company is in a
position to prove that such allegations have absolutely no foun-
dation in fact.” Then their course is clear : let them briny
forward this proof, and we shall feel satisfied. This is what
we have all along fruitlessly asked for.
At the same time we are anxious to know what they will
prove. Our last letter is not an allegation, but a string of plain
facts, laid before your readers with no unnecessary comment.
Perhaps they will prove that we sent no pictures at all.
Will they deny that we wrote asking them to lay aside the
four pictures which they — but not their rules — objected to ?
Will they deny the letter from one of their own judges, stating
that only part of our pictures were judged ? Will they deny
their own letters accepting our pictures as in form ? These
are our “ allegations," and unless Messrs. Wollaston and
Peasgood are prepared to bring forward some of this proof
which they profess to have, it is useless to reply further to
their present valueless statements.
Auty & Ruddock, W. Parry,
T. Galloway, J. Pike,
J. P. Gibson, H. R. Proctor,
J. E. Goold, H. G. Ridgwat,
Edgar G. Lee, Lyd. Sawyer.
Mosley Street Cafe, Newcastle-on- Tyne, April 21st, 1890.
patent EnteUtgnue.
Applications for Letters Patent.
5,613. C. Guttmann, 21, Cornhill, London, “ Developing-
Room Lamp.” — April 14th.
5,681. C. R. Shill, 67, Oakhurst Grove, East Dulwich Green,
“ Portable Frames and Suspenders for Mounting and Sus-
pending Pictures.” — April 15th.
5,742. E. Fairweather, 218, Devonshire Road, Forest Hill,
London, “ Developing Photographs.” — April 16th.
5,815. S. Raudnitz, 82, Chancery Lane, London, “Substitute
for Glass.” — April 17th.
5,860. Harry Ransom, 4, South Street, Finsbury, London,
“Cameras.” — April 17 th.
5,863. A. S. L. Abraham, 34, Southampton Buildings, Lon-
don, “ Photographic Shutters.”— April 17th.
Specifications Published.
7,071. — April 27th, 1889. “Spreading Gum, Paste, and like
Liquids, and Stoppering the Bottles containing such Liquids. ”
Adolph Buhi.er, Reiehenhall, Bavaria, late Captain in the
Bavarian Army.
My invention relates to an improved device for enabling gum,
paste, and similar liquids to be evenly spread, the said device
serving also the purpose of an efficient stopper for the bottles
containing such liquids.
It is well known that when spreading gum or similar liquids
by the use of a brush in the ordinary manner, the brush at
first usually contains too much of the liquid, and therefore lays
it on too thickly and unevenly, and if the brush be wiped
against the bottle neck to free it from a superfluity of liquid,
the cork of the bottle is liable to stick fast in the neck thereof.
To avoid the latter difficulty, loose covers, such as metallic cap-
sules, are used, which have the objection that the liquid in the
bottle, through exposure to the air, thickens in a very short
time. Even the recently proposed elastic gum bottles which
terminate in a slit conical tube, and which are used directly for
I spreading the gum by giving the bottles a slight pressure, do
326
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
not well answer the purpose, as the gum soon hardens at the
outlet and clogs it up.
By my invention the hereinbefore described objections arc
overcome.
My improved device comprises a tube which is so fitted in
the corks of the bottle that it can be easily removed therefrom
and replaced.
The tube is advantageously of cylindrical form, pointed at its
lower end, where it is provided with several small perforations.
The tube is preferably fitted with a collar at the upper end, in
order to prevent the point from coming into contact with the
bottom of the bottle.
The upper end of the tube, which is open, has an india-
rubber cap which serves, firstly, to suck a quantity of the
liquid into the tube ; and secondly, when softly pressed,
to cause the liquid to issue through the perforations in the tube
and become evenly and slowly spread.
Instead of employing an india-rubber cap the tube may be
constructed with a piston similarly to a syringe, or the tube
itself may be made in the shape of a plunging-syphon. As the
hole in the cork is made to just fit the tube, all the gum which
may be on the outside of the tube is removed by the cork when
drawing the tube out for use. The tube can, however, be
fastened to the cork, and as it is not necessary to scrape or
wipe the tube against the bottle neck, the cork will not be
liable to stick.
After the tube has been used for spreading the liquid, it is
pushed down again through the cork inio the bottle, until the
collar rests tightty on the cork, thus forming a secure stopper
and preventing the drying up and thickening of the liquid. If
the india-rubber cap of the tube, when pushing the latter back
into the bottle, be compressed by the fingers, the liquid will
enter the tube as soon as the pressure of the fingers is removed,
and the tube will thus be always ready for use.
Instead of using the conical point of the tube for spreading
the liquid, this may be more evenly affected by adapting special
spreading devices to the latter, such as a brush, a piece of
elastic attached to a spring wire, a piece of sponge or a rubber
roller, it being necessary for this purpose to soraew'hat modify
the shape of the end of the tube.
7,759. May 9th, 1889. — “A Combined Umbrella Walking-
Stick.” Gwendoline Peyman, South Bank, Milverton,
Leamington, Warwickshire.
We print this patent because umbrella walking-stick camera
stands have been found useful in photography. The inventor
says
This invention consists in combining an umbrella with a
walking-stick ‘ 1 such a manner that the combined article can
be used for an umbrella or for a walking-stick.
In carrying out my invention, in some cases I form the
umbrella on a tube, such umbrella-tube sliding over a tubular
or solid core.
I form the walking-stick hollow, and place the umbrella and
core inside the walking-stick in such a manner that the walking-
stick can be used for ordinary purposes.
When I wish to use the umbrella, I push the sliding tube
and umbrella out at the end of the walking-stick until the
umbrella shade is entirely outside the walking-stick ; I then
draw back the umbrella tube over its core, and push the
walking-stick concentrically up or inside the shade, and expand
the said shade over the extreme end of the walking-stick,
and then use the walking-stick as a handle for the expanded
shade or umbrella.
The hollow walking-stick must be of a suitable transverse
section to receive a collapsed umbrella ; the umbrella would,
of course, be made of the thinnest material so as to collapse
into the smallest possible dimensions.
8,603. 23rd May, 1889. — “The Production of Phototypes.”
Johannes Adalbert Fischer, Merchant, Leipzig, Saxony.
In the art of printing, the usual method of producing images
in imitation of photographs has been to print the image* on
specially prepared sheets — chalk or chromo-paper sheets — the
said sheets being prepared with a suitable mass on their entire
surface, which could only be done at considerable cost. On
the other hand, in attempting to transfer the images on
ordinary printing paper, there arose the difficulty that, owing
to the absence of the so-called chalk base, the sheets could not
be sufficient lj- polished or glossed to obtain the desired effect.
In order to simplify and cheapen the said printing process,
I proceed as follows : — Any ordinary priuting paper is coated
with a suitable ground glass — or the latter is pressed on — but
only within the outline of the images, after which the images
are printed, and then the surface is polished or glossed.
The images or phototypes thus produced are similar to photo-
graphs or heliotypes, but can be produced more cheaply than
those which were made by preparing the entire surface of the
paper.
The inventor claims : —
An improvement in the production of phototypes, which con-
sists in providing the paper with a base of a suitably prepared
mass within the outlines of the images only, then printing the
image, and subsequently polishing or glossing the surface by a
polishing or glossing machine.
2,776. February 20th, 1890. — “ Photographic Lens Shutters.”
Frank Bishop, of the firm of Marion and Co., 22 and 23,
Soho Square, London, Dealers in Photographic Materials.
A communication to him from abroad by the firm of Voigt-
liinder and Son, of Brunswick, Germany.
The inventor claims : —
1. In a photographic lens shutter composed of segments or
plates pivoted to an annular frame, and simultaneously moved
about their pivots, the construction of the said plates of such
form as to opeu or separate from each other at the centre, and
at practically the same instant or immediately afterwards, in
the direction of the circumference in the form of curvilinear,
ray-like extensions of the central aperture.
2. The combination, with thehereiu-describedshutter, audits
spring-actuated crank motion provided with a shouldered discs,
of the spring-actuated detent adapted to engage with either
shoulder of the said disc, and arrest the shutter in either of
two positions for the purpose specified.
3. The combination, with the herein-described shutter, and
its spring-actuated crank motion, of the spring-actuated detent
adapted to engage with the spring motor, and arrest the
shutter in either of two positions, and of the trigger lever
provided with an adjustable escapement piece adapted to act
on the detent, and disengage it from the spring motor with
whichever shoulder it may be in engagement, and capable of
being so set as to keep the detent out of engagement with the
spring motor during the whole motion of the shutter, or allow
the detent to immediately fall back into engagement with the
spring motor, so as to arrest the shutter when it reaches the
fully-open position.
4. In the herein -described shutter-actuating and releasing
mechanism, the combination, with the trigger and escapement
piece, of the cam or eccentric for adjusting said escapement
piece in either of its two positions.
2,781. February 21st, 1890. — “Cramp for Glueing Picture
Frames.” Georoe Ott, of Ulm, on the Danube, Germany,
Manufacturer.
This invention is a device intended to facilitate the glueing
of frames for pictures and such like, and the compression of
mitred quoins.
The inventor claims a mitre cramp for picture frames or the
like consisting of a frame with an open space furnished with
rabbets, a slide provided with two movable cheeks having dents
arranged at an angle of forty-five degrees, a spring, screw,
cheeks, for the purpose of joining quoins of bands or frame
bars to be glued or otherwise secured together, the whole com-
bined and operating substantially ns set forth in the specifica-
tion.
Camera Club Notices. — Saturday, April 26th, first excur-
sion of the season, Nutfield — leader, ltev. C. F. Fison ; Thurs-
day, May 1st, 8 p.m., Captain Abney will read a paper — sub-
ject to be announced later ; Monday, May 5th, 8 p.m., opening
of exhibition of Mrs. Cameron’s photographs ; Monday, May
5th, 8.30 p.m., smoking concert — last of the season,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
327
April 25, 1890.]
Procee&tnga: of ^oncttfg.
Camera Club.
Tkursdiy April 1 7 tit ; Mr. A. Stkoh in the chair.
A L*e noir on “Amateur and Professional Photographers,”
by Mr. \V. Adcock, was read by die Secretary in consequence
of the absence of the author through illuess. In the paper
Mr. Adcock stated that he was dealing with a delicate subject.
He was an amateur himself, and he had never received a
penny for anything he had done in photography. Amateur
photography was said to reduce the trade of the professional
worker ; also to exercise an influence adverse to him by
conveying an idea to the public of the low cost to him of
the articles he produces ; it was likewise said that amateurs
injured him by giving photographs for sale for charitable pur-
poses. It was said that these influences, in addition to the
rent, rates, taxes, and wages which the professional photo-
grapher had to pay, had rendered it difficult for him at the
present time to keep a special staff for special work. His
(Mr. Adcock’s) sympathies in this matter were with the trader,
whose difficulties he believed to be increasing year by year. As
to the charge of injuring private trade by giving prints for
sale at bazaars in aid of charities, the end seemed to justify
the means. In such cases he employed a trader to produce
from his negatives all the prints he required for the purpose.
He thought that amateur photographers should buy as many
photographs from traders as if they had never taken up the sub-
ject. He also thought that when the friendsof an amateur wan ted
prints from negatives he had taken of them, the amateur should
give the negatives out to a trader and let him supply, on
reasonable fixed terms, whatever prints might be required.
Amateurs should try to give professionals all the support they
could, and obey the golden rule of doing unto others as they
wished others to do unto them.
Mr. Pringle and Mr. Webber expressed approval of much
that had been said by the author of the paper, after which the
discussion drifted into the minor question of the separation of
amateurs and professionals at competitive exhibitions ; a vote
was taken on the point, and ihe meeting was unanimous in the
opinion that no such separation should be made.
The Chairman held that if any injury were done by the
amateur to the professional, it was very slight, and in por-
traiture, the most profitable branch of photography, the pro-
fessional has every advantage, for he has a studio and means of
lighting such as an amateur never dreams of possessing. He
himself had been started in amateur photography by a pro-
fessional. He was at the seaside at the time, and went to get
his portrait taken. In time the prints were sent to his hotel,
and when he looked at them he could not recognise himself in
the least ; it looked like a portrait of the Prince of Wales, and
he had been given somewhat of a Roman nose ; all his friends
laughed at the picture. He went to the photographer and
asked him what he meant. This time he saw the proprietor,
who said, “ Oh ! I suppose you want a likeness. If so, you
must give me another sitting. ” He then sat again, and the
result was worse than before ; consequently, when he returned
to town he thought that he would try what he could do him-
self, so he bought a little apparatus and started as an amateur.
He did not think that he had ever done any harm to a pro-
fessional photographer, and he did not believe that amateurs as
a class did any harm to professionals. He thought that were
it not for amateurs, photography would not be at its present
state of perfection. If they slightly injured those of the
professionals who turned out inferior work, where would be
the manufacturers of apparatus and photographic goods were
there no amateurs ? Altogether, he thought that they did the
photographic industry more good than harm.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 17th inst., Mr. C. H. Cooke occupied
the chair.
A question was asked in reference to the price of aluminium.
Mr. A. Haddon said that at a previous meeting he stated that
he believed it could be bought at about 6s. pel lb. ; this price,
he had since ascertained, was below its present market value.
In ingot it could be bought for 15s.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater, referring to the permanency of silver
prints, said he had recently opened a tin case received from
Naples in which some silver prints had been packed since 1880 ;
the image had quite faded.
Mr. W. E. Debenham said he had a batch of silver prints
that had been lying by since 1882 ; they had been kept flat,
but up to the present time they showed no trace whatever of
fading except that the paper had turned a little yellow.
Mr. J. S. Teape showed a changing bag which could lie
easily made. It consisted of two thicknesses of black satteen
cloth folded and sewn ; the ends were left open, through which
the hands were inserted, the changing being done entirely by
feeling. He had used it frequently in the field for changing
plates, and had found it perfectly safe.
Mr. W. E. Debenham had used a similar bag for changing
plates out of doors. To insure the plates being put into the dark
slides film side down, he attached a small strip of gummed
paper to the back and over-lapping one of the sides of each
plate ; when putting the plate into the slide this strip of paper
was torn off.
Mr. Everett suggested backing the plate. The rough side
would be a guide in changing entirely by the feel, and would
also act as a protection.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater showed several bromide prints of sun-
set pictures. The negatives w'ere taken on Easter Monday at
six o’clock in the evening. In exposing, the cap was taken
quickly off and on the lens, using fj 22 stop. He also showed
some prints from negatives of the landslip at Walton-on-the-
Naze. Referring to the newspaper reports of this matter,
Mr. Freshwater drew attention to Burnt House Farm shown in
one of the pictures as still standing, whereas the reports stated
that this place had been destroyed by the catastrophe.
The Chairman asked whether paper packed between plates
would be likely to cause abrasion of film.
Mr. Debenham thought not, unless a great weight was put
upon them.
Mr. A. Cowan said that this method of packing had advantages
over the paper clips at the edges of plates ; packed in the latter
way plates were more easily broken.
Mr. J. S. Teape said that in grooved boxes it was sometimes
very difficult to get the side plates out of the box ; to obviate
this he simply cut the corners off the box.
Mr. Draoe said that when in New York he bought some plates
which were packed with a strip of cardboard at the edges ;
when developed the film that had been in contact with the
cardboard was found to be full of holes.
Mr. A. Haddon remarked that at the last meeting a lantern-
slide cover-glass, showing a deposit, was exhibited by Mr.
York, but as the crystals were rubbed off before passing round,
the members had no opportunity of examining it. Heshowed
two glass globes blown by him some time ago ; on the inside of
each an arborescent growth had commenced. Mr. Haddon
said that he hail found this growth sometimes commence within
twenty-four hours, but only with soda-glass. He remarked on
the absence of any crystalline formation in incandescent lamps.
From this he inferred that a certain amount of moisture must
be present to form the deposit. In the case of the globes
passed round, this would be supplied by the breath in blowing
them.
Derby Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held in its Rooms, Derwent Street,
on Thursday, the 17th inst.; Mr. Thomas Scotton presided.
Mr. R. Keene read a paper, in the course of which he said
that he had no new theories to propound, no new cranks in
development, as we were so well provided with photographic
literature that everything new was published as soon as it left
the hands of the inventor ; but he would give a short sketch
of the troubles and trials of a photographer who practised the
art some thirty or forty years ago. He dwelt upon the trouble
and time of cleaning and coating glass, and keeping in order
the silver bath, as compared with the dry plate process.
He exhibited a 15 by 15 camera of some twenty years or so
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[April 25, 1890.
328
back, aud compared it with the beautifully made instruments
now in use, stating that a kit of that period would weigh about
three cwt., and now we can get the same result with only a
weight of ten pounds. The paper was interspersed with lively
anecdotes, and was both interesting and instructive. He advo-
cated a system in the exposure of plates, and not to take every-
thing indiscriminately, but to study the locality well before
taking the camera out.
A discussion followed. A number of prints by the Grapho-
tone Company was exhibited.
North Middlesex Photographic Ci.ub.
At the meeting of the above Society on the 14th April, Mr. H.
M. Smith, of the Eastman Company, attended to show some
Kodak cameras, which have already been described in these
pages.
Mr. Walker spoke of the difficulty in obtaining a supply of
the reliable celluloid film with promptitude.
Mr. Smith said that in future the Company hoped to be able
to meet the demand, as they were entitled to one-third of all
that manufactured in America, and were completing the en-
largement of their English works.
In answer to questions, Mr. Smith said that the shutter of
the Kodaks worked at about one-fortieth of a second, and that
its speed may be altered by releasing the spring ; this the East-
man Company are always willing to do free of charge.
The Secretary said that there had been complaints of mark-
ings said to arise from electrical causes.
Mr. Smith responded that there has only been one batch
yielding such markings, aud it was from this, unfortunately,
that Mr. Walker took those negatives wdiich he exhibited at the
Camera Club. The defect was due to coating the celluloid
under as high tension as if it had been paper. Recently the
machinery has been altered, so that there is little probability of
any films being defective from that cause.
On April 28th Mr. F. L. Pither will lecture on “ Art in
Photography.”
Photographic Society op Japan.
A meeting of the above-mentioned society was held in the
Public Hall, Yokohama, on the evening of Saturday. 22ik1 inst.,
Mr. J. Johnstone in the chair.
After the minutes of the previous meeting had been read,
the following candidates were unanimously elected members of
the Society : — H. E. Watauabe, Hiromoto (President of the
Imperial University), Professors B. Koto, J. Milne, and Aug.
Revilliod, Mountjoy Squire (Commander, R.N.), and Messrs. J.
Fraser, G. Scott, A. Futami, T. Tanaka, T. Enami, S. Nihara,
A. R. Lamb, and W. Willett.
A lantern exhibition was then given. Prof. Milne opened
the proceedings by a lecture on earthquakes, illustrated with
maps showing the distribution of volcanoes and of districts sub-
ject to seismic phenomena throughout the world, and more par-
ticularly through Japan, and by a set of slides from photo-
graphs of the destructive effects of earthquakes in all parts of
the world. Some of these showed the danger of arched struc-
tures where earthquakes prevail, others how fractures follow
vertical lines of apertures in buildings, and one how the end
house of a row may be, so to speak, heaved away by the
momentum of the others, which themselves remain intact.
After thus there was an exhibition of a popular nature. There
was a large attendance of members and visitors who seemed to
thoroughly appreciate the pictures, but, unfortunately, the pro-
ceedings were considerably curtailed by a mistake of the exhi-
bitor, who threw the words “good night” on the screen
while there were still many slides to be shown. The audience
rose and were out of the hall before there was time to explain
the matter. The lantern was (with the trifling exception men-
tioned above) ably handled by Mr Takashima Matsuchi.
Messrs. Neoretti and Zambra request us to publish that
they pay a large sum for the exclusive right of taking photo-
graphs in the Crystal Palace aud grounds, as certain enquiries
have recently tbeen made about this matter.
3nstocrs to (jToncspontJcnt*.
All A Ivirtissments and cinnnunriations relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, shiuld be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.8., 2, St. M ary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
E. C. (Burslem). — Elastic Collodion, Probably the best way
of tempering collodion, and conferring upon it a superior
degree of elasticity, is to add a very small proportion of
castor oil, which is freely soluble in .alcohol. This does not
wash out when subsequently immersed in water, but remains
permanently in the film. Only by trial — using, of course, a
minimum — can you find out what quantity to add to the
normal collodion to modify the film in accordance with your
requirements. We should not be inclined to recommend
camphor for this purpose, because of its volatility leading to
alteration by atmospheric exposure.
Photophane.— We really cannot undertake to advise about
investments. You have the Prospectus, and this gives you
ample means of pushing your own enquiries.
Ledbury. — Grains and Grammes. Our Correspondent points
out the disadvantage of adopting the contracted mode of
spelling the word “grain,” for with many writers who do
not take the trouble of dotting the “ i,” there will often be
a doubt about the manuscript as to whether grain or gram
is intended. For this reason we have always advocated the
retention of the French method of spelling the word
“gramme,” so as to avoid error from tliis cause, aud give
the printer specific guidance.
M. P. G. — Oxalate of Silver, when ex posed to light, undoubtedly
gives off carbonic acid, and leaves residual silver in the
blackened product. From this decomposition you cannot
very well argue against the oxychloride theory, there Iteing
so little analogy between the two cases ; the oxalate carrying
its own reducing agent, whilst none is present when the
white chloride of silver is exposed to light, unless water
takes part in the reaction, as has been asserted.
F. C. S. — Impure Sulphites. You are, doubtless, alluding to
Mr. Bothamley’s statement on this head. If so, you have
only to test for sulphates , which may creep in from atmo-
spheric oxidation, by adding to the aqueous solution of the
sulphite a considerable excess of hydrochloric acid, and then
testing with cliloride of barium. Be careful, to use pure
water and HC1, and do not leave the sulphurous acid liquor
exposed to the air, for it is certain to absorb oxygen, and so
pass on to sulphate.
Old Hand.— Change of name. You are never likely to hear
again of Mr. Russell Manners Gordon under his old name,
for the distinguished amateur bears now the Portuguese
title of the Marquis de Torrebello, and resides in Madeira.
T. A. B. — Citro-Chloride Paper. The following proportions
for a plain paper are given by Herr A. Ost, of Vienna, in
Ernst Lietze’s Manual of 1888. Salting solution, one part of
common salt in thirty parts of water. Sensitizing bath —
Nitrate of silver... ... ... ... 1 part
Water ... ... ... ... ... 12 parts
Citric acid ... ... ... ... 1 part
Alcohol ... ... ... ... ... 1 ,,
Mr. Bedford described his mode of working albumenised
paper with separate baths at the March technical meeting of
the Photographic Society. See also page 274 of the News
for April 1 1th.
W. H. B. (Cambridge). — Reduction of Over- Intensified Nega-
tives. 1. Those which have been made too dense by treat-
ment with bichloride of mercury and ammonia may be reduced
again with weak hypo, or even with very dilute hydrochloric
acid. 2. Negatives originally under-develojied, and there-
fore hard, may be improved by Mr. Farmer’s process, which
consists in soaking them in hyposulphite to which a small
quantity of a lemon-yellow solution of potassium ferrieyanide
has been added. Furthermore, in printing from hard nega-
tives, try Mr. Cowan’s method of sunning from t he back as a
mode of toning down the violent contrasts,
J. D. and Amateur received,
NEWS
THE
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1652. — May 2, 1890.
CONTENTS.
P AO K
Improvements in the Mounts of Lenses 329
Mr. Eiffel a Photographer 3S0
The German Photographic Union 330
The Founding of the Lantern Society 332
The Photographic Convention at Chester 333
Lantern Slide Work. Ry Godfrey Ringley 333
Photographic Exhibitions in India 83 3
Crossing National Frontiers with Dry Plates 33C
Photography in Fiction 337
Notes 338
PA8«in»;
The Photographic Club 339
The Latent Photographic Image. By C. II. Bothamley 339
A Meeting About Lens Standards 341
The Permanence of Photographic Prints. By Prof. H. Fol ... 343
Photographic Lenses. By T. R. Dallmeyer 344
The Society of Arts 345
Patent Intelligence 340
Correspondence 346
Proceedings of Societies 347
Answers to Correspondents 348
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE MOUNTS OF
LENSES.
A meeting, the results of which are likely to be of
considerable benefit to photographers in this and in
some other countries, was held last week in London
under the auspices of a committee of the Photographic
Convention, and a long report thereof is given in these
pages to-day. A fair number of representative
opticians accepted the invitation of the committee to
be present at the meeting, the object of which was to
consider the subject of standards for photographic
lenses. From the general drift of the conference, it
seemed that there was little chance of the opticians
being likely to agree to issue diaphragms with apertures
made in accordance with one particular standard, but
when it came to the question of establishing a system
of uniform standard flanges, there seemed to be a fair
chance of agreement, and some practical steps are about
to be taken to achieve the desired result. To the
photographer this means that hereafter he may be
relieved from the necessity of carrying an unnecessary
weight of wood and brass, in the form of adapters or
extra camera fronts, and that one of his objections to
adding to his stock of lenses will be removed. Another
blessing which may result from the meeting of last
Friday will be the general introduction of camera
screws of uniform dimensions.
The consideration of the subject of standard bayonet
joints for lens mounts, in place of the ordinary screws,
was considered by some of those present to be too large
a question to take up now, but it is evident that the
time lost by a photographer in screwing and uuscrewiug
lenses, especially when they have fine threads, is a
grievance, and sometimes causes the loss of a picture.
Mr. G. L. Addenbrooke once exhibited at the Photo-
graphic Society some lenses specially mounted, so as
not to be open to the objection just mentioned, and he
has stated that he never knew what comfort in land-
scape photography was before he had those lenses made.
If they were to be examined at the adjourned meeting
of the opticians next week, their criticisms of them
would be of public interest. Mr. Dallmeyer expressed
the opinion last Friday that screw bayonet joints were
better than pin bayonet joints for lenses.
Various opticians are feeling their way in the
direction of adopting aluminium mounts for lenses, and
some lenses so mounted are in the market, as already
published in these pages. Some opticians are hesitating
in the matter because they think aluminium to have an
uncertain character, for opera-glasses are often returned
for repairs because their aluminium mounts get out of
order. Cases are known in private life of such mounts
oxidizing somewhat suddenly into white clay, when
accidentally subjected to unfavourable conditions.
Defects of this kind are more likely to become evident
! when the mounts are made of bad aluminium, and as
| good aluminium is twice the price of bad, it is evident
that the latter may often find its way into cheap opera-
glass mounts, which are largely made in France. In
fairly trying aluminium for lenses, the best only
should be used. Pure aluminium has much the same
physical characteristics as pure copper, but differs from
copper strongly in its chemical characteristics. This is
especially noticeable in its electro-chemical relations.
To favour the use of aluminium in lens mounts, only
the best metal should be employed, and the user of the
lens should take reasonable care not to store it in a
damp place.
Perhaps an alloy of aluminium may be found which
will be better for lens mounts than the pure metal ;
but it must consist almost entirely of aluminium, or
the saving in weight as compared with the weight of
brass will be insufficient. A firm in the North once
made harness of an alloy of aluminium and bismuth,
which alloy was subject to slow oxidation, so that the
harness could be polished simply by rubbing off with
leather the thin coating of white clay formed,
330
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 2, 1890.
HR. EIFFEL A PHOTOGRAPHER.
An exhibition of competitive designs for the “ Great
Tower ” in London has been opened at the Hall of the
Drapers’ Company in Throgmorton Street, the place in
which the coming City Photographic Exhibition is to
be held. The promoters, “The Tower Company,
Limited,” of whom Sir Edward Watkin is said to he
the leading spirit, have offered prizes of five hundred
guineas for the best, and of two hundred and fifty guineas
for the second best design and estimate for a tower of not
less than 1,200 feet in height. The curious show of
designs is well worth seeing, and will be open from
Monday until Friday next week, between midday and
five o’clock in the evening, admission free. On Wed-
nesday next the doors will not he closed until ten
o’clock at night.
Mr. Eiffel has thus found his imitators. It may not
he generally known to the followers of the art-science
that Mr. Eiffel is an amateur photographer, and that a
photo-mechanical print from one of his negatives was
issued some months ago in the Revue Suisse de la Photo-
graphie. The scene represented was a “ Festival of
the Grape Growers,” in which the peasantry were
represented enjoying high jinks at what may be called
a harvest home in the wine districts.
The most remarkable specimen of retouching — if so
it may be called — which we have ever seen, came from
Mr. Eiffel, and was the work of a professional photo-
grapher in Paris. When the Eiffel Tower was three
parts finished, we spent some weeks in studying the
details of its construction, and after returning to
England, received a large photograph of the tower
from Mr. Eiffel. The photograph was not quite up to
date, having been taken a fortnight previously. On
representing this to Mr. Eiffel, he asked for its return,
and it was sent to him.
A few days later the same photograph came back to
us in a case by express passenger train, with the tower
represented as it stood the night before the photograph
last left Paris. By the skill of the hand-artist, so
much of the tower had been added to the original
photograph, that the picture extended off the albumen-
ized paper, and some one or two inches of the picture
were thus up an the mount itself. The work had been
beautifully done ; the top of the tower matched the
lower part in colour and photographic appearance with
surprising fidelity. Those photographers who do not
like to call this an instance of retouching are at liberty
to call it an example of the lateral extension of the
photographic image.
Photographic Club. — Subject for discussion on May 7th,
“ Lenses for Instantaneous Work ; ” May 14 th, “ Photographic
Definition.”
Mr. Stanley. — In a graphic description of the explorer’s
arrival at Dover, a daily contemporary says : — “Just before
the company on deck made a movement for the shore, an enter-
prising photographer succeeded in taking a picture of the group.
He was in the nick of time. He seemed to be quite satisfied.
Hut if the photographer got all he wanted from Mr. Stanley,
it was more than anybody else got. The interviewers got
nothing from him, except that he felt well enough, but that he
wanted rest. They bored him,”
THE GERMAN PHOTOGRAPHIC UNION.
The following notice has been sent to us of a meeting of
German photographers and an exhibition at Eisenach,
under the presidency of K. Schwier, a photographer of
world-wide celebrity. The nineteenth travelling meeting
of the German Photographic Union will take place from
the 27th to the 29th of August, 1890, in Eisenach.
An exhibition is again, as formerly, connected with this
meeting, in which both members and non-members are
allowed to take part. To this the members of the German
Photographic Union are hereby kindly invited. Non-
members will be gladly welcomed as guests, but they must
present themselves personally to the directorate. Notices
should be sent to the Court photographer, C. llemde,
Eisenach, or to the president, K. Schwier, Weimar.
THE ORDERING OF THE ENTERTAINMENT.
Tuesday, August 2G th. — In the afternoon at 1 o’clock, a
reception of the guests at the railway station ; members
of the local committee will attend to meet the train ; their
mark of distinction will be a dark green and yellow ribbon.
In the evening at 8 o'clock, issue of entertainment tickets
in Groblers Restaurant (Zimmermann). For members and
those belonging to them, the price of these tickets will be
ten marks, for non-members thirteen marks.
Wednesday, August 27th. — In the forenoon at 8.30, open-
ing of the nineteenth Travelling Meeting in the hall of the
Clemda.
Commencement of the Order of the Day.
At one o'clock, the opening and official inspection
of the exhibition in the manufactory ; at 2 o’clock, a
general departure for the Wartburg; official inspection of
the Wartburg. Taking of groups. Evening concert in
the Wartburg.
Thursday, August 28th. — In the forenoon at 8.30, contin-
uation and conclusion of the Order of the Day. At 12
o'clock, a breakfast at the Tivoli. At 1 o’clock, a
promenade in the environs of Eisenach. In the afternoon
at G o’clock, a general entertainment at dinner, and a
sociable meeting in the hall of the Clemda.
Friday, August 29 th. — In the forenoon, at 10 o'clock,
meeting and breakfast at Grobler’s Restaurant (Zimmer-
mann). At 11 o’clock, a general excursion bv carriages
to Wilhelmsthal. At 2 o’clock, a general lunch at the
same place at 1.50 marks a head. At 3 o’clock, a farther
expedition to Ruhla, and thence back again to Eisenach.
At 8 o’clock in the evening, a meeting in the Clemda, and
announcement of the decisions of the committee appointed
for the distribution of the prizes. Conclusion of the
nineteenth Travelling Meeting.
the order of the day.
August 27th, at 8.30 in the forenoon : — (a) Transaction
of necessary business, (h) The inquiry box ; every mem-
ber of the directorate is willing to receive inquiries, (c)
Opening and inspection of the Exhibition. At 1 o'clock
the Exhibition will be opened for those who take part
in it.
Wednesday, Aug. 27 th, from 1 o’clock to 2.30.
Thursday, Aug. '28th, from 1 o’clock to G o’clock.
Friday, Aug. 29 th, from 1 o’clock.
On Friday, Aug. 29th, from 1 o'clock at noon ; on
Saturday, Aug. 30th, from the same hour ; and on Sunday,
Aug. 31st, the Exhibition will be also open to the public.
The Exhibition will be divided into three principal
groups, containing fourteen divisions, having relation to
the following prizes of honour, medals, and diplomas : —
Mav ‘2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
831
Tic Fir.*t Group. — Particular announcements and insti-
tutions:— (a) Constant. — (1) A gold, a silver, and a bronze
medal, given by the Festge Institution, for the three best
collections of picture groups of two persons in cabinet
form ; open to members and non-members of the German
Photographic Union* ; (2) The gold medal of the
Kindermann Institution, for the best collection of single
portraits of the size above mentioned, open to members
and non-members of the German Photographic Union*.
( l> ) Occasional. — (3) A prize of honour given by Herr
F. Brandseph, Sen., and Herr II. Brandseph, dun., of
Stuttgart, consisting of a silver cup (of the value of 200
marks), for the best collection of landscapes in cabinet
form, open to members and non-members of the German
Photographic Union*; (4) The Eisenach Institution of
Herr C. Kindermann Hamburg, consisting of a complete
travelling apparatus, 13 by 1.8 c.m.. of the value of 200
marks, for the best collection of a day's work (24 cabinet
portraits), from smaller studios, open only to members of
the German Photographic Union* ; (5) A prize of honour
given by llerr Fr. Ritter v. Voigtliinder, of Brunswick,
consisting of 300 marks, and another of 200 marks,
for the best biking of a group ; open to members
and non-members of the German Photographic Union.*
The Second Group. — General Union Announcements : —
These are intended for members and non-members of the
German Photographic Union ; professionals, amateurs,
and manufacturers may take part in them, (a) Constant ;
(G) A silver medal for a new rapid copying process. The
successful inventor will not be bound to communicate
any of the mysteries of his invention ;* (l) Occasional.
Here are announced as first prizes, silver and gold medals
with diplomas attached ; as second prizes, bronze medals :
as third prizes, diplomas. The number of these distinc-
tions will be left to the sole direction of the awarders
of the prizes. These prizes will be conferred : —
In Section A (for pure photographic work) ; (7) For
the best photographs in the portrait department, either
enlargements or direct pictures. The enlargements must,
however, be executed in the studio of the exhibitor ; (8)
For the best specimens in the landscape department,
among which are to be included studies of architecture
and instantaneous takings of movable objects ; (9) For
distinguished performances by amateurs ; (10) For dis-
tinguished scientific work, whether of a photographic or
literary character. In Section B (for photographic work
and reproduction) ; (11) For the best photograph in the
department of reproduction ; (12) For the best specimens
in the field of new mechanical printing processes. In
Section C (13) for special works, improvements, meritorious
manufacture of photographic utensils (backgrounds, deco-
rations, furniture, cameras, &c.). praiseworthy exhibitions
of raw materials (chemicals, papers, cartoons, &c.) With
these last a judgment of the Examining Committee of the
German Photographic Union must be sent in, upon which
the awarders of the prizes can rely in their decision.
To the Exhibition under the first and second groups
every kind of photograph is admitted, also all appliances
necessary or useful to the photographic art — such as
chemicals, apparatus, backgrounds, &c.
According to No. G of the regulations, to the prize com-
petition in group A7 — 10, as also to the institutions 1 — 5
(so far as the contrary is not expressed), only such photo-
graphs are admitted as have never been before shown in
All particulars may beobtained on application to the President.
any exhibition, and have been prepared since the last
travelling meeting of the German Photographic Union at
Weimar. It is requisite for competitors to declare that
these regulations have been complied with. There can
be no exception to them under any pretext whatsoever.
All photographic pictures must be sent in a condition
suitable for exhibition, that is to say, in frames or as collec-
tions in a portfolio. It is preferable for pictures to be
framed without glass, that they may be more conveniently
judged.
Pictures will, in the Exhibition, be divided into groups,
&c. For this reason, landscapes, portraits. &c., should
not be mounted in a single frame, but they should
be framed separately, every kind by itself.
The Third Group. — Exhibition for foreigners : — (14) To
satisfy numerous requests, and to maintain the friendly
relation of the German Photographic Union with foreign
photographers, the committee has decided upon making
a special department of the Exhibition for their interests.
To this all foreigners (non-members of the German Photo-
graphic Union), especially our American and English
colleagues, are hereby invited. In the conditions of
competition in this group, No. G of the above-mentioned
regulations must be carefully attended to. Photographs
exhibited in this group may have been exhibited else-
where, but it is desirable that in this group also no older
work than that of last year should be represented. Con-
tributors to the third group are not bound to pay
anything for space, but it is earnestly desired that
the objects sent in should be left to the travelling
care of the German Photographic Union, in order that they
may be seen by those members of the Society who have
not been able to visit the Exhibition.
In this group also gold, silver, and bronze medals, as
well as diplomas, will be offered for prizes (as above).
For works, &c., in all the groups which are not success-
ful enough to win a prize, honourable mention may be
obtained.
In addition to this, especially deserving performances
in any part of photography which are not included under
any of the above-mentioned numbers may be especially
rewarded by the consent of the directorate.
The prizes offered by the Union will only be given in
cases where the exhibits reach the highest (and not the
relatively highest) degree of excellence in their respective
divisions.
The awarders of the prizes will consider in the first
place the knowledge of technique, and artistically good
execution. These features will be of the first impor-
tance in all the prize distributions.
Preliminary applications with respect to the exhibition
are to be addressed to the President of the German Pho-
tographic Union, Herr lv. Schwier, Weimar. Appli-
cants included in the provisions of the second group (7 to
13) will receive thereupon application tickets, which are
to be sent, after being filled up, to Herr C. Remde,
Eisenach, up to the 15th of August. Exhibitors in-
cluded in the third group may apply without any form.
The delivery of the exhibits must be made between the
20th and 25th of August, at the exhibitors’ own cost and
risk, to I lerr ( )tto Yolpel, in Eisenach. Works intended for
the Sections 1 to 5 of the first group, as well as of
Number 6 of the second group, are to be sent to I lerr
(’. Remde, Eisenach, without any previous application.
Upon each package is to be marked clearly, “For the
German Photographic Union.” Every exhibit and every
332
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Mat 2, 1890.
frame — with the exception of pictures belonging to the
Institutions 1 to 5 —must bear upon their backs the address
of the exhibitor. Exery box .and every cover must bear
the same address on its inside. The exhibitions will,
according to their estimated worth, be insured on the part
of the German Photographic Union against danger of fire
and water. Xo further accountability will be admitted.
It is better, when possible, to send amount for the space
required with the application. The charge for space to
members of the Union is three marks for every square
metre : to non -members five marks for every square metre
of table, wall, or ground superficies. Every commence-
ment of a square metre will be reckoned as a full square
metre. Applications for space over ten square metres
will be entitled to ten per cent, discount.
For members of the German Photographic Union
included under the second group, Division A, Xos. 7 and
10, as also Division B, Xos. 11 and 12, the two first square
metres will not be reckoned. From foreign exhibitors,
so far as they come under the third group, no space hire
will be exacted. Candidates coming under the six
institutions (Nos. 1-6), will pay no space hire. The
reckoning of the space hire is regulated (except in the
case of unusual claims) after the actual space occupied
by the pictures or frames. Applications or deliveries
arriving too late can only be furnished with spaces remain-
ing unoccupied.
The return of the goods will be at the cost of the
exhibitor, after reimbursement of charges at the conclusion
of the exhibition, by Herr Otto Volpel, in Eisenach.
Remittances of money must be directed to Herr L.
Frank, in Eisenach.
From the afternoon of the 29th August, till Sunday the
31st August inclusive, the exhibition will be open to the
public. The exhibitors are therefore required to allow
their exhibits to remain on view until the exhibition has
closed.
The awarders of prizes, who are chosen according to
the statutes regulating the Exhibition, consist of nine
persons ; of these, three are chosen by the directorate. The
Travelling Association then announces a list of eighteen
persons chosen by acclamation, and of these the remaining
six persons are chosen by the exhibitors present. These
nine officials are the awarders of all the prizes. They
must, according to Xos. 2 and 3 of the business regula-
tions, form three groups, each group consisting of three
persons.
The first of these groups has to judge about the Sec-
tions— I.; the second about the objects exhibited in II.
A and B ; and the third group has to judge about the
objects exhibited in II. C. and III. The resulting judg-
ments of these three groups will be afterwards proved
and confirmed by the Collective Jury. The Collective
Jury may substitute a gold for a silver medal, as an award
of the highest distinction.
The critical meetings of the Exhibition will relate
to —
(a) Lectures and Discussions.
An Entertainment Lecture will be delivered by .
There will also be introduced to the assembly .
( h ) Communications respecting the adjudicated awards
and prizes for all objects exhibited will be announced on
Friday, the 28th August, at eight o’clock in the evening.
The Directory of the German Photographic Union —
K. Schwier, Weimar, President. The Local Committee
— C. Remde, Eisenach, Court Photographer.
THE FOUNDING OF THE LANTERN SOCIETY.
The inaugural meeting of the new Society bearing this title,
and having for its chief objects the development and popularisa-
tion of the optical lantern, took place in the Theatre of
the Society of Arts on Friday last, when some 200 visitors
attended.
The chairman of the council, the Hon. Slingsby Bethell,
prefaced the demonstration by an apology for the impromptu
nature of the programme, which, he said, was due less to a
lack of resources than to an earnest desire to make an early
beginning, with the view to placing the claims of the new body
well in the foreground. Having explained that the session
proper would commence on the 1st of October next, and that
all applications for membership received in the interval would
be treated as belonging to the year then to be entered upon,
he appealed to all present who were interested in the optical
lantern to bring the claims of the Society before their friends
at the first fitting opportunity, and continuing, said it had
been agreed that the programme of the Society might l*st be
carried out :
1. By the engaging of premises in some central position in
London, at which the meetings of the council and of the
Society might be held.
2. By acquiring suitable apparatus for the purpose of giving
exhibitions of general and scientific interest to both members
and their friends.
3. By obtaining the services of specialists in every branch of
art or science suited to optical demonstration.
4. By offering — as far as the funds of the Society will
permit — remuneration or awards for the development of the
optical lantern, and of all apparatus pertaining thereto.
5. By imparting instruction to those who are desirous of
learning how to effectively manipulate the optical lantern, to
produce slides an 1 apparatus, and to efficiently employ the
; same both in private and in public.
t>. By assuring for the members of the Society special and
1 advantageous terms from manufacturers and others for the pur-
chase or loan of apparatus and slides.
7. By forming a large and comprehensive loan collection of
lantern transparencies pertaining to art, science, and kindred
subjects ; such loan collection to be placed at the disposal
of every member, upon conditions to be laid down by the
council.
8. By providing a means of inter-communication l>etween
the members of the Society, whereby each member may be
made acquainted with the private collections of his fellow-
memliers, and may be able to negotiate a mutual loan if so
desired.
9. By arranging an interchange of demonstration Itetween
photographic, microscopical, and other societies interested in
optical lantern work.
The Chairman further remarked : —
“The marvellous powers of photography to illustrate and
bring home to the mind in the most striking and faithful
manner, especially by means of the optical lantern, the glories
and beauties of nature, the treasures of art, and the wonders
of science, induced us to hope that, by drawing together [ar-
sons thus interested, a jowerful society may be formed on an
intellectual, educational, and scientific basis, with a recreative
and social side, and of which our present meeting is but a crude
and incomplete example.
“ Although not a club in the usual sense of the word, still
we hope soon to have a suitable habitation, where meetings of
members will be held, pajiers read, discussions encouraged, and
some photographic work carried on.
“Composed, as I believe we shall be, of scientific and prac-
tical men, of professional as well as of amateur photographers,
of those learned in chemical, microscopical, and optical science
i generally, constructers and designers of every description of
apparatus, we shall endeavour at least to benefit and instruct each
other, if not those unconnected with us, and bring to greater per-
fection in all its phases and aspects — technical as well as artistic
— this particular branch of the art and science which we have
adopted for study.
, “ Another aim that the Society has in view is the formation
May 2, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
wS;
333
INTERN SLIDE WORK.
^ ^ dv Aambbi niWT rv
BY GODFREY BINGLEY.
of a large loan collection of lantern slides, complete in its classi-
fication, arrangement, and method of illustration.
“ As we advance, scientific and photographic societies, educa-
tional bodies, schools, and institutions will have facilities of
affiliating themselves to us, and thus obtaining much ass:stanee
from our extensive photographic library, so to speak. Mem-
bers will, of course, receive this privilege to a larger extent,
and many more, for eventually we hope to offer them additional
advantages, viz., the use of dark rooms and laboratories for all
photographic operations, the production of lantern slides in
particular.
“America has already made great strides with the optical
lantern, so we shall endeavour to put ourselves en rapport with
our cousins across the Atlantic, and to interchange with them
for photographic illustrations of their grandest wonders of
nature representations of some of our homely but lovely scenery.
“ Welcoming, as members of the Lantern Society, all thus
interested, we shall develop, I trust, into a large and influential
tody, competent and willing to place any fresh knowledge and
experience that we may acquire within the reach of others of
like tastes.
“ Finally, growing in strength, we may number amongst our
body members, practically and scientifically, more learned in
particular branches of science, who will come forward and
initiate us into the meaning, mysteries, and beauties of many
of our unappreciated photographic illustrations.”
Following the address of the Chairman, which was cordially
received, there were projected upon the screen about 130 fine
slides divided into three different lots, and comprising — Views
by Ferrier and Soulier, of Italian and Swiss scenery, ice scenes
in Swiss mountains and at Niagara ; astronomical photographs
of the moon and of the eclipse of the sun, taken with the Lick
telescope ; views of the Forth Bridge and of the engine room
of the City of Paris after the accident to her machinery ;
representations of old lace from the South Kensington Museum ;
a large collection of Woodbury slides of Indian and Syrian
Temples ; types of heads ; views of English Cathedrals, both
iuterior and exterior ; insects mounted direct on glass ; views
of the Paris Exhibition ; and a large collection of landscapes
from all parts.
In the interval that elapses before the programme of the
Society is entered upon in earnest, the Council will be busily
engaged in drafting bye-laws, selecting suitable accommodation
for the future home of the Society, and the Honorary Secre-
tary, Lieutenant C. E. Gladstone, R.N., will be pleased to
forward full particulars and applications for membership, upon
receipt of a post-card at 6, Bolton Street, Piccadilly, Lou-
don, W.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT
CHESTER.
This Photographic Convention for 1890, under the pre-
sidency of Mr. C. II. Bothamley, will be held at the Town
Hall, Chester, on June 23rd to 28th, 1890, inclusive.
The Council consists of Messrs. Conrad Beck, IV. Bed-
lord, C. II. Bothamley, F. A. Bridge, J. J. Briginshaw
(Hon. Secretary and Treasurer), F. P. Cembrano, E.
Clifton, E. IV. Cowan, A, Cowan, T. R. Dallmeyer, G.
Davison, A. R. Dresser, F. Evans (Local Hon. Secretary,
Eastgate Buildings, Chester), AV. P. J. Fawcus, S. II. Fry,
Friese Greene, A. Haddon, F. Haes, II. M. Hastings,
Adolph Levy, A. Mackie, E. W. Parnell, A. Pringle
(Chairman), T. Samuels, J. Traill Taylor, G. AA'atmough
A\ ebster. and J. B. B. AA’ellington.
Suppression ok Halos in Photographic Proofs. Paul
Henry and Prosper Henry. — The authors succeed in avoiding
these halos by covering the back of the plate with a layer of
normal collodion holding in solution a small quantity of chry-
soidine. This varnish having an index of refraction little differ-
ent from that of glass, completely suppresses the halos. — Chen i-
<cal At ics.
What 1 have to say this evening will, in a great measure,
be based on my owrn short experience, and though what I
may bring forward may be “ stale, flat, and unprofitable ”
to many of the older members of this Society, I trust that it
may be of some little assistance to any who have not yet
attempted to make lantern slides. For some reason or
other, only a small proportion of the members of this
Society sends in lantern slides to our annual lantern ex-
hibition. Certainly there is no better or more pleasing
way of showing photographs than by exhibiting them on a
screen with the aid of the optical lantern ; the fact that so
many people go to our lantern exhibitions is in itself a
proof that this branch of photographic work is appreciated,
and to the photographer the artistic qualities and failings
of his work become more manifest when seen enlarged on
the screen, than when viewed on a small print. Before
proceeding farther, it may be well to allude to the best
size of camera to work with, as some amateurs do not care
to make anything but lantern slides. Small cameras arc
made to take a plate 3£ square, and although this small-
sized camera may do for ordinary landscape work, it is
practically useless for instantaneous photography, such as
marine and seaside studies, cattle pieces, and other moving
objects. Many of you, no doubt, who work quarter-plate
cameras, have found them too small for this class of work,
and have been considerably disappointed, when the plate
has been developed, to find nothing but a barren waste of
water, or a field with the surrounding fence the only sub-
ject on the plate. I would therefore advise nothing less
than quarter-plate, or 5 by 4.
Lantern slides are made either by “ direct contact,” or
by “ reduction’’ from the negative by re -photographing
from the negative by means of the camera and a reducing
frame.
Slide making by “direct contact” is the plan most
generally adopted by amateurs, because of the ease with
which it can be done by artificial light ; but I very much
prefer, however, making slides by “reduction,” especially
if working from a half -plate, or larger negative. No doubt
very good slides are made from quarter-plate negatives by
“ contact,” but how few pleasing ones are made from the
larger sized negatives in this way, for when taking a view
with the camera, you study the proportions and composi-
tion of the picture in relation to the size of the plate you
are working, and not simply with the idea of printing out
a picture 3} square ; it is only by “ reduction ” you can
get the full value of your negative on the lantern plate.
Another advantage obtained by “ reducing” is that a soft
slide may be made from a hard negative, and also good
slides from poor and faulty negatives, negatives from
which it would be impossible to make a slide by “con-
tact,” or even to get a passable silver print from. In
“ contact ” printing, the length of exposure required of
course varies according to the make of plate used and the
density of the negative. I think it is best to have one
fixed distance from the light for exposing the slide, and to
vary the time of exposure according to the density of the
negative, rather than vary the distance. If the distance
the frame is held from the light be varied, always remem-
ber that the length of exposure will increase as the squares
of the distances the frame is held from the illuminant, and
not in a numerical ratio ; for example, if an exposure of
* A paper read before the Leeds Phot 'graphic Society.
oo 4
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 2, 1890.
10 seconds at one foot distance is sufficient, and the distance
is increased to 3 feet, an exposure of 90 seconds will be
needful.
For making slides by “reduction” some sort of re-
ducing frame is required to hold the camera and negative :
the apparatus is, however, very simple. It consists of a
baseboard on which there is a sliding block to carry the
camera at one end, and at the opposite end a deep box
about ten or twelve inches square, open at the end next
the camera, the other end holding a sliding carrier in which
to place the negative.
“ Reductions ” are best made by daylight. The plan 1
adopt is as follows : Having placed my reducing frame,
on which I have fixed a quarter-plate camera, in front of
an upper window (in the lower square of which I have
inserted a sheet of ground glass for the purpose of diffus-
ing the light), I place the negative in the sliding carrier
and carefully focus it, then stop down the lenses to U.N.
16, and expose the plate in the usual way. The exposure,
of course, varies according to the light and density of
the negative as in “contact” printing; at this time of
the year the exposure will vary from 30 seconds to a
minute with a fair average negative. A long exposure
and retarded development will give warm tones ; a short
exposure and active development will give black tones,
and I find the tones are always warmer if the exposures
are made on a bright, sunny day, than even with a long
exposure on a dull day. I advise, however, that workers
should adhere to one standard strength of developer ; and
for “ contact ” printing one fixed distance from the light for
exposure, and produce the tone desired solely by the time
of exposure. If this plan is adopted I am sure much
more satisfactory results will be obtained than by con-
tinually altering the strength of the developer, and vary-
ing the distance the plate is held from the light.
Most of the slides prepared by professionals are made
by the collodion or wet plate process ; very fine slides are
also made by collodio-albumen.
It is generally considered that there are no lantern
slides at all equal to those made by one or other of
the collodion processes. No doubt for brightness and
“ sparkle ” collodion slides are difficult to surpass, but
there is often a want of half-tone about them, consequently
little gradation between the high -lights and shadows.
The gelatine plate is running the collodion process a very
hard race ; and I venture to think — though it may be
considered somewhat heterodox to even throw out the mere
suggestion — that for softness and half-tone the gelatine
plate holds the field. I do not propose to enter into any
details of the working of the collodion processes, neither
do I intend to say anything about preparing gelatine plates,
as I have had no experience in any of these branches of
photographic work. I know there are several of our
members present who prepare their own plates, and who
have in the past given us the results of their experience.
There are many good makes of plates on the market, and
for those who do not care to make their own, I would
say try several makes, and then stick to those you find
give you the best results. I may say in passing that
gelatiuo-chloride plates are of no use for reducing, as
they are far too slow.
Lantern plates are usually developed either by ferrous
oxalate, pyro and ammonia, pyro and washing soda, or
hydroquinone. Formerly ferrous oxalate was the favourite
developer for lantern plate work, but it is not so much
used now. The tones produced by it are always of a cold
grey, and considerable care is required when working with
it, for the slightest contact of hypo will cause a fog to
spread over the plate. Pyro and ammonia is a favourite
developer with many workers ; some add a little carbonate
of ammonia to obtain red tones. A very good developer,
and one easy to work with, is washing soda and pyro. It
gives pleasing tones, but it has, however, the disadvantage
of often leaving a yellow fog on the plate, which must be
removed by a clearing solution, and, unless considerable
care is used in clearing, many of the finer details may be
entirely removed ; and if allowed to remain in the solution
too long, the plate loses its sharpness, and looks fiat
when shown on the screen.
Hydroquinone has now come into great favour as a
developer for lantern plate work, and is the one I prefer
to all others. It gives absolutely clear glass, and the
slides require no clearing after development, unless they
have been token from thin or faulty negatives, when a
little local clearing by means of a camel's hair brush may
be required.
The formula that I like the best is one given by Thomas
and Co. with their plates, viz. : —
No. 1. — Hydroquinone
... 160 grs.
Sulphite of soda
2 ounces
Brom. amm....
... 20 grs.
Citric acid ...
... 60 „
Water
to 20 ounces
No. 2. — Carbonate of potash...
... 2 ounces
Carbonate of soda (crystallized)
0
... - ff
Water
to 20 „
Use an equal quantity of each.
I generally develop four plates with 2y ounces of solu-
tion. I have developed as many as ten, but four are quite
sufficient, for after that number the developer becomes
very slow, and has a tendency to “ block ” the shadows.
Eikonogen is said to produce similar results to hydro-
quinone, but I have never tried it.
Tt is better to develop slides by artificial light rather
than by daylight passing through some non-actinic medium ;
for daylight is so variable in its intensity that it renders it
difficult to judge the proper density of the slide in con-
sequence ; whereas, by artificial light, you can have one
fixed standard, and develop the slides to pretty nearly an
equal density. It is desirable to develop a little denser
than required, as the slide loses a little of its density in the
fixing bath. Immediately after placing the plate in the
developing solution, pass a camel’s hair brush (kept in a
cup of water near the developing dish) rapidly over the
plate, to remove any small air-bubbles which may be on
the surface of the film. After development, the plate
requires a good wash under the top, and should then be
placed in the fixing bath : —
Hypo ... ... ... ... ... 4 ounces
Water ... ... ... ... ... 20 ,,
And allowed to remain there for a few minutes after all
whiteness has disappeared, so as to ensure thorough
fixation. Wash again after removal from the fixing solu-
tion, and place it for a short time in a saturated solution of
alum to harden the film. If working with hydroquinone,
on no account place the plate in the alum solution before
fixing, or you may obtain a result not to be desired.
If from any error in exposure, or if the slide is taken from
a thin negative, causing it to be opaque when there ought
to be clear glass, this opacity may be removed with a
May 2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
335
little care and patience by the aid of the following clearing
solution : —
Sulphate of iron . . .
Alum
Sulphuric acid ...
Water.
3 ounces
1 ounce
1 „
20 ounces
Pour a little of this solution into a small dish, and place a
basin containing clean water near ; then, holding the
plate in the left hand, with the sky or fogged part slanting
downwards, so as to prevent the clearing solution running
into the details of the picture, paint with a small brush
the clearing solution over the fogged part of the plate
until it becomes quite clear, frequently dipping the plate
into the water during the process to prevent the clearing
solution spreading over the plate. Any over-dense
shadow may also be reduced in this way. Before doing
this, take care that the slide has been in the alum bath.
Lantern slides must be quite free from fog or veil ; the
above method will quite remove this defect, and, if care is
used, the details of the picture will not be injured. After
fixing and clearing as above-mentioned, the slide should
be washed for a few hours in the same way as an ordinary
negative. On taking the plates out of the washing trough,
it is advisable to give each a good rinse under the tap, so
as to remove any particles of grit that may have been 1
deposited on the film from the washing water, and then
place them on edge to dry — not in a rack — where they
will be kept quite free from dust.
There arc several methods of toning slides, but I have
not tried any of them, for I much prefer the rich brown,
or even the black tone of the ordinary photograph, to
the red or other tints that may be obtained by toning,
and I believe there is considerable risk of a toned slide
fading away.
When the film is thoroughly dry, it is ready for
mounting for the lantern. I am sorry to say there is
often but little care exercised with this part of the
work, and many an otherwise good slide is completely
spoiled by the careless and slovenly way in which it is >
mounted. The photograph and cover glasses should be
absolutely clean, and free from all dust and finger j
marks ; and here I would say a word as to the thick-
ness of the cover glasses. Very thick glass adds much
to the weight of the slides, as you will find to your
cost if you have them to carry far. The extra thin covers
are the nicest, but, unfortunately, they soon break when
using the slides; even the pressure of the fiugers will
do this ; therefore, I would say, use a medium thick-
ness of glass, and take care to have it free from
scratches and air-bubbles. The paper mask to be placed
between the photograph and the cover glass should be
of suitable shape, and carefully adjusted to the size of the
photograph ; on no account use the circular masks, as
this shape is most inartistic, and frequently quite spoils
the picture. The masks having one white side and the
other coloured are the best, as the white side is an indi-
cation to the lantern operator as to the side of the photo-
graph to be placed next the light, and it also enables the
name of the slide to be written upon it. The binding
strips should be neatly put round the edges of the slide,
and two white or coloured discs placed on the two top
corners of the front of the slide, to show at a glance which
is the top of the view ; then carefully remove all finger and
gum marks, and the slide is complete.
k have to thank Mr. Walter Colls for an excellent print of
Dr. Kuiersou’s “Breezy Marshland.”
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS IN INDIA*
In photographic circles, both at home and in India, there
exists much divided opinion on the subject of exhibitions
and awards. One section is totally averse to both, another
would hold the one and withhold the other, a third is
strongly convinced that both exhibitions and medals are
as the breath of our nostrils, whilst a large and growing
section believes that the present system of awards must be
purified and elevated. Without expressing a decided
opinion on the question one way or the other, it will afford
food for reflection if the system on which the Society has
hitherto held its exhibitions is examined. Those dili-
gent members who study the rules are doubtless aware
that one of the objects of our Association, as laid down
in the constitution, is to hold exhibitions of photographs
and photographic apparatus. It is not stated how often ;
but they are to be held in Calcutta. As a matter of fact,
these exhibitions have been held regularly every year since
the resuscitation of the parent society in 1887, and since
then no little money — let alone time and energy — has been
spent in carrying out this object. For instance, at the
late exhibition, no less than six gold and eighteen silver
medals were awarded ; and, as there were only sixty-four
competitors in all, no one is likely to turn round and accuse
the committee of dealing them out with a niggard hand.
Of this number of competitors nineteen only were of the
so-called professional class, whilst forty-five were
amateurs. With this preponderance of the amateur over
the professional, it might naturally be supposed that the
amateurs would have carried off at least half the medals,
but this was not the case. No less than five gold and
nine silver medals went to the nineteen professionals, and
only one gold and nine silver to the forty-five amateurs.
But the members of the Society come out of the analysis
even worse than this, for only six medals rewarded them
for all they contributed, and not one of these was in gold.
With such a result staring us in the face, it may well be
asked if the proportion of medals offered to Anglo-Indian
amateur photographers was generous enough to foster that
emulation which, some say, only medals can impart.
On the other hand, there is a strong feeling amongst
those who say they know that, if medals are not freely
offered to outsiders of both classes of workers, our
exhibition walls will be covered with silver prints of that
respectable mediocrity which they suppose is the
supremest effort of the Anglo-Indian amateur photo-
grapher. Now this contention is not unreasonable if
the only way of alluring the best pictures to our walls
is by a liberal offer of medals. But is this the case ?
If the best pictures arc necessary for educational pur-
poses — and this may be granted— every one of the pictures
sent by the home professionals might have been pur-
chased and sent out to us at probably less cost than we
actually paid under the present system. And as regards
the local professional photographers, who contributed not
a little to the embellishment of our show, I have been
told by one of the largest winners amongst them that
they are not likely to feel aggrieved, should the Society
decide to exclude them from medal-winning, so long as
they are all placed on the same footing. It is sufficient
inducement to them, I am assured, to be allowed to
exhibit their works in an attractive form, with the name
of the firm displayed over them. There should be no
difficulty in arranging to have this done. And the
* From the Journal of the Photographic Society of India, April.
33G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 2, 1890.
amateurs at home and in America whose works contri-
buted so much to our pleasure and profit, how are they
to be rewarded, if not with medals? This is the real
difficulty ; and, if it is wished that the best works shall
grace the walls of our exhibition, the .Society must be
careful how they treat their brethren who have become
masters of photography. In this matter it may be sub-
mitted that there is a discreet middle course in which to
steer. We should welcome the works of every well-
known amateur, no matter what his particular school is,
because there is good to be got from the study of all good
pictures, and be prepared to offer inducements to amateurs
to exhibit such as are acceptable and fitting in the circum-
stances of each case. So competition should be optional.
To all who care to compete, let medals be given ; and to
those who do not, let the Society engage to pay all
expenses of the exhibits to and from Calcutta. If this is
done, promising every care and attention to prevent
damage or loss, and engaging that these honourable
exhibits shall be well mounted and hung, there is every
reason to believe that the applications for space will be as
great, if not greater, than they have ever been before.
In arranging an exhibition on these lines, precautions
would have to be taken to divide off the exhibits so that
no invidious comparisons could be made between the
medalled pictures — presumably second-rate — of, let us
say, the writer, and a greatly superior one of the same
class of, say, Dr. Emerson sent hors concours.
This is a matter in which the members themselves are
directly interested — one, if I may say so, of almost vital
importance to the Society — so that its discussion in the
columns of the Journal is earnestly invited, seeing it is
likely to be of the greatest value to the Committee when
they next meet to settle the prospectus of the next annual
exhibition.
CROSSING NATIONAL FRONTIERS WITH DRY
PLATES.
Photographic Scraps for May contains some useful
information for Continental tourists, and states that in
Sweden and Norway the photographer will have no
difficulty at the Custom House, provided the photographic
baggage is not too large ; but as good stocks are kept in
the country, it is not necessary or advisable for a traveller
to burden himself with large quantities. There is no
restriction on the taking of photographs in the streets or
country, but, naturally, for church or museum interiors,
one requires to obtain permission, not difficult to obtain
as a rule. In Russia, things do not go so smoothly with
the tourist. Photographic apparatus for tourists’ own use
is charged with a duty equal to about 8d. per English
pound, and plates with one of about 3 Id. per pound.
Photography on its amateur side is so little known to the
Russian Custom House officials that they have not the
faintest idea of the sensitiveness of plates or papers to the
light ; consequently the poor traveller has a rough time of
it, unless forewarned. To take views almost anywhere,
one requires the permission of the authorities, and, to
obtain this permission, tourists should obtain before
leaving home a certificate from the Russian Consulate in
England, that the bearer desires to take photographs, is
an amateur, and proposes to use such photographs only
for his own pleasure. In Holland and Belgium, plates
carried by tourists are liable to pay ten per cent. duty.
As a rule, the Customs do not insist upon opening the
boxes ; but, as the revenue officers are apt to suspec t
smuggling in every form, they may at times examine the
plate boxes; still, it will be done politely, and in a properly
appointed dark room. In France, plates, on entry,
whether for the traveller’s own use or as merchandise, are
dutiable to the extent of 18 ’50 francs per 100 kilos,
equivalent to about 3s. per pound English. Apparatus,
if well worn, and clearly for personal use, is passed free of
duty ; if new, ten per cent, is levied. Usually the Customs
officials are most easy about the enforcement of these
duties, and about the examination generally, when it is
plain that one is not other than an amateur ; but the
tourist who goes loaded with heavy photographic impedi-
menta may find he has to pay these legal, but seldom
imposed, duties. Most officials have by this time learnt
the disaster which follows the opening of plate-boxes in
an ordinary room, and are daily becoming more com-
plaisant with amateur photographers, and seldom or ever
does any trouble arise. As to the taking of photographs,
but little restriction is imposed, as long as fortifications
are avoided. In Italy, plates are dutiable to the extent of
Is. per kilo, or, if accompanied by a certificate of origin
from the Italian Consulate in London, of 3d. per kilo.
Apparatus for personal use is not charged for. If the
camera is new, the Customs may insist on a duty being
paid, but will, if requested, give a certificate, on the pro-
duction of which the duty will be remitted on leaving the
country. The officials are very tender with amateur
photographers, and a few boxes of plates, and any
apparatus, may be readily passed without cither trouble or
payment of duty. Photography may be freely practised
in any and every town the informant thinks, with the
restriction not to approach too near fortifications. He
recommends the use of hand cameras, which the populace
have not yet learnt to recognise as such, as a tripod and
large camera always collect a crowd of ever-present idlers.
In Germany, the actual imposition of duty leviable on all
plates is more honoured in the breach than in the
observance, whilst apparatus enters free. The Customs
are well used to tourists carrying cameras, and no diffi-
culty is met with. If the traveller should be asked, as a
matter of form, to open a box of plates, he is taken
courteously to the dark room ; the examination is made
promptly, and, with many apologies, he is speedily
released. If fortifications are avoided, there is practically
no limit to the opportunity for taking photographs, unless
it is in some of the watering-places, where permission
must be asked for, and is readily obtained. In Switzer-
land, the favourite hunting ground of tourists, photographic
and otherwise, the greatest attention is given to the needs
of photographers, and the Customs allow both apparatus
and plates carried by tourists for their own use to pass
free of duty, l’hotographing seems .absolutely free from
restriction throughout the country. Greece offers a wide
and interesting field, and the Custom House people offer
no difficulty in the way of free import of tourists’ apparatus
and plates. Visitors should not carry too many of the
latter. There is no restriction on the taking of photo-
graphs, and it is needless almost to say that Athens and its
neighbourhood offer sufficient scope for weeks of pleasant
labour. The ruins of Olympia in Western Peloponessus,
the Yale of Tempe, and the monasteries of Kalembak in
Thessaly, the Islands of Corfu and Zante, with Eleusis
and Dafue, are all easily reached. Travelling in Greece,
even in districts remote from the beaten track, is quite
safe. For farther information see Photographic Scraps.
May 2, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
337
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FICTION.*
Another interesting story of an equally speculative
character, though of a totally different kind, is told in an
American magazine. A photographer, who calls himself
a photographic artist — explaining that this title costs
nothing, and affects people with much the same sort of
respect as those well known combinations of letters 15. A.,
F.S.A., M.A., F.R.G.S., D.D., with many others — is invited
down to a small country village to photograph a Church
inside and out. The lady, the deceased incumbent’s
daughter, a certain .Miss .Tones, who has invited him. is
taken suddenly ill on the day of his arrival, and is unable
to see him. Not to waste his precious time, the photo-
grapher takes portraits of the present incumbent — to be
sold after to his flock for money to be spent in repairing
the church — of two children, and a pair of lovers. Every
professional knows both these last to be among the worst of
subjects. The lovers insist on arranging each other ; the
children cannot be arranged at all. The result is com-
monly disastrous. Even if a good picture be obtained,
people paying for the work are mostly dissatisfied. The
mother finds the true image of her spoilt brat different
from her ideal. The face of the beloved is not, for the
lover, sufficiently heavenly ; but the eye of the camera
is not like that of the mother or the lover— it is not blind.
If. on the other hand, a bad picture is the reward of the
photographer’s toil, then is the wrath of Romeo a terrible
and awful thing, while Juliet weeps silently as she gazes in
disgust upon her distorted image. As for the spoilt child,
after spoiling in its turn some half-dozen plates, seven
devils enter into it, causing its last state to be worse than
its first ; and, in the end, with some twenty eyes — a very
Argus — and about ten times that amount of fingers — a very j
llriareus — it reflects, collectively, the portrait of a j
Catherine wheel in mid-effervescence. To return, how-
ever, to the story. The lady recovers. The photographer
is placed outside the church in the very worst position.
That ecclesiastical building is sacrificed to an elaborate
stucco tomb, with a narrative of the many virtues of the
lady's father, the Rev. Jeremiah Jones, M.A. In the inside
of the church, the operator, placed once more in the worst
position, is instructed to make a picture including the
pulpit, the vicarage pew, and the communion table,
adorned on either side with the commandments blazing
in gold on an amethyst ground. In vain the
unhappy photographer explains that the amethyst will
turn to opal, and inky sable occupy the place of gold.
The lady is not to be moved by what she doubtless con-
siders baseless representations to defraud her of her
stipulated right. Difficult, indeed, is it to persuade her
that it is impossible to include in the same picture the font,
which lies at the other end of the sacred edifice. Rut this
being at last accomplished by the rhetoric of the photo-
grapher, he setsat once to work. The windows of this church
are filled with wondrous creations in green and yellow glass,
not altogether the best light for photography, but bravely
the artist struggles on. During some twenty minutes'
exposure, lie beguiles the time by reading the names of the
pew occupiers printed on their respective pews, the
gorgeous decalogue, one or two commemorative tablets,
and a neatly written placard attached to a pillar conveying
the information that a man may not marry his grandmother.
Marvelling much at this, he moves to put on the cap. when
suddenly the “church-going” bell, as Cowper calls it,
* Continued from page 313.
begins to toll. Though a lion be in the path between the
artist and his instrument when the time is come to affix
the cap, yet will he affix it. The inhabitants of the hamlet
cluster together at the church door to learn the meaning
of this unwonted bell-ringing. Among them appears Miss
Jones herself, majestic but angry. “ What irreverent
action is this?" asks the lady. “How should I know,
madam ? ” replies the astounded photographer ; adding in an
injured tone, “and, as for irreverence, have I not been
standing here for half-an-hour with my hat off in a draught
as bad as that of a blacksmith's bellows? ” It is afterwards
found that some of the village fry have rung the bell, but the
photographer has gone in a pet to develop his picture. It
grows, considering the difficulties he has had to meet,
well. The carefully worked cover of the communion
table — the long loving labour of some pious Dorcas — com-
mences its second birth; the carved oak rails emerge one
after the other in satisfactory sequence, the decalogue
appears — alas ! no longer aglow with its original glory —
the vicarage pew, and the pulpit. Yes. the pulpit ; but what
is this spectral figure which rises out of it ? An old gentle-
man with a black mole, in a black gown, with white hair and
in white bands. The photographer marvels, but presents
in due course, the photograph to Miss Jones. “Ah!"
shrieks that lady, “ it is — it is papa ! " and faints forthwith.
“ I keep.’- says the photographic artist at the conclusion of
this little American tale. “ I keep that negative among
my curiosities."
This paper might perhaps, in the reader's estimation, be
called “ Fiction in Photography’’ with a nearer approach to
descriptive truth than is made by its present title, “ Photo-
graphy in Fiction.” Several other tales may be found by
any who care to search for them, which in no degree lessen
or detract from the fitness of the former heading. One, for
instance, tells of a young girl about to become a bride, who,
chancing to take refuge under a poplar during a storm,
received an image of that tree through her petticoats on her
left leg, leading afterwards to a remarkable identification.
Tales of the photographic effects of lightning are indeed fre-
quent. Resides the well-known anecdote of the boy who
climbed a beech on a Sunday for the sake of robbing a
bird’s nest, and was punished with a distinct view of a bough
and a bird’s nest on his right cheek — a gruesome spectacle,
and a warning to all who chanced to meet him — we have
the story of the sailor who went through life with the lec-
ture of a horse-shoe affixed to the mast-head on his back ;
of the respectable tradesman who bore the device of a
couple of sovereigns on his side, supposed to be taken
from these two pieces of metal in his purse ; and — though
this last story seems, as regards its genuineness, open to
doubt— the story of the unhappy lover who died of love,
and bore, as the doctor who anatomised him after death
discovered, the portrait of his lady’s face distinctly photo-
graphed on his heart.
Number 6 of The Photographer, published at Cincinnati,
Ohio, issues as its supplement a specimen of engraving by the
Photo- Engraving Company, of New York, the subject being an
unacknowledged reproduction of Mr. H. P. Robinson’s picture,
“ He never told his Love,” here entitled — perhaps more appro-
priately— “ A Morning Chat.”
Dixuler’s Polytechnucher Journal says that to persons
unaccustomed to it, ammonia in the atmosphere becomes mis-
chievous when present in the proportion of O'Oo per cent. ;
O' 0t> percent, will kill most animals in an hour and a half. Up
to 0'03 to O'Oo per cent, the system can become accustomed
to ammonia ; but beyond that proportion the ill effects very
rapidly come on.
338
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
jftOt C0.
It would be interesting to have a little more
information concerning a process of photographic
reproduction invented by Mr. Henry Sutton, of
Ballarat, Victoria. It has been stated that “The
inventor follows a method essentially different from
those hitherto used. He makes his prints on gela-
tine, hut not by means of dots or lines, nor even
by the process for printing with fatty inks. He
utilizes the ordinary gelatino-bromide plates, and
impressions them in front of the object to be repro-
duced. The surface of the image is simply covered
with a piece of gauze, and afterwards developed and
fixed in the ordinary manner. The plate is then
placed for five minutes in a bath of water heated from
79° to 80w F. The excess of water is removed by a
sojourn of ten seconds in alcohol. After drying, the
plate is placed in a copper planclietj heated to 212v F.
over a Bunsen burner. This degree of heat is main-
tained for about two minutes. The plate is then ready
for the printing press.”
Professor C. Michie Smith, at the last meeting of
the Royal Society, described a curious application of
photography to scientific research. The object desired
was a method of determining surface tensions by mea-
surement of ripples. Ripples are set up on the surface
of the liquid by means of a tuning fork, and the sur-
face is then photographed along with a suitable scale.
The lengths of the ripples can thus be obtained by
micrometic measurement of the negative. This, we
fancy, represents the latest instance of the long list
of instances in which photography has been utilised
to solve some problem of science.
It is stated that the great and unprecedented rise in
the price of platinum is causing much anxiety. The
various platinum printing processes have been received
with such favour by the photographic public that the
demand for the metal has, during the past four months,
much exceeded the possibilities of supply. As we
mentioned some time ago, there was for a few days
literally a famine in platiuuin, the manufacturing
chemists being unable to make the photographic salts
in sufficient quantities to meet the orders of their
customers. They have now got over this difficulty,
which of course was only a temporary one, but the
inevitable has come about— a great rise in the price,
the quotations now being about forty per cent, higher
than they were a year ago.
The awkward point in the matter is that platinum,
unlike a chemical product, cannot be cheapened by the
increased demand. It must be sought for, and dug
from the mines, and up to the present moment the uses
have been so limited that it has not been worth while
for anybody to “ prospect ” likely sources for its
discovery. No doubt this will be done now that photo-
[May 2, 1890.
graphy promises to be an outlet for its utilization, but
meanwhile the supply, to use commercial phrase, is
“short,” and likely to be so. A financial paper
suggests that some of the active minds engaged in
mining matters might do worse than embark in the
search for platinum. If so, perhaps platinum may be
discovered in “paying quantities” — at least, this is
what the prospectus of any platinum company is sure
to say.
Artists are less fortunate in their actions at law when
the point at issue turns upon the faithfulness of a por-
trait than photogiaphers. It is a curious fact that in
the disputes as to the fidelity of a photjgraph which
have found their way into the English County Courts,
not one case in twenty has been decided against the
photographer. It may, of course, be that the photo-
grapher starts with the advantage of the generally
received dictum that photography cannot lie, but too
much stress must not be laid on this, as we may pre-
sume a judge is uot to be biassed by outside opinion,
but will decide every case on its merits. However
this may be, the fact remains as stated.
Nor do we think that if English County Court judges
imitate the example set them recently by a Berlin legal
authority, the result would be any different. In this
case the fidelity of a portrait in oils was in dispute,
and the judge in question adopted the course of direct-
ing the lady to array herself in the dress in which she
sat to the artist. The plaintiff obeyed, with the con-
sequence that the judge gave a verdict in her favour.
It is a common thing, as most photographers know, for
a lady to find fault with her photograph, not because
the face does not please her, but because the dress does
not “come out ” as she expected. Hence, if an order
similar to that of the Berlin j udge were enforced, the
chances of a victory would be still more problematical
than they are at present. On the whole, photographers
need not fear the consequences of the Berlin episode.
A good deal of complaint is being heard as to the
way the frames of the pictures sent in to the Royal
Academy are treated. An artist frieud the other day
had his picture returned, which he did not mind so
much, as it was within the right of the immaculate
Forty to reject it ; but what he did object to was that
the frame — an expensive one — was irreparably damaged.
It is well known that the pictures are stacked one
against the other, and that, to get some particular
picture, the carpenters will not hesitate to walk over
the stacks, much as a cat walks the tiles, but scarcely
so lightly. If they wore slippers not so much harm
would be done, but, in the case of hob-nails, the frames
suffer. When complaints were made two or three
years ago to the Photographic Society that the frames
were damaged, we believe the Council compensated the
owners. The Royal Academy" is above this con-
sideration, and all the artist can do is to suffer in
silence, or write to the newspapers.
May 2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
339
TIIE PHOTOGRAPHIC CLUB.
The annual report, list of members, rules, and proceedings
of the Photographic Club, for the year 1889, has just been
issued. This popular Club was established in 1879. On
the title page its honorary ollicers are stated to be : —
Trustees — William Bedford and Frank Haes; Committee — i
W. Benham, F. P. Cembrano, II. E. Davis, K. W. Foxlee,
A. Mackie, E. A. Newell, J. B. B. Wellington, and
.1. W. Zaehnsdorf ; Curator — II. M. Hastings, F.I.C. ;
Recorder — E. Clifton ; Librarian — C. E. Hesse; Secretary
and Treasurer — F. A. Bridge, East Lodge, Dalston Lane, E.
The meetings of the Club are held every Wednesday
evening at Aiulerton’s Hotel, F'leet Street, London. The
treasurer's report sets forth that the year ends with a
balance in hand of £129 17s. fid. , and that it has other
funds and property.
The longer papers read at the meetings of the Photo-
graphic Club have for the most part been published in
these pages, but a variety of useful information will be
found in the ollieial reports of its meetings.
In the discussion on “ Purifying Water for Photo-
graphic Purposes,” Mr. A. M. Levy said that, roughly
speaking, there were three kinds of impurities in water —
insoluble substances, which might be removed by filtration ;
soluble substances, such as chlorides of sodium and mag-
nesium ; and gaseous matters. The latter might be
ammonia or carbonic acid, aud might be got rid of by
boiling the water for about half-au-hour. The addition of
a little carbonate of soda would precipitate the chlorides.
The usual amount of solid matter in the water supplied by
the London water companies was about two grains to a
gallon. The impurities in water varied considerably
according to the local conditions of supply ; sometimes
water contained as much as twenty-five to thirty grains per
gallon of calcium or magnesium salt. A ready method of
estimating the quantity of magnesium or lime salt was by
means of Clark's test. A solution of definite strength was
made of Castile soap in spirit ; this was added, drop by
drop, to a measured quantity of the water to be tested
until the froth formed on shaking was permanent. The
amount of the salts present was arrived at by the amount
of soap solution used. He considered the most con-
venient method of purifying water for photographic
purposes was boiling it for half-an-hour and then leaving
it to cool. It was an advantage to boil the water in a
kettle that was already encrusted witli scale. In reply to
questions, he said that the addition of a small quantity of
alum would precipitate organic matters, as also would iron
chloride ; but such treatment was more suitable for
ordinary purposes than for photographic ones. Perman-
ganate of potash would also get rid of organic matter.
The hon. secretary stated that solutions were sold to
prevent the incrustation of boilers. He had seen some
dark fluid which was reported to have been very effectual.
Mr. Levy said that there were scores of such in the
market. The acting ingredient in all was carbonate of
soda ; they were coloured to fancy.
In the discussion on “ Copying Engravings aud Wood-
cuts for Lantern Slides,” Mr. A. Cowan said that if the
originals were faulty, as many woodcuts were, it was im-
possible to get a good solid picture from them. The little
ink on the dark parts allowed the white paper to show
through. This, when magnified, became much more
apparent. If the lines in the original were continuous the
copy would be all right. Mr. T. C. White thought it
probable that a negative made from a tracing in ink would
be better than from the original. Mr. E. W. Foxlee
stated that some years ago he had made some 10 by 8
transparencies from pictures in Punch for showing on the
30 foot screen at the Polytechnic Institution. As the
lenses used in the lantern were not achromatic, it was
possible one fault hid the other. He did not think there
would be any difficulty in copying a well-printed engrav-
ing or woodcut. Mr. Woods said that there was no fault
of this kind in copies of copper-plate engravings. He
thought the texture of the boxwood on which the wood-
cuts were made might influence the result. Mr. A.
Mackie thought that much depended on the paper on which
a woodcut was printed. If a rough paper were used, the
ink did not reach the hollows in the grain. The American
illustrated periodicals were printed on very smooth, hot-
pressed paper, and the impressions were very perfect.
Mr. J. Nesbit found that Mawson’s photo-mechanical
plates were excellent for work of this kind. For making
drawings for copying there was nothing better than
Stevens’ ebony stain ; it left a splendid solid black, and
dried very quickly. Mr. Foxlee thought wet collodion
the best for this class of work. Mr. Richmond said that
he obtained good results on ordinary Ilford plates deve-
loped with ferrous oxalate and intensified with mercury.
He had also found that Air. Wellington's method of
intensifying answered well. He had somewhat modified
and, at the same time, he thought, simplified the formula.
His modified formula was —
A. — Silver nitrate
Water
B. — -Ammonium sulphocyanide
Water
C. — Hypo.
AVater
... 100 grs.
... 7 ozs.
... 240 grs.
... 7 ozs.
... 240 grs.
... 7 ozs.
For use, take one drachm of each of the three solutions in
the order named, and apply to the plate. He preferred a
fairly long exposure.
THE LATENT PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE.*
BY C. H. BOTHAMLEY, F.I.C., F.C.S.
The composition of the material composing the latent
image isas yet an unsolved problem. It is generally regarded
as being identical with the dark products obtained by the
more prolonged action of. light, and this view is supported
by the fact that they are affected in the same way by many
re-agents. Carey Lea’s observations (loc. cit.) that a brief
action of reducing agents on silver compounds produces
invisible but developable images, whilst prolonged action
produces visible images, and that in both cases the
images are identical in behaviour respectively with the
invisible and visible latent images produced by light, is
also very strong evidence in favour of the same conclu-
sion, but their identity is not yet proved. The resistance
of the latent image and of the darkened products to the
action of nitric acid render it highly improbable that they
consist of metallic silver ; and it was for a long time sup-
posed that they were sub-salts of silver corresponding
with a sub-oxide Agt(), described by the chemist Wohler.
According to this view, the latent image consisted of a
minute quantity of silver sub-chloride Ag2C, or sub-
bromide Ag2Br, or sub-iodide Ag-J, containing half the
quantity of halogen present in the ordinary salts.
Attempts to obtain Wohler’s sub-oxide have been made
* Concluded from page 321.
340
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 2, 1890.
without success by Newbury, Muthmanu, von Pfordten,
and Bailey and Fowler, and, of course, attempts to make
the sub-chloride from it have failed also. The methods
used for the purpose of obtaining the sub-oxide were,
however, not such as, reasoning from analogy, were likely
to be successful. They all depended on the possibility of
stopping the reduction of an ordinary silver salt when
half the radicle had been removed, without at the same
time producing any metallic silver. Even in the case of
well-known and stable compounds this is a matter of
much difficulty, and when dealing with a substance such
as ordinary silver oxide, itself extremely easily reduced
to the metallic state, the difficulty of definite partial reduc-
tion becomes enormously greater. Moreover, chemists
are acquainted with many cases in which the haloid salts
of an element are much more stable than the correspond-
ing oxide — the mercurous salts which are analogous to
the silver salts afford an excellent example — and, there-
fore, the non-existence of a silver sub-oxide is no proof
of the non-existence of silver sub-chloride, sub-bromide,
or sub-iodide. This question remains for further investi-
gation.
Carey Lea found (foe. cil.) that by the action of re-
ducing agents, such as ferrous hydroxide, alkaline milk or
grape sugar, &c. , on silver salts, he obtained products
very similar in properties and composition to the dark
products produced by the action of light. They are very
slowly attacked even by strong nitric acid, but more
rapidly by potassium iodide, and are decomposed by
ammonia, sodium thio-sulphate, &c., with separation of
metallic silver. He regards the two sets of compounds
as identical in character, and considers them to belong to
the indefinite class of compounds known as “ lakes,” or,
in other words, as compounds of silver sub-salts with
varying proportions of the ordinary salts, the compounds
having a much higher stability than the sub-salts them-
selves. In order to recall the mode of formation of the
dark products, which vary in composition according to
the conditions of their preparation, but always contain
less halogen than the normal silver salts, Carey Lea
proposes to call them photo-salts of silver ; thus, photo-
chloride, photo -bromide, photo-iodide, &c. We do not
know, however, that these bodies are really “salts” in
the usual acceptation of the term ; and although the
names are very good, it would be better to speak of them
more generally as photo-compounds or photo-products.
Hunt stated* that when silver chloride darkens in pre-
sence of air and moisture, half the chlorine is replaced
by oxygen, and researches by Idodgkinson,t the
details of which are not yet published, led him to
the conclusion that the darkened silver chloride is
an oxychloride of the formula Ag4Cl2(), formed from
four molecules of silver chloride AgOl. AgCl. AgCl.
AgCl., by the substitution of an atom of oxygen for two
atoms of chlorine, thus AgCl. Ag. O. Ag. AgCl. Experi-
ments, the details of which have not been published, can-
not of course be criticised or properly appreciated ; but
it is very difficult to believe that a silver oxychloride
could form in presence of strong nitric or hydrochloric
acid. It is also important to observe that the supposed
oxychloride is not a reduction product of silver chloride,
but a substitution product, the quantity of chlorine and
oxygen in the formula given being sufficient to neutralise
all the combining power of the silver. Silver oxide is
* “ Researches on Light,'’ 2nd ed. p. 80.
t Photoob Armc Nkws, xxxi , 371.
known to be readily reduced to the metallic state by
developers : and if we assume that this rcducibility of the
oxide is transferred to the oxychloride, which would be
the case if the compound had the constitution represented
by the formula given, the formation of the oxychloride
would certainly explain the production of an image on
development On the other hand, it is equally well
known that silver oxide is very readily attacked by acids,
and it is not easy to see how an oxychloride could retain
the instability of the oxide in presence of reducing agents,
and yet offer so great a resistance to the action of acids.
If further experiments prove that the darkened products
are really an oxychloride and an oxybromide respectively,
it is not at all probable that they will have the constitution
which has been suggested.*
It seems quite certain that the presence of oxygen is
not essential to the formation of a dark photo-product
from a haloid silver salt. Dry silver chloride darkens
readily when exposed to light under benzenef or in hydro -
gen.J or apparently in presence of any substance which
can bike up chlorine, whether the particular substance
contain oxygen or not. It is obvious, however, that we
are not entitled to assume that the products formed are
identical, and the behaviour of a substance out of con-
tact with air and moisture gives no direct evidence as to
its behaviour when oxygen and water are present.
It has not yet been definitely proved — indeed, from the
nature of the case, absolute proof is almost, if not quite,
impossible — that the material composing the latent image
is identical in composition with the visible products found
by the more prolonged action of light, although the various
facts previously referred to furnish very strong evidence
that this is the case.
The exact point which we seem to have reached is
this, that the latent image is a photo-chemical reduction
product containing a lower proportion of halogen than
normal silver chloride, or bromide, or iodide, and much
more easily reduced to the metallic state : but the problem
of its composition and constitution still remains to be
solved.
Thf. Photographic Society of India. — The steady progress of
this Society, as recorded in its journal, is evidenced by the
accession of thirty-six new members since Januarj\
Thf. Camera Club. — The fifth of the series of photographic
exhibitions at the Camera Club will be open on and after Tues-
day, May 6th, to visitors on presentation of their cards. The
exhibition will consist of photographs by the late Mrs. Julia
Cameron, and by the kind co-ojieration of Mr. H. H. Cameron
the Club is able to exhibit a fully representative collection.
Amongst other pictures will be the portraits of Sir John Her-
schell, Lord Tennyson, and Robert Browning, produced by Mrs.
Cameron more than twenty years ago. The pictures will be on
view for about two months.
A New Reagent for Pyrocallol — At a recent sugar meet-
ing of the Mulhouse Industry Society, M. Matthieu-l’lessy
described a new reagent for cane sugar, grape sugar, and pyro-
gallic acid, consisting of a solution of lead paranitrate (PbHNOJ
in an excess of melted ammonium nitrate (Mon. Sc i cut. , Decem-
ber, page 1,446). It is prepared by melting 54 parts of am-
monium nitrate, and adding to it 84 parts of lead nitrate and
21 parts of lead hydrate. The reagent melts at about 1 1 5 Q C.,
and in contact with glucose it gives a cherry-red colour ; with
cane sugar the colour of cafi-au-lait ; and with pvrogallic acid
a chrome-green colour. — l harm. Journ.
• Ilodgkinson ( >oc . cil.) and llelJola’s “Chemistry of Photography,”
p 5G.
+ Guthrie, B'itith Journal of Photography, xxxii , 393 ; Carey Lea,
American Journal of Science [8] .38.
} Hitchcock, Amer. ('hem . Journal, xi. 474 ; British Journal of Photo-
graphy. 1890, p. 8.
May 2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
341
A MEETING ABOUT LENS STANDARDS.
The Lens Standard Committee of the Photographic Convention
having publicly asked all photographic opticians interested, to
meet it at the Mona Hotel, London, to consider the subject of
standard diaphragms and flanges, the meeting took place last
Friday night. Mr. A. Haddon occupied the chair, and among
the opticians present were Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer, Mr. Conrad
Beck, Mr. J. Turnbull (Wray and Son), Mr. W. Taylor, Mr.
H. W. Hobson, Mr. 'I'. P. Watson, Mr. A. Payment, and
Mr. M. J. Swift.
The Chairman stated that the committee had been appointed
at the Birmingham meeting of the Photographic Convention in
1 888, to consider the lens standards of the Photographic Society,
and what improvements might be made therein. It had
previously done a certain amount of work. The results of
their deliberations that evening would- be brought before the
Convention at its meeting this year in Chester. He hoped
that the opticians present would be led by the voice of the
majority. He could not see why photographers should have
to carry about in their apparatus a greater weight than is
necessary of wood and brass.
The Chairman then distributed some printed copies of the
original report of the Lens Standard Committee of the Photo-
graphic Society, as follows : —
“We, the Members of the Committee appointed by the
Council of the Photographic Society of Great Britain to con-
sider and report upon the best means of attaining uniformity
in the construction of apertures in the ‘ diaphragms of
lenses,’ ‘flanges,’ and ‘camera screws,’ have now the honour
of communicating the result of our investigations. Our aim
has been, as far as possible, to combine the nearest approach to
scientific accuracy with practical utility. Had either consi-
deration exclusively engrossed our attention, modified recom-
mendations might have resulted. Dividing our Report into
three divisions, the first section has reference to ‘ Lens
Diaphragms,’ the second to ‘ Flanges and Adapters,’ and the
third to ‘Camera Screws.’
“Lens Diaphragms. — With regard to Diaphragms, we
recommend — 1st. That the aperture of the standard-unit
diaphragm should have a diameter equal to one-fourth the
equivalent focus of the lens, and be marked ‘ 1,’ the approxi-
mate equivalent focal length of the lens itself being engraved
on the mount. 2nd. That diaphragms with smaller openings
should have apertures diminishing in area to the extent of one-
half from the unit standard downwards, and be marked
successively 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, &c. These numbers would
indicate to the practical photographer that if a given sensitive
film requires with the unit stop an exposure of one second,
the introduction of a smaller one would necessitate an
exposure of as many seconds as the numbers marked on it ;
in other words, each stop would require double the exposure
of the preceding one. Should a lens not admit of a
diaphragm with an aperture as large in diameter as one-
fourth its focal length, nor exactly any one of the above-
mentioned sizes, we still recommend that all the apertures be
made in uniformity with the above scale, with the exception
of the largest, which should be marked with the number its
area requires in relation to the unit diaphragm. In the case
of a lens having a working aperture exceeding in diameter
one-fourth its focal length, the diaphragm should be marked in
fractions (as ‘5, ’25, Ac. ), in uniformity with the standard
apertures, according to the sizes of their relative apertures.
We further advise that diaphragms required to l>e made with
apertures intermediate to the standard sizes should invariably
be marked with numbers corresponding to the ratio of their
area to the aperture of the unit diaphragm.
“Flanges. — We advise the construction of flanges with
internal and external screw threads of a standard series, for
attachment to cameras having screw threads adapted for screws,
li in., 2 in., 2 j in., 3 in., in external diameter, and made with
twenty-four threads to the inch 3| in. The 3i inch to have
twenty-four threads to the inch on the inside, and twelve
threads to the inch on the outside. If larger ones are required,
we recommend that they increase in size one inch in diameter,
from four inches upwards, with twelve threads to the incln
both internal and external. We also recommend the manu'
facture of a series of adapters, with inner screws made to
carry any existing lens, and with outer ones corresponding to
the next or other larger size of the standard flanges above
described. Hereafter, whenever practicable, the screws cut
on the mounts of all newly-manufactured lenses should be
suited to one of the above-sized standard flanges.
“ Camera Ferews. — With regard to camera-screw connections,
we recommend that henceforth all screws fitted to cameras
either for attachment to the stand, for fixing rising fronts, or
for other movable part-, should be either \, | of an
inch in external diameter, and in pitch of thread and other
details in accordance with the generally recognised Whitworth
standards for the above-mentioned sizes.
“ The Council of the Photographic Society of Great Britain
having accepted this Report, have directed that a series of
standard flanges and camera-screws be constructed and kept in
the custody of the Society, and be called “The Photographic
Society’s Standards.” Upon application to the Secretary, these
standard flanges and screws will bo shown, and printed copies
of this Report be given to those manufacturers of lenses,
flanges, and camera-screws who may be desirous of adopting the
above standards.
“ The Gallery, 5a, Pal! Mall, 3. W., July, 1883.”
Mr. W. Taylor said that he thought the fixing of lens stan-
dards to rest entirely with the public. To make a change
would involve each optician in much expense, so any change
must come by the optician feeling that if he is not up to the
times, the times will leave him behind. His firm used the
standards of the Photographic Society, and did not see that
there was any advantage in making a change, for to change a
system of lens fittings meant a change of all patterns, the
‘ abandonment of old stock, and involved other losses, which
few opticians would voluntarily agree to make. Interchange-
able screws on gas-pipes are one thing, and lens screws are
another ; the latter are far more difficult to make, and many of
the standard microscope screws in the market are not so well
made as would please a good mechanic. They exceed the proper
limits of error. In some of them he had found an error of ,
of an inch, and that was a serious thing. If any society
wished to alter the present system relating to photographic
lenses, steps would have to be taken to provide members with
standard gauges, and the means of correcting those gauges
when they began to wear. He thought the Whitworth thread
to be good and suitable for lenses. Some photographers
wished bayonet fittings for their lenses ; such fittings were
liable to become unsteady ; the turning of them out was not
convenient to the lens maker, and they were far more diffi-
cult to make interchangeable. The lens screws adopted in the
system of the Photographic Society are coarse, and this to
some extent meets the requirements of the man who wants a
bayonet joint to save time. His firm so made their lenses
that any number of them would screw into the same flange
upright, and this was a subject which should be considered
when dealing with interchangeable fittings. The gauges for
making the screws should be true to of an inch.
Mr. Conrad Beck remarked that in the cutting of standard
screw threads for the microscojie, the point of the tool wears, so
causes an inaccuracy at the bottom of the thread, which in
other parts is of the right size ; therefore special means have
been devised for afterwards cutting out the surplus metal at
the bottom of the thread.
Mi-. M. J. Swift did not think a little shake in the screw of
a lens mount to be worth considering at all ; the mount is not
particularly faulty if it holds tight.
Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer did not think that any optician
individually would go to the unnecessary expense of altering
the whole of his system. He thought that any standard
adopted should be universal, and not confined to England alone.
The French Photographic Conference had done well to invite
persons from other countries to meet and discuss this question
of lens standards, for diaphragm apertures are not wanted only
for England, but for every’ country. He had first suggested
the decimal system for lens apertures, and the decimal standard
342
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 2, 1890.
seemed to have been taken up by the French ; indeed, he
thought that it would be taken up universally. The Conference
did not take up exactly his standard, but Dr. C. Fabre, who
was a great authority, considered his (Mr. Dallmeyer’s) standard
to be better than that adopted by the French. Hail he been
at the meeting, he should have suggested the ratio for apertures
of one over the root of ten, instead of one over ten. The
tendency of the times at home and abroad is towards the deci-
mal system, and he thought that that system should be
employed for lens stops. He thought that a bayonet guage
would be convenient and valuable, but that they should have a
screw bayonet catch, and not a pin bayonet catch. He also
thought that they should follow up what had been done by
Continental scientific men, and that a system based upon the
English inch would not be likely to become universal.
Mr. \V. E. Debenham hoped that the Committee had had
the French report, from which it appeared that the English
Society’s standard had never been mentioned at the Paris Con-
ference. That Conference had considered and rejected Mr.
1 tallineyer’s standard of / over ten, but had adopted the
decimal standard. Lens mounts made according to the
standard / over four of the Photographic Society are now largely
made and sold, so the fact should have been brought under
the notice of the Conference. He did not see why a good
and exceedingly convenient standard, once made and adopted,
should be thrown aside without very strong reasons. Very
likely the decisions at the last International Conference
might be throw'll aside when the Conference meets at Brussels.
Mr. Dallmeyer said that one over the root of ten was
“the” decimal standard, and that one over ten was “a”
decimal standard.
Mr. Arthur Payment was then invited to speak by the
Chairman, and replied that he came to listen, and not to talk.
Mr. T. P. Watson said the same.
The Chairman then read the following letters : —
Dear Sir, — We, as manufacturers and dealers, find that the
standard flanges 1 i, 2, 2j, 3, &c., with the Whitworth threads,
are generally approved of, and almost the first question buyers
put now is, “ Are these standards ?”
Charles Reynolds k Co.
72 and 73, Fore Street, London, E.C., Ap, •il 25th.
Dear Sir, — I regret very much that a very important
engagement, of which I was unaware when you honoured me
with a call, will not allow me to attend the discussion this
evening.
If I had been able to attend, the points I should have
pressed would have been these : —
1. That all flanges should be made in progressive sizes of
4 inches, as 1, lj-, li, and so on.
2. That a universal pitch of thread be used for ttauges
having an aperture up to 2i inches, viz., a pitch of 18 threads
per inch.
My reasons for the above propositions are : —
In regard to No. 1. — That as many makers have issued a
large number of lenses having flanges of varying apertures,
and threads of varying pitches, it would become quite easy
for any maker to manufacture adapters that would screw' on
to all existing lens mounts, so as to make them fit a standard
flange.
In regard to No. 2. — The screw pitch I have chosen is
technically known as Whitworth, or f gas. The screw
chasers for working these threads can be obtained at almost any
decent tool shop, and being a Whitworth pitch, is almost
universally used. The depth of the thread being only 3V of
an inch, it also admits of fairly light flanges being used with-
out the danger of the bottom of the threads being cut right
through the body of the tlauge.
Again regretting my inability to attend, I am, yours truly,
David W. Noakes.
HUlimjtyatc Street, Greenwich, Jeondon, S. E. , April 24, 1890.
Mr. Conrad Beck thought the questions before the Committee
to depend largely upon an arrangement between manufacturers.
Could they, by meeting, arrange any system mutually satis-
factory ! In the matter of aperture dimensions he did nut
think that they should agree. As regarded lens-screws, he did
not think that so much accuracy as in microscopic apparatus
was necessary, especially with the majority of cameras at pre-
sent in use. The great difficulty in the way of adopting
standard flanges is, that at present there arc a great number
of flanges in the market which they would still have to make
lenses to fit after new flanges had been adopted. In any new
system the flanges now employed should be utilised as much
as possible, rather than that fresh ones should be stamped ;
therefore it seemed desirable to ascertain what flanges are now
mostly in use. After a time the tendency would be for the
public to come gradually to the standard sizes.
Mr. William Bedford remarked that before the Photographic
Society framed its system of standard apertures, the late Mr.
Dallmeyer had a standard system of his own ’ butwhen theCom-
mittec of the Photographic Society met it obtained littleassistance
from professional opticians, who were not represented as they
should have been. The Committee fixed on the standard of/
over four. He thought that too much might be made of the
decimal system, because when the sizes of stops are once fixed,
the practical photographer does not want to know' what their
dimensions are ; indeed, the change to / over the root of ten
would be of no value whatever to the professional photographer.
As regarded flanges, the Committee of the Photographic Society
did not consist of first-rate mechanics, but it satisfied itself
what the diameters should be. He agreed with Mr. Taylor,
that this part of its report might be improved by additional
definitions. If the Convention had standards made, opticians,
perhaps, would have no difficulty in getting similar standards
made by the same firm. He believed that Mr. 1 lallmeyer would
find that this system has come too late, liecause the system
recommended by the Photographic Society has spread, not alone
in this country, but throughout America and largely in Conti-
nental Europe.
Mr. Dallmeyer thought that in selling lenses it would be
well to state the intensity ratio evciy stop represents ; such
information ought to be conveyed.
Mr. F. A. Bridge remarked that stops were not always made
accurately'.
Mr. Taylor said that some opticians took into consideration
the fact that the light is condensed by the front lens of a
doublet. He bail not suggested that lens screws should be
accurate to ,ouo5 part of an inch, but that the standard gauges
should be so made.
Mr. Beck said that if the committee would decide upon the
sizes, the matter of making the lenses interchangeable might
be left to opticians, because the Whitworth standards in ordi-
nary use are available.
Mr. A. Cowan stated that when Whitworth made the
standard gauges for the Photographic Society, it was under-
stood that he was also ready to make them at any time for
opticians.
Mr. Dallmeyer then moved the following resolution
“ That this meeting recommends that a meeting be called of
as influential a body as possible of manufacturing opticians, to
decide upon the most convenient series of sizes for standard
flanges and camera screws that shall be most suited to meet
existing conditions of their manufacture. These standard
flanges at present to be limited in number, and, when decided,
to report to the Committee of the Photographic Convention of
the United Kingdom. It is also suggested that the question
of means for their adoption be decided upon. That
this meeting be called for the 9th of May, at this hotel at
seven o’clock.”
Mr. Conrad Beck seconded the motion.
The Chairman remarked that the question of standard
diaphragms was of much less interest to photographers than
that of standard flanges. He should be glad if opticians would
bring their lenses, and compare dimensions.
Mr. Conrad Beck thought that all the lens makers in this
country might be invited to state on what system they graduated
their stops.
Mr. Dallmeyer’s motion was then carried unanimously.
The Chairman then successively took the votes of the meet-
ing as to whether it preferred for lens apertures the ratio of J
May 2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
343
over the root of ten, / over ten, or / over four, and those
present voted almost unanimously in favour of / over four.
The meeting was then adjourned for a fortnight.
Last Tuesday, the Chairman of the Committee sent the
following circular letter, on behalf of the Committee of the
Convention, to a number of opticians : —
“ Dear Sik, — 1 am directed to forward to you the enclosed
resolution passed at a meeting held on the 25th inst., at the
Mona Hotel, Henrietta Street, Covent Garden, and to solicit
your co-operation. The next meeting will consist almost ex-
clusively of opticians, and, in order to facilitate matters, it is
desirable that you should bring details of internal diameters of
Hanges, number of threads to the inch, and any other details
you can furnish in connection with the attachment of all classes
of photographic lenses to cameras as now issued by your firm.
A. H addon, Chairman of the Lens Standard Committee.
Jioyal Naval College, Greenwich, S.E., April 29th, 1890.”
TIIE PERMANENCE OF PHOTOGRAPH IC
PRINTS.
BY PROFESSOR H. l'OI..
Prints on albumenised paper are so well known, and have
been so often spoken of, that it is not necessary to revert
to this subject. Those who buy, and those who sell such
prints, know well enough how long they last ; the prefer-
ence given to this process, therefore — a preference espe-
cially remarked in the smaller towns, and among the lower
classes — can only be attributed to the force of habit, or
the absence of taste. It is different in the case of those
photographs called permanent, which are now made by
very different processes. This assertion of permanence
is as admirable as it is in the case of the reproduction ob-
tained by means of fatty ink in the press, as well as of
those produced by photo-engraving, collotypy. and photo-
typy. There remain, therefore, but three principal
methods to be investigated : the bichromatized gelatine
(carbon) process, the platinum process, and the gelatino-
bromide and gelatino-chloride of silver process.
An image may change in three ways : —
1. The dark portions may fade.
2. The background may become darker,
o. The print may leave the support.
It is well known that albumenised paper combines
these three objectionable features.
The carbon process suffers from the third of these
troubles. The image is simply stuck to the support, and
although a separation is not of frequent occurrence, it is
not possible, however, to guarantee that it will not occur.
This same trouble is again found in Woodburytypy, or in
the collodio-chloride of silver process. In platinotypy,
neither separation of the film nor weakening of the image
is to be feared, but rather a darkening of the background,
as it is impossible to entirely prevent the penetration, into
the body of the paper, of the solutions containing iron and
platinum. In truth, the iron salts may, however, be
entirely removed by careful washings with water con-
taining a little chlorhydric acid : in this connection there
can be no danger, except for want of care. It is not the
same thing with the platinum salt. This last possesses
the disagreeable property of entering into a combination
so resistant with the gelatine or the resins with which most
of the papers are sized, that no acid washings can remove
this combination. Such papers containing platinum acquire
in time a yellowish-green tone, which completely spoils
the primitive image. It is not necessary, however, to
wait several years to ascertain if platinum prints will yield
to this danger. To make sure of this, place the image in
water containing sulphuric acid, and allow it to remain
twenty-four hours, as Pringle has recommended ; if the
paper contain chloride of platinum, it will then show a
rather dark yellow tone. It is rather difficult to find,
among dealers, papers free from this objection. It is
unnecessary to insist on the fact that all platinum paper
should be prepared with arrowroot, and not with gelatine.
Among the numerous photographers who use this
process, there are but few who take this precaution, and
who, consequently, can attach much importance to the
permanence of the platinotypes found in the trade ? How
can it be otherwise, since the Platinotype Company, of
England, founded by Willis, exclusively uses paper pre-
pared with gelatine ?* The public is ignorant of the tech-
nical side of the question, and judges the whole process
from some specimens that have already become green.
It would be very desirable if photographers and amateurs
were able to prepare by their own hands the true
platinum paper. The magnificent labours of Pizzighelli
and of Hubl would enable them to do this without
difficulty, if Pizzighelli would only complete his informa-
tion on the preparation and the quantitative analysis of
iron solution, so that a professor of chemistry were not
the only one able to understand them.
As regards the gelatino-bromide and the gelatino-
chloride of silver processes, they seem to fill, or to be
able to fill, the three conditions of permanence — pro-
vided, however —
1. That the gelatine film is solidly attached to the
paper.
2. That the iron contained in the developer has been
completely eliminated by the acid washings.
3. That the image has been sufficiently fixed in the
hyposulphite.
4. That the hyposulphite has been completely removed
by a thorough washing.
These four conditions met, the developed silver salt
prints may offer the best assurance of permanence. The
thing presents itself rather differently with the gelatino-
chloro-citrate of silver prints (aristotypes) that have not
been developed. Most of the prints that have been
made within a few years have, doubtless, kept well, even
in their fine details, but some of them show, here and
there, yellow spots. It would be necessary to make
more extended investigations to determine if the trouble
comes from an insufficient elimination of the hyposulphite,
or if the prints, without defects in their preparation,
would still be liable to the reproach of want of per-
manence.— Revue Suisse de la Photograpliie.
The Leeos Photographic Society. — The president of the
Leeds Photographic Society is Mr. Thomas W. Thornton ; vice-
presidents, Messrs. Thomas Dawson and C. H. Bothamley ;
librarian, Mr. T. Butterworth ; lion, treasurer, Mr. O. H.
Bod well ; the hon. secretary, Mr. S. A. Warburtou, 9,
Banstead Terrace, Roundliay Road, Leeds ; and the committee,
Messrs. Godfrey Bingley, F. W. Branson, W. Denham, E. H.
Jacob, and the officers of the Society. The following are its
arrangements for the remainder of the year : — June 5,
“ Sources of Pleasure in Landscape,” Mr. Thomas Dawson ;
July 3, technical exhibition ; Aug. 7, outdoor excursion ;
Sep. 4, “ Demonstration on Alpha Printing,” The Ilford Com-
pany ; Oct. 2, “ Watchwords for Workers” (picture choosing
and picture making), Mr. Atkinson Grimshaw ; Nov. 6, open
lantern exhibition in the Albert Hall ; Dec, 4, “ Some Photo-
graphic Art-Notes,” Mr. Frank Kidson, and annual meeting.
* The Platinotype Co. carefully avt ids the use if paper containing
gelatine. — Ed.
344
HIC NEWS
HO
[May 2, 1890.
-'3
PHOTOGRAPH IC LENSES. *
BY THOMAS R. DALLMEYER.
;r
Photographic lenses in general are optical systems for the
formation of real images. The perfection of the image,
its exact resemblance to the object, and its distinctness,
will depend on the exact conveyance of all the rays of
pencils emanating from every point in the object into
strict mathematical points in the image, or the nearest
approximation to such points as may be. If aberration
is present, due to improperly chosen curvatures, or
improperly combined materials, the resulting image will
lose in its distinctness, and may become useless. The
object, then, in constructing lens systems is the best
possible destruction of aberrations, both chromatic and
spherical. With this in view, we have to consider : first,
the proper selection and perfect homogeneity of the
materials employed ; secondly, the best selection of curves
ascribed to the material ; and thirdly, mechanically, a
strict maintenance of the “figure” (as it is technically
termed) of the curves when the material is properly
polished. As it will not be possible in the time allotted
to this paper to touch on the mechanical processes
employed, I will mention here that this, of course, is a very
important consideration.
Glass is a very perfectly elastic substance, and if in the
processes of sticking the glass on to polishers the material
becomes ‘‘biassed,” however perfectly the curve may then
be polished, the glass, on being released from the polisher, ;
will spring back, and the true curve will no longer be |
maintained, and will give rise to an unexpected appearance
in the image technically termed “ unnatural ” aberration.
Similar effects occur from bad workmanship in polishing,
the polish not being distributed equally. Such defects
are quite inadmissible, for although not visible by ordinary
reflection, the polish appearing very good, a critical
examination of the image will show the deleterious effect.
In the application of photographic lenses for ordinary
purposes, we ask the instrument to do practically what is
theoretically an impossibility. An imaginary perfect lens
can only truthfully depict one plane at a time, every other
plane being out of focus; when, however, the lens is used
under conditions that all rays coming from points in the
object are so situated that they are practically parallel ;
or the circles of confusion in the plane of the image,
when removed from the plane for parallel rays, are so
small that they are undistinguishable from points visually,
the general appearance is one of uniform sharpness. In
ordinary lens construction the rays are usually considered
as parallel ; but in large portrait lenses the means should
be given, if sharp images are the theoretical desideratum
of correcting the spherical aberration introduced for
nearer planes.
There are great advantages, you will be aware, from
rapid lenses or brilliant images. Herschell points out that
the brightness of an image is proportional to the quantity
of fight which is concentrated in each point of it ; and,
therefore, supposing no aberration, as the apparent magni-
tude of the lens which forms it, seen from the object
area of object „ . , „ ,
X . . . Or, since the area of the object : that
area ot image
of the image : : (distance) 3 of object from lens : (distance) 3
of image ; and since the apparent magnitude of the lens
seen from the object is as its ( — jjajpe^er \ *
\ distance of object / >
• A paper read at the 8ociety Ari' lit w. In lay night.
the brightness or degree of illumination of the image is as
the magnitude of the lens seen from the image alone,
whatever be the distance of the object. Now the
apparent magnitude of the lens seen from the image is
always much less than a hemisphere. Therefore (leaving
out the loss of fight by reflection and refraction), the
illumination of the image is always much less than that of
the object.
I mention these facts at the outset for the reason that
you may clearly understand that it is quite impossible for
the lens with a large ratio of aperture to focus, or one
that aims at attaining a maximum brightness of image
(such as are used in portraiture), also to maintain, at the
same time, the uniform qualities above referred to in a
lens, the ultimate employment of which is to depict, with
sufficient exactitude or definiteness, objects in different
planes. With the decrease of brightness, or aperture,
conies a reduction of the angle at which the extreme rays
cross, increasing thereby the limits through which the
plane of the plate may be moved for similar diameters of
out-of -focus circles ; but, as the depth increases by the
proportion, the diameter of the lens is diminished or
stopped down, the brightness decreases as the square of
the intensity ratio, or the ratio or aperture to focus. As
the ultimate applications of various optical systems are at
the outset understood, a knowledge of geometry and
analysis will enable the optician to construct different
forms that shall be particularly suited to the end to be
attained.
I take it for granted that you are all acquainted with
first principles and first approximations in the refraction
of fight at plane and spherical surfaces, and are familiar
with the fact that the different coloured rays of which
white fight is composed are unequally refracted in their
passage through a refracting medium, giving rise to
chromatic aberration.
As stated before, our effort is, as far as possible, to
destroy in the final image of every system the aberrations
arising from spherical forms of the lenses and chromatic
aberration. The process necessary to destroy the latter
being the easier defined, we will approach it first, and
return to the headings.
I. — The Proper Selection of Materials.
It is well known and easily demonstrated that a single
lens cannot be made free from either spherical or chro-
matic aberration for parallel rays. (A study of the diffe-
rent forms of single lenses and their adaptability to
different photographic purposes is very interesting and
instructive, and we will run through them briefly when on
the subject of spherical aberration.) If, however, we
combine two or more lenses of different media, we have
the means of annihilating both aberrations simultaneously.
The elimination of chromatic aberration is rendered pos-
sible by the property of refracting substances of dis-
persing colours in a very unequal degree, though the
difference in the refractive power is comparatively slight.
Taking the D line of the spectrum as brightest visually,
and the G or II line as that of the most chemically active
rays, in order that a lens may be of value in photography
— or be actinic — it is most essential that these fines be
combined, whatever may become of the rest. Thus, two
lines can be combined with two different kinds of glass,
and n fines may be of course combined by employing n
different kinds of glass.
For example, take Chance’s ordinary hard crown glass,
the refractive index for liue 1) = 1517116, and for the
Mat 2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
line G, 1 ‘528348; for dense flint, for line D, 1 ‘622411,
and for line G, 1 ‘646071. The difference, then, between
these lines is, for the crown glass, ‘011232, and for the
flint, ^fleOO. The dispersive power of the flint between
these particular lines is more than twice as great as that of
the crown.
Now, you know that if a number of lenses are placed in
contact (supposed infinitely thin), the focus or conver-
gence of system is equivalent to the algebraical sum of
the components of the system. It can be shown for two
kinds of glass, such as the above ; the chromatic aberra-
tion can be destroyed, or actinism (the coincidence of
chemical and visual foci) be maintained : the glasses must
be unequally dispersive, one convergent or positive, and
the other divergent or negative. The system can be made
free from chromatic aberration, and convergent if the
lens formed of the less dispersive power is positive, and
is divergent if the lens formed of the less dispersive
power is negative. In every case the ultimate rays from
the lens converge to form a real image, so that (unless in
the lens-system a negative element is introduced as a
corrector) it will be found the positive element is always
composed of the less dispersive medium.
Recent improvements in glass manufacture necessitate
the expressions of “positive ” and “ negative ” elements in
lens systems, instead of the flint and crown, and to these
I am about to refei. My late grandfather, in a paper con-
tributed to this Society on “ Practical Illustrations of the
Achromatic Telescope,'’ says of glass then known : “ The
flint is easily distinguished from the crown by its superior
specific gravity, arising from the quantity of lead which
enters into its composition. Thus, the glass which is
called flint glass has, in fact, a smaller proportion of silica
than crown. It obtained this title from the care employed
in selecting the flint with a view to the purity of the glass,
and the term has since become so extensively adopted as
to be now almost European.-’ Again, “discs of homo-
geneous flint glass, more than four or five inches in
diameter, are exceedingly rare, and very costly.” The
advances in the art of glass-making have been very great
since that time. By the skill and enterprise of Messrs.
Chance, of Birmingham. Pfeil, of Paris, and most recently
the elaborate work of Professor Abbe, assisted by Messrs.
Schott and Gen. of .Jena, the means at the optician's
disposal is now placed in a much more satisfactory posi-
tion.
(To be continued.)
Photographic Society ok Philadelphia. — At the meeting
of the Society on April 1st, the chairman announced the sud-
den death of their President, Mr. Frederick (iraff, which
occurred on Sunday morning, March 30th. For nearly thirty
years his official connection with the Society had been contin-
uous— as chairman of the meeting called to organise the same,
then as vice-president, and serving two terms as president. He
was indeed regarded as its father. To his untiring zeal for its
welfare the Society is in a great measure indebted for the high
position it holds in the photographic world. At the meeting
on April 2nd, the following minute was adopted and ordered to be
published, after which, out of respect to the memory of their
deceased president, the Society adjourned : — “ The members
of the Photographic Society of Philadelphia desire to testify to
t heir sense of the great loss they have sustained in the death of
their President. Frederick Graff. They feel that by his death
not only have they lost a most efficient presiding officer, but
that each one has been bereft of a dear friend, a sage counsellor,
and one who gave of his very best to promote the interests and
well-being of the Association,”
THE SOCIETY OF ARTS.
Last Wednesday night, at a meeting of the Society of Arts,
under the presidency of Capt. W. de W. Abney, F.R.S., Mr.
T. R. Dali meyer read a paper on “Photographic Lenses” (see
page 344). In the course of the lecture, he exhibited a
cemented double-concave lens, which gave a positive focus,
because of the optical properties of the three glass elements of
which it was composed.
Mr. J. Traill Taylor, upon being invited to speak by the
Chairman, said that he would rather see the discussion taken
up by members of the Society of Arts who did not make optics
a special point, as the meeting might then be of more interest
to them.
Mr. W. E. Debenham was glad of the tribute which Mr.
Dallmeyer had paid to Professor I’etzval, whose optical
achievements had enabled photography to make great advances
in the days of slow processes, and he was sorry that Steinheil’s
name had not been mentioned, for the lens Steinheil invented
had been more adopted by photographic opticians than any
other. He did not think that any improvement had been made
in the portrait lens by the late Mr. Dallmeyer’s modification ;
the Dallmeyer lens had certain advantages, but, balancing one
thing against the other, his admiration of the work of the late
Professor Petzval was as great as ever.
Mr. J. T. Taylor asked, in connection with the nodal points
of Gauss, and in the case of a rapid rectilinear lens, from what
point in that lens should distant rays be measured ? He asked
the question because he thought that theory and practice did
not quite agree in the matter. Carey Lea placed the point
between the combinations, but nearer to the back lens than the
central position. Could Mr. Dallmeyer tell them how to cure
the sweating of glass 1 He had a lens which was in the con-
stant habit of getting damp. Someone had recommended
boiling it to remove the hygroscopic constituent from the sur-
face.
Mr. Conrad Beck said that the focus of a doublet should be
measured from a point slightly nearer to the back than the front
lens. The focal length could be ascertained by the use of a
very thin single lens placed so as to throw an image of a distant
object so that it shall be of the same size as the image thrown
by the double lens. Most of the Jena glasses useful to photo-
graphic opticians will not stand the action of air, but the new
glasses open up an enormous field of optical research, and their
poperties require a vast amount of investigation before their
utilitarian value can be known.
Mr. L. Scott said that paragraphs hail been published in
newspapers about Jena glass giving the power of making lenses
with both surfaces flat or nearly so, yet with the power of con-
verging or diverging rays of light. Was that true ? He had
found that he could make more rapid exposures, sometimes to
the extent of twenty-five percent, quicker, by cutting off the
yellow rays from his lens by means of a glass trough containing
a dilute solution of ammonio-sulphate of copper.
Mr. Dallmeyer remarked that he had not much to which to
reply. Mr. Traill Taylor knew the answer to his own question
about measuring the focus of doublets, and had published two
methods in his own paper, whilst he (Mr. Dallmeyer) had pub-
lished therein a third. Dr. Hopkinson had done something to
get rid of the sweating of glass. The only effectual way was
to sandwich such glass by cementing it between pieces of other
glass which did not sweat. By using only blue light with
lenses, the screen cut off the green and other rays in white
light which otherwise would act upon the plate ; he thought it
best to use the whole of the light available, and not a part
thereof. In reply to Mr. Debenham, he was proud of the
advances his (Mr. Dallmeyer’s) father had made in optics, what-
ever opinion others might have about them.
The Chairman, w hen measuring the focal length of a double
lens, preferred to employ a pinhole rather than a thin single
lens ; the pinhole must be so placed as to give an image of the
same size as that thrown by the doublet. The distance varies
when the focussing has to be done over a near instead of a
distant object. He had had some little experience with Jena
glass, and had found that it would not bear the atmosphere at
all. Some time ago he required for a special purpose a lens
346
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
(May 2. 1890.
in which rocksalt should form a part, and a friend made him
such a lens sandwiched ; that lens was made five years ago,
yet is perfect at this day, notwithstanding the hygroscopic pro-
perties of rock-salt. Ammonio-sulpliate of copper solution
cut off many of the rays which are active photographically,
so he was surprised to hear that it shortened the exposure.
He could understand it if the operator were using iodide of
silver, because the red and yellow rays have a reversing action,
and the plate would be protected therefrom by the blue screen ;
without such protection they might undo some of the work done.
An increase in exposure might, perhaps, with iodide of silver, be
obtained to the extent of one or one-and-a-half per cent, but
not twenty-five per cent. He should not like to recommend
anyone to try the blue screen method, except for experimental
purposes.
Patent Entelltgenre.
Applications for Letters Patent.
6,028. P. Rudolph, 4", Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, “ Photo-
graphic Objectives.” — April 21st.
0,029. K. Abbf. and P. Rudolph, 47, Lincoln’s Inn Fields,
London, “ Photographic Objectives.” — April 21st.
6,066. B. Jumeaux, 17, St. Ann’s Square, Manchester, “Pho-
tographic Developers.” — April 22nd.
6,081. W. Weir, Miligaire, Stirlingshire, “Invention for Re-
flecting Objects in the Background,” to be known as “The
Detective.” — April 22nd.
6,093. J. Merritt and W. E. Spencer, 77, Chancery Lane,
London, “Cameras.” — April 22nd.
6,101. G. Castagnino, 76, Chancery Lane, Loudon, “Appa-
ratus for Distributing, Diffusing, or Reflecting Light.” —
April 22nd.
6,143. S. P. Read, Ivy Bank, Etherow Road, East Dulwich,
London, “ Postal Case for the Preservation of Drawings
during Transmission.” — April 22nd.
6,147. A. Drummond, 70, Wellington Street, Glasgow, “Glaz-
ing Structures.” — April 23rd.
6,173. W. P. Thompson, 6, Lord Street, Liverpool, “The
Reproduction of Drawings or the like.” (Raoul, Sanson,
anil Amedee Wilbaux, Belgium). — April 23nl.
6,221. J. W. Lovibond, 53, Chancery Lane, London, “Instru-
ments for Estimating, Measuring, or Comparing the Colours of
Transparent or Opaque Bodies, and for Testing Colour-
Vision and Light -Perceptive Power.” — April 23rd.
6,233. A. Pumphrey, 128, Colmore Row, Birmingham,
“ Stereoscopes.” — April 24th.
6,239. H. M. Hastings, 54, Edith Road, West Kensington,
London, “Apparatus for Ascertaining the Distance of any
Object for Photographic Purposes.” — April 24th.
6,247. C. R. Bonne, 41, Eastcheap, London, “Apparatus to
be used in the Development of Photographic Negatives.”
(Eduardo Casal, France). — April 24th.
6,259. J. Makepeace, 37, Chancery Lane, London, “ Glazing
Roofs.”— April 24th.
6,294. W. H. Stacey, 18, York Street, Sheffield, “ Dark
Slides for Cameras.” — April 25th.
Specifications Published.
3,403. March 4 th, 1890. — “ Machines for Applying a Coating
of Mucilaginous Substance.” Charles Hudson and Joseph
Spoor Hudson, 3, Langdale Terrace, Stockton-on-Tees,
Cardboard Box Makers.
This invention relates to a machine to be used for spreading
a coating of gum, paste, glue, or other mucilaginous substance
to the underneath side of paper, cardboard, and the like, and to
the delivery and transit of the said coated article to some
place where it is required for use or placement, and also for
cutting the said paper when such cutting is necessary, as in
the case of wall papers, or for narrow strips for cardboard box
makers.
The inventors claim : —
1. The use of endless strings in grooves around the coating
roller, for the purposes described.
2. The combination of a pasting roller for coating paper at
the underneath side, with endless carrying bands.
3. The combination of a coating roller for coating paper at
its underneath side, with means for turning the paper the
coated side uppermost.
4. The combination of a mucilage roller for coating paper at
its underneath side, with endless take off strings, and means
for turning the paper the coated side uppermost.
5. The combination of a coating roller for coating i>aper at
its underneath side, with means for turning the paper the
coated side uppermost, with carrying apparatus.
6. The combination of cutting apparatus with coating roller.
7. An apparatus for cutting strips of paper, and roller for
coating the same, with means for taking the paper off the
finishing roller, and carrying it away ; also for turning it the
coated side uppermost, substantially as described and shown.
(fTorrcsponticttce.
THE CRYSTAL PALACE CHALLENGE CUP COMPETI-
TION.
Sir, — -The Newcastle exhibitors complained that some of
their pictures were excluded from the Challenge Cup Competi-
tion, and I thereupon immediately checked off, by their list
and the catalogue, every picture as hung in the three alcoves
set apart for them. Not one was missing, but, in addition, two
of those which had been previously shown at the Crystal
Palace were included. As, however, no mention of the dis-
qualification of those two, or of any others, was made to a
single judge, it is not easy to see how the presence of two
additional pictures was prejudicial to the interests of the New-
castle Society.
The entire number of the Newcastle pictures — Mr. Sawyer
having substituted two new for two old ones — was submitted
to the judges for their consideration, and the responsibility of
the Executive was then and there brought to an end.
J. F. Peasgood.
Crystal Palace Company, Crystal Palace, .S'. £. , April '26th.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION.
Sir,— The fifth annual Photographic Convention will l>e held
at the Town Hall, Chester, on June 23rd to 28th inclusive.
The proceedings will be opened by a conversazione. During the
week, papers by eminent authorities will lie read, and an exhibi-
tion of novelties in photographic' apparatus will beheld. Sub-
committees appointed to consider the questions of lens standards,
and weights, measures, and formulae will present reports.
Excursions to various places in the neighbourhood have been
arranged. The scenery around Chester is universally acknow-
ledged to lie exceedingly picturesque and beautiful, and replete
with historical interest, and it therefore presents unusual attrac-
tions to the photographer.
The annual subscription is 5s., and admits to all the privi-
leges of membership. Members who desire to read papers or
give demonstrations are requested to forward their names at
an early date. A detailed programme will be forwarded as
soon as final arrangements are complete.
The council trust that the good work already done by the
Convention will commend it to your support, and they hope to
have your assistance in increasing the number of its members.
J. J. BriginsHaw, I/on. Sec. and Treas.
On Thursday, May 8th, there will bean exhibition of lantern
slides at the Camera Club, from negatives recently taken by
Mr. J. R. Rodgers and Major Nott in Egypt, and by Mr. H.
M. Elder in Madeira.
Photo- Mechanical Printing. — An article published in this
journal last week about photo-mechanical processes was quoted
from The Beacon, of Chicago, the mention of which circumstance
was omitted in error. Shortly, a series of articles on the same
subject, by a writer experienced in photo-mechanical processes,
will appear in these pages.
Mat 2, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
347
^rocee&tngs of ^octettes.
Photographic Society op Great Britain.
The technical meeting of this Society was held on Tuesday
evening last, the 29th ult., Mr. T. Sebastian Davis in the chair.
A kodak of larger size than those previously exhibited was
shown by Mr. Jackson. The camera was made to take a roll-
holder having forty-eight films of size 7 by 5, and when fitted
for use weighed five pounds and a quarter. The diaphragm
plate was in the form of a quadrant pivoted at the angle.
Many film negatives that had l>een taken with the apparatus were
handed round, and the chairman enquired what method of
development had l>eeu employed.
Mr. Jackson said that he had used pyro and ammonia for
some, but for the most part the negatives had been developed
with pyro and a mixture of potash and soda.
The Chairman asked whether Mr. Jackson had used quinol.
Mr. Jackson replied that the action of quinol was too slow.
Great density could be got with it if it was desired. In
developing these films it was necessary to carry on the action
until the image was almost gone, as it lost so much in the
fixing bath.
Mr. Arnold Spii.ler enquired whether Mr. Jackson had
found any method of varnishing satisfactory.
Mr. Jackson had not succeeded with varnish. For drying
the films he used in the first place a bath of methylated
spirit, glycerine, and water. After a short stay in this solu-
tion the films were pinned up by a corner to dry, and when
dry were rolled with the films outwards and kept so for about a
couple of hours.
Mr. Spili.er thought the use of glycerine introduced the
danger of taking up silver from the paper used to print on.
Mr. Jackson said that the glycerine could be removed from
the surface of the films by wiping them when dry with
cotton wool. The films were made in various speeds ; those
used for the negatives now shown were of about twice the
rapidity of the stripping films.
Mr. Friese Greene showed a film about 20ft. long, with a
series of negatives on it. For developing such long strips he used
a dish in which several glass rods were fixed horizontally at a
little distance from the bottom of the dish. The film was
wound in and out of these rods, and the dish waved during
development.
Mr. Spiller had been able to get very dense negatives on
celluloid films by using eikonogen in conjunction with caustic
potash or soda. The films being very hard, would stand strong
alkali better than most emulsions.
Mr. \V. England showed some negatives taken on thick
celluloid films.
Mr. T. Samuels thought films of this substance much better
than the thin ones previously shown, which were very difficult
to develop.
Mr. W. E. Debenham pointed out the advantage of thin
films when collotype or other mechanical processes were to be
employed.
Mr. Spiller had found no difficulty in developing thin
films.
Mr. Jackson said that the method he used was to place
about a dozen films, one on the top of the other, in the deve-
loping dish. They were kept face downwards, and moved, as
in toning prints, by taking up the bottom one, and laying it on
to the top.
Mr. \V. England showed an arrangement for holding a
celluloid film in a dark slide of larger size than the film itself.
Three strips of thin card were glued on to a thick card in such
a way as to go round three sides of the film to be used. On
these strips were other strips, overhanging the film for a
distance sufficient to ensure holding it in. He also showed a
sheath made with a card back, and furnished with edges
of ferrotype plate, under which the edge of the film was
slipped.
Mr. A. Cowan showed some plates illustrating the effect of
orthochromatising ordinary plates. He first showed a pair of
plates, one of which had been orthochromatised and exposed for
a minute under a negative at a window covered with four thick-
nesses of yellow material. There was found to be a fully
printed transparency on development. The companion ordinary
plate similarly exposed showed but a very faint image. The
sensitiveness of the orthochromatised plate for ordinary daylight
was, however, much diminished, as was shown by a pair of
negatives and by plates exposed under a sensitometer screen.
The action of the yellow had been much exalted, whilst the
general sensitiveness was lowered. It had been said that there
was great difference of orthochromatic effect as the daylight
was bright, or inclined to be yellow. In exposures, however,
that he had made at 12 o’clock in the day and at 7 in the
evening, he had not been able to discover any relative difference
in the sensitiveness of the orthochromatic and ordinary
plates.
Mr. W. E. Debenham considered that Mr. Cowan’s experi-
ments showed conclusively the efficacy of the orthochromatising
solution that he had employed. He noticed a strong pink
colour still left in the plates, much stronger, he thought, than
would be the case with any commercial plates.
It was mentioned that the subject of stereoscopic pictures
and apparatus would be brought forward at the next technical
meeting, to be held on the 27th of May.
Camera Club.
April 24 tli. — Capt. W. de W. Abney in the chair.
Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer, in continuation of his paper on
“Limitations in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus,” said
that he did not pretend to any more knowledge of art than was
included in any educated man’s curriculum with a taste for the
fine arts. He had been criticised for entering upon points outside
the limits of the province of an optician. He had, however,
endeavoured to show the tendencies of the focal treatment of
subjects, starting with that of sharp focus, which of itself was
a mathematical triumph, and had then indicated the instru-
mental possibilities outside this treatment to produce results
more in accord with the artist’s taste. “Sharp all over”
photographs are truer in <1 rawing than those of contrasted
definition. Major Nott had taken up the opposite position to
Mr. Davison, perhaps rather extremely. He (Mr. Dallmeyer)
did not agree with the general statement of Captain Abney, that
a photograph sharp all over is seen in parts with thesame amount
of “ fuzziness ” as in nature, when the eye is directed chiefly
to the principal object, and when the photograph is of large
size, say 20 by 15, with a focal length of lens of 30 inches.
In fact, this must entirely depend upon the distance of the
nearest plane included. Binocular vision will make this distance
greater than monocular vision, as portrayed by the photo-
graphic lens. The artist, Mr. Davis Cooper, had had the mis-
fortune to lose the sight of one eye, and had arrived at the
definite conclusion that, within a distance approximating closely
to sixty yards, there is an alteration in the focus of the eye for
different planes, becoming more striking the nearer the planes
approach to the eye ; beyond that, no appreciable difference
exists ; this, of course, may vary with different eyes. In Capt.
Abney’s case, if the nearest plane were 2,000 inches distant,
uniform definition through all planes must obtain, and to get
uniform sharpness in nearer planes, the lens must be more and
more stopped down. If the eye were focussed in the nearer
plane chosen, it would have a different focus than for those
most distant, and this does not so nearly approach to the hand-
ling by an artist. He (the speaker) thought knowledge of the
“ sight-stop ” for extreme distance to be of value to the artist,
as the largest stop he should employ. More stopping down
introduces “local colouring,” making the photograph too topo-
graphical to be called artistic ; the focus of the lens should rest
where the eye wishes to rest, and give the picture desired by
the individual. Mr. Davison was surprised at his statement
of what was and what was not art, but mere mechanical
excellence, he (the speaker) fully admitted, will pall upon
people, and those who too much advocate it will be left
“ hoist with their own petard.” Although his views might not
be serviceable to him commercially, and might be misinterpreted
as departing from a scientific and mechanical height, he, for
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
[May 2, 1890.
348
^ngtoerg to (ftomgponticntjs.
oue, elected to go forward, in order that a still wider applica-
tion of lenses per se, jierfect mathematically, might, by intelli-
gent use, serve the double purposes of the two extremes of
artistic and scientific requirements.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 24th mst., Mr. W. H. Prestwich
occupied the chair.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater exhibited a book of silver prints of
Chester and neighbourhood by Mr. G. W. Wilson, of Aberdeen.
Mr. Freshwater thought it might be interesting to the members
of the Photographic Convention visiting the next meeting at
Chester.
The Hon. Sec. showed a lantern slide of Burnt House Farm.
The negative was taken last September, previous to the land-
slip. He also passed round a case of photographic enamels by
Lafon de Camarsac and Joubert, the property of the Photo-
graphic Club, presented by Messrs. F. Haes and A. Cowan.
The exhibit gave rise to a discussion as to the relative merits
of the powder and substitution processes.
Mr. A. Cowan said the powder process had the advantage of
simplicity, and the results, in his opinion, were certainly equal.
Mr. \Y. H. Harrison remarked upon the condition of the
ancient enamels at the British Museum, the enamel of many
of these being cracked in several places. He considered this
might be due to the unequal expansion and conti action of the
metal support and the enamel under the influence of changes
of temperature.
Mi-. T. K. Freshwater showed the silver prints referred to
at the previous meeting that had been packed for several years
in a tin case. It was found that some of the prints were quite
perfect, others having faded.
The Chairman said that from his experience, he believed silver
prints made on ready-sensitised paper were more permanent
than those made on freshly-prepared paper. It was difficult to
understand why a batch of prints produced under the same
conditions were not always all equal in permanency.
The Hon. Sec. exhibited some results in copying pictures
with ordinary and isochromatic plates. In one case there was
a marked difference in favour of the isochromatic plate. In
the other instance — the subject being a water colour with
purple sky, and same colour reflection in the water — it was
generally considered that the ordinary plate gave the best result.
In one of the prints there was a vast difference in the render-
ing of a small cloud in the picture.
Mr. 4Y. E. Debenham said he had used collodion on his lens
and an eosine bath with excellent results ; with one maker’s
ordinary plate he had used a yellow screen with good effect.
Photographic Society of Ireland.
A technical meeting of this Society was held on Thursday
evening, 24th inst., at 15, Dawson Street, Dublin, Mr.
Greenwood Pim in the chair.
A joint paper on “The Utility of Hand-cameras on Tour,”
by Mr. M. Hedley and Dr. J. Alfred Scott, was read by the
latter, and slides of pictures taken in Scotland last year by the
authors were exhibited by means of the lantern, and were
much admired. After the paper,
The Chairman asked Dr. Scott what proportion of exposures,
time or instantaneous, were the best 1
Dr. Scott, in reply, said that only 18 out of 169 plates
exposed were time exposures, and that they invariably turned
out very good. In reply to Dr. Cosgrave, Dr. Scott said that
his lens was a cheap French H.K., with full aperture of //6 :
but he found that /G 2 gave a general “all-round” focus, and
told better for transparencies.
In reply to Mr. Strangways,
Mr. Hedley said that he used one of Lancaster’s “ Instanto-
graphs,” placed in a common pine box, with Lancaster’s
ordinary revolving shutter.
The Chairman then exhibited Ferrero’s film carrier ; Fallow-
field’s detective camera was shown by the Rev. Canon Bagot ;
Shew’s “Eclipse” camera by the hon. sec. ; and Dr. J. A.
Scott exhibited a hand camera of hjs own manufacture, Iwsed
on Rouch’s model,
All A Ivjrtissments and cimmunuations relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the papir should b9 addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.8., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
Amateur. — Inside Painting of Studio and Park Room. Pro-
vided you select a light tint it is almost a matter of indif-
ference what shade of colour you adopt ; probably pale blue
or stone colour would be most suitable for the studio, and in
certain cases one might be disposed to give a top coating of
luminous paint to show a light throughout the night. The
dark room should be painted No. 1 chrome yellow.
J. D. (Glasgow^. — Truncated Bellows for Camera. Following
the directions in the Year-Book for 1889, pages 173 to 180,
it would be quite easy to make a pattern first in cartridge
paper, and settle the measurements for a 12 by 12 bellows
in this way lief ore cutting out your material. 4Ve admit
the figures in the plates and explanatory drawings are not
very intelligible, but most of them can be read by a lens.
J. D. (South Shields). — Your Ligroine lamp ought to find a
reaily sale at cost price. Offer it by advertisement. A
second letter duly received this week.
Antiquary. — Roman Baths in the City of Bath. Enquire of
Mr. A. F. Perren, Milsom Street, who took several photo-
graphs, both of the square and round baths, when they were
first opened.
B. C. — Botanical Photography. Your question is answ’ered,
and other points of detail referred to, in Julius Sachse’s
admirable article in last week’s News, page 322. Begin at
once, or you will lose the earlier phases of development.
K. Kohwtkr (Weimar). — Is thanked for sending iurther details
of the Voigtlander, Festge, and Kindermann competitions,
medals and money prizes to be given at the forthcoming
(August) meeting, in Eisenach, of the German Photographic
Convention. The general particulars are incorporated in the
prospectus appearing in our pages this week.
F. C. S. — Chlorine. Water Aetinometcr. Professor Alexander
Pedler, of Calcutta, has investigated the action of sunlight
upon chlorine water, with the result that he found oxygen
escaping with effervescence ; but he does not go to the length
of asserting that the measure of the oxygen collected is a
true photometric indication of the intensity of the solar
radiations. The equation 2H.0 4- 2CL = 02 + 4HC1 was
established in the main, but there are secondary changes
resulting in the production of hypochlorous and chloric
acids, which detract from the amount of free oxygen disen-
gaged during this reaction. The ultimate change is, how-
ever, more complete when dilute solutions of chlorine are
employed, so that further experiments are required for the
purpose of fixing the limit at which the chemical decomposi-
tion of water by chlorine becomes a reliable measure of the
actinic force.
A. L. (Otago, N.Z.) — Benzoline Saturator. Having read the
account to which you referred us, we cannot suggest any
cause for the failure of the apparatus, but should lie inclined
to blame the benzoline. It would be well to inter] >ose a
Maugham jet, or cylinder plugged with copper wires, and
capjied at both ends with copper or brass gauze, to overcome
the risk you encountered by the flame passing l»ack. You
might then find it advantageous to warm the benzoline satu-
rator, for it is evident that you had an excess of oxygen.
Having already an ether vajiourizer, you might try the etho-
lienzene light, which is highly recommended in the same
account.
H. T. L. (Westport, N.Z.) — Staining of Negatives whilst Print-
ing. Gelatine negatives are much more difficult to protect
than collodion, on account of their greater prominence. In
a damp climate you should print them with a plate of talc
between, as is often done with valuable negatives here in
England,
MI 1C NEWS.
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1653.— J% 9, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PADS
An International Photomicrographic Exhibition in Antwerp... 349
Photographers and Crowds 360
The Royal Academy of Arts. 1890. By the Rer. F. C. Lambert 360
Photography in France.— Death of M. Peligot— Bridal Medal
— Photograt hs in Colours — Exposure Shutters and Chromo-
Photographic Apparatus — Pellicular Films or. Celluloid —
Photo-Collographic Process — Halation— Coloured Screens
—Instantaneous Photography. By Leon Vidal 352
The Royal Institution— Captain Abney on Colour 333
An Exhibition of Mrs. Cameron’s Photographs 354
Stereo Photography. By Q. F. Powell 355
A Standard Method of Development. By C. II. Bothamley ... 36fi
PAOS
Photography in Germany.— Heliochromic Experiments — New
Collodion Emulsion Paper. By Hermann E. Gunther 357
Notes. — Weights and Measures — Stanley’s Photographs —
Costume Album— Process Work— Building Records 358
How Anschutz Photographs the Larger Wild Beasts 359
Photography in Natural Colours, as effected by Herr Franz
Veress, of Klausenbnrg. By Dr. J. M. Eder 360
Photography of the More Refrangible Rays. By V. Schumann 361
Photographic Lenses. By T. R. Dallmeyer 361
Patent Intelligence 363
Proceedings of Societies 364
Answers to Correspondents 368
AX INTERNATIONAL PHOTOMICROGRARHIC
EXHIBITION IN ANTWERP.
A Committee has been formed to organise an Interna-
tional Exhibition in Antwerp, devoted to microscopical
science in all its branches, on the occasion of the third
centenary of the invention of the microscope. The
Exhibition will be divided into two sections, the one
retrospective, the other a display of microscopes by
actual makers, also accessory apparatus and photo-
micrographs. During the Exhibition lectures will be
delivered, illustrated by means of the photo-electric
microscope, and among the subjects included will be : —
“The History of the Microscope,” “The Use of the
Microscope,” “ The Projection Microscope and Photo-
micrography,” “ The Microscopic Structure of Vege-
tables,” “The Microscopic Structure of Men and
Animals,” “ Microbes,” “ The Adulteration of Food
and other Substances.”
The Executive Committee consists of M. Charles de
Bosschere, President ; Dr. Henri Van Heurck, Director
of the Botanical Garden of Antwerp, Vice-President ;
M. Charles Van Geert, jun., Vice-President of the
Floral Circle of Antwerp, Secretary- General ; and M.
Edmond Grandgaignage, Director of the Superior Insti-
tute of Commerce, Antwerp, also M. Gustave Royers,
Chief Engineer of the City of Antwerp, Members.
The Executive Committee says that it is unneces-
sary to state the importance of the microscope, for
without it none of the natural and medical sciences
could have reached the altitude at which they stand
to-day ; without it we should not know the structure
of plants, of men, or of animals, and the modifications
which take place in our tissues under the influence of
certain diseases would be unknown. Several diseases
which the presence of microbes enables us to detect at
an early stage, would otherwise he mistaken for unim-
portant maladies of another character. Without the
microscope forms of life innumerable would remain
unknown to us ; take, for instance, the infusoria, the
diatoms, and the bacteria. Numerous adulterations of
articles of commerce, which are now detected with
j ease by means of the microscope, would otherwise
J remain undiscovered. Rut why continue this long
enumeration ? Suffice it to say that without the micro-
scope we should not now he better instructed in the
natural and medical sciences than were our fathers one
or two hundred years ago.
The Committee adds that the compound microscope
was invented by Hans and Zaeharias Janssen, of
Middelburg, and the researches of Professor Hurting
result in assigoing the date of 1590 to the invention,
which date is admitted by competent authorities. For
a long time the inherent defects of the compound
microscope forced students to make general use of the
simple microscope, until about 1824, when Charles
Chevalier finally established the compound microscope
by the union of two brilliant ideas, the combination of
isolated achromatic lenses in a compound objective,
and turning their plane faces towards the object. In
the previous year, 1823, Chevalier conceived the happy
idea of superposing achromatic lenses in the microscope
of Selligue. The Committee concludes by saying that
the project of celebrating in 1890 the third centenary
of an invention which has produced a veritable revolu-
tion in the scientific domain will receive, without
doubt, the sympathetic approbation of all men of
science, as well as of the great army of amateurs now
“passionately” engaged in research earned on with
the aid of the microscope.
Such is the original scheme of the Committee; but a
few days ago, Dr. Van Heurck told us that its carrying
out is postponed until next year. The City of Antwerp
has promised to subscribe fifty thousand francs
towards the Exhibition, and to give the use of a
buildiug for its purposes, in which building four
thousand square metres of space will be available.
The Government of Relgium was fully expected to
subscribe fifteen thousand francs towards the under-
taking, but at the last moment it declined, and as
the Committee wants another fifteen or twenty
thousand francs to carry out its plans, the Exhibition
is postponed until 1891. The idea is to keep the
| Exhibition open for three months, July, August, and
nr>o
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 9, 1890.
September, we presume for the benefit of tourists
who pass backwards and forwards through Antwerp in
such numbers in the autumn. Antwerp is one of the
favourite landing-places in Europe of American
tourists, many of whom book there direct from New
York, and year by year the number of English passing
through Antwerp is increasing, by reason of the
good accommodation provided of late years on the
Harwich route, combined with moderate fares. The
general public cannot be expected to wax enthu-
siastic over photo-micrography, although brilliantly
illustrated lectures may help to rouse them from
their torpor ; neither can it be expected that skilled
microscopists could make it convenient to be in
Antwerp on or about a particular fixed date, hence
the keeping of the Exhibition open for a long time
is more likely to meet their requirements. Zeiss
has expressed his interest in the Exhibition and
willingness to exhibit therein.
On the occasion of the opening of public exhibitions,
the reception of visitors by the city of Antwerp is
usually of the most hospitable character. Some of us
will not soon forget the receptions given by the
venerable Burgomaster and others at the inauguration
of the Antwerp International Exhibition several
years ago.
THOTOGRAPHERS AND CROWDS.
Crowds, especially of street boys and street girls, have
been the deadly enemies of architectural photographers
for all time, and many have been the devices for
clearing an open space in front of the camera. One
of the most time-honoured is that of mounting a large
lens at the back of the camera to draw the crowd in
that direction, whilst the view really desired is taken
by the small lens in front.
A few days ago two English photographers planted
their cameras on opposite sides a deserted space in
Ghent to take an adjacent church ; instantly, of course,
children dropped from the clouds, emerged from the
earth, concentrated from all possible directions, and
each operator had his crowd around him. One of them
folded his arms, leant against a wall, and gazed stead-
fastly at his friend in the distance ; the children soon
grew tired of gazing at an operator doing nothing, then
cleared off to watch the more active manipulator; the
first one, thus relieved, then made his exposure.
The same day, when taking another view, one of
these photographers discovered that a boy in the crowd
prided himself on his dancing ; that boy was immedi-
ately otfered the sum of one penny to dance several
yards behind the camera. The delighted boy entered
into the contract, and executed akind of Belgian “fling”
which drew the crowd to the back of the camera.
The view was then taken.
In the old cities in Belgium and Holland archi-
tectural photographic work is somewhat more easy than
in towns in England, because there are so many canals
and rivers about. For this reason numerous picturesque
views are obtainable when the lens is pointed over the
parapet of one or other of the bridges.
THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF ARTS, 1890.
BY THE REV. F. LAMBERT, M.A.
We have been so long accustomed to be told that “the
Academy this year is certainly not up to the average,”
that it will be quite refreshing, for once in a way, to omit
that time-honoured enigma, for it is by no means an easy
thing to reply to the obviously pertinent question. What
do you mean by the average V
It is not an unnatural presumption that the readers of
these notesare for the most part interested in the making
of pictures by some of the various photographic processes
of the day, and their interest in the pictures now on
view in Burlington House will concern them chiefly for
such degree of sympathy as the aforesaid paintings will
conjure up in the photographic eye.
The writer has little or no sympathy with that type of
cynic who is blind to all aspects of criticism save that of
fault-seeking — finding or inventing which has but little
benefit in it beyond flattering the vanity of the defect
discoverer ; but, on the other hand, rather with him who
“ Finds tongues in trees ; books in ruoning brooks,
Sermons in stones, and good in everything.”
There arc but few. if any, pictures in this vast gathering
from which nothing may be learned, if even it be what to
avoid, what not to do, or how not to do it, although there
are vast differences in the lessons, as in the long scale of
tones and subjects of nature herself ; yet it is always a
lasting and solid consolation to the humblest follower of
Art in nature that she has yet secrets which he has just
as good a chance of discovering as any other user of
human eyes, and be his nugget small, yet so long .as it has
the ring of truth, he may take to himself the consciousness
of having added to the wealth of the world.
The number of works included in the catalogue is, per-
haps, somewhat less than in some recent years : but proba-
bly, if the cream be less in quantity, it may be compen-
sated for by its quality.
Perhaps it may be as well at the outset to state that the
following remarks are not an attempt at what is usually
termed art-criticism — which is too often but an ill-matched
patchwork of ignorance, flattery, smartness, and art cant —
but rather an attempt to suggest to my photographic
friends what is worth while their seeing for themselves, so
that they may think for themselves also.
G/alien / No. 1. — No. 4 (“The Loving flip,” Seymour
Lucas, A.), is rather of the sharp-all-over sort, a crisp
picture, and suggestive in its arrangement of secondary
detail. No. (by G. A. Storey, A.R.A.), “The Hungry
Messenger” is its title, and the hero of the act the mes-
senger himself, a half-starved Puritan, having delivered
his missive to a Roundhead commander, accommodates
his appetite from his neighbour's plate, an incident of a
somewhat comic nature, which is enhanced by the earnest
look on the reader's face.
Simple and natural incidents are such as, perhaps, best
lend themselves to photography, and thus this picture may
suggest a new direction to some one for a subject-picture
through the camera.
At this end of the room, rather high up, are two studies
of lions' heads (No. 7, “The King of Beasts,” P. II. Fisher,
and 94, “Duke,”P. G. Cooper) which strongly remind
us of some shutter pictures taken in the Zoo. not long
ago ; also No. 8 (“Bosom Friends,” a couple of dogs, by
C. P. Garland), all show what important part photography
is destined to play in pictures of “objects in motion,”
May 9, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
551
No. 66 (■• A Florentine Fruit Shop," 1’. W. Adam) is an
“lively” subjects generally. In No. 9 (‘‘The Broken
Pitcher,” C. G. Hards) we have a favourite incident which
is becoming classical ; it would seem as though no exhibi-
tion is complete without it. No. 18 (“ Dinah Morris
Preaching,” C. Gregory) is an admirable subject for the
study of pose and grouping; note the man in background,
the critical semi-defensive angle of his legs. No. 19
(“The Cast Shoe,” K. W. Macbeth, A.) purchased by the
Chantry Bequest, reminds one strongly of some place not
a hundred miles from Cambridge : the inn sign “ five miles
from anywhere and no hurry,” has a familiar sound. Note
how the man holding the horse connects the two groups of
figures and leads up to the theme, and how the one second-
ary small figure at the side looking at the spectator carries
one's eye into the picture at once.
Somehow we do not take kindly to No. 29 (“A
Daughter of the Ghetto,” Luke Fildos, R.A.); it seems
to bring to our mind the word “retouching.” Before
leaving this corner, take a glance at No. 14 (“Lilies.”
Blanch Jenkins), a child's head lighted from the back, and
note the luminosity of the face in shade. Try this light-
ing at various angles in the studio : verb. sap. Passing
on to No. 25 (“ The Moon is up, and yet it is not Night,”
Sir J. E. Millais, R.A.), wc have a masterly hand, familiar
to all in portraiture figure, giving us a landscape well
worth careful study. The photographic eye says, “ no-
thing is in focus except the stag's head, and that isn't very
sharp ; ” but stand back a yard or two, and if there isn't
“ focus,” there is air, breadth, simplicity, quietness ; a ground
fog just creeping up in the distance. Perhaps the some-
what regular band of undergrowth, arranged somewhat
like an arc of a circle of which the spectator imagines
himself the centre, is not quite satisfactory — nevertheless,
a picture ; a lesson in tone and the power of simplicity.
Close by, No. 20 (“ La pia de Tolomei,” Edwin Long,
1*. A.) is one of the figure studies which this artist has
taught us to expect. The various ornaments, decorations,
designs, symbols, &c., on the breast seem to rather dis-
tract one from their number and sparkle. The hands
are worth studying. Just at first No. 30 (“ The Revenge,”
dames Kay) calls to mind Turner’s “Fighting Temeraire”
— a vigorous conception, and boldly carried out, if, per-
haps, with a somewhat lavish hand in strong colour.
No. 31 (“Homewards,” E. A. Waterlow, A.) must
surely bring to mind many a spoilt plate — many an attempt
(and failure) to catch the bright gleam. In looking at
No. 36 (“By Quiet Waters,” J. E. Grace) one is tempted
to say, “ Try another cloud negative.” The sky seems too
fiery for the title, or the subject, and gives one an impres-
sion that it does not belong to the rest of the picture.
No. 40 (“His Playthings,” K. Earle) reminds us of many
a photograph where an attempt is made to “ make a pic-
ture ” by just collecting a few odd “properties” and
“ getting them all in.” The clouds, again, in No. 43
(“The White Mill,” David Murray) seem to come too
forward — seem much nearer than the mill sails, in fact.
And again in No. 57 (“Moorland,” C. II. II. Macartney)
the clouds don’t seem “to belong.”
No. 59 (“The Young Duchess,” II. Schraalz). It seems
a pity to have put “ patches” on such a sweet face, and
given such a twist to the neck, that one’s admiration melts
into sympathy for the sitter’s discomfort — “ Eh ! surely ? ”
And, again, the English face in the Japanesque get-up in
No. 65 (“ A la Japonaise,” Mary Groves) seems to appeal
chiefly to our consciousness ot the general m/fitness of
things generally.
apt illustration of another kind of unfitness of things.
We like softness, even “ out of focus,” at the proper time
and place ; but the accepted definition of that ugly word,
“ Dirt,” shows us that there is “a place for everything ” ;
and we don’t somehow feel thoroughly satisfied in our
minds as to whether those yellow objects are oranges or
balls of wool.
In No. 67 (“ First Words of Love,” C. E. Perugini) we
think that it would have been better if one of the two were
a little more like speaking, and not both apparently in
considerable doubt as to “what to say next.” The
Romeo-and- Juliet theme seems a never-failing one ;
perhaps such ideal themes may justify idealisation of
treatment.
No. 68 (“A Placid Morning,” II. W. B. Davis, H.A.),
takes us to open air again. What wc like best is the
transparency and luminosity of the shadows on the cattle,
and one bit of the foreground water : but the sky and
distance do not make us feel the “ palpitating air of early
dawn.”
No. 69 (“ Polo," J. C. Dollman) brings to mind the
question as to whether it is desirable to represent violent
action in works of art, and again, if so, whether the
“ critical moment ” is the best one to select. We do not
affect a knowledge of horse-flesh or anatomy, and therefore
will be content with saying that some of the animals seem
in “funny” positions; but here we must call in Mr.
Muybridge as our court of final appeal as to the possi-
bilities.
Nos. 74 and 80 (“Augustus Holden,” and “Sir D. A.
Smith,” by W. W Ouless, R.A.), we have two very
suggestive portraits, both well worth study. The fur in
No. 74 is particularly “ furry,” although every hair is not
painted singly as some would insist upon.
No. 73 (“ Good Luck,” Lyell Carr) certainly does make
one feel cold, although the sun-cast shadows on the snow
cheer one somewhat.
No. 76 (“All Hands Shorten Sail," F. Brangwyn).
This is a picture to be well looked at, but we will defer
saying more until we come to others by the same artist.
No. 81 (“Davy Jones’s Locker,” W. L. Wyllie, A. )
certainly upholds the view that there are “as good fish
in the sea, &c.,” and at this particular point they seem to
be more than plentiful.
No. 75 (“Last Night’s Disaster,” J. C. Hook, R.A.)
must not be passed over. The figures at work digging
out the sand from the tide-cast boat certainly strike us as
the best part. The sky and sea both seem hard, and not
inviting of attention.
No. 82 (“ A Foretaste of Summer,” L. C. Nightingale)
comes as a note of warning ; too many horizontal and
vertical lines are not often pleasing, and we could have
imagined the swans a bit more feathery. No. 86 (“ The
Fringe of the Forest,” F. S. Richardson) is fuzzy enough
to satisfy the pin-holiest of pin-hole advocates ; and No. 88
(“Across the Common,” Claude Hayes) is also, as Mrs.
Gamp would put it, “likewise so dispoged."
No. 89 (“Snakes,” Estelle d’Avigdor). There are
several of these weird semi-mysterious dark pictures this
year. "We should have liked this one better had we been
more satisfied about the bit we took to represent a patch
of open sky, up in one corner.
No. 91 (Portrait, by W. Carter) is well worth careful
looking at ; excepting the colouring, we like it. The pose
is easy and natural, balance of the head is good, and the
352
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
hands are easy ; generally, the treatment is broad and
simple, and its simplicity gives it weight.
No. 96 (“Among the Brambles,” Val. C. Priuceps, A.).
We don't quite know whether to look at the brambles, or
the young ladies, or the small boy who is staring at us, and
so we feel constrained to pass on into the next gallery.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FRANCE.
BY LEON VIDAL.
Death of M. Peligot— Bridal Medal— Photographs
in Colours — Exposure Shutters and Chromo-
Photographic Apparatus — Pellicular Films ox
Celluloid — Piioto-Collographic Process — Hala-
tion — Coloured Screens — Instantaneous Photo-
graphy.
At the opening of the meeting the Chairman announced
the death of M. Peligot, president of the Society, and read
the discourse which had been pronounced over his tomb
at the funeral. Peligot was a great chemist. Although
he had never devoted himself especially to photography,
he not the less rendered service to this science, in which
he was greatly interested. It is not yet known who is
to succeed M. Peligot as president of the Society, but we
have some reason to believe that it will be M. Janssen,
who is a member of the Institute, as were Messrs. Reg-
nault, Balard, and Peligot. It is a tradition of the Photo-
graphic Society to place itself under the highest possible
scientific patronage by calling to the presidency a member
of the Institute. No choice, moreover, could be more
acceptable than that of M. Janssen, whose work in astro-
nomical photography has been of such great importance.
On the occasion of the marriage of the daughter of
the grand nephew of Nicephore Niepce, the Bureau of the
Photographic Society made an offer of one of the medals
struck on the occasion of the celebration of the fiftieth
anniversary of photography. The medal bears the effigies
of Nicephore Niepce and of Daguerre.
Photographs in colours, by M. Yeresz, of Kolos/.var.
were shown at the meeting. Much has recently been said
and published concerning these productions ; notably in
the Photographic News interesting articles have appeared,
especially that by Capt. Abhey in the last number. We
had expected to see something better than those examples
which were exhibited, which add nothing new to what is
already known on the question, except that they are on
glass, and obtained with gelatine emulsion. AVe are cer-
tainly not amongst those who absolutely deny the possi-
bility of the solution of the problem of photography in
natural colours, no one having the right to say to science,
“Thou shalt go no farther,” but we may certainly affirm
that the interesting researches of M. A'eresz have not yet
led to this solution so ardently desired.
General Sebert has made two very interesting communi-
cations. One relates to a method of studying the action
of photographic exposure shutters. The apparatus em-
ployed for the purpose was shown. In this apparatus the
effective work of the shutter registers itself. It is the
application in practice of a method indicated by M. De
Labaume Pluvinal at the time of the Congress. The
apparat us consists of a kind of dark slide forming a camera,
in the interior of which slides a light board worked by
two springs. In front there is a circular opening closed
by a metallic plate, across which is a very thin slit. If a
piece of sensitive paper is placed on the thin board, and
the whole is exposed to a powerful light whilst the board
[May 9. 1890
is moved by the springs, the various zones of the sensitive
paper passed behind the slit, and if the light is equal
throughout, its action is translated on the sensitive film
by a continuous tint. On the contrary, if during the
passage of the paper there are irregularities in the source
of light, these irregularities will show themselves by
inequalities in the zones on the paper. If it is desired to
try an exposure shutter, it is placed in front of the opening,
and by using a bifurcated tube we act simultaneously on
the release of the board bearing the sensitive surface and
on that of the shutter. At the same time a tuning fork is
released, vibrating 100 to the second, and carrying a small
hole at the upper end to allow light to pass. On the cor-
responding part of the sensitive paper a sinuous line is
produced, each bend of which indicates the one-hundredth
part of a second. AVe have thus simultaneously a graphic
delineation of the work produced by the shutter, and of
the time occupied. The line varies, according to the
nature of the shutter. Those with vanes opening from
the centre to the circumference, and closing from the
circumference to the centre, without stopping, give an im-
pression in the form of a lozenge with curved sides. But
if there is a stoppage — that
is to say, an instant when the
objective is left fully open —
the figure takes the form
shown — that of the preceding
one, plus the rectangle ABCD
inserted in the centre portion
of the curvilinear lozenge.
AC, BD, have a length corresponding to the duration of
the full opening of the lens. AA'ith other shutters the
forms are different, but analogous to the one described,
the work with full aperture being always indicated by a
rectangle in the centre of the field. On comparing
various shutters with this apparatus, we find which is the
one that, with the same duration of total action, gives the
largest amount of work with full opening, and this is
evidently the one which should be preferred. The suiu-
oidal trace gives the exact duration of each part of the
exposure, and we have thus automatically registered the
various phases of action. The idea of the registering
tuning fork attached to this apparatus was given by M.
Cornu.
The other communication, by the same author, relates to
an apparatus for reproducing an object in movement at
equal intervals regulated in advance ; these intervals may
be varied according to the requirements of the case. It
is composed of six cameras furnished with shutters, which
are acted upon successively by two needles carried on a
rotating disc ; the first needle opens each shutter, and the
second closes it. The operation is performed in the
fraction of a second, so that we can obtain the photographic
registration of the various phases of the movement of a
projectile, a torpedo, &c. The spring movement is
supported independently of the cameras, in order to avoid
shaking.
M. Grieshober showed some new pellicles of gelatino-
bromide of silver ou celluloid. The sheet of celluloid
bears two coats of gelatino-bromide — one on the front,
and one on the back ; by this means halation is avoided,
and, if the impression is divided between the two surfaces,
the negative may be used on either side. Some of these
pellicles were distributed among the members for experi-
ment.
M. Balaguy summed up his process of photo-collography
May 9, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
353
on pellicle covered with gelatiuo-bromide of silver.
The coating of gelatine is attached to its pellicular support
by a silicated solution. It is sensitized by bichromate of
potash, and printing is carried out in the customary way.
It is washed in the usual manner, and placed on a Hat
surface, where adhesion takes place by vacuum. The
printing with fatty ink is effected in the usual manner.
In short, the characteristic of this process is the use of
flexible supports, gelatinized beforehand, and photo-
lithography allows us to pull a certain number of impres-
sions from each plate. We do not see the use of the
bromide of silver, and we believe that an identical — or.
perhaps, better — result would be obtained on gelatine alone.
M. llalagny thinks that the silver increases the sensitive-
ness of the film. We have made the following experiment :
A piece of Eastman's paper was freed from bromide
of silver at one end by immersion in hyposulphite of soda ;
it was then washed, and the whole sensitized with bichro-
mate of potash. After exposure to light, we could find
no difference in the sensitiveness of the two halves. The
use of bromide of silver appears to us so far to be a simple
luxury without any advantage. M. llalagny proposed to
practically demonstrate his very interesting process at a
technical meeting of the Society.
The question of halation has been stirred up anew.
We have observed that the remedy proposed by M. Cornu
is uot practicable on account of the non-drying nature of
the essences he mentioned. Collodion with chrysoidine
alone is not sufficient, a negative showing halo obtained
when using this method having been shown by us.
Finally, we have shown a negative without the slightest
halation obtained on a plate the back of which was covered
with collodion containing chrysoidine, to which was added
another tinctorial substance in order to absorb almost all
rays, methyl violet Further, as our experiments were
made on Monekhoven orthochromatic plates, and through
powerfully coloured screens, it is shown that neither
orthochromatism nor the use of screens is a remedy
against halation. The best remedy is a collodion which
dries quickly, and is so coloured that all rays are absorbed.
Apropos of coloured screens, we mentioned our experience
with a conti nuating screen. An orthochromatic plate is
exposed in the camera in the usual way with a suitable
yellow screen ; it is then exposed to light under a com-
bination which only allows red and orange light to pass.
The supplementary exposure is about four or five times
as long as the camera exposure, but will vary according
to the nature of the continuating screen. On develop-
ment, the red is found to have acquired its proper value.
With plates sensitised for red, the use of the continuating
screen is still necessary, but for a shorter time. In
connection with this subject, we also showed our sen si to -
colorimeter : but it would take too long to describe it
now. and we shall return to it later.
M. Joseph Vallot indicated a process of photographing
grottos by the aid of magnesium, lie uses a lamp which
allows two grammes of magnesium powder to be blown
through at once. A good flash of about two metres in
height is produced, aud in this way he has been able to
reproduce very successfully details of certain interesting
grottos in Le Herault. M. Vallot showed conclusively by
lantern projections the success he had obtained in the way
indicated.
The Newcastle Photographic Exhibition will close to-morrow
(Saturday) evening. At 7.30 p.m. there will be a vocal and
instrumental concert in the building.
THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
CAPTAIN ABNEY ON COLOUR.
Last Saturday afternoon, Captain W. de IV. Abney
delivered a lecture on the above subject, aud began by
remarking that he had previously explained to them how
he measured the amount of blackness of a silver or
platinum deposit by means of a rotating disc, and that the
amount of blackness of deposit can be shown to scale.
From any particular blackness the intensity of the light
which produced it can be ascertained ; when he had a
variety of blacknesses he could compare them, and say that
such and such an intensity of light produced each, so that
it was really a quantitative process of measuring the
chemical action of light. He had discovered that the
deposit followed the curve of the law of error.
The law applies not only to platinum deposits, but to
anything whatever reduced by the action of light ; for
instance, the fading of indigo follows the same law, but is
so long in fading that a longer unit of time has to be
selected. In the case of the fading of carmine, a con-
venient unit of time is one hour, and in the case of indigo
six hours. In ordinary photography the units of time are
changed, for when the light is feeble aud the lens stopped
down, they do not count by seconds, but by hours. For
each pigment there are certain rays which are chemically
active. Experiment shows that the intensity of light is
interchangeable with length of exposure, yet a very small
change can be measured by the spectrum method he had
brought under their notice ; for instance, it had been
ascertained that the first change in carmine is the fading
of tin blue element it contains. The phosphorous oxide
recently discussed at the Royal Institution by Professor
Thorpe changes in the light first to yellow and then to red.
People have taken it that the amount of apparent change
shows the exact sensitiveness to light, but this is not the
case ; the observations had to be referred to the curve in
the diagram before them, to lear n the absolute sensitiveness
to any part of the spectrum.
Captain Abney here exhibited some colours which he
aud another had exposed for eighteen months to the action
of light, and said that month by month they had taken
portions of those bands of colour, and measured them one
after another by the method he had described. There
are, however, some pigments with which it is impossible to
deal in this way, because they take so long to fade ; rose
madder only begins to fade after the lapse of eighteen
months, and medical men have not yet found out how to
prolong life sufficiently to finish the experiment with that
substance.
The sum of the effects produced by the different rays is
the same, whether the same rays act together or at a
different time. This is perfectly true as a rule, but there
are exceptions. There are rays of the spectrum which
tend to undo, or mask, the effect of the other rays ; the
red will mask the work done by the blue ray, so that if the
red is made to act upon a sensitive surface before the
violet, the result is uot the same as if they acted together,
because, in the first case cited, the red has nothing to
undo. In ordinary photographic work, the rays which
undo the effect produced by the other rays may be
neglected, as the influence is so feeble under the condi-
tions. An image in red light may be projected upon a
screen illuminated by white light, and a photograph of the
red image be obtained, because the red rays undo some of
the effects of white light by oxidising the film.
3,14
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 9, 1890.
Captain Abney then photographed an image of the
spectrum after passing the rays through green glass ; he
used bromide of silver paper, and developed by means of a
brush. On the same sheet he also photographed the
spectrum without green glass interposed. The result was
that, the green glass was seen to have cut off both ends of
the photographic spectrum ; the image produced subject
to its intervention was shorter and feebler than that pro-
duced by the spectrum of white light. The lecturer said
that if the effect of blue light upon a bromide of silver film
be taken as one hundred, that of green light will be about
twelve. On these principles the photographic intensities
of light passing through coloured glasses could be
measured.
The spectrum value of a sensitive salt can be increased.
If a salt of silver be stained with certain fugitive dyes, the
salt is increased in sensitiveness to those particular parts
of the spectrum which the dye absorbs ; a lake is formed
in the first instance, and this gives nuclei upon which
development can take jdace. He then showed the results
of photographing a colour sensitoineter by means of an
ordinary plate and by means of an orthochromatised plate ;
he also exhibited photographs of a doll dressed in various
colours, to show the results obtainable by different
methods. The best result was obtained by illuminating
the doll with mixed green and yellow light, then photo-
graphing it on a plate which had been treated with erythro-
sine and cyanine ; in this experiment, the blue of the
spectrum was, it will be noticed, eliminated.
He exhibited two photographs, upon silver plates, of
the spectrum in natural colours, and remarked that the
colours, though not strong, were clearly discernible.
Such photographs, he said, were not new, but had been
taken for forty years.
If three colours be taken, which, together, make white
light, it is perfectly possible, by superposing them, to get
what, to the eye, appear to be all the colours of the spec-
trum. He then, by mixing red, green, and violet rays,
produced white light, and afterwards, by mixing them in
another way, obtained a good representation of a complete
spectrum upon the screen.
A photograph in natural colours, he said, was not due
to the colours of thin plates. At present it appears to be
highly improbable that photography in natural colours will
ever be of commercial value. Colour is mostly produced
under red light by an oxidation process, and by oxidising,
the molecule becomes of such a shape as to reflect red
light. Violet light has a reducing action ; in fact, he had
sometimes produced white, by red and blue undoing the
action of each other. Thus one end of the spectrum tends
to undo the work of the other end. The investigator on
photography in natural colours, whose work is now
attracting attention, is simply repeating the experiments
made years ago by Mr. George Wharton Simpson. If
once a man succeeds in completely solving the problem of
photography in natural colours, lie ought to make a
fortune first, and be hanged afterwards, for the discovery
will be the destruction of all art feeling.
Thk Photographic Club.— Subject for May 14, “Photo-
graphic Definitions” ; May 21, “Photo-Mechanical Pi •ocesses.”
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — Ordinary Meet-
ing at 5a, Pall Mall East, on Tuesday, May 13th, at 8 p.m.,
when papers will be read on “ Reflected Images in Optical
Combinations, and their Effect on the Brilliancy of the Final
Image, ’ by T. R. Dallmeyer ; and on “Photography with a
Flash-Light,” by W. England.
AN EXHIBITION OF MRS. CAMERON’S
PHOTOGRAPHS.
An Exhibition of -Mrs. Cameron’s photographs was opened
at the Camera Club last Monday, and highly deserves a
visit from those who have been brought into photographic
existence by the case of the modern dry plate processes.
To the older photographers the pictures are not new.
The portraits by Mrs. Cameron are a powerful argument
in the mouths of those who are adverse to excessive sharp-
ness of focus in photographs: they are artistically beauti-
ful in the highest sense, and some of them so resemble in
style portraits by the old masters, that it is difficult to
realise that they arc not orthochromatic photographs of
ancient paintings. < hie of the most striking portraits is
that of the late Sir John llerschel, a pioneer in scientific
photography, and a former contributor to these pages.
Another is a likeness of Mrs. Cameron herself, with
square-cut features, and an expression of spirituality and
kindliness.
On Monday evening, Mr. Davison, in drawing the
attention of the members to the pictures upon the walls
of the Club, said that the task was a pleasant one, and that
Mrs. Cameron was an enthusiastic worker ; in putting up
the pictures he felt that it would be easy to wax enthusi-
astic about them himself. Some of them contained
eccentricities which had better have been left out, but in
the main they must recognise the wondrous force of her
portraits ; she had seized the leading characteristics of each
face, and had delineated them as could have been done
better in any other way. She had advantages, for she mixed
with artists, and she had models whose heads lent themselves
to pictorial effect. The disadvantages of the time in which
she worked were very great. She lived in the wet collodion
days ; her studio was a fowl-house converted for the pur-
pose, and in that way she obtained her magnificent dark
backgrounds for portraits. Sir John llerschel was an
astronomer, and in his portrait there is appropriately some-
thing star-like in the disposition of the hair. Some female
heads, from life, in the collection show wonderfully the
characteristics of the pre-llaphaelite school. He felt it to
be scarcely possible that the character of Thomas Carlyle
could have been rendered with more force than in his
portrait before them. The public are only now learning to
appreciate the work of Mrs. Cameron, and he ventured to
predict that they would see much more work of the same
kind before many years had passed away. She publicly
exhibited her works but rarely, and then, as is often the
case, was not satisfied with the judges’ awards. Among
those who wrote to her about her photographs, sent to
some exhibition, was a German, who sent to her the
following letter, evidently aided in his literary work by a
dictionary : —
“Mr. announces to Miss Cameron that lie received the
first half a pound note, and took the photograpliies as Miss
Cameron wishes. He will take the utmost sorrow* to place
the pictures were good.
“Mr. and the Cmitic regret heavily t that it is now
impossible to take the portfolio, the rooms are filled till the
least winkle. | The English Ambassade takes the greatest
interest of the placement of the photographies of Miss Cameron,
and Mr. seut his extra ordinarest respects to the cele-
brated and famous female photographs.
“ Your most obedient.”
* Care, which was the word needed, is expressed by 11 Sorgen” as well
as sorrow We invert the sentence, and we read, to have the picture well
placed where the light is good.
♦ Regret heavily, severely, seiiously.
I Winkle is corner in German.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
355
May 9, 1890.]
partition to prevent blurring, or over-lapping of the two
pictures in the centre. A single lens may be used if a
sufficiently long sliding front is adapted, which will allow
the lens to be moved laterally from centre to centre of the
halved plate ; but this will only do for still life, or possibly
for portraiture. But if this branch of photography is to
be carried out satisfactorily, twin lenses are absolutely
necessary, inasmuch as it is impossible to take moving
objects for the stereoscope with one lens, and sea pieces
lose all their value if a wave, for instance, is not taken by
both lenses at the same instant.
The base of our triangle, or distance between the lenses,
will vary slightly in ordinary land or sea scapes, according
to the distance from the camera of some of the near as
well as distant objects. And here I would remark that
near objects are necessary to the success of the pictures,
the principle of the stereoscope being what I call relative
displacement of objects one to another when viewed by
Mrs. Cameron's pictures, and thatintime, following on the eitilcr eye or either lens separately. Hold up your finger
lines of such work as had been occasionally done by Mr. or (jtjler smap object before any other object, look with
.She also once received the following communication : —
“ Miss Lydia Louisa Summerhouse Donkins informs Mrs.
Cameron that she wishes to sit to iier for her photograph.
Miss Lydia Louisa Summerhouse Donkins is a carriage person,
and therefore could assure Mrs. Cameron that she would arrive
with her dress uucrumpled.
“Should Miss Lydia Louisa Summerhouse Donkins be satisfied
witli her picture, Miss Lydia Louisa Summerhouse Donkins has
a friend who is also a carriage person, who would also wish to
have her likeness taken.”
About this letter Mrs. Cameron records : — “1 answered
Miss Lydia Louisa Summerhouse Donkins that Mrs.
Cameron, not being a professional photographer, regretted
she was not able to ‘ take her likeness, but that had Mrs.
Cameron been able to do so, she would have very much
preferred to have her dress crumpled."
Mr. Davison continued that he hoped that the Club
would make use of all the instruction it could gain from
Faulkner, Mr. Lvouel ( lark, and others, they would sec
them not only equalled, but eclipsed
one eye and then with the other, and in turn different
parts of the background will be covered by what is held
up, so that with both eyes you, as it were, look round the
near object or objects. This, though crudely explained,
will possibly illustrate the principle of the stereoscope,
and show that two separately taken pictures are necessary.
When well placed or selected foreground objects are se-
cured in a picture, the result in the stereoscope is that
other objects and parts of the composition will fall back
or assume their relative positions, and the effect desired is
obtained. For some subjects (principally scientific) the
base of the triangle or distance apart of the points for
taking the two pictures is considerable, some thirty or
forty yards for the Pyramids, to many hundreds of miles
for the moon ; and this reminds me that stereo work can
be accomplished by a quarter or 5 by 4 camera, and taking
parencies which many remember with keen pleasure, but twQ pjctures by placing the camera at the different points
to the absurd and vulgar groups, which must have ag r*quired, for ordinary work at the opposite ends of a
NTK11KOSCOPIC PHOTOGRAPH Y*
BY O. F. POWELL.
First of all I begin with a lament that this branch of
photography is not as popular as it deserves to be, and
surprise that it has so long remained so. Secondly, I will
try to account for its unpopularity.
1st. Fashion; it was once very popular, but fashion
changes, and the pendulum has swung to the opposite
side.
2nd. The degeneration of the subject and style. Of
course I do not refer to the very beautiful glass trans-
gone far to discredit the stereoscope in some minds.
3rd. I think many admirers of the stereoscopic picture
must have been sadly disappointed by the slides sold, for
doubtless many have been taken in by the fraud of making
a so-called stereo slide without the double negative. Such,
it is almost needless to say, are fiat as a single picture,
and to this we shall again refer.
These three causes have, let us hope, worked their own
cure. The pendulum of fashion is on its return, the vulgar
style is ignoininiously dismissed, and, as a rule, photography
is too much to the fore for unscrupulous dealers to pass
off bad work on the public.
This brings us to what a stereo slide is, or rather should
be, namely, two pictures taken separately from the
opposite angles at the base of a triangle, the sides of
which should converge to a point as nearly as possible the
most distant in the view to which the camera is directed ;
the length of the base of the triangle varies considerably
with the subject. A good rule is, for ordinary work, to
have the lenses (if a pair are used in a rigid front) two and
three-quarter inches apart, centre to centre, this being
about the distance apart, centre to centre, of the eyes. A
better plan is to have a special front with double rack-and-
pinion, by which the lenses can be brought nearer or set
farther apart as required. Of course when the two
pictures are taken upon the same plate (any landscape
graduated board fastened to the top of the tripod.
Any process for negative taking or printing will do for
the work, but I consider that the transparency for the
stereoscope is the perfection of photography the
roundness of life is given by the stereoscope to a friend's
likeness, to a bit of lovely scenery, snow, hoar frost, or
ice, which might pass unnoticed in the fiat photograph,
but which is absolutely charming in this instrument. Too
much contrast is undesirable, and what looks flat and
wanting in pluck and crispness outside the instrument may
be exactly right inside. I he stereo-photographer can
often choose charming bits, which, as single pictures,
would be passed over. To return to the negative;
presuming it is double, on the single plate being taken, as
usual, upside down, on placing it picture wise, the light
and left pictures are reversed, and must be cut asunder
for mounting, or the effect is the reverse of what is
desired, or pscudoscopic. There is a way of folding a
double-length strip of paper, and printing two copies, by
which means the paper can be cut in the middle, and save
the double mounting ; but this requires calculation and
care hardly worth an amateur's while, though valuable
where many prints are required off the same negative.
Glass transparencies, too, require great nicety and care,
but which amply repay him. A word as to subject ; choose
such as are likely to please generally, and not one’s self
slope will do, say by 5), the camera must have a central ai0UC) anj suci, a3 will, as far as possible, explain them
Abstract of ,i pager read at the Bath Photographic Society. I Selves.
35G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [May 9, 1890.
A STANDARD METHOD OF DEVELOPMENT*
BY C. H. BOTHAM LEY, F.I.C., l'.C.S.
No one, 1 imagine, would venture to propose a uniform
method of development for all the varied subjects with
which a photographer meets in ordinary practice. The
nature of the subject, the conditions under which it was
photographed, and the intention of the photographer, or,
in other words, the character of the result which he desires
to obtain, must all be taken into account in the subsequent
treatment of the plate ; and to develop all plates in the
same way would reduce photography from the level of a
method of fine art, which most of us hold it to be, to the
level of a mechanical process, which some critics tell us
it is.
There are, however, many cases, chiefly of a scientific
character, in which a uniform method of development is
desirable, if not indispensable. Stellar photography is
probably the best example which can be cited. V hen
testing plates, too, it is essential to operate under strictly
comparable conditions. The necessity for adopting some
constant method of development in the work on ortho-
chromatic photography with which I am at present en-
gaged, led me to give some attention to the matter, and
this paper is mainly a statement of the chief points which
seem to require careful consideration in this connection.
When attempting to select a standard method of
development, we may direct our attention to : (1) The
sensitiveness, as measured by the intensity of illumination
or time of exposure required to produce an impression
which can be developed ; or (2) the gradation of the
resulting image.
I may say at once that, in my opinion, it is not
practicable to frame or adopt any standard developer
which shall be generally applicable when gradation is the
chief consideration. A developer which would be
perfectly satisfactory for line subjects would be unsuitable
for subjects in half-tone ; a standard which would satisfy
an operator who desires to produce soft negatives would
not meet with the approval of au operator who delights in
“ pluck.” Gradation depends not only on the mode of
development, but also on the manner in which the emul-
sion has been prepared, and the physical character of the
gelatine which has been used. Moreover, the relation
between the gradations given by two different kinds of
plates does not remain constant, but varies with variations
in the composition of the developer. The most, therefore,
that seems possible is to devise some standard method (or
methods) from the point of view of sensitiveness, and then
learn to deduce from the results obtained with it as much
information as it cau be made to give concerning the
gradation-quality of the plates.
The problem consequently becomes narrowed to a
method of development which will enable us to compare
the sensitiveness of different plates, and to obtain from
any plate the maximum amount of detail which it can be
made to yield without fogging. Our object is to obtain a
visible and printable deposit of metallic silver from every
part of the emulsion which has been acted upon by light,
without reducing those portions on which light has not
acted. Development is a process of selective reduction,
and this fact it is very important to keep in mind. \\ e
have likewise to bear in mind that many photographers,
even scientific photographers, are not chemists, and have
very little skill in chemical manipulations ; they also have
to rely upon the dealers in chemicals for the purity of
their preparations.
A standard method of development, if it is to be really
useful, and gain general adoption, must fulfil several con-
ditions : —
1. It must be simple in execution.
2. It must resemble, as closely as possible, the methods
used in ordinary practice.
3. It must involve the use of only such chemicals as can
be purchased in a state of purity, and are not hygroscopic,
or liable to undergo other alteration when stored with
ordinary care.
4. The solutions required must be easily prepared, and
not liable to alteration.
Ferrous oxalate dissolved in a solution of potassium
oxalate fails to fulfil several of these conditions. Potassium
oxalate and ferrous oxalate can, it is true, readily be
obtained in a state of purity, but the preparation of a
solution from these materials is a somewhat tedious opera-
tion. Ferrous sulphate is a more convenient iron salt in
practice, but both the solid and its solution readily oxidise.
This difficulty is removed to a considerable extent by the
use of ferrous ammonium sulphate, but even this salt
alters somewhat rapidly after being dissolved. 1 he ferrous
oxalate solution itself oxidises very rapidly, and the ferric
oxalate which is formed is not only a vigorous retarder of
development, but is also a reducing agent of considerable
power. lastly, we have to take into account the fact
that this developer is rarely used for ordinary negative
work, and even its use for positives is becoming less
frequent.
F.ikonogen is also unsuitable, because : (1) Its purity
at present is a very variable quantity ; and (2) Its
behaviour with various accelerators, and under different
conditions, is not yet fully understood.
There remain pyrogallol and quinol, and of these the
former seems decidedly preferable, because, in the first
place, it is the developer most largely used in actual
practice ; and, in the second place, its much greater
solubility makes the preparation of solutions an easier and
more rapid operation than when quinol is used.
Pyroijallol is readily obtained pure, and remains unchanged
for a very long time in well closed bottles if kept out of
contact with ammonia vapour.
The alkali employed as an accelerator may be ammonia,
ammonium carbonate, sodium carbonate, or potassium
carbonate.
The restrainer may be au alkaline bromide, or au alkaline
salt of an organic acid.
Ammonium bromide is the most suitable restrainer
when ammonia is the accelerator. It is readily obtained
pure, and, although slightly hygroscopic, it is easily dried
in an air bath, or by placing it on a clean plate on the top
of a moderately warm oven. Potassium bromide, on the
other hand, usually contains small quantities of bromate,
and, not unfrequently, small quantities of caustic potash.
If. however, sodium or potassium carbonate is used as the
accelerator, and a restrainer is required, potassium bromide
must be used, since ammonium bromide would be decom-
posed with formation of ammonium carbonate and free
ammonia. Alkaline salts of organic acids are unsuitable
for the purpose under discussion, because of the difficulty
of obtaining them in a state of purity.
The French Exhibition in London will be opened early this
month by the Lord Mayor. Its president is M. Gustave
Sandoz, and its Director-General Mr, J. R. Whitley.
* Read at the Photographic Society.
May 9, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
357
PHOTOGRAPHY TNT GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Hkliochromic Experiments— New Collodion Emulsion
Paper.
Since the results of Mr. Fr. Veress's attempts to produce
photographs in natural colours have been published, the j
interest of the profession as well as of the public has been
again directed to this mysterious branch of our art-science |
which, in 1839, Sir John Herschel pointed out as “ only a
question of time.” Half a century has elapsed since then,
and the problem is still unsolved. It is well known
that by the investigations of Becquerel and other pioneers
of our art-science, the possibility of reproducing colour
by means of photography has been proved, but that they
only partially succeeded in fixing their prints. Of late,
Mr. V cress has, as the tests of Professor Yogel are show-
ing, not yet obtained results which can be regarded as
permanent, but Mr. Yeress, whom I know very well, and
who is as assiduous and as talented as he is modest, has
never claimed to have solved the problem of heliochromy.
On the contrary, he describes his labours as simple expe-
riments, about which people make “ too great a bustle,”
as lie expresses himself in a letter. The partial success
of these labours has incited other investigators to repeat
the experiments of Niepce de Saint Yictor and of Poitevin.
At the last meeting of the Society of Practical Photo-
graphers of Berlin, Mr. Gaedicke presented prints, pro-
duced by himself by means of the older methods, which
exhibited a number of beautiful, brilliant colours. He;
said that they were produced on gelatino-chloride paper,
which was previously exposed to light until it turned dark
reddish brown, in order to obtain the sub-chloride forming
the basis of these experiments. The paper was next,
according to Poitevin, bathed for about two minutes by
lamplight in a mixture of equal parts of a concentrated
solution of sulphate of copper and of a five per cent, solu-
tion of bichromate of potash, then dried in the dark, and
exposed to sunlight beneath coloured sheets of glass. In
order to shut out the invisible ultra-violet rays, which in
printing act injuriously, Mr. Gaedicke used a glass plate
coated with a gelatine solution to which a trace of uranine
or aesculinc had been added. After drying, this glass
is almost colourless by transmitted light ; if, however, it
is held in an inclined position and looked at from above, it
appears, in the one case, beautifully green, in the other blue.
Dr. A. Miethe recommended, in order to conserve moi-c
fully the fluorescent qualities of the plates after drying,
the addition to the gelatine solution of a small quantity of
glycerine. He gave the following formula : —
Gelatine ... ... ... ... 2 grammes
Glycerine ... ... ... ... 2 ,,
Water... ... ... ... ... 25 c.c.
Aesculine ... ... ... ... 0-05 gramme
The gelatine is dissolved at a low temperature in 15 c.c.
of the water, then the glycerine and the aesculine, the
latter dissolved in 10 c.c. of water, are added, and the
whole is filtered through sheep's wool. With this solution
the glass plates ai’e coated rather thickly, allowed to
set. and dried in a place free from dust. Through
plates of this kind the ultra-violet rays still partially pass ;
in order to shut them out completely, it is necessary to
combine with this aesculine plate another one. which con-
tains 0-02 gramme of fluoresceiue instead of the above
given quantity of aesculine. The two plates with the
film sides placed together, and the edges cemented with
black paper, which may be coated with asphalt varnish,
in order to protect the films against the influence of the
air. If after some time the aesculine plate turns brown,
it must be replaced by a fresh one. The pure aesculine
as well as the fluoresceiue may be procured from I)r.
Schuchardt, of Gorlitz. A combined plate of this kind
may be placed over the printing frame, which contains
the above described dark brownish silver sub-chloride
paper together with the coloured sheets of glass, and the
whole is then exposed to diffused daylight. Beneath a
yellow sheet of glass the paper soon turns lighter, and
after about half-an-hour it will be printed out, showing,
if watched by lamp-light, a rather brilliant yellow tone.
Beneath a ruby glass the paper acquires a brilliant ver-
milion colour ; beneath a green glass a slightly brilliant
olive-green ; beneath a blue cobalt glass a darkish brown.
The coloured prints keep for some time, provided that
they are not exposed to direct sunlight, and if after
printing they are washed several times in water which has
been slightly acidulated with sulphuric acid. Dr. Miethe
remarked that in his own experiments he used an
ordinary collodio-chloride solution with silver in excess.
He exposed it in a light coloured bottle to sunlight for
several hours, shaking it from time to time ; and then
decanted it from the brownish sediment which was
formed. Paper prepared with this collodion gives with
rapidity bright colours beneath coloured gelatine films.
Dr. Miethe tried to fix his prints with a solution of
magnesium chloride, which has recently been recom-
mended for this purpose by Mr. It. Liesegang, and to
which he added alum up to three per cent. This fixing
agent seems, however, not to fulfil the hopes which it
afforded ; in the case of Dr. Miethe's experiments, at all
I events, the vivid colours of the prints faded even in the
dark, and after some days nothing but faint tints were
visible, which, however, did not become weaker even
after they had been exposed to sunlight for some hours.
It will be seen from these experiments that we at
present have not advanced beyond the position of forty or
fifty years ago. The possibility of reproducing natural
colours by photography to a certain degree has been
proved, but we are waiting for somebody who can invent
the means of fixing the colours obtained.
A new collodion emulsion paper has been introduced
by Mr. Y. Angerer, of Vienna, which, as far as can be
judged from a few experiments I have made with it,
answers well. Collodion emulsion paper, in general, does
not enjoy so much favour in this countiy as its mighty
rival, the gelatino-chloride paper, probably because the
treatment of the latter is more convenient. The collodion
emulsion paper, during the different manipulations after it
has become wet, is rather tender, and has a decided in-
clination to curl, particularly when the paper is somewhat
thick. It should be carefully treated while in a wet con-
dition, the collodion film being easily damaged, particularly
around the edges. These insignificant defects of the
chloride of silver collodion paper are, however, sufficiently
compensated by the extreme sharpness of the pictures
on the same, particularly in comparison with albumen
paper, where the details in the deepest shadows are hardly
visible. For toning, T use the sulphocyanide of ammonium
bath, which is convenient in its handling. The prints
tone extremely quickly, even in comparison with those
upon gelatine paper, if toned in the combined toning and
fixing bath. Enough care cannot be taken not to lose the
beautiful purple tone of the collodion paper by the rapidly-
following bluish-black.
358
Oa> the photographic news.
[May 9, 1890.
%
mm. .*$■
\Vr^p/
Photographers are not alone in the difficulty of
deciding upon one uniform system of weights and
measures. The subject is continually being alluded to,
and it cropped up incidentally at the last meeting of
the Photographic Society, when the much- abused
English system found a champion in some respects in
Mr. C. H. Bothamley. The American pharmacists are
about to take the matter iu hand, and it will shortly
be discussed by the Revision Committee of the U. S.
Pharmacopoeia. Mr. J. W. England, writing on the
subject in the American Journal of Pharmacy , advises
the abolition of the “parts by weight” system, and
the adoption of the French metric method. The
metric system is supposed to be in use in America, but
it is only so in name, for Mr. England says, that of
nearly 500,000 prescriptions over which he has had
supervision in preparation during the last five years,
there have been but two metric prescriptions, and from
enquiries he has reason to believe that the general
experience differs but little from his. He points out
that if the physicians do not lead the way, it cannot
be expected that pharmacists, or chemists and druggists
as we should call them, will trouble about the metric
system. Photographers are much in the same position
here; they are waiting for the dealers to initiate a
simpler method. The French arc in the happy position
of having settled the question. Were they not, it
certainly would have been one of the first things
discussed at the International Photographic Congress
of last year.
A fine set of illustrations from photographs are
promised with Mr. Stanley’s forthcoming article in
Scribner. These photographs are of scenery upon
which the eye of a white man never gazed previous
to Mr. Stanley’s visit. It would be interesting to
know Mr. Stanley’s photographic experience — whether
he developed his plates on the spot, or whether he
brought them away under lock and key to be developed
at home. A word or two also as to how the natives
regarded the camera would not be amiss.
The latest of American photographic notions — the
costume album — has been ridiculed, but how valuable
for the student of social philosophy, if the term may
be used, would such a record of a quarter of a century’s
fashions be. The costume album, it may be as well to
explain, is thus constituted. On the left hand page is
the photograph ; on the right is an artistic arrange-
ment of the materials composing the costume which
the photograph represents. The collector usually
begins her album with her wedding dress, and proceeds
with the various “confections” of the dressmaking art
in which she indulges from time to time. Such an
album would, we fancy, be productive of rather mixed
feelings on the part of the persons concerned. To the
lady it would afford, on the whole, a pleasant reminis-
cence, dashed slightly with a little bitterness, because
dressmakers do occasionally make misfits; but to
her husband, it can only revive recollections of the
many cheques which the dresses represent. The
student of whom we have already made mention would
probably be the person who would gaze upon a
“ costume album” with unalloyed delight.
The fate of the New York Illustrated Daily is not
encouraging to enterprises of a similar nature. It has
died out, never, so we are told, to be revived. For a
few weeks after it stopped there was a project to carry
it on, but this was abandoned, and everything has
been sold. Nearly a million of dollars was sunk in the
paper, but it did not succeed because of the inferior
quality of its illustrations. Photography has done
much since the New York Daily was started to make
sucli an undertaking possible, but the problem of
combining very rapid printing with artistic results has
not yet been solved, and this problem is at the present
moment the stumbling block in the way of success.
Given the necessary time, “ process ” work in the
hands of those who know how to draw for its
requirements has a chance of its own. The latest
illustrated weekly paper started in New York is of a
large size, and entirely illustrated by process cuts
of a high class.
A photographic record is being kept of the progress of
building the new library, Washington. A camera is
planted on the roof of the building occupied by the
architect, and a record of every detail of the condition of
the work, the height of the walls, the piles of material, is
thus preserved. The photographs are afterwards classi-
fied, are properly labelled, and can be produced for
reference if any question arises as to what was done, or
what was not done, at any stage of the work. Thus the
camera acts as a check upon the contractor ; but this is
not the sole purpose for which the photographs are taken,
as they are found to be a valuable supplement to the
written records of the operations.
It is a pity this plan was not adopted when the
foundations of the Board Schools about which so much
has been said, were put in. Though the camera is not
yet able to distinguish between good and faulty bricks,
or real mortar and the “ mic-mac ” imitation, it would
probably record not only the depths of the foundations,
but the kind of soil upon which the bricks were laid.
Contractors have a wholesome dread of the photographer.
W e knew a case where, on the roof of a new building
falling, a photographer was called in to photograph the
place, so as to produce evidence of faulty construction
in case the contractor repudiated any liability. When
the photographer appeared on the ground, the con-
tractor’s men, acting under orders, surrounded him,
and effectually prevented anything being done, by
upsetting his dark tent.
May 9, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
359
HOW ANSCHUTZ PHOTOGRAPHS THE LARGER
WILD BEASTS.
About a quarter of a century ago an interesting article on
the photography of brutes, written by Frank IIaes,and read
before the then North London Photographic Association,
appeared in the Photographic News. The experiments
of Mr. Haes seem to have been attended with no little
difficulty and danger. In the first place, he complains that
the prevailing colours, red and yellow, are not favourable
for photography, Next, he was more or less unsuccess-
ful, generally more, with the zebra and the ratel, the hyrax
(the Biblical coney), and the kiwi-kiwi, the leucoryx and
the Syrian wild ass, the dingo, and the Tasmanian devil.
The chimpanzee was too ill-tempered to allow his por-
trait to be taken, and the innate modesty of the monkey
possibly lay in the way of a successful picture. One
variety of the simiaj, when everything was ready, would
turn suddenly round and present a view which the artist
by no means desired. Another variety would insist on
looking steadily into the camera. The goats had to be
held by the beard, the weak point of the goat, and the
iguanas by the tail. The African python chose to tie him-
self in. a very complicated knot, and the confusion of the
armadillo was such that it was difficult to determine which
was his worthier end. The clouded tiger could not well
be taken inside his cage because of the bars, and the space
he occupied was, says the author of the article, too small
to admit of my introduction. There may have been other
reasons for his not entering the clouded tiger's den, but
he has omitted to declare them. 'Hie modesty of the
monkeys has already been mentioned, but they appear to
have been inferior in this virtue to the aye aye. 'Phis sin-
gular nocturnal quadruped, the cheiromys Madagasca-
riensis, which Cuvier placed among rodents, but was re-
ferred by Sonnerat to the family of makis or lemurs, gave
especial anxiety to the photographer. Its diffidence,
whether natural or acquired, was extreme. When the
camera was in readiness, and the door of its cage was
opened, it immediately covered itself completely with its
tail.
Brute photography is better managed now than then.
In the Zoological Garden of Breslau, and elsewhere, many
excellent portraits have been token. Of the method
adopted in taking a bear in Breslau, the following descrip-
tion is given in a German paper.
The present month’s number — number 15 — of the
German Photographic News, presents its readers with two
illustrated supplements : the one an instantaneous pho-
tograph of a bear by the well-known Ottomar Anschutz of
Lissa, the Polish Leszno in Russia, some forty miles south
of Posen, signed on a portion of rock which the animal is
mounting, “ Ottomar Anschutz, Lissa (Posen), 1888.” Of
this a photogravure has been printed by II. Riffarth, of
Berlin. The other is a portrait, an original negative of Er.
Muller, of Munich. This is extremely well represented
as a photogravure by the Art Publication Institute of I)r.
E. Albert & Co., of Munich, and shows, says the German
paper, what the treatment of Dr. Albert is able to effect in
the ordinary taking of portraits. The treatment is even
better adapted for this kind of photography, as we shall
demonstrate, says the German Photographic News, in our
next number, which will contain a group by Brokeseh, of
Leipsic.
With regard to the portrait of a bear, the reader is in-
formed that the original sitter, or rather climber, is to be
found at his present residence in the Zoological Garden of
Breslau, which has been often visited by Herr Anschutz,
as is well known, for the purpose of taking portraits of its
inhabitants. We will, says the above quoted journal, give
our readers some little insight into the plan adopted by
Herr Anschutz of taking wild animals, which he has him-
self kindly communicated to us.
The usual method of taking savage beasts in their cages
has a good result only exceptionally, for the three following
reasons. The first reason is that the lighting arrange-
ments are not generally of the most convenient character ;
the second, that the narrow space in which the animal is
confined hinders its free and natural motion ; the third,
that the iron bars of the cage are altogether out of place
iu the picture. Herr Anschutz therefore constructed for
himself in Lissa a large enclosure or keep, in which he was
able to take the smaller animals in various ways to his com-
plete satisfaction. Foxes, wolves, and apes were also well
photographed in this improvised animal studio.
But for the larger ravenous inmates of the Breslau Zoo-
logical Garden this enclosure was clearly not suitable, and
these inmates could scarcely be transferred from Breslau
to Lissa. Herr Anschutz then conceived the idea of
building a larger and stronger kind of keep in the Zoologi-
cal Garden. Through the courtesy of the directors of
the Garden in Breslau, Herr Anschutz was able at the be-
ginning of the year 1888 to erect a firmly constructed
keep of strong planks of a superficial area of some 140
square metres. This enclosure was open above, but the
walls had a height of six metres, which fulfilled all
necessary requisites.
In an additional wing on one side of the enclosure there
are placed three cages serving for the sleeping apart-
ments of the wild animals ; on the longer side several
underground passages lead into the enclosure itself. These
are fastened with folding iron gates, and serve to facilitate
the business of portraiture.
On the other side is an oblong aperture, furnished witli
an iron shutter. Here the apparatus is placed command-
ing a view of the enclosure. As soon as the animal comes
into the space commanded by the camera, the portrait may
be secured. The background of the enclosure is a painted
landscape, which is varied according to the habit of life,
colour, and size of the animal to be token. Such varia-
tions harmonise naturally with the foreground, consisting
of rock or stone.
When their photographs are to be token, the beasts are
caught and brought in a transport cage into the enclosure.
After some time, and after they have become accustomed
to their new apartment, they are photographed. The ori-
ginal pictures, .as all of Herr Anschutz’s studies, are of
smallest size, and are afterwards enlarged.
A great difficulty often occurs in bringing the animals
into the proper spot for their portraiture — that is, into the
full sunshine. In this case hunger and thirst seem the
only available roads to success. Living food is commonly
distributed to the beasts on such occasions, whereby a
more exact representation of nature, and an increased
effect is secured. The photographing of bears, says Herr
Anschiitz, isan especially difficult undertaking, since these
animals manifest great unwillingness to enter the photo-
graphic studio. Eight days were required to bring these
refractory subjects before the photographic lens. Even
fasting was unable to move their stubborn minds, and it
needed an extreme degree of artifice to induce them to
enter their respective cages. But en revanche, these bears
3 iJO
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 9, 1890.
behaved themselves, after they had once got into the
studio, in a manner which was morally beautiful. Their
general deportment was far more decent than that of
other beasts. And so Herr Anschutz was enabled to take
over three hundred distinct likenesses of these regenerated
brutes. Although, he says, I had on many occasions and
with much zeal studied the characters of Mr. and Mrs.
Bruin — or, as the Germans say, Herr Petz and Gemahlin —
I was nevertheless much astonished with the variety of
their gestures and the general many-sidedness of their de-
meanour. The different sentiments of the mind are in no
other animal so clearly expressed as in the bear. On
several occasions I have been much surprised by their
power of observation, and I have come to the conclusion
that the bear is the wisest of the beasts.
The German Photographic News promises a description at
a later date of the instantaneous apparatus employed by
Herr Anschutz, an apparatus which was shown lately at
the exhibition at Weimar. The manufacturer has, it
seems, some additions to make, which will considerably
change the character of the instrument.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN NATURAL COLOURS AS
EFFECTED BY HERR FRANZ VERESS, OF
KLAUSENBUIIG.
BY DR. J. M. EDICR.*
Through the kind mediation of Herr E. Von Gothard,
of Ilereny in Hungary, I have received some photographs
in natural colours by Herr Franz Veress, of Klausenburg ;
some of these photographs are on glass, and are to be
viewed as transparencies, whilst others are on paper, and
• show by reflected light.
The glass pictures show a beautiful ruby red colour ;
this indeed predominates for the most part in the diaposi-
tives as the ground colour. On this is seen a vividly
coloured brilliant picture, in which especially, deep ruby
and bright yellow are conspicuous, and contrasting with
them are distinct blue-violet, and blue ; green, on the
other hand, is not represented in these pictures. The
outlines of the photographic picture are perfectly sharp,
and the different portions of the glass picture show with
complete distinctness from each other.
The paper pictures have a greyish brown ground colour,
on which the photograph in natural colours stands out ;
in this case also the colours from ruby red to orange
yellow predominate, but in one of them there is also a
decided violet blue. The photographs in question are
to a certain extent fixed, since after a stay of some hours
in a light apartment they did not show the smallest change.
In addition to this, they had been examined by many
persons in daylight without any special care being
exercised, and were not injured thereby. I did not
apply any more stringent test to ascertain their permanence
under the influence of light, as I wished not to risk
injury before showing them at the March meeting of the
Vienna Photographic Society.
On the preparation of the sensitive surface, Ilerr E.
von Gothard communicated briefly to me a few data. The
sensitive compound is a silver chloride collodion, or gela-
tine emulsion of special preparation, spread upon glass or
paper. The plates are exposed in a printing frame — the
glass ones for two or three hours, and the paper ones for
three days — under a transparent coloured drawing. The
* Translated fur the Phut >or wuic Nkws /ruin the Photoyraphische
Correspondent*
colour of the emulsion film is brownish red ; the picture
appears in a few minutes in a negative form, the dark
places showing as white. The colours come out slowly,
and then they are fixed in an alkaline bath, which makes
the colours still more intense. In the camera, weeks of
exposure are required.
Herr Veress has, however, found a sensitizer by means
of which the exposure may be notably shortened.
It appears to me that this process of photo-chromy is a
happy application of the photo-chloride of silver described
two years since by Carey Lea, the same substance probably
as that described fifty years ago by John llcrschel (1840),
Ed. Becquerel (1847, 1848, and 1855), Niepce de St.
Victor (1851-1860), and which Zenker has dealt with in
his “ Photo-Chromie.”
As far as 1 am aware, the application of colour-sensitive
chloride of silver in the form of an emulsion has hitherto
been but little if at all practised, and the skilful experi-
mentalist Ilerr Veress owes the noteworthy success of his
photographs in natural colours to this combination.
In view of the circumstance that Herr Veress, after a
year and a half of experiment, can already show such
results, it is to be hoped that the continuation of his re-
searches will hasten the solution of the problem of photo-
graphing in natural colours in an important degree.
It is at present to be noted, that in spite of the imper-
fection of these first specimens, Herr Veress’s experiments
have met with success, especially in the ability to fix
photographs showing the natural colours. Against this
gain, the circumstance that all colours do not show with
the same vividness is a consideration of less importance.
A New Photographic Society. — It is proposed to form
a photographic society in Baling, and it is probable that
suitable accommodation for meetings may lie obtained at
the Local Board Offices, and a convenient dark room be
fitted up for the use of members. Those wishing to
join should communicate with Mr. H. \Y. Peal, 2, Craven
Terrace, Baling.
Royal Institution. — At the general monthly meeting held
last Monday, with Sir James Crichton Browne in the chair,
the following vice-presidents for the ensuing year were
announced Sir Frederick Abel, C.B., D.C.L., F.R.S., Mr.
William Crookes, F.R.S., Dr. Edward Frankland, F.R.S.,
Mr. William Huggins, D.C.L., Earl Percy, Mr. Basil Woodd
Smith, Sir James Crichton Browne, M. I). , treasurer, and
Sir Frederick Bramwell, Bart., F.R.S., lion, secretary. Pro-
fessor Tyndall was elected honorary professor of natural
philosophy, and Lord Rayleigh was elected professor of natural
philosophy. At the annual meeting held on Thursday, May 1st,
the annual report of the committee of visitors for the year
1889 testified to the continued prosperity and efficient
management of the Institution. The real and funded property
now amounts to above £82,000. entirely derived from the
contributions and donations of the members. Fifty-one new
members were elected in 1889. Sixty-three lectures and
nineteen evening discourses were delivered in 1889. The
books and pamphlets presented in 1889 amounted to about
283 volumes, making, with 539 volumes (including jwriodicals
bound) purchased by the managers, a total of 822 volumes
added to the library in the year. The Duke of Northumberland
was elected president, Sir James Crichton Browne treasurer,
and Sir Frederick Bramwell, Bart., secretary. Mr. Louis
Fagan, assistant keeper of the department of prints and
drawings at the British Museum began a course of three
lectures on “The Art of Engraving” on Tuesday, May 6th.
Professor Dewar, F. R.S., commenced a course of six lect ures on
“Flame and Kxplosives ” on Thursday, May 8th; and Dr.
Charles Waldstein, director of the American School of Classical
Studies, Athens, will begin a course of three lectures on “ Recent
Excavations in Greece ” to-morrow.
Mav 9, 1890.|
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
301
THE PHOTOGRAPHY OF THE MORE REFRAN-
GIBLE RAYS*
BY V. SCHUMANN.
In all the domains of science the method of taking photo-
graphic observations has of late years grown apace, and
supplants more and more the ocular method. Of all the
students of science, however, who bring photography into
their service, there are none who can derive so much
advantage from the photographic registration of observa-
tion as those who deal with the spectrum. The rays
thought to be alone photographically active — those from
the region of the blue and violet — have now, for some
decades past, been fixed by the “never forgetting retina of
the camera ” for the observation of future generations.
The red and yellow, on the other hand, first came into
importance photographically since II. W. Vogel has
shown that by treating photographic plates with suitable
dyes — optical sensitisers — they may be rendered sensitive
for the optically bright rays. Spectroscope workers,
like Ilasselberg, Rowland, and others, have made good
use of the important discovery, and especially since the
voluminous researches of Dr. J. M. Eder on optical
sensitisers have been given to photographers, they having
succeeded in photographing that part of the spectrum
which was thought to be beyond their grasp.
Yet further. By the help of optical sensitisers (cyanin),
Burbank has so far succeeded in securing the infra-red
spectrum on gelatine plates, that his results show twice
as many lines as those in the spectrograph taken some
years earlier by Capt. Abney, which had so much enlarged
the borders of the knowledge of the spectrum attainable
by our science. We may well believe that photography,
since in recent years it has made so much advance in this
direction, may yet be made to work as far into the infra
red as Langley, by means of his bolometer, has opened it
out to us.
Invisible as is the infra-red in general, so on the other
side of the spectrum is the ultra-violet. Invisible,
however, only for our human eyes, by no means so for
the photographic plate. On the contrary, there is a not
inconsiderable array of sources of light that have their
most powerful photographic action, not in the visible
spectrum, but in that portion where, to our retina, total
darkness reigns. To this class belongs particularly the
light of the electric spark. Sunlight comes very near to
it in this respect. It must, however, be well understood
that the rays of the latter are very strongly influenced by
the properties of the atmosphere through which they have
to pass before they reach us. Of even greater influence
than the atmosphere may be the nature of the media of
which the optical part of the photographic apparatus is
composed. This applies not only to photographic apparatus
for spectrum work, but to photographic objectives in
general.
All glass, optical glass not excepted, however colourless
and however transparent to our eyes, absorbs, neverthe-
less, a considerable amount of the ultra-violet light.
Many kinds of optical glass are so opaque to this kind of
light that they obstruct almost the whole of the ultra-
violet rays. To quote only one case, when the sun’s
spectrum is photographed with 11. W. Vogel's small
spectrograph, itis found that the spectrum picture ends at
the same place as it ceases to be visible to our eyes. Such
a spectrum picture, especially if taken to judge of the
Translated for the Pboiooeai’UIC News from the Special Supplement
to the Photographiache Rundschau.
qualities of a colour-sensitive plate, has, on account of the
partial suppression of the blue, violet, and ultra-violet rays
which result from the use of the heavy flint glass of the
prism and the apparatus, but a relative value. Only to
the eye of one accustomed to working with the spectrum
is there evidence in it which is understood. When, on
the other hand, a person unpractised in spectrum photo-
graphy uses apparatus of this kind for studying ortho-
chromatic plates, he will be sure to read a degree of
sensitiveness for the yellow and red rays which the plate
does not at all possess. In this case it is nut the sensitizing
<lye which makes the plate sensitive to colour, hut the heavy Jlint
glass of the Amici prism which reduces the blue and violet rays
so far that they may only produce about half their proper
action on the plate, whilst the red and yellow rays fall
upon the coloured gelatine film almost unchanged. In
such circumstances, it is easy to prepare plates that
shall appear to possess enormous sensitiveness for the
yellow rays. A photograph taken with Vogel’s small
spectrograph shows certain rays to be as much restrained
as in a photograph taken with a lens, and through a
strongly-tinted yellow screen.
When the prisms and lenses of a photographic spec-
trum apparatus consist of glass of the same amount of
transparency for all rays as our photographic objectives,
the photograph of the solar spectrum shows, with short
exposure, a larger portion of the ultra violet rays inactive
force. From such a spectrum photograph the colour
sensitiveness of orthochromatic plates, such as are pre-
pared for our use, can be safely estimated.
The fewer rays that are withheld by the lens, the shorter
may be the exposure of the plate. If the same subject is
photographed with a lens made of glass and again with
one of quartz, it is found that the last-named works con-
siderably quicker than the other. Quartz allows the
ultra violet rays to pass almost entirely. If a glass can
be made which permits nearly the same amount of rays to
pass as quartz does, the exposure required for taking a
photograph will be considerably reduced from what it is
at present.
( To be continued).
PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES.*
BY THOMAS K. DALLMEYER.
In this country much valuable work has been accomplished
by Dr. John Hopkinson and Professor Stokes, in obtain-
ing convenient methods of expressing the measure of the
irrationality of combinations of various glasses made by
Messrs. Chance, of Birmingham. Dr. Hopkinson con-
tributed a very important paper, especially to opticians, on
this subject to the Royal Society in 1877, and in conjunc-
tion with my late father, worked out some important and
valuable improvements in glasses for special photographic
purposes, and succeed in practically curing several of the
glasses then made from “sweating.” Professor Stokes,
too, suggested a titano -silicic crown that should be per-
fectly achromatic with a flint ; this glass, however, was
not found to be of much practical value. To express
the irrationality, Dr. Hopkinson found a convenient
formula that more accurately represented the facts from
observations than the direct method of curve drawing, as
the errors in this case would be greater than in those of
observation. 1 refer those interested to the paper, but
give you the results of that formula, which serve to show
* Continued from page 315.
3 62
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [May 9, 1890.
how little there was to choose between the ordinary glasses
made by Messrs. Chance. The figures show the measure
of irrationality in a combination of each combined with a
standard : —
Hard Soft Titanic Light Dense Extra Double
crown. crown. crown. liint. flint. dense flint, extra flint.
—11-7 — 10 7 —9-4 -94 —11-8 —119 —13-2
It will be interesting to compare some of the new glasses
from Jena with these ; and although they are presented
in a less elegant form, the prospectus is a very practical
representation of the qualities of the glasses, so 1 give
the data of Chance's glasses in a similar form to those of
Jena ; but we will first make a preliminary investigation
as to the conditions to be arrived at.
The dispersion, then, of colour produced by a positive
or convex lens, may be neutralised by the addition of a
negative or concave one, without cancelling the deviation
of the rays, as the positive and negative lenses act with
opposite effect. In other words, a compound lens may,
by the proper adjustment of the powers of the separate
lenses, be made achromatic or actinic, although if irration-
ality in the dispersion exists, only the union of a definite
number of species can be combined, according to the
number of different media forming the compound lens.
If the radii of a lens are r and s, in general approximation,
V = -< .-i 1 ji + 1 1-
J ( ) ( r X 1
Herschel terms the reciprocal of the focal length the
power of a lens, and this is seen to depend on (p—l), which
we may take as the measure of the refracting power of the
substance of which the lens is composed, and the second
+ *s ( the simplest measure of the joint curvature.
To determine the relation between the focal lengths of
two lenses that shall be achromatic or actinic when in
contact : —
Let represent
+ — J- and Mi m-2 the indices of
\
r r
P ( r * j
refraction for the two lenses for one species of rays.
Then if « be the distance from which the pencil
originally diverged,
1 -- Ml-1 + 4*2— 1 _ 1
v., pi p, u
and similarly, if p represent the index of refraction for
another species of rays,
_1 _ M'l-l + f'H _ 1
vt pl Pi u
As v, is to be the same for both species, we get by sub-
traction, term by term, and representing p — p by Ap, we
have
yr + V1 = o,o.-/, =/it*t.
J 1 Jt A yul
Now, in general, / = - , ;
m— 1
V -A = A •
A /q
M~ — 1
A p 1
A p' — 1*
Therefore the focal length of lenses are directly, or their
powers inversely, as the dispersive powers of the media
of which they consist.
Again, since - .
"J
t
1_1
t >•
1 >
s \
P- 1
1 >
‘ 1 + 1 ,
( r s j
A u 1
M~ 1 • /'
That is to say, the chromatic variation of the power of a
lens is obtained by multiplying it by the dispersive power
of the medium,
°r -A*- :
Mi—1 Mi— 1
0)*
In like manner, by adding a third species of glass, we can
satisfy a third condition, viz., that the third species should
be united to the two former. And in general
Am
1
Au
= n
1
fift-fn M— 1 fift-Jn
The prospectus published by the laboratory at Jena is
presented in a very practical form to opticians ; the re-
fractive index for the brightest line I) being given, and the
differences of the refractive indices for the four intervals,
CF, A'D, DF, and FG'. The interval CF, containing the
brightest portion, is sufficient to characterise the medium
dispersion, and from the proportion of this to the
value p„ — 1 there is given in a separate column the re-
. . • (a
ciprocal of the relative dispersions or of (^_j j-
The
proportion of partial dispersions in the intervals AM),
DF, FG', are a sufficient guide to judge of the possibilities
of successful combinations for achromatism. There are
also given the numbers obtained by dividing these intervals
of partial dispersion by the amount of medium dispersion
for the interval CF, and a comparison of these quotients
will show the tendency and amount of the residual
secondary spectrum. The identity of corresponding
quotients proves the possibility of achromatising without
secondary colour.
go .
u_i Partial Dispersion
£1?
Kinds of Glass.
2 *3
iS S 2
A' to D. D
to F.
§ 5
Chance’s.
a> a
t o.—
a -v
A p. F to G'.
G0 Q
Hard crown
.. 1 5179
00860
60 2 00553 00605
•00487
2.49
•643 -7f3
•566
Soft crown
.1 5151
00910
56-6 00577 00642
•00521
2-55
•634 -705
•572
Titanic crown ...
..1 5432
•01021
53 2 * 00491 00722
00634
2-55
•400 707
■622
Light flint
..1 5738
•01385
4T4 00 853 -00987
■00831
3 22
■615 713
600
Dense flint
..1-6202
•01709
36 2 * 00670 -01220
•01122
365
•399 714
•656
Extra dense flint
..1-6489
01919
33 8 -01152 -01372
•01180
3 87
■600 -714
615
Double dense flint
..1-7174
02434
29 5 -01419 ’01749
•01521
449
•591 ’718
•625
Jena.
Silicate crown of high
) 1-5258
00872
60 2 1 -00560 00614
•00494
2-53
refractive power
•642 -704
•566
2 24+
Light borate crown
1 1 5047
■00840
60 0 ) 00560 -00587
•00466
■667 -700
•555
Silicate gla's
) 1 6368
■01049
51 2 ) 00659 00743
•00610
276
[ -628 -708
•582
Borate Flint ...
' 1 -5736
•01129
50 8 ) -00728 00795
•00644
2 82+
•645 -704
•571
Medium phosphate
crown
A 1 6590
•00835
66 9 00546 (10587
•654 -702
•00166
•557
3 07
Borate flint
j 1 5503
•00996
55-2 -00654 -00669
•00561
2-56
•656 -702
•563
Dense barium phos-
1-5760
•00881
65 2 00570 - 00622
•00500
3 35t
phate crown
644 703
•565
2-49
Calcium silicate
) 15179
j 1-5303
00860
60-2 -00553 -00605
•00487
crown
•643 -7u3
•566
2 81
Boro-silicate Hint ...
•01114
49-4 -00710 00786
•00644
•637 -706
■578
* These intervals arc taken from B to D, D to F, and F to G.
t These glasses are very soft or unstable when exposed to the air, and
should be protected in use.
In the older products of glass factories it was quite
sufficient to take the specific gravity of the various glasses,
as a near approximation to any alteration in the optical
properties of different meltings : a greater density indicat-
ing an increase of refractive index and dispersive power.
The figures in the list taken from the prospectus from
Jena show that glasses are made of nearly equal relative
dispersion, with considerable differences in partial dis-
persion ; and, again, others in which the partial dispersion
May 9, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
s'l' O fv>
<3?
363
is almost identical, with considerable variation in the
relative dispersion. In those instances it is evident that
the secondary spectrum can be abolished. There is,
however, a residual tertiary spectrum in the couples
referred to, but it is quite unimportant compared to the
secondary spectrum left in a combination of ordinary
silicate “crown” and “flint” glasses. In photographic
lenses the object is to get all the chemically and visually
active rays possible together, and with certain of the
glasses of lower dispersion improvements may yet be made
by a better correction, both in the chromatic and spherical
aberrations of the eccentrical pencils in lens systems.
The first approximations in theory, both for aplanatism
and actinism, are simple enough when the lenses of the
systems are considered thin, and second approximations,
for the central pencils, are given in most of the text-books
in which thickness is taken into account, and are easily in-
telligible. In lenses required to be both aplanatic and
actinic, we are not limited only to the central pencils, and
it is of the highest importance that all incidences for the
lens should give the same results as the central pencils,
and it is the inquiry into the forms best suited to accom-
plish this that constitutes the optician’s great difficulty.
As a matter of fact, it is impossible to construct an
aplanatic lens that is free from chromatic aberration for
a central pencil that shall be so when a pencil of rays meet
the lens obliquely. Lenses may be considered as made
up of an infinite number of prisms, and, as you are aware,
achromatism is ouly possible with combined prisms for
one particular incidence. Now. a parallel ray and an
oblique ray must of necessity have different incidences on
the surface of a system, and hence, if it is actinic for the
parallel ray, it cannot be for the oblique ray, strictly
speaking.
Forms of lenses than that most nearly approximate
to the conditions throughout of equal incidences and
refractions at emergence, will conform to the best con-
ditions for actinism as well as aplanatism, as we shall see
presently.
AVe have found, then, from first principles alone, that
the main condition for actinism is only one of focal length
to be ascribed to the various lenses of the system, and, for
the best results, the powers of these components must be
rigidly maintained, whatever may be the ultimate form or
selection of curvatures adopted to best suit particular
applications.
(To be continued.)
patent $ntcUt(*nuc.
Specifications Published.
5,418. March 29th, 1 88 9. 1 \Triviisj iaren t Printed Paper.”
William Li.oyd Wise, 48, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London,
Consulting Engineer and Patent Agent. Communicated
from abroad by Joseph Mathieu Badon, of 59, Hue de Suede,
ii Saint-Gilles Lez, Brussels.
This invention relates to the production of transparent
tinted paper having the appearance of stained glass, and to
means or apparatus for its manufacture. Transparent tinted
paper, according to this invention, is printed in a continuous
form, after the manner of wall-paper, and by similar methods
of printing. Like the latter paper, it may conveniently be
made in rolls of eight metres length and fifty centimetres
breadth.
The impressions which, as in lithographic printing, form a
glaze — that is to say, do not run — may be made by various
means, including blocks or cylinders, of which the printing or
relief portions are formed of caoutchouc, or gutta-percha,
covered with a thin coating of gelatine, applied either by
immersion in a weak solution of gelatine mixed with a variable
proportion of treacle, or of glycerine, or else by a brush.
These printing portions can be supported and surrounded by
sheets of copper, or fixed by one of the means indicated above.
The coating of gelatine is intended to prevent the caoutchouc
or the gutta-percha from being affected by direct contact with
colours or inks made with oil or turpentine ; further, the
impressions obtained by this means are sharper and more
regular than those obtained by caoutchouc or gutta-percha
when employed alone.
Colours and inks made with turpentine or oil are employed
for blocks and cylinders which are faced with caoutchouc or
gutta-percha, and for blocks and cylinders of wood, or metal,
covered with a coating of gelatine. Colours and inks made
with water, to which gum, gelatine, glycerine, or like substance,
is added, are employed for blocks and cylinders faced with
caoutchouc or gutta-percha. Colours and inks made with oil,
or made with water, serve equally well for blocks or cylinders
which are faced with zinc.
For transparent paper printing, it is advantageous to employ
the paper known as pelure. This paper, after having received
the impressions to form the design, and the prints to imitate
the lead and joints (of the stained glass), receives one coat of
oil varnish on each face. When this preparation is dry, it is
re-coated, also on both faces, with an adhesive medium com-
posed of gelatine, which serves to fix it in place on the glass.
In applying the paper thus prepared, it is only necessary to
moisten it with hot water ; apply it to the glass which is to be
decorated, and, to remove any bubbles of air, by passing over
the paper a brush, a cloth, or any suitable body, in order to
ensure complete adhesion without the necessity for using any
other medium than that which is already on the product
itself.
Camera Club Notices. — Thursday, May 15th, 8 p.m. —
Informal meeting. Saturday, May 17th. — Excursion to Wrot-
ham, for Igtham and district. Leader, Mr. I). Howards.
Train from Victoria at 8.50; Holborn Viaduct, 8.45; St.
Paul’s, 8.48; Bromley, 9.20; arriving at Wrotham at 10.8,
where a conveyance will be in readiness to convey the party to
lgtliam. A later train leaves Victoria at 11.35, Holborn Via-
duct at 11.30, and St. Paul’s at 11.33. Very beautiful country,
and picturesque and interesting subjects. Dinner at the
“ George and Dragon," lgtliam, at 5. 45 p.m. It is probable
that some members may go down on the Friday evening.
Those intending to join in this arrangement should notify the
same on the list posted in the Club. Monday, May 19th,
8.30 p.m. — Lantern in operation. Evening for testing slides.
Notice to be given to Mr. F. J. Roberts. Thursday, May 22nd,
8 p.m. — Mr. E. R. Shipton, “ Cyclo- Photography.” — Some
recent developments, including an ideal cycle. Thursday, May
29th, 8 p.m. — Informal meeting. Saturday, May 31st. —
Excursion to Pulborough and Fittlcworth. Leader, Mr. Gale.
Particulars will be posted in the Club.
7,897. May llt.t, 1889. — “ Illusions Produced by Persistence
of Vision.” Eitic Stuart Bruce, Gentleman, 10, Observa-
tory Avenue, Kensington, London, W.
A narrow lathe of wood or other suitable material about an
inch wide is made to revolve rapidly by hand power, an electric
motor, or other suitable power, the effect being an almost
invisible haze. But when the revolving lathe is placed in the
path of the rays of light proceeding from an optical projection
lantern in which there is placed a transparent picture, the
image is apparently cast upon the air. In reality, portions ouly
of the image are cast upon the revolving lathe in such rapid
succession that they are united into the perfect whole by the
retentive action of the retina of the eye.
In some cases of exhibition it may be desirable to obliterate
the second image which, in ordinary circumstances, is cast upon
the wall or other receiving surface behind the revolving lathe.
This can be conveniently done by placing two sheets of ribbed
glass, of which the exterior surfaces are covered with crumpled
sheets of gelatine, preferably of a blue colour, behind the centre
of the lathe at a suitable angle. The sheets of glass are sup-
364
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 9, 1890.
ported on a stand which is capable of adjusting the angle. The
second image then falls upon the sheets of glass, and is so dis- i
torted bv the angular position of the glass, and broken up by
the crumpled surface of gelatine, that it is practically annihi- i
lated. '
^roceetftngg of ^octettes.
The Camera (j/ub.
May 1st. — Bedford Street, Strand, London. Mr. T. It. Dall-
meyeh in the chair.
Captain W. ue \V. Abney, F.R.S., president of the Club,
then read a paper on “ Pinhole Photography,” a subject which
he stated to be interesting at the present time, especially as
one of the members of the Club is now taking pictures by the
use of pinholes instead of lenses. He then set forth in detail
how he had mathematically calculated the best size of pinhole
to give the best picture when placed at a given distance from
the plate, with the result that if that distance be ten inches,
the diameter of the pinhole should be ‘026 inch, or, roughly,
a little over a fiftieth of an inch. Mr. Davison had pointed
out to him a pinhole photograph in which near objects seemed
to him more sharply rendered than those at a distance.
When the objects are near to the lens, the best diameter
of the piuhole differs a little from that just stated.
Suppose the plate to be ten inches from the hole, and the
object one hundred inches, then the best diameter of the hole
is ’0246 inch. When the plate is fourteen inches from the
hole, the best diameter of the latter is ‘03 inch. In times
past he had found the utility of pinholes for photographic
purposes. Once at Zermatt he made a three hours’ journey
over a glacier with some ladies for the purpose of taking photo-
graphs, and, at the end of the journey, discovered that the
lenses had been left behind. They lunched heavily, and some
tins which had contained pate dc foie yras were lying about.
One of the ladies lent him a hair-pin, with which he pierced a
hole in a flat disc cut out of the top of one of the tins ; that
hole, when measured long afterwards, turned out to be -04
inch. They then took three or four photographs, and he had
brought one of them to show to the Club. A large pinhole
gives most gradation, a small one gives a “lumpy” image, so
that the photographs decrease in quality when the pinhole is
too large or too small. He did not like the pinhole photo-
graphs ; but if anyone wanted fuzzy pictures, why not at once
use a lens out of focus, and so avoid all trouble about pinholes l
The Chairman, after inviting any member to speak, said
that as no one had risen in response, he would make a few
remarks first. Capt. Abney had treated in an analytical way
what could be arrived at geometrically ; he (Mr. Dallmeyer) had
tried the latter method, and arrived at the same results. The
apertures mentioned by Lord Rayleigh at the British Asso-
ciation had twice the diameter just given by Capt. Abney.
Captain Abney responded that Lord Rayleigh said nothing
about what size of aperture would give the best image ; he
had merely maintained that a pinhole picture of suitable
dimensions must be viewed at the distance at which the plate
stood from the pinhole, to get rid of the appearance of fuzzi-
ness ; thus, with a plate at nine feet distance, Lord Rayleigh
used an aperture of oue-sixteentli of an inch, and said that
the resulting photograph should be viewed from the distance of
nine feet. He had been searching for the greatest diffusion
allowable.
Mr. Elder asked how it was that there was not a greater
falling off of the illumination at the margins of pinhole pic-
tures. A ray passing obliquely through the hole practically
passes through a smaller aperture than does the central raj’.
Captain Abney responded that the mathematics of rays of
light passiug through ellipses was a complicated subject, which
the Camera Club would not thank him for putting before them.
With an iucluded angle of sixtj’ degrees, little was lost in bril-
liancy or definition at the edge of the plate.
Mr. W. Willis asked what would be the result of the use of
monochromatic light in piuhole photograph}’, instead of light
of all degrees of refraugibilitj’.
Captain Abney responded that with monochromatic light
improved definition would be obtained, and that the aperture
would probably have to be diminished by about one-twenty-
fiftli. In connection with stellar photography he used mono-
chromatic light, and a distinct difference in the diameter of
the disc resulted ; for such purposes he used light half way
between G and F ; it was just over the blue lithium line.
Mr. Willis asked what medium he would recommend for
getting monochromatic light by means of interposed glass.
Captain Abney used suitable true monochromatic light from
the spectrum ; he did not believe in using media. Ammonio-
sulphate of copper solution gives a band, not a line, and with
it interposed, he did not think that the pictures would be either
better or worse. Sodium light is not monochromatic ; it gives
red, blue, green also, but yellow in overpowering proportion.
Lithium w’as the only substance he knew which would give a
light approaching that which Mr. Willis wanted ; it could be
obtained by using a fairly strong source of heat, just strong
enough with chloride of lithium to bring out onlj’ the red and
blue lines, and in photographic work the red could be neglected.
With care the oxyhydrogen flame would bring only the red and
blue lines out with chloride of lithium, and the blue was
perfectly monochromatic. Another way of getting pictures by
means of small apertures was by using a fairly minute ring or
zone in place of a pinhole, that is to say, something like a large
pinhole with an opaque disc in its centre. This plan gives fairly
good results ; they are as good as with a pinhole of the best
aperture, and the time of exposure is shorter under the same
conditions of lighting.
Mr. L. E. Clift asked how Captain Abney made the pinholes
of the dimensions he required.
Captain Abney did it by means of needles made into punches ;
he clipped the needles, and measured them micrometrically.
Mr. Lyonel Clark had experimented in pinhole photograph}’,
and found that, generally speaking, his apertures had double
the diameters of those used by Captain Abney, but the varia-
tion in the pictorial results was not very great. He usually
gave about twelve minutes’ exposure in the winter. He had
found that special punches were of no particular use. Wills
sold his tobacco in thin tinned sheet iron ; the top of one of
these tins could lie taken, a hole “ jabbed ” through it with a
needle, and the blurred end of the hole turned to the object.
At first he made his punches properly from an engineering point
of view, with the largest diameter of each at the cutting edge,
but afterwards he found that “ jabbing ” a needle through the
top of a tobacco box answered equally well.
Captain Abney had found that plan to sometimes cut off
light from the side of the picture.
Mr. William England hail found a piece of celluloid dyed
black to be an excellent medium for piercing to get aper-
tures for pinhole photography.
Mr. George Davison said that there was an advantage in
giving long exposures in pinhole photography. Sometimes, with
a large pinhole and bright light, the view included can be seen
on the focussing screen. Captain Abney held that the pictures
of Alma Tadema were “nearly” as sharp as photographs ;
that word “ nearly ” made all the difference. Nine-tenths of
our artists can paint sharper than they really do. but omit
to do so on purpose ; they invariably leave much detail out,
which an ordinary photographer tries to get in. He thought
uniform out-of -focus to be sometimes exceedingly desirable in
landscape work, and better than a plane of sharpness across
the picture at a particular distance. The object of relieving any
one portion of a picture is to draw special attention to it, but
that is not necessary in many cases. As to the advice of
using a lens out of focus, he had tried that plan sometimes,
and thought the results not to be so good as if he had used
a pinhole, but he should prefer a lens if it would do the same
work in a shorter time ; the pinhole had, however, some advan-
tages. It was neither costly nor heavy. Lenses were
wanted into which spherical aberration could be introduced at
will.
Mr. Rodgers remarked that Mr. Davison aimed at breadth, and
had argued that it could only be obtained by sacrifice of detail.
He (the speaker) thought that artists might give minute detail
accurately without interfering with the general broad effect.
May 9, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
365
Mr. Davison replied that artists were the best judges iu this
matter, and they disliked photographs because they gave too
much detail.
Mr. Willis was recently in the studio of a celebrated painter
who had before him a picture with its foreground magnificently
painted, but he ran his brush, charged with some transparent
colour, all over that foreground ; this had the effect of sub-
duing it. Could not something of the same kind be done in
photography ? The eye is satisfied with the first glance at a
picture in which the principal object is sharp, afterwards, as in
looking at nature, it searches for detail, and is disappointed
when it is not there.
Mr. Rodgers said that in the paintings of birds by Mr.
Stacey Marks the amount of detail was extraordinary.
Mr. Hcmphkry stated that paintings usually have to be viewed
at a greater distance than photographs, and that the former
are painted so as to give to those at a distance the appearance
of great detail.
Mr. Davison exhibited a pinhole photograph which he said
that he considered to be the best he had ever been able to
turn out by any method.
The Revd. F. C. Lambert remarked that the whole point
seemed to turn upon the words “correct detail.” Artists do not
want to destroy what is present, but photography in their eyes
emphasises detail. He thought that detail should be subdued,
and that a picture taken with a small stop gave an impression
to the observer not conveyed by the scene itself. That some-
thing should be left upon which the imagination could play,
was necessary in every work of art.
Captain Abney advised all tourists who went out to lunch,
an<l to take pinhole photographs, to begin the exposure before
lunch, and to finish it afterwards, to save time. About the
year 1865 he travelled a few hundreds of miles in India to
photograph some cave temples, and when he arrived found that
he had left his lenses behind him, so happening to know about
pinholes as lenses, he made a pinhole of about a tenth of an inch,
with which he took some 10 by 12 inch photographs; that
was in the wet-plate days. When he mentioned this at the
Photographic Society it was hardly believed by one or two of
the members, and some comments appeared in the Photo-
craphic News throwing doubt upon his statement ; upon
reading those comments he felt “corked.”
Mr. W. H. Harrison : How long ago was that
Captain Abney replied that it was about the year 1881,
and the comments had been made by a mutual friend of theirs.
He hail forgiven, but hail not forgotten. Some of those at the
meeting were not sufficiently credulous to accept his statement.
However, just afterwards, a photographer — Mr. Henderson-
found that he could take pinhole photographs, and that settled
the matter. Although science and art have to be combined
sometimes, they did not seem to get on very well together,
and he did not profess to be more than a humble student of
art ; his work was in another direction. Perhaps, however,
scientific workers might help artists to obtain any amount of
fuzziness in their pictures. Whenever, at exhibitions, painters
turned out fuzzy pictures, he always looked at the frames, and
not at the pictures.
Mr. Dallmeyf.r said that the sole object of Lord Rayleigh,
in his paper read before the British Association, and published
in the Photographic News, was to show where lenses became
unnecessary. Iu a picture containing no leading feature or
group in one plane, uniform softness all over is admissible ;
but all views are not of that description, ami where there is
some object present of particular interest, he thought that
emphasis should be laid thereupon. As regards lenses for the
purpose, when the apertures are small, there is a difficulty in
introducing spherical aberration. A transparent diffraction
plate placed across the aperture of the diaphragm will do
something in the direction of yielding the desired result. A
simple way of making such gratings is to draw a multitude
of lines, and then photograph them.
Captain Abney remarked that Mr. Dallmeyer’s father had
made him a grating containing only one hundred lines to the
inch, for use in the photo-heliograph at Greenwich ; it certainly
gave marked fuzziness.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 1st inst., Mr. J. Traill Taylor occu-
pied the chair.
Mr. H. M. Hastings exhibited a series of silver prints of the
exterior and interior of Salisbury Cathedral, recently taken by
him.
The question was asked whether varnishing a plate with a
coloured substratum, previous to coating, would be a preventa-
tive of halation.
The Chairman thought there would be a risk of the colour-
ing matter in the substratum being communicated to the sensi-
tive film ; for this reason he would prefer backing the plate.
The Hon. Sec., in developing some ordinary and isochro-
matic plates, backed, using yellow light, omitted to screen the
light during the development of the isochromatic plates ; the
result was an excellent image of the backing of the film. He
had been able, with certain makes of plates, to dispense with
both yellow screen and back iu copying paintings successfully.
Mr. W. E. Debenham preferred, when copying pictures, to
illuminate the room with yellow light ; he considered it better
than the methods usually adopted, as no optical difficulty was
introduced. The exposure, of course, v as prolonged.
Mr. A. L. Henderson exhibited a stereoscopic negative of an
out-door view taken during his stay in the West Indies. Across
the plate was the figure of a hand with outstretched fingers.
He said he had several more negatives taken at the same time,
all showing this curious phenomenon ; he was unable to account
for it in any way. He had tried to produce the same effect
since by placing his hand in front of the lens during an expo-
sure, but had failed.
Mr. A. Cowan, commenting upon solutions of eikonogen
frequently becoming discoloured, showed a bottle about one-
third full of a solution of eikonogen that had turned quite
black ; he also showed another bottle quite full that was per-
fectly bright and colourless. He stated that the same solution
had been poured into each bottle, and the bottles had stood
side by side for a month. The bottle containing the dark solu-
tion had, during that time, been occasional!)' opened to take
out some of the solution ; whereas the other had remained
corked and quite full the whole time. He thought this con-
clusively proved that the darkening action was due to the action
of the atmosphere.
Mr. H. M. Hastings showed two lantern slides developed
with the new developer graphol ; also some bromide prints
developed with an acid eikonogen developer, recommended by
Mr. J. H. Voight, Chairman of the Photographic Society of
Frankfort-on-Maine. It is claimed for this developer that,
it is rendered more energetic, and its keeping qualities much
improved, in an acid condition. This is effected by the addi-
tion of hydrochloric acid. Mr. Hastings said he had developed
eight plates in the same solution, which remained perfectly clear
to the end ; the last plate, however, took half an hour to com-
plete development.
Newcasti.e-ox-Tyne and Northern Counties Photographic
Association.
At the Central Exchange Art Gallery last Friday evening, a
lecture was given by Mr. J. P. Gibson, under the auspices of
the International Photographic Exhibition, upon “Northumber-
land : Its Antiquities and River Scenery.” Mr. Gibson, who
showed a splendid collection of over 150 of his own lantern
slides, at the outset dealt with the pre-liistoric races who dwelt
in Northumberland, and he exhibited a slide illustrative of
a hut circle. He proceeded to describe the customs of the
people in the earl)' ages, giving a pictorial reproduction of a
human skull found in Tarset Burn. Next he dealt with the
period of the Roman occupation, which he followed with views
of the present day of the camps of Cilurnum, Housesteads, and
Birdoswald. The Saxon age then formed the subject of his
lecture, and Mr. Gibson illustrated his discourse with photo-
graphs of crosses and other antiquities found in the Hexham
district. Mediaeval antiquities were touched upon. Typical
castles were shown, such as Seaton Delaval, Morpeth, Wark-
worth, Alnwick, Bamburgh, and Etal. Modern topics came
36G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 0, 1890.
next, and the lecturer, working westward from Newcastle,
found opportunity to give views of the birthplace of George
Stephenson at Wylam, and Bewick at Cherry Burn. Bywell
Church and Castle Aydon Castle, and Dilston were also treated
upon. A brief sketch of the Derwentwater family was given.
The scenery of the River Tyne and its tributaries was finally
shown, beginning below Hexham, up the North Tyne to
Bellingham, and on the shores of the South Tyne to Thirlwell
Castle. There was a large attendance.
Photographers’ Benevolent Association.
Adjourned annual general meeting, Friday, May 2, at 181,
Aldersgate Street, London, the president, Mr. J. Traill
Taylor, in the chair.
The Chairman said that the business of the evening was
the election of officers for the ensuing year. The new rules
which had been passed by the meeting held on February 14
had just received the sanction of the Registrar-General of
Friendly Societies, and the Association would in future be bound
by them.
The following officers were then elected : —
President — Mr. J. Traill Taylor. Trustees — Captain AV. de
\Y. Abney, C.B., F.R.S., and Mr. IV. S. Bird. Treasurer —
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S. Committee — Messrs. H. D. Atkinson,
AA'illiam Bedford, William Benham, E. Clifton. T. J. Collins,
F. W. Cox, T. K. Freshwater, G. T. Harris, A. Mackie, J. D.
O'Connor, J. S. Rolfe, and E. A. AYhittemore. Auditors —
Messrs. \V. Holt, E. AY. Parfitt, H. J. White, and J. W.
Zaehnsdorf. The lion, solicitor, Mr. William Benham, was also
reappointed, and the election of Mr. H. J. Beasley to the post of
lion, secretary confirmed.
The meeting passed votes of thanks to the officers for the past
year, and to the hon. solicitor for his special services.
Twelve new subscribers were enrolled.
All communications should be addressed to the hon.
secretary, Mr. H. J. Beasley, 65 and 66, Chancery Lane,
London.
The Hackney Photographic Society.
This Society held its annual soiree on Thursday, May 1st, at
Morley Hall, and about 400 visitors were present. Various
friends contributed to the entertainment of the company, and
the evening was brought to a close by an exhibition of mem-
bers’ lantern slides. The prize winners were Messrs. Fred
Evans and Carpenter. The room was tastefully decorated
with plants and flags. This concludes the first year of the
Society’s existence.
Bath Photographic Society.
April 24</i. — Excursion to Box and district.
April 30th. — Ordinary meeting, Sir. Pdmphrey, president, in
the chair.
Mr. J. A. Howe was elected a member of the Society.
The Hon. Secretary announced the receipt of a specially
prepared copy of “ East. Anglian Life,” presented by the author,
Dr. P. It. Emerson. Some early volumes of (he Photographic
Society’s Journal were also presented by Mr. Wheatcroft.
Circulars relating to forthcoming exhibitions at Amsterdam
and in the City of London, and other matters of interest,
were drawn attention to.
Mr. G. F. Powell then gave a paper on “Stereoscopic Pho-
tography ” (see page 355).
The Chairman, in thanking Air. Powell for his paper, said it
was true stereoscopes had goue out of fashion, but pictures
when suitably prepared to be viewed in them appeared more
realistic than photographs generally. He thought the angle of
base should be kept small, not exceeding the distance between
the eyes. AN hether the stereoscope would lie resuscitated he
could not say, but it was possible to purchase a cheap form,
with half-a-dozen stereoscopic pictures, fora shilling.
Air. Ducdale thought the reason stereoscopic photographs
fell into disuse was largely due to the pictures lieing too wide
— 2i inches was a convenient size.
Air. Austin J. King, vice-president, thought stereoscopic
photography might come again to the front if more perfect
instruments were provided. The difficulty of adjusting one’s
sight to a particular form of instrument was an obstacle, for
the two eyes do not focus quite the same. If both eyes do
not adjust themselves, then the effect of rotundity does not
become evident. Another difficulty, into which he would not
then enter, was astigmatism.
Dundee and East of Scotland Photographic Association.
A meeting was held on Alay 1st, with Air. G. G. AIaclaren in
the chair.
The manipulations of the new printing process, “ Kallitype,”
were demonstrated. The process was said to be exceedingly
simple, presenting few difficulties, to print very fast, and to be
moderate in price.
A negative of the font in St. Mary’s, Broughty Ferry, was
shown. A small portion of two stained glass windows was
included in the upper corners of the negative, and on the left
side of the font near the foot there was a reflection of a panel
of the window to the right. No explanation could lie given
as to the cause of the reflected image.
The following office-bearers were elected for the session
1890 and 1891 : — President, Air. John Alathewson ; A'ice-Pre-
sidents, Messrs. J. 1). Cox and AA". AI. Alartin ; Council, Messrs.
AV. Bertie, A\\ F. Hill, P. Kerr, G. 1). Alaedougald, G. G.
AIaclaren, \V. Salmond, A. Stewart, A\'. D. A'alentine, J. AA’elsh,
and T. L. AVynd ; Secretary and Treasurer, Air. A'. C. Baird,
Broughty Ferry, N.B.
Photographic Society of Philadelphia.
An adjourned stated meeting of the Society was held on AA’ed-
nesday evening, April 9th, Air. John G. Bullock, viee-presi-
dent, in the chair.
A communication was read by the Secretary from the editor
of the Photographic Times, presenting a copy of “Practical
Photo-micrography,” by Andrew Pringle. The Secretary also
reported that, owing to the removal of the Society of Amateur
Photographers of New York to new quarters, which would fully
engross the attention of both officers and members for some
months, it had been agreed to postpone the exhibition until the
spring of 1891.
Air. Browne spoke of the loss the Society had sustained in
the death of its President, Air. Frederic ( Ira ft', and said that it
had seemed to certain of the members desirable that the posi-
tion of ^resident should lie filled at once ; he therefore nominated
Air. John G. Bullock for the office. The nomination was
seconded by Air. F. T. Fassitt, and Air. Bullock was unani-
mously elected President.
Dr. Mitchell, of the Executive Committee, read a com-
munication from Air. Frank H. Rosengarten, entitled “ The
“ AATorking Department of the Photographic Society of Phila-
delphia.” The paper was a lengthy plea for enlarging the scope
and usefulness of the Society, gave a history of previous
efforts which had been made in this direction, and was accom-
panied by circulars and other data illustrative of the working
of the Camera Club, of London.
Considerable discussion followed the communication, during
which Air. Browne called attention to the fact that liefore the
end of the year the Society would have to consider the import-
ant question of a change of quarters. He thought a special
committee might be appointed to consider all propositions made
to it, and in this way relieve the Society from a great deal of
discussion.
Dr. AIitchei.l moved that the chairman appoint a special
committee, to consist of the president, vice-president, secre-
tary, and treasurer, and six other members, to consider and
report to the Society the advisability of procuring other and
more convenient quarters, and the institution and development
of a suitable working department for the instruction and im-
provement of members in photographic work. This was carried.
Air. Carbutt, alluding to a letter he had read at a pre-
vious meeting, from Air. Pancoast, in regard to keeping quali-
ties of plates, showed a negative sent him by Air. Pancoast,
May 9,. 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
taken recently on a Carbutt A plate which had been coated
about 1884 or 1885. The negative showed no signs of de-
terioration on account of age of the plate.
Mr. Brownb, referring to the appointment of a committee
to ascertain the cause of certain deterioration in lantern slides,
said that within the last two weeks he had examined a large
number of slides with a table microscope having a two-inch
objective. With a glass of this power, he noticed that in
many cases the crystallization or cloudiness is formed on the
cover glass, but not invariably so. It has been said that much
of this difficulty arises from the quality or composition of
the glass — that from the thin glass now used both for picture
and cover emanates some chemical injurious to the slide. This
might be so, but in his experience, which hail been almost
entirely with the quality known as “15. P. C.,” he could not
lay this fault to the glass. In examining the slides he found
much matter evidently deposited from impure washing water,
which seemed to consist of particles of vegetable matter,
mud and sediment of various kinds which had not been per-
fectly washed off. He also thought that the central spots
from which the crystallization started were sometimes due to
hyposulphite of soda in the gelatine film. Years ago, having
trouble of this kind, he had commenced using diluted cyanide
of potassium instead of hypo for fixing slides. Slides so fixed
did not show any of the faults in question. Much of the
trouble, he thought, arose from intensification. The pur-
chasers of commercially-prepared slides demand dense posi-
tives, which makes it desirable to use some form of intensifi-
cation. Among the chemicals used for this purpose is sulphide
of potassium, which to his mind is most objectionable. He
hail found the treatment with bichloride of mercury, followed
by a bath of bichloride of platinum, to make a permanent and
safe intensifier.
Mr. Fassitt had found the treatment with mercury invariably
fatal to a gelatine slide.
Dr. Wallace thought the question of fading depended not
so much on the use of mercury as upon what the mercury
was followed by. If ammonia were used, the result would lie
disastrous ; but with cyanide of silver the picture would not
fade.
Mr. Carbutt, speaking of the use of cyanide of potassium
for fixing gelatine slides, said it could be used if perfectly pure.
The ordinary commercial cyanide contained caustic potash,
which had a deleterious effect on the film. He recommended
a solution of eight or ten grains to the ounce as suitable for
fixing an ordinary gelatine plate with safety.
Mr. Rosencarten said that most of the hypo used contained
large quantities of foreign matter and impurities. In his own
practice he used only the pure article.
Mr. Belt, endorsed the remarks of Dr. Wallace relative to
the use of mercury.
Mr. Carbi'tt, claimed that there was no need to intensify
lantern slides. He hail been making some positives requiring
great density ; it was simply done with pyro, soda, and bromide.
I he action should lie well restrained, and the exposure as full as
subject and condition will allow. In the instance referred to
nearly a minute elapsed before the image began to show, ft
was a positive made by contact. For the purpose of those using
his process plates, the developer consisted of :
Water
Carbonate of soda crystals
Sulphite of soda crystal
Bromide of soda or potash . . .
60 ounces
2
" J »
1 99
60 grains
To each ounce o. the above, 2i to 3 grains of dry pyro are
added. By this means perfectly clear glass in the transparent
parts of thenegative, and dense blacks, can readily Ire obtained.
The Gloucestershire Photographic Society.
Annual meeting, April 28th, 1890 ; the president, Mr. W. B.
Wood, in the chair.
lhe president, vice-president, treasurer, and committee of
last jear were re-elected. Mr. A. H. Church was elected
lion, secretary. The retiring secretary, Mr. F. H. Burr, and
the Rev. Mowbray Ti otter were added to the committee. A
807
warm vote of thanks was passed to Dr. Emerson for his valuable
and useful gift, “ Pictures of East Anglian Life.”
The presentation print for 1890 was selected, the voting
being in favour of a 1 5 by 1 2 platinum priut of a view by
W. C. Beetham. A lantern outfit, consisting of a pair of
mahogany lanterns, with cylinders, regulators, and jets, was
on view, and it was decided to purchase the same for the use
of members.
The triennial exhibition (open) will be held in October and
November, and prospectuses in accordance with recently
expressed ideas will shortly be issued.
Photographic Society ok Japan.
A MEETING of the above-mentioned Society was held in the rooms
of the Geographical Society, Kyo-bashi, Tokyo, on Monday,
March 24th, at 4.30 p.m., Mr. Edmond Holmes in the chair.
The following new members were elected : — Messrs. 11. W.
Borthwick, H. Deakin, .1. McDonald, C. Pope, T. P. Solomon,
and A. C. Stern.
Mr. C. D. West showed a number of prints toned by
Clark’s new platinum toning process. In many cases there
were, alongside of the platinum-toned prints, others from the
same negatives toned with gold in the ordinary way. The
platinum tones were blacker than the gold. There was some
difference of opinion as to which were the pleasanter, but on
the whole the verdict was in favour of the platinum. Mr.
West explained that there was reason to believe the platinum-
toned prints to be more permanent than the others. He found
it inadvisable to use nitric acid in the bath, as recommended by
Mr. Clark, at least with albumenized paper, as it gave yellow
high lights. He preferred citric acid, and a bath comparatively
weak in the platinum salt. The following formula was given ;
To each ounce of water add one half grain of chloroplatinite
of potassium and four or five grains of citric acid. This bath
keeps well.
Mr. A. J. Hare showed a number of prints toned after
dissolving a quantity of common salt in any ordinary toning
bath. The prints then went direct from the printing frames
to the toning bath, and from the toning to the fixing bath,
there being no intermediate washing. The following advan-
tages were claimed for the modified process. Less over-print-
ing is necessary ; there is considerable saving of time ; the
tones are richer than when the paper is washed before reaching
the toning bath, and there is much less tendency to run to
“ mealiness ” in the shadows in the case of toning to a deep
purple or black. The prints shown were done on the ready
sensitized paper of the Japan Dry Plate Co., and the tones
were pronounced exceedingly fine.
Mr. W. K. Burton showed a sample of the more recently
manufactured eikonogen. He hail received a dozen or two of
bottles of the substance, and in every case but one the colour
of the chemical was nearly white ; in the case of one single
bottle, however, the eikonogen had turned quite black,
although this particular bottle appeared to be as securely luted
as the others. Mr. Burton hail found this new eikonogen dis-
tinctly superior to the old, and considered that it had clear
advantages over pyro for some kinds of photographic work.
A demonstration of “ Photo zincography ” was then given
by Messrs. AY. K. Burton and Y. Isawa. This is a process
whereby blocks to print type-high can be photographically
produced from any line drawing or sketch. A very light print
is taken from the negative on common photographic paper, but
is neither toned nor fixed. The outline is gone over with a
pen and the best quality of Chinese ink, and as much line
J shading is put in as may seem desirable, after which the print
is put in a bath of a solution of bi-chloride of mercury. This
quickly makes the photograph entirely disappear, the line
sketch only remaining. If a photograph is not to be used the
artist sketches directly with black ink on pure white paper.
In either case the result is the same, a line sketch that is copied
in the camera, the wet process being used by preference. The
negative must be reversed, and the reversal is secured either
by using a reversing mirror in copying, or by stripping the film
of the negative from the glass and turning it over. A polished
zinc plate is next coated with a mixture of albumen, water,
368 THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. (May 9, 1890.
aiul bichromate of either ammonium or potassium, and when
dry, is exposed under the negative, a faintly visible image
resulting. The plate is then covered with a very thin uniform
coating of a greasy ink applied by a roller, and is dipped in water.
In a minute or two the ink begins to leave all the plate but
those parts representing the lines, and, the action being helped
by rubbing gently with a piece of cotton wool, there is soon
an image in printer’s ink on the zinc plate. The plate is dried,
and a quantity of powdered resin is dusted over it ; this sticks
to the greasy lines, but not to the rest of the surface, and a
slight heating is enough to incorporate it with the ink. There
is now a sufficient “ resist ” to make it possible to etch away
some of the metal between the lines, and the plate accordingly
goes into a bath of weak nitric acid. There is only one reason
why the etching should not be continued till the whole of the
necessary relief is got at one operation, and that is that the acid
has a tendency to “ under-cut ” the lines. It is, therefore,
necessary to protect the edges as well as the tops of the lines.
To effect this protection, the plate is taken from the bath after
a very little relief has been got, is dried, and is heater! just
to that point at which powered resin will stick to the lines, but
not to the rest of the plate. The plate is then again powdered
with resin, and when the lines have taken all that they will, it
is heated enough to melt the resin and make it run down the
sides of the lines. The plate then stands an etching in a
somewhat stronger bath, and the process is repeated five to ten
times, according to the coarseness or fineness of the work.
The lines thus obtained are firm and solid, but there are
generally slight ridges running along the sides of them pro-
duced by the different etchings. To get rid of these the plate
is cleansed of all resin, and is inked up with a smooth roller
which touches only the tops of the lines. The operation of
dusting with resin and heating is once more gone through, and
the plate has its last etching, or last but one — for it is some-
times advisable to repeat this etching twice — when it is ready
to be trimmed and mounted type-high for the printer.
Samples of every stage of the process, from the original
negative to a block that had been printed in a machine, and
prints from them, were shown, and the process of developing
the image on the zinc and of etching was demonstrated.
The demonstrators explained that it was claimed that the
whole process, from the taking of a photograph to the produc-
tion of a finished block, could be gone through in two hours in
England. They doubted this, but could easily do the work in
from six to eight hours. The block really could be produced in
two hours from the time of taking the exposed zinc plate from
the printing frame. They farther explained that the advantage
of the process was that an exact copy of any line subject,
no matter how complicated, could be made in a few hours,
either of the same size as the original, or smaller or larger.
♦
The publication of several pages of news is postponed until
next week, because it has been found impossible to find space
for them in this issue.
The London and Provincial Photographic Association.
— First Saturday outing, May 10th, to Waltham ; trains from
Liverpool Street, 2.5 and 2.50.
The offices of l' Amateur Photog raphe and of the Bulletin dcs
SocieUs Photographigues de France have been removed to
24, Boulevard Saint-Germain, Paris.
The British Museum (South Kensington) authorities have
this week ordered a large number of Mr. Gambier Bolton’s
animal studies from life and skeleton series, to be framed and
hung in the galleries of the Geological section ; this is one
of the first instances of the kind on record.
Sheffield Camera Club.— The usual monthly meeting was
held on the 25th April, when a students’ night was given.
Members were invited to bring objects of interest to be dis-
cussed by those present. A number of negatives were de-
veloped by several of the members.
The formula of the acid eikonogen developer mentioned by
that able experimenter, Mr. H. M. Hastings, at the meeting of
the London and Provincial Photographic Association, was pub-
lished some weeks ago in these pages in one of Dr. Gunther’s
articles, and seems to deserve practical attention,
^nsfoerg to erorrcspontJentg*
All Alvirtis»aients and coaimuuijations relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper should bs addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic Nkws, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, 1'urnival 8treet, London.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
E. H. M. (Plymouth). — Combined Fixing ami Toning Bath.
With reference to Mr. R. E. Liesegang’s toning bath, described
in the News of 25th ult., page 322, we should not be
inclined to say that it would be permanent, for one cannot
have hypo and gold together in the same solution without
some of the gold separating out as a black deposit on stand-
ing, even in the presence of the sulpho-cyanide. lTsed im-
mediately, as directed, it would tone quickly and fix the
prints at the same time. See the first answer to an Irish
correspondent in the News of April 11th for a good toning
bath for Aristotype, which could be used until exhausted, and
lie content to fix in a separate bath.
A. B. (Bishops Stortford). — Portable Developing Tent. The
lightest and best material is a thin black mackintosh, such
as used for overcoats, but this does not bear sun exposure
very well or hard usage. A top covering of canary fabric
would help to protect it. We are not acquainted with any
paint or varnish that can be relied upon to keep out the
actinic rays, when the material has to lie constantly folded.
A double fabric of black and yellow calico, or ml union, is
sometimes employed.
T. S. (Carlisle). — Collodio-Chlorirlc Prints. 1. In the absence
of details we can only say that the prints are excellent, and
the process seems capable of giving vigorous impressions,
like albumenised paper. One of the prints is iridescent ; is
this intentional, or the result of employing too thin a film
of collodion ? 2. The process would appear to be capable of
professional employment like the Alpha paper.
L. T.- — Thermometer Beales. — Your doubts are resolved by
looking at the thermometer table at the end of the Year-
Book. The 18 degrees evidently mean Centigrade, and are
equivalent to 64| degrees Fahrenheit, which is a manage-
able temperature at this season of the year.
S. M. (Brighton). — Ammonia in the Camera. Without trying
the experiment, we cannot say whether the diffusion of
ammonia fumes in the camera would have the effect of
expediting the exposure with gelatine plates. It should be
easy to test the point for yourself with brown paper, or an
old blackened sponge, slightly moistened with -880 ammonia,
and placed within the camera. When ascertained, we should
like to know the result.
Mounter. — Chocolate Cards. The colour may very possibly
bleed out if you use oil of cassia in your starch paste, for
the essential oils are powerful solvents of organic colouring
matters. Encaustic paste, alt hough containing these aromatic
bodies, does not act in the same way, because of the pro-
tection afforded by the wax.
M. S. T. — Operators’ Specimens. The question was threshed
out a few weeks ago in the News. There is no alternative
but to accept the statement that they are the bond fide work
of the applicant. We have known instances of high-cla s
professional work ) icing openly shown in specimen cases other
than those of the real producer ; the prints of an eminent
Dublin firm being sometimes shown in London to attract
customers.
Received : — Notices of the Chester Meeting of the Photographic
Convention, June 23rd to 28th inclusive, C. H. Bothamley,
F.C.S., President ; and Camera Club exhibition of Photo-
graphic pictures by the late Mrs. Julia Cameron, now on
view ; of the lecture on ,:The Photographic Image,” to lie
delivered by Professor Meldola, at the Royal Institution, on
Friday, 16th inst. ; also copy of “ A Proposed Photographic
Survey of Warwickshire,” by W. Jerome Harrison, F.G.S.,
which has already appeared in our pages.
Adelphi. — The Lantern Society's Display last Friday week was
chiefly remarkable for the excellence of the electric lighting
employed in the lantern, which gave a steady and brilliant
image upon the screen. The high quality of most of the
slides likewise contributed to the success of the exhibition.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1654.-3% 16, 1890.
s .
<1 /.
CONTENTS.
PAOX
Some Optical Causes of Defective Photographs 360
Direct Platinum Printing 870
Moessard’s Cylindrograph' 370
Conversazione of the Royal 8ociety 371
Photographic Lenses. By T. R. Dallmeyer 872
The Royal Academy of Arts, 1890. By the Rev. F. C. Lambert 374
A Standard Method of Development. By C. H. Bothamley ... 374
Photography in Milan 376
The Glasgow Photographic Exhibition 377
Notes 378
PAQK
Celluloid as a Drawing and Printing Material. By Colonel J.
Waterhouse 370
Carbon Printing. By E. Brightman *80
The City Photographic Exhibition 381
A Meeting of Opticians about Lens Mounts 381
Photography of the More Refrangible Rays. By V. Schumann 381
Patent Intelligence 382
Correspondence 38S
Proceedings of Societies 385
Answers to Correspondent* 388
SOME OPTICAL CAUSES OF DEFECTIVE
PHOTOGRAPHS.
The optical cause of a curious defect which on rare
occasions is found in negatives, was stated by Mr.
Dallmeyer at a meeting of the Photographic Society
last Tuesday Dight, and the information seemed to be
new to most of those present. He said that each con-
cave surface in the elements of any lens, which surface
faces the sensitive plate, acts as a concave mirror throw-
ing back some light upon the plate, and occasionally even
a definite image. Mr. William Bedford remarked
that he had sometimes been troubled by this defect,
especially when taking interiors, a window in one part
of the picture being sometimes faintly reproduced upon
another part of the picture where it was not required,
and he thought that Mr. Dallmeyer had satisfactorily
explained the cause of the mystery.
One thing escaped the notice of the meeting, and
that was the influence which the sensitive plate itself has
upon the phenomenon, for it is evident that under the
same circumstances a better negative should be obtained
upon a matt-surfaced gelatine film than upon a bright
surfaced gelatine film. The latter would tend to act
as a polished plane mirror, and to increase the defect,
besides wasting useful light which ought to be doing
work inside the film. The matt-surfaced film would
absorb more light, and that which it reflected would be
more scattered in all directions inside the camera, than
in the instance of a film with a better reflecting surface.
The influence of the surface of the sensitive film upon
the phenomenon, therefore, deserves experimental
investigation.
Another cause of imperfections in photographs, to
which too little attention is paid at present, then
occupied the attention of the meeting, namely, the
want of care commonly exercised in not screening the
front of the lens from light not required to form the
picture. Mr. William England called special attention
to this in the wet-plate days when he was photographing
in Paris, as we remember from having been so struck
at the time by his advice as to have at once had one of
the old-fashioned stereoscopic box-cameras in our
possession fitted with an adjunct to comply, as far as
possible, with the recommendations which he laid
down.
What is desirable is, that the lens of a camera shall
look through a rectangular aperture or “ window ” in
front, which aperture shall cut off all light but that
required to form the picture, and to get the best results
in this way it is evident that the aperture should not
be too close to the lens ; it should be at that distance
at which the straight edge of an opaque object would
not photograph with too large a penumbra from its
out-of-focus position. The screening of the lens from
unnecessary light from the sky is of more importance
than screening it from light coming from any other
direction, and the plan is as useful in the studio as in
the field. A little tunnel formed in front of the studio
camera by black curtains also fulfils the function, as
pointed out by Mr. Debenham, of reducing the number
of brightly illuminated floating particles in the air
between the camera and sitter. These particles
reflect light into the lens, so the shorter the length of
illuminated dirty air between the sitter and the lens,
the better.
To one point of this subject, again, attention was not
given by the meeting. It is not alone necessary that
the rectangular aperture should be far enough from
the lens to work with reasonable efficiency, but the
power must exist of being able to shift the position of
the aperture in a plane parallel with that of the camera
front, in order that when the rising or falliug front is
brought into play, the whole system, including plate,
len«, and rectangular aperture shall be properly centred.
We have often thought that the flat, vertical platform
formed by the wooden face of the shutters of the
Kershaw type, might be utilised by affixing thereto a
suitable arrangement for giving a rectangular aperture
well in front of the lens. The platform itself is
already a little distance in front of the lens-hood, and
more distance might be gained by suitable construction
of the adjunct, which adjunct should be made of
aluminium or other light material.
370
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 10, 1890.
DIRECT PLATINUM PRINTING.
Mr. Otto Sonoma lias sent us some specimens of Dr.
Jacoby’s direct printing platinum paper, which has the
usual characteristics of papers in which platinum black
is thrown down by the agency of a ferric salt when
acted upon by light, a class of papers in the preparation
of which we have done a considerable amount of ex-
perimenting. We find that Dr. Jacoby’s paper, like
the others, requires a good light if fair rapidity be
required in the printing, that vigorous negatives suit it
best, and that excellent pictorial results can be obtained
with it if attention be paid to the necessary conditions.
Dr. Jacoby recommends operators to keep the paper
tightly pressed in a very dry and cool place, excluding
air as much as possible ; chloride of calcium tins are the
best receptacles for this paper. Clear negatives with
plenty of contrast and detail give the best results. He
also says that in very dry weather the paper should be
slowly passed over the steam of boiling water before
putting in the printing frame, as the paper, when dry,
will not print out to the full depth without the assist-
ance of some slight moisture. If the paper be put in
the frame quite dry, only a faint image will be obtained,
which, after all details are faintly discernable, can
afterwards be developed to the required depth by hold-
in git over steam. In a damp atmosphere the paper will
contain sufficient moisture, without steaming, to obtain
the desired depth in the printing frame, and it is by
fully printing-out in the frame and in good light that
the best black tones are obtained. The pad of the
printing-frame should be of india-rubber or other water-
proof material to prevent irregularity in the depth of
the picture. Prints of sufficient depth obtained either
by direct printing in the frame, or by intensifying by
steam, are to be put into two baths of diluted hydro-
chloric acid. The first, 1 part acid to 75 of water, five
minutes ; the second, 1 part acid to 50 of water, five
minutes ; then wash in water for fifteen minutes, till
all traces of yellowness in the high lights have dis-
appeared. Printing as well as fixing should be done
on the same day.
A word of caution may be added about the steaming
of the paper, when it is necessary. If this be overdone,
and the paper made too damp, it is liable to stick to the
negative at places, and to cause stains; hence it is
safest to give too little rather than too much steaming,
and to use varnished negatives.
The advent of all direct printing platinum papers is
to be welcomed, for it is high time that all photo-
graphic work should be as durable as that executed by
means of printing ink, and that photographs liable
to fade should be things of the past.
MOESSARD'S C Y LINl) ROGRAPH.
Messrs. George Houghton and Son invited us to inspect
Moessard a Cylindrograph, a French panoramic camera,
which was introduced a month or more ago into the
Lnited States, and is now obtainable in London. The
instrument has certain points of resemblance to Johnson's
pantascopic camera, but the motion is given by hand,
and the image is thrown upon a curved surface, con-
sisting of an Eastman flexible film in a flexible dark
slide ; the slide, with the film inside, bends like a long
sheet of thick cardboard. In reply to our inquiry
whether different parts of the plate received the same
exposure when the latter was given by hand-power, the
answer was that best method of exposure for uniformity
is to move the handle backwards and forwards two or
three times, with a short quick motion.
If it be desired to give more exposure to one end of the
film than to the other — which may be the case with some
subjects — it can be done, and this power the pantascopic
camera did not possess. Moessard's instrument is exceed-
ingly light for a camera of the class, and it will give the
complete circle of the horizon upon 21 films, which means
the use of three films in so doing. A doublet lens of
eight inches focal length is employed, and the best parts of
the lens arc chiefly engaged in forming the whole picture
in cameras of this class. Lightness for this class of
camera, and simplicity, are the chief features of the instru-
ment, illustrations of which are given herewith.
♦ —
The London Chamber of Commerce. — Mr. Kenric B.
Murray, secretary to the London Chamber of Commerce, sends
us an advance proof of the invitation card for the owning
soiree of the City Photographic Exhibition. Its size is 9 by ti
inches, and represents a lady not dressed for the soiree standing
by the river side arranging her back hair under cool conditions,
whilst a number of little Cupids on the other side of the river
are photographing her with a big camera which hampers them
sorely ; indeed one has to stand upon the back of the other
to reach the focussing screen. The original of the clever
design, as we happen to know, was scratched off-hand on blot-
ting paper by one of the rising geniuses of the photographic
world, whilst another genius present aided with his remarks ;
but we do not feel at liberty to give names without previous
sanction.
May in, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
871
CONVERSAZIONE OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY.
Photographs at thf. Rate of One Hundred per Second
— The Apparatus Employed — Falling Water Drops
Photographed at the Rate of Twenty per Second —
Photography an Aid to Forestry — New Apparatus
Connected with Polarised Light— A New Direct-
Vision Prism suitable for the Lantern — Photographs
of the Spectrum of the Nebula in Orion — Stellar
Photographs — Clusters in the Sword-Handle of
Perseus — Aluminium and its Alloys — Photographs
of the Eggs of the Great Auk.
Last Wednesday night, at a Conversazione of the Royal
Society, Burlington House, Sir George Gabriel Stokes,
Bart., M.P., President of the Society, received the members
and the invited guests. Many of the objects of scientific
interest, displayed in rooms of the Society, indicated the
great utility of photography in various branches of science.
Mr. C. V. Boys exhibited some apparatus of consider-
able interest to photographers, by which he had taken
negatives of an electric spark at the rate of from 80 to 100
per second, which is found to be the most convenient
speed in practice, although the apparatus will make 2,000
or more exposures per second if need be. This is a
modification of the method employed by Dr. Oliver Lodge
to show the oscillatory nature of an electric spark formed
under proper conditions. Six lenses are mounted on a
disc, and are made to rotate ; each forms upon a screen
an image of the spark, which is drawn out by the move-
ment of the lens into a broken band of light. The lenses
are not at exactly the same distance from the axis, so that
the band formed by one is not overlapped by the band
formed by the next. Thus, the whole duration of the
spark, from the first to the last oscillation, is observed or
photographed. Single achromatic lenses are used in the
revolving wheel, in fact they are the front lenses of
opera-glasses; the small wheel carrying them is driven
by multiplying gear, and can be made to turn with such
velocity as to emit a musical note.
He also exhibited some photographs showing the forma-
tion of water-drops, taken, some at the rate of 14, and
others at the rate of 20 exposures per second ; the rate
of 14 per second was rather too slow.
Water drops, half-au-inch or more in diameter, were
allowed to slowly form and break away in a liquid of
slightly lower specific gravity, namely, a mixture of
paraffin and bisulphide of carbon. Photographs of these
were taken as follows : they were illuminated by an elec-
tric arc and large condensing lenses, a camera was placed
in front, and the view was rendered intermittent by a card
disc with one hole near the edge made to rotate at from
14 to 20 turns a second. The exposure was about one
eight-hundredth of a second. Forty inches of photo-
graphic plate were arranged in a long slide which could be
drawn past by hand. Three of these multiple photo-
graphs were exhibited last Wednesday. The thaumatrope
was made by sticking the separate parts of the last series
round a card disc, and afterwards painting the surface
black and white, following the outlines of the photographs
exactly.
The thaumatrope, anciently so-called, clearly shows the
gradual formation of the drop and the spherule, the oscil-
lation of the pendant drop immediately afterwards, the
rebound of the spherule from the pendant drop, the
oscillation of the large drop as it falls, and its rebound
from the water below into which it fell.
Other photographs exhibited were shadows of water jets
cast upon a photographic plate by the action of a small
distant spark, a method invented by Mr. Chichester Bell.
The remainder were photographic shadows cast by a
water jet upon a rapidly moving plate by the intermittent
light of an oscillating spark. These clearly show the
movement of the separate water drops.
Mr. Boys, who is a Fellow of the Royal Society, and
demonstrator to the Physical Society, always has something
especially attractive to show at these Burlington House
gatherings.
The Royal Meteorological Society exhibited the collec-
tion of photographs of meteorological phenomena described
in these pages a month or two ago.
Professor II. Marshall Ward, of the Forestry School,
Cooper’s Hill, near Windsor, exibited a selection of lantern
slides enlarged from photomicrographic negatives, remark-
able for their freedom from defects under the difficult
conditions of production. The transparencies showed (1)
the habits, and other peculiarities, of various trees from
different parts of the world ; (2) the comparative structure
and anatomy of several European timbers ; and (3) some
of the more prominent features of diseases of wood, and
fungi causing them.
Professor Sylvanus P. Thompson exhibited an optical
rotator. This apparatus is for rotating the plane of
polarization of light, and is intended to be used in conjunc-
tion with polarizing reflectors (black-glass mirrors and the
like), which do not admit of being bodily rotated around the
axis of the beam of light. The principle of the new rotator
consists in the employment of two quarter-wave plates of
mica, one of which is fixed at 45® across the plane-polar-
ised beam of light, which it thus converts into circularly-
polarised light. The second quarter-wave plate, which
can be rotated by a simple gear, reconverts the circularly-
polarised beam into the plane-polarised light, vibrating
in any desired azimuth.
He also exhibited a new and simple straight- vision prism
of value for use with the optical lantern and for other
purposes ; it is partly liquid and partly solid, and so con-
structed that much less light is lost by reflection from
surfaces than in the case of direct-vision glass prisms. It
consists of a single prism of Jena glass, of very wide angle,
immersed in cinnamic ether. The materials having
identical mean refractive index, rays of mean refrangibility
pass straight through, but others do not, consequently a
spectrum is obtained.
He also exhibited a natural diffraction-grating of quartz.
This specimen of iridescent quartz exhibits diffraction-
spectra corresponding to those of a grating ruled to
12,000 lines to the inch. A micro-photograph taken by
Mr. C. L. Curteis, with a Reichert’s apochromatic (3 mm.)
lens, shows the nature of the minute structures of the
specimen. For the sake of comparison, a diffraction
grating of 6,000 lines to the inch, photographed on glass,
was exhibited beside the piece of quartz.
Professor Sylvanus Thompson also exhibited a number
of flat bottles, each containing two liquids, incapable of
mixing, placed over one another. They were chosen so
that each liquid absorbs all the rays that the other one
can transmit. Though each was transparent, they were
jointly absolutely opaque ; they were also opaque when
shaken up together.
Mr. J. Norman Lockyer exhibited photographs of the
spectrum of the nebula in Orion. These photographs were
taken in February with the 30-inch reflector at Westgate-
372
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16. 1890.
<>n-Sea ; the exposures varied from two to three hours.
The one token with three hours’ exposure (February 10th)
shows abont fifty lines between 4 500 and n 373, but many
of them are only visible with difficulty, especially in arti-
ficial light. The Henry Draper Memorial photograph of
the spectrum of P Cygni was shown for comparison, and
it was seen that all the bright lines are amongst the
brightest in the nebula. This argues in favour of the
view that stars with bright-line spectra are of a nebulous
character.
He also exhibited a photograph of the arc spectrum of
manganese, showing the use of silver poles in eliminating
impurities. This was one of a new series of photographs
used in the preparation of a new map of metallic spectra
with relation to the sun, Rowlands’ photographic map of
the solar spectrum forming the basis. The purest salts
obtainable are volatilised in the electric arc between silver
poles, and in this way the impurities contained in the ordi-
nary carbon poles are eliminated. The silver poles were
kindly prepared by Prof. Roberts-Austen, of the Royal
Mint.
Mr. Lockyer lastly exhibited photographic comparison
spectra of sun and arc, in the region b to B. These com-
parison photographs form part of a new series intended to
cover the region which has hitherto been mapped by eye
observations alone. The plates used were ordinary gela-
tine dry plates, treated with cyanine and erythrosine.
Professor W. Grylls Adams exhibited a new measuring
polariscope, for measuring the angles between the optic
axes of biaxal crystals.
Mr. Isaac Roberts exhibited some stellar photographs,
one of which was a photograph with two exposures of the
plate — the first of two hours’ duration on the 29th January,
and the second of two and a-half hours’ duration on the
3rd February, 1889, the interval between the exposures
being five days. The photograph is intended to illustrate
a method for detecting variability in stars during short
periods, and it indicates that ten faint stars in the region
of the great nebula in Orion have changed in magnitude to
the extent of from one-fourth to two-fifths the measured
photographic diameters of the stellar images during the
interval between the dual exposures.
We asked Mr. Roberts how he knew that the differences
were not caused by minute local areas of lower sensitive-
ness of the gelatine plate, lie admitted that more experi-
ments were necessary to remove photographic doubts, and
will hereafter have to be made, but a difficulty is that the
opportunities for taking such photographs are of rare
occurrence.
Mr. Roberts also exhibited a photograph of the two
clusters in the sword-handle of Perseus, showing remark-
able coronal and festoon-like groupings amongst the stars
on several parts of the photograph. These clusters are
quite free from nebulosity, and in this respect they differ
from other clusters which he has photographed ; for those
clusters are involved in faint but distinct nebulosity.
Sir Henry Roscoe exhibited some specimens of
aluminium and alloys manufactured by the Aluminium
Company. They included — pigs of alumiuium, 99 per
cent, pure ; castings in aluminium, rough and finished ;
specimens of aluminium, soldered ; aluminium wire, sheet
and drawn rod ; aluminium medals, plain and gilt ; cast
aluminium bronze and brass, showing (a) tensile strength
and elastic limit, (5) twisting stress, (c) thrusting stress,
long specimens, (d) thrusting stress, short specimens ;
stamping in aluminium bronze, rough ; 10 per cent.
aluminium bronze, twisted cold ; 5 per cent, aluminium
bronze, worked hot and cold ; aluminium brass, worked
hot and cold ; aluminium bronze and brass sheet.
Lord Rayleigh exhibited the polarisation of light by
chlorate of potash crystals, also an instrument for testing
colour vision.
Mr. Edward Bidwell exhibited 106 photographs of the
eggs of the great auk. There are 67 recorded eggs of
this extinct bird, of which 45 are in Great Britain, and
11 in France. The collection of photographs exhibited
consisted of two views each of 53 of these eggs, photo-
graphed to scale by professional photographers under the
personal supervision of Mr. Bidwell.
Dr. II. C. Sorby exhibited Chietopodae, Medusae,
Ascidians, Nudibranchs, and other Invertebrate, pre-
pared as lantern slides, showing not only the general
form, but also much of their anatomy. He says that some
details may be brought out to greater advantage by means
of a properly developed photograph.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES*
BY THOMAS I!. DALLMEYER.
II. — The Best Selection ok Curves Ascribed to the
Material.
In photographic lenses the curves ascribed to the lenses
are spherical, and this form of curve gives rise to what is
known as spherical aberration or error, and its effects in
single (uncombined or uncorrected) lenses are (a) indis-
tinctness of the image formed for the axial pencil, (5)
curvature of field, (c) astigmatism, (</) distortion. A per-
fect photographic lens would be corrected for all these
errors ; the corrections are approximated by combinations
of lenses, and we will proceed to examine the conditions
best suited to accomplish each.
(«) We have seen that no single lens can be made free
from chromatic aberration, nor can it be free from spherical
aberration. For a given material of definite refractive
index the transversal and longitudinal measurements of
the aberration vary with the shape of the lens, and, again,
the spherical aberration varies with the aperture and the
index of refraction of the glass.
For convenience in arriving at accurate results, it is
best to separate the smaller errors, shown by a second
approximation, from the main or first approximation.
Thus, to arrive at a first approximation, we have the well-
known formula connecting the radii and refractive index
of the material with the focal length : —
■! L+ 1 ’
( r s )
Then, in a second approximation, we have two additional
corrections to consider, viz., the thickness of the lens and
the measure of aberration, / being the thickness, and >j the
semi -aperture —
(m-1F/<8
H r-
M — 1
the negative signs indicating a diminution of the first
approximate value.
The third term cannot be made nothing for any known
material, but it is interesting to make this quantity a
minimum with definite media of different refractive indices.
* Continued from page 363.
May 16, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
373
Iii most text-books this is done for glass of the nominal
refractive index v = 1-5. Taking a definite focal length
and aperture for parallel rays, we have to decide what
values to ascribe to the radii r and s, to satisfy the con-
dition.
Calling the reciprocals of the focal length and the
radii F, R, and S, we have
R = — S + JL,
ft— 1
and using this notation,
R3 + [S + [n + 1) F] (S + F)'-’ = minimum.
Differentiating, and substituting
, , d R
— 1,or7s'
- 3R> + 2 [S + Ij, + 1) F] (S + F) + (S + F) - = 0
and substituting again
- S + F - for R
M — 1
we get
{^+2, + 6}s={j-4ip-2,-3}F
here if h=. 1*5, 21S = 6F, and hence
or r : s
1 : 6 ;
1 _ 2 1 _ 12
s if r 7/
commonly known as the crossed lens.
Supposing the refractive index were higher, say 1*6,
here r : s : : 1 : 15 to satisfy the above condition, and the
lens assumes a shape nearer the convexo-plane lens.
For a given glass of known index of refraction, and
assuming various ratios between the radii of curvatures,
we can from equation (2) find at once expressions that
show the amount of aberration in any chosen form. In
speaking of lenses it is essential that the term used to
describe the lens should define the surface on which the
pencil of rays is incident ; thus, a plano-convex lens means
that the rays are incident upon the plane side, and a
convexo-plane lens that the rays are incident upon the
convex side.
Now taking the usual table thus calculated for ordinary
forms of single lenses (for parallel rays), in which the
refractive index m = 1 ’5, and including the correction for
thickness, let us see what we can learn here.
Distance of least
Diameter
circle of aberration
from
of least
circle of
•
approximate
focus.
aDerration.
Plano-convex lens ...
27
y-
9 J,3
8
f "*
4
Equi- convex lens
... It + 1
yf
5 y 3
6 4
f
■" ~S 7 1
Convexo-plane lens ...
... p + 4
y*
7 y1
3 8
f
- 12 /*
Crossed lens
...2-4f+ l5
y-
15 y3
29 56
f
'"28 /*
We see that in each change of form the position and
diameter of the least circle of aberration differs ; the
longitudinal aberration increases or diminishes as the square
of the diameter of the aperture, and inversely as the focal
length, and the least circle of aberration is proportional
to the cube of the aperture, and inversely as the square of
the focal length. Thus, for two similar lenses, in radii
and glass, but one having twice the diameter of the other,
the larger lens will havt a longitudinal aberration four
times as great, and the least circle of aberration will be
■eight times as great ; and again, of two lenses of the same
aperture, but one double the focal length of the other, the
longitudinal aberration will here be the half (or inversely
as the focus), and the diameter of the least circle of aber-
ration the quarter (or inversely as the square of the focus).
Thus, to diminish aberration in a single lens, the only
remedy is to stop it down, but this can never entirely cure
it. Now, with a given material we have fora definite focal
length the best form to ascribe to the lens to reduce the
aberration of the central or axial pencil to a minimum, and
we can further improve this by stopping the lens down.
For photographic purposes we have now to consider the
best form to ascribe to this lens to fulfil the other condi-
tions that are also required for the formation of a distinct
image. These investigations with a single lens are fully
dealt with in Sir G. Airy's paper, “ On the Spherical Aber-
ration of Lenses,” and for a fuller investigation I must
refer you. The steps necessary are (1) to find proportion
of the tangents of the angles made by the axis of a pencil
with the axis of a lens before and after refraction; (2)
the distance from the lens of the plane perpendicular to
the axis of the lens at which the convergence of the rays,
in a perpendicular or vertical plane, takes place ; and (3)
the distance from the lens of the plane perpendicular to
the axis, and in a horizontal plane at which the converg-
ence of the rays takes place. The difference of the posi-
tions of these planes of the primary and secondary foci
gives rise to the effect of astigmatism. A geometrical
illustration will probably exjjlain the matter more clearly,
and I think you will find these preliminary investigations
of considerable use in the more complicated ones of com-
binations and systems of lenses to be dealt with later.
The effect of astigmatism in lenses appears to be little
understood, so I offer you the following practical in-
terpretation of the theoretical deductions above referred
to in connection with Sir George Airy’s admirable analy-
tical treatise.
It has been frequently asked what coma and astigmation
are. Coma is astigmatism, the vertical focal plane being
corrected pretty accurately throughout the plane of the
image, but the horizontal focal points being situated, off
the axis, in very widely-different planes.
Take the plano-convex lens and the convexo-plane lens
with a plate having a narrow slit cut across it in conjunc-
tion with the lens.
Now, in either case the vertical plane off the axis will
have a certain curvature of the field, but the image for the
oblique pencils will be distinct (in a sense). Now, if the
plate be turned so as to take the horizontal focal plane at
positions where the image was distinct for the vertical
focal plane, it is no longer so for the horizontal plane, but
a very strong coma is visible ; with the plano-convex lens
coma-oaf, and with the convexo-plane coma -/a. Now,
the vertical plane has less curvature of field than the
horizontal, so that by cutting off the horizontal and using
the vertical, coma ceases.
I may mention here that if astigmatism in a single com-
bination or any system of lenses were entirely cured, there
should be the same focus for both planes.
In testing lenses for astigmatism, this is a very powerful
method of finding the amount. The effects of observing
a point of light are very interesting, as is also the use, in
double combinations, of an astigmatic stop.
( To be continued).
^
London and Provincial Photographic Association.—
May 22, Mr. J. Traill Taylor will give a paper on “The Ethics
of Photography.”
374
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [May 16, 1890.
THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF ARTS, 1890.
BY THE REV. F. C. LAMBERT, M.A.
Gallery No. 2. — On entering the second room we soon find
a small picture from which to take a hint, No. 106 (“This
Little Pig went to Market,” J. T. Ross) ; note the unity of
the group, and not one of them staring at the camera ;
i.e., spectator — one face, or rather a part, is only seen.
The subject is not one of any great rarity.
No. 109 (“ May Day Morning,” E. A. Abbey). We
wonder if that “ cock o’ the walk ” is only just waking up ;
it seems “too quite too” early, and something like general
fog all over the pla canvas.
No. 110 (“The Abyss,” J. T. Nettleship), “a quick!
plate and shutter.” We only hope we may never see
“ the likes o’ you ” in nature : too suggestive of an after-
a-lobster-supper- dream.
No. 115 (“ Luxor,” J. Farquharson). Note the j
strong values and sharp shadow — contour of strong sun-
light.
No. 117 (“ Bp. S. Alban’s,” W. W. Ouless, R. A.) is a
vigorous portrait, but brings to mind the expression “asj
fresh as paint.” Time will improve this painting.
No. 123 (“After Waterloo,” A. C. Gow, A). As a
general rule, we do not care for the usual gaudy glare of
so-called military pictures, but this certainly is well worth
careful study. The feeling of the general hurry-along, '
“the rush” under subdued excitement, is skilfully
expressed. Note the general unity of the sub-groups, |
the diversity of expression under a common stimulus — j
the “ order in disorder” — the general “go ” of the whole I
picture, and yet all in a subdued key.
Nos. 124 and 666 (“Bp. of Durham, Dr. Westcott,”
“ Late Bp. Durham, Dr. Lightfoot,” both by W. B.
Richmond, A). It is a melancholy and striking coinci-
dence that within the same building, and from the same
brush, we should have two bishops of the same see, and
that these should be the two mostjustly-renowned scholars
that the world has known. It is difficult to say which is
the better likeness, for both are most masterly, and both
very fine examples of the portraitist’s art.
No. 131 (“ .Sandy Margin of the Sea,” B. W. Leader, A).
We like the sandy foreground much the best, for the
distance is not distant enough to please ; note that some
of the foreground blades of grass and bits of “ sea holly ”
nre painted in detail, and others suggested only.
No. 143 (“ Our Village,” H. Ilerkomer, A.) ; and every-
one of course asks, “Is it bushy?” Anyhow, it contains
plenty to look at ; at first one feels the groups are rather
scattered about, disconnected, a village divided against
itself. Note the kindly old grandfather and child ; the
boys enjoying the pleasures of imagination at “ the” shop,
and the prosperous buxom dame at the door. The red-
haired girl in foreground seems a bit above her station in
life, but is a fine study all the same. AVe don’t quite
realize “that house,” at least not the hind part thereof,
but suppose it's all right. Of the three sons of toil, the
middle figure seems the nearest to our experience and idea
of the working man. The foreground — and here we do
really mean the foreground — might have been cut up
a bit, wheel marks, &c. , with possible advantage.
No. 150 (“ A March Gloaming,” J. L. Pickering) is a
pleasant study — sombre in tone, quiet, broad, and simple,
and we imagine might have been still more pleasing witli a
less noisy sky.
* Cuntinued from page 332.
No. 151 (“ How the Gossip Grew,” F. D. Millet) con-
tains much good still life painting, and yet, on the whole,
is not satisfactory, possibly a case of “too much focus;”
too much to carry away the eye from the leading theme ;
hence a note of warning !
No. 156 (“Cloud Chariots,” W. A Mackworth). The
artist here gives a free lesson to some of his not very
distant neighbours on the walls ; although there is still
wanting that feeling of the “ arching vaults of canopied
heaven.”
No. 160 (“E. A. AVaterlow, A.R.A” by L. Alma-
Tadema, R.A.), interesting chiefly as being a portrait of
one well-known painter by another equally “if not more
so.”
No. 166 (“ Solitude,” by the President) we reserve for
the present.
No. 168(“ Evening,” F. AV. Jackson). The effect is quite
in agreement with its title — quiet, calm, restful, and the
sky pleases us well.
No. 175 (“Moonlight,” &c., II. J. Stock). The poetic
title prepares us for something rather weird, uncanny, and
makes us repeat that we do not often see a picture lighted
by sunlight which conveys the effect of moonlight.
No. 177 (“ Karnac,” J. Farquharson); see note on
No. 115. These wonderful temple remains, all leaning
over to the left, make us think about swing-backs, spirit
levels, &c., and .altogether leave an uncomfortable feeling
of something wrong. Before leaving this room there is
yet another picture, No. 129 (“ If,” Theodore Cook), which
may be well seen from some little distance. The interior
of a work room, with a lonely toil-burdened occupant at a
sewing machine ; the broken chair, and care-worn face,
general surroundings, tell a tale, without words, of priva-
tion— gloom, doubt, if?
(To be continued.)
A STANDARD METHOD OF DEVELOPMENT*
BY C. H. BOTHAMLEY, F.I.C., K.C.S.
Comimg now to a consideration of the alkali to be used,
ammonium carbonate may at once be rejected because of
its great instability. Potassium carbonate has certain
advantages over the sodium salt, but is less easily obtained
pure, and is very hygroscopic. This last property renders
its use impracticable to anyone but a chemist. Our choice
therefore lies between sodium carbonate and ammonia.
The former has the advantage of much greater stability, is
readily obtained pure, and can be kept in well closed
bottles without undergoing chauge. Sodium carbonate
is commonly met with in three forms : the ordinary
crystals, or decahydrate, NaA'03, 10ILO ; the crystalline
monohydrate NaX'03, 1LO, formed when the preceding
hydrate is exposed to air until it crumbles to fine powder,
and ceases to lose weight ; and the anhydrous salt, Na^CO;,.
The molecular weights of the three compounds are
respectively 286, 124, and 106, and hence one part of the
anhydrous sodium carbonate is equivalent to IT 68 part of
the inonohydrate, and to 2 ’698 parts of the decahydrate.
It is difficult to obtain either of the hydrates of absolutely
definite composition, and consequently the anhydrous salt
should be used.
Anhydrous sodium carbonate can be purchased of a
high degree of purity, but, as a rule, will require drying
at 150° C. or 300Q F. It is best made by heating pure
* Continued from page 336.
May 16, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
375
sodium bicarbonate (sodium hydrogen carbonate) at
150Q C., which expels all water and excess of carbonic
acid, but does not produce any sodium oxide. The
anhydrous salt should be kept in a bottle closed, preferably,
with an india-rubber cork. It will absorb water again if
exposed to air.
Ammonia, although much less stable than sodium car-
bonate, has much less action on the glass of the bottles in
which its solution is kept. Moreover, it is very largely
employed in practice, and the possibility of using it in a
standard developer deserves careful consideration. The
concentration of even moderately dilute ammonia solution
is liable to variation, in consequence of the volatilisation
of the gas. A determination of its strength is made either
by taking the specific gravity — a tedious operation if done
accurately, and of no value if done inaccurately — or by
titrating with a standard acid, as in the ordinary process
of acidimetry. The latter operation is very simple, and
requires very little special apparatus, and no unusual
manipulative skill.
Trituration of Ammonia. — We require a burette holding
50 c.c., and graduated in fifths or tenths of a c.c. (or
I, 000 grains graduated in half-grains) ; a pipette with one
mark holding 10 c.c. (or 100 grains) ; a measuring flask
with one mark holding 1,000 c.c. (or 10,000 grains) ; a
standard acid ; and an indicator consisting of a solution of
aitrin, made by dissolving one part of the dye in 500 parts
of dilute alcohol.
Oxalic acid is the most convenient acid to employ.
The purest oxalic acid obtained from a first-class dealer in
fine chemicals* should be used. It has the composition
II, 0/),, 2H20, and 126 parts are equivalent to 34 parts of
real ammonia, NII3.
Dissolve "37 '06 grammes of the pure acid in 1,000 c.c.
of water; 1 c.c. of this solution is equivalent to 0.01
gramme of ammonia, Nil,. The solution should be kept
in a cool place in the dark.
Dilute strong ammonia with fifteen times its bulk of
water ; measure off 10 c.c. by means of a pipette, and run
it into a beaker or dish, in which you have previously
placed about 50 c.c. of water. Add two or three drops of
the aurin solution, and then, having previously filled the
burette to zero with the acid solution, run the acid very
carefully into the ammonia, with constant stirring, until
the pink colour is just, and only just, discharged. Now
read off the amount of acid which has been run from the
burette ; the number of cubic centimetres of acid required
gives the number of centigrammes of ammonia, NII3, in
the 10 c.c. of dilute ammonia solution taken. Label this
solution “ Diluted Ammonia, No. 1,” and put the strength
on the label. From this it is easy to make up an ammonia
solution of definite strength. It is desirable to repeat the
trituration, and take the mean of the two results. If they
do not .agree, a third experiment must be made. Before
the burette is filled with the acid solution, it should be
rinsed out with a small quantity of the solution, which is
then thrown away, and the burette is filled. The pipette
should likewise be rinsed out with a little of the ammonia
solution.
Pyrogallol should be dissolved in distilled water im-
mediately before it is wanted, but the solution will keep
well enough for a day or two in a well-closed bottle if it
is kept out of contact with ammonia fumes. No acid
should be added ; there is no evidence that the acid is
* Becker and Co.; Burgoyne, Burbidges and Co.; or Hopkin and
■Williams.
without decomposing action on the pyrogallol, and it
neutralises part of the alkali used as an accelerator.
Sulphites are inadmissible in a standard developer. It
is almost impossible to obtain them in a state of purity,
and they are subject to continual alteration. Analysis of
a large number of samples of commercial sulphites has
taught me that even approximate purity and constancy of
composition are only to be found in well-crystallised samples
of the so-called metasulphites or metabisulphites, which
are more properly called anhydrosulphites. Even in these
cases the salt was never quite pure, and it altered continu-
ously, though slowly. Variations in the composition of
the anhydrosulphites affect the quantity of alkali which
they neutralise, and hence, of course, affect the active
strength of the developer. We are also, at present, with-
out definite information as to the exact part which a sul-
phite plays in development, and the influence of different
proportions of it.
Consideration of these points led me to the conclusion
that a standard developer should contain —
A. Pyrogallol, ammonia, ammonium bromide ; or
B. Pyrogallol, sodium carbonate, potassium bromide,
or no restrainer.
It is well known that the action of a developer depends
upon (1) its concentration ; (2) the relative proportion of
the constituents ; (3) the duration of its action ; and (4)
the temperature.
A standard developer must be so compounded that it
will reduce all silver bromide which has been acted upon
by light, without reducing the bromide which the light
has not altered, or, in other words, without producing
chemical fog.
Messrs. Clark and Ferrero have calculated the relative
proportions of the constituents of the more important of
the various unnecessarily complicated developing formulas
which have been proposed. Examination of these num-
bers shows that a developer which contains in each fluid
ounce 2 grains of pyrogallol, 1 grain of ammonium bro-
mide, and 3 minims of ammonia solution ’880, may be
taken as an approximate average. The use of such a
solution as a normal developer has frequently been recom-
mended by Mr. Andrew Pringle. If these quantities are
calculated to parts in 1,000, and the proportion of real
ammonia, NII3, is substituted for that of the strong solu-
tion, we find that they agree approximately with a deve-
loper which contains in 1,000 parts by measure, 5 parts of
pyrogallol, 2 5 parts of ammonium bromide, and 2-5 parts
of real ammonia.
In accordance with one of the conditions previously
laid down, that the standard developer should correspond
as closely as possible with the developers used in ordinary
practice, I adopted these proportions as a preliminary
standard, and made a number of experiments with a view
to determine how far this developer was applicable to plates
of various kinds, and how far the results were modified by
the conditions under which the developer was allowed
to act.
Before describing the experiments and their results, it
may be as well to point out that the methods in common
use for measuring sensitiveness are not particularly accu-
rate. Iu the Warnerke sensitometer screen, or the Spurge
sensitometer, the difference between a sensitiveness of 1
and a sensitiveness of 2 is represented by three numbers or
holes ; in other words, they do not measure sensitiveness
to less than about 33 per cent, of its value. NewalTs
sensitometer is capable of giving much greater accuracy,
376
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16, 1890.
but is not iu general use. There is, however, no reason
why we should not have a standard method of development
in readiness for the improved methods of sensitometry
which will some day be invented.
(To be continued.)
PHOTOGRAPHY IN MILAN.
A new photographic journal has just appeared in Milan.
It is called the Photographic Dilettante , and is published
with illustrations monthly, under the direction of Signor
Dott. Luigi Gioppi. The editor, iu presenting this journal
to the public, speaks of it as an aspirant “ desiring to
become a direct emanation of the great art of light and
shade.” Without seeking to diminish in any degree the
importance of the already existent photographic publica-
tions in Italy, the design of the present journal is, says
Signor Gioppi, to provide, at a cheap price, a popular
paper with essentially practical ideas for all who are inte-
rested in photography.
The title of the journal shows that it is chiefly intended
for beginners and amateurs ; but it will also have an interest
for more advanced students and professionals who are
desirous to increase their scientific knowledge or amplify
their business gain. The variety and clearness of the illus-
trations will, it is hoped, says the editor, not only embelish,
but assist the comprehension of the matter contained in the
printed pages. Special attention will also be paid to all
inquirers, in order to establish between this journal and the
public a “ moral chain of sympathy and affection ” in an
art which, says the editor, we love above any other.
At present the Photographic Dilettante is a “ direct emana-
tion ” from the celebrated Annales Photographiques, an able
and successful journal numbering amongst its contributors
some of the chief scientific, practical, and amateur
votaries of photography. But it is the purpose of the
editor to add a large quantity of original matter suited to
the tastes and wants of its community of readers.
The present number of the Photographic Dilettante for
the month of May contains several interesting articles,
such as “ For Beginners,” “An Historic Account of the
Art,” “ Photographic Failures, .and Means to Avoid
Them,” “Apparatus for Enlargements,” “Instantaneous
Photography,” and “Photography with the Magnesium
Light.”
In “ Photography for Beginners ” is given an interesting
anecdote communicated by Signor E. Beleurgey de Ray-
mond. One of this writer’s friends, an excellent musician,
used to utter loud and continuous complaints about the
rejection of his pictures. Every year several were
returned to him with the fatal word rijiutato — declined —
marked iu momumental characters on their backs. Ilis
fellow-citizens, in consequence of this decree, were
unable to admire liis landscapes of a cauliflower green,
and his horses of a pronounced jaundice yellow which
caused astonishment to his cook. The musician could
endure with patience abuse of his music, which was good,
but the slightest disesteem of his pictures, which were
bad, offended him beyond forgiveness. One day, as he was
inflicting on Signor dc Raymond his complaints against
the obliquity of the judges of his productions, and the
general degradation of taste of the people of his time,
the latter asked him why he did not busy himself
with photography : “ With your artistic taste you would
certainly obtain most praiseworthy results.”
“You thiuk so,” replied the musician; “well, it
might be, but photography is not art.”
“It is at least very near it. Look at these photo-
graphs, for instance,” and Signor de Raymond produced
several views taken from the Valle d’ Aosta in a masterly
manner. “There,” said Signor de Raymond, “is true
feeling, and so true art.”
“That is so,” replied the musician ; “ but, for my own
part, I aspire to something beyond that. ”
“ Several months afterwards,” says the narrator of the
story, “ I met my musiciau again with his whole being
trausfigured. He had set himself seriously to the practice
of photography, and had already attained a fair modicum
of success. This success was the death-knell of his
pictorial daubs ; no more cauliflower greens or jaundice
yellows were declined by judges of deteriorated taste in
art, and our musiciau became an amateur photographer of
no small repute.”
“I narrate this story,” says Signor de Raymond, “to
show that the learning of photography is neither long nor
difficult; and, whilst to become a painter certain natural
gifts are requisite, in addition to years of labour, to become
a photographer is within the reach of almost everybody.”
In the “ Historic Account of Fhotography,” M. Rizzardi
recalls the observation of the astronomer, Arago, on the
10th August, 1839, that photography was the most
marvellous conquest of the human mind ; and that of
Lamartine, who spoke of it, not as a trade, but a high art
and phenomenon in which the artist has the sun for his
fellow-worker. According to M. Rizzardi, the “ first idea
of the camera-obscura was incontestably that of the
Neapolitan, Giovanni Battista Porta ” — a name since
ingeniously converted by some person better acquainted
with biblical than Italian history into St. John the Baptist.
In the article entitled “Apparatus for Enlargements,”
the reader is informed that the ever extended use of
papers of gelatino-bromide and chloride has determined
the editor to produce a series of articles showing how
these may be employed in printing by contact, and how
they may be especially utilized for enlargements. “ The
press of space in our present number,” writes the editor,
“ compels us to defer our first article on this subject
to our next number in June ; but an illustration accom-
panies the letter-press of a machine for enlargements, of
which a detailed account will be given hereafter.”
♦
Proeessok Mbldola’s lecture on “ The Invisible Photographic
Image ” will be delivered at the Royal Institution to-uight.
Photography at Eton. — Last Saturday night, Mr. Andrew
Pringle delivered an address on “The Pleasures, Advantages,
and Various Branches of Photography ” to a goodly number of
Eton boys, iu the new lecture room at the College. The
lecture was illustrated with lantern pictures projected upon a
specially prepared wall ; such white walls for the purpose are
now becoming common in scientific and other public establish-
ments, showing the growing popularity and utility of the
optical lantern. Mr. Pringle spoke under the auspices of the
Volunteer Corps of the College, so he dealt more particularly
with military photography, and the biunial lantern employed
was skilfully worked by the sergeant of the corps. The
speaker stated that he was a Harrow boy, and gloried in the
generous rivalry between Harrow and Eton. Mr. Pringle
ended by urging the formation of an Eton photographic society.
The science master, Mr. Porter, then expressed his willingness
to receive the names of intending members, and perhaps the
suggestion will bear practical fruit, because about a hundred of
the scholars possess cameras. The lecture was of a lively
nature, and well received.
May 16, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
377
THE GLASGOW PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION.
The Seventh Annual Exhibition of the Glasgow and West
of Scotland Amateur Photographic Association, just closed,
was held in their own rooms, 207, West Regent Street.
To call it an average exhibition would, perhaps, be over-
stating actual facts, for taking into consideration the
membership, the exhibits in no way correspond to the
continued growth of the Association. Perhaps it is almost
too much to expect that pictures can be obtained annually
in sufficient number and of sufficient merit to meet the
requirements of an exhibition which is confined to mem-
bers solely. These remarks are suggested by the con-
spicuous absence of work from those members who were
the prize takers of former years. The works are missing
of Snell, Anderson, Rennie, Coulson, Goodwin, and many
others. It might be a judicious step to refrain from
having an exhibition next year, or, if the members should
still desire to continue the yearly show, let some classes
be arranged for outsiders, so that additional interest
might be imparted and a collection gathered that would
attract the general public.
Taking the classes in the order in which they appear in
the catalogue, first of all conies that of Landscapes. This
is divided into two sections : Section A, for pictures whole-
plate size and over ; and Section B, sizes under whole plate.
There are eight competitors in the former section, and
David II. Clark, M.A., carried off the honours with his
three pictures — “Summer Morning, St. Monance,” “The
Trysting Tree,” and “ Pittenweern.” In addition,
Mr. Clark has secured a medal for the most artistic
picture in the exhibition, which has been awarded to
“ The Trysting Tree." The judges, perhaps, had little
difficulty in arriving at their verdict in the case of the
picture specified ; it would hold its own iii a much
more strongly competed exhibition than the present.
Mr. Charles -1. Shaw secures second prize with his ‘•Cot-
tages in Landash, near Rothesay,” “ Old Pier, Landash;”
while the third prize goes to Mr. George Sheriff, for his
“ Fisherfolk, Pittenweern." “ Fishing Boats, Anstruther,”
“ Willows on the Carron these have been printed by
Blanchard's toning process. In Section B, ex-President
Ralph II. Elder has been placed first and third for his
“ Views in Brittany,” while Mr. John Morrison, Jun., is
ranked second in order of merit, lie has several sets of
pictures in the class, all of a high order of merit, and all
taken by the hand-camera. The successful three, how-
ever, are “Fishers,” “Lake of Menteith,” “Ploughing,
near Kelvingrove Park.”
Class 2 — that of Figure Studies — is, as far as competitors
are concerned, decidedly weak, there being only two
entries. Mr. Clark scores here again with his “Two
a Penny,” “The Army of the Future,” and “A Funny
Story.”
Class ?>. Instantaneous. — As usually to be found in this
class, there are one or two pictures which, strictly speak-
ing, do not answer to the term instantaneous. George
Sheriff has been awarded first place for “S.S. Pioneer
leaving Oban,” “Before the Wind,” “Sound of Mull;"
“S.S. Mountaineer leaving Oban;” and “The Thistle,''
“The Ariel," “The Cruiser," and “ Marguerite" of Mr. T.
Steven, Jun.. arc placed second. Yacht pictures and
steamer pictures seem to be more or less played out,
and it is somewhat remarkable that a series of hand-
camera pictures by Mr. John Morrison, Jun., has not
been recognised by those judging as worthy a place.
Either of the frames shown by Mr. Morrison was worthy
of recognition, the subjects chosen being in no sense
hackneyed.
Class 4. Portraits. — As necessarily with amateurs, wo
must not look for a very high standard in this class,
j Although five entries, only one prize has been awarded,
and this goes to Mr. Thomas Taylor, certainly the best
shown.
Class 5. Groups. — Victor L. Alexander.
Class 0. Animals. — It is difficult to say why this class
should not be a more strongly competed for class than it
is. Mr. James Fleming takes first place with his Dog,
Chickens, Pony.
Class 7. Still Life awl Interior. — David R. Clark is again
to the front. He shows three interiors of the Municipal
Buildings, Glasgow, all 15 by 12 pictures. Second prize
goes to T. Stephen, Jun., for his interiors of St. John’s,
Malta.
Class 8. Enlargements. — Generally one of the strongest
classes in an amateur exhibition. The judges have decided
to make only one award, and it goes to Mr. Archibald
Watson, President, for Marble Staircase, Municipal Build-
ings, Glasgow; Faleide, Norway; and Corridor, Municipal
Buildings, Glasgow. Some of the portraits enlarged
would require to be hung very high indeed in order to
minimise defects of original negatives.
Class 9. Transparencies. — Mr. Archibald Watson, Presi-
dent, is the sole prize taker in this class, there being only
himself and Mr. John Morrison, Jun., competing. These
exhibitors have made their transparencies on Mawson and
Swan's plates, and very creditable productions they are.
Lantern plate work being so much in the ascendant at
present, it was a matter of astonishment to find this class
of picture so poorly represented. Perhaps it would have
been a little ridiculous to have given two prizes when only
two men had entered the lists, but Mr. Morrison's three
pictures have, owing to a lack of interest on the part of
his fellow members, been somewhat shelved. They run
Mr. Watson very closely, and had more entries been forth-
coming, Mr. Morrison would have been pretty sure of
second place.
Class 10. Developed Prints. — In this class the bromide
print is predominant, although one or two specimens of
platinotype are to be found. Mr. John Ure Primrose —
or, to be more accurate, Councillor Primrose — is here at
his best. He takes both first and second prizes. The
pictures ranked first arc those of “The Staircase, Muni-
cipal Buildings, Glasgow," and a “ Drawing-room while
those second include “Coming into Rothesay,” “Off
Dunoon,” “At Hunter's Quay.” The picture, “Off Dun-
oon,” is particularly fine. On either side of a river
steamer are grouped several yachts evidently becalmed,
but most picturesque in their erect bearing with all sails
set, the whole forming a most effective and telling piece
of composition. About a dozen of frames have been sent
in containing pictures which are not for competition, and
among them Mr. Clark’s exhibit is the most important.
The picture entitled “ Fisherman and his Wife” gained a
medal at the exhibition held some little time ago at Castle
Wemyss.
In conclusion, it should be mentioned that the judging
was entrusted to Mr. Paton of Greenock, Mr. Allan of
Ayr, and Mr. William Young, artist, all of whom have
already officiated in a similar capacity at previous exhibi-
tions of the Glasgow amateurs.
378
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16, 1890.
i&otts.
The proprietor of a Transvaal paper, having offended
the Government by an article vigorously attacking its
policy, discovered himself in hot water. The autho-
rities swooped down upon the printer, placed an inter-
dict on the paper, and prevented a second edition
appearing. The proprietor, howevei’, was equal to the
occasion, and had a copy of the first edition photo-
graphed. Proofs to the number of eight hundred were
printed, and such was the demand for this journalistic
curiosity that the Transvaal Truth in its photographic
form was largely bought up at half a guinea a copy.
The “ Automatic Photograph Company,” which has,
during the past few days, appealed to the public for
£100,000 to enable it to start in business, has no doubt
a very elever idea to work upon, but the pecuniary
success does not appear to be so certain as the prospectus
would have one to believe. It is, of course, easy
enough to say that 1,000 machines producing half-a-
crown a day will yield £45,625, because this is equiva-
lent to two and two making four. What is not so easy
to determine is the absolute certainty that 30,000
people daily, or nearly nine millions and a-half
yearly, will stand in front of these automatic
machines and be photographed. We fully admit that
the novelty of the operation will attract the multitude
at first, and that in favourable spots, and under favour-
able circumstances, the machines will be kept going ;
but that anything like the numbers will patronise them
which the promoter of the Company confidently expects
remains to be seen.
It may be doubted also whether £15,000 — the sum
estimated as covering “ cost of collection, rentals of
machines, depreciation, repairs, and management ” —
will be anything like an adequate amount. Nothing is
said definitely as to the second item. The experience
of other automatic machine companies goes o show
that the rents charged by railway companies and others
form a large proportion of the annual outlay, and we
suspect that if £10 per machine per annum were put
down as a yearly rent, it would not be under the mark.
So far as can be learnt from the prospectus, the appara-
tus has not had the test which can alone be considered
reliable — a lengthened public usage. The machine
may be of an extremely hardy nature, and not at all
likely to depreciate, or it may require frequent repairs,
but on these points evidence is wanting.
What may be termed the photographic side of the
prospectus appears to be equally open to criticism.
Hoes it not seem strange that out of the score or so of
press notices advertised, not a single photographic paper
figures in the list ? The inventor has carefully avoided
experts, and he may have been prudent in so doing,
but as we have not examined the apparatus, we offer
no opinion on this point, and simply record the fact.
It is comforting to know that “ it is not pretended that
the invention will materially interfere with high-class
photography,” but people are likely to have some
curiosity as to “ the secret of preparing the chemicals.”
“ Hitherto,” the prospectus gravely sets forth, “ it has
been necessary to use expensive materials, which has
made it impossible to produce photographs at anything
approaching the figure named. It will, therefore, be
seen that the revenues of the Company can be largely
increased by selling the chemicals for ordinary
photographic purposes.” Until one has had an
opportunity of testing these mysterious “ chemicals,”
the photographic public will not “ see ” this at all.
But no doubt photographers will be glad to be con-
vinced. The omission to mention the exact position of
Mr. Ladislas Nievski, the “technical adviser to the
Board” (and who is also a director and one of the
parties to the contract) with regard to the Stereoscopic
Company seems to be slightly misleading. Mr. Nievski
is paraded as ‘ ‘ chief photographer, London Stereoscopic
and Photographic Company, Limited,” and this has
led the Stereoscopic Company to advertise that their
name having been published in the prospectus of the
Automatic Photographic Company “ in connection with
an operator who is no longer in their employ,” it is
necessary to state that neither directly nor indirectly
have they any interest in or connection with the Auto-
matic Company. No one will be surprised at this
denial, and so far as the particular point is concerned,
it would surely have been more ingenuous on the part
of the Automatic Company to have prefixed “ chief
photographer ” by the word “ late.”
A question as to the patent. The prospectus states
“a case has been laid by the Company before Mr.
Moulton, Q.C., and Mr. Goodeve, the well-known
authorities on patent law, as to the validity of the
patent, and they have given as their opinion that the
patent is good and valid.” No doubt ; at the same time,
it may be as well to remember that there is another
automatic photograph machine in the field. This is the
apparatus of M. Enjalbert, which was at work for some
time in the Paris Exhibition.
The detective camera may be the forerunner of novel
forms of art. We read in a fashion journal that there
is a necessity for a new individual — one who might be
aptly termed a lightning artist — who could paint with
rapidity, and show immediately on large canvasses the
very remarkable town-events which are occurring.
The detective camera, it is discovered, is expressive
and real in its results, but they are diminutive.
With the assistance of a few pounds of bright colours,
large cartoons might be accurately painted in by u
lightning artist. This is all very well, but when the
cartoons are painted, what then i Hoes it mean that a
panorama or diorama of scenes in London streets is in
contemplation ?
Mat 16, 1890.] y^;THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
^ ^VV . - —
379
CELLULOID AS A DRAWING AND PRINTING
MATERIAL.
BY COLONEL, J. WATERHOUSE, U.S.C., ASSISTANT SURVEYOR-
GENERAL OF INDIA.
I have lately been trying some experiments with
celluloid films as a material for drawing and printing
upon in connection with photographic processes of repro-
duction, and a brief account of the results may not be
uninteresting. The advantages celluloid possseses as a
drawing material are : —
1. Its great translucency, which enables tracings to be
very easily made upon it, and also renders it an excellent
material for being used as a transparency or transmitted
positive or negative for photographic printing. The
absence of all grain makes it much better for these pur-
poses than paper or cloth.
2. Its impermeability to and uuabsorptiveness of water or
moisture, which make it quite free from any tendency to
be affected like paper by hygrometric changes, or to be ,
attacked by mildew and damp.
3. The fine matt surface, which takes pencil, chalk, or
ink very readily, and can easily be renewed, if necessary,
by graining with fine sand or emery powder.
4. The facility witli which drawings can be washed off
and renewed for purposes of correction or for making new
drawings. The surface can easily be kept clean and free
from dirt.
I have tried the films as obtained from America, in
three thicknesses, the -n>Vo> i»«o and jjj J,, of an inch
The first is about the thickness of thin paper, and is al-
most free from colour ; the second, which seems to be 1
the kind in ordinary use for negatives, &c., is about the j
thickness of a sheet of stout writing paper, and shows a !
light buff colour if laid on white paper ; the third is
about the thickness of an ordinary playing card, and shows
a strong buff colour over white paper.
On account of its freedom from colour and great
flexibility, which would permit of its being rolled without
damage, the thinnest kind would probably be found the
most suitable for drawing upon ; but as the surface of the
thin sample sent me was not so evenly grained as the
others, I used the medium kind for the trials. It was
found that a soft black lead pencil worked very pleasantly
on the matt surface, and gave a fair opacity of line when
viewed through the film, so that pencil drawings on this
material might be copied in facsimile very easily by various
photographic processes. Rlack chalk also works very
well, aud gives more opacity in the lines than lead pencil
does. The softer kinds work better than the hard. With
the latter, as with hard lead pencils, there is a tendency
to make lines which polish the surface and render it trans-
parent when viewed through the film.
Indian ink drawings in line can be made with perfect
fineness and delicacy, either on the matt or polished films,
with pen or brush ; but, so far as I have tried, it is not
easy to produce shaded or coloured tints in washes ; the
surface of the material is too unabsorbsnt, and cut-shades
are produced oh drying. Stippling or work with the air-
brush would probably answer better for shaded drawings
in Indian ink or colour.
Our trials have already shown that drawings in pen and
ink and in chalk on celluloid can be reproduced very
effectively by the photo-etching processes on copper,
either by the direct methods, in which asphalt um or
bichromated albumen is used as the sensitive surface, or in
the manner used for ordinary half-tone heliogravure work
with carbon tissue. In the latter case, the drawing must
be reversed, uidess the film of celluloid is thin enough to
allow the drawing to be printed with sufficient sharpness
through the film. The drawings would also be suitable
for reproduction by certain of the block processes now in
use, and blocks could be produced directly from the
artists’ drawings. For all facsimile work, negatives could
easily be obtained, if necessary, by contact printing on dry
plates.
The drawings can, in fact, be reproduced by any of the
photographic processes now used for reproducing tracings;
aud as the material is perfectly free from all inequality of
grains, is sold in large sheets, and will soon be available in
continuous rolls, it seems likely that it might well replace
tracing cloth or paper, for all copying or tracing purposes,
and especially for tracings to be copied by photography.
The cost of the celluloid sheets in any case is not great,
and if not required to be kept, the drawings can be washed
off, and the same materials used over and over again.
For sketching purposes the celluloid would be very useful,
and could be made up into blocks, like paper. It would
keep much better than the latter in a damp climate. For
drawings for decorative purposes, the material could no
doubt be also usefully employed.
For preparing factitious negatives celluloid also offers
great advantages and facilities. In this way a drawing in
Indian ink or other pigment can at once be turned into a
reversed negative suitable for photo-mechanical printing
by the collotype processes, or by any of the block
processes depending on a direct photographic impression
from the negative on a zinc plate, coated with asphaltum
or chromated colloid. For this style of work, lamp or
ivory black, with a little gum, is the best ink to draw with,
Indian ink being rather inclined to become insoluble by
keeping. As soon as the drawing is completed, it is evenly
coated with a mixture of lamp-black and gold size, as
recommended by Major Gore, R.E., or with printing iuk
aud turpentine with a little gold size, so that it may dry
quickly. As soou as this is the case, but not before, the
film is placed in water, which will at once clear the ink off
the lines of the drawing, leaving them quite transparent
against the opaque ground. F or fine work a little clear-
ing of the lines with a soft sponge maybe necessary.
The new films have been tried as a printing surface, in
place of stone or zinc plates, aud have been found to
answer fairly well, excepting that it is very difficult to
keep the ground clear and white, and free from a slight
dirty tint. Gum and gelatine with various acids and with
bichromate of potash have been tried as “ etching ” pre-
parations, but so far without effect. If with further trial
this defect can be overcome, the films might be very
valuable as a substitute for stone or zinc in printiug.
With the delicate cream colour of the stone, which is so
much pleasanter for draughtsmen’s work than the dark
grey colour of the zinc plates, they possess all the lightness,
portability, and infrangibility of the latter, without their
liability to corrosion. Their ready flexibility would be of
value in printing from curved surfaces.
1 have not yet had an opportunity of trying the films as
a support for the gelatine printing surface in collotype
work, but it seems most probable that the thicker kind of
celluloid ( of an inch thick), would be suitable for this
( purpose, aud would have the great advantage over glass
| plates of not being liable to break. The transparency of
I the films would admit of the sunning of the gelatine coat-
380
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16, 1890.
ing from the back, in exactly the same way as with glass
plates.
The celluloid films can be printed on from stone or
zinc fairly well, though the ink takes some time to become
thoroughly dry. Printing from copper plates was not
found to answer. Type can also be printed from, but the
impressions obtained were somewhat weak, and the type
indents the films very much ; but further trial might give
better results. Such prints from type would be useful in
a variety of ways, for typing names and titles, &c., on
heliogravure plates, and for many other miscellaneous
purposes. The impressions from type seem rather too
weak to use at once for photographic printing, but they
can easily be strengthened by brushing over them some
red bronze powder or black lead.
The acquisition of a material like celluloid, obtainable
in sheets of large size and fine surface, which is practically
transparent, inextensible, and unabsorbent of moisture,
nor readily acted on by most acids (acetic acid attacks
and dissolves it), is a great advance for all work connected
with photography and printing, and it seems probable that
we may sec a very largo extension of its use in these
directions before long.
CARBON PRINTING.
BY K. BRIGHTMAN.
Carbon printing appears to receive less attention from
amateurs than any other method of reproduction. The
reason why this beautiful process is so neglected is, I
think, because an impression prevails that the process is
complicated, troublesome, and uncertain. To read a des-
cription of the method of working certainly might give
one this impression ; but the operations are all extremely
simple, and with the introduction of the stripping and
celluloid films, giving negatives that can be printed from
either side, a second transfer is unnecessary : thus the
process is greatly simplified.
The advantages of the carbon process are many: —
1 . It is undoubtedly permanent.
2. Prints may be made in any desired colour.
Absolute uniformity of tone.
1. It can be adapted to all classes of negatives by varia-
tion in the strength of the sensitising solution. A thin
and feeble negative will give a brilliant and rich print by
using a weak bath for sensitising ; and a hard, dense nega-
tive will yield a soft and delicate print bv increasing the
strength of the solution.
">. The results obtained by this process arc equal, if
not superior, to those obtained by any other method.
Against all these advantages we can only set down two
drawbacks. The first is that the sensitised tissue will not
keep in a ready prepared state for many days ; in keeping,
a decomposition takes place, which renders the tissue
partly or entirely insoluble. Secondly, the action of light
on the tissue is invisible, so that examination will not ena-
ble us to ascertain the progress of depth of printing; but
by means of the actinomcter we are enabled to guage
accurately the time required to form the image, so that
this cannot be considered to be a serious objection.
I'he carbon process is based upon the property of gela-
tine, gum, and similar substances, when mixed with bi-
chromate of potassium, of becoming insoluble under the
action of light.
* A paper read before the Bristol and West of England Amateur Photo-
graphic Association.
Briefly described, the carbon process consists in adding
carbon in the form of lampblack, or other finely-divided
colouring matter, to a mixture of gelatine, which is evenly
spread upon paper. This forms what is technically
termed carbon tissue, which is rendered sensitive to light
by immersion in a solution of bichromate of potassium.
After exposure under a negative, this paper is soaked in
warm water ; the portion of the gelatine unaffected by
light dissolves in the water, while the insoluble portion, or
that which has been acted upon by light, together with
the imprisoned colouring matter, remains attached to the
paper, forming the varied gradations of light and shade in
the picture.
To obviate defects experienced by Poitevin and L'Abbe
Laborde, Swan introduced his patent process of double
transfer.
The gelatine tissue, after exposure, was cemented by
means of an india-rubber solution to stout paper. After
the rubber cement was thoroughly dry, the print was im-
mersed in hot water, and the paper which formed the
original support of the gelatine film was washed away with
the soluble gelatine, leaving the reversed picture attached
by means of the rubber solution to the second sheet of
paper. It is, of course, obvious that this gave a reversed
image, requiring a re-reversal, which was effected by
sticking the paper face downward to another sheet of
paper by means of gelatine. When thoroughly dry, the
upper sheet of paper was removed by softening the rubber
cement with benzole, leaving the image or picture now
properly reversed on a sheet of paper.
This method, though yielding fine results, was trouble-
some, slow, and costly ; and it remained for Johnson, by
his more simple method of double transfer, to bring the
process to perfection.
Lewes Photographic Society. — This Society has issued the
following notices: — June 3rd — Paper on “Twelve Months’
Experiences as an Amateur Photographer,” by Mr. (}. .1. AYight-
inan. June 21st — Excursion to Newiek. July 1st — Paper
on “Composition, Light, and Shade,” by Mr. E. .1. Bedford.
July 19th — Excursion to ISuxted. August 5th — Paper on
“ Printing Processes,” by Mr. A. H. C. Corder. August 30th —
Excursion to Hayward’s Heath for llalcombe. September 2nd
— -Annual Meeting. September 18th — Excursion to Hail-
sham.
Ai.UMiNiu.vr. — According to the Tribune, of Rome, Georgia,
as quoted by /mention, a rather important discovery has
recently been made in Floyd County, in the shape, apparently,
of a vein of bauxite, or cryolite, suitable for use in making
aluminium. The Tribune appears to think that the vein con-
tains pure aluminium, but even Georgia could hardly furnish
such a wonder, and it will be quite sufficient glory for Floyd
County to supply an ore capable of easy conversion into metal.
The same journal speaks of a baton of aluminium, with regard
to which il makes the following observations : “ Lightness is
a very desirable quality in a musical director’s baton, as well as
the metallic brilliancy of surface that shall easily catch and
hold the eye of the performer. Aluminium is, therefore, a
good material for the purpose, as is soon to be demonstrated.
A baton of this metal, recently cast at the Pittsburgh
Reduction Company’s works, bears the inscription ; “ Pre-
sented to Mr. Richard Teckwer, February 24th, 1890, on the
occasion of the XXth Anniversary of the Philadelphia Musical
Academy, by the Counterpoint Class of 1890.” The baton is
1 7in. long, and tapers from iin to 5-16in. in diameter, and
though solid throughout, weighs only 3w oz. It is beautifully
engraved along its whole length, except about two inches in the
centre, where the inscription is placed. It has bands of an
alloy of gold and aluminium, and the whole surface is finely
burnished.”
May 16, 1890.]
The photographic news.
381
THE CITY PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION.
A prospectus has just been issued about “The City
Summer Photographic Exhibition,” to be held under the
auspices of the Photographic Trade Section of the London
Chamber of Commerce. Among other matters, the
circular gives the names of the members of the committee
of the Photographic Trades’ Section, as follows : — Messrs.
Walter S. Bird (Chairman), Frank Bishop (Deputy Chair-
man), Thomas R. Dallmeyer, J. .1. Elliott, Friese Greene,
William Grove, F. W. Hindley, Bulmer Howell, Payne
Jennings, II. S. Mendelssohn, J. Lillie Mitchell, L.
Warnerke, Waterlow and Sons (Limited), Thomas P.
Watson, and S. G. Buchanan Wollaston.
Mr. W. S. Bird states that the members oi the com-
mittee have no interest in the coming photographic exhi-
bition other than the general welfare of the trade and
profession.
The executive committee of the exhibition consists of
Messrs. W. S. Bird, Chairman (the Autotype Company),
T. Watson (IV. Watson and Sons), Payne Jennings, Frank
Bishop (Messrs. Marion and Co.), and Conrad Beck
(II. and J. Beck), and they state that the Photographic
Section of the London Chamber of Commerce has received,
through the medium of the Chamber, an offer from the
Drapers’ Company of the use of their Hall in Throgmorton
Avenue for the purpose of an exhibition. They add that
a photographic exhibition held in the centre of the City
under such auspices cannot but be advantageous to the
trade. The Banqueting Hall, a palatial apartment, will
be reserved exclusively for apparatus, permitting a larger
display than has yet been seen in London, while the
Drawing Room, Square Room, Court Room, and the
Corridor will be devoted to photographs by all processes.
A soiree will be held on Friday evening, 30th May, at which
the committee state that the presence of the Lord Mayor
and many city and parliamentary dignitaries is expected.
The exhibition will open on Saturday, May 31st, and close
on the 10th of June ; hours, 10 to 6 ; admission free.
The Section will have to provide a large number of single
and double screens, covered in cloth, giving some 2,000 ft.
of space, and so arranged as not to impair the splendour
of the apartments. The cost of picture hanging, soiree,
advertising, paid assistants, and so on, it is calculated will
be covered by a charge to exhibitors of two shillings per
square foot, the minimum charge for any exhibit being ten
shillings. It is anticipated, however, that the expense
may be covered by about one shilling and sixpence per
foot, and, if so, a due proportion of the fee paid will be
returned to the exhibitor. Should the expenses exceed
two shillings per foot, the excess will be met by a guarantee
fund already subscribed by members of the Section.
Provision will be made, if possible, to accommodate
Bhow cases for apparatus. Sketch and measurements
should be promptly forwarded. Applications for space,
and for detailed particulars, should be made to Mr. E.
Cocking, Photographic Section, London Chamber of
Commerce. Mr. Cocking has been appointed secretary,
and, by the courtesy of the Chamber, accommodated with
office facilities at Botolph House. There will be no
medals or awards ; the display is not competitive, but to
illustrate the best work — optical, mechanical, and artistic
— of the photographic trade. There will be no catalogue.
Exhibitors will be supplied with two sizes of cards to fill
iu title or brief description, with name and address, so that
visitors can at a glance see the desired particulars.
Exhibitors contracting for fifty feet of screen can direct the
hanging, and have their names and addresses at the foot of
the screen. As far as possible the works of each exhibitor
will be kept together. Invitations to the soiree will be
sent to each exhibitor and friends.
Mr. Frank Bishop wishes photographers who have not
already done so to make their applications for space before
all is allotted, and informs us that Messrs. Waterlow have
prepared a fine invitation card, five thousand of which will
be issued by the Chamber of Commerce to the leading
merchants and traders of the city of London, for the open-
ing soiree on the 30th inst.
A MEETING OF OPTICIANS ABOUT LENS
MOUNTS.
Last Friday the adjourned meeting of opticians and of
some members of the Photographic Convention Com-
mittee was held at the Mona Hotel, Covent Garden,
London, with Mr. A. Iladdon in the chair. Those present
were Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer, Mr. William Beck, Mr. Conrad
Beck, Mr. W. Taylor, Mr. II. R. Fairbanks, Mr. llees
Curtis, Mr. M. J. Swift, Mr. Hobson, Mr. Turnbull (Wray
& Sons), Mr. T. E. Freshwater, Mr. F. A. Bridge, and
Mr. J. J. Briginshaw.
The opticians decided unanimously as to the most suit-
able size of flange and character of threads for lenses of
the smallest sizes ; a second sized larger flange was then
recommended for adoption by a majority, and certain
dimensions for standard camera screws were unanimously
recommended. What the various dimensions are we are
not at liberty to state, because the meeting thought that
publication now would be anticipating the report of the
Committee. Mr. Dallmeyer stated at the meeting that
Mr. Walker, of the Eastman Co., thought that America
would adopt the flanges recommended by the Convention,
and that he would recommend American firms to do so.
The meeting was adjourned for the consideration of
suitable dimensions for flanges of larger size.
THE PHOTOGRAPHY OF THE MORE REFRAN-
GIBLE RAYS*
BY V. SCHUMANN.
Spectroscopy is fortunately not exclusively dependent
upon the employment of glass. Much better service is
rendered by a section of quartz. Since the year 1852,
in which Stokes discovered the remarkable transparency
of this mineral, it has been much more used for spectro-
scopic researches. Its transparency for the ultra violet
rays is indeed astonishing. A few seconds’ exposure
suffices to take a photograph containing perhaps four
times as much as would be obtained with a glass having
a similar dispersive power. When the limit of action of
such a photograph is ascertained, it is found to be about at
the wave-length 2,195 ; that is, as indicated by the cadmium
spectrum, in the neighbourhood of the line No. 25. We
have not then, however, reached the limits of the action
of light. All the rays which lie on the other side of line
25 work sensibly siower. This is the case with the
cadmium fine 26, still more for the zinc lines 27, 28, and
29, and to a yet further degree with the 8 further lines of
the same element, which required a protracted exposure
iu order to obtain them.
* Continued from page 361.
382
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16, 1890.
If the lenses of the spectrographic apparatus have a
long focus (from f to 1 metre) then there does not
appear to be a trace of light existing beyond the zinc
line No. 29. Unless extraordinary precautions are taken,
one may give exposures even of several hours’ duration
without obtaining any result. When, however, the
absorption by the air is taken into account and dealt
with, then, with the aid of the aluminium spark, we may
succeed in obtaining a range of lines more refrangible
than the zinc line No. 29. Of the lines thus obtained,
five in number, indications are obtained in the region of
No. 30, 81, and 32. In my experience this is the most
refrangible ray that had as yet been photographed.
The photography of these lines offers extraordinary
difficulties. For years I laboured in vain to obtain the
action of them upon my plates, and only in the spring of
1889 were my efforts crowned with any success. I had
then at last before me in the photograph the long tried-
for lines, but so weak in parts, and of so little intensity,
that to insure their visibility required special care. The
portion of the spectrum in which they appeared showed
with diffused light no trace whatever of a line.
Are the aluminium lines above mentioned the only ones
that exist on the other side of the wave length 2024 (zinc
line No. 29), or is that region richer than researches up to
that time had been able to prove? This question exer-
cised me considerably, since I had made the last five lines
of aluminium obedient to the rule of photography. I
found myself led, by particular circumstances, to take up
again my researches in this direction. A newly fitted up
spectrographic apparatus, furnished with all the appliances
that my experience of over ten years with the quartz
apparatus could suggest — I will return to the arrangement
of this instrument later on — yielded me at last, although
after many disappointments, an unexpectedly happy
result.
Whilst feeling my way photographically step by step
along the limited region referred to, I came at last upon a
newline. This showed between the pair of lines A1 No. 32.
Soon after I found a second, and later on a third and a
fourth line emerge, and finally these were followed by a
widely extended group of lines going far beyond A1 No. 32,
which, to the eye, appeared to contain considerably over
100 lines. Unfortunately this last-named group is extra-
ordinarily feeble in its action. To photograph it
requires an exposure of several hours’ duration. Moreover,
they only showed with clearness where I had suppressed,
as much as possible, all diffused light in the interior of the
apparatus. Whether these lines belong to aluminium
itself T am not able at present to decide. Since they are
so far removed in activity from the other lines, it may be
supposed that these are due rather to the air than the
electrodes. For me, however, this question came less into
consideration. It sufficed me provisionally to ascertain
that my source of light gave an almost contiuous spectrum
extending far beyond A1 No. 32, and not ceasing till the
wave length 1820. Hereby, then, proof was obtained that
there are rays which are much more refrangible than A1
No. 32.
The unlooked-for happy success with aluminium induced
me to carry on researches on the more refrangible rays
with a number of other elements. I have now made
experiments with many photographs of the spectra of
silver, arsenic, gold, bismuth, calcium, cadmium, cobalt,
chromium, copper, iron, potassium, magnesium, molyb-
dium, sodium, nitrogen, lead, palladium, platinum,
antimony, silicon, tin, tellurium, and tungsten. The
wealth of lines of most of these spectra has far exceeded
my expectations ; at the same time, amongst the new lines
are many which possess great power of light, and not a
few which are of decidedly shorter wave length than that
of A1 No. 32. To the more powerful in light of
these last-named spectra belong those of bismuth, calcium,
and tellurium. The number of lines in many photo-
graphs is extraordinarily large. Tungsten, for instance,
has sixty, and iron not less. Approaching this are
the spectra of platinum, palladium, molybdium, and
copper. Some elements give very sharply defined lines.
Tn this particular tellurium stands forth prominently with
a very characteristic group of lines close to A1 No. 32.
Some other photographic spectra, on account of the
cloudy character of their lines, leave, for the present,
much to be desired. Spectra of this kind require the
utmost care if they are not to remain as quite useless for
the purpose of obtaining measurements.
Although my photographs show a large number of lines
beyond A1 No. 32, yet I have never succeeded in obtaining
any action beyond the wave length 1820.
It is known that even quartz keeps back a portion of
the ultra-violet rays, and according to the paper by Soret
on this subject, the most highly refrangible rays are par-
ticularly affected. Whether they are completely absorbed,
or only in part, is a question which can only be decided by
a medium which surpasses quartz in freedom of trans-
mission. Such a medium we possess in fluorite. With
the help of a prism and two lenses of fluorite, photographs
might be obtained which, on account of the absorption of
the quartz apparatus, were not with it practicable.
( To be continued).
patent EntdUgciuf.
Specifications Published.
1,098. January 21s<, 1890. — “Photographic Apparatus.”
Communicated from abroad by Emil Kipper, 361, Broadway,
President of a Company, and Enoch Wood Perry, juur.
of 24, Easth 14th Street, Artist, both in the City and State of
New York. Henry Harris Lake, of the firm of Hazeltine,
Lake, and Co., Patent Agents, Southampton Buildings,
London.
This invention relates to that type of photographic apparatus
wherein a series of superimposed sensitised plates is successively
exposed, and transferred from the camera-box or plate-holder
into a suitable receiving chamber or box through the medium of
externally operated mechanism.
The objects of this invention are to improve the construction
and operation of such apparatus ; to provide new and improved
means for transferring the exposed plates or films into the plate-
receiving chamber ; to provide a novel and efficient envelope or
carrier for each sensitised plate which will cut off or interrupt
the transmission of the chemical or actinic rays of light to the
plate or plates in rear thereof ; and finally, to generally im-
prove photographic apparatus of the type referred to.
The inventors make twenty-two claims, and their specifica-
tion is accompanied by drawings.
19,896. Dec. 10th, 1889. — “Apparatus for the Manufacture
of Photographic Films.” A communication from George
Eastman, of Rochester, in the County of Monroe, and State
of New York, United States of America. Alfred Julius
Boult, 323, High Holborn, Loudon, M.I.M.E.
This invention relates to the production of flexible photo-
graphic films from a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and cam-
phor, and in apparatus therefor ; the said apparatus being also
capable of use in forming thin, uniform coatings or layers of
other materials ; and the said invention consists in the novel
construction, arrangement, and combination of parts.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
383
May 16, 1890.]
The principal elements of the complete machine, apart from
the frame work, are a bed-plate having a rigid and substantially
level, smooth, and perhaps polished surface ; a spreading
mechanism adapted and arranged to be moved longitudinally
over the bed plate, and deposit and spread a thin, uniform layer
of the fluid coating m vterial ; a removable casing for enclosing
the surface of the bed-plate, with exhaust apparatus for draw-
ing off and collecting the volatile solvents, and stripping and
reeling devices capable of being moved over the bed-plate, for
removing therefrom and winding up the dried film or films.
The bed-plate, through preferably constructed of sheets of
plate glass, may be constructed of other suitable material having
either a polished or dead surface, and is properly supported and
levelled, the abutting ends or edges of contiguous sections being
accurately fitted to form close joints. The interstices, if any,
are filled in level with the surface of the glass by the introduc-
tion of a suitable material or composition, such as cement,
plaster-of-paris, wax, readily fusible metal, &e., with a view to
removing all crevices and depressions into which the fluid solu-
tion might enter and thus produce ridges or other irregularities
on the surface and in the thickness of the film.
The inventor claims : —
1. In a machine, such as is described, the combination of a
bed-plate having a substantially flat surface and a travelling
coating apparatus mounted and reciprocating upon guides
parallel with the surface of the bed-plate.
2. In a machine, such as described, the combination with the
depositing and spreading apparatus mounted upon guides, of a
sectional bed-plate composed of sheets of glass, with the inter-
stices between the abutting edges filled with plaster-of-paris or
equivalent material level with the surface of the sheets, to
form a bed-plate having a continuous surface.
3. In a machine, such as described, the combination to form
the bed-plate for the reception of the film, of the frame, the
vertically adjustable cross bars, sheets of glass resting upon
said beds, and a filling of plastic material between the edges of
adjacent sheets to form a continuation of the surface thereof.
4. In amachiue, such as described, the combination with the
bed-plate of a travelling coating device, provided with a
receptacle for the fluid, having a discharge orifice, and a
spreading blade supported in rear of said discharge orifice, and
extending transversely across, and parallel with, the surface of
the bed-plate.
5. In a machine, such as described, the combination of the
bed-plate, a travelling hopper, or receptacle for the fluid, having
a discharge orifice and spreader, and guides travelling with the
hopper, and engaging the surface of the bed-plate to prevent
the fluid from spreading laterally.
6. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the bed-plate, of the travelling hopper supported on guides
eugaR*ng the surface of the bed-plate, said hopper having a
discharge orifice, and a spreader in rear thereof.
7. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the bed-plate, and travelling carriage supported upon guides
parallel with the bed-plate, of a depositing and spreading device
mounted and guided upon the surface of the bed-plate, and con-
nected to the carriage.
8. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the bed-plate, the carriage supported upon guides, and traver-
sing longitudinally of the bed-plate and mechanism for actuat-
ing said carriage, of a coating device connected to said carriage,
mounted directly upon the surface of the bed-plate ; and pro-
vided with a receptacle for the reception and discharge of the
fluid upon the bed-plate and a spreader blade.
9. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the stationary bed-plate and movable carriage, of the hopper
detachably secure to said carnage, and provided with guides
eugagiug the face of the bed-plate, said hopper being provided
with a regulated discharge and a spreading blade.
10. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the surface upon which the film is formed, and a receptacle for
containing and discharging the solution upon said surface of a
flexible spreading blade, and a series of guages interposed
between said blade and the surface designed to receive the
solution for automatically adjusting the edge of said blade.
11. In a machine, such as described, wherein the fluid is
deposited and spread upon a retaining surface, and in combi-
nation with the devices for depositing such fluid, and the sur-
face upon which it is deposited, an automatically adjusting
spreading blade, the same consisting of a series of independent
sections supported upon gauges interposed between the blade
sections and the surface upon which the solution is deposited,
substantially as described.
12. In combination with the sectional spreader blade, and
independent pressure devices applied to the sections thereof,
the gauges interposed between the ends of the adjacent blade
sections and the surface upon which the film is formed or spread
by the blade.
13. In a machine, such as described, and in combination
with the. bed-plate and a hopper movable longitudinally of, and
parallel with, the surface of the bed-plate, and provided with a
discharge orifice for the fluid, a sectional spreader blade, sup-
ported in rear of the hopper, each blade section being provided
with an independent pressure, device, and gauges engaging the
surface of the bed-plate.
14. In a machine, such as described, and in combination with
the sectional spreader blade supported in rear of the hopper, a
pressure spring applied to each blade-section to force it towards
the bed-plate, and two gauges interposed between each blade-
section and the bed-plate to adjust and sustain said blade-
sections with their edges removed from, and substantially
parallel with, the surface of the bed-plate.
15. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the bed-plate and sectional blade co-operating therewith to form
a film, or layer of the fluid ; a series of gauges or supports
for the blade-sections resting in contact with the surface of
the bed-plate, and provided with converging or bevelled
sides.
16. In a machine, such as described, and in combination
with the sectional spreader blades, a series of trailing strips
pivotally supported at one end, and extending beneath the
blade sections, and resting in contact with the surface of the
bed-plate, or supporting surface for the film.
17. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the sectional spreader blade and supports, engaging the bed-
plate to hold said blade-sections removed from the latter, the
bow springs engaging said blade-sections to press them towards
the bed-plate.
18. In a machine, such as described, and in combination
with a blade-section, a bow spring attached to a bracket at or
near its centre, with its ends engaging the blade-section.
19. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the rear and end walls of the hopper, of the pivotted front
wall and adjusting devices, such as cams, operating to adjust
the discharged orifice.
20. In a machine, such as described, the combination of the
bed-plate, the carriage travelling on guides parallel with the
bed-plate, the chains or belts on opposite sides of the bed-plate
driven in unison and provided with devices engaging the
carriage.
21. In a machine, such as described, the combination of the
bed-plate, the travelling carriage, the hopper attached to the
carriage, and provided with a regulated discharge orifice, and
the sectional spreader blade mounted in rear of the hopper, and
provided with pressure devices and gauges for sustaining the
edge of the blade substantially parallel with the surface of the
bed -plate.
22. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the bed-plate, upon the surface of which the film is formed,
of a removable casing for covering the film while drying, and
an exhaust apparatus in communication with the interior of said
casing.
23. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the frame, bed-plate, and the trunk or conduit communicating
with an exhaust apparatus or device, of the removable casing
provided with an inlet orifice at one end of the plate, and an
outlet at the other end opening into the exhaust conduit.
24. In a machine, such as described, and in combination
with the bed or plate upon which the film is formed and to
which it adheres, a carriage traversing said bed and provided
384
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16, 1890.
with one or more cutters for dividing the film into strips while
attached to the bed.
25. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the supporting surface to which the film adheres, of a traver-
sing winding reel.
26. In a machine, such as described, the combination of a
supporting surface on which the film is formed, a carriage
mounted on guides, and traversing longitudinally of said sup-
porting surface, and two or more winding reels mounted upon
said carriage in different planes.
27. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the supporting surface, or bed-plate, upon which the film is
formed, a travelling carriage, and rollers mounted upon said
carriage in different planes, to support the strips, and draw
adjacent strips at different angles from the surface.
28. In a machine, such as described, the combination of the
bed-plate, the traversing carriage, and two series of winding
rollers or reels mounted upon separate shafts on said carriage.
29. In a machine, such as described, the combination of the
bed plate, the traversing carriage, and two shafts mounted
upon said carriage and geared together, each of said shafts
being provided with a winding roll or reel.
30. In a machine, such as described, the combination with
the bed-plate, or surface upon which the film is formed, and
separated into strips while adhering thereto, of a travelling
carriage, winding rolls or reels, and driving mechanism therefor,
mounted upon said carriage, and yielding tension devices, such
as springs, intermediate the reels and theii driving mechanism.
31. The general combination and arrangement of parts con-
stituting the complete film-spreading device, substantially as
described and illustrated.
32. The general combination and arrangement of parts con-
stituting the complete film detaching and winding device,
substantially as described and illustrated.
33. The general combination and arrangement of parts con-
stituting the complete machine, substantially as described and
illustrated in the drawings accompanying the specification.
7,667. May 8th, 1889. — “Obtaining Aluminium or its
Alloys.” Godfrey Bamberg, 7, Holly Village, Highgate,
Gentleman.
My invention relates to the production of aluminium from
its chloride, or from the double chloride of aluminium and
sodium, by means of zinc. It has heretofore been proposed
to bring these bodies together in the solid or liquid form
under heating whereby zinc chloride is formed and aluminium
set free. Difficulties arise, however, in this process which have
prevented its practical adoption. According to my present
invention I avoid such difficulties by volatising the zinc in the
first instance, and then bringing the zinc vapour together with
the vapour of aluminium chloride or of the double chloride of
aluminium and sodium at the temperature of a white heat
under the exclusion of air, whereby the chemical affinity of the
zinc for the chlorine of the chlorides is increased, and both the
zinc and the chloride or chlorides are brought into intimate
contact in the finest possible state of subdivision, so that a
most effective reaction of the particles is established, resulting
in the ready production of chloride of zinc, and the setting
free of the aluminium, which condenses to metallic form.
I prefer in this process to employ an excess of zinc over and
above that required for effecting the said decomposition, so
that the liberated aluminium in condensing shall at once mix
with the excess of zinc.
The proportions of the materials required for the above
described reaction are, theoretically, 195 parts by weight of
zinc to 213 parts of chloride of aluminium, but as above
stated, I prefer to use an excess of zinc.
The proportion of zinc which combines mechanically with
the aluminium is afterwards separated therefrom by subjecting
the alloy to a temperature above a clear red heat, or about
1,040° Cent., when the zinc will distil off, while the
aluminium, not being volatile at that temperature, is left
behind.
The zinc vapour given off can either be directly used again
in the process, or it can be condensed into the metallic form.
The zinc chloride can be converted into zinc oxide by the addi-
tion of caustic soda, and the zinc oxide can be reduced to zinc
by mixing it with fine carbon in any suitable manner and raising
it to white heat in the usual way of smelting zinc, and
this zinc can be used over again. It will probably be
advantageous to use the same zinc over again, as it will contain
less impurities than the original zinc, namely, iron, arsenic,
silicon, &c.
In practically carrying out my said invention I proceed as
follows : —
A suitable retort is nearly filled with zinc previously melted,
and of as pure a quality as practicable, and another retort is
partially filled with the chloride of aluminium, or the double
chloride, or materials such as would produce the vapours of
the chloride upon being raised above clear red heat (1,040° C.).
These retorts are connected with a third retort, or suitable
mixing chamber, by pipes or channels preferably covered with
a suitable non-conducting material, so that no sublimation of
the chloride, or condensation of the zinc, should take place in
them. The mixing chamber is maintained, under exclusion of
air, as nearly as possible at a white heat towards that part
thereof where the pipes from the retorts enter, while the
further end should be at a lower temperature so as to allow
the particles of aluminium and zinc to run together thcrin in
the form of a liquid to be drawn off to cool. The zinc
chloride will escape at the furthest least heated end as a vapour,
and it can then be condensed to a liquid state by meaus of
any of the usual cooling apparatus. The mixed zinc and
aluminium is distilled, the zinc going off as a vapour which
may be injected directly into the above mixing chamber again,
to economise fuel, or it can be cooled down to solid form ; the
less volatile aluminium remaining behind in fluid metallic form,
is run off and solidified.
What I claim is : —
The process for the production of aluminium, or an alloy of
aluminium and zinc, from aluminium chloride, or double
chloride, wherein metallic zince and the chloride of aluminium,
or double chloride of aluminium and sodium, are respectively
heated in separate vessels or chambers to the point of vola-
tilisation, the resulting vapours of zinc and of aluminium
chloride, or double chloride, being then brought together in a
third highly heated vessel, under exclusion of air, whereby
zincic chloride and metallic aluminium will be produced, sub-
stantially as herein described.
The Royal Society. — The Royal Society was instituted in
December, 1660, and is the oldest society of the kind in the
world with the exception of one at Rome. From the period of
the Restoration to the reign of Queen Anne, the Royal Society
stood alone in this country, in which it has always been the
chief scientific organization. Among its former presidents was
Sir Isaac Newton, who occupied the chair from 1703 until his
death in 1727. Many objects of interest, which once belonged
to Newton, were on view in a glass case at the conversazione last
Wednesday. Among those present at the conversazione were —
Dr. John Evans (treasurer of the Royal Society), Dr. Michael
Foster and Lord Rayleigh (secretaries), and Dr. A. Geikie
(foreign secretary), the Archbishop of Canterbury, Sir Joseph
Hooker, Sir Charles Nicholson, the Swiss Consul-General, Lord
Ashbourne, Sir Patrick Colquhoun, the Earl of llosse, Lord
Sudeley, Sir Henry ltoscoe, Mr. Justice Wills, Lord Arthur
Russell, Sir Edward Reed, Sir D. Salomons, Lord Alfred
Churchill, Lord Justice Fry, the Earl of Crawford, the Earl of
Mouut-Edgcumbe, Sir William Thomson, General Brackenbury,
General Strachey, Sir Alfred Lyall, Sir D. Galton, Sir Low-
thiau Bell, Sir F. Abel, Mr. Wemyss Reid, Mr. A. J. Balfour,
Sir Charles Wilson, the Astronomer-Royal, the Master of St.
John’s, Cambridge, Admiral Sir John Hay, the Bishop of Lich-
field, Earl Stanhope, Sir Trevor Lawrence, the Aust rian Consul-
General, Sir Frederick Pollock, the Bishop of St. Asaph, Sir
Frederic Leighton, the Provost of Oriel, the Master of Christ’s,
and Sir F. Bramwell. The members and visitors were received
by the President of the Royal Society, Sir G. G. Stokes, Bart. ,
more familiarly publicly known under the time-honoured name
of Professor Stokes, whose discoveries in relation to fluorescence
are so well known among photographers.
Mat 16, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
385
©omgpon&ettct.
DEVELOPMENT IN TWO SOLUTIONS.
Sir,— In reply to the letter of your correspondent “X.”
which appears in the last number but one of the News, I regret
that there should be any difficulty in understanding the para-
graph in my article in the Year-Book to which he refers.
The words in italics which I now insert may perhaps help to
express my meaning more clearly. “The second developer or
intensifier need only consist of a similar solution (to the first),
with the full dose of pj’ro (and alkali in proportion), and the
addition of a soluble bromide.” The quantity of pyro would
be the same as recommended for the ammonia formula — viz.,
8 grains to the ounce of developer, not 1 6 grains (as “X. ” puts it),
which is the quantity contained in the No. 1 solution, the latter
being mixed for use with an equal bulk of No. 2, which contains
no pyro. The amount of bromide necessary would vary accord-
ing to the alkali used ; soda requires less than potash, while
some samples of the latter require more than others. In either
case, very much less bromide is needed than with ammonia ;
probably 3 to 4 grains potassium bromide to the ounce of
developer will give all the restiaining power necessary.
With regard to “ Beach's developer,” I confess I do not
understand the formula as given by your correspondent, nor do
I see how it can be utilized as it stands, inasmuch as the various
ingredients are not soluble in anything like the proportions
given ; also the method reoommended for using the compound
is diametrically opposed to the principle I have advocated of
obtaining detail first and density afterwards.
B. J. Edwards.
The Grove, Hackney, London, N.E.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
Sir, — It is interesting to find by your extract from the
Journal of t.ie Photographic Society of India that the subject of
reform in the conduct of photographic exhibitions has travelled
as far as Calcutta, and that our Indian brothers are already
beginning to discuss the question whether present regulations
are the best possible. In the course of his remarks the writer
tells us that in the late Calcutta Exhibition, out of nineteen pro-
fessionals exhibiting, only five were undecorated by the judges.
This clearly shows that the medal craze is as bad abroad as at
home. The question arises, is it possible or desirable, now that
the use of medals has been so degraded, that they should be
abolished altogether ? If it were possible in art to decide what
is absolutely good, better, or best, and any definite standard
of excellence could be fixed, then some reasonable arrangements
might be made for awarding to the best photographs in the
show some honourable distinction. But it is quite impossible.
There is no absolute standard of excellence in art. The best
to one school — a very masterpiece — to another school may be
an abomination, and so everything depends on the judges,
generally honest, but seldom competent to appreciate the subtle
beauties of a truly artistic production. They are thus often
overpowered by the aggressiveness of size, subject, or quantity,
and frequently pass over the finest work from its refined un-
obtrusiveness.
The exhibition promoters appear afraid to abolish medals,
fearing that so doing would take away all inducement to exhibit.
Well, perhaps it would act in this way to a great extent if
nothing were put in their place, but it seems to me there is
a satisfactory way out of the difficulty. First let me ask,
why do photographers exhibit ? For fame, for advertising,
or to sell their exhibits, or for a combination of all these, and
the raison d’etre of an exhibition we may assume to be educa-
tional, or to demonstrate the best possibilities of the art. Now
if societies holding exhibitions would start on a scale according
to their means, a sort of Social Photographic National
Galleries, a collection of the best work sent to their shows,
they would meet the best interests of ali concerned, and
attain the objects of exhibitors and promoters alike, beside
performing valuable historical work, preserving many beauti-
ful productions which would otherwise in all probability drop
away in a short time into obscurity. Ralph W. Robinson,
proceedings! of Jrorietfes,
Photographic Society op Great Britain.
The ordinary meeting of this Society was held on Tuesday
last, the 13th iust., the President, Mr. James Glaisher, F.R.S.,
in the chair.
A paper by Mr. T. R. Dallmeyer on “ Reflected Images in
Optical Combinations, and their Effect on the Brilliancy of the
Image,” was read, accompanied by diagrams on the black board.
In the course of the paper Mr. Dallmeyer referred to the first
demonstration on the subject by his father, which had teen
made in conjunction with Sir John Herscliel, and given to the
Society in the year 1867. The subject of the flare spot was
then particularly gone into, but there were other considera-
tions which might advantageously be dealt with. Flare spot
was due to the formation of the diaphragm, and could in most
lenses be modified or dispersed by changing the position of the
diaphragm. For the causes of want of brilliancy now to be
discussed the following deductions would apply. 1. The fewer
the number of reflecting surfaces, the greater the brillancy of
the image. 2. The fewer of these surfaces that were concave
to the plate, the greater was the brilliancy of the image.
3. The fewer of these surfaces that were behind the diaphragm,
the greater the brilliancy. Flare spots and what were called
ghosts had been dealt with, but a point which he believed had
not been previously treated was the reflection of light by the
plate itself on to the lens, and the consequent reflection back
from the lens on to the plate of some of this light. A camera
was shown on which, in place of lens, was a front pierced with
a pattern of holes at one corner. The back of the camera
was fitted in the place of the plate with a concave reflector
having the same focus as the distance from the front, and
images of the holes were then seen to be thrown on to the
corner of the inside of the camera front opposite to that at
which the holes existed. Included in the drawings on the
black board were representations of the following lenses — a
rapid rectilinear, a Petzval portrait lens, a Dallmeyer portrait
lens, and a Dallmeyer single rapid rectilinear lens. The latter
was introduced particularly because there had been a contro-
versy between Mr. \V. K. Burton, of Japan, and himself about
it in the pages of the Photographic News. Mr. Burton had,
however, since then, in a communication to a photographic
newspaper, admitted him (Mr. Dallmeyer) to be in the right.
When with this lens it was desired to obtain particularly bril-
liancy, and other considerations were of less importance, it
would be tetter to use the stop behind the lens.
Capt. Abney congratulated Mr. Dallmeyer upon bringing
forward a new phase of the question. One cause of want of
brilliancy that had not been touched on was the fact that glass
was not perfectly transparent, but acted as a source of light to
the extent, indeed, of 4 per cent.
Mr. W. England thought that more care ought to be taken
to shield the front of the camera from light. In his practice
he never went out to photograph without a hood attached to
the camera, and he thought camera makers generally ought to
furnish their cameras with such an appliance.
Mr. L. Warnerke was of Mr. England’s opinion, that hoods
should be furnished with cameras.
Mr. V. Blanchard thought that the credit of using a hood
to shade the lens was due to Mr. England, and that he had
suggested it to the late Mr. J. H. Dallmeyer.
Mr. W. E. Debenham remembered seeing and using a sliding
box hood, called a front camera, as long ago as 1 857. It could be
drawn forward so as to exclude light from the lens, except that
coming from the picture to be represented. Such an arrange-
ment was far more effective than a small hood attached to the
lens itself.
Mr. T. Samuels had noticed, when photographing with John-
son’s pantascopic camera many years since, that the image was
more brilliant than that which he could obtain in other cameras,
and found that this brilliancy was due to the fact that the
camera was supplied with a front or hood to keep stray light
from the lens.
Dr. G. Lindsay Johnson thought a shade for the lens very
38(3
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
important. He used simply a tube which just fitted freely
enough on to the lens jacket to enable it to be drawn forward,
as much as might be desired, for the purpose of shading the
lens. He did not see the advantage over this plan of having a
large hood. He would like to be informed whether the superior
brilliancy noticed in photographs taken with a single lens was
not due to the fact that the tube of such a lens acted itself as
a hood.
Captain Abney could not see the advantage or difference in
principle of a large hood attached to the camera over a small
one attached to the lens. In illustration of his remarks, he
drew a diagram upon the black board showing the sun and a
lens, and, drawing a line from the one to the other, said that
it did not matter where the hood was placed so long as it cut
that line.
Mr. Debenham thought that Captain Abney would admit
that the last proposition would be correct only in the case of a
lens of infinitely small magnitude, or of a pinhole photographic
apparatus. Where the hood was small and close to the lens, if
the bottom of the lens were to be shielded from the sun, the
hood might have to be drawn down so low that the upper
part of the picture which it was desired to include would only
fall upon the lower portion of the lens, and so either act only
with a reduced amount of light, or be altogether cut off, if, as
is the case with doublets, the stop is behind the front lens.
Mr. Dallmeyeu said that he agreed with Captain Abney
that it did not matter where the hood was placed, and
disagreed with Mr. Debenham in the matter. An optician
was required to place a hood where light from any required
angle, say, from where the sun was, should not pass through
the diaphragm of the lens. He drew on the black board a cone
extending from the front of a doublet lens, and represented
a hood first, close to the lens, and then at some distance from
it, and said that it was of no importance at what part of that
cone the hood was placed. With regard to the desirability of
allowing some reflection, he added that it gave what was called
the effect of atmosphere, but whatever there might be in its
favour from an artistic point of view, from a scientific point
of view any loss of brilliancy should be avoided.
Mr. Warnerke showed some strips of gelatine film such as
is used for emulsion. These strips hail darkened at the edges,
and he thought this circumstance might help to explain the
fogging of the edges of gelatine emulsion plates which was so
often found to occur when they were kept for any length of
time.
Dr. Lindsay Johnson showed a photograph which he
characterised in no very flattering terms, but which was an
object of curiosity as having been taken by an automatic photo-
graphic apparatus, of which the members had doubtless heard.
It was of the ferrotype kind, and measured about two inches
in length.
Mr. Debenham said that according to the prospectus of the
company formed to introduce this machine, the chemicals
used were cheaper than those at present employed in photo-
graphy, and as it was proposed as part of the business to
supply such chemicals to photographers, they might be led to
hope for some reduction of expense from this cause. On the
other hand, as it was stated the chemicals and materials for
the photograph had been contracted for at the rate of a half-
penny each, and as the cost of either collodion and bath, or of
gelatine emulsion, for such a plate, would probably not exceed
the twentieth of a penny, there might be some mistake as to
the cheapness of the chemicals. The cost of ferrotype plate
itself he did not know, hut did not suppose that it could
amount to the difference.
Mr. J. W. Beaufort was elected a member.
The Camera Club.
On Thursday, May 8th, a special lantern slide exhibition took
place at the Camera Club, and photographs taken during
recent tours in Egypt were shown by Messrs. Rodgers, A.
Collins, and Major Nott.
Amongst the transparencies were some of excellent quality,
and the collection contained a variety of interesting illustra-
tions of present life and manners in Egypt, with original views
[May 1C>, 1890.
of the pyramids and other remains and public buildings. Mr.
Elder exhibited a number of photographs recently taken in
Madeira and Teneriffe ; Mr. Andreae some interesting views of
volcanoes in action and other subjects ; Mr. Ferrero some
landscapes taken on club excursions ; and Mr. Crookes some
charming pictures of Ightham Moat-house. Other slides by
Messrs. Fitz Payne, Carnell, and Sands were exhibited.
On Thursday, May 22nd, Mr. Shipton will read a paper on
“ Cyclo- Photography — some recent developments, including an
ideal bicycle.”
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
The usual weekly meeting was held on Thursday, May 8th,
Mr. J. S. Tbape in the chair.
The Hon. Sec. announced, as a result of the committee
meeting held last week, that it had been arranged to have an
outing once a month on the second Saturday in the month ;
also that papers and demonstrations had been promised by
Messrs. J. Traill Taylor, W. E. Debenham, and A. Haddon.
Messrs. H. M. Smith, A. Haddon, and T. E. Freshwater
were elected delegates to represent the Association at the
forthcoming meeting of the Photographic Convention at Chester.
Mr. H. M. Hastings passed round some prints on the new
Parisian paper, prepared with chloride of iridium. He said it
printed in about half the time of silver, toned very quickly,
but lost considerably in the fixing. The general opinion was
that, judging by the directions enclosed with the paper, and the
results shown, the proportion of iridium used was exceedingly
small, and that the process bore a strong family likeness to
silver prints on plain paper.
Mr. Hastings also exhibited a series of twelve quarter-plate
negatives developed with various developers — from eikonogen
I to pyro and ammonia. They had all received the same exposure,
and were all developed for seven minutes. He considered the
best result obtained with the No. 1. eikonogen developer, as
prepared in the directions issued by Messrs. Marion and Co.
A circular letter was read from the Photographic Convention
of the United Kingdom, asking that delegates might lie sent
from the Association to the Chester meeting.
Mr. P. Everett moved that “ the circular lie placed under
the table, and that delegates l>e not sent there was no seconder,
and Mr. Everett withdrew the motion.
The Hackney Photographic Society.
This Society held its annual meeting, on May 8th, at Morley
Hall, under the presidency of Dr. Roland Smith.
The Society has just terminated the first year of its exist-
ence, and lias a roll of nearly 100 members, included in which
are several well-known amateurs, prize takers at various exhi-
bitions.
The following were elected officers for ensuing twelve
months : — President, Dr. Gerard Smith ; Vice-Presidents, Dr.
Ambrose Kibbler, Dr. Roland Smith, and Mr. J. Hubert ;
Treasurer, Frank Jolly ; Curator, A. Dean ; Secretary, Mr.
' Fenton Jones, 1 2, King Edward’s Road, N.E. ; Council, Messrs.
I H. Burton, W. L. Barker, H. J. Beasley, J. O. Grant, F,
Houghton, Dr White.
Birmingham Photographic Society.
May 8th. — Alderman J. B. Stone, J.P., in the chair. Eight
new members were elected.
The curator of the Municipal Art Gallery (Mr. Whitworth
Wallis) sent a communication acknowledging the receipt of the
National Challenge Cup (won by the Birmingham Society at
the Crystal Palace Exhibition in March last), and asking for
examples of the pictures which won the cup to be exhibited
with it in the Art Gallerj’.
At the closeof the ordinary business Mr. Stone announced that
the present meeting had been called specially to discuss the
proposed photographic survey of Warwickshire. In the course
of his remarks, he said: — “There are two distinct ways in
which you can deal with the matter ; one is by taking it in
hand yourselves anil deciding to work out the whole problem,
| taking credit for the result of your labours, keeping tlje con-
May 1G, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
387
trol of the whole undertaking, and carrying it out within your
own limits. If you take this view it will be your duty to set
about a scheme within your own means aud within your own
numbers. If you take a good lead, you will be followed by
others, and if you take a narrow view, and you permit
jealousies to exist amongst yourselves, or in respect to other
people, you will damage the whole thing. If you can decide
upon broader lines, which I recommend, you will at once offer
to the whole world a good idea, aud appeal to the co-operat ion
of every one interested in it to contribute towards its success.
For this you must go outside your own Society. It appears
to me if you do (aud I hope you will) you will obtain consider-
able support — pecuniary and otherwise — from the county
generally. You must present to the public a broader scheme,
that will invite confidence and that will attract support. You
cannot propose any kind of council or committee limited to
yourselves ; you must begin by proposing a representative
council for the photographic survey, and must state frankly
that you are prepared to send representative members and
render every assistance. There would be, of course, elected
representatives from other districts and other societies, and 1
suggest, also, co-optative members useful to you in many ways,
and men sufficiently known to ensure the confidence of the
city of Birmingham and the county generally. Then, depend
upon it, your prospect will succeed, and you may almost be-
lieve that j’our scheme is an accomplished fact.”
Mr. Jerome Harrison, F.G.S. (Vice-President) said that their
President advocated the establishment of a County Council or
Committee, by which the photographic survey of Warwickshire
should be directed ; and, considering that there were several
photographic, as well as many scientific, artistic, and literary
societies in the county, he agreed that such a guiding body was
desirable. Such a council should consist of representatives of
all the societies willing to promote the work of the photographic
survey. But he (Mr. Harrison) did not think it was necessary
that their own Birmingham Society should sink their own iden-
tity with the task which they hail resolved to undertake. The
Council of the Birmingham Photographic Society had been care-
fully considering the question, and they had unanimously passed
the following resolution: — “That it is desirable to form a
photographic survey section of the Birmingham Photographic
Society, with separate officers and separate subscription, to com-
mence and carry out a photographic survey of Warwickshire.”
He trusted that the meeting would endorse that resolution.
The section could then invite the co-operation of other workers
in the county and form the “ County Council ” to which Mr.
Stone had alluded, by which the work done by each Society
should be pointed out. As there would necessarily be certain
expenses incurred, it would be needful to charge a small extra
subscription to the section. He hoped they would also invite
gentlemen to join the survey section who, although not photo-
graphers, felt an interest in the work ; and for them the sub-
scription should be somewhat higher. Such persons could
thus join the survey and assist in its work without becoming
members of the Photographic Society.
The resolution was carried unanimously.
It was then resolved, “ That the subscription to the Photo-
graphic Survey Section shall be half-a-crown per annum for
members of the Birmingham Photographic Society, and half-a-
guinea per annum for all others.”
Thirty-eight gentlemen then gave in their names as members
of the new section.
The officers of the section were elected as follows : —
Chairman — Mr. J. B. Stone. Vice-Chairman — Mr. Jethro
A. Cossins. Curator — Mr. B. Karleese. Treasurer — Mr. S. G.
Mason. Hon. Secretaries — Messrs. J. H. Pickard and W. J.
Harrison.
The question of a governing body to direct the general work
of the survey was next considered. The following resolutions
were then passed : — 1. “ That the Council should consist of
representatives elected by the various photographic aud scientific
societies of Warwickshire, with co-optative members who may
be of service in developing or aiding the work of the survey.”
“That the photographic, artistic, and literary societies of
\\ arwickshire be invited to send representatives to a general
meeting on May 22nd, at St. Edmund’s College, Edmund Street,
Birmingham, for the purpose of electing a council to direct the
photographic survey of Warwickshire.”
Sheffield Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held at the Masonic Hall on Tuesday
evening, when, after the routine business of the meeting, and
1 the election of Mr. W. Y. Davy as a new member, Mr. J. W.
Charlesworth gave a paper on “ Hand Camera Work.” He
began by describing one made by himself, and showed the
most minute details of the same. There were also laid on the
table hand cameras by Swinden and Earp, the Griffith’s
guinea camera, the quarter-plate Kodak and the original
Kodak, two by T. G. Hibbert, viz., Turnbull and Rouch’s ;
also the Demon, a toy.
It was announced that Mr. Chadwick, of Manchester, had
promised to give a paper at an early date ; also that the
Britannia Company, Ilford, would give a demonstration, “How
to Work Alpha Paper,” at the September meeting. A copy of
Dr. Emerson’s book “Pictures in East Anglia,” given by the
author to the library, was produced, and arrangements were
made for the loan of the same amongst the members.
I
Photographic Society of Ireland.
\ An ordinary meeting was held on May 9th, when the President
Mr. George Mansfield, J.P., occupied the chair, and Mr. L.
! R. StRANGWAYS, M. A., read a paper on “Stereoscopic Work.” The
subject was a resume of the past, an insight into the present,
! and a prophecy of the future of the stereoscope as it relates
j to photography.
There was a discussion which brought forth experiences of
some of the older members of the Society. Mr. Strangways
exhibited a number of cameras which he owned, as well as some
which he obtained from the trade, to illustrate the various
points he put forth.
At the conclusion of the paper and discussion Mr.
Hedlky exhibited a hand camera made by Messrs. Swindon
and Earp, of Liverpool, which has a capacity for carrying
twenty plates in the smallest space, and possesses many well-
thought-out devices.
The first excursion of the season took place on May 10th to
| the Dargles. The morning was wet and the day very' dull,
whicn resulted in a small attendance of members.
The session is to close for indoor meetings by an exhibition
of members' work in lantern slides on the 22nd inst. This
meeting is to take place in the large theatre of the Royal
College of Science instead of the Society’s rooms.
The West Surrey Amateur Photographic Society.
On Wednesday, May 7 th, Mr. Davison gave an address on
“ Platinotype Printing Processes,” accompanied by a demon-
stration. Mr. Winsford occupied the chair. Several new
members were nominated.
Mr. Davison, having recited the advantages of the processes,
and given briefly the theory of the formation of the platinum
image, explained the distinction between the hot bath, cold
bath, and printlng-out methods respectively’, and proceeded to
develop a large number of proofs showing the ordinary details
J of practice as well as the variations in colour obtainable by the
I use of the sepia papers, and by the addition of mercuric
| chloride (half dram to one dram per ounce of hot oxalate solu-
tion) to the developer. Cold bath prints were also developed ;
specimens of all the variations were handed round upon glass
plates, as also mounted examples of platinum prints on fabrics
and rough papers.
It was decided that the next out-door meeting of the
Society should be to Carshalton and district, and that the sub-
ject for the first Wednesday in May, evening meeting, be
“ Gelatino-Chloride Emulsion Papers.” Mr. James is to treat
this subject.
The Lewes Photographic Society.
A paper on “ Cloud Photography ” was read by Mr J. J. Holl-
| way at the usual monthly meeting of the Lewes Photographic
388
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 16, 1890.
Society, held on Tuesday evening. The chair was occupied by
the president, Mr. J . G. Braden. A vote of thanks was passed
to Dr. P. H. Emerson for the gift to the society of a
copy of his work on “East Anglian Life.”
Mr. J. J. Hollway read his paper, and described the many
beauties of cloud form and sky effects, illustrated by
examples from the works of Constable and Gainsborough,
showing the proper relation cloud forms should bear to the
other part of the pictures. While recommending photo-
graphers to use cloud negatives to complete their pictures — for
he considered nothing so offensive to the artistic eye as the
broad patch of white for the sky generally seen in photographs —
he cautioned them about using them in an inartistic manner, as
it was quite probable that unless clouds were inserted with
taste and after careful consideration of their appropriateness
to the general effect of light and shade and general composi-
tion of the picture, they would rather detract from what
beauty might have existed before their introduction, than
bring about the desired improvement. Mr. Hollway exhibited
specimens of his own cloud photographs, and by this means
showed how greatly the general effect of a photograph could be
improved by the judicious introduction of clouds.
At this meeting it was arranged to meet the Hastings
Photographic Society on Wednesday, June 4th.
The Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
May 21 will be “Photo-Mechanical Processes”; May 28,
“ Photographic Fog.”
Colouring Matter from Chlorophyll A. Hansen ( Bot .
Cen&ralil. 38, 632) prepares the yellow and the green constitu-
ents of chlorophyll in what he believes to be a pure condition
by the following process : Some leaves of grass are boiled in
water from fifteen to thirty minutes, then washed many times
with water, and dried in the dark. The dry matter is extracted
with boiling alcohol, and the solution saponified by boiling for
three hours with a slight excess of aqueous soda ; a current
of carbonic anhydride is then passed through the solution, which
is afterwards evaporated to dryness on the water-bath. Ether
extracts from this soap the yellow colouring matter only, which
is purified by evaporating down and crystallizing from a mixture
of equal parts of ether and light petroleum. The soap, after
extraction with ether, is extracted with a mixture of alcohol
and ether, which dissolves only traces of the combination of the
green colouring matter with soda. On adding another quantity
of alcohol-ether and also phosphoric acid, the green matter is
liberated and passes at once into solution, from which it is
obtained by evaporation in the form of a brilliant, fragile,
greenish-black solid, insoluble in water, benzene, aud carbon
bisulphide, sparingly soluble in pure ether, very soluble in
alcohol with strong red fluorescence. The crystals of yellow
colouring matter form orange-red plates insoluble in water,
soluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform, and benzene to a deep
yellow colour, and in carbon bisulphide to a brick red. These
crystals are transformed in the light into cholesterin. The author
considers this yellow substance to be identical with the yellow
colouring matter of flowers and fruits in general, including that
of the carrot. — J. Chem. Soc.
Received : — From Mr. J. It. Gotz, a bottle of special concen-
trated toning solution for a new Obernetter matt surfaced
gelatino-ehloride paper. The specimen prints accompanying
this were free from objectionable gloss, yet contained plenty of
detail. The sulphoeyanide toning solution we tried upon
Alpha paper which happened to be handy, and found it to give
rich blacks exceedingly quickly, so that it had to be diluted
more than recommended by the vendor. Fallowfield’s well-
known Photographic Annual for 1890 has also been received.
It is now a goodly volume of 432 pages, and contains a consider-
able quantity of literary matter, giving useful practical
information, in addition to the trade particulars relating to
photographic appliances. Mr. Fallowfield also sends one of the
sheaths which he now fits to his “ Facile ” hand-camera, to
overcome the difficulty of the varying thicknesses of dry plates.
Some notices of books and some patent intelligence we are
again obliged to postpone because of press of other matter.
to ©omgpontrentg.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
S. B. — Merge? a Mercury Process. The details of this process
were never made perfectly clear, but you will find an account
in the journals of April 1872. Paper was treated with
ammonio-nitrate of silver, or with a gold salt, then the
negative, exposed to mercury vapour, was laid down upon it,
and there left, so that the mercurial fumes escaping there-
from should effect the reduction of the silver (or gold) salt,
forming an amalgam on the principle of the A rim- Dianne. The
image so produced in the paper was toned and fixed in the
ordinary way, and was said to be permanent.
M. E. P. — Gum Elemi in Photo- Lithographic Ink. We find
some particulars in the Photo. Corresponds relating to the
employment of gum elemi in the somewhat complex mix-
ture which is used for ink, both on stone and zinc, for the
photo-mechanical processes. It is combined with suet, bees-
wax, asphalt, resin, and turpentine, linseed oil varnish and
lamp-black constituting, indeed, the chief ingredient in the
ink specified in a long formula therein given.
Amateur (Sandgate). — New American Printing-Out Process.
Give it a trial by all means, and compare with your ordinary
method for rapidity. No chloride is used, but equal parts
of ferric oxalate, silver nitrate, and gelatine dissolved
together in warm water with a small quantity of tartaric
acid.
T. L. — Photography in Natural Colours. Since you wrote last
week, the letters of Dr. Eder, Dr. Gunther, and M. Leon
Vidal, have all appeared in the News, and give as much
information as seems likely to be forthcoming ; but from
these you will be able to glean further details.
Assayer (Llanelly). — Chlorine in Hydrochloric Acid. The
best way of testing for free chlorine is to dissolve a small
quantity of diphenylamine in the suspected hydrochloric acid,
and look for a blue colouration. Or, the diphenylamine may
be dissolved in alcohol, and poured gently upon the surface
of the acid, when the production of a blue halo at the line
of junction makes itself apparent.
Technic. — The Britannia Works Premium. It is very easy to
criticise, but if prepared with a formulated scheme, the way
is still open for you to submit a proposal, together with the
names of those who agree to assist you in giving effect to
your plans.
F. H. — Zinc Alloys. Unless you put in some tin, it is not
possible to make zinc alloy with lead.
Gothic Art. — Albert Diirer. The current number of the
English Illustrated Magazine devotes twenty-one pages to a
notice of his works, by Albert Fleming, with some very fine
engravings.
C. H. (Walsall). — Dr. W. J. Nicol’s patent for “ Improvements
in and connection with Photographic Printing,” is dated
March 29th, 1889, No. 5,374.
F. C. S. — New Gaseous Elememt, Yes, if confirmed, the new
element damarium will quite revolutionise the present system
of chemical formula according to the ruling atomic theory.
Hydrogen, being no longer the lightest known element, can-
not be taken as unity, but will have to give place to
Damarium (D) at the bottom of our atomic series, and all
the former weights will have to be doubled. Thus, hydrogen
becomes 2, chlorine 71, oxygen 32, sulphur 64, &c. It is
said to be the most powerful reducing agent known, instantly
throwing out gold, silver, copper, and lead from their
metallic solutions, and reducing sulphurous acid to free
sulphur, with production of the new oxide, 1)4 0. Truly
this will necessite great changes, but we must wait for con*
firmation of this astounding discovery.
Col. Waterhouse. — Your interesting communication received
and forwarded. Your experiments certainly indicate quite
an original departure.
Received : — Report of the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Meeting of
British Association, and Prospectus of the Automatic Photo-
graph Company, Limited,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
' •<»'
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1655. — May 23, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOK
A Damp Process 389
A Meeting i f Opticians about Lens Mounts 390
An International Photographic Exhibition in Vienna 390
Astronomical Photography. By 'William E. Plummer, M. A. 390
Photography of the More Refrangible Rays. By V. Schumann 392
A Standard Method of Development. By C. H. Bothamley ... 393
Groups and Grouping. By C. Brangwin Barnes 39G
The Progress of ilie Photo-Mechanical Printing Processes. By
Hermann E. Gunther 396
PAOt
Notes 39*
The Royal Academy of Arts. 1890. By the Rev. F. C. Lambert 399
Photoeraphic Lenses. By T. R. Dallmeyer 400
The Royal Institution 402
Fiction in Photography 403
Photographic Mounts 404
Patent Intelligence 405
Proceedings of Societies 40T
Answers to Correspondents 408
A DAMP PROCESS.
Much is said now-a-days about the ease of the gelatino-
bromide and other dry plate processes for landscape
photographic work, as compared with the wet plate
method of early times, with its developing tent or box,
and the other heavy encumbrances it was necessary to
take into the field. Perhaps the newly fledged race
of photographers may be unaware that so far back as
1863 an excellent “ damp ” process was in use, cheaper
than the present dry-plate process, whereby plates
which would keep good for a day could be taken into
the field just as dry plates are carried, and be brought
home for development the same evening. Home
practical advantages might perhaps be gained by
experimentally examining the artistic and other merits
of some of the best processes of the past, especially as
it is well known that wet-plate methods tend to favour
high quality in certain photomechanical and orthochro-
matic results.
The glycerine process was devised by Mr. Fysh, one
of Mr. Valentine Blanchard’s friends, and Mr. Blan-
chard published it in the Year-Book for 1863. A plate
is coated with bromo-iodised collodion, then immersed
in a thirty-grain nitrate of silver bath made faintly
acid with acetic acid, for it is said that in this process
no trace of nitric acid must be present in the solutions.
The next step in the treatment is made by the use of
the following solution : — Take of English honey, old
and crystallized, four ounces; Price’s glycerine, two
ounces ; nitrate of silver, thirty-grain bath, new and
iodised, six ounces. When thoroughly mixed, add
kaolin half an ounce and shake well, and repeat the
shaking occasionally for an hour ; then place the mix-
ture in a light place, but not in sunshine, for two days.
The solution above the kaolin deposit improves by
keeping, and when required for use some of it is fil-
tered into a measuring-glass for the purpose. When
the plate is taken from the sensitising bath some of the
glycerine mixture is poured over it, and kept moving
until all oily appearances cease. The plate is then
drained into the bottle, and some more of the glycerine
mixture is poured over it ; again the surplus is poured
from the plate into the stock bottle, after which the
plate is placed on edge on blotting paper to drain ;
when sufficiently drained it is placed in the dark slide
for use. Mr. Blanchard’s experience was that these
plates would keep in good condition four hours in sum-
mer, and a day in winter. We used the process ex-
tensively, and about 1865 published in contemporary
photographic literature some experiments made with
it. By reducing the proportion of nitrate of silver in
the glycerine solution, it was found that the plates
could be made to keep good for a day in summer. The
old protosulphate of iron developer was used to bring
out the image.
The glycerine and honey mixture recommended above
seems highly empirical from a scientific point of view,
and no doubt the solution will bear simplification, but
in general it yielded excellent results in the hands of
those who gave it a trial. Mr. Carey Lea tried it on
our recommendation, as mentioned in his book on
photography, and spoke favourably of his experiences
therewith. Those who found it a failure perhaps used
impure materials, for honey is one of the most easily
adulterated articles known, as the Swiss — who produce
it in large quantities — are aware; then again, some
samples of glycerine contain lead, and even high-class
varieties sometimes contain chloride of sodium, and
will not stand the nitrate of silver test. Not a bad
method of applying the glycerine “ preservative ” is by
means of a dipping bath. To those who understand
the precautions necessary in working the wet-plate
process successfully, the glycerine process for outdoor
work within a moderate distance of home is easy,
rapid, and inexpensive.
390
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
A MEETING OF OPTICIANS ABOUT LENS
MOUNTS.
Perhaps the most influential meeting of photographic
opticians ever held was that which took place last Wednes-
day night at the Mona Hotel, London, to make recommen-
dations to the committee of the Photographic Convention
about standard mounts for lenses. Mr. A. Iladdon
presided. Those present were Mr. T. It. Dallmeyer, Dr.
James Edmunds, Mr. John Stuart (Boss and Co.), Mr.
II. G. lleyburn (Ross and Co.), Mr. L. Cohen, Mr. A.
Staley (Charles Reynolds and Co.), Mr. II. J. Anderson
(Messrs. II. Anderson and Son), Mr. M. J. Swift, Mr. E.
Clifton (the Stereoscopic Company), Mr. W. Taylor, Mr.
Conrad Beck, Mr. II. Crouch, Mr. Turnbull (Messrs.
Wray and Sons), Mr. T. E. Freshwater (Messrs. Newton
and Son), Mr. II. IV. Hobson, Mr. T. P. Watson, and Mr.
II. It. Fairbanks.
As we have been requested not to publish the decisions
at this series of meetings, because such publication would
anticipate the report of the Committee, it would be of no
use to publish the discussions which led thereto. Last
Wednesday, Dr. Edmunds gave the meeting some of the
benefit of his large experience relating to the construction
of standard screws for scientific purposes. The resolu-
tions about two standard flanges passed at the previous
meeting were rescinded to clear the ground, because of the
much larger attendance last Wednesday. Certain other
resolutions as to the standards to be recommended for
adoption for the flanges of lenses of all sizes were then
passed, but not unanimously, for some of the larger
opticians objected; the chief point of difference of opinion
was as to the exact size of a standard flange approximating
to lj inch in diameter. In the course of the meeting
Mr. Taylor remarked that the opticians had but power to
make recommendations to the Convention Committee,
upon which Mr. Watson opined that if those present
agreed to make certain standard flanges, those flanges would
become the standards for the whole world ; whereupon Dr.
Edmunds remarked that those who would exercise most
authority in the matter would be the public.
The Chairman announced that if the Committee desired
to consult the opticians again, it would invite them to
meet in London shortly before the opening of the Con-
vention.
AN INTERNATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBI-
TION IN VIENNA.
An influential International Photographic Exhibition, or
“ Photographic Salon,” will be held in Vienna in April
next year, under the management of the Vienna Club of
Photographic Amateurs. The regulations have not yet
been formulated, but the general idea is to exhibit only
first-class and comparatively recent work, and to make
quality rather than quantity the predominant feature. A
jury of artists and photographers will decide as to the
admission, or otherwise, of each picture. The exhibition
will be held in the Imperial Austrian Museum of Art and
Industry. Mr. Carl Ulrich, vice-president of the Club,
who is now in London, has furnished us the above
particulars. The president is Mr. Carl Srna, the Club of
Amateur Photographers, Wallfischgasse 4, Vienna.
In the course of his lecture last Friday at the Royal Institu-
tion, Professor Meldola said that cuprous chloride is as sensitive
to light as chloride of silver, and he performed an experiment
in proof thereof.
ASTRONOMICAL PHOTOGRAPHY.
BY WILLIAM E. PLUMMER, M.A., K.B.A.S.
On a very superficial survey of the history of astronomy,
we may easily perceive distinct epochs at which its further
progress as an observational science is apparently barred,
and as easily recognise the improved mechanical means
whereby those barriers have been removed and a new and
wider field of research opened up to patient investigation.
The discovery of the telescope, coming as it did when
naked eye records had accomplished their utmost accuracy,
marks such an epoch ; the discovery of the principle of
the achromatic telescope, which happily surmounted the
inconvenient difficulty presented by the enormous focal
length necessary for the due performance of a single lens,
marks another. And now, when we see this principle
carried to such an extent in the manufacture of huge
object glasses as to tax alike the powers of the optician to
fashion, and of the engineer to mount, we have, in the
application of photography, a possible means for the
prosecution of astronomical science into regions of un-
expected interest. We may, therefore, hope that astronomy
as a science has not yet culminated, and that, so far from
being effete, there are still awaiting solution, problems
which will only be suggested by further developments in
mechanics and optics.
We have alluded to the application of photography as
marking an era of increased activity and further progress
in astronomy. It would have perhaps been more correct
to have insisted on the employment of the gelatine dry
plate, as the date from which this new departure is to be
reckoned ; for the peculiar principle which gives im-
portance to this method of research is its capacity for
rendering available the accumulative effects of feeble
light when exercised over considerable intervals of time.
In the days of the wet collodion plate this valuable result
could not be made effective, and consequently its applica-
tion, though valuable for accuracy of delineation, secured
what would have remained little more than scientific
curiosities. It is not intended here to suggest that the
early photographs of the moon taken by De la Rue,
Rutherford, and others possess no value ; but it must be
remembered that they show no more detail than do our
telescopes of moderate power and excellence. They do
not mark any material advance in astronomical science.
They exhibit the potentiality of advancement which the
further progress of photography has converted into a
reality. The negatives taken thirty years ago, when
De la Rue and Berkowski photographed the coronal
appendages of the sun during a total eclipse, taught us no
more than that their shape and position could be accu-
rately depicted for all time on a sensitised plate. It was
undoubtedly in this respect a great advance over sensa-
tional hand-drawn pictures ; but if the sensitiveness of
the plate had not improved, and especially if the film had
still to be used in a wet condition, photography would
never have advanced to such a point as to be considered
an engine, and a powerful engine, in astronomical re-
search. The same remark applies to Bond, of Harvard,
laboriously photographing a few of the brighter double
stars in the heavens, the discussion of the measures of
which showed no improvement on the micrometrical
measurements of ordinary telescopes. The practical con-
finement of photography to such bright objects as the
sun and moon, for years after the early and praiseworthy
attempts of De la Rue and Bond, proves how little, in its
May 23, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
391
earlier stages, it was thought to be a serious competitor as
an instrument of research with the largest made tele-
scopes.
Rut as soon as the dry plate enabled us to stoic up
the accumulated effects of the minutest points of light
till they could be rendered visible on the negative, it
was evident that we possessed a method of recording the
aspect of the heavens with a delicacy and minuteness
that were only limited by the mechanical difficulties of
the operator. The exertions and experiments of photo-
graphic chemists, at first undertaken with a view of
shortening the exposure, and rendering permanent very
transient effects, have supplied astronomers the means of
operating in a very different direction, who, by enor-
mously increasing the exposure, have been able to per-
ceive the traces and register the effects of constant but
very minute sources of light.
In one sense it must be remembered that the photo-
graphs taken by the astronomer are pictures of very
transient duration, and they are taken under exceptional
difficulties which do not affect the ordinary operator.
Ilis instrument and his camera are being carried on the
earth's surface with a velocity of several hundred miles
an hour, while the object he is photographing does not
partake of this motion. Consequently, he is often
several thousand miles distant at the end of his exposure
from the spot where it was commenced. This is
ordinarily expressed by the motion of the heavens, and
except the astronomer has some effectual means of over-
coming the difficulty arising from this source, and main-
taining the direction of his lens and camera unaltered in
space, it is evident that he will not be able to ensure the
light from a star constantly falling on the same spot of
his sensitised plate. Two defects would therefore
exhibit themselves on the development of the latent
image : the bright stars or objects that arc easily and
at once photographed would trace lines on the plate in-
dicating the direction of the earth’s motion on its axis,
while the fainter stars requiring long exposure to impress
their images on the film would not be visible at all. The
greater part of the motion necessary to counteract this
difficulty is given to the instrument by means of clock-
work, whose rate is so regulated as to carry the telescope
with the same velocity as the earth revolves, but in an
opposite direction. Consequently, if the telescope be
pointed to a star and the clockwork be put into action,
the instrument would theoretically remain pointed towards
that star, however long the exposure was continued. But
clockwork, however carefully made, and however inge-
niously controlled by mechanical appliances, will never
move with the perfect uniformity of the earth’s rotation.
Therefore it is necessary for the observer to attach a
telescope to his photographic apparatus, and to keep a star
seen through it accurately bisected by a wire, by slight
correcting motions given to the telescope, when lie per-
ceives that the star has moved away from the wire by the
smallest perceptible quantity. Xor is this his only diffi-
culty; for owing to atmospheric refraction, which
depends upon the star’s altitude, and which, of course,
changes during the exposure, a star will move slowly, but
perceptibly, in a manner that no clockwork can adequately
follow, and the continual adjustment or removal of this
source of error can only be effectually remedied by minute
alterations of the direction of the telescope in space. When,
therefore, a plate is taken of two, three, or four hours'
exposure, it means that an observer is all the time watch-
ing the behaviour and motion of a star in a connected
telescope, with the view of removing or nullifying such
slight deviations from regularity as the imperfections
of mechanism or the physical circumstances of refraction
necessarily introduce. For, without such precautions, and
without a very considerable amount of care and attention,
it is impossible to produce that kind of picture in which
the stars are shown on development as perfectly round,
hard, and small discs, various in size according to their
magnitudes, the brighter the star the larger the photo-
graphic image.
The method of development is at the choice of the
operator ; but since accurate measurement of the dis-
tances between these minute discs is generally required,
it is prudent to obtain as fine a granulation as possible.
Ilvdrokinonc gives generally very good results, but those
who wish to force the utmost from their plates are rather in
favour of a ferrous oxalate development.
Either of the two kinds of telescopes in use among
astronomers, namely, the reflector and the refractor, is or
can be made, available for photography. But there is this
difference. In the former case, the reflector, all the rays,
whatever be their colour or wave length, are brought to
one and the same focus, and therefore such an instrument
is immediately available. In the achromatic refractor as
hitherto applied, the rays have necessarily suffered disper-
sion in passing through the object glass, and the labour of
the optician is devoted to bringing the brighter rays of
the visible spectrum to a common focus, while the rays
about (!, in the solar spectrum, the most sensitive for
bromide of silver plates, are brought to a focus, or at least
converge to a focus, at a point necessarily at some dis-
tance from the most suitable for visual rays. Hence in a
refractor the plate is not exposed at the visual focus, and
a particular form of object glass has to be selected in order
to secure rapidity of action and precision of image.
The advantage appears, therefore, to lie on the side of
the reflector, and it was, accordingly, with those instruments
that the earliest attempts at astronomical photography on
an extended scale were conducted. When we consider
that a reflector is a simpler optical arrangement, that it is
less costly in construction, that it is available alike for all
rays of the spectrum, and can, therefore, accommodate
itself to any prepared film, it is not a little surprising that
most energetic efforts, finally crowned with success, have
been made to adapt the refracting form to the purposes of
this method of research. It is, however, a fact that, in
the past, nearly all the serious astronomical observations
have been made with refractors. The explanation of this
rather curious fact is not hard to seek, but it would lead
us too far astray to discuss the point here. The reason
for noticing it is, that it was probably felt that if photo-
graphy was to reap a wide and abundant harvest in the
future, refractors must be constructed to play the same
conspicuous part in the new astronomy as they have done
in the old. And, undoubtedly, the credit for the due
appreciation of this fact, and for taking the steps neces-
sary' to secure its accomplishment, belongs to French
ingenuity, the ablest exponents of which, in this branch,
are the brothers Henry, of the Paris Observatory. Of
the permanent success which has attended their exertions
it is too early to speak with confidence, but it must be
admitted on all hands that they have fully appreciated the
advantages to be gained, and manfully coped with the
great difficulties that barred further progress.
Jt would extend this article to an interminable length to
392
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHY OF THE MORE REFRAN-
GIBLE RAYS*
attempt to give even a catalogue of the various purposes
to which photography has been, and is being, applied in
the region of astronomical research. To some of the
more important and more interesting we shall hope to
refer on a future occasion, and show how objects of which
the largest telescopes had not revealed the presence, have
accurately depicted themselves on a sensitised film ; how
variations which the eye cannot appreciate have been
made easily visible ; how labour has been saved, and time
has been shortened. The success has been so rapid and
so marvellous in the past, that it woidd be bold to forecast
for it any ultimate failure in any direction, but there are
difficulties which have not yet been wholly overcome, and
of which it is not easy to see the solution.
It may be as well to point out some of these apparently
unavoidable drawbacks. It is evident that if a plate be
exposed for some hours in order to secure the record of
the position of the faintest stars in a given district, it is
inevitable but that the brighter stars must be over-exposed.
Indeed, it not infrequently happens that a reversion of
the negative image supervenes, and this long exposure is
attended with this inconvenience, that the size of the
image of the brighter stars becomes so large, that they are
extremely difficult to bisect with the necessary precision,
or to determine the centre of action whereat the photo-
graphic image commenced which would correspond with
the position of the star in the sky. The periphery of the
image is generally of so loose a texture that it is impos-
sible to determine this point from measures made at the
circumference. And further, considered as a picture it
is a failure, because the brightest stars appear as points in
the sky without any sensible area, and for accuracy of
reproduction the negative should reveal them equally
minute. The effect of brightness in the sky is translated
on the negative by increased area.
This defect of over-exposure is still more strikingly
shown in the photographs of bright nebula?, where it fre-
quently happens that when a plate has been exposed long
enough to secure the detail in the fainter parts, the
brighter portions show a mass of uniform density. This
difficulty is partially removed by taking exposures of vary-
ing length, in some of which all the details will have
received the proper exposure, and then constructing a
picture of the whole, from the study of its several parts.
And lastly, it may fairly be urged that a photograph has
no power of discrimination to seize the momentary and
best view of a celestial object. If the exposure be carried
on through a short but perceptible interval, the effect
registered on the sensitised film is the sum of all the vary-
ing aspects, which, owing to atmospheric tremor and mauy
other causes, the object successively presents during that
interval. The final result may be compared to the effect
which would be produced by overlaying many images of
the same object taken with a camera in minute but rapid
vibration.
West Loxdox Photographic Association. — On the 9th the
annual smoking concert took place at the Richmond Hotel,
Shepherd’s Bush Road, under the chairmanship of Dr. Low.
The programme was in itself a work of art, having been
photo-etched by Mr. Walter L. Colls from a design by J. Martin
Dickens. On the 3rd about thirty members of the Society met
at “ Jack Straw's Castle,” Hampstead, and spent an afternoon
in seeking “ bits ” in the neighbourhood of the heath. On
the 17th, twenty-eight members sought out some of the
charming scenery in the vicinity of St. George’s Hill. While
the members were waiting for their evening repast, Mr. J. D.
England exposed two whole-plate celluloid films upon them.
BY V. SCHUMANN.
Fluorite in perfect white crystals is now-a-days such a
rare miueral that it is hardly to be got, even in small
paltry pieces, and not at all in large ones. My optical
installation certainly contains a fluorite prism, but it is, in
consequence of mauy faults, so defective that its appli-
cation to the end I had in view was not to be thought of.
After having for years vainly endeavoured to obtain
such a prism as I desired, my researches on the ultra-
violet rays would have remained completely blocked, but
that I fortunately was able to obtain, though only as a
loan, a fluorite prism and lenses, both of unusual size and
purity.
With this fluorite apparatus I renewed my researches,
and was. thanks to its excellent definition, immediately
enabled to go somewhat more closely into the question
of the absorption of light by quartz.
In the first instance T confined myself to observation
of the fluorescent spectrum as shown when a plate of
uranium glass is brought into the path of the rays. When
I, during the observation, introduced a plate of quartz
between the source of lights and the slit, I found, at all
events with the thicker plates, that the brightness of the
image was visibly diminished, and by so much more to
the eye as the quartz plate was thicker. The largest
quartz plate, which was 5 c.m. in thickness, stopped the
more refrangible rays entirely. The less refrangible rays,
on the other hand, were but slightly similarly affected.
I am far from arguing that the total disappearance of the
particular spectrum region proves the total absorption of
the rays. The physiological effect stands on a different
ground from the photographic effect. The whole fluor-
escence spectrum is, however, so badly defined in com-
parison with the photographic image, that I must give
the preference to the latter, even when its sharpness leaves
much to be desired. After the somewhat crude earlier
experiment the registration of the absorption by the rays
was taken in hand. On account of its energetic action I
chose for this purpose the aluminium line No. 32. Although
the photographs — about 100 in number — that I made for
the purpose do not enable me to give an exact numerical
table of absorption, yet I can state with tolerable certainty
that films of quartz up to a few millimetres in thickness
keep back the ultra-violet rays but very little ; but on the
other hand, if of 10 m.m., and still more of 20 or 30 m.m.
in thickness, the quartz retards the exposure of the rays
at the end of the ultra-violet in a very pronounced degree.
Whether the yet more refrangible rays behave in the same
manner as the aluminium line No. 32, I am unable to say.
A circumstance to be mentioned later on led me to the
conclusion that if there is any difference it cannot be
a very considerable one.
Following these results I was able, without much diffi-
culty, to increase the permeability to light of my spectro-
graph, which was fitted up with a quartz prism and quartz
lenses. I reduced the thickness of the quartz through
which the light had to pass by replacing the lenses hitherto
used by thinner ones (2 ’2 m.m.) and by shifting the
prism so that its edge approached more nearly the centre
of the field of light of the collimator lens. In this way
the thinnest portion of the prism — that is, the margin at
the refracting angle — was made much more use of than
* Continued from page 382.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
393
May 23, 1890.1
when the prism, as is customary, stands in the middle o*
the field of light. With the spectrographic apparatus
thus remounted I was able to photograph all the rays, even
to the most refrangible, as with fluorite. It only requires
longer exposure, in order to attain to the performance of
the latter. These photographs yielded the noteworthy
result that, with a sufficient lengthening of the exposure,
quartz is not less well suited to the photography of the
less refrangible rays than is fluorite.
When I was in the fortunate position of being able to
farther prosecute my researches by means of a fluorite
apparatus, I hoped to find a quantity of new lines beyond
those which my earlier researches had discovered. The
first experiments, having this end in view, undeceived me
completely, the following ones not less, and even the last
of several hundred, carried on with increased power of the
electric spark, gave no more evidence of a fulfilment of
my desire for more light in this direction.
Beyond the wave-length 1820 there reigned with the
fluorite apparatus the same absolute darkness for the
gelatine plate as in the spectra obtained with quartz.
Whether there is really no action of light in this dark
region, or whether the bodies analysed did not yield any
rays in that place, or whether the silver molecule on the
plate so obstinately refuses to yield to rays of shorter wave-
length any image that can be developed, must provision-
ally be left undetermined. Of great influence upon the
sensitiveness of the plate appears to be — as my earlier
researches taught me — the enormous impermeability of gela-
tine to light of all rays more refrangible than the cadmium-line
No. 18. In my experiences of later date I found that, for
example, a gelatine film of only a few thousandths of a
millimetre in thickness sufficed to preveut the passage of
the whole of the spectrum beyond the cadmium line
No. 24, and that for the absorption of the last of the
aluminium lines a yet thinner film suffices. Like gelatine,
also behave collodion and gum arabic. There now remains
to me the hope that experiments with other elements — I
have it in view to search for the more refrangible rays in
the spectra of the elements that I have not yet tried —
may enable me to discover lines of shorter wave-lengths.
With the electrodes of the aforementioned metals that I
have already employed, further success may be obtained by
the use of an electric spark of greater energy than that of
the apparatus I have hitherto applied to the purpose.
Having this in view, I propose to repeat the whole of my
experiments.
Hitherto, my electrical apparatus has consisted of a
chromic acid battery of four large elements, a Ruhmkorf
indicator coil for a spark of 25 cm., and twenty Leyden jars
40 cm. in height. F or my future work I have prepared
ten Grove cells of unusual size (the platinum electrode
measures 10 by 19 cm.), a Ruhmkorf induction coil for
50 cm. spark (secondary coil 75,585 windings of about
54,000 metres in length, and 68,000 resistance) and a Ries
battery of nine Leyden jars of 40 cm. in height. Perhaps
with this more powerful apparatus I may find more lines,
as well as more refrangible ones, than in my former
observations.
I refrain, as before stated, for the present from a more
detailed description of my photographic apparatus. I
propose to furnish a complete account as soon as I have
by further experiments thoroughly proved its capability.
1 will now conclude with some details of the power on
light of my apparatus. My old spectrograph, even with
long continued exposure, and with the slit opened wide,
about £ m.in., only once gave me the aluminium line
mentioned, and then only in weak discontinuous streaks.
With the fluorite instrument an exposure of two seconds
sufficed to obtain a photograph of the before mentioned
aluminium, and that with a slit of 0‘080 m.m. opening.
We need go no further to discover the extraordinary
power of light of the later instrument.
The energy of the less refrangible rays of the ultra
violet part of the spectrum with this instrument is
so overpowering that I had never known the like. A few
minutes’ exposure sufficed to solarise many of the lines of
this position of the region. Such lines are washed out in a
completely exposed spectrum. Of all the spectra that I
have photographed, those of sodium, bismuth, and
chromium give the most powerful solarization ; with
chromium the solarisation goes to such an extent that the
whole spectrum appears as light stripes, strewed with lines
of slight intensity. The uncommon light power of my
spectrograph has been of special service to me in making
the extensive set of photographs of the region of the
spectrum that was undertaken.
A STANDARD METHOD OF DEVELOPMENT.*
BY C. H. BOTHAMLEY, F.I.C., F.C.S.
Method of Experiment. — Four well-known commercial
brands of plates were selected, of as widely different and
as representative characters as possible, viz., Wratten and
Wain wright’s Ordinary, Ilford White Label, Mawson and
Swan’s Castle, and Thomas’s Thickly Coated Landscape.
They were exposed for 30 seconds behind a Warnerke
screen at a distance of 1 metre from a standard light con-
sisting of one square centimetre of the brightest part of a
Silber Argand working at full power. It was believed
that a Warnerke screen would give results sufficiently ac-
curate and concordant for the purpose in hand, and the
concordance between the results, and the fact that there
was rarely any doubt as to which was the correct number,
justify this belief.
Development was conducted in a room which had a
practically constant temperature of 16° C. (62° F.), and
when finished the plates were rapidly rinsed, immersed
in acidified alum to arrest development, well washed, and
fixed in the usual way.
The sensitometer numbers were read off both before
and after fixing. The practice of different experi-
menters differs in this respect. Whether a number which
is just visible by reflected light before fixing will be visible
by transmitted light after fixing depends, of course, upon
the density which the deposit has acquired, and since from
a practical point of view it is efficient or printable sensi-
tiveness that we wish to measure, to read alter fixing is
perhaps the better plan. In the course of numerous and
extended series of comparative experiments in another
connection, I have found that more concordant results are
obtained by reading after fixing.
In order to eliminate as far as practicable the iutiuencc
of air on the developer, development was in several cases
conducted in dipping baths of the old pattern, the
tops of which were closed by thick, flat pieces of india-
rubber, cut to shape, and fastened down by india-rubber
bands which passed round the bath. The bath was com-
pletely filled with developing solution.
* Continued from page 370,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
3 91
[May 23, 1890.
The results are given in the table; 15 F = before lixing;
AF = after fixing.
In (a) all the plates showed slight chemical fog, and in (A),
with a longer time of action, the amount of fog was very
considerable.
Diluting the developer with an equal volume of water,
the proportions of the constituents remaining the same,
practically prevented chemical fog when development was
not prolonged (<•), but the density* in all four cases was
slightly less than in (a). With prolonged development
all the plates were badly fogged (d).
Double the amount of bromide also practically prevents
chemical fog with short development (e) and (/), although
the density in (< ) was slightly less in all four cases than
in (a). With long development, however, there was
considerable fog ( <j and A), though in all cases decidedly
less than in (A).
Continual rocking of the dishes during development as
opposed to occasional rocking (e and /), has no effect
on the final result as regards degree of sensitiveness. In
all cases the density was slightly greater with continual
rocking (/), but the gradations were distinctly better
when the dishes were only rocked three or four times in
the course of five minutes.
Development in open dishes with occasional rocking
gave the same numbers (<j and A) as development in closed
vessels, but the amount of staining was greater under the
former conditions.
The discolouration of the developer is due mainly to
the action of the air upon it, and only in a very slight
degree to its own action on the plate. Even after devel-
opment for an hour in closed vessels the liquid has only a
pale sherry colour.
With regard to time, five minutes is not quite long
enough to obtain the maximum effect with certainty. Pro-
longed development, however, tends to chemical fog,
which was strongly marked in all cases where development
was continued for an hour. The fact that the chemical
fog was greater in (</ ) than in any other case where
ammonia was used indicates that the amount of fog is a
question of time quite as much as of the concentration of
the developer.
Sodium carbonate, even in large quantity (i), acts more
slowly than ammonia, the density being lower in all four
cases than in the corresponding cases in (o) or (e). These
plates were free from chemical fog, but in (A), after pro-
longed development, the fog was very dense. Reduction
of the proportion of sodium carbonate to 10 parts in 1,000
Pa' ts Dy weight in 1,000 parts by msasure.
Time and condi' ions
of development.
T.C.L.
Castle.
W.W O.
Ilford R.
(«) Pyro 5 ; am. brom. 2 '5 ; ammonia,
n f
A F
n F
A F
B F
A F
B F
A F
NH ,.
5 minutes : open dish
10-11
10
15
14
10-11
10
15
13-14
(A) Ditto ditto
(r) Pyro 2*5 ; am. brom. 1 •25 ; ammonia
1 hour : closed vessel
10
10
15
15
10-11
10
17-18
15
1-25 •
5 minutes : open dish
10
10
15
14-15
11
10
15
14
(</) Ditto ditto
(e) Pyro 5 ; am. brom. 5 ; ammonia 2'5
2 hours : closed vessel
5 minutes : open dish :
10
10
15
15
10
9
18-19
15
(/) Ditto ditto
occasional shaking
5 minutes : open dish :
10
10
14
13-14
10
10
14
13
constant shaking
10
10
14-15
14
10
10
14
13-14
( >j ) Ditto ditto
1 hour : open dish
10
10
15
15
11
10
17-18
15
(A) Ditto ditto
1 hour : closed vessel
10
10
15
15
11
10
17-18
15
(t) Pyro 5 ; sodium carbonate 25
5 minutes: open dish
—
8
—
14
10
—
14
(k) Ditto ditto
(■i») Pyro 5 ; sod. carb. 10 ; potass.
1 hour : closed vessel
—
10
15
—
10
,
15
brom. 2 ‘5
j-hour : closed vessel
—
—
15-16
15-16
10-11
10
15
15
failed to prevent fog with long development. Addition
of potassium bromide in quantity equal to 2-5 parts in
1,000 prevented chemical fog, even when the plates
were developed for half an hour ; but the action of the
developer was slower and the density less.
In presence of sodium cardonate and absence of sul-
phite, pyrogallol solution so rapidly becomes of a v< ry
dark colour, and stains the film so badly, that if this alkali
is used in the standard developer development must
always be done in closed vessels. It is also well to bear
in mind that sodium carbonate has a considerable tendency
to produce frilling.
Temperature is well known to exert great influence on
the rate of development. If the solutions are much be-
low 15w C. (60WF.), it is with most plates almost impos-
sible to get density. According to Eder's experiments,!
however, brom-iodide plates which gave 14° when
developed for three minutes with sulpho-pyrogallol and
ammonia at 2® (35*6® F.) only gave lf>° when develop-
ment was conducted at 2Ga (79° F. ). It seems, there-
* “Density,” here and in the following paragraphs, refers to the density
generally, but more especially to the density of the highest numbers.
t Photo Corr., 1S8J p. 87.
fore, that temperature has a much greater effect on the
density of the image than on the degree of sensitiveness
indicated by the sensitometer number. It is, however,
important to fix a standard temperature at which develop-
ment shall be conducted.
It is important to note that whatever the composition of
the developer, if sufficient time was given, the maximum
sensitometer number obtained was constant for each brand
of plates. It follows that, provided that the developer is
allowed to act so long that it produces its maximum effect,
variations in its composition are without influence
on the degree of sensitiveness registered, but affect the
gradations by determining the rate at which development
bakes place. Mr. I.yonel Clark, as a result of his
elaborate experiments with developers of all kinds, has
previously arrived at the conclusion that “the action of
light is absolute : that is to say, a certain quantity will
effect a change in the haloid salts, and any substance
capable of developing will, in a greater or less time, make
this change apparent” (Phot. News, 1889, p. 832).
My own experiments afford independent confirmation of
Mr Clark's conclusion. In this result we have further
evidence of the necessity for distinguishing clearly be-
May 23, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
395
tween the three different stages of development, on which
I insisted in my recent paper at the Camera Club Confer-
ence ( Camera Club Journal. Con/. Xo.). Variations in the
composition of the developer do not limit the formation of
the primary image, but only affect the rate .at which it is
formed.
Upon the basis of these results, combined with general
experience, I recommend the following standard deve-
lopers and methods: —
I . — Standa rd Pyro-A mmonia .
5 parts pyrogallol, 5 parts ammonium-bromide, 2-5 parts
of real ammonia, NHJt in 1,000 parts by measure of the
solution.
Develop for 10 minutes in an open dish or closed
vessel, with occasional rocking, at a temperature of 15w C.
(60° F.).
II. — Standard Pyro-Soda.
5 parts of pyrogallol, 10 parts anhydrous sodium-
carbonate, NajCO.,, 2 -5 parts potassium bromide in 1,000
parts by measure of the solution.
Develop for half-an-hour in a closed vessel at a tem-
perature of 15° C. (60’ F.).
Of the two I decidedly prefer pyro-ammonia. It acts
more rapidly, and gives more uniform results with plates
of various kinds. The only drawback is the necessity for
determining the strength of the ammonia solution ; but
this operation takes very little time, and demands no more
manipulative skill than will be possessed by any pho-
tographer whose work necessitates the use of a standard
developer at all. Titration of the ammonia is little, if any,
more trouble than the drying of sodium carbonate. A
large quantity of ammonia solution can be made up at
once, for at this degree of dilution its strength does not
alter even in summer, provided that the bottle containing
it is kept in a moderately cool place.
Some brands of plates will not stand the quantities of
alkali (ammonia or sodium carbonate) recommended with-
out giving more or less chemical fog, but it may safely
be said that the quality of such plates is not of the highest
desirable standard. All the plates of best repute are
not fogged by the proposed standard developers.
Preparation and keeping of the Solutions. — The developer in
either case must be made up in two solutions, which are
mixed immediately before use. The pyrogallol should be
dissolved in distilled water, and although it may be kept
for two or three days in a well closed bottle out of contact
with all traces of ammonia fumes, it is much better that it
should be dissolved when it is wanted. This plan involves
very little trouble, and occupies only a short time.
Standard Pyro-A mmonia.
A. — Ammonia, NH, ...
Ammonium bromide ...
Water up to
B. — Pyrogallol
Water up to
5 parts
10
1,000
10
1,000
} )
) )
y y
yy
Mix in equal volumes immediately before use. It is obvi-
ous that the mixed solution will have the composition
proposed for the standard developer.
The ammonia and ammonium bromide solution will
remain unaltered for a long time if not kept in a very
warm place, and may therefore conveniently be made up
in large quantity. It is better to keep it in several bottles
of moderate size than in one large bottle, partly on the
score of convenience, partly because any accident happen-
ing to one of the bottles does not spoil the whole stock of
solution.
In making the ammonia solution we have first to calcu-
late how much of the “ Diluted Ammonia Xo. 1 ” will be
required. The titration with standard oxalic acid has
given the number of centigrammes of real ammonia in
10 c.c. of the solution, or in general terms, the parts of
ammonia by weight in 1,000 parts by measure of the solution.
Suppose that 10 c.c. of the ammonia solution required 15'4
c.c. of standard acid, then the 10 c.c. contain 15 ‘4 centi-
grammes of real ammonia, or 15-4 parts by weight in 1,000
parts of the solution by measure. We require to know
how much of the solution will be required to give us
5 parts of ammonia, the quantity contained in the standard
solution. Obviously —
5X1,000
15-4
or in general terms —
5 X 1,000
— volume required,
parts of ammonia in 1,000
— volume required.
or
centigiammes in 10 c.c.
Weigh out 10 parts of ammonium bromide into a flask
holding 1,000 parts by measure, add a small quantity of
water, and when the bromide has dissolved, add the volume
of “ Diluted Solution Xo. 1,” given by the calculation, and
dilute up to 1,000 parts.
An operator accustomed to the use of the metric system
will find no difficulty in making up the solutions. Any
one who uses English measures will find it convenient to
make up 16 ounces, i.e., 7,000 fluid grains, or 10,000
fluid grains. The former quantity requires 70 grains of
ammonium bromide and 35 grains of real ammonia, the
latter 100 grains of bromide and 50 grains of ammonia.
Measuring flasks graduated to 1,000 or 10,000 fluid grains
can readily be purchased. Grains and fluid grains only
should be used, and minims should be avoided.
Standard Pyro-Soda.
A. — Anhydrous sodium-carbonate
Potassium bromide
Water up to
B. — Pyrogallol
Water up to
20 parts
5 ,,
... 1,000
10
... 1,000
yy
yy
yy
Mix in equal volumes immediately before use.
The sodium carbonate solution is made by dissolving
the weighed quantities of the solids in water and diluting
up to 1,000 parts. It may be kept for a considerable time,
but the solution is very liable to attack and dissolve certain
kinds of glass.
Of the proposed standards it may be said —
(1) That they agree very closely in composition with
the developers used in ordinary practice.
(2) That they do not produce chemical fog on plates of
good quality when allowed to act for a time sufficient to
develop the maximum sensitometer number which they
will give.
(3) That the proportions of the constituents are simple,
the materials are easily obtained in a state of purity, and
the solutions are readily prepared.
It seems, therefore, not too much to hope that they will
meet with the favour of those whose work requires the use
of a standard developer of general applicability.
The Photogk.vphic Club. — Subject for discussion May 28,
“Photographic Fog”; June 4th, “Photo-Mechanical Pro-
cesses.’! Bank Holiday outing at Uxbridge ; train from
Paddington 10.55, Westbourne Park 10.58.
396
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
GROUPS AND GROUPING.
BY C. BRANGWIN BARNES.
The photography of groups, either family, wedding, pic-
nic, scholastic, regimental or otherwise, is a branch
business in itself, and is treated as such by some firms,
who manage to make a remunerative branch of it.
It is a great pity that the military group business should
be mainly in the hands of a foreigner ; were his business
premises in England T should not grumble, but the facts
of the matter seem to be that up till now no English
photographer has been found enterprising enough to travel
round the various military centres and photograph the men
of the regiments there stationed in companies, purely “ on
spec.”
It has been left to a Frenchman to take the necessary
risk, and from all appearances he seems to make a
good thing of it ; his operator in this country takes the
negatives and the work is finished in Paris. Although
T personally have strong objections to a foreigner
monopolising this branch of the business, I am not pre-
judiced as to his work, which I must unequivocally state
is uniformly good ; the pictures are whole-plate size, well
grouped and lighted, properly exposed, nicely retouched
and printed, enamelled, and supplied in cut mounts at, I
believe, two shillings per copy. As the average number
of copies sold from each negative would be about fifty,
this should be well worth doing, and I would here remark
that the old proverb, “Anything worth doing, is worth
doing well,” applies strongly to taking photographic
groups. If a group be well taken, every individual com-
posing the same will purchase at least one copy, so that
the better the picture, the more remunerative will it be to
the photographer.
The great question in taking a group out of doors is to
select a good light — direct front light is far too often used,
with the result that the pictures are much too flat and
poor ; a side light should always be chosen, the space to
be occupied by the group apportioned and focussed before
the subjects are grouped.
This latter operation can be performed with the aid of
one or two persons placed at the edges and centre of the
space selected, and care should be takeu in selecting just
the necessary diaphragm ; too large a stop will of course
give the edges out of focus, and at the same time should
too small a one be used it will unnecessarily lengthen the
exposure, which is an important question when the
steadiness of some thirty or forty persons has to be con-
sidered. When this part of the process has been
completed, the figures should he grouped as rapidly and
carefully as possible, due note being takeu as to the
colours of costumes, light and dark portions being so
arranged as to balance properly and make a harmonious
whole.
Grouping completed, a glance should be given at the
composition from the front of the lens, to ensure that no
one is hidden behind another, the word should be given
and the exposure made, immediately followed by a second
and perhaps a third. Nervousness and fussiness on the
part of the operator should be avoided, as it is sure to
create a lack of confidence on the part of the sitters if
exhibited. In a group of any large number, there are
sure to be one or two amateurs who will be free with
suggestions as to what you might or ought to do; these
must be quietly and at the same time politely ignored ; if
you let them see that you thoroughly understand what you
are about, and are yourself confident of a good result,
they will usually, in vulgar parlance, “dry up,” and leave
the arrangement in your own hands. Where the group is
composed of a large number of persons, I would recom-
mend that the size of picture taken should be at least
12 by 10, and whenever it can be managed, 15 by 12 ; the
larger the picture the more imposing it looks, and the
better the orders.
Groups look elegant when vignetted and mounted
in contact with bevelled glass, so-called opalines; the only
objection to this style of finish being that they look some-
what smaller than when mounted on card with a three or
four inch margin, but the increased delicacy is an advan-
tage which should outweigh the disadvantage of size.
THE PROGRESS OF THE PHOTO-MECHANICAL
PRINTING PROCESSES.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
I.
Many air improvement has been made in connection with
photo-mechanical printing processes since my last reports on
this special branch of photography were published in these
pages,* so that I think it desirable to take a brief survey
of the most important advances and successes which
deserve to be recorded.
Photo-zincography and Photo-lithography. — For taking prints
from a prepared zinc plate in the lithographic press the
bichromated albumen process is still much used in Ger-
many, because it is about twelve times as sensitive as the
asphalt method, though the latter gives finer and sharper
lines. In this process the zinc plate, previously poured
over with warm water, is coated with a thin film of bichro-
mated albumen, and, after drying, exposed beneath a nega-
tive. The zinc plate is then rolled up with transfer ink,
and placed in water, until it can be developed by means
of a pad of cotton wool. In developing, the sensitive
albumen film is sometimes rubbed rather briskly, to re-
move tone ;t this, however, causes the lines of the
image to be damaged, though only to a slight
degree. But afterwards, in etching the picture,
the etching fluid enters into the channel thus produced,
and quickly enlarges it, so that the lines damaged during
development are soon entirely broken up. This defect
may be almost entirely avoided by the following method,
recommended some time ago by F. O. Moerch. An
asphalt solution is prepared in the well-known manner,
and, after filtering, is poured over the exposed bichro-
mated albumen film. A slight degree of heat accelerates
the drying of the coating of varnish. After drying the
plate is immersed in a dish of luke-warm water from
half an hour to two hours, according to the amount of
exposure which the albumen film has had beneath the
negative. During this operation the albumen film becomes
hygroscopic, but only at the parts which have been pro-
tected from the action of light, and the asphalt coating is
loosened by this reaction. If now the film be slightly
rubbed by means of a fine pad of cotton, the lines will
come out sharply and completely. They can hardly be
damaged, because the asphalt coating, if once dry, becomes
exceedingly hard where it rests on a dry ground, whilst it
becomes brittle and friable where the base is damp.
• Sea Photographic Nkws, xxxii., page 98, 155, 197.
t It may be remembered that by the ‘‘ terminus tcchnicus ” tone or false
tone, that action ot light is understood which extends over the parts of the
film that were entirely covered by the negative, and which imparts to the
imfression a flat appearance.
May 23, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
397
A useful invention has been made by the firm of Wezel
and Nauraann, of Leipzic, who prepare zinc plates as a
substitute for lithographic stones. This is done in the
following manner: lithographic stone is dissolved in a
mixture of sulphuric and hydrochloric acid, and to the
solution is added a mixture of an asphalt solution and
resin with some good oil-soap, such as sebacylic lime.
After removing the superfluous acid by evaporation, the
residue is dried to powder, which is now a combination
of sebacylic lime and sulphate of lime. The dry powder
is then mixed with a weak solution of soda, and by a
steam injector sintered on the hot zinc plate, which
thereby receives a coating equal to that of the natural
lithographic stone. These prepared zinc plates are
treated in the same manner during the transfer process as
lithographic stones, only the etching is somewhat
modified, inasmuch as phosphoric acid with diluted gum
arabic is used instead of hydrochloric acid or aqua
fortis. More than 6,000 prints may be obtained from one
transfer, and the zinc plates are suitable for any kind of
transfer, as well as for any lithographic pen and ink or
chalk work.
An original method of photo-zincography has been
adopted by a well-known German establishment. As I
am told, it is the same process which is in use in the photo-
graphic department of the Belgian School of Civil Engineer-
ing for the reproduction of plans and maps. In this
^process, zinc of the factory of the “ Yieille Montagne,” in
Belgium, is used, which bears the numbers 8 to 10, accord-
ing to the surface of the sheets. The plate is at first
cleaned in a solution of nitric acid of 8 percent., and then
polished and washed in plenty of water. The plate is then
again placed in the nitric acid bath until it has acquired a
uniform silver-grey appearance, when it is removed, again
rubbed and thoroughly cleaned, and finally coated with a
gallic solution. In the above-mentioned establishment
this solution is prepared as follows : 75 grammes of nut-
galls are broken and dissolved in 1,500 c. c. of water.
The solution is reduced to one-third its volume bv boiling';
next it is mixed with 125 grammes of gum arabic, 25 c.c.
of hydrochloric acid, and 12 c.c. of nitric acid, and then
filtered. The zinc plate is coated with this solution by
means of a flat brush. When the coating is dry, the plate
is washed, dried, and coated with the following sensitive
solution : —
Asphalt ... ... ... ... 20 grammes
Oil of lemon ... ... ... ... 15 „
Benzine 500 c.c.
which should be filtered after solution. The exposure
necessary is from 30 to 40 minutes in the sun, and 2 to 3
hours in diffused light. The development of the plate is
effected with essence of turpentine, or, if this does not
exercise the necessary dissolving power, with a mixture of
this essence with benzine. After development, the plate
is immersed in a bath of diluted acetic acid (5 per cent.)
to remove the nut-gall and to uncover the lines of the
image. In order to transform the image into one which
can be machined like a lithographic stone, it is coated with
a solution of 100 grammes of absolute alcohol and
5 grammes of gum-lac, by means of a brush, dried, and
treated with essence of turpentine, by which the asphalt
is dissolved. By this treatment the portions of the zinc
plate beneath the lines of the image are uncovered, and
the plate can then be rolled up by the use of an aqueous
gallic solution, and printed in the well-known manner.
A rapid photo-lithographic process has of late been
| invented by M. Balagny. A gelatino-bromide plate is
I placed for a few minutes in a solution of bichromate of
potash, when it is removed, dried, and exposed beneath a
photographic negative. It is then exposed for a few
seconds to light at its back, and then thoroughly washed.
The plate is now fixed on the table of a photo -lithographic
press, rolled up with fatty ink, and printed in the customary
way. Balagny uses gelatino-bromide films, specially pre-
pared for this purpose by M. Lumiere, the gelatine coating
of which is attached to its pellicular support by a silicated
solution. In using ordinary gelatine plates, the film
would probably be pulled off in rolling up the plate. By
this process a number of photo-lithographic prints can be
procured an hour after the negative to lie reproduced has
been made.
The same process has been for several years in practical
use in the Imperial Printing Establishment at Berlin,
with the difference that the prints are not taken directly
from the negative, but that after rolling up the negative,
a transfer is made from it on to a zinc plate.
An excellent method of preserving drawings and photo-
engravings on lithographic stones, so that they may be
reproduced after a lapse of many years, has quite recently
been published by Fr. Sandtner, of Copenhagen. From
a stone bearing an engraving, or a photographic transfer,
a print is taken, with a solid black ink, on transfer paper,
and this print is at once transferred to a sheet of white
gelatine, or to parchment paper, which has been coated
with a gelatine solution. This transfer is mounted on a
drawing board, and by the aid of a flat and soft brush
covered with a solution of aniline brown, taking care that
no streaks are produced. After drying, it is coated once
more, and, when dry, again ; the printing ink is washed
off with a few drops of turpentine by means of a small pad
of cotton. The gelatine transfer is then removed from
the drawing board, when it shows a beautifully clear nega-
tive, which is perfect to the smallest details. Imperfect
transfers can be at once washed off gelatine sheets by
means of essence of turpentine, and the sheets may be used
again. Negatives of this kind can be preserved for many
years if they are varnished with a white turpentine
varnish to which some siccative has been added. The
picture side is varnished first ; then the back of the sheet.
This coating of varnish not only protects the negative from
moisture, but it prevents folds and wrinkles Prints from
such negatives are taken on transfer paper which has been
prepared, in the well-known manner, with a solution of
bichromate of potash, and the impressions are then trans-
ferred to the stone.
Photography Int Colours. — In the Photographic Globe's
editorial notes, the writer says : — “ To express an opinion
that photography in colours is impossible, or to discredit
the announcement that somebody has succeeded in it, is
something photographers ought not do. The French did not
believe in Daguerre’s success until a famous savant introduced
his discovery for him, and if anybody claims to have succeeded
in colour photography, give him a chance and listen to his
statement. It is bound to come, but whether in the form now
agitated in Austria, Germany, or on the lines of Mr. Bierstadt
of New York, it is impossible to say. Mr. Bierstadt evidently
knows more about the subject as connected with process work
than any other photographer, and an examination of some of
his work in coloured prints, the plates of which were made
with chromatic screens, equivalent to the coloured prints,
would lead one to believe that chromophotography is not far
off.
398
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
i^otcs.
The Court Journal is well advanced with its photo-
graphic intelligence. It gravely announced in a recent
issue that the Photographic Exhibition now being
organized by the London Chamber of Commerce was
opened on the previous Wednesday week. Our
contemporary evidently has got a little mixed between
photographs and the plans of the Watkin tower
which have been on view in the hall of the
Drapers’ Company, where, also, the Photographic
Exhibition will be held. Apropos of the Drapers’ Hall,
it may be said that no such gorgeous surroundings
have ever accompanied an exhibition of photographs.
Probably the hanging committee will have some
trouble in arranging the pictures so that all shall be
equally well lighted, as most of the four or five halls
are illuminated only from the sides.
The enterprising people who have been offering a
confiding public a “ two-pound pastel portrait free ” on
the condition that it shall be “framed suitably so that
the work shall show to advantage,” have not thought
it worth while to take any notice of the rather
damaging correspondence which has been published,
and which throws a light on their curious method of
doing business. Two persons have related their
experience in the Globe. This experience is identical.
Each sent a photograph, and received an answer request-
ing the remittance of ten shillings for a frame, as it
was to their “mutual interest to have the picture
framed by a first-class house.” If, the writer went on
to say, the purchaser was not perfectly satisfied in every
respect with the pastel and frame, the remaining nine
shillings need not be sent. In the two cases mentioned,
neither thought it worth while to send ten shillings for
a frame which had not been seen, and declined the
tempting offer, and the coincidence concludes by the
inability of both to get back their photographs from the
advertisers. What is wanted now to make the story
complete is the experience of some person who has
complied with the conditions of the advertisers.
Lady William Lennox, who is doing a good business
as a milliner, doubtless writes from experience when
she says, “ some women invariably hate a new gown
or bonnet the instant it has been sent home. ‘ I wish
I hadn’t bought it ; so stupid of me not to remember
that I look hideous in that colour always ’ ; or, 1 of
course, I ought to have known that these sleeves
would make me too frightful for words.’ ” This is the
experience all over of the photographer. Some ladies
invariably hate their new photographs. Perhaps they
discover (a discovery, by the way, not always made
known to the photographer) that the dress they were
photographed in does not suit them, or that some little
peculiarity in the gown has been made manifest by the
camera, and so they do not like the photograph. Not
a few regard being photographed as they regard
shopping — an occupation which demands a great variety
to be shown them before they can make up their minds.
The idea of having but a single photograph to approve,
or the reverse, is a species of Hobson’s choice which
is almost repulsive. All this makes the photographing
of some ladies a nervous undertaking, not to be
regarded lightly by the photographer.
Quite an unique collection of photographs is in
progress of arrangement at Moscow. The idea has
originated with the Baroness Klara von der Decklei',
of Tiflis, who has sent a circular letter to the beautiful
women of the world, asking them to forward their
photographs to her. These photographs will be
examined by a committee of artists, and those approved
of will be placed in an album to be entitled, “ Types of
Female Beauty of the last years of the Nineteenth
Century,” and deposited in a museum at Moscow for
preservation. All this is interesting, but one would
like to know what plan the Baroness has adopted to
find out the beautiful women. She must have names
and addresses, because a letter simply addressed, for
instance, to the most beautiful woman in London,
would have sufficient claimants to puzzle the Post Office.
The ltoyal Geographical Society has taken a step
in the right direction. It is now alive to the fact
that there are not only such persons in the world as
amateur photographers, but that now-a-days there is
scarcely a man who travels who has not a photographic
kit stowed away somewhere in his luggage. The
Council of the Society has therefore issued a request
to all the Fellows to forward copies of any photographs
they may have taken during their travels* to the map
curator of the Society. Should the donor have
purchased the photographs, lie is desired to give the
name and address of the photographer for reference.
If this idea be well supported by the numerous
travellers who belong to the Society, a valuable
collection will be accumulated.
Eppiug Forest is becoming one of the happy hunting
grounds of the amateur photographer. A stroll through
its woodland glades the other day revealed the fact
that not one, but dozens, had selected the place for
photographic study. Somebody recently complained
that when setting up his camera he was stopped by one
of the keepers, but surely this must be a mistake. The
only explanation possible is that the amateur intended
to photograph a group of friends, and that the keeper
mistook him for one of the peripatetic professionals
who, we presume, either pay for the privilege of
making a living out of the visitors, or have a licence
from the Common Council.
The occupation of the peripatetic photographer, by
the way. must have been seriously interfered with by
the amateur. Save on such places as Hampstead
Heath, Epping Forest, and Clapham Common on
popular holidays, he cannot have much to do. Even
among the working classes cameras arc becoming
common enough, and in hosts of little suburban back
gardens on Sundays they may be seen at work.
May 23, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
399
THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF ARTS, 1890.
BY THE REV. F. C. LAMBERT, M.A.
Gallery No. 3. — No. 186 (“ Onwards,” Sir John Gilbert,
R.A). Our first feeling is that the frame is too small for
the picture, and that the horse will shatter the whole thing
to atoms, and dash out the brains of the unfortunate rider.
No one cau say that there is not plenty of “go ” here.
In No. 190 (“Departing Day,” Peter Graham, R.A.)
we miss the cattle, and feel the rose-red mountain crowns
are what the street-hawkers describe as “ ’ighly coloured” ;
but, in spite of the vivid tint, the scene is a beautiful one.
No. 195 (“A Smithy," W. C. Symons). This is
coming nearer home — i.e., nearer the photographer’s
pasturage — and is well worth careful examination, both for
pose, arrangement, tint, and tone. The realities of life are
the natural food for the camera.
Two pictures by Walter .T. Shaw, No. 200 (“ Off Bolt
Head”), and 206 (“A November Day”), are such grey
and green seas as have been seen (and tried for) on many
a focussing screen.
The large and central picture of this end, No. 203
(“ Redemption of Tannhiiuser,” Frank Dicksee, A.), the
work of an Associate, put in this place of honour for the
first time, speaks for itself. It is almost superfluous to say
that it is altogether a masterpiece. Note the earnest
expressions of the youthful acolytes ; the central massing
and grouping of the “ whites,” and of the “ blacks,” at side ;
the sacerdotal, inflexible dignity of the priest — movement
of the messenger briuging the symbol of .absolution ;
sympathy of the pilgrim band ; the emotion in that one
hand of the utterly broken Tannhiiuser ; the unity through-
out, and general convergence towards the leading theme ;
breadth of treatment, and warm glow of declining day.
All go to befit it for its place of honour.
There are two portrait studies near here, pointing a
lesson to the portrait photographer— Nos. 204 (by James
Saut, R. A.) and 211 (by H. T. Wells, R.A). Note care-
fully the open lips. There are very few people who can
keep their mouth shut, either literally or metaphorically ;
fewer. still who can do this gracefully ; and still fewer when
before the lens, especially when told to “ close the lips and
look cheerful.” Therefore, do not make everyone close
his lips when before the lens, if he seldom or ever closes
them away from that cannon’s mouth.
In portraiture, note again No. 212 (by E. J. l’oynter,
R.A.), how a lovely face may be detracted from by a
distressing background.
No. 215 (“Low Tide,” Peter Graham, R.A.) pleases
one more by his figures and the bit of rock they are on,
than the rest of that picture.
In No. 224 (“ Rus in Urbe,” Briton Riviere, I!. A.) we
take to the “ collie ” rather than to the boy ; and again, in
No. 225 (“The Anxious Look-Out,” Thomas Faed, R.A.),
the faces are not to our liking — quite.
No. 234 (“Thames, Dorchester,” Vicat Cole, R.A).
Here is some fine cloud drawing, and the “swirl” of the
eddying waters is good to look upon, but the trees — a
larger stop . . . !
No. 235 (“ Portraits," W. O. Orcliardson, R.A.) contains
many a hint to the taker of groups.
Let us now consider together: No. 241 (“Outward
Bound”), No. 248 (“Stand by”), and No. 76 (“All
hands shorten sail,” in room 1, all by Frank Brangwyu).
No need to refer to catalogue to know that these three are
* Continued from page 371.
off the same palette ; almost monochrome — in cool tint
and low in tone — broad, and simply, relying on drawing
with true values, and lo ! the picture grows. In No. 76,
that unruly bucket, rolling from the lurch of the
ship, seems somewhat “too sharp” to give a satisfactory
idea of its erratic motion ; possibly its entire omission
might have been an advantage. This is a debatable
point, of course : but, anyhow, the residuum of success
goes far to support the dictum frequently attributed
to Turner, viz., “ it is the greys which make the picture.”
Now look below at No. 243 (“ Bath of Psyche,” by
Sir F. Leighton, P.R. A.), call to mind No. 166, and
see opposite, No. 310 (“The Tragic Poetess”), by the
same master, and each in their severe, yet befitting classic
frame-surroundings. Psyche, the beloved of Eros (Cupid),
and rival of Aphrodite (Venus), the personification of the
human soul purified by passion and misfortune, and so
prepared for perfect purity and happiness ; the Dawn in
search of the life-giving sun, &c. One needs such
exquisitely beautiful manifestations as these to enable the
ordinary mind to participate in the rich, boundless imagery
of ancient Greece. Such creatures — i.e., creations as these
— we at once feel are not made of ordinary human clay.
Nor are they, I take it, ever intended to be looked upon
in that light. Art is as manifold, not only as nature
herself, but also as many sided as the creatures which a
cultured imagination can conceive, or create, upon a basis
of idealised nature. And, although just for the moment
it is not easy to fully grasp the foreshortening of the left
arm of the Tragic Poetess, nevertheless the creation,
idealisation of her care-burdened beauty, the inexorable
sweetness of the face, gives one a fuller meaning to the
conception, Nemesis. The deities of classic times were a
reality then, such as but few can now realise, and those
few alone can reveal them to us. Each of the three
pictures helps one to realise that poetry is not for the car
alone. That they are not "to be thought of as made of
human clay, one has but to glance to the next frame, No.
249 (“A Jib for the New Smack,” J. C. Hook, R.A.),
where the hardy toilers of the deep are further hardened
by their toil.
In No. 258 (“The Terrace,” (4. D. Leslie, R.A.), one's
sympathy goes out towards the young lady, who, ■with
justice, might repudiate being so utterly ignored in the
title, and, as a matter of arrangement, we should have
preferred the basket of flowers being almost anywhere else
rather than where it is
No. 266 (“Brixham Trawlers,” C. Stoney) is an old
and familiar, beloved and valued, photographic friend.
No. 270 (“ The Sculptor,” J. B. Burgess, R.A.) is a fine
work. The sculptor is the sort of man who lives for his
art, and yet is not unworthy of the loving adoration of his
wife. The “Church militant" called in to pass opinion
on “ the clay ” evidently feels his responsibility concerning
Pia Mater, Alma Mater. Note the echo of the theme, the
repetition, re-duplication of the mother and child “ in the
flesh,” as well as “ in the clay,” the picture on the wall,
the subdued background and surroundings, contrast of
the old and the young, the relief of contrast in darks and
lights, general unity throughout, and the harmony of tint
and tone. Altogether, a picture to study and learn much
from.
No. 271 (“ Loch Katrine,” J. MacWhirter, A). An
instructive study for the camera-man ; shows the value of
a subordinate figure. Note its position, relative size, and
balance, the simple scale, and soft warmth of colour.
400
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
Also, in No. 279 (“ Old Sherwood ”) by the same artist.
Again, note the broad and simple treatment, true in tone
and warmth of the after-glow ; how the grouping of the
bits of “ life" all lead up to “that bob! captain of a fear-
less band.”
In No. 285 (“ Highland Tramp Crossing a Headland,”
Thomas Faed, 11. A.), although there is a feeling of the
frame being too small for the si/.e of the figures, and
rather cramping their space to move in, yet the man's face
is just simply grand — a bit of real life — a face with a history
behind it, and worth all the rest of the picture put
together.
No. 296 (Portrait, F. Goodall, R.A.), with a plain back-
ground of a rather unusual tint, which tells well against
the face, and also the black and rose-coloured silk ; and
yet, possibly, it might have been still better had the green
been of a somewhat lower tone ; perhaps the hands are not
quite satisfactory, but certainly the balance of the head is
admirable.
No. 294 (“By the Committee Boat,” W. II. Bartlett).
Boys about to shirt for swimming race. The variation of
pose is noteworthy, but we do not ever remember seeing
boys (or men) racing in bathing caps.
No. 311 (“ Grey Day at Newlyn," Anna Nordgren).
We should very much like to have seen this picture put in
a more see-able position. It is undoubtedly a carefully
wrought work, in cool, low tone, nothing “painty” or
shrill, but ably carrying out the feeling of a grey day ;
calm, sombre, quiet.
In No. 318 (Portrait), Professor Herkomer shows us his
well-known skill in portraiture, and, in No. 319 (“ Poverty
and Progress,” A. 11. Y. Titcomb), shows the power of
“reality” treated with simplicity, truth, and breadth, the
“common-place” conveying true pathos. The world is
full enough of subject ; it only wants seeing.
No. 324 (“ Frigidarium,” L. Alma-Tadema. II. A). The
interior of a Roman bath, where, at the time represented,
it was customary to begin with a Calidarium (hot bath) or
Tepidarium (tepid), and take the Frigidarium (cold)
afterwards. The cold bath was in great x-epute after
Antonius Musa recovered Augustus from a dangerous
disease by the use of it, but fell into discredit after the
death of Marcellus, which was attributed to the injudicious
use of this remedy. Of course the marble and draperies
are all that this painter has taught us to expect, yet,
nevertheless, we have seen several of his larger works
which have pleased us much more.
Of the two diploma pictures, No. 337 (“Freedom of
the Press,” J. B. Burgess, R.A.), and No. 338 (“On the
North Foreland, W. O. Orchardson, R. A.), the “ censors of
the press” will probably appeal most strongly to the photo-
graphic instinct. Several notes may here be made — in
pose, general arrangement of subject, and chiax-oscuro.
In No. 328 (“ Garden Flowers,” Marcus Stone, R.A.),
the garden steps and girlish beauty call to mind
similar pictures (and backgrounds), yet the youthful grace
of the figure, the flower of the “posie,” is restful for the
eye to dwell upon. The title, “The world went very
well” (No. 302, by John Pettie, R.A.) calls up “All in a
garden fair.”
While at this end of the room, take a distant view of
two large portrait studies — No. 269 (C. Calthrop), and
No. 292 (P. R. Morris, A.R.A). Both bx-ing to mind the
effect produced by using a too short focus lens — not
“ (wide-angle>wisely, but too well"— (revised edition).
Is this effect contributed to by being hung aloft?
PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES.*
BY THOMAS I!. DAI.I.MF.YEIt.
From the general formula deduced from the three investi-
gations above, applied to a case to find the distance of the
diaphragm and the radii of the surfaces most favourable
to the formation of a distinct image, it is found that it is
not possible to form an image perfectly distinct on a plane,
although a distinct image can be formed on a curved
spherical surface, the curvature of which is dependent on
the refractive index and the focal length ; in fact, its radius
is n F.
In these two cases (shown on black board), the diaphragm
in one case is situated behind the lens at a distance
g--1 - /.
+ M + 1
Radius R = M~1 /. Radius S L_ /
li- n — l
The other case is in the plano-convex lens, where the
distance of the diaphragm
r = oo
« = (g - 1)/.
And as the curvature of field is dependent on the
higher the refractive index, the less curved will the field
become. The effect of the diaphragm has a most im-
portant bearing on astigmatism, curvature of field, and
distortion. In connection with astigmatism, the use of
the diaphragm is the only means, in a single lens or system
of lenses, of diminishing it if it should exist. On curva-
ture of field and distortion it acts in exactly opposite
directions in single lenses or single cemented combina-
tions of more than one lens.
Take the case of the plano-convex lens above with a
small diaphragm in contact. The curvature of field here
will be very considerable, but the distortion practically
nil. Now the further the diaphragm is removed from the
lens the greater becomes the distortion, but the less the
curvature.
It will be seen that by limiting the aperture the image-
forming rays for each small pencil are closer together, and
are not interfered with by those that have shorter foci, and
would meet the lens at far greater refracting angles
if the full apei-ture were enxployed. The further the
diaphragm is removed, the flatter does the field become,
but more distortion is introduced.
(</.) Distortion. The usual and simplest manner to
describe this is to find the appearance after refraction of
a square grating when the diaphragm, supposed small, is
placed in front of the lens, and the field “ flat ” or cured of
curvature. Where the refracting angle is greatest, viz.,
furthest away from the axis, the pencils are more refracted
towards the axis than they are as they approach the axis,
the axis itself suffering no displacement. The single
rays of course may be taken as the axes of pencils. You
* Continued from p. 372.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
401
1890.]
that the pencils representing the lines be-
come convergent towards the axis. This distortion is
known as “barrel-shape" distortion. The opposite dis-
tortion, called pin-cushion, occurs if the diaphragm be
placed behind the lens. The “barrel-shape” distortion is
generally considered the less disagreeable of the two, and
hence the diaphragm is usually placed in front of the single
lenses.
Being now familiar with the effects of spherical aberra-
tion as produced by single lenses, and the general principles
adopted to eliminate these errors, we will proceed to inves-
tigate how combinations of lenses may still further and
better tend to annihilate the errors of form.
The various applications of lenses to different purposes
will indicate the most appropriate directions in which to
work to accomplish this. For very rapid lenses, such as
are used in portraiture, it is necessary to pay strict atten-
tion to the aplanatism of the central pencil, and choosing
such forms as are best suited to eliminate curvature of
field, astigmatism, and distortion, but these latter are
made subservient, in the main, to those of rapidity. When,
however, aperture may be sacrificed, we are enabled to
lay greater stress on the three latter considerations, but in
every case the skill of the optician consists in the best
compromise among the effects of aberration.
We have seen that a single glass lens can neither be
achromatic nor aplanatic for parallel rays, but we have
found that a single lens can be made achromatic by com-
bining it with another lens of different dispersive power ;
the condition for axial achromatism being merely one of
the correct relation between the focal length of the lenses
or their powers. Let us now examine the condition for
aplanatism by combination with another lens.
In the first approximation combining two lenses we
have —
1 1 1
‘’i
v2
J i «
1 +-L
ft
T +
r,
1
ft
2
»
so that if the lenses are in contact, the effect is the same
as one lens equal to the algebraical sum of the powers of
each ; if the second lens was negative, for example, we
should get —
1 _ 2 _ ! 1
*2 /. h « 5
and with any number lenses —
We have found a second approximation for a single lens
showing the aberration, and for our purposes here this
may be put under a more convenient form.
Since
1
+ 1
—
1
and *
+
i
i
i
u
V
f
r
8
x —
i /’
Let
1
u
1
~ V
(1
+ “)>
1 __
r
2(m
l
i)7
(i
+ *)»
If we
1
V
1
2/
(1
— «),
i
s
-V
l
i»7
(i
— *)»
then find the values of
a
+ -Y and
a +
_L\
2
l r
w 1
i *
v J
we obtain the second approximation in a more convenient
form after the necessary reductions, viz. :
We have at the first lens,
I = ]. — A + — l — | it±-2 *2 + 4 (m + 1)
f, J U 1) ( M — 1
+ «>, + 20 0.— 1)
This may be written
1 1 ! 1 ,
— = -f 1- “i r.
vi J i «
and on passing to the second lens
1 1 1 ,
= y
V2 f u
ax
1,1 1 , / , \ ,
= _+ — + (<*>,+ a>2)y-
7. ft
and in general-
i=I+4+i+
A ft ft
((■),+ 01., -j- .... ain) y-.
The object then for aplanatism is to make
H a> = O.
1 _ 1 +
fn u
Now this can always be done by assuming a definite ratio
between the radii of one lens and finding the ratio between
the radii of the second that shall destroy the first aberra-
tion.
Now if we call r, the radii of the first lens, and r2 s2 the
radii of the second lens, and bike a form of aplanatic com-
bination, such as the rapid rectilinear, in which both front
and back combinations are identical with cemented and
identical contracts.
Here Si and r2 are identical except in sigu, and if the
glasses chosen are suited, there is only one form for the
best correction for spherical aberration. The ratio of the
powers is a constant, and therefore by a proper substitu-
tion in the above equations, this construction becomes a
simple matter. The question evolves itself into a simple
quadratic, one root of which is usually imaginary. Should
both be imaginary, the glasses are unsuited to the purpose,
and a symmetrical system cannot obtain.
The front combination alone, with its convexity towards
the object for the oblique pencils, has a powerful coma-m,
and the back combination alone, with its concavity out-
ward, a powerful coma -out. The two in the combination
have the effect of counterbalancing one another, more or
less, according to the selection of suitable material ; the
residuum effect of aberration for the oblique pencils being
visible as astigmatism or curvature of field, but distortion
is destroyed. A proper selection of the new glasses
certainly enables improvements in both these respects with
larger apertures than was formerly possible.
For the elucidation of the possibilities of producing
combinations of large aperture suited to portrait work, at
a period, too, when rapidity was of the utmost importance,
we owe a great debt of gratitude to the prince of mathe-
matical opticians, Professor Petzval. His portrait combi-
nation, known to you all, was a triumph, and the result of
pure analytical investigation. He proved to working
opticians the possibilities of vast improvements in the
instruments then made, and also confirmed them in many
of their geometrical and practical deductions.
For your interest I have made a drawing, tracing the
course of the rays through a Petzval combination for
the oblique as well as the central pencil, and it serves to
show how perfectly the mathematical elegance — perhaps I
should say labour — brought to bear on this subject cor-
responds with the general principles then known and
402
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
worked upon for the best relation to exist between the
incidence and emergence of the various pencils to form a
distinct image.
I think I may be allowed to mention here, with pardon-
able pride, my late father’s improvements in lenses
generally since that period, and particularly with respect
to his portrait combination. It was a great advance
on that of Petzval, not only for greater covering power,
but for strict mathematical capabilities. You are well
aware that a lens that is free from spherical aberration for
parallel rays is not so for nearer objects, but becomes
what is called over-corrected for spherical aberration.
Now, in addition to better optical perfection, the form of
the back combination, by a mechanical contrivance of
separating the back flint from the crown, will correct
or counterbalance the over-correction for nearer objects
if neecssary, or may, on the other hand, be so far removed
as to introduce, according to taste, a considerable amount
of positive spherical .aberration, that was first asked
for by the late Mr. T. 11. Williams, to soften the biting
sharpness of lenses when required to produce more artistic
results.
In slower lenses, where rapidity is sacrificed, a judi-
cious selection of the powers of the elements in the
combination or combinations, and arranging their curva-
ture so that, as in the case of achromatism, the pencils
at incidence and emergence are similarly treated for every
part of the lens, so do we arrive at better perfection
of the image, until the maintenance is so perfect that
it becomes a parallel with an imaginary pinhole (without
diffraction), the aperture or intensity being as great as
possible consistent with this perfection.
To conclude, as photography for utilitarian purposes in
the sciences and commerce require our lenses to attain
the highest mathematical precision, no less does art — and
photography is rapidly gaining ground as an art — require
the optician to handle the subject in an equally intelligent
manner, to give to those instruments wider capabilities.
Photographic Society ok Great Britain. — Technical meet-
ing, Tuesday, May 27th, at 8 p.tn., 5a, Pall Mall East, when
“ Stereoscopic Work ” will be discussed.
Colonel Stuart Wortley. — We regret to have to announce
the death of Colonel Stuart Wortley, who occupied a leading
place in London photographic circles some years ago. His large
landscape photographs and his sea views, in which the camera
often faced the sun, were many of them of a highly artistic
character. Not long since he went on a voyage round the
world for the benefit of his health.
A Varnish Vehicle in Painting. — In a circular issued by the
Aston Chemical Company of Birmingham, it is stated that an
article in the Daily Teleyraph lias said : — “ The late Frank
Holl used as a vehicle, amber varnish, diluted may be with a
little nut or purified linseed oil, to make it run more freely,
and though amber varnish is found difficult to work with, it has
proved to be the only durable preparation of its kind extant.
Mr. Hcrkomer, Mr. Sant, Mr. William Hughes, and other promi-
nent painters ‘swear by amber varnish,’ and the freshness of
their productions of several years ago sufficiently testifies to the
merits of that valuable vehicle.” The circular adds that the
one great drawback to the use of a varnish vehicle in painting is
its rapid drying quality, causing the brush to drag, and pre-
venting its being worked freely ; and again, if an oil be mixed
with amber varnish, the incorporation of the two is not com-
plete enough to form a reliable stable mixture. Mr. Standage
has overcome both these drawbacks ; his medium is neither a
varnish nor a simple oil, but a peculiar combination of the purest
linseed oil with the finest quality of carefully hand-picked
amber. No other ingredient whatever enters into its composi-
tion.
THE ROYAL INSTITUTION.
Professor Meldola on “The Invisible Piiotograi’hic
Image.”
Last Friday night Professor I>. Meldola delivered a lec-
ture at the Royal Institution upon “The Invisible Photo-
graphic Image.” Dr. Edward Frankland, F.R.S., pre-
sided. Among those present were Captain W. de W.
Abney, Professor Alexander Ilerschel, Mr. Paul Water-
low, Air. Geddes, Mr. J. W. Swan, Mr. II. Trueman
Wood, Lord Rayleigh, Mr. C. Y. Boys, Mr. AValtcr
Coffin, Professor Dewar, Professor Hughes, Mr. F. Gold-
by, Dr. J. II. Gladstone, Mr. Shelford Bidwell, and Dr.
James Edmunds.
Professor Meldola began by giving an outline of the
history of photography, beginning with the photographic
design produced by Schultze in 1727. The next step was
the considerable advance made by Wedgwood, and first
made known at the Royal Institution, of spreading the
sensitive compound over a surface instead of using it in
mass ; this was done in 1802. He told how Fox Talbot, in
1835, produced photographs on paper by means of chloride
of silver, and how later on some of these photographs were
brought under the notice of the Institution by Faraday.
Sir John Ilerschel coated glass with chloride of silver by
subsidence, and one of his early photographs produced in
that way was exhibited. The discoveries of Niepce de
Chalons and Daguerre were described, and their like-
nesses, together with that of Fox Talbot, were projected
on the screen by means of the electric lantern. As to
Dr. Thomas Young’s photograph of Newton's rings, taken
in 1803, Professor Dewar by search had found on the
premises what was believed to be the appliance made by
him for producing the rings, and, as they could see, some
of the rings were distinctly visible. The lecturer spoke of
the discovery of the action of light on bichromate of
potash by Mungo Ponton, then entered into historical
details of later date.
The speaker pointed out how silver chloride becomes
discoloured under the action of light and at the same time
gives off chlorine, or, under some circumstances, hypo-
chlorous acid. Bromine acts in analagous manner under
the action of light, and silver iodide does so only when a
halogen absorbent is present. The amount of darkening
produced has no relation to the relative sensitiveness of
the three haloids ; it only means that some of the products
are more highly coloured than others. Evidently the
action is one of photo-chemical decomposition, and is not
a mechanical change. Substances which absorb the
liberated halogen accelerate the decomposition ; oxidising
substances act as retarding agents. Captain Abney has
made this his own special subject, and it is evident that a
ray of light falling on a silver haloid is doing chemical
work. The chemical nature of the coloured product
resulting from decomposition by light is still shrouded in
mystery ; all that is known is, that it contains less of the
halogen ; it is never formed except as a mere trace, mixed
with a relatively vast mass of unaltered haloid. Carey
Lea has called such products photo-salts, meaning thereby
a combination of each dark product with unchanged
haloid. He (Professor Meldola) thought that the free
metal theory of the deposit hardly holds good, because
chloride of silver will darken in the light under strong
nitric acid, and the latter acid would dissolve the dark
product if it were silver. The sub-haloid theory may be
true, but still it has not been established in such a way
as the chemist has the right to demand.
403
May 23, 1890.1 THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
The oxychoride theory is also without vigorous proof.
He had put most carefully dried silver chloride under
dried liquid hydrocarbons, and in every instance it had
darkened under the action of light ; sucli results, however,
merely raise the question, what are the kinds of products
due to the medium in which the decomposition takes place ?
When chloride of silver darkens under water, an oxy-
chloride may be formed.
Mr. Carey Lea has recently formed some beautifully
coloured compounds of silver, which he thinks to be
identical with those which form the photographic image.
In 18f>9, a committee of the British Association described
something of the same kind, and how to form red silver
chloride.
The invisible photographic image is now formed in a
minute fraction of a second, but there is good reason to
believe that it is analagous in composition to the photo-
salt, although it would be premature to say that it is
the same. It was at one time held that the invisible image
is due to a molecular and not a chemical change, an idea
which he believed to still survive. Reducing and oxidising
agents act in the same way upon the visible and upon the
invisible image, and halogen absorbents make modern
films more sensitive still, which facts tend to show that
the image is of the same nature in both cases.
Carey Lea, Eder, and Abney have shown that
mechanical pressure will produce the same effect upon
a sensitive film as that which is produced by light, but a
halogen absorbent must be present ; and, if the result of
the action of stress or light were merely mechanical, he
could not see the necessity for the presence of the halogen
absorbent. That this absorbent must be present is a fact
strongly in favour of the chemical theory of the invisible
image. The experiments of Mr. Spring, of Liege, show
that in some instances when great pressure is brought
to bear upon certain dry salts, chemical reactions are
set up; something of the same kind seems to take
place when light acts upon a silver haloid. In conclu-
sion, he thought that the scientific foundations of the
problem of the nature of the invisible image must be laid
by the chemist ; but the problem is a difficult one, because
the photo-salts of Lea are not of such a definite nature as
those with which the chemist is in the habit of dealing.
We postpone a criticism of this lecture until the full
text has been published.
Nouth Middlesex Photographic Club. — An outing of this
Club will take place on Monday, May 26th ; the members will
meet at Paddington Station at 10 a.m., and proceed to Cook-
ham and work to Maidenhead. Friends and visitors are invited
to join.
The Late Mr. W. H. Geddes. — In the course of an
obituary notice the Arbroath Guide says: — “ Mr Geddes is best
known from his connection with photography in Arbroath, and
in that connection he is known far and wide. He was the
oldest photographer in the town, and indeed it was his
brother Thomas who introduced the art into Arbroath. Mr.
Thomas Geddes had his joinery shop in North Grimsby, and
somewhere about the year 1848, while continuing to carry on
that business, he opened a photographic studio in High Street.
At that time the Daguerrotype was the common form of pho-
tography, but shortly after starting the business Mr. Geddes
began to take portraits on glass, and he continued long enough
in practice in Arbroath to introduce also the taking of photo-
graphs on prepared paper as at present. In 1851 Mr. Thomas
( Jeddes emigrated to Australia, and his brother William took
up the photographer’s business, doing good work. Since then
the business has been much developed by his sou, who will
carry it on under the same title as before.
FICTION IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
The story of a Strange Sitter, also told by an American of
Americans, lias a wholly unexpected finale, and so pos-
sesses one of the most interesting features in historical
narrative — that, namely, of surprise. It is Christmas Eve ;
the hour is within a few minutes of midnight ; outside the
closely-fastened shutters the wind is howling, driving the
blinding snow into the eyes of a few solitary wayfarers
who are luckless enough to be out of doors at such a sea-
son and at such a time. The photographer’s little parlour
is rendered still more cosy by the charms of contrast. All
is comfortable here. Cigars are lighted, fresh glasses of
toddy, with the due quantum of lemon peel, are supplied ;
chairs are drawn closer round the roaring fire — the matter
of drawing closer of chairs is de ritpieur — and the American
artist and host begins his tale, a long one, of which the
following is a short summary.
I lived at that time, says the narrator, next door to a
boarding house, which supplied me with frequent cus-
tomers. One afternoon, about a week before Christmas,
a certain Captain Adolphus Smith called to have his por-
trait taken. He was a remarkably handsome man, “cluster-
ing curls waved round his chiselled brow,” and so on. lie
was also very particular about the appearance of his neck-
tie. Two days after his visit, while I was working at his
portrait, I was started by a voice immediately behind my
chair. I turned and saw a young girl of a pale
ghastly appearance, dressed entirely in white, with a single
red rose in her bosom. “ I wish,” she said, “ for a carte-de-
visite, to be given, when finished, to Captain Smith.” In
a state of extreme excitement, I took the necessary nega-
tive without the slightest trouble. The girl remained
motionless, and in a good position. AVhen I returned with
the plate she was gone, and I should have thought the
whole matter a dream, had there not been a material
greenback, which was not there before, lying on my table.
In due time I gave the Captain his own portrait and that
of the mysterious young woman. “What ! ” he cried, in a
voice hoarse and almost inarticulate with rage, “ what is
this?” and fell to the floor in a faintingfit. It was after-
wards explained to me that the portrait Avas that of
a Miss Susan Robinson, who had fallen in love Avith the
Captain, had been treated by him Avith much unkiudness
after kindness ; had received, in short, her coup <le grace
from the Captain’s cruelty, and had died some twelve
months before she appeared in my studio. So far, says
the photographer, it seems evident that I had taken the
photograph of a ghost ; but there is more to come. Some
mouths afterwards, a lady from the boarding-house
chanced, in looking at my scrap-book, to light upon the
portrait of my strange sitter. “Ah! ’’she said, “I see
you have taken Miss Sarah Robinson.” “ Pardon me,”
said I, “Susan.” “No, no, Sarah,” replied the lady ;
“ Susan died over a year ago. This is the portrait of her
twin sister, Avho Avas staying in our boarding-house last
Christmas.” I then learnt, says the photographer,
that Miss Sarah Avas subject to epilepsy, and had been
treated Avith nitrate of silver, which, lodging in the tissues
of her skin, had imparted to it a permanent livid colour,
fully accounting for my spectral sitter's ghastly appearance.
She had probably seen the Captain enter my studio, and
being acquainted Avith the whole story of her sister's un-
happy love, had determined to give that gay soldier a
lesson. Not, I fear, to any good purpose, concludes
* Continued from page 337.
404
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
the story teller, since the last I heard of him was that he
was one of the most notorious male flirts in New York.
Another story of several pages professes to show what
may be done by a photograph. “ Only a Photograph,” is
the title, but from a photograph arises — not probably for
the first or the last time — a wedding. The reader is in-
troduced to the Picture Gallery at Antwerp, where a
visitor, Mr. Brown, has received another man’s hat in
exchange for his own, which he had left in the charge of
the proper official. Now, Mr. Brown’s hat had the
distinction of holding a lady’s photograph fastened to the
top lining. The gentleman who has received this hat for
his own sees the picture, becomes enamoured of the shadow,
and seeks the substance. For some time his efforts are
fruitless. The tale gives an amusing description of his
obtaining, after much toil, an introduction to a lady who,
alas ! though similar to his ideal, differs from it on a nearer
view in some important particulars. After numerous
difficulties, upon which the story dilates at large, he meets
with the object of his aspiration, tells her all about the
photograph, without showing it to her, and asks her advice
on the subject. The lady, who loves him at first sight,
finds her position a hard one. She is unwilling to assist
him in discovering the girl who, she naturally supposes, is
her rival. That, indeed, would be in her opinion, crowd-
ing the mourners. No : she declines to advise him.
“Will you, then, see the picture?” asks the lover.
“That would not be right,” replies the unconscious
beloved. However, being a woman — and so not entirely
devoid of curiosity — she at last consents to look at it. A
handsome case is handed to her, which she opens, and dis-
covers her own portrait. The conclusion, so far as these
two are concerned, may be confidently left to the reader’s
imagination. Only one difficulty remains for after-
consideration. How did this lady's photograph find its
way to the hat of the gentleman who visited the Picture
Gallery at Antwerp ? Mr. Brown had a sister, a friend
of this lady, and the owner of her photograph. When Mr.
Brown left his sister for Antwerp, she, wishing to remind
him of her, pinned, on the night he left, what she thought
was her own picture, in his hat. The picture was really
that of her friend. And this little mistake of Miss Brown’s
was the cause of the marriage. Nor must the photo-
grapher be forgotten, for had the portrait been a bad one,
that marriage would probably never have taken place.
In the next tale, a photograph, so far from producing a
marriage, nearly produces a divorce. The interest of this
story of a tragi-comic character turns on an error in a
number affixed to a negative. It is told by a rising photo-
grapher. who begins by numbering his negatives as people
sometimes number their cheques — with thousands for units.
The dramatis persona; arc a young man with an old and
jealous wife, and a middle-aged friend who has formerly
been a suitor for her hand. The old lady, of course, has
money. One day this former suitor comes to bid her
farewell. He is compelled, he says, in a sad and mysterious
tone, to leave England for ever. The old lady receives
this intimation with calm composure. “ You are one of
my husband’s most intimate friends,” she observes ; “ can
you tell me anything about him — I mean as to what he
does when away from me— before you go? ” “ Notliing,”
he replies; “yet stay! last Wednesday he visited a photo-
grapher’s with me. Go to that photographer’s and ask
for No. 99,999. When you obtain the unfortunate's por- 1
trait, it will explain all ” ; and without a word more he was ,
gone. The unfortunate ! Horror-struck, the wife, |
already in her imagination abandoned, visits the photo-
grapher who tells the story — the photographer indicated
by her former suitor — and asks for the fatal number. She
receives it, utters a shriek, and faints. The husband
returns home unsuspicious to his meat tea. The kettle is
boiling on the hob, the cat lies in her accustomed place on
the hearth-rug, but his wife — ah! his wife — has become a
fury. “Look,” she cries with vindictive emphasis, “at
this,” and thrusts No. 99,999 before his astonished eyes.
“ Well,” says her husband, “ what of it ? ” It is a pretty
face, in a dress very fashionable and very low cut. “ It
is,” says the wife, “ a brazen hussy, and you ought to be
ashamed of yourself.” “Why on earth should I? asks
the innocent husband ; “I never saw the woman in my
life.” * ‘ Oh, the perfidy of mankind ! ” she groans in reply,
and threatens the divorce court. At this juncture the
former suitor comes in radiant. He learns what is the
matter, and asks to see No. 99,999. “ Good gracious !
he exclaims, “ here is some mistake. No. 99,999 is the
number of my own portrait, and it has been affixed to the
portrait of — well, somebody else.” “Your sister, he
continues, turning to the lady, “had refused me, I had
determined to leave for America, and I was anxious to let
you have my own portrait which I had taken for her.
However, she and I have made it all up now, and you
must do the same.” “The mistake,” says the photo-
grapher, “was owing to the negligence of a careless boy,
whom I was unwise enough to employ as a clerk. It very
nearly made me a witness in proceedings in the Divorce
Court,
(To be continued).
PHOTOGRAPHIC MOUNTS.
The Liverpool Daily Courier of Saturday and Monday last
contains a report of a case which came before Mr. Justice
Lawrence and a social jury at the Nisi I’rius Court, Liverpool
spring assizes.
The Courier of Monday last says : — “ This was a part heard
action by Aaron Vandyke, photographer, Bold Street, to
recover damages for breach of contract from Marion and Co.,
wholesale dealers in fancy and photographic goods, London
and Paris. Mr. J. C. Bigham, Q.C., with Mr. T. S. Little
(instructed by Mr. Walter H. Cowl), appeared for the plaintiff ;
and Mr. W. R. Kennedy, Q.C., with Mr. Pickford (instructed
by Mr. Henry White, of Loudon), for the defendants. The
plaintiff purchased from the defendants, about the
end of 1886, 50,000 enamelled cabinet mounts,
which were alleged to be defective, photograplis
mounted on them exhibiting signs of streakiness after the
lapse of a few months. This, the plaintiff contended, was due
to the presence in the mounts of hyposulphites, caused by
insufficient washing during the process of manufacture. On
the other hand, the defence was that the streaks in the photo-
graphs were to be attributed to lactic acid, produced by fer-
mentation of the germs in the solution of starch used by the
plaintiff in mounting the photographs. Further evidence was
given for the defendants, among the witnesses examined being
Mr. Thomas Bolas, F.C.S., Mr. Frank Bishop, a partner in the
firm of Marion and Co., Mr. Cowan, photographic specialist,
Mr. George Taylor, Mr. W. Downey, and Mr. Mowll, photo-
graphers. After considering their verdict for three-quarters
I of an hour, the jury returned into court, the foreman announcing
1 that there was no posssibility of their agreeing. His Lordship,
however, said they must make another effort to arrive at a
definite decision. In reply to the jury the plaintiff expressed
his willingness to take the verdict of the majority, but to this
the defendants refused to assent. The jury again retired, but
as after two hours’ further deliberation they were unable to
agree, they were discharged.”
May 23, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
405
patent Intelligence.
Applications for Letters Patent.
6,607. F. Taylor, 4, Corporation Street, Manchester. “ I’hoto-
f? graphic Printing Frames.” — April 30.
6,825. J. Parkinson, S. Fawcett, and C. F. Parkinson, South
^ Regent Street, Lancaster. “ Registering Apparatus for
Photographic Exposures.” — May 3.
6,861. G. Prescott, 99, Hatton Garden, London. “Stereo-
scopic Slides.” — May 3.
6,984. H. Silberglbit, 4, Corporation Street, Manchester.
“Apparatus for Developing and Fixing Photographic Nega-
tives.”— May 6.
7,010. B. J. B. Mills, 23, Southampton Buildings, London.
“Cameras.” (Louis Lumiere, Montplaisir.) — May 6.
7,066. W. G. Tweedy, 8, Athenaeum Terrace, Plymouth.
“Actuating Photographic Shutters.” — May 7.
7,150. J. B. Brooks, 6, Livery Street, Birmingham. “Camera
Stands,” — May 8.
7,159. R. Mercer and A. J. Mercer, 128, Colmore Row,
Birmingham. “Hand Cameras." — May 8.
7,248. H. R. Home, 40, Rowan Road, Hammersmith, London.
“Photographic Shutters.” — May 9.
7,296. C. D. Ahrens, Tudor Road, Norbiton, Surrey.
“ Apparatus for the Polarisation of Light.”- — May 10.
7,411. H. M. Hastings, 54, Edith Road, West Kensington,
London. “Light-tight Developing Dish.” — May 13.
7,420. A. Coke, 2, Guldnev Road, Clifton. “Photometer.”
—May 13.
7,453. A. G. Green, C. F. Cross and E. .1. Bf.van. “A
Process for Photographing bv means of Organic Compounds.”
—May 13.
7,489. C. C. Veters, 12, Market Street, Leeds. “Cameras.”
— May 14.
7,578. \V. G. Thomson, 8, Quality Court, London. “ Photo-
graphic Roller Holders.” — May 15.
7,589. W. E. Gibb, 35 Southampton Buildings, London.
“Apparatus for Producing Photographic Pictures.” — May 15.
7,650. J. R. Gotz, 433, Strand, London. “ Photographic
Shutters.” — May 16.
Specifications Published.
9,358. June 5th, 1889.-— “The Production of Alloys of
Aluminium.” Robert Ellis Green, late of No. 41, Sand-
ringham Road, Hackney, now of No. 5, St. John's Terrace,
Southall, Merchant.
This invention relates to the production of alloys of
aluminium with any other alloy-forming metal ; its object is
to produce such alloys, not by combining metallic aluminium,
which has already been produced, with a metal, but directly
by decomposing the fluorides of aluminium or the double
fluorides of aluminium and potassium or sodium in the
presence of the metal with which it is desired to form an alloy.
To illustrate the manner of carrying out the invention, I
proceed to describe the details of the process when the object
is to form an alloy of aluminium and iron.
I use a crucible or retort or any suitable furnace which will
1 >ear the heat at which iron becomes fused ; at the lower part
of the crucible or furnace I fix a tuyfsre or inlet pipe, con-
nected to a supply of carburetted hydrogen or hydrogen gas.
I place in the crucible or furnace iron, and fluoride of aluminium,
or the double fluoride of aluminium, and sodium or potassium,
and sometimes white sand (silica) or silicate of soda, or potash,
or other compound of silicon if it be necessary ; that is to say,
that inasmuch as man}’ qualities of iron contain silicon, I am
guided by the amount of it that is contained in the iron which
I am about to use. Thus, if the iron be free from silicon,
and when desiring to produce an alloy of aluminium and iron
which shall contain one per cent, of the former, to every
100 lbs. of such iron which I put into the crucible or furnace,
I add 8 lbs. cryolite (double fluoride of aluminium and sodium),
and 35 ounces silicate of soda, or 40 ounces silicate of potash, or
32 ounces silicon disulphide, or 26 ounces of white sand, and
I lessen the quantity of silicon compound which must be placed
in the crucible or furnace in proportion to the amount of ,
silicon contained in the iron in accordance with the chemical
combining proportion.
Having made these calculations and put the necessary quali-
ties of each material into the crucible or furnace, and turned
on the supply of gas through the tuyere, I gradually raise the
temperature of the crucible or furnace till the whole contents
have become fused. I keep up this heat for about thirty
minutes, when the fluoride having decomposed, its aluminium
is absorbed by the iron and the alloy formed, and is ready to
be drawn off into moulds.
When forming alloys of aluminium with other metals I
proceed in the same manner, and use the same materials,
except that I substitute the other metal with which I wish to
alloy the aluminium in place of the iron as above.
What I claim is : —
1st. The production of alloys of aluminium in the manner
described.
2nd. The production of alloys of aluminium direct from
the fluorides of aluminium, or the double fluorides of
aluminium, aud sodium or potassium, and silica, or compounds
of silicon reacting upon each other in the presence of a metal.
10,594. July 1st, 1889. — “Shutters for Photographic
Cameras.” John Kershaw, 47, Spring Gardens, Buxton,
Derbyshire, Photographer.
The improvements which are the subject of this invention
relate to the means employed for closing the spring blind in
the shutter of a photographic camera, and the object of this
invention is to construct a shutter that may be used either as
an instantaneous shutter or as a time shutter, when an interval
of time for exposure is required in lieu of instantaneous expo-
sure.
I construct a shutter in which is a spring blind with an aper-
ture for exposure of light to the sensitive plate. By means of a
gravitation lever in combination with a ratchet wheel on the end
of liberating roller of spring blind, as described in the specifi-
cation of my invention, for which letters patent for Great
Britain were granted to me bearing date the 21st day of April,
A.D. 1885, and numbered 5,014, the spring blind in the shutter
may be closed instantaneously.
For the purpose of obtaining an interval of time for expo-
sure when instantaneous exposure is not required, I employ a
secondary lever of an angular shape in combination with the
aforesaid gravitation lever. I suspend this secondary lever to
a stud formed on a spring plate, which I attach to the side of
the shutter in proximity to the gravitation lever. I form an
angular slot or cam groove in this secondary lever, through
which I pass a stud which is attached to the gravitation lever.
On the end of the liberating roller of spring blind I attach a worm
which, when the said liberating roller is revolved by the opera-
tor in order to wind the blind on, the said roller, preparatory
to exposure, actuates a worm wheel affixed to the side of the
shutter. 1 form this worm wheel with a hole in the face
thereof, into which a stud attached to the aforesaid spring
plate is caused to enter by the action of the spring plate, when
the ratchet wheel is revolved and the before-mentioned hole
comes opposite the stud in spring plate. I attach a pawl to
the aforesaid spring plate, which engages with and prevents
rotation of the ratchet wheel affixed to the end of the blind
roller immediately the said stud enters the hole in the face
of the worm wheel, but not at any other time.
When it is required to close the spring blind instantaneously,
the herein-above-described secondary lever remains inactive,
and the spring blind in the shutter is instantaneously closed
by one compression of the air bulb which is attached to the
pneumatic tube acting on the gravitation lever ; but when it is
preferred to obtain an interval of time for exposure, the said
secondary lever, in which is a cam groove, is set at an angle
which necessitates a second compression of the air bulb in order
to close the blind or shutter, the first compression causing the
blind to open and remain open until the second compression of
the air bulb, which releases the pawl from the ratchet wheel
by the return of secondary lever to its original position, and
thus permits the spring blind to close.
To obviate concussion in checking the blind when the said
blind is required to be kept open to obtain a longer exposure,
400
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 23, 1890.
I place in the liberating roller a coil spring with a resistance
which is insufficient to neutralise the action of the spring con-
tained in the bottom or receiving roller for the blind, but is
sufficient to prevent concussion.
When it is required to give more exposure to the foreground
than to the sky, I cause the aperture in the blind to open from
the bottom of the shutter by placing the coil spring in the
receiving roller in the upper part of the shutter, by which means
the blind is caused to pass from the liberating roller contained
in the upper part of the shutter, over the tension roller at the
bottom of the shutter, and, returning upwards, is wound on the
receiving roller.
10,504. June 28th, 1889. — “Deciding the Correct Exposure
in Platinotype Printing.” Charles Robert Crawford, 40,
Monmouth Road, Bayswater, London, Gentleman.
I take a negative of a number or series of letters, or figures,
or signs, and when this negative has been duly developed and
properly treated for printing, I cover the first letter, or figure,
or sign with one layer of fine tracing paper or other suitable
material, and the second letter, or figure, or sign with two layers
of paper or material, and the third letter, or figure, or sign
with three layers of paper or material, and so on, providing as
many letters, or figures, or signs as may be desired, and cover-
ing the same, if necessary, with glass, and under this negative
so treated I place a piece of ordinary sensitised paper, enclosing
the whole in a suitable printing frame. In the same frame, or
in another by its side, I place the platinotype paper under its
negative, which has also been properly treated, and I give these
two prints the same exposure until the platinotype print has
been correctly exposed, when I note the letter, or figure, or
sign that is just visible in the first mentioned or deciding print.
The next prints are arranged for and from both the negatives
in the same way, and when the letter, or figure, or sign noted
as above is again just visible in the deciding print, the correct
exposure has again been given to the platinotype print, and in
this manner all these platinotype prints will be exactly alike
when they are finished off in the usual manner, care being
taken that the bath is kept at about the same temperature.
When the trial exposure has not been quite exactly correct, it
will be easy to make a due allowance therefor, and note a
letter, or figure, or sign before or behind that which is just
visible as aforesaid.
9,408 June 6th, 1889. — “Apparatus for Copying by Photo-
graphy.” Archibald Barr, Professor of Engineering, and
William Stroud, Professor of Physics, both of the York-
shire College, Leeds.
Our invention has reference to the copying by means of
photography of pictures, drawings, book illustrations, and the
like, more especially for cases in which it is desirable to have
the reproductions or negatives of all one size, or restricted
to a very few definite sizes. Now the object of our invention
is to provide an apparatus by means of which such copying may
be effected with ease, rapidity, and accuracy.
Such an apparatus should provide or consist of means, (1)
for properly supporting the book or picture ; and (2) for sup-
porting the camera, and adjusting the same at the proper
height and distance, and in the proper position with reference
to the picture, and also for focussing the same. One of the
most useful cases to which our invention may be applied is
the production for lecture use of lantern slides of illustrations
from books, and we shall describe our invention with
reference to such use, as this, perhaps, best illustrates and
ascertains the nature of our invention.
An apparatus constructed in accordance with our invention
consists in the first place, of a holder or support for the book.
Such holder may conveniently consist of a box-shaped frame,
open at the front, and provided at the back with two sliding
boards arranged so thatthey can be simultaneously and to an
equal extent moved towards or from a central vertical line.
The upper edges of the boards may be arranged to move in a
narrow groove in the under side of the top board of the frame
close to the back edge thereof. The lower edges of the sliding
boards may be similarly fitted to slide in grooves in the bottom
of the frame, or provided with lugs or bosses fitting on a
tubular or plain slide or guide bar. The two sliding boards
arc so connected together that they are constrained to move
simultaneously and to an equal extent towards or from the
centre vertical line (in which their inner edges would meet if
closed up). This may be effected by suitable link mechanism,
but is perhaps most conveniently carried out by providing
each sliding board at its lower end with a tapped or screwed
boss or socket, fitting respectively on opposte (i.e., the right
and left hand) side portions of a quick pitched right and left
handed screw. In this case a guide for the lower edges of the
sliding boards as above mentioned is unnecessary. The book,
opened to the page containing the illustration to be copied,
is placed with this page against the back sliding boards, which
have been opened the necessary distance so as to expose the
illustration to be copied. The opposite page of the book is
i laid on the top board of the frame at the back thereof, and
a pointer or index attached to one or other of the sliding boards
facilitates the adjustment of the boards to give the proper
opening, the size of which may have been previously ascer-
tained by measurement from the illustration. A couple of
Argand gas burners, or other source of light, placed one to-
wards each side, and towards the front of the frame, supply
j the necessary illumination for the picture ; the front of the
frame being, of course, covered in so much at each side, as to
exclude the direct light from the lens of the camera. Instead
of using artificial light, the frame may be arranged and placed
so as to expose the illustration to be copied in daylight.
The second part of our invention relates to the means for
supporting, adjusting, and focussing the camera. The camera
is supported by mechanism for adjusting it to the proper
height (to be afterwards described) from a frame or carriage
capable of being moved on a railway or longitudinal guide, so
that the centre line of the camera may be moved to and fro
in a direction at right angles to the back of the frame or book-
holder, i.e., to the illustration to be copied. An index or
pointer attached to the carriage or frame, and a scale of equal
parts fixed on the side of the railway or longitudinal guide,
enables the camera to be at once adjusted at the proper dis-
tance from the book holder to produce a negative of the
desired size.
The scale is most conveniently graduated and marked
according to the longest dimension of the picture to be copied,
so that when the camera is placed with the index opposite this
division, the image of the picture in the camera will be of the
desired effect.
The camera is supported from the carriage or frame by means
of a parallel motion, so constructed as to keep the camera in a
perfectly horizontal position both longitudinally and trans-
versely, and preferably so as to constrain the camera to move
in a vertical line, so that its up and down motion may not affect
its distance from the book-holder. Such a parallel motion
may consist of two pairs of hinged boards (or equivalent link
connections), the angular or radial movement of the one pair
being at right angles to the angular or radial movement of the
other pair. Or the two pairs may be arranged with their
angular or radial movements in the same sense or direction, in
which case a vertical guide and a connecting board or rods
joining the middle hinge is required in order to keep the
camera perfectly horizontal in a longitudinal direction. The
lower boards hinged to the carriage or frame may further be
prolonged below the point or axes at which they are hinged
to the frame or carriage, and carry a balance weight or weights
to facilitate the raising and lowering of the camera ; or a
spring may lie introduced so as to balance or partially balance
the weight of the camera. Such spring may be conveniently
introduced at the hinge connecting a pair of radial boards or
frames. A pointer attached to the camera, and a vertical scale
of equal parts fixed to the carriage or frame, facilitate the
adjustment of the camera to the proper height, a scale of
equal parts lieing also attached to the inner edge of one or both
of the sliding boards of the book-holder, for reading off the
requisite height of the camera. The movable or negative end
of the camera is provided with a pointer or index, and the
base of the camera with a scale of reciprocals for facilitating
the focussing of the camera ; the graduations and markings of
May 23, 1890.]
407
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
this scale being made to correspond with those of the scale
indicating the distance of the camera from the book-holder.
By the arrangement of scales described, if a picture, for
example, having twelve inches as its longest dirneusious is to be
reproduced, the camera is to be removed to the mark twelve on
the railway, and the back end of the camera to the mark twelve
on the base board of the camera.
• Provision may be made for securing the camera in any posi-
tion in which it may have been adjusted.
In order to facilitate the use of the apparatus for the pro-
duction of positives from negatives, provision may be made
for supporting the negative in the same position as that
described for the book-holder ; or provision may be made to
alter the position, anil a second pointer or index attached to
the camera carriage at a distance from the other equal to the
distance between the front and back of the book-holder.
To support loose drawings, photographs, pictures, we may
provide a board to which they may be fixed, such board being
furnished with a ledge or brackets at right angles thereto, so
as to rest upon the top board of the frame.
7,983. May 14 th, 1889. — “Making Lantern Slides for Copy-
ing.” Walter Griffiths, Highgate Square, Mosley Hoad,
Birmingham, Manufacturer.
My invention consists of a new and more convenient arrange-
ment for holding photographic negatives or positives — lenses
and sensitive plates for the production of lantern slides, trans-
parencies, or other copies of the aforesaid photographic nega-
tives or positives — in such a way that the instrument is always
ready fixed as regards the required sine, the required position,
and the required focus of the said photographic picture, and
without the necessity of any preparing whatever, as distin-
guished from the ordinary methods and necessities in producing
lantern slides and transparencies.
1 carry out my invention as follows : —
The focus of the lens to be used having been discovered or
determined, I prepare a tube, preferably square, and of the
length to suit the said focus. This tube may be of any suit-
able material, such as wood, metal, mill-board, or straw-board,
&e., or a combination of these materials ; as an instance I use
wood, straw-board, and cloth combined. Into one end of this
tube, which I will call the “front,” I fix a grooved frame, into
which to slide the photographic negative or other plate, and
which is thereby held in the required position.
These grooves are made to fit any one size of plate, such as
the standard photographic sizes — t>i by 4| inch, 8 1 by Cl
inch, &e.
Immediately in front of this groove I place, if required, a
second groove, into which may be inserted a ground glass, for
the better diffusion of the light passing through the negative
or photographic plate, this being often desirable.
At the opposite end of the tube, or at any required distance
up it, I fix a frame with an aperture in the centre, in which
aperture is to be placed the sensitive plate, before-mentioned,
and which may be held in position by a spring, or any of the
usual devices. Between these arrangements, at each end, I
insert a third frame in the aforesaid tube, this third frame
carrying the lens, which is to project the picture upon the
sensitive plate mentioned, and placed in the aperture men-
tioned.
I provide a double cap or lid, wdiich fits over what I call the
back end of the tube, its function being to protect the afore-
said sensitive plate from all light except that passing through
the lens mentioned, and which light contains the image from
the negative or photographic plate situated in the grooves at
the front end of the tube. Small handles, or such like, may
be placed on the lid or cap or other parts, for convenience in
handling.
I complete the apparatus ready for use by setting the afore-
mentioned frames in such relative positions that an image of
the negative or photographic plate is projected upon any sensi- '
tive plate in the back end of the tube, with all the requisite
sharpness of focus, and correct size and position, that once
being fixed, all further setting may be dispensed with, and the
instrument rendered always ready for immediate use.
10,092. June 20 th, 1889. — “ Improvements in the Construc-
tion of Lanterns.” John Farmer Chapman, of the firm of
Farmer and Chapman, of Caledonian Works, Bilston,
Staffordshire. Tin-plate Workers, and Japanners and
Wrought Iron Hollow-ware Manufacturers.
The object of this invention is to so construct the articles
that the tops and bottoms may readily be packed as detached
from the bodies, and the bodies themselves be opened out, so
that they may be packed flat-wise, or approximately so, one
upon the other, and the parts be readily put together and fixed
in place on arrival at their destination.
The inventor claims : —
1. A lantern, or lamp, or lamp head, which is similar in
character to a lantern, having the top and bottom made
separately from the other portion of the body, so that they
may be packed detached therefrom, and the sides, including
the door (or vertically divided portions of the cylindrical part
of a round lantern, lamp, or lamp head, of the character
described), hinged together with hinges of which the pins may
be used also to fix the top and bottom to the sides.
2. A lantern, or lamp, or lamp head, which is similar in
character to a lantern, having the top and bottom made
separately from the other portion of the body, so that they
may be packed detached therefrom, and the sides, including
the door, (or vertically divided portions of the cylindrical part
of a round lantern, lamp, or lamp head, of the character
described), hinged together with hinges of which the pins may
be used also to fix the top and bottom to the sides, said top
and bottom being provided respectively with turned-down and
turned-up edges (or, in the case of a round lantern, lamp, or
lamp head, of the character described, with a turned-down and
turned-up portion respectively of its edge).
3. A lantern, or lamp, or lamp head, which is similar in
character to a lantern, constructed substantially as described
with reference to drawings.
IJroccc&tngs of ^orietteg.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the weekly meeting on the 15th inst., Mr. P. Everitt
occupied the chair.
Mr. Pask passed round some silver prints showing red
patches. The prints were on paper sensitised by himself ; he had
not experienced markings of this kind before.
Mr. W. E. Dedenham thought it arose from weakness of the
silver bath.
The Hon. Secretary believed the markings to be due to the
paper having been kept in a damp place.
Mr. W. H. Prestwich said that he had several reams of albu-
menised paper toned a blue colour which he wished to
decolourise ; he found that a little nitrate of potash added
to the fixing bath had the desired effect. He enquired if the
use of the fixing bath was likely to prove detrimental to prints.
Mr. W. E. Debenham suggested the use of a chloride of
lime toning bath in preference.
The Chairman showed some sheets of blotting paper made
from cotton waste ; it was smooth, tough, and absorbent, and
well adapted for blotting off sensitised paper.
A question from the box — “ Is the stability of a print
increased by using an alum bath after fixing ? ”
Mr. W. E. Debenham believed that, it was. The results of his
experiments in this direction had been published.
The Chairman said that he had noticed that the tone of prints
turned more purple a few' days after toning, fixing, and drying.
Mr. J. S. Teape said that he had noticed the same thing.
Bristol and West of England Amateur Photographic
Association.
The monthly meeting for May was held in the Queen's Hotel
on the 2nd inst., Colonel Playfair in the chair, when an
exhibition of slides entered b}’ members for the Society’s lantern
competition took place. The slides entered were few’, com-
paratively, but made up for the most part in quality what
408
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [May 23, 1890
£>
&tt$toerg to (ftomtfpontrcntg.
was lacking in quantity. They were entered in three classes,
under the heads of landscape, architecture, and figure subjects,
and in sets of six or more, numbered. Members present
voted during the exhibition of the several lots, and the result
was declared later, Mr. E. Brightman being found ahead in all
three classes.
A special feature of the evening was the use with the lime-
light apparatus of the patent saturator, invented by A. W.
Scott, of Weston-super-Mare. For the purpose of comparison,
the ordinary mixture of oxygen and coal gas was first employed,
some slides outside the competition being passed through. On
the employment of the saturator, however, so marked a
superiority in the illumination was at once perceptible, that
all present were of opinion that the light was more than
doubled. The saturator consists of a spiral worm or perforated
tube, coiling through a cylinder packed with asbestos, or some
similar material, and soaked in gasoline previous to use. This
arrangement is encased in an outer cylindrical body of tin or
brass, having a small box in conjunction with one of its sides,
in which burns a wax night-light, which gives off just enough
heat to vaporise the gasoline about as fast as is necessary. The
tube from the oxygen cylinder being connected with the lower
end of the spiral worm, a current of oxygen gas is allowed to
pass through, and it “saturates” itself on its way with the
gasoline vapour liberated by the warmth in the interior cylinder.
Thence passing directly to the jet, it is employed precisely as
the mixed gases are in the oxyhydrogen limelight, and the
result is probably as good.
Professor Scott, the father of the inventor, conducted the
demonstration, and shortly recounted the various advantages of
the saturator.
Leicester and Leicestershire Photographic Society.
A meeting of the Society was held in the Mayor’s Parlour,
Old Town Hall, on the 14th inst., Mr. Geo. Bankart in
the chair. Two members were elected. The report of the
excursions committee was brought up, and the following
recommendations as to excursions were accepted : — June 19 —
To Stratford-on-Avon ; July 17 — Forest District; August 14 —
Miller’s Dale, half-day; September 11— Maxstoke Priory.
The medals were then presented to the successful competitors
in the print competition, held April 1 5, as follows : — Society’s
medals (for prints over whole-plate) — Silver medal, Mr. Geo.
Bankart ; bronze medal, Mr. F. Pierpoint. Past President’s
medals, presented by Mr. Geo. Bankart (for prints under whole-
plate) — Silver medal, Mr. A. W. Wilson ; bronze medal, Mr.
W. Jolliffe.
Mr. Sculthorp having resigned his position as treasurer to
the Society, the hon. sec. was requested to convey the hearty
thanks of the Society to him for his past services, and Mr.
A. W. Wilson was unanimously elected to the post.
♦
The Society of Arts conversazione will take place at the
Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, S.W., by permission
of the Trustees of the British Museum, on Friday, 27th June.
The reception by the Duke of Abercorn (Chairman) and the
members of the Council of the Society will commence at
9.0 p.m. The bands of the Grenadier Guards and the Scots
Guards will perform during the evening.
Received. — From Mr. Alfred Jubb, Huddersfield, “The
Art and Practice of Interior Photography,” by F. W. Mills.
The book is divided into two parts, the first comprising
apparatus, exposure, orthoehromatic photography, the dark
room, and various matters involved in making the negative.
Part II. treats of the various printing processes ; and this is
followed by appendices giving the tables usually inserted in
photographic manuals. The negatives from which the illus-
trations are produced were specially prepared, the author states,
to illustrate the text by examples of different styles of work.
From Wilhelm Knapp, HalleA.S., the third edition of “Anleitung
zur Photographie fur Anfanger,” edited by G. Pizzighelli. This
book for beginners consists of 200 pages, and has 101 illustra-
tions. From Messrs. F. E. Becker and Co., illustrated and
descriptive cata-logue of photographic apparatus and material ;
a book of nearly 200 pages, with a comprehensive index.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
Ad Air irtis meats and c immunisations relating to money matters, and
to the site of the paper should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper 4 Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London*
“Apples.” — Discolouration. The yellow marks on your print
seem to be caused by atmospheric sulphuration or an escape
of gas getting into the frame, for you notice that the
margin, where pressure is applied, is free from yellow stain.
The mount is not at fault, for all the covered parts are per-
fect ; neither is the starch wrong. In short, unless you
have recently been throwing down your silver residues, or
working with sulphuretted hydrogen too near the house, we
should be inclined to suppose that a leakage of coal gas, or of
foul air, had tinged the whites of your print. Try a paper
smeared with acetate of lead to discover the origin of these
foul gases, which are evidently doing you some damage at the
present time.
.1. W. M. (Stroud Green). — Wants to hear of a good white light
for copying purpose without resorting to electric illumina-
tion. Mr James Downey, of Eldon Street, South Shields,
will give you an account of the Ligroine lamp ; or, you
might enquire of Messrs. T. Fletcher and Co., of Warrington.
Lane. — Back- Numbers. If complete, or nearly so, you might
offer them for sale by advertisement. Otherwise they are
only valued as waste paper.
A. W. L. (Finsbury Park). — Slow Toning of Albumen Prints.
The method of ammonia fuming ought to meet your case,
and this would neutralise the excess of acid which causes
you so much trouble. Lens for Groups and Buildings. A
rapid rectilinear for 12 by 10 would be suitable, or a wide
angle if you are often required to work in cramped positions.
.1. A. D.— The hearing lasted three days, and many interesting
points were touched upon. The jury were unable to agree,
but we were told that the majority was in favour of a ver-
dict for the defendants.
Col. Waterhouse. — Owing to a full programme for the May
meeting, your valued communication could not be read. The
date will secure priority, although it may have to stand
over until June ; or, very likely, it may lie published in the
Journal, if taken as read.
J. E. B. — Bromide Prints and Platinotypes. 1. You may
readily distinguish between them by touching the prints
with a drop of corrosive sublimate solution, HgClj, which
has no power of acting upon platinum, whilst silver prints
of any kind would lie instantly bleached. 2. Quite true,
the price of platinum has been very considerably advanced,
being now about 54s. per ounce.
Pat. — Leather Photographs. Why select leather as the basis,
when you can so readily obtain more uniform materials or
layers on which to work ? This is going back to the earliest
and crudest phases of photography, such as practised by
Davy and Wedgwood.
Chemic. — Boride of Silver. There need be no fear of
carbon reducing boracic acid or borax in the presence of
silver ; the experiment refen ed to necessitates the employ-
ment of magnesium along with the borate of silver.
W. L. P. — We have not heard of any such forthcoming exhibi-
tion. Let us hear further particulars, if you have any
definite information.
R. B. B. (Glasgow). — Photo-Engraving. A very good account
of the photogravure process was recently given, with a
practical demonstration, at the Camera Club Conference by
Mr. W. T. Wilkinson. See the News of March 28th, p. 237.
Photo-Litho. — New Albert Transfer Paper. This was not
procurable a few weeks ago, when we had occasion to enquire
on behalf of another correspondent.
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1656. — May 30, 1890.
CONTENTS.
FAOB
Painters as Judges of Photographs 409
Glass Screens for Developing-Room Lamps 410
Curious Experiments with Light 411
Ethics of Photography and Photographers. ByJ. T. Taylor 412
High Art 413
Developers Used by Gorman Professional Photographers. By
Julius F. Sacbse 414
The Liverpool Photographic Exhibition 415
The Photographic Convention at Chester 415
Retouching in the Near Future. By Rev. F. C. Lambert 41G
r asx
The Royal Academy of Arts, 1890. By the Rev. F. C. Lambert 417
Notes 418
Fiction in Photography 420
Remarkable Novelties in Photographic Instruments 421
The Photographic 8urvey of Warwickshire 422
Notices of Books 422
Patent Intelligence 424
Correspondence 426
Proceedings of Societies 428
Answers to Correspondents 428
PAINTERS AS JUDGES OF PHOTOGRAPHS.
It has for a long time been the custom at photographic
exhibitions to invite an artist or two — sometimes more
than two — to join with photographic experts as judges
of the works sent in for competition, their province
being to examine the pictures, and to award medals or
other prizes to those which, in their opinion, are best
entitled to distinction. That they exercise this power
with honesty of purpose and with great good nature —
for time with them means money — no one can for a
moment deny, and it would, indeed, seem ungrateful
and unnecessary for anyone to raise an enquiry as to
that phase of the question. But it has more than once
been asked — not, we may say, in parenthesis, by dis-
appointed exhibitors —whether painters are qualified
judges of what a photograph should be.
At first sight, it would perhaps appear to many that
the question can be dismissed in a very easy manner.
An artist’s business is to make pictures, and surely no
one else can be a better judge of what a picture ought
to be. This would certainly be a correct way of
regarding the subject if all pictures were produced by
the same process and in the same medium ; but we
know that this is not the case, and that the means by
which a photograph is rendered possible are very dif-
ferent to those adopted by the artist, who causes
his very thoughts to grow upon the canvas.
By a long course of study, involving intense applica-
tion and observation of things around him, he has
mastered the art of creating, with a few apparently
magical strokes of his brush, images which have either
been first impressed upon his retina, or which he has
evolved out of his inner consciousness. The roughest
sketch of a skilled artist is often a masterpiece, and
will afford more pleasure to the earnest student than
will the most fiuished picture. It may be a landscape,
a seascape, or perhaps a rapidly executed study of the
human face. It is quite rough in texture, and the
lines of the brush are evident ; perhaps even the paint
stands up in ridges where the palette knife has been.
It is not intended for, nor will it bear, the closest
examination, but we must retire from it a short dis-
tance, and then we shall see how excellent it is. Now
let us try an experiment with this rough sketch in oil.
Cut a hole the size of a penny piece in a square of
cardboard, and cover it over the canvas so that only
part of the picture enclosed within that little circle is
visible. It is meaningless ; it is a patch of paint, and
nothing more. The painting, we at once acknowledge,
must be studied as a whole, and at a certain distance,
or its beauties will never unfold themselves ; but, seen
thus, we cannot fail to admire the skill of the artist,
and wonder how it is that he is able to express so much
by so little.
But how different is this picture to a photograph.
Its very roughness, which constitutes one of its chief
charms, exhibiting as it docs the power of mind over
matter, would not be even tolerable in a photograph.
Its want of detail, its lack of sharpness, would at once
condemn it in the eyes of a man whose art education
had been confined to photography. Such a man would,
however, be able to tell us that by certain devices he
could mimic these effects which are so dear to the
artist. He would say that by purposely throwing his
lens a little out of focus, so as to soften the outlines of
his picture, and by other little devices during the
printing operation, he could make his photograph
appear not unlike a painting in monochrome. He
might also truly say, that sometimes by accident — by
an error in development, for instance — a negative will
give a peculiarly soft misty effect when printed, which
will at once attract the eye of a painter. Let us
suppose that such a picture finds its way to an exhibi-
tion where an artist is among the judges. The painter
at once recognises an effect that he would fain produce
on canvas with his brush. His practised eye insensibly
clothes it with colour, and he admires it as something
which he has never before seen in a photograph. To
his mind, therefore, it stands out distinguished by an
indefinable beauty from its fellows. It more nearly
approaches in its nature a painting than anything else
410
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Mat 30, 1890.
on the walls around him, and to it, in his honest opinion
the medal ought to go. If this view be supported by
the other j udges present, who will perhaps hardly like
to set up their opinion agaiust that of an R. A., the prize
will go, not to the best photograph, but to the one which
most resembles in appearance and general treatment
a painting.
It is a recognised canon of art that a worker dealing
with a particular material shall not hide its identity,
and attempt to make it imitate something else. The
sesthetic craze of a year or two back — laughed at as it
rightly was for many of its extravagances — at least did
good in teaching people that a plain coating of honest
paint was better than graining to badly imitate some-
thing else, and that red brick is not improved by stucco
to make it appear like stone. The woodcarver must
remember that he is working with wood which by its
nature lends itself to a certain treatment, and that he
must not produce from it the solid ornament more fitted
for stone. The worker in iron must follow the path
laid down for him by Quentin Matsys and others, and
must not trespass upon the domain of Grinling Gibbons,
or attempt to reproduce the delicate filagree work of
those who work in gold, silver, or ivory. A painter in
oils would at once acknowledge the foolishness of
attempting to imitate the work of his brother in water-
colours, and the pastellist will, if he be wise, steer clear
of both, knowing that his coloured chalks have a field
all their own. We consider that the same thing should
hold good with photography. It has its own particular
merits and demerits, and it should not be bent and
tortured to resemble that which it is not, and with
which it has little in common. Those who juggle with
it, and try to get certain effects from it by purposely
putting lenses out of focus, and otherwise abusing their
apparatus, would do well to throw up photography
altogether, and take to some branch of art where the
hand can be made obedient to the eye, and where the
will rules both.
But to return to our question, “ Are painters qualified
judges of a photograph ? ” We humbly think not, and
have set forth our reasons for this opinion. At the
same time we trust that we have also made plain our
high admiration for an artist’s work. His opinion would
be invaluable were it confined to pointing out errors of
composition, or indicating faults which might have been
remedied by a more judicious position of the camera.
But if he be ignorant of the many difficulties with
which a photographer has to contend — and has not had
himself some practice with the camera — he is hardly
qualified to pronounce judgment upon a photograph
placed before him. He is, indeed, in much the
same position as a photographer would be if called to
pass judgment upon a number of paintings. The
photographer, like the artist, would be trammelled by
preconceived notions of nature which he had gathered
from his own daily practice. He would at once discard
all excellencies due to subtle contrasts of colour, for
they would be beyond his ken, and if he were called
upon to pass an opinion upon, say, one of Turner’s
pictures, he would probably assert that it was most
outrageously out of focus, and would suggest that the
artist would do well to insert in the picture the details
which were lacking.
GLASS SCREENS FOR DEVELOPING-ROOM
LAMl’S.
Fkom current literature it appears that some confusion
prevails in the minds of a considerable number of photo-
graphers as to the best kind of light to use in the
developing-room, and its relative amount of safety.
The only way out of this maze is to consider each item
upon scientific principles, and the one selected for con-
sideration now is that of the glass screens of developing-
room lamps.
Sometimes it is said that such-and-such a sample of
red or other glass is not safe, and it is condemned
accordingly, after being tested somehow, either by means
of photographic plates or by the spectroscope. The
circumstance should be borne in mind, however, thut
all transparent coloured glasses are white, or, rather,
practically colourless, if made in sufficiently thin films,
and that only as the thickness of the glass increases,
does its power of selective absorption of particular rays
of the spectrum become apparent. Hence, a sheet of
ruby or other glass which has been condemned, might
have been accepted by the person who rejected it had
he tried two thicknesses instead of one. The second
sheet of the same average ruby glass scarcely reduces
the light visually more than if it had it been a sheet
of common window glass, because the first piece cuts off
nearly all the rays it naturally absorbs, and the small
fraction remaining has alone to be cut off by the second
sheet of glass. If, however, the simple of glass be
really bad for the purpose, because it naturally freely
transmits a band of rays injurious in developing, such
rays may more or less pass through the second sheet as
well as the first. Once, in an instance in which a
photographer had, after employing his mode of testing,
rejected one sheet of red glass in favour of another, we
recommended him to try two thicknesses of the first
glass, and it proved to he better for his purpose than
the single sheet of glass which he had originallv
accepted.
In all experiments of this kind the light should be
practically constant ; that given by any particular
make of candles — which candles are turned out com-
mercially in tolerable uniformity — is near enough for
utilitarian purposes. The flame should always be at
exactly the same distance behind the screen. The man
who uses variable daylight as his source of illumination,
and then arranges his screen to make the light inside
the room fairly safe under all circumstances, is acting
against first principles, and straining his eyesight con-
siderably and unnecessarily, taking the average of a
whole year’s work.
Why is an ordinary sheet of ruby glass transparent,
and a sheet of iron opaque ? The theory is that the
molecules of the glass are all in a state of vibration,
and that waves of light of different wave-lengths beat
upon the vibrating molecules. Those waves of light
May 30, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
Ill
which coincide in time of vibration with the period of
swing of the molecules, arc absorbed by the latter, and
increase the motion of the molecules ; such increased
motion is made evident in the form of heat. The glass
grows warmer by cancelling such rays, for power is
never lost ; it can only be transformed. The waves
not of the same period as the molecules have not their
energy taken up by the latter, so pass round them, and
come out at the other side of the sheet of glass. A
sheet of iron contains atoms or molecules which
respond to all the waves of the luminous spectrum,
hence none of them pass through. Ice absorbs the
invisible rays of the sun freely, but trjnsmits the visible
rays, so whilst the former rays will gradually melt a
lens made of ice, the visible rays will pass through the
ice lens freely, and can then be made to ignite gun-
powder.
CURIOUS EXPERIMENTS WITH LIGHT.
The following is an .abbreviation of a letter from
Mr. G. M. Minchin, of the Itoyal Engineering College,
Cooper's Hill, which appeared in last week’s Nature: —
Before publishing in detail the results of many experi-
ments on the generation of electricity by the action of
light falling on certain sensitive substances, I wish to
make known a result which seems to be of a most remark-
able character.
The photo-electric cell which I employ consists of a
small glass tube, filled with an alcohol; two metallic plates
are immersed in the liquid ; each plate is connected with
a platinum wire which may either be soldered to the plate or
passed through a small hole in the plate and pinched tightly
to it ; these wires pass through the ends of the glass tube
and are sealed into it. The poles of the cell are con-
nected with the poles of a quadrant electrometer.
The plate is sensitised by a peculiar process, the mere
publication of the details of which would not enable a
reader to make it successfully. The publication of the
process is therefore reserved for a future occasion. One
plate is quite clean — not sensitive to light. The cell
is fixed vertically in a clamp. When the cell is
of the “impulsion” kind, what happens is as fol-
lows: Daylight being allowed to fall on the sensitive
plate, the spot on the scale of the electrometer
moves, and after a few seconds comes to rest, indicating
an electromotive force varying with the intensity of the
light, its amount for such diffused daylight as we have at
present (May 10) at noon being between J a volt aud J of
a volt — which is, I submit, a surprisingly great magnitude.
On the withdrawal of the light, the deflection falls, and
there are means of rapidly getting rid of the deflection
without injury to the cell. Either before or after this
deflection caused by light ceases, let a slight tap (some-
times inaudible) be given to the base or clamp in which
the cell rests, and then results a remarkable change in the
cell. It is no longer sensitive to light. The insensitive state
is indicated by a rapid return motion of the spot on the
scale ; it is merely indicated by this motion, there being no
necessary connection between this motion and the insen-
sitive state, for if the cell were now left for some time
(perhaps an hour or so) in the dark, the disturbing E. M. F.
of the cell would vanish, and there would be nothing to
tell us that the cell remains insensitive ; but that it is
really still in the insensitive state we find at once on again
exposing it to light. Another gentle tap given to the
clamp, or the stone table on which the whole apparatus
rests, will restore the sensitive state ; and so on indefinitely,
the sensitive and insensitive states following each other
aud being produced, in the case of many such cells, with
great ease.
These results I found a long time ago, and they have
been seen by, or communicated to, several scientific friends.
From the first, I maintained that the results are due to an
alteration of the molecular state of the sensitive surface,
or of the layer of contact of this surface with the liquid,
and that in one arrangement of the molecules the light
energy can be taken up electrically, while it cannot be so
taken up in the other.
I now come to the special point which is the occasion
of this communication. A few days ago I was investi-
gating the effect of static charges communicated to the
plates on the sensitive and insensitive states, and in the
course of these experiments I found that if a Voss
machine, not in any way connected with the cell or the
electrometer, was worked in the room while the cell was in
the insensitive state, the moment a spark passed between the
poles of the l oss, the insensitive state was altered to the sensitive,
whether the cell was connected with the electrometer or
not. Finally, I found that the best method of showing
the inductive effect of the spark is to connect an insulated
wire, apparently of any length, to either pole of the cell,
and to place the poles of the Voss near the wire ( a dis-
tance of several feet will do with a spark about half-an-
inch long).
If the cause to which I have assigned the change from
the photo-electrically insensitive to the photo-electrically
sensitive state of the cell is the true one, it is impossible
to avoid the speculation that impulsion results of this kind
may be very common in the economy of nature ; and that
the mode in which solar energy is taken up by plants may
be effected, and even altered in kind, by sudden electro-
magnetic disturbances. The effect of a Hertz oscillation
is, indeed, not confined to an alteration of a plate from
the insensitive to the sensitive state ; for I have cells in
which if the sensitive plate is, on exposure to light,
electrically negative to the back plate, a Hertz oscillator
at a distance will reverse the relation when the plate is
again exposed to light.
While the above communication was going through the
press, I made an experiment which renders it almost
certain that in the impulsion cells the results are due to
the formation of some oscillating layer at the surface
of the sensitive plate. Being anxious to keep the alcohol
in the cell (which in this instance was closed by a ground-
glass cap), I sealed the cell into a glass tube through the
extremities of which the wires of the cell passed. The
effect of the disturbance thus resulting was that no amount
of tapping the support of the cell would change it from
the sensitive to the insensitive state, although before
being thus treated it was sensitive to the most minute
disturbance. I suspected, however, that after some hours
the liquid and the plate would again enter into the peculiar
relation on which the impulsion results depend, and so it
turned out ; after three hours the cell could be rendered
insensitive by taps, and sensitive by the inductive effect of
a Voss machine.
♦
Eikonogen. — It will be seen, from an article by Julius F.
Sachse, quoted on page 414 of our present issue, that eikonogen
is the favourite developer with professional photographers of
Germany, whose opinions were recently asked by circular.
412
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Mat 30, 1890.
ETHICS OF PHOTOGRAPHY AND PHOTO-
GRAPHERS*
BY J. TRAILL TAYLOR.
Some are unkind enough to allege that there is no system
of ethics applicable to photographers and photography,
unless in the inverse application of the term, and they
adduce examples in favour of this negation, to some of
which I shall have occasion to allude.
Can photography lie ? it lias been asked. Can photo-
graphers lie ? or, to put it more plainly, Do photographers
lie, and why, or under what circumstances, do they lie ?
Is it necessary they should, and is it expedient that the
strict and severe Temple of Truth be erected in its
midst? In the social world strict ethics are largely
ostracised ; ethics and politeness, popularly so called and
practised, are not invariably in harmony.
In what I say, I am not supposed to have reference to
photographers as social, private individuals, but merely to
them as photographers. In itself photography is but a
plastic tool in the hands of those who know how to employ
it, and it may be made to subserve good or evil. My
present purpose will be served by pointing out certain
directions in which deviations from pure ethics are
occasionally made by those who handle the camera. In
doing so, I take no cognisance of departures from accuracy
of statement made to serve the exigencies of trade or
commerce. Deliberately false or misleading representa-
tions do not enter into the topic before me, this being
simply falsehood open and palpable. Neither do the
tradesman’s arguments to his innocent purchaser that
such and such a piece of apparatus is the thing for him to
have, because such an one uses none else, and he has
obtained a plethora of medals at exhibitions ; this is
humbug. Nor does my category include the one who
assures me a lens is ten inches in focus, while, measured
properly, instead of from the posterior end of the brass
work, it is twelve ; this is ignorance. Nor the tramp who,
pointing his camera at a house under pretence of photo-
graphing it, secures the money in advance, without having
any intention of developing his plate, if plate there was in
his camera ; this is fraud. Nor the young Daguerreo-
typist who, having succeeded in taking one or two fairly
good Daguerreotypes, handed his camera over to a more
experienced man, after having, unseen, smeared iodine on
the shutter of the dark slide, by which his rival failed in
toto in producing a picture ; this is trickery, and, under
some circumstances, pardonable. Nor the one who rubs
powdered nitrate of silver inside the front of the dude’s
hat at a picnic with ladies when the thermometer is in the
nineties; this is mischief. These, and numerous examples
of like nature of departure from the straight path which
might be adduced, scarcely come under the heading of mal
ethics, although they are not ethical. And yet the line of
demarcation is hard to draw.
Nice distinctions may even be drawn between artifice,
deception, fraud, charlatanry, empiricism, delusion, white
lies, and black lies, but they all belong to the same family.
Photography is in itself so absolutely truthful that it is
accepted as evidence of realism. The camera merely
depicts what is placed before it. But realism is not neces-
sarily, and does not necessarily convey, truth. The large
lump of coal placed on a cloth-covered table with a few
miniature shrubs and twigs around its base, and then photo-
graphed on a large scale to do duty as a scene in the Rocky
* A lesturette at the London and Provincial Photographic Association.
Mountains, or anywhere else, cannot be said to be in
accord with ethics if such be done with intent to deceive,
even although the trick cannot be discovered by the
experienced geologist who examines the perfect strata
through his magnifying glass.
A point of sight may be selected for a view which, when
aided by a lens of short focus, shall give as a result a photo-
graph true as a piece of realism, but conveying the false
idea that the duck-pond in the foreground is a large lake,
and that the shrubs or trees of six foot height almost rival
the giants in the Maraposa Grove in California. A realistic
photograph, while thus geometrically true, may not only
fail in conveying a truthful expression, but one the every
reverse.
Stepping from nature outside to inside the studio, who
has not heard of the two sets of solid furniture — one being
in miniature, to be had in use solely when men of Zaccheus-
like stature desire that their circumscribed longitude should
be elevated into that of mid-stature by contrast with the
surrounding tables and chairs. I touch only lightly upon
one of the most prevalent of mal ethics in the studio,
because it is the outcome of the ignorance of the photo-
grapher ; I refer to the two entirely different kinds of
perspective to be so often found in one picture — that of
the background and side scenes on the one hand, and that
of the figure on the other. In a portrait — a standing
figure of a lady full length— which was seemingly much
admired at a recent exhibition, the point of view of the
background was below the knee, that of the figure itself
was .about opposite her eyes. But some background
painters and photographic artists so-called do not appear
to think that perspective has anything to do with their art.
The amateur who takes his portraits out of doors with
natural surroundings never encounters this anomaly ; the
perspective of his figure and background necessarily har-
monise, and is it to be wondered at if the educated artist
or observer of nature is found to give preference to one
over the other ?
Artists seem to arrogate to themselves a prescriptive
right to improve upon nature. 1 have heard the late Sir
George Harvey, President Royal Scottish Society
Academy, speak in approving terms of a local artist who
always enlarged the eyes of his subjects when working
them up by the brush or pencil ; photographs, in the
estimation of this gentleman, always made the eyes too
small — for artistic taste, I presume. But {esthetic truth
and ethical truth are not the same tiling, although there
are cases in which one may with advantage be made sub-
servient to the other. I heard a famous New York photo-
grapher giving directions to his managing printer, who
was one morning submitting to him rough proofs from the
negatives of the preceding day. 4 4 Take a big slice oft that
lady’s belly (indicating with a pencil) and place it on
behind. It will much improve her appearance.” And it
did so. “ But that is not like ,” I remarked of a
new portrait of a famous actress, since extensively pub-
lished ; 44 she is rather sour and scraggy, while this one is
amiable and somewhat fleshy.” “Oh,” remarked the
photographer, “a retoucher has been working a whole
day on that face in order to obtain this effect. She doesn’t
care whether it is a good likeness or not, so long as we
make her good looking.
Retouchers! O, what ethical sins have you not to
answer for ! You supply all the crudities and deficiencies
of nature. At your magic touch strabismus vanishes.
Where nature has been unkind in the matter of eyes, ’tis
May 30, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
413
yours to supply the required number, and convert miner
cular into binocular vision ; to round the sharp angles of
the features by the transference of adipose tissue from
where it is not wanted to where it is needed ; to fill up the
furrows dug by time ; to enact the chiropodist upon facial
excrescences ; and the dentist, in case the taker of the
negative has forgotten to stuff cotton wadding pads inside
the mouth to ensure a pleasant rotundity to the wan
cheeks — a thing a New York photographer never omits.
You do not believe that the man or woman exists who, in
his or her heart, endorses the sentiment of Oliver Crom-
well about being painted with his wrinkles and warts.
And you are right. They may assert as much as they
like, but you well know such phrase and fact do not coin-
cide, and accordingly you dress your ewe in lamb fashion,
taking shelter behind Luther’s dictum, that a great artist
portrays a man as he should be, and not necessarily as he is.
Perhaps it is in the West States of America where re-
touching has its highest development. A reporter in
California interviewed a photographer and conversed on
retouching.
“What do you think of that? ” said the artist, showing
a cabinet portrait. It was simply the likeness of a mild,
motherly, middle-aged lady, and the reporter said he
could see nothing remarkable about it.
“ I suppose not. How do you like this ? ”
“Good Lord, what a fury ! ” exclaimed the reporter,
as he looked on the deeply seamed face of an old woman,
with lowering brows, thick, cruel lips, .and a brutal chin.
“ Same subject,” explained the photographer, putting
the two pictures side by side. “ Shows what retouching
can do.”
“ But the retouched one does not look a bit like the
woman who sat for it.”
‘ ‘ Of course not ; that's the beauty of it. The old
woman wouldn't have taken the picture if it did. A
photographer these days has to be barber, surgeon, and
dentist. Look at this.”
It presented a man with a bald head and a twisted eye.
In the finished picture the eye was straight and the bald-
ness gone.
“For friends of his youth in the West, you know.
Here’s another.”
This time a young man with two of his upper teeth
protruding repulsively was shown. The tusks had been
extracted by the artist's brush.
“ Corresponding with a Boston girl he had never seen,
but that he wanted to come out and marry him.”
The reporter looked over piles of negatives, and com-
pared them with the pictures made up from them, and
sent out unblushingly by the sitters as likenesses. Plain
women were made pretty, pretty ones given beauty, and
in all cases the looks had been vastly improved. No
woman seems to want to have herself shown just as she is,
and the men are quite as vain. Very young men are
frequently amazed at finding how much heavier their
moustaches and downy siders are when photographed,
rhe camera makes lean women plump and fat ones slimmer,
knocks off ten years at least from the age of the mature,
and in ninety cases out of a hundred lies shamelessly.
Of course, it is the camera, not the photographer, who is
to blame.
(To be continued.)
The Photographic Clcb. — The subject for discussion on
June 4th will be “ rhoto- Mechanical Processes.”
HIGH ART.
The following, from last week’s Referee, is not altogether com-
plimentary to the photographic profession : —
They coaxed me up a hundred stairs,
They lured me to their den,
For me they laid their artful snares —
Those photographing men.
They dragged me to a room of glass
Beneath a blazing sun,
1 thought I should have died. Alas !
I’m nearly fourteen stone !
They saw their victim pant and blow,
They heard him cry, “ I melt ! ”
But ne’er a one for all my woe
One grain of pity felt.
They seized my head and screwed it round,
And fixed it in a vice,
And simpered when they had me bound,
‘ ‘ That pose is very nice !
“ Look up— look up, and wear a smile,
Look pleasant, if you please.
You must keep still a little while ;
Just straighten up your knees.”
Tis thus they jeer and jibe at me
As, faint and hot, I try
An inch before my nose to see
With sunstroke in my eye.
I think of all the bitter wrongs
My later life has known ;
I writhe beneath Fate’s cruel thongs,
I knit my brow and groan.
And still, with many a smile and smirk,
The artist trips about,
And gives my chin a little jerk
And sticks my elbows out.
Ye gods, am I a grinning ape
To pose and posture thus ?
Am I a man in human shape,
Or turkey that they truss ?
My head is free ; with fiendish mirth
I raise a vengeful hand,
And dash the camera to earth,
And fell the iron stand.
I take the artist by the throat
And pin him to the wall,
And jerk his chin and tear his coat,
And hold his head in thrall.
I bid the trembling victim smile,
I cry, “ Be gay and laugh,
And in the very latest style
I'll take your photograph ! ”
I twisted tili I broke his neck,
I baked him in the sun ;
I left the room an awful wreck,
And then the deed was done.
They held an inquest on the bits ;
Ye photographing crew,
Before to you the writer sits
Just read that inquest through.
The opening soiree of the City Photographic Exhibition,
under the auspices of the Photographic Trades Section of the
London Chamber of Commerce, will take place in the Drapers’
Hall, Throgmorton Street, this evening, at nine o’clock.
One of Mr. W. M. Ashman’s photographs — which he showed
us yesterday — of the interior of Bath Abbey, has a large stained-
glass window in front of the lens rendered in all its details with
unusual perfection and sharpness, and this without under-
exposing the interior of the building ; it forms a good sample
of this difficult class of work.
414
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 30, 1890.
DEVELOPERS USED BY GERMAN PROFESSIONAL
PHOTOGRAPHERS*
BY JULIUS F. SACHSE.
Early in the present year the publishers of Liesegang's
Photograpliischcs Archiv, in Dusseldorf, Germany, prepared
a circular to be sent to the most celebrated professional
photographers within the German realm, for the purpose
of thoroughly settling the question as to what special
developer, formulated for gelatine dry plates, was in most
general use with professional artists who make portraiture
their speciality, further asking information how their
special formula works in every-day practice. As a test
whether the scheme would meet with a favourable recep-
tion, and bring forth free responses, it was concluded to
send out at first but half a hundred of these circulars as a
feeler. To the surprise of the projectors of the scheme,
twenty-eight replies were received within a few days.
The editor of the Archiv prefixes the list with the
explanation that they do not wish it to appear as if they
believed the success of photographic portraiture to depend
solely upon the composition of the developer. AVe repro-
duce the list entire for the benefit of our readers, both
amateur and professional, that they may gather such facts
and hints as have proved of value in the practice and
experience of the most successful artists in the far-off
Fatherland.
The circular contained the following four leading
questions, viz. : — (1) AY hat developer do you use in your
portrait studio? (2) AVhat special properties or quali-
fications do you claim for your developer? (3) Give
combination of solutions used in cases of normal ex-
posure ? (4) Do you use a preliminary bath (Vorbad),
and what of ?
Herr von Ayx, Mainz. — Developer — Eikonogen. Pro-
perties— The brilliant action on the half-tones and high-
fights during reduction, with proper manipulation. Com-
position (No. 1). — Sulphite of soda, 200 g. ; distilled
water, 3,000 g. ; eikonogen, 50 g. First pulverize the
sulphite, then dissolve in the water ; to this solution add
the eikonogen in crystals ; place the whole in a water bath
until the latter is wholly dissolved. (No. 2). — Carbonate
of soda, 150 g. ; distilled water, 1,000 g. For use, 3 parts
No. 1, 2 parts No. 2. No preliminary bath.
Carl Borntrager, Hofphotograph Wiesbaden. — Developer
— Eikonogen. Properties — It permits of a shorter ex-
posure than any other developer known to me ; works out
fine detail, neither monotone nor too hard, with great
rapidity. Composition (A) — Distilled water, 1,500 c.crn. ;
sulphite of soda, c.p., 100 g. ; eikonogen, 50 g. Dissolve
the sulphite and eikonogen in hot water. Keep this
solution in a dark bottle with ground-glass stopper, in
dark closet away from all contact with ammonia or acids.
(B) — Distilled water, 500 c.cm. ; carbonate of potassium,
c.p., 75 g. For use, three parts A to one part B
immediately before using. AArhen plates are developed
far enough, wash well under tap, then place in 5 per cent,
alum bath for one minute, again wash thoroughly, and fix
in bath : AVater, 800 c.cm. ; hypo, 200 g. ; bicarbonate
of soda, c.p., 40 g. No accelerator.
Heinrich Fritz, IIofphotograph-Greiz. — Developer —
Eikonogen. Properties — Advantages over the oxalate
developer formerly in exclusive use : 1. Shortening time
• A digest of the useful information about developers, collected by the
Dusseldorf publishers, appeared recently in these pages in a letter from our
German correspondent. The present article of Mr. Sachse, from the
American Journal of Photography, contains the details. — Ed.
of exposure by one-half, so that slower and better plates
can be used ; 2. Use of developer until exhausted, there-
fore much cheaper and convenient. Composition —
Sulphite of soda, 100 g. ; carbonate of potassium, 40 g. ;
eikonogen, 20 g. ; to which is added a few drops of hypo,
1 : 50. (Note in the original the volume of water is not
given.) By addition of water and bromide of potassium,
over-exposed plates may be easily corrected. Accelerator
— Unnecessary with above developer.
Arno Cersten, Hofphotograph, Altenburg 1 S. — Deve-
loper— At present only eikonogen (since six months),
prior to that, oxalate and iron exclusively. Properties
— The local water supply is strongly impregnated with
limestone, and great difficulty was experienced in clean-
ing the hands and utensils while iron was used ; therefore,
eikonogen is now exclusively used. In addition, I value
the rapidity of development, the softness and clearness
of the shadows, in spite of which they still have enough
strength. I use my own dry plates, made after Ober-
netter’s modified formula. Composition — 1 rub 12 g.
eikonogen crystals to powder in a small wedgewood
mortar ; pour this into a funnel ; after closing the
opening with cotton, 1 then add 50 g. pulverized sulphite
of soda, then fill the funnel with 750 c.cm. distilled water;
stir with glass rod until filtered. To this add 8-10 c.cm.
concentrated solution of bisulphite of soda, at 38° I?.,
which almost destroys the colour of the filtered solution.
Then pour 38 g. of calcined soda (c. p.) in the same
funnel with 250 c.cm. of distilled water ; filter when
dissolved ; then pour both solutions together, and shake
well. Thus I make 1 litre of developer in 15 minutes
without using boiling water. Accelerator — Not necessary
in normal cases ; when necessary, take 1 part hypo to
3-10,000 parts of water ; soak the plate a minute, then
develop without washing. Fixing Bath — 1 part hypo to
5 parts water ; to 3 litres of this solution add 50 c.cm. of
concentrated solution of bisulphite of soda.
■Julius Schaar, Dusseldorf. — Developer — Eikonogen.
Properties — Quick and strong action ; the negative being
very soft yet strong, without having to resort to intensifica-
tion ; with attentive manipulation the picture appears in
three to four minutes beautifully modulated. Composi-
tion (A) — Distilled water, 1 litre ; sulphite of soda, 10 g. ;
eikonogen, 10 g. (B) Carbonate of potasssium, 150 g. ;
distilled water, 1 litre ; hypo, 4 g. Take equal parts.
L. Springer, Hirshberg in Schlesien. — Developer — Dur-
ing the past six months eikonogen, with great advantage,
in place of all others. Properties — Magnificent, clear,
yet strong negatives, when developed until the deepest
shadows show through ; results not to be obtained with
any other developer. Composition (A) — Sulphite of soda,
200 g. ; distilled water. 3,000 g. ; eikonogen, 50 g. (B)
Carbonate of soda (cr.), 150 g. ; distilled water, 1,000 g.
For use, A, 1 part; B, 2 parts. Fixing bath — Hypo,
250 g. ; sulphite of soda, 50 g. ; water, l,000g. ; sulphuric
acid, 8-10 g. In developing a plate, old developer is first
used until the image appears ; this is then poured off and
completed with fresh developer until the negative is very
strong, as the negative is apt to reduce in the fixiug bath.
In copying poor photographs t lie oxalate developer is used,
as the eikonogen brings out the grain of the paper in too
great relief. This fact in itself is a proof that greater
results are obtained with eikonogen than any other
developer.
I. II. Voight, Hofphotograph Homburg, v.d. Ilbhe. —
Developer — Eikonogen for negatives as well as contact
May 30, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
415
prints .and enlargements on chloride and bromide paper.
Properties — the image appears rapidly, and develops
gradually until the required density is reached, when it
may be immediately checked. If proper attention is paid
to the work, neither intensification nor reduction is neces-
sary with my developer. A clear picture is obtained, per-
fect in all detail. Water, 500 g. ; sulphite of soda, 25 g. ;
carbonate of potassa, 5 g. ; carbonate of soda, 15 g. ;
eikonogen, 5 g. Eikouogen must be pulverised in a
mortar to thoroughly dissolve.
P. Barth, in Elberfeld. — Developer — Iron oxalate.
Properties — Simplicity, greater capabilities of development,
especially in the case where a large number of plates are
to be developed consecutively. Composition — Saturated
solution, .lust so much iron is to be added to the oxalate
as the latter will stand without becoming turbid. 1 wish
to mention it is, on the whole, immaterial what developer
is used. The whole difficulty in portrait photography
consists in properly lighting the subject.
Emil Becher Dillenburg. — Developer — Iron oxalate.
Properties — With this developer I always obtain the same !
results. It is easy and simple in its manipulation, and j
gives negatives such as are only obtained with hydro -
quinone or eikonogen under extraordinary favourable
circumstances. It also allows, in my experience, shorter
exposure. Composition — Sulphate of iron and oxalate of
potash are dissolved in distilled water. For cabinet plates
I take 12 g. iron to 40 g. oxalate, by normal exposure.
When the light was weak, increase the volume of developer
one-half. In over-exposure, reduce the volume of deve-
loper and add water. The chemicals must be pure.
[Note. — I prepare my own dry plates.]
A. Blankhorn, Ilofphotograph Offenbach a. in. — Deve-
loper— Iron oxalate; tried hydrochinon ; plates fogged,
time too long, preparation too complicated, also too dear.
Properties — Simplicity of manipulation, absolute safety,
and cheapness. Composition (A)— Sulphate of iron,
1 part; distilled water, 3 parts. (B) — Oxalate of potash,
1 part ; distilled water, 3£ parts. Dissolve warm. Just
before using, mix 1 part A to 2 parts B. For under-
exposure add 1 drop soda (to -15-45 solution) when partly
developed. In case of over-exposure 2-3 drops bromide
potassium. Accelerator — For short exposures 1-2 minutes
in hypo bath, 1-1,000 for instantaneous pictures of children
invaluable.
(To be continued.)
THE LIVERPOOL PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION.
The Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association will next
year hold an International Photographic Exhibition, and by
permission of the Liverpool Corporation, in the Walker Art
Gallery there.
The Exhibition will open on Friday, 6th of March, 1891,
and close on Saturday, 4th of April, 1891. The intention is
to keep the Exhibition open for four weeks only, but no frames
can be removed until the “ final close ” of the Exhibition.
The Executive, being anxious to elevate the standard of
public competitions in every way, intends to restrict its efforts
to triennial public exhibitions ; also, as far as practicable, to i
reduce the number of awards, the intrinsic value of a medal
being, of course, a secondary consideration. It trusts that other
associations and photographers will assist its efforts to limit
public exhibitions, their frequency being somewhat fatal to
originality and good work, as well as a severe tax on exhibitors.
Among the numerous conditions are the following : —
Pictures from exhibitors abroad — i.e., outside the United
Kingdom — may be sent unframed, packed in boards. They
will receive every care, and be framed temporarily, free ol' cost.
The executive undertakes, free of cost to exhibitors, to unpack,
repack, and deliver to the carriers at the close of the exhibi-
tion all exhibits, but will not hold itself responsible for any
accidents. The best professional assistance will be engaged,
and every possible care exercised.
The names of the judges will be announced in January, 1891,
prior to the date fixed for entry of exhibits. The board of
judges will consist of men of recognised artistic and technical
ability, with whom the executive is satisfied that merit, and
merit only, will be their guide in giving the awards. The
name of the exhibitor and title of the picture must appear
plainly on the front of the picture, mount, or frame.
The number of awards will be practically left to the judges,
they having discretion to withhold entirely awards in any of the
classes where more than ordinary merit does not exist, or the
number of competitors is not considered sufficient. The
judges have also power to award extra medals for work of
special merit. The award of the judges shall in all cases be
final. No medals will be awarded except those struck off the
dies of the Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association, and
no prizes or awards will be accepted from any other source.
Except in the champion clase, no picture of any description
shall be entered or allowed to compete which has been pre-
viously exhibited at any public competition in the United
Kingdom, an exception being made in favour of the Photo-
graphic Society of Great Britain as regards its 1890 Pall Mall
Exhibition. Private exhibitions confined to members of photo-
graphic associations not to count as public competitions or
exhibitions.
Properly printed, unmounted, duplicate copies of the win-
ning pictures are to be supplied to the Liverpool Amateur
Photographic Association, which will be preserved in a suitable
album, to remain on view in the Club Rooms of the Association,
as a memorial, and record of the prizewinners of the 1891
Exhibition.
♦
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT CHESTER.
The excursions connected with the Photographic Convention
have been arranged as follows
Excursion A.— Conway Valley, Tuesday, 24th June, Conway
and Bettws-y-Coed ; leaders, Messrs. C. H. Bothamley and
W. Tomkinson ; leave Chester by tiain for Llandudno Junction.
Two parties will be formed — one for Conway, the other will
proceed by train to Bettws-y-coed. (1) Conway. — Leader,
Mr. C. H. Bothamley. Conway Castle, exterior and interior
— Plas Mawr, an old Elizabethan Mansion — Town Wall and
Gates — Beach — Shipping. A return journey to Llandudno
can be made from the Junction at various times during the
day. Tal-y-Cefn, a very picturesque village up the valley,
can also be reached by rail, leaving by Llandudno Junction,
and returning from Tal-y Cafn. (2) Bettws-y-coed. — Leader,
Mr. W. Tomkinson ; by train from Llandudno Junction.
Swallow Falls — Miners’ Bridge — Fairy Glen — Conway Mill and
Falls — if time, Ponty Pant and Ledr Valley. Those who
intend to go on to Bettws, and wish to break the journey at
Conway, must take return tickets for Bettws.
Excursion B. — Moreton Old Hall. Train via Crewe, to
Mow Cop. Members must obtain of the local Secretary tickets
of admission to the Hall and its surroundings. Only twenty
can be issued for each day. This also applies to Thursday’s
excursion.
Excursion C. — Eaton Hall, Wednesday, 25th June ; leader,
Mr. G. Watmough Webster ; by steamer from the Groves at
1.15 ; return fare, 6d. A Convention Group will be taken.
Excursion D. — Vale of Llangollen, Thursday, 26th June ;
leader, Mr. J. L. Mackrell. (1) On arriving at Llangollen the
party will make for the Vale Crusis Abbey — Morning Light ;
(2) Cross over mountains to Chain Bridge and Berwyn, then
down the Canal ; (3) The Old Maid’s residence.
Excursion E. — Moreton Old Hall ; leader, Mr. F. Evans ;
train via Crewe, to Mow Cop. (1) The Royal Mersey Yacht
Regatta, Friday, 27th June ; leader, Mr. Paul Lange ; (2)
Hawarden. Train from Northgate Station. The Old and
New Castle — The Park — Church and Village.
416
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 30, 1890.
For the convenience of members wishing to visit Eaton Hall
during the week, time tables will be published of the sailings
of the s.s. Ormonde, the new twin-screw steamer specially
designed and constructed for passenger traffic on the River
Dee (under Board of Trade supervision), for the safety and
comfort of passengers. Eaton Hall is six minutes walk from
Eccleston Ferry. The return fare to Iron Bridge or Eccleston,
upon production of membership ticket. The best view of the
Hall is to be obtained from the river bank, near the Iron
Bridge, in the morning before 10.30.
Permission has been given to photograph the following places,
at any time during the week, upon production of a membership
ticket — By the Dean, for Cathedral and precincts ; by the Rev.
S. Cooper Scott, for St. John’s Church and Ruins ; by the Duke
of Westminster, for interior and exterior of Eaton Hall and
Park by Mr. W. H. Gladstone, for Hawarden Castle and
Park.
RETOUCHING IN TIIE NEAR FUTURE.
BY REV. F. C. LAMBERT.
The question, “ Is retouching moral ? ” is one which
certainly presents one aspect of the question, but the old
adage, “ Any fool can ask a question which may puzzle a
wise man to answer,” comes to my mind. For I may at
once confess that this question is not altogether unlike the
older one, “ Is it permissible to use poison? ” And like
many such questions, can only be answered by asking
other questions.
There is more similarity than may appear at first sight
between the retouching and poison problems. We may
reply that a poison in the hands of a competent person,
familiar with its limits and uses, ceases to become a poison
in the ordinary sense, and becomes an invaluable means
of producing a much desired result. Everyone now-a-
days knows that many of our most valuable medicinal
remedies were for a time regarded simply as poisons, and
marked “dangerous” in mental capitals. The reckless
and ignorant use of them would have kept them on that
formidable platform, had not kindly science turned these
tyrants into faithful servants.
The liberal abuse and abundant contempt with which it
seems just now in certain quarters a matter of habit to
besprinkle the art of retouching, is certainly a matter for
some consideration.
The question I would place before the consideration of
practical workers is this: Is retouching being used with
that care with which we should handle a most powerful
drug, or with the freehanded lavishness with which our fore-
elders administered the cure-all black draught ?
It is worse than foolish on the part of the professional
worker to nurture ill-will against that part of the younger
generation which is being told and taught by its artistic
friends that professional portraiture is a burlesque on art,
and reply that the public “will have it;” that they pay
for the “glass-marble” surface, and expect to get it ; for
the question remains : Who taught them to expect them ?
History repeats itself often enough, as we all well
enougli know. The introduction of this new power of
course was followed by its liberal abuse. There is some
connection, too, between the sharpness of detail and
characterless smoothness of surface.
But the pressure of cultivated taste is slowly but surely
making itself felt in a growing demand for a general
softness of outline — less glitter and polish — and a not
altogether unreasonable demand that a portrait should
contain some, if small, resemblance to the original.
Therefore a word of friendly warningand suggestion may
be offered to the professional worker — viz., “Progress
reform, change is in the air. The novelty of the egg-
shell or billiard-ball surface is fading. The time-
honoured glassy stare, with the two catch lights in the
eyes, is losing its mesmeric effect. The discriminative
sitter does not value sharpness-all-over (or anywhere, for
matter of that) so much as many a negative maker
would suppose. With less of this sharpness there is
less need for retouching. Broad and simple lighting
again will render that little still less. A characteristic
pose, well caught, will make the sitter and his friends
prefer that particular print with possibly faulty technique,
to a more ‘ highly finished ’ show case specimen.”
Voluntary reform from within is surely better than
enforced reform from without.
The motto is “ less and better ; ” less of indiscriminate
smoothing this and sharpening that ; and what little is
wanted, let it be in the right place.
We may for convenience of expression say that so-
called retouching of negatives is of two kinds.
1. Remedial. — /.<?., endeavouring to remove those results
produced on the print which are not, under normal condi-
tions, observed in the sitter — freckles, colour blotches,
deep-seated scars, and all such differences which the plate
emphasises in a way not usually observable.
2. Constructive (and often Destructive). — Removing
wrinkles, straightening noses, and “improving!” nature
generally.
It is with this latter sort that I would say, with
the coming generation, “ We’ll have none of it.”
That a certain amount— but not so much as many think
— of No. 1 is not only legitimate, but necessary in our
present state of knowledge, it is altogether idle to deny.
But the best doctor is the one who cures us with the
least physic, and so the best retoucher is he who can do
the most with the least. Quality, and not quantity. To
retouch without some knowledge of drawing, &c., is to
prescribe without knowing the symptoms of the case or
the properties of the drugs.
As the chemical and optical side of our art grows, the
need for the retoucher will decrease in inverse ratio ; but
meanwhile, the man who hopes to gather approval and
support must assuredly, in the very near future, diminish
the quantity and increase the quality of the retouching
part of his work. As to the education of the retoucher,
and the duration of his work in the future, I must defer
my remarks ; concluding with one most significant
fact — viz., the phenomenal growth of matt-surface — black
and white printing processes, which very considerably
reduce the quantity of remedial retouching required to
produce prints, which commend themselves more to
trained artists than any other, be they never so highly
finished specimens.
Mr. Gladstone and the Amateur Photographer.— Says
the Daily News : — “ A story told at Hawarden about the
amateur photographer stopping Mr. Gladstone in the village,
and appealing to him just to stand one second till ‘ a snap
picture ’ of him was taken, is quite correct ; but our Chester
correspondent says there is a sequel which has not been recorded.
Mr. Gladstone shook his head, smiled pleasantly, and walked
on to wants the new station. Returning later, he found the
enthusiastic amateur still standing near the same spot, and
looking extremely unhappy at his failure. To a second appeal
in these circumstances, Mr. Gladstone, good-humouredly enter-
ing into the situation, yielded, and stood in the village street
until the camera was adjusted and he had been ‘ taken ’ by the
now delighted artist, who, after profuse thanks, went on his
way rejoicing.”
May 30, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
417
THE IlOYAL ACADEMY OF ARTS, 1890.
BY REV. F. C. LAMBERT, M.A.
Gallery No. 4. — As no photographic exhibition is com-
plete without a vieYv of Conway or Windsor Castle, so,
also, is it almost axiomatic that no collection of portraits
is complete without Mr. W. E. Gladstone, No. 361 (by
Sir J. E. Millais, R.A.). The monotony, however, is
relieved in this case by a grandson being added. “ Grand-
pa’’ has his eye on the speaker, or rather the spectator,
“as usual.” Monotony is again relieved by having a
view from Windsor Castle, 366 (F. Goodall, lt.A.; for a
view of the Castle vide 484), and certainly the bit of
foreground wall is not the least attractive part of the can-
vas. The general light seems somewhat cold, and not
inviting of prolonged study. Nor is our old friend the
( 'onway utterly forgotten, vide 353 (1). Watson). No. 396
(“Puritans’ First Winter,” G. II. Houghton, A.) has
all the subject and sentiment for a strong picture, but
somehow, the distant figures do not look as distant from
the foreground figures as their relative size would imply.
No. 405 (“A Difficult Passage,” E. W. Grier) presents an
elderly' gentleman — with a ruby nose — deliberating how he
may best “shift” so as to “ bow” a difficult passage of
“crotchets and quavers” on his “cello” — a simple,
homely subject, without the usual superfluous studio
properties (N.B., an unobtrusive background), and,
taken altogether, a picture well worth a few mental
notes.
No. 420 (“The Haven under the Hill," Sidney S. Morish)
makes one think of the delightful fresh air of our coast
line — say Luccombe Chine, or some of the Denes in
Yorkshire. Study this picture carefully. The portrait
study, No. 444 (“Lady Betty,” P. II. Calderon, R.A.), is
interesting, inasmuch as it presents a by no means unpleas-
ing rendering of a tint of hair not generally admired.
Poets have sting of tresses and locks of tints without
number, almost without name, but one fails to recall any
poetic epithet for this tint except Yve have licence to call
it “golden.” However that problem may find issue, it is
a most admirable and masterly piece of painting. Note
the graceful pose of the head, disposal of the hands, and
simple lines of drapery — some valuable hints here. Before
quitting this room, observe No. 398 (“An episode of the
Deluge,” C. E. Butler). No. 386 (Ditto, Mr. W. Blackden),
and last, but not least, No. 499 (Ditto, ditto, II. J. Draper)
in the next room (Gallery V.). These three would have
gained rather than lost in the public eye had they been
placed side by side.
Gallery No. V. — The first thing which catches our
eye on entering Gallery V. is No. 449 (Portrait, W. B.
Richmond, A.), and almost involuntarily we say, Oh, what
a splendid frame ! and then pass on to No. 457 (“Harvest
Festival in Cornish Fishing Village,” W. B. Fortescue), a
natural realistic gathering “ of the people,” who have
brought their offering of fish and fruit. Note the effect of
the back lighting of figures in the gallery'. Is it a desirable
or satisfactory thing to represent people with their mouths
open as though singing? (On this point compare No. 774.)
Close by is No. 458 (“ Where Sea and River meet,” B. W.
Leader, A.) ; perhaps somewhat gaudy' in foreground,
nevertheless full of sunlight. Observe there is abundant
definition without great extremes of small detail.
No. 462 (“A pound a leg,” Leghe Suthers). An even-
ing effect admirably rendered in subdued and harmonious
tones and tints. The itinerant horse dealer offering “ a
pound a leg” for a doubtful nag from a still more doubtful
gipsy owner. The arrangement of the parts is instructive
and note worth.
No. 470 (“Conversion of St. Hubert, A. Lemon),
showing Hubert, who, engaged in the pleasures of the
chase to the exclusion of his religions duties, until a stag
with a spectral crucifix presented itself and converted this
merry huntsman from the chase to the cloister, where he
“lived happy' ever after,” finally becoming Bishop of Liege,
and bequeathing to all members of his race the power
of curing the bite of mad dogs (query M. Pasteur).
Altogether a dramatic composition, yet not unpleasing,
excepting in the rawness of its sky, perhaps.
No. 473 (“Echoes of a far-off Storm,” -T. Brett, A.R.A.),
a “ stormy ” letter to the plate maker demanding an explana-
tion of that streak of thin emulsion or fog mark across the
plate?
No. 485 (“The only Survivor,” F. Bourdillon). The
pose of kneeling figure is admirable, full of suggested
strength and pathos.
No. 487 (“A Summer Night,” A. Moore) calls to mind
the word “ stipple.” The formal interlacing of the flowers
is rather distressing. Some of the figures are avell worth
study as regards pose and balance.
No. 501 (“ Yarmouth, LAY.,” Henry Moore, A.). Note
the “echo” of the two foreground cows “in focus,” and
the more distant ones less so, and how it gives depth of
planes, gradation of distance, the simplicity of the lines
of composition, general treatment and handling, full of
light and air.
No. 507 (“ Oliver Twist,” James Sant, R.A.). A scene
from the boundless store-house of Dickens. Who can
forget his first impressions and sympathy avith Oliver?
“ He had a crust of bread, a coarse shirt, and two pair of
stockings in his bundle. lie had a penny too — a gift of
Sowerberry’s after some funeral in which lie had acquitted
himself more than ordinarily well— in his pocket. ‘A
clean shirt,’ thought Oliver, ‘is a very comfortable thing;
and so are two pair of darned stockings; and so is a penny;
but they are small helps to a sixty- five mile walk in winter
time.’ ... So after a good deal of thinking to no parti-
cular purpose, he changed his little bundle over to the
other shoulder and trudged on. (Ch. viii.) Oliver before
us seems a bit too fresh, may-be ? Are the dog and sheep
an artistic license? The shepherd in distance is not the
least interesting part of the picture.
No. 519 (“ Paris and (Euone,” G. A. Storey). The red
cap worn by' Paris does not seem to quite harmonise with
the red parts of Mrs. Paris’ garments, nor does the youth-
ful figure of Paris give one an idea of the sort of person
to carry off Helen of I roy. AV as it a case of I roy, Troy
agin?
The question proposed by C. Seton, No. 512 (“A doubt-
ful Strad.”), seems to find some sort of answer in
No. 1050 (“A genuine Stradivarius," W. Gay). A pity
these two frames are so far apart.
Sir H. Trueman Wood. — Sir Frederick Brainwell announced
last week at the Society of Arts that Mr. H. Trueman Wood
is about to be knighted, and added that this was “a mark of
honour from our Sovereign which I am sure no man has more
thoroughly deserved than he has. The way in which he has
carried out the duties of secretary since the death of Mr.
Le Neve Foster must, I am sure, have been appreciated by our
thousands of members, and the way in which he carried on
those duties which he undertook of looking after British
industries at the late Paris Exhibition deserves praise at all
hands.”
418
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 30, 1890.
jaotesL
Military authorities seem to be suspicious of plioto-
graphy. On no other ground can the curious fact
of the entire absence of photographs of the interior
of the Tower of London be explained. A few days
ago we strolled through the interesting building, and
on arriving at the Beauchamp Tower enquired whether
any photographs could be obtained. The answer was
in the negative. In justice to the sturdy yeoman of
the guard who was in charge, we are bound to say
that he was rather hazy on the subject, as he seemed
to think that the etchings he had on sale would answer
our purpose as well as photographs. But this was
excusable, as it was impossible for him to express
an opinion on what he had never seen, and, so far
as we could discover, the interior of the room in the
Tower so full of pathetic records has never been photo-
graphed.
matter. If the public must speculate, they may as
well speculate in photography as in anything else.
The highest price ever offered for a photograph was
probably that which was mentioned in vain some weeks
ago for the photograph of the plaintiff in a certain
action. The theory of the defendant was that the
plaintiff was the same person who achieved notoriety
on the Continent some time since, but to sustain the
theory, proof of identification was necessary. A hun-
dred pounds was offered for a photograph, but the
person who had one in possession refused to sell. An
artist was then employed, and attended the court dur-
ing the hearing of an appeal on some point of law.
Unfortunately, he could only catch a glimpse of the
plaintiff, and his sketch was a failure. Up to now
sensitive plates are not equal to the subdued light of
our law courts, or a detective camera would have been
called into requisition.
This seems a strange piece of indifference or neglect.
On the walls, carved by their own hands, are the names
of prisoners whose lives — or, to put the matter correctly,
whose deaths — are part of the history of England.
Surely no more interesting memento could a visitor carry
away than such a fac simile as photography could give.
Even as a question of profit, the walls arc worth
photographing. If a description of the writings on the
walls can be sold, why not also photographs ? There
is not an American visitor — and they can be numbered
by scores — who would not purchase a photogx-aph of
the word “ Jane,” so deeply indented by the unfortu-
nate ten days Queen of England. As for the other
objects of historical interest in the various parts of the
Tower, their name is legion, and yet not a photograph
is purchasable. It sounds incredible, yet it is the fact.
We do not know who is the responsible authority, but
if it rests with the Constable, perhaps the newly
appointed official, Sir Daniel Lysons, will take the
matter into consideration.
Whatever the result may be, what is known as a
“ boom” has set in with regard to penny photographs.
The parent Automatic Photograph Company has
the capital it asked for, and on the strength of its
success has floated a more extended scheme for the
purchase of its foreign patents, for which it modestly
asks a quarter of a million. Meanwhile one of those
ingenious persons always ready to follow somebody
else’s lead, has spotted a weak point in the original
undertaking — the omission to make any mention of arti-
ficial light, without which the use of the machine is re-
stricted to the daytime — and has brought out a rival com-
pany, one of the features of which is that provision has
been made under the patents to apply the electric light
automatically. This company estimates the number of
its customers at fifty per day, whereas the other one put
the possible number at thirty. No doubt one estimate
is as trustworthy as the other, but as both companies
have taken great care not to invite photographers to give
an opinion on the merits of the rival schemes, we do
The Americans are extremely fertile in their inven-
tion of photographic “notions.” The latest freak of
fashion is for a gentleman to send to the lady he
admires a handsome box, which, when opened, shows a
photograph of an aristocratic pair of ears, the back
button-hole of an abnormally high collar suppoiting a
closely cropped head, and a view from behind of a
well-cut coat. Indignation is, of course, the first
emotion raised by the receipt of such a portrait, and
the young lady naturally seizes a piece of ribbon
attached to the box with the intention of rending the
unwelcome gift to pieces, when, at the first tug, the
picture slides out of the box, disclosing another which
shows the proper features of the young man, smiling,
after the manner of his kind, at his mollified sweet-
heart.
It is not every sitter who is so indifferent to his per-
sonal appearance as represented in a picture as is the
King of the Belgians. He was recently sitting to an
artist, and, getting somewhat tired, expressed a hope
that the work would be speedily completed. The
artist replied that he was afraid he should be obliged
to detain him a little longer. The King sighed and
remarked, “You might finish me off in a couple of
seconds or so.” “How?” exclaimed the amazed artist.”
“ By just drawing a large man with a big nose.” This
was undoubtedly au abbreviated way of describing his
appearance, yet, judging by the Belgian postage stamps
and the Belgian coins, it was sufficiently accurate.
But monarchs must, after a long course of photo-
graphers and artists, grow somewhat callous as to how
they look. As each photographer and each painter
gives a different rendering of the royal features, the
only interest the sitter must have in the subject is how
he or she will be turned out at the hands of the new
man. In fact, crowned heads at times must get a little
mixed as to what is their exact appearance and
expression.
May 30, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
419
The West-End photographers have been exception-
ally busy on the occasion of the recent Drawing-Rooms
in photographing the debutantes. It would be exceed-
ingly convenient if the Queen would have a studio
fitted up at Buckingham Palace, so that ladies could be
photographed in all their freshness as they arrive. To
array oneself for the ceremony, and to put on one’s
dress, train, and feathers for the photographer the next
day, is not quite the same thing. Somehow, all the
spirit and “ go ” of the affair evaporate. Her Majesty
is a great collector of photographs, and why not add to
her interminable list of albums a “ Drawing-Room
Album,” to contain such portraits of the ladies
presented to her as might be available ? It would
probably mean an extensive studio and a large staff of
artists, but it need not cost the Queen a single farthing.
There are plenty of enterprising firms who would
undertake the task, provided they were not hampered by
Court routine or restrictions.
In more than one instance we have recently noticed
with satisfaction that ethnographical science is
finding out the value of photography. At the Stanley
Exhibition are several pictures which give a good
idea of the natives of different tribes — what manner
of men they are, and how they occupy themselves.
We have all read much about Africa and its inhabitants
of late months, but these photographs tell us at a
glance much more than we can glean from any written
description. One photograph, showing how the huge
tusks of ivory are carried from the interior of the
country to the coast, is especially interesting. The
poor natives have evidently yet to learn how to keep
still and look pleasant, for they have done neither the
one nor the other, some of the figures being very indis-
tinct in outline ; but as they are somewhat deficient in
clothing, a little fuzziness is not a matter for regret.
But at our more permanent ethnographical collection
at the British Museum the value of photography is
also recognized, for several fine enlargements from pic-
tures taken at New Guinea by Lindt, of Melbourne,
have recently been hung on screens. These pictures
measure about 42 by 36 inches, and if we remember
rightly the originals of some of them were shown a few
years back at one of the Pall Mall exhibitions. One
picture of a chief’s house, supported on rough piles
above water, is most interesting, as showing a lake
dwelling of to-day, resembling those of ancient times,
the remains of which have been so often found in
Europe. A group of children — little black imps — is
huddled together on a platform in front of the house,
just as we cce the small monkeys at the Zoo crowding
together on a cold day.
•Some other photographs in the same gallery seem,
by their yellow tint, to be of older date. These are
portraits of Kaffirs, some of which exhibit a remarkable
form of head-dress, which looks like a tall cap covered
with astrachan and with a plate on the top. But this
is, in reality, no cap at all, but is formed by the natu-
ral growth of the hair, or rather wool, which is clipped
all round like a well-kept hedge, and is crowned by a
ring made of palm leaves, which is covered with vege-
table wax and polished up with charcoal until it rivals
in the splendour of its shine the domestic fireplace of
civilisation. There is an old saying that “ one half
the world does not know how the other half lives.”
It would seem that photography is destined to be of
great service in supplying part of the required infor-
mation .
Those who still make oxygen gas — and their number
must have been greatly reduced since the Brin Com-
pany hive supplied it in cylinders at such a cheap rate
— will be interested in a letter which appears in the
Scientific American , in which the writer asserts that
he has for some time discarded the use of manganese
for admixture with the potassic chlorate, and has sub-
stituted for it carbonate of iron. There is probably
some confusion here, for carbonate of iron is the crude
iron ore, occurring either as spathose, or, in a more
impure form, as clay ironstone. This, under the action
of heat, is changed to ferric oxide. The red oxide has
long been used in association with potassic chlorate for
oxygen making, and if this substance is intended,
there is nothing new in the suggestion. If, on the
other hand, the clay ironstone is meant, impurities
would be likely to be introduced into the retort, which
might lead to serious accident.
It is evident, from reports reaching us from many
sources, that eikonogen as a developer is fast find-
ing friends among both professional and amateur
workers. From our own trials of it we believe it to
be more valuable for portraiture than for any other
branch of photography, and for the reasons that the
contrasts which it affords are soft, and that the colour
of the deposit lends itself admirably to the inevitable
retouching pencil. Amateur workers who have been
used to obtaining vigorous landscape negatives with
pyro and ammonia generally fail in their first attempts
at portraiture, because they aim at a density which
blots out all the finer lines and expressive markings of
the face. With eikonogen they can hardly fall into this
error. It gives an image like a ferrous oxalate deve-
loped plate at its best, and works with far greater
certainty of result. We all know that on the Con-
tinent almost exclusively, and in some of the principal
studios in this country, the ferrous oxalate method has
for a long time been the standard system of development
for portraiture. Eikonogen seems likely to usurp its
place.
The French Exhibition, like most other large exhi-
bitions now-a-days, was far from complete on the
onening day, and half consisted of packing cases. In
about another week it will be in a fairly advanced state.
The Exhibition consists largely of fancy articles, in
which the French display their acknowledged high
level of artistic excellence and refined taste.
420
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 30, 1890.
FICTION IX PHOTOGRAPHY.
A pretty and pathetic story was told many years ago —
at a time, indeed, when photography was a mere infant —
in the Family Herald. A certain honest peasant woman,
known as “ La Veuve Yvonne,” living in a little secluded
village in Brittany, having heard of the marvellous powers
of photography, determined to visit Paris to test its merits
after a fashion of her own. Arriving at the capital, she
inquired for a photographer, and visited his studio. “ I
wish,” she said, “ for a portrait of my child.” “Certainly,
madam ; have you brought the child with you, or shall 1
call upon you? ” “ Neither,” replied La Veuve Yvonne :
“ they tell me you are very clever in making children's
portraits.” “ I succeed pretty well,” said the photo-
grapher ; “ but when they are exceptionally restless,” —
“My child will not trouble you with his restlessness.”
“Ah! then,” replied the photographer smiling, “I am
pretty 6ure to do well.” “My child,” she continued, “is
dead.” The photographer ceased to smile. “ You want
a picture of him before he is buried.” “lie has been
dead and buried for five years.” “What!” said the
surprised artist; “you have, then, a picture of him.”
“If I had,” replied the widow, “I should not be here.”
The photographer told her kindly that what she requested
was impossible. “ Impossible ! ” — and the widow’s coun-
tenance fell — “ they told me that photography could work
miracles." A sudden thought sprung from the kind heart
of the photographer, and illuminated his brow. “ You
have still your child's clothes, madam?" “ Yes, I made
them for him myself.” “How old was he? " “ Six years.”
“The colour of his hair?” “Golden.” “He was a
good boy? — you will forgive my inquiries.” “lie said
his prayers every night at my knee." “ Pardon me for
asking all this,” said the photographer to the weeping
mother. “ You shall — yes, by the help of heaven— you
shall have his portrait. In a couple of days come to me
again.” The widow came, and received the first proof.
“ It is he ! ” she cried with a mother's happy love, “ it is
my son. He wears the little boots I got for him from
neighbour Dubois. This is his little coat with the pearl
buttons, which I sewed on with my own hand. Ah ! and
that is his long, bright, golden hair. Oh! monsieur,
what shall I pay you for this? ” “ Madame,” replied the
photographer, “photography, you have been told, can
work miracles, and miracles are never paid for.”
Dame Yvonne returned to Brittany, and remained till
the day of her death convinced that the portrait she had
placed over her cottage bedstead was the portrait of her
dead child.
The good photographer had dressed a small child of his
own in the boy’s Breton costume, and had represented
him in a kneeling attitude, his head bent, and his face
hidden by his hands, clasped together in the humble .atti-
tude of prayer. On a deceit of this kind, as on the cele-
brated oath of Uncle Toby, the recording angel, while
inscribing it in the book of human actions, surely dropped
a tear, blotting it out for ever. That celestial being,
indeed, seems to have inspired the mother with a reply to
all the doubts and cavils of inquisitive neighbours.
“ Why,” said one of these, “ docs your son hide his face
thus in his hands ? ” “ Ah !” replied La Veuve Yvonne,
“you must be a bad Christian indeed to ask that. The
little angel in heaven is praying for me, his poor old
mother, who is left in the world alone.”
Even religious stories have been suggested by photo-
graphy. But they seem not to have been a commercial
success. A little volume containing them, entitled the
“ Photographer,” was discontinued after the second num-
ber. These stories present a melancholy reflection of
Bunyan. The camera appears not to lend itself kindly to
the purposes of conversion. In one tale we arc told that
the three brightest features in the Christian’s countenance
are Faith, Hope, and Charity. So far, indeed, as faith is
the evidence of things not seen, the photographic com-
parison is happy. The protagonist of another tale is asked,
“ Do you perceive your faithful likeness? Does your
countenance appear hopeful V Is your charity sufficiently
in shadow? Is your body full of light? Is the light
which falls on you unsteady ? Are you endeavouring to
look cheerful, or are your features rigid and harsh ?”
Dismayed by these enquiries the protagonist endeavours
to escape, but the photographer adjures him not to run
away, to let him look again at his general appearance, and
finally adjourns the sitting to a time of increased light.
The preceding stories were all told in prose. The follow-
ing was originally composed in rhyme. A young officer,
cornet Fitz Sparrow, in the Aldershot Blues, “ stood four
feet six in his shoes,” and his diminutive stature was to him
a source of enduring shame and sorrow. He forgot, or
never knew, apparently, the moderate statures of those
military heroes, those thunderbolts of war, Nelson and
Napoleon. It was in vain that he mixed raw eggs and
brandy and drank the compound ; it was in vain that he
wore the tallest top hats he could find ; it was in vain that
his bootmaker, by the aid of cork heels carefully concealed
in his boots, thought to accomplish the unaccomplishable.
No man. we have it on the best authority, can by taking
thought add a cubit to his stature, and that was exactly
what cornet Fitz Sparrow attempted to do. The brandy
gave colour to his nose instead of length to his legs ; the
tall hat made him look top heavy ; the high heels went be-
fore a fall. And cornet Fitz Sparrow was so anxious to
marry, but every maiden said him nay. At last he resolved
to advertise, “ Wanted, a Wife. ”
A dozen answers were sent to his advertisement, but
every one of the applicants desired his c arte -de-vi site.
This request, which would betray the smallness of his
stature, lie felt to be a death-blow to his hopes. However,
lie went to a photographer — a cunning artist —who assured
him he could give him the appearance of a giant.
Fitz Sparrow was in raptures when the photographer, by the
aid of a child’s table and chair placed close to the cornet,
gave him the size of a modern Goliath, lie immediately
forwarded a dozen copies of his carte to the dozen
applicants, and they appointed a dozen meetings at a
dozen different times and places. Alas ! one by one they
came, saw, and, disgusted by the lowness of his bodily
frame, left him ; all save one, the twelfth, a little fairy,
who whispered in his ear, “ Oh, I am so glad; I was so
afraid you were too tall.” It is needless to give much
more of this rhymed story. They married, and, being
botli short, kept each other in countenance in more
senses than one, and were happy ; and ever afterwards,
Cornet Fitz Sparrow, though he only “ stood four feet six
in his shoes,” stood, in his own estimation, five feet ten
at the very least.
Mu. F. P. Cembbano and Mr. J. B. B. Wellington are now
in Stockholm, after a hand-camera excursion up the Rhine, down
the Danube to Vienna, then to Oberammergau and the Passion
Play, thence to Copenhagen.
Mat SO, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
421
REMARKABLE NOVELTIES IN PHOTOGRAPHIC
INSTRUMENTS.
Last Wednesday night, Mr. J. A. Rudge, a scientific
instrument maker of Bath, exhibited to the Batli Photo-
graphic Society a new optical lantern, with mechanism
attached, to represent, by means of a series of photographic
slides, men and other animals moving as in life. The first
instrument of this kind was exhibited a few years ago to
the Photographic Society in London by Mr. Friese
Greene, who informed the meeting that it was invented
by Mr Rudge, of Bath. It consisted of a lantern with one
condenser, and four small projection lenses, each receiving
light from the lamp through a separate part of the con-
denser. A rotating opaque disc was so shaped that
before one image — say of a face — was entirely cut off from
the white screen, the next image was imposed upon it, so
that the one gradually melted into the other. In this
way the face could be seen changing from grave to gay,
and so on, and the very twitching of the skin of the face
could be seen. Mr. Greene heightened the effect by
painting the gelatine negative with cobaltic and other salts,
so that, as the slide grew warm from the heat of the lantern,
colour gradually appeared in the face and dress. The
effects were, from an entertainment point of view, vastly
superior to those produced by Mr. Muybridge and others
by application of the thaumatrope principle, the un-
pleasant jerkiness of which is well known. Mr. Rudge’s
lantern was defective in several ways, .and, among others,
in the small sizes and numbers of photographs it could take
in one series.
Later on Mr. Greene brought out an invention upon
the same lines, and had an instrument constructed con-
sisting of three lanterns, by which means he was able to
bring the full power of one condenser to bear upon each
slide exhibited ; the instrument also included some costly
mechanism for automatically bringing a long series of
twenty or more slides into play. Practically, like most
new inventions, it was defective, and, for want of sufficient
adjustment beforehand, was far from doing its best work
when exhibited before the Photographic Society. Since
then considerable improvements have been made in the
instrument, but at present they are not for publication.
Mr. Chang, the Secretary to the Chinese Embassy, had a
private view of the whole machine at work a few days ago,
and was much interested therein.
lanterns of this class necessitated the taking of photo-
graphs in rapid succession— that is to say, several in the
course of one second of time — and that led to the inven-
tion by Mr. Greene and Mr. Mortimer Evans of the
camera for giving ten or even more exposures a second.
Quite recently, as published in these pages, Mr. C. V.
Boys has invented and used a machine for taking one
hundred or less of photographs per second, when the
object is sufficiently self-luminous, or illuminated.
The next public step in this eventful history took place
last Wednesday night at Bath, when Mr. Rudge exhibited
to the Photographic Society there a new instrument,
which may be explained by the aid of the accompanying
diagram.
In this diagram A B is the lantern, pivoted at C to per-
mit a small front motion, of which C is the centre ; I)
represents the position of the lamp and chimney ; E E are
rollers to facilitate a little right and left motion of the
front of the body of the lantern, from which the parts in
front of the condenser F F are detached ; H II are two
discs, on each of which six photographic portraits of the
same person are printed ; the discs rotate upon their
respective pivots KK. The large tube M carries two
smaller tubes NN, in which are mounted lenses which
swivel in any direction, and can then be clamped. PP is
a moving shutter.
When this machine is in action, the front of the lamp,
and the condenser thereupon, are constantly moving
either to the right or to the left ; this enables a smaller
condenser to be used than would otherwise be necessary,
and tends to equalise the illumination on the screen during
the changes in the image. The discs and photographs
resemble those obtained with Stirn's camera, but are of
larger size ; the apparatus used with the lantern is also
employed when taking the negatives, so that when the
latter are printed as positives on another circular sheet of
glass, they are certain to be in true register. The greatest
difficulty in making this class of instruments consists in
obtaining perfect registration everywhere, so the
mechanism must be perfect. The next greatest difficulty
is in obtaining equal illumination of the projected images
during their changes. The machine exhibited by Mr.
Rudge last Wednesday night was not quite finished, and
as the positives were not ready, he had to employ
negatives instead ; it served, however, to explain the
principles involved. He is making this machine for Mr.
Greene.
The instruments already mentioned are probably the
heralds of the dawn of a new branch of photography, the
ramifications of which no one can foresee. We once pub-
lished that the power of taking and of printing negatives
with immense rapidity brings us several steps nearer the
greater use of photography as a meaus of publishing news
and of bringing out of books. Mr. Boys has already
found such appliances necessary in one branch of scientific
research. Mr. P. Braham told the meeting on Wednesday
night that crystals in the incipient stage of their formation
do not grow slowly, but shoot out all at once, consequently
such instruments may possibly reveal the details of this
scientific phenomenon, and show how crystals grow in
their primary stages. Of the value for historical pur-
poses of such instruments, when perfected, Mr. Friese
Greene wrote in the last Year-Book.
Yesterday morning we called, with .Mr. Friese Greene,
upon Mr. W. M. Ashman, whose skill in practical photo-
graphic work is well known. His studio faces the south,
so is glazed with ground-glass, and in hot weather, by
turning a tap, he can let a thin sheet of water flow down
the whole surface of the roof ; this, he says, makes the
whole studio beautifully cool in about ten minutes. Of
course the evaporation of water has a powerful cooling
effect. He uses homely furniture as accessories in pho-
tographic work, and has striped tinted blinds, instead of
white ones, so that the whole studio has a little more than
usual the appearance of an ordinary room.
422
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF WARWICKSHIRE.
A meeting of those interested in the Warwickshire Survey was
held at St. Edmund’s College, Birmingham, on Thursday,
May 22nd, the Mayor of Sutton Coldfield, with Mr. J. B.
Stone, F.G.S., in the chair. There was a numerous attendance
of the members of the Birmingham Photographic Society,
together with representatives from the Vesey Club, the Muni-
cipal School of Art, the Coventry Photographic Society (Mr. F.
W. Dew), the Philosophical Society, and others. Letters of
apology were read from Messrs. S. Timmins, Richard Tangye,
Surgeon-General Ranking (President of the Leamington Photo-
graphic Society), H. W. Jones, F.C.S. (Vice-President of the
Coventry Photographic Society), A. E. Donkin (Rugby School),
H. R. Lloyd (Birmingham Archaeological Society), Professor
Poynting (Mason Lodge), and others, all giving their approval
to the survey, and promising to help in the work.
Mr. Stone said that the object of the meeting was to organise
a County Survey Council which should take charge of, organise,
and carry out a survey of every object of public interest in the
county of Warwickshire. The survey would include photo-
graphs of buildings — ancient and modern — of ancient manu-
scripts, of paintings, of objects of geological and botanical inte-
rest ; it would, in fact, form a record which would enable
future generations to have some idea of the state of the county
as it existed in the latter part of the nineteenth century. He
referred to a letter which had beeu received from the secretary
of the Birkenhead Photographic Association, claiming origi-
nality for the idea of making a photographic survey. There
could be no originality in the idea, for it had beeu carried out
after a fashiou — many times. He had himself made what he
supposed the Birkenhead Society would call a photographic
survey, by photographing all the old buildings in the hundred
of Hemlingford, quite a quarter of a century ago. But the
survey which Mr. Jerome Harrison had proposed, and which
they were prepared to carry out, was something of an alto-
gether different nature. He proposed “ That a County Photo-
Survey Council be created for the purpose of organising a
complete photographic survey of Warwickshire ; such council
to consist of elected representatives from the various photo-
graphic societies in the county, in the proportion of five per
cent, of the members of each society, together with two repre-
sentatives from each of the scientific, literary, and artistic
societies in the county ; that the council shall have power to
elect co-optative members, and shall appoint public trustees for
taking charge of the records obtained.”
The motion was seconded by Mr. W. Jerome Harrison,
F.O.S., who said that he heartily welcomed the presence on
the survey of the scientific and artistic workers whom he saw
present. They could lend great aid in drawing up lists of
noteworthy objects to be photographed. He trusted that Mr.
Baguall, whose “ Flora of Warwickshire” was on the eve of
publication, would at once supply them, for example, with a
list of famous trees within the county. Mr. Jethro Cossins,
the eminent architect, had promised help with the churches.
It would be part of their first work to obtain information as to
the thousands of valuable negatives which were already in
existence.
Mr. W. Buucher (School of Art) hoped the council would
take into early consideration the question of publication of a
selection of the results obtained. He thought that a thousand
subscribers to such a work could be obtained with ease.
Mr. F. W. Dew (Coventry) promised hearty co-operation in
the work, and spoke of the great alterations which had been
made within the last few years in the churches of Coventry.
He had many valuable negatives of those churches before their
restoration.
The motion was carried unanimously.
The Chairman proposed, Mr. S. G. Mason seconded, and it
was carried unanimously, “ That the first co-operative members
should be appointed at that meeting ; that they should retire
at the end of the current year, when the council shall proceed
to elect other members to fill the vacancies, the retiring
members to be eligible for re-election.”
The last resolution, which was put from the chair, seconded
by Mr. Jctlno Cossins, aud carried unanimously, was “That
[Mat 30, 1890.
the photographic and other societies of the county be requested
to at once elect their representatives, aud that the first meeting
of the new council be called for June 12th.”
Xottces of iSoofes,
The Amateur Photographer’s Library, Nos. 2, 3, and
4. (Hazell, Watson, and Viney, London , 1890.)
These are three recently issued little volumes, each deal-
ing with special subjects of interest and use to photo-
graphers, especially to beginners.
Cameras, Lenses, and Shutters.
“Cameras, Lenses, Shutters, &c.” is the title of No. 2
of the series, and consists of a number of articles by
different authors who have given special attention to the
subject. The first article in the book is on 1 ‘ Cameras,”
by Mr. IV. Y. Corbet, who, after a few practically useful
remarks about tripods, says : — “ A plain screw and a flat
camera bottom offer a ready means of revolving instru-
ment, at same time abolishing horizontal front, and lessen-
ing weight and complication. It will now be seen that
revolving heads and horizontal fronts are not wanted.”
This is an example of the slipshod composition pervading
the article of often leaving out the word “the ” where it
ought to have been inserted, and contains error as to a
matter of fact. No revolution of the camera on its axis
will bring an imaginary line, passing through the centre of
the lens, away from the centre of the plate and nearer to
one or other of its edges ; the horizontal front enables
this to be done, aud with certain subjects, and when using
lenses with a not very flat field, gives optical advantages
not otherwise obtainable. When using a portrait lens, to
Lake instantaneous photographs in places where the light
is not good enough to permit the use of a doublet, some-
times the view may be such as to cause a horizontal front
to become a welcome appliance. The rest of the article
contains some useful suggestions.
Another article on the same subject is by Air. John
Powell, who deals with the subject of camera-legs with con-
siderable critical ability, showing that the legs of cameras
deserve more scientific attention than they have hitherto
received. At present they are made too much by rule of
thumb, so far as obtaining the maximum rigidity with the
minimum weight of wood is concerned, so that the photo-
grapher is often carrying more wood than is necessary to
obtain the same amount of rigidity. Some of Air. Powell’s
valuable utterances on this subject are here quoted : —
There is one important factor which seems to have beeu
entire overlooked, viz. , that with the same cubical dimensions
— in other words, the same weight of timber — we can obtain
greater rigidity. Viewing the ends of most tripods, we note
that the pieces are approximately square, that the breadth and
depth are nearly similar, instead of being long rectangles. let
us take two examples, one of the former and one of the latter,
and consider their respective comparative strengths : —
Breadth. Depth. Content.
No. 1. Approximately square sec-
tion, in eighths of an inch = 5 x 6 = 30
No. 2. Long rectangular section, do. = 3 x 10 = 30
In the first case, the breadth is assumed as §in., and iu
the second case as j) in. Now, under a cross strain the
strength is proportional to the breadth, so that No. 1 : No 2 : :
5 : 3, that is, No. 2 is only | of the strength of No. 1. Next,
in the first case we have taken § as the depth, and in the second
case xf. Now the depth is most important. The strength
varies as the square of the depth, so that iu this respect
No. 1 : No. 2 : : 36 : 100, or in other words, No. 2 is nearly
May 30, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
423
three times as strong. Lastly, combining the former and
latter calculations, it will be found that No. 1 : No. 2 : : 180 :
300, or that No. 2 is nearly double the strength.
Further, as already stated, the ratio of length to depth in
No. 1 would be 64 to 1, whereas in No. 2 it would be 38 ’4
to 1, a considerable advantage.
Again, the clear space between the joints would be, say, 15 ins.
Hence the ratio of length to breadth, that is, 15 to jj in.,
would be 40 to 1. Further, as this only applies to one part,
and that part could not buckle under ordinary circumstances
without the pair being similarly affected, it is manifest that it
is fully equal to the other proportions, the only disadvantage
being the formation of a rectangle with the joint pins, which
would be somewhat dependent on a sound, well-finished joint.
To this, however, both are comparatively dependent for rigidity.
Mr. Powell also considers the first principles of con-
struction to secure the rigidity in the camera, which in
theory should be so affixed to the tripod that the centre of
gravity of the camera is below its support. He suggests
a camera constructed upon these principles, and describes
it by means of diagrams, but as the diagrams do not appear
in the book, having been omitted apparently by accident,
readers are not in a position to criticise the details. Appa-
rently the camera is fixed below the head of the stand.
The author says : —
The advantages, briefly, may be summed up as follows : —
1. The legs practically meet at a point.
1. The camera is in stable equilibrium.
3. It dispenses with the use of a level.
4. The line of sight is always normal to the plate.
5. It presents the least equivalent area of pressure to the
wind, which, other things being equal, is a decided advantage
in form over the pyramidal, as the latter is over the square or
rectangular form.
Air. Powell, in dealing with the subject of conical versus
square bellows for cameras, gives his verdict absolutely in
favour of conical bellows, chiefly because, when open,
they present less wind surface. This is the most question-
able part of his excellent article. When the camera is of
long range, which is the case with the most serviceable
instruments, conical bellows are apt, under certain cir-
cumstances, to cut off a part of the image when the
operator is using the rising or falling front ; various
devices exist for overcoming this defect by gathering
together and fixing some of the folds of the bellows, but
it would be more convenient were no such devices neces-
sary.
A third article on “ Cameras ” is by Mr. J. II. Taylor,
who says that he prefers plumb levels to spirit levels for
cameras : the former, however, are more in the way of the
operator. A level of any kind is scarcely necessary, where
buildings are in the field of view, to give truly perpen-
dicular lines as a guide in focussing, but in some mountain-
ous regions, with no vertical straight line in view, and the
legs of the camera erected on a bank sloping like the roof
of a house, the photographer soon discovers the value of
levels for special purposes. A fault in many of the levels
now sold for photographic purposes is that they are too
sensitive ; were they less so, within certain limits, they
would be easier to use, and no practical disadvantage would
creep in. Mr. Taylor speaks of the large per centage of
defective photographs obtained from one cause or another
in the use of hand-cameras, and recommends that when-
ever possible they should be used on the top of a light
stand. This advice is good for those who care for quality
rather than quantity.
Next come some papers on lenses. The first, by the
llev. T. Perkins, gives some of the optical principles at the
root of the construction of lenses. Towards the close the
author says : —
Half a doublet forms a Landscape lens which will work with
about // 23 or // 32 ; in many of Ross’s rapid symmetricals,
the two combinations are of different foci, and as either will
screw on the back of the lens tube, two different singles may
be obtained. A doublet of intermediate focus may be
obtained by removing the back combination, and replacing
it by the back combination of a doublet of longer focus. Ross’s
portables may be thus used. It is well to have a cap to fit
each end of the lens tube. Dust is thus excluded, and the
lens protected from injury. But, despite all care, dust will
find its way to the glasses ; to remove it, dust with a camel’s
hair brush, then wipe with chamois leather, or a soft silk
handkerchief kept, when not in use, in a broad-mouthed stop-
pered bottle. A little pure alcohol may be used to remove
stains that the dry leather will not remove. The lenses,
when not in use, should be kept in a case with a division for
each, or put away in a box, each lens being placed in a bag
of chamois leather.
Mr. J. II. Hargrave gives a paper on the same subject,
so also does Mr. J. H. Taylor. The latter, on page 31,
gives an elaborate description of a diagram, which diagram
is not in the book. It is a good memoir.
The next article is by Mr. W. Groves on “ Shutters.”
The roller blind shutter next the plate is theoretically the
best forgiving the largest amount of light in a given time.
Mr. Groves says that its bulk is objectionable. This
would not matter so much, especially as it forms part of
the camera ; but its weight, as at present generally made,
is against its general use. A remedy would be to substi-
tute aluminium for brass in some of its parts. Mr. Groves
says of this shutter : —
Shutters used immediately in front of the plate permit the
full power of the lens to act on each portion of the plate
during the whole time the said portion is uncovered. By
using a drop shutter or roller-blind shutter with a narrow
aperture the width of the plate, it is probably possible to
give shorter exposures and obtain sharper images of objects
than with shutters in other positions. In the case of rapidly-
moving objects the images obtained by these shutters are
slightly bent or distorted, as will readily be seen when it is
considered that the image is exposed bit by bit as it travels
along the plate. This distortion may be reduced to a mini-
mum by causing the shutter to travel in a direction opposed
to that of the image. Variation in the exposure given to the
foreground and sky may be affected as in shutters imme-
diately behind the lens. Shutters in this position become
very bulky for the larger sizes of cameras ; their exposure
apertures have to travel over a large amount of space, and,
as in the case of shutters immediately behind the lens, they
require to be especially fitted to the camera. Shutters behind
the lens are particularly adapted for hand or detective
cameras.
The next article on “ Shutters” is by Mr. J. II. Taylor,
and the third by Mr. Louis Meldon, whose objection to
the roller blind shutter next the plate we think to be
stated in too strong terms, and that its utility is far above
his estimate. Mr. Meldon gives the following table of the
rapidities of different shutters, but does not state who
made the exjjeriments, nor how the measurements were
made, and the latter is a point of vital importance : —
The following is a list of the rapidities shown by certain
shutters, which may be of some little use in affording an
approximate idea of what may be expected from them : —
Drop Shutter
Second.
i
• •• i j
Aperture, 2J sec.
»>
t*
...
i
•••
„ I sec.
Newman’s ...
...
1
••• T5
Whole- plate.
The Plunge ...
l
... o
Quarter-plate
ft
...
... If
» »
424
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
Watson’s Double Snap
1
7o
Whole -plate.
Phantom ... ...
rV t° x's
» sky
tio
Quarter-plate, double
,, foreground
Jo
bands.
Cadett’s Lightning : sky ...
A
Whole- plate.
,, „ foreground ...
A
Wollaston’s Diaphragmatic..
A
Whole -plate.
Robinson and Son’s (go and
return) foreground
h
Half-plate.
.. sky
A
Lancaster Instantograph ...
i
IT
Half-plate medium
Kershaw
rV to os
band.
Whole-plate.
Grimston up to
A
Aperture 1 £ ins.
Meldon(asmadebyl’erken) „
Tibs
1 1
at »
Caldwell (as made by Wray) „
IBS
>> » >>
Thurey and Amev ... ,,
3 So
»> >» M
Mr. P. Lange’s
1
77
» H »
The next article is by Mr. L. A. Burrow on “ The
Sensitive Medium,” in which the author deals with emul-
sion making, lie says that with iodide of silver alone iii
emulsion the image is dense, but there is little detail in the
shadows or high-lights. But has the best method of
preparation, or vehicle, or mode of development for iodide
emulsions yet been discovered ? It may be remembered
that Sutton and a few others stated that iodide of silver is
more sensitive than the bromide in the wet collodion
process, but necessitates greater attention to the purity
aud condition of the nitrate bath.
Mr. W. P. H. Foster contributes an article on the same
subject, so also does Mr. J. A. Randall. The latter puts
forward the following pleas for the use of slow plates,
except where quick ones are a necessity : —
Before preparing an emulsion, it must be decided whether it
is to give rapid or slow plates. The difficulty of making a
good emulsion increases as means are taken to gain rapidity ;
whereas to prepare a slow emulsion is a certain and compara-
tively easy matter. The film of a plate coated with a slow
emulsion is of an orange colour, and much denser than the
film of a quick plate ; for this reason halation is not so likely
to impair the quality of the finished negative. With a slow
plate a degree of richness can be obtained thaf is not so often
seen in a rapid plate. There is a certainty connected with
slow plates, and an amount of comfort in working, which
cannot be equalled with rapid plates. They can be developed
in a light which adds considerably to this comfort and cer-
tainty of result ; the plates being more manageable, whilst
developing the latitude of exposure is much greater. For
fleeting effects in landscapes, instantaneous views, and moving
subjects, a rapid plate is, of course, necessary, but when it is
not a matter of time in exposure, no advantage can be gained
by using an extra rapid plate.
The Rev. T. Perkins, M.A., contributes an article on
“ Exposure,” at the close of which he says : —
Many photographers find a difficulty in timing exposures.
Wishing to keep their eyes on the subject during the exposure,
in order that they may re-cap the lens even before the full in-
tended exposure lias been given should anything suddenly move
and so irretrievably ruin the picture, they cannot keep their
eyes on the second hand of their watches ; but I always count
seconds in the following manner, and by it I can count even a
minute with an error of not more than one or two seconds : I
repeat as fast as I can as many letters of the alphabet as I find
from experience I can say in a second, thus, “a b c d e f,
one ; ” “abedef, two ; ’’ and so on up to ten seconds ; then
I begin a second set until the requisite number of seconds is
completed. A little practice is all that is required to gain
great accuracy by this method, the first idea of which I gained
from Professor A. S. Herschell, who used a somewhat similar
plan to couut the time of the flight of meteors across the sky ;
[May 30, 1890.
and I should advise its use for exposures not exceeding twenty
or thirty seconds — for longer exposures a watch is more con-
venient.
i
Mr. W. A. Watts, M.A., also contributes an article on
“ Exposure.”
Finally, the book closes with three articles on “ Deve-
lopment,” by Messrs. H. E. Murchison, F. T. Bennett, and
W. A. Watts. Subjects which should meet with more
attention in a future edition of this useful little work are
finders, focussing-glasses, focussing screens, and some-
thing about eikonogen, for, although the book is dated
1890, there is nothing in it about the latter developer.
For the notices of the other two books of the series,
space cannot be found this week.
Anleitung zur Piiotographie fur Anfanger. Von
G. Pi/.zighelli. (1890. Knapp , Ilalle a S.)
This work, which is not bulky, although containing 200
pages illustrated with over 100 woodcuts, professes
modestly enough to be an introduction to photography
for the use of beginners. It will certainly serve this pur-
pose, as each subject is taken from the beginning, and
explained in a way that is calculated to make it understood
by those who have not had previous instruction in photo-
graphy. It is, however, so thorough in the treatment of
the subjects included in its scope that it may well take
place as a manual not for beginners merely, but for refer-
ence on the part of the amateur, and even of the professional
photographer. We have seldom met with such a trust-
worthy and, so far as it goes, complete handbook in so
small a compass as is presented in the present volume by
the well-known writer aud experimentalist, Captain
Pizzighelli.
patent EntcUtgctuc.
Applications for Letters Patent.
7,764. D. J. Playfair, 87, St. Vincent Street, Glasgow.
“Obtaining Cyanides and Ferricyanides.” — May 19th.
7,842. J. Hines, E. Howell, and H. Howell, 96, Buchanan
Street, Glasgow. “ Automatic Photographic Machines.” —
May 20th.
7,850. J. B. Birkbeck, 12, Primrose Hill, Loudon. “ Produc-
ing Optical Illusions.” — May 20th.
8,099. S. H. Burcheli., 37, Chancery Lane, London.
“ Cameras.” — May 23rd.
8,139. J. Ralfh, Prince’s Chambers, Wolverhampton. “Pho-
tographic Albums.” — May 24th.
8,151. W. P. Thompson, 5, Lord Street, Liverpool. “Cameras.”
May 24th.
8,160. J. P. Bayley, 18, Fulham Place, Paddington, Loudon.
“Photographic Burnishing Machine.” — May 24th.
Specifications Published.
9,312. June 5th, 1889. — “ Photographic Box Cameras.”
Georoe Charles Inkpf.n, Architect and Surveyor, 12, Have-
lock Road, Southsea.
The construction of box cameras, the means of releasing the
exposed plates, bringing forward fresh plates and storing them
after being exposed, also the construction of the lens shutter
and means for opening and closing same.
The camera consists of an oblong box with raised platform
each end. On the back platform the plates are placed in vul-
canite sheaths and held in position by india-rubber bands,
and are pressed up to the front by means of a coil spring. The
lower edge of the sheath is caught iu a catch and the upper
part by a lever worked from the outside of the box, which, on
being moved alternately to the left or right, correspondingly
passes over notches in the vulcanite sheaths, and releases the
May 30, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
425
plates, which fall upon a roller covered with india-rubber,
and are afterwards passed and collected together beneath the
platforms at each end of camera. The front platform carries
the lens of the ordinary type, and the focus can be regulated I
from the outside. The shutter consists of two vulcanite discs,
fixed on a centre, attached to a base board, and having a drum
with two cords wound upon it. The pulling of the cords
alternately causes a corresponding movement of the discs,
which, in passing over the lens aperture, opens and closes the
lens.
The inventor claims : —
1st. The means by which a plurality of plates, films, or
other sensitised media, arranged one behind the other in a
camera, are released in succession, removed from the field of
the lens, passed into a depository chamber, and retained there
in such a manner as to prevent them falling forward so as to
obstruct the field of the lens, as substantially set forth.
2nd. In providing a back of thin vulcanite, or other
suitable material, with projecting edges, as a carrier behind
the plates or films, and securing the two together by means of
elastic bands, preferably placed towards the ends of the carrier,
which also prevents the sensitised surfaces being damaged, as
substantially set forth.
3rd. In cutting notches in the projecting edges of the
carriers above-mentioned in such a manner as to be alter-
nately placed when a number of carriers are arranged in suc-
cession one behind the other, and a sliding bolt or other similar
means which, by engaging with the projecting edges of the car-
riers, causes the catch or catches of the bolt to release its
hold on passing the notches or slots in the upper edge of the
carrier, and allows one carrier with the plate or film to be
expelled from the platform, whilst the plate immediately
behind it is secured by the bolt and carrier, as substantially
set forth.
4th. The arrangement of the sliding bolt and the lever
which imparts a movement to it actuated from the external
case of camera : also the capability of the lever being connected
to the mechanism of a lens shutter so as to set it and reset it,
as substantially set forth.
5th. One movement alone is required to reset the shutter
and release a carrier with plate ; the action being simultaneous,
it follows that it is impossible to take two views on one plate,
as substantially set forth.
6th. Exhibiting the number of the carrier by a sliding
register visible from the outside of camera of a corresponding
number to that placed on carrier, as substantially set forth.
7th. In providing a platform in the body of the camera,
on which are placed one or more rollers, covered with india-
rubber, to break the fall of the carrier with glass plate or film
when expelled from the plat form, protect the sensitised surface,
and conduct the carrier to the depository chamber, as sub-
stantially set forth.
7,522. November 4 th, 1889. — “ Photographic Apparatus.’ ’
Victor Jules Emile Damoizeau, 17, Rue St. Ambroise,
Paris, Gentleman.
This invention relates to the construction of photographic
apparatus which is capable of taking in any desired angle or
even the entire horizon, for producing panoramic views for plans,
landscapes, and the like.
The inventor claims : —
1. The construction of a carriage with two racks worked by
a common pinion, which permits the use of a lens of any focus,
and insures an equal and simultaneous displacement of the
camera and of the front.
2. The general arrangement and construction of the camera
forming a magazine containing folded bellows, and capable of
being taken off in one piece.
3. In the camera proper, the arrangement and use of cylinders
and rollers and lever which secure the regular rolling up and
unrolling of the sensitive material, as well as the means for
driving them from the motor which actuates the carriage at
the same time.
4. In the camera described, the employment of two quad-
rants for determining the aperture of the diaphragm and
regulating the time of exposure.
5. The combination with the camera described of a spring
pricker for making the register- marks on the sensitive material,
and of the counter constantly indicating the amount of the
sensitive material that has been used.
6. The means for working the shutter simultaneously with
the other parts, and for closing the same automatically when
the carriage stops.
7. The construction of the front with slides for obtaining a
horizontal and vertical displacement with a wide range of
motion.
8. The special construction of the lens mounting, which
forms one with the sliding front, and which is furnished with an
opening to permit the lenses to be changed.
9. The synchionous moving of the optical centre of the lens,
and the roll of sensitive material which is unwound at the back
of the lens.
10. The addition to the extremities of the sensitive roll
of black paper or fabric, or the like, which covers the sensi-
tive material when rolled up, so that it may be withdrawn
from the camera or placed in position therein in open daylight.
11. The general arrangements and combinations of parts
constituting the improvements in photographic apparatus, sub-
stantially as described and illustrated by drawings accompany-
ing the specification.
7,347. May 2nd, 1889. — “ Photographic Cameras.” Richard
Williams Thomas, 121, Cheapside, London, Artist.
My invention is principally designed for cameras for taking
instantaneous photographs. I construct my improved camera
with two lenses, and preferably in the shape of an ordinary
field or opera glass — one side being fitted with a lens and focus-
sing glass, and the other side being provided with a lens and
also suitable arrangements for the dark slide and shutter. The
two sides are joined together and worked backwards and for-
wards by means of a screw, as in an ordinary field glass, and
the lenses in each side are so arranged that by movement of
the screw both are focussed at the same time ; the shutter is
connected with a catch or spring fixed or projecting to or near
the wheel or thumbscrew, by which the screw is worked. By
means of my invention the operator is able to see the object at
the time he takes the photograph, and the risk of failure is
thereby minimised.
10,319. June 25th, 1889. — “Supports for Photographs.”
Henry John Mansell, 57 and 59, Golden Lane, London,
Wholesale Stationer, and Eustace Frith, of the firm of Frith
and Co., Wray Park, Reigate, Surrey, Wholesale Photographic
Publisher.
The object of the invention is to provide a cheap and readily
applicable stand for photographs, cards, and other articles.
The stand consists of a back-board to which is attached a
shorter or lesser front-board, the two being hinged together.
The extent of movement Of the shorter board or limb is con-
trolled by means of a band, cord, or attachment, which may
conveniently consist of a doubled ribbon, the fold enclosing a
ring at one end, which ring rests against a hole in the back of
the board whilst the ribbon passes through it, but the ring
cannot pass, on account of its greater size. The other end of
the ribbon passes through a hole in, and is attached to, the
shorter hinged portion. The photograph, card, or other article
to be exhibited is cemented or otherwise secured to the short
limb, and the back-board serves with the photograph or other
article — such as opaline cabinet or other sized photograph — to
which the shorter leaf may be attached, to form a steady sup-
port for the whole, and serving to hold the photograph up in
a convenient position for exhibition.
19,897. December 10th, 1890. — “The Manufacture of Photo-
graphic Films.” A communication from George Eastman,
of Rochester, in the County of Monroe, and State of New
York, United States. Alfred Julius Boui.t, 323, High
Holborn, London, M.I.M. E.
Specification in our next.
Thf. June number of Scribner's Magazine contains an article
on the “ Emin Pasha Relief Expedition,” w'hich is illustrated
with reproductions from photographs taken by members of the
expedition.
420
©omsponticnce.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[May 30, 1890.
—
Ishoccctitngs of jcoctctics.
“UNHAPPY COLONIALS.”
Sik, — Though I spent a good many years in England Jn
graduating at Cambridge, and going to the Bar, I am a native
of Tasmania. In my early days, I well remember the quality
of wares imported into several of our Australian colonies.
Anything was good enough for us, and if the articles imported
were not up to the mark — well, the diameter of the world
separated the English manufacturer from our wrath. In
later times we have been better treated ; but I want to tell
you of a recent experience of mine with a box of whole-
plates. As I cannot blame the local vendor, I may say that
I got them from a well-known Melbourne firm — Messrs. J. W.
Small and Co. I have long confined myself to this one make
of plates ; but in one of the boxes no less than five plates had
a line clearly and cleanly cut through the film, which ran a
photographic telegraph wire across my picture. I would
enclose a print, did not the description appear plain enough.
After two plates in succession treating me in this way, I
expended the rest on views of the magnificent Derwent River
at Hobart, taken from the garden of my brother, the Chief
Justice of that colony.
Now, how about the next box of this make, which I place
in my slides ? As I take in and read, not only your paper,
but another English one, as well as American, French, and
German, and occasionally an Italian book, such as “ Bettini’s
Fotographia Moderna,” I deem it prudent to place my plates
in their slides in absolute darkness. If it does no good, it can
do no harm, and you can dust and insert without much trouble
in the dark. But then these “lines ” cannot be detected.
I am familiar with the “ D ” line in the solar spectrum, but I
felt seriously inclined to designate these happily unfamiliar
ones as “ D — d.”
Now, I simply ask you, would this box of plates have been
placed on the market in England 1 And was it not sold out
here simply because we are helpless in the matter ?
I would not have mentioned the name of the firm were not
its wares so well established in the market that my complaints
are necessarily and intentionally harmless. Moreover, the
managers of the Company are probably unaware that
defective plates left their establishment ; nor do I want that
company to forward me a box of their best manufacture to
replace the defective box. I imported some of films from
America ; they developed with many spots. On writing to
them to ask how to get rid of them, that firm admitted that
many complaints had been received of a similar nature, and
said that they were anxious to replace the faulty sample with
others. I wrote thanking them, but declining the replace-
ment. All I ask for is a little more care in exporting goods to
the Antipodes.
F. Stanley Dobson, LL.D., M.L.C.
Melbourne, 5th M arch, 1890.
[We have omitted names of firms in this letter, to deal
only with general principles. Mr. Dobson’s remedy over one
box of bad plates is not through newspaper channels. — Ed.]
THE HACKNEY PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY.
Sir, — Below is our programme for June, 1890, at the Morley
Hall, Hackney, Room No. 4 : —
Wednesday, 4 th — Excursion to Loughton ; trains leave
Liverpool Street for Loughton at 10.6 and from Fenchurch
Street at 10.13. Dine at “ King’s Head,” Loughton, at 7 ;
social evening. Saturday, 7 th — Excursion to Wan stead Park ;
meet at Leytonstone Station at 3.8. Thursday, 12th — “ Hand
Cameras,” Mr. A. R. Dresser. Thursday, 26th — “Selection
and use of Lenses,” Mr. H. Crouch. “ Selection, use of
Camera, parts, and apparatus advisable,” Mr. J. 0. Grant.
W. Fenton Jones, Hon. Sec.
12, King Ed ward Road, llacknty, London.
It is really astonishing what immense progress the art of
photography has made these last few years. Why, you don’t
really know your friends’ likenesses when you see them. — Flic-
yendc Blatter.
The Photographic Society of Great Britain.
t
At the technical meeting of this Society held on Tuesday
evening last, the 27th inst., Mr. G. L. Addenbuookk occupied
the chair.
The subject of stereoscopic photographs and apparatus
having been previously announced as matter for the evening’s
discussion,
Mr. T. Sebastian Davis showed a stereoscopic camera fitted
with a sliding shutter resembling a drop shutter, with two
openings, but working laterally by pushing with the finger, or
by an elastic band instead of falling by gravity. The openings
in the moving board were made as long as practicable, and by
this means it was not necessary to adjust it to a great nicety
when used for time exposures. As to the distance at which
the two halves of slides should be mounted, they ought not to
be more than about 2$ inches, which might be considered as
a full average of the distance of the human eye from centre to
centre ; otherwise the pictures did not properly coalesce in the
stereoscope. He thought, too, that the size and proportion
generally chosen were not the best. He believed that many
amateurs had given up stereoscopic photography on account of
the smallness of the angle of view included in the pictures.
He would get over this by the use of a lens of short focus —
3 inches. The picture should be 2 J inches in length ; but,
for landscapes, he thought a more artistic and satisfactory pro-
portion would be to have them only 2| inches in height. The
surface for printing on should, he thought, be as fine and free
from grain as possible. Albumen paper he did not consider
fine enough, and glass transparencies were not suitable for all
subjects.
Mr. Arnold Spiller considered that paper prepared with
chloride of silver in gelatine was better than albumen paper
for the purpose. There was a fine enamel as a basis for the
emulsion, and there was more detail in the shadows than with
albumen paper.
Mr. Friese Greene said that it was his impression that
celluloid was better than paper as a basis for stereoscopic
prints.
Mr. Atkinson showed a stereoscopic print upon gelatino-
chloride of silver paper, which supported Mr. Spiller’s view.
He also showed a stereoscope fitted with achromatic lenses.
Mr. Valentine Blanchard thought it was an objection to
the dimensions proposed by Mr. Davis, that the foreground
would be so much cut off. It was just the foreground in
landscape pictures generally that gave such value to the stereo-
scopic effect of the photograph. In order to utilise the
foreground to a greater extent than would otherwise be the
case, Mr. Wilson, of Aberdeen, would frequently place his
camera within two feet of the ground.
Mr. \Y. E. Debenham said that the necessity for limiting
the distance at which the two halves of a stereoscopic photo-
graph should be mounted, depended upon the eyepieces used.
These might besoarrauged as to unite two photographs of, say,
whole-plate size. In any case it was desirable to have the
eyepieces so mouuted that they could be separated more or
less. By this means they could be ad justed for eyes that were
either farther apart or nearer than the average, and adjustment
could also be made for photographs that were mouuted at a
greater or less distance apart than ordinary.
Mr. T. Samuels thought that it was more correct in
principle to use a single lens in a Latimer Clark camera rather
than a pair of lenses. The axis could then be directed to the
centre of the pictures.
Other members did not hold the same view.
Mr. W. England had sometimes, when photographing
statuary, used a lens of twenty inches focus. This was to prevent
exaggerated perspective caused by coming too near to the
subject. He also showed photographs of large size, mounted
as stereoscopic pictures. They required a special stereoscope
in which the pictures were necessarily farther apart, and farther
from the eyepieces than in the usual form of instrument.
Mr. L. Warner ke showed some specimens of a gelatine film
May 30, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
427
which had been prepared as a basis for a second coating with
silver emulsion. It never had been coated, but was nevertheless
covered along the exposed edges with a stain like that seen on
plates that have been kept for some time. He thought, there-
fore, that this stain, which has been so often noticed, does not
belong to the silver emulsion, but to the gelatine itself.
Mr. Chapman Jones said that the edges, which looked dark
on the plates, came out clear in the developed picture.
Mr. Arnold Spieler said that the films shown were not
comparable with the gelatine in an emulsion, as in these films
there was a large quantity of carbolic acid, the action of which
must be taken into account.
Mr. L. Warnerke showed a block that had been made upon
a zinc plate previously coated with copper. The plate was so
hard, that five thousand impressions might be worked off it.
The Camera Club.
May 22 ml. — Sir George K. Prescott in the chair.
The Chairman exhibited a hand camera which he said that
he considered to be the simplest that he had ever seen ; the
plates were mounted in sheaths in a kind of a book, and each
plate, after exposure, fell down on hinge, leaving the next to
be exposed after it was moved into true focus ; and this was
done by one movement.
The Hon. Sec. exhibited a Watkins exposure meter and one
of Fallowfield’s sheaths for plates.
Mr. E. R. Shipton read a paper entitled “Cycle Photo-
graphy and its Recent Developments, including an Ideal Cycle,”
and said that by means of a tricycle the photographer rolled his
kit instead of walking with it, so economised energy and gained
the pow’er of going farther afield ; in fact, on a tricycle he could
conveniently carry a 15 by 12 inch camera and appurtenances.
He exhibited a tricycle with wheels fitted with the new pneu-
matic tyre, and described various spring carriers for attach-
ment to any tricycle to protect the photographic apparatus
from vibration. The pneumatic tyre had given him an average
of two miles per hour increase in speed, and had proved most
luxurious in use, but added £6, or thereabouts, to the cost of
the vehicle ; he could go eight or ten miles an hour with it,
carrying 100 lbs. weight of luggage ; the weight of his machine
was about 95 lbs. He could go over every kind of road,
including sharp flints. For the first few' days he was nervous
about going over stones with the new tyre, but gradually
gained confidence, until he took every kind of road which came
in his way, and altogether he had been about 300 miles with
the new tyre. The tyre must not be allowed to get flabby, but
must be kept blown out ; he had had to blow out his tyres
three times, and lapse of time, more than of work, seemed to
render this necessary.* He described the construction of the
pneumatic tyre, how to blow it out writh a little forciug syringe,
and how to repair it should it get accidental!}' or wantonly
punctured. So far, his tyre had not become even marked, and
seemed as good as at first.
Mr. H. Stdrmet remarked that one objection to the pneu-
matic tyre was, that if it were driven at a large obstacle, such
as a brick, it gave a rebound, and “up went the w'hole lot.”
The great bugbear in cycling with photographic apparatus was
dust, especially that caused by the jolting of the plates in the
slides. Sometimes with the new tyre he had driven two miles
an hour faster, but on the average had not gained much in
speed over that obtainable with the old one ; with the new
tyre, going down hill, the machine went flying.
Dr. Patterson had found the resistance of the air to be
of more importance than weight when tricycling, and liked
the baggage to be so packed as to present as narrow a surface
as possible towards the front of the machine.
Mr. Enrico Ferrero had been a cyclist for twelve years, and
‘lid not believe in carrying so great a weight of luggage. An
expert like Mr. Shipton could do more in the carrying of
luggage than could an ordinary cyclist. He (the speaker) '
did not lielieve in tricycles in photography ; they were
always an encumbrance ; with them the photo-
Certain ga«es will slowly pass through india-rubber, and the oxygen
of common air passes more rapidly than the nitrogen. — Ed.
grapher had chiefly to keep to the road, and not to
enter paths and fields to get views he frequently required.
A safety bicycle and half-plate apparatus would be found to
be as convenient as anything. The best place for carrying
photographic luggage was on the back of the cyclist.
Mr. George Davison had also found a tricycle to be always
in the way when used on a photographic expedition.
Mr. Shipton, in the course of his reply, said that he wished
that opticians would make casket lenses with a shutter forming
part of the lens tube, and not burden purchasers with so
great a weight of brass as at present, when lenses of different
kinds are carried.
The Hackney Photographic Society.
The ordinary meeting of this Society was held on Thursday,
Dr. Roland Smith (vice-president) in the chair. Mr. E. J.
Wall’s paper on “Photographic Chemistry” was read. Mr.
Wall preferred giving an elementary paper, as there were
many amateurs who only took up photography for the pur-
pose of getting pictures without the particular study and value
of each of the chemicals used. He described the manufac-
turing of plates and the compounds used, and gave the uses
of chemicals in other photographic operations. In the dis-
cussion which followed, Messrs. Dean, Grant, Reynolds, and
others took part. Mr. Dean showed a simple stereoscope made
by Pumphrey. He had found it effective. Various books
were given to the Society by Messrs. Dean, Reynolds, Grant,
and the Secretary.
On the motion of Mr. Reynolds, a vote of thanks was
passed to the officers of the Society for their efforts during
the past year, and he complimented the Secretary for the
manner in which he had conducted the affairs of the Society,
Mr. Bruce Capel was elected a member.
The excursion on June 4th will be to Loughton, and on the
7th to Wanstead.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 22nd inst., Mr. A. Cowan occupied the
chair.
Mr. H. M. Hastings exhibited some prints on the new chloride
of iridium paper. Some pieces also of this paper were dis-
tributed among the members for trial.
Mr. J. Traill Taylor read a paper on the “ Ethics of Pho-
tography” (see page 412).
In the course of the discussion that followed the reading of
the paper —
Mr. W. E. Debenham disagreed with the idea that amateurs
interfered detrimentally with professionals. The great strides
that photography had made were due, in a great measure, to
amateur workers.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater spoke of the anomalies that were
sometimes seen in photographs on the market. He referred, as
an instance, to a photograph of a brook, which had a very large
sale. A stork had been printed -in not in proportion to the
surroundings ; the stork was about three times the size it ought
to be. He knew a case where a gentleman sent some negatives
of Florence to have some prints made ; when he received the
prints he found some clouds had been introduced into the pic-
tures. The prints were all returned with the remark, that
clouds w'ere not usually seen in Florence.
The Chairman said that it was sometimes not borne in mind,
when printing-inolouds,that theyshould be reversed in thewater ;
he had seen photographs with clouds printed in the sky which
were conspicuous by their absence in the water. The reflection
of clouds in water was easily done by printing through the
glass.
Mr. W.E. Debenham, speaking of stereoscopic vision, said that, in
addition to the microscopeandstereoscope, there wasau instrument
which, he thought, might prove useful in warfare ; he referred to
the telestereoscope, by which the solidity of an object at a distance
could be judged. Some years ago he constructed a telestereo-
scope, using a pair of field glasses for the purpose. To one of the
object glasses a mirror was fixed, which received the reflection
from a second mirror fastened at the end of a rod fixed at right
428
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Mat 30, 1890.
angles to the field glass ; by this means distant objects could
be viewed stereoscopically. Mr. Debenham explained the con-
struction of the telestereoscope by diagrams on the blackboard.
Mr. T. Waltenberg asked whether he could restrain anyone
from copying a photograph he had taken some years ago ; he
had been paid in the usual way of business by the sitter, who
was now dead. It was the opinion of the members that, having
been paid for the negative at the time of sitting, he had no
publishing rights whatever in the possession of the negative.
The Photographic Society of Ireland.
The last meeting for the season of this Society was held on
Thursday evening, 22nd inst., by permission, in the Lecture
Theatre of the Royal College of Science, Stephen’s Green,
Dublin, and took the form of a pul die exhibition of lantern
slides. There was a large attendance of members and their
friends, and upwards of 200 slides, principally contributed by
members, were passed through the lanterns. In the absence of
Dr. J. Alfred Scott (vice-president) the slides were described by
the lion, sec., Mr. J. H. Hargrave, C.E. The lanterns were
worked efficiently by Mr. James Carson, C.E. Amongst the
slides deserving special notice were those of Miss White, the
only lady member of the Society, and the “slumming” hand-
camera work of Mr. C. R. Strangways, Dr. J. A. Scott, and
Dr. Cosgrave.
Eye-Piece for the Lick Telescope. — It is said that the
Lick Telescope will, in a few weeks, be supplemented
by a remarkable piece of mechanism. This is an eye-piece
which has just been completed at Rochester, N.Y. No
other eye-piece of anything like equal dimensions has ever
been made. The largest now in use is not over two inches in
diameter, while the new piece measures over three inches.
The eye-piece is constructed on a perfect theory. There are
two lenses, six inches apart. The larger one is called the field
lens, and is six and one-half inches in diameter. The other lens
is the eye-glass proper. It is composed of three lenses, a
double concave, double convex and meniscus, cemented together.
The field lens is of crown glass. The meniscus, or correcting
lens, is of flint glass. The light from the heavenly bodies, seen
through the Lick Telescope and this new eye-piece, will he 2,000
times as bright as that seen with the naked eye.
Artificial Illumination. — Prof. Langley, says the Detroit
Free Press, read a paper at Washington on the subject of
artificial illumination, in which he advanced a novel idea. He
says that all existing systems in a varying degree sacrifice
economy, because a very large per centage of the energy used is
diverted from the production of light to the useless generation
of heat. This is not only a direct waste, but the production
of heat is a positive disadvantage. He shows how much better
nature does this work in the case of the firefly, and of the
luminous infusoria which are seen upon the surface of the sea,
and are so numerous especially in the British Channel, as to
have a practical effect in lighting the course of the vessels.
He says that the light which distinguishes these insects is
produced by a chemical, not by a physical process, and is
unattended by any perceptible development of heat. He
expresses the belief that a careful scientific study of these
insects may lead to the discovery of a means by which the same
effect can be artificially produced upon such a scale as to have
an industrial value.
Received. — The monthly part for May, of “ Traite Encyclo-
p&lique de Photographic,” by Charles Fabre, published in Paris
by Gauthier- Yillars and Son. The present issue embraces,
among other subjects of interest, a chapter on platinotype, and
is, like its predecessors, freely illustrated. From Ed.
Liesegang, Dusseldorf, “ I’hotographischer Zeitvertreib,” by
J. Schnauss. It contains a number of interesting applications
of photography, old and new, collated from various sources, and
is freely illustrated. A more extended notice will be given of
the book in due course. Watson’s exposure meter, a criti-
cism of which is postponed.
Ungfoers to ©orrcgpon&entg.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, 3t. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Alr-rtisj-nents and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper 4 Carter, 5,Pumival 8treet, London.
L. E. — Horny Dryness of Sensitized Albumen Paper, During
the prevalence of unusually hot or dry weather you may
find it advantageous to add nitrate of soda to the silver loath.
The addition of ten or fifteen grains to each ounce of sensi-
tizing bath makes a considerable difference, but be careful
not to exceed this amount, for there may loe danger of stain-
ing your gelatine negatives. Sugar is sometimes employed
for the same purpose.
M. P. S. — Photo-Chemical Investigations. An extremely impor-
tant paper, embodying the results of many years of research,
was read by Dr. Ferdinand Hunter, at the recent meeting of
the Liverpool Section of the Society of Chemical Industry.
The subjects treated of were the density or opacity of the
negative, modes of measurements, development of plates
under varying conditions, gradation secured by different
developers, the intensification and reduction of negatives,
unit of exposure, rapidity of sensitive plates, and instru-
ments for actinometry. The whole matter is treated in a
thoroughly scientific spirit, and we hope to give you shortly
a r<5sum<5 or the author’s valuable communication. At the
same meeting Mr. E. G. Ballard exhibited a new actino-
rneter, in which Balmain’s luminous paint is employed, but
in a different way to that suggested by Mr. Warnerke.
Tyro. — Action of Chromic Acid upon Alcohol. The sub-
stance you obtained was aldehyde, which is always formed
when alcohol is heated with sulphuric acid and a bichromate,
or with chromic acid itself. Chrome alum could not give
rise to its formation. Aldehyde has a very peculiar
aromatic odour, and in composition stands midway between
alcohol and acetic acid.
W. M. — Baching for Drying Plates. The common method is
to paint with a mixture of raw sienna and dilute gum water
or dextrine, but Dr. Fol’s plan is better. It is to moisten a
piece of carbon tissue cut to the size of the plate with equal
parts of glycerine and water, and apply it like a sticking
plaster to the back surface, pulling it off l>efore developing
the negative. The same piece of black tissue may lie used
many times. Photo- Engraving. See Answers to R. B. B.,
of Glasgow, last week. Mr. W. T. Wilkinson’s book is not
yet reprinted, but it contains much useful information.
A. Smithson (Dublin). — Magnesium Chloride as a Fixing Agent.
Dr. Liesegang proposes the use of this salt as a solvent for
chloride of silver, and urges its superiority over hyposulphite
on the ground of its being more readily got rid of by
washing. It is equally applicable to plates and prints.
T. F. — Lime Light. Your letters received. The hand-bellows
would be considered a disadvantage, and probably lead to
inequality in the lighting. A powerful Bunsen burner,
surmounted by a ball of platinized asbestos, or zirconia lime,
might possibly give a steady light of sufficient intensity for
copying purposes.
R. S. L. — Cyanide Fixing of Gelatine Plates. As a ready means
of getting rid of free caustic potash in the cyanide, you
might mix with it a certain quantity of sal-ammoniac, which
would have the effect of turning this impurity into the
harmless free ammonia, and then it could not soften the
gelatine.
Enquirer. — The Opera-Glass Camera. The statement is
probably true. A very similar, if not identical, arrangement
was brought out many years ago by MM. Geymet and Alker.
A. M. M. — The Journal of the Photographic Society of India
contains, as you say, amongst other matters of great interest,
the identical paper which formed the subject of our corre-
spondence. No injustice will be done by taking the proposed
course, as the communication bears date April 22nd.
Received : Clapham and W ,H. S. ; Wm. Harbutt, replied by
post.
NEWS.
THE
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1657 .—June 6, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOX
Translucent Screens for Developing-Room Lamps 429
Photographs of London j 430
Guaiacol as a Developer for Dry Plates. By Colonel J.
Waterhouse 431
The City Photographic Exhibition 432
Photographs on View at the Drapers’ Hall, Throgmorton
Street. By Rev. F. C. Lambert, M.A 433
Photography in Rome 434
The Royal Academy of Arts, 1890. By the Rev. F. C. Lambert 434
Ethics of Photography and Photographers. By J. T. Taylor 436
PAOI
Notes 438
Photographic Exhibitions. By George Davison 440
Photography in Florence 441
A Photographic Exhibition at Hexham. By James Brown
and Edgar G. Lee 442
Notices of Books 442
Patent Intelligence 443
Correspondence 446
Proceedings of Societies 44a
Answers to Correspondents 448
TRANSLUCENT SCREENS FOR DEVELOPING-
ROOM LAMPS.
Last week the subject of transparent coloured screens
for developing-room lamps was considered. Next in
order come translucent screens, such as those of opal
or ground glass, or fabrics like paper or cloth.
A translucent screen may act in two ways, namely,
by its colour, if it have any, and by its translucency.
By means of its latter function it diffuses the light from
the flame, preventing the rays from the latter falling
direct upon the plate; it also, to a limited extent,
quenches some of the blue and violet rays. Particles
in suspension, such as mist or dirt in the air, or solid
particles in translucent screens, tend to cut off the blue
and violet rays more than the yellow and red ; this is
why street gas flames, seen through a fog, appear
redder and redder the farther they are from the eye of
the spectator, and why most samples of opal glass have
a yellowish hue when viewed by transmitted daylight.
For this reason a sheet of opal glass, used with a sheet
of unsafe ruby glass in a developing-room lamp, will
probably at once make the light practically safe, not
alone by lowering the intensity of the light by diffu-
sion, but by cutting off more or less of the feeble band
of blue rays which found its way through the imperfect
sheet of ruby glass. As, however, two sheets of ruby
glass scarcely reduce the amount of light in the room
more than does one sheet, two sheets of ruby glass and
one of opal glass in each window of the lantern tend to
give an exceedingly safe light, all other conditions being
equal. Opal glass has such power of quenching and
diffusing any feeble blue radiations which may find
their way through an imperfect sample of ruby glass,
that any spectroscopic testing of the triple screen des-
cribed is practically unnecessary. Opal glass is the
best diffuser of white light known obtainable in mass,
but it quenches such a large per centage of the light
that gas globes made of it prove excessively costly in
use, unless the light required to be utilised falls where
it is wanted through a large orifice in the bottom of
the globe. Ground glass, which consists of plain glass
with a surface of minute abrasions, cracks, and scratches
produced by grinding, is not so good a diffuser as opal
glass.
For the perfect diffusion of white light, it is necessary
that the particles producing the diffusion should be
exceedingly clean. One more perfect means of diffusing
light than by opal glass is kuown, but cannot be util-
ised in photography, namely, by means of smoke con-
sisting of particles of phosphoric acid. Phosphorus
burnt in oxygen gas throws off this smoke, and when
the smoke gets thick enough to hide the flame of the
burning phosphorus, a light is obtained surrounded by
the best and cleanest diffusing medium known.
Cloth, paper, and such like fabrics for developing-
room lamps now demand attention, and at first sight it
seems strange that such coarse substances should be
so useful when dealing with such minute agencies as
waves of light. Put a piece of coloured cloth or tissue
paper under the microscope, and, with a strong white
light on the other side of the fabric, it will be seen to
be full of minute holes, letting through white light in
abundance, and brighter light will be seen coming
through some parts of the fibres themselves than
through other parts. If, now, two thicknesses of the
fabric be used, almost all the white light is cut off,
because a hole in one thickness will rarely so come before
a hole in the next thickness that a ray of white
light can pass through both. Three thicknesses of red
cloth make an excellent screen, the total amount of
colour and translucency being large, and all pure white
light cut off. Telegraph cables are made on the same
principle ; there might be a fault in one layer of gutta-
percha, but if the cable have a second layer, it is
hardly likely that a fault will occur in both at the
same place ; three layers of gutta-percha make every-
thing practically safe.
Sometimes it is recommended in print to make a
developing-lamp window with one large sheet of red
cloth, and those who make the recommendation have
doubtless found it to answer in their own experience ;
yet this single screen lets some white light pass through
430
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jdnf. 6, 1890.
its numerous minute holes. The explanation is, that
the exposure of the plates of such operators has been
long enough to enable a good image to be developed
before the fogging power of their light has had time
to act injuriously. On the same principle, by suitable
manipulations, an instantaneous exposure on one scene
may be given to a plate by means of a shutter, and
afterwards a longer exposure of the same plate to
another scene, and in the developing bath the latter
will come up all right, with no trace of the former.
As regards dcveloping-room lamps, it is as easy to
make good as bad screens, so it is as well not to employ
imperfect means, which have to be compensated in
other ways, when good results have to be obtained
therewith.
There is reason to suppose that dead white bodies,
such as opal glass, are entirely built up of transparent
particles. The foam of the sea is white, yet it is
formed entirely of transparent drops of water ; the
light getting into the midst of the myriads of drops is
refracted and reflected in all directions, and becomes so
scattered as to produce the effect which is called
“white.” The something occurs with ground glass.
The glass is as transparent as ever it was, but the number-
less minute cracks, scratches, peaks, and valleys upon its
surface scatter the incident light and produce the deac
white effect to the eye. The whiteness of paper is due
to the way in which it scatters light, but let its inter-
stices be filled up with varnish, it scatters the light
less, and the transparency of the cellulose fibres
becomes more manifest.
PHOTOGRAPHS OF LONDON.
The day is approaching when the man who does not
use a camera will be looked upon as quite a remark-
able character, and his biography and portrait will
appear in those publications which keep the memory
green of those who have deserved well of their country.
Rut before that day comes the Continent, and places
generally where holiday seekers most do congregate,
will photographically be used up. There will be then
no spot which has not been haunted by the photo-
graphic worker, and “ taken ” by everybody. Perhaps,
however, London itself will escape this general photo-
graphic scourge, for it is a remarkable circumstance
that every7 dweller therein runs away from the “ big
village ” before he deigns to unlimber his camera anc
tripod. Why this should be so we cannot guess, unless
it be a kind of perversion of the text which tells us
that no man is a prophet in his own country. Certain
it is that most photographers do not see in their own
city anything worth photographing; otherwise they
would not be in such a hurry to turn their backs upon
it in favour of places not possessing one tithe of its
beauty or interest.
Although we hold that in London can be found a
wealth of pictures by those who have eyes to see and
minds to appreciate, we must confess that London
people are far from picturesque. To begin with, we
have no distinctive national costume. Next we have
the influence of fashion, which plays mad tricks with
the human form divine, and which does its best to
correct or destroy the graceful design upon which our
first parents were built. If we turn to western
London, and stray into Kensington Gardens, we are
among these fashionable folk. They are what is called
well dressed ; but they are all alike to the photographer,
who must perforce neglect the charms of colour. One
' ady is to him adorned very much like another, the
tailor-made girl being predominant ; and as to the men,
there is still less variety, for the coats are all of one
pattern, and the chimney-pot hat docs not lend itselt
to artistic treatment. If we go east we have a differ-
ence, but little variation. The starched collar is re-
placed by the dirty spotted neckerchic-f; the black coat
by one which was once black, but which, like the
average lodging house keeper, “ has seen better days ; ”
and the shiny hat of respectability is deposed in favour
of the “billycock.” But look at them as we may, no
one is picturesque. One class is trim, clean, and neat,
and the other slovenly and dirty, but they do not make
good pictures.
The streets themselves are, some of them, in spite
of the march of improvement, full of beauty. Of
course there are miles and miles of ugly thoroughfares,
with rows of houses exactly alike. There is the
Belgravia pattern, the Bloomsbury pattern, the Pimlico
pattern, and any number of other patterns peculiar to
the districts in which they occur, and which owe their
design to the fertile imagination of some jobbing builder,
who has often been, more successfully, the architect
of his own fortune. Then there is the suburban villa,
which can only be described by that truly dreadful
word, “ genteel.” All these the searcher after the
picturesque will studiously avoid. He can, if he will
only seek them out, find plenty of old world nooks in
and about the city. Crooked lanes, containing rickety
houses, and ending often with a peep at some old
church tower, or spire, which completes a perfect
little picture. Then there is the noble river Thames,
which affords an endless field for pictorial possibilities.
The river has plenty of photographic worshippers, but
they all confine themselves to its upper reaches, and
everyone takes the same views. There is, for instance,
that eternal cottage on the bank near Cookham, Boul-
ter’s Lock, and many other spots which have been so
often photographed that, if the wet process had
continued to hold its own, the taking of these pictures
would have run the Thames dry. But it is in the city
part of the river that the real pictures are to be had,
and one artist — Wyllie — has been quick to see this, as
his noble masterpiece, now hung at South Kensington,
and many of his other works, declare. Photographs of
barge life, of merchantmen, and of the Dutch-built
boats which still find their way to London Bridge,
form in themselves materials for much study.
The extreme ugliness of the London houses is in many
places relieved by the beauty of the trees. It is too
much the fashion to talk of the smoke, the dirt, and
the noise of London streets, as if there were no
beauty, no cleanliness, and no quiet to be had anywhere
June 6, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
431
within its walls. All lovers of the metropolis will
resent this as a gross libel, for there are not only many
quiet spots, but there are plenty of beautiful trees.
And especially beautiful are these trees just now in
the early summer, when they have but lately unfolded
their leaves. Some of our suburban streets, too, just
lately have been brilliant with laburnum, lilac, and
white and red may, the colours of which have delighted
the eyes of those who seldom see a country lane, while
thiir scent has reminded them — as only a scent can — of
long-forgotten days among fields and hedgerows.
But what may bo called the permanent trees of
London are full of beauty, and especially is this true
of the noble plane tree, which flourishes with such
unwonted luxuriance that it would almost seem as if
it preferred to suck in the carbonaceous matter neces-
sary to all vegetable growth in the form of soot and fog.
Walk by the side of some of those old squares in Blooms-
bury, from which fashion has long ago fled, and where
many of the houses are let out in apartments, or are
filled with boarders. The trees there are above the
dictates of fashion, and continue to thrive and afford a
grateful shade to those who pass by. In Bedford
Square, Mecklenburg Square, and many other similar
localities these plane trees are in lovely condition, and
throw out their twenty-five or thirty foot branches,
crowded with graceful foliage, over the footpaths,
and they wave lazily in the gentle breeze as the after-
noon sun steals through their leaves. But even in the
city itself trees are not unknown. In one or two
of the old city churchyards there are fine specimens.
Note those, for instance, hard by Billingsgate, just
opposite the Custom House, where thousands of
sparrows congregate in the evening, and make a
veritable Babel with their ceaseless twittering. Nor
must we forget that famous tree in Cheapside which
has been immortalised by Wordsworth. It is now,
unfortunately, walled-in in such a manner that its
top only is visible from the main thoroughfare, and
it is a matter for wonder that it continues to live
under such conditions. But we believe that it is
a fact that, within the past twenty years, rooks
have been known to build in that tree, until, per-
haps, the long journey necessary to them before they
could obtain their natural food, made them give up
the struggle.
If proof were wanted that London is capable of
affording fine opportunities for the picture maker,
we might refer to an exhibition of water-colour
drawings, by Mr. Herbert Marshall, R.W.S., which
was lately opened in Bond Street. Here we had no
fewer than one hundred sketches in colour by one
artist, many of them being perfect little gems. If
one painter can do so much, surely there is much to
he done with a camera.
The Devon and Cornwall Camera Club forwards a programme
of summer outings ; among them we notice the Royal
Plymouth \ acht Club Regatta, to which the Photographic Club
will be conveyed by its aquatic confreres in the s.s. Sir
Francis Drake,
CrUAIACOL AS a DEVELOrER FOR DRY
PLATES*
BY COI.ONF.L J. WATERHOUSE, B.S.C., ASSIST.-SURVF/YOR
GENERAL OF INDIA.
In connection with the use of the pyrocatechin, or catechol,
as a developer for dry plates, it struck me that guaiacol,or
methycatechol, which is a very much cheaper product,
being only about Is. 6d. an ounce, instead of 4s. a drachm,
might possibly be of use in the same way. On trial I find
it is so, and it may, therefore, be interesting to the Photo-
graphic Society to know of it, in order that further trials
may be made by anyone interested in the matter. I can-
not find any record of its having been tried before.
Guaiacol is a colourless, oily liquid, with a rather pun-
gent smell. It is obtained by dry distillation of guaiac
resin, and in other ways. It is only slightly soluble in
water, but readily so in alcohol, ether, acetic acid, and
alkalies. I find it dissolves easily in solutions of caustic
soda or the carbonate of soda, the solution having a slight
green tint.
I have not yet had time to ascertain the best proportions
for developing purposes, but 20 minims of it in 2 ounces
of a solution of carbonate of soda crystals at 4 per cent.,
well stirred till dissolved, gave a solution which, though
somewhat slow in action, possessed very fair developing
powers. A similar solution of 30 minims of it in 2 ounces
of a solution of caustic soda (1 part solution used with
Thomas’ hydroquinone developer, diluted with 3 of water)
developed rather quicker, but otherwise seemed no better.
The negatives are not nearly so dense as those obtained
with a similar solution of pyrocatechin, but .are more har-
monious. The deposit is even and fine grained, and of a
yellowish-brown tint, which seems to have fairly good
printing powers. I enclose some film negatives, with
prints. There is no tendency to stain or fog, nor to the
superficial veil common with hydroquinone. The develop-
ing solution, after use, takes a much stronger colour, and
also has a strong empyreumatic smell, which is somewhat
persistent, and sticks to the hands for some time after-
wards.
So far as I can see at present, guaiacol is not likely to
supplant ferrous oxalate, pyrogallol, or other recognised
and well-tried developers, but the use of a liquid develop-
ing agent is new and interesting ; and, if the material itself
can be kept indefinitely without decomposition, it might
be useful for travellers in place of the more readily decom-
posable dry developers, like pyrogallic acid and hydro-
quinone, which easily spoil by exposure in corked bottles.
The smell will be somewhat against the new developer,
though it is really not unpleasant, and is probably whole-
some, as guaiacol has recently been recommended as a
remedy for consumption.
According to Watts, f guaiacol forms crystalline salts
with the alkalies and alkaline earths, which appear, as might
have been expected, to be readily decomposed and turned
black by exposure to air and moisture. Otherwise they
might form very efficient developing salts, and be more
convenient to use than the guaiacol itself. To have the
alkali and developing agent together in a single crystal-
line salt would be most useful for travellers. The further
development of this phase of the question I must leave to
more experienced chemists.
* The above paper was received too late to be read at “ the May meeting
of the Photographic Society.” Any discussion that may arise on its pub-
lication will be taken at the June meeting.
f Victionary of Chemistry, Vol. II ,p. 94Q.
432
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jcne 6, 1890.
THE CITY PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION.
The above exhibition was opened to the public last Satur-
day at the Drapers’ Hall, Throgmorton Street, London,
and on the preceding evening its promoters, the Photo-
graphic Section of the London Chamber of Commerce,
invited a number of their friends to a conversazione in the
hall. Among those present were Alderman Sir II. and
Lady Knight, Sir Charles Clifford, Sir Frederick Young,
Mr. Carl Ulrich, Vice-President of the Amateur Photo-
graphic Association of Vienna, Mr. John Spiller, Mr. Leon
Warnerke, Miss Warnerke, Sir Charles Mills, Mr. Alderman
and Sheriff Stuart Knill and Mrs. Knill, Mr. Under-Sheriff
Beard, Mr. Alderman Cowan, Mr. J. S. Balfour, M.P.,
Mr. Howard. M.P., Mr. W. F. Lawrence, M.P., Mr. D.W.
Coates-IIardlcy, Mr. Benjamin Scott (City Chamberlain),
Mr. J. S. C. Ileywood (Master of the Drapers’ Company)
and Mrs. Heywood, Mr. and Mrs. S. Hope Morley, Mr. and
Mrs. T. Tyrer, Mr. W. S. Bird (Chairman of the Photo-
graphic Section), Mr. F. Bishop (Deputy-Chairman), Mr. K.
B. Murray (Secretary), Sir G. Chambers, Mr. E. N. C.
Braddon, Sir James Garrick, Senor de Olano, Mr. A. S.
Pollard, M.A, Mr. J. A. Brand (City Comptroller), and
Mr. W. Leaf.
In formally declaring the exhibition open, Sir Albert
K. Rollit, M.P. (Chairman of the Council of the London
Chamber of Commerce), delivered a short address, in the
course of which he spoke of the great development of
photographic art, as shown in the exhibition, and empha-
sised the wisdom of making the art familiar to as many
minds as possible, thus leading the public to appreciate
and cultivate it. Looking at it from another point of view,
he said that they must not forget what photography had
done for cognate sciences. The recording and measur-
ing instruments connected with photography gave the
opportunity of fixing questions of time and space beyond
the possibility of human error, and in connection with
astronomy and physical science the assistance of photo-
graphy had been invaluable. They were deeply indebted
to those who had taken so much trouble to - bring this
exhibition about, and he felt it a personal privilege to be
able to declare it formally open. A vote of thanks having
been accorded to the Drapers’ Company for the use of
their hall, Mr. Alderman and Sheriff Knill briefly apolo-
gised for the absence of the Lord Mayor, who had only
that evening returned from Yorkshire, in, he was glad to
say, much better health.
The exhibition included a fine show of apparatus and
photographs, but in the collection were few things of
novelty ; the object of the exhibition was to show the
public something of the present position of photography
and its appliances, and in this it succeeded well. Day by
day the attendance of the general public increased, proba-
bly because the rumour spread from mouth to mouth that
in the Drapers’ Hall was a photographic picture gallery
worth seeing, and should the exhibition become an annual
institution, the benefit will be felt of having broken the ice
of public apathy this week.
Mr. Walter Tyler, of London, exhibited lanterns and
cameras; Mr. W. F. Slater, frame mouldings and appa-
ratus ; Mr. Gotz, apparatus and lenses ; Mr. Abrahams,
apparatus; Messrs. Houghton and Co., the French panta-
scopic camera, already described in these pages ; Mr. F.
W. Hart, varieties of apparatus and a portable stand of
bamboo, which, when disjointed, can be readily carried
under the arm, and can be fixed so as to hold backgrounds
and reflectors for use in private houses with the flash-
light; it can also be used to hold a magic lantern
screen ; at the exhibition it was used with curtains, so as
to form a kind of canopy over Mr. Hart's stall ; this por-
table stand is a new invention. Mr. Dallmeyer exhibited
lenses ; the Stereoscopic Company, apparatus ; Messrs.
Sands and Hunter, apparatus ; Messrs. 11. and J. Beck,
apparatus ; Mr. Schblzig, albumenised papers, and a
few German cameras and stands ; Mr. Morley, apparatus ;
Mr. Crouch, apparatus; Messrs. Marion and Co.,
appparatus, and an illustrated book issued this week by
Mr. Bobert Slingsby, on photography by the flash light.
Mr. 1>. J. Edwards, specimens of work in orthochromatic
photography ; Messrs. Watson and Son, apparatus ;
they exhibited one of their “ Acme ” cameras fitted with
an extra-wide front for stereoscopic work, and it is useful
to be able to apply a light modern camera in
this way. Messrs. Wray and Sons exhibited lenses;
Messrs. Newton and Co., elaborate oxyhydrogen and
electric microscopes; Messrs. J. Lewis and Co.,
apparatus ; Messrs, l’earson and Denham, apparatus ;
Mr. E. G. Platt, brass work for photographic apparatus ;
Mr. J. D. England, celluloid negatives and films ; Mr.
England says: — “The instantaneous views were taken
by my father and myself on a trip to Bushey Park on
Whit Monday, and although the apparatus was jolted on
a tricycle over a dusty road, there is scarcely a single pin-
hole on any of the negatives.” Messrs. Perken, Son, and
Payment exhibit apparatus. Mrs. George Smith exhibited
some transparencies mounted as table lamp screens and
fire screens ; Mr. George Smith exhibited his sciopticon
camera and other apparatus ; Messrs. Mawson and Swan,
apparatus.
“Walks in the Grand Duchy of Luxemrurg,” will form
a new illustrated section to the forthcoming issue of Mr. Percy
Lindley’s “ Walks in the Ardennes.”
Hydroxylamine Developers. — There is a new reducing
salt, .also a reducing solution sold by the Badischen Aniline and
Soda Fabric Company, which contain hydroxylamine. The
former compound is a white substance with an acid reaction,
soluble in ten parts of water. It contains sulphate of hydroxy-
lamine and some organic substance. Analysis showed that 100
grammes of it contained an amount of hydroxylamine corres-
ponding to 16 ‘5 grammes of the hydrochloride, while 100
grammes of the solution contained a quantity equivalent to
10 grammes. Hydroxylamine is a very suitable develojier for
gelatino-chloride plates, — A. Lainer, in Phot. Mitt.
Dourly Albumenised Papers. — M. L. Van Neck gives the
following formula) for sensitizing and toning doubly albumen-
ised and very brilliant papers. 1. Add magnesium carbonate
to the silver bath in the proportion of two grammes to a litre
of the bath ; this will prevent the formation of a red colour
in die bath. 2. The strength of the sensitising bath should
not be more concentrated than from 8 to 10 per cent. It may
be strengthened from time to time by the addition of a 12 per
cent, solution of silver nitrate. 3. The washing before fixing
should be done with tap water, rain water beiug frequently very
impure. 4. Toning bath : —
1. — Sodium acetate, pure fused ... 15 grammes
crystallised
,, biborate
Distilled water
2. — Gold chloride (brown)
Distilled water ...
15
8 „
2 litres
1 gramme
50 c.c.
An hour before use mix the two solutions, shake well, and place
in the flask in a strong light. The toning action is very rapid.
In winter the solutions must be kept at a temperature of 20 J C.
— Bulletin Beige.
June 6, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
433
PHOTOGRAPHS ON VIEW AT TIIE DRAPERS’
IIALL, THROGMORTON STREET.
BY REV. F. C. LAMBERT, M.A.
The number of pictorial exhibits is not so large as one
would expect, for, although most of the well-known large
firms are represented, yet one rather expected to see a
stronger contingent of the less known workers sending
one or two frames of their best work.
Passing up the spiral staircase, and entering the room
nearest the top of the stairs, the visitor finds himself in
what, for convenience sake, may be called Gallery I. As
there are no numbers on the frames, it may stive time by
saying at the outset that the order of these notes runs from
right to left round the walls, and then the screens are
taken in order.
Close to the left of the door on entering are several
frames sent by Messrs. Waterlow and Son, illustrating
those processes of reproduction for which this firm is so
well known. It is instructive to notice, not only the
various effects produced by different methods, but also
how both surface and tint bear influence in the general
effect. Messrs. Frith come next with two frames — one
chiefly landscape, executed in the manner familiar to all
who know their name, and a second, devoted to archi-
tectural studies; some of the interiors are remarkably
fine. Then come Messrs. Lambert Weston and Sons
with several frames ; that at the bottom in the left-hand
corner, seems to outstrip the others — at any rate, for pose
and ease of expression, and unconsciousness of the operator.
Above is “ Our Village,” produced by Mr. Thurston.
Perhaps one might venture to say that this is not llushey ;
the clouds seem rather heavy for the lighting of the road-
way. To the right of this is “ A Misty Morning,” and
very misty it looks — a picture well worth careful study.
The inevitable “ Eiffel Tower,” with Wray’s rapid rect.,
is not far off, and in company with several yacht studies
by Messrs. West and Son, all of which are admirable
specimens of that well-known firm’s work. At the other
end of the room, and near the door, are found several of
Mr. Payne Jennings’ pictures, many of them so well
known to travellers over the Great Eastern Railway. A
very small one in the middle of the frame nearest to the
doorway should be noticed.
Passing to the screens, the first frame likely to interest
is that containing the two poets, Tennyson and Browning,
by Cameron and Smith. Messrs. Elliot and Fry send a
large show in various styles, the most pleasing, as a study,
being a portrait of a little lady in red carbon — the
smooth, bright, clear, surface of the so-called opal being
fitted for the rendering of such young and tender skin,
the bloom of maidenhood. Mr. F. Dower sends a collec-
tion of very interesting studies, chiefly of Professor Her-
komer, R.A., as “Filippo,” in the poetic comedy
performed at the llushey Theatre in April last. These
admirable studies would have been still more interesting
had a little care been given to the background ; or
at least, to avoiding the dark band behind the legs. Near
here is an instructive photogravure, after Blair Leighton,
by the Typo Etching Company ; also, close by, are several
flash-light productions, which will interest experimentalists
in this direction. Messrs. Window and Grove, and also
Morgan and Kidd, are fully represented on the screens in
this room.
On entering Gallery II. the Stereoscopic Company
demand attention by their numerous productions in various
styles, and here may be seen several portraits of well-
known public characters. Then comes an admirable por-
trait of Professor Huxley, and also another, nearly as good,
of Dr. Joachim ; both are well worth careful study, and
reflect great credit on Messrs. Downey. Messrs. Fry
(Brighton) show a frame of camp life studies which will
be of interest to the Volunteer “camper.” The Auto-
type Company exhibit a large screen of carbon pictures in
various styles of frame and shade of tint. Many old
friends turn up again, but are none the less worth re-study.
The Parthenon Frieze must on no account be passed
withou due attention.
On the other side may be seen a collection of curious
and deeply interesting early fans, produced at a time when
it was not necessary to say, as it seems now-a-days,
“ painted by hand ” (as though it was more general to use
the feet for that purpose). The antiquary will be inte-
rested in seeing a reproduction of a page of the Magna
Charta. Messrs. Bedford Lemere and .also Mayall send
numerous examples of their portrait and other work.
The third gallery (or exit passage) is not very happily
lighted, there being rather too much glare and glint on
the glass to enable seeing the pictures to full advantage.
Mr. Flather sends specimens of the “ dry point or needle
finished” enlargements, which produce an effect somewhat
out of the usual enlargement groove. Next come two
fine portraits by Robt. Faulkner, and various specimens
of his proverbial skill with children. High up — too high
up, in fact, for comfortable survey — are two large opal
studies of “ Sun and Cloud,” by Friese Greene, interest-
ing in more ways than one, and decidedly reflecting credit
on their producer.
Several portraits of Mr. Thomson recall the Gains-
borough style of backgrountl, and are suggestive of various
hints in that respect. Three or four portrait studies by
II. S. Mendelsohn, and Messrs. Doulton & Co., repro-
ductions of those never-to-be-forgotten Tinworth bas-
reliefs, bring our survey to an end.
A small gathering of lantern-slides by Messrs. Fincham,
York, & Son, and “ last but not least,” Mr. G. Smith
(trading as the Scioptican Co.), also a collection of
coloured ones by Newton & Co., are to be seen in some
of the windows.
On the whole, although not being particularly impressed
with any great proportion of new work, there are several
pictures worth study, even if seen before. It is not a
very rash prophecy to prognosticate that if an exhibition
be held on similar lines, say in ten years’ time, there will
be seen a decided change in some respects at least — the
direction will be, perhaps, rougher surfaces and less re-
touching.
On Monday next, June 9th, Mr. G. J. Clarke will give a
lecture on “ Photographic Optics ” before the North Middlesex
Photographic Club, Jubilee House, Hornsey Road.
Can it be true that the historically interesting initials,
devices, and mottoes on the walls of the old prisons in the
Tower of London have never been photographed ? A writer
in the Photographic News assures us that he made inquiry on
the spot, and received a negative answer. This of course does
not mean that the “ beefeater ” produced a “ negative,” but,
on the contrary, that this simple and only trustworthy mode
of reproducing these pathetic records of captivity had not been
adopted. In their place some etchings were offered ; but these
are obviously very different things. The camera should at
once be brought to tear upon the inner walls of the Beauchamp
Tower. — Daily News.
434
tH£ PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 6, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN ROME.
The Bollettino , a journal published every two months in
Rome, and the chief organ of those interested in photo-
graphy in that city, gives the result of the last election of
members of its Photographic Society as follows : Adler,
Dottor Yittoria ; Intrigilo, Avv. Benedetto; Teneraui, Cav.
Carlo ; and of the correspondent members— Calvaria, Cav.
Avv. Giuseppe, of Castellamare di Stabia ; Daniele, Oreste,
of Catania ; Garzia, Oronzo, of Maglie ; Hermans, Charles,
of Brussels ; and Orsini, Marchese Antonio, of Solmona.
The opening of the Second Annual Exhibition of Pho-
tography took place in the Palazzo di Belle Arti on the
2nd of May, when a large number of members took part.
The display included landscapes and interiors, portraits,
instantaneous views, film negatives, photo-micrographs,
enlargements, flash-light pictures, architectural views, and
representations of costumes taken in Morocco and in Sweden.
An excellent article on “The Duration of the Pose”
begins thus: — “Formerly, when collodion occupied the
whole field of photography, the first difficulty in the art
was the preparation of the sensitive surface. Now that
the preparation has undergone a radical change,
passing into a branch of industry, that first diffi-
culty has vanished, aud there has succeeded to its place
the duration of the pose, the exact determination of which
has over the resulting picture an influence as great, and
possibly greater than formerly, seeing that in the very
short poses of the present time even a little error has a
value of relatively greater importance. ” The article goes
on to say that the duration depends (1) on the sensitive
preparation, (2) on the actinic power of the light, (3) on
the object, (4) on the diaphragm, and (5) on the distance.
Thus, if it were required to represent by an algebraic
formula the conditions governing the pose l", we should
have —
t" = k. P. L. O. d. D.
where k is the invariable constant.
The article, which is too long to translate, is written by
A. Roncalli. It is succeeded by a short notice of the
effects of the Schippang varnish upon collodion enlarge-
ments. This article, written by Ab. F. Castracane,
makes mention of some unhappy results of the use of
this varnish on some of his own pictures. After this
comes a letter from Sac. D. Ratti, on halation, or
aureole , as the Italians call it. Then a paper on the
development of instantaneous negatives and on the toning
of aristotype paper, by Bne. T. Melazzo. Various notes
and receipts, with a bibliography and a short notice of the
illustrated supplement, complete this interesting number.
The illustration is that of a moonlight effect, the negative
by A. Ducros, the phototype by Danesi, of Rome. “To obtain
this picture,” says the letter-press note, “ it was sufficient to
set the machine against the setting ” — pardon the indis-
cretion ; I was about to add sun — “ and to remove the
cap. But, before this is done, that certain fifth* sense
has to be taken into account,” without which,
‘ Non licet adire Coriutum ! ’f
and Signor Ducros, profound aud advanced artist aud
photographer as he is, possesses this fifth sense, and uses
it in a masterly manner.”
Prof. O. N. Rood says that the retina of the human eye is so
sensitive to the action of light that a flash lasting only one forty-
billionth of a second is sufficient to make an impression upon it.
THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF ARTS, 1890.
BY THE HEW F. C. LAMBERT, M.A.
G allery No. VI. — Close to the doorway is No. 523 (“ When
the Flowing Tide comes in,” W. Rainey) ; a jolly lot of little
sandboys dabbling their feet in the tide-water, calling to
mind some of friend Sutcliffe’s delightful Whitby studies,
and opens the question of how he would have arranged a
row of “little lads ” just like that? Many a photographer,
on seeing such a scene as No. 539 (“The History of many a
Winter's Storm,” F. Walton), would have said, “there’s
nothing in it,” but Mr. Walton has contrived to “knock a
picture out of it.” N.B., No. 540 (“Viaticum,” J. M.
Price) just at first glance reminds one of the photographs
one sees of the much-talked-of “Angelus,” by J. F.Millet.
The picture before us represents some two or three pea-
sants, presumably French, kneeling and watching the
“ Priest ” passing in the distance on some errand of mercy
— perhaps conveying the last sacrament to some departing
member of his flock. It is a work in a low key, cool in
grey, subdued tint, and worthy of careful study.
No. 543 (“A Stranger,” N. Garstin). Pose of the two
children is note-worthy, but the picture reminds one some-
what of the “ two-negatives’” effect.
No. 551 (“The Death of Cleopatra,” lion. John Collier)
is quite the big thing of the gallery —should be seen from
a considerable distance — in fact, is best seen from just
without the opposite doorway. The texture and cold
surface polish of the two colossal gods of dark green
granite or syenite, is admirably rendered ; perhaps the
colouring of the pillars is somewhat raw, the general
parallel trend of the seated figure, and the dead one on the
floor catches the eye ; also the elevation of sternum of the
dead Cleopatra, over whom is spread a delicate diapha-
nous drapery, showing the modelling of the figure in a
very masterly way; altogether a fine picture, and one from
which much may be learned.
Close by the door (and also near the floor) are three
small pictures, well worth looking at, viz., No. 583 (“The
Edge of the Quarry," T. T. Rowe) ; No. 584 (“ Windsor
Castle,” W. Fitz) ; No. 585 (“A quiet pool,” A. Lawson).
No. 582 (“ Thunder Clouds,” A. W. Williams) is also a
very creditable rendering of a by no means easy subject.
No. 604 (“A Grey l)ay,”A. Hulk), might well have been
greyer still.
No. 632 (“ In old Kent,” R. W. A. Rouse), is well worth
the attention of the photographic eye. Note the admirable
rendering of that bit of chalk or clunch quarry.
No. 646 (“A Lantern Manufacturer,” E. Docker); a
clean faced urchin manufacturing that ever-favourite ghost
producer — a turnip lantern. A picture showing good,
honest, straightforward painting, and of which, perhaps,
the too clean face of the “ manufacturer ” is the least
satisfactory. Before leaving this room, Nos. 524, 542, 553,
560, 562, 571, 599 may be looked at, and several hints
gathered, aud, as Captain Cuttle would advise, “when found
make a note on.”
Gallery VII. — No. 658 (“Resurgam,” II. Swanwick).
A lone dead body of a toiler of the sea, washed up by the
tide. Truly a gruesome subject, not the sort of picture
many people would select as a daily companion at the
dining-table ; yet, withal, not without some charm in its
rendering of air and soft morning dawn-glow.
No. 672 (“The Silent Evening Hour,” B. W. Leader, A.).
Here is an answer to the familiar question, “ What’s in a
name?” Who can deny that a first impression is often
* “ Sixth, or do the Italians reckon only lour senses 1 Pr. Dev.
r Corinthum.
June 6, 1890.")
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
435
(though, perhaps, unjustly and unconsciously) influenced
by a name? The title (often enough very misleading)
tempts many a one to buy a book. Here is a poetical title
of a poetry-yielding subject. The old homestead of red
brick and thatch, surrounded by uncultured patches of
gorse, affording glorious shelter for the rabbits out to feed
at the “ evening hour,-’ the crows returning home, the sky
all a-glosv with warm, rich golden light ; all put together
with “ Leader-esque ” skill, and conveying much in the
way of hint and suggestion.
Above is an utter contrast, No. 671 (“The Dock Strike,”
D. Hardy). A vivid reality of life, and a creditable ren-
dering.
No. 695 (“ Highlands and Islands,” Keeley Halswelle).
The title reminds one of “ spelling-bees” and Peter Piper
of pepper-corn fame. The rainbow seems much nearer
than is usually seen, and so also do the clouds. This pic-
ture comes rather as a puzzle, and bewilders one in trying
to find a satisfactory place to start from.
No. 699 (“A Gem worth polishing,” C. Calthrop). The
gem is a country lad with a turn for “fiddling,” discovered
by “The Squire” in a humble cottage. There are several
points worth observing and remembering, both in the matter
of pose and lighting, although the four figures placed at
the four corners of a “ lozenge ” is somewhat formal ; and
there is, perhaps, a more than pleasant scattering of the
lights and darks.
No. 701 (“Golden Autumn,” G. N. Langlands), No. 706
(“ Pulling Turnips, &c.,” M. 11. Jones), and No. 723
(“ Turnip Field,” J. II. Inskip), are all most suggestive to
the camera-artist, well worth careful study for hints in
the general arrangement of subject and tone, wncreby
homely subjects are made attractive by the way in which
they are treated.
No. 726 (“ Undine,” R. Lehmann). This calls to mind
81, and if, after seeing that picture, there lingered any
doubt, this (726) is quite conclusive that there are “ many
more fish in the sea, &c.”
No. 708 (“Mount Etna from Taormina,” John Mac
Whirter, A.) must not be passed by without careful study.
Stand back a couple of yards or so and observe how the
feeling of distance is given by the gradual suppression of
minute “f-64 detail” — how the contrast of values is sub-
dued in the receding distance, as the shadows are filled
more and more with diffused light, and observe, too, how
certain parts (planes) in the midtile distance are more
sharply defined than some of the nearer or more distant
ones. Note the high key in which the scale of tones is
pitched, and how the azure waters melt into the prismatic
purples and greys of distance. All of which go to show
that there are “ many ways to choke a dog” — pardon — to
paint a picture without tying the mill-stone-like tenets of
anil school about one’s neck. Before quitting this room,
No. 719 (“Dawn,” S. E. Waller) must be inspected,
although lying somewhat out of the photographer’s range,
yet it is most desirable that he should contemplate good
work of any and every kind. The picture carries us back
a century or so to a country garden at early dawn, and the
guests, who have “kept it up” till “daylight doth appear,”
are departing in the combined light of carriage -lamps and
dawn. A couple of lovers in the foreground “linger in
sweet moments.” There is much admirable work to repay
careful study, even to the delicate gossamer, “as fresh as
morning dew distilled.”
Gallery VIII. — The first picture on entering Gallery viii.
is No. 758 (“The last Blessing,” C. Tayler). Stricken
unto death lies a wasted form, tendered by a trouble-worn
mother, a hardy-handed, tender-hearted father, and the
priest in absolution conveying the last blessing of Mother
Church, conjuring up a fearfully, awfully real scene of
love and sorrow ; the whole, painted in a low key, in
harmony throughout both in tint and tone with the senti-
ment, producing a picture of great power. The face of
the father — honest fellow — is a fine study.
No. 775 (“How Lisa loved the King,” E. B. Leighton).
See previous note on open mouths, as though to represent
singing without the sound. The pose of the listeners is
more listener-like. The texture of the marble is not quite
satisfactory.
No. 781 (“The Angry Sunset, &c.," II. Jobling) is a nice,
simple, airy picture, broadly painted in pleasing harmony
— sunny yet not gaudy, conveying the feeling of open
space rather than specific detail.
No. 792 (“Tired Out,” P. E. Strettou). It is not often,
perhaps not often enough, that one sees pictures of this
“interior dimly lighted” kind, and this one comes as a
relief, inviting and also repaying careful examination. An
anxious mother watching beside the bed of a fever-worn,
tired-out sleeping child, in a room but dimly lighted by a
glowing fire and candle, in the small hours of dark night.
There is no oppressive detail, but everything is seen when
looked for, yet nothing catching the eye to carry it away
from the leading theme.
No. 794 (“ Rifle Match,” E. Crowe, R.), brings to mind
the hand-camera-out-for-a-bank-holiday ; at first sight a
little anxiety arises as to whether the “ shootist” is aiming
at a blade of grass about six feet away.
No. 821 (“First Snow,” F. IV. Meyer). A town dweller
might be disposed to condemn this picture as too raw, but
it is not by any means an out of the way effect as seen by
those who live in the country all the winter round.
No. 744 (“Seeking Sanctuary,” R. Hedley) must be
seen from a distance — across the room — and all diffused
light shaded off from the eyes, when the moon-lit Norman
doorway and iron work of later period comes up well, but
the man’s face seems somewhat over lighted.
Gallery No. IX. — No. 830 (“River Camel,” W. Llewellyn)
points the moral of the too great squareness of a 10 by 8
plate, and the patch of thin emulsion towards the middle
is an unpleasant reminder, but the clouds are nice and
soft, not painty, but airy as clouds should be.
No. 842 (“ Bathers,” E. Stott), brings up again to mind
the old conundrum “ How big should the wafer be on the
negative to represent the size of the sun ?”
No. 846 (“Frosty Morning,” F. Whitehead). A
capital version of what is seen (and felt) often enough in
the fens.
No. 857. (“Net barking,” F. S. Richardson). Except-
ing the sky, this picture is one to please and instruct.
No. 866 (“On the Temple steps,” E. J. Poynter, R.A.),
This, at first glance, suggests the question, Was the
painter here trying to see how many different patches of
differing colours it would be possible to work in together?
Pink, red, lake, crimson, yellow, greens, blues, purples,
&c., and flesh tints. The part which seems to come out
of the encounter best is the legs below the knee, and the
inscription-bearing marble slab behind them.
No. 888 (“Twilight,” C. W. Wyllie) is a nice, quiet,
cool, grey moonrise, with the “blue band” of a distant
fog, with which the fire-smoke and fire-lights blend plea-
santly.
No. 895 (“Washing Day, Newlyn,” II. L. Norris)
436
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 6, 1890.
seems to run somewhat too far into the low-toned end of
the colour octave. It does not require any great effort
of the imagination to fancy a brighter, whiter, and lighter
froth of soap -lather, for instance.
No. 890 (“Lava mea ab iniquitate mea,” A. Lonza) is a
jolly picture, a “tale well told.” An old monk drawing an
obstinate cork from a wine flask. The expression on his
feature-drawn face may suggest more than one “ wrinkle.”
The “hangmen” were, perhaps, “ cruel to be kind ” in
hanging No. 913 (“ Water Meadows,” .T. L. Bernard)
and No. 914 (“Malvern,” J. Ehrke) one above the other.
We have here and almost “ in a nutshell” the “ focus versus
fuzzy” question. It is well worth while for photographers
of both or any “school” to look at these two from a little
distance, and also as near as he can get, and then think a
bit for himself and see if he cannot see some recom-
mendation in the writer’s favourite motto, * ‘ via media, via
tuta.”
No. 972 (“Fresh from the Altar,” J. Hayllar). A very
remarkable piece of fine detail painting, representing more
painstaking skill than some of the big brush school would
credit, and instances admirably the lesson that one subject
may find fitting expression in a method which would be
utterly fatal to one partially similar.
Gallery X. — In this room the pictures which are most
likely to repay the observant visitor are No. 996 (“Por-
trait,” M. C. W. Flower), vide also No. 635 by same artist;
No. 1,016 (“ Waiting for the Train,” J. II. F. Bacon), a
sweet, thoughtful face painted with great sympathy ; |
No. 1,009 (“Bunswick,” V. P. Yglesias), a quiet bit of N.
Yorkshire ; No. 1,042 (“Three miles to the Fair,”C. Ilayes),
perhaps the most truthful rendering of snow in this year's
collection; and No. 1,028 (“The 9th of November,”
W. Logsdail), a picture which makes one say Oh !
Gallery XI. — No. 1,090 (“The Young Wheat,” David
Murray) will certainly repay careful study, and is the
kind of subject open to the country photographer.
Observe how perspective of the parallel lines gives feeling
of distance, and how the lines of the clouds assist in
giving also the feeling of space — the open air effect so
seldom sufficiently conveyed.
No. 1,146 (“By order of the Court,” S. A. Forbes).
One of the leading pictures of the year; contains many
hints which space does not permit being given at length,
but must not be passed over without careful study. There
are also several other pictures to be carefully examined,
viz., No. 1,076 (“Perseus and Andromeda,” II. S. Tuke),
No. 1,104 (“October Glow,” A. East), No. 1,111 (“Last
Load,” B. Gast), No. 1,112 (“Chip of the old block,”
W. B. Fortescue), No. 1,113 (“The Ferry,” W. Osborne),
and No. 1,140 (“ Roman Holiday,” F. M. Skipworth).
The Architectural Room calls up numerous interesting
questions both as to interior and exterior work, and there-
fore will repay a visit. The “ Black and White” and also
Water-colour galleries are obviously abounding with
lessons and hints, which space does not permit one to enter
upon ; and the question of the bearing of photography
towards the revival of miniature painting and growing
attention recently given to “burnt-in enamels," must all
be reserved ; but most reluctantly do we relinquish our
study of, perhaps, the most difficult branch of art, viz.,
sculpture, but a branch which no real serious and truth-
seeking art student can afford to neglect.
Herr H. F. R. Voigtlander, of the firm of Voigtlander
aud Sou, has, it is reported, been knighted by the Emperor
of Austria.
ETHICS OF PHOTOGRAPHY AND PHOTO-
GRAPHERS*
BY J. TRAILI. TAYLOR.
A funny instance of slightly unethical behaviour comes to
my recollection. The once well-known Marcus Sparling
was intent upon taking a stereoscopic view of an old house
in the Edinburgh Cowgate, but, when the light suited, the
street was usually full of boys just out of school, who
invariably persisted in standing in front of his camera.
In this dilemma he applied to me for advice, and, as a
consequence, the next day found him with a huge, highly-
polished French portrait lens attached to the back of his
camera, and pointing in the direction opposite to that
where stood the coveted old house. 1 his time the boys,
true to their instincts, posed in front of the showy lens in
the rear, and stood still patiently during the three or four
minutes (these were the days of long exposures) required
to get the building photographed. This may be off-colour
from the ethical standard, but what was one to do under
the circumstances?
Here is a view, fully exposed, taken of a railway carriage
when the train is certified by the engineer as having been
going at thirty-five miles an hour, and yet every one of the
occupants of the compartment is sharp and distinct. As
the story stands it is simply a marvel, but “seeing is
believing.” Where the ethics come in is the withholding
the explanation that it was taken from the window of a
carriage iu another train, which, on a parallel track, was
moving at the same rate of speed, and when, consequently,
one was motionless as regards the other — a phenomenon
that can be witnessed every morning, about nine o clock,
between Finsbury Park and Holloway Stations, on the
Great Northern Railway.
Double printing, when practised by one imperfectly
skilled, may prove a fertile cause of departure from truth.
Clouds of a nature totally inadequate to the character of
the scene may be introduced. The foreground of a pic-
i ture may be Indian, and in the distance may be seen the
Crystal Palace with its Sydenham surroundings. One of
our members has, by way of joke, introduced in a view in
Epping Forest an alligator disporting himself by the bank
of one of its pools ; but many things equally non-natural are
semetimes to be discovered in a combination photograph.
Thus, we have the incongruities arising from the attempts
to combine, in one picture, pieces of landscape or inci-
dents taken with lenses the foci of which are widely
different. Not only so, but we have iu one inharmonious
whole parts of views lighted differently from each other,
and as many kinds of perspective as there are elementary
parts in the finished result. I have seen in a pseudo-
moonlight photograph the orb of night printed the size of
a threepenny piece, when that of even a split pea would
have proved too great. Nay, I have, and you all have,
seen moonlight photographs in which the dominant light
fell upon the objects from a point thirty or forty degrees
to one side of the position of the full moon by which the
, scene was supposed to be illumined.
The mere mention of photography in the law courts
will recall an incident narrated by one of our members a
few years ago. It was a case of ancient lights, and in the
morning he, as a well-known professional, undertook the
task, in the interests of the plaintiff, to show by truthful
photography that the erection of a building then in pro-
gress would most certainly cause a serious obstruction of
• Continued from page 376.
June 6, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
437
the light. He did his work to the satisfaction of the solici-
tor, and received his well-earned fee. But next morning
the solicitor for the defendant employed him to establish
the fact by truthful photography that by the erection of
the building in question no light whatever would be
obstructed. lie effected this, as in the previous case, in
a satisfactory manner, and received his fee. He. doubt-
less, reasons that there is no more immorality in this than
is reputed to be found in the daily practice of legal or
patent experts, and other counsel, who give “opinions”
usually favourable to those by whom their advice is sought.
Nor is there.
A humorous application of mal ethics in photography
is to be found in the photographer in an agricultural dis-
trict, who had often occasion to take negatives of cattle
and horses. He overcame the difficulty so often expe-
rienced of the animals whisking their tails and spoiling the
exposure, by the ingenious expedient of keeping a large
and various assortment of negatives of cows’ and horses'
tails, from which lie selected one that matched that of any
given specimen, and printed it in, having previously
stopped out the original that was blurred by motion. This
suggests the practice of the photographer in the military
town, who kept a stock of well-taken figures in uniforms,
but minus the heads, which he supplied from those of the
gallant patrons of his studio. And this in turn suggests
mention of a practice, horrible in its abomination, which,
more than twenty years ago, was — happily not frequently
— adopted by some foreign photographers, of printing the
heads of respectable ladies on the undraped bodies of
some of the same sex to whom this qualifying term could
not possibly be applied. Of all ethical sins in photography
this one was the vilest, as the junction of head and figure
was so perfectly effected as to deceive even photographers
themselves.
And dry-plate manufacturers, what of them ? Are they
ever guilty of practices contrary to ethics ? 1 lonestly I
believe they are not. The day has long gone by since
any manufacturer sought to utilise his waste or “shady”
plates by inserting two or three of them in every dozen
package of good plates. Happily, this system, being
suicidal, quickly effected its own cure, so it no longer
exists.
“Borrowed plumes” is a term which covers several
departures from the strict ethical path. I allude parti-
cularly under this heading to professional photographers
who display in their show cases as their own work that
which has been executed by others ; and also to amateurs
who, buying their plates ready prepared, get their deve-
loping, printing, mounting, and finishing done by others
more skilled, and then exhibit, and possibly obtain medals
for it, as their own work. A case is on record in which
this was carried to an extreme, for not only was all the
foregoing done, but it was done with a borrowed camera,
and an artist present had indicated the spot on which to
erect it, and the exposure to be given. Well might the
narrator ask who of all these should have got the medal
that was awarded the picture made under these circum-
stances?
I have mentioned an amateur of one type ; there is
another, viz., the one who, posing as an amateur, yet
enters in some respects into pecuniary competition with
the professional, doing work for his friends and such of the
public as apply, at so-called prime cost — that is, cost of
material — thereby in many cases depriving the man who
has to subsist by the exercise of his profession of his means
of living. On the unfairness of such a proceeding it is
not necessary I should dilate, especially as it is not un-
ethical, and does not come properly within the scope of
my subject.
Photographic authors and writers do not usually lend
themselves to the encouragement of departures from ethics,
but Elbert Anderson, in his book, “ The Skylight and the
Dark Boom,” is not so fastidious. He advises that, even
“ if your sitter sits still and has a good expression, but
upon developing the negative you find you have com-
mitted a blunder, rush out of the dark room, and tell him
with a bold face that he moral! You must never be in the
wrong ; it must always be his fault.”
Over a month ago I was discoursing on stereoscopic
photography at another Metropolitan society, and after
speaking of the expedient that had to be resorted to
when photographing the moon, namely, taking advan-
tage of her librations, and thus increasing the stereo-
scopic base from the two and a half inches between the
eyes to many thousands of miles in order to show her in
the stereoscope as the spherical ball we know her to be,
and by parity of reasoning I adduced my own experience
in photographing a coastline from the deck of a yacht,
allowing a space of a few hundred yards between
the shots in order by such abnormal displacement to
show every creek and jutting headland as they existed in
nature, although undecipherable in the monotonously
straight coast line as seen by the eye. It was objected
that this was not truth. Not, perhaps, as a representa-
tion of what the eye saw at the moment, but literal truth
all the same. This expedient is an aid to vision on the
same principle as looking through a telescope to see an
object at a range too great for normal vision, or photo
graphing by microscopic aid an object otherwise
altogether invisible.
But mention of the stereoscope suggests malpractices
with it which are altogether contrary to ethics. For
instance, trimming pictures so as to impart a fictitious
acclivity to a railway ascending a mountain which is already
fairly steep in itself, as practised by a well-known photo-
grapher; or making a stereoscopic pair of pictures from
one and the same negative, by which they undoubtedly
coalesce when viewed in the stereoscope, but which are
devoid of relief.
“ Dodges ” are not necessarily antagonistic to ethics.
They are generally expedients for expediting the means to
the end. Many of them could be mentioned were it
desirable or necessary.
Do not look upon me as hypercritical in regard to the
latitude permissible to photographers. All things are or
may be lawful ; the expediency thereof must be deter-
mined by circumstances. Let photographers practise
every conceivable dodge that they can think of, and no
offence against the strictest code of ethics will be perpe-
trated, so long as it is not done, to quote Truthful James,
“The same with intent to deceive.”
Developing Flash-Light Negatives. — A word as to the
developing of flash-light pictures. As nine out of ten are hard,
the best method, in my experience, is to give them as little
pyro or eikonogen as possible, so that the detail will have time
to appear, and after detail comes up, and the high-lights are
thin and translucent, apply full strength developer until the
negative is strong. In this respect a flash-light picture is
like a snow scene, easy to take, but difficult to develop. — C. M.
Cohen.
438
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 6, 1890.
iaotes.
The Prencli police are nothing if not methodical.
When the M ay- Day demonstrations were feared in Paris,
several of the leading capitalists and financiers received
threatening letters. These letters were all photo-
graphed carefully, and submitted to experts for the
purpose of ascertaining if they had been all forwarded
by the same person, or “ group ’’ of agitators. Why
these letters should have been photographed, instead of
the originals being submitted to the experts, we do
not understand ; but doubtless the police know why.
Perhaps it was necessary that the official photographer
should be kept employed.
Our reference to the absence of photographs of the
interior of the Tower, and especially the Beauchamp
Tower, has attracted the notice of the daily press. The
Daily News quotes with approval ; the Globe with a
reservation. The Globe agrees with us that the cause
is partly due to the “ array of ceremonial ” with which
the Tower is hedged round, but urges also that “in
the first place the light in such places is very bad, and
the position of prisoners’ inscriptions is often very
awkward.” But the badness of the light is, in these
days of magnesium powder and sensitive dry plates, no
obstacle at all, while there are no inscriptions save
those in the passage — the most interesting of which is
that of Robert Dudley, Earl of Guildford — which present
any difficulty. “It is, besides,” adds our contemporary,
“ possible to attach too much importance to such relics
of old days. Some of the inscriptions are, beyond
doubt, genuine, and arc often deeply pathetic. But it
is not quite ceitain that imaginative custodians have
not fathered them upon imaginary authors.” This
may or may not be, but the question of authenticity
is not one which the photographer is called upon to decide.
Meanwhile it is pleasant to see that the subject is
deemed of sufficient importance to draw comments from
two of the leading London papers.
It is now, we read, the fashion for barristers’
chambers in the Temple to be ornamented with pictures
of various “bits” of the Inn, both interior and exterior ;
while it is almost de rigueur that on the walls should
be hung portraits of judges and other legal celebrities.
This possibly explains why the photographs of the
luminaries of the bench and bar can be so readily
purchased ; otherwise, one would think the sale of
such pictures was so small, it would hardly pay for
the trouble of keeping a variety. In regard to the
pictures of the buildings, these, it appears, are mostly
water-colour sketches and etchings, a series of the
latter being now in process of completion. It is
curious that photography has been made use of to such
a small extent as it has in regard to photographing the
Inns of Court. The briefless barrister — and his name
is legion — might do worse than employ his idle hours
in photography. Yet, so far as we know, few of
them have taken up the art.
Even those who have, appear to have done so in a
perfunctory spirit. Witness Mr. Stavely Hill’s ex-
perience. Mr. Hill paid a visit to Canada some
time ago, and took with him a camera and a number
of double backs. In crossing the Atlantic, the ship
encountered some icebergs, and Mr. Hill promptly
brought out his camera and made six exposures on the
frigid monsters. On his return home, the backs, with
their contents, were handed over for treatment to a
professional photographer, who, on opening the slides
which it was supposed contained the precious negatives
of the icebergs, made the unpleasant discovery that
the whole six were empty. Instead of filling the
slides himself, as a genuine amateur would have done,
Mr. Hill trusted to the dealer of whom he had bought
his apparatus, and, by some carelessness, the assistant
had omitted to fill some of the slides. It was ex-
ceedingly unfortunate that Mr. Hill should have picked
out the empty slides, because he was particularly
anxious to obtain a picture of an iceberg; but in
photography ’twas ever thus. It is always the cherished
picture which comes to grief.
Not enough notice has been taken of the phenomena
which found publicity, not in the photographic but in
the daily press, of the efficacy, photographically speak-
ing, of thunderstorms. We were told of two instances
of photographs in natural colours. One occurred during
a photographic lecture at the Polytechnic, when a
violent thunderstorm arose, with the result that a
coloured image was imprinted, not upon the plate, but
upon the lens. In the other case, a lady clothed in a
black dress checked with green, red, and a narrow
yellow stripe, was sitting for her portrait. When the
thunderclap had burst, and the lady had scampered
away in fright, the operator developed, and found, to
his astonishment, “ a beautifully delicate, naturally-
coloured Daguerreotype.” We do not like to
doubt the veracity of anyone, and least of all the
veracity of a photographer ; therefore, although we have
not seen either the “ lens ” or the “Daguerreotype,”
we would not say such things have not been.
The point we would like to enforce upon photo-
graphers is the desirability of not allowing a thunder-
storm to slip without trying to utilize it. Warm
weather has now been with us for some time, and the
probability is that thunderstorms will follow. The
proper thing, therefore, to do is, directly thunder and
lightning make their appearance, to rush to the studio
with a sitter who is not nervous, and begin Liking
photographs one after the other. Benjamin Franklin
got a good deal out of a flash of lightning with a homely
umbrella, and we do not sec why the photographer
should be less successful with a camera.
Architects’ drawings look very pretty, but do not
gain by being photographed. Photography has a
knack of exposing their weak points, and, as a rule,
make them ridiculous. An American paper having
published the photograph of the architect’s drawing of
Junk 6, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
439
an hotel to be erected in Mexico, a Mexican journal
favours its readers with the report of its special artist
upon the photograph in question. The expert, after
severely criticising the building, says : — “ The only
redeeming feature I was able to discover in the photo-
graph are three mops on the right hand side of the
building, and two on the left-hand side. I suspect
they are meant to signify palm trees, as a homage to
the tropical character of Mexico.” Severe, but, we
doubt not, truthful criticism.
Now that the optical lantern is taking such a
prominent place in all sorts and conditions of work,
it will not be out of place if we refer to a possible
application of it which may not have occurred to those
chielly concerned. We refer to the aid which it might
render to the theatrical scene painter. The usual
course in painting a scene is to first of all make a small
sketch of the composition, and then to rule lines across
it so as to divide it into squares. Similar squares
are then “struck” by charcoaled string on the large
primed canvas as a guide to the artist, who then
reproduces the sketch in its enlarged form. Now, of
course, all this work would be greatly hastened and
simplified by photographing the original sketch, and
throwing the image of the negative on the whitened
canvas, so that the scene painter could follow the
outlines with charcoal or brush. With a lens of good
definition, and with a simple form of lime light —
always available in a theatre — the thing could thus be
easily done. In painting-rooms of limited area, there
might be a difficulty in finding sufficient space for the
lantern ; but there would even then be the alternative
of making the enlarged sketch on the stage itself.
In the old wet-plate days, developing dishes were
unknown. The liquid was thrown over the glass as it
was held by one corner between the fingers, and the
image showed itself almost immediately. But now a dish
is necessary, and, with many developers, rocking that
dish becomes a necessity if we wish to avoid unequal
action on the film. We can of course rock the dish
by simple manipulation ; but those good people, the
dealers, whose province it is to save us all trouble, and
who will, if we wish, do everything for us save exposing
the plate to the action of the lens, have devised several
ingenious rockers. The pendulum has until now been
the usual principle of this arrangement ; but Mr. Hinton
showed us the other day an extremely neat contrivance,
by which the rocking is done by clockwork. The
apparatus consists of a neat box, with the clockwork
inside, acting, like a watch, by means of a coiled spring.
It gives movement to a metal platform above, upon
which a developing dish may be placed. After being
wound up, the platform will execute a see-saw move-
ment for about five and twenty minutes.
Although the season for fiash-light photographs is
now past for the present, we may call attention to a
new form of light of this description which lately
formed the subject of a communication to the Washing-
ton Chemical Society. Dr. Thomas Taylor, of the
United States Department of Agriculture, was the
originator and exhibitor of this new aid to photographic
work. The magnesium powder is associated with
charcoal made from the silky down of the milk weed
— a form of carbon so pure, that it leaves no ash. A
little of this composition placed on tissue paper, and
fired, produced a flash which was so instantaneous,
that enough heat was not developed to scorch the
paper upon which the powder rested. We well know
that this is not the case with several of the more or
less dangerous mixtures which have been recommended
for flash-light purposes. Many of these not only set
fire to the surface upon which they rest, but scatter
burning particles around, and behave generally like a
small volcano.
If there be such a man as a photographer who is
puffed up with an inordinate opinion of himself, he can
very easily get the conceit taken out of him by study-
ing one of the boards placed by the London County
Council at the entrance to all parks and open spaces
under their control. Inspection of one of the regula-
tions will speedily convince the reader that the L.C.C.
docs not think much of camera-bearers in general, for
they are classed with itinerant showmen, gypsies, and
other hangers-on of open air existence. The particular
regulation to which we refer prohibits all kinds of
amusements dear to holiday folk, and numbers among
them the innocent tripod stand and its belongings.
The section is thus worded : — “ Erecting or placing in
the Park any post, rail, fence, photographic apparatus,
cocoanut , stand, swing, or any building, erection, or
obstruction of any kind whatsoever.”
Shades of Daguerre, Niepce, and other departed ones,
who laid the foundations of our art science, hear how
your followers are treated by officialism in this year of
grace 1890 ! They are classed with cocoanut throwers
at “ three shies a penny,” with Aunt Sally, with
round-abouts, with erectors of swings, and with all
that wandering class of irresponsible persons who, in
the old days of fairs, used to live in an atmosphere of
gilt gingerbread and flaming naphtha lamps. But per-
haps, after all, this is a little joke on the part of the
newly elected Council, for certain it is that if proper
application be made to their Secretary, he will
recognize the claims of the ubiquitous photographer,
and will grant him the necessary “ open sesame.”
A single permit to photograph, issued by the County
Council, holds good for all the parks and open spaces
under its control. In Battersea Park will be found a
few scenes which make excellent photographic pictures,
since there the authorities have been to some little
expense in the production of artificial rockwork and
waterfalls ; the rocks are now so mellowed with age,
and covered with vegetation, that nature unadorned
seems to rule throughout. Some of the trees in the
park are sub-tropical ; they are moved and kept under
glass during the winter months.
440
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 6, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.— No. I.
BY GEORGE DAVISON.
Exhibitions arc taking a prominent place in photographic
history. The causes of this growth and extension are
not far to seek, and their influence may be readily traced.
Just at present there is a revolt against the greater part of
the system in vogue, and what were a few years ago
regarded as unpopular and fanciful reforms now promise
to be taken up and generally adopted. This ready sur-
render is probably attributable to the vast increase in the
number of exhibitions and to the frequent absurdities and
inequalities which have resulted from the application of an
unsuitable code of regulations.
Recently I happened to hear a photographer of long
standing complain that there was nothing but exhibitions
talked about and reported, so much so that he did not
care to read the journals. He was a worker of the older
school ; one whose delight was in processes and the
mechanical practices of photography, and, probably, it
would be impossible for such an one to appreciate the
highest objects of such exhibitions, or the motives which
actuate those whose anxiety to place the whole system on
a higher level finds such frequent and earnest expression.
The chief interest which has been taken from the first by
photographers in the work of these exhibitions has been as
to what new wonder or scientific excellence they brought
before the public. The whole was looked upon and
judged by scientific standards and conventions. It has
taken a considerable time and experience to teach the
lesson that there must be a wide separation of artistic and
scientific applications and results by photography. An
understanding of this distinction is essential as a founda-
tion for the framing of what will probably be the future
regulations for photographic exhibitions.
Photographers have been misled by the conventions, or
absorbed and distracted by the business of photography.
They have been faithless and disloyal to their art, and have
distrusted its power for anything beyond what they had
themselves done. But there has been growing a belief in
higher art possibilities for photography, and, in spite of
some strenuous attempts to impose unnecessary limitations,
there are a good many photographers who are enthusiastic
in assisting whatever may prove or extend the capabilities of
photography as a means of artistic expression. It is this
latter influence which is responsible for much of the desire
for exhibition reform which is now so prominent.
The question to be considered is what regulations and
conditions are required for an art exhibition. The general
characteristics and requirements of pictorial art must be
considered and made the test. If this be done without
prejudice, the difficulties concerning regulations very
greatly vanish. The way is clear. Where struggles con-
cerning detail arise, they may be traced to an attempt to
compromise with old prejudices, the domination of
standards, or the exigencies of popular vulgar taste and
craving for excitement. So far in general terms. In
subsequent articles this test will be applied to some of the
difficulties which arise and are very generally discussed.
' There are some interesting points in connection with
early exhibitions which may well be referred to, as naturally
leading up to a consideration of affairs as we find them
to-day. Exhibitions are responsible for the pros-
perity and even for the existence of some photographic
societies. The foundation of the Photographic Society in
1853 is greatly attributed to the influence of the Great
Exhibition of 1851, for the Athenaeum of March 13th, 1852,
refers to a proposal which was before them for the forma-
tion of a Photographical Society, which, they state, originated
in the “ meeting of the professional and amateur photo-
graphers from various countries whose pictures were
shown at the Great Industrial Exhibition of 1851.” This
proposition had for some time been “ hung up ” on account
of the difficulties attending Fox Talbot’s patent rights.
More directly, too, the exhibition of photographs “ by the
most notable professionals and amateurs ” at the Society
of Arts, in December, in 1852, as described in “ Notes
and Queries ” of that year, had an influence in stimu-
lating the enthusiasm and warming up the sympathy which
pressed forward the movement, which had in 1851
received so much impetus by the showing of Dr. Diamond’s
specimens at Lord Rosse's soirees. At the exhibition
held at the Society of Arts, it may be noted that the ad-
mittance was fid. each, and that certain ladies greatly dis-
tinguished themselves by their exhibits.
From the first the Exhibition of the Photographic
Society took leading place. Some of the early regula-
tions of the exhibition of January, 1854, are given in that
Society’s Journal. These were very simple and general,
the most interesting being a grandmotherly restriction as
to amount of margin desirable and allowable for the
photographs, and a rule that “ prints from touched or
painted negatives must be described accordingly.” These
exhibitions were well supported. It was announced that
1,000 pictures were included, and this is about as many
as are received to-day. Further, the gallery was open to '
the working classes in the evening at a charge of 3d. each.
In February, 1854, the Devon and Cornwall Photographic
Society had its first meeting at St George's Hall, Stone-
house, in connection with a small exhibition and soiree,
which was “attended by all the most distinguished people
in the neighbourhood,” and at which “ photographs were
taken by artificial light in the presence of the company.”
This may be taken as typical of the frequent local
societies’ inaugurations of recent days, though more pros-
perous sounding than the reports of these latter meetings.
As the societies multiplied, so did exhibitions increase.
There was mut ual action and reaction. A writer at the date
remarks that the exhibitions mostly take place at the same
time, and the bewildered exhibitor scarcely knows where
to astonish the public gaze with his “ pet productions” —
a very exact anticipation of the remarks which have been
so freely heard of late. Manchester had its first annual
exhibition in May, 1856. The Bombay Society, with over
one hundred members prior to April, 1855, had its exhi-
bition and Journal, and a class in the Elphinstone Institu-
tion for instruction in photography. Brussels, also, had
an exhibition in 185C, and we find the International Photo-
graphic Society at Amsterdam giving medals about the
same period. With the institution of such societies as
Liverpool, Dublin, Birmingham, Norwich, Brighton and
Sussex, Maulmaiu, Bengal, the Societe Franeaise, and the
Photographic Society of Scotland, exhibitions very
naturally grew and extended. As might be expected, it
it was not, however, until the dry plate became established,
that the multiplication of societies and exhibitions became
phenomenal. These exhibitions are found to popularize
photography, and to advertise and give a stimulus to the
societies organizing them. Sympathy, emulation, and
business enterprise, all combine to ensure large and
prosperous shows. In the multitude of rival exhibitions,
those responsible for their management have thought it
June 6, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
411
necessary to devise fresh allurements every time to attract
a large body of exhibitors. The result of this has been,
in this age of absurd competitions, a multiplication of prizes
and an exclusive consideration of what would ensure a
Large crop of frames and a commercial success. The
spirit of competition has for a time affected photographic
exlubitions in an astonishing manner. Exhibitors have
been led to give themselves entirely away in the scramble
after prizes which could carry no real honour. Even the
judges have been too anxious to accept what seemed to be
the superior distinction of deciding upon the respective
merits of well-known competitors. Now, however, there
is a strong tendency to scrutinize regulations before con-
senting to be associated therewith, and there is also a fair
prospect of exhibitors, judges, and exhibition authorities
combining to better the present state of tilings. There
are already satisfactory signs in the announced regulations
or proposals for forthcoming exhibitions at home and
abroad, to which reference will be made in further dis-
cussion of this subject.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FLORENCE.
The Camera Obscura, a monthly review connected with
the progress of the art of photography, and published
under the able direction of Professor L. Borlinetto, with
Germauo Salvi as editor, and an efficient staff of collabo-
rators, contains, besides articles on the development of
the latent image, and on the formation of composite pic-
tures, a notice of the Italian Photographic Society, which
holds its meetings in Florence.
The last general meeting, on the 11th of May, was
presided over by Professor Golfarelli, on account of the
lamented indisposition of the president. Thirty new
associates were admitted. After the transaction of the
usual necessary business,
The President gave a demonstration of the perfection
gained by Italian makers of gelatino-bromide plates,
such as Melazzo, of Naples, Cappelli, of Milan, and the
recently established house of Semplicini, in Florence.
Signor Paganori then spoke, in a few moving periods,
of the death of the late able and well-known member of
the Society, Giuseppe Alinari. The great loss experienced
by the photographic world iu the decease of this accom-
plished artist is further touched upon in the necrology at
the conclusion of the Camera. It is there stated that
Alinari, who gained for the establishment over which he
was the technical director numerous national and
international prizes, was born on the 29th April, 1836.
He was a pupil in the Infant Asylum founded by Guicciar-
dini, and entered while yet extremely young the house of
Falcini to study the art of inlaying and mosaic. His
brother Leopoldo, having taken it into his head to become
a photographer, made some successful early attempts, and
was encouraged by Giuseppe Bardi, who had chanced to
see his work, to continue his labour, and ultimately opened
a small establishment on the ground floor of a house in
the A ia Cornina, taking as his assistant his brother
Giuseppe. Phis happened iu 1853. By degrees he was
induced, through his increasing business, and by the advice
of his friendo, to add to his little shop a chamber for tak-
ing portraits. But this was in its turn found insufficient,
and Leopoldo having acquired some ground in what is
now called the Via Nazionale, there erected a large and
imposing building, which was not completed till 1862.
The photographic labours of the brothers Alinari were
soon so highly appreciated, not only in Italy but in other
countries, that amongst the many important commissions
with which they were entrusted about this time, must be
reckoned that of the Archduke Alberto, who, iu addition
to requiring a reproduction of a part of the designs in the
Royal Gallery of the Uflizi, also desired that the brothers
Alinari should betake themselves to Venice, and after that
to Vienna, in order to execute some designs which he had
chosen there for photographic representation.
On the 9th November, 1865, little more than two years
after the inauguaration of his new establishment, Leopoldo
ceased to occupy himself therewith, leaving the care of his
two infant orphans to his brothers Romualdo and
Giuseppe, giving the former the general administration,
and the latter the technical direction of his well-established
house. It was then that the earnest activity, the noble
unselfishness, and the artistic intelligence of Giuseppe
Alinari made themselves chiefly conspicuous.
Ever ready to work, always at his post at the proper
time, apparently unwearied by labour’s fatigue, he effected
in a few years by his own unassisted endeavour more than
the result of the united forces of many excellent photo-
graphers in Italy and elsewhere.
The frescoes of Santa Croce, executed for the Duca di
Luynes, those of San Miniato, executed for the same
patron, the chapel of Brancacci al Carmine, the frescoes
of S. M. Novella, and those of the Palazzo Riccardi, of
the Sistine Chapel at Rome, and a thousand other works,
all of extreme difficulty, were undertaken and com-
pleted by Giuseppe Alinari by means relatively weak and
poor, seeing that at that epoch the great universal panacea,
the gelatino-bromide of silver, which has transformed count-
less “fools” into photographers, was not known, but recourse
must then have been had to wet collodion, in the use of
which so many modern photographers have encountered
almost insuperable difficulties.
Being such a man as has been described, Alinari was at
the same time excessively modest, and i-ather sought to
avoid than to encounter all that might produce for him
honour and prizes ; nay, he went so far on several occa-
sions as to refuse both when they had been offered to him.
It was with no little difficulty that he was at last induced
to become a member of the committee for the promotion
of the photographic exhibition held in Florence, and of
the photographic society, in which he would never accept
any mark of exceptional honour or any post of unusual
distinction.
The later years of his life were spent on the illustra-
tions of a work on architecture, published by Professor
Steigmann. To this work he brought so much passion and
so great intelligence that Steigmann, in the letter of con-
dolence which he sent to his nephew Vittorio, thus ex-
presses himself : —
“I have just heard of the death of Signor Giuseppe
Alinari. What a grief for me ! What a loss for art !
“ In him I miss a fr'end, not only to myself, but to my
work.
“ But all the world may mourn for one who has brought
into the hearts of so many a love for the photographic
art.”
Giuseppe Alinari died the 24th April, 1890.
♦
The Photogkahic Club. — The subject for discussion on
June 11th will be “ Paintings as Art Examples to Photo-
graphers”; June 18th, “ Mounting aud Finishing Photographs.”
442
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
A PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION AT HEXHAM.
BV JAMES BROWN AND EDGAR G. LEE.
Perhaps the most remarkable “one man” exhibition ever
held is now on view in the Town Hall of the quaint old market
town of Hexham, commonly known as “ the heart of all
England.” The show consists of over 400 photographs by
Mr. J. P. Gibson, of Northumbrian scenery and antiquities,
ranging from whole- plate to 15 by 12, and mostly by the
platinum toning process, which, in Mr. Gibson’s hands, lends
itself admirably to artistic effect.
Mr. Gibson is an ardent antiquarian, whilst as a landscape
photographer he has stood in the front rank for many years.
The standard of the exhibition is high, and the work shows
evidence of thought and tender care throughout. The
technique, as might be expected from such a careful worker, is
good, except in a few of the architectural subjects, in which
the effect of the “harmless” yet necessary wide-angle lens is
somewhat unpleasantly manifest.
Whilst some of the subjects possess only a local and
arch;cological interest, they are treated in the same careful
artistic manner as his well-known landscapes. Entering the
Town Hall, we find photographs illustrating Northumbrian
architecture from pre historic down to modern times, instan-
taneous street scenes, views of bleak moorlands, and of the
sylvan and romantic scenery of the Tyne and its tributaries,
which Mr. Gibson has made peculiarly his own. With so
many pictures on view, it would be difficult to attempt a
lengthened criticism, but we propose to single out a few for
special comment.
The 15 by 12 first claim our attention, and a long way
ahead stands No. 269, “Autumn Haze,” a charming view on
the South Tyne, with the distance beautifully softened by a
perfectly rendered haze. Another feature of this picture is a
choice bit of reeds and rocks, with figure judiciously intro-
duced. Next is No. 267, “ Under the Haycock Fast Asleep,”
in which the foliage in the middle distance is exceptionally
fine, and the figures from which the picture takes its title are
placed naturally without any straining after effect. In No.
268, “September,” we have a reach on the South Tyne, a
piece of pure landscape art, with gleams of sunshine playing
over the water at the bend of the stream, and a gnarled old
oak standing out in bold relief. Coming to the whole-plate
series, the task of selection becomes more difficult. Our own
feeling is that No. 82, “ At Ladle Wells,” is the choicest and
most artistic pure landscape in the whole exhibition. It
represents with startling realism a desolate, barren moorland ;
rushes and burnt heather make up the foreground ; two trees,
bare and bleak as the surrounding heather, stand out weird
against the wintry sky ; the whole forming one of the finest
and withal simplest pictures we have ever seen. No. 36, “ By
the Brooklet,” is of its kind a gem, which shows how a simple
subject may be aided by artistic feeling in placing figures as
aids to the composition. In No. 65, “Out for a Holiday,”
an otherwise fine work is slightly marred by too much white
road, which exercises a disturbing effect. In No. 69, “ The
Beautiful River,” the subject does not belie the title ; a
splendidly balanced picture, with an artistic foreground. No.
159, “The Wind that Stirs the Mere,” is another scene of
loveliness— a small Northumbrian lake. Here, again, the
materials are simple — a crag and a sunlit expanse of water
broken up into ripples by the wind, with the foreground and
sky — two of Mr. Gibson’s strong points — alike admirably
treated, so treated, indeed, as to make the picture.
Space does not admit of further individual notice, although
many pictures merit it. In this catagory may be included
No. 39, “Old ltidlcy Bridge”; No. 55, “ Coast ley Burn-
foot ; No. " The Lonely Moor ” ; No. 76, “ Hindley Bum
No. 99, “Tickling the Trout”; No. 342, “Waiting,” and
No. 222, “The Thief’sTyke.” This last is a vigorous subject
vigorously treated, larch trees against the sky with a finely-
broken up foreground.
The architectural subjects, as subjects, do not call for special
comment, but locally, of course, are interesting. The salient
feature of the series is the fact that by proper handling, the
[June 6, 1890.
careful study of lighting, and judicious selection of clouds,
what -in many cases would have been ordinary photographs are
transformed into works of art.
Summing up, the effect produced upon our minds by this
unique show is one of unmixed pleasure, and admiration of the
thoughtful adaptation of means towards ends displayed in
many of the works. We suggest that the Camera Club authori-
ties should at an early date endeavour to secure some of the
gems of this collection for one of their “one man” exhibitions.
• -•
Xotkcs of
The Amateur Photographer's Library, Nos. 3 and 4.
( UazeU , Watson , and Viney, London, 1890.)
Experimental Photography.
This little book, Number 3 of the series, is written by
Mr. C. J. Reaper, a Fellow of the Chemical Society, and
contains much elementary information about photographic
chemistry likely to be of use to those beginners who
have not studied the latter subject. As regards develop-
ing room illumination, he is right in recommending a large
window, eighteen inches square, for the lantern, but says
that it should be of one thickness of ruby cloth ; if he
examines such cloth under the microscope by means of a
strong light on the other side of the fabric, as recom-
mended in another column, he will see reason to alter
this advice, and to advocate the use of at least two thick-
nesses.
Much of the book deals so much with elementary pho-
tography, that any criticism of it would be of little inte-
rest to our readers ; suffice it say, the instructions given
to learners are, generally speaking, sound.
Mr. Reaper gives the following instructions for the
production of prints of different colours by iron pro-
cesses:—
If we do not admire the blue colour of these prints, we can
readily change it to a very beautiful green by immersing the
finished print for a few minutes in very dilute sulphuric acid,
about two drops of the strong acid to the ounce of water.
Views of breaking waves printed in this manner make striking
pictures.
A dark-brown tint can be secured by making use of the
well-known reaction between the salts of iron and tannin, a
reaction to which the colour of ordinary writing ink is due.
To obtain such a brown colour we float the blue print for five
minutes on a solution of tannin containing 10 grs. of the
substance in an ounce of water, then transfer it to a solution
of ordinary washing soda of the same strength, and lastly
retransfer it to the original tannin solution, after having washed
the print for ten minutes in running water.
A black print can, lastly, be obtained from a blue one by
floating the blue print on a solution of silver nitrate containing
one grain of the salt to the ounce of distilled water, leaving it
there for five minutes, washing the print for about half-an-
hour to get rid of every trace of free silver nitrate, and then
immersing it in the usual ferrous-oxalate developer, the same,
in fact, as we employed with the Eastman paper.
In the preceding processes we have produced blue prints on
a white ground, t. «., the unexposed parts remain white, and
the exposed portions become blue. The salts of iron can, how-
ever, be also made to yield prints of the reverse character,
viz., ones in which the exposed portions remain white and the
unexposed portions become blue. To understand how this is
brought about, we .again take some ferrous sulphate and ferric
chloride, and add to each a small quantity of a solution of
potassium ferrocyauide or yellow prussiate of potash. AVe
shall find that the ferrous salt will yield a light-blue precipitate,
changing rapidly to dark blue, whilst the ferric salt will yield
an immediate dark-blue precipitate.
If we could exclude from the ferrous salt every trace of the
June 6, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
413
ferric compound, we should obtain a white precipitate. AVe
can now understand how, by employing potassium ferrocyanide
as a developer, we can obtain a print in which the exposed
(ferrous) portions remain white, whilst the unexposed (ferric)
portions become blue. The solution previously used is not very
suitable for this purpose, but the following will yield good
prints : —
Citric acid ... ... ... ... 40 grs.
Ferric chloride ... ... ... ... 48 ,,
Gum arabic ... ... ... ... 42 ,,
Water ... ... ... ... ... 11 ounces
Soak the gum arabic for a couple of hours in half the quantity
of water, and then dissolve it by placing the vessel in a warm
place. Meanwhile, dissolve the citric acid and ferric chloride
in the other half, and mix the two solutions. The paper is
floated on the solution for a couple of minutes, then dried and
exposed, and the prints developed by floating them on a solu-
tion of potassium ferrocyanide containing twenty grains of the
salt in an ounce of water. Development completed, the prints
are immersed in weak sulphuric acid (six drops to the ounce of
water), and finally washed for ten minutes or so.
The “ cyanotype ” in this form is only, of course, a curiosity
when employed with negatives, but it is a very valuable
process indeed when the object is to reproduce engineers’ draw-
ings on tracing paper. Evidently in such a case the black
lines will, if the paper is exposed under the drawing, be
rendered as blue ones, whilst the ground through which the
light has passed will remain white, the sensitive substance
having been changed there from the ferric to the ferrous con-
dition.
Ordinary note-paper is good enough for experimenting upon
with these processes, but some of our readers might wish to
secure blue prints possessing the brilliancy which characterises
those made on sensitised silver paper. To do this, ordinarv
albumenised ( not sensitised) paper is first washed in running
water for half-au-hour to free it from the ammonium chloride
with which it is impregnated, then dried, and treated with the
sensitising solution, making use of a pledget of cotton wool to
brush the solution on the surface, instead of floating the paper.
And if a still greater amount of brilliancy be desired, the
albumenised paper can be first of all floated on boiling water
to coagulate the albumen, then washed and sensitised as before.
Washing the paper in cold water removes the greater part of
the albumen as well as the ammonium chloride, but this is
avoided by coagulating it by heat.
The action of light upon ferric oxalate is the basis of the
deservedly popular platinotype process, in which the image
consists of metallic platinum, one of the most unalterable
substances known.
The author gives information about the wet collodion
process, and how to make lantern slides thereby by super-
position. This may prove useful to some of the new race
of photographers not versed in the processes of the past.
The wet plate process is still somewhat extensively used
by professional photographers for special purposes.
Art Photography.
Number 4 of the series, “ Art Photography,” is written
by Mr. II. P. llobinson, and contains several engravings,
all of which have been carefully printed. The work is
readable, and is written in Mr. Robinson’s usual analytical
and interesting manner. On page 37 the author says : —
Although I have said I should prefer a beautiful untruth to
an ugly fact, I cannot deny that more truth, within its limits,
is exacted of photography than of any other method of repre-
sentation, and we must give all the truth we possibly can. If
we cannot give the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, then we must lie like truth, which, after all, is perhaps
as good a definition of art as we have.
The little book contains some practical instructions
about combination printing, of which art Mr. Robinson
stands undeniably at the head. As the whole system of
combination printing has been vigorously attacked during
the last year or two, the following utterances of Mr.
Robinson in its defence may not be without interest: —
It was a maxim with the Spartans that if your sword was
short you should add a step to it. It being, I think, sufficiently
proved that our present optical resources do not enable us to
represent properly some of the simplest scenes around us which
we ought, as artists, to reasonably expect to be able to obtain,
we must try some other way that will help us to succeed.
The obvious step that we must add to our short sword, until
something better is invented, is combination printing. I have
now had more than thirty years’ experience of this method,
and still think it not only the best, but the only way of getting
many subjects which should not be lost to our art. It is of
all others the process for the amateur ; it will enable him to
spend many pleasant hours, and haply achieve distinction.
The method takes time and patience, no doubt, but you “get
your own out of it.”
patent Entelligcnre.
8,913. W. S. Wardle, 290, Brixton Road, Loudon, “ Im-
provement in Photography.”- — May 27th.
8,210. H. R. Yea and F. J. Piper, 169, Union Street, Ply-
mouth, “ Camera Stands.”— May 27th.
8,214. M. A. Wier, 3, Palace Grove, Upper Norwood, “De-
veloping Photographic Films in Actinic Light.” — May 27th.
8,372. H. R. Dines, 22, Garrick Street, London, “ Changing
Plates in Hand Cameras.” — May 30th.
8,391. T. Hudson, 6, Lord Street, Liverpool, “Photographic
Apparatus.” — May 30th.
8,446. J. Pitt and W. Hudson, 128, Colmore Row, Birming-
ham, “ Detective Cameras.” — May 31st.
Specifications Published.
18,897. December lOt/i, 1890. — “The Manufacture of Photo-
graphic Films.” A communication from George Eastman,
of Rochester, in the County of Monroe, and State of New
York, United States. Alfred Julius Boult, 323, High
Holborn, London, M.I.M.E.
This invention relates to the manufacture of the improved
flexible film produced in the manner and having the character-
istics hereinafter described.
In practising this invention, a clear fluid solution of nitro-
cellulose, or gun-cotton and camphor, is first made by dissolving
said materials in one or more of the known liquid solvents,
such, for example, as methyl-alcohol, which is preferably used
because of its active solvent properties. To remove all uncon-
verted or imperfectly dissolved substances from, and to clarify
the solution, it is preferred to filter it through fine cotton cloth,
the object being to obtain a solution which will be perfectly
clear, and which can be readily spread in a thin layer or film
upon the surface of a level glass plate or other rigid supporting
surface, and which, when dry, will be photographically struc-
tureless. Such a fluid solution may be produced by dissolving
9,000 grains of soluble gun-cotton, or nitro-cellulose, and 5,400
grains of camphor in 112 ounces of methyl-alcohol.
It has been found that when such solution is spread out in
the form of a film, and dried as the process of drying is accom-
panied with the evaporation of the more volatile constituents,
the mass shrinks, and its exposed surface is liable to become
pitted or covered more or less with small depressions, and that
it is otherwise liable to prove objectionable. To obviate this it
is preferable to add to the solution made according to the
above formula, say 28 ounces of fusil oil, and also preferably,
though not necessarily, 7 ounces of amyl-acetate, or any
equivalent agent which produces the same effect.
The proportions above given for the solid and liquid con-
stituents of the solution may be varied, as well as the propor-
tions of fusil oil and amyl-acetate according to circumstances,
but those which are above given have been found to give
satisfactory results.
The dissolving of the solids may be hastened and the
products rendered more uniform by the application of gentle
heat with occasional agitation, the process toeing conducted in a
441
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
[June 6, 1890.
closed vessel to prevent loss by the evaporation of the volatile
constituents.
Having made the clear liquid solution mentioned, the next
proceeding is to obtain a thin la\'er or film of the same by
depositing and spreading the solution upon a rigid supporting
surface. For this purpose it is preferred to use a flat table or
bed plate of plate-glass or other material having either a
polished or dead surface, and on the surface of which the
solution may be spread by means of a suitable spreader moving
longitudinally over the said table.
It has, however, been found that when the fluid solution is
applied directly to and dried on the clean surface of the table
or bed-plate, it adheres so firmly to the said table that the
subsequently formed complete photographic film can be removed
only by the application of considerable force, which sometimes
results in the tearing of it or in its being stretched unequally
so that it will buckle, and be unfitted for use in roll holders
and for negative making. To overcome this difficulty the
surface of the glass or other rigid supporting surface, before
the fluid solution is spread thereon, is rubbed over or coated
with a weak solution of mineral wax in benzine, or other suit-
able solvent, or a weak solution of beeswax, or with any other
equivalent agent to produce the same result. After the bed-
plate or table has been so prepared, a thin layer of film of the
fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and camphor in methyl-alcohol
is spread evenly upon it.
The preliminary coating of wax solution should be of a
character to weaken without preventing the adhesion to the
glass surface of the supporting film, as it is very desirable that
this supporting film, when dry, should adhere throughout its
whole under surface to the rigid supporting surface until the
photographic film is to be removed.
The next operation, which must be performed in a photo-
graphic dark room, is to apply to the surface of the supporting
film a suitable sensitised medium such as fluid gelatino argentic
emulsion in the form of a thin uniform layer or film, but
experience has shown that unless special provision is made
against such a contingency this sensitised film will not adhere
at all points to the supporting film, but will be detached or
separated at parts, and thus form blisters in the photographic
film.
This, it has been ascertained, is due in part at least to the
greasy character of the surface of the supporting film, to
remove which such surface is washed preferably with clear
water, to which has been added from 2 per cent, or 3 per lent, j
of a binding agent such as silicate of potash or silicate of soda.
After the surface of the film support is again dry the layer or '
film of gelatino argentic emulsion is spread evenly upon the
washed surface, and will be found to adhere uniformly The
spreading of the sensitised film may be effected by the same
apparatus as is used for spreading the supporting film.
The supporting film and sensitised film which, combined
together, are herein termed the photographic film, are retained
in place upon the rigid supporting surface until the sensitised
film has dried, when the photographic film may, if desired, be
cut into strips of suitable width, and it is then ready to be
removed or stripped from the said rigid supporting surface,
which may be effected by means of a traversing roller.
The film for supporting the sensitised film is necessarily J
made quite thin, ordinarily from 3 to 5 one-thousandths of an
inch in thickness, or about the thickness of the paper supports
heretofore generally employed in ordinary roll holders.
A photographic film produced as described, is of such thick-
ness and flexibility that it can readily be wound upon the
spools of ordinary roll holders, such as the Eastman Walker
roll holders, and manipulated for exposure in the latter. The 1
supporting film or backing for the sensitised film is of a j
material unaffected by moisture, of uniform density, free from j
striae and buckles, and photographically structureless, and the
photographic film as a whole is capable of being used for all '
those photographic purposes for which can be used glass plates |
with sensitised films in ordinary cameras or paper, with similar
films in roll holding cameras.
Having now particularly described and ascertained the nature
of this said invention, and in what manner the same is to be
performed, as communicated to me by my foreign corres-
pondent, I declare that what I claim is: —
1. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
producing flexible photographic films, which consists in first
applying a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and camphor in a
layer or film upon a rigid supporting surface, then drying the
same, said film being photographically structureless when dry,
and of sufficient strength and stiffness to properly support and
sustain a suitable sensitised film through all the operations of
negative making and printing positives therefrom ; then spread-
ing thereon, while still upon said rigid supporting surface, a
thin layer or film of gelatino argeutic emulsion ; then drying
the same while still on said rigid supporting surface ; then
stripping the photographic film from said support ; such photo-
tographic film when dried and stripped being of such a thick-
ness as to be flexible enough to be wound upon the rollers of,
and used in, ordinary roll holders.
2. The herein-before described improvement in the art of pro-
ducing flexible photographic films, the same consisting in
depositing upon a rigid supporting surface a fluid solution of
nitro-cellulose and camphor, spreading the same into a film of
substantially uniform thickness, but having the surface in a flat
plane, drying said film while still in contact with said rigid sup-
porting surface, thereby producing its uniformity of surface and
causing it to adhere closely to said rigid supporting surface,
said supporting film being photographically structureless when
dry ; applying a thin layer or film of fluid gelatino argentic
emulsion to the said dried and adherent supporting film by
spreading said emulsion progressively from end to end of the
previously dried supporting film, drying said film of emulsion
while the supporting film is still adhering closely to the rigid
supporting surface, and finally detaching or stripping the photo-
graphic film from the rigid supporting surface preparatory to
winding the same upon spools ; said photographic films being
sufficiently flexible when dried to be wound upon the rollers of
and used in ordinary roll holders, and to be manipulated in the
latter for exposure.
3. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible photographic films, which consists in first
making a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and camphor; second,
filtering such solution ; third, depositing and spreading the
same in a film upon a rigid supporting surface and allowing
the volatile constituents to evaporate while the supporting film
is adhering to the said rigid supporting surface, said supporting
film being photographically structureless when dry ; then apply-
ing an even layer or film of fluid sensitised emulsion to the
surface of the supporting film, while still adhering to the rigid
supporting surface, and finally drying said sensitised film and
stripping the photographic film from its support.
4. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible photographic films, which consists in first
making a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and camphor; second,
filtering such solution ; third, depositing and spreading the
same in a film upon a rigid supporting surface and allowing
the volatile constituents to evaporate while the supporting film
is adhering to the said rigid supporting surface, said supporting
film being photographically structureless when dry ; then apply-
ing an even layer or film or fluid of sensitised emulsion to the
surface of the supporting film while still adhering to the rigid
supporting surface, and finally drying said sensitised film and
stripping the photographic film from its support by means of a
traversing roller.
5. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible film supports, which consists in adding fusil oil
to a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and camphor, and subse-
quently depositing and spreading such solution upon a rigid
supporting surface and drying it.
6. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
formiug flexible film supports, which consists in combining
methyl-alcohol, camphor, nitro-cellulose, and fusil oil to form a
fluid solution, and then depositing and spreading the latter
upon a supporting surface and drying the same.
7. As an improvement in the art of producing flexible film
supports, the herein-before described improved step in the pro-
cess, which consists in forming the fluid solution, of a mixture
Jcne 6, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
445
of methyl-alcohol, fusil oil, nitro-cellulose, and camphor, to form
a fluid solution for spreading in a thin film upon a support.
8. As an improvement in the art of producing flexible film
supports, the addition of amyl-acetate to a fluid solution of
nitro-cellulose and camphor in a liquid solvent, and the subse-
quent depositing and spreading of said solution in a film upon
a supporting surface and drying the film upon the latter.
9. As an improvement in the art of producing flesible film
supports with smooth surfaces, the same consisting in combin-
ing fusil oil and amyl-acetate with nitro-cellulose, camphor, and
and a fluid solvent, and subsequently spreading the fluid solu-
tion in a thin layer or film upon a supporting surface and
drying the said film, preliminary to the application of a film of
gelatino-argentic emulsion.
10. The herein-before described improvement in the art
of forming flexible photographic films from a fluid solution of
nitro-cellulose and camphor, the same consisting in first apply-
ing a solution of wax to the supporting surface ; depositing
and spreading the fluid solution in a thin layer or film upon
said surface ; drying the supporting film thus formed ; spread-
ing a thin layer of gelatino-argentic emulsion upon the dried
supporting film and drying the same ; and finally stripping the
photographic film from the support upon which it was
formed.
11. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible photographic films, which consists in applying
an even layer or film of a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and
camphor to a flat surface by means of a spreader moving
longitudinally of the same, evaporating the volatile constituents
to dry said layer or film, and subsequently, while said film is
adhering to the flat surface upon which it was first deposited,
applying a fluid sensitised emulsion to its exposed surface by
means of a travelling spreader, drying said sensitised film, and
finally stripping the photographic film from the flat surface.
12. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible photographic films, the same consisting in first
forming a layer or film of a solution of nitro-cellulose and
camphor by spreading such solution upon the flat and rigid
supi>ort, evaporating the volatile constituents to dry said film
and cause the same to adhere firmly to said flat support, apply-
ing a film of sensitised emulsion upon the exposed surface of
said film support and drying said film of emulsion, dividing the
photographic film into strips while still attached to its flat
support, and then winding said strips upon a roller or rollers to
strip said photographic film from its support.
13. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible photographic films, the same consisting in
depositing and spreading a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose and
camphor upon a supporting surface in the form of a thin layer
or film, and drying the same ; then washing the face of the
dried film support ; then spreading upon the surface of said
film support a film of fluid gelatino-argentic emulsion and
drying the same ; and finally stripping the photographic film
from its support.
14. The herein-before described improvement in the art of
forming flexible photographic films, the same consisting in
depositing and spreading a fluid solution of nitro-cellulose ami
camphor in a thin layer or film upon a plate or surface pre-
viously coated with a solution of wax ; drying said film
support ; washing the exposed surface of said film support ; then
spreading a thin layer or film of fluid gelatino-argentic emulsion
ui>on said film support and drying the same ; and finally strip-
ping the photographic film from its support.
15. The manufacture of photographic films substantially as
specified.
30-4. January 7 t.i, 1890. — “Apparatus for Coating Photo-
graphic Plates.” Frank Bishop, of the firm of Marion and
Company, 22 and 23, Soho Square, London, Dealers in Photo-
graphic Materials, and Alexander Cowan, Chase Side,
Southgate, London, Manager of Marion’s Photo- Works,
Southgate, London.
This invention relates to improved apparatus for coating
photographic plates with sensitive emulsion.
The invention relates first, to the construction and mode of
mounting of the coating trough, and has for its object to ensure
the even distribution of the sensitive emulsion, and enable the
thickness of the deposit to be easily regulated.
The trough is V-shaped in cross section, and is constructed
of two strips or plates of glass, or other suitable material, the
one, forming the inclined bottom side of the trough, being
bedded upon a hot water circulation chamber, and the other,
forming the upright side of the trough, being clamped in
position with regard to the first-mentioned plate, its lower
edge being truly ground at a suitable angle, and set at such
a distance from the surface of the bottom plate as to regulate
the escape of the emulsion, and allow it to flow in an even
stream down the lower projecting part of the bottom plate.
The ends of the trough are closed by blocks which assist to
hold the two plates or strips in proper relative angular position.
The hot water chamber extends the whole length of the trough,
and to it are fixed at intervals clamps having set screws
adapted to hold the plates forming the two sides of the
trough in their proper relative position at all points of their
length. The trough is supported by the ends of the hot
water chamber being seated on balanced levers mounted to
oscillate at the sides of the coatiug table, over which the
trough extends, the lower edge of the inclined side of the
trough resting lightly on the plates to be coated as they are
carried beneath it upon the coating table.
In the case of a long trough, a lip formed by a strip of
flexible material interposed between the bottom plate and the
hot water chamber would be used to compensate for inequali-
ties in the glass, and would rest upon the plates to be coated
instead of the lower side of the trough itself.
The invention further relates to the means of supporting
and guiding the plates whilst and after being coated, so as to
avoid defects in the film due to local differences of temperature
consequent on the contact with the under sides of the freshly-
coated plates of their carrier-rollers or other supports. It also
relates to means of receiving waste emulsion from the plates,
so as to avoid the soiling of the under face of the plates with
emulsion.
For this purpose, the plates are supported at their extreme
edges only by knife-edged rails, and run between guiding rollers
or pins mounted alongside the knife-edged rails, the edges of
the plates overhauging gutters formed to receive superfluous
emulsion, the guttered rails being arranged above a hot water
tank, by which an even temperature is maintained.
5,046. April 1st, 1890. — “Photographic Camera.” William
Blake Luce, Boston, Suffolk, State of Massachusetts, United
States of America, Draughtsman.
The inventor claims : —
1. The combination of a vertically elongated camera-box, having
upright grooves and an aperture in the lower part of its front,
and a lens-tube open at its inner end, and longitudinally mov-
able in the said aperture, the said parts being so arranged that
when the lens-tube is within the camera-box, sensitive plates
placed in the grooves of the latter are supported by the lens-
tube, and, as it is withdrawn, the plates drop one by one into
the field of the lens carried by the lens-tube.
2. A camera-box having vertical grooves and apertured front,
the said aperture being circular and internally threaded, in
combination with a cylindrical, threaded lens-tube removable
in the said aperture, substantially as set forth.
Royal Institution. — At the monthly meeting on June 2nd
(Sir James Crichton Browne, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., treasurer
and vice-president, in the chair), Messrs. C. J. Cullingworth,
M.D., F.R.C.P. ; Jonathan Hutchinson, F.R.S., F.R.C.S. ;
Rudolph Messel, Ph.D., F.C.S. ; Henry Charles Mylne ; and
Dan Rylands, were elected members.
Aluminium. — Every common brick contains two to three
pounds of metallic aluminium. The raw material containing this
capricious metal forms one of the chief constituents of the
earth’s crust, so that, next to oxygen and silicon, and perhaps
calcium, aluminium may be considered the most abundant of
the elements ; yet the difficulties in the way of extraction are
still so great as to call for a comparatively high selling price, —
Aluminium, its Uses and Alloys.
446
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 6, 1890.
CTomsponfcfenre.
THE KIMBERLEY CAMERA CLUB.
Sir, — I am pleased to inform you that a Camera Club has
been started out here. The following is a newspaper report
dated May 10 th : —
“A meeting of the principal amateur photographers in
Kimberley was held last night at the Gresham Hotel, there
being present Messrs. Macfarlane (in the chair), Trimble,
Harrison, Chappell, Wallace, Ablett, Harden, Pringle, Skead,
Moriarty, Titmas, Bousfield, Gassen, and the Rev. Ogle.
“The Chairman, in a few remarks, explained the object of
the meeting, which was to form a club for the mutual improve-
ment of members in photography. He had much pleasure in
stating that eighteen members had already been enrolled.
“The following gentlemen were elected office-bearers: —
President — Rev. Ogle ; Vice-President — Mr. M. Macfarlane ;
Hon. Secretary — Mr. F. 0. Wallace ; Committee — Messrs. F.
Skead, T. Titinas, If. Moriarty, and J. T. Harrison.
“ It was resolved that another meeting be held in a fort-
night’s time for the purpose of drawing up a set of rules ; a
vote of thanks to the Chairman terminated the business.”
F. O. Wallace, Hon. Secretary.
Kimberley, S. Africa, May 10th.
NEW OBERNF.TTER PAPER.
Sir,— I wish to call your attention to the new issue of Ober-
netter gelatino-cliloride of silver paper for matt surface, exhi-
bited at the Drapers’ Hall in two prints. The tones obtained
are beautiful and finer than platinotype or bromide, and though
in black and white, preserve just that tint of half tones which
is distinctive of a photographic image. J. R. Gotz.
19, Buckingham Street, Strand, June 2nd, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHERS’ BENEVOLENT ASSOCIA-
TION.—AN APPEAL.
Sir, — Will you kindly afford me space to appeal to your
readers on behalf of the P.B.A. ? At the annual meeting the
functions of the Association were so largely extended, by en-
abling the committee to deal with any well-authenticated cases
of distress brought to their notice, that we are anticipating a
considerable increase in the number of calls on our limited
funds. In fact, the grants already made this year largely ex-
ceed the average. Under the new rules, contributions of former
subscribers to the funds to the extent of £250 have been set
aside as a nucleus around which to form an annuity fund, and
this sum cannot be drawn upon for the purpose of granting
temporary relief. I wish to impress on your readers the fact
that this is the only charity which exists with the object of as-
sisting persons connected with photography who are in neces-
sitous circumstances arising from misfortune ; and many who
have been reduced to this necessity, including more than one
name once distinguished in the profession, could testify with
gratitude to welcome aid received from the P.B.A. in the time
of need. The minimum subscription has been fixed at 2s. 6d.,
and I appeal to the benevolence of your readers to induce them,
if I can, to subscribe to the funds according to their ability, with
the confident assurance that the committee will deal with any
money entrusted to them with discretion and economy.
Subscriptions and donations will be thankfully acknowledged,
and a copy of the rules forwarded, by the honorary secretary,
Mr. H. J. Beasley, 65 and 66, Chancery Lane, W.C.
Thanking you for your kind support in the past,
William Bedford, Chairman of Committee.
East Dulwich Photographic Society. — The following are
the excursions proposed for the dates named : — June 21,
Windsor ; J uly 1 9, Boxmoor, Hemel Hempstead, and neigh-
bourhood ; August 4, Arundel ; August 16, Burnham Beeches ;
September 20, Chingford and Epping Forest. The place and
time of assembly are to be arranged on the night immediately
preceding the excursion.
Uroccc&tngs of J&oriettfg.
The London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 29th ult., Mr. T. E. Freshwater occu-
pied the chair.
Mr. C. H. Cooke passed round three plates he had exposed
on some flowers. No. 1 had been dipped in a bath of erythro-
sin and ammonia ; No. 2 in erythrosin without ammonia ;
No. 3 was an ordinary plate. A yellow screen had been used
in all cases. No. 2 gave the best results. The strength of the
erythrosin solution was 1 in 35,000.
Mr. P. Everett asked the particulars as to Tailfer’s patent,
and Mr. W. E. Debenham explained them as far as his memory
permitted.
Mr. J. S. Teape passed round some prints on the iridium
paper distributed at the previous meeting ; he corroborated
the statement made on that occasion, viz., that the printing
was very rapid, but the loss in toning and fixing was very
great. In answer to a question, he said that he used the toning
bath as soon as made, and it was considered that had he used
an old toning bath the reduction would not have been so great.
Mr. Debenham said that many years ago Messrs. Hennah
and Kent, of Brighton, produced a number of pictures on plain
paper which were much admired. When Mr. Hennah pub-
lished his formula it was found that he used a small quantity
of chloride of gold in the salting solution.
Question — “ In using a pinhole camera, how’ is the distance
between the hole and sensitive plate determined ?”
The questioner was referred to the tables published in the
Journal, giving the size of hole and distance by which best
results had been obtained. The image is in focus at different
distances from the pinhole.
Mr. A. Cowan said if the pinhole were a suitable size, all
that had to be determined was the size of picture, roughly
speaking. If a 6-inch focus lens would give the object the size
required, the plate should be placed about that distance from
the pinhole.
The Saturday outing for June 14th is to Epping Forest.
Members to meet at Hale End Station (G.E.R.) from 3 to 3.30.
The Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 29th May at 3, Lord Street, Mr. Paul
Lange presided.
The following w’ere elected members of the Association :
Messrs. R. Rawlinson, F. Hope Jones, Edgar Storey, R. L.
Rawlins, H. Bebbington, and James Nelson, jun.
Mr. William Tomkinson reported on the excursion to Burton
on 3rd May, when a) tout forty members took part in photo-
graphing this picturesque Cheshire village, aud 163 pictures
were taken.
Mr. J. Macdonald Bell exhibited a patent plate rocker,
wound up aud set going with a clock-work arrangement.
The President announced that the next excursion would be
to liossett and Cresford on Saturday, the 7th June ; aud that
the next practical demonstration would take place on the 11th
June, the subject to be “ The Intensification and Reduction of
Negatives demonstrator, Mr. T. L. Mackrell. After this the
series will be discontinued until September, when it will recom-
mence with “ Lantern Slide Makiug.”
The Eastman Company (representative Mr. H. M. Smith),
then exhibited and explained the Kodak No. 4, 5 by 4 camera,
and promised to come to the next meeting on June 19th, and
give a practical demonstration with the films.
The evening concluded with the exhibition of the Boston
(U.S.A.) new set, entitled “The White Mountains of New
Hampshire,” prepared by members of the Boston Camera Club,
and lent to the Liverpool Association in trust, for exhibition
to any photographic society in the United Kingdom on applica-
tion to Mr. E. M. Tunstall, hon. sec. of the Liverpool Asso-
ciation.
Mr. Paul Lange read the descriptive lecture which accom-
panies this set, mounted in type on large cards, with the photo-
June 6, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
447
graph of each slide on the back, so that the lecturer is able to
keep a check on the lanternist by referring to the back of his
card. The slides were shown by the aid of Messrs. Archer’s
oxyhydrogen lime-light lantern. It may be interesting to
notice that our American friends have had their slides made by
the wet collodion process, and this set is considered far superior
to the former one on “ Boston.”
The Bath Photographic Society.
May 28<A. — Mr. George F. Powell in the chair.
Delegates were appointed to represent the Society at Chester.
Dr. Preston King, Messrs. E. J. Appleby, and G. J. Turvey,
were elected members.
Watkins' exposure meter, sent for exhibition, was shown.
Mr. C. Cloakley exhibited a new tripod stand, constructed
with double parts at the bottom ; also an instantaneous drop
shutter, rigged on a shifting platform, by which means the
shutter is pushed aside when desired for focussing or other
purposes. The points referred to he claims as new.
Mr P. Biiaham, F.C.S., F.R.M.S., then delivered an
address on the subject of “ Photo-Micrography,” which he
fully illustrated. Mr. Braham commenced by saying photo-
graphy is a powerful aid to science and truth, and in each
branch of investigation its uses are increasing, and also arts
and manufactures are benefitted by it. What its future develop-
ments may be, it is hardly competent for human intellect
more than dimly to surmise. In astronomical investigation it
has already done great service, and objects unseen by the human
eye have been developed by the sensitive film and, assisted by
spectroscopy, given information concerning systems hitherto
unknown. In microscopic investigations, permanent and
truthful records can be retained of transitory subjects, and suc-
cessive periods in formation and development printed on the
film for future reference. The small bijou lime light was
shown to be, next to sunlight, the best for producing sharp
images, as the rays emanate from a spot of light, while with
other lights a portion of a sheet of flame is used, and cannot
give a perfect image. The diminutive lime light is fitted on a
condenser stand, or on the microscope in place of the mirror,
and has an adjustable lens in front consisting of a microscopic
objective, a convergent, divergent, or parallel beam being alone
used with no eye-piece, as every additional lens interferes with
the accuracy of the image. If different objectives are used,
with sufficient distance between them and the sensitive plate,
photographs of any required size can be taken. There may be
a slight adjustment required from the visually perfect image to
the photographic ; this can only be accurately ascertained by
experiment, as this distance varies with different objectives.
Photographs were taken of a microscopic photograph to
graphically illustrate the difference between photo-micrography
and micro-photography, and also of an opaque object, which
were very successful. With regard to objectives generally, the
lecturer said that in the telescope the effective or useful area
should be clearly specified, and the angular aperture or effective
area in microscopic objectives, and in photographic lenses the
largest stop with which a sharp picture can be obtained should
be known.
A discussion followed, in which Messrs. Wheateroft, Wells,
Bristow, Williams, C. G. It. Wood, Cloakley, Dr. King, and
the Chairman took part. Several questions were put and
replied to, and a hearty vote of thanks was accorded to the
lecturer.
Mr. J. A. Rudge exhibited in action the machine which he
has invented, and named “The Bi-Phantascope.” The object of
the inventor is to take photographs which can, by the same lens,
be reproduced with sufficient exactitude to represent animation.
Thus, facial expressions, under any circumstances, may be
shown by means of transparencies from suitable negatives, with
all the muscular action noticeable in life, and free from jerki-
ness attendent upon the “wheel of life” method adopted by
Muybridge and others.
The Chairman showed a series of pictures made by means
of the No. 2 Kodak, charged with a band of sensitive cellu-
loid. Some of the prints were among the best that have
been seen of this class of work.
Mr. E. E. Peacock handed round samples of combination
printing cf a creditable character.
Two fine studies of cloudland, reproduced on bromide opal,
24 by 18, were sent for exhibition by Mr. Friese Greene.
The Photographic Society ok Philadelphia.
A meeting was held on May 7th, president John G.
Bullock in the chair.
The committee appointed to prepare a memorial of the
late president of the Society, Mr. Frederick Graff, presented
their report, from which we extract the following : — “ Perhaps
one of the greatest sources of consolation to those who are
called, upon to mourn the loss of a friend and leader, is the
review of his past life as connected with themselves and the
interests over which he presided, particularly when those recol-
lections fill us with love, admiration, and respect for the charac-
ter of our lost friend ; we think this will be found pre-
eminently the case in regard to our late lamented president,
Frederick Graff. We have been accustomed to see him in our
midst so ong a time, presiding over our councils, encouraging
us by his example and advice, exciting our zeal in the race by
his own untiring interest in our work, and his great desire
that our noble art should be more than a casual amusement for
the passing hour. His own love for it was genuine — amongst
the very first to take it up as an amateur, and to apply to
it all the energy and resources of his well-trained mind, his
interest never flagged, nor did his enthusiasm diminish during
his life. The social side of his character was not less remarkable.
He was always ready to assist with his advice and counsel
those standing in need.”
Mr. Frederick E. Ives sent to the meeting a package of
photo-micrographs. In a note accompanying the prints he
stated that they were made with comparatively low-priced
objectives, which were not intended for photographic work,
and not selected with a view to such use. Some of the plates
used were Carbutt “ orthochromatic,” others Seed plates
treated with erythrosine, and all exposed through yellow
colour-screens. A small pencil of light was used for amplifica-
tions up to forty times, a bull’s-eye condenser for medium
powers, and condenser of seventy degrees for high powers.
Mr. Cheney, referring to the matter of incrustations on
cover glasses of lantern-slides, stated that having had occasion
to remount two old silver prints which had been framed for
many years, he found the same incrusation on the glass which
had covered the pictures. In this case the cause could not be
looked for in any chemicals emanating from the glass plate.
He attributed the incrustation in some way to acetic acid.
Mr. Stirling read a letter from Mr. York, the English slide-
maker, stating that the incrustation was due to the use of
French or German glass, which contains an excess of alkali
which is acted upon by moisture. With English flatted
crown glass the trouble could not occur.
Mr. Coates, who had a large collection of slides made by
Mr. York, stated that he had never found the defect on any
of these slides.
Mr. Fellows stated that he hail experienced the trouble
with English flatted crown, as well as with the French glass.
Mr. Sartain had frequently seen the deposit on the inner
side of the cover glass of Daguerreotypes. In this case it was
thought that the chemicals used in forming the picture caused
the deposit on the glass.
Mr. Stirling, referring to the recent Photographic Exhibi-
tion at Newcastle-on-Tyue, thought the Society had reason to
congratulate itself very much on the achievements of three of
its members, no less than four medals having been won by
them. Mr. Pancoast won a silver medal for architectual sub-
jects, Mr. Bullock a bronze medal for landscape work, and
Mr. Redfield a silver medal for figure subjects, and also one for
lantern slides. The best English professional and amateur
workers met on equal ground in these competitions, making
the result all the more gratifying.
Mr. Francis Burrows showed a French hand -camera, in the
form of a pistol. It contained a roll of Kodak films, making
a square picture the full width of the film. The exposure
448
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 6, 1890.
was made by pulling a trigger, as with an ordinary pistol.
About one hundred exposures had been made, but, owing to
some fault in in the shutter, which was rather heavy, it had
not quite produced a sharp negative, the shutter invariably
jarring the camera at the instant of exposure. A register
showed the number of exposures made, and two short legs
could be turned down in front, forming with the pistol butt a
tripod stand for use with time exposures.
Mr. Earle showed a camera made by R. and J. Beck, the
mountings of which, as well as the lens, were of aluminium.
The reduction in weight as compared with brass, as usually
used, was about one half. A rack and pinion movement
operated the back portion of the camera in focussing, enabling
a short focus lens to be used as readily as one of long focus.
The front board could be extended by hand to an}’ desired
point, within moderate limits.
Mr. Walmsley showed a camera he had devised for micro-
scopic work. The box was but about four inches square,
mounted on an adjustable rim stand, with bellows for attaching
to the microscope in any position. Anthony’s Lilliput plate-
holders were used, carrying either plates or films. He had
used powers ranging one and one-half to one-fifteenth with
equally good results.
Mr. Redfield showed a tripod stand made by Ashford,
of Birmingham, England. It was made of teak wood, and so
constructed as to be very strong and rigid, and at the same
time quite light. The lower leg, by a convenient arrangement,
could be drawn up between two of the four upper pieces entirely
to the top, shortening the legs one-half, and making the adjust-
ment for uneven ground or to various heights very convenient.
Mr. Hanawelt showed an exposing-shutter of his own in-
vention, in which the slide moved horizontally in front of the
lens. The opening being narrower at the top than at bottom,
gave one-half the exposure to the sky as compared with the
foreground. By an ingenious mechanism, a sort of crank motion
operated the slide, avoiding any jar at opening and closing, and
regulating the movement of the slide so that its speed was slowest
at the instant of full opening, and quickest at the beginning and
close of its action.
♦
Mr. J. E. Dawson writes that the story quoted in our
last from a daily paper, about Mr. Gladstone and the Photo-
grapher, is not quite accurate, and encloses us an interesting
extract from the Huddersfield Examiner, for which there is
not space this week.
Photographic Society of Great Britain. — The last meeting
of the session will be held at 5a, Pall Mall East, on Tuesday,
June 10th, at 8 p.m., when papers will be read on “The Esti-
mation of the Efficacy of Plate Backing,” by W. E. Debenham ;
on “The Staining and Clearing of Gelatine Films,” by Chap-
man Jones, F.I.C., F.C.S. ; and on “ Photographing the_I induc-
tion Spark,” by Sir H. Trueman Wood, M.A.
He Knew His Boy. — Father (to Photo Artist) : “I would
like you to give my son a chance in your studio.” Photo Artist :
“ What can the lad do ? ” Father : “ Well, at first he couldn’t
do anything more than take charge of all the operating,
retouching, and printing departments ; but later on, when he
has more experience, he will be right handy to do the sweeping,
clean the windows, and sift the ashes.”
Camera Club Notices. — Thursday, June 12th, 8 p.m. —
Informal Meeting. Friday to Monday or Tuesday, June 13th
to 16th or 1 7 th. — Excursion to Norwich and the Norfolk
Broads ; Leader, Dr. D. G. Thompson. Members intending to
join are requested to notify same, and the time they will remain
of the party. See notice of particulars in Club, or write for
same. Thursday, June 19th, 8 p.m. — Informal Meeting.
Thursday, June 26th, 8 p.m. — Informal Meeting. Saturday,
June 28th. — Excursion on River Thames, from Reading down-
ward. Ladies invited. Leaders, Mr. W. Clarke and Mr. J. F.
Collins. Full particulars will be sent to those desiring them.
H. — The ladder by which you are ascending to the Temple
of Fame, candidly we do not think to be poetry.
M. — The less said about the matter the better.
Owing to the pressure on our space, articles by Dr. Morton,
Hermann Gunther, and others in type, are held over till our next.
^Ingfoerg to (tfomgpontfentg.
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic Nfws, 5, Fumival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S. , 2, St. Mary’s Roal, Canonbury, London, N.
All A Ivjrtis ; neats and cim-nunications rel iting to money matters, and
to tho site of thi paptr should bo addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic Nkws, Messrs. Piper <4 Carter, 5,Furnival Street, London.
W. M. (Clapliam). — Odcdand Crumpled Paper Negatives. The
best way would be to remove the oil or vaseline first by
repeated treatment with fresh benzol, then dry, and iron the
negatives between leaves of blotting paper. This will make
them clean and flat again, and then perhaps you can in-
tensify ; but great care must be taken first to remove every
trace of fatty matter. This done, grease them again with
vaseline oil on the wrong side, bake them well in the sun
until all opaque spots have disappeared, and finally remove
the superfluous grease with cotton wool.
M. P. S. — A New Method of Determining the Sensitiveness of
Photographic Plates. The research to which we briefly
referred last week should have been attributed to Dr. F.
Hurter and Mr. V. C. Driffield conjointly, instead of being
put down as the work of the first-named gentleman alone.
Col. Waterhouse. — Guaiacol as a Developer. Your paper
was received in time to be printed in the May Photographic
Journal. All other particulars were given in our private
letter of the 28th ult.
W. H. S. — Judges, 1890 Exhibition. Your views have to a
considerable extent been endorsed by the writer of the
leading article in last week’s News. Although several
painters have been nominated to serve on the jury, it is
hardly likely that more than two or three will be elected,
and these would strengthen the body of judges on the art
side, so that great benefit may l>e expected from their asso-
ciation with the photographers as in former years. Your
second remark is answered by the official notification that
the ballot was not to close until June 4th, thus giving
ample time for the voting papers to be returned.
A. G. (Brighton) — The City Exhibition at Drapers' Hall
is well worth a visit, and remains open a week longer. In
addition to the framed specimens and isochromatic work,
there is a goodly show of apparatus, including the Moessard
cylindrograph camera.
E. P. (Bangor) — Strength of Acetic Acid. The hydrometer
furnishes no reliable indication, for the specific gravities are
altogether anomalous. You may test with standard alkali
(dilute caustic soda) added until litmus paper show's it to
be exactly neutralised. For the glacial acid, a very good
proof is to boil it in a test tube, and see whether the vapour
is inflammable.
A. M. M. — We thank you for your kind offices in the Indian
matter.
L. E. D. — Stereoscopic Photography. Of late there is quite a
revival in this branch of our art-science, several English
and many foreign amateurs having been working with twin
lenses during the last and present seasons. The Belgian
Bulletin has an article on the subject, and the last technical
meeting of the Photographic Society was devoted to it.
Although Wheatstone announced the instrument in 1838, it
was not until photography had come to his aid by furnish-
ing satisfactory diagrams, and Brewster hail popularised the
matter by the invention of the lenticular stereoscope, that
much progress was made ; then Wheatstone gave his
Bakeriau lecture on January 15th, 1852, to put the finishing
touch to this important brauch of scientific work. The
earlier attempts failed by reason of employing too wide an
angle.
J. W. W. (Burnley). — Broien Stains on Dry Plate Negatives.
The plates seem to have been kept too long ; try the effect
of prolonged immetsion in a clearing bath of citric acid and
alum. See Year-Book, p. 197 ; or, for fresh trial, use
Bedford's developer, p. 195.
W. V. Morris, H. F., J. M., and A, T., received.
THE
CONTENTS.
PAGK
Photography in Natural Colours 449
About some Developers 450
Keducirg Halation 451
Photographic Exhibitions. By George Davison 452
The Effect upon Toning of Printing through Coloured Glasses.
By Edward A. Colledge 453
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 454
Developers Used by German Professional Photographers. By
Julius F. Sachse 456
Optical Lanterns and Methods of Illumination. By Mr.
Stirling 457
FAOI
Japanese Mulberry-Bark Paper. By A. Lasenby Liberty 457
Notes 458
On Reflected Images in Optical Combinations, and their Effect
on the Brilliancy of the Final Image. By T. R Dallmeyer 460
Negatives. By Thos. II. Morton, M.D 461
Notices of Books 463
Four Faded Photographs .-. 464
Patent Intelligence 465
Correspondence 466
Proceedings of Societies .T. 467
Answers to Correspondents 468
PHOTOGRAPHY IN NATURAL COLOURS.
Much stress has been laid by Dr. Eder and Dr. Yogcd
about the amount of permanency of the photographs in
natural colours sent to them by Herr Yeress, unaccom-
panied by a description of his process. As yet, there
is no published evidence of any advance having been
made by Herr Veress over those who have preceded
him in the work, and the testimony as to the durability
of the results may be founded upon incomplete infor-
mation as to what has been done previously in this
matter. The photographs in natural colours, in their
earliest days, faded rapidly, but after a time it was
found that they could be to some extent fixed by a
weak solution of ammonia of carefully regulated
strength ; little or nothing is on public record as to
the time of immersion in this bath. The fixing at
last arrived at such a degree of perfection that Mr.
Traill Taylor, who had some of these photographs sent
to him for delivery to Sir David Brewster, found that
they were not visibly affected by two weeks’ exposure to
daylight. To the day of his death Mr. Warren De La
Rue had one of Becquerel’s partially fixed silver-
plate photographs in natural colours in his possession.
We first saw it about twenty years ago at his
private observatory at Cranford, where he photo-
graphed tho moon, and again quite recently, but a
few months before his death. In the twenty years
it was practically unchanged, so far as memory can
be trusted, but it must be remembered that when it
was not required for inspection Mr. De La Rue
kept it carefully protected from light in a leather
case.
Some of the early photographs of this class being
thus permanent, what becomes of the only testimony
adduced that Herr Veress has made a new departure?
He candidly says that “ toe much bustle ” has been
made about his experiments, a remark which is amply
justified so far as any information at present before the
public is concerned. Dr. Yogel has found that twenty
minutes’ exposure at four o’clock in the afternoon to
slightly veiled sunlight, or seven minutes’ exposure to
an unspecified kind of electric light at a distance of
fifteen centimetres, deepens the ground tint of the
photographs sent to him by Herr Veress.
In all photographs of this class hitherto produced,
those on paper have not been so pronounced or so
pleasing as those upon glass, paitly, perhaps, because
the ground colour seems to show up more strongly
upon paper.
The latest information upon photography in natural
colours relates to pictures on paper, and is published in
the number of Le Moniteur de la Photographie just to
hand. The Moniteur sets forth that at the last meet-
ing of the General Photographic Syndicate in Paris,
M. E. Vallot exhibited a good photograph in natural
colours, printed directly from a coloured picture upon
glass, and it was produced in this way : —
Thick photographic paper is floated for three min-
utes upon —
Water 100 grammes
Chloride of sodium ... ... ... 20 ,,
It is essential that the paper shall then be dried
quickly.
Next it is sensitised for five minutes upon the follow-
ing bath : —
Water 100 grammes
Silver nitrate ... ... ••• ••• 10 ,,
After draining for a few moments, it is washed in run-
ning water for ten minutes.
Then, to get rid of all traces of nitrate of silver, it is
placed for five minutes in —
Water 100 grammes
Sodium chloride ... ... ••• 20 ,,
It is then washed for several instants.
Tho violet argentic chloride of silver is then formed
by exposing the paper to light in a bath containing five
hundred centigrammes of water to which twenty centi-
grammes of the following solution have been added : —
Distilled water 100 grammes
Protochloride of tin ... ... ... 3 ,,
Sulphuric acid... ... ... ... 10 drops
450
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jone 13, 1890.
When the film has taken a deep violet colour, it is
washed for five minutes and allowed to dry.
When dry, it is washed for two minutes in a mixture
of equal parts of the two solutions given below : —
Solution A.
Water 100 grammes
Bichromate of potash ... ... 5 ,,
Solution B.
Saturated solution of copper sulphate.
After being dried, the paper is in a condition suitable
to give colours. Under a coloured painting on glass,
an exposure to full sunlight for three-quarters of an
hour is necessary.
When removed from the printing frame the colours
are seen on the paper, but as if fogged, but come out
more brilliantly after the print is put in the following
bath : —
Water ... ... ... ... 100 grammes
Sulphuric acid ... ... ... 20 ,,
The prints must not be left too long in this bath,
because it at first improves, and afterwards destroys
the colours.
After abundantly washing these prints, M. Vallot
albumenises them to give eclat to the different tones.
The Moniteur says nothing about any fixing operation.
Full information as to the production upon silver
plates of photographs in natural colours will be found
in the last Photographic News Year-Book, and to
bring information on heliochromy down to the latest
date, we now quote a letter from the American Journal
of Photography just to hand, which letter is written by
Herr Yeress himself, who therein also does a valiant
battle royal with the English language, in which the
language has come off the victor : —
Dear Sir, — Please accept my thanks, dear sir, for your
kindness as to continue sending your journal to me, although
you knew that my journal, the Fenykepiszeti Lapok, had ceased
to appear. I assure you, it has been always an enjoyment for
me to receive your paper, so excellently edited, and I would
truly be very glad if the little sortiment of my photos upon
paper and glass in natural colours, I send you by the same
mail, would prove you how much I esteem the favour you do
me. Please, dear sir, to select some of the photos, and deliver
it, as well as the enclosure, to Mr. Carey Lee, his lodging being
unknown to me. I shall be very thankful to you, because I
want to say him myself, how much I value his arduous labours,
lie goes quite another way than I do, but if he be ready to
unite his experience with mine, I am persuaded we would
triumph in a very short time. You see, dear sir, that I suc-
ceeded to fix the colours ; its for the preparation upon glass, it
is in gelatine, upon paper in collodion. The exposure of the
photos upon glass was of 3-5 hours, upon paper 2-3 days.
Since I succeeded to make such photos upon smooth plates of
thickened (condensed) petroleum in 10-30 minutes.
The plate is put into a copying-frame, and exposed from a
transparent coloured drawing. My aim is now to lessen the
time of exposure as much as to enable me to work with the
camera, to photograph moving objects, which I could not do
till now, because for camera work 1 wanted 2-3 weeks.
Francis de Veress.
Kolozsvar ( Klousenburg ), Hungary.
The London and Provincial Photographic Association. —
Monthly outing, June 14th. Members to meet at Wood Street
Station (G.E.R.), at 2.40, and walk through Cook’s Folly to
Hale End. Trains from Liverpool Street 2.2 and 2.16.
ABOUT SOME DEYELOFERS.
Every photographer has his pet method of develop-
ment, and, as a natural consequence, he is apt to decry
everything but his own particular formula. This is
as it should be, for a man is far more likely to
do good work if he believes in his tools to such an
extent that he does not care to meddle with new
fangled ones. We have known certain amateur photo-
graphers who have never yet succeeded in turning out
any good work, simply and solely because they have
had a superabundance of time and money on their
hands, which have led them into temptation. \Ve all
know that a certain large employer of labour is, accord-
ing to Dr. Watts, always ready to find “ some mischief
still for idle hands to do,” and the particular mischief
that commends itself to the idle man of photographic
proclivities is to mess about with all the different
brands of plates and with the various developers
which are placed from time to time within his reach
by enterprising traders. Such a worker, at the end
of a few weeks, finds his dishes, his measures, and
his bottles in a state of topsy-turvydom, which is
only equalled by the chaos which exists in his own
biain.
A beginner is always to some extent puzzled as to
the right developer to use, and if he can only get hold
of something in a bottle which will coax out some kind
of an image when thrown upon an exposed plate, he is
satisfied. The bottle must contain a ready-mixed
liquid, and so long as it will act, the aspirant to photo-
graphic fame is happy, and will ask no questions
about its composition. It, of course, stands to reason
that such a ivorkor will never become an expert,
although he may, by an occasional fluke, turn out a
good picture ; but still he will be better off by sticking
to his bottle of unknown liquid than he will be if he
is always ringing the changes upon every nostrum that
is brought forward.
Within the last few years several new developers
have been introduced to the notice of photographers,
and each has its admirers. Some will declare that
hydrokinone gives them far more certain results than
anything else which they have ever tried. Otheisgivo
the piemicr place to eikonogen, and it is certain, as
one of our notes stated the other day, that several
photographers are taking to it for ordinary studio work.
A new developer, bi-kinol, has only just been intro-
duced into the market by Mr. Hinton, and this, too,
has already many friends. Then we have a number of
old-fashioned workers who say that the pyro and
ammonia “ mixture as before ” is as good a medicine for
their complaints as they can find, and that they intend
to stick to it through thick and thin.
Now it is our duty to look upon all things photo-
graphic with a strictly impartial eye, and to do our
best to point out as far as we can the excellencies or
shortcomings of anything in the shape of apparatus or
formula; which come under our notice. Nor are we in
the habit of pissing an opinion upon anything until we
have submitted it to trial. With a view to ascertain
June 13, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
451
the relative merits of some of the developers now in
use, we put them to a practical test in the following
manner: First of all, we exposed a 10 by 8 plate in
the camera, giving it sufficient time to fairly bring out
— as we judged — all possible detail. We, in fact, did
our best to produce a good negative by means of nor-
mal exposure, and without reiving upon any kind of
forcing during development. When this plate was duly
exposed, it was removed to the dark room and divided
with a diamond iuto four equal portions. We marked
these on the film side with an aniline ink pencil res-
pectively, “bi-quinol,” “ hydrokinone,” “eikonogen,”
and “ pyro.” We then proceeded to develop each with
the developing agent whose name it bore.
The first to be treated was marked “ bi-kinol,” a
developer which is supplied in two solutions. We
mixed these in the proportions recommended for a
normal exposure — i.e., forty minims of each to the
ounce of water. Watch in hand, we looked for the
first trace of the image, and noted its appearance in one
minute and a-half. We judged development to be
complete in four and three-quarter miuutcs. Result,
greatly under-exposed. Next came the hydrokinone,
which brought out an image in two and three-quarter
minutes, but which at the end of seven minutes
appeared far more under-exposed than its predecessor.
Evidently, we thought, we had made a mistake, and
should have kept the cap off the lens for another half
second or so. But we proceeded with our work, and
took up the “ eikonogen ” plate. In this case the
sky portion appeared in one minute, and detail followed
in two minutes, all action stopping at the end of six
minutes. This plate had far more density than the
other two, but still we should have preferred to see a
far denser result. We now had only one plate left for
treatment, and for its development we were to rely
upon pyro and ammonia.
This old-fashioned developer we mixed in the pro-
portions which experience has proved to be the best for
bringing out the image on a plate which has received
the normal exposure. Again we timed the operation,
and we noted that the image made its appearance in
twenty-five seconds, the action being complete in two
and a-half minutes. There was every indication that
the exposure had been quite sufficient, as will be seen
by the time required for development to become com-
plete. No further addition of the alkali was needed,
and we may mention that the developer was restrained
at the outset with bromide, and that the pyro used had
been mixed for some weeks previously with a preserva-
tive in the shape of potash meta-bisulphite.
The four portions of the negative were duly placed
in the fixing bath, so that they could be examined in a
completed form. But the results already noted during
development were in no case modified. The pyro de-
veloped portion was the only one which would be
capable of yielding a satisfactory print. It was dense
in the high-lights, exhibited clouds in the sky portion,
and was generally crisp and brilliant. The others all
suffered, more or less, as we have said, from under-
exposure.
Our experiment tends to show that the old pyro and
ammonia developer is not yet displaced by any newer
agent. At the same time we may point out that in the
latter the amateur has something to fall back upon
when he finds that his negatives are over-exposed. It
is a common fault into which the amateur falls, and he
subsequently finds that pyro development gives nought
but thin images, which are useless to him Let him seek
the new agents for a remedy, and hold fast to that one
which he finds to be good. For transparency work,
where exposure often extends over half a minute or
more, some of these new developers are far better than
pyro ; and we shall take an early opportunity of detail-
ing some experiments we have made in this direction.
REDUCING HALATION.
Last Tuesday night Mr. Debenham read a useful paper
before the Photographic Society about halation. On
looking down upon a piece of plane glass at a bright
spot of light reflected therefrom, the interior reflections
between the two surfaces and some other conditions,
render it difficult to see how much of the light comes
from the back and how much from the front surface,
also how much is absorbed by any particular “backing.”
Mr. Debenham’s plan was to paint various backings for
reducing halation side by side upon one surface of a
prism, by which method the conditions of observation
became much easier. Bitumen has long been known
to form a good backing for plates, but it is troublesome
to remove, and Mr. Debenham described experiments
by which he had found that a solution of caramel in
gum water acts even better than bitumen. The least
troublesome method of backing a plate, in'our experi-
ence— and the plan is but moderately efficient — is that
which we devised in 1881, and published in current
photographic literature ; namely, rubbing glycerine
over black mackintosh in a thin film, then squeegeeing
the fabric upon the back of the plate. This backing
can be pulled off just before developing. Perhaps the
substitution of a solution of caramel in glycerine will
increase the efficiency of the latter mode of working,
and give little trouble to the operator.
Why does not some enterprising manufacturer intro-
duce backed plates into the market, wrapped in pairs,
so that, if opened by custom-house officers, only two
plates are likely to be spoiled and fogged, instead of all
in the box? Why, again, are not printed labels in
four or five European languages pasted outside the
boxes, stating their contents, and that they must not
be opened in ordinary light ? Why, again, are not the
developing formula? recommended by the particular
maker not always pasted on the outside of his boxes, so
that the solutions can be made up before opening a box
of plates? One or two makers have already adopted
the latter plan. An extra charge must, of course, bo
made for all these conveniences combined.
♦
Ink for Writing on Photographs is made of iodide of
potassium, 10 parts ; water, 30 parte ; iodine, 1 part ; and
gum arabic, 1 part. It produces white lines on the dark back-
ground.
452
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
BY GEORGE DAVISON.
n.
It is matter of common notoriety that photography in
England did not long maintain the high and dignified
standing which it took at the outset. No wonder, then,
of the simplicity and dignity which characterised them
whilst they were solely the outcome of pure, scientific
enthusiasm. In the facility of producing representations
of a kind, in the rapid extension of photography as a pop-
ular pastime, and the development of dependent indus-
tries, there seems to have been generated the seeds of
disease or weakness, which naturally showed itself some- 1
what in exhibitions. Taking the state of things at the
end of the first decade of such enterprises, we find medals
and prizes, classification and unnecessary limitations, intro-
duced. At the tenth exhibition of the Photographic
Society of London, held in May, 1864, at the galleries of
the Society of Female Artists, in Pall Mall, five medals
were offered, with the impossible and odious “ besting ”
system. One was for the “best” portrait, another for
tne “ best ” landscape, a third for what was called a
“group,” a fourth for architectural work, and a fifth for
photo-mechanical processes. With, probably, the aim of
barring some individual or individuals more mechanically
skilful or painstaking than the rest, “groups ” were only
permitted from single negatives. Possibly this restriction
was devised to discourage what might have been held to
be the reprehensible practice of combination printing, but it
hardly fseems so. Amongst other conditions, there was the
sweeping order that no pictures from painted or touched
negatives would be permitted, a duplicate to accompany
each picture. Three inches margin was allowed for large
pictures, two for smaller, an unhappy recommendation to
put several small photographs in one frame being appended
The character of subsequent exhibitions was not dis-
similar, simplifications and improvements being introduced
from time to time as far as the Photographic Society’s
exhibition was concerned. Coming to the present time,
the leading features of the general run of exhibitions are
too well known to require much description. A laudable
desire to please and attract everybody, and make a financial
success of the undertaking, minute classification and sub-
classification, piles of metal medals, consolation stakes,
even handicaps, and all in such profusion that the only
question with each exhibitor is, whether he will obtain a
first, second, third, fourth, or extra prize — these seem to
be the characteristics that circumstances have brought us
to. It has been the rapid increase in such puerilities and
excesses that has at last stirred up so large a section of
those interested in photography to bike some active steps
in the matter. The special meeting of representatives at
the Camera Club early in 1888 was the first sign of any
combined action, and the influence of those discussions
and resolutions was seen in a gradual education of the
great body of exhibitors themselves, and in the increased
interest shown by the press in the subject. The more
definite pronouncement made at the Camera Club
Conference this year may be taken as the expression of
the opinions and views which, in the course of the year
past, have become rife amongst photographers. The
adoption of most of those conditions, and a closer following
of the regulations in force at the Photographic Society’s
exhibition, are now fairly well ensured. The complete
change will not be immediate, as is seen in the mixture of
reformed rules and deference to local prejudice displayed
in some of the announcements for future provincial
exhibitions. However, the improvement, though gradual,
is certain, and has its greatest encouragement in the proot
it adduces that a higher estimation is held of the scope
and value of photography.
Turning to the inception of the movement which has
developed into the recent rage for reform, it is found that,
as far as any individual influence can be distinctly traced,
Dr. Emerson is responsible for first laying down tht lines
upon which the agitation has travelled, just as, guided by
a severe culture, he has been the first to introduce into
photography, by example and precept, much else that is
valuable and likely to bear good fruit. In October, 1885,
he published in the Amateur Photographer an article giving
an outline of an “ Ideal Exhibition,” and it is interesting
to notice how exactly the later outcry has, unknowingly,
taken its watchwords from those suggestions. They are
the conditions which any individual, moving under the
influence of the most cultivated art of modern times,
would be compelled to impose, and there is hardly more
than one of the suggestions in that article which anyone
could wish to alter.
The chief of these proposals were : — 1. That all the
judges be artists (certain names of those capable of under-
standing the true scope of photographic art being
given). 2. One picture, one frame. 3. No retouching.
4. Uniform framing (say all gilt.) 5. That the judges be
the hanging committee. G. That there be no classes, but
that the award be made for the so many best pictures.
7. Each exhibitor limited to three pictures. Such
exhibitions, Dr. Emerson added, he was sure, “ would do
more to raise our art than the most voluminous writings.”
In proposal No. 7 I take it the suggestion conveyed is
that nothing inferior should be received, a most important
regulation for every public exhibition, and one more
often adopted in earlier days than now, but chiefly then on
account of limited space. One of the earliest announce-
ments to this effect was in connection with an exhibition
of the French Photographic Society in 1861, where it is
stated in the British Journal, February 15th, 1861, a jury
was appointed “ to weed out ” the photographs.
Now it is evident that a code of rules such as that just
indicated is framed for an art exhibition purely, and it is
in that connection that most of my remarks are made. A
magnificent photographic exhibition, exclusively historical
and scientific, might, with energetic management, be
organized, hut certainly any system of competition and
awards would be equally out of place in such an enter-
prise. Even in a trade exhibition, the objectionable
results of prizes and medals are now generally held to be
greater than any advantages derived from such competition
and lottery.
Taking photographic exhibitions as we find them, the
tendency is ever towards making them art exhibitions,
and, therefore, the whole question of regulations turns
upon the art capabilities of photography. If there are
no possibilities ; if photography is to be held as a lame,
limited, and mechanical means of aesthetic representa-
tion, without any power of artistic expression, as held by
Mr. Stillman and one or two half-hearted supporters of
his views in this country, then most of this agitation is
misdirected, and it matters little whether the dignity and
influence of photography be consulted in these shows, or
whether they be promoted and regulated merely as a use-
Jcne 13, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
453
ful stimulus to trade, or as a small social excitement. My
remarks are entirely based upon the confident belief that
photography is worthy to be wooed as a means of artistic
expression, and upon a desire that its proper claims in that
respect should be recognised. In this view I hold that
the following conditions ought to be observed in what
purport to be photographic art exhibitions.
1. That there should be no classification, and no awards
whatever further than the honour implied by acceptance
for exhibition.
2. That a strict and competent hanging committee
should reject all inferior exhibits without fear or favour.
3. That all distinctions of amateur and professional
should be entirely suppressed, all pictures exhibited being
for sale unless specially exempted.
4. That the number of photographs accepted from each
exhibitor be limited.
5. That each picture (save in application to decorative
art) be separately framed.
In my next article I shall refer to these points, and then
proceed to a brief discussion of the questions now prom-
inent as to the constitution of boards of judges, and as to
classification, opposing most strongly the hardly logical
contentions against artists as judges recently published in
the News, and objecting to the pleas for classification put
forward by some ardent photographic exhibitors.
THE EFFECT UPON TONING OF PRINTING
THROUGH COLOURED GLASSES.
BY EDWARD A. GOLLEDGE.
A short time ago I had occasion to interview Mr. Otto
Scholzig with reference to his now well-known sensitised
paper, who, after having most kindly afforded me the
information required, submitted to my notice some samples
of paper which had been exposed to light through some
coloured celluloids ; I was struck with the remarkable
effect of the various tints obtained by the light acting upon
the silver paper after passing through the various coloured
mediums, more especially as the toned specimens pro-
duced totally different effects to that obtained when
printed in the ordinary manner. I lost no time in putting
the experiment to a severe test, and the result of my
experiments in this direction I now desire to place before
my readers.
I have tried printing through the following colours :
blue, ruby, orange, yellow, and green, and it is really
surprising to note the variety of tone that may be secured
by the various methods. I shall mention that my aim has
been to obtain as pure a black as possible, and my experi-
ments have certainly been rewarded with success far
beyond my expectations.
Of all the colours experimented with, I find green,
yellow, and orange give the best results.
Blue glass seems to have very little effect unless it pos-
sesses a decided greenish tint. Ruby glass I have dis-
carded altogether for securing a black tone in the finished
print, and the very best results are obtained when employ-
ing green glass of a somewhat deep colour, and printing
in direct sunlight, I have not found any marked differ-
ence in the effect produced when printing in the shade,
and of course the time occupied is much prolonged.
My experiments have been conducted solely with
Scholzig’s matt surface and other papers of his manu-
facture, and although they have been carried out in a very
hurried manner, I feel convinced that many advantages
may be gained by adopting the method referred to.
The appearance of the print before toning is somewhat
peculiar, inasmuch as it is in colour a beautiful purple
brown, a colour one is so anxious to obtain, as a print of
this description (which I never secured by any other
means) is in excellent condition for the toning bath. My
difficulties hitherto have been to get other than the brown
tint, which colour will not tone to the desired black. It
would appear to me — not over well acquainted with the
chemistry of photography — that the action of the light
upon the sensitised paper is similar to that of crystallisa-
tion. In order to obtain good crystals it is necessary to
allow time for them to form, and the crystals are deposited
in certain parts of the vessel only, in bold form. Quicken
the process by violent evaporation, and we obtain a shape-
less mass of small crystals all over the vessel. The
printing process appears to be a kind of crystallization,
the chlorine of the silver chloride being freed, and silver
sub-oxide being deposited in a crystallised form. It is
acknowledged, also, that slow printing produces better
detail than quick printing, but it was not until I had
experimented that I discovered that various coloured
silver oxides or sub-oxides, precipitated under various
coloured lights, had each an entirely different affinity for the
gold in the toning bath, and that the one took the deposit of
gold rapidly, whilst the other refused to take it altogether.
There is no doubt that the tones obtainable by the method
I describe on matt surface paper are quite equal to the
best results ever obtained by any of the platinum pro-
cesses. . . . Mr. Scholzig is certainly to be congratulated
on having been the prime mover in this most important
discovery, to improve, if not to perfect, the tones of
the silver print, both matt as well as albumenised.*
In order to get the best effect, it is necessary that the
paper should be printed very deeply — in fact, so deep that
detail in the shadows is quite lost. I have found that in
printing from a negative in which some parts are dense,
owing to halation or some other cause, it is necessary to
carry on the printing until detail in the densest part,
appears ; this does not appear to affect the other part of
the picture, which, under ordinary circumstances, would
be much over-printed ; also when printing from a weak
negative, much finer results may be obtained by using
the green glass than if printed in direct light ; in fact, I
am of opinion that intensification of negatives will be
rendered quite unnecessary if, when printing, the pre-
caution is taken to print through the green or yellow
glass ; of course, the time occupied in printing is longer,
but to my mind this is no drawback to the process. For
want of time my experiments have been somewhat
limited, but perhaps this may come under the notice of
some one who may be able to devote time in experimenting
with various tinted glasses ; there is certainly a wide field
for research.
The after manipulations are much about the same as
with ordinary printing, but when using the matt
surface paper, the prints simply require a rinse in one
water before placing in toning bath. I recommend the
following bath for pure black tones : —
Borax
Uranium nitrate
Gold
Water
Of course, if a qua
... ... ... 1^ drams
... ... ... 4 grains
3 „
... ... ... 24 ounces
tity of prints is to be toned, more
* Mr. Scbolzig has shown us some prints with exceedingly rich black
i tones produced as stated.— En,
454
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
gold should be added, but with the bath above given I
have toned from 21 to 3 dozen whole plate prints on
the matt surface paper. It is necessary to replenish
the bath with gold if it becomes weak, and the same
solution may be used several times, providing gold has
been added.
The tungstate and phosphate bath, as recommended by
Mr. Scholzig, gives fine dark tones on the matt surface
paper. The time occupied in toning this paper is but a
few minutes. I place the prints in salt and water, and
fix in the usual manner.
The enamel and brilliantly albuinenised papers take
longer to tone, and it is as well to wash thoroughly before
toning, and place in the last washing a dram or two of car-
bonate of soda. Tone until all brown has disappeared
when viewed by transmitted light, and place in salt and
water and fix in usual manner with a drachm or so of
ammonia added to the bath. Fine black tones may be
obtained by this method, although any range of tone may
be had, according to fancy.
It is possible some of my readers have already tried the
experiment I have endeavoured to describe, but to myself
it is entirely new.
While conducting my experiments I have found that,
when using deep ruby glass, the time occupied in printing
is considerably less than when using yellow or orange ;
this fact is worth knowing, as it touches upon another
branch of photography, and will encourage amateurs to
use more light in their dark rooms. For my own part,
I always use twelve inches of orange glass, and have
developed the most rapid plates in the market without a
mishap ; but I feel I am encroaching upon another subject,
which is not my intention. Silver printing with green
glass and gold toning is my subject, and I must leave my
readers to experiment and judge for themselves.
Since writing the above, it occurred to me that the
prints toned in the bath with the uranium might not be
permanent; I therefore placed several of them (matt and
albumenized) in a strong solution of nitric acid and water
for many hours without the slightest change taking place,
proving beyond doubt that the tones obtained are the
result of a deposit of gold, and therefore permanent
The East Dulwich Society has purchased, for loan to members,
a 12 by 10 camera and lens, which was on view on June 6th.
Lack of Symmetry in the Eyes. — When the average man
or woman comes to be fitted with the first pair of glasses, some
curious discoveries are made. Seven out of ten have stronger
sight in one eye than the other. In two cases out of five, one
eye is out of line. Nearly one-half the people are colour-blind
to some extent, and only one pair of eyes out of every fifteen
are all right in all respects.
A Toning Bath. — MM. Detaille Bros, say that when equal
parts of a 15 per cent, solution of sodium hyposulphite, and
of a 10 per cent, solution of alum, are mixed, a precipitate is
produced, and the formation is so slow and continuous that
the authors found a precipitate to be forming three mouths
after the mixture of the solutions in the cold. A transparency
placed in this solution tones slowly, the colours of the image
varying from a dark brown to a reddish violet. An analysis is
given of the precipitate : it contained 30 per cent, water, 28
per cent, alumina, and 38 per cent, of sulphur, consequently
the authors infer that the toning is due to the action of nascent
sulphur, and a plate of silver immersed in the solution for
several days became quite black. The best results are
obtained with gelatino-chloride plates. If the mixture be
diluted with from two or three times its volume of water, it
may be used to tone paper prints (fugitively ?). The Mawson
chloride plates are said to give very good results with this
toning solution. — Bulletin Beige.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN F„ GUNTHER.
New Sensitometer — Development of Gelatino-Chlo-
ride Papers — Blistering of Albumen Prints —
Stained Negatives — Judicial Photography — Helio-
chromy— Biblia Pauperum.
A Xew Sensitometer. — A clever modification of the
Warnerke sensitometer has been suggested by Mr. R.
E. Liesegang. In order to obtain a more even gradation
of the intensities of the light on the sensitive plate to be
tested than can be obtained by superimposing a number
of strips of paper, he makes use of the well-known optical
law according to which the intensity of the light dimi-
nishes with the distance. It will be remembered that in
Mr. Warnerke’s instrument the phosphorescent and the
sensitive plate are placed parallel ; Liesegang, on the con-
trary, arranges them in a certain angle — of 45 degrees, for
instance. The action of the light on the gelatine plate
naturally diminishes more and more with the distance. If,
now, a number of threads be drawn in front of the plate,
to keep off the light, it can be determined after
development how far the light has acted, and a deduction
can be made, as in the case of the Warnerke sensitometer,
of the sensitiveness of the film. This method offers also
the advantage that a narrow strip of the edge of the plate
is sufficient for the trial, and that the plate tested may
afterwards be safely used for making an exposure. In-
stead of keeping off the light by means of threads in
order to produce the white lines on the plate, it will be
sufficient to draw on the plate parallel lines with a concen-
trated solution of potassium bromide, to render the lines
insensitive, so that in developing they will remain white.
The Development of Gelatino-chloride Papers. — In the
newly opened flash-light studio of Professor Schirm, of
Berlin, the lighting arrangements of which I have des-
cribed on a former occasion, all the prints are made on
development paper exclusively. For prints made by con-
tact, I)r. Just’s gelatino-chloride paper is used with the best
results. About the mode of development, Mr. AVilh.
Steiner, manager of this establishment, gives some prac-
tical hints in the Miltheilungen. It makes no difference, he
says, whether the ferrous-oxalate, the hydroquinone, or
the eikonogen developer be used, they all being equally
suitable for the purpose ; but the alkali developers are to
be preferred, on account of their exceeding cleanliness, and
because they may be used repeatedly. In order to obtain
a pure black gelatino-chloride print, equal to a platinum
print, a relatively strong developer with a large quantity
of any alkali — such as potassium or sodium carbonate —
should be used, to dispense with as much light during
exposure as possible, for plenty of light gives brown
tones, whilst they are blackened by the alkalies. As, how-
ever, bluish-black tones are obtained by too large a quan-
tity of alkali, it is necessary to take the golden mean
between light and a strong developer, and this is effected by
the use of a restrainer of potassium bromide by prefer-
ence, which allows an exposure giving brown tones, and at
the same time a strong alkali developer giving black
tones. By this means a beautiful ricli mixed tone is
obtained, in which the brown appears only like a warm
sepia-coloured glazing upon a black image. Care should,
however, be taken not to use too great a quantity of the
restrainer, as in this case a loamy, greenish-brown tone is
liable to appear.
Blistering of Albumen Prints and its Prevention. — At a
June 13, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
455
meeting of practical photographers which was held some
days ago, an interesting discussion took place about the
blistering of albumen prints. It was rightly said by a
member that the disease is connected with the present
mode of preparation of the albumen paper, and that the
paper of the early days of photography did not blister,
because then it was albumenized with fresh egg-albumen,
and not mixed, as now, with blood-albumen, the properties
of which are different in some degree. It absorbs, for
instance, the oxygen from the air more rapidly than egg-
albumen, disengaging carbonic acid. It was remarked that
this interesting phenomenon of slow combustion would, per-
haps, be a cause of alteration of the prints. Many a remedy
for the defect was then given, most of them being
probably well known to the profession, but the following
one, which was said to be originally described in a Germau
contemporary by Herr Rudolph, of Ilof, seems to me
especially certain in its results, and therefore to be recom-
mended. After toning, the prints are rinsed and piled up
one upon another, the larger sizes being laid separately,
also the cabinets and the smaller prints. They are then,
every size separately, laid between smooth oil-cloth, and
the latter is placed on a smooth board and pressed with a
squeegee until the prints become slightly transparent,
which may be seen best by reflected light, looking at the
back of the prints. They are then once more rinsed and
placed in the fixing bath. Prints treated in this manner,
it is said, never blister, except perhaps at the edges, if
not correctly piled up ; this being, however, of no conse-
quence, as the edges are cut off. The whole manipula-
tion, which is completed within two to five minutes, is
very simple and effective, and besides, it is much cheaper
than many of the other well-known remedies.
Stained Negatives. — A very effective method of restoring
gelatine negatives showing the well-known yellow stain
has been introduced at the Imperial Institute for Photo-
graphic Researches, of Vienna, by Mr. Robischeck. The
plate is at first carefully freed from its varnish by means of
alcohol, washed with water, and then placed in a dilute
aqueous solution of bromine, which is obtained by adding
a few drops of bromine liquid to about half a pint of
ordinary water, and which is then, together with the plate,
exposed to the direct sunlight. The action of the bromine
very soon becomes .apparent. The yellow stain disappears,
and it then is well to watch the further progress by trans-
mitted light. After the image has become clear, which
requires six to eight minutes, according to the degree of
concentration of the bromine solution, the plate is placed
in alcohol, to remove the rest of the bromine, and then
dried. In this way the restored negative can be re-used
within a very short time. The results are said to be very
satisfactory.
Judicial Photograph;/. — Of the high importance of photo-
graphy for judicial purposes, the following incident gives
evidence. Some weeks ago, a letter which had been
written twenty years ago by a convict — who is still a
prisoner — was presented to Professor Max Muller, of
Brunswick. On the second page of the letter there were
written about five additional lines, apparently with a
colourless or slightly coloured liquid ; but the writing
was undecipherable. Only the existence of written
characters could be seen if the letter-paper was held
against the light, so that the latter was reflected in the
well-known manner to the eye. According to the declara-
tion of the attorney-general, urine had probably been
used by the prisoner for writing. Various chemists to
whom the letter had been previously presented had not
been able to develop the writing by treatment with
chemicals. Prof. Muller at first himself made experiments
with urine writing, and found that written characters of
this kind may be easily made readable if the paper con-
taining them is heated until it begins to turn yellowish.
The written characters will then become visible in a dark
brown colour. When the above-mentioned letter was
treated in the same way, only a very slight yellowish tint
was imparted to the writing, so that, whilst the existence
of written matter could undoubtedly be stated, it was still
impossible to decipher it. Now it occurred to Prof.
Midler to take a photograph of this portion of the letter
— on an ordinary gelatine plate, of course — and when the
latter was developed, it showed the written characters
very distinctly, so that they could be entirely read
without any difficulty.
lleliochromg.— At the last meeting of the Berlin Society
for the Advancement of Photography, which took place on
Friday, the 16th of May, a letter of Herr Eugen von
Gothard, of Ilereny, was read, which contained interest-
ing information about the progress made of late by Ilerr
Fr. Veress in his experiments with photography in
natural colours. According to this communication, Herr
Veress has succeeded in increasing the sensitiveness of
his emulsion so much, that it is now possible to produce a
picture in which the colours are rendered much better
than formerly within fifteen seconds, whilst in his former
experiments he required two to three hours to attain a
similar result. Herr v. Gothard, in his letter, promises to
send shortly a number of the new pictures produced by
Veress.
.4 Photographic Reproduction of the Biblia Pauperum. — The
“Biblia Pauperum,” as it will be known, is one of the-
most eminent productions of the art of printing, belonging
to a time prior to the great invention of Gutenberg. The
pictures, toge ther with the descriptions, were cut in
blocks of wood, and then inked up with the ink-ball.
Upon this inked-up woodcut was placed the moistened
paper, and pressed with another ball, the so-called brayer.
In consequence of this imperfect mode of printing, certain
inequalities with regard to the colour, and some unclear
and unsharp portions were produced, and at the same
time the fact revealed that the back of the paper could not
be printed in consequence of the relief, resulting from
printing the front side. One has repeatedly tried to
reproduce these old block-printings by drawing, but all
these reproductions are more or less imperfect on account
of the fact that one has always anxiously avoided repro-
ducing also the defects, i.e. , the uneven printing, the partial
unclearness, and broken lines which form the characteristic
sign of the block-printings, and an important support to
the researches in the arts. By the aid of photography
perfect duplicates can be produced, showing all the charac-
teristics of the old mode of printing. Of this fact the
beautiful reproduction of the “ Biblia Pauperum,” which has
recently been issued by a Vienna publisher, gives evidence.
It has been produced by means of the photo-mechanical
processes, proving in this form the immense value which
photography possesses in connection with the investigation
of the arts.
In Butgoyne’s Monthly Circular for this month, bichloride of
platinum is quoted at twenty-eight shillings an ounce, nearly
double the price it bore a few mouths ago.
456
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
DEVELOPERS USED BY GERMAN PROFESSIONAL
PHOTOGRAPHERS*
BY JULIUS F. SACHSE.
Cathakina Culie, Frankfurt, a. M. — Developer — Iron
oxalate. Advautanges — For portraiture, when the artist
has complete control of the lighting and exposure, I con-
sider a developer which always works evenly as the most
desirable, and that one is the iron oxalate. I have not
been able to obtain equal results as to detail or lights with
any other developer. It is also cleanly, and its use is not
harmful to the skin. Composition — Iron, 1-3 ; oxal. pot.,
1-4. Developer — 1-4. Accelerator — Always 30" —
1-2,000.
R. Fath, Halberstadt. — Developer — Ferrous oxalate.
Advantages —In comparison with all other developers,
quicker action, with greater modulation. Composition —
1-3. Accelerator — Negatives of children and copies, a
bath of soda.
F. W. Geldmacher, Frankfurt, a. M. — Developer —
Oxalate of potash and iron. Advantages — That I rarely
lose a plate by over or under-exposure, a property which
I cannot reach with any other developer. Composition —
Potash, 1-3J ; iron, 1-3 ; hereof 3 parts potash, 1 part
iron dissolved in hot water. Accelerator — Water, 1 litre ;
hypo, piece as large as a pea, soak 1 min. ; fix without
washing.
Prof. E. Ilanfstaengle, Frankfurt, a. M. — Developer —
Exclusively oxalate. Advantages — Absolute freedom
from fog. Composition — (A) Oxalate of potash, 1 kg. ;
water, 4 kg. (B) Sulphate of iron, 4 kg. ; water, 1£ kg.
For use, 1 part iron to 3 parts oxalate. Accelerator —
Hypo for child exposure only, dissolve 1 4 g- hypo in water
20 c.cm. ; of this solution take 1£ c.cm. to 500 c.cm. water.
Fr. Kahlmeyer, in Osnabriick. — Developer — Ferrous
oxalate. Advantages — Simplicity, cheapness, cleanliness.
Composition— (A) 1,000 V ; (B) 250 g. Neutral oxalate
of potash crystals ; 3 parts A, 1 part B. Accelerator — For
short exposures add to developer 10 g. hypo solution
1: 200.
N. Leyendecker, in Berncastel. — Developer — Iron
oxalate. Accelerator — None.
Fr. E. Marr, Zweibriicken. — Developer — Ferrous
oxalate. Advantages — Any desired intensity and fine
gradations can be obtained. Composition — Both solutions
are made 1 : 4, and for use mixed 1 : 4. (I only use extra
heavy plates.) Accelerator — Plates receive ample exposure,
and are developed with much bromide, also when hypo
accelerator is used.
Peter Risse, in Duisburg. — Developer — Ferrous oxalate.
Advantages — Surety. Composition — Both solutions
saturated. Iron added according to circumstances,
relative to lighting, exposure, and plate. Accelerator —
Only occasionally, and then 1 part hypo, 2,000 water.
Arnold Overbeck, in Diisseldorf. — Developer — Iron and
oxalate of potash. Advantages — Simplicity and great
latitude. Composition' — 1 iron, 3 oxalate. Accelerator —
With short exposures, hypo 1 : 5,000.
A. Sternitzki, Braunschweig. — Developer — In general
oxalate, with short exposures (children), hydrochinon.
I miss, however, here the important question, “ What
plates V as in my experience, the various developers do
not act the same with all makes of plates ; for instance,
with English and some German plates, I should decidedly
prefer pyrogallol, while in the portraiture of children with
the “ Schleussuer " plates I would use hydrochinon.
* Continued from page 416.
Advantages — Oxalate gives with Monckhoven plates, which
I mainly use, a clear picture with fine detail and clean
plates ; but even here it depends on the different emulsions,
and often to obtain suitable negatives I resort to hydro-
chinon. Composition — Oxalate, both solutions saturated,
and used in proportion of 1-3 to 1-4. Hydrochinon and
pyrogallol according to the usual formula. Accelerator —
Only unwillingly ; I would much rather add a little hypo
to the developer.
Carl Bellack, Leipzig. — Developer — Hydrochinon ; also
a mixture of hydrochinon and eikonogen. Advantages —
More rapid appearance of image and completion of deve-
lopment with nice contrasts. Eikonogen alone works to
monotone, and requires too much time for intensification.
For very short exposures, eikonogen answers to start the
development ; hydrochinon to complete the reduction.
Composition — (Hydrochinon No. 1) Water, 2,000; sul-
phite of soda, 180 ; hydrochinon, 30; carbonate of potash,
180-200; for under-exposures, warm developer to 50° R.
(Hydrochinon No. 2) Water, 1,000; sulphite of soda, 90;
carbonate potash, 120-150; hydrochinon, 1: for extra
short exposures, children, &c. Commence development
with No. 2; after detail is out finish with No. 1.
(Eikonogen) Water, 1,000 ; sulphite of soda, 90; carbonate
of potash, 40 ; carbonate of soda, 10 ; eikonogen, 20. A
developer composed of hydrochinon and eikonogen as
above will be found advantageous in certain cases.
Accelerating bath — Never.
Theodore lvlauer, in Offenbach a. M. — Developer —
Hydrochinon. Advantages — Softness of shadows, with
relative short exposure. Composition — (A) Water, 500 ;
sulphite of soda, 50; hydrochinon, 10. (B) Water, 400 ;
soda, 50. For use, 3 parts No. 1 ; 4 parts No. 2.
Accelerating bath — Sulphite of soda, 50; water, 1,000;
hypo, 2.
C. Hertel, Hofphotograph in Mainz. — Developer —
Pyro-soda. Advantages — (1) Clean work ; (2) great
latitude of exposure ; (3) black tone. Composition — (A)
Solution of sulphite of soda, 1-10 ; pyrogallic acid, 1-5 per
cent. (B) Solution of soda, 5-10 per cent. Equal parts
A and B. Accelerating bath.
(To be continued .)
The Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
June 18th will be “Mounting and Finishing Photographs;”
June 25th, “ Matt Surface Printing.”
American Reproductions. — In photogravure reproductions
on Japanese paper and satin, the Lithotype Publishing Com-
pany, Gardner, Mass., make a specialty of reproducing proofs
in the shortest possible time after they get to this country, and
many times they have their prints ready for delivery before
the proofs have been shown out of New York. The firm have
added over one hundred subjects within the past year, and
probably have the largest number of new subjects of any
publisher in this country. In the copyrighted line, taken from
American paintings, the picture, “The Mishap,” a charming
bit of child-life, has had a large sale. — Picture and Art Trade.
Etching Metals. — The Berlin Papier Zeituiif) describes a
method of etching metals, such as zinc, from which it is desired
subsequently to take prints. The image is transferred in the
ordinaiy way to the surface of the zinc plate, which is backed
with asphalt, and immersed in a bath of dilute acid. One
terminal of an electric current proceeding from a dynamo is con-
nected with the liquid, the other with the zinc plate. As soon
as the current passes, the metal commences to be attacked with
such rapidity, that in a few minutes the exposed portions are
eaten into the depth of the thickness of a sheet of paper. In
this manner the zinc may be very rapidly etched to any depth
desired.
rs i Of
-NX W'
„ v\ w/'X
5«" «. 1890 1
THE liOYXt,' C
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
457
/POLYTECHNIC
The fifty-eighth amuuil'eshibttfon of this Society will open
at Falmouth ou Tuesday, 26th August, and continue
open for five days. Medals and prizes arc offered in
various departments, including photography.
The following are the general regulations : —
1. All exhibits must be forwarded so as to reach the Poly-
technic Hall, Falmouth, not later than Tuesday, August 19th,
after which no article will be eligible for competition, and no
space can be guaranteed.
2. All pictures and photographs must be framed ; and if
left at one of the following places of the Society’s authorised
agents ou or before Tuesday, August 12th, will be conveyed
from these depots to and from the Exhibition free of charge,
namely : — Messrs. Worth and Co., Cathedral Yard, Exeter ;
Harris and Sons, 197, Union Street, Plymouth ; J. Mitchell
and Sou, 15, I5ed ford Street, Plymouth; and Thomas Solomon
and Co., King Street, Truro. The agents will not receive any
article unless delivered to them free of conveyance and other
charges.
3. The carriage of all other articles must be paid by the
exhibitor.
4. All cases and packages sent to the Exhibition must be
addressed “The Royal Cornwall Polytechnic Society, Fal-
mouth,” and must bear the name and address of the owner ;
the covers to be fastened with screws. The exhibitor must
write on the back of each picture his name and address, its
title, whether it is an original or a copy, the name of the
artist, and whether he is a professional or an amateur. The
works of professional artists may be sold from the gallery,
through the secretary of the Society, Mr. E. Kitto, and a
commission of five per cent, will be charged thereon.
5. Exhibitors must enter all articles intended for exhibition
be obtained from Mr. W. Brooks, Laurel Villa, Wray Park,
Reigate (member of the general committee).
The Art Union of Cornwall (under the sanction of the Board
of Trade) selects its prizes from the works exhibited by pro-
fessional artists. The drawing for prizes will take place at the
Polytechnic Hall during the Exhibition, viz., on Friday, August
29th, 1890. Information respecting the Art Union may be
obtained from the honorary secretary, W. W. J. Sharpe,
Falmouth.
All information may be obtained personally, or by letter, on
application to the secretary, Edward Kitto, F.R.Met.S., the
Observatory, Falmouth.
JAPANESE MULBERRY-BARK PAPER*
BV A. LASENBY LIBERTY.
The variety of purposes for which paper is used in Japan
is not a little astonishing, including as it does such widely-
differing objects as overcoats, window-panes, string, and
pocket-handkerchiefs. One of the most pleasing sights I
ever witnessed was at the Government paper factory at
Shiebu-Ogi, where we watched hundreds of intelligent
little Japanese girls and women, clad in spotless white
robes, preparing the mitsumata, the bark of the paper-
mulberry, or dipping and arranging the snowy layers of
pulp on the rectangular straining sieves. I have here a
few samples of paper given me on the occasion of this
visit. It has the usual characteristics, toughness and a
silk-like surface. Very little paper is exported, notwith-
standing its manifest excellence, as it is costly, and the
cultivation of the paper-mulberry tree (cuttings of which
are forbidden to be exported) is at present confined within a
somewhat limited area. The present Government are
on forms provided for that purpose by the Society, which may , . . , .. . , , . .
the secretary, or any of the above-named ^stow.ng great attent.on to the paper industries, and ex
be obtained from
authorised agents.
6. This entry form must in all cases be returned to the
secretary on or before August 9 th.
7. The Society will not be answerable for loss of or damage
to any article sent to the Exhibition, but every care will be used
to prevent injury while in the Society’s possession.
8. After admission no article may lie removed until after
the close of the Exhibition (this regulation does not apply to
the photographic department for this year),
perimenting with pith, old silk rags, and many kinds of
vegetable products. At Shiebu-Ogi they manufacture all
the chemicals used in the different processes, and the
number of workers employed is quite astonishing. Paper
is also made by hand labour in small quantities and varying
qualities in scores of the towns and villages, and, for
fibrous toughness, is far superior to European paper.
The excellence of certain kinds of Japanese paper for
9. Discretionary power is vested in
Society as to exhibiting any article sent.
10. Board of Trade protection is granted to all new and
unpatented inventions.
The judging in all departments of the Exhibition (shoithand
excepted) will take place on Monday, August 25th.
The following .are the regulations specially affecting
photography : —
In ail cases state whether the work is professional
or amateur, and name process of production. All work sent
for competition must have been executed within eighteen
months of the date of this Exhibition. Carte-de-visite por-
traits are excluded from exhibition, except when illustrating
some special process or novelty.
Professional Photographers. — Medals are offered by the
Society for meritorious productions in the following subjects : —
(1) Landscapes, (2) Portraits, (3) Composition Pictures, (4)
Instantaneous Pictures, (5) Interiors, (6) Six Pictures in
Platinum, (7) Transparencies for Window Decorations, (8) Pic-
tures by Improved Processes, (9) Enlargements. All enlarge-
ments for competition must be the work of the exhibitor.
Amateur Photographers. — Medals are offered by the Society
for meritorious productions by amateurs.
Photographic Appliances. — Medals are offered for improved
apparatus and appliances. All exhibits in this department
must be accompanied by a written explanation of their special
features.
Information respecting the Photographic Department may
the officers of the prints and etchings need not be emphasised.
Aldehydes in Photography. — The well-known property of
the various aldehydes to reduce silver to the metallic state
from an ammoniacal solution of silver nitrate, especially when
warmed, has suggested their application to photograph}'. But
their use has hitherto been impracticable on account of their
strong odour, their insolubility or difficult solubility in water,
and the facility with which they are oxidised on exposure to
the air. But most of these aldehydes, and especially formic
aldehyde, are susceptible of combining with the acid of the bi-
sulphites of the alkaline metals, and producing compounds
which are readily soluble in water, and which appear capable of
being used with advantage in many ways in the various photo-
graphic processes. Already two German chemists have patented
the use of the compound produced by uniting formic aldehyde
to bisulphite of soda. No experience, to speak of, has yet been
gained as regards the new product, and it is not certaiu that it
will present any practical advantage over the reduction agents
already employed. It is asserted, however, that a very minute
quantity of it added to the gelatine emulsion, either during its
manufacture or after it is applied to the glass plate, renders the
sensitive film very much more sensitive than it is without this
addition, and that it may also be used in the developing bath
with success. These aldehyde compounds have a marked affi-
nity for bromine and iodine also. — Burgoync's Monthly Maga-
zine.
* A portion of a paper read before the Society of Arts.
458
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890,
.poteg.
The French, with their love for precise nomenclature,
have given to photographic science a new term —
chrono-photography. Chrono-photography, expanded
in our somewhat cumbrous language, means the art of
taking photographs in a series of measured spaces of
time, and examples may be cited in the experiments of
Marey, Muybridge, Anschutz, and others. In an
article on the subject which appeared recently in La
Nature, the writer glanced at the various methods in
use, the principal of which appear to be three in
number: — First, that employed by M. Marey in
photographing the flight of pigeons, by an arrangement
which brought the bird against a perfectly black back-
ground ; secondly, the plan which made the sensitive
surface move in a series of equal jerks across the focus
of the lens ; and thirdly, the use of as many indepen-
dent cameras as might be deemed necessary. These
three comprise the methods which have produced
results known to the public.
But, as the writer in La Nature remarks, “ all has
not yet been said on this interesting question,” and
inventors are still busy studying the subject. An
apparatus which was highly spoken of was exhibited
at the Paris International Exhibition, and, in 1888,
Mr. W. G. Levison presented to the Photographic
Academy of Brooklyn a new apparatus, holding the
sensitive plates in a revolving drum, to bring them one
after the other rapidly to the focus of the lens. Mr.
Friese Greene’s “ mitrailleuse ” camera, and the appar-
atus of Mr. C. V. Boys, have already been described in
these pages.
Photographers who lay themselves open to be
twitted for producing incongruous effects — as, for
instance, when the landscape is lighted from one side
of the picture, and the put-in “natural clouds” from
the other — may now take refuge in the defence that
painters are not at all squeamish in regard to incon-
gruities. A case in point may be cited from the
Academy. One of the artists, it seems, has introduced
into a landscape the representation of a fern against
which, from a picturesque point of view, there is
nothiug to be said, but from a botanical aspect, a good
deal ; for a critic who is also a naturalist declares that
the fern in question is of a rare sort, and grows
only iu two places, neither of which is the locality
indicated in the picture. The artist cannot explain
satisfactorily how he came to contradict nature in this
way, and the inference is that he must have borrowed
the plant from a friend’s conservatory.
What with photography on the one hand watching
over their errors, and candid critics on the other look-
ing out for slips, the artist now-a-days must speak by
the card. Jacob dreaming of the ladder to heaven,
and arrayed in the attire of a Flemish peasant of the
sixteenth century, as represented by a well-known
Dutch painter, would not now be tolerated. It is even
possible whether doubts, in these critical days, would
not be thrown upon the graceful silver birches which
Turner found so effective in the composition of his
pictures. They were introduced with such suspicious fre-
quency, that the chances are that some careful inquirer
might, if he had cared to take the trouble of comparing
the picture with the scene depicted, have discovered
that the silver birch, like the photographer’s cloud, was
put in. To discuss the question whether, as Lord
Lytton was fond of declaring with the use of capital
letters, the True and the Beautiful are one, or whether
each can exist apart, would take too long just now,
and we must leave the problem where it is.
The Bulletin de la Societe Franca is e contains an
interesting memoir of its late president, M. Pcligot,
whose death we announced recently. M. Peligot,
like many other men whose researches have done so
much for the progress of photography, was not a prac-
tical photographer, but his experiments in respect to
the chemistry of photography resulted in much practical
good. In 1855 he brought before the French Photo-
graphic Society the advantages of the double chloride
of gold. He was one of the earliest to draw attention
to the effect of light in colouring glass, and his repeated
cautions as to the dangers of certain artificial illumin-
ants will be well remembered. He succeeded M.
Balard in the Presidency of the French Society, and
was re-elected annually.
Photography is a source of income little suspected.
Most people have noticed the photographs on cigarette
boxes, and the attractive-looking pictures which are
exhibited iu tobacconists’ windows, but few imagine
what it costs to produce them. In the United States
this method of advertisement is carried on to a much
larger extent than in England. The latest business
amalgamation is that of the cigarette-making firms,
and one result of this will be that £17,000 a year on
photographs alone will be saved on a “ trust,” working
upon a capital of a million. The photographic adorn-
ments on cigarette boxes may appeal to American
citizens, but the attraction is played out in England,
and fortunately there is little chance of this “ trust ”
being brought to the notice of English investors.
A graceful compliment has been paid to the grand-
daughter of Nicephore Niepce at the last meeting of the
Societe Franchise de la Photographic. Some time ago
it was decided by the French Government, on the
recommendation of the Society that a Jubilee medal
should be struck and engraved in honour of the fiftieth
anniversary of Daguerre’s discovery ; and it was decided
by the Societe that the medal should be presented to
Mdlle. Niepce on the occasion of her marriage.
The competition organised by the French Minister
of Public Instruction for a prize of £80, to be com-
peted for with the object of providing apparatus
especially suitable for the requirements of tourists,
Junk 13, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
459
has just been decided. The decision had been
postponed for some time on account of the lack
of competitors; but eventually a respectable number
presented themselves, and after numerous trials
made by the committee appointed, a conclusion was
arrived at. The conditions were that each com-
petitor should send two lenses, one a panoramic lens
of at least 100 degrees, and the other of a smaller angle,
but possessing certain qualities — that is to say, rec-
tilinearity of the lines, flatness of field, sharpness of
the different planes, and equal illumination.
In the panoramic competition, M. Adolphe Martin
has gained the award. In the second competition the
lens shown by M. Berthiot fulfils all the conditions
desired, in spite of the weight being somewhat exces-
sive. It has therefore been decided to divide the
prize offered by the Government into two equal sums
of £40 each, which will be awarded to each competitor.
The photographer is a necessity at all public func-
tions, and it may not be long before he will be con-
sidered equally necessary at private ones. We are
constantly reading of the matches of the Australian
cricketers being interrupted in order that the teams
may be photographed. A youthful foreign prince who
has achieved a little cheap notoriety arrives at Dover,
and the ubiquitous photographer is seen on the bridge
of the steamer struggling to take a picture of his
reception. A deputation waits upon an eminent
statesman in an informal way, and the photographer is
on the watch to secure a memento of the visit. By
and bye the services of the photographer will be as
commonplace a thing as the services of the hairdresser.
A photographer will follow the monthly nurse and the
doctor, and newly-born babies must look forward to
being photographed as well as being registered. The
camera will pursue one at every stage of existence, from
the first tooth upwards. Indeed, if the automatic
photographic machine is going to prove the gigantic
success so confidently predicted for it, it will be more
convenient and more economical to have an apparatus
set up in the hall, and consult it every morning as one
does the barometer.
It will be a comfort to sober-minded people to know
that the various idiotic competitions which have gradu-
ally been becoming a feature of modern journalism have
been declared illegal, and that they will perforce be
discontinued. The information which the solution of
the questions proposed made known was generally of
no use to anybody, except, perhaps, the winner of the
prize, and it probably did him more harm than good.
If any photographers should hanker after some similar
vent for the display of their abilities, they can easily
find plenty of problems which await solution — for there
are worlds yet left unconquered for aspiring Alexanders
in our art. One of them occurs to us. Why should a
negative benefit by unlimited supplies of water, while
it remains wet and fresh from the fixing bath, and yet
be spoilt by an accidental splash which may reach it
when dry ?
What we mean is this. Many a good negative has
been ruined by a single drop of water accidentally
falling upon its film after it has been dried. The water
may be aqua pura in the fullest sense of the words. It
may be rainwater freshly distilled from cloudland, tap
water, or any other water, but where the drop falls it
will act as a reducer, and a spot — light by comparison
with the rest of the negative — remains upon the film
for ever. No one has yet, so far as we know, explained
why this should be so, but there is no kind of doubt
that water acts in the way described.
If the water were contaminated with hypo there
would be nothing to be surprised about, for hypo has a
distinct reducing action in the presence of air. This
fact, we believe, is not generally known, but it can be
easily put to the proof in the following manner : Take
a negative fresh from the fixing bath, give it a good
rinsing under the tap, and then transfer it to a pan of
water deep enough to cover one-half of the film as the
plate stands on edge. At the end of half an hour or so,
the plate will be found, upon examination, to be much
less dense on the half exposed to the air than it is on
the other half which has been below water. It is
unnecessary to point out that here we have a simple
and easy method of reducing an over-dense negative.
We have always regarded the introducer of cheap
apparatus as a benefactor to the art of photography
and its votaries — provided that it is so constructed that
it is capable of taking some kind of presentable
picture. Many a good worker has begun with a cheap
set, and has thus acquired a taste for the art, and in
good time has provided himself with something better.
So far, so good. But we have lately observed that
certain apparatus has been introduced which can be
bought for a few shillings — with chemicals and every-
thing complete. Boys at school are commonly the
purchasers of it, and when they have saved up their
pocket money for the purpose, they find themselves
in possession of a mere toy which is next to useless.
A plausible prospectus points out the wonders that
can be achieved with the instrument, including instan-
taneous pictures within doors. We lately examined one
of these contrivances, and found that its lens was shut
in with a fixed diaphragm, which made it work at //32.
The boy who handed us the instrument for our opinion
told us that no fewer than eight “ other fellows” at
his school had bought them. “ Well,” we said, “ have
you seen any negatives taken with it?” “No,” was
the reply; “but I’ve seen a lot of plates of clear
glass taken with it.”' Let our readers caution their
young friends not to waste their pocket money on such
things, for clear glass can be obtained much more
cheaply, and without the trouble of exposui'e and de-
velopment.
400
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
OX REFLECTED IMAGES IN OPTICAL COMBI-
NATIONS. AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE BRIL-
LIANCY OF THE FINAL IMAGE.*
BV T. I?. DALLMEYEH.
The first practical demonstration of the deleterious effects
of internal reflections in lenses on the resulting image was
contributed to your Society in 1867 by my late father,
who, in conjunction with Sir John Hcrschel, gave both a
practical and theoretical explanation of the “ Cause of
the Central Spot or Flare in Photographic Lenses," and
they pointed out how, in certain optical systems, this
trouble might be overcome or cured. As you are aware,
the “ flare-spot ” is due to the formation of a real and
inverted image of the diaphragm by internal reflections in
the back lens upon the plate. With certain forms on
alteration in the position of the diaphragm, either nearer
to or further from the lens, may eliminate the
effects of flare-spot should it exist. The general
deductions arrived at by this investigation were :
“ First, the fewer the number of reflecting sur-
faces (other things being equal), the greater will be the
brilliancy of the resulting image ; second, the smaller the
diameter of a lens, or combination of lenses, covering a
given sized plate or area (other things being equal), the
greater will be the brilliancy of the resulting image. ”
The final brilliancy of the image is, of course, not only
dependent on reflected images in lens systems, but I
propose to confine my remarks to this aspect of the sub-
ject this evening, taking it for granted that proper “ flare-
spot,” as introduced by the arrangement of the systems
and position of the diaphragm, does not exist.
The loss of brilliancy, due to reflection, in the resulting
image is due to three main causes : — («) The number of
reflecting surfaces giving rise to a definite number of
reflected images; ( b ) the disposition and curvatures of
the lenses in the system ; (e) their diameter as regards
available aperture in the formation of the ultimate image.
So far as I know, this subject has only been approached
from one point of view — viz., in general, the number of
reflected images of the object due to the number of open
reflected surfaces ; but there is another, and, I am inclined
to think, more important aspect — viz., the interference
that the original light on the plate has upon the total light
on the plate by reflection from the lens surfaces during
exposure.
(«) By placing a number of lenses with different
numbers of open surfaces in the separate systems side by
side in a camera (all of the same focal length), and direct-
ing them simultaneously to a distant bright object, one
can compare not only the number of images formed by
the reflecting surfaces, but also the relative positions and
brilliancy of each image.
By such a comparison you can estimate visually the
more or less deleterious effect likely to be produced by
the position of the images and their brilliancy on the
resulting image. Elaborate drawings could certainly be
made to show for any system the exact positions along the
axis for each image, but the estimate of the relative bril-
liancy of each is better attained by the practical estimate.
I have endeavoured, by placing a small camera at the
back, to get photographic images with definite exposures
to illustrate the comparative brilliancy in a number of
instances, but the focus of the lens employed to show
this requires to be so short to get sufficient depth with
* R«ai before the Photographic Society of Great Britain.
very small stops to bring them all out sharply that the
images are so small as to be practically valueless as illus-
trations.
In any case, the number and brilliancy of these images
alone cannot be a fair estimate of the resultant effect of
the disposition of the components of the system on
the detrimental effect of reflections as a whole. If the
plate were absolutely black, and no reflections froinit took
place, this consideration alone would suffice, but the
whitish surface upon which the image is received (and
never uniformly lighted) receives again reflected images
from the component elements of the lens system itself.
In order to exhibit these effects in a very pronounced
degree, I have inserted an imitation plate partly (drawing)
illuminated, and in the position of the lens various forms
of mirrors, plane, convex, and concave.
The effect of these on the non-illumiuated portions of
the plate are, of course, very remarkable, the convex
mirror having the least, and the concave the most
detrimental and powerful effect.
The headings ( b ) and (c) are then here of very great
importance. The greater the number of concave sur-
faces in the lens system towards the plate, the more will
the resulting images suffer in brilliancy ; and again, if the
diameters of the lenses are large and concave towards the
plate after the stop that determines the intensity, the more*
will the brilliancy diminish.
The diaphragm, then, you will understand, plays an
important part on the brilliancy of the image by its situa-
tion. Were it not for reducing the angle included in a
picture, there are many eases in which the addition of a
diaphragm behind the lens might prove of advantage for
brilliancy, but in any case these experiments show how
detrimental the effect of a small stop in front of a combi-
nation with concavities towards the image behind it would
tend as regards brilliancy in cases of powerful contrast,
and might give rise to “ghosts” as distinguished from the
proper ‘ 1 flare -spot. ”
The reason of this contribution arose originally from a
controversy with Mr. \Y. Iv. Burton, in the Photographic
News, as to the claims of a new lens of my own, known
as the rectilinear landscape lens, over the ordinary
symmetrical combinations generally known as the rapid
rectilinear. He has since agreed with me on the points at
issue in a letter to the Amateur Photographer.
There were other considerations entered into besides
that of reflected images, in number and brilliancy, that
affect final brilliancy in the comparison of the two lenses
named ; but Mr. Burton, in any case, had entirely over-
looked the aspect brought to your notice this evening,
and I will certainly say that, although the rectilinear land-
scape has the advantage in the matter of number and
brilliancy of reflected images, as regards its use in cases
of powerful contrasts of light and shade, the form of
rapid rectilinear is decidedly the safer as, stop for stop, the
concave surface behind it (in the case of the rectilinear
landscape) would have greater liability to produce ghost,
although this might be overcome by reversing the lens in
such cases.
The reflections of the light on the plate from the lens
back on to the plate will easily explain the reversed images
occasionally met with, of bright windows in interiors, on
the darker portions of the picture when taken with double
combination lenses in which there are concave surfaces
towards the plate, even when “flare-spot” does not exist.
The slight amount of diffused light given by the num-
Jone 13, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
461
ber of reflected images and the elements concave towards
the plate, have often been preferred hy artists as giving
more atmosphere ! I don't think “atmosphere” is quite
the word, but as the eye in viewing nature is always filled
with a certain amount of diffused light by the lens of the
eye itself, so also a lens system that imitates this, to a
certain extent, may be more applicable to artistic pur-
poses, but is certainly detrimental for the highest scien-
tific precision.
NEGATIVES*
BY THOS. H. MORTON, M.D.
In all elementary books relating to photography we soon
arrive at the terms “positive” and “ negative,” with an
explanation thereof, and I do not know of a better than
that given by T. F. Ilardwich in his “Manual of Photo-
graphic Chemistry,” 1857, who says, “A positive may be
defined to be a photograph which gives a natural repre-
sentation of an object as it appears to the eye. A nega-
tive photograph, on the other hand, has the light and
shadows reversed, so that the appearance of the object is
changed or negatived.” We afterwards learn that the
photographic image developed on a sensitive collodion film
can be made either a positive or negative. The ordinary
portraits by this collodion process taken on glass are ex-
amples of thin negatives converted into positives by back-
ing with black varnish or other dark material which affords
the necessary shadows; the white deposit of reduced
silver, viewed by reflected light, being the positive image.
If you made the deposit denser and used no backing, a
negative would be the result, and, of course, any number
of positives on sensitive chloride paper by contact and
exposure to light can be printed.
With the gelatino-bromide process, which is generally
in use for making negatives, the photographic image is not
adapted to produce positives in the way just mentioned.
The reason is that the reduction of silver takes place in
the gelatine film, not on the surface, as by the collodion
method, consequently the gelatine masks the image, pre-
venting the reflection which assists to give a positive im-
pression to the eye. We occasionally meet with a gelatine
plate, when developed and wet, giving a distinct positive
effect, and this does not appear to alter the printing
quality.
The negative is to a photographer much the same as type
and ink to a printer, or bears the same relation an etched
plate has to the finished engraving; consequently it is
our endeavour to produce a negative being a faithful ex-
position of the subject portrayed with the light and sha-
dow reversed, and I shall confine my remarks principally
to the gelatino-broinide film as usually manufactured. I
presume there are few amateurs who prepare their own
plates. Fortunately, that is not essential, as a good,
reliable sensitive plate is easily obtained. Yet a know-
ledge of the various emulsion processes is highly interest-
ing and profitable.
Negatives may be considered in reference to their
defects, good qualities, and also the conditions which act
favourably, or the reverse, in their production. In the
first place, many defects are due to some error in the
manufacture ; these imperfections arc less common than
formerly, owing to accurate methods adopted by the
makers, but we meet with troubles of this kind yet ; some
* Read before the Sheffield Camera Club.
are not apparent until after the plate is exposed and deve-
loped. (Several examples are on the table.) Insufficient
emulsion, too thin coating on the glass plate, shown by the
image appearing through the back of the plate rapidly
during development, and inability to get density and
contrast; result in a thin, weak negative.
Impurities in the emulsion. — Some particles find their
way in during preparation, or settle upon the plate when
coating. Wool or cotton fibres, or hair from the head or
face. I have noticed dust uncommonly like snuff, but I
should think no well-regulated factory would allow an
operative to indulge in this luxury. I believe special
provision is made in the way of clothing and surroundings
to obviate contamination by dust, &c. Finger markings,
or greasiness of film, are troubles, likewise pinholes —
cup-like depressions, due to bubbles in the emulsion —
and scratches of film, either by careless handling or small
fragments of glass in cutting. The way in which plates
are taken out and re-packed after exposure is a source of
anxiety, and I question which is the best plan — grooved
boxes, or packing film to film, or inserting a narrow edge
of paper between at the margin. The last plan appears
most sensible, providing the paper is chemically pure, and
only just sufficient to overlap, say, a quarter of an inch.
Grooved boxes are doubtful ; I have found plates impaired
by long keeping in this way ; the passage of air, even when
light is perfectly excluded, has a detrimental action on
the silver salt. Also frequent unpacking or retention
in dark slides for any lengthened period, as air is not
always pure, nor yet dry. As regards ordinary paper,
when overlapping the film, an insensitiveness to some
extent is noticed on development ; quarter-plates suffer
most in proportion ; we lose part of the picture.
Pressure on the film has been given as a cause of insensi-
tiveness, but hyposulphite of soda is present in many
papers. You can readily detect this salt by the starch
and iodine test.
It is also alleged that white paper, although quite pure,
will affect a bromide film, by reason of inherent luminous
property ; yet I have a number of plates originally packed
with tissue paper many years old, which act as quickly and
efficiently as a new batch
Leaving the accidental defects of plates, we may now
consider the good qualities of a negative, and how
obtainable. Assuming the bromide film to be perfect, and
properly exposed on a well-lighted subject — either portrait
or landscape — what are the conditions required to secure
a first-class result? There really is not much beyond
care and judgment during development ; and allow me to
remark, in passing, that a deep chemical knowledge is by
no means absolutely essential, or how could the tyro of
a few weeks produce a negative from which a print might
gain him a medal at some exhibition for technical
excellence ?
As I before remarked, we have to make a negative
which shall be a faithful copy of the subject portrayed,
having the light and shadow reversed. Although the
theory of the invisible or latent image caused by light, and
transformed into a visible one by certain reagents, is not
quite clear, we are led to believe that the action of light
rays from a reflecting object through a lens affects the
sensitive bromide in a variable degree according to its
intensity, exerting a photo-chemical or physical change,
attended with the liberation of a certain proportion
of bromine. This disturbance is most in the part struck
by brightest light rays — say, in a landscape, from the sky ;
r
462
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
and the rays from clouds and other white objects penetrate
deeper into the film than those from darker bodies.
The change so far is an impression or disturbance of
the molecules invisible to the eye. It is well known that
the haloid salts of silver in emulsion after exposure to light
are readily acted on by certain substances having great
affinity for oxygen — especially when combined with an
alkali— as pyrogaUol, hydrokinone, &c. ; these precipitate
the silver. It follows that any of these reducing agents,
or so-called developers, act chemically most on the parts
affected by strong light, and reduction of bromide of
silver to the metallic state will be visible in the gelatine
film. This semi-metallic or darkened material is virtually
the photographic image and the basis of a negative. To
obtain the true value of this impact of light, it is necessary
to use judgment in developing. Take an ordinary pyro-
gallic formula
I'yro
Am. bro. ...
Liquid am. (fort.)
Water
I don’t wish to be very elementary, but we know that
pyro is the active principle, ammonia the accelerator, and
the bromide of ammonia or potash acts as a retarder.
When these chemicals are in contact with exposed film
an action is set up, first attacking the surface particles and
sinking or permeating the gelatine deeper until the limit
of light-acted on material is reached, as represented in
diagram fig. 2 — No. 1, outline of latent image. With an
Section of Plate.
... 2 grains
l
4 ,,
... 1 drop
to 1 ounce
Fig. 1.
1 2 i 4 5 ■«!
Sky ► Clouds House Trees Fiqurc Foreqround
t v ^ \ M y
A.- Invisible or latent image. B.— Film unaltered. C — Glass.
Fig. 2.
A.— Developed Image. B.— Film unaltered. C.— Glass.
accurately timed exposure and normal developer a well
contrasted negative is generally produced, and after fixation
in hyposulphite of soda solution there should be found
a perfect image ; but a negative is not always a trauscript
of nature, and we ask how that is the case. Take this
specimen. Thin image, no contrast, want of vigour, flat,
won’t make a print worth looking at. There are several
reasons. First, under-development ; we remove the plate
out of the dish, thinking it is sufficiently dense, and find
after fixing there is scarcely any image. The developer
has not penetrated to the deeper stratum of bromide
affected by light. Secondly, over-exposure with the same
developer will give a flat monotonous result, as the whole
plate is overdone ; equally again, when under-exposed, a
poor black and white hard negative, no half-tone or grada-
tion ; a chemically fogged plate — the result sometimes of
prolonged action — also staining by the yellow discoloura-
tion of pyro, which affects the film even when uuexposed
to light. I consider that gelatine itself, as regards hardness
or impermeability, has an influence on the development.
When excessively dry it obstructs the chemical action.
Possibly this may account for the variable times requisite to
develop some makes of plates. I have noticed old long-
kept plates are more tedious. Occasionally there is a want
of sharpness in detail not attributable to defective lens or
error of focussing ; this may be ascribed to using a deve-
loper which is too energetic. In the collodion process,
when the reducing agent was abnormally active, the
particles of silver which built up the image were thrown
into confusion, so to speak, and not accurately deposited
on the lines laid by impact of light, hence a fuzziness.
Although the wet process is not quite identical with
gelatino -bromide, it suggests the desirability of gradual
development.
As regards the colour of negatives, no one prefers a deep
yellow stain, even if the image is well defined on .account of
slow printing. In using pyro or hydrochinone we gene-
rally get some yellowness ; when too pronounced it can
be cleared by citric acid alum solution. If a negative is a
trifle thin, a little stain helps the shadows or clear glass.
It is, moreover, reasonable to look upon the colouring
matter present in solution and attracted to those parts
requiring density as a positive advantage. Intensification
of negatives rarely gives a result equal to a properly
exposed and developed plate. The reduction of thick
unprintable negatives is comparatively easy, but needs
care. The conversion of silver or silver oxide into a
chloride or iodide, and then dissolving out with hypo-
sulphite, will reduce the thickest negative, lly experi-
ence the photographer learns by sight the appearances
which indicate a good negative, and also when dealing
with uncertain degrees of exposure he modifies the de-
veloper; no one would wilfully apply a very strong
developer upon a plate which might be much over-exposed,
knowing that the film would be hopelessly fogged. lie
begins cautiously with little alkali, or less pyro or more
restrainer. I cannot leave the subject of negatives without
allusion to the use of isochromatic plates and yellow screen,
although we are promised a paper by Professor Arnold on
this topic later on. It has been recognised for some
time that reflection from objects coloured red or yellow
fail to impress the sensitive salts to the same extent as
bodies coloured green, violet, or blue ; consequently,
when developed, the true values of those colours are not
brought out properly. I apprehend the rationale of
erythrosin and other dyes of eosin series, as also chloro-
phyll and certain pigments including use of a yellow
screen, subdue — or, rather, bring down — the less actinic
rays to the level of those more active, and on this assump-
tion I should imagine that a blue screen might convert the
yellow to a green, and lessen the time of exposure.
The want of perfect truthfulness, as regards accurate
light and shade gradations, is due, I am convinced, to the
cause mentioned ; for any subject in monochrome, a
neutral tint, and well-lighted, is sure to be faithful, the
exposure being correct. When taking a portrait, with the
countenance freckled or red patches present, a disparity
of gradation is at once noticed, supposing puff, powder,
or other white substance, is not used on the face before
exposure ; but a negative can be made good by the
retoucher’s pencil ; and, speaking of retouching, which,
witli most amateurs is rather a weak point, how often our
best negatives want just a little? All the pinhole
scratches, thin shadows, and many defects, require the
useful, but much abused, artist's work.
The rapidity of sensitive films, in respect to negative-
making, affords a wide field for discussion. I used to take
June 13, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
463
instantaneous, medium, and slow, but find it safer to work
one class, at least, in a day’s excursion ; and to adhere to one
maker is a wise course. The very rapid are not generally
adapted for landscape, unless used with drop shutter or
short exposure, but for interiors I believe in them.
In concluding these fragmentary notes, in which the
artistic or pictorial aspect of negatives has been purposely
omitted as too extensive, I would merely say that a good
negative will always produce a good print by any process.
It can be reduced or enlarged without perceptible loss,
and, if the negative is kept dry and properly varnished,
may last for many years. Therefore the acquisition of
a first-class negative as a means to an end cannot be over-
rated, and the considerations involved in its production
are equally interesting as any other branch of photo-
graphy.
Xottccs of iSoofcs.
Helios, published twice a month. No. 3, June 1st, 1890.
(./. Theunis, Antwerp').
This is a new Belgian photographic periodical. It contains
photographic news of a varied description, and commits
itself to no programme or leading article expressing
editorial opinions. Among other things it states that the
Liege Section of the Belgian Association of Photographers
has fitted up an electric lantern for the projection of pic-
tures on photographic slides, at its meetings, andilluminating
a disc six metres in diameter. More than two thousand
persons responded to the invitation of the Section to
be present the first time it was used in public. The same
journal states that M. Ch. Puttemans, Professor of
Chemistry, is now giving a course of educational lectures
on “ Photography ” at the Industrial School, Palais du
Midi, Brussels. The production of ceramic photographs
is one of the items on which instruction, with experi-
mental illustrations, will be given.
Dr. Wallraff writes to Helios, asking what would be the
good of taking negatives in natural colours if the said
colours could not be reproduced as positives upon paper.
“ If,” he says, “ I had the odd ( baroque ) idea of preserv-
ing the features of my. mother-in-law, and that my lens
did not refuse to yield to this extravagance, it would not
be sufficient that the negative plate should be kind enough
to let posterity know that she has a greenish complexion,
black teeth, a red nose, and hair the colour of the coat of
a she-ass ; it is necessary that the positive print should be
equally benevolent. We may, therefore, definitely rele-
gate the problem of photography in colours to the same
category as those of the philosopher's stone, the squaring of
the circle, and perpetual motion.”
It may be explained to Dr. Walraff that the photo-
graphs in natural colours on silver plates, as produced by
Becquerel and others, are positives when first taken in the
camera. It is to be hoped that his mother-in-law will see
his letter and give him his deserts.
Agenda du Chimiste. ( llachette and Co., Paris, 1890).
This work, which, in the course of years, has under-
gone several editions, bringing all parts of it down to the
latest date, is edited by M. G. Salet, of the Paris Faculty
of Sciences, M. Ch. Gerard, Director of the Municipal
Laboratory at Paris, and M. A. Pabst, Principal Chemist
to the Municipal Laboratory at Paris. Its value to photo-
graphers is that it is full of tables of figures and highly
condensed valuable practical information — and nothing
else — likely to be of use for reference to those engaged in
practical and experimental work and research ; there is no
“ padding ” or wasted space in the whole book. The first
edition of the little book was published in 1877, by M.
Ad. Wurtz, whose dictionary of chemistry is, in France,
equivalent to what that of Watts’ is in England, and
Gmeliu’s in Germany. In 1878 and 1886, subsequent
editions were brought out by M. G. Salet. M. Wurtz
first compiled it for the use of his students, and per-
haps to save himself the trouble of continually giving
them the information ; they found it of such value that
they had to consult it daily in their experimental work.
From these facts it will be seen that it is a standard book.
The Agenda du Chimiste has a small portion of its space
specially devoted to photography, and other portions, as
in the case of tables of solubilities, and so on, are indirectly
related thereto.
The following arc some of the tables given in the
book : —
Corresponding Quantities of Various Silver Compounels used
in Photography.
Silver.
Nitrate.
Chloride.
Brcmidc.
Iodide.
1
1-574
1-328
1-741
2-176
0-6353
1
0-844
1-106
1-382
0-7523
1-184
1
1-310
1-638
0-5744
0-904
0-763
1
1-250
0-4595
0-723
0-610
0-800
1
Corresponding Quantities of Various Gold Salts used in
Photography.
Gold.
Neutral
; Chloride.
Chloride of Gold
and Potassium.
Chloride of Gold
and Sodium.
1
1-542
2-1048
2-0229
0-6485
1
1-3645
1-3119
0-4751
0-7326
1
0-9611
0-4943
0-7623
1-0405
1
Corresponding Quantities of Various Bromides used in
Photography.
Bromine.
Ammonium
Bromide.
Potassium
Bromide.
Sodium
Bromide.
Crys. Cad-
mium Bro-
mide (4 A<]).
Zinc
Bromide.
1
1-225
1-488
1-287
2-150
1-406
0-816
1
1-214
1-055
1-754
1-147
0-672
0-823
1
0-865
1-445
0-945
0-777
0-952
1-156
1
1-671
1-092
0-465
0-570
0-692
0-599
1
0-654
0-711
0-871
1-058
0-915
0-529
1
Corresponding Quantities of Various Iodides used in
Photography.
Iodine.
Ammonium
Iodide.
Potassium
Iodide.
8odium
Iodide.
Cadmium
Iodide.
Zinc
Iodide,
1
1-142
1-307
1-181
1-441
1-255
0-876
1
1-145
1-035
1-262
1-099
0-765
0-874
1
0-903
1-102
0-960
0-847
0-967
1-107
1
1-220
0-063
0-694
0-793
0-907
0-820
1
0-871
0-797
0-910
1-042
0-941
1-148
1
The work gives information about the reduction of
silver residues of various descriptions ; also about the
analysis of silver baths, and contains an exposure table by
M. Derval.
464
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890,
FOUR FADED PHOTOGRAPHS.
“ Only a woman’s hair,” once upon a time Swift wrote
upon a well-known, an historic little parcel ; and critics
yet differ and contest iu gentle periods whether the great
satirist worte it in pathos or in irony, iii sorrow or in
scorn. Only a woman's hair, when there is so much of
that material in the world of nature ! Only four faded
photographs, when there are so many of them in the
world of art ; so many sick with that sallow complexion
which indicates incurable disease and approaching disso-
lution. But as that hair had its value worthy of a
distinctive label, so also have these photographs. In the
first place, they are enclosed in what was originally such a
dainty cover, a skin, as it were, of the colour and softness
of cream. Then the delicacy of their make was so largely
insisted on ; each separate limb and member had its own
peculiar praise. Next was recorded their faithfulness,
which would “assist the student of art to train both eye
and hand to an accurate fidelity, essential to the purity
and force of the ideal creations of genius.” This sentence
is not that of the present writer ; he is unable to weave
such splendid patterns of rhetoric ; he has, indeed, it may
be whisperered, but a poor and imperfect conception of
what it means. But it has been copied literally out of the
preface of the volume containing the four photographs,
and surely signifies something great and splendid, for of
the mountain in labour it is unnatural to expect the birth
of a mouse. Then again these four photographs were to
be the harbingers, the forerunners, the ancestors of others
as fair, or even fairer than themselves. Suggestions were
asked from the world at large to secure this end, to enable
the proprietors to add to the usefulness and attractiveness
of the pictures which were to follow. But no suggestions
came, or if they came, they never appeared. No more
photographs followed these first four. Therefore are
they perhaps more distinctly precious.
Alas! Their pure creamy cover is now defiled with
dirt, a laceration through the centre has been patched up
with a bit of common blue paper. The four photographs,
each with its allotted sheet of tissue to preserve it in its
pristine beauty, are all bleached and faded ; the fine detail
which it is charitable to suppose once delighted the eyes of
their beholders has disappeared, and on the first and last
number — the Alpha and the Omega— has been written by
the authorities of the British Museum Library — the sole
copy, in all probability, which this heedless and careless
world of ours contains — the fatal word “Discontinued,”
which, being translated into the language of our own
mortality, is “ Dead.”
And now rising before us, like pale ghosts, our four
photographs seem to plead for some little notice, before
they disappear for ever, to plead with such mute eloquence
of entreaty as a tender-hearted man may with difficulty
withstand. But a little while longer and they will be
gone as we shall be. Surely lie who chanced upon that
little packet with its sad inscription, “Only a woman's
hair,” and gazed upon what it contained, hesitated a little
space before he gave it up to destruction. He might
bury it in the earth, or, if approving of cremation, he
might burn it, but in any case he would treat it reverently,
and not scatter it on the floor to be swept away into the
common heap by the housemaid’s broom. Our four faded
photographs demand a like reverence of treatment. We
will touch them tenderly and with care, will give them
that sort of posthumous immortality which men seek for
in brass and marble, before we return them to their long
sleep, not probably soon again to be disturbed, in darkness
and in dust.
About two score years ago, an elegant but thin volume
was published at, we will say, Little Orpington, called
“ Photographic Illustrations.” Its contributors were
members of a Photographic Society — the Little Orping-
ton Photographic Society — and its preface stated the
object with which the publication was then “ brought
forward.” This preface is chiefly conspicuous for a dig-
nified modesty. “It is not,” says the mouthpiece of the
members of the Little Orpington Society, “ that we sup-
pose ourselves to have achieved results surpassing those
already attained by many artists, nor that we desire to
step forward as teachers of the detail of photographic
manipulation ; but we wish to test the use of photography
as a help to education in its highest and widest forms,
and at the same time to bring forward the relation in which
this nascent art stands to the work of the poetic artist.”
It was an idle hope, a fruitless aspiration ; the result of
the test was adverse. “Education in its highest and
widest forms” would have none of it, and the relation
between photography and “the work of the poetic artist”
is in this one number by no means clearly defined.
Illustrations also were promised in the preface of
“ objects interesting either in themselves or in their asso-
ciations,” and these objects were arranged in five classes:
History, Antiquities, Art, Natural Objects, Mechanics.
These classes seem to rebel somewhat against the rules of
logical division, inasmuch, for instance, as the illustrations
under history might be placed under antiquities, and both
of them again under art. The pictures, however, in this
first and only number, the four faded photographs, are, or,
we should rather say, were, representations of an East
view of Bramhall Hall, a West view of Bramhall Hall,
Dr. Arnold, of Rugby, and a Steam Hammer. The steam
hammer, which is placed, not perhaps inadvertently, in
close succession to Dr. Arnold of Rugby, could only
come under mechanics, but the particular classes of
Dr. Arnold of Rugby, and of Bramhall Hall, east and
west views, are not so easily determined. The latter,
we are told by some letter-press, has been held by “the
family” for nearly four centuries. The picture would
therefore, perhaps, be rightly classed under antiquities.
Copious quotations from Ormerod’s “ Cheshire” give details
about the arms, and rooms, and fortunes of the house
which, however interesting to “the family,” affect the
photographer very lightly, if at all. That artist is
probably altogether careless of the detailed fact that their
“ arms were argent, a chevron sable between three cross
crosslets fitche of the second and crest on a wreath, a
felon’s head couped haltered or." More interest-
ing than these matters, which may have contributed in
some measure to the sudden and untimely decease of the
Photographic Illustrations, is a subjoined so-called photo-
graphic memorandum, giving the date and the time of day
on which the photographs were taken. The conditions
for the taking of Bramhall Hall were not unfavourable.
It was a sunny summer noon, under a blue sky flecked
with floating white clouds. The lens used was a single
one of 2£ inches diameter, the focal length from the back
surface was 12J inches, and the diaphragm J an inch. The
negative was taken by a modification of Le Gray's waxed
paper jirocess, and the exposure was six minutes in the
camera and 1J hours in development.
Unless we rank the photograph of Dr. Arnold of Rugby
June 13, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
_1 — \
465
m
IJatrnt
—
under the head of art, a 'division under which all respect-
able photographs might .be included, we must place it
under that of natural objects, fencing it off thereby —
though by a somewhat strange party- wall— from Bramhall
and the Steam Hammer, neither of which certainly can be
regarded as an’object of nature. The letter-press accom-
panying Dr. Arnold of Rugby’s photograph gives the
leading events in the life of this excellent man, as labor-
iously culled from the newspapers and books of reference
of the time, informing the reader that he wrote at I .ale-
ham several papers on Roman History for the Encyclo-
pedia Metropolitana, and that lie traced the eternal truths of
Divine Providence in their varying application to the
different states of society. 1 lis photograph was taken from
a bust on a dull, frosty day in mid-autumn, by a doublet
lens of inches diameter, with 9 inches focal length from
the back lens, and a diaphragm of i an inch. The
negative was a collodion one, developed slowly with
pyrogallic acid —
Distilled water ... ... ... 1 gr. to 1 oz.
Glacial acetic acid ... ... ... 20 min.
Exposure two minutes.
The Steam Hammer gives occasion for a diatribe on
hammers generally from the earliest periods. Its negative
—collodion — was developed with protonitrate of iron, then
intensified with bichloride of mercury and iodide of
potassium. It is the most distinct of the four pictures ;
but the subject appears somewhat infelicitously selected
for a “ nascent” number of a photographic journal.
“J. Nasmyth & Co., Engineers, Manchester,” is still
distinctly visible on the right of the machine, and
“ J. Nasmyth’s Patent,” is equally clear on the left. Two
figures are introduced, perhaps three, but it is dificult to
speak with certainty, as the third may well be intended for
a wheel; and with this the photographic illustrations con-
clude. A similar venture, if conducted on widely different
lines, might at the present day be a success.
But this venture of forty years ago was a failure.
Whether it was that the “descriptive essay” which we
have ventured to call letter-press, embodying, in the
opinion of the writer of the preface, “the principal facts
which require to be known in connection with the illus-
trations as briefly as possible,” was a trifle too long for
the public patience, or whether the “ facts which require
to be known ’’failed to impress the reader as altogether
necessary, or even material, will now probably never be
discovered. It may be that the reader, anxious for
promised “aid in the great work of mutual education, by
giving strictly faithful representations of objects which
could not otherwise be laid before him,” was of opinion
that Dr. Arnold of Rugby was not such an object, or sup-
posing that he was, that his portrait might have been
laid before him otherwise. In any case, our four faded
photographs are the only pictures to be seen in the fancy-
built gallery of the members of the Photographic Society
of Little Orpington, and none, it may be affirmed with
certainty, will resort to any process for the purpose of
reproducing them.
enre.
Photographers’ Benevolent Association. — A meeting of
the committee was held on June 6th at Great James Street,
Bedford Road, Mr. W. Benham chairman. The grants were
made, and one new member elected. Any firm desirous of
assisting the Association can have copies of rules on applica-
tion to the hon. sec., H. J. Beasley, 65, Chancery Lane,
• C*
S3>
Application for' Letters Patent.
8,558. \V. H. Coulson, 33, Chancery Lane, London, “ Metallic
Frames for Glass Roofs.” — June 3rd.
8,647. J. C. Shenstone, 70, Chancery Lane, London, “Focus-
sing Arrangement for Cameras.” — June 4th.
8,724. G. V. Fosbf.ry, 46, Southampton Buildings, London,
“Developing Room Illumination.” — June 5th.
8,822. W. G. Thomson and W. Ward, 8, Quality Court, Lou-
don, “ Roller Holders for Photography.” — June 7th.
Specifications Published.
10,131. June 21st, 1889. — “Taking Photographs in Rapid
Series.” William Friese Greene, Photographer, 92, Picca-
dilly, London, and Mortimer Evans, Civil Engineer, of Savile
Club, Piccadilly.
The invention has for its object the formation of photo-
graphic pictures, and relates chiefly to the production of such
pictures as are necessary to illustrate and register the move-
ments of animals, insects, or moving objects, either taken singly
or in masses, as may be desired.
For this purpose they construct an apparatus by which, with
a single camera and lens, a rapid series of such pictures may
be taken, and by which a series of fresh photographic sensitive
films or portions of such photographic film may be substituted
for those which have been exposed to the action of light with
sufficient rapidity for the desired end.
This camera has already been fully described in the Photo-
graphic News. The inventors make fourteen claims.
9,869. June \bth, 1889. — “Instantaneous Shutters for
Cameras.” A communication from George Eastman,
of Rochester, County Monroe, State of New York. Alfred
Julius Boult, 323, High Holborn, London.
In carrying out this invention I provide a pivotted plate or
shutter having a segmental slot preferably considerably longer
than the lens opening. The edges of the shutter may be
turned up or provided with stops, and pivotted at the same point
as the shutter is a cover narrower than the shutter, having no
slot, and also having one side turned up, and provided with
one or more stops. This cover is so controlled by a spring
or springs as to have a tendency always to lie at one side of the
shutter, and when in this position is entirely clear of the slot in
the shutter and the lens. The shutter is also spring con-
trolled with a tendency in the direction opposite to that of the
cover. In its normal position the shutter lies so that the slot
is entirely past the lens opening, and a part of the solid
portion of the shutter, as well as the cover, both lie behind the
lens so that no light passes. In setting the shutter prior to
making an exposure the shutter is pulled over to its furthest
limit on one side by any suitable means, such as a lever or a
cord provided with an external button, and secured around a
pulley on the shutter spindle ; this pulley being so arranged as
to carry the shutter with it in one direction, but to leave it
free in the other direction. The shutter is provided with two
or more peripheral openings into which falls the end of a
spring controlled or spring lever pivotted ; the cover also is
provided with one or more slots.
The action is as follows : —
When the shutter is drawn over by the cord the cover remains
behind the lens, being retained in that position by the spring
lever until the opening in the shutter has passed the lens,
when a suitable projection upon the periphery of the shutter,
or special peripheral formation, causes the spring lever to rise
out of the cover which then, under the influence of its spring,
passes over to theside of the shutter out of the way of the slot in
the shutter. The shutter is held in its set position by the
spring lever entering a slot, suitably arranged for the purpose,
and to make the exposure a press button or equivalent on the
outside of the case may be pushed in against the reversed end
of the spring lever, with the result that the acting end of ti e
lever is removed from the slot in the shutter, which then, under
the influence of a spring, flies over, making an exposure for the
length of time during which the slot passes the lens opening,
460
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
the shutter finally resting in the original position, when both
shutter and cover are behind the lens.
The cover is arranged with a peripheral slot or projection
which takes on to the spring lever, so as to raise it clear of the
portion of the shutter necessary to allow the slot to pass, the
lens opening during the setting of the shutter, after which, as
already explained, the lever is raised by the shutter itself, and
the cover flies clear.
By this means it will be seen that there is no occasion for
capping the lens during the setting of the shutter, as the pre-
viously described cover prevents the passage of light through
the lens during the setting of the shutter.
This shutter may of course be arranged in front of the lens,
or behind the lens, or, in the case of double lenses, between the
two, according to requirements.
By providing suitable peripheral slots, both shutter and cover
may beheld by aspring lever in a position to leave the uncovered
slot in the shutter opposite the lens opening, so that a prolonged
exposure may thus be made.
(JTomspontJcncc.
PAINTERS AS JUDGES OF PHOTOGRAPHS.
Sir, — Perhaps you will allow me to make a few observations
on your article of May 30th on the above subject, as I fear it will
not receive the unanimous approval of those who are endeavour-
ing to regard photography as something more than a mere
imitative process. I should have asked you to grant me this
favour last week, only I was in hopes that a more able pen than
mine would have dealt with the matter. If photographs can
possess any artistic merit — and that this is possible cannot be
denied — then surely those merits can better be guaged by per-
sons who have been trained in art. You controvert this opinion
by saying that photography cannot, or should not, attempt to
imitate painting, and because the qualities which make a good
painting or drawing do not necessarily make a good photograph,
and you quote in support of this the well-known canon of art
that “a worker dealing with a particular material shall not
hide its identity and attempt to make it imitate something
else,” and tell us with perfect accuracy that a water-colour
drawing should not imitate an oil painting, or an oil painting a
water-colour. But a painter in oils may legitimately endeavour
to give the softness of water-colour, or a water-colourist the
boldness of oils, without laying themselves open to the charge
of imitation. So, too, in the case of etching : an etcher does
not and cannot attempt to make his works resemble paintings
in monochrome, but that is no reason why he should not strive
to give painter-like qualities to his etchings. In fact, “ the
object of the Society — Painter Etchers — is not merely the
restoration of original etching, but the re-infusion into all
forms of the engraver’s art of the painter-like qualities it has
lost” ( Vide Exhibition Catalogue.) These etchers do not
rest satisfied with drawing their subject on the plate and then
sending it away to be bitten, and the prints pulled from it in
a mechanical manner. On the contrary, in order to obtain
painter-like qualities, they resort to what would be called in
photography dodges of manipulation, or, as you 'would say,
“juggling” with the plate. In fact, the man who does the
biting and the pulling must himself be an artist, and know how
to make the best use of the materials and apparatus with which
he is working. Why should not the same latitude be allowed
to photography ? A lens used in a particular way will give
microscopic definition ; if used differently it will subdue defini-
tion. Both these properties are at the service of the photo-
grapher, and it is not “juggling” with a lens to make use of
them. Etching is also capable of giving the finest definition,
but that is no reason why it should always be shown, whether
suitable to the subject or not.
In the case you mention of a certain photograph attracting
the eye of an artist, it appears to me that the award was cor-
rectly given, not because it was more like a pain ring than other
photographs, but because it was more like a picture, and the
art of photography does not lose its identity by producing
pictures.
But then comes the disappointed exhibitor who complains
that a medal has been awarded to a photograph which is
technically bad, because it shows errors in focussing, exposure,
and development. That is not so ; the focussing, exposure, and
development are correct for the result aimed at ; and here
comes in the art to assist the science. You seem to imply that
a photograph which possesses painter-like qualities may be com-
pared to a piece of grained wood. This is not so, for the
latter is solely an imitation, and the former is not. You might
fairly compare a photographic copy of an engraving with a
piece of grained wood, because this is essentially an imitation,
and does not pretend to be anything else. But an artistically
treated photograph of a natural scene, although it may have
(and must have if photography is to be carried to its highest
limits) painter-like qualities, does not and cannot attempt to
imitate a painting. To obtain the best results the science of
photography must be the servant of the art. The art teaches
us what we should strive for, and the science how to obtain it.
Therefore, in judging a photographic exhibition, the knowledge,
training, and taste of an artist should be supreme, and the
scientist should not be allowed to intrude his technicalities
into a realm the nature of which ( qua scientist) he is wholly
ignorant. You have written strongly against artists judging
photographs, but I am glad to see that at the conclusion of
your article you have written still more strongly against photo-
graphers doing so. If it should ever again be my fortune
to gain a medal, I hope and pray that it may not be at the
hands of a man who holds that “Turner’s pictures are out-
rageously out of focus, and who would suggest that the
artist would do well to insert in the picture the details which
were lacking.” Wilson Noble.
52, Sloane Street, S. IF. , June 7th, 1890.
P.S. — I am glad to see that Mr. George Davison has com-
menced a series of articles on “ Photographic Exhibitions.” I
trust his able pen will deal with the question of artists or
photographers as judges.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION.
Sin, — Allow me, through your columns, to announce that
the proceedings of the forthcoming meeting at Chester will be
opened by the Mayor of Chester at a conversazione to be held
at the Town Hall on the evening of the 23rd inst.
Permission has been given to photograph the following
places at any time duriug Convention week upon the production
of a membership ticket : — Conway Castle (interor and exterior),
by invitation of the President and Council of the Royal Cam-
brian Academy of Art ; Chester Cathedral and prccints, by the
Dean ; St. John’s Church and ruins, by the Rev. S. Cooper
Scott ; Interior and Exterior of Eaton Hall and Park, by the
Duke of Westminster ; Hawarden Castle and Park, by Mr. W,
H. Gladstone.
Excursions have been arranged during the week to Conway
Valley, Bettwsycoed, Hawarden, Eaton Hall, Vale of Llangollen,
Royal Mersey Yacht Regatta, and Old Moreton Hall.
At the evening meetings papers will be read as follows : —
“The Records of Photo-micrography,” Mr. A. Pringle;
“ Imagining and Imaging,” Mr. P. H. Newman ;“ Orthochro-
matic Photography with Rhodamin,” Mr. C. H. Bothamley ;
“ Photography in Norway,” Mr. Paul Lange ; “Astronomical
Photography,” Mr. A. A. Common; “A Magazine Camera
and Lantern,” Mr. Friese Greene. Reports also will be
received from the Lens Standard Committee, and the Weights,
Measures, and Formulae Committee.
A fully detailed programme will be forwarded on application.
J. J. Briginshaw, Hon. Secretary.
128, Southwark Street, London, June 10th.
PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TOWER OF LONDON.
Sir, — In reference to the remarks made in your last two
issues in respect to not seeing any photographs of the Tower
for sale, and of the inscriptions in the Beauchamp Tower in
particular, I beg to state that I have spent an immense amount
of time in photographing inscriptions and other things in all
June 13, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
467
parts of the Tower, which to me and a few others are very
interesting. For years past I have given up publishing photo-
graphic prints, as I have a great horror of the Bankruptcy
Court. 1 went into publishing, to supply the middleman,
who is seldom or ever satisfied at whatever price they are
offered to him, and then it is mostly “ sale or return ” business.
I need not say the return means when the prints are in such a
damaged condition as to be unfit for sale, which again means
ruination to the producer. I have seen 1 2 by 10 prints sold
to the shopkeepers for a few pence each, and other sizes in
proportion. I have some two hundred negatives of the Tower
alone, but in the present state of the market, publication is
entirely out of the question. 1 am still continuing my series
for private circulation only, also photographs of many other
buildings of historical interest. The way this state of things
has been brought about is that a few capitalists have put
many thousands of prints into their, trade, flooding the market
with trash, at about five per cent, above the cost of production,
and a little man who endeavours to make an art of photography,
if he attempts publication, goes to t he wall. I myself have
been told by the shopkeepers it is not a matter of quality so
long as they are cheap, because Mr. So-and-so’s pictures, which
arc supplied to them at half the price, sell just as well. So
what inducement is there for any worker to make a venture ?
Jteigate, June 7 th, 1890. Wm. Brooks.
JJioccctitngs of £oricttcj$.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
The ordinary monthly meeting of this Society took place on
Tuesday evening, the 10th inst. Mr. J. Glaisher, F.R.S.,
president, occupied the chair.
A paper was read by Mr. W. E. Debenham on “ Estimating the
Efficiency of Plate Backings,” illustrated by a diagram and by
photographs of the reflected images from various backing
agents. A series of such backings, too, was shown coated on
one side of a prism, and they could thus be examined, and the
light reflected from them compared by simple inspection. Such
inspection would showcertain substances to reflect muchlight, and
the sesubstances could, therefore, be rejected ; whilst others that
promised better could be compared by photographing the
images reflected from them. The first plate shown had
received twelve exposures on different parts, one when using a
prism unbacked, and the other eleven taken with various back-
ings applied to the prism. In some cases no images, and in
others only very faint ones, had been given in the photograph,
and the substances that thus appeared to answer the best
were again used on the prism with longer exposures. One
substance that he found very effective was caramel or burnt
sugar, used in combination with an equal weight of gelatine or
gum arabic. One plate which had received three exposures — -
one of fifteen seconds to the uncoated prism, one of one hour
to the prism coated with bitumen, and one also of one hour to a
backing composed of gum caramel and China ink — showed images
of the first two to be about equal ; the bitumen image receiving
about 240 times the exposure of the unbacked one ; whilst
the gum and caramel showed still less image. He was not
aware that the use of caramel as a plate-backing agent had
been tried before ; it was certainly very effective. Another plate
had received six exposures through a hole of about the of
an inch diameter. These exposures had been of fifteen seconds,
one minute, four minutes, and sixteen minutes on the un-
backed portion, and of sixteen minutes on the backed part.
The latter showed no reflections, whilst the former, even that
with fifteen seconds or ^ of the exposure, showed the ring of
halation characteristic of total internal reflection.
Mr. J. Spiller said that amongst the many substances that
might be thought available for plate backing, the aniline dyes
could not practically be included, as they would cause stain or
action upon the film if they crept on to it, as they would be
sure to do. Auiline orange would dye the film, and he knew
of no chemical agent capable of remaining the stain. It
was a troublesome job to have to remove a backing of bitumen,
and he was glad to hear of a soluble substance like caramel
that was so effective.
Mr. Id. Chapman Jones thought the experiments shown very
interesting and valuable, but that backing plates was a step
that ought not to be required. They wanted to use in the
film itself all the energy of the light striking upon it, not to
let any be lost, then have to be absorbed by a backing. Plates
were now manufactured on a commercial scale whi;h did not
require any backing. Photographs of such a scene as one
containing dark trees and light clouds showed no halation with
such plates. For dark interiors with bright windows backing
might be required, but he would prefer to alter the conditions
of the subject itself.
Mr. W. Bedford said that plates which did not show halation
owing to thickness of the film owed their freedom from this
defect not. to the light being entirely stopped in the film, but
that development did not with such thick coatings proceed
quite to the back of the plate, where the light from the back
surface of the glass was reflected.
Mr. T. Samuels recommended the use of collodion stained
with a dye in preference to other modes of backing ; but
backing he considered necessary.
Mr. Debenham, in replying, said that he thought plate
makers might be induced to supply backed plates. A backing
might be used cither of gelatine and caramel — the gelatine of
such a kind as to frill off quickly in development — or of gum
and caramel, with perhaps black pigment also.
Mr. H. Chapman Jones read a paper entitled “The Stain-
ing and Clearing of Gelatine Films.” He showed a great many
results of experiments made upon gelatine plates ; some,
after the removal of the silver compound by immersion in a
solution of hyposulphite of soda, but most of them upon the
film containing gelatino-bromide of silver. The result of his
experiments was to show that the substances recommended as
clearing agents did not possess the action claimed for them,
but that what clearing appeared to be effected was really due to
the extra washing received, and that simple water would do all
that any clearing would, whilst some of these agents retarded
or positively prevented the clearing action which water alone
would have exercised. A mixture that had been recommended
of alum, citric acid, and ferrous sulphate, he had found to
make a stain already existing still more pronounced. One
set of experiments showed eikonogen as the only agent not
producing stain, whilst with pyro there was a slight stain, and
with hydrokinone a more marked discolouration, which, more-
over, was not even, but accentuated at the edge at which the
solution had been arrested.
Mr. T. Sebastian Davis wished to know whether Mr.
Chapman Jones had made comparative experiments with
distilled water as against ordinary water for the removal of stains.
Mr. Chapman Jones had not done this.
Mr. Arnold Spiller could not agree with the author of
the paper. He remarked especially that he had found the
mixture of ferrous sulphate alone and citric acid to be particu-
larly useful in removing yellow discolouration. Citric acid
solution, also dilute hydrochloric acid, he had used and found to
be effective.
Mr. A. Mackie noted that ferrous sulphate had an intensi-
fying effect, which subsequent application of an acid removed.
Mr. Arnold Spiller explained this intensifying action by
the fact that pyro oxidised in development and combined with
the gelatine. The application of ferrous sulphate then formed
a compound resembling the black in writing ink.
Mr. Chapman Jones defended his conclusions by pointing to
his experiments, to which he had been led by direct observa-
tion. Alum he had always found to be positively detrimental.
The fixing bath that he used was hypo, to which some car-
bonate of soda was added, and he never used the solution twice.
A paper by Sir H. Trueman Wood on “Photographing the
Induction Spark” was taken as read.
It was announced that the annual soiree in connection with
the society’s exhibition would be held on September 27tli, and
that pictures for the exhibition must be sent in by the 15th
of that mouth.
Mr. J. B. Stacey was elected a member of the Society.
68
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 13, 1890.
The Lewes Photographic Society.
Monthly meeting June 6th. The prints sent in to the
quarterly competition were on view. Mr. N. S. Starnes acted
as judge, and attended the meeting specially to explain the
merits and demerits of the various prints submitted to him.
The certificates in classes 1 and 2 were both awarded to
Mr. G. J. Wightman, who then recounted his “Twelve
Months’ Experience as an Amateur Photographer,” in an
interesting manner. In the course of his remarks he said he
owed his success to the Society, and he advised all who wanted
a healthy and instructive hobby to take up photography.
The Sheffield Photographic Society.
The monthly meeting was held at the Masonic Hall on Tuesday
evening, June 3rd, Mr. B. J. Taylor in the chair.
The Secretary announced that he had an invitation for the
Society to send a delegate to the Photographic Convention of
the United Kingdom, to be held from the 23rd to 28th inst.,
at Chester. He then put upon the table samples of Worm aid’s
lantern slide masks of various shapes and tints, when several
boxes were ordered, to be given to those members who had
promised to present slides to the Society, so as to have them all
somewhat uniform.
Mr. T. G. Hibbert gave a practical demonstration of
the Kallitype printing process. The specimens he showed
were Payne’s grey in colour. The process, he said, was
claimed to be permanent, and required no hot baths, calcium
tubes, or rubber bands ; Kallitype, he continued, being much
more sensitive than ordinary silver paper, care is required in
printing to fill the frames in a yellow light or weak daylight, also
not to examine them out of doors, as with ordinary sensitive
paper. He found it to print in about one third the time required
by silver paper. Having some printed, he then proceeded
to develop the same, somewhat after the platinotype
method, after which a general discussion followed, and it was
agreed that as yet it was not superior, if equal, to the platino-
type process, but would, no doubt, be considerably improved.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 5th inst. , Mr. W. Coles occupied the chair.
Mr. H. M. Hastings exhibited negatives taken at Uxbridge
with a hand-camera.
Mr. J. B. B. Wellington, who had just returned from a
tour on the Continent, said that his photographic luggage had
passed through eleven custom-houses, but he had experienced
no difficulty whatever with the authorities.
The results of the competition Pyro v. Eikonogen were
passed round and adjudged ; Mr. H. M. Hastings being the
champion of eikonogen, Mr. C. H. Cooke using pyro. The
conditions of the contest were, that five exposed plates should
be given by Mr. A Cowan to each competitor for development,
the exposures being unknown. Prints from each set of finished
negatives were shown, each member present marking the print
he considered the best. The result showed that in the cases of
over-exposed prints from negatives, those developed with pyro
were considered the best, but with under-exposures eikonogen
obtained the most marks.
The subject for discussion for the evening was “The Print-
ing Process that best Registers the Gradation of the Negative.”
Mr. R. P. Drage opened the discussion by reading a short
paper advocating the superiority of silver prints in this respect
over all other kinds of printing.
Mr. W. E. Debenham was of the same opinion. For range
of gradation he considered albumen and gelatine gave excellent
results ; platinotype did not give the same amount of gradation.
The Chairman said that in selecting a printing process, it was
necessary to consider the subject of the picture, whether general
effect or minute detail was desired.
Mr. J. J. Briginshaw said that for printing from negatives of
microscopic objects, hegave preference to gelatine for the render-
ing of all the fine details of the negative so necessary for this
class of work.
Mr. A. Cowan said that for printing from thin negatives the
best gradation was obtained with albumenised paper.
The outing on Saturday next will be at Hale End ; members
to meet at Wood Street Station at 2.30.
to ©otwpontients*
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication ,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.8., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
AU A IvirtUi nents and c immunisations reliting to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper Sc Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
A. T. — Donkin Relies. A photograph of Dychtau, marked to
show the spot of Messrs. Fox and Donkin’s last bivouac,
appeared in the Pall Mall Budget of 15th ult. In the ice
cave on a rock ledge were found thermometers and other
apparatus for determining the boiling point of water at
high elevations, together with an iron stewpan, drinking
cup, and fine instruments packed in sock and glove. There
was no camera. Probably our friend had this with him
strapped upon his shoulders, but the now useless revolver was
found hanging on the rocks at an altitude of about 14,000
feet.
J. M. (Norwood) — Nitrate of Soda for Wet Plate Bath. We
should not recommend you to add nitrate of soda to a collo-
dion sensitising bath, because Dr. William Allen Miller
proved many years ago that it diminished the sensitiveness.
If you must put in something to retard the evaporation on
the plate during warm weather, try the addition of a small
dose of Price’s purest glycerine, using as little as possible,
or it may cause fog. If by chance you get in too much,
sunning the bath and filtering is the best way of rectify-
ing it.
W. V. Morris. — Sizes for Stereo Camera and Plates. Either
the by 5 camera, commonly used by amateurs with a pair
of twin lenses of about 4^ inches focus, or one for plates
7 j by 4£ inches. The Holmescope is a good form of hand
stereoscope, with large square lenses shaded by a hood, all
other parts being left quite open.
F. R. A. S. — Solar Eclipse of 11 th instant. We thank you for
the information, and, for the benefit of our readers, make
known the following particulars : — In the north of Africa
and southern parts of Asia, the sun will present an annular
eclipse, but at Greenwich it will, of course, be only partial ;
beginning on Tuesday next at 8.20 a.m. ; maximum phase
at 9.23, when about one-tliird or 0-37 of the sun’s diameter
will be obscured, and ending at 10.30 a.m. With landscape
camera and long focus lens provided with instantaneous
shutter, good results, although small, ought to be obtained,
these permitting of being afterwards enlarged. It would be
advisable to back the plates with carbon tissue, and possibly
two or more exposures could lie received upon the same
plate, allowing time for the disc to travel clear. By watching
the ground glass it could easily be ascertained previously
what interval should be allowed to get the images well clear,
and a few preliminary experiments would settle this point,
and likewise the adjustment of the time shutter. Another
direction of study should be the registration of the crescent-
shaped spots of light under trees, always visible during the
progress of an eclipse, and a further set of experiments
might be made with a pinhole camera.
S. H. & Co. — Spotted Prints. One unmounted and five
cabinets, all showing the same defects, which at. first sight
appear to owe their origin to bronze powder, magnesium, or
other reducing particles, got in amongst the photographs,
but we are unable to discover any trace of these, even with
a microscope. The fixing and washing have been very care-
fully performed, for there is no evidence of hypo, and
your description indicates the best known method of work-
ing. Is it possible that a bad album with sham gold edges
and margins is responsible for the mounted cabinets ?
Otherwise, the case remains, as you say, a “ mystery.”
H. F. — The City Exhibition. The specimens were noticed
last week on page 433, and it was unnecessary to refer to
them again in this column.
J. E. D., A. W., received.
THE
CONTENTS.
P AO 1
The Photographic Convention at Chester „_469
Negatives for Photo-mechanical Work 470
The Progress of the Photo-mechanical Printing Processes. By
Hermann E. Gunther 471
Depth of Focus and Diffusion of Focus. By W. K. Burton ... 472
Photographic Exhibitions. By George Davison 474
New Photographic Objectives. By Dr. Ernest Abbe and Dr.
Paul Kudolph.... 475
New Photographic Lenses. By Dr. Paul Rudolph 476
Photography at Greenwich Observatory. By the Astronomer
Royal 477
PAOX
Notes 478
The Grosvenor Gallery. By Rev. F. C. Lambert, M.A 480
Notices of Books 481
Conversazione of the Royal Society 482
The Costume Album * 484
Mr. Toole Among Photographers 485
New Salts Exhibiting Optical Phenomena 486
Patent Intelligence 486
Correspondence 487
Proceedings of Societies 487
Answers to Correspondents 488
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT
CHESTER.
Next Monday the Photographic Convention will meet
in the ancient city of Chester, the most old-world look-
ing place in this couutry, and one which will present
plenty of subjects to the photographers who attend the
gathering. A disadvantageous feature is that red sand-
stone has been so largely used in the construction of
the more interesting buildings, and that that colour is not
the best for plates which have not been made red-
sensitive. Time was when Chester rose boldly from
the plain, and, with its ancient walls and battlements,
had an exceedingly picturesque appearance, but for
many years past houses have been springing up close
outside its walls, and somewhat dingy suburbs cover
the space once occupied by green fields. On a fine
day the Welsh mountains can sometimes be seen faint
and grey in the distance from the city wall. The
“rows” of Chester 4 are unique; these consist of two
rows of shops — one row above the other — upon one side
of the street, so that, including both sides of the
street, there are four rows of shops in all. While
walking in front of the upper row of shops, the
pedestrian treads a pavement laid above the ceiling of
the lower row of shops ; the second floor of the house
is above his head, so that he is in a kind of arcade, but
not one of any pretensions to architectural beauty.
These “rows” form a protection from the glare of the
summer’s sun, also from rain and snow ; but altogether,
arcades in street architecture are not usually found to
he desirable in places north of the Alps. One or two
of the streets in Berne have arcades after Italian fashion.
They are liked during the few months of summer, but
the tradesmen who have shops therein say that the
arcades make the said shops too dark and gloomy the
greater part of the year.
Photographic excursions from Chester have been
planned for nearly every day during the coming week,
and the most attractive are those to Conway and
Bettws-y-Coed, at the former of which places the
more picturesque part of North Wales begins. Great
Orme’s Head is within moderate distance, and
from it Puffin Island and the coast of Anglesea can he
seen. Once we had a day of the Robinson Crusoe kind
all alone upon Puffin Island, with not even a puffin for
company, because some rats were wrecked on the
island several years ago, and found puffins’ eggs to
agree with their constitution. The tide runs with
great velocity between Puffin Island and Anglesea,
and any lonely sojourner on the former for a day feels
grateful that the fisherman does not forget to return to
the island to bike him back to Beaumaris. Some
exceedingly pretty photographs of the Welsh, hills are
obtainable from the Anglesea side of the Menai Straits,
because the hills are at a suitable distance, and have a
good marine foreground. Towards evening the light
is best, because at mid-day the sun would be behind the
hills, facing the camera. The mountain Penmaenmawr
is but two or three miles from Conway, and has a
railway station at its base, so is available for those who
wish to do some climbing. Conway Castle will, of
course, he largely photographed again next week, as it
has been largely photographed before. Near the mouth
of tho Conway was a pearl fishery once upon a time ;
the pearls were found in a coarse kind of mussel. As
they will be under the guidance of a scientific man, the
“ conventionists ” are likely to make some explorations
in this direction, and to return home with their pockets
full of mussel-shells. There is good sea-bathing near
Great Orme’s Head, and a lively species of small shark,
from four to six feet long, at times frequents the region
between Great Orme’s Head and Puffin Island.
The excursion party for Bettws-y-Coed will plunge
for a few miles into the hilly part of Wales, but will
see nothing of the higher mountains of the Snowdon
range, unless it goes several miles farther on, along
the Capel Curig road, when Snowdon itself will come
into view. About the finest view of Snowdon obtain-
able is still faither on, near the point where the Capel
Curig road meets that from Llanberis to Beddgelert ;
this point is high up the side of the Vale of the Waters
470
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 20, 1890.
— Nant Gwynant. A great lake covers the bottom
of the valley, and from the other side of the lake rises
the most precipitous side of Snowdon, which can here
be seen from base to summit. A little inn is near the
junction of the roads already mentioned, and many
years ago two wayfarers were imprisoned therein by rain
for two days, with but two books in the house, namely,
a Welsh Bible and “ Thoughts on Suicide.”
The people in Wales are usually hospitable and good-
natured. We know those of the south better than
those of the north, and this is the kind of talk one is
liable to hear from Dafydd Rees about Evan Evans,
who went to have his photograph taken : “ Have you
heard that Evan Evans went to John Jones to have his
shaps (shapes) taken, and Morgan Griffiths says it was
done bad, shockin’ bad, iss (yes) indeed, to goodness.”
A Pembrokeshire literary man of ability and a born
Welshman once compiled the following sample of
Welsh-English : —
O, had I the harp of King Dafydd,
What a lively lament I’d indite,
But the verse nowadays is so rabid,
I’m almost ashamed for to write.
Doubtless the Bettws-y-Coed party will bring back
with them various specimens of the Welsh-English
language of North Wales as applied to photographers
and photography.
NEGATIVES FOR PHOTO-MECHANICAL WORK.
Of late years the employment of photographic pro-
cesses for the purpose of illustration in periodicals and
books has become so general that this kind of work
has not only displaced, to a great extent, the art of
the wood engraver, but it has called into being a num-
ber of publications which would never have seen
the light had not this quick and convenient method
of producing wood blocks presented itself. Photo-
graphs in half-tone can be converted into blocks ready
for the printing press without difficulty, but their want
of depth makes it difficult to obtain satisfactory prints
from them unless they are impressed on fine paper and
with very good ink. It is different with line blocks,
as they are called — that is to say, blocks which have
been produced photographically from drawings in pen
and ink, and which consist wholly of line work.
There is some little art required in producing a
negative from such a drawing, for its chief character-
istic must be that the lines upon it shall he clear as
glass, and that the background upon which they are
traced shall be as opaque as possible. The negative
must be reversed, but in these days of films which can
be printed from either side this consideration should
not present any difficulty. The hardest task before
the worker has hitherto been to get the strong contrast
between the lines and ground, to which we have just
adverted, and this was, for a long time, deemed to be
impossible to attain on a gelatine plate. So the custom
among those who undertake this class of work has
been to reverse their negatives by use of a surface-
silvered mirror placed outside the lens, and to produce
those negatives by the wet process.
Many photographers might, with reason, object to
take up the old process. Some because they have never
made pictures on wet plates — and this is, of course, true
of a number of modern workers — and others because
they have not sufficient space at command to keep the
old and the new methods distinctly apart. The
result of this is that the special form of negative
required for photo-mechanical processes is regarded as
something obtside the usual range of business, and the
work is left to others to do.
But such considerations need no longer stand in the
way, for it is now quite possible to obtain upon a gela-
tine plate a negative which shall rival in its contrasts
of black and white that which is produced by the aid
of the silver bath. AVe have lately experimented in
this direction with two brands of plates, and have
obtained most successful results, and we are informed
on good authority that there is at least one other brand
in the market which will answer equally well.
The first we tried were Mawson and Swan’s photo-
mechanical plates, which, as their name implies, are
made for the purpose. The drawings which we copied
were made in black ink upon a clay surface paper,
which is a recognised material for work of this cha-
racter, the mineral surface giving each line made by
the pen a sharp outline instead of the ragged edge
which lines will often exhibit if made on card of the
ordinary kind. The plates are very slow in action —
much slower than those produced by the wet process —
and the exposure with a small stop ran up to two
minutes or more. We at first tried for development a
hydroquinone formula which we found advocated in
print, but it was useless in our hands. It certainly
gave an image which was intensely white and black,
and at first we were pleased with its promising appear-
ance ; but unfortunately we found, subsequently, that
the black was by no means of a non-actinic character,
and that it let the light through to such an extent that
the negatives had to be rejected.
We now commenced de novo , but this time we took
good care to depend upon pyro for development. The
change in the result was most marked, and there was
the further advantage of increased speed of production.
Density, we found, could be obt ained to any extent,
and in one case where an error had been made in
exposure, and the film was not quite dark enough, it
was brought up to the level of the others by a short
immersion in a mercurial intensifying solution. In
the after operation of printing we found that the dark
portions of the negatives were so opaque that no light
could pass through, and they were in every other
respect as good as those produced by the wet process.
The advantage of being able to bring up a negative to
this pitch of density without having recourse to
intensification, which is apt to clog the finer lines, and
often brings disaster in its train in the shape of dis-
colouration, is obvious.
The other brand of plates which we found suitable
for this work was Edwards’ isochromatic. We were
employing one of these plates for copying an engraving
simply because it happened to be at hand, and we
June 20, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
471
were altogether unprepared to tiud such an intensely
black and white image as it afforded. As in the former
instance, the lines were absolutely clear, but on a dark
brown, non-actinic ground. We need hardly say that
the exposure required was much less than that necessary
for the photo-mechanical plates, for, as is well-known,
the isochromatic plates are well fitted for instantaneous
exposures. We actually gave about one-eighteenth
of the previous exposure, with the result just stated.
There was here an immense saving of time, but with
the disadvantage of working afterwards in the dimmest
of red lights for fear of fogging the plate. Mawson
and Swan’s plates, on the other hand, can be worked in
a yellow light without fear of disaster. The other
brand of plates to which we have alluded as being suit-
able for this class of work is made by England, but
we have not tried them.
There still remains the difficulty of reversing the
negative, which is necessary for photo-mechanical work.
Few photographers possess a surface-silvered mirror,
and the method which some have advocated of putting
the plate in the dark slide wrong side before does not
work well in practice. The makers should, therefore,
bring out a film coated with suitable emulsion for this
class of work, and then the last obstacle will be
removed for those who wish to add to their business by
producing these negatives for process work.
THE PROGRESS OF THE PHOTO-MECHANICAL
PRINTING PROCESSES.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
II.
An interesting comparision has been made of late by C.
Kampmann, of Vienna, between various chromate baths
for sensitising photo-lithographic transfer paper. He
found that the sensitiveness yielded is greatest in the
case of those baths which contain ammonium bichro-
mate (1,000 c.c. water, 43 grammes ammonium bichromate,
and neutralised with ammonia ; or, according to Professor
Ilusnik, 1,300 c.c. of water, 70 grammes of sodium
bichromate, 30 grammes of ammonium bichromate,
neutralised with caustic ammonia). By using baths which
contain potassium bichromate, the sensitiveness is about
one-third less ; it is, however, practically increased by the
addition of manganous sulphate, as recommended by W.
Weissenberger. By this addition not only the time of
exposure is shortened, but also the impression becomes
more distinctly visible on the bichromated paper during
printing, because its colour becomes then deeper brown
than usually. Moreover, the addition of manganous
sulphate causes the transfer-ink to adhere more firmly
on the rolled-up paper during development. The bath
recommended by \V. Weissenberger consists of : —
Water 1000 c.c.
Potassium bichromate ... ... 40 grammes
Manganous sulphate 5 ,,
It may be applied to any of the various existing gelatinised
transfer papers, and by its use the same result is obtained
as with an usual potassium chromate bath of a much
higher state of concentration.
So far I have spoken about the treatment of the
impression transferred to the zinc or stone plate, and of
the preparation of the transfer paper ; I may now be
allowed to add a few directions as to the best condition
of the negatives destined for photo-lithographic purposes.
It is generally supposed by inexperienced operators that
a negative which is to be reproduced by photo-lithography
should show the lines quite clear, and the rest of the
film absolutely dense and opaque. The latter is, how-
ever, not only unnecessary, but even unsuitable, since, if
the negative is intensified until this density is obtained,
the fine lines are liable to close, or at least to lose
so much of their clearness that they will print very
difficultly and defectively. Provided that a well prepared
transfer paper is used,* a moderately dense negative is
quite sufficient. AVith such a negative, also, the finest
lines and points are printing, whilst the so-called false
tone (see page 396) which is produced on account of the
whites being not absolutely opaque may be easily
removed by rubbing during the development of the
rolled-up copy.
In order to obtain a negative of this kind — i.e., of
moderate density — a “ hard ” working collodion should be
used. I suppose that the wet collodion process is used
because it gives always the best results in this special case.
A very good formula, which I have tried with perfect
success, is the following one, recommended by Max Jaffd,
an experienced photo-lithographer : —
Alcohol ...
Calcium chloride
Cadmium iodide
Ammonium iodide
100 c.c.
T6 gramme
7 '8 grammes
This iodizing solution is added to 1,000 c.c. of plain
collodion of two per cent.
In the case of densely drawn originals of wood-cuts —
copper and steel engravings, for instance — it will generally
be unnecessary to intensify the negative ; if, however,
in other cases, an intensification is required, the following
method may advantageously be used. The following two
solutions are prepared : —
No. 1. — A cold saturated solution of chloride of mercury.
No. 2. — A cold saturated solution of potassium iodide.
To solution No. 1 so much of solution No. 2 is added that
the red precipitate, which forms at first, is redissolved.
The mixture must be diluted as required for use, because
it would otherwise act too strongly. The plate must, of
course, be thoroughly washed before and after intensifi-
cation.
The darkening of the intensified negative is done with
hydrosulphide of ammonia, which is diluted with about
four parts of water. The negative should appear entirely
darkened after this treatment ; if it is not yet sufficiently
vigorous, the operation may be repeated. Care should be
taken that the hydrosulphide of ammonia is not applied
in the same room in which the silver baths are placed.
In the case of gelatine plates being used instead of wet '
collodion plates, I can recommend the following combined
eikonogen and pyrogallic acid developer as thoroughly reli-
able, with which any desired density may be obtained. The
plate is at first developed with eikonogen, until the details
of the drawing are well out ; then it is rinsed with water
and re-developed with the ordinary pyro developer. The
negative becomes at once denser, and its density may be
increased to any desired degree.
• I have noticed that icpeatedly inquiries hve been directed to the
Editor cf this journal with regard to the “ New Albert Transf-r Pape',”
which I have described in a previ us number. Since, as it seems, it is
not yet procurable in England, I give here the address of the manufac-
turers : E. Jaffe and A. Albert, Wien, Wabiiug, Theiei ienga te 17.
472
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 20, 1890.
Photogravure. — With regard to photogravure, in which
process great improvements have been made within the
last few years in Germany, two important publications of
a thoroughly practical character, in which the working
details of the whole process in its present form are clearly
and extensively described, deserve special attention. The
first one, by E. Kiewning, has been published in the
Deutsche Photographer i Zeitung ; the other one, quite recently,
in the Photograpliische Correspondent, by Rudolf Maschek,
of Vienna. Upon these two communications the follow-
ing lines are based. The two kinds of transfer paper
which are used and recommended by Maschek are the
diapositive paper of Braun and Co., of Dornach, for
transferring the positive image, and the papers of the
Autotype Company, of London, for the production of the
relief-negatives.
The correct and careful composition of the etching
baths is of special importance. Maschek prepares stock
solutions, which he keeps in labelled bottles. For large
plates he takes 20 pounds of chloride of iron, and dis-
solves them completely in distilled water, until the weight
amounts to 1,500 grammes per 1,000 c.c. of the liquid.
Afterwards he graduates the etching liquid, adding to the
single baths so much distilled water that the specific
weight amounts to : —
1*420 for the first etching (41° Beaumd).
1*375 for the second etching (38° ,, ).
1*330 for the third etching (35" ,, ).
1*285 for the fourth etching (31° ,, ).
The dusting-in of the copper-plate with very finely pulver-
ised asphalt is one of those acts upon which depends
the success of the etching process to a high degree. For
this purpose the Syrian asphalt must be sifted through a
number of sieves, the openings of which become finer in
succession, until it passes through a sieve of fifty-four to
sixty meshes to each centimetre square. To prevent the
exceedingly fine powder escaping during this procedure,
the sieve should be covered with a white cloth reaching
down to the table, and the table covered with white
paper.
A Good Mountant. — The following mouutant is strongly
recommended by Mr. W. Willis for delicate prints : — Weigh
out 2 ounces of the best arrowroot ; mix it into a thick paste
with 2 ounces of hot water, and then add 18 ounces of boiling
water, stirring briskly. Soak half-an-ounce of gelatine in
water until it is thoroughly soft and swollen. Stir this swollen
gelatine into the hot arrowroot, with which it will quickly in-
corporate itself. Add ten or twelve drops of pure carbolic
acid. This forms a stiff jelly when cold, and it should be used
cold, being brushed on to the back of the prints or applied to
them with a sponge.
How Far Can You See? — According to an American paper,
there has been a great discussion going on in Europe concerning
the distance at which large objects on the earth’s surface are
visible. Emile Metzger mentions that he once saw Keizerspickt,
in Sumatra, when separated from it by a distance of 110 Eng-
lish miles ; he also says that on very favourable occasions he
has managed to see Guy Merapi, in Java, when 180 miles inter-
vened. E. Hill, the civil engineer, says that he has seen Mont
Blanc from Piz Muraun, near Dissentis, a distance of almost 120
miles. J. Starkie Gardner states that Mont Blanc is visible
from Piz Landguard, though distant about 3 degrees. Wymper,
the explorer, says that when he was in Greenland he could
plainly see a mountain peak from which he was separated by
150 miles. The whole range of the Swiss Alps has been
looked upon by J. Hippisly while 200 miles away ; Sir W. Jones
affirms that the Himalayas have appeared to his view from the
great distance of 224 miles. — English Mechanic.
DEPTH OF FOCUS AND DIFFUSION OF FOCUS.
BY W. K. BURTON.
There has been so much discussion about the two subjects
with which I head this communication, that I think a
few words supplementary to what I have recently written
on optics in the Photographic News may not be out of
place.
In one of these communications I defined, or rather
tried to describe, “ depth of focus,” and I do not consider
that it is necessary to repeat the definition here.
It has already been stated that depth of focus is
inversely proportional to the diameter of the aperture, and
to the focal length. From these facts there may be
deduced others, a knowledge of which may be of some
practical use to the photographer. Thus, assuming a
certain maximum amount of want of definition as per-
missible, or not offensive in a photograph, we can work
out a very simple rule that will tell us the distance of the
nearest object that will be in focus at the same tune as an
indefinitely distant object, with a given focal length and a
given aperture. Or, on the other hand, knowing the
distance of the nearest object, and the focal length of the
lens, we can get the size of stop that it is necessary to use
so as to have the distance in moderate focus when the
nearest object is focussed for, or vice versa. There is
always some want of precision in applying such rules,
because we have to assume that a certain definite amount
of want of definition is permissible, and not more, whereas
it is really a matter of artistic judgment in the case of each
particular subject how much the less important parts of
the picture should be subordinated to the principal
subject by allowing them to be out of focus. Moreover,
as pointed out by Mr. W. E. Debenham, the roundness of
the field of lenses prevents any rules that can be formulated
from applying to objects near the side of the plate, except
when a very narrow angle is included, and when, in conse-
quence, the field is practically flat. The effect of rouud-
ness of field is, that objects near the edge of the plate, far
nearer than indicated by any rule, may be in focus at the
same time as the distance projected on the middle of the
plate. Still, it is often useful even to know what is the
nearest object not very far from the centre of the plate
that will be in focus at the same time as the distance, or
to know what diameter of stop is the largest that we may
use with a foreground object at a certain distance focussed
without getting the distance much out of focus.
In measuring lack of definition, whether due to lack of
depth of focus or to spherical aberration, the term “disc
of confusion ” of such-and-such a diameter is used. The
meaning of this is, that if a mathematical point in the image
is focussed, that point will be represented in the image by
a blurred spot of a certain diameter. Thus, a fixed star
may be considered as practically a point. If it be said
that a certain lens has so much spherical aberration as to
“ give a disc of confusion of of an inch in diameter,”
the meaning is that, however we focus our lens, the image
on the ground glass will not be a point, but a spot of not
less than of an inch in diameter.
It is generally assumed that it is permissible, at least in
the case of “ the distance ” in a photograph, to allow a
point to be represented by a disc of , J-0 of an inch in
diameter, the reason being that, when looked at from the
ordinary distance that is generally unthinkingly selected
by people of normal sight, such want of definition does
not amount to blurring, but amounts only to a barely
June 20, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
473
appreciable amount of softness. Indeed, there are many
who are not even satisfied with the amount of softness thus
given in the distance even of landscapes, much less in the
case of figure subjects or portraits. Mr. Debenham
has farther pointed out that a rule that allows the same
amount of lack of definition due to want of depth of focus
for all sizes of pictures cannot be a reliable one, as we
look — or ought to look — at large pictures from a greater
distance than we look at smaller ones from. This is
correct, no doubt, but I cannot agree that such a rule as I
mention is without any use, for — always bearing certain
limitations in view — I have used it in practice for years,
and have found it very handy.
In the first place, as regards very small work, we ought
to look at such photographs from a very near point of
view in most cases, and there are differences between
different people as to the nearness from which they will
look at a small picture. Thus the writer— though having
good sight for distant objects without artificial aid — finds
that he can, without excessive strain, examine photographs
at a distance of only six inches from the eye ; but he
believes he is right in supposing this to be uncommon, and
that not many will voluntarily hold even a small photo-
graph much nearer to the eye than twelve inches.
On the other hand, it must at once be admitted that the
rule is useless for small negatives that have to be enlarged,
and that it is not correctly applicable to very large work,
in which considerably more softness than is represented by
the rhs of an inch disc of confusion is always permissible,
or even desirable for artistic effect.
In practice, I consider that the rule that takes a disc of
confusion of of an inch as a standard is fairly appli-
cable to all work that is not to be enlarged, and that is not
of a size (say) larger than 15 by 12. The rule was stated
by the present writer, in the Photographic News, some
years ago, in a form that is not absolutely correct, but that
is well within anything that is needed in practice, and that
has the advantage of great simplicity. It was stated in
words somewhat as follows : —
“To find the nearest object that may be focussed for
FOCUS TABLE FOR DETECTIVE CAMERAS AND OTHER SPECIAL WORK
« *
Focus
of lens
in
inches.
Decimal Standar
■d Stop
Humber*
Ratio Marked on Stops
Focus
of le:i 3
in
niches
5
10
1
20
25
30
35
40
/
7
l
A
/
y
£0
A
✓
TT
J
rs
'fz
f
To
/
TT
A i A
L.
7 >1
Number of
feet and inches after which all in focus.
1
Number of feet and Inches af»er which a
11 in focus.
4
19 4
■38
ns
9IO
»9
80
7'5
70
• //
19 4
I"
170
■5*
>38
i2«;
"5
107
9 10
92
8-8
82
/
78
/ //
7 '4
7 0
4
<1
2IIO
154
I2-IO
11*1
910
90
84
7’>o
21 IO
19 2
17 0
'5'4
140
12 10
1 no
ill
104
9 9
9'2
8-8
83
7 >o
■u
41
=4'5
'73
■45
125
hi
101
9 4
89
245
2>'5
>97
>7 3
■5 S
'4-5
'3 3
12 5
117
IO I 1
.03
9 9
9 3
89
■»!
4j
273
19 '2
160
"3 9
124
•113
ID'S
9 9
27 3
23 IO
213
19 2
'7 5
160
U'lO
139
12 1 I
12*1
"5
10 10
io'3
9 9
4;
5
30 2
21 -3
179
>53
>37
125
n6
10 10
30 2
265
23 -6
213
194
179
165
'5 3
'4 3
'3'5
12-8
"4
10 10
5
33 3
23-4
19-6
1610
15*0
139
12 8
II I I
33 3
291
2511
23 4
2' '3
196
l8l
l6lO
>5 9
'4'9
rp,
»3-2
,26
i ri 1
51
36 5
258
215
.8-5
• 6-5
150
13 10
>30
365
317!
285
25 8
23 4
21-5
1910
>k5
'73
162
>5 3
>4-5
>3 8
13 0
5*
51
39- 10
28 0
23 ‘5
201
17 11
165
152
.'43
39' 10
3411
3'7
28-0
25-6
235
21 8
201
1810
17 8
16S
'5 9
14 I 1
■4 3
5?
6
43 4
306
256
211 1
196
178
166
156
43'4
38 0
33 10
306
27 '9
256
236
2111
206
'93
181
17 2
.6-3
156
H
61
47 0
330
277
239
2 1 *2
194
I7IO
169
47 0
41-2
36 8
330
3° 1
277
25 6
2J 0
22 2
20- IO
I9S
iS 7
'77
'69
«i
61
5010
35 '9
2910
25-8
22-10
20’ 1 I
>93
l8*I
50 IO
IV6
39 7
35 9
32 6
29 IO
277
25 s
24 O
22 6
2I'3
201
19 0
181
BJ
6 i
54 0
386
32-2
278
24 8
22 6
207;
196
54 9
4 So
42 9
386
35'°
322
299
27 '8
25lOi
24 '3
2210
217
20 6
1 9 6
6?
1
5811
4i 5
347
299
266
24 3
22 4
21 O
58-11
5*7
45 11
4i 5
37 8
34 7
3...
299
27 9
26 'I 1
247 j
23 '3
22 0
210
7
without putting the distance more than just perceptibly
out of focus with a given stop, multiply the diameter of
the stop in hundredths of an inch by the focal length of
the lens.”
Example : — A lens 12 inches focus is used with a stop
11 inches in diameter (// 8). The diameter of the lens in
hundredths of an inch is 150. 150 X 1 foot = 150 feet.
What is meant, then, is that we will have the distance in
very nearly sharp focus when focussing for any object at
the distance of 150 feet, and not near the edge of the
plate ; but that if we focus for a nearer object, the distance,
using a stop of 1 j inches diameter, will be very clearly out
of focus — a thing that may or may not be desirable.
If we know the distance of the object that we intend to
focus for, and wish to know what stop we may use so as
to get the distance just nearly sharp, the rule is as follows : —
Divide the distance of the object by the focus of the lens,
and the result will be — in hundredths of an inch — the size
of the largest stop that will not put the distance con-
spicuously out of focus.
Example : — A lens of 16-inch focus is being used, and
the principal object is at a distance of 100 feet. It is
wanted to know what is the largest stop that may be used,
focussing for the principal object, without putting the
distance more than a little out of focus. Divide 100 feet
by 1-J- feet (16 inches). The result is 75 and 75 inch, or
|-inch is the largest stop that may be used, unless it is
wished to put the distance conspicuously out of focus.
These two rules may be put in the shape of formula?,
eliminating the slight error — equal to once the focal length
— that there is in them both, as follows : —
D == (100 d X/) + /
l = D
100/+/
where —
D = Distance in feet of the nearest object that may be
focussed for without putting the distance conspicuously
out of focus.
474
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Junk 20, 1890.
d, — the diameter of the stop in inches.
f — the focal length of the lens in feet (or the fraction
of a foot).
This table will be readily understood from what goes
before. Instead of heading the columns of figures
“number of feet and inches after which all is in focus,” I
should prefer to head them “distance of the nearest
object that may be focussed for without putting 1 the
distance ’ more than just perceptibly out of focus.” In
using a detective camera for the kind of work that it is
generally used for, and when it is not possible to focus for
each subject separately, the camera should be adjusted,
before starting, by extending it till a distant object is just
perceptibly out of focus with the stop most commonly
used. If this be done, the distances in the tables will,
approximately, be the distances of the objects that will be
in sharpest focus, and all objects within half these distances
of the camera will be within nearly perfect focus.
The table has been constructed on the basis of a “ disc
of confusion ” of tJx,- of an inch. If it is wished to use the
table for lenses of longer focus than any given in it, still
on the basis of a “ disc of confusion ” of rJ-0- of an inch,
the distances must be increased in the ratio of the square
of the focal lengths. Thus, for focal lengths two, three,
or four times those mentioned, the distances must be
multiplied four, nine, or sixteen times. If, on the other
hand, in the case of long-focus lenses, the figures be
increased directly as the focal lengths of the lenses — two,
three, or four times for focal lengths, two, three, or four
times those given — and objects at the distances thus got
be focussed for, it will be found that “ the distance ”
is, in all cases, perceptibly out of focus, but not to an
extent that will generally spoil a picture.
It is true that, if such a rule be adopted, very small
photographs will, when looked at from the distance that
most people find it comfortable to look from, will appear
“sharp all over,” a thing which some photographers con-
sider very inartistic ; but then it must be borne in mind
that photographs taken with lenses of shorter focal length
than the shortest distance that they can be comfortably
looked at from, can never give a true impression in any
case, unless enlarged or looked at through a magnifier.
But if enlargement be resorted to from these small photo-
graphs, the amount of lack of definition in the enlarge-
ments will be the same as if the photographs were taken
direct.
(To be continued.)
Prophetic. — “ I have a lively presentiment that the time will
come when a work will be judged by its merits, and not by the
method of its production ; and then, with some fostering care,
things can and will be done that scarcely believers, and never
unbelievers, yet dream of in their philosophy.” — 0. G. Rej-
LANDER.
Red Glass. — A new red glass has been recently produced in
Germany. Besides its use for the manufacture of bottles,
goblets, and vases of various kinds, it will be found applicable
in photography and in chemists’ and opticians’ laboratories.
This glass is produced by melting in an open crucible the
following ingredients: Fine sand, 2,000 parts; red oxide of
lead (minimum), 400 ; carbonate of potash, 600 ; lime, 100 ;
phosphate of lime, 20 ; cream of tartar, 20 ; borax, 20 ; red
oxide of copper (protoxide), 9; and bioxide of tin, 13 parts.
By a single melting a transparent red glass is said to be
obtained of a very line quality, of which various objects can
be manufactured directly, without the necessity of a second
heating to iuteusk*- the colour.— Scientific American.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
BY GEORGE DAVISON.
III.— The Medal System.
There lias been such a rapid advance in general opinion
regarding reformed regulations for Photographic Exhibi-
tions that it is to be regretted that the full and essential
step of sweeping away the whole prize system has not
been more boldly advised and urged. Several short steps
are, however, frequently safer than a rapid leap, and, no
doubt, the majority will soon recognise that a system of
competition is detrimental to, and should be, as far as
possible, kept away from anything like a serious devotion
to art. What would be thought of an argument which
recommended newspaper or any other poetry competitions
as a good nursing system for a poet of nature ? It is the
same with good art. There is certainly much that is
inferior which must be, and is commonly, classed as art,
and, just as these versifying competitions may develop a
facility in “ doggreling,” so the craze for prizes may tend
to multiply third-rate efficiency. But it leads to imita-
tion and sensationalism in a matter where the best can
only be hoped for from subtle insight, the result of un-
disturbed study and practice. These artificial classifica-
tions into good, bad, and indifferent never yet helped a
man to do anything great. They may possibly have
spurred on certain temperaments in an unhealthy ambi-
tion to be accounted amongst the best photographers ;
but the lesson is soon learnt-that it is possible, by accu-
mulated distinctions, to be accounted a “best” photo-
grapher, and yet to be absolutely innocent of originality
or artistic culture. Competitions may serve the purposes
of modern enterprising newspapers, anxious for an
“advertiser’s circulation;” but, however directed, they
can never forward the highest purposes of art, whether
by photography or any other technique. Perhaps the
worst of all such competitions are those in which a “ set
subject” is given, whether poetry in couplets or stanzas
to be illustrated, or abstract ideas to be schemed in con-
crete form and pictures of this “machinery ” taken. The
artist must work in a way different from this. He has to
arrive at such a state of cultivation that he can under-
stand what Nature in her varying moods says to him
direct, and he may not come to her with preconceived
notions of finding what some one else has first seen and
expressed.
The only arguments which have been forthcoming in
support of a prize system in photographic exhibitions
have been based on love of excitement, on business con-
siderations by a portion of the exhibitors, and on the
anxiety of the promoters for the financial success of their
enterprise. No doubt the sweeping away of awards
would remove much of an inferior kind of interest which
these and other lotteries excite ; but this would be highly
beneficial. It can hardly be believed that men will not
exhibit without the inducement of these vainglorious
competitions. If that be so, the probability is their
exhibits are best not seen publicly at all. The whole
case is fairly met by the rigid exclusion of all distinctly
inferior exhibits. The adoption and efficient carrying
out of this system is, I believe, the best means of im-
proving the influence and effect of our photographic
exhibitions. Such a plan has never yet been adopted in
any notable open exhibition. The element of interest
and competition, it may be said, will remain, inasmuch as
acceptation becomes the award, and this is, to a certain
Jcne 20, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
475
extent, true ; but degree in these and in most questions
is of first-rate importance. The separation is easy, and a
broad classification of good and bad is a not unwhole-
some corrective, and is free from the evils which follow
in the train of a system of “bests” and of hair-splitting
and erratic judging. IIow easy such a wholesale weed-
ing out would be is well-known to all who have had any
experience in comparing and hanging the entiles at any
large exhibition. Those pictures near or upon the
border-line of acceptability would at times, appear to
receive unequal treatment, but this is but a small objec-
tion. Generally speaking, fifty per cent, might well be
spared, and no one have any fair ground for murmuring.
To come to actual example, it would be possible to wax
enthusiastic over what the Exhibition of the Photo-
graphic Society of Great Britain might become under
such a revised and improved system. It would be a
more impressive lesson to photographers, and do greater
credit to photography amongst artists and the cultivated.
Very little of the more harmless interest argued for the
medal system would be lost. The question would be,
“ Are my pictures hung, and where?” 1 venture to think
there would indeed be a wider interest roused amongst
exhibitors and the public, as well as greater service done
to the art. All other considerations are small compared
with the improved average of the exhibition, and the
higher estimation in which it w'ould be held by those
whose valuable opinion soon becomes the popular view.
It is sometimes argued that the experiment has been
tried, and has proved a failure. This is not true. The
experiment has never been made. Certainly, medals
were dispensed with at the exhibition of the Photo-
graphic Society of Great Britain in 1888, but there the
thing began and ended. There were too many concerned
in influencing the exhibition or its management who, for
some personal or business reason, took exception to any
reform in this respect, and with these it has been the
practice to quote the experiment as an instance in support
of their view. But their contention is unjustifiable. The
attempt was but a lame and disorganized one, and the
intention of the change wras in no way explained or
understood. I lay great stress upon that point. If the
aim of the reform had been fully and fairly put before
exhibitors, as it ought to have been, many would have
made special effort, the credit deserved would have been
given, and the exhibition would have retained its
supremacy. Not only was no intimation of the change
giveu, but, if anything, less energy than usual was dis-
played, and the few opponents of the movement seemed
to claim credit for doing their utmost to spoil the exhibi-
tion, a result that was certainly not attained. After
doing their best to ensure failure, they point to the
result as a triumph for their foresight ; but on very in-
sufficient grounds. The number of photographs at that
exhibition was the same as usual, and there was about
the same proportion of amateur and professional
exhibitors; with the exception of half-a-dozen abstentions,
all the customary men were represented, and the average
was but slightly lower than usual. As I have said, the
full reform was not effected at all. The essential portion
of any such scheme — rejection of inferior exhibits — was
altogether omitted. As is the rule, practically all the
entries were accepted. And yet this is referred to as a
fair test. If the members and executive of the Photo-
graphic Society of Great Britain were loyal to their
organization and to photography, and applied definite-
ness and energy in explaining and urging forward the
higher form of exhibition — a rigid weeding out, with care-
ful and tasteful arrangement of the pictures — then the
result could not fail to be superior to the ordinary annual
collection. Other societies in England have already
schemed out such a plan of action, and in Vienna the
excellent club there established is adopting the higher
form of regulations for its 1891 exhibition.
NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC OBJECTIVES*
BY DR. ERNEST ABBE AND DR. PAUL RUDOLPH.
No. I.
Our invention relates to photographic objectives, and the
improvement consists in the construction of a system of
lenses in which the function of collecting the rays of light
forming the image, and that of correcting the spherical and
chromatic aberration, are allotted to distinct parts of the
system.
In constructing photographic objective-glasses in which
the advantage of an extended image-field is to be coupled
with a large, effective aperture, particular difficulties are
encountered in attaining the desired degree of absence of
spherical aberration of the pencils of light that produce
the image. In view of obtaining the extended field aimed
at, objectives of the usual types require to be provided
with lenses of high curvature, and these always give rise
to certain residual spherical aberrations (the so-called
‘ ‘ zones ”) whereby the distinctness of the image is impaired
when the aperture is fully open.
For the purpose of obviating this defect, and simulta-
neously facilitating an impioved correction of the chro-
matic aberration, we compose the objective of two uncor-
rected single collecting lenses, which, in view of the
aplanation of the field, have their convex or more convex
sides turned outwardly, and a correcting-system possessing
an infinite, or a large positive or negative focal length,
so that it does not at all, or but inconsiderably, alter the
focal length of the two collecting lenses combined ; the
said correcting-system being constituted by two or three
single lenses cemented together and arranged beween, and
separate from, the collecting lenses. By means of this
disposition it is possible to considerably diminish the afore-
said residual spherical aberration or “zones.” At the
same time, it gives a wider scope in the selection of the
glasses to be employed iii the manufacture of the lenses
composing the correcting-system. In particular, it fur-
nishes favourable conditions for the application of those
kinds of glass which have the property of almost com-
pletely uniting three colours of the spectrum, or, in
other words, which neutralise the secondary spectrum, and
thus produce a superior degree of chromatic correction.
The construction, therefore, yields comparatively ready
means for the manufacture of such highly achromatic
objectives as are called “apochromatic,” according to the
terminology introduced by Professor Abbe.
The Death of Mb. T. B. Jordan. — The death is reported
of Mr. Thomas Brown Jordan at the age of eighty-two.
Mr. Jordan, who was born in Bristol in 1807, began life as an
artist, and, after turning his attention to physical science, he
established himself in Falmouth as a mathematical instrument
maker. In 1838 Mr. Jordan devised an instrument for record-
ing by photography the variations of the barometric column.
About the same date he invented a declination magnetograph
and a self-recording actinometer.
• This is a patent specification issued in England last Wednesday.
476
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 20, 1890.
— — i
NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES.*
BY DR. PAUL Rt’DDI.PlI.
No. r
My invention relates to photographic objectives, and the
improvement consists in the construction of the objective
of two separate systems of lenses, the individual members
whereof have, relatively to each other, particular refrac-
tive properties.
A main difficulty to be overcome in the construction of
photographic objectives, besides realising the other numerous
conditions subject to the purpose which these objectives
have to serve, consists in sufficiently compensating the
astigmatism of the obliquely incident pencils of light, and
in removing the indistinctness of the marginal portions of
the field resulting from such astigmatism. And, in fact,
all the photographic objectives constructed so far possess
more or less this deficiency, that with an approximately I
plane field the focus of a group of rays within a primary
(meridional) section of an oblique pencil of rays, remains at
a greater distance than the focus of the group of rays with-
in a secondary (sagittal) section of the same pencil.
After a course of investigations on the conditions whence
results this anomaly, and the means of mitigating its effects,
the photographic objective forming the subject of this
specification was arrived at. It is mainly a dissymmetri-
cal combination of lenses composed of two distinct systems
of single lenses cemented together. This combination of
lenses is characterised by the concurrence of the following
two properties : —
1. That in one of the two distinct systems the positive
member (collecting lenses) has a smaller, in the other
system, however, a greater refractive index than the nega-
tive member (dispersing lenses) cemented thereto.
2. That each system in itself is approximately achro-
matised, i.e. , that the chromatic aberration of each of the
systems, expressed by the difference of the reciprocals of its
focal lengths for two different colours, is small as compared
with the chromatic aberration of a single crown glass lens
having the focal length of the entire objective, the latter
chromatic aberration being measured after the same manner
as the former.
A combination of lenses realising both these require-
ments simultaneously presents particular advantages. On
the one hand, it admits of the astigmatic differences being
removed without rendering the application of more than
two distinct systems necessary, and, on the other hand,
it yields favourable conditions for satisfying all the other
requirements connected with the correction of photo-
graphic objectives.
The above defined contrariant combination of the two
distinct systems composing the objective furnishes the
simplest means for compensating the astigmatic differences
of oblique pencils. This is due to the fact that a system
composed of lenses cemented together, and in which the
collecting lens has a greater refractive index than the
dispersing lens, gives rise to astigmatic differences opposite
to those caused by a system of lenses the collecting lens
whereof possesses a lower refractive index than the
dispersing lens.
With the mode of compounding both parts of the
objective as indicated above, it is, therefore, only necessary
to choose the ratios of the single lenses in both these
parts in such a manner that the opposed astigmatic
• This is a patent issued in this country last Wednesday by Dr. Paul
Rudolph, mathematician, of Jena.
differences are of the same magnitude, in view of attaining
compensation of this astigmatism, or an astigmatic cor-
rection of the entire objective.
But in order that the realisation of this condition does
not enhance the difficulty of achromatising the whole
objective, it is essential that the objective possesses also
that second property as defined at the beginning of this
specification, i.e., it is necessary to effect the contrariant
composition of the two separate systems in such a
manner that at the same time each system may be in
itself achromatised. It is, however, neither particularly
advantageous nor in all cases practicable to perfectly
achromatise the individual members of a double objective ;
for the mere thicknesses which must be given to the lenses
may, in each member of the objective, necessitate deviations
from achromatism amounting to about one-fourth of the
chromatic difference of the reciprocals of the focal
lengths of a single crown glass lens having the focal
length of the whole objective. But it is of practical
importance that the mode of composing the systems of
lenses does not in itself involve any limitations even to
their approximate achromatisation, and that it does not
render inevitable still greater chromatic differences than
are required to meet other conditions.
This last requirement may be satisfied by a suitable
choice of the combinations of glass which are employed
to form the two parts of the objective. The following
observations may explain the principles which govern the
selection of suitable glasses.
Those pairs of glasses (crown and flint) which are
generally resorted to in the construction of achromatic
lenses (and which a few years ago constituted the sole
means of obtaining achromatism) possess this charac-
teristic feature, that a higher refractive index invariably
implies a greater relative dispersive power. (Under the
term dispersive power is to be understood, as usual, the
quotient A n i.e., the difference between the refractive
n— 1,
indices for two different colours divided by one of these
indices, or by the mean index of refraction minus one.)
A pair of glasses of this kind — which may be said to be
of a normal character — admits of the application of
positive (collecting) systems, if achromatism is to be
attained, only under the condition that the positive
element has a lower refractive index than the negative.
Recent progress in glass manufacture has, however,
added to the list of optical glasses other kinds of glasses
which admit of such pairs being selected, in which the
relation of the refractive indices and the relative disper-
sive powers is just the opposite as in the other case, i.e., in
which the glass having the higher refractive index does
not also possess the greater, but, on the contrary, the
smaller relative dispersive power. Such pairs of glasses
maybe said to be of an abnormal character, in contradis-
tinction to the first-named class.
The application of pairs of glasses of the last-named or
abnormal character admits of the production of systems
with positive focal lengths in which, without prejudice to
the attainment of achromatism, the more refractory medium
acts as the positive (collecting) element.
There can be little doubt, Mr. Lockyer believes, that in the
Parthenon the greatest function was when the chryselephan-
tine statue of Pallas Athene was lighted up by the rising sun.
In Greece the eastern horizon was used, in Egypt both east and
west.
Jdne 20, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
4/
PHOTOGRAPHY AT GREENWICH OBSERVA-
TORY*
BY TIIE ASTRONOMER ROYAL.
The tube for the 28-inch refractor, which is of special
construction, has been made by Sir II. Grubb in prepara-
tion for the object-glass which is now being figured. The
experimental 4-inch object-glass referred to in the last
report was mounted on the Sheepshanks' equatorial, and
eighteen photographs were taken with it last summer, the
lenses being separated for photographic achromatism,
and the crown lens reversed to correct for the spherical
aberration introduced by the separation. The best dis-
tance of separation was determined, and the photographs
obtained were found to be quite satisfactory. The com-
pletion of the 28-inch object-glass has been delayed,
presumably by the pressure of work on the 18-inch
photographic telescopes, which have engaged so much of
Sir II. Grubb’s attention, but it is hoped that the new
refractor will be ready for mounting very shortly.
The 12|-inch refractor, which will be dismounted
shortly, would be very useful for the observation of comets,
occultations, and phenomena, for which it is well
adapted. It might with advantage be mounted on the
Passed equatorial in substitution for the much heavier
tube and cradle of that instrument, the provision for
rotation of the mirror and tube (which necessarily adds
greatly to the weight) being dispensed with. The tube
of the refractor would, I believe, provide a good attach-
ment for a large mirror, 3m. 48 (llft 8in) in focal length,
which Mr. Common has generously offered to make for
the Observatory. Reference has already been made to
the expediency of mounting the Lassell equatorial at a
greater elevation above the ground.
The 13-inch photographic refractor, with 10-inch
guiding telescope by Sir II. Grubb, has been lately
mounted in the new 18-foot dome over the computing
rooms, and one or two trial photographs have been taken
with it. The definition appears to be very good for shirs
near the centre of the field, but the marginal images
might, perhaps, be improved by a slight readjustment of
the lenses.
For determinations of motions of approacli or reces-
sion of stars 457 measures have been made of the dis-
placement of the F line in the spectra of 26 stars, and
20 of the b line in the spectra of 5 stars, besides com-
parisons with the spectra of the moon, the sun, or the
sky as a check on the general accuracy of the results.
Observations of Algol on seven nights confirm as far as
they go the previous results indicating orbital motion.
The observations of Spica made in past years are found by
Professor Bakhuyzen to be tolerably well represented on
the hypothesis of orbital motion with a period of
41 Ob- 856, agreeing well with that recently discovered by
Hr. Vogel’s photographic method. As the series of
observations with the 12f-inch refractor (extending over
fifteen years), will be shortly brought to a conclusion, it
is proposed to discuss them with a view to the detec-
tion of orbital motion, whether of long or short period,
there being indications of this in the case of several
stars.
In the year ending 1890, May 10th, photographs of the
sun have been taken at Greenwich on 212 days, and of
these 439 have been selected for preservation, besides
* A portion of the official report of the Astronomer Royal, issued last
Monday,
thirteen photographs with double images of the sun, for
determination of zero of position.
For the year 1889 Greenwich photographs have been
used on 173 days, and photographs from India and Mauri-
tius filling up the gaps in the series on 187 days, making
a total of 360 out of 365 on which photographs have
been measured in this year.
The sun has been free from spots on 211 days in the
year 1889, the longest spotless period being October 23rd
to December 11th. There were also eight other spotless
periods of more than a fortnight. The mean daily spotted
area in 1889 was 78, as compared with 89 for 1888; but
the mean daily area for the latter half of the year was
nearly twice as great as for the earlier half, being 103 as
compared with 53. Again, the mean distance of spots
from the equator was 5°-46 in the first six months, and
14° 72 for the last six ; and both these facts thus point to
the middle of the year 1889 as a well defined date for the
sun-spot minimum.
The photographic reductions are complete to 1890,
January 6th, and the copy for press to 1889, December
31st, is in the printer’s hands.
Photographs from India and Mauritius have been
received from the Solar Physics Committee, and have
been measured as far as 1890, February 17th and Febru-
ary 14th respectively.
As regards the further discussion of the results of
former years : —
Ledgers of the positions and areas of spots for the
years 1882, 1883, and 1884 are being formed. Similar
ledgers for the years 1878-1881 (including the results
from the Indian photographs, measured under the direc-
tion of the Solar Physics Committee) have been com-
pleted, and the mean results formed.
Melbourne photographs, available for filling up gaps in
the series in the years 1875 and 1876, have been measured,
and the reduction attempted; but it appears, from an
examination of the results, that the information received
as to the orientation of the plates is incorrect, and until
further particulars are obtained from Melbourne the reduc-
tions cannot be proceeded with. All the available photo-
graphs taken at Harvard College during the same years
have now been measured and completely reduced, 64
having been measured in the past year.
The discussion of personality in measurements of
8-inch photographs by 9 observers, and the discussion of
probable error in measurements of 4-inch photographs,
have been completed and published in the Photographic
Results for 1888.
Soluble Saccharate of Inox. — Athenstaedt’s process is
given as follows in the Moniteur ScientiJique : A solution of a
ferric salt, 1 to 100, is precipitated by a similar solution of
ammonia or fixed alkali, taking care to operate at a temperature
of about 10° C., and in all cases below 15r C. The precipitate
must be washed rapidly, in the dark, with distilled water having
also a temperature between 10° and 1 5? C. The ferric
hydrate thus produced is then mixed with powdered sugar in a
quantity so regulated that the dry preparation will contain
three parts of metallic iron to one hundred parts of sugar.
The mixture of hydrated ferric oxide and sugar is maintained
at the boiling point until the oxide of iron becomes dissolved in
the syrup. The dry product is obtained by drying in vacuo at
a low temperature. This saccharate of iron (a most improper
name, as it contains no saccharic acid) may be kept in solution
made by diluting the mixture when cold by pure distilled
water. We are told that these solutions are clear, and that
they remain so indefinitely, without any further addition or
any special precautions. — Burgoyne't Monthly Circular.
■178
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
i&otcs.
Au interesting article in Harper's on modern Erench
painters reveals the fact that there is a rival to Mr.
Muybridge in the person of M. Morot, whose eye is so
sensitive and so educated that ho can follow the
movements of a horse almost as quickly as does an
instantaneous camera. This faculty has led M. Morot
to be accused of painting the movements of horses as
they have been ascertained by instantaneous photo-
graphs ; but, in point of fact, he has never used
photography at all ; indeed, he had already made his
observations of the movements of the horse before
Muybridge gave to the world the result of his remark-
able experiments. M. Morot, when a youth, spent
nearly all his time in the manege of a friend of his
family, who was a horse trainer. The result of his
observations was the discovery of much error on the
part of artists in drawing horses in motion. He dis-
cussed the matter with the riding-masters of Nancy,
had fine sand laid down in the manege to catch the
foot-prints, and, in order to facilitate his observations,
invented a little apparatus composed of a cardboard
tube, with two horizontal slits in it, one exactly
opposite the other. This tube, held before his eyes,
and turned sharply with the fingers, formed a shutter
or “ obturator,” on the same principle as the shutter
of a photographic camera, closing the field of vision in
about the fortieth part of a second. By means of this
apparatus he watched the movements of the horse and
analysed them, and each element of the movement
impressed itself upon his finely-cultivated retina so
sharply that he was able to draw it immediately from
memory.
Thus, thanks to the extraordinary sensitiveness of
his eye, aided by this little cardboard tube and a patient
pencil, he discovered nearly the whole theory of the
horse’s movements while he was still a boy; but M.
Morot was not such a pedant as to adhere to the
observations of what might be called abnormal vision.
In painting horses in movement, some compromise has
to be made between microscopic observations and
ordinary eyesight . He therefore gets over the difficulty
by avoiding in the principal figures all intermediary
elements of movement ; he selects rather the beginning
or the end. In the confused mass of a cavalry charge,
he will paint one horse completely, and the rest of the
troop will be bits of horses, elements, and movements,
all the phases which scientific analysis gives, and this
agglomeration and detail create the illusion of a vision
of rushing horses.
Some sharp-eyed critics have been discovering in the
pictures of the ltoyal Academy further incongruities,
one of which was alluded to in these pages a fortnight
ago. The lighting of Mr. Albert Moore’s picture “A
Summer ^ight’ has been called in question as not
[Jcne 20, 1890.
being like anything yet seen in nature. Mr. Chevallier
Tayler’s “ The Last Blessing ” is also declared to be
inaccurate. The priest, in this picture, is simply hold-
ing up two fingers, whereas the whole hand should be
raised, as the use of two fingers is only permitted to
eminent dignitaries of the Church. Mr. Wyllie’s pic-
ture of “Davy Jones’s Locker” displays a slight
ignorance of chemistry. The large anchor in the fore-
ground is painted a red rusty colour, but iron under
water does not take a red rust ; it is only when exposed
to the air that the red oxide is formed. It must be
very disagreeable to artists when they find that
chemistry cannot be made to correspond with art. But
the anchor in question makes an effective piece of
colour, and Mr. Wyllie’s defiance of chemical laws is to
be condoned on this score.
The death of Count Ostorog, better known as
“ Walery,” is announced. The event came as a shock
to a numerous circle of friends, as until recently
he was in the prime of life and, apparently, in the
best of health. Walery was a photographer and artist
of no ordinary skill, and of unbounded energy. His
business was recently converted into a limited liability
company. It is the brother of Walery who has accom-
panied the expedition of the Chartered British South
African Company on a special photographic mission.
Some interesting pictures of Matabeleland, and probably
its monarch, Lobenguela, may be expected.
Until last week, it was not certain whether the Ober-
Ammergau Passion Play was a dramatic performance
pure and simple, or in some fashion a religious ceremony.
An incident which happened a few days ago must, how-
ever, settle the point once and for all. A prominent
journalist distinguished himself by an excess of
zeal, which the authorities regarded as an act of
piracy. In order to provide his friends with repro-
ductions of the scenes, he seated himself close to the
stage, at one of the performances, with a photographic
apparatus. He then went to work ; but unfortunately,
Caiaphas caught sight of him, and sent a messenger at
once to stop further proceedings. Following on the
heels of the first came a second messenger, demanding
that the plates should be given up. The journalist
refused, and was therefore taken before Caiaphas —
who happened to be the Burgomaster of Ober-
Ammergau — and charged with having trespassed
upon the monopoly, for which certain concessionaires
had paid a large sum of money. It so happened that
the amateur was able to prove that he had communi-
cated with the concessionaires, and had obtained per-
mission. The result was a happy release, with an
abundance of apologies.
Sometime ago, attention was called in the News to
the experiments which have been made on the Con-
tinent, showing that out of a number of married
couples photographed, and of an equal number of
June 20, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
479
brothers and sisters, it was found that a much larger
proportion of married people resembled each other
than did the brothers and sisters. The topic has emerged
from the circle of photographic gossip, and has been
discussed in the daily papers. A lively article
appeared in the Daily Telegraph on Monday, in which
the subject is treated in whimsical fashion. In some
respects, however, the arguments of the writer are
incomplete. For instance, he asks — “May a plain
man catch the infection of loveliness from his pretty
wife after ten years or twenty of companionship ? ”
This theory, the writer goes on to say, gives certainly
a great advantage to the owner of feminine loveliness.
This is all very well ; but what about the other side
of the picture ? May not feminine loveliness contract
a few of the masculine defects? We also fail to
note any moral deduced by the writer from his
speculations. Obviously, if anything is to be learnt
from the resemblance between married people, it is
the bearing which this resemblance or want of
resemblance may have upon happiness in married
life. Would it not be worth while, therefore, for the
legislature to insist upon the principals in divorce cases
being photographed, so that some kind of data might
be arrived at on this interesting point ?
M. Gaston Tissandier, in an article on Hash-light
photography in La Nature, gives a hint which those
who are fond of this pastime will do well to
remember. He strongly urges the sitters not to place
their eyes in the direction of the light, as they are
almost certain to shut their eyes at the moment of
exposure, and the effect in the picture will be that
they are either blind or asleep. People to be photo-
graphed ought to look on one side, or better still,
take an attitude of reading a book or looking at an
album. The latter suggestions do not strike us as par-
ticularly novel. The piquancy of flash-light photo-
graphs lies in their unconventionality. It is quite
possible, with a little ingenuity, to get pictures of
domestic life where the figures shall not appear
asleep, without resorting to the very much played-out
book. In flash-light photography by means of
magnesium powdor, as in photographing by the electric
light, one of the chief problems demanding attention
is the suitable diffusion of the light.
The notes in reference to photography and the Tower
of London have done good. They have made known
the fact that the Tower has been photographed,
although not a single copy is to be found in the place
where one would naturally expect it — namely, within
Tower itself. It is to be feared there is too much
truth in Mr. Brooks’s complaint contained in his letter
of last week, that the photographic print trade has
been spoilt, so far as the producer is concerned,
by excessive competition. But this competition
ought not to affect the sale of photographs in the
Tower.
The application of photography to household decora-
tion is gradually making headway, and we have lately
noticed, with some interest, that there are displayed in
many furniture shops tasty little screens, over-mantles,
&c., in which are spaces for pictures. This is a far
more sensible way of utilising phot jgraphs than is the
custom of putting them into albums, because visitors
to one’s house can look at them or not as they please.
They are too often given an album of pictures to
examine just as if they were children, and required
something to keep them quiet. We have occasionally
experienced the tortures of looking through an amateur’s
album, and have found it very like, but not so enjoyable,
as the room of horrors at Madame Tussaud’s.
Now, if photographs are used for decorative purposes,
only the very best are utilised, and if one of them has
a premature attack of yellow jaundice, it is instantly
removed, and a fresh copy takes its place. The owner
watches over them with care, and they are not suffered
to run to seed. But albums get neglected, and the
majority of the pictures iu them are often not fit to be
seen.
Another field for photographic decoration is found in
fanlights over doors, lamp shades, or, indeed, in any place
where coloured glass interspersed with transparencies is
admissible. The glass work is not difficult to lead
together, and the metal grooving can be purchased at a
cheap rate at many glaziers’. An article in an American
paper was lately devoted to this subject, and it pro-
fessed to give full directions whereby the amateur
painter and glazier could put this kind of glass work
together ; but, strange to say, it omitted to state the
kind of flux to use for soldering the lead work. The
best that we have tried is Russian tallow, although
rosin will act nearly as well. The pattern to be worked
out in the glass is first of all drawn full size on paper,
and while this pattern lies on a table the glass is cut,
piece by piece, and fitted above it into the lead work.
When one side is soldered, the entire mass is turned
over, and the joints on the other side are joined up with
the soldering iron.
Some persons are very fond of complaining that
cameras and lenses are far too expensive, and that one
often pays too dearly for the privilege of having a lens
bearing a well-known name. But they forget that this
name is a guarantee of value, and that some time hence,
when, perchance, they are anxious to sell or exchange,
it will give the article a far higher selling price than
would be possible without it. These grumblers would
be surprised to learn the cost of some of the best
material used in camera construction. One well-known
maker bought the other day a log of very hand-
somely figured mahogany. It was as hard as iron, and
a camera made with it would be calculated to stand
the vagaries of climate in any part of the world. The
price paid for it was at the rate of three shillings and
four pence per square inch.
480
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 20, 1890.
THE GROSVENOR GALLERY.
BY REV. F. C. LAMBERT, M. A.
The visitor who inspects this collection of work
chiefly with a view to increasing his own store of sugges-
tions, and gatherings hints for his own work with the
camera, will not find many striking pictures.
The first one will probably be No. 31 (“Youth and
Age,” E. E. Simmons), an old man nursing a sleeping
child ; the group, with its appropriate cottage surroundings,
skilfully treated and truthfully rendered, with a back
lighting through the cottage window. Subjects of this
character are among the most suggestive to the camera
man in search for suitable subjects.
No. 36 (Portrait of 1). Q. Orchardson, R.A., by him-
self). It is most unfortunate that the nightmare-produc-
ing expression “ greenery-yallery ” should be so inextri-
cably interwoven with the name of the Grosvenor Gallery,
because it has a flavour on the tongue which one would
gladly get rid of when there is presented to one’s notice
such admirable workmanship as this portrait undoubtedly
contains.
No. 46 (“ Goodbye,” E. Harris), a clever treatment of
strong outside daylight, and also cottage interior lighted
by a small window. The truth of subdued, light tones is
carefully worked out.
No. 72 (“ Lustra,” II. .T. Hudson) is noteworthy forits
treatment of some of the flesh parts in shade.
No. 90 (“Study of a Head,” John da Costa), a small
but admirable piece of careful, straightforward work. An
old woman’s wrinkled face under a light-tinted sun bonnet,
in words does not sound anything worth painting; but it is
not the subject, but the truth of the subject, that makes a
picture of what might easily be a very ordinary sketch.
No. 115. Here we have another “painter painted,”
palette and all— viz., J. C. Noble, A.R.S.A. — by John
Pettie, R.A. The portrait is not altogether restful for
the eye ; the strong light on the forehead, on the collar,
and edge of the aforesaid palette all seem to claim attention
one by one. The moral for portrait photographers,
anyhow, is, do not have too many high lights struggling
with each other for the observer’s attention.
No. 127 (“Finished Sketch of the Traitor,” by the
same artist as No. 115). The title of this picture will
convey a new idea to those who have followed in the
ways of their forefathers in thinking that a study was an
unfinished whole, while a sketch was a finished part ; but
■with or without a title, there is much good work in the
picture, even if the outlines of some of the limbs of the
figures are striking.
No one will think of leaving this gallery without looking
at S. P. Hall’s remarkable little picture of the royal
wedding party of July last (No. 141). On this party
Mr. Stanley turns his back— or, rather, someone has so
arranged the portrait of him (140) by Miss E. M. Merrick.
On no account must be overlooked a pencil sketch of the
Marquess of Salisbury, by the Marchioness of Granby.
It is very seldom indeed that one sees such a clever
sketch as this — a sketch truly it is, but one which drives
home the lesson that a few lines in the right place are worth
infinitely more than a million of them in the wrong place.
(Retouchers, please note this in the largest mental capitals.)
Passing into the Second Room, 149 (“The First of
September,” D. Sadler) claims attention, and calls for
inspection all over the canvas. It is a specimen of good
workmanship, and too much of it — i.e., so much detailed
subject that it becomes a matter of effort to concentrate
one’s mind on the theme. Above this is 150 (“ Court of
Criminal Appeal,” Sir A. Clay), portraits of some six
well-known “lawyers,” all very fine and large. The
artist had by no means an easy task before him, and when
all the circumstances of the case are grasped, it must be
admitted that he has produced a creditable and memorable
piece of work. Note carefully how the matter of variety,
with unity of pose, has been worked out — befitting
expressions as portrait studies, disposal of twelve hands !
No. 164 (“Washing Day,” John Reid) brings up the
thought, “ too many figures ; some are sure to move and
spoil it.”
No. 165 (“Miss Maude Millett,” C. W. Bartlett) is an
instructive study of the camera -artist. Note the effect
of a side light on the flesh and white drapery ; parts of
the flesh seem almost too transparent for a portrait.
No. 174 (“ Oporto,” C. N. Ilemy), a lot of good work,
broadly treated in a simple scale of colour, resulting in
good harmonious work, and not too much focus either.
No. 182 (“Striking a Bargain,” G. King) is just the
thing for camera men ; many obvious hints may herefrom
be gathered. Note and study this picture well. Now
look at No. 155, over doorway (“ Portrait”), and observe
the effect of tilting the head the same way as the back of
the chair tilts over ; one of the arms, too, is more or less
parallel. Another obvious note.
No. 205 (“A Moment’s Rest,” W. E. Norton). Al-
though there is a general feeling of wishing for a bit
more focus somewhere about the picture, yet, despite that
unsatisfied longing, it is a painting of decided merit, and
well worth the study of any artist. Of the portraits in
this room, No. 203, by Hon. J. Collier, and No. 187,
by F. M. Skipworth, are especially deserving of useful
study.
In the Third Room, No. 239 (“A Silver Mist Melting
in Softest light,” R. H. Carter), a group of fisher folk in
an early morning mist, sorting and packing their catch, is
a splendid picture. Here we have a reply, in part, to the
.advocates of the extreme fuzzy school on the one hand,
and the fj 64 school on the other, showing that it is not
impossible to reproduce all the feeling of softness and
distance, subdued detail, apart from fuzzy outline, and
also that there may be plenty of detail, and even bright
light, with a mist, without wiry crispness everywhere or
anywhere. The unity of the whole picture and the melt-
ing of one plane into another, the gradual diminution of
detail, are all points to be studied and remembered.
No. 248 (“ Room in Brussels’ Almshouse,” 11. Yos) is
more pleasing as a collection of many studies than as a
whole ; the long line of figures introduces a difficulty not
easy to overcome. The picture is in a low key, and
broadly treated.
No. 259 (“Four Jolly Sandboys,” Miss J. R. Taylor).
This is the sort of subject in which a camera-man can
get a long start, and it is from photographs (of the right
sort) that artists might now and again take a hint in this
kind of work.
Among the studies of the nude, we should select
No. 288 (“A Water Baby,” Hon. J. Collier), and No. 185
(“ Boy and Dryad,” C. N. Kennedy), as being worthy of
considerable study,
No. 320 (“ Portrait,” L. Ward) prodneesa curious effect,
and for the moment gives one the idea that the man is
“standing on nothing” against a rather strongly tinted
background.
June 20, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
481
No. 327 (“The Ramesum, ” J. Varley) shows .admirably
the effect of strong sunlight and sharp-edged shadow,
without the soot and whitewash effect usually produced by
the shutter maniac.
No. 341 (“ Javanaise Dancers,” A. Melville) gives one
rather a shock. The exclamation, “ What a splendid
frame ! ” is almost irresistible.
No. 350 (“An Interior,” Miss C. F. Jones), a skilful
piece of work. Observe that the darker parts are not
without a due share of detail. (Expose your next interior
/«%•)
Nos. 337 and 360 (Landscapes, R. B. Nisbet, R.S.W.),
pictures of “almost nothing at all,” and yet pictures.
Why ? Because there is truth of tone, true values, with-
out which a painting is diagrammatic (if that), and lacking
in the true essential element of every art, viz., truth of
proportion , not only of drawing, but also of detail , of lone
(light power), and tint (colour power).
One more picture, and one to linger over — viz., No. 371
(“The Missing Boat,” David Green). It is not easy, nor
is it pleasant, work seeking for a fault in a picture like
this, which demands, and is entitled to, much in the way
of praise. Some may say part of the immediate foreground
is “to let”; and yet even its simplicity by no means
detracts from the point of interest. Note the simple lines
of the general scheme — harmony of figure-group of fisher
folk, simplicity of their belongings, boat huts, and cloud
drawing ; the feeling of air, space, and largeness in
the distance — all contribute in producing a picture of
considerable power, and one which owes much to its parts
being kept in true proportion throughout.
Xottcts: of JJoofcs.
Magnesium Flash-Light Photography, by Robert Slings-
by. ( London , Marion and Co., 1890.)
This book is written for those who intend to take up Hash-
light photography in a serious way, and not to take an
occasional “ chalky ” picture by way of pastime. The
pages are of large size, to accommodate specimen illustra-
tions, and the literary contents are limited, but practical
and to the point. The author tells how many more flash-
lamps are necessary as the size of the apartment, hall, or
theatre increases ; how and where to place the lamps ; howto
give a large number of flashes simultaneously, and other
miscellaneous information, the result of practical experi-
ence, for Mr. Slingsby has given special attention to this
class of work. Much better pictorial and artistic results
can be obtained by flash-light photography than occa-
sional dabblers therein are prone to suspect. We con-
sider Mr. Slingsby’s book to be of practical value to pro-
fessional and other photographers of the present time,
and that it is the forerunner of a class of such works
likely to appear when the system of flash-light photo-
graphy is more elaborated.
On page 15, Mr. Slingsby quotes from the Photo-
graphic News of January 24th last a formula for
making an explosive flash-light powder, containing per-
chlorate and chlorate of potash, which Professor Max
Muller, of Weimar — as our German correspondent stated —
“asserts” not to be so dangerous as a mixture containing
no perchlorate. However this may be, we think the
mixture to appear so dangerous upon theoretical grounds
that, like all others containing chlorate of potash, the
ingredients should be powdered separately, should not
be kept mixed in bulk, but that only enough should be
mixed at a time, with the feather end of a quill pen, to
give the desired flash when exploded, otherwise deadly
results may follow.
Photographischer Zeitvertreib. By Hermann Schnauss.
( Ed. Liesegang, Diisseldorf, 1890.)
The matter of this work is much more interesting and
instructive than its title — “ Photographic Pastime ” — might
lead one to suppose. It is a description of such of the less
practised photographic methods, including some that might
be called “ dodges,” as are within the reach of an amateur,
or of the professional photographer who likes to do some-
thing out of the regular groove of photographic business,
without the necessity for any special costly apparatus —
anything, in fact, that cannot be easily improvised with a
little application and goodwill.
The first part of the work relates to the best means to
adopt in photographing flowers, paintings, animals, snow
scenes, and moving water. Then follows the photographing
of electrical discharges, both natural and as produced by
dynamic and other artificial sources. A very curious illus-
tration is that of a seal photographed by its electrical con-
dition, and not by any illumination thrown upon it.
We next come to a description of the means to be
adopted for taking photographs — portraits particularly —
by night. Here, in addition to a description of mag-
nesium lamps, is a diagram showing the positions of the
sitter, camera, light, and shield to protect the lens from
rays proceeding directly from the flash.
In the next chapter, on photographic curiosities, we find
doubles, spirit photographs, and caricatures dealt with and
explained. A more serious question is then taken up,
that of combined portraiture as introduced by Galton, the
necessary simple appliances for which are fully illustrated.
Following this chapter is one on photographing by means of
what is called a pin-hole camera. Details of the method
are given, but the illustration of a pin-hole photograph
accompanying it has doubtless suffered in the process of
conversion into a surface block necessary for use with the
letter press, as it is not nearly such a perfect result as
some that we have seen produced in this manner.
The tables given of time of exposure for different sizes
of pinhole, and what stands for length of focus, should
be found useful to any who may think of trying this
method of producing photographs. Photographing by
the aid of a telescope is a chapter which may be turned
to practical account. Without going into astronomical
photography, it not unfrequently happens that it is
desired to obtain a larger image of some distant object
than can be got with the lenses at hand.
The stroboscope, which is next described, requires
more elaborate apparatus for the production of the neces-
sary photographic negatives, but the same cannot be said
of the photo -kaleidoscope pictures that follow in the work.
We have not exhausted the contents of the book, which
includes printing with floral borders, printing direct from
natural objects without the intervention of the camera,
and other matters calculated to interest those readers
who are not satisfied with merely treading the most beaten
roads, but find pleasure in exploring the bye-paths
which lead to results of a more unaccustomed character.
The work is plentifully illustrated, and in such a way as
to materially facilitate a ready grasping of the methods
described.
482
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 20, 1890.
CONVERSAZIONE OF TIIE ROYAL SOCIETY.
Breath Figures, and their Relation to Photography —
Reversal of the Image in Breath Figures — The
Rising Sun and Egyptian Temples — Sun Gods —
Photographs of Wild Beasts — Photography and
Forestry— Astronomical Photography — More Photo-
graphs of the Eggs of the Great Auk — Platinotype
Portraits— Tornado Photographs.
Last Wednesday night the annual ladies’ conversazione of
the Royal Society was held at Burlington House. The
president, Sir George Stokes, and his daughter, Mrs.
Humphrey, received the guests. Among those present
were : —
Dr. John Evans (treasurer), Professor Michael Foster and Lord
Rayleigh (secretaries), Dr. Archibald Geikie (foreign secretary),
the Lord Chancellor, Duke and Duchess of Sutherland, Earl
and Countess of Rosse, Earl Compton, Lord Bratnwell, Lord
Thurlow, Lord Sackville Cecil, Lord Arthur ltussell, Lord
Basing, Lord Coleridge, Mr. A. J. Balfour, Lord Justice Fry,
Bishop of Limerick, Admiral Sir John Hay, Admiral Sir George
Richards, General Sir Peter Lumsden, General Sir Lewis Pelly,
Sir James Caird, Sir Lyon Playfair, Mr. Justice Stirling, Sir
William Thomson, Sir Heury Barkly, Sir James Paget, Sir
George Paget, Sir Henry Roscoe, Sir James Douglass, General
Sir Beauchamp Walker, Sir John Lubbock, Sir Henry Rawlinson,
Sir William Bowman, Sir F. Burton, Sir Frederick Abel,
Archdeacon Farrar, Mr. Calderon, R.A., Professor Storey-
Maskelyne, M.P., Professor Norman Lockyer, Sir George
Baden- Powell, Mr. W. H. Preece, Sir R. E. Wei by, Sir Benjamin
Baker, Mr. G. A. Spottiswoode, Sir William Savory, Sir
Frederick Bratmvell, Mr. Moulton, Q.C., Dr. J. H. Gladstone,
Sir Charles Wilson, Mr. H. H. Johnston, Sir Frederick Pollock,
Professor and Mrs. Sidgwick, Dr. Quain, Rev. J. R. Diggle,
Dr. Ogle, Mrs. W. K. Clifford, Miss M. Shaw-Lefevre, Miss
Kensington, Miss Clough, Miss Sellars, and Lady Ashburton.
Mr. W. B. Croft, M.A., exhibited some breath figures,
showing that polished surfaces placed near to bodies in
low relief often take an impression of the detail, which is
made visible by breathing upon the surface. The period
of exposure varies in different circumstances.
Mr. Croft says: — “ 1. A coin is lightly pressed on a
freshly split surface of mica for thirty seconds ; the mica
takes a breath figure of the detail of the coin. 2. Paper
printed upon one side has lain for ten hours between two
plates of glass ; the print appears in white letters on
both. Part of this phenomenon, although not with
print, was noticed by Moser in 1840. 8. Sometimes
the print appears in black letters ; the same impression
may change from white to black. 4. Coins are put on
the two sides of a piece of glass and electrified for two
minutes ; each side has a perfect impression of that side of
the coin which faced it. An electrotype plate may be
reproduced iu a similar way. These effects were partly
indicated by Karsten in 1840. 5. An electric spark is
sent across glass. Five superposed bands appear, black
and white, of decreasing breadths, as well as three per-
manent scars. Riess, 1840. 6. The microscope shows
water particles over the whole surface, larger or smaller
as the effect is black or white.”
A strong point of interest in these breath figures, from
a photographic point of view, is that they arc liable to
something resembling “over-exposure” when the electrical
action is continued too long, for then the image is entirely
or nearly obliterated. Upon suitably rubbing the plates,
however, the image comes out, .as if the rubbing had
removed some film ; in this latter respect there is as yet
no parallel in photography, so far as we know, although,
when church windows are “ overdone ” and rich iu fog i
and halation, rubbing down the surface of the negative
with turpentine will usually bring pictorial details into
view. A still stronger point of interest about the breath
figures is, that sometimes reversed images are obtained ;
sometimes the image will come out as a positive, some-
times as a negative, and Mr. Croft tells us that he does not
know the conditions governing the reversal. These
phenomena too much resemble some of those familiar in
photography not to make it reasonable to suppose that
they bear some relation to each other. From a theoretical
point of view, they are of interest ; in the case of breath
figures, at all events, the image is not reversed by liberated
bromine.
The breath images are sometimes full of exquisitely
sharp detail, and they are somewhat stable, for Mr. Croft
keeps them stored in plate boxes, like those for negatives,
and they do not seem to fade. Dipping the plates in
water and wiping them with a cloth smudges the images,
but does not remove them. They can, however, be
removed by rubbing the plate hard with damp leather.
To get a breath image of a coin, the following method is
adopted : — A piece of patent plate glass is taken and
washed, and wiped clean ; such perfect cleaning as usual
in photography is not necessary. Another sheet of glass
is taken and laid upon the table ; a slip of tinfoil is then
laid on the sheet, then comes the piece of clean glass,
and the coin on the top of all. One conductor of a
Wimshurst electrical machine is connected with the coin,
and the other conductor with the strip of tinfoil between
the glasses ; the machine is then turned for two minutes.
The glass discs of the machine arc fifteen inches in dia-
meter, and are turned at the rate of about one revolution
per second. The poles of the machine are arranged at the
sparking-distance of about half an inch, as a safe-guard
against the electrification of the coin being overdone.
Breath images are sometimes obtained simply by taking
a piece of paper printed on one side, and leaving it for
some hours between two sheets of patent plate glass.
Moser, Hunt, and others made many experiments on
this subject in the days of old, and Karsten found that,
on suitably electrifying a coin on the top of a pile of
plates of glass, he could get an image of the coin on
every plate, and always on its upper surface.
Professor J. Norman Lockyer, F. R.S., exhibited, by
means of the lantern, photographs of a number of Grecian,
Egyptian, and other temples, including some of those of
Thebes, taken by Captain Abney. Mr. Lockyer pointed
out to the assembled company that many of these temples
pointed east and west, and were open at the ends, so that
the rising or the setting sun could stream through each
temple, and illuminate the sanctum sanctorum at the other
end ; the temples, therefore, are like horizontal telescopic
tubes, with a collimating axis. To show that this idea is
worth considering, he pointed out how a king’s palace and
a second structure near a temple both had openings
which would permit the passage of the rays of the sun
through the two buildings, and then through the great
temple of the sun god, Ra, “The Lord of the Two
Horizons,” a title which has more meaning to the astronomer
than to the archamlogist. This idea of Air. Lockyer's we
therefore think to have more to support it than some of
the numerous speculations about sun gods. A pamphlet
has been issued, purporting to be written a thousand years
hence, satisfactorily proving to our descendants that the
present Professor -Max Muller of Oxford has no existence,
but is a sun god, a solar myth. Professor Lockyer is a
June 20, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
483
kind of sun god in his way, for lias not a celebrated ballad
described him as the “ owner of all the corona ? ”
Dr. II. P. Bowditch exhibited some specimens of
American composite photography.
Mr. Gambier Bolton exhibited some lantern pictures of
animal and bird studies photographed from life. These
studies were the result of eighteen years’ photography at
home and abroad, and they include slides of the newly
discovered zebra (equits grevyi, stuffed), and Mr. Yorke’s
photograph of the quagga, from life. Mr. Bolton
told the assembled listeners that he believed the
latter to be the only photograph of the quagga in exist-
ence ; it was taken but a few months before the death
of the animal. The peculiarity of Mr. Bolton’s photo-
graphs was that they were taken by long exposures — that
is to say, exposures of one or two seconds’ duration — in
order to avoid the harsh shadows incidental to instan-
taneous photographs taken in direct sunlight. Among
the photographs was one of the green monkey, as well as
of several other rare beasts. From its restlessness, he
found the leopard the most troublesome animal to photo-
graph, and nervous dogs with long, flapping ears caused
difficulty.
Some admirable platinotype photographs by Mrs. F. W. 1 1.
Myers were on view ; they displayed refined artistic
taste, and good technical skill. Several of them were
portraits of public celebrities, including Bret Harte ; the
others were chiefty character portraits. One of the best
of them represented two cherubs.
The Royal Meteorological Society exhibited some
tornado photographs. Among others, there were fourteen
photographs showing the devastation caused by the tor-
nado at Rochester, Minnesota, U.S., on August 21st,
1883. The great force of the wind in the tornado was
illustrated in a very striking manner by two of the photo-
graphs, as one shows a horse impaled by a large branch of
a tree, and another shows pieces of straw driven end-on
into the bark of trees. There were two photographs of a
tornado cloud taken at Jamestown, Dakota, U.S., June 6th,
1887. The cloud funnel was twelve miles to the north.
The Society also exhibited a photograph of a tornado cloud
taken in the storm on June 22nd, 1888, showing the spiral -
shaped funnel trailing at a considerable altitude in the air
at the other side of a lake, New Hampshire, U.S.
Professor II. Marshall Ward, M.A., F.R.S., exhibited a
selection of transparent photographs, showing (1) various
trees and plants from different parts of the world, including
European oak, beech, spruce, the Indian banyan, palm
and bamboos from Ceylon, and Californian pine ;
(2) illustrating the microscopic characters of some impor-
tant timbers, such as are employed for determining their
nature ; also various details in the anatomy of healthy
wood generally ; (3) a selection of photographs of diseased
oak and spruce, showing how different are the symptoms
exhibited by the same timber when attacked by different
fungi. Illustrations of several destructive fungi were on
view, and some details of their action given. As an
example of the uses to which photography may be utilised
in forestry, we append a list of those transparencies exhi-
bited by Mr. Ward which relate to the diseases of timber
and plants caused by fungi : —
A block of the wood of oak destroyed by Thelcpliora Pcrdix.
A similar block of oak destroyed in a very different way by Poly-
porus dryadcus. A similar block, also oak, showing the again
different mode of destruction due to Polyporus sulpkureus.
"transverse section of a branch of oak destroyed by Polyporus
sulpkureus ; the light parts are filled with mycelium. Longi-
tudinal section of wood of oak destroyed by Telcphora Pcrdix.
The cavities of vessels, &c., are filled with fungus hyphsc,
which pierce the walls and dissolve them by means of soluble
ferments (enzymes), reducing the structure to a friable or
rotting mass. Very highly magnified. A block of spruce
destroyed by Polyporus mollis. A similar block, also spruce,
showing the very characteristic and different mode of destruc-
tion due to Trametcs rndicipcrda. Stump of a young tree
attacked by Agaricus melleus, a destructive parasite. Portion
of bark of a tree bearing fructifications of Polyporus sulpkureus,
a destructive parasite. Portion of branch of beech attacked
by Nectria ditissima, one of the fungi which causes “canker.”
Specimens of wood suffering from “dry-rot,” due to the
ravages of Merulius lacrymans. A withered leaf covered with
“ mould,” one of which ( Botrytis ) is capable of parasitic exist-
ence on living plants of various kinds.
Mr. Isaac Roberts, F.R.S., exhibited sixteen original
photographs of stars, nebuhe, and clusters, including five
photographs of the Great Nebula in Orion, namely : —
1. A negative with five consecutive exposures, each of
5 seconds, 30 seconds, 1 minute, 3 minutes, and 6 minutes
respectively, showing the stars in the trapezium, and the
progressive photographic development of the nebulosity
around them. 2. A negative showing the appearance of
the nebula, with an exposure of 15 minutes. 3. A nega-
tive showing the nebula, with an exposure of 81 minutes.
The third nebula (y 1,180) is also shown on this plate.
4. A negative with an exposure of 205 minutes, showing
great extensions of the nebulosity, and that the nebula
(1*1 1,180) is connected with the Great Nebula. 5. A
negative with dual exposures, and an interval of five days
between them, illustrating a method for detecting variable
stars of short period. The suspected variables were indicated
by circles drawn around them. He also exhibited : —
6. A negative of stars in the constellation Cygnus, showing
more than 16,000 stars on four square degrees of the sky,
with an exposure of 1 hour. 7. A negative of the nebula;
(81 and 82 Messier), and a nebulous star in Ursa Major.
8. The Spiral Nebula (51 Messier) in Canes Venatici.
9. The Dumb-bell Nebula (27 Messier) in Vulpecula.
10. The Ring Nebula (57 Messier) in Lyra. 11. The
Globular cluster (13 Messier) in Hercules. 12. The
Great Nebula in Andromeder. 13. Nebulae in the
Pleiades. 14. The double cluster in the sword handle
of Perseus. Remarkable groupings amongst the stars are
also shown. 15. The minor planet Sappho on the 30th
December, 1886. The trail of the planet during 60
minutes was shown within the circle drawn around it.
16. The minor planet Sappho on the 7th January, 1887.
The trail is within the circle, .and, by comparing its
positions on the two photographs, the distance it has
moved during seven days can be measured.
Air. Edward Bidwell again exhibited some photographs
and models of the eggs of the great auk, but in somewhat
larger number than at the last conversazione of the Royal
Society, as published in these pages at the time. The
prints measured 6 by 4 inches, and were upon bromide
paper ; they were executed by Mr. Kidd, who had been
engaged to travel with Air. Bidwell over a large part of
Europe for the purpose.
The great auk, or garefowl, formerly existed in large
numbers on the coast of Newfoundland, from which
country, and from the rocky islets off Iceland, most of the
birds and eggs now in collections were obtained. In con-
sequence of the quantities killed for food by the English
and French fishermen, the bird was exterminated in its
American home early in this century, but it survived in
484
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jcnk 20, 1890.
Europe until 1844. There are 77 recorded specimens of
the grea auk, 14 skeletons (fairly perfect), and 67 eggs.
The collection of photographs exhibited consisted of two
views each of 55 of the eggs, photographed to scale. The
models were cast in moulds taken direct from the eggs.
THE COSTUME ALBUM.
That the ablest and best of human endeavours are too
often misunderstood and maligned is a truth so trite and
obvious as to require little illustration. Whether it be
from envy, which, like a shadow, pursues merit and proves
it substantial ; or from ignorance, which is unable to com-
prehend desert ; or from indifference or laziness, which
is too idle to look for it, some of the greatest benefac-
tors of humanity have been suffered to languish in
obscurity, or have met that which is worse, the exasperating
destiny of ridicule and reproach.
These reflections are likely to be aroused in the
deliberative mind by the Costume Album, which has
been laughed at by the superficial as the “latest of
American notions,” and nothing more. It has been
regarded simply as a pretty picture book, instead of
a collection of moral memoranda, as it really is, and its
author, no doubt, intended it to be, and its untoward
fate in this respect recalls in a remarkable manner that
of a great work with a somewhat similar ethical purpose,
an abortive birth of some fifty years ago.
That “virtue should supersede crime and establish
peace and harmony on earth ” is, it will be generally
allowed, something devoutly to be wished. How this
desire may be accomplished was discovered by an author
of the name of Thomas Wirgman, who published in
1837 a book entitled “The Grammar of the Five Senses,”
which he regarded as a first step in infant education. This
infant education was also to be an universal education, and
“ established,” in the author’s words, “for ever.” It was
presented by him to the Bishop of London in the hope
that the Bishop might cordially enter into its ideas, and
suggest it as a text-book throughout the whole world.
Moreover, severe scrutiny was invited for the detection of
one single untenable proposition, for which a reward of
ten pounds — who was to be the judge in the matter is
not stated — was offered by the author.
This book, beginning with the five senses, illustrated
by the simple notions of an umbrella, a tree, a drum,
an apple, and a rose, proceeded incontinently in its
second chapter to the metaphysical considerations
of space and time. The volume was adapted to the
childish intelligence by the aid of colours, in small
parallelograms of about 14 by 4 inch. Eternity appeared
a pale arrangement in orange ; Time was distinguished
by a heavenly blue ; pink dignified Conception and
Understanding. The error of the great Aristotle was
thus demonstrated to the infant, “for in his catalogue
of ten notions he has introduced quando and ubi,
thus converting the only two mental recipients into mental
activities, viciating (sic) the whole science at its com-
mencement, and frustrating his own laudable design.” But,
notwithstanding its condemnation of the Stagyrite, its
attractive colours, and its author’s estimate of its cor-
rectness, the Bishop of London seems to have treated it with
disregard, and the Queen — to whom a special presentation
copy was submitted — acquainted Mr. Thomas Wirgman
that she could not entertain applications for its use to
‘ ‘ really improve the state of education for the infant
population,” and coldly referred him to her confidential
advisers for the future.
The American mind which conceived and brought
forth the pregnant idea of a Costume Album has been
as much misunderstood as the unlucky author of the
“Grammar of the Five Senses.” Already, indeed, has
the shaft of ridicule been aimed at this elegant concep-
tion, and many imperfectly acquainted with its object
have spoken of it with disparagement or vilification.
It lias been supposed to be merely a Magasin de Modes, a
common fashion book, with this sole difference, that the
person draped exists not in imagination but in reality.
Were it nothing but this, it might, perhaps, deserve the
obloquy with which it has been assailed, but its inventor
beyond doubt aimed at something higher, intended some
noble moral end far other than a mere idle gratification
of the eye. We may conceive him to be a second Adam
Smith, dealing with the influence of custom, and fashion,
and association upon the moral sentiments.
In this way of thought a Costume Album may be
regarded as a continual monitor, or a vade mecum of good
advice. As, when a new fashion of dress comes in, the
folly of the outgoing fashion is commonly perceived
and insisted on, so many actions which the principle of
association lias connected with that dress are afterwards
seen face to face in their naked deformity. The senti-
ments of conduct are, perhaps, as much influenced by
fashion as the sentiments of beauty. As the dress of one
time seems at another absurd, so also does the be-
haviour. What is to-day supposed to be elegant is pro-
nounced hideous to-morrow ; what is to-day regarded as
good and worthy of approbation is denounced to-morrow
as bad and morally indecent. Suppose, if an illustration
be required, that a lady possesses in her Costume Album
a photograph of an apparel which she had made or ‘ ‘ con-
fectioned ” for the express purpose of beholding a bull
fight at Seville, or of assisting at a pigeon shooting
match at Ilurlingham. The very next photograph in her
collection represents her in the modest attire suitable
for attendance at her own parish church, in which attire
she prays devoutly to be delivered from the pomp and
vanity of this wicked world. Surely a moral lesson will
be conveyed to the most heedless and inattentive mind
by such a pictorial juxtaposition. Surely the most bird-
witted — without any reference to the pigeons at Ilur-
lingham — woman will be thereby mentally benefitted.
Thus, the Costume Album will become a valuable diary
of life’s experiences, teaching her what to seek after and
what to avoid. If we suppose the prices of her varied
raiments to be .added to them, after the fashion of a linen-
draper’s ticket, though the appearance of the photograph
will be in no way bettered, yet what a valuable lesson in
economy will hereby be gained !
The pigeon shooting attire, besides presenting a
record of time used, to say the least of it, for no
profitable or praiseworthy purpose, will, with its
adventitious ornaments and wholly unnecessary elabora-
tion, remind her who once wore it how great an expense
was then thereby incurred ; the parish church apparel,
showing no immoderate outlay, and “quoted,” to
borrow a mercantile flower of expression, “at a
modest figure,” while it affects her with no pang of by-
gone extravagance, will, at the same time, cheer her heart
and strengthen her future endeavour with a sense of an
accomplished duty likely to bring about a temporal and
eternal advantage. Again, the many changes of her
June 20, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
485
costume in a short season will remind her of the muta-
bility of life, of the uncertainty of happiness, and of the
nature of the only true good, unchanging, and eternal.
Here is a dress which she wore at that dinner party of
A’s, where a hired man, an alien to the profession of a
footman, spilt a plate full of soup down her back. Then
she thought she should have died with vexation and
chagrin ; now she wonders how such an accident could
have affected her equanimity. Here is a ball dress with
an infinitesimal irregularity of fit; she remembers what
words she used to her dressmaker in regard to it with
remorse and shame. Here, again, is the dress in which
she showed that mean jealousy of her husband at that
picnic at X’s. How often has she since confessed to her-
self, while looking upon its representation in her Costume
Album, that her anger was wholly idle, and misplaced, and
foolish, inasmuch as it was within an ace of wrecking all
her happiness in the future. And so against all the other
evil passions of the mind — those harpies which prey upon
the human heart — the Costume Album may actas a memorial
and as a warning.
Not a dress in that book is without its own little history
of good or evil, known probably to herself alone. So she
may repair to this excellent volume, as to another “ Pilgrim’s
Progress,” in any spare moment of serious meditation, and
see herself, as it were, in a looking-glass. Nor is the
advantage to her alone. Finding the folly of envy, malice,
hatred, and all uncharitableness so clearly recalled to her
by her Costume Album, she will have the chance — and
probably use it — of improving her own character, and
thereby adding to the happiness of those around her. Nor
is this even all. After she herself has passed away, her
children may in their turn learn a lesson from her old
Costume Album. Turning over its pages, from the gay
sprightliness and vivacity of the dress of their mother's
youth, to the grave and sedate sobriety of her apparel in
old age, they will receive such moral instruction and
benefit as could hardly be produced in them by any alien
record, and their earliest thoughts of the vanity of the
world, their first earnest conviction of the frail estate of
human things, may be born in them by the inspection of
this “latest of American photographic notions.”
May the book long flourish which is fraught with such
wholesome counsel, and meet not the unhappy fate of the
book of Thomas Wirgman. It is truly sad to read the
concluding words of his preface. “ Should the reverse of
this pleasing dream take place,” says the author of the
“Grammar of theFive Senses” — anticipating the possibility
of its ill success — “should its writer still meet with the
same apathy and indifference which have signalized the
last forty years of his existence, his theory, together with
his dialogues, must for ever die ; unless, indeed, like the
Pythagorean theory of the celestial bodies, after a lapse of
many thousand years it should find another Copernicus to
bring it into play.” Absit omen!
The Photographic Convention. — Since our last issue, and
up to the time of going to press, we have not received from
the Photographic Convention a cop}’ of the official programme,
or any additional details as to the Chester meeting. From
another source information comes that Mr. Friese Greene will
exhibit one or more of the new cameras for taking a consider-
able number of photographs of moving objects per second, as
well as one or two other interesting pieces of mechanism. The
lantern machines for projecting the said photographs on a
screen are at present defective, but are likely to be all right in
a few weeks' time.
MR. TOOLE AMONG PHOTOGRAPHERS.
A subscriber has sent us a copy of the Melbourne Argus
containing the following narrative. Says Mr. Toole : —
“ I have to sit again for my photograph, and you may as
well come along with me. Having my photograph taken
always reminds me of one occasion when I was taking a stroll
on Hampstead Heath with Beerbohm Tree. We met a little
travelling photographer, who wanted us to have our piotures
taken for sixpence each, frame included.
“ ‘ But I’ve never had my picture taken before,’ I said,
‘ Does it hurt much ? ’ ‘ Why, Lor’ bless you ! no,’ he says,
‘ it’s as easy as any think. Just you stand steady, and I’ll take
yer in two minits. ’
“ ‘But I’m so nervous — you must let me hold my friend’s
hand, and you must take us together. What do you put that
black cloth over your head for ? Have you hurt yourself ? ’
“This necessitated his leaving off to explain to us the use
of the black cloth, and by that time we told him we had
become so nervous that he must promise not to look at us while
we were being taken. The moment he turned his face and
began counting, Tree and I made the most frightful grimaces
imaginable at the camera. The man took out the negative,
scrutinised it with a puzzled expression, and said, * I can’t
make it out. Somethin’s gone wrong — yer faces have come out
like puddens, they’re all over the shop. ’Ave another try, gents.’
We had another ‘ try,’ repeating our protests of nervousness,
and inducing him to turn his head away. We contorted our
faces worse than before, and you never saw such extraordinary
productions in your life as those photographs. The man was
very crestfallen, and we told him we did not think much of liis
machine, paid our money, and strolled on. Presently we were
accosted by another photographer, who invited us to have our
portraits taken.
“‘How much?’ we asked him, and when he quoted the
same price as the first man, we said, ‘ Why, we have just had
them taken by a fellow over there, and he only charged us
twopence each, but we were not very well pleased with them,
and have a mind to try you.’
“ He looked furiously in the direction of the other man, and
his temper did not improve when he came to examine the
negative, because we went through exactly the same fooling as
before. We paid, and left him with the very evident inten-
tion stamped on his countenance of going over to ‘ have it
out’ with his rival for underselling him, and thus ruining
trade.
“Of course, we subsequently bestowed life annuities on
both of these men.
We had now arrived at the photographer’s, and followed
Toole into the little office, the walls of which, as is usual with
such places, were hung with every imaginable specimen of work
done on the premises. Consequently, we were not prepared
to see Toole lean over the counter and ask the young woman
attendant if she could recommend him to any place in Mel-
bourne where he could have his photograph taken. The girl
stared at him, but there was such a look of humble and
inquiring gravity in his face that she only smiled, and said he
could have his likeness taken there.
“ Yes,” said Toole, in a deprecatingly considerate tone of
voice, “but I shouldn’t like to put you out, you know. Now,
if you could tell me of some place where they make a business
of it, I should be so much obliged.”
The girl, repressing a tendency to laugh, for his manner
was full of a pleading earnestness, assured him that they made
a business of nothing else, and asked what style he would
like to be taken in.
“Well,” he answered thoughtfully, “I don’t quite know,
for I was never taken before, and I don’t know which style hurts
the most. I believe a group is the least painful form, so I
think the three of us would like to be taken in a group.”
“ Well, now, here is a group. Would you like to be taken
in this style ? ” and she handed him one of those remarkable
pictures in which two young men stood bolt upright in the
background, while three others were disposed at their feet in
what are called picturesque attitudes, the whole five looking as
486
[Jcne 20, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
stiff and uncomfortable as disconcerted pickpockets. Toole
gazed at this sadly for a few minutes, and plaintively remarked,
“ Oh, I see, it takes five to make a group ; just you wait here
a moment while I run down stairs and get a couple of men
out of the street to make up the number, so we can be taken
in a group,” and he turned to go.
“No, no,” said the girl, “there are five here; I havn’t a
group of three to show you, but three can be taken just as
well as five.”
“ But wouldn’t it be more painful with only three ? ” Toole
asked innocently, but got no answer, for the girl dived behind
a little screen, from which she presently emerged with a
heightened colour, and said if we would please to step upstairs
to the next floor but one, she would arrange everything through
the speaking tube. Now, it is a bad thing to commence
laughing when you are not quite certain of your power to stop,
and I am sorry to say one of Mr. Toole’s companions was in
this case by the time we reached the first landing. This was
occupied by a merchant’s office, full of packing cases and
samples, in which two or three clerks were working, while the
man of business was seated at a little desk all by himself.
With a hurried injunction of “ Don’t laugh,” Toole preceded
us straight into the room, and, addressing the man at the
desk with a smile of cheerful serenity, said, “ We have
spoken to the young lady downstairs, and she arranged us
through the speaking tube. We want a group of three, please,
as I understand it doesn’t hurt more than five, and I hope
you wont’t keep us long, as I have an appointment.”
I thought the man of business would have fallen backwards
out of his chair, but he recovered himself, and said, with a
smile, “I think, sir, you are mistaken.”
“Yes, we want to be taken,” said Toole, pretending to be
deaf. “Any style you think best, you know. I should like
to arrange my hair first.”
“ I said, sir, I think you have made a mistake. If you
want the photographer he is on the next flat.”
“As flat as you like,” Toole answered. “I’ve seen some
of ’em raised, but I don’t think it any improvement. You
won’t keep us more than ten minutes, will you ? ”
“You have come to the wrong office, sir,” said the
merchant, raising his voice. “What name did you want?”
“Oh, yes, we’ll have a frame, if it’s all the same price —
not that I am particular to a shilling or two. Perhaps you
can show us some specimens ? ” Toole’s countenance was
smiling amiability itself.
I felt my lips beginning to quiver when the merchant rose
solemnly from his chair, leant on his knuckles across the
desk, and proceeded to bawl directions how to find the studio
upstairs to Toole, who listened intently with his glass in his
eye and his hand to his ear. But I missed the termination
of the scene, for our other friend was suddenly seized with
a violet fit of something between a cough and a sneeze, which
sounded so suspiciously like an uncontrollable outburst of
laughter smothered in a handkerchief, that I was obliged to lead
him out and thump him on the back. We heard the directions
being shouted out — half the city might have heard them for
that matter — and presently Toole joined us not a bit flustered,
and quietly remarking that it appeared we had made a mis-
take, for the studio was on the floor above. As Mr. Toole’s
man had actually been there in the morning, and made an
appointment for him with the photographer, no further pranks
could be played there, and the sitting only occupying a few
minutes, we again descended to the street.
The Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
Wednesday, July 2nd, will be “ Matt Surface Printing.” July
9th, lteportof Delegates to the Photographic Convention. Satur-
day, June 28th, outing at Pinner ; tea at Queen’s Head at 6.30.
The British Association. — This year the British Associa-
tion meeting will be held at Leeds, and will begin on Wednes-
day, September 3rd, under the presidency of Sir Frederick
Abel, C.B. The president of section A (Mathematical and
Physical Science) will be Mr. J. W. L. Glaisher, F.R.S., who
long since has achieved eminence as a mathematician, and is
the son of Mr. James Glaisher, the president of the Photo-
graphic Society.
NEW SALTS EXHIBITING OPTICAL PHENOMENA.
Among the most extraordinary and beautiful optical pheno-
mena presented by organic compounds, it would be difficult, or
perhaps impossible, to find any rival in this respect to two
new products lately obtained in the laboratory of a Viennese
chemist, Dr. Edmund Morvan. Nothing similar has been seen
hitherto, and it is expected that the careful study of the physi-
cal properties presented by these compounds may ultimately
bring out new ideas with respect to our theories of light and
colour.
The first of these is an organic compound of oxide of zirco-
nium, and is named by its discoverer zircon-ethyl-methyl-
phthalein. The other belongs also to the aromatic series, and
is called monococyl-metadihydroxyl-benzol.
These compounds exhibit hitherto unknown properties of
refraction and fluorescence. The former appears yellow by
transmitted light, and green by reflected light — that is, it
looks like a brilliant yellow liquid with a bright green fluores-
cence.* The latter appears violet and green under the same
conditions.
The first-named compound shows a remote resemblance to
the substance known for some time past as fluoresein, but is
distinguished from it by its ready solubility in water, and also
by the fact that when treated with nitrate of silver it yields
a bright red precipitate of nitrate of zirconethyl. Under the
influence of the electric current it presents most interesting
features. In a very weak solution, in a small glass tube her-
metically sealed and submitted to an electric current, it changes
its colour to blood-red, and shows a light blue fluorescence ;
the latter, says Dr. Morvan, is due to zirconium. On after-
wards breaking the tube and neutralising with a minute quantity
of ammonia, the substance resumes its original aspect and fluor-
escence.
A weak solution of the monococyl-metadiliydroxy-benzol,
placed in a hollow prism, refracts light strongly ; on its spectrum
being thrown upon a screen, both colours of the fluorescence
disappear. The zircon compound behaves in a similar
manner. Removing the white screen and collecting the
coloured rays by means of a lens — the rays thus collected now
forming a simple ray — the latter, on being conveyed through a
common prism, is spread out again into a spectrum, in which
not only the fluorescent colours are wanting, but also their
complementary tints. These are certainly most interesting
properties, such as have never before been noted in any sub-
stance. But there are many other wonderful properties to which
we have no space to allude here. — Burgoyne’s Monthly
Magazine.
patent EntcUtgcnrc.
Applications for Letters Patent.
8,928. F. W. Branson, 2, East Parade, Leeds, “Cameras.” —
June 10th.
8,956. W. J. Radford, 17, Brunswick Street, Liverpool,
“ Improvements in Light Baskets for Carrying Light
Articles.” — June lltli.
9,058. J. C. Shenstone, 70, Chancery Lane, London, “Lamps
for Photographic Enlargements.” — June 11th.
9,118. II. H. Lake, 45, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Photographic Apparatus.” (Rudolf Krugener, Germany.)
— June 12 th.
9,158. C. H. Gale, 38, Scarsdale Villas, Kensington, London,
“ Adjustable Tripod.” — June 13th.
9,208. G. T. Teasdai.e Buckbll, “ Printing in Colours." —
June 14 th.
9,218. F. \Y. Hayward, 23, Upper King Street, Norwich,
“Colouring and Softening Photographs on Paper.” — June
14 th.
9,231. W. Milner, 11, Yerbury Road, Holloway, London,
“ Photographic Shutters.” — June 14th.
* Fluoresein, which also exhibits these optical phenomena, is ubur.4-
antly soluble in a weak solution of ammonia. — Ed of P. N.
Jone 20, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
487
@orregpon&cnrc.
FLANGE SCREWS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES.
Sir, — At some meetings of a sub-committee of the Photo-
graphic Convention, certain sizes were suggested as standards
for the flange screws of photographic lenses.
We, the undersigned, who were present at the meeting,
with every desire to assist in the settlement of this important
question, were convinced that the sizes arranged would not be
universally adopted by the leading manufacturers. We felt,
however, quite confident that it would be possible to arrange a
series of flanges which could be adopted by ourselves, to which
we could arrange to make all our lenses in the future, and
which should also be of such a character that the majority of
lenses now in the market should screw into them.
We are making careful investigation into the matter, and we
have gone quite far enough to see that we shall be able to adopt
such a series of sizes. Several important considerations are
beiug carefully considered, amongst which may be mentioned
the absolute necessity of arranging a series of diameters which
are in suitable ratio to the dimensions to which the lenses
themselves must be made. In order, therefore, to obtain
standards that will be in future adopted by the leading makers,
we are carefully arranging a series of sizes to which we shall
work in future, and which we shall submit for the careful
consideration of the Photographic Society of Great Britain,
and the Photographic Convention.
Ross & Co.,
J. H. Dallmeyer,
R. & J. Beck,
W. Wray,
Henry Crouch,
James Swift & Son.
THE CONVENTION VISIT TO OLD MORETON HALL.
Sir, — Many of your readers who propose visiting Old
Moreton Hall during the Convention week will be greatly
disappointed to find it undergoing a course of whitewash and
tar. The creamy old plaster and woodwork are being daubed
all over with glaring whitewash, and where the timbers and
carvings come it is receiving a coat of tar on the top of that.
I don’t know if this piece of vandalism will be finished, and
the scaffolding removed, in time for the Convention visits,
but I thought it best to make known what is being done and
what to expect. If the council can suggest some other of the
fine old mansions with which the country abounds as an alter-
native, it would be well. Richard Keene,
Dolby Cottage, Western Bank, Derby, June 14.
PASSING PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATES THROUGH FOREIGN
CUSTOM HOUSES.
Sir, — About passing plates safely through foreign custom
houses as well as our own. I have soaked off some safeguards
from an old box. The plates should be in grooved wood
boxes, with small squares of orange or ruby glass in the
cover and bottom through which the officers can see that the
boxes cannot contain cigars. I never had one opened.
Plaques photograpliiques. Si la boite est ouverte les plaques seront
compb’tement perdues. Messieurs les officiers de la Douanc sont pries
d’avoir la bont<5 de.regarder dans l'interieur au travers des verres dc couleur.
Vetri preparati per la fotografia. 8j la casetta viene aperta i vetri sono
intieramente rovinati. Si prega l’officiatc della Dogana ad avere la bonta
di osservare a tra verso dei vetri color.it' .
Photographic plates. If the box be opened the plates will be utterly
ruined. The officers of the Custom House are begged to i xamine the inside
through the coloured glass.
Those who take glass or films in ordinary card boxes must
take also the consequences.
When will the dealers have the good sense to supply orange
or red paper made adhesive for the repair of damage to boxes,
camera-bellows, or tents, or for making a temporary changing
place behind a farm window ?
k When will they have the sense to make grooving fit for
modern sheet glass, with thin partitions, instead of going on for
generations making grooves to take wet plates and plate glass ?
For use abroad the boxes might be made much less in thick-
ness to take each dozen. Now, four grooves go to an inch and
an eighth. There ought to be six in that spacing. Compact-
ness is tried for by grooves for ten plates each, back to back, a
woeful business.
I have beautiful boxes made by Mr. Meagher for me to take
abroad, with the partitions of vulcanite, I believe. But finer
grooving might and ought to be made than the dealers give us
still, and we put up with. J. J. Cole.
Mayland, Sutton, June 19</(, 1890.
A PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY IN CAMBERWELL.
Sir, — It has been suggested that a Photographic Society
should be formed in Camberwell, and in furtherance of this
a few amateurs residing in the neighbourhood have arranged
to meet at the Stirling Castle Hotel, Church Street, on
Wednesday, the 25th inst., to consider the matter.
With your usual courtesy, perhaps you will be able to find
room in your valuable journal for the insertion of this letter,
as no doubt some of your readers, amateur or professional,
interested in the subject may be glad to know of the for-
mation of such a society, and willing to promote it by attend-
ing the meeting. George C. Pike,
South Rood, Camberwell, June 17 th, 1890.
laroccetfmgs of £oriettes.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 12th inst, Mr. H. M. Hastings occu-
pied the chair.
Mr. S. G. B. Wollaston spoke about a method of develop-
ment, using first eikonogen to get detail, and then following it
with hydrokinone to obtain great density.
The Chairman exhibited some platinotype prints, and also
some prints on Pizzighelli paper ; the latter he considered
to be better prints than he usually was able to get on this
paper.
Mr. J. S. Teai’E showed prints from the same negative by
four processes. Aristotype, cold bath platinotype, Pizzighelli,
and albumenised papers were used. Aristotype was slow in
printing, but for detail and gradation of tone he preferred it
to either of the other processes he had used.
Mr. W. E. Debenham said that, having regard to the question
under discussion — the printing process that best registered the
gradation of a negative — he was in favour of a glazed surface
paper, such as albumenised or aristotype paper. The majority
of the members present were of the same opinion.
A point was raised whether the printing process that best
rendered the gradation of a negative gave the most artistic
effect. This led to some discussion, in the course of which
various views were expressed on the subject, but no definite
decision resulted.
Hackney Photographic Society.
Mr. A. R. Dresser read a paper on “Hand-Cameras” on
Thursday last, the President in the chair. There was a good
show of hand-cameras.
Mr. Dresser, who has taken over fifty prizes, brought a number
of enlargements, and considerable time was spent in examining
them. In addition to the cameras, the lecturer showed
one of his own construction fitted with a Voigtlander wide-
angle lens, which he preferred almost to any other ; it
gave sharp pictures. He used a shutter with which he
could get any exposure up to 3 of a second, and could, more-
over, use either roll-holder or plates at will without any extra
trouble. He had taken a jumping dog with it, and other
things equally fast, without the least sign of motion on the
part of the subject. For plates he had used Paget’s and Fry’s,
but preferred the new films of Eastman’s, which he found
faster than any other for negatives.
488
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 20, 1890.
Dr. Gerard Smith, the president, spoke of lightning marks
in the latter, but was assured by the representative present
that this had now been overcome, and was a thing of the
past.
A number of lantern slides was put through the lantern,
illustrative of Mr. Dresser’s work.
Mr. Abraham showed his newly perfected hand-camera, fitted
with a Taylor lens and focussing arrangement.
The Sheffield Photographic Society.
The annual excursion took place on the 11th inst. to Bolton
Abbey and Woods. By invitation a goodly number of members
of the Rotherham Photographic Society joined the train at
Masbro’, leaving Sheffield Midland Station in suitable weather
for the taking of pictures. On comparing notes, it was found
there were altogether fifteen cameras which had been used, and
about one hundred and forty-five plates exposed, and ten
Eastman’s films. After tea, several plates were exposed on the
members and friends.
The North Middlesex Photographic Club.
June 9th. — Mr. Walker in the chair.
Mr. G. J. Clarke delivered a lecture on “ Photographic
Optics,” first speaking of the action of light when entering or
leaving one medium of different density to the other, so as to
make quite plain the reason of the action of lenses, and after-
wards speaking of the defect incidental to different lenses, and
the means by which they were overcome ; he illustrated his
remarks by means of well-drawn diagrams.
Mr. McIntosh wished to know if a stop placed behind as
well as before a single combination lens would prevent distortion
of marginal lines, and whether it would introduce other and
more objectionable disadvantages.
The Secretary : Such an arrangement would prevent such dis-
tortion, but would cut off more than half the light, even with
the largest stop, and with smaller ones the proportion would
be much greater, besides which it would practically form a
tube of the diameter of such stops, and of the length which
separated them, thus allowing only a very small portion of the
plate to be illuminated. As this would reduce the angle to
a very small one, any picture taken with an ordinary landscape
lens of the same angle would not show any distortion, and
be free from the inconvenience.
Mr. Goodhew : Would not sandwiching the new Jena glass,
which is affected by the atmosphere, between two plates of
other glass affect the optical properties ?
Mr. Clarke explained that allowances were made for such
alteration.
On Monday, June 23rd, Mr. W. T. Goodhew will open a
discussion on “Development.”
Lenses. — A Correspondent of The Beacon (Chicago) says : —
“ My first portraits, and fairly good ones, too —I myself being
the judge — were madewith a lens ground from the bottom of a
tumbler, and I have had landscapes in at least one exhibition
taken with a 10-inch focus spectacle ‘eye,’ but, for all that, I
generally carry a Gundlach and a Ross whenever I go out, and
mean to add a Bausch and Lomb-Clark as soon as I can afford
it.”
Brotherly Love. — The Newcastle (England) Photographic
Association sets a good example to societies generally in realis-
ing the beauty of the lines :
“ Behold h 'W good a thing it is,
And how becoming well,
Together i-uch as brethren are
In unity lo dwell.”
Instead of the silly jealousy that too often obtains between
the professional and the amateur, the members, mostly pro-
fessionals, under the impression that the amateur was less able
to pay his dues, resolved to reduce them by one-half for the
purpose of bringing amateurs in in larger numbers. Is it any
wonder, after this, that the Newcastle men are at the very top
of the tree ? — The Beacon ,
Ungfoerg to (ftormpontfents*
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 3, Fumival
Street, London, E.C.
AH questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spilter, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
J. E. D. (Huddersfield). — Mode of Publication. You might
send prints to Messrs. Marion and Co., Messrs. W. and D.
Downey, or to Messrs. Waterlow and Sons, asking their terms
for publication. If neither of these firms will undertake it,
you could get them reproduced in collotype or Woodbury-
type, and make your own arrangements for sale. Prompt
action is desirable.
A. W. — Maignen's Softening Water Process. We find two
patents credited to P. A. Maignen, of London ; the first
is for “Improvements in Filters,” dated December 14th,
1887, No. 17,220; the second is for “An Improved
Automatic Separator,” dated March 28th, 1888, No. 4,760.
Neither of these makes reference to a process of softening,
but solely to methods of filtration through asbestos cloth
and a series of conical perforated vessels. It is, however,
likely that the employment of lime could lie conjoined with
the filtration system, and so a general purification result.
C. E. E. — Ferro- Prussiate Paper. The address of a maker
has been sent to you by post.
Sensitised Paper. — Since writing to you last week all the rest
of the paper has been printed, toned, and fixed without any
other result than that already reported. Three more prints
received.
H. S. (Antwerp). — Pinhole Photography. The most recent
formula is that of Lord Rayleigh, who read a paper on the
subject at the Newcastle meeting of the British Association.
(See report in the News of September 20th last, page 611.)
The apertures worked were one-sixteenth of an inch for
9-feet focus, and it was stated that with a focal length of
66 feet the hole might lie as large as the pupil of the eye.
You might also refer to “La Photographic sans Objectif,”
by Captain R. Colson (Paris: Gauthier- Yillars, 1887),
which has fora frontispiece a view of the Domedes Invalides,
taken at a distance of 100 metres on a gelatino-bromide
plate in twenty seconds, with an aperture of 0-3 millimetre,
and focal length of camera 0 -1 3 metre. Mr. George Davi-
son’s pinhole photographs, shown at the last year’s Photo-
graphic Exhibition in Pall Mall, were eminently satisfactory.
S. W. — Tower of London Inscriptions. Mr. Wm. Brooks has
himself answered your point in his letter to the News,
page 466. At the Crystal Palace Exhibition last year a
very complete series of the Tower of London, including
many of the wall inscriptions, was shown upon the screen
during several evenings, and excited a good deal of interest.
Although Mr. Brooks tells us that his pictures are not yet
published, it is well to know where they could be procured
in the event of a demand arising.
P. M. — Photography in Colours. This question has been
pretty well threshed out of late, and the conclusion seems
to l>e that a very protracted exposure is required, without
the possibility as yet of transferring the results to paper.
Nor have we conclusive evidence that the coloured impres-
sions are permanent, or bear free exposure to light.
Edgbaston. — Acid Toning and Fixing Bath. When alum
and hypo are mixed together in solution there is a slow
decomposition, resulting in the separation of free sulphur, to
which the toning is chiefly due.
H. H. B. — Aristotype Paper. It is advisable to separate the
toning and fixing processes. For toniug, use the chloride of
gold with excess of chloride of potassium and neutralised
with chalk. Fix afterwards with hypo or sulphocyanide.
See pages 196, 288, and 368 of present volume.
A. M. M. — Your letter received. It requires consideration,
and we will write to you in the course of a few days.
J. G. M. and others received.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
A VA
Vol. XXXIY. No. 1660.— June 27, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAOK
The Photographic Convention at Chester 489
Percentage of Failures 490
Photographic Convention of the United Kingdom. Presidential
Address by C. H. Bothamley 491
Paintings at the Goupil Gallery. New Bond Street. By Rev.
F. 0. Lambert, M.A 495
Imagining and Imaging. By Philip H. Newman 495
Correspondence 49G
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther. 497
Notes 498
PAQ1
New Photographic Objectives. By Dr. Ernest Abbe and Dr.
Paul Rudolph 500
Notes on the Report of the Lens Standard Committee. By A.
Haddon 501
Photographic Exhibitions. By George Davison 508
Depth of Focus and Diffusion of Focus. By W. K. Burton ... 504
Animal Photography : Its Difficulties, Uses, and Abuses. By
Gambier Bolton 505
Proceedings of Societies 507
Answersto Correspondents 508
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT
CHESTER.
Last Monday evening the Photographic Convention
began its 1890 meeting in the ancient city of Chester,
and was warmly welcomed there by the Mayor, Mr. J.
Salmon, and the Mayoress, who gave the visitors a
reception in the Town Hall, and at the same time
invited three or four hundred private guests to meet
them. Floral decorations were profuse ; the hospitality
was upon no limited scale, and an official welcome was
given by the Mayor in the assembly room in the build-
ing. Symptoms of pomp and state were visible, in the
form of two doorkeepers, one bearing a sword given to
the Corporation of Chester by Henry VII., and the other
supporting a mace, or the mace supporting him. At
the official welcome the Mayor said that it was his
wish and intention to make an impression upon his
Conventionalist visitors at that, their first visit to
Chester, in order that they might have an opportunity
of receiving them again. Mr. Andrew Pringle, the
late President of the Convention, then resigned his
office to Mr. C. H. Bothamley, and at the same time
stated to the listeners that from his acquaintance, short
as it had been, with the Mayor, and from what he had
seen of his ability, business capacity, and hospitality,
he was convinced that the inhabitants of Chester had
acted most wisely in the election of the present chief
magistrate of their city. The new President of the
Convention then delivered his opening address, after
which came a musical entertainment, in which Miss
Annie Griffith, Miss Macdonald, Mr. AYebster Williams,
Mr. T. Muir, and others took part.
A display of photographs and photographic instru-
ments was laid out in the Council Chamber, in which
the chief feature of novelty was a costly and elaborate
piece of photo-micrographic apparatus made by Mr.
Swift by order of the Privy Council, and designed by
Mr. Andrew Pringle ; it was specially planned to secure
freedom from vibration, and to give abundant means for
adjustment. Of this instrument and some of the other
apparatus we shall have more to say hereafter.
The visitors were highly pleased with their reception,
and with the numerous photographic attractions of
Chester. AVe asked the city surveyor how he managed
to keep the mouldy old buildings from falling on the
dwellers therein, and burying the latter in the ruins.
He replied that he often had to condemn new houses,
but not old ones, for jerry builders were unknown in
early times ; thus was this apparent marvel explained.
He also informed us that some people in Chester had
long had the idea which we mooted last week, that it
would be well if there were a wide, clear space all
round outside the old city walls, and that the houses of
the new suburbs should not be built close up thereto ;
he added that one citizen was doing what he could, at
his own expense, to improve the present state of things
in the respect stated.
Last Tuesday morning there were excursions to
Llangollen and to Moreton Old Hall ; the latter was
found to be under repair, and somewhat in the state
described in a letter last week in these columns. The
weather was fine, and the Llangollen party enjoyed their
excursion over the hills exceedingly. In the evening
the report of the Lens Standard Committee was read.
Messrs. Dallmeyer and Beck gave data suggestive of an
alternative or modified scheme, and the whole matter
was referred back to the committee. There is a hope,
and a somewhat prevalent opinion, that the opticians
may come to some amicable and unanimous conclusion
as the result of coming conferences.
On Tuesday evening, also, Mr. A. Haddon read a
paper on “ Lens Standards,” and Air. Gambier Bolton
one upon “ Animal Photography,” in the course of
which he projected upon the screen those pictures of
wild beasts of which mention was made in these pages
last week, in our description of the conversazione of the
Royal Society. Among the photographs was one of
the quagga, an animal now supposed to be extinct.
Mr. Yorke took the negative long ago, and now will
not part -with it for love or money. Additional parti-
culars will be found in the paper of Mr. Gambier Bolton,
who is the delegate of the Camera Club to the Cop
490
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
vention. Steps ought be taken to obtain a few of the
the most indestructible and permanent positives possible
from Hr. Yorke’s negative. The quagga is an animal
somewhat of the zebra type, but being heavier than
the zebra, has been killed off first, as the area in which
it lived with the lion and other carnivorous beasts
became more limited by the extension of the boundaries
of civilisation. The unfortunate zebra will follow the
quagga.
On Wednesday afternoon there was an excursion by
steamboat up the river Dee to Eaton Hall, the seat of
the Duke of Westminster, at which place some group
photographs were taken. It rained throughout the
whole trip ; some of the excursionists were out iu the
rain in the stem of the little boat during the whole
excursion, there and back ; others were packed like
sardines in the little cabin, in which also from fifteen
to seventeen excursionists were obliged to stand up the
whole time. A few tarpaulins, so disposed as to pro-
tect parts of the boat from rain, would have been a
thoughtful precaution, if no better means were
available.
On Wednesday morning the annual meeting of the
Convention was held in the City Hall, and a regulation
was made to increase the number of provincial members
on the council. It was also settled that the next meet-
ing of the Convention should be held in Path, that is to
say, the 1891 meeting. On Wednesday evening Hr.
Andrew Pringle read a paper by Hr. P. H. Newman on
“ Imagining and Imaging; ” this was followed by one
by Hr. C. H. Bothamley on “ Orth 'chromatic Photo-
graphy with Rhodamine,” and with another by Hr.
Paul Lange on “Photography in Norway.”
Yesterday, Thursday, the chief excursion was to
Conway, under the guidance of the President of the
Convention. Views of the exterior of Conway Castle
were taken, and then of the inside, after which the
whole party, including Hr. Pringle, the ex-president,
and Hr. Ting Fan Chang, secretary to the Chinese
Embassy, lunched at the Castle Hotel, a well-known
home of art, belonging to Hiss Dutton, and containing
antique furniture which once belonged to Louis
Phillippe ; also paintings by some of the best artists of
modern times, and some rare specimens of Venetian
glass. Hr. Briginshaw photographed the whole party
at the luncheon table. Plas Hawr, an old mansion in
Conway, built in the days of Edward I., was next
visited, and photographs taken therein of Queen Eliza-
beth’s room by Hr. Briginshaw and Hr. Watkins; the
latter made use of his new exposure meter for the pur-
pose. The annual exhibition of the Royal Cambrian
Academy of Arts \vas going on in the building, and
included paintings by Sir Frederick Leighton and
others. Some of the grand old chimney pieces of Plas
Hawr were draped for the purposes of the exhibition,
so could not be photographed. The members of this
excursion party returned by separate trains, as some
would not leave at the appointed time to listen to the
reading of papers at Chester in the evening.
PERCENTAGE OF FAILURES.
Ik all photographers were as careful to call attention
to their spoilt plates as they are to their successes,
we should be better able to appraise their capabilities
than we are at present. We speak more particularly
of outdoor work — for in a properly conducted studio,
where the operator is able to guage his exposures to a
nicety, and where a developer of definite and unvarying
composition may be reasonably expected to bring about
a certain result, spoilt plates are few and far between,
although there must always be a percentage of failures —
to please patrons and from other causes which are
not altogether under the control of the worker.
With out-door work it is different. Iu one respect
the worker of bygone days, with his cumbrous impedi-
menta and his wet plates, was better off than his
successor of to-day. It was incumbent upon him to
develop his plate immediately after exposure, and
although this entailed the use of a dark-room or tent,
and a druggist’s shop full of chemicals, yet the trouble
involved had the compensating advantage of informing
him at once of his success or failure. If the
former, he departed on his way rejoicing, and if the
latter, another plate was collodioniscd there and then,
and the exposure was repeated. There was also some
satisfaction in the thought that he knew the history of
his plate, for he had cleaned the glass, had possibly
prepared his own collodion, and knew that the bath
which he had so carefully compounded would not play
him false. He knew, too, that a trifling error of expo-
sure one way or the other could be readily corrected
during development snd intensification.
The modern dry-pl.ue worker, on the other hand,
has many pitfalls into which he is apt to fall unless he
is constantly on the alert. He does not make his own
plates — except in rare instances — but he knows that he
can rely upon well-known brands for uniform
excellence. In the early days of the gelatine process
complaints of plates which frilled and displayed other
disagreeable defects were rife, but these faults have
almost entirely disappeared, and it is quite an excep-
tional thing to meet with a plate which does not give
fair results. The only danger to which the purchaser
is liable is that of meeting with a box of stale plates.
This has once or twice occurred to us when we have
purchased in country districts, where there is not as
yet a large demand for such goods, but never when we
have been able to obtain the plates direct from a London
warehouse. Such plates tell their own tale by general
insensitiveness, by mottling, and still more conclusively
by the metallic stain which forms a border round their
edges, and which is plainly seen after development by
reflected light. It is true that the stain will give w’ay
to alcoholic treatment, or to a weak solution of the
ferrideyanide reducer, but its presence is as the wrinkle
of old age, which brings other troubles iu its wake.
The pitfalls to which we have referred have not,
however, to do with faulty plates, but are brought
about generally by the carelessness or ignorance of the
worker himself, and it is according to his success iu
June 27, 1890.]
TIIE PIIOTOG RAl’IIIC NEWS.
491
steering clear of them that his capacity may be guaged.
If it ever fell to our lot to choose a good worker from
a number of applicants, we should not dream of sub-
mitting them to the ordinary ordeal of a competitive
examination by means of written questions and answers.
In spite of the universality of this custom, we are
certain that it does not bring the best,men to the front.
Those with the best capacity for cramming, and who
have the most retentive memories, are those who win,
while the man with the creative brain, and who has
power at his finger ends instead of book knowledge, is
left far behind. Our plan would be to give each man
a packet of, say, four dozen plates of a recognised brand,
and to turn him loose with his camera in a certain
district or county. He who produced from those plates
the largest percentage of good negatives would be the
man for us, supposing that in other respects he was
not objectionable.
But what percentage of failures by the ordinary
worker may be considered allowable, and to what causes
are those failures mainly attributable ? Host of our
readers know by experience what it is to start on a
photographic trip with several dozens of dry plates,
with anticipations respecting those articles which are
seldom realised. We pass by the common losses caused
by injudicious exposure, for these faults are generally
attributable to want of experience, and the remedy is
obvious. Now imd then an old hand is caught napping,
and over-exposes a plate, not by error of judgment,
but because he forgets to insert in the lens the p ir-
ticular diaphragm which he had intended to use. He
will not fall into this error if he is careful to let the
various operations of focussing, exposing, &c., follow
in regular order, and more especially if he makes it a
rule to examine the picture on the ground glass while
the lens is provided with the same stop that is to be
used for exposure. The experienced man will always
do this, for he knows that he can judge of the exposure
necessary far more accurately by examining the picture
in this way, and noting the amount of illumination
which it has, than he can by the best tables which
were ever conceived or constructed.
Another accident by which a negative is often ren-
dered useless occurs when it is necessary, in consequence
of the position of the sun, to shade the lens. We are
in favour of using a properly constructed shade for the
lens under all circumstances, but usually the hat does
duty for want of something better; and too often its
rim will cause an unlooked-for eclipse of the upper
part of the picture. The negative from which the
greatest results were anticipated is generally the one
which exhibits some vexatious freak of this kind, and
the uninteresting one, which might be spared, remains
perfect in every respect. Other accidents are in many
cases due to the over-elaboration of construction which
distinguishes modern cameras. Working with one of
these instruments lately which was provided with
every conceivable movement, we noticed that one or
two of our pictures were quite out of focus, although
wo had taken every precaution to see that the image
wa3 sharply defined on the ground-glass previous to
exposure. We traced the fault to the loosening of
certain screws which control the to-and-fro movement
of the back of the camera — a movement, by the way,
which is never required except in the case of a lens of
abnormally short focus. The mere act of drawing the
shutter of the dark slide was sufficient to disturb the
position of the camera-back, with the result described.
A certain proportion of negatives are commonly lost
by the superposition of one image on the top of
another, by access of light during changing, and by
entry of light through faulty cameras and dark slides.
A small number are also lost by beginners who often
forget to draw their shutters, and the plate remains
unexposed. All these pitfalls assail the photographic
worker, and he must be looked upon as uncommonly
successful if his failures amount to as little as ten per
cent. We know that there are numbers who will tell
us that they never go wrong, and that if they take out
with them fifty plates, they will bring back fifty faultless
negatives. We have found that such boastful beings
produce negatives which are faultless only in the eyes
of their parent.
PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION OF THE UNITED
KINGDOM.*
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BY C. H. BOTHAMLEY, F.I.C., F.C.S.
At our meeting last year we were celebrating the jubilee of
the photographic negative, and my predecessor in this chair
very fitly devoted the greater part of his address to a sum-
mary of the history of photography during the past fifty
years. Although, as you will remember, that address had a
somniferous effect on the delegate from the Leather Bellows
Club, the rest of us listened with much interest to the admir-
able account of the rise and development of photography
which was laid before us. The events of a year usually
require much briefer treatment than the events of half a
century, and a review of the progress of the past twelve months
is unfortunately made easier by the fact that little, if any-
thing, of first-rate importance has been done. No discoveries
or inventions of far-reaching influence have startled the photo-
graphic world.
Much interest has been excited by the announcement that
an Austrian, Herr Verescz, had made a decided step towards
the solution of the problem of producing photographs in
natural colours. It is understood that the method is based
on Carey Lea’s researches on the photo-compounds of silver,
and that it differs from earlier methods in that the sensitive
material is used in the form of an emulsion. How far the
results are in advance of those obtained by previous experi-
menters is a point on which there are differences of opinion.
It seems practically certain that, at any rate, some improve-
ment has been made in the permanence of the images, and
we shall look forward with much interest to the results of
further experiments by the same worker.
This problem of photographing objects in their natural
colours is of very great interest. It seems to be the one thing
on which the non-photographic public has set its heart ; nor
are photographers lacking in enthusiasm. How far these
desires are likely to be realised we cannot tell. More or less
imperfect photographs in colours have often been obtained, but
they are not capable of multiplication in the way in which we
make hundreds of prints from one and the same negative.
Whether we shall ever obtain a chromatic negative process is
at present merely a matter of conjecture ; we can only say
that the direction in which the solution of the problem is to
be looked for is not yet apparent.
In dealing with another difficulty — the proper monochro-
» Read at the Photographic Convention at < hester.
492
[June 27, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
< .
matic rendering of coloured objects — we have made much
greater progress. No marked advance, however, has been
made since last year, and the general adoption of ortliochro-
matic methods is impeded by the facts that their successful
employment, especially for outdoor work, necessitates certain
modifications in well-established methods of working ; that the
preparation of the plates involves some manipulative skill and
acquaintance with the selective sensitisers to be used ; that it
is not at all improbable that a sensitiser with a similar name,
but of greatly inferior power, will be used unless great care is
taken in purchasing the materials ; that the commercial pro-
ducts upon which many have to depend do not at present
represent the maximum possibilities of the methods. Nor is
this true only of this country. Examination of many repro-
ductions of pictures shows that some Continental workers
have not obtained complete mastery over the capabilities of
the processes, even for the particular class of work in which
their advantages were most quickly recognised. The whole
question of colour, physical and physiological, scientific and
artistic, is very complex and difficult. Accurate knowledge
and conceptions are comparatively recent acquisitions, and it
is therefore not surprising that in the practical treatment of
its various problems progress is somewhat slow.
Development and developers have, as usual, attracted much
attention. Eikonogen has gradually obtained a firm hold as a
useful addition to our developing reagents, its special value
lying in the fact that it enables us to obtain well gradated
negatives wlieie other developers would be very liable to give
excessively strong contrasts. It follows that in dealing with
very short exposures eikonogen is of the greatest service. In
portraiture also it gives very fine results.
Catechol or pyrocatechin has not been fully investigated,
partly on account of its high price. Quite recently, however,
Dr. W. H. Perkin, jun. , has described a ready method of pre-
paring it from guaiacol, an allied substance much lower in price.
In this connection it is interesting to note that Colonel
Waterhouse has recently shown that guaiacol itself is a deve-
loper, though it does not possess any exceptional powers.
One very important fact in connection with the principles of
development has been established by Mr. Lyouel Clarke in the
course of his elaborate experiments on different develops rs, and
has been confirmed by later experiments of my own made for
quite another purpose. It is, that the maximum sensitiveness
that a plate will show — in other words, the maximum detail
obtainable for a given exposure — is the same for all developers,
and for all variations in the composition of one and the same
developer. Different developers differ, however, very con-
siderably in the time required to make the maximum detail
visible, and it follows, of course, that the gradations of the
resulting negatives are very different. That, in a word, is the
nature of the difference between developers — a difference in
gradation, and not in the maximum detail obtainable, provided
that the action of the developer is continued for a sufficient
length of time. Recent papers contributed to the Photographic
Society by Abney, and to the Society of Chemical Industry by
Hurter and Driffield, are worthy of careful study in connection
with the question of development.
Photo- mechanical printing processes have made no remark-
ably new departure, but their applications continue to increase.
Cheap illustrated papers, and a great increase in the number
of the illustrations in magazines of all kinds, constitute unmis-
takeable evidence of the usefulness of these processes. Without
photo-mechanical printing, a paper like the Daily Graphic
would be impracticable.
Chromo-typogravure, which produces the fine results seen in
Fiijaro Illustri, and chromo-collotype, which as yet is not often
seen in this country, produce results in many respects superior
to those of ordinary chromo-lithography. They are at present
our furthest advance in the photographic production of coloured
pictures. Colour printing with photogravure, I may perhaps
remind you, will reproduce water-colour drawings with a fidelity
so great that it may deceive even the artist of the original
drawing.
The applications of photography to scientific purposes become
every day more uun.erous and varied, and I do not hesitate to
say that it is in this direction that photography has won, and
probably will win, its greatest triumphs. Here it is without
a rival or competitor, and does services which nothing else is
capable of doing. As a method of fine art it occupies, and
probably will always occupy, a subordinate position.
In no branch of science have the photographic results been
of greater importance than in astronomy. Mr. Ainslie Common,
encouraged by his great successes with his big three-foot
reflector, has constructed and set up in his observatory at
Ealing a magnificent five-foot reflector, in almost every respect
the most powerful and most perfect telescope that has ever
been made. It was designed and erected especially for photo-
graphic work, and its jierformances will be watched with great
interest. You will, I am sure, share my pleasure in knowing
that Mr. Common has very kindly promised to give us, at our
meeting next year, an account of the later developments and
results of astronomical photography. Mr. Isaac Roberts, with
a much smaller reflector (twenty inches) at his private observa-
tory at Maghull, near Liverpool, has produced some of the
most remarkable photographs that have yet been done. Some
of these I am fortunate enough to be able to show you, and I
would especially call your attention to the wonderful photograph
of the great nebula in the constellation Andromeda, which
shows that in this nebula we have a new Saturn in the actual
process of formation. The condensed central mass, and the
system of long oval rings surrounding it, can be very clearly
seen. Of the important bearing of this result on the nebular
hypothesis I cannot here speak. It must be a source of great
satisfaction to all photographers to know that Mr. Roberts’s
splendid work, like that of Mr. Common before him, has this
month lieen awarded the blue ribbon of science — the Fellowship
of the Royal Society.
A very remarkable recent result is Professor Pickering’s
discovery that a certain star is really a double star with its
components too close together to be resolved by telescopes.
The discovery was the result of observations on the variation
in the definition of photographs of the spectrum of the star.
Mr. Andrew Pringle will tell us that photography has its
triumphs in dealing with the minute as well as with the
immense, and some of those triumphs he will bring before us
during this meeting.
Amongst other things, photography has been largely and
systematically applied to the study of lightning, ami by Lieu-
tenant R. Abercromby to the study of clouds and meteorology ;
by Lord Rayleigh to the study of the effects of electrification
on jets of liquid ; and by Mr. C. V. Roys to .the investigation
of falling drops of water. Mr. Friese Greene will describe to
us a new form of magazine camera which he has invented, and
which is especially suitable for investigations of the kind to
which I have just referred. An account of Mr. Muybridge’s
work we heard from his own lips last year, and this year Mr.
Gambier Bolton is to tell us of the results which he lias ob-
tained in applying photography to the study of animals from a
different point of view. There is, in fact, no branch of natural
science in which photography is not rapidly becoming indis-
pensable.
If the applications of photography to science have been
numerous and successful, the same cannot be said of the appli-
cations of science to photography. Most of the problems
awaiting solution at our last meeting still remain unsolved.
The careful experiments of Mr. Chapman Jones have given us
accurate knowledge of some aspects of mercurial intensification,
but of the real nature of the latent photographic image, of the
change which silver compounds undergo when exposed to light,
and of many other reactions which underlie some of our most
important processes, we are still almost entirely ignorant. The
reasons are not very far to seek. The investigators in these
subjects throughout the whole world at the present time may
almost be counted on the fingers. I say investigator* design-
edly ; of experimenters of a certain kind we have enough and
to spare, but of competent investigators there are very few
indeed. The fundamental problems to which I have referred
are very complex and difficult, and their investigation requires
a knowledge of chemistry and physics much greater than is
usually possessed by photographers, and, on the other hand, a
June 27, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
493
better practical acquaintance with photography than competent
chemists and physicists usually have. Further, they involve
many micro-chemical and electro-chemical changes with which
we are at present imperfectly acquainted. In the less difficult
questions of technique and processes, the relative merits of
different modes of treatment and the like, we might have ex-
pected to find more satisfactory progress ; but here also we have
made no great advances. From time to time, it is true, papers
appear in the journals recording so-called experimental inves-
tigations of the action of various developers, relative sensitive-
ness of different plates, and similar matters. In not a few
instances they leave us just where we were. So far as the
advancement of photography is concerned, they represent
merely so much wasted time and wasted material — -wasted be-
cause, for want of attention to some indispensable conditions,
neglect to eliminate important sources of error, want of dis-
tinction between several possible causes, and the like, no defin-
ite conclusions can be drawn from the evidence offered. The
euthusiasm of the experimenters is undoubted, and if a thirst
for notoriety is not always invisiole, we may take it that a
desire to advance photography is their chief incentive. Why,
then, do their efforts so often lead to nothing? Chiefly from a
want of training in the art of experiment ; from want of
acquaintance with the scientific method. A really good ex-
perimenter is a rarity ; an accurate observer must be both born
and made, and is a still less common species. With very rare
exceptions indeed, the scientific method, which includes not
only the arts of experiment and observation, but also the power
of properly co ordiuating the facts, and of making accurate
deductions from them, is only to be acquired by careful and
long training. Such training, it is a mere truism to say, very
few photographers have had, but to it we must undoubtedly
look for our future progress.
I do not, of course, mean that good work cannot be done in
photography unless a man has a profound acquaintance with
chemistry and physics. I sec before me a sufficient number of
living examples to at once disprove any such assertion. The
scientific method lies not in the matter, but in the manner.
It would be out of place here to attempt any definitions or
illustrations of what the scientific method really is. We might
define it negatively as that which is usually absent in photo-
graphic experiments, but that would not take us much further.
One of the most important characteristics of the scientific
method is great reserve and caution in making deductions ;
one of the chief characteristics of not a few so-called photo-
graphic experimenters is a fatal facility for making hasty and
incorrect deductions from imperfect data. No stronger proof
can be found of the fact that photography is comparatively in
its infancy, that its fundamental principles are not generally
understood, than the rubbish which is sometimes brought
before photographic societies in the form of papers — papers
which even now and again escape the waste-paper baskets of the
photographic journals. This latter catastrophe, of course,
only happens when the editor is away on a holiday. Similar
productions are characteristic of all crafts or arts which are
still carried on largely by rule-of-thumb ; they would not be
tolerated in societies of a truly scientific character, or in an
art which was really carried out on scientific principles.
Photography has an artistic as well as a scientific and tech-
nical side, and if I have not unnaturally dealt with the scien-
tific questions first, I do not forget that the majority of photo-
graphers regard the artistic aspects as the more important.
In the artistic development we may, I venture to think, con-
gratulate ourselves upon steady and well-founded progress.
Argument as to whether photography is or is not a method of
fine art is no longer necessary. Its place has been taken by
discussions, often of an animated kind, between the different
schools of photographic artists — uaturalistics, naturalists,
realists, and the like. Very few who are competent to deal
with the matter now refuse to admit that, in the hands of a
man of artistic temperament and training, photography may
be a method of pictorial fine art just as much as much as
mezzotint or sepia. We shall all admit that the possession
of a camera and lens will not make a man an artist ; neither
''ill the possession of a palette and a box of paints. It is also
true that a very large majority of the photographs which we see
are far from having any claim to be regarded as works of art, but
is that not also true of the bulk of the paintings which are pro-
duced ! Fine art, I take it, lies not in the method, but in the
use of it ; in all cases it is the man, not his medium of expres-
sion, that determines the result.
In 1873 Mr. P. G. Hammerton, the well-known art critic
and editor of the Portfolio, very clearly and tersely summed
up the case against the claims of photography to rank as a
method of fine art. “(1) It is false in local colour, putting
all the lights and darks of natural colouring out of tune.
(2) It is false in light, not being able to make those sub-
divisions in the scale which are necessary to attain relative truth.
(3) It is false in perspective, and consequently in proportions
and forms. (4) Its literalness and incapacity for selection and
emphasis are antagonistic to the artistic spirit.”
Most of this was true enough seventeen years ago, but we
have advanced a little in our knowledge of science and art
since then. Falsity in local colour has almost disappeared
before the development of orthochromatic methods, the prin-
ciple of which was discovered in the very year in which Mr.
Hammerton wrote. Falsity of light arises mainly from the use
of plates of unsuitable quality, and from imperfect knowledge
of exposure and development on the part of the operator.
Falsity in perspective and the proportion of forms is entirely a
question of the proper or improper use of lenses, and need not
exist at all. Literalness and incapacity for selection and
emphasis are defects in the photographer more than in photo-
graphy. How far we have advanced in this direction I will
bring to witness, if not Mr. Hammerton himself, at any rate
Mr. Hammerton’s paper. In the January number of tl*s year,
speaking of the photographs which illustrate Miss Agnes
Giberne’s book, “The Ocean of Air,” the Portfolio says, “But
what it concerns us to observe is, that though they are merely
literal transcripts from nature, and no other artistic faculty
than that of selection has been exercised in their production,
this faculty alone has sufficed in several instances to produce
genuine works of art. If an artist were to take, for instance,
the “ Trees in a Mist,” photographed by Mr. Sutcliffe, of
Whitby, it is not too much to say that lie would find it difficult
to improve the composition, or to alter a single line for the
better.”
In their assault on the fortress of art, photographers have
already carried the barbican, and many may be found in the
outer ward. A few have even forced their way into the inner
court, but the keep remains in the hands of the painters and
sculptors, and in their hands, I doubt not, it always will re-
main. Every method of fine art has its limitations, and in the
case of photography these limitations are, in many respects,
more severe than in any other method. I, for one, accept Mr.
Ruskin’s dictum that every true work of art shows distinctly
the method by which it has been produced, and that its character
and possibilities are largely determined by the method. I have
little sympathy with those whose chief anxiety seems to be to
make their photographs look like something else. I believe that
if photography is to maintain the position it has already won,
and is to make further advances as a method of fine art, we
must not only be fully acquainted with and make the most of
its capabilities, but we must also quite clearly recognize its
limitations. We must be content to admit that there are cer-
tain classes of subjects which come rightly within the scope of
the painter, but are unfit for treatment by photography. In
our appreciation of a picture we cannot forget the method by
which it has been produced ; and when, 'for example, you see
a photograph professedly of an incident which took place before
photography was invented, the unreality and want of truth is
too prominent. You are unable to rid your mind of the idea
that, after all, it is only a literal representation of a group of
models. When, too, we see photographs which profess to re-
present those human emotions which we commonly hold sacred
from intrusion, a sense of unfitness more than counterbalances
any pleasure arising out of mere technical artistic skill. All
this has been pointed out before, more appropriately and with
much greater force, by the doyen of photographic artists, Mr.
H. P. Robinson. Latterly in America they have very largely
191
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
developed the practice of photographic competitions, prizes
being given for the best set of photographs illustrating some
poem or part of a poem or story ; and to some extent the prac-
tice has, unfortunately, like the potato beetle, spread to this
countr}'. If the subjects are properly chosen, with due regard
to time and place, such competitions may not do any harm,
though it is contrary to experience to expect that any real fine
art will be developed in such a manner ; but when the outcome
is photographs of such scenes as a girl in agony by the deathbed
of her father, done, of course, with the help of models — -to take
only one example out of those which you may see in the Ameri-
can magazines — it is an outrage upon one’s sense of the artistic
fitness of things.
Even where groups of figure studies of the class to which I
am referring are successful, the result is often due to the
models quite as much as to the photographer. He has to be
content with the best he can make of them ; he cannot with
his camera alter lines and expressions as a painter can with his
brush. In the hands of a few masters, pictures of this kind
are undoubtedly often successful ; but in the greater number
of instances they are not at all pleasiug to anyone but the
photographer and the models, and sometimes not even to the
models. I hold that in the interests of photography as a
method of fine art, it is to be regretted that photographers do
not chiefly confine themselves to the classes and subjects that
photography' can deal with excellently', instead of striving after
effects and results which, from the essential limitations of the
method, are a severe strain on its capabilities. What class of
subjects, you may ask, do I regard as proper to photography
from the artistic point of view ? I would reply, portraiture
pure and simple, with studies of figures in costume, and groups,
if you like, provided that they are put forward as such ; landscape
and seascape, in which figures are either subordinate or absent
altogether. At the risk of making invidious distinctions, I
would cite Wellington’s “ Eventide,” Mayland’s “ There is
Sorrow on the Sea,” Gale’s “ Sleepy Hollow,” many of the
studies of Sutcliffe, and many of the landscapes of Green, as
examples of the class of work which seem to me to show photo-
graphy at its best. Someone may raise the old objection that
in dealing with pure landscape and seascape you have not
sufficient human interest ; you can only7 represent the literal
beauty of your subject, and have no opportunity for the
idealisation which some hold, though others do not, to be
essential to all fine art. I decline to accept the dogma ; but,
even if it were true, I would reply7 in the words of Fra Filippo
Lippi : —
“ If you get simple beauty, and nought else,
You get about the best thing Qod invents :
That’s somewhat; and you’ll find the soul you have missed
Within yourself when you return him thanks.”
What can be done to promote the advance of photography,
scientific and artistic ? The development of a desire for better
training, and the provision of means to satisfy the desire. Here,
as in many educational matters, we are behind our Continental
competitors. Germany has long had an efficient school at
Berlin, under Professor H. W. Vogel, and there is a well-
known school of a more technical character at Scliloss
Gronenbach, under the direction of Herr W. Cronenberg.
Zurich has a new photographic laboratory full to overflowing.
Austria has its new and splendid Photographic Institute, with
abundant accommodation, and a large staff of teachers under
the direction of Professor Eder, and they attract students not
only from all parts of the Continent, but also from England
and America. Here in this country we have the schools at
the Polytechnic and the Birkbeck Institute, and in various
science and University Colleges up and down the country
instruction is given in the principles and practice of photo-
graphy, but all of them together are scarcely equal to the
Institute at Vienna, and they confine their attention almost
exclusively to teaching, doing but little in the way of research.
In America they are not even so well off as we are. So far as
I can learn, there is only one school of any importance, that at
Chatauqua, and I am informed on very good authority, that
very little desire is shown to take advantage of the instruction
offered, and that the school is only kept alive by the energy
and self-denial of its teachers.
It has been proposed to found a Photographic Institute in
this country, and we shall all be agreed that, founded on a
right basis and conducted on right lines, it might be of incal-
culable benefit to photography. Founded on a right basis and
conducted on right lines — that is the essence of the whole
matter, so far as possible success is concerned. An Institute
of Photography, I take it, should teach, and examine, and con-
duct original research. It might possibly also act as a court
of arbitration in disputes involving technical matters, but the
advancement of photography7 in all its branches and aspects,
by teaching and research, should be its chief business. It should
be thoroughly, though not ambitiously7, equipped ; it must be
free from connection with commercial interests of any kind ;
above all, it must be free from the immaturism which so often
clings round present-day amateurism.
Whether, when all these conditions were fulfilled, it would
attract a satisfactory number of students, is a matter of con-
jecture. We English are slow to avail ourselves of our advant-
ages in matters educational, even where the knowledge to be
acquired has a direct monetary7 value. The experience of exist-
ing schools is not altogether encouraging, but the prestige which
would attach from the beginning to a properly equipped insti-
tution especially devoted to photography would probably do
much. The standard of every-day requirements in photography
is gradually being raised, and there is little doubt that better
instruction will be necessary7 to produce and maintain the
higher degree of skill demanded. One thing is certain, that
when the establishment of such an institution comes within
the sphere of practical politics, the members of the Photo-
graphic Convention will not be backward in their support of it.
After all, the real progress of photography depends no more
on institutes than the progress of civilisation and human
knowledge depends on Acts of Parliament. The welfare of a
community depends on the conduct and character of the
individuals composing it ; and the progress of an art or craft
depends on the skill, the thoroughness, the enthusiasm of
the individuals who practise it. We, as a Convention, are
banded together to advance the interests of photography, and
all that appertains thereto. As a Convention, we arc
endeavouring to justify our existence, and in some measure, at
least, we are succeeding ; but whatever we may do as a body,
we have each an individual responsibility, an individual duty,
towards the art which we practise — to see to it that our own
work, be it much or be it little, is honest and thorough, the
best that it is in us to do. Am I not right in holding that
the spirit which should animate every follower of the photo-
graphic art is the spirit which inspired the poet when he
wrote —
“ In after days, when grasses high
O’er- top the stone where I shall lie,
Though ill or well the world adjust
My slender claim to honoured dust,
I shall not question or reply.
“ I shall not see the morning sky;
I shall not hear the night wind sigh ;
I shall be mute, as all men must,
In after days I
“ But yet, now living, fain were I
That some one then should testify,
Saying — ‘ He held his pen in trust
To Art, not serving shame or lust ’
Will none !— Then let my memory die
In after days!”
Messrs. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, & Co., have pub-
lished “ Practical Notes on the Preparation of Drawings for
Photographic Reproduction, with a Sketch of the Principal
Photo-Mechanical Printing Processes,” by Colonel J. Water-
house, B.S.C., Assistant Surveyor-General, India. This work
was originally published, it is said, in 1887 as a series of papers
in the Indian Engineer , with the object of bringing together the
results of long experience in preparing maps and plans for
reproduction by7 photo-zincography ; but the scope of the
volume, which is divided into eight chapters, with an addendum,
has been extended to include drawings of all kinds, supple-
mented by7 information gleaned from the few authors who have
written on the subject.
June 27, 1890.]
495
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PAINTINGS AT THE GOUPIL GAlXERY, NEW
BOND STREET.
BY REV F. C. LAMBERT, M.A.
Messrs. Boussod, Valadon, and Co. have uow on view
two series of paintings, both of which are of some peculiar
interest to those concerning themselves with current art.
The first is a set of water-colour drawings by Madeleine
Lemaire, illustrating “Flirt,” the latest novel by Paul
Ilervieu. The series comprises some thirty-six small
pictures, separately framed, the chief feature being the
semi-decorative floral border, which strongly reminds one
of a certain style of photo-album. While admitting that
the artist has executed these floral edgings in many cases
with conspicuous skill, yet it is a question of some
importance for artists of all sorts — including photographers
—as to whether any such decorative work is, or is not, out
of place around figure studies. Three larger pictures are
free from this question. One of these three (No. 39,
“ Melancolic ”) and one of the smaller ones (No. 11 , “ l’oste
Rcstaute ”) show how the artist can manage the play of
light in and out the folds of crimson plush. As this is a
material which presents some difficulties to the ordinary
photographer, he would do well to study these two, and
also look at many of the others, as they contain for him
numerous hints as to the arrangement and pose of people
in modern costume.*
The second scries comprises thirty-one “ oils by the
veteran Russiau artist, Ivan A'ivasovsky. It is interesting
to know at the outset that all this series have been painted
after the fifty-second anniversary of the artistic career of
this artist celebrated at St. l’etersburgh in 1887. Space
does not permit much detailed criticism of the various
paintings. The general impression conveyed by them is
that they most probably represent climatic conditions
which are exceptional, .and outside the usual experience
of English eyes. In several instances they remind one
very strongly of some of the Norwegian and Swedish
painters. Every one visiting this room will be struck
with the large size of No. 10 (“ The Supreme Moment ”),
a shipwreck scene in mid-ocean, with waves rolling moun-
tains high,” depicted on a canvas of Dore-esque propor-
tions. It has some fine colour passages ; some of the
water looks very wet, cold, and transparent, but without
saying such mountain billows do not exist in extreme
cases, it may be questioned whether those who ever have
been in such peril as herein shown, would be sufficiently
reliable evidence for the construction of such proportions
as are admittedly of extremely rare occurrence.
In Nos. 11 (“ Bather ”) and 17 (“ Dead Calm ”) clouds
are shown which, in this country, do not usually take
that shape so near the horizon.
Nos. 19 (“ Sea-Piece ”) and 21 (“ Night Effect”) gave
an impression of a want of some stronger skylight with
such vivid reflections.
The two skylights in No. 18 are rather puzzling.
Nos. 14 (“ Argonauts ”) and 16 carry us into the region
of speculation. In No. 14 the chief feature of interest
is cut into by the frame. In No. 16 (“Destruction of
Pompeii ”) the spotty lights in foreground and streaks in
sky are painful reminders of defective emulsion. In
No. 26 the sun, or full moon, whichever it may be, seems
of an unusual shape.
One may often see the sun's disc when low down and
near the horizon, apparently compressed vertically into a
* For an article on this artist, consult Art and Letters, December, 188S.
shape somewhat elliptical, but the sun in No. 26 does not
seem to have been affected quite in this way.
All the pictures are, undoubtedly, well worth careful
inspection, even if only to teach us English folk that our
way of seeing and doing is not the only way — not even
necessarily the best way.
IMAGINING AND IMAGING*
BY PHILIP H. NEWMAN.
I suppose it is pretty generally admitted now that photography,
within certain well-defined limits, is a legitimate means of
artistic expression, and in spite of mutterings and echoes heard
from time to time to the contrary, statements that the various
scientific processes by which light becomes an image maker,
“only serve to degrade nature,” are not seriously maintained
in the face of demonstrations that such results, when they
occur, are due to the want of ability on the part of the photo-
grapher, shown in the selection of his subject or the choice of
his implements. A further proof of the alliance between fine
art and photography is the increasing desire of photographic
societies and conventions to leaven the purely scientific with
the purely artistic, the materialism of lenses and chemicals
with the emotional and the aesthetic. And here I may be per-
mitted, perhaps, to acknowledge the great compliment that
has been paid me in being asked to address you on these latter
subjects. I am the more stimulated to do so, however, from
feeliugs of gratitude as an artist for the benefits and assistance
photography has conferred upon me. It has been argued that
scientific studies and the exercise of optical and mechanical
processes are not expected to be found side by side with that
divine afflatus which should pervade the artistic nature — in a
word, that photographers have no imagination. I can only
conceive of this as a jest, and must treat it as such.
It is true, personally, I can only allude to my photographic
capacity as of the humblest, although I have succeeded in
imaging uow and then all I have focussed, yet I am entitled to
bear witness to a phenomenon of the dark room, which
makes it at once a great school of imagination. I know of no
exercise of imagination my mind has undergone equal to that
experienced when developing a plate, as to how the latent
image would turn out ; and I will even confess, although I
never thought to do so even to my bosom friend, in the dark
room, that my imagination has begun to develop the image
when no chemical formula would do it. I need not tell you,
who have doubtless in your time undergone this hallucination,
that no hypo would ever fix the picture. But to be serious,
we have all of us imagination, and it will grow and bear good
fruit if w’e will allow it, enriching the gardens of our minds,
and making pleasant avenues for art to linger in. Our great
danger is, undoubtedly, that science and dry fact will tend to
dwarf and kill our imagination, especially if, moreover, we
encourage that pernicious vice of looking at everything only
through the camera.
Photography has been working amongst us, as Mr. P. H.
Emerson says, “ for fifty years for better or for worse,” and I
am afraid, if I believed in everything or much which he has
written, I should have to admit “ for worse.” I should have
to say to you to-day, gentlemen, when Daguerre addressed that
meeting of the French Academy on the 19tli of August, 1839,
and showed it the hitherto fugitive image fixed in a picture of
silver, he sounded the death knell of fine art ; but I do not
believe in all Mr. Emerson has written, and fine art is re-
prieved.
It is not my intention to drag you page by page in a review
of the book I allude to — “ Naturalistic Photography ” — or that
portion of it which relates directly to fine art, most of which
you have, doubtless, read ; I shall only have occasion to touch
upon it here and there. My only reason for mentioning it at
all is, that enthusiasm for one branch should be without pre-
judice to the whole tree. One aspect of fine art does not
necessarily cover the entire field, though the solemn and
authoritative dicta of this book would imply that it did. No-
* Read at the Fbotographic Convention at Chester.
496
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
thing that comes within Mr. Emerson’s purview that is not
naturalistic in art is to be tolerated, and unless you focus the
subject, so to speak, with his lens you must be wrong. As
tastes for ever vary without being necessarily bad, this con-
tention is surely inartistic and illiberal.
In a chapter devoted to “Naturalism in Pictorial and Glyptic
Art,” Mr. Emerson careers through the schools, from Pharaoh
in Egypt to Reynolds in Leicester Square, from China to
Bouverie Street, from Japan to the Royal Academy ; with the
touch of a magician’s wand, with the stroke of a pen, with a
few dozen pages acutely sensitised to the true impressions of
art at all periods, this book disposes of the w hole question.
The cognoscenti and the savants, the art critics of ancient and
modern times, have indeed lived in vain ; their writings, with
little exception, can be shown by the fierce light of naturalism
to be so much waste paper, that ought, of course, at the
earliest opportunity, and in the eternal fitness of things, to
crumble into dust— that dust which lias been cast into the
eyes of an hitherto misguided world. Mr. Emerson falls into
ecstacies, however, over Egyptian lions, and discriminately
tolerates some Assyrian ditto. Touching Greek art with a
light hand, he points out with satisfaction that Appelles’
greatness was due to his imitation of nature, and that pre-
viously Apollodorus was the first true painter, but “ that the
innovations made by him in the relation of foreground and
background cannot be compared to the improvements effected
by the Brothers Van Eyck in modern times.” This is a far
cry, and I dare say the Brothers Van Eyck and Appollodorus
would .,be as astonished as we are at the comparison. Mr.
Emerson recommends the friese of the Parthenon to our notice,
and lingers awhile among the Rornaus, admiring particularly
the heads of Nero of Commodus in the British Museum.
Riding his hobby of naturalism at a canter through Pagan
times, he pulls up with the horse of Selene, bowing his com-
pliments to the Greeks for the height of their horizon, and
whom, it is refreshing to find, he considers “very advanced.”
We then find ourselves with Mr. Emerson loftily surveying
early Christian art in a tolerant spirit ; but he is very in-
tolerant when art was tied and fettered by priestly domination
in mediaeval times, and he shall not be blamed, excepting that
he does not dwell sufficiently on the protection the Church
afforded art, and the loving naivty with which it was inspired.
We will not follow him across China and the East, but watch
him running amok against everything and everybody in the
Renaissance who does not fulfil his standard of naturalism.
Such men as Diirer get off by the skin of their teeth, and the
only artists standing out as worthy of the greatest commenda-
tion are the Van Eycks and Holbein. Something, however,
has to be said for Andrea del Sarto, but Michael Angelo,
Raphael, and Corregio are swept away like chaff before the
wind. Benvenuto Cellini, the author of the Perseus, is not
recognised as a sculptor, but as a goldsmith, and as to Rubens
and Vandyck, &c. , the less said the better. Hogarth stands out
among the English school of painters with Crome and Gains-
borough, and perhaps Constable as an associate ; but Reynolds,
Turner, Nasmyth, Stanfield, Linnell, and Maclise go by the
board. I will not weary you further, or twice kill the killed ;
it has been reserved for Mr. Emerson to convert the Temple
of Fame into a slaughter-house, and I would rather he held
the entire monopoly ; but, as his book speaks so authoritatively
on a subject with which you desire I shall have something to
say, it is necessary for me to do something towards clearing
the ground, and it shall be my task to show you where 1 con-
sider are obvious mistakes.
Mr. Emerson’s battle cry, or rather, his killing cry, is Nature !
nature ! nature ! go to nature ! Well, I am with him : we are
all with him, being sane men ; but what nature ? He says the
Greeks went to nature ; many sculptors have told him so.
Truly it needed not that ; he might have evolved that from his
inner consciousness, if he could not see it. How, then, what
nature did they go to ? Was it the nature of a labour-stunted
physique, a brain-killed body, a factory-degenerated virility ?
Did they study arms from a sewing-machine girl, legs from a
ballet dancer or a cyclist ? Where would Mr. Emerson image
his legs from to-day, even with the help of all the rectilinear
lenses he possesses ? Of course, I mean that the legs should be
artistic legs, such as a Greek would have modelled. I think
we should find Mr. Emerson rather at his wits’ end if he had to
draw- such legs, unless he is well grounded in anatomy, or hap-
pened, by a fluke, to be visited by an exceptional model whom
lie could photograph. The general type of images of legs he
could get would not come up to the standard of what Mr.
Emerson’s imagination would dictate, and I should not be sur-
prised if, after all, we did not find him, having put the camera
on one side, assisting his imagination by taking a look at that
Elgin friese we all so much admire ; not to copy, oh, no! but
just to see how the old fellows did it. Then, if he had to get
a whole body, say a Venus d< Milo, without a trace of stays,
how then ?
But I forgot Mr. Emerson cares for none of these things,
but would rather have a peasant woman from nature than a
Venus, Virgin, or Saint from imagination and cultured ideal.
Well, there is no accounting for taste ; but it is hard he will
not permit the freedom in others he takes himself. There are
still those equally earnest men in art who prefer the Saint,
the Virgin, the Venus of ideal and refined culture to the
peasant woman. By the way, I should like to know
how Mr. Emerson is affected in relation to this subject
by that exquisite remark of Balzac’s. — “ L'une dcs
gloires <lc la socictd c'est d’avoir cree la femme, Ul
oil la nature d fait une fcmelle.” Freely translated :
“ One of the glories of society is, that it has created woman,
where nature has only made a female.” Surely, Mr. Emerson,
the ideal is not so hopeless after all, and it is just possible
that a great intellectual effort to attain an ideal on a reason-
able substratum of nature might be partially successful, and
not altogether Utopian ; at least, even if for argument’s sake
wre demolished the old masters to a man. Mr. Emerson should
surely know it is no reproach to photography that though the
camera can do much, it cannot do impossibilities ; the intellec-
tual effort in its use must, to a great extent, be subject to the
model it focusses. You cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s
ear in photography, much as you may do in that way in paint-
ing ; but, on the other hand, are you always sure of making
the best of the sow’s ear as such ? Not at all, unless you bring
considerable artistic ability to bear upon the treatment
of your subject ; and when, instead of the sow’s ear, you
have, say, a very beautiful woman to photograph, the difficulty
and the intellectual effort becomes iufinitely greater, and you
will be glad of some hints from Sir Joshua, to say nothing of
Raphael and Rubens, bsides Holbein, Titian, Gainsborough, and
the favoured few Mr. Emerson tolerates.
(To be continued.)
(tfovrcgpontJcnce.
CENSURES ON PHOTOGRAPHIC DEALERS.
Sir, — Noticing several letters which have appeared in the
pages of some of your contemporaries, conveying sweeping
censures on photographic dealers, I deem it only just to state
that, during a professional experience extending over thirty-
seven years, save in one instance I have never met aught but
the fairest treatment ; and in this solitary exception the
offender could scarcely be regarded as a dealer.
Mr. Otto Scholzig, whom I particularise, because he has been
so distinctly mentioned, has satisfactorily supplied me with
paper for several years, during which period I have but once
liad occasion to call attention to a faulty parcel, damaged per-
haps through some lack of care in packing ; it was at once
replaced without a question — a practice I have invariably found
to hold good with all other houses with whom I have had busi-
ness transactions.
It affords me much pleasure to offer this unsolicited testi-
mony to the fair and straightforward dealing of this large sec-
tion of the photographic community, who are, in too many
instances, blamed on very inadequate grounds.
Win wood, Tunbridge Wells, June '^th. Wm. Ma.YLA.ND.
June 2 7, 1890.]
tHE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
497
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
Stripping the Film of the Gelatine Negative —
Unfavourable Opinions of the Akisto Paper — Toning
Silver Bromide Transparencies on Opal Glass.
Stripping the Film of Gelatine Negatives. — There are
several good methods of stripping the film of gelatine
negatives, which may be used to produce reversed negatives
for photo mechanical purposes, though I have always
found that the process is of absolute certainty only in
the case of the specially prepared gelatine plates of the
trade. A method, however, with which I have repeatedly
succeeded is the following, worked out by M. Charles
Petit, professor of the renowned photographic reproduc-
tion establishment of Paris, and recommended of late
by a well-known French amateur photographer, in the
Archiv. The finished negative, after thorough washing
and drying, is placed for ten minutes in a bath of 100 c.c.
of water, 5 grammes of potassium or ammonium bichro-
mate, and a few cubic centimetres of alcohol, allowed to
drain, and dried in the dark. It is then exposed, at first
from the glass side, for ten minutes in the sun, or forty-
five minutes in diffused light, the gelatine film being
covered during this operation by a black paper. Then
the film side is exposed for a little shorter time. The
plate is then washed in several changes of water until
the latter remains clear, and dried. It is, however,
necessary, in order to ensure success, that the gelatine
film retain a certain degree of moisture, such as it
would have acquired if it had been dried for twenty-
four hours in a cellar. In order to strip the film, an
incision is made in it by means of a sharp pen-knife
about one-eighth of an inch distant all around the edges
of the plate, then one corner is lifted, and the film care-
fully stripped. After stripping, the film is placed rever-
sedly upon another glass plate of a little larger size than
the film, in order to facilitate the operation ; an expan-
sion of the exposed bichromated gelatine film does not
occur. This transferring process is done best by placing
the glass plate on the bottom of a dish filled with clean
water, and the reversed film upon the plate. The whole
is then lifted and allowed to drain for a moment ; to
obtain perfect contact between film and glass, a piece of
letter paper is placed on the glass, and the excessive
water pressed out by means of the ball of the hand or of
a squeegee. It is then put away for drying. The
stripped film can, of course, also be used as negative
film, and in this case, after the drying which follows the
washing out the bichromate, a coating of plain collodion
can be imparted to the gelatine surface, then a five per
cent, gelatine solution to which some glycerine has been
added. By this coating the bichromated gelatine film
below, which is very fragile, is made more resistant. The
stripping of the film is then done in the same way as
described above.
Unfavourable Opinions of the Aristotype Paper. — It is a
fact very often to be met with in daily life that the better
a thing and the more successful it is. the greater is the
number of the envious, who try to oppose it by .all
means. This is the case now with the aristotype paper,
which, by all who have printed witli it and judge it dis-
interestedly, is designed unanimously as the paper par
excellence for amateurs. On the many advantages and
merits of this paper has been written so much, that it
would be needless to repeat it ; be it sufficient to state that
the number of its admirers and adherents grows from
day to day. This, however, is by no means to the liking
of some persons, who disregard all that they have not
invented themselves, and who therefore search for
defects and disadvantages of the material — in most cases,
however, vainly. So to the aristotype paper the objection
was made from the very beginning of its existence that
the high gloss of the surface of the finished prints was
inartistic and even offensive, and a German contemporary
quite recently contained the following criticism : “ The
aristotype paper, with its uncertain tones, with its vulgar
high gloss, and the faded details, is very seldom suited
for artistic effects.” If the writer of this judgment had
ever seen the splendid and most artistic views of moun-
tains printed on aristo paper by M. Vittorio Sella, of
Biella, or the beautiful landscapes of Mr. Cronenberg,
he would, perhaps, have altered his opinion. With regard
to the glossy surface of the aristo prints, it is only neces-
sary to remember that they can be produced as easily
with a matt surface, by squeezing them on a ground glass
plate instead of a plate glass or ferrotype plate. They
are then very much like platinotype prints as regards the
tone and the surface, with the difference, however, that
their sharpness is much greater than that of platinotypes.
Genre pictures and portraits are specially suitable for this
treatment. Mr. Alfred Stieglitz, one of our most eminent
amateurs, who had sent to the last Jubilee Exhibition at
Berlin a large number of genre pictures printed on
aristo paper and toned with the platinum toning bath,
writes in Professor Eder’s “ Year-Book “ A celebrated
professor, one of the most bitter enemies of the aristo
paper, asked me whether my pictures were printed on
platinotype paper ? And he was highly surprised when I
answered, ‘ They are aristo prints, toned with platinum.’
This example shows the small importance of such
judgments, and for what reason they are published.
Toning Silver Bromide Transparencies on Opal Glass. — •
This procesg is, in general, not quite simple, because a
sensitive silver bromide emulsion, after the reduction,
cannot be toned directly. The ordinary gold baths are
useless, since the reduced silver is too coarsely grained. It
is, therefore, necessary to transform the picture at first
into a silver chloride print. I)r. Miethe recommends for
this purpose the following solution : —
Water... ...
Alum...
Potassium bichromate
Hydrochloric acid
... 1000 c.c.
... 20 grammes
After a few minutes the print is well washed, exposed for
about two minutes, and developed with the citrate deve-
loper. According to the time of exposure, the tone varies
from red, through brown, to black.
A Fine Arts Exhibition is to be held at Poona in September
next, when a money prize and two silver medals are to be
offered for photography. Two out of the three judges for
this section of the exhibition will be photographers.
The Bureau Scandinave, Brussels, has organised a photo*
graphic excursion to the west of Norway, to leave Rotterdam
on Thursday, the 14th August. Arrangements have been made
for the use of a dark room in each hotel at which the excur-
sionists may stay.
Birmingham Photographic Society. — The first half-day
excursion of the season to Coventry took place on Saturday
last. Mr. F. W. Hard}', of the Coventry Society, accompanied
the members to the principal architectural buildings of the
city. The next excursion is fixed for July 12th.
498
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
j3otcs.
Usually the judging of competing photographs and
the awarding of prizes in connection with an exhibi-
tion are looked upon as thankless and almost disagree-
able operations. . Where the task is performed by ladies
the reverse seems to be the case ; at least, so we learn
from our lively contemporary, Woman, which states
that “Mrs. Eveleen Myers (sister of Miss Dorothy
Tennant). Miss Edith Scannell, and Miss Ida Vernon
have just concluded the pleasant task of adjudicating
on some 300 photographs by ‘ ladies only.’ ” If these
ladies found their duty a “pleasant” one, and if the
lady competitors are also satisfied with their verdict,
we would suggest that Mrs. Myers, Miss Scannell, and
Miss Vernon be invited to assist the judges of the
next exhibition in Pall Mall. Up to the present no
exhibition year has passed over without some little heart-
burning on the part of someone. Perhaps the intro-
duction of ladies might do away with all asperity.
We ought not to forget, in connection with this subject,
to mention that the 300 photographs alluded to formed
the first Amateur Ladies’ Photographic Competition,
and that the first prize of a gold medal was awarded
to Miss E. Dora Anderson.
One of the periodicals of the “Bit” class offers a
prize for the best answer to the following question :
“ What are the best uses to which photography can be
put ?” There cannot be the slightest objection to the
discussion of such an interesting question, but it must
be confessed that the reason given for the wording of
the question is puzzling. It is, so we read, put in the
above form so that those who know nothing of photo-
graphy may have an equal chance with those who are
familiar with the art. One would have thought that
in such a competition the latter would be first and the
former nowhere ; but perhaps the editor of the paper
in question has some convincing proof of the con-
trary up his sleeve. If so, every photographer would
much like to hear what it is.
Mr. P. O’Brien, M.P., is apparently quite convinced
of the value of photography as a political argument.
First, he secures with his own hand some photographs
of the peculiar process known as “ shadowing.” Next
he has copies of the pictures handed about in the
House of Commons. Lastly, he has an optical lantern
apparatus placed on a barge, which is anchored off the
Houses of Parliament, and throws images of the said
photographs on a screen for the delectation or otherwise
of the members. The question is, what will be the
next stage? Hitherto, the most singular discrepancies
have been evident between the accounts given by Irish
members who have been eye-witnesses of certain scenes,
and the official versions furnished by the police. Will
it come about in future, when Mr. Balfour traverses
a statement, that he will be silenced by the triumphant
production of a photograph of the scene in question ?
If so, and if the evidence of photography is valuable,
[June 27, 1890.
then the Irish police will have to be furnished with
instantaneous cameras, so that Mr. Balfour may be able
to give an adequate rejoinder to the photographs of
his opponents by producing the police picture. This
kind of thing would, at all events, open up very
interesting discussions, and give an opportunity for
speaking to the photographic members of the House.
Indeed, the freemasonry of photography, and the
friendly feeling it fosters, might positively be beneficial,
and considerably soften the acrimony of the debates on
Irish questions.
Thotography and the photographer have always been
an irresistible source of fun to Mr. Toole. His inter-
view with the Australian photographer, related last
week in these pages, shows that he has not yet exhausted
his joking propensities in this direction. Mr. Toole’s
recently published “Reminiscences” abound in
allusions to his photographic experiences. Some of
his pranks in the studio must have been extremely
funny. He tells how, when he, Phelps, and Charles
Mathews were playing “John Bull” at the Gaiety,
they were photographed together for the Illustrated
London News. The photographer was very much
impressed with his work, and very anxious ; and just
as he had posed the group to his entire satisfaction,
Phelps gave one of his little nervous coughs. Mathews
remarked, “ It’s no good trying to get your tragedy
cough into the picture, Phelps ; it can’t be done.”
They were photographed in character; Phelps had on
one of his heavy tragic wigs, and Mathews one of his
tall comedy hats. Just before the last pose the photo-
grapher suggested that Mr. Mathews should take off
his hat. “ It will make your face lighter,” said he.
Mathews, in his quick, merry way, taking off his hat,
Said, “ Don’t you think if Mr. Phelps took off his
tragedy wig it would make his face lighter ? ”
At the last meeting of the Royal Astronomical
Society Mr. Knobel gave an interesting account of a
visit he had paid to Dr. Yogel’s observatory at
Potsdam. Referring to Dr. Yogel’s new photographic
telescope, just finished, Mr. Knobel said that, with
the exception of the French telescope, this was,
he believed, the first introduced for the photographic
survey of the heavens which had been entirely com-
pleted. Mr. Ivnobcl was also privileged to examine
some photographs taken with this telescope, with one
hour’s exposure, of the Nebula of Orion. Incidentally,
Mr. Knobel said that Dr. Schriener, who has been
devoting much attention to the photographic magnitudes
of stars, informed him of the conclusion at which he
has arrived, that white stars require only one-tenth
of the exposure of red stars to give the same photo-
graphic magnitude ; it is, therefore, difficult to deter-
mine the magnitude of stars when they differ mate-
rially in colour.
The experiment tried by the Pall Mall Gazette of
asking the frank opinion of the various artists whose
pictures are reproduced in its publication, “ Pictures of
June 27, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
499
1890” was a hazardous one, hut on the whole it has
come out of it fairly well. At the same time, it must
be confessed that the remarks which find fault are more
interesting to read than those which express satisfac-
tion. We gather, for instance, that Mr. John Brett,
A. R. A., knows something of photography, for he writes :
“If you turn to page 37 I feel sure you will agree
with me that the print is extremely weak. Not
having seen the negative, I cannot with certainty
indicate where the fault lies, but my opinion is that
the negative was thin. . . . The printer has printed it
with the utmost care, but a thin negative is past pray-
ing for.” Mr. Colin Hunter is also dissatisfied. He
is “ sorry to say that my picture seems to have suffered
more than usual in transferring it into black and
white.” Mr. C. N. Kennedy thinks his pictures are
good “ considering the badness of the photograph,” but
Mr. Yecnd King, who sent a “ particularly good ”
photograph, finds that his work has suffered through
being over-reduced. Sir J. E. Millais misses his moon,
which “up” in the painting has “gone behind a
cloud” in the reproduction. Mr. W. B. Richmond is
exceedingly candid when he says, “ I should not be
just to myself nor to you if I expressed a favourable
opinion — I think they are very bad indeed.” Mr. G.
A. Storey observes that, “ Considering that I sent you
a very brown photo, I think my picture comes out
very well,” which is consolatory, though we should
like to know what Mr. Storey means by a “brown
photo.” Mr. Walter Winch also lays blame on the
unfortunate photographer, as “ the reproduction is as
good as it could be, considering the quality of the photo-
graph.”
Mr. E. J. Poynter unconsciously points out the cause,
probably, of most of the dissatisfaction when he says,
“ I consider that the reproduction of the water-colour
of the ‘Queen of Sheba ’is good, considering the difficulty
which the colouring of the work presents to the photo-
grapher.” Exactly ! The colouring of many artists’
work, notably that of Mr. John Brett, whose pictures
have in them all the colours of the rainbow illuminated
by the limelight, does present difficulties. To make a
good copy of a painting requires special knowledge and
special skill. Artists possibly do not recognise this,
but think that anybody who has a camera can photo-
graph a painting. If they want good printing repro-
ductions, let them get the best photographs obtainable.
Manufacturers in all trades know that to be success-
ful in business they must see that economy is
practised in all departments, and many men owe their
financial success to their care that nothing shall be used
wastefully. But there is a limit to economy, as in all
things, and it is sometimes difficult to avoid the tempta-
tion of overstepping the line. In the manufacture of
dry plates this temptation takes the form of making a
given quantity of gelatine emulsion spread itself over a
larger surface of glass than is desirable, or of reducing
the proportion of silver in the emulsion to the smallest
possible quantity. The practice of this kind of economy
is a suicidal policy, for although a certain number of
amateur workers may be attracted at first by cheapness
of production, they will soon learn that it is better to
pay more for a better article. The difference of the
results obtainable with a plate which is liberally coated,
and that which is poor in emulsion, is enormous, and
careful workers are not slow to find it out.
It is said that a Paris photographer claims that cellu-
loid as applied to photographic films is a French inven-
tion, on the ground that in the spring of 1882 he
showed some of theso pellicles at a meeting of the
Photographic Society of France. We have often heard
that Frenchmen have claimed Waterloo as one of their
victories, and their claim to celluloid is about as well
founded. Celluloid was discovered by Parkes in this
country more than forty years ago, and it was at once
proposed to use it as a support for the photographic
negative image ; and it would have been so used had it
not been for the circumstance that the solvents used in
collodion acted upon it. An aqueous solution of gela-
tine has no such effect upon it, and, therefore, the idea
has again been revived, and has at last taken practical
shape.
Photography is very often allied with other occupa-
tions, and does good service in adding to the income of
a man whose ordinary work is of a far different kind.
This is commonly to be observed in out-of-the-way
country towns where the population is not sufficient to
support a photographer who depends entirely upon
picture making for- his living. An instauce of this
mixture of occupations we lighted upon the other day
in an old-fashioned town in the heart of Sussex, where
the only photographer in the place seemed to be a kind
of Jack of all trades. First, he was a disciple of St.
Crispin, and his work-bench was covered with old
boots and shoes in various stages of completion. Next
he was a taxidermist — and he told us that amateur
naturalists for miles round sent him birds and beasts to
be stuffed. Specimens of his skill in this way were
hung upon all the walls of hie shop. Then he was a
beemaster, and he showed us two hives with their glass
superstructures crammed with honey-comb. He also
dealt in rabbits and other wild beasts, but his heart
was evidently in his photography.
This humble worker had constructed his own studio,
and all his own apparatus except his French half-plate
portrait lens. One of the glasses of this lens he used
for landscape purposes, and very good pictures he
turned out with it of noted places in the neighbour-
hood. For these he found a ready sale, and the printing
and toning of them give him continual occupation in
the summer months. As we parted with him, we
could not help thinking of the number of woikers we
have known who, possessing a battery of lenses and
expensive apparatus of every kind, cannot produce
pictures of equal merit to those which were lying amid
the chips of leather and the stuffed birds in this worthy
man’s shop.
500
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC OBJECTIVES.*
BY Dli. EKNEST ABBE AND DR. PAUL RUDOLPH.
No. II.
In the annexed drawing, an objective carried out accord-
ing to our invention is shown partly in outside view and
partly in section. L, and L5 are the two collecting -lenses,
made in this case of concavo-convex form. The correcting -
system consists in the biconvex lens L3, and the concavo-
convex dispersing-lenses L2 Lt, the two latter being com-
posed of glass having such power of chromatic dispersion
as is necessary to compensate the chromatic aberration of
the lenses L„ L3, and Ls.
According to the kinds of glass used in the construc-
tion of the described objectives, and according to the
special conditions to be realized by the total result obtain-
able from the system, a perfectly symmetrical arrange-
ment of the lenses, such as is shown by the figure, may,
in certain cases, suffice ; in others, where a wider range of
means for corrections or for removing objectionable
reflections is desired, a dissymmetrical arrangement may
be preferable.
In the following tables we append three numerical
exemplifications of the manner in which lenses of given
kinds of glass have to be ground for carrying our
invention into operation. In these tables the
letters n r* r 3 r* )*.*, r6 r7 r8 denote the radii of
curvature of the lens-surfaces marked by the said
letters in the figure. </, d« d3 <lt d-a are the cen-
tral thicknesses of the lenses, and 5, bs the respec-
tive air-distances between the lenses Li L2, and L4 Ls.
All dimensions are expressed as fractions or multiples of
the focal length of the entire system token as unity. To
obtain the dimensions of any particular objective, all that
is necessary is to multiply the numerals given in the
tables by the focal length required. The kinds of glass
to which the tobies refer are determined in the first
example by the refractive indices nD, nF, and nGli corres-
ponding to Fraunhofer’s spectral lines I) and F, and the line
FLy of the spectrum of hydrogen respectively, whereas in
the second and third examples the indices nn and tip
only are employed.
1.
Radii :
r, = — t*8 = + 0*2574
7*2 = — ?'7 = -f- 0*3847
»*3 = — 7'6 = + 2-3040
7*4 = — 7*5 = + 0*1374
Glasses employed :
nT
Thicknesses of glass and air-distances :
(/1 — db
(%2 ~~ ^4
6, = J2
0*034
0*011
0*056
0 042
n..
"F
1*52457
1*58745
1*52956
1*59388
D
L, L3 L5 : 1*51840
L„ and L4 : 1*57950
Position of diaphragm close behind lens L,.
largest effective aperture : 0*16.
Angle of field : about 90°.
II.
Unsymmetrical arrangement. Achromatic correction.
Thicknesses of glass and air-distanccs :
d, = 0 033
d, = 0*010
d3 = 0*062
di = 0 Oil
db = 0*036
5, = 0*041
b2 = 0*044
Radii :
7*1 = -p 0*2473
7*2 = -p 0*3707
7*3 = -p 2*2000
7*4 = -P 0*1324
r5 = — 0*1452
7*6 = — 2*4350
7*7 = — 0*4272
t*8 = — 0*2798
Glasses employed :
"d ”g,
L, L3 L3 : 1*50932 1*52037
L2 and L4: 1*56808 1*58231
Position of diaphragm close behind lens L4.
Largest effective aperture : 0*16.
Angle of field : about 90°.
III.
Symmetrical arrangement. Achromatic correction.
Thicknesses of glass and air-distances .
d, = d5 = 0*050
d2 — — 0*020
Radii :
r, = — r8 = 0*4401
7*2 = — 7*7 = 1*3503
»*3 = — n = CO
r4 = — >*5 = 0*2001
Glasses employed :
= 0130
b~ = 62 = 0*100
L, L3 Ls
%
1*51780
1*56745
L2 and L4 :
Position of diaphragm close behind lens L4.
Largest effective aperture : 0*30.
Angle of field: about 50.°*
”<h
1*52901
1*58233
Photooravinq on Sensitive Paper. — Mons. D. Stravoe Zellis,
of Alexandria, indicates a process which he has always found to
succeed perfectly. Taking a sheet of thin white paper, he
traces on it the title he wishes to photograve at the bottom of
his negative, and oils it on both sides ; having taken away the
excess of oil by pressing it between two sheets of blotting-
paper, he varnishes it again on both sides and leaves it to dry.
He then cuts away at the foot of his negative a piece of gelatine
equal in size to the prepared paper, and replaces it with this,
sticking it on by means of a solution of gum-arabic and water.
He then presses away the little bubbles of air which prevent
its i>erfect adherence, and, this done, waits until his work dries.
If, when taking a proof, it is seen that the written letters do
not give a very white impression on the sensitive paper, it will
be necessarv to retouch the characters which come out badly
on the reverse of the oiled paper. To write the titles, Mons.
D. Stravos Zellis uses a mixture of gum-arabic, lamp black,
and water. The process is simple, costs little, and gives
excellent results. — A nnales Photograph iques.
Symmetrical arrangement. Apochromatic correction
(the secondary spectrum removed).
* Continued from page 475.
• in the patent the inventors claim-*1 In a photographic objective, the
combination of two single collecting-lenses, and a compound corrccting-
system composed of single lenses cemented together, the said correcting-
system having a large focal length, and being placed between the collect-
ing-lenses, substantially as described.” -El).
June 27, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
501
NOTES ON THE REPORT OF THE LENS STANDARD
COMMITTEE.*
BY A. HADDON.
Before submitting the report drawn up by the Lens Standard
Committee, I propose to state the history of this Committee,
and the reasons for the recommendations at which it has
arrived.
At the meeting of the Convention held in Birmingham,
1888, a committee of five members was appointed, at the
suggestion of Mr. \V. Taylor (Leicester), “ to consider the
adoption of the standard lens fittings recommended by the
Photographic Society of Great Britain, or to suggest alterations
of that system, and to take or indicate such steps as may be
considered necessary for its effective establishment.” The
Committee thus appointed consisted of Messrs. A. Cowan, A.
Gifford, A. Haddou, J. H. Pickard, and S. G. B. Wollaston.
That Committee met twice during the time which elapsed
between the Birmingham and London meetings, and the Chair-
man (Mr. Wollaston) drew up a report, which was submitted to
the Council, and it was decided that the same should be read
at one of the evening meetings. After the reading of the
report, Mr. W. Taylor proposed that the report be not adopted,
but be referred back to the Committee for further consideration.
Mr. Conrad Beck seconded the motion, which was carried.
At a meeting of the Council held in London on February :11st,
1890, the Committee was reappointed, consisting of Messrs. A.
Cowan and A. Haddon (Mr. Wollaston having previously
tendered his resignation as Chairman of the Committee), with
power to add to their number. It was thought advisable to
increase the number by adding to the list the names of three
gentlemen well known to you— viz., Mr. W. Bedford, Dr. J.
Edmunds, and Mr. H. M. Hastings, F.C.S.
We discussed the pros and cons of different methods, so as
to formulate a system of standards which should be practical
and popular, and as we had only the report of the Photographic
Society of Great Britain to guide us, we thought it best to
consult those gentlemen who are daily engaged in the super-
intendence of this kind of work. In addition to this, so as to
ensure a meeting, a few of the leading opticians were called on
personally, and their promise to attend obtained.
The Secretary of the Committee made a few remarks on the
subject in hand, and then called for any suggestions that
anyone present might wish to make.
Mr. W. Taylor (Leicester) opened the discussion, and, among
other things, referred at some length to standard gauges to be
used in connection with the screwing of lens mounts, and
pointed out that, whatever system was finally adopted, it was
necessary to seriously consider gauges, as, unless these were
absolutely true and of the same size, to the ten-thousandth
part of an inch, or even less, the resulting work could not be
interchangeable. Mr. Taylor did not mean, as some seemed
to have inferred, that the lens mounts themselves should all
gauge to anything like the one ten-thousandth of an inch.
It would be impracticable as a manufacturing operation to
screw thousands of lens mounts to this degree of accuracy.
Mr. Taylor than showed two sets of steel gauges, such as he
had devised for his own factory, in order to ensure as near
constancy as possible in the diameter of the screwed portions
of mounts and flanges. He also mentioned that steel gauges
for the smaller sizes of lenses did not last more than one year,
in consequence of the slow but constant wear they underwent
during their use. It was impossible to harden them, as during
this operation they generally warped to such an extent as to
become valueless. He had, however, partly overcome this
difficulty by hardening certain removable pieces which could,
after the operation, be replaced in exactly the same positions.
In connection with the standard unit for diaphragms, Mr.
Dallmeyer suggested/- -/10, and mentioned that at the recent
Photographic Conference held in Paris //10 had been adopted,
so as to introduce the decimal system in connection with dia-
phragms. He considered his own suggestion better, as in order
to obtain the intensity value of the stops it is necessary to square
the denominator, and in his case it would only be necessary to
* Bead at -Re Photographic Convention at Chester.
strike off one nought, whilst if the French system were adopted
two noughts would have to be struck off in order to obtain the
unit area. Your Committee agree with Mr. Dallmeyer that the
method he has suggested is extremely clear and thoroughly
scientific, although there is much to be said for the powers of
2. If they were starting a system anew, they might well re-
commend Mr. Dallmeyer’s suggestion for general adoption.
But, as against this, they have to take into account the num-
ber of diaphragms that have been marked on the /- 4 system,
as recommended by the Photographic Society of Great Britain,
and, therefore, think that it would be unwise to make an
alteration now, more especially as the//4 system is at present
getting to be well understood and widely used.
Messrs. Debenham and Beck also spoke on this subject, and
finally, when the question was put to the vote as to which of
the three systems should be recommended for adoption, // 4 as
the standard unit was carried by a large majority.
The next point for discussion which was raised resulted in a
proposition from Mr. Dallmeyer, seconded by Mr. Beck, that a
special meeting of opticians be called in order to settle the
sizes of the screwed portions of lens-mounts and flanges.
The last subject that was brought before the meeting and
voted upon on this occasion was screws for attaching cameras
to tripods and for fixing rising fronts, &c. As nothing better
was suggested than appears in the report of the Photographic
Society of Great Britain, this was put to the vote and carried
unanimously.
The meeting was then adjourned till the 9 th of May.
Prior to the meeting of May the 9th, a circular was drawn
up, and about two hundred copies posted to the different
opticians whose names appear in the London Postal Directory.
This circular embodied the different suggestions that had been
made, and contained a copy of the resolution proposed by Mr.
Dallmeyer and seconded by Mr. Beck. The response to this
appeal for data was very meagre.
As the meeting of the 9th of May consisted almost ex-
clusively of opticians, and was more or less of a private nature,
we need not enter into details, but will only give the results
arrived at.
On this occasion between ten and twelve opticians were
present. Some data as regards diameters of the screwed
portions of the mounts of lenses and numbers of threads to the
inch were handed in for tabulation ; but these data proved to
be only approximate, no attempt having been made in any case
to measure accurately the diameters, and the necessity for
accurate guaging having been apparently not realised.
On discussing these results, it was found that the diameter
of the smallest lens mount, where screwed to receive the flange,
had been derived from an old guage prepared by Andrew Ross.
This thread has been copied by several younger makers, and it
is believed that some 100 to 120,000 lenses of this particular
size have been manufactured and are now in use. Upon con-
sidering this state of things it was proposed that this size should
be adopted in the future. This was carried unanimously.
Mr. Dallmeyer thereupon very kindly offered to supply specifi-
cations as regards exact diameter, thread form, and thread rate
for this screw, which was understood to be 1 -5 inch in diameter.
The next larger size, 2 inches about, was then discussed, and
for the same reasons as given above with regard to size No. 1,
this was put to the vote, and carried by a majority (6 for, 2
against). Thereupon Mr. Dallmeyer promised to supply data
for this screw also.
It was then proposed that the standards of the Photographic
Society of Great Britain, with the above modifications, be
accepted ; this was lost by 3 voting for, 5 against the pro-
position.
The Photographic Society of Great Britain had kindly lent
their standard gauges to one of the gentlemen present, and the
gauges were upon the table for examination.
With regard to the form of screw to be adopted in connec-
tion with lens-mounts, it was proposed and carried that the
thread form known as Whitworth should be adopted.
It was then proposed, seconded, and carried, that as the
present was not a sufficiently large representative meeting,
another meeting be called, and that all opticians be invited to
502
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
send in to the Secretary of the Committee exact measurements
of lens mounts and flanges, with their thread rates for all the
classes of lenses which they manufacture.
The meeting was then adjourned till the 21st of May.
As soon as possible a second circular was sent out to all opti-
cians, as on the previous occasion, and as a result eight state-
ments were received, and these were tabulated.
From the data thus tabulated, it appears that Messrs. Newton
and Co., Reynolds and Co., Suter, Taylor, Taylor and Hobson,
and the Stereoscopic Company, have been for some time past
manufacturing lenses in accordance with the specifications of
the Photographic Society of Great Britain.
The tabulated results also showed that what had been sup-
posed by Mr. Dallmeyer to be 1 ’5 -inch guage, and which had
been adopted as one of the standards by the previous meeting,
was in reality 1'513-inch. The screw which had been supposed
to be a 2-inch also turned out to be 1 '98-inch. It also appeared
that there was some considerable divergence between these
mou its and those issued by the younger houses, who had copied
the Andrew Ross mount without access to the Andrew Ross
gauge, and now manufactured these screws of such various
dimensions that there was no certainty of interchangeability of
these so-called 1'5 and 2-incli mounts, among some half dozen
makers, who all considered they were making the same screws.
Upon these facts becoming clear, the whole subject of the
resolution which had been adopted at the last meeting had to
be reopened.
In the discussion which followed, Dr. Edmunds was the first
to speak — this being the third meeting- -and he told those
present that in considering standard screws they had three
things to bear in mind : 1st, the diameter of the screw, and
that in all cases this should be measured on the outside of the
male screw, full diameter ; 2nd, the form of the thread ; and
3rd, the screw rate or pitch — i.e., the number of threads to
the inch ; and that it was absolutely necessary to keep each
one of these points separate and distinct. As regards the
diameters of the screws, he would advise the English inch as
the standard, as anyone who wishes to make standard gauges
can easily turn up a ling or plug gauge, and then compare it
with the standards kept by the Board of Trade for this purpose,
and in that way ensure uniformity of manufacture and complete
interchangeability. He would therefore most strongly advise any
odd fractions of an inch that might occur in any of the sizes as
at present manufactured to be abandoned, and the inch and
simple submultiples, as lj, 1??, 1|, 2, &c., to be taken in
their stead. In olden times, before the screw-cutting lathe was
invented, Mr. Holtzapffel originated certain forms of threads,
and, though these at the time were as perfect as could be
expected under the circumstances, yet now that we have a more
scientific method for originating screws, we should use it and
put aside theseold forms. For brass work, where the maximum
of strength is required, he had no hesitation in saying that an
angle of 60p was preferable to any other, and that the top of
the thread should be flat. The work could be turned down to
the exact diameter, and then screwed up ; if the original
surface between the threads was left so as to form the flat when
finished, the screw would be of the required diameter. The
form of thread recommended by the late Sir Joseph Whitworth
was an angle of 55°, rounded at the top and bottom. This
form of thread could not be surpassed for cast iron, but was
not the best for other metals where the greatest strength was
required. The number of threads was not so important so
that it was uniform.
In answer to these remarks of Dr. Edmunds, it was pointed
out that a flat top thread, in the case of photographic lenses,
would be more likely to bind if it were bruised, and therefore
the rounded Whitworth angular form of thread would be
preferable on this account. Shot chasers of the Whitworth
form can be obtained all over the world from any respectable
tool maker, whilst if an angle of 60 1 were adopted the chasers
would have to be specially made, which would considerably
increase the cost. Dr. Edmunds agreed that these were very
good reasons why the Whitworth thread form should be
adopted, especially as the maximum strength in the case of
photographic lens mounts was not required.
It was then proposed and seconded that since, from the
statements supplied, the diameters of the lens adopted at the
last meeting were not exactly 1 '5 and 2 inches respectively,
but a small fraction larger in the one case and smaller in the
other, those resolutions be rescinded in order to clear the way
for further discussion and suggestions. This was put to the
vote and carried.
It was then proposed that in all cases the English inch be
taken as the unit of measurement. Carried unanimously.
It was then agreed that, in consequence of the difficulty of
measuring internal diameters of flanges, &c., all terms of
measurement be regarded as made upon the outside diameter of
the male screw thread.
The next point discussed was whether the present smallest
size of the Photographic Society of Great Britain standards,
viz., 1*5 inch, was not too large for the mounting of lenses for
hand-cameras. The majority were of opinion that it was, and
that a smaller size was necessary, and finally it was agreed to
start with the smallest diameter 1-inch, and the next 1'25
inch.
It was next proposed, seconded, and carried (by nine for,
and five against) that 1 '5, 1 '75, and two inches be the next
sizes, and that the others rise by half an inch up to four inches,
and then by one inch, as prescribed by the Photographic Society
of Great Britain.
It was then stated by some that certain lenses look over-
mounted with amount of two inches in diameter, and, in addi-
tion, it would enable those opticians who have up to the pre-
sent issued lenses a little over 1 '5-inch to make adapters which
could fit 1'75 inch without increasing to any serious extent
the weight or bulk of the lens mount, and this new inter-
mediate size would be very useful for the double purpose.
It was then unanimously agreed that the form of thread
should be that known as the Whitworth angular thread.
The last matter to be settled was the rate or pitch, and it
was agreed that for the smallest sizes up to 3 inches inclusive,
the number of threads to the inch should be 24, and for the
3| and upwards, 12 to the inch, these being the two thread
rates recommended by the Photographic Society of Great
Britain.
Mr. W. Taylor (Leicester) then proposed a series of standard
adapters to carry any lens one size larger, and that these should
be numbered ; also that lenses, adapters, and flanges should be
so adjusted that when the mount is screwed home in its flange,
with or without adapter, the diaphragm, index, or other fitting
shall always stand in the same convenient position.
Report of llie Committee, consisting of Messrs. W. Bedford,
A. Cowan, Dr. James Edmunds, Mr. H. M. Hastings,
and Mr. A. Haddon (Secretary), appointed to consider
Lens Standards.
The committee appointed “To consider the adoption of the
standard lens fittings recommended by the Photographic
Society of Great Britain, or to suggest alterations of that
system, and to take or indicate such steps as may be con-
sidered necessary for its effective establishment,” now submit
their report as follows : —
We have carefully, with the aid of the leading opticians,
considered the subject remitted to us, and we hope that our
recommendations will not only receive the sanction and supi»ort
of this meeting, but be universally adopted by all who desire
the improvement and fuller utilisation of photographic
apparatus.
1. We have not seen any reason to depart from the existing
“ Photographic Society Standards,” which, as far as they go,
we adopt. The modifications hereinafter suggested are either
in the nature of explanat ion or amplification of those standards.
2. We recommend that the English inch be taken as the
standard unit of length with regard to all measurements in
connection with lenses, flanges, adapters, and camera screws.
3. That the form of thread for lens-mounts, flanges,
adapters, and screws, be that known as the Whitworth
angular thread, and in order that there may be no misuuder-
June 27, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
503
standing with regird to this, we append the specifications, so
that any one, wherever situated, can originate this thread-
form for himself.
4. That all measurements where screws are concerned he
made on the outside of the thread of the male or plug screw
when finished.
As to Lf.ns Diaphragms.
AA’e recommend : —
5. That the aperture of the standard unit diaphragm have a
diameter equal to one-fourth the equivalent focus of the lens,
and Ire marked “1,” the approximate focal length of the lens
or combination being engraved on the mount.
6. That diaphragms with smaller openings should have
apertures diminishing in area to the extent of one-half the
preceding one, so that the second diaphragm should be marked
“ 2,” indicating that twice the exposure is required when this
stop is used compared with what would have been necessary
had diaphragm “ 1 ” been used under exactly similar circum-
stances. The diaphragms should therefore be marked : —
/
' f
f
/
/
f
/
/
/
4
5 u
s
11 -3
10
22 6
32
45'2
61
1
2
4
8
16
32
61
128
256
7. Should a lens not admit of a diaphragm with an aper-
ture as large in diameter as//4, nor exactly any one of the
above-mentioned sizes, we still recommend that the largest dia-
phragm should be marked with a number in accordance with
its area with reference to this unit, and that all diaphragms
of smaller area be marked in conformity with the above series.
8. In the case of lenses having working apertures larger in
diameter than/, 4, the diaphragm with largest aperture should
be marked in accordance with its value, and the next '25 or • 5 ,
if either of these be admissible, and then according to the scries
given above.
As to Screws for Attaching Lenses to Flanges and
Adapters.
9. AYe recommend the following to be the external diameters
of the screwed portions of the lens-mounts for the attachment
of the same to the flanges : —
Diameter of Screw
in Inches.
No. of Threads
per Inch.
Diameter of Screw
in Inches.
No. of Threads
per Inch.
1
24
*3-5
12
1-25
24
*4
12
*1-5
24
*5
12
175
24
And upwards,
24
advancing by
*2-5
24
iuches.
12
*3
24
* Screws Ihus marked arc a'ready the established standards ol tin- Photo-
graphic Society of Great Britain.
As to Flanges and Adapters.
10. AA’e recommend, in order to provide that all leuses fitting
the same flange shall stand with their diaphragm, indices, or
other fittings in the same convenient working position, that
every ring or muff screw gauge shall bear a zero mark upon its
face, and that such part of the lens-mount as is desired upper-
most be set to coincide with the zero when the lens is screwed
home In the gauge.
11. For convenience and uniformity the zero should be
placed where the thread becomes complete, i.e., where the point
of ? tool cutting such screw-gauge would lie in the plane of the
ring face.
1 2. AA e recommend that standard adapters to carry any
lens in a flange one size larger than its own be numbered as
follows : —
Number 1 2 3 4 5 C 7 8 9 10 &c’
Inside Screw ...1 1.25 15 1*75 2 2 5 3 3‘5 4 6 &c.
Outside Screw. ..1-25 1-5 175 2 2 5 3 3 5 4 5 G &c.
13. 1 lie standard adapters to be adjusted in the same manner
as the flanges with regard to same convenient working position
of diaphragm indices or other fittings of lens mount.
As to Camera Screws.
14. In the case of metal screws used for attachment of
camera to tripod, fixing rising front, or any other movable
parts of the camera, we recommend that these should be of
the form known as the AA’hitworth angular thread, and of the
following diameters and pitch : —
Diameter ...
■itf-inch
j-iueh
,'Vioch
A-inch
No. of threads per
inch
24
20
18
1G
As to Lens-Hoods.
15. AA ith a view to convenience and to the interchangeability
of lens-caps, time-shutters, &c., we recommend that the outside
measurements of lens-hoods be finished off to one or other of
the sizes given in paragraph 9, and that for each sized camera
all the lens-hoods be, as far as practicable, finished off to the
same external dimentions.
Appendix.
The AA’hitworth thread is constructed as follows : — Two parallel
lines are drawn, separated by a distance equal to 0’96 of the
pitch (distance between two threads) ; these are intersected
by two sets of parallel lines inclined to each other at an angle
of 55°, and meeting top and bottom, one-sixth of the total
depth of the angular thread thus formed being cut off at top
and bottom and rounded down.
The altitude of the resulting thread is 0-64 of the pitch.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
BY GEORGE DAVISON.
IV. —Classification.
In the last article of this series it was argued that com-
petition is incompatible with the best interests of photo-
graphic art, and that, instead of awards, a system of rigid
rejection of inferior exhibits would not only ensure keen
interest in exhibitions, but would also make for the higher
credit of photography. It may also be remarked that,
with the sweeping away of awards, there go by the board
most of the difficulties and evils which follow in the train
of the competitive system. Amongst the worst of these
are those which are introduced by the practice of classify-
ing photographs which purport to be artistic productions.
Even under a prize system the balance of reasonableness
is strongly in favour of doing away with classification in
the art section of an exhibition. Classification leads
inevitably to difficulties, 'whether with competent or in-
competent judges. The absence of classification, if the
jury be qualified, can be met with no such objections.
The case is somewhat different with scientific exhibits,
where the divisions are sharp, and special experts are
required.
It is argued that a certain amount of classification is
essential to make judging possible or easy, that it en-
courages the prosecution of special branches of work, and
finally, that the very general adoption of classification
proves a need in that direction. Only the second of these
contentions has any force, and in that experience has
taught that classification does not stimulate special appli-
cations.
To begin with, how much classification is to be
observed '! AVhere shall the line be drawn? If, on the
ground of fairness to exhibitors, and to make the work easy
for the jury, divisions arc commenced, there is no rational
limit to the process. The principle being allowed, every
one has a right to be classed separately for some difference
in his subject or process, and the same argument which is
501
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
advanced in favour of separation would require separate
judges practised in the respective branches or divisions.
This is an absurdity at the outset. If music be taken for
analogy, it must be remembered that the abstract beauty
of the music is independent of the instrument by which
it happens to be produced. There is nothing analogous
in saying that it is easier to judge musicians classified into
trombonists, pianists, and the like, than if taken together in
competition. This idea carried out in photographic
competitions would require subdivisions into wet-collodion
work, photographs taken with doublets, photographs
taken with triplets, hand- camera prints, and soon, distinc-
tions which have nothing to do with the artistic merit of
the work. It may possibly stimulate the trade of making
bassoons, and the practice of playing that instrument, if
it be known that large prizes are specially offered for
proficiency in performing thereon, but I am of opinion
that such artificial stimulus has generally proved a failure.
The rather general adoption of classification in no way
proves its advisability, but merely shows that the atten-
tion of photographers is too exclusively turned to the
mere practical and mechanical means employed, and that
those responsible for exhibitions have acquired the idea
that manifold subdivisions conduce to attract a large body
of exhibitors.
The whole of the arguments that I have objected to are
based upon a misapprehension. The question as to
whether a certain landscape is better than a certain por-
trait never arises, nor should it be the function of the judges
to arrive at a conclusion which is to be placed first, which
second, third, fourth, and so on. No one is qualified to
make such distinctions. Each judge would, if working
independently, have a different view of the order to be
observed. The proper object of the judges is to place the
stamp of their approval upon those photographs in which
artistic merit is found, and in this a fair general agreement
ought not to be a difficulty. There is no limit placed
upon the awards. They may be few or many. The
awards are equal. One would imagine, from the cry for
all this classification for purposes of comparison, that pic-
tures great enough to be worthy of distinction by artists
were freely scattered about in photographic exhibitions,
whereas the fact stands that in the best of our exhibitions
there are never more than six or eight pictures of any
completeness. The method of “ no classification ” works
admirably at the Exhibition of the Photographic Society
of Great Britain. The difficulty in that, the best of all our
exhibitions, is to find eight or ten pictures really worthy
as works of art. Generally speaking, only three or four
awards seem to be given on these grounds— an equal
number, perhaps, being overlooked — whilst the remainder
go for some excellence or interest as novelties or
eccentricities.
The invariable effect of classification, both with qualified
and with incompetent judges, is to multiply prizes. Rigid
classification in some degree coerces a judge into
yielding here and there in deference to what appears to
be the wish of the promoters. A great point is justly
made of leaving everything to a good jury, and, in this
view, classification is but a farce, and a device for
inveigling photographers to send exhibits.
For those who must have classes, there are one or two
suggestions worthy of consideration. There should be no
divisions according to size ; it is a slur upon the judges,
and is only part of an ignorant and catch-penny system.
There should be no distinction of amateur aud professional ;
it is either a pandering to bad performers, or an excuse
for multiplying awards. There should be no hand-
camera class or enlargement class in the art section.
Instantaneity and amplification find a place in the scientific
section, but as pictures, all these should rely simply on
their artistic qualities. There are endless anomalies and
absurdities introduced by classifications to which it is
needless to refer. My experience would lead me to con-
demn the whole system. If it is best that awards shall be
freely bestowed upon every decent workman, those who
clamour for classification are right. If it is desired to
establish higher claims for photography than are generally
admitted, then let the same tests be applied as are brought
to bear in painting and in sculpture.
DEPTH OF FOCUS AND DIFFUSION OF FOCUS.*
BY W. K. BUIiTON.
The principle from which we may deduce rules that will
tell us what diameter of stop to use to get lack of defini-
tion proportionate to the focal length of the lens used, is as
follows : —
With a comparatively near object focussed for, the disc
of confusion, representing a point of a distant object, will
be proportionate to the focal lengths of different lenses,
when the actual diameter of the stops is the same for all
the lenses. In other words, to get a falling off of defini-
tion in the distance, proportionate to the focal lengths of
the lenses (and therefore approximately proportionate to
the size of the picture, if wide-angle lenses be avoided),
the stop must be of the same diameter, whatever the focal
length of the lens.
From this principle the following simple rules may be
deduced : —
If it be wished that “ the distance ” appear quite sharp
when the picture is viewed from a distance equal to the
focal length of the lens — that is to say, from the distance,
about, that any intelligent person would select for looking
at it from — the diameter of the stop must not be larger
than ..TiTTo of the distance of the object focussed for.
If the stop be as large as , Aro the distance of the
object photographed for, “the distance'" will be perceptibly
out of focus.
If the stop be as large as ji„ the distance of the object
focussed for, “the distance” will be markedly out of focus.
It will be understood that, when “ the distance ” is men-
tioned above, what is meant is any object at such a distance
that it sends practically parallel rays of light from a point
to the whole of the aperture area of the lens. This, for
all ordinary photographic lenses, is a few hundred times
the focal length of the lens, or anything more.
From the above rules adopted in practice, I have deduced
one or two rough approximations as to the maximum dia-
meters of aperture that are admissible in practice. Thus, I
find that, no matter how long or how short the focal length
of a lens used for landscape work, it is seldom that an
aperture of more than about two inches is permissible, on
account of the falling off due to lack of depth of focus,
whilst in the majority of cases it is not easy to use an
aperture of over 1 £ inches. Again, in portraiture I find
that, whatever the focal length of the lens, or the size of
the picture, it is difficult to use an aperture much over
3 inches in diameter, aud this on account of the want of
depth due to size of aperture only.
* Continued from page f'f.
Jdnf. 27, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
505
One small point in connection with depth of focus is
worth mentioning before 1 go on to another subject. If
we focus for a comparatively near object, and use such a
stop as to bring about a certain approach to sharpness in
“the distance,” we will have the same amount of sharpness
(or of want of sharpness) at a distance from the camera
of just about one half the distance of the object focussed
for. If, for example, we focus for an object at the dis-
tance of 200 feet from the camera, whatever stop is used,
there will be the same amount of sharpness in “the dis-
tance” and in an object at 100 feet from the camera. If,
therefore, we wish to divide the focus, or, rather, the lack
of focus, equally between the foreground and the distance,
we should focus for some point twice as far from the
camera as the nearest bit of foreground.
These latter statements hold true only when leaving out
of consideration roundness of field and the use of the
swing back.
Dijf'usion of Focus. — This is a subject that lias always
been of much interest to photographers, but that has had
its interest revived lately on account of the views put
forward by a set of photographers who call themselves
“Naturalists.” These photographers — amongst whom are
numbered several of those who undoubtedly excel in the
production of photographs that are really pictures, and
who must, therefore, if possible, be listened to with
respect — contend that it is not advisable to have any part
of a photograph as sharp as a good photographic lens will
make it. It has been contended that the sharpness given
by a photographic lens of good quality is greater than
ought to be permitted in a photograph, simply consider-
ing the matter from an optical point of view. This is a
thing that 1 cannot admit at all, and I think I have satis-
factorily proved, in a paper read before the Camera Club;
that the contention will not stand the test of a thorough
examination. On the other hand, as a mere matter of
artistic taste, of “ feeling,” or of whatever we may be
pleased to call it, it has been stated by several of the most
artistic workers of the present time in photography that
no part of a photograph should be as sharp as it could be
made by the use of modern photographic lenses. Coming
in this form, the opinion is one that should demand respect,
even from those who do not agree with it.
But besides this there is another reason why, in certain
cases at least, it seems advisable to sacrifice the keenest
definition that it is possible to get. I refer now to those
cases in which, on account of the comparatively large
apertures that must be used to bring the exposures within
reasonable limits, a part of the subject must be markedly
out of focus. We have such cases in portraiture, especially
in the case of large sizes, and when we have such cases,
the fact that one part of the subject is in “ wirey ” defini-
tion, makes the parts that are out of focus only to a
moderate extent appear offensively “fuzzy” by contrast.
To prevent this contrast, the extreme definition is sacrificed
by introducing what is generally called a “diffusion of focus”
arrangement. Such an arrangement prevents extremely
sharp definition, even in the part of the image that isactually
focussed for, whilst it does not at all, or does only slightly,
increase the lack of definition in other parts of the subject,
and, in any case, reduces greatly the contrast of parts in
the sharpest focus and in less sharp focus.
(To be continued.)
Mu. Thomas Brown Jordan, whose death is announced,
was the inventor, in 1838, of an instrument for photographically
recording the variations of the barometric column.
ANIMAL PHOTOGRAPHY : ITS DIFFICULTIES, USES,
AND ABUSES.*
BY GAMBIER BOLTON, KZ.8.
The animal and bird studies from life which I shall show you
to-night are generally admitted to be the results of one of the first
serious attempts yet made to combine, in however small a
degree, scientific and artistic qualities in animal photography.
Commencing in 1872 with a three-guinea set from our old
friend Fallowfield, of Lambeth, in the days of wet collodion
plates and cumbersome apparatus, I have, off and on, both at
home and abroad, continued my work amongst birds and
animals ever since, labouring under many difficulties of which the
portrait, landscape, and hand-camera photographer knows
nothing— a puff of wind moving the mane, tail, or feathers: the
slight sound causing the twitching of an ear, the quick action
of the eye and nostrils, or even the movement necessary in
breathing, spoiling hundreds of otherwise perfect plates, many
of them only taken after hours, and, in some cases, even days of
watching ; and, as I shall presently show you, it is quite a
common occurrence to use thirty to fifty plates on a single
animal or bird, and in some instances nearly one hundred half-
plates have beeu exposed and developed before the one pe rfect
negative has been obtained.
From this you will see that a good deal of patience is required
— some would call it obstinacy ; anyhow, a determination not
to be beaten, but to return to the task day after day until the
result satisfies you ; a natural taste for, and some idea of,
zoology, and a certain amount cf artistic training is also neces-
sary before the proper positions for the various subjects can be
selected — positions that will please and satisfy naturalists,
artists, and the general public (three rather hard task-masters) ;
whilst to take up this work wich the idea of producing only the
best possible results, throwing aside all others, must mean such a
heavy outlay and expense a3 to prevent it from ever being
made to answer from a financial point of view, at least in our
day.
With so many publican! private zrological collections around
us, there is little or no demand at present for animal photographs,
except amongst the learned societies and artists ; but we must
remember that animals and birds that are useless to man have
had their day, have already reached and passed their zenith, and
the time is not far distant when photographs of many of these
will be sought after, and, like a really good large photograph of
the quagga or dodo to-day, would be almost priceless. For
following these we have many, such as the bison, aurochs, zebra,
giraffe, and hippopotamus fast disappearing before the march of
civilisation, and it can only now be a question of a comparatively
few years before they, too, become extinct, and we shall be com-
pelled to turn to paintings and, above all, photographs to show
our descendants what they were like.
This, then, I consider the first and greatest use of animal
photography, and I am glad to say that it is being recognised as
such at last ; for, as some of you know, the British Museum
authorities have lately ordered a set of these studies to be framed
and hung in the Geological Section at South Kensington ; and
if, as I feel sure there are many here who, naturally fond of
zoology, have taken up photography as an amusement, I would
urge them, especially if they travel, to lose no opportunity of
getting good negatives of the more scarce variety of animals and
birds, as they will be invaluable for future reference. Do not
waste your plates on such childish, easy subjects as swans, deer ,
cattle, and sheep ; our exhibitions have swarmed with them
from time immemorial. They have been taken in every con-
ceivable position years ago in the old days of wet collodion and
long exposures, when there was some difficulty attached to the
work. But I urge you to aim somewhat higher. Read up the
habits and peculiarities of the animal or bird you propose taking,
and endeavour to show them plainly in your finished print, and
you will not only be giving yourself real pleasure, but also
benefiting the generations to come.
* Bead at the Photographic Convention at Chester.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jcne 27, 1890.
506
Let me here pause for a moment to answer a question that I
am continually beiDg asked, “ What is a perfect animal photo-
graph ? ” First and foremost, it should have had sufficient
exposure to bring out all possible detail in the hair or feathers
and in the shadows, detail being necessary in this branch of
photography almost more than in any other. It follows from
this that the perfect photograph, though taken in sunlight
(which should be avoided if possible), should not be an instan-
taneous one, but should have had a fair exposure. I know that
this means hours of watching and waiting, when a snap-shot
might be obtained in a few moments, but the resulting negative
is very different ; one is of little or no use to anybody, the other
may be of use to naturalists and artists for all time. The
perfect animal photograph, then, should be free from heavy
shadows, full of life, yet unrestrained and natural in position
and expression; all four legs and the tail should show distinctly,
and the mane (if any), nostrils, ears, and eyes, and hairs round
them, should be microscopically sharp.
I would urge these things particularly upon those who are
called upon to judge animal studies, as this is the real test of
the perfect one ; and may I also add a word of warning ? Take
care that the photograph was not from a stuffed subject, as taxi-
dermy has been brought to such a pitch of perfection (especially
abroad) that unless a very careful examination is made, in many
cases one may be taken in.
Animal photography is not only useful to the scientist, as I
have endeavoured to show, but also to the artist. There are
still some, I am sorry to say, who deny that they ever use them,
and, as the dealers tell me, slip in and out of their shops looking
as though they had committed an unpardonable sin ; but, from
what I have seen and heard, I am convinced that all use them,
and many openly admit their indebtedness to photography,
whilst not a few possess cameras of their own, and may be seen
usiog them constantly. It was the need of an artist in the
country requiring a special position of a tiger to sketch from
that first induced me to publish my series ; as going the round
of the London dealers, I found t hat, though one or two had
made an attempt to bring out some large-sized photographs of
animals, they were taken so small originally as to be woolly and
flat, and of no use whatever to the artist ; and I was convinced
then, as I am now, that no one can hope to succeed in this by
occasionally working with a hand-camera, but he must use a large
camera, and devote his whole time — in fact, his life — to the work.
I have touched on some of the difficulties and use3 of animal
photography ; let me now speak briefly of its abuses.
I am sorry to say that the professional photographer has a
good deal of blame to bear, for he is, I fear, hopeless in this
respect. Take a walk round any city and look in at their win-
dows, and you see rows of dogs’ heads, lacking expression as
much as they do bodies, dogs, and cats lying down in sleepy
positions, or sitting up looking like wooden dummies, horses and
cows with three legs and a smudge representing the tail or ears,
all with the scared look that tells of the assistant not far off
waving a handerchief or clapping his hands, or taken at such an
angle that the heads are large enough for elephauts, whilst the
bodies fade away into the distance, “ fine by degrees, and beauti-
fully less.” It is amusing to enter with a dog and say in a quiet
way that you wish him taken standing, and above all, with his
tail up. The innumerable excuses that will be invented, the
old, old story that heads are so much more fashionable and
artistic, that they look so natural when lying down or sitting up,
anything but standing, and above all, without that exasperating
caudal appendage raised.
I have heard photographers liment the waste of time and
plates used over a child’s portrait, but when they have heard of
the hours of watching and hundreds of plates thrown into the
waste box before good negatives of the dogs standing and with
their tails up can be obtained, they have thauked their stars
that their lines have fallen in more pleasant places.
Of course there are very rare instances where it is right to
take only a head ; for instance, when the body is badly shaped,
deformed, or injured ; but these are very exceptional circum-
stances, and I would, therefore, urge the professional photo-
grapher the wide world over to look to this matter at ones, and
try to introduce a little more life and expression into his animal
photographs, particularly into those of the horse and dog.
But professional photographers are not the only ones to abuse
this branch of our art-science. There are amateurs, I regret to
say, men high up, in fact, at the very top of the tree, whose
pictures (for they are nothing else when the animal portion is
left out) have won and are still winning medals at every exhibi-
tion, and whose work is pointed out to the rising generation as
a model for them to aim up to. Tney rightly introduce animals
into their work, but, using a wide-angle lens, get such hideous
distortion as to become perfectly painful to those who have to
sit and gaze upon these “ nightmares” day after day, as many of
us are often compelled to do during a club or “ one man ”
exhibition.
Others, too (and here many of our very oldest workers are the
chief offenders^, rather than lose some picturesque group, will
take a negative with a horse, cow, or donkey’s tail or ears
blurred from movement, thinking, probably, that the charm and
beauty of the whole composition will draw off the attention from
such a trivial fault. But surely even our friends the (photo-
graphic) naturalists would not strain their theory so far as this,
and endeavour to make the blurred ear or tail the starting point
for the out-of- focus portion of their picture.
But there are, I regret to say, far worse offenders than either
of these. Amongst the changes which I have seen during my
photographic life is that of a school of men which has sprung up
during the last three or four seasons, calling themselves
detective -camera animal photographers. Now there is no harm
in using a hand-camera occasionally for animal photography
especially if it is made to focus and show exactly what is being
taken at the moment of exposure, on the twin-lens principle, for
by this means many very valuable negatives can be obtained
with a slowed- down shutter, and by working on cloudy days ;
but the school of which I am now speaking will have none of
this. With box cameras and a rough scale for focussing by, they
rush about in blazing sunlight taking snap-shots at every con-
ceivable living thing that comes within their reach, and in
every possible position ; in fact, as we have seen with regret at
several exhibitions lately, they simply prostitute this branch of
scientific photography by showing us hideous caricatures of
some of God’s noblest works — animals taken at such an angle as
to be all head or hind-quarters, minus one or two legs, an ear,
or a tail ; lions yawning and scratching themselves, dogs climb-
ing up trees, giraffes all body and no head — things done for the
sole purpose, as they often admit, of raising a laugh at the
unhappy animal’s expense. How, I venture to ask, would one
of these so-called artists of the funny school like to see them-
selves, on show in a shop window, taken wh<»n suffering from
influenza, a bad toothache, or when they have just trod or sat
down upon the business end of a tin tack ? Surely our aim should
be a higher one than this, and if we are going to devote our
time to zoological photography, let us at least try to show our
subjects in the most artistic and natural positions.
Forgive me if I have spoken too strongly on this subject, but
when we see signs all around us of animals fast dyiug out, and
being rapidly exterminated as civilisation advances, it is surely
time for someone to make a stand, and, in endeavouriug to point
out the use3 of animal photography, not to pass by in silence its
glaring and manifold abuses, which not only scientists and artists
have condemned, but which the good taste and better education
of the rising generation has taught them are abuses ; and I trust
sincerely that those who have perpetrated them will leave this
branch of photography alone for the future, and turn their
attention and talents to something a little less ambitious than
the endeavour to win for themselves the proud title of the Land-
seers of photography ; for this cannot be laid claim to by any
precocious aspirant after a few months of practice at animal
photography, bnt can only be hoped for after years of hard work of
head and hand ; and besides such a title as this, all those vapoury
names of kings and princes of hand-camera work which they
June 27, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
507
have arrogated to themselves must fade into iusignificaDce, for
there may be many kings and princes, but we have at present
no Landseer.
I propose showing you, first, two slides as an instance of how
not to do it. The first is that of a lion (?) standing behind the
bars of his cage. This slide, I am told by the maker, has been
sold by thousands, and is used all over the civilised world with
lectures as an example of what the king of beasts looks like.
Beyond a nose and a few hairs there is absolutely nothing but a
very fine study of iron bars. The hand-camera school are par-
ticularly fond of these negatives, one of them observing last
year that he thought the bars gave a greater idea of the animal’s
ferocity and strength ; he forgot to add that he could not possibly
photograph them without the bars, as he was not permitted to
get inside the outer enclosures at the Zoological Gardens.
The second slide that I propose showing you is that of a bull-
dog, bought from a shop window in London last week. This is
rather a good specimen of its kind, but he is strapped down iu
the long grass apparently to a rock, and, as a study of a collar,
strap, grass, and stone, is good, but there is very little bull-dog ;
and how anyone could ever be tempted to waste a plate on
such a really good subject in such a hideous position as this
is one of those things that will probably never be revealed till
later on.
I shall next try to show you what I hope you will 'agree in
saying is the way to do it. Commencing with the Carnivora
(taken standing, in dull light, and without the bars), we will
pass on through the Unyulata, leaving the birds and dogs till
the end.
I would mention that all these studies were taken with an
ordinary whole-plate camera and Itoss lens, rarely instantaneous,
but most on dull days, the majority having had exposures of
from one to two seconds.
Mr. Gambier Bolton then exhibited about fifty slides, which,
he mentiohed, had this season been exhibited at the Royal
Society, Burlington House; Royal Institution (twice), and
before the Zoological Society, London ; and had been awarded
medals at the Crystal Palace two consecutivo years.
liJroreetftncjS of ^oritttes.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
The technical meeting of this Society was held on the 24th iust.,
Mr. Leon Warnerke in the chair.
Mr. H. Chapman Jones brought forward a double dark slide
that he had produced at the meeting held in Januaiy last. He
had then also exhibited two plates that had been kept in this
slide, and that showed with under-exposure patches of increased
development opposite to where the hinges had been. These
hinges had originally been of leather, but this material had been
removed, as it had been found to cause fogging at the part of the
plate opposite to it, and a woven material had been substituted
for the leather. On the plates shown in January, which had
been placed in the slide immediately after the new material had
replaced the leather, he had attributed the markings to increase
of sensitiveness, which, he thought, was caused by the same
substance in the leather which had at first caused fogging,
having penetrated the woodwork and being given off afterwards
in such small quantity as to be insufficient to fog, but enough to
exalt the sensitiveness. Some members had then suggested that
there was not an increase of sensitiveness in that part of the
plate opposite to the hinges, but a decrease in the rest of the
plate, due to the wood or varnish U3ed. He thought that he
could now show that this theory was not the correct one, as he
had since kept plates in the slide for some months, plates cut
out of larger ones of which he had kept the remaining pieces,
and on developing he cauld not find the slightest difference in
sensitiveness, or any mark opposite the hinge. The absence of
the marking now he considered to be due to the emanation
originally belmging to the leather and left iu the wood having
exhausted itself in the first week or two.
The Chairman mentioned that he had had a slide which
caused fogging, not due to leather, for there was no hinge to it,
as it was one of those where the shutter was made to draw out
entirely. The inside of this shutter was varnished, and there
was a projection in the cut-off which scraped away the varnish
in two lines. Plates placed in this slide showed clear spaces
opposite to these lines, whilst the rest was fogged. Further to
test it, he had scraped an image on the shutter, and found that
a plate, after keeping in the slide for some time, reproduced the
image in the same way that the lines had been reproduced. He
could not say what was the composition of the varnish that gave
off such a deleterious action.
Mr. Atkinson remarked that he had found great difficulty in
keeping flexible celluloid films flat in the press whilst printing.
He also noticed that they were not flat in the camera when
there was any tension on the rollers of the dark slide.
The Chairman said that to get the celluloid to lie flat whilst
printing, a press must be used with many screws at the back.
He had one of twelve by ten size, the baik of which had been
sawn nearly through in lines making twelve squares, on each
of which a screw was brought down. He thus secured good
contact.
Mr. Atkinson remarked that it was a complaint that there
was no good way of varnishing celluloid. He had found
Mawson’s varnish, supplied expressly for celluloid, to answer
exceedingly well.
A Member referred to the use of gold size thinned with benzole
or turpentine ; but
The Chairman stated that gold size darkened so much in time
that its use was a serious disadvantage. A solution of amber
in chloroform made a varnish that answered very well. Some
linseed oil darkened very much, whilst other samples did not do
so. Linseed oil was boiled sometimes with lead, and sometimes
with manganese. In the former case darkening must be
expected. There was a work of Spon’s giving several details on
the subject.
Mr. Scamell said that there was also one of Weale’s series, by
Field, in which various formula) would be found relating to
varnishes and drying oils.
Mr. Atkinson asked whether celluloid films were liable to
decay.
The Chairman had some now that he had had for fifteen
years, and could find no change in them.
Mr. W. England considered that they were as durable as
glass.
The Liverpool Amateur Photographic Association.
At the meeting in the Club Rooms, 3, Lord Street, on June
19th, Mr. Paul Lange presided, and the following were elected
members of the Association : Messrs. Albert Proctor, Alexander
Cannon, Win. T. Philip, J. N. Stolterfoht, and James D.
Paterson.
The President reported on the excursion, to Rossett and
Gresford on the 7th inst., when about thirty members and six
ladies were present, and 200 pictures were secured. He men-
tioned that the next excursion would take place on
July 19th (whole day), to Bolton Abbey. He also entered into
a detailed explanation of the Chester Convention, and recom-
mended the use of Mawson’s backed plates for taking the interior
of Eaton Hall.
On the 31st July Mr. J. W. Wade, vice-president of the
Manchester Amateur Photographic Society, will give a paper
on “ Landscape Photography,” with illustrations in charcoal,
and he will also introduce a chapter on architectural photo-
graphy. Later on, iu August or September, the Britannia Com-
pany is to give a demonstration with their alpha paper.
A fine mounted print was presented to the Society by Mr.
Friese Greene of the Convention members group of 1889, taken
on 24 by 20 glass plate slightly cut down.
The late Mr. J. W. Robinson, junr., a young member of the
Society who died last month, has bequeathed his camera and
outfit to the Association for the use of the members of the
Society.
508
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[June 27, 1890.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 19th inst. Mr. J. J. Briginshaw occu-
pied the chair.
The next meeting being the annual meeting, officers for
the ensuing year were nominated in accordance with the
rules.
Mr. J. P. Everitt showed prints in platinotype of nega-
tives taken at the outing at Hale End the previous Saturday.
He also passed round silver prints from the same negatives for
comparison, arising out of the discussion of the previous
week.
Mr. W. E. Debenham was in favour of the albumenised
prints as showing more oorial perspective and gradation, an
opinion that was shared by many other members present.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater also showed some prints taken at the
same outing ; these were on Pizziglielli paper. Replying to a
question, Mr. Freshwater said these had taken two and a half
hours to print.
A question from the box was read : “ Is there any advant-
age in printing through green glass on to silver paper ?”
Mr. Pask said at the Photographic Exhibition recently held
in the City, some silver prints were exhibited which were stated
to have been printed under green glass.
The Hon. Sec. said that he had used with advantage a
sheet of green gelatine in printing from collodion negatives
when they were of a slatey tint.
Mr. T. E. Freshwater exhibited some prints from negatives
taken during his holidays last summer ; these, in several cases,
showed a dark broad band down the centre, which he attributed
to unequal coating of the plates.
Mr. W. E. Debenham said a piece of loose string hanging
down behind the lens would produce a similar effect. Various
theories were put forward to account for the markings ; it was,
however, generally agreed that they were caused by some
defect of the camera.
Mr. Freshwater said he would bring his camera down to
the next meeting ; he believed it to be quite perfect.
A question from the box was read : “ Can anyone tell what
is ‘ bone dryness ? ’ ”
Mr. W. E. Debenham said he should consider an article to
be in this condition when no moisture was perceptible to the
senses.
Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on July
2nd will be the “ Report of the Convention Delegates ” ; July
9th, “ Photographing Theatrical Scenery.”
Received. — From Messrs. Piper and Carter, “ A Casket of
Photographic Gems ” : A Collection of 500 Dodges, Receipts,
Entertaining Experiments, &c., in connection with the Art of
Photography and its Branches, collected, classified, and ar-
ranged for ready reference, by Ingles Rogers.” The compiler
explains that the favourable reception of the pamphlet entitled
“ One Hundred Photographic Dodges ” induced him to produce
a work of a similar nature on a larger scale, culled from the
photographic literature of the past half-dozen years. Like the
former work, the present one is intended “as a ready reference
book for the 1 old hand,’ as well as a means of instruction for
the beginner, and to form a handy pocket companion for both.”
The book consists of 142 pages, and contains as frontispiece a
specimen of Messrs. Waterlow and Son’s collotype work, repre-
senting Cookharn Lock, with a party of pleasure seekers return-
ing from Henley Regatta. The same publishers submit a
copy of the “ Evolution of Photograph}’,” by John Werge. It
comprises a chronological record of discoveries and inventions,
contributions to photographic literature, and personal reminis-
cences extending over forty years, and is illustrated by plates
giving portraits of those whose names are identified as leaders
in the advancement of the photographic art. 'We will say no
more of this book at present than that it is divided into four
periods : the first deals with such facts as bear on the discoveries,
early researches, and ultimate success of the pioneers of photo-
graphy ; the second embraces a fuller description of their
successes and results ; the third is devoted to a consideration
of patents and impediments ; and the fourth to the rise and
development of photographic literature and art.
to ©ornspontientsi.
All Communications, excopt advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All quest’ons requiring a reply in this column should be aldressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.8., 2. St. Mary’s Hoad, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
Teionbrtdge. — Our Holmescope came from Messrs. H. T.
Anthony and Co. , of New York, but we believe they are
procurable from the Eastman Photographic Company, 115,
Oxford Street, W.
L. E. M. — Printing Hard Negatives. Improved results can
sometimes be obtained by sunning the paper prints from the
back. Another method is to screen off the under-exposed
masses of shadow by one or two folds of tissue paper, or
use a thin transparency as a mask to be supei posed whilst
printing. Perhaps the best method is to coat the finished
hard negative with collodion emulsion, give a brief exposure
to light through the back, develop, and work with this com-
pound negative. Or, lastly, reproduce the negative with
full exposures at both stages of this operation.
F. M. S. — The Solar Eclipse. You seem to have been more
fortunate than observers in London or the metropolitan
district, where, owing to the clouds and rain, the eclipse was
scarcely visible.
J. S. R. (Brighton). — Yellow Stains on Albumenised Prints.
Failing to discover the cause of the yellowish colouration,
unless it be hypo, it is at least satisfactory to find that the
prints may be so easily cleared by immersion in dilute hydro-
chloric acid ; but you must remember that if working with
rose-tinted paper the acid will dissolve out the whole of the
rosaniline, and necessarily alter the tone of the print.
Viator. — Smokeless Powder. We have seen the photographs
to which you refer, but the military considerations involved
scarcely come within the province of discussion in these
columns.
A. W. — Maigncn's Softening Process. Further enquiry has
elicited the fact that the inventor proposes to boil jiowdered
charcoal with lime water, and then use this preparation for
softening water by stirring in a small quantity, and afterwards
filtering through his asbestos cloth.
L. P. (Norwich). — Aluminium Lens Mountings. Not an alloy
of aluminium, but the pure metal itself is now employed by
several leading opticians in the mounting of their lenses, for
the sake of diminishing their weight. With care they ought
to prove incorrodible, but we cannot answer for sea-spray
not affecting the metal.
M. T. — Hypo Eliminator. Hydrogen peroxide has already
been proposed, but is not easy to procure, and it may
possibly act upon the albumen coating, if not upon the
finely reduced metal constituting the image. It is far pre-
ferable to depend upon a thorough washing, or even upon
treatment with a weak acid, to destroy any remaining trace
of hypo.
J. G. M. (Scarboro’) — Printing out Emulsion. This may lie
the ordinary collodio-chloride, such as described at page 203
of the Year-Book, or Captain Abney’s gelatino-citro-
chloride ; see his “ Instructions in Photography,” pages
288 and 289. If neither of these will answer your pur-
pose, apply to Mr. Friese Greene for a suitable preparation,
or to Messrs. George Houghton and Sons, High Holborn,
W.C.
Intaglio. — Electro Carbon Reliefs. These were executed as
far back as I860 by Mr. J. W. Swan, specimens being
shown in the historical collection at the International In-
ventions Exhibition. Seven years later, Mr. Woodbury pro-
duced some plaster casts from his gelatine reliefs, and
showed them at the Dundee meeting of the British Asso-
ciation, stating that these could be copied by the electro-
type process if desired. Many later experimentalists have
worked at the same subject, some of them taking casts in
Spence’s metal.
NEWS
os? &
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1661. — July 4, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAO*
Novelties at the Photographic Convention 509
The Photographic Convention at Chester 510
Photographing Flowers 511
A New Photometer. By F. H. Varley, M.I.E E.( F.R.A.S. ... 512
Depth of Focus and Diffusion of Focus. By Prof. W. K. Burton 514
Imagining and Imaging. By Philip II. Newman 515
Notes. By Colonel J. Waterhouse, B.8.C 517
Notes 518
PAO K
Photographic Exhibitions. By George Davison 520
The Record of Photo-Micrography. By Andrew Pringle 521
Weights, Measures, and Formulae Used in Photography 52S
New Photographic Lenses. By Dr. Paul Rudolph 524
Patent Intelligence 52G
Correspondence 526
Proceedings of Societies 527
Answers to Correspondents 528
NOVELTIES AT THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
CONVENTION.
Three instruments of special novelty were exhibited
at the Photographic Convention at Chester ; one of
them was a new photometer, another a photo-micro-
graphic camera of new design, and the third a new
magazine camera.
The photometer was the invention of Mr. Frederick
H. Varley, and his article describing it will be found
in another column. Mr. Friese Greeno exhibited the
instrument to the Convention. It consists of a rotating
disc with two variable apertures, which can be opened
or closed during rotation by the ingenious mechanical
contrivance known as the Furgusson paradox. The
light from the one source passses through one of the
apertures, and the light from the other source through
the second aperture. A comparison is made by means
of two shadows, the relative depth of which is regu-
lated by the size of the apertures. When the shadows
are balanced, the angular aperture of the two orifices
is read off. The advantage of this instrument is, that
both the electric light and the standard flame are
measured when they are at the same distance from the
screen ; consequently the two shadows are of equal
size, so the density of the shadows for equal areas is
the same when balanced. This feat, we believe, has
not previously been achieved in photometry, except in
the wedge photometer of Dr. Wollaston, which, how-
ever, is of too limited a range to be suitable for most
practical purposes. Mr. Varley and Mr. Friese Greene
are arranging some experiments for determining by
means of this photometer the value of direct sunlight
in candle power ; also the value of reflected light
from the clouds, blue sky, foliage, and other objects.
Scientific data of this kind will be of interest to
photographers.
Another remarkable piece of apparatus exhibited at
the Convention was a photo-micrographic instrument de-
signed by Mr. Andrew Pringle, and constructed by order
of the Privy Council by Messrs. James Ssvift and Son.
In high photo-micrography absolute steadiness of the
apparatus is as necessary as it is in large astronomical
telescopes, or in the galvanometers used in working
the Atlantic cables ; therefore the chief feature of
Mr. Pringle’s instrument is its great steadiness and
solidity. Its principle may be explained by the aid of
the accompanying diagram, in which AB is the base-
board of mahogany, measuring 6 feet 8 inches by
20 inches, and CD is one of two pieces of heavy solid
mahogany forming a tramway on which the camera
slides in brass guides, and to which it can be firmly
clamped by screws. The camera takes half-plates, and
has an extension of from eleven inches to four and a-half
feet. A special feature of this invention is the brass
cradle, W F, which is so formed as to hold both ends
of the microscope tube when high powers are used;
thus all vibration of the tube at the eye-piece end is
prevented. H is an adjustable stage, with a sub-stage
condenser ; K is an achromatic condensing lens, and
N the lime cylinder for the oxyhydrogen light. The
cradle is steadily mounted at one end upon a brass
trestle, two legs of which are shown at E ; at the
other end it is supported below F. The lime light
part of the apparatus is mounted upon a platform, so
that it can be made to approach to or recede from the
microscope, and to give a divergent or parallel beam
of light at the will of the operator. The whole of this
end of the instrument turns round upon a base-board
to permit the adjustment of the object. The ultimate
destination of this apparatus is the Royal Veterinary
College, Camden Town, London, where a room in the
basement has been specially arranged for its reception,
and where it will be fixed on a support of heavy
masonry, resting upon a foundation of solid concrete.
The third novelty of mark exhibited at the Conven-
510
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 4, 1890.
tion was a new camera, a great improvement upon the
one described a few months ago in these pages, for
taking negatives upon an endless film at the rate of
from five to ten or more per second. The original
camera, invented by Mr. Friese Greene and Mr.
Mortimer Evans, paid out a certain length of film for
each picture, and this slack length was suddenly
drawn into position for the exposure. The later
camera, first publicly exhibited at the Chester
Convention by Mr. Friese Greene, was the inven-
tion of Mr. Frederick Yarley, and in it the film
is never allowed to slacken, but is kept taut by means
of springs acting differentially inside the paying-out
roller and the receiving-roller, so that the two rollers
have always a balanced spring-pull in opposite direc-
tions. When a length of film is required for exposure
a disturbing element comes into play in the shape of a
horizontal roller, which rises and draws off exactly the
length of film required for the next picture. By this
instrument the film is paid out with great steadiness
and regularity, and none of the film is wasted, for
each negative is separated by but a narrow line from
its successor. Application has been made for a patent
for this camera, which is likely to be useful for mili-
tary and other purposes, in addition to those purposes
which Mr. Friese Greene had in view when he started
the idea of cameras of this class. With the optical
means at present in use in such of these cameras as
have been constructed, he says that he finds exposures
at the rate of about five per second to be the best
speed for obtaining good negatives sufficiently near
each other in time to convey the idea of life and motion
when successive positives from them are projected at
the same speed upon a screen by means of a suitable
lantern.
A s to this matter of speed, Mr. Greene said to the
Convention : “ The familiar experiment of the com-
plete ring of light seen upon whirling a burning stick
in a dark room, shows that the sensation of sight lasts
for a short period after the mechanical action which
produced it has ceased. This period is probably
different for different eyes, and for different amounts
of excitation even in the same eyes ; I hope to prove,
at some future date, by the pictures taken with the
machine camera, that some people see them perfectly
on the screen when they are produced at the rate of
three a second, that others see them perfectly at four,
five, and six a second. Of course, the size of the
picture upon the screen, and the amount of light which
the lantern can give, have something to do with it too.
If the light be very intense the effects last much
longer, so that you can run them through slowly.
For the present purpose it may be assumed that a speed
of from three to seven per second will be enough to
show life-like effects to any audience, or to represent
nature in motion as we see it. The duration of
visionary impression varies with the powers or struc-
ture of the eye in different individuals, just as the time
necessary for the ^recovery of the tone of the retina
varies in passing from brightness to darkness.”
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT
CHESTER.
List week we published particulars about the Photo-
graphic Convention at Chester, until the time of going
to press, when the members of the Convention were
leaving Conway. The Castle Hotel, at Conway,
where lunch was taken by the excursionists, and at
which Mr. Bothamley, the President of the Conven-
tion, is well-known, is a centre for artists, and much
visited by Americans in the summer months when
en route from Holyhead to London, because Miss
Dutton, its proprietor, has a large collection of works
of art of various kinds.
Here we found original works by Cipriani (the founder, with
Sir Joshua Reynolds, of our Royal Academy), Romney, Sir
Thomas Lawrence, David Cox, Frederick Tayler(the late Presi-
dent of the Royal Water Colour Society), J. W. Whittaker and
J. D. Watson, both distinguished members of the same Society,
Joseph Knight, who is one of our best English etchers, Daw-
son Watson, Buckley Ousey, Edwin Ellis, R. Somerset, Dan.
Fisher, R. Gallon (the President of the Crichton Art Club),
Peter Ghent, W. L. Banks, W. B. Turner, J. C. Salomon,
Charles Potter, and others. There is also a handsome speci-
men of the Old English Water Colour School of the middle of
last century, by Smith of Chichester. Its purity of colour is
in marked contrast with the water colours of modern days, in
which body colour is so freely used. There is a half-length
life-sized original portrait of Dame Penderil, of Boscobel,
notorious for her loyalty and fidelity to the gay and popular
though ungrateful monarch, Charles II.
The Conway and Bettws-y-Coed parties returned by
various trains to Chester in the evening. The majority
returned by the earliest train to be present at the
reading of papers, and in this train was Mr. Ephraim
Wood, the chief superintendent of the Chester and
Holyhead line, who was fully alive to the business
advantages of a number of professional and other photo-
graphers being at work in his district, and afterwards
scattering pictures thereof broadcast all over the country.
He personally superintended the excursion arrange-
ments.
On Thursday evening, Mr. Andrew Pringle read a
paper entitled “The Record of Photo-Micrography,”
and the report of the committee on “ Weights and
Measures” was read. Mr. Friese Greene also read a
paper, entitled “ Suggestions,” from which we give
to-day a quotation in our leading article, and more
extended descriptions of the instruments he described
than he had time to put before the meeting.
On Friday last views were taken by the excursionists
at Hawardcu Castle, and in the evening there was a
dinner of the Convention at the Grosvenor Hotel,
Chester, which great hotel is under the genial manage-
ment of the experienced Mr. Foster. Mr. Bothamley
presided, various after-dinner speeches were made, and
a number of recitations and songs contributed by the
members. The hard-working honorary secretary, Mr.
Briginshaw, was “toasted,” and was styled “The
Father of the Convention.”
On Saturday morning last there was a meeting
of the General Committee, at which Mr. William
Bedford was appointed President of the Convention
for the Bath meeting next year. In the middle of the
day most of the members left Chester.
Jolt 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
511
PHOTOGRAPHING FLOWERS.
It is a remarkable circumstance in these days of
universal photography, and when some kind oE photo-
graphic apparatus can be found in more than one house
in every street, that flowers, the most beautiful gifts
of inanimate nature, should be almost entirely neglected
by the camera bearer. They are within the reach of
nearly all, for although some of us are destined to spend
the best part of our lives amid bricks and mortar, and
in houses whose back gardens take the form of “ leads,”
still we have friends who, better off than ourselves,
are provided with greenhouses ; or, by the expenditure
of a very modest sum at the nearest florist’s, we can
provide ourselves with a bouquet of beauty. Artists
who devote their first attempts to still life eagerly take
up flower and fruit painting, attracted, of course, by the
wonderful and unending contrasts of form and colour
which these models afford. Perhaps it is mainly
because photographers are excluded from the chromatic
world that they have not paid more attention to this
branch of work. Whatever be the reason, flowers
are neglected by photographers. In our photographic
exhibitions we seldom see pictures of flowers, and, as
far as we can remember, only one worker, whose beautiful
orchids won prizes at all the exhibitions half-a-dozen
years back, has seriously devoted his energies to
portraying Flora.
There are certainly difficulties to be met with in
photographing flowers which do not often assail those
who are engaged in the more ordinary paths of work.
One of the chief of these is the necessary nearness of
the objects to the camera — a difficulty which will be
at once appreciated by anyone who endeavours to focus
upon his ground-glass screen the image of a flower-
spangled hedgerow. It is at once seen that, owing to
the various planes of the different petals, only a few
can be brought to a sharp focus at one time. It is of
course the same if we attempt to photograph a single
flower or a mass of flowers in a greenhouse, but here
we are relieved of one great difficulty in having a
perfectly still atmosphere to work in. But, whereas
in the open air it is next to impossible to reduce the
growth to one plane, unless, indeed, we clip away half
its beauty with a pair of shears, in the greenhouse we
are able to mitigate the evils to a very great extent by
adopting certain precautions. The flowers, being in
pots, can be moved about and grouped as we may think
best, and any petal bearing stems which are obtrusively
prominent — and therefore out of focus — can be held
back by the temporary expedient of attaching to them
grey lines of the thinnest binding wire. We have
tried this plan many times with great success, but care
must be taken in adopting this method of pulling the
stems out of their natural position that they are not
so awkwardly placed that the dodge is likely to be
detected. Care must also be taken that the wires used
are properly concealed.
In photographing flowers in a greenhouse it will
generally be necessary to provide some kind of back-
ground. The entire beauty of the picture will be
sacrificed if the straight lines of the beading between
the glass panes come into view, and more especially if
the bright sky is seen through them. A square yard
of some good tinted material — such as is used for
ordinary studio backgrounds — will answer the purpose
better than anything else, but it should, if possible,
be stretched on a frame, so as to present one even,
unwrinkled surface. In the absence of a green-
house, and when we wish to photograph flowers in
the form of a bouquet, we shall do well to conduct
operations in the studio or in an ordinary room. In
the first case no difficulty should present itself with
regard to lighting, for curtains, screens, and blinds are
under ready control, but in an ordinary room, as in the
case of portraiture, special arrangements have to be
made.
The flowers must first of all be grouped as artisti-
cally as possible, and may by preference be held in
some kind of ornamental vase. This should be of
glass or of some light coloured material — such as
alabaster — in order that there may be contrast between
it and the flowers which it holds. This vase should be
placed near a window where there is a good diffused
light — not actual sunlight — with a looking glass or
white screen at the other side, so as to reflect light on
its shady parts. The background should not be too
dark, nor should it be of a pronounced pattern of any
kind. All must be as light and airy in design as
possible. The flowers themselves must not be matted
together, and it will be found that a few — say some
choice roses or lilies relieved by sprigs of maidenhair
or feathery grasses — will be far more effective than a
great number.
We have occasionally seen flower photographs —
generally roughly coloured — exposed for sale in somo
of the shops, and they are useful as a guide to show
what to avoid. These flowers appear to have been
grouped and supported on a sheet of white cardboard,
with the result that a heavy black shadow — a kind of
mourning band — borders them on all sides, for the
light in which they have been photographed appears to
have come from the front, that is, behind the camera.
Strong contrasts are most easy to obtain in photo-
graphing flowers, and they should be carefully avoided,
firstly, by suitably lighting the object and providing a
proper background, and secondly, by giving a pro-
longed exposure with a small stop, so that develop-
ment may proceed without the least forcing and
blocking up of the high lights.
The lens which is kept to use for flower work is one
of the rectilinear type. Almost any lens except a
portrait lens will do for photographing flowers, pro-
vided it can be well stopped down. To get the best
results it is as well to use isochromatic plates, and
many published pictures have shown us all what good
service such colour sensitive plates will do in this
particular field of work. But ordinary plates, if used
with a yellow screen behind the lens, and with the
protracted exposure which that course entails, will give
results which are difficult if not impossible to distinguish
from those obtained by the use of isochromatic plates.
512
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jci.r 4, 1890.
A short time ago we selected a number of yellow, red,
and blue flowers, and photographed them with ordinary
plates under the conditions just described, and also with
colour sensitive plates, and we could hardly distinguish
any differences between the two sets of negatives when
afterwards compared.
Now that spring has “ unlocked the flowers to paint
the laughing soil,” photographers have an opportunity
of taking their portraits, which should not be missed.
If the pictures appear to have no particular value, the
operation of taking them will at least bring a return to
the worker to showing him the effects of various
colours on the sensitive surface of his plates, and teach-
ing him how those effects can be modified by means at
his disposal.
A NEW PHOTOMETER.
BY F. H. VABLEY, M.I.E.E., F.R.A.S.
In writing upon photometry, it is as well to pass in review
the various appliances that have been devised for obtaining
a measurement of the comparative intensities of different
sources of light. This at once brings us to an adopted
standard of light, unfortunately as purely arbitrary as the
foot rule is for a standard of length. This standard is
termed the candle power, and is the amount of light pro-
duced from a sperm candle burning 132 grains (or 8-553
grammes) of spermaceti per hour, the pressure of the
barometer being 760 millimetres, and this standard is
the adopted one employed by all the gas companies for
measuring the c.p. (candle power) of their gas.
The celebrated Dr. Wollaston, the discoverer of palla-
dium and inventor of the goniometer, employed for his
researches a wedge-shaped trough, with glass sides, fdled
with an inky fluid. Both the standard light and the one
to be compared had to pass through this intercepting
medium ; thus, the gas-flame passed through the thicker
end of the wedge, and the standard through the thinner,
and the lights were moved nearer or farther apart until the
shadows cast by both were equal; the intensity of
the light being determined by the mean section of
each portion of the wedge through which the res-
pective lights passed. In his astronomical researches
he used wedges made of neutral tint glasses, and
with these he determined the value of light coining to us
from the stars. The value of Sirius he gives as being that
of aooVoir millionth part of that produced from the sun ;
the sun, according to the same authority, being equal to
the light produced by 5,563 wax candles burning at one
foot distance from the screen.
Professor Wheatstone employed a vibrating bead of
silvered glass, and the two lights to be compared appear,
by reflection, as two parallel luminous lines. By em-
ploying the law that “ the intensity of the illumination
of any body in the presence of a source of light will depend
upon its distance from that source and secondly, that
light decreases as the square of the distance of the
luminous body ; a distance is found when the luminous
parallel lines are equally bright — that is to say, that by
altering the relative distances of the two lights until the
luminous lines appear to be of equal intensity, and squar-
ing these distances from the vibrating bead, the different
illuminating power of the two sources of light is readily
measured.
In place of the vibrating bead of Wheatstone’s,
the Bunsen screen is generally adopted, a long scale hav-
ing at one end a standard candle, and the light to be
measured at the other, is provided with a tram line, upon
which runs a carriage carrying the Bunsen screen. By
moving this screen between the two lights until a position
is found where both surfaces are equally illuminated, and
measuring its relative distance from the two lights, and
squaring their distances as before mentioned, their
measurement is obtained. These photometers are fitted
up in a room painted a dead black in every part, so that
no false light by reflection shall interfere with the cor-
rectness of the readings. With such an apparatus a light up
to 400 candle power can be measured ; but when an electric
arc light has to be determined, the photometer room would
have to be from 50 feet to 100 feet in length to obtain
the balanced illumination of the Bunsen screen. If we
are measuring a 10,000 candle-power arc light, the distance
would be as follows : — Standard candle from screen one
foot, electric light from screen 100 feet, that taken as the
value of the square of the distance — namely, lOObv 100 =
10,000 candle power at one foot.
Professors Ayrton and Perry have devised a photo-
meter by which the distance of the electric light from the
screen may be very considerably reduced. The light falls
upon a given area — say a circular inch — and passes through
a concave lens which diffuses the light, and causes it to
spread out, the area of the diffused circle depending upon
the distance of the screen from the concave lens.
Assuming that it be made to cover a plane exactly ten
inches in diameter, the decrease of illumination will be
proportional to the square of the diameter, or a one-
hundredth part as bright. By this device the distance of
the electric light 4rom the concave lens can be reduced to
ten feet, when it would balance the standard light at one
foot from the screen, or, in other words, 102 X 102 =
10,000, the amount of light produced from the electric arc.
Captain W. de W. Abney has obtained the reduction of
the brighter light by employing rotating sectors which
allow only a given quantity of light to pass, which he can
vary at will by opening and closing the sectors whilst they
are being rotated, and he determines the value of the light
by calculating the areas of the wedge-shape openings.
Figs. 1, 2, and 3 illustrate this.
Fif. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
Fig. 1 shows the sectors open to full extent, viz., 'JO0, when 50 per cent,
of the light will be intercepted, and 50 per cent, pass through.
Fig. 2 shows the sectors open 45°, when 75 per cent, of the light is
stopped, and 25 per cent, passes through.
Fig. 3 shows the sectors opeu 18°, when 90 per cent, of the light is
stopped, and 10 per cent, only passes.
The photometer I am now about to describe differs
from all these in being a direct reading instrument, in
which the standard and the light required to be deter-
mined are both placed at the same distance from the screen
shown by fig. 8.
Two discs, perforated by semi-ring-shaped openings,
the breadth of which are equal, as shown in fig. 5, are
July 4, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
513
mounted ou an axis with their openings reversed, so that
when the outer half -ring is fully open (extending to 180°)
the inner ring is entirely closed ; or if the outer half-
ring is open to 90°, then the iuuer ring will be opened to
Fig. 5. Fig. 6. Fig. 7.
the same extent, as shown in fig. 6. In that case, when
the discs are rotated, two complete circles are formed,
through which an equal amount of light will pass. Again,
as in fig. 7, the outer ring is nearly opeu, and the inner
Fig. 4.
one only partially so. As before, two rings are formed
upon rotation, but the amount of light which passes
through will be unequal, being, in fact, directly propor-
tionate as the extent of the degrees of arc of the open-
ings are to one another. If, say, the outer ring is opened
1G0°, and the inner 20°, in order that the more intense
light passing through the inner circle shall balance the
standard light passing through the outer, all that has to
be done is to read off the respective degrees and write
them down in the form of fractions — that is, -,Vi = i ;
from this we ascertain that the light is eight times more
intense than the standard. Instead of the conventional
division of the circle, we divide the half-circle into 2,000
parts, for the purpose of obtaining a finer or more extended
range of reading up to 1,999 times. ; these divisions, by
means of a vernier, can be further subdivided ten times,
and read up to 20,000 candles in round numbers.
The breadth of the semi -ring- shaped windows in this
instrument is one inch, and in front of the discs are two
equal collimators, one of which projects a disc with a
black centre, and the other a corresponding luminous
spot. They are regulated so that when the light falling
upon the screen from both sources is equal, a uniform
disc is obtained ; but if one or the other preponderates, a
disc with a grey spot, or a grey marginal ring with a
bright spot, indicates which of the two sources of light
reaching the screen predominates.
In order to regulate this, it is necessary to open one
of the windows and close the other until a balance is
obtained. This is effected by bringing into play a modi-
fication of the well-known Furgusson paradox : the rear
disc is carried by the central axis, and the front disc by
a long sleeve fitting over it ; both the central axis and the
sleeve are provided with tooth wheels. Above these is
an axis which carries two wheels, one with a hundred teeth,
and the other with ninety-nine teeth, which are readily
placed in or out of gear bya jointed lever; when in gear
they cause the two discs to shift or turn upon each other,
and so open or close the windows. It is convenient in
some cases to dispense with the collimators, and deter-
mine the values of the light by comparison shadows, in
which case a "|” -shaped screen is employed pierced with
Fig. 8.
two holes each a circular inch in diameter, the centres
of which are of a distance apart which corresponds with
the mean diameter of the circular window's through which
the light passes on to the screen. The middle partition
forming the "]” prevents one light from interfering with
the other. The apparatus is set in rotation by turning a
band wheel, and the windows adjusted until the two
shadows balance. The values are read off from the
divided scale of 2,000 parts, which is numbered from left
to right, and right to left, giving at once the fraction values
of the ratios of one aperture to the other.
Photographic Society of Upsala. — Mr. N. C. Duner
writes that the number of the members of this society now
reaches fifty, and that it has been resolved to hold an exhibi-
bition of members’ work in the autumn.
Photo-Micrographs of Diatoms. — MM. A. Traun and Witt,
in their work on the fossil diatoms of Hayti, describe their
peculiar method of photographing these objects. They first
photograph the diatoms with a magnification of not more
than 100 diameters, and afterwards enlarge the negatives, so
as to obtain a photograph magnified 500 diameters, proper for
photo-printing. Fine details are said to be brought out, which
are invisible to the naked eye in the smaller photograph. — .
The Microscope.
514
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jolt 4, 1890.
DEPTH OF FOCUS AXI) DIFFUSION OF FOCUS.*
BY PROFESSOR W. K. BURTON’, C.E.
The introduction of “diffusion of focus” was first sug-
gested by Mr. J. Traill Taylor, and first put into practical
shape by the elder Dalhneyer. Practically, “ diffusion of
focus ” is brought about by allowing a certain amount of
positive spherical aberration to go uncorrected, and, in the
case of the “diffusion of focus” lenses introduced by Dall-
meyer, the spherical aberration is introducible at will by the
unscrewing of the back lens of the posterior element of a
lens that has already been illustrated in the course of these
communications.
There has been a great deal of discussion as to whether
the introduction of spherical aberration can actually
improve the definition in any planes or not, and I do not
propose to enter into this much-vexed question here. It
does certainly, I am convinced, in many cases result in a
practically more harmonious picture than results from a
perfectly corrected lens, and all that I propose to do here
is to try to explain the result of working with a lens not
Completely corrected for spherical aberration, and to
touch on one point in connection with this that has, I
think, so far been overlooked.
I use for the illustration of this matter a couple of cuts
taken from the Photographic News of April 6th, 1888, in
illustration of a paper that was read by Mr. T. It. Dall-
meyer before the Photographic Society of Great Britain,
on “So-called Depth of Focus and Diffusion of Focus.”
Figure 1 is intended to represent the rays of light pass-
ing from a point O through a lens that is without any
spherical aberration, and that come to a focus at I. A
point at O is thus represented by a point at I. Points at
o , and o2 will, on the other hand, be represented by spots
of light of the diameter of the cones of light at i2 and ix.
Now, as the diameter of a point is zero, the spots of light
representing points nearer to and farther from the plane
focussed for are, in this case, indefinitely larger than the
point representing a point in the plane focussed for, and
the contrast is, therefore, indefinitely great.
Figure 2 represents the same state of affairs as figure 1,
but that there is, in the latter case, a certain amount of
spherical aberration introduced. It will be seen that, in
this case, a point at 0 is not represented by a point at I,
but by a spot of a quite appreciable diameter ; whilst, on the
other hand, the spot shown at i2 is no larger than where
there is no spherical aberration; that at i2 is not much
larger. The contrast is thus very much less.
A point that may not be of much practical importance,
but that has, I think, been overlooked in all the discussion
that there has been on this question of “ diffusion of focus,”
is this. It has, so far as I know, always been assumed
that, in using a diffusion of focus lens, supposing a point
to be focussed, the ground-glass will be so adjusted as
that it will cut the cone of light where the diameter is the
smallest — that is, at I on the cuts that are given above. I
believe, however, that in practice this is not so, but that
focussing is done more nearly for that part of the cone
where the light from the edges of the lens comes to a focus,
and that for the reason that a certain increase of diameter
means a much greater increase of area towards the edge of
the lens than near the middle, so that the brightness of the
cone at that part where the rays from the edge of the lens
meet will be far greater than at any other part, and focussing
will be done for that part ; where a point in the image
will be represented by a very small bright spot with a
halo round it, points both nearer and farther off being
represented by bright rings filled with a dimmer light.
Focussing will, I consider, be done not for the plane I,
but somewhat more nearly for that of i2 . I have tried —
not very successfully, I fear— to show what I mean in
figure 3. I have re-drawn the last figure, but showing
the lines that are supposed to represent light, thick in
proportion to the amount of light that passes through
the ring that is immediately enclosed by each pair of lines.
This light, beginning from the centre, varies with equal
increments of diameter, in the ratio of the numbers 1,3, 5,
7, &c. It will be seen that the greatest concentration of
light is between I and i2. It is already recognised as
advisable that, in the case of a lens with adjustable diffusion
of focus, the focussing should be done after the adjustment
is made. I think what I have just explained is in great
part the reason of the advisability.
Diffusion of Focus in Landscape Lenses. — The lens above
mentioned as the invention of Dallmeyer, which allows of
introducing diffusion of focus at will, is an expensiv e form
■ Continued from page 475.
JcLY 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
515
of portrait lens. It is quite possible, however, with the
cheapest form of lens — namely, the single landscape lens —
to produce all the effects of diffusion of focus simply by
increasing the opening to a certain extent. Thus, a
single lens with the opening increased to anything between
about fj 16 and f/S, according to the form and the kind
of glass used, will give a very soft image, and the apertures
mentioned are such as are quite sufficient for portraiture
with modern dry plates. In fact, for very large work,
there are reasons for preferring the single lens, with
aperture opened as described, to any other form of
lens.
The only objection to the single lens used as described
is that, if we wish diffusion, we are practically confined to
the use of a fixed aperture, for an aperture only a little
greater than that which will give a pleasantly soft image will
give one that is intolerably fuzzy, whilst one only a very
little less will give an image quite sharp in one plane.
Another objection is that in many cases, especially if the
lenses be of second-rate quality, the opening of the aper-
ture gives rise, not only to a certain amount of spherical
aberration — which is wanted — but to chromatic aberration
also, which is very troublesome.
All this refers to the use of landscape lenses, but for
portraiture only. Until lately it was considered that dif-
fusion of focus was of use only in the case of portrait
work. I have, however, stated that recently some photo-
graphers, whose opinion must be respected on account of
the work that they have done, have stated that they think
that no part even of a landscape should be quite sharp.
Far the best way in which to avoid this sharpness, if it is
to be avoided, would be to use a suitable diffusion of focus
lens. Unfortunately, no lens with diffusion of focus
arrangement suitable to landscape work has, at the time
of writing, been specially designed. The “ portrait ” or
“portrait and group ’’lens of Dallmeycr is not suitable
except for small sizes, because, if used nearly full aperture,
some parts of a landscape are liable to be put wildly out of
focus ; if even a moderately small stop is used the spherical
aberration intentionally introduced by the diffusion of
focus arrangement is corrected, and some plane of the
subject is represented quite sharply. Even the single
lens, if the aperture be opened till there is perceptible dif-
fusion, will, in most subjects, except in the case of small
sizes, give some parts of the image far too much out of
focus. There is, at the present time, some demand for a
landscape lens that will allow of the introduction of quite
perceptible diffusion at will, with apertures at least down
to about fj 20. It should not be a difficult problem for
opticians to design such a lens, and doubtless we shall
have one before very long.
[The table of figures in Professor W. K. Burton’s article on
the diffusion of focus, published in these pages on June *20th
last, was calculated and compiled by Sir David Salomons — a
circumstance omitted to be stated at the time because of a
printer’s error.]
♦
Royal Institution’. — The general monthly meeting will be
held on Monday, July 7 th, at 5 p.m.
Obituary. — The Rev. F. W. Hardwioh died a few days ago,
and his departure is a great loss to photography. For a long
course of years his “ Text-Book on Photographic Chemistry”
was the chief one connected with the subject, and to this day it
holds that position in relation to the collodion process. We
also regret to have to announce the death, last Sunday, of
Mr. C. G. Collins, the camera maker, who was well-known and
respected by the older photographers as well as by those of the
dry-plate period.
IMAGINING AND IMAGING.*
BY PHILIP H. NEWMAN.
That is an ingenious idea of Mr. Emerson’s where he com-
pares art with the barometer, rising towards naturalism and
falling to the abyss of conventionality ; and he tells us that if
we map it out we shall find on the apices of the ascending
curves the masters of sculpture of the Egyptian and Assyrian
Lions, Phidias, Van Eyck (a long jump that) Diirer, Holbein,
Da Vinci, Titian, Velasquez, Donatello, Rembrandt, De Hooghe,
Corot, Millet, Gainsborough. Now I don’t suppose he will in
the least mind which of these we examine, so let us take Van
Eyck, and see what the celebrated “ Arnolfini and his Wife ”
(Mr. Emerson’s favourite picture) will prove for him. Now',
please believe me, I should be unworthy the title of an artist
if I did not admire this painting intensely, and it may be
granted at once that you need not be an artist at all to ad-
mire it, or to realise its extraordinary merits ; they are patent
at a cursory inspection ; also that it was unquestionably painted
from nature, but with Mr. Emerson we will look deeper. I
had a tolerable recollection of the picture — as who has not — but
I have been to the National Gallery on purpose to study it
since reading Mr. Emerson’s book, and what did I find ? As
he says, “It is wonderful in technical perfection, in senti-
ment, in truthfulness of impression. Note the reflection of
the orange in the mirror, with what skill it is painted ; it
fact, the whole is full of life and beauty, the beauty of
naturalism. It is a masterpiece good for all time, and yet it
is but the portraits of a merchant and his wife. No religious
subject here inspired John Van Eyck, but a merchant family,
yet in many w'ays the picture remains and will remain unsur-
passed.” Quite so. But there is something more, something
that is as apparent to the student as its naturalism, or any of
the qualities we have enumerated, something that needs no
searching analysis, something anyone may see, something John
Van Eyck would have been the first to admit, but which Mr.
Emerson has not referred to.
This something, what is it ? It is conventionality, style,
and without which this picture w'ould not, in an artist’s opinion,
be the magnificent work of art it is. The folds of the
drapery in the wife’s robes denote careful arrangement and
conventional treatment and drawing, indicative of the style
of the period ; that due ordination and sub-ordination of
parts of magisterial line and breadth of effect discoverable in
this school, and manifest in this and other important works
of the accomplished master. Undoubtedly this, as in many
w’orks of the period in the Low Countries, is wonderful to have
been done without the aid of photography, and it would well
serve Mr. Emerson, or anyone else, as a text to enlarge upon,
as to how photography can be made useful to painters ; but
he has only chosen to use this illustration to show how Van
Eyck went direct to nature for his models ; but this needs no
insistance. Raphael, and many other painters whom Mr.
Emerson abuses, did precisely the same thing, and conventional-
ised no more than Van Eyck has done (for pace Mr. Emerson)
I must maintain the picture is brimming with conventionality
and style, a style that was carried on among the Flemings to
Holbein's time, and is conspicuous happily in his best work.
But why does this painting at the end of the middle age
period attract our author’s notice so much? Is it because he
thinks that it at all shows what might be obtained if photo-
graphy could ever be done in colouis ? If such is his idea, let
me tell him at once that he would be dreadfully disappointed,
for he would miss that added charm of individuality, without
which no w’ork, pictorial or glyptic, appeals to us or retains
our sympathy ; that charm that comes of art w'hicli is based
on a study of nature, but which is a totally different charm to
that of nature, excepting now and again in her rarest moods,
or where man has meddled with but not marred her.
But if a man photographs a field or sea, and paints up to
his transferred outline from colour memoranda, and many
studies, and never so well, Mr. Emerson is horrified at what
he calls a counterfeit, howbeit landscape and see painting
based upon such counterfeiting has reached a higher standard of
' Continued from page 4 ltd.
516
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 4, 1890.
excellence — as mere painting — than at any time in the world’s
history.
Then what about imagining and imaging ? Where may the two
combine, and where, from the camera point of view, must they
be friends apart ? Mr. Emerson has cut the Gordian knot, but
he has not solved the difficulty ; he ridicules an ideal, except-
ing what may come of itself out of nature, so the art of diffi-
culty, as far as he is concerned, remains precisely where it was.
The fact is, each of us must solve the difficulty for himself,
and in his own way. If he be a genius he will have little
trouble ; if he is not, he will save himself many plates, much
chemicals, and more disappointment if he looks up some of
the authorities our author affects to despise ; and whether the
photographer be a genius or not, it will be just as well for him
to see where others have succeeded and where failed. Amongst
these he will, of course, come across Rejlander, and will see
that he kept imaging and imagining together to a very wonder-
ful extent indeed, and he only failed because of his models. If
he could have obtained some of the models Phidias and Apelles
could get, the history of photography would have been as great
in aesthetics as it is in science. Photography is not to blame
for this ; she must be content with the models she can get, and
do the best she can with them ; and very much she can do, if
the artistic faculty is cultivated (if not native) by a searching
study of the old masters of form, sentiment, and composition,
and especially if the photographers will abstain from short-
focus lenses, and can be persuaded to burn all their small stops.
Bad photography has a great deal to answer for in the multi-
plication of copies of inferior work, leading our attention to
detail rather than to breadth and simplicity, which should be
the characteristic of all art, pictorial or glyptic. False notions
of taste must, of necessity, be encouraged by such multiplica-
tion, especially in those less cultivated minds which look upon
every photograph as a picture. This alone should stimulate
every photographer to strive for the best from an art point of
view.
The matter of detail has affected the arts of design and
picture painting alike, and very importantly ; its influence is
discernible in every exhibition, and is distinctly a bad one in
the true interests of art. I am glad to think that my views
coincide with Mr. Emerson’s on detail in art work, and agree
with him as to its limitations to that which is fundamentally
necessary. I have alluded to this question of detail in another
lecture,* but I feel its import so greatly as to dwell upon it
with renewed emphasis here.
The tendency' of artists to paint bits, and amateurs to
purchase them, was never so great as in the present day.
Nothing could be said against it were these bits looked upon
— as they' should be — as merely' a means to some great and
legitimate artistic end ; but when one is deafened by the
parrot cry of “Nature, nature, nature!” one is apt to lose
patience and ask, Why' is this aimless sort of thing going on —
this painting of elaborate passages in nature, with subtle
reflections and interminable detail that tell us nothing but
that in competition with the camera man’s eye and brain are
inferior instruments, if the product is to be looked at as the
true end of fine art ? Well, I do not believe it is, or ever
will be. We are passing through phases of change ; if the
camera has stimulated some of our younger painters to study
nature lovingly and searchingly, they' must look upon it as a
means to an end ; and while they may be congratulated on
escaping the far more dangerous Charybdis of a tricky im-
pressionism— as demoralising as it is false — they must avoid the
Scylla of sacrificing breadth to detail. The image should on
no account content them unless it bodies forth their highest
thoughts and aspirations and most poetical ideas.
People talk of realism and idealism, impressionism and
naturalism, fashionable verbiage that only conjures up the
ghosts of things in art ; they seem quite to forget, or to ignore,
that these isms are but the robes of art, the fanciful draperies
with which the goddess coquettes with all but her true
votaries, or illusory fires with which, like a will-o’-the-wisp, she
leads a purblind and bungling dilettanteisv i into the hoglaiul
of cant and empty phrases. No ! art is not got on easy terms ;
* See Photographic News, March 7th, 1890.
she is ever a coy goddess ; but when you can unveil her of
these isms, and you are really face to face, you will find her
the same to-day as she was far back across the dim centuries
to your predecessors — fair, modest, truthful, with wide, honest
eyes, searching the hearts of man, sounding the intellectual
depths of struggling human nature, telling truths calmly,
piously, earnestly, affording her true worshippers most gracious
and pleasant consolation, and ennobling them for ever. I warn
you that art that does not do all this is not true art,
but one of those weird lights that will drown your soul in a
quagmire.
Mr. Emerson is exceedingly bitter on the religious side of
art. We, of course, must all regret as much as he that priest-
craft at many periods did put it in fetters, but, without being
fanatical, it is possible and just to be grateful to the religions
of the world — heathen or Christian — for creating and preserving
to us the monuments that exist. It may be weakness, but I
am none the less proud of it, that when I stand before the
cathedrals of this country, or northern France, I am thankful
to be alive to see them, and to know that the bishop builders
have formulated for me a prayer in stone. Am I, are you, to
put these things by as toys of a puerile age, and say, “ All senti-
ment, my dear sir ? Art teaches us better now ; the bishop
builders were all very well in their way, but the French Revo-
lution, plus the Zolaciples, gives us a truer gospel, don’t cher
know ; you’ll see it through the camera if you’ll only stick to
nature.” I often wonder if men who practically say or think
this sort of thing know anything about art at all ; they
certainly don’t expect art to say anything to them or teach
them anything. One says to you, “ I don’t want the story at
second-hand ; I know the page of I.empriere the artist got it
from ; ” and so, forsooth, because he has not invented a legend
he fs not to paint it. Because he has never seen a hero he is
not to imagine one, and give pleasure and instruction to a less
imaginative brother by a picture for fear the brother should
ask, “ Are you sure it all happened just so?” or say, “Of
course you photographed the hero, dear boy'.”
Fancy a painter being commissioned for a picture or fresco
of Prudence for the adornment of a town hall or law courts,
and being prohibited from using the admirable and instructive
subject of I lyssesand the Syrens because the painter — let him
be able to paint evei so poetically — did not invent the story,
and could not get a photograph of the syrens. Again, and for
similar reasons, I am not to buy' a Perseus and Andromeda to
hang upon my walls, do I want a lesson in chivalry never so
much. Some of the rising painters have laid these teachings
somewhat to heart, and to their cost, for, instead of boldly
taxing their imagination, they have tried to make a compromise
between nature and art. A most ludicrous instance of this is
present to my mind, where the subject painted was this very
Perseus and Andromeda naturalistically treated ; the figures
were fairly painted, as paintings, and undoubtedly extremely
like the models, but these, of course, were of such a poor and
unheroic type as to suggest that they had by some means been
deserted by their bathing machines. The monster was too
flabby to describe. Another Andromeda occurs to me; here
the painter had exercised all the imagination he was capable of,
and had used his model so judiciously as to obtain a fine figure ;
yet his mistake was as grave as in the former case. This
Andromeda seemed, excepting for her silver handcuffs and
chain, to be sunning herself after the bath, while the emerald
waves and purple islets suggested a strand where monsters
never came and chivalry was scarcely needed. The poetical
insight wanting in these instances might serve to support Mr.
Emerson’s argument against painting such subjects, did we not
know that it has been painted worthily more than once in our
own time ; and, above all, remember that while painters are
many', artists are, and ever will be, few.
(To be continued.)
The Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
July 9th will be “Photographing Theatrical Scenes Report
of the Convention Delegates. July 16th — “Iron Printing
Processes.” Saturday, July 12th — Outing at Iiickmansworth ;
train from Baker Street at 2.16.
July 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
517
NOTES.*
1SY COLONEL J. WATERHOUSE, II. S. C., ASSISTANT SURVEYOR-
GENERAL Ot' INDIA.
Eikonogen Developer. — Some eikonogen, lately received
from Europe, was on arrival in crystals of a pale yellow
colour, quite free from brownness ; but, in the course of
a few days, it gradually turned of a deep brown purple
colour, though kept unopened. This coloured coating
dissolves easily, forming a solution of a strong brown-
madder colour, leaving the clear crystals, which are not so
soluble.
For developing, the solution recommended by the maker
in the printed instructions given with the eikonogen was
not found to answer. A better developer is that given by
Dr. J. Nicol in the American Annual and Photographic Times
Almanac as below. It works well with Wratten’s plates
and with Eastman andother films. The formula is —
A. — Eikonogen ... ... 5 grammes or ounces
Sodium sulphite ... 10 ,, ,,
Water ... ... 100 cub. cents, or fl. oz.
B. — Sodium corbonate ... 7 ‘5 grammes or ounces
Water ... ... 100 cub. cents, or 11. oz.
For ordinary use, to one part of .1 aud one part of D add
two parts of water ; but the proportions may be varied,
density and contrast being increased by adding more of
.1 or less of B, or vice versa. Bromide is not necessary,
but in hot weather a little would probably be an improve-
ment.
When solution A is made with the fresh yellow crystals,
it has only a pale yellow or greenish colour ; but if the
crystals have become brown, the solution is a dark green,
becoming gradually darker by keeping, especially by
access of air. It should, therefore, be kept in well closed
bottles filled up. The mixed developer has a yellowish
colour, and does not become very dark by use. Several
plates can be developed in the same solution, a little fresh
being added if necessary, or the plate may be transferred
to a fresh bath to bring out detail in deep shadows. In
some cases a better method will be that described by Mr.
B. J. Edwards in this year’s Year-Book oe Photography,
of first developing with a normal developer to bring out
detail, and then finishing off and gaining intensity by a
similar developer with a full dose of the developing agent
restrained by bromide, because the eikonogen seems to
have a tendency to give a thin image full of detail, and
special treatment may be required to give force and
brilliancy.
The above developer works very cleanly, and is quite
free from any tendency to stain either plates or fingers.
With it, as with other developers, the character of the
result seems to depend on the idiosyncrasy of the par-
ticular make of plate used, though this does not appear
to be so much the case as with hydroquinone. On the
whole, eikonogen seems likely to be a valuable addition to
our resources, especially for instantaneous work, and
probably for developing paper prints.
Eastmans New Films. — The new transparent film for
use in roller slides, brought out by Messrs. Eastman and
Co., has many good qualities, but several improvements
must be made in its manufacture before it can be con-
sidered perfect.
It appears to be made from a solution of pyroxy-
i'lorn the Journal of the Photographic Society of India.
line in acetate of amyl, with the addition of a large pro-
portion of camphor. As was pointed out by the writer in
the Photographic News in March last year, collodion
prepared with acetate of amyl gives a very structureless,
tough film, and it was suggested that such a film would
be very suitable as a support for gelatine emulsion, as the
new Eastman films show it to be. These films are beauti-
fully clear and colourless, showing only a very slight
colour on white paper, but unfortunately they are full of
small specks of dust or undissolved material, which cause
lumps on one side of the film and corresponding hollows
on the other. The slight want of contact may not be of
much consequence in printing, but for all enlarging pur-
poses these spots greatly diminish the value of the films,
and would ruin the appearance of the prints from them.
At present the writer has only used the films in the
ordinary Eastman carriers, cutting off pieces of film from
the roll as required ; but it is difficult to get them to lie
flat in the carrier frames, and the thicker celluloid films
are much better in this respect. The films arc very sensi-
tive, and work clearly and well with the eikonogen de-
veloper ; they stand a high temperature fairly well without
ice or the alum bath, and give very perfect sharpness of
detail, more so than the matt-surfaced celluloid films.
Some of the writer’s negatives show another very peculiar
defect, a kind of branch-like markings all over the image,
but specially noticeable in parts of an even medium
density, such as sheets of water, and they may most easily
be seen crossing the blank margins, where the film has
been protected from the light by the carrier frames. This
defect has, the writer believes, been noticed in some of
the journals, and attributed to electrical action, an
assumption which is well warranted hy their appearance ;
but how the markings are produced, whether by tension
or strains caused in rolling the .films on the spools, or
in stripping them from their original supports in a very
dry atmosphere, there is nothing to show. If a piece of
film be cut off the roll and developed without being exposed
to light, the marks may be seen very clearly in branched
and single lines running in the direction of the length of the
films. They have the appearance of being produced by
faint sparks. A piece of the film crumpled up strongly
in the hand, then opened out and developed, showed no
such marks due to the crumpling, nor did pulling out the
film strongly in jerks show any ; though in the present
very damp state of the air here it would be difficult to
excite electrical action. The marks seem to occur only
in patches on the films. It is to be hoped that their
cause will be discovered and removed.
Notwithstanding these defects, which seem likely to be
easily remediable, the new films promise to be an enormous
improvement over paper films in the roller slide, for which
they are specially adapted. The writer has found that
paper films fail entirely in cases when they have to be
kept a long time between exposure and development, and
are practically useless for travellers and explorers unless
they are developed immediately or within a month or two
of exposure. The writer has not had a good opportunity
of testing the keeping qualities of exposed celluloid films ;
but he has found that the films themselves lose much of
their original sensitiveness by keeping even a few months.
Some very sensitive American films which were received
here in August last are now only of an ordinary sensitive-
ness, but otherwise good. No particular precautions
have, however, been taken in keeping them, and they have
been taken to Europe and back in the time.
518
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 4, 1890.
Advei-tising detective agencies move with the times.
One advertises in this fashion: “ Instantaneous photo-
graphy for secretly securing photographs of persons
when together or separately, for identification and
corroboration.” We are rather inclined to think
the advertiser, like the lady in the play, protests too
much. “ Instantaneous photography for secretly
securing photographs of persons when together or
separately,” is all very well in theory, but difficult
to reduce to practice. Still, we do not doubt the
possibility in a good light. It would be instruc-
tive to have the experiences of the operators in the
employ of the detective agency ; at the same time, it is
quite possible (if a story coming from Paris be true)
to turn photography in such cases as are hinted at
in the advertisement to a questionable use. The
Parisian story is, that an Austrian gentleman, after
dining at his hotel, went out to enjoy a walk in the
Bois, and, suddenly remembering an appointment he
had made, summoned a cab to take him in the direction
lie had to go. He had not been in the cab many
minutes before it stopped, and a man entered it quickly,
and closed the door behind him. Before the Austrian
had time to cry out, a handkerchief saturated with
chloroform was held to his face, and ho became partially
unconscious ; the next thing he knew was that he was
in a room, and was being photographed by the electric
light. The explanation of this mysterious business is
that the gentleman’s wife was anxious to obtain a
divorce from him, and to bring about the object she
took steps to obtain a photograph of her husband. All,
then, that was necessary for the fabrication of an
accusing picture was to procure a photograph of a
notorious lady, and to combine the two pictures,
“ which,” says the paper relating this veracious story,
“ could be easily done by an ordinary photographer.”
Wo should say that there was about as much truth
in this story as there is in the efficacy of the photo-
graphic appliance advertised by the detective agency.
It is impossible to commend the use to which an
American firm of publishers has applied the art of
photography. They photographed the pages of the
“Encyclopaedia Britannica,” and from the photo-
graphic plates printed and sold a spurious edition.
Fortunately, some of the articles were written by
Americans and copyrighted in America, and thus
Messrs. A. and C. Black, the owners, were able to
proceed against the infringers of their rights. It is
curious to note that the point upon which the English
firm Avas able to obtain judgment was also made use
of as a defence, the defendants contending that these
articles by American writers were nothing less than a
trap laid for the American public and American pub-
lishers. If this be so, all that an impartial person can
say is, so much the better.
Lenses whose behaviour is eccentric are not unfami-
liar to photographers. A lens which has hitherto
borne an irreproachable character has been known to
refuse to come to a sharp focus, and to otherwise annoy
its owner. Indeed, one well-known photographer in
such a case has been heard to express an opinion
gravely that the lens was drunk. However this may
be, a microscopical objective seems recently to have
behaved in a most extraordinary manner, as the pro-
ceedings at the last meeting of the Royal Microscopical
Society will show. It appears that a committee, con-
sisting of Mr. Mayall, Dr. Dallinger, and Mr. E. M.
Nelson, had been appointed to examine a new objective
in which great interest was manifested, and a report
was to have been submitted to the members at the last
meeting. The committee, however, failed to bring up
the report, and for a full and sufficient reason.
Mr. Mayall explained that when the committee pro-
ceeded to test the objective by photographing an
object, they fouad, to their disappointment, that the
visual and actinic foci were not coincident. However,
by guessing what focal allowance to make, they suc-
ceeded in obtaining out of the out-of- visual-focus a very
nearly sharp photograph. But as this want of coin-
cidence would have made the lens very inconvenient
to use, they returned it to Jena for alteration. After
a lapse of several weeks Dr. Czapski, of Jena, replied
that he had not found any trace of a “ chemical ” focus
non-coincident with the visual focus, and the objective
was again forwarded to London. Again the committee
went to work, and this time the visual focus agreed
with the focus in the photograph. In fact, as Mr.
Mayall remarked, the transit of the objective from
London to Jena had somehow got rid of the “ chemical ”
focus. This, to say the least, is unsatisfactory, and we
would have wished that some other explanation had
been given. The Microscopical Society evidently were
not equal to the task of solving the mystery, and
unless the theory of the photographer mentioned above
be accepted, it is difficult to account for the abnormal
condition of the lens in question.
A curious experiment in what may be called stereo-
scopic science has been made by Dr. Schobben, a
member of the Antwerp section of the Belgian Photo-
graphic Association. Recently he exhibited before
the section a series of stereoscopic views shown by two
lanterns placed side by side. Each lantern contained
half a stereoscopic view, and a coloured glass was
placed in front of the lens, red for the view on the
right-hand side, and green for that on the left. The
views were then thrown on the screen, and the spectator
looked at them through a pair of spectacles with red
and green glasses (red for the right eye, and green for
the left). The result was, it is alleged, that the
spectator saw a non-coloured image with as much relief
as in the stereoscope.
Here are a few foreign items which may not be with-
out interest. A new photographic society lias been
started in Amsterdam. Photographs are admissible at
the forthcoming exhibition of architecture in Italy.
July 4, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
519
This, by the way, is the first of the kind ever held in
that country. The photographic exhibition which has
been in course of organization at Grenoble was opened
on Tuesday, and will close on the 30th of August. A
very admirable specimen of photo-collography by
M. Balagny is presented with the June number of the
Bulletin de la Societe Francaise de Photographie. The
subject is a view of the interior of the Paris Exhibition.
A smart piece of work was done by a newspaper
agency over the appointment of Sir Edward Bradford,
the new Commissioner of Police. The secret as to the
successor of Mr. Monro had been well kept, and until
the announcement was actually made in the House of
Commons on Friday night no one knew anything of the
matter. Yet the early editions of the evening papers
of the next day contained a very fairly-executed portrait
from a photograph. Possibly Sir Edward knew what
was in store for him when the appointment was made
known, and had his photograph in readiness for the
journalistic artist.
A Boston blacksmith has made a discovery that may
revolutionise the arts of photo-engraving, electrotyping,
and even type-setting. He has found that pen-and-
ink sketches on common writing paper can be trans-
ferred to iron as distinctly as if the mould was of
greater size. Two plates, one 3£ by 5 inches, and the
other 5 by 6 inches, are shown by him as a proof of
his ingenuity. Upon the smallest one is written the
Lord’s Prayer, the letters being quite distinct. The
others contain outline drawings. He explains his work
in this way : “ What you see on them is done with a
common steel pen on a piece of thin paper. The paper,
when prepared, is pinned into a sand mould, iron is
poured into the mould, and the writing is transferred
to the casting.” The explanation is not quite so satis-
factory as one could wish. As the white rabbit said in
“ Alice in Wonderland,” “there is a good deal to be
done first.” What does the inventor mean when he says,
“the paper, when prepared ?” How prepared? He
seems to have missed what, probably, is the most im-
portant part of the process.
We were told lately by a well-known manufacturer
of photographic apparatus that there is an extra-
ordinary demand for detective cameras this season, and
that although he had a large staff of men at work on
these articles alone, he could not keep pace with the
demand. It seems incredible to those who are not
experts that this instrument should have become so
popular, and yet that it should not fulfil its destiny
and justify its name by being used by our police force
for the detection of wrong-doers. At one time there
were hopes raised that by its deterrent aid crime would
become almost extinct. But all good photographers
know well that this blissful state of things will never
come to pass through the aid of secret camera work,
unless, indeed, the criminal classes will consent to pose
themselves on sunny days in front of the instrument.
Our weather is too precarious, our streets are too dark,
and our quarry is too sharp to enable us to execute any
such work in a haphazard kind of way.
Gelatine plates are usually of such excellent quality
that few failures can reasonably be ascribed to them.
A case was, however, brought before our notice the
other day where a raw amateur had complained to the
maker of one of the best brands of plates in his market,
that several of his pictures had been spoilt by pinholes
in the film, and he sent one of his negatives, with
his letter of complaint, as a guarantee of good faith.
The maker was able to prove, by raising a portion of
the film from the glass, that it contained no holes, and
that the clear spots on the surface were due to careless
development. Many workers are apt to forget that
certain samples of gelatine are at first most repellent
of water, and that it is a wise jprecaution with all
plates to use a soft camel-hair brush, in order to
establish contact between film and liquid.
The “Obernetter” adds yet another film to the
many which are now on the market, and it appears to
be a preparation of gelatine rendered insoluble, and to
resemble celluloid in all its good qualities. We trust
that it will be found possible to sell it at a price which
will approximate to the price of ordinary dry plates,
for the great difference in cost between celluloid and
the plates which it aims at superseding is the chief
stumbling block to its use. Another consideration
which at present bars these films is the difficulty of
adapting them to apparatus which has been made to
accommodate glass plates without a considerable amount
of trouble and inconvenience. Modern workers lack
the patience of their forefathers, and will not be
troubled with difficulties if they can possibly help it,
but still the £ s. d. matter is the one which they
consider most.
Photographers who have had leisure on their hands,
and who have not been obliged to consider too much
the bread and butter side of their work, have often
produced amusing puzzle photographs. These have
generally consisted of such subjects as a man playing
chess with himself, or a person holding his own head
in a dish, and so on. Most photographers know how
such things can be done, but few would imagine that
the pictures were possessed of any marketable value.
A certain transatlantic worker thinks differently,
and he advertises that he will show all his hanky-
panky tricks — which he calls “ freak photography ” —
for a compensatory number of dollars. This is quite
excusable in an American, for it is well known that he
can see money in a thing where a Britisher would dis-
cern no glitter of hope. It was only the other day
that a report reached America that Sarah Bernhardt
might possibly have to lose a leg by amputation. An
American speculator immediately wired that he would
— if the event came off — give a long price for the
limb and the sole right to exhibit it. We slow
Britishers would never have thought of such a thing.
520
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
BY GEORGE DAVISON.
No. V. —Hanging Committees and “ Amateur and
Professional.”
It is a necessary consequence of any system from which
picture classification and prizes are banished that there
should be a strict and competent hanging committee,
which should reject all inferior exhibits without fear or
favour. The best committee would consist of those held
to be qualified judges, provided that some or all of them
possessed practical experience in arranging and hanging
pictures. As compared with the task of selecting those
pictures which possess artistic qualities, it may seem com-
paratively easy to weed out what is distinctly inferior, and
a board consisting of ordinary practical photographers
might, perhaps, do this with fair accuracy. At the same time,
it must be remembered that the functions of a hanging com-
mittee are by no means limited to rejection of the worst
entries. They also include distinguishing in a broad way the
degrees of merit, to ensure that a picture of the highest qual-
ity shall not be placed in an inferior position. The best
exhibition would undoubtedly be one iu which only such
work is accepted as would be worthy of a place on or next
the line. Pictures which are held to be fairly treated by
“skying” or “flooring” ought not to be accepted at all.
It is a common thing to hear even the exhibitors them-
selves say that they would rather not have their pictures
hung at all than have them put out of reach of inspection.
It is essential, then, that there should be amongst the
members of a hanging committee those who are free from
what may be called photographic prejudices; that is, those
who, with or without a knowledge of photography, would
judge of the entries purely as pictures (as a poet might
judge of poems) without consideration of the mechanism
employed, and exactly as they would judge of a series of
exhibits iu any other black and white process better
recognized iu art. A photographer is by no means
unlikely to pass by a work with the highest artistic
qualities as even unworthy of a place in the exhibition, if
it happen not to be marked by any sensational effect, or
by what is peculiarly known amongst us as “technical
qualities.” There will, no doubt, be very few pictures
having the highest qualities for the hanging committee to
be troubled about, but they ought to be competent to
deal with those that do appear, and it is in the hope and
expectation of seeing more such perfect pictures by photo-
graphy in the future that such lines as these are penned.
Where space in an exhibition is practically unlimited
there is much scope for pleasing arrangement. One
thing, however, must be kept prominently in mind, that
it is the pictures that have to be seen, and not the acces-
sories or the scheme for displaying the exhibits. Art in
displaying exhibits must be concealed.
Where the frames abut one upon another throughout
an exhibition an unobtrusive arrangement may be made
which approximately gives the effect of panels. To
hang such an exhibition sucessfully means that the
director should first of all know well, and partly divide
out, all the pictures he has to deal with. The work is
best done where the whole of the exhibits in a section are
arranged by one individual, and not piecemeal by several.
The after labour and difficulties are reduced two-thirds
if the whole of the pictures can be mapped out upon the
floor before any one portion is actually fixed up. The
prior selection of those which are to occupy the principal
[July 4, 1890.
central positions, and along the best line of sight, is at
least essential. A large treatment is called for, and, at
the same time, throughout the operations close considera-
tion has to be given to points of detail in regard to
harmony and symmetry and quality of work. Hanging
committee duties arc probably sometimes taken up lightly
without any conception of the responsibilies or of the
powers called for in such a function. There are very few
men who are absolutely deficient iu taste, but in some
cases pictures have gained attention and superiority of
position from such “hangmen” purely from their size
and wealth of gilt moulding, or from good selling charac-
teristics, and this without any consciousness of error.
In the work of placing pictures, constant vigilance and
energy are needed, and, for the effective and satisfactory
hanging of a large room or gallery, the “artist-hanger”
must have all the exhibits iu his mind’s eye, and must not
object to physical effort and frequent experiment. In
regard to some few details it may be observed that the
general practice affects large pictures in two ways. If
they arc held to be good, they are selected as centres ; if
bad, they are skied. On either hand of the centres some
approximation to symmetry by arranging pairs, or similar
blocks of frames, is arrived at. It has become the cus-
tom for exhibitors to desire to have their pictures, particu-
larly if small, hung together ; but it cannot be of any
importance to a collection of pictures that they should be
all together, although it is advisable for a technical series.
A picture should be in a frame by itself. In the scientific
section, which a hanging committee does well to keep
entirely distinct, or in a portion of the gallery by itself,
the difficulties arc not, perhaps, so great. The exhibitor
decides by his entry form whether lie wishes to enter his
exhibit as of scientific interest or as a picture, or if lie
does not do so the committee can easily do it for him.
When exhibition authorities are alive to the proper method
of workinga high-class scientific exhibition, specialists might
have to be called in, but at present the purely scientific
applications of photography are very little illustrated in our
exhibitions.
Another regulation which, at the outset, I proposed as
a plank in a good programme for an exhibition of art
photography was in regard to the peculiar division sought
to be set up between amateur and professional. My
proposal was, “ That all distinction of amateur and pro-
fessional be entirely suppressed in such an exhibition, all
pictures being for sale unless specially exempted.”
If it were possible that there could be a class of wealthy
workers fully devoted to photography and to developing
its highest possibilities other than as an avowed profession,
nothing could be better ; but this, as in other arts, we
know to be an impossibility. A class to do the highest
good must be professional. Dilettantism never yet
helped on any cause very far. I Susy men who take up
photography merely as a pastime cannot pretend to show
what can be done by its means. Neither, of course, can
those who work at photography in the ordinary studio and
topographical grooves. Art knows no “ .amateur and pro-
fessional,” save to express by it badness and goodness.
The absurd restriction involved in the distinction
between amateur and professional prevents photographs
being sold at exhibitions. If the photographs were good
pictures, they would be demanded and sold.
Those of us who pride ourselves on being amateurs
seem to be claiming credit for the hopeless mediocrity and
the worthlessness of our photographs. This system tends
Jolt 4, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
521
to keep photography low iu general estimation. People
ask with unblushing readiness for the gift of a photograph.
Like most things cheap, they are also considered nasty.
Much of the value of a work is given by that which the
producer puts upon it himself. Everyone interested in
photography must hope to see more and more photo-
graphers whose work is worthy of it publish their pictures
in some form creditable to the art. Only let them take
competent opinion before doing so. The rubbish that is
sometimes sold in exhibitions and published in our journals
— particularly, I fear I must say, in those of our American
friends — cannot fail to do great harm by exciting ridicule
at the expense of photography.
In regard to regulations for photographic exhibitions,
the removal of classification would, of course, sweep away
the absurd division of amateurs and professionals. If
competition is unfair (which it is not ) between those with
studios and those without, so much the worse for com-
petition. Let it be done away with. The artist wishes to
see the best ; the interests of photography call for
the best. There can be no defence for giving awards
to a class because the work of those composing it is not so
good as that of another class.
THE RECORD OF PHOTO-MICROGRAPHY.*
BY ANDREW PRINGLE.
It may, perchance, be matter of wonder as well as of interest to
some of you that the history of general photography has been, to
a great extent, bound up with the history and record of photo-
micrography ; not that the special application of photography
to microscopy has in any direct way influenced general photo-
graphy, but rather because the men trained by education, and
perhaps fitted by nature, for microscopic study, which is
equivalent to saying minute and accurate observation have
found photographic technique useful, and have turned their
observant minds to photographic wants.
And, moreover, images projected by a microscope are so
evidently convenient for the study of any method of graphic
representation — the enlarged image can so readily be kept
steadily fixed on one plane, the optical qualities of the pro-
jected image can be so readily examined, the worker is so
wholly independent of weather — that there is not much cause
for wonder in our finding some of the earliest experimentalists
in photography using the projected microscopic image as the
subject for their photographic researches. Last year I had the
honour to review before you the progress of photography dur-
ing fifty years, but this year I take you back, if you will be
pleased to accompany me, to a period more remote than fifty
years ago. Let us turn to the year 1802, and we shall find —
probably in the journal of the Royal Institution — records of
the experiments of Wedgwood and the observations of Humphry
Davy on “Leaves and Wings of Insects taken by Solar Light
on Prepared Leather.” This surely is early enough in the
history of photography. It is well known that both Fox
Talbot and the Rev. J. B. Reade used the solar microscope, and
many other names famous in the records of photograph y are
also found in the early annals of photo-micrography. Mr.
Reade is known to have produced photo-micrographs in 1887,
insects being his chief subjects, but in 1839 he produced
results greatly superior to his efforts of 1837. About 1838
the prototype of our triple achromatic condenser was brought
forward by Dujardin, and in ’39 or '40 Dancer used the gas
microscope and photographed therewith on silvered plates.
Donne? and Foucault, iu Paris, presented engravings from
photo-micrographic Daguerreotype plates in what Moitessier
called a “ magnificent atlas." The first instance known to me
of the use of polarised light for photography was in 1857,
when M. Bertsch exhibited in Paris crystals of salicine photo-
graphed by polarised light. About the “ fifties ” a great many
* Read at the Photographic Convention at Chester.
names are found, many of them well known to us, as Shad-
bolt, Diamond, Maddox, Wenham, Viles, besides many savants
of other countries. Dr. Maddox showed at the Royal Society,
in 1867, photo-micrographs illustrating a paper he then read.
Enormous strides were made in our science Dy Dr. Wood-
ward, an army surgeon of the United States ; in fact, his
work may be said not only to mark, but to constitute, an era
in photo-micrography. His work first claimed notice about
1864, and consisted not only of medical subjects, but of
diatoms taken at very high magnifications.
I am not aware of the exact date when Dr. R. L. Maddox
first produced a photo-micrograph, nor can he fix the date him-
self, but I have here a photograph of P. Angulatum X 3,000
diameters of superlative excellence produced by my friend
in 1838 or 1839. This was by no means his first attempt, as
is easily seen from the high quality of the negative now in my
possession. It is not within my subject to describe even briefly
the apparatus used by these early workers, but I may say that
the illumination used by them was either the gas microscope
or sunlight, and many ingenious forms of heliostat were used.
Dr. Woodward’s heliostat was specially admirable, and Dr.
Maddox designed one of high quality and moderate price.
Still, iu this country at least, direct sunlight can never be
depended upon, and in the days of wet collodion the photo-
micrographer must have had frequently to lie idle. In the
present day, with the much more sensitive plates at our com-
mand, we can utilise as radiants not only the electric arc, but
electric incandescent lamps, such, for example, as Dr. Van
Heurck uses with such success ; limelight, such as I use myself ;
and even the light of ordinary paraffin lamps.
Perhaps I may be excused if I dwell with a certain fondness
on the photography of bacteria. I believe that Dr. Robert
Koch, the eminent bacteriologist of Berlin, was the first to
publish photographs of bacteria; this was in 1877. In his
paper “On the Investigation of Pathogenic Organisms,” trans-
lated by Mr. Victor Horsley for the New Sydenham Society,
Koch speaks very strongly in favour of photo- micrography,
and even says he would prefer a bad photograph to a drawing,
however good ; but it seems that at a later period he found
certain difficulties of colour to be almost or quite insuperable,
and he was then inclined to make less of photo -micrography
than he had previously done. Dr. E. Klein, F.R.S., was also
inclined to condemn our science for his purpose, for in
“ Micro-Organisms and Disease,” third edition, 1886, I find
these words : — “Micro-photography, by which microscopic
specimens of bacteria are photographed, has hitherto yielded
results so unsatisfactory that even Koch, who first introduced
it, has abandoned it in lieu of accurate drawings made in the
usual manner.” Possibly, when Dr. Klein wrote this his words
were true, but certainly he has changed his opinion now, as I
have v ery good reason to know.
I could name a considerable number of books and a very
great number of papers which are illustrated by photography.
George M. Sternberg not only illustrated a book of his own on
bacteria by photo-micrographic prints, (second edition, 1883),
but has written a book of careful and detailed instructions for
the practice of the science. Dr. E. M. Crookshank is in the
same position ; he has published a book largely illustrated by
photographs of bacteria, and he is also the author of “Photo-
graphy of Bacteria.” A paper read by Dr. Crookshank to
the Photographic Society of Great Britain, and illustrated by
his negatives, first directed my attention to bacteriological
photography. In 1885 both Hauser and Van Ermengen
published photographs of bacteria, and after the works of
these men the secience may be said to have gained a sure
footing ; the chief obstacle to success, the stumbling block
of all these earlier workers, was the difficulty of colour render-
ing, unless the preparations were suitably or deliberately
stained for photography. Colour-correct photography, then,
forms one of the foundation stones of the edifice of photo-
micrography so rapidly rising among us.
My remarks up to this point have been purposely made
to lead up to certain stages in the records of photo-micro-
graphy, and we have reached the stage of colour-correct
rendering of stained objects. There is another photographic
522
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jcly 4, 1890.
matter which has been alluded to in passing, but must now be
more particularly treated. I have referred to increased sensi-
tiveness of our plates. Just as Wedgwood, Davy, Reade, and
Talbot used photography for microscopic work, and in practising
the one elaborated the other, so Dr. Maddox, in the search
after certain photo-micrographic effects, fell upon gelatine
emulsion photography. I need not tell you how Bennett
revolutionised photography, but I must point out the effect
his discovery had on photo-micrography. We are no longer
dependent on sunlight ; we can work with the very highest
powers without undue length of exposure ; the developed image
is quite fine enough for any purpose ; and nearly all the
difficulties and inconveniences of wet collodion and silver bath
are removed from our path. The advantage in reduced
exposure is not by any means a matter of time only, for, during
prolonged exposure, there is imminent danger of movement
either from tremor or from alterations of temperature, both of
which are fatal to success, but most difficult to avoid. We
have, then, at the present day, advantages purely photographic
which were not within reach of the masters of photo-micro-
graphy of past years ; we have plates much more sensitive,
and so we get results much more rapidly, much more certainly,
and with much less expense ; but in a large class of cases we
get results much better — somedmes, in fact, we get results
which, without orthochromatic photography, we could not
obtain at all. The indefatigable Koch was stopped by colour
difficulties, as already stated ; but it is interesting to know that,
so far as I have seen, the very best photographs of bacteria
published up to the present time are by Drs. Fraenckel and
Pfeiffer, colleagues or assistants of Koch. These bacteriological
photographs are so fine that I have brought a few of them for
your inspection. They are all, or nearly all, produced by
orthochromatic methods, and while I cannot quite agree with
all the directions given in the text of No. 1, still, there can
be but one opinion as to the results these gentlemen have
achieved.
I would point out that some of the methods of staining most
followed by bacteriologists and microscopic technologists in
general would afford excellent examples of subjects difficult to
photograph on ordinary plates. Tubercle bacilli are usually
stained either red on a blue ground, or blue on a yellow-brown
ground. Violet coloured bacilli anthracis are very frequently
found in preparations counter-stained with Bismarck brown or
vesuvin. The fungus of actinomycosis shows best stained blue,
red, and yellow, and I shall presently show you the ortho-
chromatic results from such a staining. A much valued
multiple stain — my own favourite stain for ordinary pathologi-
cal and physiological tissues — consists of bright blue for nuclear,
bright red for connective, and orange more or less bright for
proto plasmic tissues. I venture to assert that no ordinary
plate will properly render a section well stained by this method,
yet with yellow-sensitive plates, and the use of screens chosen
for each occasion, I am in the frequent habit of photographing
such subjects, and I generally end by getting good results.
I could show you bacteria sections photographed repeatedly on
ordinary plates, and with the greatest skill and care I could
bring to bear, where there is not a trace of a microbe ; whereas
with a colour-corrected plate the organisms stand out clear and
unmistakeable. My paper is not intended to be a course of
instruction in photo-micrography, but is rather an attempt to
point out by how much and by what means our science has
advanced, is advancing, and will doubtless continue to advance.
The advances made since the infancy of our science have
been simply astounding. Conceive the time and conceive the
labour when the principle of “ correcting lenses for photo-
graphy ” was undiscovered. Petzval, about fifty years ago,
showed the way to this correction in photographic lenses, but
not till long after that did photo-micrography become so im-
portant in public estimation that opticians were forced to
consider the correction for microscopic objectives. Some opti-
cians do not seem to have grasped the subject even yet, but
there are others who have done so most successfully.
And again, resolution and definition, which, though perhaps
technically distinct, are nevertheless bound together, depend
on angular, or rather, numerical aperture. The. earlier opti-
cians might get their objectives with visual and chemical foci
coincident, they certainly did attain to very flat field images ;
but they were incompetent, and, indeed, do not seem to have
been desirous to get large aperture with other qualities good.
Resolution, or separation of line from line, depends on fixed
laws relating to numerical aperture. A lens having a numeri-
cal aperture of 0 '30 will, in the most actinic part of the spec-
trum, resolve 38,000 lines to an inch ; N.A. l'OO (the highest
air angle) gives the power of resolving 127,000 to the inch,
while N.A. 1 '4 is capable of resolving nearly 180,000 per inch,
Now many of us possess objectives having apertures nearly
approaching to N.A. 1*4, while lately Zeiss produced a glass
having a numerical aperture of 1 '63. I shall show you some
work done with this glass by Dr. Van Heurck, of Antwerp.
When the system of immersion was introduced an enormous
stride was made, and an enormous additional power gained. If
we have a dry lens our numerical aperture is evidently limited to
the extent of the air angle — 1 80°, or n.a. 1 ; but when water im-
mersion wasintroduced, and still more when homogeneous immer-
sion, the numerical aperture was at once increased to a very large
extent. It may seem a paradox that we can get a glass to
embrace a larger angle than 180° ; at first glance this seems to
bespeak looking round a corner, but the explanation is simple
enough. We do not look round a corner, but in our angular
aperture of ISO*1 we include more pencils of light. If, for
example, with a dry lens we can include 1,000 pencils, we
can with water immersion (by virtue of the higher refraction
index of that liquid) include 1,300 pencils, and with suitable
oils 1,500 ; while, if we use not only suitable oil, but suit-
able glass for our condensing arrangements, we can, as already
stated, reach to 1,600. But, beyond this gain, immersion
greatly improves the qualities of our objectives ; it increases
working distance, improves illumination, and mitigates the
tendency to diffraction images.
Herein, then, lies one of the great advances made in our
optical appliances. We vastly improved the performance and
increased the range of our objectives by the immersion system.
Amici seems first to have noted the beneficial effect of water
immersion, but the system, I believe, was first carried into
practical effect by Nacliet or Hartuack. Mr. Wenham seems
to have suggested, but not used the homogeneous immersion
system, and the great optician Abbe, of Jena, worked out the
matter, and brought Wenhatn’s idea to full fruition. Oil of
cedar, in virture of its refractive index and its dispersion
coinciding nearly with those of crown glass, is the oil generally
used for homogeneous immersion. But it must be borne in
mind that, in order to get the full effect of this system, the
objects themselves must be mounted in a medium of high
refraction index, and this process is very apt to lead to error
in observation. Mr. Nelson rarely photographs diatoms at
any angle beyond the air angle, in order, as I undertand, to
avoid these errors of interpretation due to mounting objects
in these media of high refraction indices. Unstained physiolo-
gical tissues are often destroyed for observation by being placed
in glycerine, and a piece of glass placed in a bottle of water is
not in advantageous circumstances for examination.
I have now to touch on the latest, and one of the great
advances made, and this one affects in a very special manner
our science of photo-micrography. On account of the nature
of the glass used previously to but a few years ago, opticians
found it impossible to correct objectives for more than two
regions of the spectrum ; lenses were corrected for the blue
and yellow regions, or perhaps more commonly for the green
and red, and when using such lenses under conditions at all
trying we find fringes of colouring bordering our objects ; in
other words, we have a marked uncorrected residual spectrum.
But Abbe and the firm of Schott, working together, at last
succeeded in making glass with different refracting and different
dispersing powers from the powers of glass previously made,
and as a result Abbe has formulated and Zeiss has made objec-
tives far superior in correction to any we have ever had before.
The photographic results are distinctly superior to those obtain-
able by use of more ancient objectives, and there is, moreover,
a marked improvement in the images even for visual observation.
Three spectrum regions at least are made practically coincident
Jolt 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
523
in foci, and the colour fringes are, if not wholly eliminated, at
least greatly reduced. Some English opticians have produced
with the new glass — which, as has lately transpired, contains
fluorspar — very good “ apochromatic ” glasses, apochromatic
being the term used to describe this new phase of optical
achievement. It is claimed that by use of this new glass greater
numerical aperture can be obtained in conjunction with equally
good or better general qualities, such as flatness of field,
illumination, &c.
So far, I have mentioned special advances that have been
made ; I may now say broadly that the optical improvements
consist of the attainment of larger angle without loss of
general quality. I think I may say that the history of micro-
scopic optics has been the history of numerical aperture.
There always was, and there ever will be, a limit to the aper-
ture possible with a given focal length, but now more than
ever we are getting long focal length and large aperture con-
jointly. In microscopic optics the word penetration must creep
in sooner or later. Penetration or “depth of focus” is the
suppositious power of focussing on two planes at right angles
to the optic ax:s simultaneously, sufficiently accurately to
prevent visible blur. It is manifestly impossible to focus on
two such planes equally sharply, and the question is simply,
“ How much blur is permissible ? ” In artistic photographs
it is a matter of taste ; in scientific micrography it is a
matter of mathematics. Penetration decreases directly as
aperture increases, but decreases as the square of magnifica-
tion. It is, therefore, beyond argument that the more the
aperture — and, consequently, the more the resolution— we can
get with the least magnification, the greater will be the pene-
tration we shall obtain ; and, therefore, what we have to search
for is an objective of low pow'er, with as wide a working
aperture as can be achieved without damage to the corrections
and general qualities of the objective. With a given focal
length opticians reach a point of aperture beyond which they
cannot go without injury to the quality of the objective. That is
where we shall always stand ; but our standpoint will from
year to year be pushed onward, and our optical appliances
will from year to year improve.
Speaking for myself, I am well satisfied with the optical con-
trivances we have to-day, but I look with eagerness for some
advance in photographic power ; particularly I long for
greater power to cope with certain colour effects and colour
combinations frequently met in my experience. I have no
spark of doubt that in the process of time every candid
investigator of microscopic objects who wishes a graphic repre-
sentation of his objects of study will employ photography as
his delineator ; and I maintain that the scientific iuvestigator
of scientific facts is bound to use for delineation the only
scientific method of delineation — photographic.
Appendix (Objects shown in Illustration).
(1.) Books. — “Bacteria,” by O. M. Sternberg, second
edition, 1885 ; “Photography of Bacteria,” by E. M. Crook-
shank, 1887 ; “ Mikro-photographischer Atlas der Bacterien
Kunde,” by Fraenckel and Pfeiffer, Nos. 1 and 2, 1889 ; “ La
Chambre Noire et Le Microscope,” by Jules Girard, 1869.
Prints, Ac.— Collection by Dr. R. L. Maddox from 1868 and
onward — diatoms, insects, silica films, &c. ; Diatoms by
Thomas Comber ; Diatoms, &e., by Dr. Clifford Mercer, Syra-
cuse, U.S.A. ; various objects by Mr. Rafter, U.S.A. ; Scrap-
book of Bacteria, by A. Pringle, 1878 and onward.
Lantern Slides.
Probiscis of blow-fly (lowest power to n.a. 0-90), four slides.
P. Angulatum 'j
n (X3000) . Maddox, 1868 or 69.
Silica film I
Navicula aspera ( X 1 000)
P. Angulatum (X1000)
Cymbella (X1000) ^-Comber.
Isthmia nervosa (X1000)
Coscinodiscus osseus (X1000)
Trieeratium (X 80), (X 375), and (X 750) A. Pringle.
P. Angulatum (X670) n.a. 0*7 0-9'
, , ( X 1200) n.a. 0 *5 ,, ,,
„ ( X 630) n.a. 0-65 i" „
„ ( X 1080) n.a. l-0 f " „
N. Lyra (X230) black ground 1" ,,
C. Asteromphaieus ( X 2000) n.a.
M. Nelson.
A. Lindheimerii
P. Angulatum (X600)
A. Pellucida
P. Angulatum
S. Gemma
A. Lindheimerii
A. Pellucida
n.a. 1*38
n.a. 1*4
n.a. 1 ‘6
n.a. l-6
n.a. 1 -6
n.a. 1*6
n.a. 1‘6
n.a. 1'6
A Spencer '
A Apo
-Van Heurck.
;
A. Pellucida (X750) n.a. 1-4 |Apo ,
P. Angulatum (X 2000) n.a. 1* A >> / °
Collection of bacteria, including actinomyces, cholera, typhoid,
anthrax, &c.
Apparatus.
(1.) Designed for the Royal Veterinary College. Made by
Swift.
(2.) Baker’s apparatus.
WEIGHTS, MEASURES, AND FORMULA' USED
IN PHOTOGRAPHY.*
Report of a Committee consisting of W. Bedford, C. H.
Bothamley (Secretary), A. Cowan, A. Hadron, A.
Levy, A. Pringle, and G. Watmough Webster,
appointed to consider the Weights, Measures, and Formula i
used in Photography. Draivn up by C. II. BOTHAMLEY.
General Considerations.
The question of Weights, Measures, and Formula) divides
itself into two parts —the system of weights and measures to
be used, and the method of using them.
A. Weights and Measures. — Choice lies between the Eng-
lish system, or a modification thereof, and the metric or French
system.
The metric system is now almost exclusively used for scien-
tific purposes. Its advantages lie not so much in the magni-
tudes of the units, but in the facts that there is a simple
definite relation between the measures of weight and the
measures of capacity, and that it is a decimal system, the mul-
tiples and submultiples being powers of ten.
It is necessary to point out, however, that the relation
between measure and weight is only theoretically exact at
4° C. (39‘2° Fahr.), at which point the unit of weight, the
gramme, is the weight of one cubic centimetre of pure water
weighed in the latitude of Paris. At the ordinary tempera-
ture of 15® C., however, the deviation resulting from the
expansion of the water amounts to only 8 in 10,000, and is
negligable for all practical purposes. Only in investigations of
a very refined character need the divergence be taken into con-
sideration.
With respect to the English system it is necessary, in the
first place, to point out that the old “Apothecaries’ Weight,”
with its ounce of 480 grains, and its submultiples, the drachm
and the scruple, is no longer legal in the buying and selling
of chemicals, and it has not been included in the “ British
Pharmacopoeia” since 1864.
The legal units of weight in which dealings in chemicals,
and all materials except gems and precious metals, are transacted,
are the pound avoiidupois, the ounce avoirdupois, and the grain.
The pound contains 16 ounces, or 7,000 grains, and the ounce
contains 437 -5 grains. The relation between the grain and the
ounce is inconvenient.
The English units can be used, and are frequently used deci-
mally. Quantities are expressed in grains and decimal parts of
a grain, and there is no greater difficulty in writing 205 ‘0 grains
than in writing 12-96 grammes. Grain weights from 10,000
grains to 0-01 grain can easily be purchased.
• Read at the Photographic Convention at Chester.
524
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jolt 4, 1890.
The relation between weight and fluid measure is of pre-
cisely the same kind as in the metric system. The gallon is
the bulk of ten pounds of water at 62Q Falir. ; a fluid ounce
is the bulk of an ounce of water at 62'! Fahr. ; 16 fluid
ounces, or 7,000 fluid grains, is the bulk of 16 ounces, or 7,000
fluid grains, or one pound of water at 62' Fahr. Since the
relation is quite exact at 62° Fahr., it is more exact at the
ordinary temperature than in the case of the metric system.
Below the ounce, however, such a relation does not exist.
The submultiple, the minim, has no simple relation to the
grain, and this arises from the fact that when the fluid ounce
was changed from the bulk of the troy ounce, oi 480 grains,
to the bulk of the avoirdupoise ounce, or437‘5 grains, the old
mode of subdivision was retained, and we now have the fluid
ounce of 437'5 grains divided into 480 equal parts or minims.
A minim is therefore the bulk of only 0-911 grain of water,
and to take the minim and the grain as equivalent intro-
duces an error of about 10 per cent.
Fluid grains are, however, in use for chemical purposes, and
the relation between the grain and the fluid grain at 62° Fahr.
is precisely the same as that between the gramme and the
cubic centimetre at 4e C. Measures graduated in fluid grains
can be obtained without difficulty, and have been used by many
photographers for a considerable time.
Whilst fully recognising the advantages of the metric system,
we are also bound to recognise the facts that the English system
is much more familiar, that the weights and measures of this
system are possessed and used by almost all photographers, and
that a knowledge of decimals sufficient to enable a decimal
system to be used easily and accurately is by no means so
widely diffused as is desirable. It follows that the general
adoption of the metric system will at any rate require a con-
siderable time, and in dealing with formula; we recommend a
method which is independent of the system of weights and
measures used, provided always that the relation of the unit
of weight to the unit of measure is the same as that- existing
between the gramme and the cubic centimetre, or the ounce
and the fluid ounce.
Recommendations.
A. Weights and Measures. — 1. If the metric system be used,
weights will naturally be expressed in grammes and measures in
cubic centimetres.
2. If the English units be used, the minim and the drachm
should not be employed at all. All weights should be expressed
either in grains or decimal parts of a grain, or in ounces and
fractions of an ounce ; all measures in fluid grains, or in fluid
ounces and fractions of a fluid ounce.
B. Formula’. — 3. Formula; should give the number of parts
of the constituents, by weight or measure, to be contained
in some definite number of parts, by measure, of the solution.
The mixture can then be made up with (a) grammes and cubic
centimetres, or (6) grains and fluid grains, or (c) ounces and
fluid ounces, according to the unit selected.
4. The standard temperature for making up solutions should
be 15s C. or 62° Fahr. No appreciable error will be intro-
duced by the fact that these two temperatures are not quite
identical.
5. Formula; should give the quantities of the constituents
to be contained in x parts of the finished solution, and not the
quantities to be dissolved in x parts of the solvents. When a
solid dissolves in a liquid, or when two liquids are mixed, the
volume of the solution or mixture is, as a rule, not equal to the
sum of the volumes of its constituents. The expansion or
contraction varies with the nature of the solids and liquids, and
the proportions in which they are brought together. In making
up a solution, therefore, the constituents should first be dis-
solved in a quantity of the solvent smaller than the required
volume of the finished mixture, and after solution is complete,
the liquid, cooled if necessary to the ordinary temperature, is
made up to the specified volume by addition of a further
quantity oi the solvent.
6. It is very important to specify in the case of liquids
whether parts by weight or parts by measure are intended.
The equivalence between weight and measure only holds good
ill the case of water and liquids oi the same specific gravity —
a fluid ounce of ammonia solution or of ether weighs less than
an ounce ; a fluid ounce of strong sulphuric acid weighs nearly
two ounces.
7. Whenever possible, formulr* should give the quantities of
the constituents required to make up 10, 100, or 1,000 parts of
the solution.
8. When a mixture (e.g., a developer) is to be prepared just
before use from two or more separate solutions, it is desirable
that the proportions in which the separate solutions have to be
mixed should be as simple as possible, e.g., 1 to 1, 1 to 2, 1 to
3, 1 to 10.
9. When metric units are employed the original French
spelling, “gramme,” should be used in preference to the con-
tracted spelling, “gram,” in order to avoid misreading and
misprinting as “grain.”
Appendix.
Weighing and Measuring.
A brief description of the correct methods of weighing and
measuring may be of service to photographers who have had no
laboratory training.
Measuring. — The correct reading is the horizontal tangent to
the meniscus ; that is, the horizontal line which touches the
lowest point of the curved surface of the liquid in the case of
water and all liquids which wet glass, or the highest point of
the curved surface in the case of mercury and similar liquids.
When the liquid is so opaque that the meniscus cannot be seen,
the reading must be taken at the apparent horizontal surface
of the liquid. The measuring vessel should be exactly vertical,
and the eye of the observer should be exactly on a level with
the surface of the liquid.
Weighing. — To assume that the weights in the two pans are
equal when there is a distinct deflection of the index of the
balance towards one side is obviously incorrect. To take the
weights as equal when the beam is at rest, and there is no
deflection at all, also gives untrustworthy results. The
balance should be made to vibrate, and the weights in the
two pans are equal when the index makes equal excursions on
either side of the position of rest, which is usually the centre.
NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES*
BY DR. PAUL RUDOLPH.
No. II.
In an objective consisting of two distinct systems,
the contrarious elements required for compensation
of astigmatic deviations are obtained without pre-
judice to full liberty as regards achromatisation of each
single system, by compounding one of the systems —
presuming both to be positive systems — of a normal, the
other of an abnormal pair of glasses (the terms “ normal”
and “ abnormal ” being taken in the sense of the definition
as given above).
The elements of actual construction of objectives, as
specified in Tables I, II, and III, furnish examples for the
practical application of this invention under varying con-
ditions.
The opposite character of the pairs of glasses in the
two separate members of a doublet are, however, condi-
tional to the desired effect only in case both these mem-
bers are required to be positive (collecting) systems, and
if both are also required to assist in a notable degree in
the concentration of the rays of light, or, in other words,
in the diminution of the focal length of the objective.
For many purposes it may, however, be sufficient or even
advantageous to assign the function of the concentration
of the rays of light wholly or principally to one system
(principal system), viz., in such a manner that the other
need not produce any notable refractory effects in the
sense of a diminution of the focal distance, it having simply
■ Continued from page 478.
July 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
525
and essentially to act as a correcting system, which admits
of a relatively large positive or even negative focal length.
According, us in this particular case, the principal system
consists of a normal or of an abnormal pair of glasses, the
positive or the negative element of the correcting system
must be made to have the higher refractive index ; the
nature of the pair of glasses of which the correcting
system is composed — i.e. , whether it is of a normal or of
an abnormal character — is, however, non-essential, pro-
vided its focal lengths be taken very great. If, however,
a negative focal length which is not very great as com-
pared with the focal length of the principal system be
given to the correction system, the latter, in order to
insure the conditions of achromatisation, must be com-
posed of a pair of glasses of the same character as the
principal system ; i.e., either both of pairs of glasses of the
normal, or both of pairsof glasses of the abnormal character.
The elements of construction, as specified under IV,
serve to illustrate an anastigmatic combination of lenses
of this last kind, in which one of its members constitutes
such a correcting system of a negative focal length, both
members consisting of normal pairs of glasses.
The new type of photographic doubt lets thus set forth
admits, as is shown by the preceding explanations and the
examples appended to this specification, of many modifi-
cations of detail, which modifications do not, however,
introduce any novel features. The focal lengths of both
parts of the double objective may have any ratio what-
ever ; the system consisting of an abnormal pair of glasses
and likewise the correcting system — assuming this latter
case to enter into consideration — may constitute either
the anterior or posterior member of the combination ;
finally, a great variety of glasses may be employed for
carrying out the cons'ructive principles as stated above,
provided they leave sufficient scope for the selection of
such pairs as are prescribed in each particular case by the
foregoing directions.
All these special alternatives of practical construction
are intrinsically dependent upon the particular purpose
which such an objective has to serve, and the correspond-
ing conditions regarding the aperture, the size of the field,
and the degree of perfection required with respect to
correction. Whenever these particular conditions on
the one hand, and the optical constants (refractive index
and dispersive power) of the available kinds of glasses, on
the other hand, are given numerically, any optician versed
in the treatment of problems of this kind is enabled,
guided by the preceding remarks and the examples
appended at the end of this specification, to numerically
determine, according to known methods, those elements
of construction (radii, thicknesses of lensts, air distances)
which will sufficiently compensate astigmatic deviation,
beside furnishing ali the other usual corrections. In par-
ticular, no novel constructive feature is introduced by
making one (vide Table III) or both of the cemented
systems of the doublet to consist of three instead of two
lenses, which may be particularly advantageous in such
cases where the objective is to have a large aperture.
For inasmuch as the use of three single lenses has no
other aim in view but to distribute the effect otherwise
attained by a single lens, over two, made of the same or
similar kinds of glass, the substitution of a triple for a
double lens belongs to those expedients which are ordi-
narily made use of by practical and theoretical opticians
in order to attain au increased number of elements afford-
ing means for optical correction.
In the annexed drawings, three different arrangements
of objectives, carried out according to my invention, are
shown in full size, partly in elevation and partly in section.
According to fig. 1 the anterior system of lenses is com-
I
Fig. 1.
posed of the dispersing lens L, and the collecting lensT. ,
while the posterior system consists in the collecting lens
L, and the dispersing lens ht, all these lenses being con-
cavo-convex. B is the diaphragm. In the objective
represented by fig. 2, the 'anterior system L, L... is com-
posed alike to the preceding one, whereas the posterior
system consists in the biconcave dispersing lens Ls and
the biconvex collecting lens Li. Fig. 3 again shows a
i
Fig. 3.
like system L, L>, while the posterior system comprises
two concavo-convex dispersing lenses, L3 and Li, and the
concavo-convex collecting lens L<. The letters r, r3 r3 rt
)-i rB ?-7, to be referred to hereafter, denote the radii of
curvature of the lens surfaces to which they are appliedj
di d» d3 di di the central thicknesses of the lenses, and l\ bt
the distances between the diaphragm B and the lenses.
52G
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
(July 4, 1890.
patent Intelligence*
Specifications Published.
11,994. July 29th, 1889. — “Polishing Engraved Glass or
Plate or Sheet Glass.” Jabez Facer, Glass Etcher, Collis
Street, Dennis Park, Stourbridge.
The invention relates to cut and engraved flint and coloured
glass or sheet or plate glass, and has for its chief object the
polishing of glass without the use of pumice or rotten stone
and putty powder. For this purpose I provide a bath com-
posed of hydrofluoric acid and sulphuric acid in equal propor-
tions, with a sufficient quantity of water added to reduce it to
a convenient strength for working purposes. In cases where
metallic or other ingredients are introduced into the glass for
colouring purposes, the addition of a small quantity of nitric
acid or muriatic acid is beneficial.
The mode of operation is, then, to wash the glass with the
acid until the desired brilliancy is attained.
I make no claim to the ordinary use of hydrofluoric or other
acids for any of the branches of decorative etching as at pre-
sent practised.
What I claim is : —
The use of the above-mentioned acid bath for the purpose
of polishing cut and engraved flint and coloured glass or plate
or sheet glass, and thus accomplishing by a chemical process
what has been hitherto performed by mechanical appliances
combined with the use of most injurious powders and manual
labour.
12,648. August 10th, 1889. “Obtaining Alloys of Aluminium."
John Clark, 80, Great Brook Street, Birmingham, Metal-
lurgist.
The object of the invention is to operate upon any silicate of
alumina with certain reagents in such a manner that when the
said prepared silicate of alumina is mixed with the metal or
metals intended to be alloyed with aluminium, and is melted
therewith, the intended alloy of aluminium with such metal or
metals is produced ; or, if the prepared silicate of alumina is
brought into contact in any convenient manner with such
metal or metals while in a melted or plastic condition, the
intended alloy with aluminium is thereby produced in a
similar manner.
<£omgpon&ence.
PERSPECTIVE IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
Sin, — May I take the liberty of expressing a fear lest a pas-
sage in the presidential address, which we have all heard or
read with such interest, may be so misunderstood as to dis-
courage a study of much importance, namely, that of the rela-
tions between visual and photographic perspective. Comment-
ing on Mr. Hamerton’s case against photography in his well-
known essay, that “It is false in perspective, and consequently
in proportions and forms,” the President said that “ falsity of
perspective and the proportion of forms is entirely a question
of the proper or improper use of lenses, and need not exist
at all.”
I venture to submit that though this reply appears prac-
tically complete as regards the apparent distortion of portraits
taken too close to the sitter — which Mr Hammerton had
instanced as a special fault inherent to photography — yet, as a
general statement, it is incorrect, and, I fear, misleading. For
the real difficulty of the question, “ how it is we can look on a
friend’s face or figure without feeling the distortion which would
be unpleasautly obvious in a photograph taken from a jwsition
equally close,” is not touched at all, but remains a problem
which should be solved with scientific completeness, and not
merely salved with a remedy, practically efficient, perhaps,
in many cases, but yet applied empirically, and not indeed
always applicable.
We cannot help recognising that some differences must
really exist ; for our graphic delineation is on a plane surface,
corresponding neither to nature itself, nor to our vision of it.
But still more important is it to recognise that such a sense of
perspective as belongs to even the most cultivated visual per-
ception— or, to the painting which may embody that percep-
tion— will never exactly correspond to the strict geometrical
perspective of a good lens, however well selected and placed.
For what we see in nature Is affected to us by subjective modi-
fications not similarly present when we look on its pictorial
representation — photographed or painted — and photography
cannot depict what is only subjectively present. In viewing
natural scenes, we naturally apprehend actual rather than
apparent magnitudes and forms ; our perceptions being domi-
nated by past experience and acquired knowledge. For as
these strictly apparent proportions and forms change from
moment to moment as we move, they are gone before we have
fairly laid hold of them. And in the mass of such changing
and varying perceptions, which we suppose to constitute the
image of nature as we survey it, the constancy of our memory
or conception of actual forms and magnitudes, which are
always the same, preponderate to a greater or less extent,
according to our cultivation, and according to the familiarity
or strangeness of our surroundings. It is thus that a just
sense of perspective is a comparatively late product of observa-
tion and mental development, and that different parts are
apprehended in differing proportions — often contrasting
strongly with the utter rigidity and geometric accuracy of
the apparent image formed by a lens. It is thus, too, that
“falsity of perspective” means one thing to artistic feeling,
and another to geometrical accuracy. We cannot have a real
science of photographic perspective unless we fully recognise
all the facts — psychical as well as physical — and such a
science is greatly needed, rightly to direct our efforts.
I am persuaded, from other passages in the presidential
address, and from what Mr. Hamerton has written in other
essays, that these remarks are not really discordant with the
views of either authority ; and with such a feeling I have
ventured to write this letter. W. H. Wheeler.
HACKNEY PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY.
Sir, — Below is our programme for July and August, 1890 : —
July 10th — Demonstration, “ Exposure and Development,"
Mr. Birt Acres ; July 19th — Excurson to St. Albans (trains
leave King’s Cross, G.N.R., 2.40 ; July 24th — Discussion on
excursion work ; August 14th — Demonstration, “Intensifying,
Reduction, and Varnishing,” Mr. R. Beckett ; August 16th —
Excursion to Carshalton (train from London Bridge at 2. 18) ;
August 28th — “ Portraiture and Retouching,” Mr. J. Hubert.
Prizes will be given for the two best photographs taken on
Society excursions. Other prizes for work done during the
present year will be given, of which due notice will be sent
to each member. In each case an entrance fee of Is. will be
charged. Members not having paid their subscription for
present year are requested to send on at once to the treasurer.
W. Fenton Jones, Hon, Sec.
12, King Edward Road, Hackney, N.E.
THE LATE MR. BAYNHAM JONES.
Sir, — I regret to say that the oldest photographer in this
country died on the 19 th ult. at Cheltenham.
The late Mr. Baynham Jones was known to me for many
years, and the last time 1 saw him was in Loudon last year at
the Jubilee Convention. A lawyer by profession, he was from
first to last a most enthusiastic amateur photographer ; but to
convey to the minds of yourself and readers what kind of man
the late Mr. B. Jones was, I think I cannot do better than
make an extract from the “Evolution of Photography”: —
“ Looking round the hall on the opening night, and scanning
the features of those present, I was coming to the conclusion
that I was the oldest photographer there, when I espied Mr.
Baynham Jones, a man of eighty-three winters, and certainly
the oldest amateur photographer living ; so I willingly ceded
the honour of seniority to him, and, as soon as he espied
me, he clambered over the rails to come and sit at my
side and talk over the past — and quite unknown to
many present — aspects and difficulties of photography.
Mr. Baynham Jones was an enthusiastic photographer from the
first, for in 1839, as soon as Daguerre’s process was published,
July 4, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
527
he made himself a camera out of a cigar box and the lens of his
opera glass, and being unable to obtain a Daguerreotype plate
in the country, he cut up a silver salver, and worked away on
a solid silver plate until he succeeded in making a Daguerreo-
type picture. Mr. Baynham Jones was not the first photo-
grapher in this country, for the Rev. J. B. Reade preceded him
by about two years ; but I have not the slightest doubt of his
being the first Daguerreotypist in England, and in that
jubilee year of 1889 he was working- with gelatine plates and
films, and enthusiastic enough to come all the way from
Cheltenham to London to attend the meetings of the Jubilee
Convention of photography.”
He was a genial and kindly old man, and one of the old
school which is rapidly becoming extinct.
11a, Berners Street, July 1st, 1890. John Weroe.
13roccetftng;S of Societies;.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 26th inst. Mr. J. T. Atkins occupied
the chair.
The Chairman drew attention to a new French developer,
“La Daguerrienne.” Several plates could be developed in
the same solution, and the results were stated to be very
good.
Mr. J. S. Teape hail recently experienced cases of frilling
when plates were put in the alum bath, which, however, dis-
appeared when the plates were fixed.
Mr. Pask asked whether perchloric acid, added to the silver
solution, 10 drops to the ounce, w'ould preserve sensitised
albumenised paper.
Mr. W. E. Derenham said perchloric acid was a preservative
in itself, but it would not protect the paper from the effects of j
a bad atmosphere.
Mr. Teape asked if any members had seen phosphorescence in j
the dark room on a plate insufficiently washed when placed in
the alum bath.
Several members had noticed this, but no one could give
any explanation as to the cause.
Hackney Photographic Society.
At the meeting held on Thursday last, Mr. W. L. Barker
presided.
Mr. Dean showed a negative having traces of fog very
apparent, but explained that he poured a solution of caustic over
it in developer.
The Secretary said that that would explain the fogginess.
Mr. Grant showed some prints taken from negatives by a
guinea hand-camera of Griffith’s, but had found the dark slides,
in two cases out of three, had let in the light.
A fine platinotype print by Mr. Wesson was shown.
The Secretary handed round some Wormald’s masks. .
From the question-box : “ How can staining by hydroquiuone
developer on bromide paper be avoided ? ” Several members
had complained of this.
The Secretary said that he had found by using a few drops of
ten per cent, solution of brom. potassium he overcame it.
Mr. A. Barker had seen cyanide of potassium recommended.
Mr. Crooch then gave his paper on “Lenses.” He described
the various forms now in use, and spoke very favourably of
single lenses, which many people objected to on account of
distortion. He, however, had not found so much lately as used to
lie the case. The lecturer said lenses were made too rapid,
and that//ll was rapid enough for anything. He advocated
use of lenses as follows : — For quarter-plate, 3, 6, or 8, and
a 9-inch focus ; half-plate, 4, 8, and 12 ; 7| by 5 and whole-
plate, 5 or 6, 12 and a 15, or 18 inch. He objected to portrait
lenses.
Mr. W. L. Barker wanted to know why the ler.s tube of a
wide angle was so narrow.
Mr. Crouch said that it made it more portable.
In answer to the Secretary, Mr. Crouch said that the iris
diaphragm gave no extra protection from flare spot. He liked
diaphragms in this form, as there was no danger of losing them,
and you could the more easily use them. Rust on glass was
caused by an oxide formed on the surface, and was due to the
presence of lead. It should be polished out.
The Chairman then called on Mr. J. 0. Grant for his paper
on “ Selection of Apparatus.”
Mr. Grant advised the beginner to get a half-plate camera
to start with, as amateurs always got dissatisfied with a quarter-
plate, on account of its being too small. He, however, recom-
mended a cyclist to get a hand-camera such as Shew’s. He
disliked the idea of rushing off and buying a second-hand
camera, as many were not quite safe to use, not being light-
tight. He preferred the back to rack out instead of the front,
as there was no danger then of cutting off.
In answer to various questions, Mr. Grant said that with
Kinnear bellows the folds must sometimes be gathered up so
as not to cut off the view. He thought that between the lenses
was the best place for the shutter.
The Secretary asked what was the advantage of having
both a swing front as well as swing back ?
Mr. Crouch pointed out that in using wide angle lenses it
was often really necessary, through there not being room to
use the back alone.
Mr. Capell was troubled with jarring with his Newman
shutter.
Mr. Crouch said that Dr. Roland Smith avoided this by
leaving his band of shutter loose.
The Bath Photographic Society.
On Saturday, June 28th, the members visited Lacock Abbey.
The party, numbering seventeen, was conveyed by brake v id
Box and Corsham. The drive of thirteen miles is very pictur-
esque, but the incessant fall of rain prevented work en route.
Upon arrival at the Abbey, Mr. C. H. Talbot conducted the
party over his premises, describing minutely the structural
changes effected by himself and ancestors, as well as pointing
out that which through many generations had remained intact.
The Abbey, we gleaned, was purchased from Henry VIII. by
Sir William Sherrington, who converted it into a Manor House.
The work of change was further carried out by Mr. Jno. Ivory
Talbot and Mr. Wm. Henry Fox Talbot. Although Mr. Talbot
says the style of architecture has not been so well preserved as
it might have been, the place abounds in treasures in art, science,
and literature. Excellent paintings by known artists, many of
remote date, remarkable specimens of antique, and numberless
objects of scientific interest are there ; but what was of especial
interest to photographers are those unique and early specimens
of the photographic art which made the name of Fox Talbot
so famous. These date from 1834 onwards. Fox Talbot was
known to his friends as a very rapid experimenter, able to follow
an idea and results in quick succession over a wide field of re-
search ; hence so much ground covered. Mr. Talbot showed
the company several albums of photographs produced by his
father by means which he discovered anterior to his publica-
tion of the Photogenic and Calotype processes in 1839 and 1841
respectively. The etched copper plates prepared for Fox
Talbot’s photoglyptics and a number of specimens of the
process were shown. Notwithstanding the incessant rain,
cameras were fixed and several views of the buildings taken.
Upon leaving, the members were cordially invited by Mr.
Talbot to return on a more photographically favourable day next
season, which they promised to do. Tea was served at the Red
Lion, at which votes of thanks were passed to Mr. Talbot, and
to Mr. Austin J. King for his generous present to the Society,
namely, provisioning the brake en route. An invitation to visit
Prior Park from Canon Williams was read by the secretary,
and unanimously accepted for July 26th. Swift’s new hand-
camera, “ The Memorandum,” Powell’s developoids, and other
novelties were drawm attention to on the road. It was also
decided to discontinue the indoor meetings at the Institution
until next September, but regular outings will be supple-
mented.
528
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
InTOk
Newcastle-on-Tynr and Northern Counties Photographic
Association.
[July 4, 1890.
Unstoers to ©omgpontrcnts.
June 17 th. — Mr. H. G. Ridgway in the chair.
The Hon. Secretaries reported upon the recent exhibition,
which has resulted in a small balance on the right side of the
ledger.
New members, to the number of twenty-two, were then
elected, and arrangements as to outdoor meetings concluded.
The subject for the evening was an exhibition of and dis-
cussion upon “ Hand-Cameras,” examples of which were sub-
mitted by the local dealers and by various members.
Mr. J. Hedley Robinson, in opening the discussion, exhi-
bited an ingeniously simple and compact instrument, con-
structed by himself, which was small enough to be carried in
the pocket, but at the same time a business-like little affair,
taking lantern-size plates. Slides were exhibited by Mr.
Robinson, which amply showed its capacity in his hands. Com-
menting upon the cameras on view, he was inclined to fear
that, unless very carefully manipulated, there was danger of
shaking the camera when releasing the shutter ; and he advo-
cated the principle of holding the camera firmly in both hands,
taking a sight along the top at the subject, and firing the shutter
off by squeezing the bulb in the mouth, which, if not elegant,
is at least practical. The subject of lenses next came under
consideration, and he spoke highly of the single form, conclu-
ding with a sensible piece of advice — not to use stale plates for
work of this kind.
Other members then commented upon the cameras of their
choice, and the meeting broke up.
Birmingham Photographic Society.
A meeting was held at St. Edmund’s College, June 16th, Mr.
B. Karleese in the chair.
Mr. G. A. Thomason gave an epitome of the excursion to
Coventry, and gave notice of the whole day’s excursion to Wilm-
cote and Stretford on July 19 th.
Seven new members were elected.
Mr. W. J. Harrison, F.G. S. , then gave his paper on
“ Orthochromatic Photography,” which was illustrated with a
large number of negatives and prints and lantern slides taken
by the lecturer, showing the advantages of orthochromatic
plates over the ordinary ; also prints of negatives taken
from oil paintings with screens of different intensity. He said
that ordinary plates could be made to give the proper
gradation of shade by soaking them for two minutes in
Erythrosine ... ... ... ... 1 part
Water ... ... ... ... ... 7,000 parts
and then drying in dark room, and that although great strides
had lately been made in orthochromatic photography, yet no
satisfactory way had been found for photographing reds. In
the developing room it is as well to cover the red glass with
brown tissue paper.
The Chairman said that he found exquisite detail in the
shallows of negatives taken on orthochromatic plates.
Mr. Middleton said that Dr. E. Albert develops in a
blue light ; but his process of preparing the plates is a secret,
and he uses no screen. Father Perry used the same in his
astronomical studies.
Mr. Tucker had photographed the spectrum of steel at a
white heat, by placing it between two carbons connected with
the dynamo, with great success. The plates were first soaked
in eosine.
Mr. Harrison exhibited a number of prints and negatives,
showing good work, on the Vogel -Obernetter orthochromatic
plates ; these were the work of Mr. Gotz, the English agent
for these plates. Also some capital landscapes and flower
subjects, lent by Mr. B. J. Edwards, and taken on his iso-
chromatic plates.
Received. — From Messrs lliffe and Son, “ The International
Annual of Anthony’s Photographic Bulletin,” 1890-91. It
is full of information, contributed by authors of acknowledged
ability, and the illustrations, which are examples of the applica-
tion of photography to illustrative purposes, are numerous.
The price of this midsummer annual is two shillings.
All Cjininuaicitioas, except »4vertUem:nts, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Elitor of the Photographic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All quest o ns requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2. St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Alvertisemints ail communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic Nkws, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
S. B. (Aldershot). — Finely Ground Glass. For the final grind-
ing of glass intended for focussing screens, use the quality
known as flour emery, moistened with water, and rubbed
between two glass surfaces with slight circular motion. This
will furnish two screens at one operation. Another plan is
to grind the glasses singly upon a zinc plate with flour emery
and water. Mr. F. H. Varley’s instructive chapters were
those of recent date, to which you doubtless refer.
P. L. — Changing Plates. By consulting their convenience as
to time, many local photographers will give you facilities by
loan of dark room for a few minutes ; and a list of hotels
providing this accommodation is given in the “ Cyclists’
Manual and Road Book.” Several amateurs manage to do
it in absolute darkness by the touch, but this requires some
practice and forethought. The simplest lamp is a three-fold
framework of stiff cardboard filled in with cherry or ruby
fabric, with a triangular flanged plate of iron to drop over
the top, and a night light, or cup of hard paraffin with a
wick, placed within.
J. B. (Maldon). — Liesegang’s New Fixing Agent. Vie have
not yet tried it, but chloride of magnesium solution is stated
to have great power of dissolving the haloid salts of silver,
so much so that with two baths applied successively the whole
of the unaltered silver may be removed. We know that Fox
Talbot originally employed a strong brine of common salt for
this purpose. An experiment well worth trial might be the
attempt to use a concentrated sea-water for fixing, w'hich
would contain both these salts in solution. Be sure and use
enough liquor to accomplish the desired end.
M. E. T. — Cleaning the Margins of Mounted Photographs.
Whether framed or kept in portfolios, the broad mounts are
sure to become dingy in course of time ; the best mode of
cleaning the card is to rub it with bread-crumb, and not
india-rubber. Especially avoid the use of the white vulcan-
ised rubber, now commonly employed as a pencil eraser, for
the fine particles contain so much sulphur, and are certain
to cause fading of the photograph.
A Member. — The Parent Society's Exhibition will be held once
more in Pall Mall. Three months’ notice is surely time enough
to get ready, and your works will be judged by a high-art
jury of pre-eminent qualification.
L. ? A. I). — Friese Greene's Opal Cards. The specification has
been published ; No. 7,747, dated May 9th, 1889. The
cards are coated with a mixture of zinc white, turpentine,
and pale gold size, either with or without a preliminary
treatment with sulphuric acid of specified strength to parch-
mentise the paper.
S. N. — Old Earthenware Dishes. Those which have been used
long enough to develop cracks extending only through the
glaze may be cured by warming cautiously in a slightly
heated oven, and rubbing in melted paraffin. Actual frac-
tures are more difficult of treatment, shellac cement or marine
glue being the best ingredients for trial.
Tyro. — Col. Waterhouse’s New Developer. It is scarcely
correct to describe it as a preparation of gum guaiacum,
although derived from it by destructive distillation.
Guaiacol is an oily body of strongly aromatic odour, soluble
in alcohol and alkalies. Being liquid the required dose is
measured off, shaken up with the prescribed quantity of
alkaline carbonate, and used immediately as a developer.
It. M. — Photographers' Benevolent Association. Subscriptions
for the current year are now overdue, and should be paid to
Mr. H. J. Beasley, 66, Chancery Lane, W.C.
E. C., A. G. K., and Castile answered by post.
Other Correspondents in our next.
Example from " Remarkable Bindings in the British Museum." By kind permission of the Publishers , Sampson Low ,
Marston , Searle A Rivington.
—
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1662. — July 11, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAO*
Chromo-Collographic Printing 529
Photography by Telegraph 530
The Photographic Convention at Chester 531
The Photographic Convention at Bath 531
Photographic Exhibitions. By George Davison 532
A Neglected Dry Plate Process. By William Lang, Jun 533
New Photographic Lenses. By Dr. Paul Rudolph 635
Notes 536
FAOI
Photography in France. By Leon Vidal 538
Imagining and Imaging. By Philip H. Newman 538
Developers Used by German Professional Photographers. By
Julius F. Sachse 540
Patent Intelligence 541
Correspondence 543
Proceedings of Societies 54*
Answers to Correspondents 544
CHROM 0 -COLLOGR APHIC PRINTING.
Illustrated by a Pictorial Supplement.
To-day we present our readers with a supplement in
colours, executed entirely by photographic means by
Messrs. Waterlow and Sons, who have furnished the
following informatior as to its method of production.
It is one of a series of coloured photographs of remark-
able bindings of old books among those in the British
Museum.
The process is simplicity itself, and being so simple
and effective, it is somewhat surprising that it has not
been generally introduced before. Similar results have
been published before, but we believe only by means
of chromo-lithography in combination with collotype
printing ; the present supplement has been produced
by improvements upon that method devised by Mr. J.
D. Geddes.
Perhaps the process may be most easily explained
by beginning with the production of the red portion of
the print. The book is laid horizontally on a table,
and illuminated by diffused light. A reversing
mirror is employed, and a very long exposure given
with an orthochromatic plate, because, the reds not
being pure, but containing a proportion of yellow, it
is usually found that more detail is obtained than by
the use of ordinary plates. With the long exposure,
the other more actinic parts of the design are to a
great extent obliterated, so that the plate requires
little or no blocking out to make it ready for printing.
Upon another negative plate the blue portion of the
design is obtained by an exceptionally short exposure
and normal development. All the rest of this plate
but that representing the blue image is then quickly
blocked out, because skilled work is not necessary ; it
can be done in ten minutes by an inexperienced person
of average intelligence.
The two extremes, red and blue, having been ob-
tained in this way, representations of portions of the
design in other colours are obtained on the same prin-
ciple by modifying the exposures and the development
and blocking out the parts of the negative not required.
Four colours, of course, require four plates.
When a portion of the cover of the book is gilt,
that part of the design is printed from the collotype
plate upon paper in gold-size varnish, which is after-
wards gilt in the usual way.
In the supplement are four printings, three in colours
and one in gold. In the matter of gradations of tone,
the results are as good as with many more printings in
chromo-lithography, and more true to the original.
To get the exact colours an artist had to be sent to the
British Museum with a palette, where he matched on
paper the tones presented by the cover of the book.
This process represents, in a remarkable way, worn or
torn portions of the cover ; the collotype plate seems to
lend itself to the pictorial reproduction of such details.
The possible applications of the process to colour illus-
tration are barely indicated by the supplement, and
experimental research is now being made in the
endeavour to apply the method to a variety of sub-
jects, including negatives from nature and the repro-
duction of paintings.
The printings from the collotype plates are per-
formed in the ordinary way, only special care is taken
in the seK>tion of the pigments which, in combination,
will match exactly the colours of the original. Messrs.
Waterlow & Sons have now no less than eight German
and French steam collotype machines at work, and as
they occasionally get orders from the Continent, it is
interesting to know that at last a stand is being made
against foreign competition, which has so long held
sway in this particular brauch of industry. We have
inspected several well-known collotype printing estab-
lishments on the Continent not nearly so well equipped
as the works in Finsbury, in which the present supple-
ment was produced. The fact is, that the prices for
ordinary collotype print'ng are so low that without a
good supply of steam machinery, adequate division of
labour, careful attention to details, and skilled workmen
at every point, it is a class of work likely to bring in
little remuneration.
530
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jui.y 11. 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHY BY TELEGRAPH.
Jn this age of hurry every man of business is enabled,
by modern appliances, to do in a few hours the work
which our forefathers would have considered more than
sufficient to occupy them for a week. The introduction
of railways would seem to have inculcated the notion
that everything must move at railroad speed, and it is
impossible to foresee where this desire for rapid move-
ment will stop. The first step towards quick com-
munication was the semaphore system. This was
replaced by the telegraph, and the telegraph in its
turn has been largely supplanted by the telephone.
Every city and town in the world is now covered by a
complicated cobweb of wires, all converging to one
central point, where the exchange is situated, an
arrangement which permits anyone to communicate
with any other member of the association. Within
a short time, we are promised that the phonograph
will be so perfected that it will record any sounds
submitted to it, and, like an obedient clerk with a
memory that never forgets, will at any time repeat
the matter that has been consigned to its keeping.
Our telegraphic system has always been pointed to
as one of the most remarkable triumphs of science,
and one which has proved how reality will occasionally
outstrip romance, and the improvements in telegraphic
instruments which have been introduced within the
past few years would have surprised even those who
prophesied so much with regard to what develop-
ments might be brought about. News from every
part of the habitable globe is constantly pouring in
upon us, and by means of a wonderfully perfect
organisation, and by the help of the press, we receive
this news almost as soon as the events which it deals
with have taken place.
A vague notion of how this is all brought about
is all of which the general public can boast. They
know that the payment of sixpence will entitle them
to hold telegraphic converse of a limited nature with
anybody in Great Britain who is within touch of a
post-office, and this knowledge leads them to believe
readily in any report which tells of coming and
greater wonders.
A report of this kind has been raised from time to
time by means of those paragraphs which occasionally
appear in our newspapers, the origin of which it
is difficult to discover. It has been the fashion for
some time to link Mr. Edison’s name with anything
startling of an electrical nature. This is not surprising,
for Mr. Edison has already accomplished such wonder-
ful things that there is some excuse for regarding him
as a magician. It does not, therefore, excite any great
feeling of surprise when it is stated that he is engage d
upon a scheme for telegraphing a picture of an event
taking place at a distant point. The report is probably
false, but it may be true, and so it is as well that we
should consider how far such a rumour may be w ithin
the bounds of possibility.
There is more thai one contrivance by j which the
actual h in l writing of a person in iy be conveyed from
one place to another by means of the electric current.
The most noteworthy, perhaps, of these is Cowper’s
writing telegraph, which a few years ago was at work
for some time experimentally between Woking and
Waterloo Stations on the South Western Railway. In
this system the pen at the transmitting station was in
contact with certain apparatus which varied the resist-
ance of the current as the pen was moved over a slip
of paper which travelled by clockwork. These varia-
tions affected a similar pen charged with ink at the
receiving station, and the handwriting — somewhat
cramped, it is true, by the necessities of the case — was
reproduced. Now it is obvious that if handwriting can
be transmitted in this way, the transmission of a drawing
executed in simple lines — that is to say, what is
popularly known as a pen and ink sketch — cannot be
impossible. And as a matter of fact drawings, of a
kind, executed at a distant point were reproduced
by telegraph many years before Mr. Cowper’s writing
telegraph was ever conceived.
In the year 1850 Bakewell, taking advantage of the
observation made long before his time that the electric
current would decompose certain salts, and so produce
a coloured stain upon paper impregnated with those
salts, perfected his telegraphic system. It was cum-
brous in design and somewhat slow in action, but it
was capable of reproducing a picture under certain con-
ditions, the chief among them being that the design
must be executed in resinous ink on tinfoil. It will be
seen at once that such a necessity at once relegated
the instrument, ingenious as it was, to the domain
of experimental things, and the contrivance is now
forgotten except by those who take an interest in
looking up old text-books of electricity. Not many
years ago the idea was revived and very much im-
telegraph. Home results achieved by this instrument
we saw at the time of its invention, and we may
broadly say that the reproduction had the same relation
to the original that a Meisenbach block has to the photo-
graph to which it owes its origin — in that it was
expressed in lines. This line reproduction was, indeed,
a necessary outcome of following out Bakewell’s
method, which may be briefly described as follows.
The drawing in resinous ink on tinfoil was placed on a
revolving cylinder. A metallic point was caused to
touch this cylinder, and to traverse every part of it as
it revolved, so that if this point had been a cutting
tool it would have cut a screw thread from end to end
of the cylinder ; but its object was merely to bring
about electrical contact, and so complete a battery cir-
cuit. But whenever the point went over a resinous
line the current was for a moment interrupted, to be
reinstated once more when the tinfoil was touched.
These interruptions were recorded at the receiving
end of the wire, where another cylinder revolved
covered by chemically prepared paper, and traversed
by a similar pointer. So long as pointer No. 1 touched
the tinfoil, pointer No. 2 decomposed the salts in the
prepared paper, and left a coloured line ; but directly
I pointer No. 1 went over the non-conducting resinous
July 11. 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
line, the electricity was cut off, and pointer No. 2 left
no trace. The result was what we should call a
negative — a picture composed of white lines on a dark
background. It is possible that by some means photo-
graphy could be made to simplify the arrangement, and
it would certainly not be difficult to obtain a picture
on tin-foil by its aid ; but the game would be hardly
worth the candle.
If it be true that Mr. Edison is experimenting in
this direction, and has any dream of causing photo-
graphic action to take place through the medium of
an electric current, he would probably turn his
attention to selenium as the most promising agent for
his purpose, for we know that this curious substance
possesses the remarkable property of varying its
resistance with the amount of light which is shed
upon it. Professor Graham Bell has obtained some
startling results from it in his photophone experiments,
and it may possibly lead the way to the reproduction
of a picture at a point distant from its place of origin.
A dream of such possibilities has occurred to many,
but that dream has not yet taken substantial shape.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT
CHESTER.
At the Photographic Convention at Chester the follow-
ing officers and members of Council were appointed for
the coming year, and for the management of the Bath
meeting in 1891 : —
President — William Bedford, lion. Secretary ami Treasurer —
.T. J. Briginshaw, 128, Southwark Street, London. Auditors —
E. Clifton and T. Charteris White. Council — London mem-
bers : A. Cowan, H. M. Hastings, A. Haddon, A. Pringle,
Friese Greene; J. Traill Taylor, F. P. Cembrano, F. A. Bridge,
G. Davison, C. Phipps Lucas, C. H. Benham, W. H. Walker,
A. Levy, A. Mackie, J. B. B. Wellington, R. P. Drage.
Provincial members : O. Berry, Wrexham ; A. A. Carnell,
Plymouth ; J. Martin Harding, Shrewsbury ; W. J. Harrison,
Birmingham ; R. Keene, Derby ; W. Lang, jun., Glasgow ;
Paul Lange, Liverpool ; Major J. Lysaght, Cork ; E. Marlow,
Birmingham ; George Mason, Glasgow ; T. S. Mayne, Liver-
pool ; W. W. Naunton, Shrewsbury ; J. B. Payne, Newcastle-
on-Tyne ; J. Porritt, Leicester ; B. J. Sayce, Liverpool ;
A. Seaman, Chesterfield ; J. M. B. Smith, York ; John Stuart,
Glasgow ; H. Sturmey, Coventry. ; A. Tate, Belfast ; W.
Taylor, Leicester ; J. M. Turnbull, Edinburgh ; G. Watmough
Webster, Chester ; and A. Werner, Dublin.
During the excursion to Hawarden Castle, on the
day before the Convention left Chester, the weather
was splendid for photography ; massive cumulus
clouds were floating about, and every now and then
bursts of sunshine came down between the clouds. Mr.
Gladstone was fortunately absent during the Convention
visit; we say “fortunately,” because a statesman has
as much right to a term of private life as anyone else,
and the Photographic Convention cannot be numbered
among those bad-mannered intruders who almost force
themselves upon his privacy.
During the Convention visit, a terrible tragedy took
plac in front of the City Hall at Chester. A father
murdered his only son with a bludgeon, then raised the
body on the end of the weapon, and tossed it high in
the air. The childless mother next appeared upon the
581
scene, and he gave her a blow behind the head, the
sound of which could be heard all over the square ; she
likewise sank at his feet a corpse. Officials of the
Eastman Company, as well as some other photographers,
were looking on, but, from excitement or other cause,
forgot to use their kodaks. The murderer’s coun-
tenance betrayed no symptoms of regret ; on the
contrary, he smiled unceasingly, and rubbed his back
up and down against a post, uttering unhallowed
squeaks of triumph. Eor a moment only did he show
signs of contrition, by bending over his wife’s body,
and squealing, “0 Judy, dear Judy ! ” The sym-
pathies of the observers were evidently on the side of
the culprit. How is it that Punch always has as much
mob sympathy on his side as does the villainous old
wife-murderer, Henry VIII. ? Punch and Judy shows
are but survivals of Italian puppet miracle plays, and,
in his native clime, Punch originally was Pontius
Pilate.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT BATH.
About midsummer next year the Photographic Con-
vention will meet in Bath, and with the experience
of the past the managers will be better able to deal
with the difficulties of the future. Unless the excursion
for any particular day is but to a moderate distance,
or to a place of but average attractiveness, it is evidently
a mistake to draw the members back while several
hours of daylight remain, in order that they may be
present at the reading of papers in the evening.
Presumably the chief excursion from Bath will be to
Chepstow Castle and the banks of the Wye as far as
Tintern Abbey, which includes, perhaps, more beautiful
scenery than is to be found anywhere else within simi-
larly easy distance of London. Unfortunately, between
Chepstow Castle and the Wyndcliff a private park
includes the western bank of the Wye, and those who
go to Tintern by road have to pass over two or three
miles of ground away from the river, and totally desti-
tute of pictorial interest. The lower reaches of the
Wye have the highest tides of any river in England,
and when the tide is low, ugly mud-banks rise at each
side of the river, nearly as steep as the roof of a house.
Near the railway station at Chepstow is a picturesque
cutting by the river and through the rocks ; the
heights are thickly wooded. Chepstow is reached via
the Severn Tunnel, or if a steamboat be engaged, it
could go down the Avon, under Clifton Suspension Bridge,
then cross the Severn and proceed up the Wye to
Chepstow. Once this was the regular means of com-
munication between Chepstow and Bristol, but whether
the opening of the tunnel has affected the old steam-
boat service we do not know. Evidently an excursion
of this kind should occupy the whole day, and not
be cut short, as was the case at Couway, because
papers have to be read in tbe evening. Another
excursion — this one close to Bath — will, no doubt,
be along the valley from Bathampton to Bradford-
on-Avon, which is picturesque the whole way, and
includes subjects of historical interest. The ballast
532
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jui.y 11. 1890.
used in the construction of the railway between
Bradford and Trowbridge is rich in fossils, and in a
bed of blue clay in a railway cutting this side of
Trowbridge are numerous crystals of selenite, a fact
which may interest those who are in the habit of
experimenting with polarised light. A third excur-
sion will probably be to Clifton Downs and Bristol.
Bath itself, with its abbey, its architectural antiquities,
and its picturesque surroundings, offers plenty of sub-
jects for the camera. Here Beckford, the author of
Vathek, lived, and the tower built by this remarkable
man of fantastic imagination awaits the arrival of the
Convention to be photographed.
The Photographic Convention may now be said to
be upon a fairly permanent basis ; it meets a want of
the photographic fraternity in providing a summer
outing, at which, also, many meet who otherwise would
not make the personal acquaintance of each other.
The Convention, practically speaking, was founded by
Mr. J. Traill Taylor and Mr. J. J. Briginshaw. The
former gave it its somewhat American title, and the
latter told the listeners at the Convention dinner in
the Grosvenor Hotel, Chester, that the organisation has
now reached a stage at which “ it can no longer be
damned with faint praise.” Mr. A. Pringle has done
much in the nursing of the infant Convention, and the
Mayor of Chester has given a good life to the Associa-
tion, which is likely to grow into something large in
the future.
A marked feature of the meeting of the Photographic
Convention at Chester was the absence of the general
public at the meetings at which papers on photography
were read, although some of the less technical utter-
ances at such meetings were of general interest ; Mr.
Gambier Bolton’s paper and lantern illustrations, for
instance, were of a popular character. The question
whether residents in the particular locality in which
the Convention meets should be allowed to become
associates for the week on payment of the nominal fee
of a shilling towards the funds of the Convention, may
be worth consideration. Such associates might join the
excursions on the same terms as ordinary members.
The Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
July 16th will be “Iron Printing Processes;” July 23rd,
“ Ceramic Photography.”
Suggestions of Sitters. — A firm of photographers engaged
in the production of a group which, they say, is considered
successful, send the following suggestions sent to them by
individual members of the group : — “ Mrs. ’s eyes might
look larger, and her mouth have a bit taken off the corner.
The body of her dress has very ugly creases. Please have
them taken out altogether.” “Mrs. ’s eyes might be
improved and the eyebrow put straight ; the strong shade near
nose much softened ; the corner of sleeve taken out altogether.”
“ Mrs. . Lines on the face still more softened, particu-
larly between the eyebrows ; the outline of cheek near the
little girl could be improved.” “The little girl’s eyes look
too small (particularly one of them).” “ The little boy’s ears
are, by nature, too large. Can you please make them a proper
size by shading part of them out altogether against that back-
ground ; I should think it would be easy.” Our correspondent
may well wonder what next professional photographers will be
called upon to do.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITIONS.
BY GEORGE DAVISON.
No. VI. — Judges.
In the higher form of exhibition, for which I have indi-
cated a few necessary regulations, a jury in the ordinary
sense would not be required. The hanging committee
practically takes some of its functions ; indeed, the quali-
fications of a competent hanging committee are, to a great
extent, those required for a board of judges, although the
functions of the hanging committee are much broader.
Taking the system of competition as we find it, however,
the question of the jury becomes the most important to be
dealt with. If prizes are given at all, they should at least be
given only for such pictures as are truly deserving of some
recognition, and in the art section should be given only to
such as possess artistic qualities. It is safe to say that, under
the present development of the classification and competi-
tion system, in five out of six cases the successful photo-
graphs are in no way qualified for the distinction they
receive. This arises partly from the system itself, but chiefly
from the characteristics of photographic judges. Faults
from partiality, faults from vindictiveness, must be common
to any system, but defects from ignorance ought to be
avoidable. In many classes in which adjudication is made,
the award has been given for no other reason than that the
exhibit shows what has been held to be correct exposure,
the result agreeing with a certain convention or standard of
brightness and sharpness set up by a purely scientific con-
sideration of photography. Mrs. Cameron, in writing of
an early exhibition in Scotland, where she had shown
some of her remarkable portraits, complained that the test
of the judges was as to which photograph showed most
the detail and pattern of table cloth, &c., and such has
been the attitude of most photographers acting in the
capacity of jurors.
In the May 30th issue of the rHOTOGRAi'iuc News,
there appeared an article contending that painters were
not suitable or qualified judges of photographs because, it
was averred, — 1st. The means used by them were different.
2nd. They would give awards for what most resembled
paintings. 3rd. They did not know' the difficulties of
photography. Now this contention simply means that
there is no such thing as good art in photography, and that
it is purely a matter of scientific motions. The writer
speaks of roughness as charming in a painting, but as not
even tolerable in a photograph, and he conducts his
argument generally as though smoothness and sharpness
w'ere the essential characteristics of photography.
Treatment in focussing is to him no power in the hands
of the artist, and he holds the photographer’s technique
cannot be made obedient to the eye and will. It is
impossible in the limits of these articles to discuss fully
a comparison of the photographer’s and the painter’s
technique, but the question of qualifications for adjudi-
cating between photographic pictures does not depend
chiefly upon whether the means employed by the judge
and the competitor be exactly the same, but upon whether
the judge has been trained to understand what con-
stitutes artistic qualities. The aim of the painter or
etcher or engraver is exactly the same as that of the
photographer. If the photographer had been through
the same art training as the painter, then he would be
the best judge possible ; but it must be remembered it is
no question of deciding w’hether a plate is fogged or under-
exposed or done with a pinhole, and so forth, but whether
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
533
July 11, 1890.]
a picture is a spirited, complete representation of a
natural scene and subject. A long cultivation upon the
top of natural aptitude is needed to decide what is true
in a pictorial representation. It is in subtle rendering of
passages, simple or complex, in nature that much of the
enjoyment of the true connoisseur consists. Com-
position, which the jury has to understand and appreciate,
is not merely a detail of arrangement. In good composition
is comprised the selection of what will most completely
express a certain subject, and give the salient features under
the most characteristic conditions, and the whole has to be
translated in a way that shows knowledge of what consti-
tutes truthful relations. It is because photographers have
not had the needed training that they are not qualified to
judge of pictures with the highest qualities. They decide
merely from a few photographic conventionalities more or
less guided by a taste which would certainly be altered by
the study required for the production of pictures. All we
can boast of in photography are two or three who are partly
trained, but who have been compulsorily led away by
business considerations to which they have had to give their
chiefest attention ; two or three whose hearts are entirely
in their practice, but who have had no preparation, or have
greater zeal than knowledge ; and perhaps not more than
one to whom it was possible to plan out life with photo-
graphy and art as chief devotion, and to study it as
rationally required. All this may at some future time be
altered, but at present there is nothing left but to give the
influence in our competitions to the right artists, and
with a free hand. "We do not want awards given for
smoothness and sharpness any more than for roughness
and blurriness, nor in an art exhibition for the overcoming
of what are considered difficulties of exposure and the
like. What is required is the distinguishing of the photo-
graphs that have some high artistic qualities, and only
those who have learnt to know by practice can authorita-
tively do this. Artists have not been given a free hand.
They have been subjected to petty interferences, so that
it is no wonder that it is difficult to secure any further
assistance from them. It has been thought necessary to
associate one or more photographers with them, and the
artists have frequently deferred to these technical assessors,
or have been entirely influenced by the ready photographic
opinion confidently expressed, but their reliance on these
photographic colleagues is but a proof that they are unable
to find anything amongst the exhibits which comes into
the category of good art to which they can assign the
medals. They then presume that it is for some other
qualities that the distinctions must be given.
Captain Abney has recently suggested that every
visitor to an exhibition should be a judge, and that in that
way agreement with the public sentiment would most
closely be attained. But it is hardly public sentiment
that might satisfy the exhibitors. The public are apt to
go chiefly from hearsay and for a name. In a matter of
art a cultivated electorate is essential, and only those who
know ought to be on a board of judges.
In conclusion, I am of opinion that the time has come
when, if exhibitions are desirable at all, they should be
made somewhat of the kind I have outlined and argued
for. My contention in favour of exhibitions without
awards, and if with awards without classification in the
art section, has been to urge that such is a more dignified
and rational system, rather than that it is essentially differ-
ent in kind from those in vogue. If open exhibitions are
to be held at all, the element of competition must more or
less enter, but the less prominent it is the better. I do
not say that a system in which acceptation is the award is
perfect, but it is competition only in the broadest and
most manageable form, and it passes by most of the de-
fects of classified competition. Competition may tend to
the multiplication of third-rate execution, but it is of no
service in stimulating to good art ; it stifles originality and
encourages imitation. Something may be found to be
said in favour of classified competition, but the arguments
adduced are not based upon a consideration of the bear-
ing of the best art-cultivation upon the question.
The exhibition required, then, is one in which in the art
section the best, and only the best, shall appear, both from
at home and abroad ; where these best are fairly and
judiciously displayed by a competent hanging committee ;
where there shall be no classifying, every distinction of
amateur and professional being ignored ; where the pictures
shall be more uniformly framed ; where the scientific
department shall be kept distinct and be properly worked
up, exhibits from meteorologists, from astronomers, nncro-
scopists and their societies, from photo-mechanical printing
process workers, and from those interested in industrial
applications of photography being effectively sought and
secured. There have been generous offers of assistance
in this direction, and some rumours of such an exhibition
being accomplished, but our hopes still await realisation.
A NEGLECTED DRY PLATE PROCESS.
BY WILLIAM LANG, JUN., F.C.S.
A fkiend of mine who dabbles in photo-micrography con-
sulted me recently as to whether he could obtain a collodion
plate in the dry state, which he could use from time to
time as the occasion presented itself. For some of his
more highly magnified specimens, the gelatine film he
found to be not altogether suitable ; he wanted to have
all the benefits of the collodion support, bnt he also
desired to have a plate that would entail no abnormal
length of exposui’e. The process which I recommended
to my friend was one which, so far as I have been able to
ascertain, has found almost no exponents, and, as it has
met the l-equirements of the particular case I have referred
to, it may be of sufficient interest to the readers of the
Photoguaphic News to have their attention called to it.
In the spring of the year 1861, the South London
Photographic Society — a society no longer in existence,
but which in its day did some good work — organised a
committee to report on some dry plate processes then
before the photographic world. The processes at that
time known as “ dry ” were those where collodion had a
preservative applied, and the preservatives recommended
were simply legion. Dr. Russell's tannin process had
been but recently given out ; and the process which
interests us in the present communication was likewise a
recent contribution. Hence, the finding of the committee
on the two processes in question was as follows: — “The
tanuiu process and Dr. Hanuaford’s modification they
consider pi-oinising, but would at present more particularly
call the attention of the experimental members of the
Society to them.” The processes actually reported on by
the committee were the following : The Taupenot (or
original collodio-albumen process), the F othergill, Petschler
and Mann’s, Mr. Davis’s collodio-albumen, and the gela-
tine ; the latter, as then understood, having nothing in
common with what we now designate as the gelatine, for,
the gelatine being poured ou the collodion plate, played
534
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
[July 11, 1890.
only the part of a simple preservative. Briefly considered,
the two principal processes here referred to consisted in
having, in the first instance, the collodion plate duly
sensitised, and afterwards thoroughly washed. The
Taupenot plate was prepared by pouring iodised albumen
over the washed plate, draining it, and drying rapidly
before a bright fire ; at this stage the plates were insensi-
tive, but the necessary quality of sensitiveness was given
to the plate by an immersion in a bath of aceto-nitrate of
silver. The F othergill process consisted in having albu-
men poured over the plate, the albumen having had a
certain amount of ammonia added to it.
In order to avoid stains, which often made their appear-
ance, an immersion in a weak bath 5 grains nitrate of silver
to 1 ounce water was finally adopted. The modifica-
tion which Hannaford introduced was pouring over the
washed plate a solution of albuminate of silver in ammonia.
The plate, after this application, was thoroughly washed
before being set aside to dry. The preparation of the
preservative is a simple affair ; the white from a fresh
egg is taken and thinned with an ounce or two of water,
well mixed, and to the dilute albumen 1 drachm of a (i0
gram solution nitrate of silver is added ; this causes a
flocculent precipitate of albuminate of silver, which is dis-
solved by means of ammonia added drop by drop and well
stirred. It is desirable to .add no more ammonia than
actually required, and the resulting solution should be
opalescent rather than clear. The solution will keep for
some little time, and should be put away in a non-actinic
light. The development of plates thus prepared is con-
ducted as follows: First of all, should the plate not have
received a substratum, it will be necessary to go over the
edges either with a varnish or a solution of india-rubber in
benzole ; without this the tender film of collodion would
not bear the strain of the subsequent operations. Say that
the exposure has been made — and it may be as rapid as if
we were employing the ordinary gelatine plate —the first
thing to be done after removal from the dark slide is to
pour some alcohol over the collodion surface, letting it
remain on for some little time, and, before applying thedeve-
loper, it is necessary to wash the plate, very gently of
course, for we are dealing with a very different material
from that now so generally employed in photography.
Development is now proceeded with, and, until the
advent of eikonogen, it had been my habit to use a formula
similar to Beachey’s — that is, pyro with excess of sulphite.
Latterly I have had recourse to the one-solution formula
issued by Marion's people in connection with eikonogen.
The plate is generally immersed in a tray containing the
developer, aud the appearance of image closely watched.
The moment it appears the plate is withdrawn and washed.
A prolonged immersion will tend to veil the clear portions.
It remains to be here stated that the picture at this stage
looks unpromising, the image being little more than a
ghost. To bring out detail, recourse is now to be had to
the silver intensification method, as in the “ old days ” of
acid pyro development. For the benefit of those whose
acquaintance with photography is only limited to the gela-
tine period, I may state that the intensifying solutions, as
they were called, were made up as follows : —
No. 1. — Pyro
Citric acid ...
Water
No. 2. — Silver nitrate
Water ...
10 grains
25 „
2 ounces
10 grains
1 ounce
Immediately before using, a few drops of No. 2 are added
to No. 1, and the solution poured on and off the picture,
when it immediately begins to gain strength. The inten-
sifying solution, when it begins to discolour, or, rather,
when it begins to show a deposit, should be at once dis-
carded and fresh solution applied. In a short time
the proper density will be arrived at, when, after washing,
the image may be fixed either in the ordinary hypo or a
bath of potassium cyanide. In practice it is necessary
to be careful that the light employed be thoroughly
safe. Being a collodion process, one is apt to think that
the same care in this direction is not necessary, but I
know that some failures by a friend who experimented
with the process, and who was inclined to throw it up as
worthless, were shown clearly to have resulted from this
cause. The addition of some acetic acid to the intensifier
above given was found to be beneficial. The process is
thoroughly well adapted for making lantern transparencies,
either by contact or by reduction in the camera. The
tone given by the intensifying method is by no means a
displeasing one for lantern work, but it can be still further
improved by toning with a weak solution of palladium
chloride. If all the operations be carried out as des-
cribed in the foregoing, it is possible to produce trans-
parencies that have all the appearance of having been made
by the ordinary wet plate method. The rapidity of the
plate is great ; I have produced transparencies from a
negative of ordinary density by simply passing the same,
having the prepared plate behind it in a printing frame, in
front of an ordinary batswing burner.
At the Birmingham Convention, I)r. llill Norris
announced that he had produced a dry collodion plate
equal in sensitiveness to a gelatine plate. I rather think
subsequent investigations did not bear this out, but here
has been a collodion process lying more or less dormant
all these years — since 1861 — giving as great sensitiveness
as it is possible to desire. It will naturally be asked, if
that be so, how does it happen that it has not come to the
front? Perhaps it may be accounted for in two ways,
llannaford's method may have been overlooked from the
fact that collodion emulsions came shortly afterwards to
engage universal attention, io be followed by the all-
absorbing gelatine emulsion, or perhaps no one had thought
of applying the alkaline method of development to be
followed afterwards by silver intensification. llannaford’s
method of development was the acid pyro, and with this
the plate appears to possess no great rapidity. It would
be interesting if some of the readers of the Photo-
graphic News would hike up the process for themselves,
and give the results of their experiences. I think enough
has been written to enable anyone having the knowledge
necessary to produce a wet collodion plate ready for
exposure in the camera, to prepare a dry collodion plate
by llannaford’s neglected method.
The project initiated long since by Captain Abney, of
scientifically testing the optical qualities of any photographic
lens sent to lvew Observatory, may possibly be carried into
practical effect before long. A small fee will be charged to the
sender for the testing.
Enfield Camera Club. — A society has been formed called
the Enfield Camera Club. Its objects are to popularise the
art of photography, and afford mutual help in photographic
pursuits by the interchange of prints and lantern slides ;
field days, meetings, and discussions ; and giving advice and
assistance to beginners. Meetings arc held on the first and
third Wednesdays in each month, at the Lancaster Coffee
Tavern, Enfield, and the lion, secretary (pro tcm.) is Mr,
James Dudiu, Roseueath, Chase Green Avenue, Enfield,
July 11, 1890. |
AS^Joj.
THE PHOT
IC NEWS.
535
(Thu objective of this combination, represented in full
NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES.*
BY DR. PAUL RUDOLPH. by fig. 2, has a focal length of 35 c.m.)
In conclusion, I append to this specification of myiCv ^ able III.
invention four examples, which serve to illustrate the { Objective, such as shown by fig. 3, con
manner in which the principles set forth in the preceding Positive systems, with nearly equal focal lengths,
pages may be applied to the construction of different
types adapted to various purposes. All dimensions (radii,
thicknesses of lenses, and air-distances) are expressed by
proportional numbers, the focal length of the whole
objective being taken as unity. A simple multiplication
of these numbers, with the focal length actually required,
will suffice for obtaining the dimensions of any objective
wanted.
The letters of the following tables correspond to the letters
marked on the drawings (see p. 525). The different kinds
of glasses are determined by the indices «D and wG1 relating
respectively to the D line of the spectrum and to the 117-
line of the spectrum of hydrogen. In order to render
obvious the character of the pairs of glasses used in each
system, I have appended to each kind of glass the value of
Effective aperture : 0*180.
Radii :
= + 03408
r* = + 0-1217
r, = + 0"6815
r4 = — 0-3894
r-o = — 0-8763
r, = — 01947
Angle of field about 70°.
Thicknesses of glass :
dt = 0015
d, = 0 044
d3 = 0015
rf4 = 0 044
d. = 0019
= — 03213
the relative dispersive power where a n has been
calculated for the interval from the D to the Ily-line of
the spectrum, while the value of nD is taken for n.
Examples.
Table I.
Objective of the kind shown by fig. 1, consisting of two
positive systems having greatly differing focal lengths.
Effective aperture : 0-050. Angle of field about 110°.
Thicknesses of Glass:
L,:
L3 and Lj :
L4:
"D
1-55540
1 51310
1-53984
1-57360
1-57036
1-52461
1-55463
1-58642
normal pair of glasses ;
focal length = 1*741.
abnormal pair of glasses;
focal length = 1*809.
3,
Radii :
r, = + 0-2041
r, = + 00962
j-j = + 0-3329
r4 = — 0*1589
r3 — — 0 0962
r6 = —01798
Kinds of glass employed
»n n.
<7, = 0013
d2 = 0 025
d, = 0067
<74 = 0013
Distances of diaphragm B
J, = 0013
L,
l4
1*55540
1*51900
1-57360
1*54763
'*01
1*57036
1*53047
1*58642
1-56316
d;
b2 = 0-057
»D
«G,
A n
L,:
1-51282
1*52421
n — 1
1*57973
1*59357
0-0269 ]
normal pair of glasses ;
1-51680
1-52755
0-0221 J
focal length = + 1"1275.
L,
: 1-56490
1-58215
0-0224
00284
Distances of diaphragm B
5, = 0*122
bt - 0-024
Kinds of glass employed :
A M
n — 1
00269 j
0 0224)
0-0274 }
0-0224)
(The objective of this combination, shown by fig
has a focal length of 20 cm.)
Table IV.
Objective consisting of a positive principal system and
a corrective system having a negative focal length.
Effective aperture : 0*056. Angle of field about 100°.
The letters correspond to those marked in fig. 1.
Thicknesses of glass :
d, = 0012
dj — 0’056
d3 = 0034
d4 = 0010
Distances of diaphragm B [
6, = 0084
6, = 0*034
>•
Radii :
, = + 0 1928
= + 0-0938
r, = 4- 0*1251
rt = — 0*3127
r6 = - 0-0834
r6 = — 01511
Glasses employed :
) abnormal pair of glasses ;
A n
n — 1
0 0222) normal pair of glasses ;
0 0239) focal length = — 1596S.
0 0208) normal pair of glasses ;
0 0305) focal length = + 0 5956.
Having now particularly described and ascertained the
) focal length = + 3 3785. nature of this invention, and in what manner the same is
(The objective of this combination, represented in full
size by fig. 1, has a focal length of 24 cm.)
Table II.
Objectives of the kind shown by fig. 2, consisting of
two positive systems haring
lengths.
Effective aperture : 0166.
Radii :
r , = + 0-2559
r, = + 01029
r3 = + 0-4122
n = — 0-2058
r5 = + 0-4122
r6 = — 01897
Kinds of glass employed
nD ”0,
L, : 1*57973 1*59357
Lj*. 1*50546 1*51610
L3 : 1-53789 1*55250
L4: 1*57360 1-58642
but slightly differing focal
Augle of field about 75°.
Thicknesses of Glass :
d, = 0012
dj = 0 062
d3 = 0 012
dx = 0 029
Distances of diaphragm B :
6, = 0 0656
b, = 0 0656
A tl
n — l
>•02391 normal pair of glasses;
>•0210) focal length = + 2-325.
1-0272 ) abnormal pair of glasses ;
10224 j focal length = 1'426.
to be performed, I declare that what I claim is : —
In a photographic objective, the combination of two
distinct systems of lenses, each composed of single lenses
cemented together, the positive element of one system
haring a higher, the positive element of the other system a
lower refractive index than the respective negative ele-
ments cemented thereto, and each system being in itself
approximately achromatic, substantially as described.
♦
International Bibliographical Conference. — An Inter-
national Conference is to be held this summer in Antwerp, of
publishers, printers, and others connected with or interested in
books. Simultaneously, the Society of Industry, Art, and
Commerce will organise in its rooms an exhibition which will
include photographic presses and specimens of processes for the
photographic illustrations of books.
British Photographic Union. — The organising council of
the above proposed union meets at the Polytechnic School of Pho-
tography on Wednesday evening, July 16th, at eight o’clock.
Any workman who can get three or four of his fellow workmen
to delegate him may attend. The subjects to be discussed are
the form, rules, and methods of the union ; the appointment
of acting officers for London ; the form of appeal for funds ;
arrangements for the institution of the examining body,
* Continued from page 525.
536
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 11, 1890.
iiotcis.
Mr. Andrew Tuer writes pleasantly in the English
Illustrated Magazine on “ The Art of Silhouetting.”
One of the first and best silhouettists who prac-
tised in this country was Augustin Araant Con-
stance Fidele Edouart, who wa3 born at Dunkerque in
1788, and found his way to London as a refugee in
1815. It was in 1825 that Edouart took to silhouette
cutting as a profession. Spending an evening with
some friends, he was shown profile likenesses of some
of the family taken with a machine. These Edouart
condemned, but the daughters pronounced them per-
fect. Challenged to do something better, Edouart
seized upon a pair of scissors and the cover of a letter,
and, putting the father in position, “ in an instant I
produced a likeness.” The paper being white, the
snuffers were resorted to for blacking it over. Natural
skill triumphed over inexperience and difficulty.
The most interesting portion1 of the volume is that
which foreshadows the experience of the photographer.
When Edouart first began cutting out paper likenesses
it was on the understanding that if they were not
approved others would be taken. Some of his clients
returned in a day or two saying they were dissatisfied
with the old one, and they would destroy it at home.
When Edouart afterwards insisted upon these old like-
nesses being returned and destroyed before a new one
was began, complaints decreased. A young sitter
highly approved his likeness, but on a friend point-
ing out that he would look better in a dress coat — he
was taken in a frock — another was somewhat rudely
demanded. This was refused, and the sitter ultimately
refused to pay for the first and only likeness ; so
Edouart in revenge cut the body of the silhouette from
the waist downwards into a screw, made an alteration
in the top of the hat, and wrote underneath, “ Patent
screw for five shillings.” In this altered condition
the silhouette was exhibited in Edouart’s window,
where it was recognised by amused friends, and it was
not long before satisfactory terms were made with the
artist. How few photographers are there who have
not had an experience of a “ screw ” of this nature !
By the way, to have rendered Mr. Tuer’s article com-
plete, some mention should have been made of Mr.
Francis Galton’s photographic silhouettes, which he
secures by placing the sitter in a long passage, at the
end of which is an illuminated screen. The camera is,
of course, stationed at the other end.
In the interesting book just published entitled “ My
Mistress, the Empress Eugenie,” the authoress, Madame
Carette, imparts a hint which the much photographed
ladies of to-day might utilize with advantage. She
gives an amusing account of one of the court ladies,
the Countess de Wagner, who had considerably passed
beyond the charms of her youth and even middle age,
but who still fancied herself young. As a matter of
fact, she was, although over seventy, exceedingly well-
preservtd. The Empress often went into raptures over
her unfailing youth, and this pleased her greatly.
One day, she brought her portrait to the Tuilleries, in
which she appeared to be scarcely thirty years old, but
it did really resemble her, and the Empress could not
conceal her astonishment at its artistic flattery. “ I
wished to leave my friends a pleasing souvenir,” said
the Countess, “ and I therefore instructed the photo-
grapher as to what he was to put in and what omit, and
I think have succeeded in getting a pretty portrait.”
This seems to us an admirable idea. Ladies who
wish to please themselves should not fail to take
advantage of the retoucher’s art, and give their own
instructions. There is only one doubt which crosses
our minds. The Countess de Wagner’s portrait, it is
said, resembled her. Now we are inclined to think
that the photographer, in spite of the lady’s instructions,
used his own discretion ; but no doubt the Countess
imagined that her directions had been faithfully carried
out. The moral of this is, that the diplomatic photo-
grapher should listen to all the instructions of his fair
sitter, but exercise his own judgment. They will not
quarrel with him if he makes them look younger, and
yet preserves some sort of likeness.
In the same interesting volume appears a reference
to a certain photograph which played a mysterious and
unexpected part in regard to the surrender of Metz.
It will be remembered that when the Empress and the
Prince Imperial fled to England, a M. Regnier visited
them at Hastings. At his earnest request, M. Filon,
the Prince Imperial’s tutor, gave him a photograph
signed by the Prince Imperial; and this little circum-
stance expanded to unexpected magnitude. M.
Regnier presented this photograph to Marshal Bazaine
at Metz, as a pledge of the powers with which he was
charged to negotiate with him, though what these
negotiations were was not known. The whole of
this transaction has remained in obscurity, and it was
only later, when events unravelled themselves, that
the treachery of M. Regnier in presenting the photo-
graph signed by the Prince Imperial was understood.
It would be a salutary caution to peopl who fill up
cheques carelessly, if the photograph published in the
Banker's Magazine of this month were reproduced and
copies hung in every banking establishment. There is
one numeral which is extremely useful to the dishonest
person. All he has to do when he comes across a
cheque made out for £8 is to add the letter “ y ” to
the word “eight,” and an “0” to the figure, and,
■with two strokes, he thus converts £8 into £80. This
seems to have been the case with a cheque presented
to the Birkbeck Bank. The original cheque was
drawn for £8 5s., but when presented it appeared as
£80 5s. The bank paid the money, and the drawer
sued them for the amount over-paid. A photograph
of the cheque is given, as we have already noted, in
the Banker's Magazine, and proves conclusively that
the cashier was not in fault, as there is no indication
that the additions were made by a swindler.
July 11, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
537
It is taking the French papers a long time to
discover that the Americans intend to do honour to the
memory of Daguerre by raising a monument to him.
Now that the discovery has been made, one of the
lively Parisian journals suggests that at the foot of the
monument should be placed a penny automatic likeness
taker. As this is the lowest form of photography with
which the world is yet acquainted, it is not quite
certain whether the paper in question approves of the
idea of a monument. Since it speaks elsewhere of
Daguerre as one of the discoverers of photography, per-
haps it wishes the names of Niepce, Davy, Wedgwood,
Talbot, and even Scheele, to be included. If so, the
argument is not without justification.
A Parisian paper gravely states that the automatic
portrait-taking machine was anticipated by an enter-
prising jeweller who, on the first of April last, intro-
duced his invention to the public. The apparatus is
in the form of a clock which automatically marks the
day, month, and year. On the side is an invitation to
“ Drop five centimes in the slot and see your likeness.”
When you have dropped your centimes in the slot as
directed, an inscription, reading “ Here it is,” appears.
At the same instant up bobs a donkey’s head with
large outstretched ears — your likeness ! It is a new
form of an old pleasantry, and if the apparatus does
not take a photographic portrait, it certainly takes the
public taste.
The Chemical News draws attention to a question
which always troubles judges and juries, namely, the
discrepancy which is invariably seen when scientific
witnesses give their evidence. Our contemporary
rightly points out that the disagreeable spectacle of men
of equal scientific reputation disagreeing or appearing
to disagree over some vital point, and the cross-
examination of the scientific witness by a counsel who
is totally ignorant of the subject under consideration,
and who has been hastily and imperfectly coached,
do damage, not only to the reputation of the witness,
but bring science itself into contempt. This kind of
thing has always been witnessed when any action
turning upon a question of photographic chemistry
comes before the law courts. The remedy proposed is
that a scientific witness should make a written state-
ment, but should positively decline to step into a
witness box. We do not know whether this is a good
way out of the difficulty, and judging by the light of
recent photographic actions at law, probably the best
plan would be for each scientific witness on either side
to give his evidence, and let it be adj udicated upon by
a scientific arbitrator. The scientific points settled,
the legal questions involved would then be an easy
matter to decide by the usual tribunal.
Photographers are, perhaps, as much interested in
the state of the weather as any other class of the
community, for it is certain that their incomes must
fluctuate with its condition. No one cares to be
photographed except when arrayed in the chief glories
of her wardrobe, and such gorgeous vestments
are not for rainy days. This midsummer will long be
remembered for wetness, and the general stagnation
of photographic work which it has brought about ; for
it is not only the photographer who suffers — the damp
percolates through and affects every trade connected
with the art. A wet fortnight at the end of June
means that millions of plates are unexposed that ought
to have been exposed, and that thousands of reams of
paper which ought to have borne pictures remain blank.
So the wet weather affects all, from the photographic
monarchs of West End studios, to the poor fellow who
holds himself in readiness to take your portrait on the
sands for sixpence.
Writers who try to be comic have often tiied to
make fuu of the circumstance that when two strangers
meet, their conversation invariably opens with a remark
about the weather. But in this country, at least, when
the weather is so erratic in its behaviour that one
knows not whether the morrow will bring forth
scorching heat or icy cold, it is only natural that men
should have the matter uppermost in their minds.
The thing to wonder at is, that with so many millions
of persons making remarks and observations of this
kind every day of their lives, no one yet has proved
himself to be a reliable weather prophet.
The number of persons armed with cameras one meets
in the course of a day’s outing is marvellous. It
does not seem to matter in what direction you go, the
ubiquitous photographer is bound to turn up. Of
course there are favoured spots. For instance, up the
rivercameras “ comenotin singlespies, butin battalions.”
The question naturally suggests itself, if anglers are
allowed special privileges in the way of reduced fares,
why should not amateur photographers ? This is a
matter which has been mooted at several photographic
societies, and, for aught we know, the railway com-
panies may have been approached on the subject; but
certain it is that up to the present the photographer
has to pay full fare. Probably he always will ;
for the argument may be that photographers are
becoming so numerous that a reduction of fare to them
would mean a reduction generally.
Let us hope that those photographers who are for-
tunate enough to get away to the sea this year may
have a break in the clouds to look forward to, and that
many seascapes, and glimpses of life on the shore, may
compensate them for the wet season which they are
now experiencing. Should any of them roam with
their cameras in that part of our coast which borders
“ The Downs,” they should take with them a book
which has recently been published, “ Memorials of
the Goodwin Sands,” by Gattie. This gives a full
account not only of the treacherous sands, but of the
coast near which they lie, and it is very pleasant read-
ing. It always gives a zest to photographic touring
when the worker knows something about the district
in which his pictures are taken.
538
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July ll, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FRANCE.
BY LEON VIDAL.
Collographic Process by M. Balagny — Coloured
Screens for Orthochromatic Work — The “ Cristallos”
Developer— Flexible Negative Films.
Collographic Process ly M. Balagny. — The fullest details
of the divers phases of this process, which, as is known,
is based upon the use of a pellicular printing surface, have
been furnished by the author at a special conference. It
is, in short, a sort of photo-lithographic process analogous
to the Raymond autocopyist process, but with this differ-
ence, that the gelatinised paper which, in the autocopyist
process, forms the printing plate, is covered with gelatine
free from any other substance. In Balagny’s pellicle the
support is coated with gelatino-bromide of silver. Accord-
ing to our confrere, this substance, which, with regard to
gelatine, is inert, has the effect of increasing the sensitive-
ness to the light of the film when bichromated. In our
view this is a statement which remains to be proved, but
what is true — a fact which has been already recognised by
other experimentalists, notably by llusnik and Woodbury
— is, that the presence of a pulverulent body plays the
part of causing reticulation. We may, in this case, after
insolation and rapid washing, take printsin fatty ink, whilst
in the ordinary collographic process it is indispensable to
dry the film in order to produce reticulation, after which
it is moistened and impressions are taken from it. In
support of his interesting explanation, M. Balagny offered
to the Society, as illustrations for its Bulletin, 1,500 prints
representing the installation of Class XII. at the Exposition
Universelle.
Coloured Screens for Orthochromatic Work. — M. Stebbing,
following the indications given by M. Vidal, has prepared
some pellicular coloured screens for orthochromatic photo-
graphy, and presented specimens of them. These screens
are formed of discs of suitably coloured gelatine im-
prisoned between two coatings of normal collodion.
There are four degrees of colouration. No. 4, which is
the maximum, requires an exposure of from six to twelve
times the normal duration — that is to say, of an ortho-
chromatic plate employed without a screen. No. 1 is
coloured to one-fourth that extent, and requires a corres-
pondingly shorter exposure — that is, of from one and
a-half to three times the normal exposure. These screens
are very well prepared, and will render great service,
seeing that they may be used in the place of the diaphragm,
and inserted in a double diaphragm made of black paper.
The interposition of an orange yellow film should not
alter the focal point.
The “ Cristallos ” Developer. — This developer, presented in
the names of Messrs. Jeannin and Jumeau, is one of
great energy. It appears to be a mixture of hydroquinone
and potash. According to M. Audry, who has tried it,
it acts violently, and fogs the shadows. lie finds it very
energetic, but insufficiently restrained. It must be borne
in mind that it has to be diluted with four times its volume
of water.
Negatives on Flexible Films. — M. Morizet presented 300
negatives taken by him in Upper and Lower Egypt on
flexible films. These negatives are very complete.
Lantern slide reductions were projected on the screen,
and I noticed particularly views of a square in Cairo,
the rapids of the Nile, and the Place de Lougsor.
The meeting was not large, a fact accounted for
by the departure of many to the country and the seaside.
IMAGINING AND IMAGING.*
BV PHILIP H. NEWMAN.
There never was so much good painting as there is now ; the
present Royal Academy Exhibition is full of most admirable
work ; the technique gets higher and higher annually. But
now go and ask the general public what they think of this
Exhibition; the answer is, “ The dullest we remember.” The
general public are not artists, but, as usual, they are very keen
critics, and can generally tell when they see a good thing with-
out the inspiration even of a newspaper. I walked through
the rooms of the Academy the other day with a highly cul-
tured girl — no painter, but knowing our National Gallery and
some of the galleries of Europe, who could trace the influence
of Veronese and Rubens in Makart, and Velasquez in Munc-
kaksy, and could tell a Fortuny as well as she could tell a line
of Shakespeare, or a bar of Beethoven.
“ Well, my dear, how do you like the Exhibition '!”
“ Not at all ; there is only one picture I would buy ; I should
like that.”
It was a single figure, full of repose, and worthy of Greek
art ; the nature in it, like that art, had filtered through the
passion of the painter. Here, at least, there was imagining as
well as imaging.
Mr. Emerson has written other books besides the one I have
been talking about, and published many photographs from
original negatives. It would not be fair to him, having said so
much, if we did not say something about these, and it is only
fair to see how his wholesale repudiation of book-teaching in
art, and his leaning entirely on nature, has helped him. In
one of the books devoted to the Norfolk Broads, Mr. T. F.
Goodall is a collaborator, and writes, in an article on landscape :
“The roughest sketch, in which the ground and the objects
against the sky are painted in a mass in right relation to it,
is really more finished than the most laboured work wherein
the essential truth is wanting.” This may be granted at once,
but then one looks to see it illustrated by the accompanying
photographs. Unhappily for Mr. Emerson and Mr. Goodall,
photography seldom gives objects against the sky in right rela-
tion to it ; certainly, samples are sadly wanting in the book in
question. This may be the fault of the copy, or processes of
printing may have improved since. Let us pass on to another
book, and look into the “ Idylls of the Norfolk Broads ” ;
plate 6, “Bathers.” Here we have no question of
printing, but of simple composition. The lacks of two
bathers rise out of the water side by side, one a little
in advance of the other, however ; the nearer one spreads his
arms a little to lead up the angle of the bank and take away
from the verticalness of the arrangement, the other bather
keeps his arms down, one being partially hidden by his body.
Now, all .artists will admit that the human back is a beautiful
object, delightful to draw and model, in its leading lines and
subtle undulations, and Mr. Emerson missed a great oppor-
tunity here of showing himself both a photographer and an
artist ; anything more commonplace and less idyllic than the
arrangement of these two backs it is difficult to conceive. I
refrain from making fun ; any one may do that where they
cannot make sense ; but one leaves the picture with a sort of
suspicion that Mr. Emerson is making fun of us. We should
like to ask him if the idyllism of the picture is supposed
to lie in the backs, or in the background. I can-
not determine ; neither smudginess nor backs like
these are idyllic to me. Plate 9, in the same collec-
tion, represents something going on with a hay waggon,
which at first sight seems to be part of a tree ; on the right-
hand side of the picture a mau is leading the horse towards us,
and this emphasises the right angle made by the side of the
waggon, and the ground cut clean against the sky ; a little
bunchy tree is near the horse and towards the horizon, while
another man is near another small tree on the opposite side
of the picture, and serves only to enforce the emphasis
of the right angle already mentioned. I can only sup-
pose that this arrangement is done in wilful defiance of any
rules of composition whatever, and pass on to “ Pictures,
* Continued from page 516.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
539
July 11, 1890.]
iu Field and Fen.” “Ah!” you say, “how charming
Mr. Emerson can be when he chooses.” This “spring
idyll,” for instance, a girl peeling potatoes ; note the turn
of the girl’s head in relation to the line of the shoulder, and
its continuity iu the branch of the tree ; the very pail is
ordered in its arrangement with the rest of the picture. But
is this accident or design ? It would be pleasant to give
Mr. Emerson credit for this and several other pictures —
“Ploughing” and the “ Stickle-back Catcher” are excellent.
But what are we to say when we find them in company with
such wooden compositions as the “ Dame’s School ” (which
might have been so easily corrected, by the way), the atrocious
"Winter’s Morning” (look at the vaunted values here), and
the hideous “Going to Market”? Well, there is nothing to
be said but that if art is to be got by simply going to nature,
Mr. Emerson does not show us enough of the way — at least,
in the works I have referred to. Is there no sunshine ever in
the fen country, that most of these photographs have such
leaden skies ? Or does our author belong to a school that
enunciates the dogma that sunshine is unpaintable and brilliancy
vulgar ? If so, Fortuny, and some of the works of some of the
greatest living painters, might teach him better. This last
book I mention, “ Pictures in Field and Fen,” is prefaced, so
to speak, with these lines from Browning : —
“ So British public, who may like me yet
(Marry and Amen), learn one lesson hence
Of many which whatever lives should teach :
This lesson, that our human speech is naught,
Our human testimony false, our fame
And human estimation words and wind.
Why take the artistic way to prove so much ?
Because it is the glory and the good of art,
That art remains the one way possible
Of speaking truths, to mouths like mine at least.”
A more unfitting quotation to head such a book as this was
never seen, save that it is capable of a double application, rich
in its condemnation of the author. If Mr. Emerson has as
much revei euce for art as he pretends to for nature, we had
been spared many of these so-called pictures, because many of
them were not worth the taking. Many he would have re-
arranged, and could have done so quite easily. One slight
reference to the “ Soldiers Bathing in the Arno ” might have
corrected those woeful backs ; and many of the landscapists he
has slighted would have saved him from the stumbles he has
had elsewhere. I trust, for the sake of photographers, that
his advice on technical matters is more reliable than his artistic
guidance. As to his hints on art, I cordially agree with the
man who called them “ Tupperisms.” His pictures, at least as
printed in his folios, do not bear out his standard of excellence
or teaching. Let us dismiss this disciple of nature as quickly
now as he has affected to dismiss time-honoured names in art,
and let him know and bear in mind that while in characterising
a learned reverend, if oft enthusiastic criticism, as “splendidly
false,” his own has too often the latter quality, but never the
former. I unhesitatingly say that he has written on art with-
out adequate knowledge and reflection, as he has frequently
imaged nature without refined taste or imagination.
There has been much discussion lately on the subject of
beauty ; it may be difficult to exactly define it, or how much
uf it is necessary in the constitution of a work of art. It is too
wide a question to more than mention now. It may be worth
saying, however, that beau ty lies more in order and consistency
than is often allowed, and works that do not possess these
qualifications proportionately fail to charm us. Beauty,
moreover, is an individual perception, more or less, but it is
distinctly capable of wider appreciation, the more apparent is
the consistency and order I allude to. Thus, in a picture or
photograph of a group of figures there must be a principal
figure or a principal group, and it is essential for our satisfac-
tion that that principal figure should be principal in every
respect — force of light and shade, mass, &c. If there is a story
to l>e told, it gains immensely in directness by such means.
These things are exceedingly difficult to talk about, but beauty
in composition is so dependent upon them that they must not
be passed over. I am the more sensible of this because of
some recent terrible examples of photography that have come
before me, where there were several women in white aprons ;
and some that were smaller in size and more in the back-
ground were as white as that which should have been
principal. Perhaps I am rather urgent on this point of
ordination and subordination. I fail, however, to see good
composition without it ; it is my ism or idiosyncrasy. One
artist of our own time is accused of this shortcoming, and one
is accused of that. One artist of the greatest poetical insight
and refinement, a very Achilles equally in his retirement as
when he is moved to put out his strength, is accused of soft,
waxy texture. The public and the critics seem quite oblivious
of the fact that his aim is not to imitate nature in his textures
so much as to move us with his design. It would be heart-
breaking to think of the future of art in this country were it
not that one knows the tide of fadisms is at its flood, and while
it rushes on, the poet painters who see art, and beauty,
and consistency, are as firm as the rocks they rest upon, until
the tide has turned, and when their voices will again be listened
to. The young men who have any real art feeling in them
will have made their studies from nature, and will have been
as dissatisfied with them as were their great predecessors
with theirs. It may be that the foundations laid will be the
more solid from the long continuance of the realistic and
naturalistic craze, so good coming out of evil ; for certainty
of draughtsmanship and knowledge of light and colour will
be at the facile command of those who, ceasing to make un-
satisfactory images, will develop their imagination and give
us works of art. We will at least hope so.
But you ask, What has all this to do with the Photographic
Convention of Great Britain ? Much, everything, because it is
to you that art looks in the present day to be in the van of
this desirable movement ; to you who, having many sins of
omission and commission to answer for in the past, whereby
you have in a great measure been responsible for this unstudied
naturalism which is sapping the foundation of the finest taste ;
you, by your multiplying processes and waistcoat-pocket
cameras, who have been tempted to photograph everything
you have seen — good, bad, and indifferent. I am speaking
plainly but generally (of course, there are grand exceptions).
It is to you I say — artists, photographers, and photographic
artists — in the cause of art 1 appeal ; you have a great future
before you if you will only exercise a dignified reserve that a
dignified profession demands, and never photograph anything,
under any circumstances, that shall not, when it is printed, be
a joy because of its beauty.
I am certain that in the present all who have the real
interests of art in England at heart will uphold me iu this
appeal, as I am equally persuaded that Rejlander and the
greatest names in the past, and those who are yet in the
future, will approve of your doing your utmost with these high
aims in view. Pray believe me, I am not ignoring much,
very much, good work that has been done, and I know is being
done. I should like to mention names, but must not do so
for fear of invidious comparison. If I have been unjust in
anything I have said, it has not been with intention, and I
beg forgivenesss. The book I have so often alluded to was
put into my hands for the first time just as I was asked to
write this paper, that I might have some knowledge of some
of the things that had been said on the art side of photo-
graphy. I was amazed when I had read the book
at its audacity, and more amazed when I heard that its
teachings were gaining ground. I was told that photographers,
however, would be glad to be spoken to on the art question,
notwithstanding. I have spoken to the best of my power
and belief. If I have spoken loudly, I may be pardoned
for art’s sake at finding its temple shattered and its gods
dispersed, that Mr. Whistler or Mr. Anybody else should
occupy the site. Not a word against Mr. Whistler, who has
shown himself often and often a great artist. All I contend
for is, that “ naturalism ” is not the only nor the highest
art in the land. Let us, indeed, be termed Philistines and
rejoice in the honour thereby conferred on us ; the rather
keeping to our own gods than falling down and worshipping
stocks, and stones, and nature unanimated by the divine
gift the soul of man has the privilege of conjuring up and
540
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 11, 1890.
investing it with. I would rather go back a hundred years
and more ; I say it seriously. It would be better for art,
better, far better for us all, to go back to the sickly senti-
mentality and bathos of the last century, that culminated in the
lachrymatory effusion of uncle Toby’s recording angel, or,
more practically, to the primary artistic pi inciples of our great
grandmothers’ samplers, than reach the logical bourn of
naturalism where imagination dies in imaging, and over whose
portals might well be written, “ Abandon hope all ye who
enter here.”
DEVELOPERS USED BY GERMAN PROFESSIONAL
PHOTOGRAPHERS*
BY JULIUS F. SACHSE.
Anselm Schmitz, Ivbnigl. Hof. Photograph, Kolu. —
Developer — The sulpho-pyrogallol-developer. Advantages
—The developer furnishes brilliant negatives of superior
detail. Composition — (A) Water, 64 ; sulphite of soda,
16; citric acid, 1; pyrogallol, 1. (B) Water, 64; sul-
phite of soda, 8 ; carbonate of soda, 32. Developer —
Equal parts A aud B, diluted with 20 parts water.
Equal results have been attained with other formula ; the
advantages which I claim are not the result of this formula
in particular, but of pyrogallol in general. I have tested
all other developers as they appeared, among others the
much vaunted eikonogen, but soon came to the conviction
that pyro is far superior. For short and instantaneous
exposures, eikonogen in its various combinations has been
persistently praised, as it was claimed that greater results
and detail were to be obtained with the new agent than
any other. I have, however, obtained results far greater
with pyrogallol. Accelerator — None.
A. Stock, Hof Photograph, Gubeu. — Developer — Pyro-
gallol. Advantages — Very rapid development, complete
in three minutes ; at the same time, vigorous results. In
a few minutes every grade of strength can be attained.
Composition —(A) Pyrogallol, 15 g. ; sulphite of soda,
80 g. ; water, 500 g. (B) Pure soda, 100 g. ; water,
1,000 g. For use, equal parts A and B, diluted with
one-third water with several drops of bromide. For
under-exposed plates, use with bromide or water.
It will be seen by the responses given that one-half of
the whole number still adhere to the favourite German
stand-by — ferrous oxalate — their main reasons given
being the simplicity, uniformity of action, cheapness,
cleanliness, and freedom from fog. Seven of the whole
number have become converts to the new candidate for
photographic favour — viz., eikonogen — on account of the
quicker action, allowing of shorter exposure, together
with finer grain and detail ; the factor of price is also an
item in its favour.
Three are equally enthusiastic in their praise of pyro,
which we in this country can agree to. One is a convert
to hydrochinone, while another promulgates the question-
able formula of mixing hydrochinone and eikonogen. It
will be noticed that ten photographers only approve of an
occasional preliminary bath (accelerator).
The attention of both professionals and amateurs is
called to the fact that the foregoing all relate to the
department of studio portraiture only.
C. Baumann, Hofphotograph, Dortmund. — Developer
— Eikonogen. Advantages — Cleanliness aud clearness of
plates, wealth of fine tones, combined with strong high-
lights, when extra rapid plates are used. Composition —
The usual formula : (A) Sulphite of soda, 200 g. ; water,
' Continued from p. 456.
3 litres ; eikonogen (dissolved warm), 50 g. (B) Cryst.
soda, 150 g. ; water, 1 litre. For use, 3 parts A, 1 part
B. In the fixing bath no sulphite of soda is used, as it is
superfluous, and in my experience the plates are destroyed
by leaving them in a bath of that kind any length of time.
Accelerator — None.
J. H. Braschoss, Coin. — Developer — Eikonogen.
Advantages — Saving thereby half of the exposure. Solu-
tion can be used repeatedly, is lower in price than all
others, and is absolutely non-poisonous. Composition —
(1) Eikonogen, 50 g. ; sulphite of soda, 200 g. ; water,
3,000 g. (2) Soda, 300 g. ; water, 2,000 g. Accelerator
— None.
Julius Dorstling, Hofphotogr., Eisenberg i. A. — Deve-
loper— Until within three months ferrous-oxalate, since
then, with preference, eikonogen. Advantages — Shorter
exposures, detail in shadows and high-lights, and trans-
parency at the same time. Strong negatives, therefore
more rapid printers ; greater permanency. Composition
— Dissolve 200 g. of sulphite of soda in 24 litre of rain-
water, then rub up 50 g. of eikonogen in a mortar, and
pour into an earthen pot in which there is half a litre of
hot water. After both are dissolved, pour the hot solu-
tion into the 2£ litres of soda ; then shake up well.
No. 2 — Dissolve 150 g. of soda cryst. in one litre of
water. Three parts No. 1, one part No. 2. Accelerator
— None.
Otto Faltz, in Eberswalde. — Developer — Eikonogen.
Advantages — Quick and active action. The picture
develops brilliant and complete detail in the deepest shadows.
The developer can be used repeatedly. Composition —
Water, 600 g. ; sulphite of soda, 100 g. ; potash, C.P.,
40 g. ; eikonogen, 20 g. Dissolve and boil in a Florence
flask : use when cold. Accelerator — None.
W. Gilles, Unna. — Developer — Eikonogen, since six
months ago, with good results. Advantages — Detail in
the shadows ; much quicker printing negatives than
oxalate ; shorter exposure ; shading of certain portions of
the negative in printing lessened. Composition — (1) Dis-
tilled water, 1,500 g. ; sulphite of soda, 100 g. ; eikonogen,
25 g. (2) Distilled water, 1,000 g. ; ordinary soda, 150g.
For use, three parts No. 1, one part No. 2. Both solutions
keep ; No. 1, made in December, was without change in
February. Accelerator — None.
F. Ilundt, sue. to Hiilswidt-Miiuster i. W. — Developer
— Eikonogen. Advantages — The enormous reducing
po wer of the agent, with a finer silver grain than, in our
experience, is attainable with any other developer. We
use extra rapid plates exclusively, which, with pyro and
oxalate, give a very coarse grain. With eikonogen, how-
ever, the grain is so fine as not to be perceptible. Shorter
exposures than with any other developer; cleanliness.
Composition — (1) Sulphite of soda, 200; water, 3,000;
eikonogen, 50. (2) Carbonate of soda, 150 ; water, 1,000.
For use, three parts 1 and one part 2, bromide 1-2 drop
1 : 10. When the high lights stand out strong, pour off
the developer and finish with fresh (without bromide).
In this manner we obtain exceedingly brilliant, harmonious
negatives. Accelerator — None.
{To be continued .)
Royal Institution of Great Britain. — At the general
monthly meeting on Monday, July 7th, Messrs. Thomas
Townsend Buuknill, Q.C., Edward A. Harvey, Malcolm Morris,
F.R.C.S., and William Thomas Rabbits, F. L.S., were elected
members of the Royal Institution.
Jcr.Y 11, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
541
patent EntdUgcnce.
Applications for Letters Patent.
9,413. J. B. Brooks, 115, Great Charles Street, Birmingham,
“Developing Baths.” — June 18th.
9,474. J. S. Foley and L. C. H. Mensing, 166, Fleet Street,
London, “ Appliances for Exposing Transparent Photograph
after Receipt of Coin.” — June 18th,
9.497. F. A. Walton, 12, Cherry Street, Birmingham,
“Photographic Picture Stands.” — June 19th.
9.498. H. Wilkinson, Massey Park, Liscard, Cheshire, “Com-
bined Tray and Cover for Photographic Plates.” — June
19 th.
9,507. J. B. Brooks, 115, Great Charles Street, Birmingham,
“Photographic Printing Frames.” — June 19th.
9,511. J. Parkinson, S. Fawcett, and C. F. Parkinson, South
Regent Street, Lancaster, “ Photographic Shutters.” —
June 19th.
9,538. W. Rebikow, 47, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, “ Manu-
facture of Emulsions and other Materials Sensitive to Light.”
— June 19 th.
9,542. L. Koch, 6, Bream’s Buildings, London, “ Photographic
Apparatus.” — June 19th.
9,549. H. Ransom, 4, South Street, Finsbury, London,
“Shutter.” — June 19th.
9,593. C. B. Skinner, 38, Chancery Lane, London, “Cameras.”
— .June 20th.
9,715. A. J. Boult, 323, High Holborn, London, “ Cameras.”
(H. Thumber, Germany.) — June 23rd.
9,818. W. F. Greene, 321, High Holborn, London, “Cameras.”
— June 24th.
9,868. W. H. Pexton, 77, Chancery Lane, London, “Magic
Lantern Slides.” — June 25tli.
9,893. J. W. Swan and J. Leslie, Lauriston, Bromley, Kent,
“Transparent Flexible Photographic Films.”— June 26th.
9,898. R. Eager, 57, Bath Street, St. Heliers, Jersey,
“ Doubling Shutter for the Production of two Positions on
one Plate of any Size with Fixed Lens.” — June 26tli.
9,934. W. Stocks, 6, Bream’s Buildings, London, “ Lamps for
Optical Lanterns.” — June 26th.
9,981. G. W. Shatter, 35, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Changing Boxes and Slides.” — June 27th.
10,012. G. J. Sershali,, 373, Lodge Road, Birmingham,
“ Vignetting Media.” — June 28th.
10,145. M. Guttenbero, 8, Quality Court, London, “Mirror
Photo-Enlargement Process.” — July 1st.
10,165. G. E. Alder, 98, North End, Croydon, “Automatic
Production of Photographs.” — July 1st.
10,442. W. Palmer, 47, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London,
“Cameras.” — July 5th.
Specifications Published.
11,555. July 19 th, 1889. — “Coating Photographic Plates.”
John Henry Smith, Ph.D., Photographic Chemist, 9, Merkur
Strasse Hottingen, Zurich, Switzerland.
My invention for improvements in apparatus for coating
photographic dry plates and other plane surfaces with an
emulsion or viscous liquid, has for its objects to deliver the
liquid at a uniform rate, to vary the rate of delivery of the
liquid according to the size of the surface to be coated or to
the desired thickness of the coat, to distribute the liquid in a
regular stream of the width of the surface to lie coated, to
construct the surface down which the liquid flows on to the
surface to be coated, so that it readily adjusts itself to the
different thicknesses of the articles whose surfaces are to be
coated, and to provide means for traversing the surfaces to
be coated at a regular speed and in a horizontal plane past
the coating apparatus until the liquid has set, and for cooling
the plates in order to set the coating liquid.
The liquid is delivered at a regular rate from a holder placed
at a suitable height above an overflow trough by means of one
or more bent tubes or syphons into the trough. The delivery
orifices of the tubes are arranged in a horizontal plane imme-
diately above the trough. The holder is made broad and
shallow, and is raised to such a height that the differences in
the level of the liquid in the holder do not materially affect
the pressure, and consequently the regularity of the flow.
Where greater accuracy is desired these differences in level are
compensated for by making the delivery tubes partially or
wholly of india-rubber, and altering the height of the holder ;
or preferably by employing a closed bottle provided with a
delivery or syphon tube, and an air tube extending into the
bottle to near its bottom, so that the liquid is deliverd under
a constant head equal to the vertical distance between the lower
end of the air tube and the exit orifice of the delivery tube.
The rate of delivery of the liquid is varied by means of a
graduated tap in each of the delivery tubes, or by altering the
height of the holder in relation to the exit orifices of the
delivery tubes, or by adjusting the air tube of the closed
bottle, or by a combination of these methods, or the ends of
the delivery tubes are drawn out, and the quantity of liquid
which each nozzle delivers per unit of time when the holder is
fixed at the height indicated is marked upon a fixed vertical
scale at convenient distances apart. The holder is raised and
lowered by means of a rack and pinion, or other equivalent
mechanical arrangement, and its height regulated according to
the desired delivery of the liquid. The flow of liquid is
stopped by means of a tap or clip applied to the delivery tube
or tubes.
The delivery trough, by means of which the liquid is delivered
in a uniform stream of the width of the surface to be coated,
is provided with an overflow lip, ami is divided by a partition
extending nearly to the bottom into two divisions. The liquid
flows from the holder into one division, and underneath the
partition into the other or second division, where it assumes
a perfectly level surface. The liquid is painted by means of a
small brush over that portion of the lip which is immediately
above the plate to be coated, and overflows only over that
painted portion, and falls upon the plate in a uniform stream.
The form of the trough can of course be varied, but in order
to obtain a uniform distribution of liquid, the lip over and
down which it flows must be formed of surfaces including
obtuse angles only. Where the liguid overflows over a hori-
zontal surface instead of over an edge a better overflow is
obtained, and this form possesses the additional advantage
that the trough can be very accurately adjusted and levelled.
The partition of the overflow trough ruus in grooves, and can
be removed in order to clean the trough. The trough is fixed
to the coating table and levelled by means of screw’s.
In order to adjust the surface down which the liquid flows
to the different thicknesses of the articles whose surfaces are
to be coated, the liquid is arranged to flow over a curved
movable piece hinged to the trough at some distance back in
the direction in which the surfaces move. The curved piece
may rest directly upon the surfaces, or be separated therefrom
by short wires, and is of any suitable shape containing only
obtuse angles. It is so constructed that in its vertical motion
it remains in easy contact with the front edge of the trough
throughout its w’hole length, and is bent or curved backwards
at the bottom. Its back portion is only slightly inclined to
the horizontal in order that when a thicker plate succeeds a
thinner one, the upward motion of the piece is very slow.
Where large plates have to be coated it is with advantage made
jointed at one or more points.
The surfaces to be coated are traversed past the coating
apparatus, and the liquid afterward set by supporting them in
a long trough upon drums or rollers floating on wrater or other
liquid in the trough, and free to rise, and fall, and to rotate,
but all motion in the direction of traverse of the plates is
prevented. The drums or rollers are covered with cloth or
felt to absorb the cold liquid in the trough, and apply it to the
backs of the articles whose surfaces are being coated ; or the
articles may lie upon a traversing and stretched endless band,
the underneath portion of which is either immersed in the
cold liquid, or passes underneath the trough containing the
liquid ; and the upper portion of w'hich is supported at a con-
stant level, and kept constantly wet by means of the rotating
drums or rollers already referred to. It will be evident that
this arrangement will serve the double purpose of a levelling
table and a cooling apparatus.
The inventor makes five claims.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
r. 42
7,747. May 9th, 1889. — “Rendering Cardboard Impervious
to the Action of Photographic Chemicals.” William Friese
Greene, Photographer, of 92, Piccadilly, London.
This invention relates to a new or improved process and
means for rendering cardboard and the like innocuous as regards
any action on, and suitable as a basis to or upon which any
suitable sensitising medium with which it may be desired to
coat the same may be directly applied, and innocuous as regards
any action on and impervious to the action of photographic
developing chemicals or solutions, and suitable for photographic
purposes, as hereinafter referred to.
The special object of the invention is so to prepare ordinary
commercial cards, such as those whereon photographic prints as
ordinarily produced on sensitised paper are at present mounted,
as to enable the same to be sensitised with mediums suitable
for the production of permanent photographic prints of the
highest excellence and artistic value, so as to enable such prints
to be produced directly on such cards, so as to avoid the tedious
process of mounting and the subsequent process of rolling the
prints, whereby the cost, time, and labour required for the
production of such prints will be materially lessened.
Cardboard, and such cards and the like as ordinarily manu-
factured and without suitable preparation, such as that contem-
plated by the present improvements, is or are not suitable for
the reception of such sensitising mediums, or for the produc-
tion directly thereon of such prints, on account of the absorb-
ency thereof, and of the chemicals or ingredients used in the
manufacture thereof and contained therein, and of the liability
of such chemicals to effect a deleterious action on such mediums
if applied thereto directly, and on developing solutions and on
prints if obtained thereon directly, causing such mediums to be-
come unreliable and such prints to become discoloured and to fade
and to be quickly destroyed so far as the artistic merit or value
thereof is concerned.
To avoid all such disadvantages, and to obtain the aforesaid
object and the important advantages attendant thereon, I cause,
in accordance with the present improvements, the cards or the
like to be subjected to a process or treatment which will be
effective in rendering the same innocuous as regards any action
on, and suitable as a basis to or upon which any suitable sensi-
tising medium with which it may be desired to coat the same
may be directly applied, and innocuous as regards any action on
and impervious to the action of photographic developing solu-
tions, so as to render the same suitable for the printing directly
thereon of any desired photographic representation, either by
exposure under any suitable negative to daylight, or artificial
light, or in the camera or otherwise, in any ordinary manner of
obtaining photographic prints or representations.
I attain such objects firstly, by destroying all organic matter
at the surface of the card which would be deleterious to sensi-
tising mediums or to developing solutions, and, as it were,
parchmentising the surface of the card, and rendering it speci-
ally suitable for the subsequent operation hereinafter described,
and this is effected by dipping the card into or otherwise sub-
jecting it to the action of a mixture of about two measures of
strong sulphuric acid and about one measure of water, sub-
jecting it to such treatment for a time dependent upon the
quality of the card, after which I thoroughly wash the card to
free it from all acid, and dry it.
I then render the card or the like impervious to the action
of developing solutions and otherwise suitable as aforesaid for
photographic purposes, by brushing or otherwise coating the
card by hand or by suitable mechanical means once or more
times, according to the relative fineness of the texture of the
surface of the card, and according as to whether a dull, or
matt, or a glossy surface is required, with a mixture prepared
by gradually pouring about three parts by weight of spirits of
turpentine into about one part by weight of zinc oxide, stirring
the mixture the whole while, and by gradually adding to such
mixture about one part by weight of pale gold size, continuing
the stirring all the while, and for a sufficient time subsequently
to ensure homogenity in the product.
All such operations should be conducted in perfectly clean
containers, preferably formed of glass, and with glass stirring
rods, and they may be conducted at ordinary atmospheric
temperatures.
[Jil.Y 11, 1890.
After being thus coated the card is dried, and will be suit-
able as aforesaid as a basis to or upon which any suitable
sensitising medium may be applied directly, and it will keep
suitable for such use so long as it is kept free from the access
of dust and under appropriate conditions, and after being sensi-
tised it should also be kept until required for use under usual
appropriate conditions ; and may then be used and treated as if
it were ordinary sensitised paper, but will possess the advant-
age of dispensing with the operations of mounting and roll-
ing and of consequently effecting a material saving in the
cost, time, and labour involved in the production of the required
prints.
If the cardboard or the like is of a sufficiently good quality
as to be innocuous as regards any action on sensitising mediums
or developing solutions, then the aforesaid preliminary opera-
tion may be dispensed with, it then only being necessary to
render the same impervious to the action of the developing
chemicals and solutions as set forth.
If any particular colour of card be required, there may be
added to the zinc oxide, before the admixture therewith of the
spirits of turpentine, any suitable colouring matter innocuous
as regards any action on sensitising mediums or developing solu-
tions.
The inventor makes ten claims.
10,930. July 6th, 1889. — “Photographic Objectives.” Dr.
Rudolph Kruoener, Bockenheim, Germany.
The objectives heretofore used in photography consist almost
exclusively of two halves or parts, each of these halves or
parts being made of two lenses (crown glass and flint glass)
which are cemented together.
The progress made in the science of photography during the
last few years has considerably increased the requirements
with regard to optical apparatus, whilst by the momentous
undertaking of the Glastechnische Laboratorium at Jena, the
calculator or the designer of optical apparatus has had placed at
his disposal kinds of glass enabling conditions to be fulfilled
which were formerly altogether unknowm.
In photographic objectives the aforesaid conditions bear
more especially upon the evenness and lightness in focal
depth of the picture on the plate, as regards the arrange-
ments of the spherical surfaces.
The present invention is the result of a research which has
been carried out with much labour spent in calculations, and in
which many modifications have been taken into consideration.
In this research it has been found that the circumstances
are most favourable if the front part or system is made of a single
flint-glass lens of positive focal length, whilst the rear part of
system, which may be composed in any desired manner, annuls
the faults caused by the flint lens in front, and, together
with the former part or system produces a picture which
is planatically and chromatically correct.
As an example may serve an aplanatic device in which
the rear part or system consists of a negative flint glass
lens cemented to a positive crown glass lens.
The constants of the same for the following kinds of glass
are : —
n D = 1 -506 crown.
n 1) = 1 '583 flint.
R 1. 43*25 + | front lens, flint glass.
R 2. 78*69 — J central thickness, 6*19 millimetres.
Longest distauce between the front lens and rear lens = 8*26.
R 3. 76 ’89 4 rear lens, flint glass.
R 4. 22*56 | central thickness, 1 '34 millimetres.
R 5. 22 -56 + ) crown.
R 6. 50*74 + ) central thickness, 19*38.
n designating the index of refraction of the glass.
I) the spectroscopic line.
R R, &c., the several radii of the lenses.
The system has a free opening of 33 millimetres, and a
focal length of about 200 millimetres.
In the present case ■+■ signifies convex and — concave.
The herein described improvements in photographic double
objectives in which use is made of a simple flint-glass lens of
positive focal length, for the purpose of concentrating in the
plate picture a larger quantity of light with a considerable
focal depth.
July 11, 1890.] £' THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
< « • \ i \r ■*
©omgpontienrc.
SPHERICAL ABERRATION AND FOCUSSING.
Sir, — Your correspondent, Professor W. K. Burton, has
fallen into an error in describing the position of best visual
definition when positive spherical aberration is produced in
a lens. I have before now pointed out that the position of
best definition is not that of the least circle of aberration, but
beyond it, and not nearer to the lens, as stated by Professor
Burton. Referring to fig. 2, reproduced in your last issue, the
best definition will lie beyond and not between I and i2.
The image-forming rays are those near the axis, and are
clustered very nearly in one point for an aperture up to // 15 in
ordinary landscape lenses ; beyond this aperture the rays, as
they approach the edge of a non-aplanatic lens or system,
become rapidly refracted towards the lens without concentra-
tion on the axis, and introduce round the more or less definite
image the “halo” referred to. The greater the amount of
spherical aberration in a lens, the greater is the measurement of
the locus of partial definition ; and if the locus of longitudinal
aberration is much or little, common sense alone must show
that that partial definition is a fact within the limits of that
locus, and settle the “ much- vexed question.”
In ordinary landscape lenses it is not necessary to readjust
the focus if the aperture be opened tip and spherical aberration
introduced ; but in the portrait lens, by removing the flint
element in the back combination slightly from the converging
crown, the focus alters, and therefore it is necessary in this
case to readjust the focus. Thomas R. Dai.lmeyer.
25, Newman Street, IF., 8th July, 1890.
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES AT THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
CONVENTION.
Sir, — The last issue of your valuable paper was anxiously
looked for in order to read the news from Chester, knowing
that among other important questions submitted to the
Convention, was the report of a Committee on Weights,
Measures, and Formula1.
The able Secretary of the Committee, with his usual lucidity,
described in the preamble the superiority and convenience of
the metric system, and to increase its value by strong contrast,
explained also the negative beauty of the English system.
From this portion of the report we learn (what was not
generally known), that the apothecaries’ ounce of 480 grains,
after all, is not legal, and that the legal one of 437 -5 grains is
divided into 480 parts, which greatly increases the already
inextricable chaos.
Arrived at this point of the report we exclaimed, “Bravo
Convention ! that is a good blow at that horrible system ! ”
But alas ! our joy was of short duration. The commission,
according to the report, after informing us that “ the metric
system is exclusively used for scientific purpose,” declares that
photographers are not intelligent enough to understand it ;
they require long education before they will be able to use it.
Throwing this gratuitous insult at the heads of thousands
who, with good reason, consider themselves fully competent to
use the methods of their brothers occupied with other branches
of science, the commission then commits an error in proposing
a modification of the condemned system — and what a modifica-
tion !
Till now we had to deal with a bad system, but with one
only. The Convention imposes on us two — the metric
and a modified one — in which ounces and grains differ from
the old ones (they are divided into decimal parts), forgetting
that “photographers do not possess the knowledge of decimals
sufficient to enable a decimal system to be used easily and
accurately.”
Scarcely twelve months have elapsed since the Photographic
Club passed a resolution that the metric system, pure and
simple, should be adopted by photographers. The communi-
cation sent to other societies inviting them to co-operate in
view of the general introduction of the system was sympathetic-
ally received.
Why llut obstruction in the path of the useful progress
of our art by introducing another bad system, and thereby
increasing the chaos ? No doubt we have arrived at the con-
clusion that the existing system of weights and measures
is so bad that we cannot use it any longer. It is also
known that the metric system is good, is already intro-
duced all over the world, and even adopted by scientists in this
country. Let us adopt it too. By doing this we shall secure
uniformity in our expressions and simplicity in our calcula-
tions. Let us protest against the insinuation that we are too
ignorant to understand decimals, and less intelligent than the
mass of the population of Germany, and the inhabitants of
the Balkan Peninsula, and other countries of the world, who,
two months after the introduction of the metric system, be-
came thoroughly conversant with it. L. WaRNERKE.
Silvcrhowe, Champion Hill, London, S.E.
NEW GELATINE FILMS.
Sir, — In your article on the “ New Gelatine Films” you
speak of “ Oberuetter’s Films.” This is, so far, correct, as
the films are coated with the well-kuown Obernetter emulsion.
The support, however — that is, the films proper — are entirely
the make of Otto Perutz, of Munich, who also does the coat-
ing both of plates and films with the said emulsion.
J. R. Gotz.
19, Buelinyharn Street, Strand, London, July 9th, 1890.
^rocec&mgs of jJorictteg.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
The annual meeting was held at Masons’ Hall Tavern, Thursday,
July 3rd, Mr G. W. Atkins in the chair. The chairman called
upon the lion. sec. to present the annual report, which ran
as follows : —
“ In presenting the eighth annual report, your committee is
pleased to be able to congratulate the members on the work
done by the Association during the past year. The general
meetings have been fairly well attended, and the discussions
have been interesting and well supported. In accordance with
a suggestion made in the last report, your committee recom-
mended the giving of lecturettes and demonstrations monthly.
These have been very successtul, and the best thanks of the
committee and members are due to those gentlemen who have
given them. Among the most interesting subjects introduced
on these special evenings should be mentioned : — “ Glass Blow-
ing as Used in our Chemical and Physical Laboratories,” A.
Haddon ; “The Action of Ferricyanide of Potassium on
Developed Plates,” P. Everett ; “ Selecting Focal Distance with
Detective Cameras,” W. E. Debenham ; “ Etching on Glass,”
A. Haddon ; and “ The Ethics of Photography and Photo-
graphers,” J. Traill Taylor.” The lantern meetings have been
well supported, and the competitions in connection with slide
making, silver and platinum printing and developing have
been productive of much pleasure and beneficial discussion.
Monthly out-door meetings have been again recently intro-
duced, and bid fair to be very popular with those members
who have Saturday afternoons at liberty. There have been a
few resignations from various causes, and your committee
regrets to have to record the death of Mr. J. T. Collins, who
had been a member since 1884, and was for some time a mem-
ber of the committee. In thanking all those who have in any
way helped the success of the meetings of the Association
during the past year, your committee would specially urge the
desirability of increasing the number of members. The
amount of subscription is very small (only 5s. per annum),
and it is only by keeping up the number of members that the
Association can be made to pay expenses. Finally, the financial
condition of the Association (as will be seen on presentation of
the balance sheet) is thoroughly satisfactory. All accounts
and liabilities have been paid, and there is a balance in hand.”
The balance sheet was then re.d, and, with the report,
adopted.
The election of officers for the ensuing year was then pro-
ceeded with. The result of the ballot was as follows : —
Trustees — Messrs. J. Traill Taylor and Mr. J. B. B. Wei-
544
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [Jci.y 11, 1890.
lington ; Curator —Mr. A. Haddon ; Committer — Messrs. H. D.
Atkinson, F. A. Bridge, J. J. Briginshaw ; F. P. Cembrano,
E. Clifton, W. E. Debenham, T. E. Freshwater, F. S. Pask ;
Hon. Sec. arid Treasurer — Mr. R. P. I)rage.
Mr. P. Everett proposed, “ That a special vote of thanks
be given to the retiring hon. sec. and treasurer, Mr. F. A.
Bridge, for the efficient way in which he had carried out his
duties.” This was seconded by Mr. A. Cowan, and carried by
acclamation.
Mr. F. A. Bridge briefly responded, thanking the members
for their good feeling, and regretted that the limited time at
his disposal had necessitated his resigning the secretaryship.
A vote of thanks to the other officers was proposed by Mr.
W. H. Harrison, seconded by Mr. A. Cowan, and carried
unanimously. Mr. W. E. Debenham responded.
The Saturday outing was fixed for Wanstead Park, July 12th.
Trains from Liverpool Street to Ilford at 2'17.
Sheffield Photographic Society.
A SPECIAL meeting was held at the Masonic Hall on the
evening of July 8 th, Mr. B. J. Taylor in the chair, when Mr.
Smith, the representative of the Eastman Company, gave a
lecture and demonstration on their latest Kodak hand-camera,
and their new films, after which he developed some film nega-
tives exposed during the day at Chesterfield, which all came out
splendidly.
The Secretary announced an invitation from the Rotherham
Society to join their excursion to Haddon Hall on the 17th inst.
Amateur Photooraphic Association.
The annual meeting of the council of this society was held on
Wednesday, July 2nd, at 58, Pall Mall, the Right Hon. the
Lord De Ros in the chair. H. R. H. the Duke of Cambridge
was elected a vice-president, and Mr A. Newton Melhuish was,
on the proposition of Mr. Glaisher, appointed assistant-secretary.
Mr. Arthur James Melhuish, the hon. secretary, then
laid before the council the pictures for the current year, which
had been arranged and classified by Mr. Glaisher. After a
careful examination, they were pronounced by the council to be
far in advance of any previously received. They were arranged
in four classes. The first class comprised 128 pictures. The
following prizes were awarded : — To R. 0. Milne, the first
prize, a large silver goblet ; to F. S. Schwabe, a silver goblet ;
to W. Vanner, an oil painting in frame by McEvoy ; to R.
Murray, a handsome portrait album with silver plate ; a hand-
some portrait album to F. Griffith, W. S. Hobson, and F.
Wrigley ; to the Vicomte de Condeica, a large silver medal ;
to Dr. Drew, W. Gaddum, Miss J. Wilson, Miss Mahon, J. C.
Cohen, Rev. G. J. Perraiu, F. G. Smart, General Kaye, and
K. Leveuthorpe, a medal each ; to H. O. Hutchinson, a
picture in frame ; to M. De Deehy, a portrait album.
A vote of thanks was given to Mr. Glaisher for the time and
attention he had bestowed on the arrangement and classifica-
tion of the pictures.
The Sheffield Photographic Society.
The usual monthly meeting was held at the Masonic Hall on
Tuesday evening, July 1st, Mr. B. J. Taylor in the chair.
After the routine business of the meeting, prints were shown
by the president, secretary, and Mr. Crowder of views taken
at the recent excursion to Bolton Abbey.
Mr. E. Beck then read a humorous paper on “ Bolton,”
written by one of the members.
It was arranged that the Society should purchase three
American stereoscopes for use at the meetings, as many of the
members now take stereoscopic views ; and arrangements
were made for a half-day excursion to Ashopton and Derwent
Hall on July 19 th.
The Holborn Camera Club.
1 he usual weekly meeting was held at the headquarters of the
Club, 100, High Holborn, on J uly 4th, when a lecture
on “Developers and Development” was delivered by Mr. A.
Jones, and a discussion followed, which was joined in by Messrs.
Smith, Bayston, and Dear.
Hnstocrs to (tforresponticnts.
Alt CjmmunUntioas, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photooraphic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All quest ons requiring a reply in this column should be a Idressod to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.3., 2, 9t. Miry’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisemonts and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photooriphic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, J, Furnival Street, London.
W. H. M. (Stoke-on-Trent.) — Photo- Etching Process. The
bitumen process is more easily worked on zinc plates than
upon copper, and the etching with ferric chloride solution
does not then present so much difficulty, half-tones being
more readily obtained.
Castile. — Astronomical Photography. Eclipse phenomena,
spots on the sun, the phases of the moon, the occultation
of planets with their satellites, may be enumerated as some
of the more important applications of photography. To
these may be added the splendid results of Mr. Isaac
Roberts in mapping the starry heavens, and representation of
the nebuhe. Colour photography seems as far off as ever,
but even if realised, it remains to be seen how this will help
the main problems of astronomical science.
W. M. (Mainz). — Received, and answered by post.
E. G. S. — Selection of Lenses. The rapid leetiliuear ought
to do most of your work. Try the front lens of your por-
trait combination, reversed and suitably stopped down, be-
fore procuring another landscape lens.
In Trouble. — Ancient Lights. Vou are not the only sufferer.
This is often a very serious question for the professional
photographer, and you should at once cousult your solicitor.
If we rightly understand you, there was a chimney stack
before, but it has recently been raised in height, so as to
obscure much of your available light. Did you make a
representation whilst the work was in progress ?
J. P. — Wooden Washing Trays. Lance wood, sycamore, and
alder are said to be very close-grained woods, but this quality
is not all-important provided they be well coated with
shellac varnish, or basted with melted paraffin. For the
glass bottom, mixed red and white lead makes a better joint
than ordinary glaziers’ putty.
B. J. L. — Actinometer. We have referred to the patent of
a year ago, but fail to see any element of novelty. It is
based on the assumption that ordinary silver sensitised
papers are always of uniform rapidity, which is questionable.
Veiled. — Ferrous Oxalate Development. The whitish deposit
you complain of may be only a thin layer of oxalate of lime,
in which case a short immersion in very dilute hydrochloric
acid ought to remove it.
S. W. — Perished Rubber. We are not aware of any use to
which you can put it. The best plan would lie to offer it
cheap to some india-rubber manufacturer.
F. I. C. — Weights and Measures. The case is well put in the
Convention Report (see page 523 of last week). The nine
recommendations ought to meet with universal acceptance,
and it is immaterial whether French or English measures be
adopted, so long as the decimal system is adhered to.
M. G. (Preston). — Sulphate of Silver. Your proposal to add
free sulphuric acid to the silver sensitising bath is open to
the objection that the comparatively insoluble sulphate of
silver would be formed, and this is not affected by light.
The employment of citric or acetic acid would certainly lie
preferable.
N. Read. — Isochromatic Patents, Jr. The specifications are
numbered a.I). 1883, No. 101 ; a.D. 1886, Nos. 7,963 and
15,532. Rhodamine is procurable at the Atlas Dye Works,
Hackney Wick, N.E. Its use is not covered by patent.
J. W. (Leeds). — Wishes to know the formula for developing
Seed plates (American). Can am- of our correspondents
oblige us with the information ?
J. A. C. — Sensitomctcr. Mr. A. Watkins has recently
described a new exposure meter depending upon the use of
a bromide paper sensitised with nitrite of soda. This was
shown at the Hereford Society, and likewise at the meeting
of the Camera Club on May 22nd last.
Vol. XXXIV. No. 1663. — July 18, 1890.
CONTENTS.
not
The Metric System in Photography 645
About Weather Forecasts 54G
Ready-Sensitised Paperworks 547
The Progress of the Photo-Mechanical Printing Processes. By
Hermann £. Gunther 548
Expression. By J. Mew 549
Developers Used by German Professional Photographers. By
Julius F. Sachse 551
Home Portraiture. By H. H. Supplec 553
Illustrating Poems by Photography. By Catharine Weed
Barnes 556
FAOI
Notes .*4
The Photographic Image. By Prof. Raphael Meldola, F.R.8.,
The Photographic Convention at Chester 559
The Exhibition of the Photographic Society 560
Uniformity in Dens Mounts 561
Photographic Establishments 662
A Supplement to the “ Photographic News ” 562
Correspondence 502
Proceedings of Societies 563
Answers to Correspondents 564
THE METRIC SYSTEM IN PHOTOGRAPHY.
While two such champions as Mr. Warnerke and Mr.
Bothamley are in tournament in our correspondence
columns about the introduction of the metric system of
weights and measures among English photographers,
far be it from us to interfere while the case is sub
judice before the court of public opinion ; but some use
may be served by introducing a new element into the
case which may tend to accentuate or to calm the
strife. Washington Irving5 told a story, setting forth
how, in an early American hall of legislation, a hole
was found in the wall of the Parliament House,
admitting the winds of heaven, and making certain law-
givers more stiff-necked than they were before. Week
after week was passed in discussing the question to
what department of the executive staff of the govern-
ment fell the lot of repairing the hole in the wall,
until one fine morning a member, out of his private
purse, gave a bricklayer a dollar or other sum to block
up the hole, and when the members assembled the
following evening to resume the heated debate the
bone of contention was found to have disappeared.
By analagous line of action, we venture to offer a
possible practical explanation of a chief reason why
British photographers have been slow to adopt the
metric system, namely, that being convinced by the
utterances of the Convention and of other photographic
bodies that they ought to take the system up, they
found in looking through most photographic dealers’
catalogues, that the said weights and measures were
not on sale by the firms from which they ordered their
ordinary photographic goods, except, perhaps, in the
instance of a small minority ; moreover, upon calling upon
the said dealers, it may have been found that they had
no more of such weights and measures in their stocks
than they had in their catalogues. The idea, in short,
is, that the unfamiliar weights and measures are less
readily obtainable than might be the case, and that
many photographers do not take the trouble to get
them from special sources. This simple explanation
may reveal what has more to do with the matter than
the alleged influences mentioned in the Convention
report ; if so, dealers have much influence in the matter.
All over France, the metric weights, from a gramme
upwards, to such a height as photographers are likely
to require when making up small quantities of de-
veloper, are sold for ordinary trade purposes, sticking
something like cribbage pegs into a little bit of wood,
and are easier to handle than the flat, small weights in
ordinary use here.
The metric system, which has spread all over civi-
lized Europe, and into the scientific section of English
society, had its origin in the French Revolution, which
the recent Exhibition in Paris was established to cele-
brate. The ambitious French philosophers then dis-
carded arbitrary standards, and on first principles laid
down standards for the whole world, taking a portion
of the meridian of the earth as their unit of measure-
ment. The ten-millionth part of a quarter of the
earth’s meridian is the unit from which all the other
measurements are made, and this unit is called a
metre ; it is 39 371 inches, or a little more than
our yard ; one-hundredth of the metre is a centi-
metre. A cubic centimetre of distilled water at
its maximum density — 39 o° F. — is the unit of
weights, and called a gramme. This gramme in
English weight is about 15£ grains, and it is just as easy
to mix a developer by so many grammes of each ingre-
dient as it is to mix a developer by so many scruples of
each ingredient — an intellectual feat which, in our
humble opinion, the English photographer is capable
of achieving, especially when aided by weights which
he can handle more readily than those which he
had previously used.
Yesterday afternoon, after the preceding lines were
written, we opportunely received a new catalogue from
“ The Blackfriars Photographic and Sensitising Co.”
in which are quoted “ Decimal weights for photo-
graphic use, as proposed by the various societies,” but
in the index we can find nothing about measuring- glasses
on the same system .
546
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
ABOUT WEATHER FORECASTS.
The state of the weather is of so much importance to
those who depend upon light as the first necessary for
their daily work, that the question whether or not
our Meteorological Office is able to give us reliable
advice as to what the morrow may bring forth in the
way of sunshine or rain is to them a very serious one.
For some years past weather forecasts have formed a
notable feature of our daily newspapers, and in the Times
and some of the other papers we have placed before
us, in addition to the forecasts, a small map or chart
of the British Islands and the countries contiguous
thereto, marked with certain curved dotted lines, with
arrows pointing in different directions, and with other
hieroglyphics to which certain meanings are attached.
The curved lines are “isobars,” or lines of equal
barometrical pressure, and the figure at the termina-
tion of each gives its value. The arrows show the
direction of the wind in the particular locality where
they fly, and the number of barbs upon the messenger
denotes the strength of the breeze. In addition to this
information we are also given the temperature at
various stations all over the area covered by the chart,
and a knowledge of the state of the sea, that is,
whether it be rough, smooth, or in a state of calm.
It is from a study of this chart, coupled with a know-
ledge of the actual state of the weather at various
stations on a given day, that the Meteorological Office
is enabled to indicate the kind of weather which may be
reasonably looked for during the next twenty-four
hours.
The isobars of the chart represent the most impor-
tant feature of it so far as weather forecasting is con-
cerned, for all such predictions are founded upon
barometrical readings. This will at first seem difficult
to believe, for we have all had experience of house-
hold barometers, and know full well that often when
it points to “ set fair,” the weather outside is rainy,
and vice versa. Hope never yet told such flattering
tales as these barometers do with regard to fair weather
when all is foul. But we must not be too hasty in
blaming a valuable instrument, when we should rather
blame the maker for attaching to it words which are
altogether useless and misleading. In one sense the
barometer may be said to have come before its time,
for its value could never be fully appreciated before it
was possible, as it is now, to compare its readings at a
given moment over a large area. This is done daily
by means of the electric telegraph, and on the
faith of the messages so received by the Meteorological
Office, the charts and forecasts are prepared.
In order to give a general outline of the manner in
which this is accomplished, it will be necessary to
point out that the curved lines, or isobars, represent
parts of two great barometrical systems, and that one
is known as a “ cyclone,” and the other as an “ anti-
cyclone.” The first may be regarded as indicative of
bad weather, for it is usually accompanied by rain or
snow, according to season, and by leaden skies and
gusty wind. Its centre is marked by an area of low
pressure, and the rotatory movement of the winds
round about it are in a direction contrary to the hands
of a watch. The anti-cyclone is the reverse of all
these things. Light breezes circulate round a high
pressure centre, and we have those bright, balmy days
so valued by good people in general, and photographers
in particular. It is the relation which exists between
these two systems, which travel slowly or quickly over
the face of our part of the globe, which enables the
weather forecasts to be tabulated. It is true that they
are very often wrong, but experience shows that, in
the aggregate, they are correct to the extent of about
66 per cent. ; or, to put it in other words, two fore-
casts out of three are borne out by the weather which
afterwards comes to us. There are many difficulties in
the way of making reliable forecasts, and the chief one
is due to our insular position. Most of the cyclones
which bring us such bad weather travel across our
country from west to east, and therefore find their
origin in the Atlantic ocean. IIow they are formed no
one can say ; all we know is that they are due, like all
other atmospheric phenomena, to solar radiation. If
it were possible to dot signal stations at distances of a
few hundred miles all over the great western ocean,
and to place them all in electrical communication with
London, the forecasts would become far more reliable
than they are now, and the idea of establishing at
least one such station in mid-ocean has more than once
been ventilated. The difficulties in the way of such
an enterprise may, however, be looked upon as in-
superable.
Some months ago a correspondent of the Times wrote
a very amusing letter to that journal on the subject
before us, and while he admitted that the “clerk of
the weather” — i.e., the Meteorological Office — was
correct in his forecastings to the extent which we have
already stated, he more than hinted that it was all
guess work, and that the money which it cost could be
moic profitably applied. He based his strictures on
certain experiments which he had made, which were
certainly ingenious, but hardly scientific. In the first
case he pasted each published forecast for one summer
month on a separate piece of card, placed them all in a
bag, shook them up, and on each day of the following
month he took out a card and compared it with the
state of the weather which prevailed at the time. He
says that, so far as results went, it was a neck and neck
race with the clerk of the weather, but the latter won
by a short length. By which he meant that by this
“lucky bag” system his forecasts were correct in
almost as many instances as those published by
authority. In another case he tried the system of
forecasting for the morrow by adopting the weather
record for the previous day at sunset, and this plan he
also found to be moderately correct. Upon these data
he founds his belief that the present system of weather
prediction is as amusing as a game of pitch and toss by
reason of its uncertainty.
"We do not agree with this writer. The o.Tk._1
observations are taken with great care, and are founded
upon a scientific basis, and although it is common for
July 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
547
some persons to laugh at anything which they cannot
readily understand, particularly if its imperfections are
manifest, the thoughtful will feel glad that some steps
have been taken towards the solution of a very difficult
problem. Because the predictions are wrong once out
of three, it does not follow that they always will be so.
A child crawls with difficulty before it can walk up-
right, yet no one is so foolish as to scold it for
incapacity.
READY-SENSITISED PAPER WORKS.
A New Hygrometeu.
Mr. Otto Scholzig having kindly sent us an invitation
to inspect his works at Stockwell Green, Condon, now
established six years, and wherein he prepares ready-
sensitised papers for the market, the following par-
ticulars may be of interest. There are four sensitising
rooms on the premises, eack containing thirteen large
baths, on which girls float the sheets ; each sheet,
when taken off its bath, is put between blotting-papers,
or rather blotting-boards — for they are exceedingly
thick — then “mangled” through the wall into the
adjoining drying room ; the object of the rolling is to
remove all superfluous liquid. The blotters are used
over and over again, to the extent of thirty or forty
times ; they are then burnt, and the ashes containing
the waste silver are saved for reduction. There is a
reducing furnace on the premises, and the silver thus
recovered is sold to refiners, as it is not remunerative to
make one’s own nitrate salt of that metal. The metal
thus obtained is, on an average, 17£ dwts. per ounce
purer than standard silver, or but J dwt. per ounce less
than pure silver. The crucibles are of such capacity
as to produce a lump of about 16 lbs. weight of metal.
Mr. Scholzig says that he cannot account for it, but it
is a fact that the chloride of sodium forming most of
the soluble residue in the reducing pots is better than
ordinary table salt for precipitating the silver from old
baths ; it throws the chloride down more quickly, and
leaves the liquid in brighter condition.
The drying room is at a relative humidity of less than
55 per cent., and this is regulated by varying the
temperature and ventilation of the room. Girls hang
the sheets over wooden rods to dry ; after the drying
each sheet is brushed with a pad of green baize to
remove any fluff, and the sheets are afterwards packed
ready for sale.
As Mr. Scholzig naturally will not furnish the for-
mula of the sensitising solution he employs, we turn
to the next leading feature in the works of interest to
the public, namely, a new hygrometer.
An important point in drying ready-sensitised paper
is that it shall not be dried too much, which would
give it a horny character ; hence the warm drying
room has to be kept at a particular degree of
humidity. This end is attained by means of a new
hygrometer invented by Dr. C. Koppe, made by
Usteri-Reinacher, of Zurich, and in use by order of
the Government at certain Swiss meteorological ob-
servatories. Mr. Scholzig prefers it to the wet and
dry bulb instrument, for it indicates exactly what
percentage of aqueous vapour is present in the air.
In ceramic photography by the dusting process, a
good hygrometer is useful for the obtaining of uni-
form results, and the instrument is of value in other
departments of photography, so a description of the
new one may be of interest. It consists of a frame
to which one end of a human hair, carefully freed
from grease, is fixed ; the other end of the hair is
wound round one groove of a pulley wheel with two
grooves. Round the second groove a filament of silk
is wound in a reverse direction to that of the hair,
and at the lower end of the hanging silk filament
a little weight is attached, so that the hair is kept
constantly under tension. An index needle attached
to the wheel in front of a scale of 90°, divided into
100 parts, shows the amount of any elongation or
contraction of the hair. When the hair grows drier
the needle turns to the left, and when the hair
grows more damp the needle turns to the right.
When the surrounding air is completely saturated with
water the needle points to 100 on the scale.
To use the instrument, a little sliding frame covered
with muslin is soaked in water, then put in position at
the rear of the little case, the front of which is then
closed by a sheet of glass. In a short time the air in
the case becomes saturated with water, and the needle
travels nearly to 100 ; then by turning a key it is
regulated by being brought exactly to 100. The instru-
ment should be tapped a little every now and then
when regulating it, in order to overcome any inertia.
A metal back behind the muslin frame prevents the
escape of moisture. When the air in the case is
saturated with water, the metal back, the muslin, and
the glass are removed ; the hair then begins to dry so
far as the air in the room will permit it to do so ; the
index needle turns as the hair grows drier, and when
the needle comes to rest it indicates the relative
humidity of the apartment or locality in which the
hygrometer is placed.
If drops of water have formed at the bottom of the
hygrometer, they should be wiped off before taking
the reading. In order that the hair may sustain no
damage when subjected to transport, its tension is taken
548
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
off, the needle is guided to the left extremity of the
frame, and there fixed by means of a little hook.
The small weight is then pushed under a spring which
holds it tight against the middle of the frame.
By the aid of the diagram, fig. 2, it is easy to aseer-
Fig. 2.
tain without calculation the absolute humidity and
the condensing point of the aqueous vapour, by obser-
ving at the same time the temperature of the air. For
instance : —
Indication of the hygrometer ... ... 65 per cent.
Thermometer 10° Cent.
The observer then follows the horizontal line upon
the diagram till he reaches the point where the two lines
65 and 10 cross each other, and finds at the left side
six grammes marked ; this means that a cubic metre
of the air under observation contains six grammes
of vapour of water. Upon following the same line
to the right, the condensing point 3° is found ; that is
to say, the air may be cooled from 10° to 3°, or seven
degrees, before the moisture in it begins to condense.
For example : —
Hygrometer indication
Thermo meter
Absolute humidity ...
Condensing point
... 65 per cent.
... 25° Centigrade
... 15-3 grammes
... 18q Centigrade
Whilst in the first case the air only contained six
grammes of vapour with relatively equal humidity, in
the second case this quantity of vapour of water in-
creased to fifteen grammes, because the temperature
was higher. The higher the temperature of the air,
the greater is its power of absorbing vapour of water.
An Australian photographer has recently made up an album
containing 700 portraits of the pioneer colonists of Victoria,
reproduced from original photographs or paintings by photo-
mechanical means.
Photographic Terminology in America. — A new science
brings with it new words, and if one language is too weak to
supply them they must be taken from another language.
Photographers who use a preliminary bath before developing a
plate are adopting the word “ Vorbad,” from the German
“vor,” meaning “before,” and “bad,” meaning “bath.”
The photographic journals were all prompt in accepting
the word, never for a moment considering that a
noun like “ prelavation,” a Latin derivative, would answer
just as well or better. The word which we suggest
means a preliminary bath, being derived from the Latin prcela
rare, to wash or bathe beforehand, or rather from pr<e, before-
hand, and lavatio, a bath or washing. — Photographic Globe.
THE PROGRESS OF THE PHOTO-MECHANICAL
PRINTING PROCESSES.
BV HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
No. III.
After the asphalt powder has been gathered on the white
paper, it is moistened, and, on a glass plate, rubbed down
finely by the aid of a rubber, which manipulation is
repeated several times, the powder being dried each time.
The finely-powdered asphalt is now placed in the
dusting-box, which may be made either revolving on an
axis, or stationary, and provided with a blast arrangement,
but which, at all events, should have a sufficiently powerful
moving force, so that the particles of the dust are thrown
up to the cover of the box. R. Maschek uses a box
about seven feet high and three and a-half feet wide,
which, as he asserts, suffices for the coarse powder as well
as for the fine one, for the reason that by the time which
lapses between the whirling up of the dust and the intro-
duction of the plate into the box, the size of the falling
asphalt particles may be ascertained. Strips of sheet
rubber should be nailed round the inside of the door of the
box, so that it will shut up nearly hermetically.
After the asphalt has been placed in the box, the door
is closed tightly, and the powder shaken up violently.
After a lapse of a minute or two, if it be supposed that
those asphalt particles are falling which are intended to
be used in order to produce the required degree of
granulation, the door is opened, and the previously
thoroughly cleaned plate is placed therein, poised on the
points of a few double-pointed nails driven into the base
of the bex, all being equal in height. The plate remains
in the box until, if removed and held obliquely against
the light, it shows a velvet-like appearance. In looking
at it, only a shade, but better still, no plain copper at all,
should be observed. Until this state is attained, about
five to seven minutes will be required. The longer the
plate remains in the box, the greater will be the quantity
of powder deposited, and the finer will be the resulting
granulation. The plate should be removed very carefully
from the box to prevent any dislocation of the particles.
To melt the dusted-on asphalt powder, the plate is held
with the reverse side in contact with the flame of a spirit
lamp until the brown velvet-like tint of the asphalt has
changed to a beautiful bluish-violet tone. It is then laid
aside to cool down, and then placed for about one minute
in a bath of vinegar, common salt, and water, until it be-
comes copper-coloured. After the plate has been rinsed
in this batli it is ready for receiving the negative pigment
impression, which can at once be squeezed on and deve-
loped with warm water in the ordinary way. As I have
mentioned in the previous chapter, the etching of the
copper plate is done witli solutions of chloride of iron of
different concentration. Previously, however, the edges
and the reverse side of the plate must be coated with
asphalt varnish, to prevent their being attacked by the
etching solution.
The four dishes containing the solutions of different
consistencies are now placed in a row, and at last a fifth
one is added containing clear water. Dish No. 1 contains
the strongest ; dish No. 4 the weakest solution. Not too
large a quantity of the etching fluid should be poured into
the dishes, so that the picture is still distinctly visible
through the solution. A plate-lifter is necessary to
manipulate the copper plate easily in the solutions without
handling it with the fingers. Kiewning uses a curved
July 18, 1890.|
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NfcWS.
549
rack of copper wire, which is also coated with asphalt
varnish to render it indifferent to the etching fluid, and
which is provided with two handles. Maschek recom-
mends an arrangement consisting of six single bars, which
can be screwed separately on either side of the plate. At
the upper end of each bar there is a perforated tail, through
which tie-rods can be passed and fixed by screws. This
arrangement has the advantage that, in the case of large
plates, these can be transferred from one bath into
another one by two persons at the same time.
In the first etching bath the parts of the plate are
attacked which are covered with the weakest film of gela-
tine, representing the deepest shadows ; the second and
third bath successively produce the gradations of the
tones, while the fourth bath etches the light tones. The
plate is then transferred to the water bath, and it is im-
portant that this be done at the very moment it is observed
that the solution begins to attack the high lights. If this
moment be allowed to pass, the parts of the plate which
should be represented by plain copper, and which in print-
ing should be entirely free from colour, will be slightly
etched, consequently will retain the colour in the printing
press. It is well to transfer a small quantity of the etching
fluid from the fourth solution into the water bath together
with the plate, so that a very dilute chloride of iron solu-
tion is produced, which completes the etching process.
When thoroughly washed the plate is taken out of the
water bath ; the gelatine is removed by means of a piece of
soft linen, and the asphalt dust by aid of benzole. Also
the cuprous chloride which has been formed during the
etching process must be removed from the plate, and this
is done by means of a mixture of spirit and ammonia to
which some finely powdered chalk has been added.
Printing plates obtained by the above process will
generally require retouching, though it should be applied
only to a slight degree. It is achieved similarly to mezzo-
tint engraving, the high lights being put in with a bur-
nisher, and the shadows, if not deep enough, or if the
grain has disappeared through the prolonged action of the
etching fluid, are passed over with a “roulette,” in order
to give a bite for the printing colour.
If a large nutnber of prints is to be taken from an etched
copper plate, it is necessary to steel it previously. This
is done by attaching it to the negative pole of an iron
bath, and providing it, by the .action of the galvanic
current, with a fine coating of iron, which protects the
plate against wear and tear. After the plate has been
taken out of the galvanic bath, it is quickly washed
with water, then with a solution of soda, when it is care-
fully wiped by means of a linen cloth, and rubbed in
with some oil to prevent oxidation.
The Photographic Society of Great Britain. — Monthly
technical meeting Tuesday, July 22nd, at 5a, Pall Mall East,
at 8 p.m.
Conjugal Likeness. — It is a theory like another that by
moral pressure you can change the shape of your nose ; and a
Genevese society (photographic) has succeeded in showing that
the pressure aforesaid need be neither conscious nor direct. It
has secured the likenesses of eight-and-seventy couples old in
matrimony ; has contrasted the same with the likenesses of
eight-and-seventy pairs of brothers and sisters ; and has come
to the conclusion that the resemblance induced by the habit
of association is stronger than the resemblance which is an
effect of consanguinity. It is a pleasant result, aud the develop-
ments of which it would seem to be susceptible are pleasant in
likewise, — The Scots Observer,
EXPRESSION.
BY J. MEW.
It has been said that to write in defence of the claims of
photography to be an art, is to admit it not to be an art.
If this position were true, many writers are ill-sped, for
it is difficult to meet with a single volume of any book
dealing with photography without finding several pages
written, well or ill, with the avowed intention of affirming
and supporting this exact position. But it does not seem
to be true that to defend the claims of photography to be
an art is to to prove that it is not one. Could it, for
example, be said truly that to defend the claims of the
heliocentric system of our little world to correctness, is to
detnonstrate them to be incorrect ? or that to maintain the
sacred truths of our holy religion is to declare them to be
false? Such a notion would, indeed, sadly distort and
pervert the views hitherto held by the vulgar of such men as
Paleyand Butler, who have ever been regarded by the public
at large as amongst the most doughty defenders of Christian-
ity. These ecclesiastical champions, these Amadises of
orthodoxy, would, by a parity of reasoning to that adduced
to show photography to be not an art, be changed into
fellow-labourers with Tom Paine and Denis Diderot, with
Ingersoll and Voltaire.
Because the claim of photography to be an art has been
disputed, does it follow that it must, of necessity, be
disallowed? It is said that painting is an art because
it has never laid claim to be one. But in the kind of
painting known as pre-Raphaelite, which is, perhaps
the nearest approach to photography, there seems to be
about as much reason to question the existence of art as
in the ordinary photograph. The painter may place his
art in the region of imagination, a region to which the
photographer has, as a photographer, but a straight aud
narrow path of access. The broad and wide field of truth
in which the latter chiefly labours admits, on the contrary,
somewhat unwillingly any approach to art or artifice.
But painter and photographer may both be artists in the
matter of expression.
From the first meaning of expression— squeezing out
by pressure, as, for instance, the juice of a fruit — are
derived the other two meanings, one of the utterance by
the tongue, or the representation by words of mental
emotion ; the other, of the change which takes place in the
face under the influence of feeling. The term expression
has been also analogically applied to the grouping of
figures and the character of a landscape, but with these
the present article has nothing to do.
Expression, as used in the present paper, regards only
the specific conformation of the human features. To take
a homely and well-worn instance of photographic expres-
sion, it is only necessary to open an old photograph album.
There confronting you, in the great majority of pictures,
is the semblance of weary resignation and enforced repose
commonly attributed to the use of that modern instrument
of torture called the head-rest. This sad expression
seems to be squeezed out of the head as the juice out of an
orange, but it is not nearly so nice. It is the outcome of
an agony, a mental and capital distress perhaps too great
for words. It is not iuto this expression that art enters.
Nor does it enter into what is known as physiognomy.
Expression and physiognomy are, moreover, distinct ; the
latter is permanent, the former transient. Expression
varies in the same person according to circumstances in
different times. Physiognomy in the same person is always
550
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
the same. They probably are, in their origin, identical,
expressing the physiological relations between the hidden
movements of the brain and the many manifestations of
the muscles of the face ; but in physiognomy this relation
is frozen and stereotyped, while it is momentary and fugi-
tive in expression. Perhaps the nearest approach to art
in photography is the transference to the paper of such of
the fleeting expressions as are most characteristic of the
person whose portrait is to be taken. It is not infre-
quently the case — a case partaking of the nature of a
riddle — that in a picture otherwise good, well worked, and
exact in most technical particulars, a something is, by the
spectator, discovered to be absent which may be found in
another portrait upon which not nearly so much labour
has been expended — a portrait, too, which is decidedly
inferior in general accuracy and scientific detail.
The key to this riddle consists in the fact that, in the
latter picture, the operator has managed to seize a charac-
teristic exp"ession which, in the former, has been absent
or unnoticed. It is this peculiar expression which really
constitutes the likeness ; it is the representation of truth ;
it does not depend on the camera, like the annihilation of
freckles, or on position, like the shortening of a nose ; it
requires little aid from the retoucher, and it can scarcely
be comprised in the vast catalogue of “dodges.” The
photographic portrait, possessing this beauty of truth, is a
joy for ever.
Some famous painter — perhaps Stodhart — said that there
was nothing so difficult as to paint people doing nothing.
By this sentence he did not perhaps mean to imply that
those who sit for their portraits should be employed in
some manual exercise, but rather that their faces should
not be idle. In other words, he found it not easy to
obtain a good portrait without expression. If the ladies
who come to our photographers expended less artistic pains
on their furbelows, and allowed nature more room in their
faces, disappointments and heart-rendings in the matter
of their portraits would be less frequently the result.
It is, however, perhaps as idle to hope for the
extinction of what has been not inaptly designated
the mongrel smile as of the many coloured clothing.
The smile will probably always be with us, unless, indeed,
it be banished by the application of the head-rest, when
it commonly leaves in its place something worse, that
expression of resigned agony mentioned above, and com-
monly known as the “ photographic look ; ” and for the
many coloured clothing, the prolonged discussion about
the power of photography to represent colour interests not
the majority of ladies in the least, and that majority would
probably say that if the camera could not reproduce colour,
why — it ought to.
Let nature work unrepressed, uncribbed, uncabiued,
unconfined. Get rid of the “smile,” the “look,” and
their many unnatural congeners. Seize upon the expres-
sion which gives the hall-mark of individuality, and you
gain that which is of more importance than much sharp-
ness of finish, or softness of lighting, or dexterity of mani-
pulation, or beauty of pose, the supreme photographic
excellence, which gives the operator the title of artist, the
virtue of expression, without which all the other technical
virtues are as sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal.
The mouth is probably the most expressive of all the
features. It is well-known that much of the expression
which is attributed to the eyes is really due to this organ
only. For sad eyes, for instance, we should read sad
mouth. It is a fatal mistake for au artist in photography
to attempt to control this feature. It is, we
repeat, the chief scat of expression, which, again, is the
index of the soul. Suppose a sitter comes to be photo-
graphed, to take an extreme case, with his mouth open ;
not, by any means, merely with parted lips, but a man of
whom an open mouth is the normal facial condition ; the
photographer by telling him to shut it, will lose his likeness.
His resultant picture may be more decent, but it will be
nothing worth as a presentment of the original. Nor are the
muscles of the eyebrow less worthy of attention than those
of the lips. Four distinct muscles, as readers of anatomy
are well aware, govern the motions of the brow. The
varied expressions of sadness, surprise, fear, admiration,
disdain, and other emotions produced by these, have been
ably treated of by Duchenne in his “Mecanisme de la
Fhysionomie Ilumaine,” a kind of electro-physiologic
analysis of the expression of the passions, illustrated
with numerous photographs of interest, if not of profit, to
every photographer. .
Duchenne studied photography for the sole purpose of
executing these pictures himself. “ Photography, which,”
he says, “faithful as a mirror, will allow the reader to
assist at my experiments, and to form a judgment of their
value.” The photographs are none of them retouched.
Some taken in full sunlight recall the manner of Ribera ;
others, of the darker passions, such as fear and hatred,
remind the spectator of the chiaroscuros of Rembrandt.
The whole volume impresses upon the student the power
of the subject of our article, so that we may, with a well-
known artist in his profession, apply to expression and
individuality what the author of the Book of Proverbs said
of understanding and wisdom. Individuality is the princi-
pal thing ; therefore get individuality, and with all thy
getting, get Expression.
Aluminium. — There is no other metal on the earth so widely
scattered and occurring in such abundance as aluminium, yet
it is never found metallic, says an American contemporary.
But the combinations of aluminium with oxygen, the alkalies,
fluorine, silicon and the acids, are 30 numerous, and occur
so abundantly, as not only to form mountain masses, but to be
also the bases of soils and clays. Especially numerous are the
combinations with silicon and the other bases, which, in the
form of felspar and mica mixed with quartz, form granite.
These combinations, by the influence of the atmosphere, air,
and water, are decomposed ; the alkali is replaced or carried
away, and the residues form clays, the clays form soils, and
thus the surface of the earth becomes porous to water and
fruitful. It is a curious fact that aluminium has never been
found in animals or plants, which would seem to show that
it is not necessary to their growth, and jierhaps l>e injurious.
Most of the aluminium compounds appear dull and disagreeable,
such as felspar, mica, pigments, gneiss, porphyry, and trachyte ;
yet there are others possessing extraordinary lustre, and so
beautiful as to be classed as precious stones. Among these arc
the ruby, sapphire, garnet, turquoise, and topaz. One would
suppose that since aluminium occurs in such abundance over
the whole earth that we literally tread it under foot, it would
be extracted and applied to numberless uses, being made as
abundant and useful as iron. But such is not the case.
Beauxitc and cryolite are the minerals most used for producing
aluminium, and their preference lies mainly in their purity.
Native alums generally contain iron, which must be removed
by expensive processes. Beauxite comes from Austria and
France, and has only' been found in this country’ in Floy'd
county, Georgia. Cryolite comes from Greenland. It has
been found in Colorado in very small quantity. Native sulphate
of aluminia has been found on the Gila river, Socorro county,
N.M. — Invention.
July 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
551
DEVELOPERS USED BY GERMAN PROFESSIONAL
PHOTOGRAPHERS.*
BY JULIUS F. SACHSE.
Theodore Schafgans, junr., Bonn. — Developer — Until a
few months ago, oxalate ; now I have adopted cikonogen,
and use it exclusively. Advantages — With eikonogen the
film remains wonderfully clean and clear, the plate shows
greater plastique, and beautiful high lights. With the
dexterous use of old developer over-exposed plates may
be brought to the proper density, and per contra, greatly
under-exposed plates may be saved by use of the strong
developer. Composition — With normal and properly
exposed plates I use the developer exactly according to
the formulae of Dr. Krugener. With doubtful exposures
I commence with old developer, and, according to circum-
stances, finish with fresh developer. The development
must only be done by a weak red light, or the plates are
apt to fog and the fine lights disappear. I have also found
that the two solutions must be kept separate until just
before use ; also that if two solutions are mixed in large
quantities, the developer loses its power after two days.
Accelerators — My experiments prove that they do not
hasten development.
E. Lassen, Ratzeburg. — Developer — Eikonogen.
Advantages — Since six months ago l have worked with
eikonogen, and am well satisfied. We obtain brilliant
negatives, high lights, middle tones, and clearness of
shadows, with rich detail. Time of exposure is shortened
one-third in relation to oxalate, and it is cheaper. Com-
position— (A) Distilled water, boiled, 600 g. ; sulphite of
soda, 100 g. ; potash, 40 g. ; eikonogen, 20 g. AVhen the
water boils, dissolve first sulphite, then potash, and lastly
eikonogen. Accelerator — None.
C. Westendarp, Coin. — Developer — Eikonogen. Ad-
vantages— Surety, simplicity, cheapness. Composition —
I use the formula of the manufacturer. When developing,
however, I take half old developer; the plates remain
clearer, and any desired grade of strength can be obtained
thereby. Accelerator— None.
Wm. Bergmann, Moers.— Developer— Ferrous oxalate.
Advantages — Surety, simplicity, cheapness. Composition
— (A) Iron, 1 : 3. (B) Oxalate potash, 1 : 3. One part
A, three parts B. Accelerator — With extremely short
exposures, hyposulphite of soda 1 : 2,000.
Aug. Classens, Aachen. Developer — Oxalate. Advan-
tages— The constancy. Composition — In summer, 1:5;
exposure 1 : 14 seconds. Winter, 1:5; exposure 2 : 3
seconds. Accelerator — With drop shutter exposures of
£ to ^ seconds, a few drops of dilute hypo in developer.
F. Courte, Puttlingen. — Developer — Iron oxalate.
Advantages — Simplicity and constant properties of deve-
lopment. Adaptable to all kinds of exposure. Cheapness.
Composition — Saturated solution of oxalate of potash.
(A) Iron, 30 g. ; water, 100 c.cm. A few drops of 2 per
cent, solution of tartaric acid. (B) Old developer with a
few drops of above tartaric acid solution added. For use
in normal exposures : Iron (A), 1 part ; old developer (B),
1 part ; saturated solution of oxalate, 2 parts. F or over-
exposed plates: Iron (A), 1 part; old developer (B),
2 parts. For very short exposures: Iron, 1 part;
oxalate, 3 parts. Accelerator — None.
Job. Freund, Schliichtrou. — Developer — Oxalate of
potash and iron. Advantages — Simple manipulation and
sure results. Composition — (A) Oxalate of potash,
30 parts; distilled water, 100 parts. (B) Iron vitriol,
30 parts ; distilled water, 90 parts. Just before use :
3 parts A and 1 part B, with a few drops of bromide of
potassium, 1 : 10. Accelerator — None.
II. Ilaberiandt, Berlin. — Developer— After all deve-
lopers have been tried, I have left all, even eikonogen,
and return to the iron developer. Advantages — Iron acts
quicker than eikonogen. I would prefer pyro on account
of its finer detail if I only had portrait plates to develop ;
further, iron and pyro — unless through carelessness — never
fog, while eikonogen easily does. This, however, may be
the fault of the unequal quality of even the best sulphite.
Composition — (1) Oxalate of potash, 300 ; water, 1,000.
(2) Iron, 300 ; water, 1,000. One part iron to three
parts oxalate. I make both solutions with hot water, and
filter. In No. 2, 1 pour two drops concentrated sulphuric
acid to every 100 g. of hot water, then dissolve the iron,
and filter. Accelerator — One part hypo to 8,000 to
10,000 parts of water, only with drop-shutter exposures.
Louis Hermestroff, Metz. — Developer — Iron oxalate.
Composition — Potash, 1 to 3£ ; iron, 1 to 3. Three parts
of potash and one part of iron, both dissolved in hot
water. Accelerator — With drop-shutter exposures, hypo
1 : 1,000.
J. F. Klinger, Braunau ob. Oesterreich. — Developer —
Iron oxalate. Advantages — The always even results with
Monckhoven dry plates, with fine modulation, close grain,
and high-lights. Composition — (A) Neutral oxalate of
potash, 300 g. ; distilled water, 1,000 g. (B) Iron vitriol,
300 g. ; distilled water, 1,000 g. Three to four drops of
sulphuric acid. For use, 4 parts potash, 1 part iron.
Reduction if necessary. Hypo, 200 g. ; water, 1,000 g. ;
red pruss., 1-5. Accelerator — Children with advantage :
Water, 3,000 g. ; hypo, 1 g. ; citric acid, 3 g.
A. zur Muhlen, Magdeburg. — Developer — Oxalate.
Advantages — With accelerator, soft and clear shadows.
Composition — Oxalate 1-4, iron 1-3. For use, 1 part
iron, 3 parts oxalate. Accelerator — Hypo.
Alfred Person, Lahr. — Developer — Oxalate. Advan-
tages— Clear plates. Grey colour and rapid printers.
Composition — (1) Oxalate, 300 g. ; water, 1,000 g. (2)
Iron, 100 g. ; water, 3,000 g. For use, 1 three parts, 2
one part. Consider the developer the best. Have
developed shortest drop-shutter exposures with success.
Accelerator — None.
Prof. C. C. Schirm, Berlin. — Developer — Ferrous
oxalate, with accelerator (250 water, 1 part hypo), and an
addition of weak solution of hypo and bromide to deve-
loper. Advantages — Evenness in appearance of lights
and shadows, and the correct relation to each other,
gradation and beauty in detail. Composition — (A) Oxalate
of potash, 1 ; water, 3. (B) Iron vitriol, 1 ; water, 4.
One part of B to three parts of A with the addition of one
drop of solution. Hypo, 0'5 ; bromide, 3 g. ; water,
100 g. to every 10 c.cm. of developer. Also two-thirds
of old developer to one-third fresh. Accelerator — One
of hypo to 2,500 of water.
L. Schmidt, Frieberg. — Developer — Iron oxalate.
Advantages — Works not too slow, gives clear shadows
with all detail and high-lights, when suitable dry plates
are used. Composition — (A) Oxalate of potash, neutral,
300 g. ; distilled water, 1,000 g. (B) Sulph. iron, 100 g. ;
distilled water, 300 g. Sulph. acid, c.p., two to three
drops immediately before use, three parts of A to one of
B, with under-exposed plates, to every 100 g. of developer
one or two drops of hypo 1 : 100. Over-exposure, I
Continued lrom p. M0.
552
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
regulate the development with the addition of bromide
1 : 10, drop by drop. Accelerator — None. [Note. —
Have tried eikonogen in various ways, but prefer iron
oxalate to all others. I, however, think the time will
come before long when, with different combinations, the
eikonogen developer will be deemed the best.]
L. Stuting, Hofphotograph, Barmen. — Developer —
Oxalate of potash with iron. Advantages — I have found
that it works clearer and stronger than all others. Com-
position— Saturated solutions of oxalate and iron, 3 parts
of ammonia to 1 part of iron. Accelerator — With drop-
shutter and interiors 1 part of hypo, 2,000 of water, to
which add a few drops of 10 per cent, bichloride of
mercury.
George Muller, Eltville. — Developer — During the last
six months a prepared hydrochinone developer, which has
kept well and remains clear. I use it fresh for instantan-
eous, and old for time exposures. Advantages — Softness
combined with fine lights, and especially fine detail in the
shadows — good colour of the negatives. Composition —
(A) Water, 400 g. ; sulphite of soda, 45 g. (B) Water,
450 g. ; soda, 45 g. ; potash, 45 g. ; sulphite of soda, 45 g.
For a plate 13 by 18 cm. take A, 40 ; B, 5 ; 10 drops of
bromide. After these are in the developing glass, add
just before use a small thimble-full of dry pyro. Accelera-
tor— None.
Hubert Koch, lvevelaer. — Developer — Pyrogallic acid.
Advantages — It gives strong negatives with soft modula-
tion, develops strongly and quickly. Negatives are easy
printers on account of the bluish colour of the plates;
extreme cleanliness. Excellent results can be obtained.
Composition — (X) Water, 500 g. ; sulphite soda, 100 g. ;
10 drops sulphuric acid. (B) Soda, 50 g. ; Water, 500 g.
Before use — 4 parts water, 3 parts A to 3 parts B. (Note
— pyro not given.) Sulphite of soda added to fixing
bath. Accelerator — None.
These replies will suffice to show the general trend of
the German portrait artists. We find that the publishers
of the Photograph isli ch es Archiv sent out a total of one
hundred and forty-five queries throughout Germauy and
Austria-Hungary. Eighty replies were received, forty-
eight of which have been reproduced in these columns for
the benefit of our readers, both professional and amateur.
From the great stretch of territory covered by these
responses, they may be accepted as fair representatives of
the whole body of photographers who are scattered
throughout the Fatherland. The result arrived at shows
that ferrous oxalate is still the most generally used agent
in the development — more than one-half (44-80ths) still
adhere to the old stand-by; twenty-five per cent. (20-80ths)
have become converts to the latest candidate for photo-
graphic favour, viz., eikonogen. Next comes hydro-
chinon or fifteen per cent. (12-80th), and finally pyro
(8-80th), or 10 per cent, of the whole number of replies
received.
In analyzing the total replies, we find that in the advan-
tages claimed for the ferrous oxalate, seventeen claim
simplicity and surety, nine claim equality of work, nine
claim capabilites of modulation, seven claim clearness of
negatives, seven claim rapidity of development, seven
claim cheapness of price, three claim cleanliness, two
claim greater latitude of exposure, two claim value of
copying properties.
Of those in favour of eikonogen, thirteen claim that
the new developer is superior to all others in producing
soft and clear, yet at the same time strong negatives, ten
claim that the time of exposure is much shortened, eight
claim greater detail in the shadows, seven claim rapidity
of work, seven claim brilliant middle tones and high lights,
four claim advantages of repeated use, two claim negatives
that are easy printers and cleanliness in development.
Ilydrochinon : five claim keeping qualities of developer,
three claim soft and strong negatives, and convenient for
application, three claim surety of work, two claim flue
modulations.
Pyrogallic acid : four claim superior brilliancy and
detail in negative, with good colour for printing ; further,
great latitude of exposure, that it keeps well in separate
solutions, and acts quickly. The developer, however,
requires great cleanliness in all manipulations.
As to the accelerator, it is apparent that with the use of
eikonogen and pyro it is unnecessary, with hydrochinon
only occasionally, while with ferrous oxalate it is requisite
in half the normal cases, while it is always required with
drop shutter exposures or in cloudy weather ; the usual
formula is hypo in a very dilute solution 1 to 1,000 to
10,000, and occasionally with the addition of a few drops
of solution bichloride mercury.
The editor of the Archiv closes the subject with the
statement that although the returns make no pretension to
completeness, he is yet convinced that the imparted
information from practical experience will prove of great
service to the craft in general, giving many valuable hints
and points to the professional as well as the intelligent
amateur.
A Misconception, — Clara: “Well, Aunt, have your photo-
graphs come from Mr. Snappeschotte’s ?” Miss Maydeval
(angrily): “Yes, and they went back, too, with a note
expressing my opinion of his impudence.” Clara : “ Gracious !
What was it?” MissM. : “Why, on the back of every picture
were these words : * The original of this is carefully preserved.’ "
— Pittsburg Bulletin.
Messrs. Eglington and Co. announce that the August
number of Men and Women of the Day will contain three
panel photographs (10 by 7| inches) of Mr. and Mrs. Stanley (Mbs
Dorothy Tennant), and Lieut. Stairs, together with authentic
biographies. The publishers state that the photographs have
been specially taken for this publication, which is a national
photo-biographic journal, and that the portrait of Mrs. Stanley
is one of the few authorised photographs published.
An International Exhibition. — An Exhibition, promoted by
the Edinburgh Photographic Society, is to be held in the
Galleries of the Royal Scottish Academy, Edinburgh, November,
1890, to January, 1891. The object of the Exhibition is
stated to be to direct attention to the development in recent
years of photography, and to stimulate further advances by
encouraging artistic skill and invention. In addition to the
ordinary character of photographic exhibits, it is intended to
illustrate historically and technically the processes connected
with the art in their various stages, and the council will regard
it as a special favour if those having unique specimens, espe-
cially of the earlier processes and apparatus, will kindly lend
them for exhibition. Resides the above-mentioned exhibits,
the council have thought it desirable to embrace in their
operations a scheme of lectures, in which the different pro-
cesses in connection with photography will be practically
explained and illustrated. These lectures will lie given by
speakers thoroughly qualified in the treatment of their sub-
jects, and it is contemplated to have one in each week during
the continuance of the Exhibition. A series of awards will be
granted, and the council will appoint, to act as judges, five
qualified persons, whose names will be announced at an
early date. A gold medal ami silver and bronze medals will be
awarded for pictures according to merit. The secretary is Mr.
Thomas Barclay, 180, Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh,
July 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
HOME PORTRAITURE.
BY H. H. SUPPLEE.
It seems to be generally admitted that the amateur begins
by undertaking the most difficult branches of work first,
and after meeting with divers discouragements, either
abandons the whole affair or else gradually discovers the
error of his ways and gets hold of the right end and moves
on to success and satisfaction. The beginner’s idea of a
photograph is a picture of somebody, aud of a camera as
an apparatus for taking people’s pictures with, and in
many cases that is all he wants it for ; and when lie is
carefully advised to start with slow plates, aud essay only
well-lighted views, he naturally resents such ill-timed
suggestions, and generally goes home immediately and
proceeds to “take the baby.’’
This proceeding, however, is rarely a success, and
usually it is only after many tribulations that really satis-
factory home portraits are produced ; but there really
seems to be no good reason why some of the trials and
failures might not be avoided, or why one may not profit
by the hard-bought experience of others in this most
desirable and pleasant branch of amateur work.
To make fairly good portrait work, however, requires
suitable tools ; but these need not necessarily be the most
expensive. The lens should be of fairly long focus — about
twelve inches — and the rapid rectilinear type will generally
be found most available. If the cost of this be found too
high, good work may be done with a single achromatic
landscape lens of about fifteen inches focal length, in
which the fixed stop has been reamed out to a size of not
less than one inch to one and a-quarter inches. This
enlargement of aperture will of course materially reduce
the marginal definition of the field ; but when that is
wanted smaller diaphragms may be inserted, and for por-
traits, where only the very ceutro of the field is to be
employed, the increased opening will give the desired
speed, while with this length of focus and limited field the
spherical distortion is so small that it may be neglected.
For portraits great depth of focus is not needed, and.
indeed, in many cases is undesirable, and if good definition
is obtained upon the features, so that the true expression
is secured, the sharpness may well be permitted to diminish
for the remainder. Of course the possession of a fine
portrait combination is much to be desired, and where the
expense of this is prohibitory the intermediate types, such
as the Steinheil anti-planet or the new Voigtlander eury-
scope, are nearly as good.
As far as the camera goes, anything which is steady and
light-tight will auswcr, and it is unnecessary to spend
money in that direction. For cabinet portraits, 5 by 7
holders are about right, giving a moderate margin for
centreing aud trimming.
The amateur is generally limited in his supply of screen.-
and backgrounds, but sometimes the extemporised affairs
are more pleasing than the orthodox professional pilasters,
balustrades, or gates, and if care and taste are displayed
in handling the subject, the less conspicuous the background
the more satisfactory the result is likely to be.
A framework somewhat resembling a large clothes-
horse can readily and cheaply be made at a neighbouring
carpenter’s shop, and should be about eight feet high by
ten feet wide, aud, for convenience of storage, it may be
pinned together so as to be readily knocked down, and
stood away when not in use. Upon this frame various
things may be draped, aud often very effective results
o') 3
obtained. There should be one curtain of grey flannel,
giving, when photographed, a neutral tint just right for
vignetting, and soft enough to hang in easy folds without
looking harsh or stiff. This may be hung from the top by
hooks and rings, or may be smoothly drawn when the
picture is to be vignetted and the folds are not desired.
Many styles of shawls produce effective backgrounds,
especially when far enough back from the sitter to be some-
what out of focus; while, in most cases, the easy chair
which does duty for a posing chair is less obtrusive and
more effective if entirely concealed under drapery whoso
apparently careless folds are not altogether accidental.
When the floor at the feet of the sitter is to appear in
the photograph, it should be kept subordinate to the
other details, and a brilliant carpet pattern is best covered
by some quieter rug or mat. Skin robes or mats are often
quietly effective, and seem to hold the light they receive
in a way which has shown itself serviceable.
The great point, however, in amateur portraiture is the
illumination. The absence of a skylight, and the difficul-
ties in the way of controlling the light which is to be had
— these are the common causes of the defects to be seen
in most home portraits. A room should be chosen with
as high a ceiling as possible, and with a projecting bay
window whose openings extend as high as can be secured.
If there are other windows, let them be closed, so that the
light shall come approximately from one direction. Never
mind the exposure ; west or south will do, if only the
quantity and direction of the light can be controlled.
Place the camera close to the middle window, leaving
only room enough to get behind it, and close the lower
shutters behind the camera, leaving the upper ones above
it partly open to secure a slight front illumination. 1 rpon
one side the shutters of the bay window should be opened
entirely, so that the most brilliant light falls upon the
sitter from that direction, and then by regulating the
amount of opening upon the other side the shadows may
be softened to any desired extent. At first the effect
should be examined upon the focussing screen of the
camera, which should be of the finest ground glass obtain-
able. Use the full opening of the lens, and focus upon
the eyes of the model, and the definition of the rest will
take care of itself. A microscopic sharpness, by which
every thread in the garment may be counted, is readily
obtained by using a smaller aperture ; but such precision
is not wanted.
Never mind about head-rests or their substitutes, but
try to place the sitter in such an easy and comfortable
position that such supports will not be needed. Avoid
straight lines in the composition, and if the lens is of suffi-
cient focal length there need be no fear of undue distor-
tion of points nearest the camera. Standing just behind
the camera, direct your sitter to glance in the direction
which, in your judgment, gives the best effect, and then
selecting some object upon which the eyes may rest, the
exposure may be made. With rapid plates, such as Seed
26, or Cramer 85-40, two or three seconds with bright
daylight will be sufficient, using an aperture of F8 ; but
the beginner must expect to waste a few plates in gauging
the light of his extemporised gallery. After having
arranged the details of this part of the work, however, the
amateur will soon find the photographic side of the work
a matter of routine, and be able to devote his thought and
attention to the higher and more artistic matters of posing,
draping, and composition, in which, if he will, he may find
a source of endless delight. — .Inter. Journ. of Photography.
554
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jdly 18, 1890.
i^otcs.
Mr. J. R. Gotz has sent us some half-plate specimens
of flexible films of gelatine rendered insoluble and
coated with the Obernetter emulsion. They are
thinner and more flexible than those of celluloid, but
in the developing solutions absorb water and increase
considerably in thickness, acquiring at the same time a
leathery, slippery feel, and increasing much in weight.
They are not so “horny” when handled as celluloid
films. Despite their thickness, we found no difficulty
in using them in an ordinary dark slide, simply by
placing them therein with a piece of black cardboard
behind. They are coated with the Obernetter emulsion,
and the latter works well. The negatives require
aluming. Full instructions for use accompany each
packet.
The statue to Daguerre about to be erected in front
of the Smithsonian Institute at Washington is nearly
completed in the artist’s studio, and will be erected on
the 12th August next. The bronze portion is sixteen
feet high, and upon the granite beneath is the following
inscription : — “ To commemorate the first half-century
in photography, 1839-1889. Photography, the electric
telegraph, and the steam engine, are the three great
discoveries of the age. No five centuries in human
progress can show such strides as these. Erected by
The Photographers’ Association of America. August,
1890.” All photographers must be pleased at the
erection of this monument, and the only criticism we
have to make is, that it would have been well if, before
selecting the subject, its promoters had instituted some
real, sound, historical research as to the rival merits of
Niepce de Chalons and Daguerre. The general ten-
dency of comparatively recent research has been to
show that (he merits of Nicephore Niepce exceed those
of Daguerre in relation to the founding of photography.
A chief point in Daguerre’s favour is the discovery of
mercurial development. A school of historical criticism
in photography is desirable at the present time, for the
few who consult original documents are aware how
numerous are the historical errors which rapidly
become popular, and which can afterwards be eradi-
cated from the public mind only with difficulty.
There is little of a photographic nature at the French
Exhibition in London. Messrs. Haret Freres, of Paris,
have erected an oak stand for exhibiting a considerable
number of large photographs in wooden frames, which
frames are hinged to a central pillar. The principle
is not new, but the design is of interest, because it
is the one selected by the authorities of the Musee
du Louvre as the best brought before them for dis-
playing large pictures in a limited amount of space.
The pictures in the frames consist of some subjects in
the national art galleries of Europe, photographed by
Braun and Co., of Dornach. Messrs. A. C. Yasscur and
Co., of Paris, exhibit a considerable number of
French photo- mechanical prints, some of them in
colours. Mr. Reitlinger, a Hungarian, with a
manufactory in France, exhibits some artistic
frames of white metal, to hold photographs ; and Mr.
Rosenmann some remarkable metallic pens for writing,
sketching, or other purposes, the nibs of which can be
bent in any direction without breaking, and the pen
then restored to its original form. Among the amuse-
ments at the Exhibition, the driving of the lions is a
great attraction; a “Japanese” conjuring entertain-
ment is of an elegant and refined character, and a
burlesque of Robinson Crusoe contains poetry of the
following type : —
Crusoe : — “ Friday ! There’s cannibals on this isle ;
They’ve just put a black man on to bile.”
In the grounds is a cosmorama, containing photographs
of scenes in France.
The English amateur photographers who make a
speciality of instantaneous work missed a chance on
Sunday morning, when the Sans Peur Bird Society, of
Brussels, contested its annual race from London. The
members of the Sans Peur Society arc pigeon -fanciers,
and on this occasion an enormous number of birds
were liberated from the Thames Embankment adjoin-
ing Millbank Prison. When a similar contest took
place in Paris, a few months ago, the President of the
French Photographic Society invited amateur photo-
graphers to attend, as this monster flight of pigeons
offered a good opportunity of showing of what instan-
taneous photography was capable. The English socie-
ties apparently are not alive to this, for, so far as we
know, no representative was present on the occasion
mentioned above.
The ingenious photographer who keeps a sharp eye
upon the “hatched, matched, and dispatched” column
of the Times has been distanced by a still more in-
genious rival. The method of the first-named is to
photograph every morning the column in question,
divided into three sections, and send a copy to the per-
sons concerned, with the request for sixpence for his
trouble. The new man haunts cemeteries, and with
his camera photographs all the new grave-stones that
are erected. Then, having obtained the address of the
relatives of the deceased person, he posts a copy of
the photograph with the intimation that he is willing
to supply “a dozen souvenirs of the departed kfor
os. 6d.” The number of orders the photographer
receives is stated to be surprising.
Of a kindred nature is the crematory urn just patented
in America. This is an arrangement by which
the ashes of the defunct person arc always on view.
The bowl is made of the finest crystal glass, mounted
in elaborately decorated silver. A crest surmounts the
urn, which shows, in addition, masonic emblems and
two shields for inscription. Above all is a space for a
photograph, which, of course, gives a very realistic
July 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
555
touch to the whole affair. Despite its completeness,
we doubt whether this transparent urn will be agree-
able to English taste.
It is sad to read of the death of Mr. Payne, head-
master of Harrington School, near Preston. He was
an enthusiastic amateur photographer, and was spend-
ing his holidays at Ingleton, and in endeavouring to
get a good photograph of a rustic bridge, he fell from
a considerable height to the rocks below and was
killed on the spot. We are inclined to think that
amateurs frequently incur a risk of accidents in
similar fashion. They allow their enthusiasm to run
away with them for the moment, and in their anxiety
to get some view they fancy, are perfectly heedless of
danger. In some respects the amateur photographer,
especially if he be a beginner, is like the youthful
angler, who is apt to think that the more inaccessible
the spot, the more likelihood of sport, and he strains
every nerve to get to some particular point which
older men with cooler heads would have the philosophy
to leave alone.
Mr. Samuel Plimsoll is quite alive to the advan-
tages of photography. In the most recent of his
pamphlets, which have done so much to raise the
condition of the sailor, he deals with the question of
cattle ships, and what may be rightly termed their
“horrors.’’ It would be out of place to enter into
any discussion of the revelations which Mr. Plimsoll
details so graphically; all we need draw attention to
is, the assistance which he has derived from photo-
graphy. Dealing with the meat supply question, as
regards London, he gives the consumer a mass of
valuable information, by means of reproductions from
photographs, of all the market operations of Smith-
held, and one can only regret that he overlooked
photographing what would convey most important
hints to materfamilias when she buys the Sunday
joint. He gives representations of the hind quarters
of cattle dressed in the American and English fashion,
and these are all very well as far as they go, but,
unfortunately, they are drawn, and not photographed.
This seems an unaccountable omission, as photographs
could have been easily obtained, and would have
shown the difference between the two in a forcible
manner.
Still, we are grateful to Mr. Plimsoll for what he has
done, and especially in regard to the photographic
operations carried on in America, in regard to the
cattle ships. He says that, in the outset of the inves-
tigations, he sought the aid of his brother in New
York, aud requested him to employ a photographer iu
that city to obtain photographs of vessels loading and
loaded with live cattle. This was done by a professional
photographer, Mr. Barrett, an amateur assisting him.
The photographs, reproductions of which are given in
the volume, are twelve in number, and depict most
graphically the conditions under which the sailors have
to work. It seems that the decks are formed simply
by the roofs of the cattle-sheds, are full of openings,
and have not the least vestige of a bulwark. As for
the way in which the cattle are stowed, the less said
about it the better. It is significant that, in some
cases, permission to photograph was refused, aud it is
clear that the people concerned had a wholesome
dread of the evidence of photography.
A new use has been found for our old friend pyro
by Dr. Gautrelet, of Vichy, who lays claim to the
discovery that it renders tobacco harmless to mouth,
heart, and nerves, without in any way spoiling the
soothing effect or the aroma of the seductive weed.
The proper way to bring about this desirable result is
to plug the pipe or cigar holder with a pledget of
cotton wool which has been soaked in a ten per cent,
solution of the pyrogallol, so that the smoke drawn
through this filter may be robbed of its bad qualities,
and the noxious weed may be noxious no longer.
With this precaution the tongue will not fur, the head
will not ache, and everyone will be able to smoke with
impunity. We are not quite sure, but we fancy that
if every smoker were to take the trouble to insert in
his pipe a wisp of cotton wool as a bed for the tobacco
to rest upon, all the evils with which the weed is
credited would be obviated without any aid from
pyrogallol. It must be remembered that the latter,
from its poisonous nature, might possibly prove to be
more dangerous than the nicotine.
Hand camera work must have been, during these
last two months of cloudy skies and general darkness,
quite at a standstill, and the detective agency whose
novel advertisement we quoted a fortnight ago must
have found their efforts to secure compromising pictures
severely handicapped. Even in the best of weather
such pictures will present great difficulties. Let us, for
instance, take the case of some unfortunate couple whose
portraits a paid spy armed with a camera is anxious to
secure. The picture must be taken in sunlight, with
the faces of the victims turned towards the instru-
ment, so that there may be no doubt as to identity,
and at the same time the operator must be careful that
he himself is not detected. With all these things
opposing him, the chances are ten thousand to one
against success, aud glad we are that this is the case.
The actual difficulties of instantaneous portraiture
with hand-cameras may be guaged from the circum-
stance that such portraits of well-known public cha-
racters are never seen. If they were easy to procure
the market would teem with them, for they would
find a ready sale. The only case of the kind of which
we arc cognisant is an extremely unflattering portrait
of her Majesty the Queen smiling in her carriage.
This was exhibited in the shop windows about a year
ago. Her Majesty’s countenance is so well known to
everyone that the picture can be recognised, but if
it had represented any one of less note it would
have been almost useless ; at any rate, as a means of
identification.
556
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jci.y 18, 1890.
ILLUSTRATING POEMS BY PHOTOGRAPHY*
BY CATHARINE WEED BARNES.
As the Venus of Milo stood before her sculptor-creator
saying to his inner consciousness. “ You have made me
visible to men, but among them, as on Olympus, none
shall question my sovereignty”; so poetry says to her
various adorers, “ No one shall be able to say he has
sounded the depth of my soul.” One approaches nearest
her inmost shrine in closely following nature, and it is
the part of true wisdom to study her under all the ever-
changing conditions of life with a reverend worship which
will richly reward every faithful worshipper. Not to those
who deny her power, or to those who try to force them-
selves into her most sacred penetralia, are its mysteries
discovered, but to those who in spirit and in truth wait
before its altar. Painters and sculptors have sought
through all ages to reveal poetry by means of form and
colour with all the varying expression of her changeful
features, but there is no reason, it seems to me, why,
among those who seek to translate into visible shape her
spiritual beauty, only those should be numbered to whom
heretofore the world has given the name of “artist.”
Why should the fact of using brush or pencil presuppose
in its user the possession of artistic power or appreciation?
The world does move, and people are beginning to under-
stand that alter all it matters little what tools are used if
into the finished work is breathed the breath of artistic
life. Our friend Dr. Emerson seems to think that by the
blending of art and science in photography each is thereby
weakened, that each should keep to its own sphere. Is it
not possible to study science in this connection as one
does the steps in dancing, very important to follow closely
at first, but gradually becoming a second nature, so that
one, so to speak, forgets the letter in the spirit?
Let your work be so much a part of you that while not
conscious of moving according to fixed rules, you arc never-
theless largely guided by them.
Travellers abroad cau purchase the poems of Scott,
Burns, or others, illustrated by photographs of scenery
and buildings, but few and far between are the photo-
graphic illustrations designed to specially bring out the
spirit of the poem as the painter or etcher designs his
special work. The photographer must, of course, labour
within limits, but I believe they are more flexible than
generally supposed. While it is not always possible to
make one’s model fit the picture, it is possible to make the
picture fit the model. In other words, I believe that,
after careful choice of lines to be illustrated, the intended
picture should be evolved from one's brain by thinking of
it, brooding over it, dreaming of it, until all is ready for
the realisation. Take plenty of time to absorb into your
very soul the thoughts of the poem before you. Then
carefully decide on the accessories, and, if practicable,
discard those which are readily recognised as being in
ordinary studio use. Have real curtains, chairs of wood
or brass, or other material not made to simulate something
else. I make an exception in favour of using artificial
flowers and vines, but sparingly. If the operator is not
a carpenter, one can be found to construct temporary
doors and windows. They are better than the painted
article, and papier-mache is so glaringly a false deceiver.
If the deception could be well done it would be allowable,
but the average rocks, walls, trees, &c., are only too
visibly unrealities. These things need not be necessarily
expensive if the camerist is possessed of dramatic taste
and is something of a mechanic. The professional is
usually assisted during an exposure by some one to focus
while he is posing, and has everything ready for the work,
while the amateur portraitist has to be almost omnipresent,
so that he works under much greater difficulties than his
professional brother, and if he did not really deserve the
name “amateur," never would have courage and patience
to continue, but the camera fever when it reaches a certain
stage is incurable.
It should be the exception when pictures of out-door
scenes are taken by indoor light, even the light of the
studio. It conveys a wrong impression to the uneducated
eye, and, in the branch of photography under considera-
tion, does more harm than good. There is no need either
of .all the pictures being made in the studio. But where
interiors, fancy figures, or portraits are needed, the studio
is the place wherein to make them. No hard or fast rule
can be laid down on the mode of studying out or realising
illustrations. To a great extent the artistic operator must
be a law unto himself or herself, but, while working in
limits, I believe in stretching them as far as possible and
taking advantage of everything within them. If the model,
when found, does not entirely suit the character desired,
it is often well to slightly vary one’s conception of it and
gain thereby, it may be, a finer effect than the one intended.
There should be, and I say it from experience, a magnetic
relation between sitter and operator, their minds should
work together, and the words to be wrought out in the
picture should occupy their thoughts to the exclusion, for
the time being, of all else. As the actor or opera singer
best realises a character by utter forgetfulness of self, so
ought the ideal sitter to think so fully of the part to be
represented that the idea never occurs to him or her that
it is a “portrait” which is being taken. “ You are only
a part of a whole,” I say in such cases, “ it is not you any
more than the chair you sit upon that is being photo-
graphed. ”
It requires a certain amount of histrionic ability to sit
for an ordinary portrait, but infinitely more for an ideal
subject. This is not common, but where it exists the
camera can be sure of extra credit which should be shared
with the sitter. The various difficulties incident to taking
small heads and figures greatly increase when it comes to
taking large ones, and justly the camerist who takes good
ones is proud of them. Do not try to get a likeness of your
model. The point is to have the picture tell a story ;
make it do that at any cost, and it matters nothing at all if
the face is not shown or is utterly unrecognisable. Let
imagination dominate your thoughts, and your work will
have originality, character, not be like that of any one else.
This means, however, putting enough labour and thought
on one picture to take a dozen ordinary portraits. The
artistic camerist should also bear in mind by what process
his work will be reproduced, and keep that thought ever
before him from the instant of exposure until the negative
is developed. Training in some branch of art is capital
preparation for illustrating, and every picture designed is
an education for the next one. The eye becomes more
and more accustomed to realising in a picture certain stanzas
or lines, and new ones will be constantly suggested.
There is one point more that I never have heard men-
tioned. In taking an interior for illustration, if done in
the studio, it is possible to arrange a ceiling over the sitter
so that the effect of a room can be better preserved, and
the light come, as it naturally would do, from the side.
* Rea l before the Society _of Amateur Photographers of New York.
July 18, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
557
It is a good plan, also, where an out-door seene is desired,
to arrange either by means of a mirror, or water in a tank,
to simulate a stream or lake, and prevent reflections from
the roof by stretching painted canvas over it.
This subject of illustrating poems is destined to bring
about some striking changes in the world of art, and
“ weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable ” will gradually seem
to the ambitious amateur all other branches of camera
work. It is inconceivably fascinating, and one’s brain
becomes bewildered at what seems to be its destiny. The
various new and beautiful reproducing processes constantly
claiming attention seem created for this very purpose.
The camera has a wonderful future before it, and you will
need all the inspiration you can possibly gain in entering
a field of work filled with so mauy opportunities, but which
others claimed to have owned long before you. Remem-
ber first, last, and all the time, these words from Long-
fellow’s “ Kavauagh” : — “ We judge ourselves by what we
feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we
have already doue.”
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE.*
BY PROFESSOR RAPHAEL MELDOLA, F.R.S., M.R.I.
The history of a discovery which has been developed to
such a remarkable degree of perfection as photography has
naturally been a fruitful source of discussion among those
who interest themselves in tracing the progress of science.
It is only my presence in this lecture theatre, in which the
first public discourse on photography was given by Thomas
Wedgwood at the beginning of the century, that justifies
my treading once again a path which has already been so
thoroughly well beaten. If any further justification for
trespassing upon the ground of the historian is needed, it
will be found in the circumstance that in the autumn of
last year there was held a celebration of what was
generally regarded as the jubilee of the discovery. This
celebration was considered by many to have reference to
the public disclosure of the Daguerreotype process,
made through the mouth of Arago to the French Academy
of Sciences on August 10th, 1839. There is no doubt
that the introduction of this process marked a distinct
epoch in the history of the art, and gave a great impetus
to its subsequent development. But, while giving full
recognition to the value of the discovery of Daguerre, we
must not allow the work of his predecessors and con-
temporaries in the same field to sink into oblivion. After
the lapse of half a century we are in a better position to
consider fairly the influence of the work of different
investigators upon modern photographic processes.
I have not the least desire on the present occasion to
raise the ghosts of dead controversies. In fact, the
history of the discovery of photography is one of those
subjects which can be dealt with in various ways, accord-
ing to the meaning assigned to the term. There is ample
scope for the display of what Mr. Herbert Spencer calls
the “bias of patriotism.” If the word “photography”
be interpreted literally as writing or inscribing by light,
without any reference to the subsequent permanence of
the inscription, then the person who first intentionally
caused a design to be imprinted by light upon a photo-
sensitive compound must be regarded as the first photo-
grapher. According to Dr. Eder, of Vienna, we must
place this experiment to the credit of Johann Heinrich
* This is the full text of Professor Meldola’s recent lecture at the Royal
Institution, of which we gave a brief report.
Schulze, the son of a German tailor, who was born in the
Duchy of Madgeburg, in Prussia, in 1687, and who died in
1744, after a life of extraordinary activity as a linguist,
theologian, physician, and philosopher. In the year 1727,
when experimenting on the subject of phosphorescence,
Schulze observed that by pouring nitric acid, in which
some silver had previously been dissolved, on to chalk, the
undissolved earthy residue had acquired the property of
darkening on exposure to light. This effect was shown to
be due to light, and not to heat. By pasting words cut
out in paper on the side of the bottle containing his pre-
cipitate, Schulze obtained copies of the letters on the
silvered chalk. The German philosopher certainly pro-
duced what might be called a temporary photogram.
Whatever value is attached to this observation in the deve-
lopment of modern photography, it must be conceded that
a considerable advance was made by spreading the sensi-
tive compound over a surface instead of using it in mass.
It is hardly necessary to remind you here that such an
advance was made by Wedgwood and Davy in 1802.*
The impressions produced by these last experimenters
were, unfortunately, of no more permanence than those
obtained by Schulze three-quarters of a century before
them.
It will, perhaps, be safer for the historian of this art to
restrict the term photograph to such impressions as are
possessed of permanence. I do not, of course, mean
absolute permanence, but ordinary durability in the
common-sense acceptation of the term. From this point
of view the first real photographs, i.e., permanent im-
pressions of the camera picture, were obtained on bitumen
films by Joseph Nicephore Niepce, of Chalons-sur-Sabne,
who, after about twenty years’ work at the subject, had
perfected his discovery by 1826. Then came the days of
silver salts again, when Daguerre, who commenced work
in 1824, entered into a partnership with Niepce in 1829,
which was brought to a termination by the death of the
latter in 1833. The partnership was renewed between
Daguerre and Niepce de St. Victor, nephew of the elder
Niepce. The method of fixing the camera picture on a
film of silver iodide on a silvered copper plate — the pro-
cess justly associated with the name of Daguerre — was ripe
for disclosure by 1838, and was actually made known in
1839.
The impartial historian of photography who examines
critically into the evidence will find that, quite inde-
pendently of the French pioneers, experiments on the use
of silver salts had been going on ill this country, and photo-
graphs, in the true sense, had been produced almost simul-
taneously with the announcement of the Daguerreotype
process, by two Englishmen whose names are as house-
hold words in the ranks of science — I refer to William
Henry Fox Talbot and Sir John Ilerschel. Fox Talbot
commenced experimenting with silver salts on paper in
1834, and the following year he succeeded in imprinting
the camera picture on paper coated with the chloride.
In January, 1839, some of his “photogenic draw-
ings”— the first “silver prints ever obtained — were
exhibited in this Institution by Michael Faraday.
In the same mouth he communicated his first paper
on a photographic process to the Royal Society, and
iu the following month he read a second paper before the
* “An Account of a Method of Copying Painting upon Glass, and of
making Profiles by the Agency of Light upon Nitrate of Silver. Invented
by T. Wedgwood, Esq. With Observations by II. Davy.” Journ. R.I.,
1802, p. 170.
558
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
same society, giving the method of preparing the sensitive
paper and of fixing the prints. The outcome of this work
was the “ Calotype ” or Talbotype process, which was
sufficiently perfected for portraiture by 1840, and which
was fully described in a paper communicated to the Royal
Society in 1841. The following year Fox Talbot received
the Rumford Medal for his “ discoveries and improvements
in photography. ”*
Herschel's process consisted in coating a glass plate with
silver chloride by subsidence. The details of the method,
from Herschel’s own notes, have been published by his
son, Prof. Alexander Ilerschel.f By this means the old
40-foot telescope at Slough was photographed in 1839.
By the kindness of Prof. Herschel, and with the sanction
of the Science aud Art Department, Herschel’s original
photographs have been sent here for your inspection.
The process of coating a plate by allowing a precipitate to
settle on it in a uniform film is, however, impracticable,
and was not further developed by its illustrious discoverer.
We must credit him, however, as being the first to use
glass as a substratum. Herschel further discovered the
important fact that while the chloride was very insensitive
alone, its sensitiveness was greatly increased by washing
it with a solution of silver nitrate. It is to Herschel, also,
that we are indebted for the use of sodium thiosulphate as
a fixing agent, as well as for many other discoveries in
connection with photography, which are common matters
of history.
Admitting the impracticability of the method of sub-
sidence for producing a sensitive film, it is interesting to
trace the subsequent development of the processes in-
augurated about the year 1839. The first of photo-
graphic methods — the bitumen process of Niepce — sur-
vives at the present time, and is the basis of some of the
most important of modern photo-mechanical printing
processes. [Specimens illustrating photo-etching from
Messrs. Waterlow and Sons exhibited.] The Daguerreo-
type process is now obsolete. As it left the hands of its
inventor it was unsuited for portraiture, on account of the
long exposure required. It is evident, moreover, that a
picture on an opaque metallic plate is incapable of repro-
duction by printing through, so that in this respect the
Talbotype possessed distinct advantages. This is one of
the most important points in Fox Talbot’s contributions to
photography. He was the first to produce a transparent
paper negative from which any number of positives could
be obtained by printing through. The silver print of
modern times is the lineal descendant of the Talbotype
print. After forty year's use of glass as a substratum,
we arc going back to Fox Talbot’s plan, and using thin,
flexible films — not exactly of paper, but of an allied sub-
stance, celluloid. [Specimens of Talbotypes, lent by Mr.
Crookes, exhibited, with celluloid negatives by the East-
man Company.]
If I interpret this fragment of history correctly, the
founders of modern photography are the three men whose
labours have been briefly sketched. The jubilee of last
autumn marked a culminating point in the work of Niepce
and Daguerre, and of Fox Talbot, The names of these
three pioneers must go down to posterity as co-equal in
the annals of scientific discovery. [Portraits by Mr. II.
M. Elder shown.] The lecture theatre of the Royal
* For these and other details relating to Fox Talbot’s work, necessarily
excluded for want of time, I am indebted to his son, Mr. C. II. Talbot, ol
Lacock Abbey.
iThotog. Jour n, uni Trans. Photog. Hoc., June 15th, 1872.
Institution offers such tempting opportunities to the
chronicler of the history of this wonderful art, that I must
close this treatment of the subject by reminding myself
that in selecting the present topic I had in view a state-
ment of the case of modern photography from its scientific
side only. There is hardly any invention associated with
the present century which lias rendered more splendid
services in every department of science. The physicist
and chemist, the astronomer and geographer, the physiolo-
gist, pathologist, and anthropologist will all bear witness
to the value of photography. The very first scientific
application of Wedgwood's process was made here by the
illustrious Thomas Young, when he impressed Newton’s
rings on paper moistened with silver nitrate, as described
in his Bakerian lecture to the Royal Society on November
24th, 1803. Prof. Dewar has just placed in my hands the
identical slide, with the Newton rings still visible, which
he believes Young to have used in this classic experiment.
Our modern photographic processes depend upon
chemical changes wrought by light on films of certain
sensitive compounds. Bitumen, under this influence,
becomes insoluble in hydrocarbon oils, as in the helio-
graphic process of the elder Niepce. Gelatine mixed
with potassium dichromate becomes insoluble in water on
exposure to light, a property utilised in the photo-etching
process introduced in 1852 by Fox Talbot, some of whose
original etchings have been placed at my disposal by Mr.
Crookes. [Shown.] Chromatised gelatine now plays a
most important part in the autotype aud many photo-
mechanical processes. The salts of iron in the ferric
condition undergo reduction to the ferrous state under
the influence of light in contact with oxidisable organic
compounds. The use of these iron salts is another of Sir
John Herschel’s contributions to photography (1842), the
modern “ blue print ” and the beautiful platiuotype being
dependent on the photo-rcducibility of these compounds.
[Cyanotype print developed with ferricyanide.]
Of all the substances known to chemistry at the pre-
sent time, the salts of silver arc by far the most impor-
tant in photography, on account of the extraordinary
degree of sensitiveness to which they can be raised. The
photographic image, with which it is my privilege to deal
on this occasion, is that invisible impression produced by
the action of light on a film of a silver haloid. Many
methods of producing such films have been in practical
use since the foundation of the art in 1839. All these
depend on the double decomposition between a soluble
chloride, bromide, or iodide, and silver nitrate, resulting
in the formation of the silver haloid in a vehicle of some
kind, such as albumen (Niepce do St. Victor, 1848), or
collodion on glass, as made practicable by Scott Archer in
1851. For twenty years this collodion process was in
universal use ; its history and details of manipulation, its
development into a dry plate process by Colonel Russell
in 1861, and into an emulsion process by Bolton andSayce
in 1864, are facts familiar to every one.
(To be continued.)
Thk Photographic Club. — The subject for discussion on
Wednesday, July 23rd, will be “Ceramic Photography”;
July 30th, “ Printing with the Salts of Chromium.” Hank
Holiday outing to Guildford.
Mr. K. Harris, of Sydney, writes that, wishing for a pinhole
camera, he extemporised one rapidly simply by pressing a
piece of black wax into the smallest stop which he was in the
habit of using with his ordinary lens, and then making a small
hole in the centre of the wax with a pin.
July 18, 1890.”)
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
559
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION AT CHESTER.
The Report ok the Photographic Club Delegates.*
The fifth annual Photographic Convention of the United
Kingdom was opened at the Town Hall, Chester, on June
23rd with a conversazione given by the Mayor of Chester.
Certainly the reception was a most cordial and hospitable one,
and it is flattering to note that, in the opinion of a local
newspaper, well capable of forming an estimate, “ never before
had so much artistic skill been employed in the decoration of
the main corridor of the building as was brought to bear on
the present occasion.” After the formal reception by the
Mayor of the members of the Convention, the retiring presi-
dent, Mr. Andrew Pringle, in the presence of the members
and guests, introduced his successor, Mr. C. H. Bothamley,who,
in the course of his most eloquent presidential address, while
admitting that no discoveries or inventions of far-reaching
importance had startled the photographic world, pointed out
what minor advances have been made. With regard to photo-
graphy in natural colours, there are differences of opinion as to
whether the results of Herr Vereses, of Vienna, which, it is
understood, are founded ou the experiments of Carey Lea, are
in advance of those of previous experimenters ; at any rate, so
far we can only say, that the direction in which the solution of
the problem is to be looked for is not yet apparent. No
marked advance had been made in orthochromatic photography,
and the general adoption of such methods is impeded by,
among other causes, the fact that the commercial products
upon which ma'ny have to depend do not at present represent
the maximum possibilities of the methods. The appreciation
of eikonogen and the introduction of guaiacol as developers
were alluded to. The application of photography to science,
the president did not hesitate to say, is the direction in which
photography has won, and probably will win, its greatest
triumphs, and he instanced the remarkable astronomical pho-
tographs of Mr. Ainslie Common, F.R.S., aud Mr. Isaac
Roberts, F.R.S. On the other hand, he deplored the fact that
the number of competent investigators, apart from experi-
menters, was very few indeed, and strongly advocated the cul-
tivation of scientific method, which could only be inculcated by
long and careful training. Turning to the art aspect of photo-
graphy, he pointed out how we have advanced in our know-
ledge of science aud art since Mr. P. G. Hamerton’s well-known
criticism of the claims of photography to rank as a fine art
appeared in 1873 in the Portfolio, and he agreed with those
who would fix a limit to subjects which may be considered to
come within the legitimate scope of photographic treatment.
Lastly, after alluding to the efficient school of photography at
Berlin under Dr. Vogel, and the splendid institute at Vienna
under Dr. Eder, he advocated the development of a desire for
better training, and the provision of means to satisfy the desire.
Whether this could be brought about by founding a photo-
graphic institute would depend on whether it is founded ou a
right basis and conducted on right lines ; but, after all, the
future of photography would depend ou the work of indi-
viduals, and every one must see to it that his own work is
honest and thorough, and the best that he can do.
Our minds having been thus strengthened, the remainder of
the evening was, with a clear conscience, devoted to indulgence
in the Mayor’s hospitality, the admiration of lantern pictures
illustrating former conventions, and to general sociability. The
apparatus was scanned with attention, especially the splendid
photo-micrographic instrument constructed for the Royal
Veterinary College by Messrs. Swift.
Tuesday — a glorious photographic day — was well spent in
excursions (1) to Little Moreton Hall, unfortunately in process
of necessary repair, but one of the finest examples of half-
timbered, moated mansions in the country ; (2) to Llangollen,
aud by the valley of the Dee to Berwyn and Valley Crucis
Abbey. The Photographic Club was well represented at both
places, and you will no doubt see them fully illustrated. The
first business of the evening was the presentation of the report
of the Committee on Lens Standards, which was prefaced by a
lucid explanation by Mr. Haddon of the means taken to arrive
Read before the members of the Photographic Club, June 9th, 1890.
at a decision. The report recommends the adoption of the
Photographic Society’s Standards, with some few additions in
the nature of amplification and explanation. It is satisfactory
to note that there was no opposition expressed to the standard
diaphragms, which, since they werefirst recommended, have been
very extensively adopted, and now seem to be well established ;
but with regard to the flanges, it was evident that that portion
of the report did not commend itself to those opticians who
have been manufacturing lenses with mounts screwed to a diffe-
rent gauge, and who naturally consider the matter in the inte-
rest of those who use such lenses, and of which many thou-
sands are stated to have been issued. In view of the fact that
the decision of these opticians to abide by their own gauges
had not been brought before nor considered by the committee,
it was proposed and carried that the report be once more
referred back to the committee, in order that they may confer
on this point with the opticians and with the Photographic
Society of Great Britain committee. The only point now in
dispute is whether the standard flanges should be 1 inch,
1-5 inch, 1-25 inch, 1‘75 inch, 2 inch, 2-25 inch, &e., with
24 threads to the inch, as recommended by the committee, or
whether the 1 '5 inch and the 2 inch should be superseded by
the 1-52 inch with 32 threads, and the 2 inch with 30 threads
at present in use. But whatever the final result may be, the
Convention may fairly be congratulated on having aroused the
opticians to a sense of the importance of coming to some
agreement ou this question, which is one that more or less
affects all users of lenses.
Mr. Gambier Bolton, in his paper, “Animal Photography:
Its Difficulties, Uses, and Abuses,” told us of the trials he
encountered in securing scientific aud artistic qualities in zoo-
photography ; how he succeeded in giving, with the expenditure
of from thirty to fifty plates, the exposure of two seconds,
which was necessary to show the object in all its detail, on an
animal which w'as never still for an instant. He considered
that instantaneous exposures were of little or no use, and was
severe on detective camera animal photographers, though he
would admit the occasional use of a hand-camera with twin
lenses. The perfect animal photograph should have had suffi-
cient exposure to bring out all possible detail in the hair or
feathers, and in the shadow’s ; should be full of life, yet un-
restrained ; natural in position and expression (not as a man
would look who had just sat down on the business end of a
tin tack) ; all four legs and the tail should show distinctly,
and the mane, if any ; nostrils, ears, eyes, and the hairs round
them should be microscopically sharp. He urged on photo-
graphers, especially those who travel, the importance of secur-
ing faithful, scientific, and artistic representations of birds or
animals which are either rare or fast becoming extinct, aud
implored them not to w-aste plates on such childishly easy sub-
jects as swans, deer, cattle, and sheep. Mr. Bolton then
illustrated his paper by lantern pictures, first show’ing the kind
of representation to be avoided if results of any permanent
value were aspired to, and then his own pictures showing the
way to do it. These proved to the satisfaction of his audience
that the immense patience and perseverance he had exercised
had not been in vain, and went far to justify his own estimate
of their importance and scientific value.
The next paper was an important essay by Mr. Philip H.
Newman, entitled “Imagining and Imaging,” which proved to
be an attack by an experienced art critic from the conventional
standpoint on the doctrine and dogmas of Mr. P. H. Emerson,
contained in his “ Naturalistic Photography.” It is comforting
to find at the outset the rival combatants agree in paying tri-
bute to photography as an art, and in admitting its claims to
be a legitimate means of artistic expression. The combat
seems mainly to resolve itself into one of mere words. Each
sees individuality in Van Eyck’s “ Jean and Jeanne Amolfiui,”
though the one calls it conventionalism, while with the other it
is the absence of that quality. Perhaps Mr. New man’s strongest
point is where he charges Mr. Emerson with not permitting
the freedom to others he takes himself, especially when he is
taken at his word and his principles judged by his own works,
though it must be observed that they can shake hands when
treating of the expression of detail by photography, aud pre-
560
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
sumably also on the question of composite photographs, nothing
being said on this latter subject. As these two last are the
points which have most agitated photographers, and as the
treatment of historical and mythological subjects is by common
consent determined to be beyond the range of legitimate pho-
tography, we, as spectators, cannot but feel that Mr. Emerson’s
positiou is, on the whole, not materially weakened by this clever
onslaught.
The annual meeting of the members was held on Wednes-
day morning, when it was resolved that the next Convention
(1891) be held at Bath. It having been generally felt that
provincial members should, in the interests of the Convention,
be more largely represented on the council, an alteration of
rules was made to the effect that the council shall consist of
forty members, of whom not more than twenty shall be
London members, and five members from the locality where
the Convention shall be held in the following year. Power
was also given to alter or amend the rules at any special
general meeting called for the purpose. In spite of the rain,
most of the members proceeded by steamboats up the river
Dee to Eaton Hall, where they assembled on the terrace and
were successfully photographed, in the face of the adverse
conditions which still prevailed, by Mr. Watmough Webster.
In the evening the President (Mr. Bothamley) explained that
the detailed results of his recent experiments with rhodamin
would be deferred until they are more complete than he has
at present had time to make them. Mr. Paul Lange then
gave an interesting account of a recent visit to Norway, in-
terspersing it with valuable hints to intending visitors, and
illustrating it by a number of fine lantern pictures taken with
a hand-camera.
On Thursday the excursions were to Conway and up the
valley of the Conway River as far as Llanrwst and Trefriw.
The weather during the day was all that could be wished, and
your delegates determined to join the Trefriw party. Each
started with the impression that the other had found salvation
through Mr. Gambier Bolton, F.Z.S. Imagine, therefore, their
mutual surprise when, casting away their crowns, they found
themselves childishly hurrying after a trivial group of cattle,
which they suddenly resolved to image. This trip into North
Wales involved the loss of the evening’s papers, the first being
the report of the Committee on Weights and Measures drawn
up by the president. The feature of the report is that it
recommends, in dealing with formuhe, “a method which is
independent of the system of weights and measures used, pro-
vided that the relation of the unit of weight to the unit of
measure is the same as that which exists between the gramme
and the cubic centimetre, or the ounce and the fluid ounce.”
It is recommended that formula! should give the number of
parts of the constituents by weight or measure, to be contained
in some definite number of parts by measure of the solution.
The mixture can then be made up according to the unit
selected, either in (1) grammes and cubic centimetres, or (2)
grains and fluid grains, or (3) ounces and fluid ounces. The
report, we understand, was well received, and, without dissent,
adopted.
Mr. Andrew Pringle’s “ Record of Photo-micography ”
pointed out the difficulties that had been encountered in ren-
dering bacteria on account of their colour. This difficulty had
led more than one eminent bacteriologist to abandon the use of
photography for the purpose ; colour-correct photography, how-
ever, is now removing this stumbling block of the earlier
workers. Reviewing the optics of the subject, he pointed out
the advantages derived from the immersion system, and from
the later Zeiss objectives, and looked for the time when every
candid investigator would employ photography, the only scien-
tific method of delineation.
Mr. Eriese Greene’s paper, “Suggestions,” was, at his desire,
taken as read. He exhibited his magazine camera ; but, owing
to some hitch in the optical arrangement, he was unable to
show the results on the screen to his satisfaction.
On Friday many of the members might have been seen
with their cameras busily securing reminiscences of Chester
architecture, ancient and modern, the projected excursion to
Liverpool being evidently considered less attractive. Later in
the day Ha warden Castle was the object of attraction.
The annual dinner at the Grosvenor Hotel, at which about
sixty members were present, happily completed the programme.
The Chester Convention of 1890 was thus practically
brought to an end, and although, perhaps, the number of mem-
bers from the Chester district was not so large as might have
been desired, there was no question as to the success of the
meeting. All who did attend, we cannot but feel are consider-
able gaiuers both mentally and physically. It is one thing to
attend such a meeting and have the events indelibly impressed
on the memory; it is quite another thing to read or, perchance,
merely skim the papers as they appear in the journals, or to
listen to such an imperfect report as can be brought before you
on an occasion like the present. It is good to be in a position
to exercise our own individual judgment on the interesting
matter put forward for consideration, and thus to bring our
influence to bear to direct the future course of the development
of what, at present, are little more than the germs of photo-
graphic knowledge. In photography less, perhaps, than in
most other pursuits, can any one afford to take up an entirely
independent position. Each must recognise the principle of
inter-dependence, and it is for these reasons that we would
urge you to support the Convention, seeing that it has no other
aim or claim to encouragement than in so far as it tends to
advance the interests of our chosen occupation.
William Bedford) ,, ,
R. P. Drage
THE EXHIBITION OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC
SOCIETY.
The hon. sec. to the Photographic Society, Captain
A. M. Mantell, R.E., announces that the next Exhi-
bition of the Society will be inaugurated by a con-
versazione, open to members and their friends, at 8 p.in.,
on Saturday evening, the 27th of September, and that
the Exhibition will remain open daily (Sundays excepted)
from Monday, the 29th September, until Wednesday, the
12th of November; admission (from 10 a.m. till 5 p.m.)
one shilling. It will also be open every Monday, Wed-
nesday, and Saturday evening ; admission (from 7 to
10 p.m.) sixpence. Members have free admission at any
time, and will be supplied with tickets to admit their
friends.
Medals will be placed at the disposal of the judges for
artistic, scientific, and technical excellence of photo-
graphs, and for lantern transparencies and apparatus, and
the following are the judges: Capt. Abney, R.E., C.B.,
D.C.L., F.R.S., Valentine Blanchard, W. England, J.
Gale, Henry Moore, A.R.A., II. P. Robinson.
A copy of the regulations may be obtained on appli-
cation to the assistant-secretary.
Foreign exhibitors are specially invited to contribute.
The Society will pay the carriage of photographs one way,
and provide frames during the exhibition for photographs
approved by the judges. There will be no charge for wall
space. Exhibits sent in packing cases (carriage paid)
must be addressed to the “ Photographic Society of Great
Britain,” care of Mr. James Bourlet, 17, Nassau Street,
Middlesex Hospital, London. Packing-cases must
arrive not later than Monday, September 15th ; they will
be too late if received after that date. No packing-cases
can be received at the Gallery. Exhibits (including
pictures, negatives, transparencies, lantern slides, appa
ratus and appliances) sent by hand will be received at
the Gallery, 5a, Pall Mall East, on Monday only,
September 15th, until 9 p.m. Delay will prevent exhibits
coming under the inspection of the judges.
Lantern transparencies sent in competition for a medal,
not less than six, should be fitted (removable) in a frame
Jolt 18, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
561
to stand upon the table, and it is desirable that duplicates
be sent for exhibition in the optical lantern. They will
only be eligible for award when both the negatives and
slides are the work of the exhibitor. Photographic lan-
tern slides will be shown with the Society's optical lantern
during the Exhibition. The loan of slides for this pur-
pose is invited ; they must not exceed :5 { inches in height,
and, to enable the committee to select and arrange them,
must be delivered at the Gallery not less than one week
before the evening of their being shown in the lantern.
It is to be distinctly understood that the sending of
exhibits signifies acceptance by the exhibitor of the de-
cision of the council upon all matters connected with the
Exhibition as absolute and final. The council do not
hold themselves responsible for any damage that may
happen to the pictures or other exhibits whilst in their
custody, but they will take every precaution to insure
their safety and prompt return to the owners at the close
of the Exhibition. To avoid damage to frames, exhibitors
are requested to have sunk backboards to their frames,
with the fastening nails not projecting, and the whole
covered with thick brown paper. The regulations as to
the removal of exhibits can be had on application to the
assistant-secretary, Mr. Edwin Cocking, 5a, Pall Mall
East, London, S.W.
UNIFORMITY IN LENS MOUNTS.
CoNSiDKitABi.K interest is now being manifested in England
in regard to an uniform system of mounting lenses, to be
adopted by the different lens makers. For many years
the microscopists have had the comfort and great advan-
tage of the so-called society screw for their objectives.
This society screw has a thread which is of such a
character that an objective bought of any maker will
always fit upon the tube of a microscope already fitted
with objectives made with this screw. As a consequence,
no extra fittings or adapters are necessary, and every
microscopist can use a lens of any other maker than the
one he already possesses, without having to make special
changes for the purpose.
This same idea is now being discussed in regard to
photographic lenses. It is argued that all photographic
objectives of the same lens diameter, or even slightly
smaller, could be fitted in mounts having screw-threads
working into the same flanges for all makers. At the
present time even lenses of the same diameter will not fit
into the flange if they are made by different opticians.
What a comfort and convenience it would be if all lenses,
say from 61 by 8i down, had screws that fitted into one
flange, and that every make of lens of these sizes, Gj- by
8£, 5 by 8, 5 by 7, 4{ by 61, and 4 by 5. could all be used
with one flange. At the present time, if one wishes to
use a different size of lens within the above limits, there
are only two clumsy and troublesome methods available.
First, to have as many separate front boards fitted to your
camera as there are lenses you wish to use with it ; or
second, to use a series of brass adapters, one for each lens
available for the camera. The first method is clumsy in
the extreme, the extra front boards always being in the
way when packing the lenses for transportation or storing
them for safe keeping. The second method, while less
objectionable than the first, is very expensive and trouble-
some after the adapters have been made. What is wanted
is a series of screw-threads of such a standard character
that every lens maker can use them, and with one screw
for a series of lenses. Of course it would be out of the
question to have one mount for all lenses. But two or three
lenses, that differ only slightly in diameter, could be fitted
with threads that all screw into the same flange. F or
example, lenses covering 11 by 14, 10 by 12, and 8 by 10
plates could all be made to fit into a flange that carries an
11 by 14 lens tube ; and lenses that are smaller than 6|
by 8£ could all be fitted with threads to fit into a
6 j by 8£ flange. Perhaps these might be divided differ-
ently, and the 8 by 10 and lower sizes could be separated
into two groups ; but this is a matter of detail for the
opticians. What we need is a series of screw threads and
flanges so arranged that several lenses of nearly the same
size will fit one flange, and every lens of the same size
made by different opticians will fit the same flange.
Yet another source of annoyance, especially to the
travelling photographer, is the tripod screw. Up to the
present time there seems to be no easy method of
securing the camera upon the tripod except the screw,
and every camera manufacturer seems to take a special
delight in making every new camera box with a new
plate having a thread that is different from every other
tripod screw ever before made, and especially different
from that of any other maker. There are no other manu-
facturers using screws that have such an apparently
unnecessary diversity of those exceedingly useful means
of securing parts of apparatus together. And the time
has come when those who will pay attention to these
matters and the wants and needs of those that use their
wares, will succeed and prosper, while those who do not
will most certainly be ignored.
What we need is uniformity in the mechanical parts of
photographic apparatus, uniform and simple lens mounts,
uniform and correct diaphragms, and uniform tripod
screws. And we are very glad to note that such men as
Dallmcyer, Boss, Beck, and others are trying to come to
some agreement in the matter as far as lenses are con-
cerned. We also hope that American opticians will see
that it is to their interest also to take the same action and
let us have an international system. — Anthony's Photo-
graphic Bulletin.
Non-actinic White Light. — I)r. E. Liesegang says, in the
Photo Arehiv, as translated for Wilson’s Magazine, “ The expedi-
ent of covering a irindow with a fluorescent solution of quinine
sulphate has not proved sufficient to keep out all actinic rays.
This is better accomplished thus : — It is known that an aqueous
solution of three parts green chloride of nickel, and one part
red chloride of cobalt, is colourless by transmitted light, and
quite clear when dilute. The two colours are complementary,
and completely neutralize each other. Hence the light passing
through the mixed solution has no effect on the salts of silver.
Although it is quite white it is perfectly non-actinic, and does
not any longer affect the sensitive film. To completely neutralize
any possible rays in the ultra-violet, another glass is coated with
a solution of quinine sulphate in collodion somewhat acidified
with sulphuric acid. The quinine cannot be used in the same
solution because it is precipitated by the cobalt salt. As the
cobalt chloride, red when containing water, becomes blue when
free from it, the mixture must not be allowed to dry. It
may be made with gelatine and glycerine, but even a high
temperature around the window may dry it. Silver paper
which was left exposed for a week behind a thin layer of the
cobalt-nickel solution thus prepared, did not show the slightest
alteration. I have not as yet experimented with plates, but
with sufficiently concentrated solution these also should not
suffer change. ”
562
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHIC ESTABLISHMENTS.
The London Stereoscopic Co. invited newspaper repre-
tatives and others to visit their new premises at 106,
Regent Street, London, last Monday. At the top of the
premises they have a special studio for those who will
give any amount of time for the obtaining a likeness with
the best possible results. It has none of the artificial
furniture sometimes used in studios, and is intended for
those who will give the photographer a fair opportunity of
doing the highest work, without taking turn in a hurried
manner with a waiting crowd of sitters, and who will re-
munerate him accordingly.
In the developing rooms they have the electric light
with glow lamps, and two-way switches for obtaining
light from the lanterns or for illuminating the room at will.
Iu one of the dark rooms is a little piece of apparatus
by Mr. Fletcher, for obtaining nearly boiling water in
five minutes, or less warm water in a shorter time. The
chief merits of it are, that it is of small compass, and all
the parts are under the observation and within the reach of
the possessor, so that if any parts get out of order they
are not boxed up so as not to be available for immediate
repair.
With one of the cameras on the premises the operators
cau take portraits measuring 30 inches by 24 inches
direct.
A novelty, just introduced by the Company, is a
quarter-plate “artists’ camera,” measuring exteriorly
6 inches by 5 inches by 44 inches, strongly made, so that
it looks as if it might stand a kick anywhere without
damage. The lens works at//5£; it has a large finder,
and a shutter to give various speeds at will. They have
also a new camera with twin
lenses for stereoscopic work,
and photographs taken with it
were exhibited at the Photo-
graphic Convention at Chester
by Mr. Gambier Bolton.
Mr. Edgar Clifton has charge
of the amateur-teaching branch
of the business, and we hope
that he will write a book about his experiences. Mr.
Humphreys is in charge of the business section of the
amateur department. The Company has been awarded a
certificate of merit by Ally Sloper.
Mr. Friese Greene has just opened new studios at 162,
Sloane Street, London, and a day or two ago invited the
press and others to inspect them. Afternoon tea was
served and carried round among the guests by two waiters
dressed as English gentlemen of the Garrick period, with
powdered hair and everything complete. The various
storeys of the building are fitted up in artistic style, and
Mr. Greene advertises that they are “ open as an exhibi-
tion and a lounge between the hours of three and five.”
He has a good artist in oils constantly engaged upon
the premises — Miss Kate Pragnell, who is well known in
Bath and the West of England, who recently illustrated
the catalogue of paintings in the great private collection
of Sir Greville Smith, of Ashton Court, Clifton. Her
photographic colouring is executed in subdued colours,
and with artistic skill. She says that she finds that
celluloid will not bear loading with oil colours, also that
Mr. Greene’s opal cards will bear such treatment ; this
results in the exhibition of two classes of coloured
photographs.
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE “ PHOTOGRAPHIC
NEWS.”
On the sixteenth of August we shall issue as a supplement
a highly artistic photo-etching of the house of the late
Charles Kingsley, at Eversley, photographed from a paint-
ing. As this journal is usually kept by its subscribers
for binding, we recommend them not to part with their
copies until they are sure that they can get others.
©omspon&cnrc.
WEIGHTS, MEASURES, AND FORMULAE.
Sir, — In your issue of the 11th inst. Mr. Warnerke inveighs
against the report of the Convention committee on weights,
measures, and formula;, and since his letter is a most extra-
ordinary, though doubtless unintentional, misrepresentation of
the report, I will ask you to allow me to reply.
Mr. Warnerke says: “We learn (what was not generally
known) that the apothecaries' ounce of 480 grains, after all, is
not legal, and that the legal one of 43 7 "5 grains is divided into
480 parts, which greatly increases the already inextricable
chaos.” Why “after all”? The avoirdupois ounce of 437*5
grains has been the only legal ounce for ordinary buying and
selling in this country for many years ; no special apothecaries’
ounce has been included in the British Pharmacopoeia, at any
rate since 1864, and if these facts were not generally known to
photographers, they were, of course, well known to everyone
really acquainted with the English systems of weights and
measures. How can a state of things which has existed for
more than a quarter of a century fairly be said to “greatly
increase ” anything at this time of day, and is it not
desirable that, in discussing a scientific question, we should
avoid applying such extravagant terms as “ inextricable chaos”
to the comparatively simple problem of distinguishing between
an avoirdupois ounce and a troy ounce, a grain and a minim ?
Mr. Warnerke obviously does not fully recognise the difference
between the mode of division of the ounce and that of the
fluid ounce.
We never said that the metric system was exclusively used
for scientific purposes, because that would not be true. In
certain branches of applied science the English units are
constantly used.
We are charged with throwing a gratuitous insult at the
heads of thousands by stating that photographers are not
intelligent enough to understand the metric system ! We
never said anything of the kind. We did state that “ a
knowledge of decimals sufficient to enable a decimal system to
be used easily and accurately is by no means so widely
diffused as is desirable,” but that is a very different thing
from what we are asserted to have said. The statement is
unfortunately quite true ; we did not make it without first
being sure that it was iu accordance with the facts ; and wo
did not limit it to photographers, because it applies to all sorts
and conditions of men.
We are also charged with trying to impose on photographers
two systems of weights and measures, “ the metric, and a
modified one, iu which ounces and grains differ from the old
ones (they are divided into decimal parts) forgetting that
‘ photographers do not possess the knowledge of decimals
sufficient to enable a decimal system to be used easily and
accurately.’ ” In the first place, Mr. Warnerke puts between
inverted commas, and passes off as a sentence from our report,
a statement which does not occur in it at all. In the second
place, the ounces and grains which we speak of are not new ;
they are the same ounces and grains that we have been using
for years and years. Neither is the use of decimal parts of
grains aud ounces in any way a novelty ; it has been the
practice in many chemical laboratories, and with some photo-
graphers for a long time. Surely Mr. Warnerke does not
share the common misbelief that a decimal system is in-
separable from the metric system, aud that metric units are
the only units which can be or are used decimally ? Finally, in
July 18, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
5C3
this connection, we make no attempt to impose any units on
anybody ; we recommend no new units. We do recommend
that certain sub-units in fluid measure should not be employed ;
and we endeavour to show how well established and familiar
units can be used in the simplest and most intelligible manner.
Mr. Warnerke’s grievance against us, obviously, is that we
did not insist on the adoption of the metric system pure and
simple. Several of us, like many other scientific men, whilst fully
recognising the advantages of a decimal system, are by no
means so enamoured of the metric units as Mr. Warnerke
seems to be. The committee endeavoured to recommend a
scheme which should, in the first place, be practicable, and in
the second, likely to secure general adoption.
We regard our recommendations relating to formula; as the
most important part of our report. It seemed to us to be
undesirable to insist upon the adoption of auy particular units,
and it is quite of secondary importance whether any individual
chooses to use in his own practice ounces, or grains, or
grammes, so long as his units satisfy the condition of relation
between weight and measure which we specify, and provided
always that he expresses his quantities or formula; in “ parts”
when he wishes to communicate them to others. The fact
that our recommendations as to formula; are quite independent
of the particular units employed seemed to us to be one of
their strongest claims to general favour and acceptance.
The whole of the concluding and longest paragraph of
Mr. Warnerke's letter has very little bearing on the question
under discussion ; it certainly has no foundation on anything
contained in the report of the Convention committee.
C. H. Bothamley.
AX KLECTROSCOPIC MIRROR.
Sir, — An experimenter has seen occasion to arrive at the
conclusion that, under certain attainable conditions, and by the
employment of a conducting wire of a selected metal — the
same to be flattened out at each end into a highly-polished
mirror-surface — it becomes possible to transmit to a distant
station the perfect image of any face, picture, or document
thrown, under a proper arrangement of light, upon the trans-
mitter. This may, possibly, be true ; but it remains to be
demonstrated. .
Clifton.
[Because of a pen 'il n >Ie oi the original, wc are not sure whe-
ther the writer intenled this to be published with his name
attached, s; omit his na ne.— Ed.]
EALIXG PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY.
Sir, — A meeting of the above Society will be held at
the Victoria Hall, Ealing, on Thursday, the 24th inst., at
8 p.m., to appro\e the rules, enrol members, and elect officers
for the year. I am instructed by the provisional committee
to invite the attentance on that occasion of all those who are
interested in the subject. H. W. Peal.
2, Craven Terrace, Ealing, IF., July loth.
lavoccctitnsja: of Soricttts.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the weekly meeting on the 10th inst. Mr. T. E. Fresh-
water occupied the chair.
Details of a lantern slide competition to be held during the
lantern season were discussed. It was decided that the con-
ditions of the competition should be similar to those of the last
one held, three negatives to be selected, each competitor to have
them in turn. The slides may be made by any process, one
set of slides from each competitor to be an exact reproduc-
tion of the negative, without dodging, or masking, or addition
of skies.
At the request of the members, Mr. A. Cowan promised to
bring some quarter-plate negatives to the next meeting for
selection.
A member said that after toning, fixing, and washing prints on
gelatine paper, in some instances the surface of the prints be-
came very tacky, and if touched a part of the image would
adhere to the fingers. Could any member state the cause of
this ?
Mr. A. Cowan suggested as a remedy putting the prints in
an alum bath for a short time.
Mr. H. M. Hastings showed two prints on Hardcastle’s
platinum paper printed out.
Replying to a query whether drying negatives with alcohol
increased their density, Mr. J. J. Briginshaw said that some
time ago Mr. A. L. Henderson showed some results of experi-
ments he had made, which proved the affirmative.
Mr. W. E. Debenham said drying negatives quickly with
heat would have a tendency to increase their density.
Mr. W. H. Harrison described a simple photo-mechanical
process for printing coloured designs. Orthocliromatic plates
are used, and an exposure made to suit each colour ; the
remainder of the design on each i>late is then blocked out and
the negative printed on a collotype plate. A separate plate is
used for each colour in the design.
The subject for discussion on the 24th will be “ Printing
through Coloured Media.”
Photographers’ Benevolent Association.
A committee meeting was held at 4, Great James’ Street, Bed-
ford Row, on the 11th inst., Mr. \V. Bedford chairman. Messrs.
R. P. Drage, G. C. Audsley, and P. J. W. Wapp were elected
members. Votes of thanks were passed to the Mayor of
Chester for allowing the boxes to be placed in the Town Hall,
also to Mr. Briginshaw for his kind help. A vote of condolence
to Mrs. T. J. Collins was passed on the death of her husband,
who had always been to the fore in helping the Association, of
which he was the deputy-chairman. The money collected at
the convention was £2 Is. 7|d. The committee trust that
employers requiring assistants will write to the hon. sec., as
there are numerous persons on the books requiring situations.
German Amateurs. — A German amateur states that he has
made excellent portrait photographs in his garden, even in
high winds and on rainy days, by using a large white umbrella,
such as is used in out-door sketching, to control the light and
act as a curtain. He also uses a reflecting-screen made of
light muslin, stretched upon a rigid wooden frame. One of
the worst stories yet of the budding amateur is told by a
German journal. The youth in question wanted some 9 by 12
cm. plates. The dealer to whom lie went, having none in stock,
gave him a package of the next larger size, telling him he
could cut them down to suit — this, by the way, is also some-
what characteristic. The amateur forthwith went off to a
neighbouring glazier’s shop, unwrapped his plates, and had
them cut down to the proper dimensions in the ordinary day-
light of the shop. He then repacked them, took them home,
and filled his plate-holders in his dark room. Strange to say,
those plates turned out almost the worst cases of fog he had
ever seen. — Wdson's Photographic Magazine.
Croydon Camera Club.
On Thursday, July 10th, a meeting was held at the Public
Hall, Mr. G. R. White in the chair. A vote of thanks was
accorded to Mr. A. H. Smee for allowing the members to have
an excursion to his estate at Wallington.
The Secretary read a financial statement showing that the
affairs of this young Club are in a highly satisfactory condition.
Mr. I)e Clf.rcq notified the council’s views and decision in
reference to acquiring a permanent home for the C. C. C.
From his statement it appeared that the council had in con-
templation the acquisition of premises situated at 56, George
Street, Croydon, as being in every way suitable for the pur-
pose.
The Secretary proposed and Mr. Cheshire seconded a
resolution approving the decision of the council. After a few
remarks in favour of the scheme by Mr. Alfred Underhill,
the assistant secretary, the resolution was carried unanimously,
and the Secretary was authorised to call a special general
meeting on July 16th to take possession of the rooms.
The premises consist of one large room which will be used
564
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 18, 1890.
as a club room for meetings, demonstrations, and lantern
exhibitions ; there are two smaller rooms, one of which will
be used as a store room, and the other as a dark room fitted with
every convenience and appliance. The council will allow the
club to be used by tourists, cyclists, and others.
The assistant secretary (Mr. A. Underhill, 23a, Clarendon
Road, Croydon) will be glad to receive the names of candi-
dates who intend joining, or to give any required information.
Hackney Photographic Society.
The ordinary meeting was held on Thursday, July 10th, at
Morley Hall ; the chair was occupied by Mr. C. F. Hodges.
The Secretary reminded members that the monthly outing
would be on the 19th, that a competition would be held
in November, and that Messrs. H. P. Robinson and J. Traill
Taylor had consented to act as judges.
Mr. Carpenter handed round some negatives which had
holes in the films.
Mr. Acres said that they were air-bells, arising in development.
Mr. Hodges said he had found that with rapid exposures he
was troubled with them.
Mr. Acres said that it was through the developer being too
strong.
Mr. Birt Acres then read a paper on “ Exposure and
Development.” He said that he did not altogether agree with
exposure tables, and explained that exposures varied, and gave
as an example the angle of 45°, when the exposure would be
increased one half, and if at right angles it would be trebled.
The lecturer advocated the backing of plates with either burnt
sienna or Bates’ black. He preferred dull weather when pho-
tographing on glass. Some people complained of not being able
to develop isochromatic plates through their foggging by red
light. Mr. Acres said the fogging was generally caused when
the plate was held up to the light. He made two very inte-
resting experiments, one of which was as follows : Taking an
isochromatic plate, he made a positive by exposing the negative
for thirty seconds to the ruby light of the screened candle ; the
result was an exposure. The other experiment was that the
development was carried on by white light, the only change
being that he held the developing dish above the light. There
was no fogging with either of these plates.
Various questions were asked by Messrs. Hodges, Hensler,
Capel, Poulson, and the Secretary, to which Mr. Acres said
that some makers would back their plates if a sufficient number
were ordered, that plites ranged generally from 16 to 25 on
the sensitometer, and that he preferred as large a stop as
compatible with good definition.
Dr. Lif.segang, in Photo. Archiv, states that he has utilised
the known fact that the sensitiveness of silver salts is affected
by pressure in making prints. Any relief, such as a Woodbury-
type on glass, is pressed upon the paper under a sheet of glass.
Naturally the highest parts of the relief make the strongest
impression, the paper under them becomes less sensitive, and
on exposure to light a negative of the subject is obtained.
Flash-Powder. — We learn from our exchanges that a new
flash-powder has been worked out by Dr. James Taylor, of the
United States Department of Agriculture, which is obtained
from the down of the milk weed converted into charcoal, and
which is said to be almost entirely free from ash, and to burn
with a remarkable freedom and rapidity, and it is expected
that this new substance may largely supersede many of the
dangerous flash compounds now in use. — Anthony’s Bulletin.
Received. — The first number of “The Gentlewoman,” an
illustrated journal. Under the heading “ Art and Artists,”
is chronicled what is called “ another artistic advance in photo-
graphy,” and the following are the terms in which it is spoken
of: — “Mr. Vanderweyde is now producing what he terms
‘Diaphanous Effects’ in his new daylight studio, which apart-
ment is built on entirely new principles as an addition to his
famous electric light studios in Regent Street. Mr. Vander-
weyde secures, under the most novel conditions of lighting by
means of patented appliances, a subtle atmospheric and truly
diaphanous effect never before attained. The results are
extremely beautiful and artistic, and this new invention lends
tself most delightfully to portraits of ladies and children.”
. k/v •' vuyg. »
to ©omtfponBentg.
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Ur. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
W. D. B. — Preparation of the Nitrate from Old Silver. There
are two methods of working : either to evaporate the mixed
nitrates to dryness, and heat to incipient fusion, whereby
the copper salt becomes decomposed, and converted into the
insoluble black oxide ; or throw down the silver as chloride,
wash until free from copper, and reduce to pure metal by
fusing the dried chloride with three times its weight of dry
carbonate of soda. If you intend to use the nitrate of silver
only for printing, the first plan will be found to answer ;
but, for the better purposes, it is always safer to go the
length of purifying the silver in the way mentioned, and
then dissolve this again in pure nitric acid.
E. 0. C. (Boston, U.S.A.). — The Photogravure Process. Dr.
Gunther, in his letter of the 20th of June, was merely
quoting from the two German periodicals, Deutsche Photo-
graphen Zeitung (Berlin), and Photographische Correspondent
(Vienna), the first containing a practical article by E. Kiewning,
and the latter one by Rudolf Maschek. Both of these
separate numbers can be obtained by applying to their
respective publishers. Mr. W. T. Wilkinson’s manual is
out of print just now ; enquire of Messrs. England Brothers,
Charles Street. Notting Hill, London, W., for a new edition
is said to be in the press ; but a brief report of Mr. Wilkin-
son’s mode of working the photogravure process was published
in the News of March 28th last, page 237.
G. F. W. (Erith). — Alpha Paper Developer. Without ex-
perimental trial it is difficult to give an eikonogen equivalent
for the ferrous oxalate developer you now use. You speak
of the “complication” of formula; in cubic centimetres and
grammes, but nothing can be simpler, remembering that one
c.c. of water weighs a gramme. Take them as parts or
units by weight and measure, and then all will go right,
whether the English or Continental system be adopted.
J. W. (Leeds). — Seed’s Developer for Dry Plates. This was
given in the News of March 15th, 1889, top of page 170,
as follows : —
No. 1. — Sulphite of soda
Water
No. 2. — Carbonate of soda ...
Water
Normal developer, No. 1, If ounce ; No. 2,
dry, 4 grains.
H. H. B. — (Reading). — Toning of Aristotype Paper. Your
difficulties are increased by the unscientific practice of
toning and fixing in the same bath. Why not separate these
processes, using a borax or sulpho-cyanide toning bath, and
fixing with hypo as usual ? We have heard several com-
plaints of late about the muddy tones given by some samples
of this paper, but treated as proposed the defects may lie
to a considerable extent obviated. See Mr. H. 0. Hughes’s
article in the Year-Book, page 111.
L. N. — Fixing Prints with Chloride of Magnesium. The
strength of solution does not appear to be a matter of very
great consequence, provided that enough is employed to
dissolve out all the chloride of silver. We have searched the
journals for several months without finding any specific
formula for a fixing bath made with this new agent.
Probably two baths in succession would be best.
M. P. S. — Judges at the Forthcoming Exhibition. From the
list of persons nominated, we were led to infer that the Royal
Academicians would be in the majoiity ; but with Mr. Henry
Moore in association with six of the most talented art-
photographers of the day, we may still say that it would be
impossible to empanel a better jury,
1 ounce
8 ounces
1 ounce
8 ounces
ounce ; pyro,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
jJ v< \ U
1
\ *2 V •
vO’i-'T * /
CONTENTS.
PAOK
Permanent Historical Photographs 565
Photographic Orumblers 566
Indian Notes. By Col. J. Waterhouse, B.8.C 567
Flexible Supports for Photographic Films. By J. S. Fairfax 569
Notices of Books 570
The “ Crotonwanze ” Once More 571
Photography in Criminal Jurisprudence. By Julius F. Sachse 572
The American Photographic Convention 573
Notes 574
TkOi
The Glow of Phosphorus. By Professor T. E. Thorpe, F.R.8. 576
Stops or Diaphragms. By Ellerslie Wallace 577
Photography in Germany. By Hermann E. Gunther 578
The Photographic Image. By Professor Raphael Meldola,
F.R.8., M.R.1 680
Patent Intelligence 581
Correspondence 583
Proceedings of Societies 583
Answers to Correspondents 584
PERMANENT HISTORICAL THOTOGRAPHS.
The production of small photographs for historical
purposes in such a manner that they are likely to resist
the attacks of deteriorating influences for centuries, is
a problem which well deserves the attention of the
photographic world. Many years ago we gave a con-
siderable amount of attention to the problem, and
came to the conclusion that one good method was to
cement with heat a collodion transparency between
two plates of glass, by means of a resinous substance
not likely to crack or otherwise deteriorate with lapse
of time. In short, the id ■ i was to preserve the
photographic film like a fly in amber, and between two
sheets of glass. The insects found in amber lived ages
ago, and most of them belong to now extinct species.
In those early times many an unfortunate insect,
while crawling upon a hot day beneath the shade of
certain pine trees, particularly the pinites mccinifer,
found itself entombed for ever in a mass of resin
which had fallen from above as an exudation from the
tree. The essential oil in the resin slowly evaporated in
course of time, the resin itself hardened correspond-
ingly, and the body of the insect became so protected
from the ravages of time as to be preserved through
geological periods.
On this principle we once set to work to make a kind
of artificial amber so far as properties were concerned,
that is to say, a transparent, resinous cement, free from
volatile oil. A sample of pure and old Canada balsam
was taken, and placed for several days in an oven with
the door open, to slowly drive off the essential oil
without the application of much heat ; it was stirred
occasionally during the operation. Afterwards a few
drops of castor oil were added to the melted balsam,
and well stirred in ; care was taken not to add too
much castor oil, otherwise the mixture would not have
become sufficiently hard when cold. When the pro-
portions— which must be discovered by the system of
trial and error — are nicely adjusted, the mixture when
cold is somewhat tough, and not so brittle as amber.
Castor oil is not a volatile oil, and may almost be
classed with the drying oils, for after the lapse of great
length of time a thin layer of it will dry into a film.
The mixture just described is virtually a tough resin,
practically free from volatile matter.
A plate of iron, with short, firm legs and some minute
gas jets a little below it, was then taken, and some
sheets of smooth blotting-paper laid thereon, so that
the transparency should not come into direct contact
with the hot iron. The heat was regulated by means
of small taps governing the gas flames ; too much heat
discoloured the resinous mixture, and gave the trans-
parencies a yellow tinge. The transparency was laid
face upwards on the blotting-paper, and when it became
sufficiently hot some of the melted prepared balsam
was dropped upon it; the warmed covering glass was
theD laid upon the balsam, and the excess of the latter
worked out at the edges of the two plates by means of
thickly gloved fingers. Air bubbles were troublesome,
but with patience could be worked out ; this was all
the more practicable because plates larger than the
lantern slide size were not employed. Uneven glass
was troublesome and sometimes useless for the purpose ;
patent plate, or other glass with a truly plane surface,
should alone be used.
The hot iron arrangement was not a good one for
working always at uniform temperature, or for yielding
a steady heat. A better plan would be to use a brazed
rectangular vessel of copper, filled with olive oil and
with gas jets beneath ; a thermometer with its stem
projecting from the oil bath would serve as a guide to
the temperature, and the manipulations should be per-
formed on the upper copper surface of the bath.
The operations already described were performed by
us about a quarter of a century ago, in the old col-
lodion days, and the various portraits — heads and busts
only — thus preserved were altogether unchanged, so
far as memory could be trusted, when wc saw them
last, upon turning out the contents of an old box a
year or two back. One of the portraits thus preserved
was that of Faraday, and it is probably the most life-
566
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
like and interesting one of him at present in existence ;
another was a likeness — and not a flattering one — of
Professor Tyndall. The two collodion transparencies
were originally obtained from two professional photo-
graphers, who furnished them to us at the request of
Professor Tyndall.
When Mr. York photographed the last of the
quaggas, little did he think that he was earning
immortality for his name, and causing it to be em-
blazoned for ever in the annals of zoological science,
just as would have been the case with another man
had that other person been the only one to photograph
the last living dodo. Mr. York has five negatives of
the quagga, and it is desirable that positives from
them should be made as soon and as perfectly as pos-
sible by the most permanent process available, and one
yielding abundance of delicate detail. On considering
these points, it will be seen that much is to be said in
favour of the method just described, and that it is one
which deserves the attention of the historian and the
antiquarian.
Some microscopic slides cemented with Canada bal-
sam are found to lose their covering glasses by the
balsam hardening and allowing the glasses to chip off.
The process of cementing lenses, photographs, and so
on by means of Canada balsam and castor oil is as old
as the hills, and we are told that the ready-prepared
transparent cement can be had in the market. For
historical purposes, however, it is essential that the
photographer shall conscientiously make the cement
himself at the lowest suitable temperature from the
best materials, and shall take care that all the volatile
oil has been driven off ; ho must also take care that
enough castor oil is employed to guard against an
adverse amount of brittleness. The arborescent mark-
ings which sometimes appear between cemented lenses
are due to a residuum of volatile oil in the cement
used, which oil evaporates in course of time after the
cementing.
The Convention at Washington. — The Photographers’
Association of America will hold its annual convention at the
Smithsonian Institute, Washington, August 12th to 15th in-
clusive. The grand prize is offered for the best print from a
negative suggested by Tennyson’s “Enoch Arden.” During
the convention week the memorial to Daguerre will be unveiled.
Matting Lantern Slides. — A trustworthy universal form
for cutting out openings of various sizes and shapes in slide
mats is still a desideratum, notwithstanding the fact that there
are one or two mat-trimmers in the market. Without wishing
to reflect upon their usefulness, we may express the wish that
some ingenious amateur would give us some better way. A
fairly satisfactory method is to keep a stock of strips of thin
black paper of various widths, and to gum these to the face of
the slide as the subject may require, care being taken to make
perfectly square corners. Another method, which does away
with the square corners, objectionable to many, is to cut a
piece of thin, hard card- board to the size and shape of the
opening, and bend it over squarely across the middle. The
mat paper is cut to size, folded across the middle, and placed
between the two halves of the doubled card-board, which acts
as a clamp. The opening is easily cut out with a pair of sharp
scissors. Cards of various sizes aud shapes are easily made, or
thiu sheet brass may be used. — American Amateur Photo-
grapher,
PHOTOGRAPHIC GRUMBLERS.
Tiiehe arc some men who are never content with their
surroundings, and seem to have a notion that their
fellow- creatures, and the universe generally, are in
conspiracy against them, in order to render all their
schemes abortive. It is, of course, natural that photo-
graphy should have among its votaries a few men of
this kind, although it is a misfortune to them that
they ever undertook the business or pastime of picture-
making with a camera ; for this art of ours is full of
pitfalls and quicksands of trouble and disappointment,
and unless the worker be of easy temperament he will
most surely quarrel with it, and attribute his want of
success to everything but the true cause.
It so happened that a few weeks ago we had the
opportunity of spending some time in the company of
one of these grumblers, and we were certainly amused
at the way in which he met every little trivial
occurrence as if it were a foregone conclusion, and
one which had been especially prepared for his discom-
fiture. We reminded him of the well-known lines : —
“The best laid scheme o’ mice and men
Gang aft a-gley,”
and told him that it was silly to make so much of trivial
misfortunes; but he replied in a despondent tone, and
although he did not actually say that
“ From childhood’s hour
I’ve seen my fondest hopes decay,”
he looked it, and evidently meant it. As there may be
others among our photographic friends who occasionally
allow despondent thoughts (and their livers) to get the
better of them, we have thought it worth while to dot
down some of the complaints of our dyspeptic friend,
in order that they may see how ridiculous such com-
plaints appear to be when “ made a note of.”
The weather naturally furnishes the greatest amount
of matter for grumbling about, and if our friend had
confined his vituperations to this terrible month of
July, we could not but sympathise with him. But he
has quarrelled with the weather ever since he began
to photograph ; indeed, some of his acquaintances go
so far as to say that he took up the art in order to
enlarge his opportunities for grumbling at the elements.
If the sun shines brilliantly and it is seasonably hot,
he will tell you that he had set apart this very day for
sensitising carbon tissue, or for making gelatine emul-
sion, or for doing something else where cooluess was
required. Or he will tell you endless stories of how
he went to a particular place to take a certain photo-
graph with an ash tree or a birch tree in the foreground,
aud how that particular tree could only be taken in
the absence of wind ; how he had chosen a muggy,
sultry day for his work, and how a gale sprang up
directly he put up his tripod on the spot. “Just like my
luck,” he always says at the end of one of these
painful narratives. “ If I were a farmer,” he told us,
“ and my crops needed rain, I shouldn’t worry myself
at all. I should arrange to print a few photographs,
for I am certain that directly I got out my frames,
July 25, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
567
and prepared for a good day’s work, the rain would
come down in torrents ; it always does whenever I want
to print.” He also tells a remarkable story of returning
home from a morning’s work in the open country, and
coming upon a wonderful group of cattle standing
knee deep in a river, and forming a most perfect picture.
The animals were motionless, and he had everything in
his favour for taking a fine picture. He had only one
plate left unexposcd, and that he was to use for this
splendid work of art. Gold and silver medals already
dangled in imagination before his eyes, and this picture
he was determined should be the picture of the season.
He focussed with extra care, and made his exposure,
but only just in time, for the cattle presently moved
out of the water. Packing up his camera, he made
the disgusting discovery that he had never drawn the
shutter of the dark slide. He, of course, does not
attribute this accident to any fault of his own, but to
some persistent fiies which would swarm round his
head while he was focussing the picture. He is not a
very pleasant companion to go out photographing with,
because if you make a remark, or sneeze, or cough, and
he happens at the moment to expose a plate a second
time, he blames you as much for the loss of his two
pictures as if you had caused him to sacrifice as many
bank notes.
But it is in the dim obscurity of his dark room that
this grumbling friend of ours is seen, or rather heard, at
his best. If a picture is over or under-exposed, or if
no developer or combination of developers will bring
out any trace of an image — and this is often the case
with our friend — there is heard through the door sounds
of quarrelling, which gener.I' v finish up with a smash-
ing of crockery. It is only our friend grumbling at
his results, and smashing his plates by way of
emphasizing his disgust. The storm for the moment
appears to have past, but presently you will see our friend
emerge from his dark-room with a frowning expression
of determination upon his face. He makes for the
nearest table, sits down, and writes a letter to the
unfortunate plate-makers of such a character that they
would be fully justified in bringing an action against
him for slander, if they cared to do so. On one
occasion this dyspeptic individual bought, on the
recommendation of a friend, a new changing-box, aud
on the first occasion of using it returned without it.
Upon asking what had become of it, he acknowledged
that one of the plates having stuck in it, he had been
so exasperated that he threw the box down in the road
and jumped upon it. The jumping he owned had not
cured the evil — but had smashed the apparatus to
splinters. Our friend’s experiences of toning silver
prints are too sad for description, neither will we
harrow the feelings of our readers by telling them
more of the many difficulties which beset him. We
endeavoured lately to point out delicately to him that
some at least of these evils are of his own creation, and
may possibly be traced to an abnormal condition of his [
digestive organs. He differed with us, and we have
not been on speaking terms since.
INDIAN NOTES.
BV COLONEL J. WATERHOUSE, B.S.C., ASSISTANT-SURVEYOR-
GENERAL OF INDIA.
Eikonogen Developer for Bromide Prints and Enlargements.
— The following developer, given in Eder’s last Jahrbuch
by Dr. Just, as Dr. Krugener’s, has been found to answer
well for bromide paper enlargements. In 20 ounces (or
600 c.c.) of distilled water, 320 grains (or 20 grammes)
sodic sulphite, 240 grains (or 15 grammes) sodic car-
bonate, crystals are dissolved ; and then 80 grains (or 5
grammes) of eikonogen added with potassic bromide, as re-
quired, up to 10 drops (1 : 50) per 1,000 c.c. of developer.
Very short exposures are required with this developer, and
if the exposure be correct, the image is well detailed, and of
a good colour. It is said that old eikonogen developers
work better for bromide prints than fresh ones ; but with
old developers there seems to be a tendency for the paper
to stain round the edges, especially if it also is old, and
therefore it may sometimes be better to use freshly-made
developer in small quantities for each print, with a little
once used added, in preference to developing a batch of
prints one after the other in the same solution. It may
be noted that developer that has been repeatedly used
becomes strongly fluorescent or dichroic, appearing a
bright dark green by reflected light, and a dark olive
yellow by transmitted light, very much like petroleum
oil.
Preserving Eikonogen. — Eikonogen seems to be very
readily decomposed by air and moisture, more so than
pyrogallol or quinol, and it would be a great thing if some
means could be found for keeping the crystals free from
discolouration. They seem to be quite insoluble in
alcohol, and it might answer to fill up the bottles contain-
ing them with tYs fluid, or some not too volatile hydro-
carbon from which they could easily be freed by evapora-
tion when required. The brown colouring matter, which
results from the oxidation, has a certain staining action on
the gelatine film, and in preparing solutions it is well to
wash the crystals once or twice with a very little water to
remove the colour, and then to dissolve the clean remainder
in the proper quantity of distilled water. This, however,
involves a certain loss of material, which is better avoided
if possible. The solution with sodic sulphite gradually
darkens if exposed to air, and therefore the stock solu-
tions should be kept in bottles well filled up and closed.
In a recent number of the Journal des Societes Photo -
graphiques a very ingenious method of keeping a bottle
filled up is reported as brought before the Versailles
Photographic Society by Monsieur Fourtier. It would
seem that a hydroquinone developer is sold ready pre-
pared, accompanied by a box of glass beads, which are to
be put into the bottle to replace the fluid taken from it
from time to time, and thus keep it filled up. The plan
will be useful for all stock developers, and if glass beads
are not available, clean glass (old plates) broken into
small pieces, pounded quartz, or small pebbles, would
answer equally well. The dodge is by no means new, but
I do not recollect seeing it used in this connection before,
and it is certainly worth noting.
Eikonogen for Instantaneous Work. — Further experience
with eikonogen seems to show, as already recognised in
Europe and America, that it is likely to be particularly
valuable for instantaneous work, and that not so much
from the mere shortening of exposure, as for the
power it gives of using a very much smaller stop in the
568
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[Jnr.Y 25, 1890.
lens. Hitherto, when working with the ordinary pyro
developer, I have generally found it necessary to use
nearly the full aperture of a 71-inch focus rapid symme-
trical lens to cover a 5 by 4 plate fairly to margin. With
this aperture, and using extra rapid plates, not drop
shutter, over-exposure Avas rare, and the plates more
inclined to be under-exposed than otherwise. With the
eikonogen developer recommended by Dr. J. Nicol, in
the last Photographic Times Almanac, and working in the
same Avay, I found that my plates Avere considerably over-
exposed, and further trials have shown that the Avorking
aperture may be A’ery considerably reduced, the smallest
stop being sufficient for open, bright subjects with sky and
Avater, and the medium for close Avork Avith foliage; there
is the further advantage that, if desirable, a shorter focus
lens (6-incli) can be used to coArer the same sized plate.
It seems probable that before long all out-door Avork in
fine Aveather Avill be done instantaneously, and this new
developing agent Avill undoubtedly be a very great aid
in this direction. There does not seem to be the same
tendency to excessive density and hardness as Avith
hydroquinone or pyro in cases of under-exposure, and
there is a greater tendency to weakness and Avant of
density by over-exposure, or by too quick development.
The image should come up slowly, gathering density as it
goes on, and plates may be given a prolonged develop-
ment Avithout shoAving the fatal mottling Avhicli is observ-
able with hydroquinone. For studio work and interiors
Avhere it is possible to effect a substantial reduction of
exposure, eikonogen Avill also be found useful. For
vigour and delicacy of gradation it seems at present
inferior to pyro, but with it, as with other developers, the
result depends very much on the strength of the solutions,
and the relative proportions of eikonogen and alkali, as
Avell as on the lighting and exposure given.
Eikonogen Developer without Sulphite. — In nearly all the
published formula1 the addition of sodic sulphite in vary-
ing proportions, usually from twice to four times the
eikonogen, is recommended, and no doubt it is Araluable
for preserving the solution in good order. Unfortunately,
like many sulphur compounds, sodic sulphite readily
decomposes, and there can be no doubt that partially
decomposed or impure sulphite in the developer is a fertile
source of surface stains and discolouration, especially if
the sensitive gelatine silver coating of dry plates, films, or
paper has itself become decomposed by keeping, as those
sent out to this country often are found to be on arrival.
In Europe there need be no great difficulty about obtain-
ing supplies of fresh sulphite as required, but in this and
other distant lands dependent upon Europe or America for
chemicals and other products of civilisation, there can be
no certainty as to this material being fresh and pure,
though its purity as regards freedom from sulphate may
easily be tested with a little baric chloride or nitrate.
Even if fresh and good Avhen received, it soon spoils
by keeping in the corked bottles it is usually put up
in, and should be kept in Avell-stoppered bottles.
It seems, therefore, desirable, if possible, to dispense
Avith the sulphite, at any rate for home Avork, and use
freshly made-up solutions of eikonogen, addiug the
requisite quantity of alkali, Avith a little restraining
bromide to give density if necessary. Some experiments
have been made with this object, but the weather is un-
favourable at present, and I have not yet ascertained the
best proportions for general use. A solution containing
1 to 1^ parts of eikonogen and 1 to 2 parts of sodic car-
bonate crystals to 100 parts of Avater, seems likely to Avork
well , the relative proportions of eikonogen and alkali being
modified to suit the exposure and type of plate used.
Potassic carbonate has also given good results, but further
trials are necessary. I hope to have more to say on this
subject at a future time, as Avell as upon other preserva-
tives than sulphite for the eikonogen solution.
Keeping of Erythrosin-Silver Plates. — Some SAvan’s plates
which had been prepared by Mallmann and Scolik’s
erythrosin-sih’er bath process for orthochromatic Avork,
on the 19th of October, 1888, or about twenty months
ago, and had since been kept in a cardboard box in alight
temporary dark-room, made of Willesden paper, out in a
verandah, Avere lately exposed. Though they had some-
what lost sensitiveness, they developed quite clear and free
from any fogging round the edges, and Avere only slightly
marked by finger spots. This Avould seem to show that
the erythrosin-silver compound acts beneficially in pre-
serving orthochromatic plates in this climate. The English
orthochromatic plates, though working admirably Avhen
fresh, soon deteriorate under similar circumstances. The
erythrosin-silver plates referred to have been kept Avrapped
up in pairs, face to face, and it has been found that plates
kept in grooved boxes, tin, wood, or card, very soon
become decomposed round the edges. Some other plates
(Wratten's and Ilford’s) prepared with nesculin and
ammonia, with salicin and ammonia, and Avith a certain
resinous chlorophyll solution, upwards of a year ago,
backed in the same Avay, and also left through the monsoon
in the little paper dark-room, seem none the Avorse. They
developed quite clearly Avith eikonogen, and barely show
a speck of fungus.
Acid Fixing Bath. — Several Continental Avriters have
lately recommended an acid fixing bath as being more
permanent, and tending to clear plates from stains, as well
as hardening the film. In Eder’s Jahrbuch for 1890, Herr
Lainer has recommended the following: —
A. — Hyposulphite of soda
Dissolved in water to
B. — Sulphite of soda
Water
Hydrochloric acid . . .
1(30 grammes
800 c.c.
20 grammes
80 c.c.
10 „
Mix A and B ; the result is a clear solution, Avith a very
strong smell of sulphurous acid, which soon goes off.
This solution has been used with the eikonogen deve-
loper for plates and celluloid films. It kept clear at
first, but after a Aveek or so a copious black precipitate
was formed, and the sides of the bottle were thickly coated,
just as with the ordinary fixing bath. The solution has,
however, only a very slightly sulphurous smell, the smell
of camphor from the films predominating, and it is quite
free from colour. The hardening effect claimed for the
bath has not been very noticeable. Trials have also been
made with another similar bath containing chrome alum,
recommended by Cramer for use with the American
plates made by him. The formula, as given in Anthony's
Bulletin, is —
Sodium sulphite crystals...
Water ... ...
After being dissolved, add —
Sulphuric acid ...
Chrome alum powder
Dissolve, and pour into a solution of —
Hyposulphite of soda ... 2 pounds (1 kilo)
Water ... ... ... 3 quarts (3 litres)
The bath, Avhen first made up, was clear, but soon became
4 ounces (120 grammes)
1 quart (1 litre)
I ounce (15 c.c.)
3 ounces (90 grammes)
July 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS,
509
turbid, and deposited a yellowish-white precipitate. It is
claimed for this, also, that it remains clear after frequent
use, does not discolour the negatives, and forms no pre-
cipitate upon them. It also hardens the gelatine to such
a degree that the negatives can be washed in warm water,
provided they have been left in the bath a suliicient time.
It is recommended that they should be allowed to remain
in the bath from five to ten minutes after the bromide
appears to have been dissolved, in order to secure the per-
manency of the negative and its freedom from stain, as
well as the hardening of the film. This bath has a strong
green colour, and the negatives fixed in it all show a
greenish tint when laid upon paper, though it is not per-
ceptible by transmitted light. It has also precipitated,
but not so much as the other bath. It certainly does
harden the gelatine film very strongly, but if the film is
hopelessly soft to begin with it will not save it ; the outside
skin gets tanned, and is liable to separate from the lower
one, or it becomes wrinkled all over. A solution weaker
in chrome alum would probably be better for such films.
After about ten days' moderate use it has only a very
slightly sulphuretted smell, not nearly so strong as the
ordinary bath would have. It has been used almost
exclusively with the eikonogen developer. So far, the
advantages to be gained by these acid fixing baths are not
quite apparent, but further use, in comparison with the
ordinary bath, may bring them out. In this country, a
fixing batli which would remove stain, and effectively
harden soft films w’thout reticulating them, would be very
valuable.
FLEXIBLE SUPPORTS FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC
FILMS.*
BY J. S. FAIRFAX.
Heretofore it has been customary to form the sensitised
gelatine film used in the production of photographic
negatives, commonly known as “ dry plates,” upon trans-
parent glass. The increasing use of the dry plate process
for out-of-door photography has added to the demand
for a light plate, which will reduce to a minimum the
weight to be transported.
Paper has been used as a temporary support ; the
sensitised film being laid upon it in long strips, and
apparatus provided by which rolls of this film can be
placed in the camera, unrolled without opening the camera,
and successive plates exposed. This improvement has
lessened weight, but on account of the want of transpar-
ency in the paper, it has been found necessary", after
exposure and development, to separate the film from the
paper, and coat the film with collodion. The pyroxy-
line support, thus provided, requires skill to apply, and
an accident may destroy the picture on the negative ;
while it has been found impracticable to thus secure
anything but a very light and unsubstantial support.
Attempts to substitute pyroxyline for paper in the first
instance have not proved successful, the strips of cellu-
loid or plastic compounds of pyroxyline (either rolled or
split thin) having insufficient flexibility for use on rolls.
It has also been found impracticable to form these pyroxy-
line supports by means of ordinary collodion, the film
which could be formed from a single application (unless
the liquid when applied was too thick to flow) being too
* This is the substance of a patent of general interest to photographers,
issued last Wednesday. The invention is that of Mr. Freierick Crane, of
New Jeisey.
unsubstantial, while subsequent applications injuriously
acted upon or dissolved the previously formed film. More-
over, the great contraction of collodion in drying was
objectionable, as it caused the film to buckle.
The improved film or support may be made from a thin
solution of pyroxyline flowed upon a smooth surface,
called a “ carrier,” and the thickness regulated by the
number of coats, when, by using a nearly saturated solu-
tion, I am enabled to apply successive coats of this pure
pyroxyline compound, which, heretofore, has not been
done. It may be made also from a very heavy solution of
pyroxyline, and spread upon the carrier, the thickness
being regulated by the spreader. In practice I prefer to
use the heavy solution and spread it, as it is more quickly
done, and cheaper than by flowing. In making these
solutions, I use as a solvent any liquid or solvent which
will thoroughly dissolve the pyroxyline, and will not give
the film a greasy surface — to which the gelatine emulsion
will not adhere — nor injuriously affect the gelatine emulsion
when applied. In the heavy solution it is preferred to
use gum camphor as one of the solvents, and I mix with
the solution any of the miscible non-solvents, such as amyl
alcohol, butyl alcohol, and petroleum naphtha, which, while
having little or no solvent power in themselves, are often
desirable ingredients in these solutions from their water
repellant qualities and cheapness.
Having thus outlined the invention, I will proceed,
more particularly by way of illustration, to describe some
methods of applying it. I do not, however, wish to be
understood as confining myself to the particular methods
of application mentioned, as there are various other ways
which involve merely such modifications of the solution
as will be readily suggested to those skilled in the art.
For a thin solution to be flowed upon glass, or other
polished carrier, the following is found to be a good
formula : —
Methyl (or wood) alcohol ... ... 40 gallons
Amyl, propyl, or butyl acetate, or mixtures
thereof... ... ... ... ... "20 ,,
Amyl alcohol ... ... ... ... 40 ,,
Soluble pyroxyline ... ... ... 50 pounds
The solution is so nearly saturated that the second
application thereof (which is frequently necessary to
secure a sufficiently thick and substantial support) will
not destroy nor injure the previously formed film. The
solution is allowed to How upon glass (preferably first
coated with a thiu solution of iudia-rubber in benzine, or
other suitable coating, to preveut adhesion), and when
dry it is stripped from the glass or other carrier and cut
to desired sizes, or into long strips to be used from rolls,
for which the invention is especially well adapted.
For a heavy solution, to be spread upon the carrier by
a spreading knife or straight edge, the following formula
is a good example : —
Methyl (or wood) alcohol
Amyl alcohol or fusel oil
Amyl acetate
Gum camphor
Soluble ( photographic) pyroxyline
55 gallons
20 „
25 „
50 pounds
100 „
For amyl alcohol in the foregoing formulas, butyl
alcohol or its isomer may be substituted, and for the amyl
acetate, the acetate of butyl or other ethers of butyl
alcohol and amyl alcohol which are known solvents of
pyroxyline may be substituted. Also, the proportions in
which the liquids are mixed will somewhat depend upon
the amount of dampness in which they are to be worked,
570
. v \ i
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. [July 25, 1890
r — jf >
the degree of solvency of the pyroxyhne employed, the
consistency of the solution desired, and the amount of
susceptibility to water required in the film.
The solution given in the last example is too heavy to
flow, but it is distributed upon the glass or other polished
carrier (prepared as before mentioned) by means of a
knife or other equivalent device, as is well understood,
and when the film has set or hardened, I strip it from the
carrier and cut it into plates or long strips to be used from
rolls.
After taking the pyroxyliue film from the glass or other
carrier, I distribute upon it the sensitised gelatine emulsion
from cylinders revolving in a trough containing the
emulsion, or in .any of the well-known ways of distributing
the emulsion upon its support. Or I may distribute the
sensitised gelatine emulsion by spreading it upon the
pyroxyline film before its removal from the glass or other
carrier. After being coated with the gelatine emulsion,
the strips of coated films are placed in holders, or rolled
upon rollers, and are then ready for use in the camera.
If, for any reason, it is found desirable to use less
pyroxyline, or to use stronger or more energetic solvents
in any of the solutions named, the surplus or too active
solvent power may be reduced by the substitution of
miscible non-solvents in sufficient quantity to neutralize
the excess of solvent, the amount of these non-solvents to
be used in any case depending entirely upon the amount
of unemployed solvent power which is desirable to reduce.
It is to be understood that I do not confine myself to
the particular solvents named which are enumerated as
examples. For instance, in place of, or in conjunction
with, amyl alcohol, or fusel oil, or butyl alcohol, or their
isomers, I sometimes use benzoline or petroleum naphtha
or benzoline.
It is necessary, however, to use about the proportions
named of nou-hygroscopic menstrua to prevent clouding
the resultant film ; but in general, any of the well-known
solvents and well-known non-solvents may be employed,
provided they are not of such a greasy nature as to pre-
vent the adherence of the sensitised emulsion to the
finished film ; and the choice of these depends upon the
time required for the film to set or dry.
This invention may also be used as a support for photo-
graphic prints, especially in the production of trans-
parencies.
Magnesium Lamp. — Mr. K. Robert is placing on the market
a small apparatus which has been patented in France as “ Le
Tison Eclair,” to be known here as “The Lightning Fusee.”
The advantages claimed are its portability, its safety, the bril-
liancy of its light (serving to illuminate objects within a radius
of ten yards), and the ability to use it in the open air in any
weather. The magnesium powder, of which the little appa-
ratus carries twelve charges, is driven by pneumatic pressure
through the flame of a fusee-vesta placed in a holder in front
of the instrument.
A Camera-Stand Adjunct. — Messrs. Watson and Sons have
just introduced a device for rendering a tripod stand more
stable on slippery surfaces, such as polished wood or stone, or
the deck of a ship. It consists of three little brass thumb-
screws for affixing at any desired level to the three legs of the
stand. From each thumb-screw proceeds a cord to a light,
peculiarly-shaped piece of brass which the three cords hold in
suspension horizontally beneath the centre of stand-head, and
to which piece of brass the cords hold on firmly by friction.
The legs are thus “ tied,” so to speak, at any desired angle to
each other, and when accidentally kicked underneath are not
likely to fall or to allow the camera to be upset.
Nottrcg of auoofcg.
Die OuTHOSKiAfiRATHfsCHF. Photographie. Bemerkung-
iiber Misserfolge und deren Abhilfe, und Sammlung
von liecepten. Ludwig David and Charles Scolik.
Halle: W. Knapp.
This work, forming the second volume of David and
Scolik's Manual of Photography with bromide of silver
gelatine, is itself divided into three parts. The first part
treats upon orthocliromatic photography, and will be found
to possess great interest to those who either propose to pre-
pare plates giving what is known as orthochromatic effect,
or to use such plates prepared commercially, with an
understanding of the amount of effect that they should
expect, and of the extent to which that effect may be
modified and controlled by the use of coloured screens or
other artifices.
On the vexed question of the ultimate reason why the
addition of certain dyes to an emulsion should render it
sensitive to certain rays, we do not find a great deal
written. Doubtless the authors reasoned that it would be
a mistake to devote much space in a work intended princi-
pally for the use of the practical photographer, to the
consideration of the polemics of the question, respecting
which such wide differences of opinion prevail amongst
those who are entitled to be considered authorities on the
subject. Concerning a practical method of ascertaining
the effect of particular sensitisers, and reasoning there-
from with regard to their use with the sensitive silver
salts, we find the following summarised remarks.
In order to discover a suitable dye stuff for sensitising
the photographic film for rays of any particular colour, an
image of the solar spectrum is projected by means of a
prism, and a vessel containing a solution of the substance
to be examined is placed in the path of the rays between
the slit and the prism. It is then found that certain rays
disappear, and their place in the spectrum is occupied by
dark lines (absorption lines). It is noted what are the
lines thus absorbed and extinguished. If, for instance,
the interposed vessel contain aniline red or napthalin red,
as those dyes absorb the yellowish-green rays, we find in
the spectrum band a dark strip between the solar lines
D and E. We can then form a judgment, from the influ-
ence which a dye stuff has upon the visible spectrum, of
the effect which it may be expected to produce in sensi-
tising for colour the photographic salts.
There are two coloured plates in the work, one of which
shows the spectrum, both continuous and solar, accom-
panied by photographs of the spectrum taken, with the
silver salt affected by various of the recognised colour-
sensitisers. Here may be noted the effect of cyanin and
of a mixture of cyanin and chiuoliue red in carrying the
photographic action considerably beyond that effected by
eosin or erythrosin, the image in the latter case stopping
short at the yellow line D, whilst with cyanin the action is
carried well into the yellow orange, a colour which, from
its luminosity, absolutely requires to be rendered if the
plate is to approximate to a real orthochromatic effect.
The other coloured plate is one which will be appreci-
ated, especially by those practical workers who do not
care to go into the question of spectrum photography, but
like to see the direct effect of sensitising for such colours as
they meet with in nature and on the palette of the painter.
Here we find squares covered respectively with two shades
of red, orange, yellow, two greens, one yellowish, and th e
July 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
571
other inclined to blue ; two blues, and purple. The colours
appear to be well and fairly chosen ; the blues, for instance,
though different, are both bright, and do not partake of
that dark, heavy character which we have sometimes seen
in such examples, when the difficulty of making blue come
out dark in the resulting orthochromatic photographs
appears to be met half-way by special manipulation of the
colour selected. On the next page are three photographs
of this sheet of colours — one taken on an ordinary plate,
one on a colour-sensitised plate without, and one with, the
addition of a yellow screen. This set shows the advantage
to be derived from each of these aids. A pair of photo-
graphs of a landscape subject, taken one under ordinary,
aud the other under orthochromatic conditions, strikes us
as being the least satisfactory portion of the work. It is
not that the difference is not manifest, for it is so in a
very marked degree ; but — a fault that we have before
observed in similar productions — the best does not appear
to have been done with the ordinary plate. Buildings
and other objects in the foreground which are almost
lost in general blackness might, we are convinced, have
been brought out much better with a somewhat longer
exposure. It is no doubt possible that in that case the
distant mountains would have suffered from over-expo-
sure, but we think it would be better to show the
best that could be done on an ordinary plate with the
subject as a whole, leaving the orthochromatic to beat it,
perhaps, at both ends of the scale of light gradation, rather
than to present for comparison a picture which strikes
the observer as deficient in point of exposure.
To the illustrations and descriptions of the effect of
various orthochromatising additions is added what will
doubtless be the most useful aud interesting part of the
work to the practical photographer, formula; and methods
of using shown by experience to yield the most satisfactory
results. Although few photographers now make their own
emulsion aud coat their own plates, there is an increasing
number of those who like to orthochromatise plates them-
selvesbythe simple bath process, requiring no special instal-
lation beyond a dark cupboard, who will appreciate a work
like the present, in which not only are the various methods
and formula; stated and explained, but the reason is given
for the selection of one or other sensitising agent, according
to the effect desired in the plate.
The second part of the work is devoted to an explana-
tion of the various causes of failure likely to be met with
in working the gelatine process. Here not only are
failures described, but cuts are given illustrating most of
the spots aud markings to be met with in gelatine plates.
A glance at these wood-cuts brings an unpleasant
reminder of the failures that most have experienced in
the early days of gelatine photography.
The third and concluding part of the volume contains
a valuable collection of formula; for use throughout the
practise of photography with gelatino-bromide of silver.
In addition to these is a short description of the effectsand
characteristics of most if not all of the various recipes.
There is, moreover, a special chapter furnished with
several illustrative wood-cuts of the various manipulations
connected with printing by the enlarging lantern upon
gelatino-bromide of silver paper.
New Holidays in Essex, by Percy Bindley. ( London :
125, Fleet Street, 1890.)
This is another of the cheap little guide-books by Mr.
Percy Bindley about districts connected with the Great
Eastern Railway system, and is likely to be useful to
photographers, so many of the short excursions of Eondon
photographic societies being to places in the Eastern
counties. Essex may not be so rich in picturesque scenes
as some other counties near Eondon ; nevertheless, it has
its beautiful forest, and abounding objects of interest, as
set forth in guide-books, and in the records of the Essex
Field Club. Mr. Eindley's book is well illustrated, and
will give its possessor, when he is travelling in Essex, an
amount of information which will add considerably to his
interest in the the places which he visits. The book
contains a map of the county.
THE “ CROTONWANZE ” ONCE MORE.
When we sounded our note of warning in the January
Journal respecting a fresh danger that threatened the
American dry plate industry, we had but little idea that
the matter would become one of international importance ;
therefore it is with pleasure that we inform our readers on
both sides of the ocean that the incipient danger has
passed, the dark clouds have been dispelled, and once
more the photographic horizon is clear and bright without
the least sign of fog. In reply to our query in the March
Journal, Dr. A. Miethe, of Berlin, the well-known editor
of the Photographisches Wochenblatt, in No. 17 of present
volume, answers : —
‘ ‘ Our friends in America have shown much pleasure
that we so well understood their Cimex joke, as set forth
in our Eetterbox notice — as our readers will no doubt
recall the fact, that at the time we referred in our
‘ Ilepertorium ’ to an article from an American news-
paper, in which mention was made of a mythical insect
which had developed an especial appetite for the American
dry plate. Under these circumstances we could not
refrain from warning our readers against the use or
purchase of any American dry plates, so as to prevent the
introduction of this dreadful insect, which threatened to
prove more destructive than the Colorado potato beetle,
and, if possible, to obviate this great danger. Immediately
afterwards there appeared in an American magazine0 a
well-meant sally against German thoroughness and
credulity.
‘ ‘ In reply, we mentioned seriously as the occasion
offered, that an organism outside of the Crotonwanze did
exist — a fungus, which formed on damp gelatine dry plates,
and that in the process of formation, growth, or existence,
so changed or affected the photographic properties of the
affected plate that, after exposure and development, such
plates showed numberless transparent spots, and, conse-
quently, were rendered useless. We suffered heavily
during the past summer by the appearance of these
organisms,” writes Dr. Miethe, “and only overcame the
difficulty by a thorough disinfection of our dark chest with
carbolic acid and fumes of bi-chloride of mercury. The
plates which had been thus affected, as a matter of course
were lost or spoiled, and herein the friendly editor of the
American Journal of Photography has misunderstood us
(vide American Journal of Photography, March, 1890, p. 89).
“We hope,” continues the Wochenblatt, “that the little
bug which threatened to assume the proportions of an
immense sea-serpent has been scotched or decapitated, a
‘ prozedur ’ that we are glad to have aided in accomplish-
ing.” We of the American Journal of Photography also
* American Journal of Pho ograpliy, January, 1890.
572
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
claim a share of the glory in bringing about this end, and
thank Dr. Miethe for his courtesy and information, and
close with the good old motto, “ All's well that etalx well." —
J. F. S., in The American Journal of Photography.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE.
BY JULIUS ¥. SACHSU.
No sooner was photography discovered than it was recog-
nised as one of the greatest aids to the police authorities,
and became a medium for the detection of criminals and
evil doers, and the consequent prevention of crime. To
obtain an exact likeness and the duplication of prints or
pictures, which could be sent out broadcast over the
country at a comparatively small cost, thus familiarising
the various local police authorities with their lineaments,
was a menace to the criminal classes greater than any-
thing which had so far been discovered for their suppres-
sion.
The criminal classes were not slow to recognise this
fact, and took every means to circumvent a successful
portrait being taken of themselves, while the great aim of
the authorities was to obtain a serviceable portrait by
which the subject might be identified at sight beyond a
doubt. That this proved a difficult matter will be
apparent to any one who visits a “ Rogue’s Gallery,” as
the collection of criminal portraits is called in police
parlance, and which may be seen in all large cities and
towns. It will be seen at a glance that, as portraits, these
pictures are not a success, almost all of them having been
unwilling sitters who distorted their features, and, as a
result, the photographs are almost valueless for the purposes
for which they are intended.
With the advent of the dry plate, instantaneous, and
Blitz photography of the present day a new era opened,
of which the various police bureaus were not slow to
avail themselves, where formerly in “wet plate days”
the criminal was taken to the “skylight” of the photo-
grapher who had the contract with the department, and
which was often squares away from headquarters, and the
attempt at portraiture would end in failure, even after a
physical struggle with his guardians.
The writer recollects one instance in which it took
four stalwart officers to hold a prisoner while the “ artist ”
got his picture. The “ cabinet” not only showed the face
horribly distorted, with eyes shut and tongue out, but
also the hands of one officer holding his ears, the second
officer holding him by the hair, while the hands of the
third showed as if he was choking the prisoner. Under
the new regime all such scenes fall away ; the subject is
now taken instantaneously when he least expects it, a per-
fect front and profile being obtained at the same instant,
showing not alone the features at rest, but also the sub-
ject's natural position.
This applies especially to the capitals of Germany and
France, while the old system is still more or less in vogue
in this country and England. In the latter country
much dissatisfaction, photographically speaking, has lately
cropped out with the Scotland Yard authorities for their
adherence to the old methods, and on more than one
occasion the question was brought up in the House of
Commons, so far, however, without bringing any response
from the Home Secretary.
In France, the photographic methods, which are extra-
ordinarily accurate, are supplemented with a series of
measurements known as “Systeme Authropometrique. ”
The photographic department of police headquarters in
Paris now consists of a series of rooms, one for making
the exposure, into which opens a waiting-room, and
seveial dark rooms. The main room is so arranged with
mirrors that face and side views are taken at the same
time on the same plate. In connection with this depart-
ment are facilities for making silver or bromide prints
and mounting ; all work and detail are done within the
department without any aid or knowledge of outside
parties.
It is, however, in Berlin where the highest develop-
ment of police photography has been reached. Formerly
the work was done by the well-known firm of Zielsdorf
and Adler. Now it is done by employees of the depart-
ment in the new Priisidial building erected in the
Alexanderplatz, where a series of rooms connected with
the criminal department has been set aside for photo-
graphic purposes, and so constructed that portraits can
be taken at any hour of the day or night, the illumiuaut
being Blitz pulver, and it is done so quickly that the
accused introduced into the chamber or passage-way on
his way to a hearing is actually photographed before
he even has a presentiment of what has taken place.
This is accomplished as follows: When the subject
comes to within two or two and a half metres of the
concealed cameras, a gum bulb is pressed by the opera-
tor, who is also concealed. This mere pressure not only
opens the shutter, but simultaneously ignites two Blitz
flash lamps, which are placed at right angles in front,
about six feet to the right and left of the subject. A
simple pressure of the pneumatic tube, a flash, and
before the subject can get over his surprise he is
led out of the room, while the plate is developed and
fixed in the adjacent dark room. It is said that the
exposures obtained by this process have been almost
always successful. — American Journal of Photography.
Photographic Ci.ub. — Subject for discussion Wednesday,
July 30th, “ Printing with the Salts of Chromium;’ August
6th, “New Hand -Cameras.” Saturday outing, July 26th,
St. Albans. Train from St. Paucras, 2.37.
London and Provincial Photographic Association. — The
subject for consideration on Thursday, July 31st, will be
“ Home Portraiture the question to be opened by Mr. W. E.
Debenham. Visitors invited.
Photography was represented in the theatre of the
Liverpool Polytechnic Exhibition on Thursday last. Mr. Henry
E. Burn delivered a lecture on the progress and promise of the
art science, which was followed by a lantern exhibition of the
work of the Walton Photographic Society, of which he is the
president. Mr. W. Tyerman was the lanternist, and the chair
was filled by Mr. F. Murphy, an amateur photographer.
Peculiarities ok Eikonogen. — The members of the Pro-
vidence Camera Club have had a singular ex[>erience with
eikonogen. Stock solutions stored in glass-stoppered bottles
in the lockers of the dark room deteriorate badly within
twenty-four hours, while the same solutions retain their good
qualities for weeks in the private dark rooms of the members.
This opens up an interesting question, and one that we would
like to have satisfactorily answered. It may be that the
large number of different chemicals kept in the club lockers
may be responsible for the trouble, or there may be some
peculiar atmospheric conditions present, or, as Mr. Davison
suggests, the trouble may be caused by the fact that the
dissolving key of the stereopticon is kept in the lockers. Any
one who has had any exj>erieuce with dissolving keys knows
that there always hangs about them a strong odour of gas, the
presence of which may have caused the mischief. Eikonogen
has as many moods as the fair sex is credited with, only in the
case of eikonogen they are not always charming. — American
Amateur Photographer.
July 25, 1890. J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
573
TIIE AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION.
Before the appearance of another issue of The Beacon the
seven thousand, more or less, photographers of this country
will, like the ten virgins, be divided into the wise and the
foolish ; but, we very much fear, unlike their prototypes, not
in anything like equal numbers. We need hardly say that
the wise are those who will by that time have resolved to
be present at the Washington Convention and the unveil-
ing of the Daguerre Memorial : and the foolish those who
have decided to remain at home.
We believe that on a careful consideration of the pros
and cons connected with such a visit the againsts will be
few and the fors many.
It is true that the affairs of the Association have not
always, or even often, been conducted in such a way as to
meet our approval, and that the actual, as compared with
the possible, benefits have not infrequently been as Fal-
staff's bread to his sack ; but that is more the fault of
those who stayed away than of those who were present.
They, or most of them, did the best they could, according
to their light, and while that best was not always, accord-
ing to our idea, in the right direction, we have always
been willing to give them all due credit for good inten-
tions. If but one-half of those for whom photography
makes the pot boil could see attendance at the Conven-
tion to be, as it is, both a duty and a pleasure, the three
thousand five hundred would be a noble gathering, and
one from whose ranks enough good men and true could
be found to give the Conventions a character that they
have never had, and do more to raise the status of photo-
graphy than any scheme hitherto devised.
We know that there are hundreds, perhaps thousands,
throughout the country, especially amongst those who
work almost single handed, who think they cannot leave
the seat of custom, without, in some degree at least,
losing their trade ; but this is a sad mistake. Trade, or
even the apj>earance of trade, attracts trade, and the same
is true also of the professions. Ministers, doctors, and
lawyers know and take advantage of this fact. The
hard worked or working clergyman, who leaves his pas-
toral for ten days to attend the general assembly of his
church in some of the larger cities, is not only not blamed,
but thought more highly of, therefore, by his parishioners ;
the young doctor, laying the foundation of a profitable prac-
tice, knows that there is uo more sure or rapid means of
doing so than byseemiug to have his time so fully occupied as
to make it somewhat difficult to find him ; and the lawyer
and dentist who have been students of human nature as
well as of dentistry and law, keep would-be patients and
clients kicking their heels in their waiting rooms, as the
surest way of conveying an idea of their importance.
The practice of photography is amenable to the same
influence. The time has not yet come when the studio
from which the best pictures issue is the most crowded,
but rather that in which the largest quantity of work is
turned out, aud the dear, easily led, and often misled
public are often more ready to patronise the gallery where
engagements can oidy be made several days in advance
than the one in which they can only make sure of being
taken at any time. Then, as it is with the parishioners of a
clergyman, so it is with the clientele of a photographer.
They may not yet be willing to pay for his advanced cul-
ture and artistic training, but they take a pride in, and
boast of the fact that their photographer keeps abreast of
the times, aud annually goes to attend the great Conven-
tion, where he can learn how to practice all the latest
improvements and newest processes. All this, and more,
is true, aud our hesitating readers may rest assured that
even from a pecuniary point of view, attendance at the
Convention pays.
But there are other and not less important points from
which the question, to go, or not to go? should be looked
at. “ All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy,” and
the dullness is contagious, and influences all around him.
But an objectless holiday is not the true remedy. lie
must have something to take his mind from the ordinary
routine of every-day life, and nothing is so likely to
attain the end desired than attendance at the annual Con-
vention. “ As iron sharpeneth iron, so does the
countenance of a man that of his friend,” and in like
manner, the social intercourse with one’s fellow labourers
in the photographic art obtainable at such meetings, and
the being brought into friendly relation with many of
those whose names are as household words, cannot fail to
exercise an influence for good.
Over and above all this is the actual practical benefit
derived from a study of the exhibition of photographs,
which ought to and generally does include the embodied
j ideas of the best men in the profession on both sides of the
I Atlantic as to what ought to be the aim and object of the
photographer. That this embodiment has hitherto run
| too much to the technical, to the detriment of the truly
| artistic, is the result of accidental circumstances more than
the fault of conventions as such, and as the best men
gradually become, as they are becoming, more of the
artist and less of the mere photographer, the educating
1 influence of those exhibitions will acquire a higher and
{ higher degree of value.
In conclusion, we may say that we do not think our
expectation of seeing at the Convention an attendance of
between three and four thousand — half the photographers
of the country — at all too high. The Washington will
not in all probability reach anything like that number,
nor may any of those of the next few years, but we be-
lieve that photographers are gradually learning that the
true way to raise their status and secure the respect they
are fully entitled to, is to respect themselves, apd to be-
come worthy of respect by taking advantage of every
opportunity for self-improvement, the diffusion of the
entente conliale between the members of the profession
generally, and carefully studying the highest possibilities
of the art as they are exhibited, and straining every
nerve to equal, if not surpass them. These are the
desiderata that conventions are intended to bring about,
and the object will be attained just in proportion as the
attendence at the conventions increase. — The Beacon.
Miss Catherine Weed Barnes, the writer of the article
‘ Illustrating Poems by Photography,” quoted in our last
issue, is preparing to euter the competition for the illus-
tration of the poem “ Enoch Arden,” to be exhibited at
the Photographic Convention at Washington on the 12th of
August.
Aluminium. — M. Miuet has placed before the French Academy
of Sciences a process of extraction of aluminium by the elec-
1 trolysis of a fluoride of this metal in a molten state ; he
employs an electrolytic bath composed of chloride of sodium
60 grammes, double fluoride of aluminium and sodium 40
grammes. He gives various details of the method of proce-
dure. He produces by this method 21 *5 grammes of
aluminium for an expenditure of 1 -horse power per hour, and
| 30 grammes might be attained in actual practice. — Invention.
574
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
jjiotcs.
Sometimes complaints are sent to us about photo-
graphers who detain the specimens they have demanded
from assistants out of a situation, such detention being
often a grievous injury to the member of the fraternity
in adverse circumstances. The informants give us the
names and addresses of the photographers who are
alleged to have done such a shady trick, in order that
we may publish the same, and thus take the moral and
legal responsibility of bringing a public charge against
a man’s character, based on alleged facts outside our
personal knowledge, unless by means of previous
investigation which could rarely be given. A better
remedy which has been suggested is, that the assistant
should write the particulars to the superintendent of
police in the town in which the photographer resides.
We have another suggestion to make, and that is that
the Photographers’ Benevolent Association should in-
vestigate and deal with such cases. It would increase
its popularity immensely, and it seems to be within its
province to take action of this kind, to prevent the said
assistants from being obliged later on to make a heavier
and more prolonged demand upon its funds and atten-
tion.
The advice given by an American journal to a photo-
graphic amateur who asked the best method of re-
ducing a photograph, and received for reply, “ Grind it
down on the step of the back door,” has been partially
paralleled in sober earnest in Prance. The last number of
the Bulletin of the Photographic Society of the North of
France sets forth how M. Poly gave a demonstration before
the Society of his method of obtaining a matt surface
on Obernetter paper proofs. The finished prints were
rubbed with fine pumice powder, and the results, says
the report of the Society, were “ very artistic.”
The same journal contains an interesting collotype
illustration by Messrs. Berthand, Brothers, from a
negative by M. J. Cornetet, representing the theatre
of Augustus, at Arles ; also other Roman ruins in its
proximity. The action of time and weather, the
depredations of man, and occasional tremblings of the
earth, have done much to destroy this building since it
was repaired by Constantine ; the ruins are neverthe-
less remarkable and of great exteut, and they are now
carefully preserved. The women of sunny Arles, in
the South of France, are said to be the most beautiful
in Europe, and the Editing Committee of the North of
France Society says that this reputation may be in
part due to their graceful costume, which changes not
with the fashions of the day, but is of high antiquity,
and preserved unchanged to this day.
Now that the tourist season is approaching, it may
not be inappropriate to draw attention to a difference
in his favour which the landscape photographer will
find when working in some parts of SAvitzerland and
other portions of central Europe far from the Atlantic,
namely, the small average amount of wind to disturb
the foliage. About the Lucerne district, for instance,
it is common for three or four days in succession to
pass away without sufficient wind to disturb the deli-
cate leaves of the silver birch. When a Swiss from
this district first visits England, for the first week or
two, until the impression wears off, he wonders what
is the matter with the weather, for the wind seems to
him to be eternally blowing with a persistence outside
his previous experience.
Potassic chlorate has been responsible for not a few
deaths from its accidental ignition or explosion.
These have mostly occurred with oxygen gas making
for the limelight, and, happily, the number of such
accidents will be reduced to a minimum now that the
ready-made gas has become such a common article of
commerce. A few fearful accidents have, too, over-
taken boys with chemical proclivities who, in their
experimental zeal, have endeavoured to make “ bangs ”
by the attrition or percussion of chlorate with some
sulphur compound ; but the most curious accident with
this explosive agent which has yet been recorded took
place recently at some chemical works at Flint, where
a workman, striking a match upon his trousers, after
the manner of workmen, found himself enveloped in
fire, which burned the poor fellow so shockingly that
no hopes are entertained of his recovery. It seems that
his clothing had become so impregnated with the
chlorate that it resembled a mass of touch-paper, only
waiting for the initial spark to set it aflame. That
spark the match supplied.
It is easy enough to be wise after the event, and to
point out how the terrible fatality might have been
obviated by taking precautions against the dust accu-
mulating, or by preventing the use of matches in the
building. But the right course to follow would be to
give to every workman who has to deal with dangerous
agents a knowledge of their properties and general
behaviour under different conditions. Many months
have not elapsed since, at a quarry, some men were killed
while thawing dynamite over an open fire in a sauce-
pan. The inquest revealed the startling fact that,
although proper vessels are constructed for this work,
no one in the place knew anything about them. The
saucepan had always been used by the men, and fami-
liarity had bred a contempt for danger which they
dearly paid for.
The Standard of Monday last, referring to the iden-
tification of the body of the burglar who, a few days
previously, shot himself to avoid capture, states that
“ It is a curious fact that the police have in their
possession sheets of photographs of discharged pri-
soners, including one which was believed to be the
deceased, described as Richard Batten, who was sen-
tenced at the Central Criminal Court in 1877 to seven
years’ penal servitude.” We do not quite see why this
fact should have anything phenomenal about it, con-
sidering that for many years it has been the custom to
July 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
575
photograph all prisoners ; but it is certainly curious
that the police failed to identify the body by the pic-
ture which they possessed, and that it was left for his
widow to do so by the clothing upon the body.
“ A prominent photographer,” who has been recently
interviewed by a reporter of the New York Sun, has
had a good deal to say against people who come to be
photographed accompanied by interfering relatives who
know — or think that they know — much more about
posing and lighting than does the artist himself. He
quotes one case in which a lady in bridal attire came
to his studio : “ She walked up to the chair, and as
she turned to face me the silk train and thin veil fell
in wonderful folds of graceful outline. 1 told her not
to stir, but while I stepped back to get the effect, her
friend darted out and straightened the whole thing out
like a flag in a head wind.” Many of our readers have
good reason, we feel sure, for sympathising with this
complainant. It is, however, uifficult to suggest a
remedy which would not be likely to cause offence.
A little tact mingled with courtesy will, as a rule, be
the best mixture to apply.
Pyrogallol is so little used in medicine that it has
no place in the British Pharmacopana. Its principal
employment — beyond its well-known use in photo-
graphy— is for hair dyeing, when it is also used in
conjunction with silver nitrate. It has also been
recommended as the principal constituent of a salve for
certain cases of skin disease, but so far as we know
hits never been used in any shape or form for internal
administration. It is known to be extremely poisonous,
but how many grains may represent a fatal dose has
not, happily, as yet been determined.
The decision given in the celebrated copyright
photographic case, in which the Stereoscopic Company
were the plaintiffs, received endorsement iu a judgment
delivered by Mr. Justice Wills the other day. It will
be remembered that in the photographic case it was
laid down that the operator who took the photograph,
and not the proprietor of the business, was the author
for purposes of registration. The case decided the
other day turned upon the question of copyright in a
drawing. The originator of the idea had the drawing
made by an artist, and this drawing was afterwards
pirated by the defendants, although the reproduction
was not an exact copy. The judge held that the action
for infringement of copyright could not be maintained,
one of his reasons being that the plaintiff, though the
originator of the idea, was not the author of the draw-
ing. It is well that photographers should bear the
law in mind, as they may lose their rights in a valuable
photograph from ignorance of legal technicalities.
This decision in the case of photography involves
a certain amount of absurdity, because it is clear
that one man may pose the sitter, and make all the
arrangements, and be responsible for the art qualities
of the picture, while the other man does no more than
take off the cap and develop the plate. Yet the
mechanical operator is deemed the author ! This is
only one of the anomalies of the Copyright Act, which,
according to a well-known barrister, is full of blunders.
It is said that the clauses are so exclusive of this and
that right, that now, unless a special agreement is
drawn up and signed “ before purchase,” the copyright
is lost to both purchaser and painter. Even if the pur-
chaser gave the painter the copyright, after purchase
‘‘the gift fails for want of consideration,” and the
same if the gift is from the painter to his patron. In
certain cases, the value of the copyright becomes so
enormous that it would be interesting to know how the
parties interpret the Act. Take Mr. W. E. Lockhart’s
much talked-of jubilee picture, for instance. In the
first place, the painter’s commission was £1,000, and
when it came to the disposal of copyright, the best offer
obtained was one of £200 from a leading firm of dealers
for the right to reproduce the picture, and absolute
control over it for one year. Mr. Lockhart thought the
copyright was worth more, and he organised a syndicate
to exhibit the picture, with the result that the painter
received £2,000 for the copyright and use of it for
exhibition during twelve months. It is said that the
sale of photogravures will probably produce between
two and three thousand pounds more. This transaction
ou the face of it appears to be a little involved, and
one would like to know how the more involved condi-
tions of the Copyright Act have been complied with.
M. lieutlinger, the well-known photographer of
Paris, is the photographer par excellence of cats. A
delightful photograph of a kitten in a large glass
funnel stuck in a bottle, is reproduced in a recent issue
of La Nature, and its charming unconsciousness and
grace are commented upon in terms of well deserved
praise byr the editor, M. Tissandier. M. Tissandier
strongly advises amateurs to practise taking the photo
graphs of animals, and quotes approvingly M. Legouve’s
witty description of the average portraits of the human
being, as seen in the album, to show the superiority of
animals as sitters from an ai’tistic point of view.
M. Legouve, looking through an album one day, said :
“These people are much more like their portraits thau
they think for, for it is not to be doubted they have
worked in themselves their own likeness, and have thus
been at once models and painters. More than one, I
am sure, when sitting down on the photographic chair,
has taken his favourite pose, and has arranged his
features according to his own predilection, expressing
not what he is, but what he believes himself to be.
For instance, here is one who is slily smiling ; evi-
dently, he imagines himself to be witty. This, with
the eyes uplifted to Heaven and his wild hair, belongs
to the class of inspired poets 1 I should be surprised
if this person, who looks you in the face with such
keen eyes as though he would pierce you through and
through, is not saying to himself : ‘ What an eagle
eye I have, nothing escapes me ! ’ “ There is nothing
like this in the photographs of animals,” observes
M. Tissandier, and everyone will agree with him.
576
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
THE GLOW OF PHOSPHORUS.*
BY l'ROFESSOR T. E. THORPE, F.R.S.
Tiif. earlier volumes of the “ Philosophical Transactions ”
contain several papers on the luminosity of phosphorus,
and one by Dr. Frederick Slare is noteworthy as giving
one of the earliest, if not actually the earliest, account of
what is one of the most paradoxical phenomena connected
with the luminosity of phosphorus, namely, its increase
on rarefying the air. “ It being now generally agreed
that the fire and flame (of phosphorus) have their pabulum
out of the air, T was willing to try this matter in vacuo.
To effect this, I placed a considerable lump of this matter
(phosphorus) under a glass, which 1 fixed to an engine for
exhausting the air ; then presently working the engine, I
found it grow lighter (is., more luminous), though a char-
coal that was well kindled would be quite extinguished
at the first exhaustion ; and upon the third or fourth
draught, which very well exhausted the glass, it much
increased its light, and continued so to shine with its
increased light for a long time ; on re-admitting the air,
it returns again to its former dulness.” This observation
was repeated, and its result confirmed by llawksbee in
this country, and by Iloinberg in France, and seems sub-
sequently to have led Berzelius and after him Marchand,
to the conclusion thatt he luminosity of phosphorus was
altogether independent of the air (is., the oxygen), but
was solely due to the volatility of the body. Many facts,
however, combine to show that the air (oxygen) is neces-
sary to the phenomenon. Lampadius found that phos-
phorus would not glow in the Torricellian vacuum, and
Lavoisier, in 1777, showed that it would not inflame under
the same conditions ; and the subsequent experiments of
Schrbtter, Meissner, and Midler are decisive on the point
that the glow is the concomitant of a chemical pro-
cess dependent upon the presence of oxygen. It is,
however, remarkable that phosjihorus will not glow
in oxygen at the ordinary atmospheric pressure and
temperature, but that if the oxygen be rarefied the
glow at once begins, but ceases again the moment the
oxygen is compressed. Indeed, phosphorus will not glow
in compressed air, and the flame of feebly-burning phos-
phorus may be extinguished by suddenly increasing the
pressure of the gas. Phosphorus, however, can be made to
glow in oxygen at the ordinary pressure, or in compressed
air. if the gases are gently warmed. In the case of oxygen
the glow begins at 25°, and becomes very bright at 36°.
Iu compressed air the temperature at which the glow is
initiated depends upon the tension. If the oxygen is
absolutely deprived of moisture, the phosphorus refuses
to glow under any conditions. This fact, strange as
it may seem, is not without analogy; the presence of
traces of moisture appears to be necessary for the initia-
tion or continuance of chemical combination in a number
of instauces.
It was observed by Boyle that a minute quantity of the
vapour of a number of essential oils extinguished the
glow of phosphorus. The late Professor Graham con-
firmed and extended these observations ; he showed that
relatively small quantities of olefiant gas, and of the vapours
of ether, naphtha, and oil of turpentine entirely prevented
the glow, and subsequent observers have found that many
essential oils, such as those of peppermint and lemon,
and the vapours of camphor and asafeetida, even when
present in very small quantity, stop the absorption of
oxygen and the slow combustion of phosphorus in air.
* A portion of a lecture delivered at the Royal Institution.
It has been established that whenever phosphorus glows
in air, or in rarefied oxygen, ozone and hydrogen peroxide
are formed, but it is not definitely known whether the
formation of these substances is the cause or the effect of
the chemical process of which the glow is the visible sign.
That there is some intimate connection between the lumi-
nosity of the phosphorus and the production of these
bodies is highly probable. Schbnbein, as far back as 1848,
sought to demonstrate that the glow depends on the
presence of ozone. It is certainly true that many of the
substances — such as the essential oils— which prevent the
glow of phosphorus also destroy ozone. At a low tem-
perature phosphorus produces no ozone in contact with
air, neither does it glow. It has been found, in fact, that
with air ozone is produced in largest quantity at 25°, at
which temperature phosphorus glows brightly. On the
assumption that the oxidation of the phosphorus consists
in the immediate formation of the highest oxide, the pro-
duction of the ozone and the hydrogen peroxide has been
represented by the following equations : —
P. + 0, = Pj05 + 0
0 + 0„ = Oj
O + BA) = H.O,-
Both these reactions may, of course, go on simulta-
neously, as ozone and hydrogen peroxide are not mutually
incompatible ; the synthesis of hydrogen peroxide by the
direct oxidation of water seems to occur in a number of
processes. But such symbolic expressions can at most be
oidy very partial representations of what actually occurs.
It is highly probable that the combination which give rise
to the glow only occurs between the vapour of phosphorus
and the oxygen. Phosphorus is sensibly volatile at
ordinary temperatures, and by rarefying the atmosphere
in which it is placed its volatilisation is increased, which
serves to account for the increased glow when the pressure
of the gas is diminished. When phosphorus is placed in
an atmosphere of hydrogen, nitrogen, or carbonic acid,
these gases, when brought into contact with oxygen, become
luminous from the oxidation of the vapour of phosphorus
diffused through them. The rapidity of volatilisation
varies with the particular gas ; it is greatest in the
case of hydrogen, and least in that of carbonic acid.
Indeed, a stream of hydrogen gas at ordinary temperatures
carries away comparatively large quantities of phosphorus,
which may be collected by appropriate solvents. No
ozone and no glow are produced in oxygen gas at ordinary
temperatures and pressures, but on warming the oxygen
both the ozone and the glow are formed. On passing
ozone into oxygen at temperatures at which phosphorus
refuses to glow, the phosphorus at once becomes lumi-
nous, oxygen is absorbed, and the characteristic cloud of
oxide is produced, and the effect continues so long as the
supply of ozone is maintained. A drop of ether at once
extinguishes the glow.
The ether is in all probability converted into vinyl
alcohol with simultaneous formation of hydrogen per-
oxide by the reaction indicated by Poleck and Thiimmel
CU.CH,\n , n _ CH..CHOII OH
CHjCIJg / u + •' “ CHX’HOH + OH
OH |
Formic, acetic, and oxalic acids are also formed by the
action of ozonised oxygen on ether.
Phosphorus combines with oxygen in several propor-
tions, and the study of the mode of formation and
properties of these oxides is calculated to throw light
upon the nature of the chemical process which attends
the glow of phosphorus. Certain of these oxides have
July 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
'fsiRS,
577
—
STOPS OR DIAPHRAGMS.
BY ELLERSLIE WALLACE.
recently been the subject of study in the chemical labor-
atories of the Normal School of Science. When phos-
phorus is slowly burned in air, there is produced a
considerable quantity of a volatile substance, having a
characteristic garlic-like smell which solidifies, when cooled,
in beautiful arborescent masses of white crystals. It melts
at about 23°, and boils at 173°. In a sealed tube kept in
the dark it may be preserved unchanged, but on exposure
to light, and especially to bright sunshine, it rapidly
becomes deep red.* It slowly absorbs oxygen at the
ordinary temperature and pressure, but from the mode in
which the solid product of the reaction (P205) is deposited,
it is evident that the union only takes place between the
vapour of the oxide and the oxygen gas. Under diminished
pressure the act of combination is attended witli a glow
which increases in brilliancy if ozone be present. On
compressing the oxygen the glow ceases. No ozone is
formed during the act of oxidation. The degree of rare-
faction needed to initiate the glow depends upon the
temperature of the oxide ; the warmer the oxide the less
is the diminution of pressure required. By gradually
warming the oxide the luminosity steadily increases both
in area and intensity, until at a certain temperature the
mass ignites. The change from glow to actual flame is
perfectly regular and gradual, and is unattended with any
sudden increase in brilliancy. In this respect the process
of oxidation is analogous to the slow and barely visible
burning of fire-damp which is sometimes seen to occur
in the Davy lamp, or to the slow combustion of ether
and other vapours, which has been specially studied by
Dr. Perkin. Other instances of what may be called
degraded combustion are known to chemists. Thrown into
warm oxygen the substance bursts into flame at once, and
burns brilliantly ; and it also takes fire in contact with
chlorine. Alcohol also ignites it, and when it is warmed
with water or a solution of potash it evolves spontaneously
inflammable phosphoretted hydrogen. In contact with
cold water it suffers only a very gradual change, and many
days may elapse before even a comparatively small quantity
is dissolved. This substance has long been known ; it
was discovered, in fact, by the French chemist, Sage, but
its true nature has only now been determined ; its
chemical formula is found P4Og; hence its composition
is similar to that of its chemical analogue, arsenious
oxide.
The study of the properties of this remarkable sub-
stance enables us to gain a clearer insight into the nature
of the chemical change attending the glow of phosphorus.
When phosphorus is placed in oxygen, or in an atmos-
phere containing oxygen, under such conditions that it
volatilises, the phosphorus oxidises, partly into phosphoric
oxide, and partly into phosphorus oxide ; ozone is formed,
possibly in the mode already indicated, and this reacts
upon the residual phosphorus vapour and the phosphorus
oxide, with the production of the luminous effect to which
the element owes its name. The glow itself is nothing
but a slowly burning flame having an extremely low tem-
perature, caused by the chemical union of oxygen with
the vapours of phosphorus and phosphorus oxide. By
suitable means this glow can be gradually augmented,
until it passes by regular gradation into the active vigour-
ous combustion which we ordinarily associate with flame.
Many substances, in fact, may be used to phosphoresce in
a similar way.
This is the substance spoken of by Captain Abney in his recent lecture
at the Royal Institution.— En.
It is not quite easy to determine why the short and con-
venient word “ stop ” has been universally accepted by
the photographic world as a substitute for the longer one
of “ diaphragm,” unless we remember that photographers,
as a rule, are very practical folk, and like things called by
plain and short names.
It may be that the term “ stop ” was adopted from the
fact of the light being really stopped out by the diaphragm ;
and as the Germans call it “blende,” which means a
blind or screen, there seems to be some probability that
this is true.
Lenses sent out by manufacturers of reputation always
have the stops supplied, and the position they occupy is
generally fixed. This is true for such lenses as are not
intended to be taken apart and their parts used alone ;
when this is the case the position of the stop must be
changed.
Now, in spite of all this, it will be found well worth
while to be familiar with a few general facts about the
diaphragm or stop. First of all, we may say that stops
are used to improve the defining powers of the lens, parti-
cularly on the margins and corners of the picture. This
is accomplished by stopping out such rays of light as would
come to a focus too near the lens, and by allowing only
such oblique pencils of rays to pass as come to their focus
on the plane of the ground glass. The pencils forming
the more central portions of the picture pass through the
opening in the stop, and come to their proper focus in
very much the same manner as they would if there were
no stop at all in the lens.
It is fair to say that the type or representative lens of
the present day is the symmetrical doublet ; or, in other
words, a lens consisting of a front and a back combina-
tion which are nearly or quite twins in every respect. A
more exact term in optical parlance would be to speak of
the lens as what it really is, namely, a system of lenses.
Now, it is a matter of common observation that the
position of the diaphragm or stoji in these doublet lenses
is always in the middle of the tube, at equal distances from
the front and the back combinations. If one of the com-
binations be unscrewed and removed from its position,
the other one can still be used for photographic exposures.
The focal length of either combination, when thus used
simply, is about twice that of the original lens or “ sys-
tem,” and the field covered by the single combination will
be proportionately increased in size. But if the diaphragm
or stop be left in its original position, the work accom-
plished will not be nearly so good as it would be if the
stop were moved to a new point to suit the new condition
of affairs. Each of the combinations of the lens being of
the meniscus form, the old rule should be here observed
of turning the concave surface of the lens toward the
subject, and of removing the stop to a distance of about
one-fifth of the focal length in front of the said surface.
To take a familiar example : suppose an eleven-inch
rapid rectilinear combination with the stop in the middle
of the tube in the usual position, which is about an inch
from either combination. Now, if it were desired to
obtain the best results with either of the combinations
alone, and thus to utilise the increased focal length of
twenty-two inches, the proper plan would be to remove
the front combination, leaving the back one in situ, and set
the stop forward four inches from its anterior surface.
578
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
In practice this is seldom possible to do, unless a short
extra tube be so adapted to the screw-thread in the front
of the ‘ ‘ system ” that the desired increase of distance can
be obtained. But we are sure that this hint will prove
very serviceable to those who have failed in producing
satisfactory results with either combination of a “ system.”
An attempt to use the front lens of a system alone,
with the stop left in its original position, thus bringing it
in the rear, would be in every respect unsatisfactory.
A great deal of mechanical ingenuity has been expended
upon the different forms of stops or diaphragms. The
simplest and least expensive of them is the c ommon flat,
oblong piece of metal with the aperture in its centre.
The sets of six of these which are usually furnished with
the better classes of lenses should always have these
openings quite concentric with each other. This can be
verified at a glance by laying the stops together so that
their sides correspond, when any want of exactitude in
the openings will be seen at once.
All things considered, we should prefer this model of
the stop or diaphragm to any other. The only objection
to it is the danger of the loss of one or more of the set.
In indoor work this risk will not make itself felt to the
same degree as in landscape photography, where the loss
of the stops would be a very serious matter indeed. A
partial safeguard will be to rivet all the six together at the
top, so that any one of the set may be inserted into the
lens, leaving the others outside. Of course it may be
objected that the loss of one will thus entail the loss of
the whole ; so it is, indeed, but we can safely say, after
many years of work out of doors with this arrangement,
that a very small amount of care will keep matters right.
The new Iris diaphragms supplied with some of the
superior makes of lenses are new chiefly in the fact of
an index and pointer being supplied, so that a desired size
of opening can be promptly secured at will. The prin-
ciple of the Iris diaphragm itself is by no means new.
The fact of there being no loose pieces to get lost is the
strong recommendation of this form of stop ; and when
we have said this, we have pretty fairly summed up its
merits. Supposing that the operator desired to make a
change in the stop opening to one of another size, and
that he also desired to effect the change without removing
the focussing cloth from over his head and blinding his
eyes with the strong light, the ordinary central stop
would be preferable to the Iris. The change from one
stop to another is easily done by feeling, while with the
Iris model it is necessary to see just what is being done.
The “rotating diaphragms,” as they are called, are also
very convenient ; more so, we think, than the expensive
Iris ; but their use is limited to the slower working lenses,
which are never used with very large or full openings.
We may here take occasion to remark that practical
photographing rarely, if ever, demands as many as six
different stop-apertures. Taking landscape photography,
for instance, we may safe say that three sizes of stops
would be all-sufficient. One small enough to give good
definition over the entire plate, and require a rather long
exposure ; a large one, nearly the full opening of the lens,
for instantaneous effects; and one of medium size for
subjects of odd character, would be enough for practical
purposes, and directly conduce to good and uniform
results in timing.
Nothing has ever been gained by altering the stop
opening from a circle to a square, oblong, triangular, or
other form. A circular hole, neatly countersunk in the
metal, so that a mere edge is presented to the rays of
light as they enter, is all that is necessary. Stops stand-
ing at an angle, and “ sky-scrapers,” as they used to be
called, have had their day, and are now forgotten. —
American Journal of Photography.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN GERMANY.
BY HERMANN E. GUNTHER.
New Intensifying Method — Combined IIydroquinone and
Eikonogen Developer — Collodion Dry Plates of
High Sensitiveness — Table of Comparative Inten-
sities of Various Illuminants.
A Neic Intensifying Method. — A method of intensifying
a weak negative by which the actual silver image is not
the least altered is described by Mr. K. E. Liesegang as
follows : The varnished negative is coated with collo-
dion or varnish in which a red or green aniline colour
has been dissolved. Aniline colours, as it is known, are
most sensitive to the action of light. After coating, the
negative is exposed lor some time to sunlight so that it
acts through the glass plate, and through the negative
film on the colour coating. At the parts where the latter
has been exposed it bleaches, while it remains unaltered
at the parts which have been less or not at all exposed,
rendering the dark parts of the negative denser in exact
relation. As, however, aniline colours cannot after-
wards be made insensitive to light, the effect will dis-
appear .after the negative has been used for some time ;
but it is then only necessary to repeat the process of
varnishing and exposing. Certain iron salts with develop-
ment, as they are used in cyanotype, may be substituted
for the aniline colours, and then the intensification will be
permanent.
Combined IIydroquinone and Eikonogen Developer. — It
has been found that in mixing the hydroquinone with the
eikonogen developer a combination is produced which is
superior to the single developers ; it acts as powerfully as
eikonogen without fogging the shadows, and yields the
characteristic intensity of hydroquinone. I have found
this experience confirmed in my own practice. The
combined developer I use is the following : —
100 grammes
15
1000 c.c.
50 grammes
stoppered bottles the
It may be mentioned
Sodium sulphite
Eikonogen ...
Hydroquinone ...
are dissolved hot in
Water ... ...
After cooling down,
Carbonate of potassium
are added to the solution. In well
developer keeps well for mouths,
here that Mr. Eugeu Himly has of late made experiments
with glycerine added to the eikonogen developer, and
that he has found confirmation of the fact which was first
pointed out in this journal by Mr. F. Goldby, that the
keeping qualities of the concentrated eikonogen developer
are much improved by the addition of glycerine. Capt.
Himly recommends the following composition : —
Water ... ... ... ... 1000 c.c.
Glycerine ... ... ... ... 100 ,,
Potassium metabisulphite ... ... 2 grammes
Sodium bisulphite ... ... ... 75 ,,
Eikonogen ... ... ... ... 12 ,,
Carbonate of potassium ... ... 60 ,,
I have tried to complete this by the addition of —
Hydroquinone ... ... ... 4 grammes
The photographic news.
579
July 25, 1890.]
which gives au excellent combined developer, of the
keeping qualities of which I can only say that a solution
prepared six weeks ago is still entirely unaltered. The
addition of yellow prussiate of potash to the above con-
centrated developer gives good results, according to the
statement of Capt. Himly. It acts not only as a preser-
vative, but it is said to give also more contrast in the high
lights, and clearer shadows, and also to prevent fog. The
formula remains the same as above, with the addition of
Yellow prussiate of potash ... 40 grammes
The developing solution may be used either concentrated,
or diluted with one to two of its volume of water. For
travelling purposes the bulk of the stock solution may be
diminished by taking the quantity of the water as given in
the above formula, and doubling the quantities of all the
other components. The development may be accelerated
by the addition of a few drops of caustic potash or caustic
soda solution (1:10). Finally, a very good developer may
be given here which was recommended at the last meeting
of the Photographic Society of Frankfort-on-Maine, by
its chairman, Mr. T. H. Voigt : —
No. 1.
Water
Sodium sulphite
Hydroquinone
Potassium carbonate
— Slock Solution.
800 c.c.
160 grammes
20
230
No.
2.
In a dropping tube are poured —
Alcohol ... ... ... ... 60 c.c.
Glycerine ... ... ... ... 10 ,,
Pyro (dry) 10 grammes
For use, 50 c.c. of water, 10 c.c. of solution No. 1, and
5 to 10 drops of solution No. 2 are mixed. The stock
solution keeps well.
Collodion Dry Plates of High Sensitiveness. — After seven
years’ work and several thousands of experiments, Mr.
Gaedicke has at last succeeded in preparing permanent
and highly sensitive collodion dry plates, which combine
with the sensitiveness and the keeping qualities of a gela-
tine dry plate all the well-known advantages of a wet col-
lodion plate. Mr. J. Gaedicke is an investigator of high
reputation, and we are indebted to him for many a use-
ful improvement and invention, so that we may have full
confidence in his new successful work, which he announced
at the last meeting of the German Society of Amateur
Photographers of Berlin. The following are some of the
qualities which the inventor claims for his collodion dry
plates : As to the permanence, his experience extends to
six months, during which period the plates have kept un-
altered, and in his opinion there is no reason to doubt a
further permanency. The plates may be developed six
weeks (and probably even a much longer time) after they
have been exposed. The sensitiveness of these plates is
that of a gelatine plate of average sensitiveness. They
are prepared exclusively colour-sensitive. The film is very
thin, and rich in silver, and in the dry state it is very
easily injured, so that it requires careful manipulation.
After fixing, however, in the wet state it is so tough that
it can be safely rubbed over with the finger. The treat-
ment of the plates is the following : After exposure, the
plate is placed in a dish containing clean water, and the
film is allowed to soak for a minute. Then the water
is poured away and the developer poured on the
plate. An old, repeatedly used hydroquinone developer,
to which about one-tenth of its volume of freshly pre-
pared hydroquinone developer has been added, serves well.
The image appears within six to twenty seconds, according
to the exposure, and after one to two minutes the develop-
ment will be completed. The plate is now thoroughly
rinsed, and placed in an ordinary hypo solution for one-
half to one minute. It is then rinsed again, washed
for about five minutes in several changes of water, and
can then be dried and varnished. The following are the
advantages which the inventor claims for his plates in
comparison to gelatine plates : In consequence of the
thin film the image is sharper ; the deposit is of a finer
grain ; the time of exposure offers a greater latitude, so
thatitisdifficult to over-expose ; the processes of develop-
ment, fixing, washing, anddrying are much shortened; the
time required for printing is only about one-half; the
negatives keep better ; the preparation and the develop-
ment arc independent of the season and of the climatej
since the film is insoluble in water. Air. Gaedicke pro-
mised to give further particulars, and he said that he
would prefer to have the plates prepared abroad, since in
his experience inventions of this kind are more
acknowledged abroad than in Germany.
Table of Comparative Intensities of Various IUuminants. —
Mr. Alexander Lainer publishes in the Correspondenz an
interesting and important treatise on tables of comparative
exposures, in which he compares the tables of artificial
illuminants contained in the book, “ Le Temps de Pose,”
by M. de la Baume Pluvinel, with that published by
Prof. Eder in his Year-Book. For this purpose he con-
verted the latter into comparative exposures, taking the
sunlight with 60,000 candles as unit.
Table of Comparative Exposures of Various Illuminants.
Sunlight
'i Arc light
Electrical light ^Ordinary arc light ...
of a dynamo j Incandescent light (Edison or
J Swan)
Light of 40 Grove cells
,, 48 Bunsen ,, ... ...
Limelight (oxygen and house gas, ordinary
pressure)
Limelight under 3i atmosph. pressure
Magnesium wire, 0-3 mm.
„ ,, stronger
Oil lamp
Gas lamp (fish-tail burner) ...
,, (Argand burner) ...
Petroleum lamp (flat burner)
,, ,, (round burner, 15 mm. diam.)
>> >> ( >> >> 25 ,, ,, )
Siemens’ regenerative round burner
Standard wax candle, or paraffin candle
Tallow candle...
1
10—46
150—300
3000—6000
166
158
666—2608
75-1
811
300—600
5454—6000
6000—10-000
3530—3750
1200
9231
4286
600—666
60-000
66 666— 85"714
Mr. Lainer thinks that this table agrees much more with
the actual circumstances than that compiled by M.
Pluvinel.
A movement is on foot, originating at a meeting of the
Meteorological Society of Berlin, to take simultaneous photo-
graphs of flashes of lightning from widely different points of
view, during this summer, with a view to obtaining a more
accurate knowledge than now exists as to the length and direc-
tion of each flash.
A new and rather surprising use, says Anthony’s Bulletin,
has been discovered and patented by Mr. C. H. Ivoyl, of Euston,
Pa., for celluloid. By silvering the back of a sheet of this
material, Mr. Koyl has succeeded in producing a looking-glass
which is not only of excellent quality, but is much less des-
tructible, and has also the advantage of being bent or formed
into almost any shape.
580
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 23, 1890.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE.*
BY PROFESSOR RAPHAEL MELDOLA, F.R.S., M.R.I.
The photographic film of the present time is a gelatino-
haloid (generally bromide) emulsion. If a solution of
silver nitrate is added to a solution of potassium bromide
and the mixture well shaken, the silver bromide coagu-
lates, and rapidly subsides to the bottom of the liquid as
a dense, curdy precipitate. [Shown.] If instead of water
we use a viscid medium, such as gelatine solution, the
bromide does not settle down, but forms an emulsion,
which becomes quite homogeneous on agitation. [Shown.]
This operation, omitting all details of ripening, washing,
&c., as well known to practical photographers, is the
basis of all the recent photographic methods of obtaining
negatives iu the camera. The use of this invaluable vehicle,
gelatine, was practically introduced by R. L. Maddox in
1871, previous experiments in the same direction having
been made by Gaudiu (1858-61). Such a gelatino-bro-
mide emulsion can be spread uniformly over any sub-
stratum— glass, paper, gelatine, or celluloid — and when
dry gives a highly sensitive film.
The fundamental problem which fifty years’ experience
with silver haloid films has left in the hands of chemists is
that of the nature of the chemical change which occurs
when a ray of light falls on such a silver salt. Long be-
fore the days of photography — far back iu the sixteenth
century — Fabricius, the alchemist, noticed that native
horn silver became coloured when brought from the mine
and exposed. The fact presented itself to Robert Boyle
iu the seventeenth century, and to Beccarius, of Turin, in
the eighteenth century. The change of colour under-
gone by the chloride was first shown to be associated with
chemical decomposition in 1777, by Scheele, who proved
that chlorine was given off when this salt darkened under
water. I can show you this in a form which admits of its
being seen by all. [Potassium iodide and starch paper
were placed in a glass cell with silver chloride, and the
arrangement exposed to the electric light till the paper had
become blue.] The gas which is given off under these
circumstances is either the free halogen, or an oxide or
acid of the halogen, according to the quantity of moisture
present and the intensity of the light. I have found that
the bromide affects the iodide and starch paper in the
same way, but silver iodide does not give off any gas which
colours the test paper. All the silver haloids become
coloured on exposure to light, the change being most marked
in the chloride, less in the bromide, and least of all in the
iodide. The latter must be associated with some halogen
absorbent to render the change visible. [Strips of paper
coated with the pure haloids, the lower halves brushed
over with silver nitrate solution, were exposed.] The
different degrees of colouration iu the three cases must
not be considered as a measure of the relative sensitive-
ness; it simply means that the products of photo-chemi-
cal change in the three haloids are inherently possessed
of different depths of colour.
From the fact that halogen in some form is given off, it
follows that we are concerned with photo-chemical de-
composition, and not with a physical change only. All
the evidence is in favour of this view. Halogen absorb-
ents, such as silver nitrate on the lower halves of the
papers in the last experiment, organic matter, such as the
gelatine in an emulsion, and reducing agents generally,
all accelerate the change of colour. Oxidising and halo-
* Continued from page i58.
geuisiug agents, such as mercuric chloride, potassium
dichromate, &c. , all retard the colour change. [Silver
chloride paper, painted with stripes of solutions of sodium
sulphite, mercuric chloride, and potassium dichromate,
was exposed.] It is impossible to account for the action
of these chemical agents except on the view of chemical
decomposition. The ray of light falling upon a silver
haloid must be regarded as doing chemical work ; the
vibratory energy is partly spent in doing the work of
chemical separation, and the light passes through a film of
such haloid partly robbed of its power of doing similar
work upon a second film. It is difficult to demonstrate
this satisfactorily iu the lecture-room, on account of
the opacity of the silver haloids, but the work of Sir
John Herschel, J. W. Draper, and others, has put it
beyond doubt that there is a relationship of this kind
bet ween absorption and decomposition. It is well known,
also, that the more refrangible rays are the most active
iu promoting the decomposition iu the case of the silver
haloids. This was first proved for the chloride by Scheele,
and is now known to be true for the other haloids. It
would be presumption on my part, in the presence of
Captain Abney, to enlarge upon the effects of the different
spectral colours on these haloids, as this is a subject upon
which he can speak with the authority of an investigator.
It only remains to add that the old idea of a special
“ actinic ” force at the more refrangible end of the spec-
trum has long been abandoned. It is only because the
silver haloids absorb these particular rays that the blue
end of the spectrum is most active in promoting their
decomposition. Many other instances of photo-chemical
decomposition are known in which the less refrangible
rays are the most active, and it is possible to modify the
silver haloids themselves so as to make them sensitive for
the red end of the spectrum.
The chemical nature of the coloured products of photo-
chemical decomposition is still enshrouded in mystery.
Beyond the fact that they contain less halogen than the
normal salt, we are not much in .advance of the
knowledge bequeathed to us by Scheele in the last
century. The problem has been attacked by chemists
again and again, but its solution presents extraordinary
difficulties. These products are never formed — even under
the most favourable conditions of division, and with pro-
longed periods of exposure — in quantities beyond what the
chemists would call “ a mere trace.” Their existence
appears to be determined by the great excess of unaltered
haloid with which they are combined. Were I to give
free rein to the imagination, I might set up the hypothesis
that the element silver is really a compound body invari-
ably containing a minute percentage of some other element,
which resembles the compound which we now call silver
in all its chemical reactions, but alone is sensitive to light.
I offer this suggestion for the consideration of the specu-
lative chemist.* For the coloured product as a whole,
i.e. , the product of photo-decomposition with its combined
unchanged haloid, Carey Lea has proposed the convenient
term “ photo-salt.” It will avoid circumlocution if we
* I have gone so far as to test this idea experimentally in a preliminary
way, the result being, as might have been anticipated, negative. Silver
chloride, well darkened by long exposure, was extracted with a hot
saturated solution of potassium chloride, and the dissolved portion, after
precipitation by water, compared with the ordinary chloride by exposure
to light. Not the slightest difference was observable either in the rate of
colouration or in tin colours of the products. Perhaps it may be thought
worthwhile to repeat the experiment, using a method analogous to the
“method of fractionation ” of Crookes.
Jci.r 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
581
adopt this name. The photo-salts have been thought, at
various times, to contain metallic silver, allotropic silver,
a sub-haloid, such as argentous chloride, &c., or an oxy-
haloid. The free metal theory is disposed of by the fact
that silver chloride darkens under nitric acid of sufficient
strength to dissolve the metal freely. The acid certainly
retards the formation of the photo-salt, but does not pre-
vent it altogether. When once formed, the photo-chloride
is but slowly attacked by boiling dilute nitric acid, and
from the dry photo-salt mercury extracts no silver. The
assumption of the existence of an allotropic form of silver
insoluble in nitric acid cannot be seriously maintained.
The sub-haloid theory of the product may be true, but it
has not yet been established with that precision which the
chemist has a right to demand. We must have analyses
giving not only the percentage of halogen, but also the
percentage of silver, in order that it may be ascertained
whether the photo-salt contains anything besides metal and
halogen. The same may be said of the oxyhaloid theory ;
it may be true, but it has not been demonstrated.
The oxyhaloid theory was first suggested by Robert
Hunt* for the chloride : it was taken up by Sahler, and
has recently been revived by Dr. W. R. Ilodgkinson. It
has been thought that this theory is disposed of by the
fact that the chloride darkens under liquids, such as hydro-
carbons, which are free from oxygen. I have been repeat-
ing some of these experiments with various liquids, using
every possible precaution to exclude oxygen and moisture ;
dry silver chloride heated to incipient fusion has been
sealed up in tubes in dry benzene, petroleum, and carbon
tetrachloride, and exposed since March. [Tubes shown.]
In all cases the chloride has darkened. The salt darkens,
moreover, in a Crookesian vacuum. t By these experi-
ments the oxychloride theory may be scotched, but it is
not yet killed ; the question now presents itself, whether
the composition of the photo-salt may not vary according
to the medium in which it is generated. Analogy sanctions
the supposition that when the haloid darkens under water
or other oxygen-containing liquid, or even in contact with
moist or dry air, that an oxychloride may be formed, and
enter into the composition of the photo-salt. The analogy
is supplied by the concsponding salt of copper, viz.,
cuprous chloride, which darkens rapidly on exposure.
[Design printed on flat cell filled with cuprous chloride by
exposure to electric light.] Wohler conjectured that the
darkened product was an oxychloride, and this view re-
ceives a certain amount of indirect support from these
tubes [shown], in which dry cuprous chloride has been
sealed up in benzene and carbon tetrachloride since March ;
and although exposed in a southern window during the
whole of that time, the salt is as white as when first pre-
pared. Some cuprous chloride sealed up in water, and
exposed for the same time, is now almost black. [Shown.]
When silver is precipitated by reduction in a finely
divided state in the presence of the haloid, and the product
treated with acids, the excess of silver is removed and
coloured products are left which are somewhat analogous
to the photo-salts proper. These coloured haloids are also
termed by Carey Lea photo-salts, because they present
* “ Researcher on Light,” 2nd el. 1854, p. 80.
t Some dry silver chloride which Mr. Crookes has been good enouvh to
seal up for me in a high vacuum, darkens on exposure quite as rapidly as
the dry salt in air. It fom regains its original crlour when kept in the
dark. It behaves, in fact, just as the chlorrd; is known to behave when
sealed up in chlorine, although its colour is, of course, much more intense
after exposure than is the case with the chloride in chlorine. The tube in
which the chloride had bee r sealed up iu benzene, gave off a considerable
quantity of hydrogen chloride on breaking the point in June,
many analogies with the coloured products of photo-
chemical change. Whether they are identical in composi-
tion it is not yet possible to decide, as we have no complete
analyses. The first observations in this direction were
published more than thirty years ago in a report by a
British Association Committee*, in which the red and
chocolate coloured chlorides are distinctly described.
Carey Lea has since contributed largely to our knowledge
of these coloured haloids, and has at least made it appear
highly probable that they are related to the products
formed by the action of light. [Red photo-chloride and
purple photo-bromide and iodide shown.]
(To be continued.)
patent XnttlUgencc.
Applications for Letters Patent.
10,480. J. Nock, 15, Regent Street, Barnsley, “Optical
Illusions.” — July 7th.
10,506. C. J. Tozer, 54, Fleet Street, London, “ Device for
Displaying Photographs on Gravestones or ^ aults. — July
7 th.
10,545. H. P. Tattersall, 11, Exchange Street, Blackburn,
“Self-capping Shutter.” — July 8th.
10,635. J. W. Smith, 46, Lincolns Inn Fields, London,
“Photographic Shutters.” — July 9th.
10,719. F. R. Gibbon, 36, Deronda Road, Herne Hill, London,
“ Changing Box ami Slide.” — July 10th.
10,835. J. P. Bayly, 18, Fulham Place, London, (Charles
Bishop, U.S.) “Displaying Stereoscopic Views.” — July 12th.
10,871. A. Touffrevii.t.e, 323, High Holborn, London,
“ Automatic Photographic Machines.” — July 12th.
10,933. D. Webb, 70, Market Street, Manchester, “ Coloured
Dioptric and other Lenses.” — July 14th.
10,955. W. F. Ki.ein, 54, Fleet Street, London, “ Lenses.” —
July 14 th.
11,004. R. Timperley, Central Chambers, Halifax, “Auto-
matically Exhibiting Photographs.” — July 15th.
11,071. A. Watt, 89, Hartington Road, Liverpool, “Appa-
ratus for Developing without a Dark Room.” — July 16th.
11,093. H. L. Sworder, 27, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Holder to Facilitate Plate Washing.” — July 16th.
11,104. E. Edwards, 35, Southampton Buildings, London
(Oswald Moh, Germany), “Preparing Photographic Plates
of Mica.” — July 16th.
11,125. G. Wishart, Bushy Hill, Cambuslang, “Folding Tri-
pod Stands.” — July 17 th.
11,250. W. H. Keep and W. McEntee, 20, High Holborn,
London, “Removing Prepared Lithographic or Zincographic
Surfaces.” — July 18 th.
11,287. C. Judson, 11, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Toy for Producing Optical Effects.” — July 19tli.
11,293. J. E. Thornton, 3, New Lome Street, Manchester,
“Cameras.” — July 19th
* These results were arrived at in three ways. In one case hydrogen
was passed thr >ugh silver citra-e suspended in hot water, and the product
extractel with citric acid. •* The result of treating the residue with chlor-
hydric acid, and then dis-olving the silver by dilute r.itiic acid, was a rose-
tiot-d chlorile of silver.” In another experiment the dry citrate was
heated in a stream of hydrogen at 212° F.. and the product, which was
partly soluble in water, gave a brown residue, which furnished ‘‘a very
pale red body on being transformed by chlorhydric and nitric acids.” In
another experiment silver arsenite was formed, this being treated with
caustic sod I, and the black precipitate then treated successfully with chlor-
hyd ic and nitric acids : ‘ • Silver is di; solved, and there is left a substance
[of] a rich chocolate or maroon, Ac.” This, on analysis, was found
to contain 24 per cent, of chlorine, the norm cl chh ride requiring24'74, and
the sub-chlori le 14 08 per cent. The committee which conducted these
experiments consisted ot Messrs. Maskelyne, lladow, Ilardwich, and
Llewelyn, B.A. Rep. 1859, p. 103.
582
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
Specifications Published.
12,309. August 2 tut, 1889. — “ Treatment of Paper or other
Fabrics to Render them suitable for Photographic Purposes.”
James Williams, Willesden Paper Works, Willesden Junction,
Middlesex, Chemist.
Paper is at the present time treated by dipping in an
ammoniacal solution of oxide of copper (cuprammonium hydro-
oxide) in the manufacture of the well-known Willesden water-
proof paper. Such paper has, however, comparatively rough
surfaces unless glazed with roller pressure.
Paper and textile fabrics have also been glazed by applying a
coating of cellulose dissolved in cuprammonium hydro-oxide,
but, owing to the manner in which this was done, the resulting
surface was not suitable for photographic purposes.
I have discovered that instead of dissolving cellulose in
cuprammonium, it is essential to success to first prepare a
bath of strong cuprammonium hydro-oxide solution, which
must be of the utmost possible purity, and I find it convenient
to use from 1*5 to 2\5 per cent, by weight of metallic copper,
according to the degree of brilliancy required. Upon this
bath I float the surface of the paper or other fabric to be
treated, taking care that only one side comes in contait with
the solution, by which means I convert the surface of the
paper or other fabric into a structureless film of cellulose, such
film at this stage existing in combination with the oxide of
copper, ammonia, and water employed. I then conduct the
sheet of paper or other fabric, with as little exposure as pos-
sible to the air consistent with the setting of the film, to one
or more hot i oilers, taking care to lead it over the first, so
that the untouched surface is in contact with it, by which
means I expel the ammonia and water from the deposited
film.
The material thus treated has a green tint, due to the
copper hydrate contained in the deposited film. In order to
remove this and render it suitable for photographic purposes,
I pass it through consecutive baths of weak acid, such as sul-
phuric acid, which dissolves out the copper without affecting
the glazed surface. I then wash and dry the paper or other
fabric.
By this invention a permanent glaze, capable of withstanding
the action of water, steam, weak acids, alkalies, and ordinary
solvents, and with a surface closely resembling the albumenised
paper used in photography, is obtained.
In place of cuprammonium liydro-oxide, other suitable sol-
vents may be used.
What I claim is : —
1. The process of forming a practically pure, structureless
film of cellulose upon the surface of paper or other fabric,
by exposing it to the action of a solvent, and then removing
or neutralising such solvent. <
2. The processs of forming a practically pure, structureless 1
film of cellulose upon paper or other fabric, by floating the
paper or other fabric upon the surface of a solvent, and then
extracting or neutralising such solvent.
3. The process of forming a practically pure, structureless
film of cellulose upon the surface of paper or other fabric, by
exposing it to the action of cuprammonium hydro-oxide, and
afterwards to acid.
4. The process of forming a practically pure, structureless
film of cellulose upon the surface of paper or other fabric,
by floating the paper or other fabric upon the surface of
cuprammonium liydro-oxide, and afterwards exposing it to the
action of acid.
5. The treatment of paper or other fabrics to render them
suitable for photographic purposes.
14,508. Sept. 14<A, 1889. — “Applying Luminous Prepara-
tion to Paper.” James Albert Causton, of the firm of
Sir Joseph Causton and Sons, 9, Eastcheap, London,
Printer, and James Challis, of 9, Eastcheap, London, Com-
mercial Traveller.
Our improved process consists in printing any design or pat-
tern in an adhesive composition, such as gold size or mucilage,
upon paper or other substance from type, blocks, or litho- i
graphic stones by an ordinary printing press or otherwise ; and, i
while the design is still wet or tacky, dusting or flocking upon
it a layer of the chemical compound known as luminous
powder, which has the property of absorbing rays of light and
afterwards emitting them in the dark ; being the acting
ingredient in the well-known luminous paint, and composed of
sulphur and lime.
To obtain a greater body of the luminous powder, we some-
times mix a portion of it with the mucilage used in printing
the design, and afterwards dust on the powder. The non-
luminous portions of the design are printed in the usual
manner.
We are aware that luminous designs have been produced by
painting, and also by washing or coating the entire surface
with luminous paint, and stopping out the required non-lumi-
nous portion by printing or otherwise. These methods, how-
ever, involve a very large consumption of the luminous com-
pound, while the effect obtained both on the luminous and the
stopped-out portions is extremely coarse ; whereas, by our
improved process, we can produce designs of very great delicacy
and beauty with the least possible expenditure of material.
18,139. November 13th, 1889. — “Apparatus for Facilitat-
ing the Microscopical Examination of Photographs.” Henry
Duncan, 16, Tokenhouse Yard, London, Stockbroker.
My invention relates to apparatus for facilitating the micro-
scopical examination of photographic pictures, maps, and
documents, and other small or microscopic objects.
My said invention is chiefly designed to afford the means
whereby photographic miniatures of maps or the like, which,
while occupying a comparatively small space, correspond to a
very large area, can be easily examined.
My said invention is particularly serviceable to bicyclists
and tourists, and for military and other purposes where ordi-
nary maps would be objectionable by reason of their bulk, or
by reason of the difficulty of using them, particularly in
stormy or wet weather.
An important feature of my said invention is the provision
of suitable means whereby the microscope may be readily
adjusted relatively to the map or other object, so that any
desired section of the said map or other object can be brought
into the field of the said microscope. By this means, with a
comparatively small lens, it is possible to examine objects which,
as a whole, occupy an area very much larger than the field of
such lens. For example, any desired part of a small scale map
showing an area of, say, three or four hundred square miles may
be examined by adjusting the microscope as required.
In making a portable apparatus according to my said inven-
tion, I arrange the lens or lenses in a suitable tube or holder
capable of sliding in a disc or other piece fitted to rotate in or
upon the frame of the map, picture, or the like ; or I provide
other suitable means for adjusting the lens or lenses in any
direction relatively to the said map, picture, or the like for the
purpose above specified.
The tube carrying the lens or lenses is sometimes arranged to
slide into and out of the main portion of the apparatus.
The map or the like is preferably photographed on a greatly
reduced scale on a disc of glass which will fit into a suitable
case or holder provided with a removable cover, and is pro-
tected with another disc of glass secured to the first disc in
any convenient manner. I sometimes so construct these discs
as to prevent rotation of the same in their case or holder ; for
example, I form notches in them to engage with a stud or pro-
jection in the holder. I can, if desired, provide the apparatus
with any desired number of interchangeable maps, pictures, or
the like mounted in this manner.
A stud or projection is sometimes provided on the said frame
to facilitate the use of the apparatus by indicating which is the
top or north of the map. This stud or projection, moreover,
engages with a notch in the cover of the holder for the map or
the like, and prevents rotation of the said cover relatively to
the said holder.
In some cases I make the map or other object adjustable
while keeping the lens fixed, so that different parts of the said
map or the like can be brought into the field of the said lens,
or both the lens and the object may be made adjustable
relatively to each other.
Jolt 25, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
583
6,093. April 22nd, 1890. — “ A Photographic Camera.” John
Merritt, 842, President Street, and William Edward
Spencer, 293, Dekalb Avenue, Brooklyn, State of New
Vork, Physicians.
This patent is inexplicable without the aid of mechanical
drawings, and has fifteen claims.
(ftomgpontienrc.
EXPOSURE AND DEVELOPMENT.
Sir, — In your report of the last meeting of the Hackney
Photographic Society your printer has substituted “on glass”
for “in glens;” the sentence should read “Preferred dull
weather when photographing in glens.”
As some little misunderstanding might arise about the
development of an isochromatic plate by candle-light, permit
me to point out that I used the developing dish designed by
myself, which has a transparent ruby glass bottom, with a well
at one end to hold developer when the dish is held upright.
By this means it is unnecessary to remove the plate from the
developing dish to examine it for density, or to pour off the
developer. This prevents bubbles in the developer and staining
of fingers, as it is not necessary to touch the plate at all until
development is complete and the solutions washed off. The
ruby glass bottom prevents the light from reaching the back of
plate when examining for density, my experience proving that
plates are mostly fogged in this way. As to the glass side of
the film it remains sensitive, whereas the surface of film is
partly protected by the developer and the reduced image.
Birt Acres.
BRIXTON AND CLAl'HAM CAMERA CLUB.
Sir, — Can you spare a corner in this week's issue to announce
that in future we meet at Gresham Hall, Gresham Road,
Brixton, S.W., opening there on Thursday, 31st inst., and
that we shall be glad to see any photographers residing in the
neighbourhood on that occasion, or at any of our meetings ?
Thanking you in anticipation, F. W. Levett, Hon. Sec.
126, Lowden Hoad, Herne Hill, S.E., 21 st July.
laroccctftngs of £oricttes.
Photographic Society of Great Britain.
The monthly technical meeting of this Society was held on
July 22, Mr. T. Sebastian Davis in the Chair.
A set of photographs from paintings of eminent masters
amongst musical composers was received from an establishment
at Munich.
An illustration of photographic enterprise was narrated by
Mr. L. Warnerke. A photographer in the Isle of Wight was
in the habit of posting himself at a stopping place of the
Yentnor coach, and photographing the vehicle and passengers
at about eleven o’clock in the morning, and by five in the
afternoon, on the return journey, the passengers were met
with a supply of mounted prints made from the negative taken
only a few hours earlier.
An enquiry being made as to the character of Watkins’
exposure meter, Mr. Chapman Jones said that a description of
it would be found in the Journal of Chemical Industry.
The Chairman asked what would be considered a fair time
to expect commercial sensitised paper to keep in good condition ?
Mr. W. E. Debeniiam said that there were two causes which
operated to spoil sensitised paper. One cause was the influence
of an impure atmosphere, such as that of large cities. It must
not be expected that silver paper could be prepared to resist
this influence. The other cause was the inherent constitution
of the sensitised paper itself. It was this that the manu-
facturer could influence. Paper must therefore be judged by
its ability to keep in good condition if well preserved from the
atmosphere. There were also two kinds of deterioration,
discolouration, and a change which prevented the paper from
taking a rich and satisfactory tone. He had noticed that with
paper kept loose this change had come on before there was
any serious discolouration.
Mr. Chapman Jones had found paper keep better, as far as
freedom from discolouration is concerned when loose in a box
than when rolled up.
Mr. Warnerke had some sensitised paper which was more
than two years old. It had been kept wrapped in tinfoil, and
was as good as at first, with the exception of the outside sheet,
which was spoiled.
Mr. A. Cowan had found paper keep perfectly good when
placed between folds of blotting-paper that had been prepared
with a solution of common washing soda and dried.
Mr. Warnerke had used in this way paper treated with
potassium nitrite.
Mr. J. It. Gotz considered that the influence of impure
atmosphere was very strong in spoiling sensitised paper. He
had known paper to keep perfectly good for two years at a
country place in Shropshire, whilst in Sheffield as many months
sufficed to spoil it.
The Chairman said that it would be an advantage if
albumenisers would prepare paper in other and larger sizes
than the one now exclusively adopted. There would be no
difficulty in getting the paper from the mills.
Mr. Gotz then exhibited McKellan’s new magazine hand-
camera, and showed its working, which appeared to be simple
and satisfactory.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 1 7 th inst. Mr. F. A. Bridge occupied
the chair.
Mr. S. T. Chang was elected a member.
Mr. J. R. Gotz exhibited some half-plate negatives taken on
Obernetter films ; the substratum of these films is hardened
gelatine. Mr. Gotz said the treatment of these films was
similar to others. After washing, they were transferred to a
bath containing a little spirits of wine and about 7 per cent, of
glycerine, in which they were allowed to remain about half an
hour, and then dried between sheets of blotting-paper. He
also passed round some prints on Obernetter paper with a matt
su rface. .
Mr. A. Haddon said that at a former meeting Mr. Hastings
had shown some prints on Reynolds’ iridium paper. He had
subjected a piece of this paper to various tests, but was unable
to trace any iridium.
The report of the delegates appointed by the Association to
attend the Convention at Chester was given by Mr. A. Haddon,
The subject for discussion on the 31st inst. will be “Out-
door Portraiture.”
Newcastle-on-Tyne and Northern Counties Photographic
Association.
July 15 th. — Mr James Brown in the chair. About forty
members were present.
Mr. H. M. Smith, of the Eastman Company, attended to
exhibit and explain the kodak and new Tollable transparent
film. In introducing his subject, Mr. Smith said he would
naturally be expected to refer to the attacks which had been
made upon the kodak, and, in fact, he was there partly for
that very purpose. He emphatically protested against anony-
mous and erroneous statements which had appeared in one of
the photographic papers, and he especially invited the writer
who signed himself “ Newcastle ” to come forward, if present,
and argue the matter out ; an invitation which, however, was not
responded to. It was the intention of the Company, when-
ever the identity of a correspondent could be established, to
go boldly to him and afford every facility for the settlement
of disputed points. Had any of these anonymous gentlemen
given the most cursory examination to the kodak, they would
have found that the lens is not a single non-achromatic ; and
as to price, that was entirely a matter between buyer and
seller. He wished to state, in as public a manner as possible,
that in the No. 1 kodak the lens was not a single but a peri-
scopic — a doublet lens. It was not achromatised, but was
584
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[July 25, 1890.
placed so as to work at its chemical focus, and he could appeal
to results to show its quality. With the sole exception of the
No. 1, all the other forms of kodak sent out by his Company
were fitted with rapid rectilinear lenses made by one of the
principal firms of lens makers in America, and they would
bear comparison with any in the market. The focus of the
quarter-plate was five and a quarter inches, and the 5x4
six and a half inches, and all were capable of adjustment to
various distances. Results of exposures taken in the kodak
during the Convention were passed round, some hand expo-
sures and others with a tripod, as well as enlargements from
the same negatives. It was intended to demonstrate the
development of the films, but time did not admit.
After remarks from Messrs. Dunn, Park, Pike, Hemy, the
Chairman, and others, a vote of thanks was accorded to Mr.
Smith for his address.
Bristol and West of England Amateur Photographic
Association.
The excursion on the 18th to Tintern was attended by a few
members, including Mr. E. Brightman. The weather was fine,
and some good work was done.
On the Saturday following (the 21 iust.) a large number of
members went for a day’s photography and pleasure to
Keynsham and Saltford, in response to the invitation of the
president, Mr. H. A. H. Daniel. The party left the train at
Keynsham, where they visited the interesting Parish Church,
and were thence driven by Mr. Daniel to Keynsham Manor
House, where they were hospitably regaled before proceeding
farther. Return was made to Keynsham Manor in the late
afternoon. Mr. Boyden took an excellent group before the
party dispersed.
Raglan was settled on for the July excursion, which was
arranged to take place on Saturday, the 26th, the journey
being made on the previous evening.
A resolution of regret was passed by the members pre-
sent at the announcement of the death, after a rather sudden
illness, of Mr. E. S. Walsh, a member of the Society.
A Carbon Process. — Mr. O. Volkner publishes the follow-
ing dust carbon printing process, which appears to be easy to
carry out, requires no reversed negatives, and yields per-
manent prints. We also think it can be used in making photo-
typic printing blocks. Make a solution of gelatine in water(l : 60)
and draw sheets of good strong paper through it, and hang
it up to dry. Wet it again and squeeze it down on a
piece of glass. Now brush over it a solution of ten parts gela-
tine, ten parts gum arabic, twenty parts white sugar, eighty
parts distilled water. While still quite moist, put it in a dust-
ing box (such as used for photogravure) which contains a mix-
ture of 100 parts to white dry sugar and five parts of French
lampblack. After a lapse of eight to ten minutes with-
draw it, and you will find it covered with innumerable
particles of dust. Paper thus prepared will keep, and
has to be sensitised in a bath of fifty parts bichro-
mate of potassium, fifty parts bichromate of ammonia,
six thousand parts water and aqua ammonia, until it
assumes a light yellow colour, and at last, to avoid the too
quick dissolution of the gum arabic, immerse in twenty parts
chromic acid in 1,500 alcohol. Print by Vogel’s photo-
meter 16° to 18®. To develop, use warm water first, and
afterwards cold, leaving the print for several hours in water,
to which may be added a little aqua ammonia, in case the
printing was carried too far. The prints show a singular and
very pleasing grain, and need no transferring. — Dr. Eder's
Jahrbuch.
Received. — The catalogue of Mr. R. Abraham, whose
business will in future be carried on under the name of Adams
and Co. This catalogue begins with thirty-six pages of good
literary matter on practical photographic subjects by Mr.
Andrew Pringle and other good wi iters. We have also
received with thanks and suspended in the office, as requested,
our coloured book-cover supplement, recently issued, neatly
framed by Mr. W. F. Slater, of Southampton Street, Camber-
well, as a specimen of his skill in the framing of photographs.
Hnstuers to ©orrtgpontientsi.
All Communications, except advertisements, intended for publication,
should be addressed to the Editor of the Photographic News, 5, Furnival
Street, London, E.C.
All questions requiring a reply in this column should be addressed to
Mr. John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Koad, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of the
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
Col. Waterhouse. — ( ruaiacol Developer, dec. We thank you
for the letter dated 24th ult., and for the promise of fur-
ther particulars, also for the memorandum sent. The change
which you describe is not confined to India, but occurs in
more temperate climates, and sometimes even in England.
H. S. — Card Mounts. Two cabinets received showing defects,
the cause of which cannot be ascertained by mere inspec-
tion. We will look further into the matter and report to
you later on.
Focus. — Right of Reproduction. Amongst amateurs who are
friends, it is not likely that there can be any objection to
the proposed course, which is intended as a personal com-
pliment ; but as a measure of courtesy you ought to
apprise your absent colleague of the step you are taking,
even though he, being at the antipodes, may not get to
hear of it until after your copies are distributed. All
depends upon the character of the individual, and the degree
of intimacy subsisting between you. We have done so
under similar circumstances without giving offence.
I). M. — Eikonogen Development ; German Formula. The use
of eikonogen introduces no new practice as regards the
method of fixing the plates developed therewith. Bromide
is supposed to have an influence by virtue of its exerting a
slight solvent action upon the haloid salts of silver con-
tained in the sensitive film ; the same claim is made on be-
half of the trace of hypo sometimes employed as an accele-
rator.
E. O. C. (Boston). — Photo-Mechanical Processes. Inlast week’s
News you will have seen further references to Kiewning’s
and to Maschek’s processes.
Inquirer. — Hygrometers. The instrument figured and des-
cribed at page 547 may not be altogether novel, but is pro-
bably much more delicate than the cat-gut hygrometer in
frequent use. The wet and dry bulb thermometers may be
depended upon to give correct indications ; these are worked
with Mr. Olaisher’s tables.
L. P. (Yarmouth). — Ferrous Oxalate. Your letter is answered
by reference to the concluding summary, which has now
been published. See bottom of page 552.
Tyro. — Brown Spots in Silver Prints. The circular marks
appear to be due to bubbles formed whilst the prints are in
the fixing bath. The cure should be occasional lifting and
more agitation in the hypo, with greater care in removing
the excess of silver by preliminary washing.
S. D. — Cockled Ebonite Shutter. Try the effect of tying up
the slide between two ziuc plates, immerse in boiling water,
and allow gradually to cool. It ought then to be perma-
nently flattened.
J. M. S. — Weather Forecasts. From long observation and
comparisons we should be inclined to put the “successes ”
rather lower than two out of three, and several of the later
prophecies have been exceedingly unfortunate. Photographers
are quite as much interested as the farmers in getting true
indications, but we must wait for the progress of science,
and hope for better results. America is fortunate in having
a great continent and wide ocean to help their meteorological
forecasts, which are nearly always right ; whilst our insular
position precludes the attainment of this degree of certainty,
and with us, so far, they are about as often wrong as right.
W. C. N. — “ London Purple." We have never known Magenta
residues to be called by this name, but from them may lie
prepared Ruby Powder, which, in some respects, answers to
your description.
Received. — Photargus, B. B. and Co., and E.B,
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
pjP
\ P1 1 ■■ r —
Vol. XXXIV. No. 16$k— August 1, 1890.
CONTENTS.
PAO*
The Weights and Measures Used by Photographers in America 585
Dark Room Comforts 586
Steeling Photogravure Plates 587
Limitations in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus. By W.
K. Burton 587
PAO«
Literary Notice 597
Photo-Chemical Investigations. By Ferdinand Ilurter, Ph.D.,
and V. C. Driffield 598
The Photographic Image. By Professor Raphael Meldola,
F.R.S., M.R.1 699
The Recent City Photographic Exhibition 590
Photography in France. By Leon Vidal 590
Photography in Copenhagen 592
Photo-Engraving as a Business 600
Military Photography 600
Photographing Upon Wood 601
Printing Operations. By Ellerslie Wallace.... 593
The Studio in Summer-Time. By John A. Tennant 596
Treating Flexible Plates. By M. Balagny 597
Patent Intelligence 602
Correspondence 608
Proceedings of Societies 603
Answers to Correspondents 604
THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES USED BY
PHOTOGRAPHERS IN AMERICA.
As it seems probable that the system of weights and
measures used by British photographers will soon he
the same as those employed in the rest of civilised
Europe, it remains to be considered whether a variation
from the general uniformity will be found in the United
States of America. In relation to the weights and
measures of the United States, Professor T. C. Menden-
hall, the superintendent of the United States Coast and
Geodetic Survey, recently delivered a long address to
the Pharmacopoeial Convention held at Washington ;
that address contained a mass of useful information
on the subject now under notice.
Professor Mendenhall set forth that in the United
States the old English system of weights and measures,
resting upon no scientific basis, is in general use, and
that, whilst within the last fifty years the English had
somewhat improved their ancient system, the example
had not been followed in his country. He said that
the United States was one of the first nations to receive
copies of the metre. During the French Revolution,
the Committee on Safety, of which Robespierre was
chairman, transmitted to the United States a copper
metre and a copper kilogramme by order of the Com-
mittee, and this metre and kilogramme were placed in
the national archives. In the archives of the United
States Coast Survey Office is what is known as the
Committee metre— an iron bar of great historic interest,
as only three or four are now in existence. This is
one of the fifteen iron bars which were prepared from
a study of the metre, and was obtained very long ago.
Professor Mendenhall added that in 1868 a law was
passed by the Congress of the United States legalising the
use of the metric system in that country, and establish-
ing certain approximate relations between the metric
and the customary systems. He said that he wanted to
emphasise one fact which is not generally recognised in
relation to this subject, and that is, that to-day the
metre and the kilogramme are the only units that have
been established by Congress for the whole country.
In the course of his address, he also set forth that in
1869 the French Government invited other governments
to send delegates to Paris in order to attend the
International Bureau of Weights and Measures, that
they might agree on the construction of a new inter-
national metre. The old metre of the archives was
still preserved, but it no longer possessed the great
authority it formerly had, since its form was not
recognised as coming up to the modern ideas of
metrology. The French Government, therefore, con-
cluded that it was time to construct a new metre
which should be first in authority the world over.
The United States sent delegates, and in 1875 the
International Bureau of Weights and Measures was
organised by an International Convention. It was
held in France; about twenty-five nations were repre-
sented, and the result of that was the introduction
of a new prototype standard. Copies of this proto-
type standard were subsequently distributed to all the
nations of the world who had participated in the Con-
vention, and two of these copies went to the United
States, two metres and two kilogrammes. One of these
metres and one of these kilogrammes were carried over
from Paris by Mr. Graham, of the Geodetic Survey,
and were deposited in the archives of the Bureau of
Weights and Measures. They bore the seal of the United
States Minister at Paris, and of Prof. Davidson and Dr.
Gould. On the 2nd day of January, 1890, these standards
were taken to the Executive Mansion, to the Cabinet room,
and were opened. The seals were broken by the Presi-
dent of the United States, witnessed by the Secretary
of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, also by
twenty or thirty distinguished scientific men. Models
were constructed of these standards, and Professor
Mendenhall exhibited one of them to the Convention,
made of 90 per cent, platinum and 10 per cent, iridium,
coated with aluminium. It is in the form of a bar,
but it has a peculiar cross section of the form of the
letter H, so that any stress that the bar may receive
will be compensated for ; a short distance from each
end are fine lines, and they represent the length of the
586
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
metre. He also exhibited a model of the standard
kilogramme composed of the same platinum-iridium
alloy.
From this it seems that great attention is being paid
just now in the United States to the metric system,
and it may be inferred that the matter is likely to be
considered without delay by photographers there, who
are already displaying much interest in the steps
recently taken in England in relation to the standard-
ising of the mounts of lenses.
DARK ROOM COMFORTS.
It is a common belief that any place will do for a
dark room for photographic purposes, and many men
are content — sometimes, unfortunately, by compulsion —
to utilize a cupboard under the stairs, or some other
corner of the household where, to use a common but
expressive term, “ there is not room to swing a cat,”
for the purposes of development. We never yet met
with a photographer who possessed any intense desire
“to swing a cat,” but all of us are desirous of suffi-
cient room in our workshops to swing our own arms
without the danger of smashing bottles or dishes in
the process. The “ cupboard ” form of dark room is
bad for other reasons, the chief being the want of
ventilation, so that half-an-hour’s work therein causes
a feeling of exhaustion which is not always traced to
the real cause. One pair of lungs soon vitiates the
available oxygen in a small room, and if the process is
helped by a lamp, which consumes a great deal more,
the place soon becomes likened to the black hole of
Calcutta.
We lately saw at the house of an ardent amateur
photographer a very ingenious method by which his
bath-room was transformed in two minutes into an
effective dark room . The idea seemed to us to be so
original in conception that we made a note of the
arrangements, by leave of the owner, for the benefit of
others. The bath was of the usual household type, with
cold water laid on by an ordinary tap, and was placed
immediately under a window through which the after-
noon sun poured liberally into the room. The window
had a vallance above it, and curtains on either side, and
without close examination did not reveal any other
fittings ; but this window was really far more worthy
of patenting than many photographic contrivances
which are daily brought under our notice.
In the first place, it was fitted with a blind made of
ruby medium, which was fastened to a roller like any
other window blind. When pulled down the light in
the room instantly changed to crimson, but there were,
of course, gaps on each side through which treacherous,
undiluted daylight still streamed in sufficient quantities
to affect the least sensitive of photographic compounds.
No light came in from beneath the blind, for it was
made of such a length that its lower edge and lath
came over the window ledge, and could be fastened
there by a button in the wall.
Rut fixed to the outer edges of the window frame on
each side, and hidden until required by the curtains,
were two wings of black material (silesia) each about
ten inches broad. These flaps were pulled over
the edges of the blind, and two or three elastic tapes
fastened to the edge of one of them found resting places
on corresponding buttons sewn on the edge of the other
one. In this way the window was quite obscured,
while plenty of red light came into the room from
the broad band of ruby medium that was left
exposed right down its centre. With this clever
makeshift the bath-room was changed into a red room
with case, and plates could be developed in comfort
upon a wooden grid that was temporarily laid across
under the tap. It is true that the interior of the bath
bore traces of experiments with various developers, and
the paint gave evidence of chemical discolouration, but
this we should not have remarked had it not been pointed
out to us by the fair lady of the house.
Where a bath room can be adapted in this way one
great desideratum gained is a plentiful supply of water.
The importance of this is not always recognised by
photographers, and thereby many a good negative has
been sacrificed. A properly fitted dark room should
not only have a copious supply of this “staff” of
modern photography — it was not of so much conse-
quence in the days of collodion — but it should also have
a large sized sink in which plates may be left with the
water running upon them after the alum bath, as a
final precaution against the enemy hypo.
The right choice of a dark room lamp is another
matter upon which comfort much depends. When
electricity is “ laid on” to our houses that difficulty
will be solved, for there is nothing better than a glow-
lamp in a red lantern, or — as they will doubtless be sup-
plied for photographic uses — with ruby glass bulbs of
their own. In the meantime gas is, without doubt,
the best thing to use where it is available. The lantern
box in which it is contained should be largo, and may
conveniently be fitted with panes of different material,
according to the work in hand. Rut perhaps the chief
recommendation of gas is that it can readily be turned
up or down, according to the amount of light which it
is deemed safe to use with different varieties of
plates.
There are many other points which greatly add to
dark room comfort, too many, indeed, to discuss in
detail, but one or two which are commonly neglected
may be mentioned. Every bottle should be legibly
labelled, and in the case of compounds, such as de-
velopers, the actual formula should be written at length
on the label. The ability to fill a bottle afresh, with-
out the necessity of hunting through eevcral Year-
Rooks to find the original formula, is a comfort
indeed. A bottle of water, acidulated with hydrochloric
acid, and a sponge, should be kept close to the sink
in order to wash out dishes and measures after use ;
and we may mention in passing that the same sponge
passed over a sheet of glass, followed by a good rinse
under the tap, will give a chemically clean surface
more quickly, perhaps, than any other agent. These
are little things, but attention to such details leads to
big things.
August 1, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
587
STEELING PHOTOGRAVURE PLATES.
In an illustrated pamphlet on “ Photogravure,” by W. T.
Wilkinson, issued this week by iliffe and Son, will be
found thirty-two pages of reading matter, giving photo-
graphers information how to etch their own photogravure
plates, and to print off impressions therefrom. The
artistic effects producible by photogravure are now fully
recognised, and it is not impossible that this process may
play an important part in the professional photography of
the future.
The pamphlet is clearly written, and likely to be useful.
In it Mr. Wilkinson gives the following instructions for
the steeling of the etched plates when large numbers of
prints are required therefrom: —
“When the plate has been proved, the next operation
will be to steel-face it, for which purpose it is thoroughly
cleaned with whiting moistened with turpentine and
naphtha, polishing with a soft cloth ; a small portion of
the plate behind is scraped clean, and a piece of copper
wire soldered to it. The steeling solution is placed in a
wooden cell, the positive and negative poles from the
battery (Leclanche) ending in copper rods the whole
length of the cell. The solution is composed of —
Warm water ... ... ... ... 20 ounces
Ammonium chloride ... ... ... 3 ,,
Sulphate of iron and ammonia ... ... 4 ,,
When dissolved, filter, and let it stand in the cell twenty-
four hours before use. When required for use, the copper-
plate is hung upon the rod connecting with the negative pole
of battery, the positive pole being occupied by the anode
(a plate of pure steel), which must be the same size or
larger than the copper-plate. The two plates being in
position, the current is turned on by pushing in the rod
of battery, and in from three to five minutes the opera-
tion is complete, the copper-plate being covered by a very
thin film of steel. The plate, when steel-faced, is
thoroughly washed and dried, and then cleaned with
whiting and turps and naphtha, the copper wire behind
carefully unsoldered, and the back scraped flat. If the
battery is not to be used again for some time the anode
should be removed and wiped dry, the cell being carefully
covered up.”
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE “ PHOTOGRAPHIC
NEWS.”
We desire to remind the readers of this Journal that on
Friday, August 15th, a fine photo-etching, representing
the house at Eversley of the late Charles Kingsley, will be
issued as a Supplement to the Photographic News.
Clearing Collodion. — Collodion, which is often slow in
settling and clearing after preparation, may, according to the
Photo. Archil •, be entirely cleared by shaking it up with clear
quartz sand. This carries the flocks and impurities to the
bottom with it, and leaves the liquid above entirely clear.
Toning Gelatino-Chloride Paper. — The simplest toning
bath for gelatino-cldoride paper we have seen is that proposed
by W. K. Burton, of Tokio, Japan ; it is as follows : —
Hyposulphite of soda 3 ounces
Distilled water ... ... ... ... 20 ,,
Chloride of gold 6 grains
with the addition of three grains of nitrate of lead to preserve
the whites. The above bath tones slowly, and does not give
the richness produced by the sulpho-cyanide of ammonia
formula, but will recommend itself to many on account of its
simplicity. — Wilson’s Photographic Magazine,
LIMITATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF SUB-
JECTS BY FOCUS*
BY W. K. BURTON.
It must be some year or two now since I wrote to your
columns, pointing out what I considered to be a fallacy in
a statement made by Mr. T. II. Dallmeyer in connection
with the effect of reflection from the surfaces of lenses.
Mr. Dallmeyer, at that time, replied to my communication
that he intended to go into the matter thoroughly by the
aid of drawings, and I have been ever since eagerly look-
ing out for any farther word from him on the subject. I
see an announcement in a photographic periodical that has
just reached me that he is, at last, going to take the
matter up. I therefore do not enter into this question at
present farther than to say that if he, Mr. Dallmeyer, has
not gone into the matter before he has seen this, he may
hereby know that there is at least one person anxiously
waiting to hear of his results.
I now come to say a word or two in reply to some
remarks made by Mr. Dallmeyer in his recent paper read
before the Camera Club Conference, entitled “ Limitations
in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus,” in which he
criticises some sayings of mine.
I cannot help thinking that Mr. Dallmeyer either will-
fully misrepresents me, or has not understood the paper
of mine that he refers to, “ On One or Two Tenets of
the Naturalists,” and, as I cannot believe the former, I
must believe the latter assumption, and assume that my
paper was not clear. I therefore make a little farther
explanation.
In the paper of mine referred to I stated that I believed
the common statement, that the eye defines less per-
fectly than a good lens, to be a mistake. I should certainly
have added that this is as far as refers to axial definition
only. My authority is Lord Rayleigh who, unless I
remember very imperfectly, some years ago demonstrated
that the normal human eye gives central definition in one
plane as good as any lens is physically capable of giving,
but I have, unfortunately, not the means by me here to
quote chapter and verse.
Mr. Dallmeyer contradicts my statement, and gives
Helmholz as his authority ; but he persistently ignores the
whole point of my argument, to wit, that granted that the
eye gives ever so much worse definition than a lens, there
still should be in the image given by a photographic lens,
so far as any scientific reasoning goes, one plane rendered
as sharp as the lens is capable of rendering it ; because,
whatever falling off of definition due to imperfection in
the eye there may be in looking at an object, there will be
exactly the same falling off in looking at an image of the
object made with a lens that gives absolute sharpness in one
plane.
But I am repeating what I have already said several
times, and doubtless weary your readers. If Mr. Dall-
meyer really wishes to know what my views on the subject
really are — and they are very different from his representa-
tion of them at the Camera Club Conference — I refer him
to page 55 of the Year-Book for 1890, as 1 think that I
there succeeded in expressing myself more clearly than I
did in the paper I wrote for the Camera Club.
I now come to what is the real reason for my writing at
the present time. It is a question in relation to diffusion
of focus.
• Tfce full title of this article, as sent to us by Mr. Burton, is “ Djll-
meyer on Limitations in the Treatment of Subjects by Focus, and on one
or two other Subjects.” — Ed.
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[AuGrsT 1, 1890.
588
I consider a double apology due for touching on this
subject again, one to your readers for once more bringing
up a matter that has, as most will, I fear, consider, been
discussed ad museum already, and another to Mr. Dall-
meyer for venturing to differ from so great an authority as
himself on a purely optical subject. It is with the utmost
diffidence that I do so because, for one thing, optics are a
very slippery subject, and one is liable to stumble, even
after all care ; for another, I must confess that I some-
times have difficulty in quite following Mr. Dallmeyer’s
meaning. This I have not the smallest doubt is my own
fault ; but if I have misunderstood Mr. Dallmeyer in the
particular point that I am now taking up, I am sure that I
will be held excused, for I think there must be many
others who have misunderstood him as well as me.
To come to the point, Mr. Dallmeyer has several times
stated that, in the case of a lens with diffusion of focus
introduced in the form of positive spherical aberration, the
effect, if a middle distance object is focussed, is that the
falling off of definition, although greater for a near object
than in the case of a thoroughly corrected lens, is less for
the distance, and that, the important object being to reduce
the contrast between the definition of the object focussed
for and the distance, diffusion of focus is a useful
thing.
Now I state that the facts are the direct opposite of this.
Positive spherical aberration favours the nearer objects at
the expense of the distance. I think that I can prove this,
and that, consequently, all Mr. Pallmeyer's .arguments in
a recent controversy with Mr. W. E. Debenham, and also
those at the recent Camera Club Conference, fall to the
ground.
I must ask for leave to have reproduced an illustration
that has done service many times, namely, that of Mr.
Thomas Grubb, used by him in combating the claims of
the late Mr. Dallmeyer in the matter of diffusion of focus.
I would ask a close inspection of this cut. The upper
diagram represents the condensation of the rays of light
from a point after passing through a lens without spherical
aberration ; the lower, the condensation of similar rays after
passing through a lens having diffusion in the form of
positive spherical aberration.
In the former case the rays come to a focus at a point ;
in the latter case they do not, but come to a series of foci
at different distances from the lens, forming, however, a
“quasi-focus,” which is generally assumed to be at that
distance from the lens where the bundle of rays is of the
smallest diameter.
It will be seen that, in the case of the upper diagram,
the diameters of the cones of light, or “ bundles of rays,”
are given at equal distances in front of and behind the
point of focus, the diameters being equal, and, in each
case, 190 units.
In the case of the other diagram, where there is
diffusion represented, the diameters are again given at
equal distances behind and in front of the quasi-focus,
and that at that same distance as in the case of the lens
without spherical aberration. In this case it wilt be
found that the bundles of rays are not of equal diameter,
but that, whereas that farther from the lens is represented
by 280, which is much more than 190, the other is repre-
sented by 174, which is somewhat less than 190, so that
in this case there is a positive gain in the size of the circle
of confusion representing a point.
So far the argument is sound, but after this it seems to
me that it woefully ceases to be so. Mr. Dallmeyer goes
August 1, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
589
on to speak of the bundle of rays nearer the lens than the
quasi-focus as representing planes “ beyond the point
focussed upon.” He refers to this several times, about
the most distinct statement appearing iu a letter to the
Photographic News of April 27th, 1888. I quote from
the letter: — “My claims for the advantages on the side of
the lens iu question cannot fairly be refuted by Mr.
Debenham or any other photographer ; and they are
founded on the ground that it is chiefly and almost
entirely the better definition of planes beyond the point
focussed upon that we are aiming at, neglecting as far as
possible the question of foreground, where the disadvan-
tageous conditions would appear.”
Mr. Dallmeyer assumes that the bundle of rays nearer
the lens than the plane of focus represents the distance,
those farther from the plane of focus the foreground.
Now the exact reverse is the truth. If a middle distance
object be focussed for, the distance is represented by a
part of the bundle of rays farther from the lens than the
point or points where they crossed ; an object iu the
foreground is represented by a portion of the bundle
nearer than the point or points where they would cross,
were they to pass through the plate or focussing
glass.
It is true that, in focussing, we move the lens nearer to
the ground glass for a distant than for a near object,
but this has nothing to do with the position at which the
bundles of rays are cut by the plane of the ground glass
when this is not in a fixed position. I think this will be
made clear by a diagram that I have made.
In this sketch A B is intended to represent the plane
of the focussing glass. C is supposed to be the point
focussed for, and the light, represented by two thick lines, is
shown as meeting at a point in the plane of the ground
glass.
The thin, full lines (parallel till they reach the lens) are
supposed to represent light from a distant object. It
will be seen that the light rays cross nearer the lens than
the plane of the ground glass, namely, at D. The dotted
lines are supposed to represent light from a foreground
object at E. It will be seen that they cross farther from
the lens than the ground glass, namely, at F. I have not
attempted to show actual spherical aberration in this
illustration, as the result would be too confusing, but a
moment's reference to the diagram of Grubb given
above along with my own will show that were there
spherical aberration, the distant point would be repre-
sented by a much larger disc of confusiou than the fore-
ground point.
I think it will be conceded that the whole of the
recent ingenious demonstration given by Mr. Dallmeyer
at the Camera Club goes to show that the result of intro-
ducing diffusion in the form of positive spherical aberration
is to improve the definition of the foreground a very little
at the cost of the distance, which is thereby thrown into
much worse definition than with a completely corrected
lens. This may be partly compensated for in practice by
the fact that we do not focus when there is positive
spherical aberration for that part of the bundle of rays that
is of least diameter, but for a plane somewhat nearer the
lens than this, as I have already described in the Photo-
graphic News.
After all this, I do not by any means wish to argue that
diffusion of focus is of no use. I have, on the contrary,
always held that it is of great practical use, but only in
reducing the contrast of definition. If Mr. Dallmeyer
had confined himself to claiming this he would have been
on safe ground, but he has tried to prove too much.
Another thing in this. Although the effect of positive
spherical aberration certainly is to improve the definition
of the foreground at the cost of the distance. I notice,
in examining the illustration that accompanies Mr. Dall-
meyer’s paper read before the Camera Club, that there
is no appreciable difference between the two until much
more spherical aberration is introduced than would be
tolerated in practice.
Farther than this, I do not at all know that I agree with
the dictum of Mr. Dallmeyer iu which he lays it down that
it is always most desirable to reduce the amount of lack of
definition of the distance without reference to the fore-
ground. I think there are many cases in which the exact
reverse is the case.
A Cuuious Legal Case. — The Supreme Court at St. Paul,
Minnesota, handed down a decision on July 1st., in the case of
Ida Moore, of Minneapolis, against Photographer Rugg. Rugg
sold a copy of Mrs. Moore’s picture, which was put on exhibi-
tion in improper places, much to the discredit of the lady, and
she brought suit for damages. The Supreme Court holds that
it is a case in which there is ground for the recovery of damages ;
that the photographer has no right to dispose of pictures which
are the sole property of the sitter. The decision is an impor-
tant one. Similar cases have arisen once or twice previously in
other parts of the country. — American Journal of Photography.
Toning Bath for Gblatino-Chlouidb Paper. — Herr Steig-
litz recommends the following toning bath for this paper : —
Chloride of gold ... ... ... 0 '25 gramme
Nitrate of uranium ... ... ... 0'25 ,,
Bicarbonate of soda .. . ... ... 5 • grammes
Distilled water ... ... ... 300 c.c.
This bath should be used immediately, as it does not, keep.
The prints should be printed deeply, and washed at least iu six
changes of water before priuting. Fix with : —
Hyposulphite of soda ... ... ... 1 part
Water ... ... ... ... ... 5 parts
Ammonia... ... ... ... ... afewdrops
The prints are toned in a few minutes.
To obtain a reversed negative, Mr. Kronenberg makes use
of the Eastman negative transfer paper. He places in the
frame a perfectly clean plate, having the thickness of one milli-
metre ; he applies the negative paper, then a second plate, so
as to obtain perfect planitude. After exposure and develop-
ment, the paper is placed for two minutes in a bath of 500 cubic
centimetres of distilled water and one cubic centimetre of acetic
acid, then in the hyposulphite ; wash for ten minutes, then
transfer the print to a glass plate coated with gum-arabic dis-
solved iu benzine. To obtain adherence use the squeegee, then
; place the whole iu tepid water, and at the end of three minutes
remove the paper. If necessary strengthen in the ordinary
manner. — Deutsche Photographcn Zcitung.
590
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
THE RECENT CITY PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHI-
BITION.
The following is the report of the Executive Com-
mittee of the Photographic Section of the London
Chamber of Commerce in relation to the recent Photo-
graphic Exhibition at the Drapers’ Hall, London.
The executive committee appointed by the Section to
organise the Exhibition promptly commenced its duties
by issuing a circular to the trade, and, efficiently assisted
by the secretary of the Chamber, carried it through with
a fair measure of success in the manner you have wit-
nessed.
There were seventy exhibitors, eleven hailing from the
provinces, and fifty-nine representing the metropolis. A
large and interesting display of apparatus was made, and
a representative collection of photographs and processes
of printing gathered together at Drapers’ Hall, every
available foot of space in the noble suite of rooms lent to
us being occupied. The soiree was numerously and influ-
entially attended, and in its arrangements a success. The
visitors to the Exhibition were mostly city men and their
friends, the numbers averaging about 1,200 a day for the
ten days it was open. Many of the visitors took quite a
practical interest in the apparatus, and showed a lively
appreciation of the photographs displayed. Some amount
of business issued directly from the Exhibition your
committee knows, and, considered commercially, one may
safely say that the trades represented enjoyed a peculiarly
efficacious advertisement at a moderate cost.
The statement of receipts and expenditure now sub-
mitted bears witness to a small balance in hand. The trea-
surer of your committee availed himself of the conveni-
ence of passing receipts and expenses direct through the
Chamber, which received £340 6s. 6d., and paid away
£332 18s. 7d., handing to him a balance of £7 7s. lid.
This balance became increased to £8 8s. 5d., from which
£5 16s. Od. was refunded to exhibitors who had paid for
more space than the committee were able to allot,
leaving a nett surplus of £2 12s. 5d., the disposal
of which you will determine. Of the total receipts, the
sum of £18 17s. 6d. was contributed by the Chamber,
which levied a small tax on its members outside the Photo-
graphic Section in the shape of a charge on tickets for
the soiree. On the whole conduct of the Exhibition your
committee has had the benefit of the knowledge, experi-
ence, and influence of the Chamber.
(Signed) W. S. Bird, Chairman Executive Com.
Thos. P. Watson,
Frank Bishop.
Yellow Stains. — Every photographer is, no doubt, to his
own sorrow, familiar with a yellow stain in the negative, caused
by taking the plate from the fixing bath before it is thoroughly
fixed. Mr. Belitski, the well-known photo-chemist, made some
experiments recently to remove this stain, and succeeded very
well. A slight stain can often be removed by placing the
negative in the following solution : 50 parts alum, 1,000 parts
water, 10 parts bichromate of potassium, 20 parts muriatic
acid. After several minutes the negative turns yellow all
through. It is washed now very thoroughly, exposed to sun-
light for several minutes, and developed or blackened with the
ordinary iron developer. When the stain is very intense this
remedy will not prove to be of any avail, and only by leaving it
for twenty-four hours in the Lainer acid fixing bath (so often
described in all journals recently) he succeeded in removing
the stain, and saviug valuable negatives. — Deutsche Photo-
graphen Zcitung.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN FRANCE.
BY LEON VIDAL.
Photographic Nomenclature — Neglect of the Tomb and
Work of Daguerre at Cormeil-en-Parisis — New
Property of Gelatine — Acetate of Amyl Lamp —
Sensito-Colorimetry for Ortiiociiromatic Photo-
graphy— Lantern Slides Projected in Stereoscopic
Relief— Lantern Carrier by M. Donnadieu — Free-
dom of Photography in the Streets of Paris —
Literature.
Photographic Nomenclature. — In connection with the
presentation of the latest work of the French Photographic
Society, regrets have been expressed that the terms adopted
by the International Congress of 1889 have not been
employed. We look upon these regrets as premature.
The work of the Paris Congress is destined to be revised
by another Congress, which will take place probably in
Brussels in 1891. It is very probable that many of the
decisions of the preparatory Congress of Paris will be
reversed, and it is desirable to await a fuller authorisation
before hastening to adopt expressions on which a better
understanding may be arrived at. For our own part, we
opposed in the Congress the use of the expression
phototype as the designation of the photographic negative,
and we hope that the necessity for the employment of
another word will be recognised, since the word phototypie
has to serve as designating the application of photography
to typography. The Congress of Paris, although held
during the Universal Exhibition, did not include such a
number of adherents that its work can be considered as
definitive ; therefore why should it be desired at once
to impose the putting in practice of solutions essentially
provisional ?
Neglect of the Tomb and Work of Daguerre. — In spite of
the glory which is attached to the name of Daguerre, his
tomb at Cormeil-en-Parisis appears to be absolutely
neglected. The cure of this commune has informed the
Photographic .Society of the fact. He adds that the paint-
ing executed by Daguerre in the choir of the churcli
requires considerable restoration. The cost of both
reparations would amount to between three thousand and
four thousand francs. It would seem not to require a
great effort for the Society and other photographic groups
to cause these restorations to be promptly undertaken.
It is a duty that should be attended to at once, and eve
hope that the cure of Cormeil will not in vain have
addressed himself to our photographic association, which
is rich, and equal of itself to the accomplishment of this
task.
New Property of Gelatine. — Messsrs. Louis and Auguste
Lumiere, of Lyons, announce the property of chloride of
barium of dissolving gelatine. Mr. Bardy says in this con-
nection that chlorides of magnesium and of zinc possess
the same property.
Acetate of Amyl Lamp. — General Sebcrt has presented
an acetate of .amyl lamp made according to the specifica-
tions laid down by the Congress. A screen carrier has
been added in such manner as to cut the flame at the
desired height. The model is very well made, but the
price would be too high for it to come into practical use.
Instruments of this character cannot be in the hands of
every one, unless the cost is such as to render them acces-
sible to all. Until that time a simple candle has much
greater chance of being generally adopted than lamps,
however perfect, the cost of which is from fifty to sixty
August 1, 1890. |
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
591
francs. Apparatus of other kinds, still based upon the
decisions of the Congress, are in course of construction.
We see no objection to this. It will permit that they
may be put to the test of trial before the meeting of the
new Congress, in which there may be questions of intro-
ducing improvements if certain defects are recognised.
Only it is well to look upon all this for the present as pro-
visional, since it may be reversed at the Brussels Congress.
Sensito-Colorimetry for Orthocliromatic Photography. — Mr.
Stebbing desired us to confide to him the execution of
the sensito-colorimeter which we presented at a preceding
meeting of the Society. He has copied the model and
presented several examples of it. Itconsists, as is known,
of a polychromatic screen bearing the principal colours
of the spectrum. These colours are deep and light blue,
deep and light green, deep and light yellow, and finally,
deep and light red. Behind the transverse bauds formed
by the colours, there are four bands cutting across
them formed of yellow screens of different depths suit-
able for orthocliromatic photography. The instrument
permits us to ascertain the behaviour of orthocliromatic
plates to rays of various colours, with the aid of yellow
screens of various degrees of intensity, as well as without the
SENSITOCOLORIMETRE
LEON VIDAL-
COULEURS
EC R A N S
SANS
tCRAN
N° 4-
N° 3
N“ 2
N° 1 1
Blcufonce
RJ
B
o
l—
B,
B
Bleu clair
b
4
t>
3
})
2
T)
1
T
Vert fonce
V,
V2
vt
V
Vert clair
V4
V3
v>
V
Jaune fonce
■h
J2
J,
J
Jaune clair
K.
^ 2
j,
J
Rouije fonce
R4
RS
R.
R,
R
Rou^e clair
r4
P3
L
r3
r
addition of such screens. The accompanying diagram will
explain the arrangement better than any description. The
indications Bt hl signify deep blue with the yellow screen
No. 1, and light blue with the same screen. In the same
way, /.’3 and r, signify deep red with screen No. 3, and
light red also with the No. 3 screen. The letters B, V,
&c., without uumbers represent deep blue, deep green,
&c., without a yellow screen, and so on. We believe
that this method of uniform control will allow comparable
observations on orthocliromatic sensitiveness to be made
by all.
Lantern Slides Projected with Stereoscopic Relief. — M. Mol-
teni held a meeting showing the application of a method
ol obtaining stereoscopic relief in pictures projected by
the lantern. Two lanterns are placed side by side, fur-
nished the one with a red and the other with a green
glass (complementary colours). On the screen there are
thus found two images, one red and one green, and they
are superposed as exactly as possible. The spectators are
also supplied with eye-glasses, the glass for one eye being
red, and for the other green. The image seen on the
screen is monochromatised, and the relief is very appa-
rent if the superposition is exact. The experiment was
truly of great interest.
Lantern Carrier. — M. Donnadieu, Professor of the
Faculty of Science at Lyons, has designed a new lantern
carrier, of which the following is a description, for the
purpose of overcoming the difficulties that occur in
centreing and properly placing an image on the screen when
one has to work iu a dim light.
The front portion of the plate carrier is made of a piece of
wood with an aperture of eight centimetres square, bordered
by a double rebate, the inner one chamfered, so as not to throw
any shade upon the opening itself. It is closed by a shutter
turning on pivots or hinges worked at will by a button.
Behind the wood which forms the bottom of the carrier is
placed a strong glass. The frame is pierced on each of its four-
sides by a slit, in which is a sliding piece in the form of a T- A
pinchiug-screw placed above each slide fixes it in any required
position, and the slide, being narrower than the slit, may be
placed obliquely, and, being scarcely a millimetre thick, does not
project beyond the thickness of any plate that may be used. In
the frame is fitted a movable guide, which is cut out in the
centre to receive the plate. This opening must, therefore, be
of the size of the plate, or may take carriers themselves fitting
the plate. A spring pressure board with opening, covered on
the side next the negative with cloth, serves to keep the plate
flat against the stout glass of the carrier. A ground glass,
marked with perpendicular and diagonal lines, is placed in
one of the rebates. The negative is then adjusted in a full
light to the desired position against the lines, and the ground
glass being removed, the carrier may be taken into the dark
room and placed in the lantern by feeling only.
Photography in the Streets of Paris. — We are now at
liberty to photograph in the streets of Paris without any
preliminary authorisation from the Prefecture of Police.
At the present time photography expands more and more
every day. The measure which has just been taken was
an inevitable one, and it is well that the Prefecture has at
last yielded to the many representations that have been
addressed to it on this subject by the general syndicate of
photography.
Photographic Literature. — M. Mathet, chemist, has just
published a work on photographic chemistry, which is at
the same time a sort of general treatise on photography.
The new work by Col. Waterhouse, on the photographic
reproduction of designs, entitled “ Practical Notes on the
Preparation of Drawings for Photographic Reproduction,”
is of very important character. It is a classic for schools
of design and photography. We cannot too highly
recommend it to the reader.
♦
Coating Celluloid Films. — A point of interest to users of
celluloid films is brought to light in one of our exchanges, to the
effect that the various makers of these films coat the celluloid
on different sides, some makers preferring the matt surface as
a support for the sensitive emulsion, and others coating on the
polished side. Of course it behoves the user to familiarise
himself with the method followed in the films he uses, as
otherwise it will be an easy matter to place it iu the holder
“ wrong side out,” which would be most unfortunate, though
from just such a blunder as this our exchange procured some
negatives through the films which had the quality of being
unusually free from halation. — Anthony's Bulletin.
592
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
PHOTOGRAPHY IN COPENHAGEN.
Two numbers have reached us, by the courtesy of the
editor, of the Beretninger fra Dansk Fotografsk Forening,
or news from the Danish Photographic Association, a
journal which is published by the Association, and is now
in its twelfth year of existence.
The number for April contains among its leading
articles a notice of the transactions of the Association at
a meeting held on the 31st March, contributed by the
able editor, J. Petersen; also an article by Immanuel
Mohr on albumen paper and its sensitising, and an article
on a festival held on the 10th and 11th of April by the
Association in aid of its photographic work.
The number for May contains a notice of a meeting on
the 28th April, at which the President gave as the
subject for discussion “ What is the reason some pictures
become yellow with age, and others do not?” The speaker
advised the members to collect old pictures which might
bear upon the subject of the question. It would, he said,
be interesting to form a small exhibition of such pictures
on albumen paper, salted paper, and so forth.
The Vice-President gave it as his opinion that the cause
of this yellowing lay chiefly in the paper employed ; the
older papers were better, he opined, than those at present
used.
Hr. Hartmann, in some observations about the darken-
ing of white colours used in retouching, said that it was
advisable to be careful to use good opaque colours, which
were not liable to change. Hr. Cand. Pharm. Schleisner
thereupon said that a good test for the stability of the
white colour was to pour upon it a few drops of sulphide
of ammonium ; if the colour under this experiment did
not change to black, it would well resist the influence of
the atmosphere. “ Permanent ” white was permanent,
but not so good for covering. Lead colours were good
for covering, but not permanent.
The President then proposed a summer meeting, and
Hr. P. Fristup, speaking for himself and Hr. Schon,
said they would be glad to do all that lay in their power,
but advised a preliminary meeting at the earliest oppor-
tunity in some spot where there was a garden in which
one might promenade, and also a bowling green, with
other forms of amusement. The larger summer meeting
might, he thought, be best arranged in such a minor
assembly. The Vice-President promised that the propo-
sition should be laid before the general committee.
The next article in the May number by L. Belitski is
concerned with an exact comparison of different photo-
graphic objectives. Immanuel Mohr continues his article
on albumen paper and its sensitising. An interesting
treatise on carbon printing is contributed by O. Volkmer,
vice-director of the royal press.
Under the head of literature is announced the appear-
ance of a hand-book of photography, with numerous illus-
trations, edited by Albin Roosval. This work was com-
menced by the late lamented Swede, Adolf Dahlstrdm,
and is continued by the editor of the Swedish Photographic
Journal. One great feature in this work is that only so
much of the technique of the photographic art is
communicated as is necessary for the practical artist,
and it avoids long, scientific explanations. The book
might, in the opinion of the Beretninger , take a leading
place among its congeners in Scandinavia. Though
written in Swedish, no Norseman or Dane would
experience much difficulty in its perusal. What little
difficulty there may be could be easily helped by the
addition at the end of a small Swedish, Danish, and
Norwegian glossary, including such Swedish words as
might seem stumbling-blocks to readers from Norway or
Denmark. The cost of such an addition would be trifling,
and the value of the work thereby greatly increased.
The number concludes with a notice of the death of
Hr. E. Rye, who died on the 15th April, in his seventieth
year. He was one of the veterans of the photographic
profession. Like many others of the pioneers of the
photographic art in Denmark, Hr. Rye lived a very busy
life. When quite a boy he began his career as assistant
to an apothecary, but very soon left that occupation,
which suited him not a jot. After being a tutor for a
few years he took to the wine business, and later on
bought a hotel in Grenaa ; but the business of playing the
host at Grenaa was not of the kind to satisfy this energetic
young mau.
At that time photography was a newly-discovered art
in Denmark. Rye saw, with the eye of the prophet, the
great future in store for it, and, thinking that his pharma-
ceutical experience and knowledge might serve him in
good stead, sold his hotel, and devoted himself to photo-
graphy. His prentice hand was tried in Aachen, in the
establishment of the well-known Wothly. Upon his
return home, he busied himself for a whole winter with
photographing the most noteworthy objects in Thorvald-
sen’s Museum, and gave instruction at odd intervals in
the art of photographing on glass. Then he thought of
building himself a studio, but met with obstacles set in his
way by the fire brigade, and, since he feared there were
then already too many photographers in Copenhagen, he
gave up his idea, and travelled to Finland. After a year’s
furlough, he returned home and set up a studio in Vegle,
and then another in Aarhus, and lastly, took Petersen’s
studio in Odense. Together with Schroder he practised
phototypy. An attempt to make this new invention a
success in America met with very poor encouragement.
After other devices equally vain to make his fortune in
the far west, Rye at last determined, in 1872, to settle in
Copenhagen. And now, indeed, it seemed as if fortune
was disposed to favour him. His studio in Ostergade
became very soon a celebrated resort, and for some years
everything went very well. Then, in the height of his
prosperity, came sickness, at first like a little cloud no
bigger than a man's hand, but afterwards by degrees ex-
tending over him more and more, till at last he fell into the
state of a confirmed invalid, and his business into conse-
quent decay. Broken in body and in heart, he left his
studio, left his photographic labours, left, finally, his life.
His earnings, for some reason or other, were not sufficient
to ensure him comfort in his old age.
He was a member of the Danish Photographic Associa-
tion, and for several years one of the most assiduous and
constant attendants at its meetings. “ It was only when
sickness marked him for her own,” says the Beretninger,
“that we missed him from our midst.” The Association
sent a wreath to be laid upon his coffin, and many
members mourning followed him to his grave.
The Newcastle-on-Tyne Photographic Association. — Mr.
E. G. Lee, honorary secretary to this Association, writes that
it has arranged the following outdoor meetings : — Thursday,
14th August, “ Gilsland and Naworth.” Leader — M. Auty,
Front Street, Tynemouth. Thursday, 18th September,
(district not yet fixed). Leader — J. P. Gibson, Fore Street,
Hexham.
August 1, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
593
PRINTING OPERATIONS.
BY ELLF.RSLIE WALLACE.
The drying of a photographic print after the final wash-
ings have been completed is a simple enough matter,
yet it is possible for the most exasperating failures to
occur at this stage of the process ; the disappointment
experienced being all the more keen because the work is,
in a certain sense, finished.
Those unacquainted with photographic neatness might
easily imagine that all that was necessary was to take the
print out of the water, and lay it aside in any convenient
place to dry. They would soon find out, however, that
if the substance with which the wet print came into con-
tact were capable of communicating any impurity, the
print would be sure to show it in the form of stains. For
instance, suppose that the prints were hung over wooden
poles, or laid on wooden shelves, while still wet, there
would hardly be a possibility of escape from stains. This
would be true in the case cither of silver prints of any
kind, bromides, or blue prints.
Silver prints on plain paper and blue prints are more
manageable in drying than the other forms, which are made
on papers prepared with a contractile substance like gela-
tine or albumen. Supposing that the wooden poles or
shelves before spoken of were covered with clean white
linen or blotting paper, all those forms of prints having a
plain surface might safely be dried there, but an albumen
paper print would not do so well. If laid out flat on the
shelf it would contract unequally, and be so crinkled and
shrunken that there would be serious difficulty in trim-
ming. Drying over the pole would be preferable, but the
albumenised surface would be put on the stretch unequally,
so that in the case of a highly glazed surface there would
be fissures and cracks very detrimental to the finished
result.
The best method of drying prints of all descriptions,
and a very convenient and inexpensive one also, is the
following: Provide a number of spring clothes-pins, a
few yards of ordinary brass wire, and a couple of good-
sized screw-eyes. Having selected a suitable place in the
work-room where the prints will not be disturbed, screw
in one of the screw-eyes to the wood of the window or
door jamb at the height of the shoulder ; pass one end of
the brass wire into the eye and secure it, then string the
clothes-pins on to the wire, and secure its other end by
means of the other screw-eye at a convenient point across
the room. Having brought the prints from the washing
tank in an ordinary deep pan, select those of similar sizes,
bring them together neatly, back to back, while in the
water, then take them out and suspend the pair from one
or more of the clothes-pins, according to the size of the
prints. If they are very large, it may require three of
the clothes-pins to fully support them, and avoid risk of
the wet mass tearing by its own weight ; while on the
other hand, small sizes, such as 5 by 4 inches, may be held
by a single pin. When the paper is very glossy, and the
weather dry, the larger sizes may require to be pinched
together at the bottom corners by an additional couple of
clothes-pins, which will prevent the prints from separating
until thoroughly dry.
Prints dried in the maimer described will be quite flat,
and free from stains of any kind. We need hardly add
that the clothes-pins should be new and clean, and kept
for this purpose only. If the prints arc hung up to dry
in the evening, they will be ready for trimming in the
morning, when the end of the wire may be released, and
the whole turned aside out of the way until the next
occasion for use. If the wash-water is muddy, as is often
the case, the deep pan in which the prints are transferred
to the drying room may be filled with clean filtered water,
so that the collected mud in the paper may be soaked out
before drying.
The warm weather we are now passing through reminds
us of a few matters which have greatly eased our own
labours in the printing room, and, simple as they are, we
will mention them.
It sometimes happens that there is trouble in securing
pure whites in prints on albumen paper, an universal
yellow stain covering everything. The best remedy for
this is the use of alum in the printing bath, as originally
suggested by the late Mr. Anthony, of New York. Care
also must be taken that the paper is quite dry before being
f umed. Operators are too apt to forget that, as the thermo-
meter rises, so does the amount of watery vapour in the
air increase, and that sheets of paper will often dry more
quickly on a bright day in winter than on many hot days
in summer. The way the paper feels to the hand is the
best guide, and some little attention is required to be able
to tell accurately.
The question whether the strength of the silver bath
should be reduced or not during warm weather is open to
some discussion. If the paper be of first-class quality,
and the bath contain alum, as before alluded to, it would
be possible to continue making good prints having pure
whites with the bath at full strength, by which we mean
fifty to seventy grains to the ounce. There is no question
of the fact that the sensitiveness of the prepared paper
increases when floated on a strong bath, and that the com-
pound which is then formed between the albumen and
the silver is more prone to decomposition. It will
occasionally happen, if the prints come out yellow,
metallic-looking, and covered with minute black specks,
that weakening the silver bath down to the strength of
forty-five or even forty grains will cure the trouble. A
strength of forty grains, however, we should consider a
low one, and only to be resorted to for unusually hot
weather or for particular kinds of paper, such as very thin
and delicate Rives.
The paper should not be left in the fuming-box for too
long a time in hot weather. If things are properly
arranged for the purpose, ten to twelve minutes ought to
suflice for thorough fuming. It is important, of course,
that good strong ammonia be employed, and care should
be taken that the glass stopper be well secured in the
bottle. In a hot printing room the stoppers of ammonia
bottles are frequently blown out by the vapour and fall on
the floor, leaving the contents of the bottle to lose
strength rapidly. — American Journal of Photography.
It is hardly to l>e wondered at that Japan seems destined to
take such a prominent place in photography, when we think
that she has always worshipped the Sun-Goddess, and that its
representative, the burnished mirror of bronze, is still such an
important household article, and plays such a prominent part
as it does in the social economy of the country.
The Late Paris Exhibition. — The New York Lithographic
A rt Journal says that the engraving of the diploma for those
who were awarded prizes at the last year’s Paris Exhibition is
now finished, and has by this time gone to press. Before the
diploma will be issued at least four months more will have
elapsed, and whoever gets it then may obtain the silver or gold
medal awarded him — by ordering somebody to make it for
him.
594
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
&OtC0.
Hr. Adams lias exhibited to us his “ Ideal ” detective
camera, which has exteriorly no projecting parts, and
measures 8j X 4 J X 8 inches. It is fitted with a
Newman’s shutter of modified form, and Newman’s
pneumatic shutter has, by the test of general experi-
ence, proved to be a good one for the regulation of the
duration of short exposures amounting to but small
fractions of a second. The shutter works in the
diaphragm slot, and requires no setting ; there is also
an arrangement for what are called “ time ” exposures.
The plates are packed in sheaths, and each plate, after
exposure, is drawn downwards by means of a clutch
governed by a rod which is handled from outside the
box ; springs then push the next plate in the batch
into position for exposure, and so on in succession.
Last week we drew attention to the advantage to
the tourist photographer of the relatively small amount
of wind in some parts of Switzerland, but now wish to
speak of various meteorological phenomena which do
not promote photographic work. Among the Swiss
mountains there are such things as wind ava-
lanches; in a mild form they amount but to strong
gusts, which come upon the wayfarer at unexpected
moments, when at a little distance all is calm. These
sudden “windfalls” are frequent and dangerous enough
to have stopped the use of small sailing boats on some
of the Swiss lakes ; in the past such boats have some-
times been upset by the unexpected squalls, and lives
have been lost. On rare occasions wind avalanches
have been directly dangerous to pedestrians. In the
Alpine Journal of June, 1864, is a paper by Hr. Gosset,
describing a fatal accident on the Haut-de-Cry in
February of that year, to which paper Hr. F. M.
Hillard, of Haidstone, draws attention in last week’s
Nature. A body of air rendered colder and heavier
than the surrounding air by the snow and ice, suddenly
descended upon a mountaineering party of six, with
disastrous results. Hr. Gosset says : —
“ Bennen advanced ; he had made but a few steps when we
heard a deep, cutting sound. The snow-field split in two
about fourteen or fifteen feet above us. The cleft was at first
quite narrow — not more than an inch broad. An awful
silence ensued .... broken by Bennen’s voice : ‘ Wir sind
alle verloren.’ . . . They were his last words. I drove my
alpenstock into the snow, and brought the weight of my body
to bear on it. . . . I turned my head to see whether Bennen
had done the same thing. To my astonishment, I saw him
turn round, face the valley, and stretch out both arms. The
ground on which we stood began to move slowly, and I
felt the utter uselessness of any alpenstock. I soon sank
up to my shoulders, and began descending backwards.
. . . . The speed of the avalanche increased rapidly,
and before long I was covered up with snow. I was suffocating
when I suddenly came to the surface again. I was on a wave of
the avalanche, and saw it before me as I was carried down. . . .
The head alone was preceded by a thick cloud of snow-dust ;
the rest of the avalanche was clear. Around me I heard the
horrid hissing of the snow, and far before me the thundering
of the foremost part of the avalanche At last I
noticed that 1 was moving slower ; then I saw the pieces of
snow in front of me stop at some yards’ distance ; then the snow
straight before me stopped. , , , . I felt that I also had
stopped, .... but the snow behind me was still in motion ;
its pressure on my body was so strong that I thought 1 should
be crushed to death The avalanche may have taken a
minute to descend ; I can give no correct estimation on this
point.”
On one occasion, from the side of a valley we were
photographing the distant range of the St. Gothardand
intervening scenery, upon a hot, sunshiny day when
there was no trace of wind except upon the hill-side a
few hundred yards in advance of the camera ; a narrow
band of wind was there pouring down, keeping the
trees in its path in incessant motion, while all elsewhere
was still. Upon walking up to the spot to discover the
cause of the commotion, a small ravine in the side of
the main valley was found, down which air was pouring
which had been cooled and rendered heavier than the
surrounding air in the shade of great pine forests
which crowned the heights ; the cooled air was being
drained off by a natural channel.
Photographic meteorological records, on the samo
system as at Kew, are made at Hong Kong in the
Observatory there belonging to the British Government.
The instruments at Hong Kong — properly called
“ Heung Keung” — to which meterological record-
ing apparatus is attached are the barograph and
thermograph ; there is no magnetograph on the pre-
mises. Bromide paper is used, as at home, but there
is more difficulty in keeping it in the hot climate ; some
samples after a time get spotty. The Observatory was
opened for work January 1st, 1884, at which time the
waxed paper process was used, and this was superseded
by bromide paper four or five years ago. The difficul-
ties iu working the old waxed paper process at Hong
Kong were much greater than in working it at Kew ;
some kind of chemical change seemed to take place
while the paper was on the cylinder, owing, probably, to
the great heat. It developed irregularly, and seemed
to lose sensitiveness in a manner it would not have done
in colder regions. In Hong Kong there are about
twenty photographers, and nearly all of them are
Chinese. The chief professional photographer in
Hong Kong, or the one who is generally recognised as
such by the public, is A Fong. The great bulk of the
population of China objects to photographic portraiture ;
an average Chinaman thiuks that a photograph “takes
away a portion of the soul of the sitter.” In and about
the treaty ports open to western barbarians, however, this
superstition of the native population is breaking down.
We have lately received a letter from a photographic
friend at Durban, Natal, who went out there about
twelve months ago to try his fortune. He is just
about to commence a photographic tour up country, and
he says that “although the scenery is beautiful, there
are few bits that make good pictures.” This is possibly
because of its vastness, and represents a source of dis-
appointment to many a tourist who has taken a camera
to other lands — to Norway, for instance. He further
tells us that the country is in “ an awfully depressed
state, so if you know of anyone coming here, tell him
August 1, 1890.1
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
not to do so.” We print this warning, as it represents
a little piece of disinterested advice which may prove
useful.
When Solomon wrote that “ there is nothing new
under the sun,” he, of course, had no thought of photo-
graphic apparatus in his mind, because, as the old song
has it, “it was not then invented ; ” but for all that
the oft-quoted line is peculiarly applicable to so-
called photographic novelties. The latest detective
camera, for instance, takes the form of an opera glass,
and the idea has been patented. But such a camera
was constructed and shown to us ten years ago, and we
have in our possession several photographs taken with
it. We have often wondered why the notion was not
revived, for it is certainly a good one.
We all know that, as a general rule, the simplest
method of achieving a certain result is the best. One
of the American humorists puts the matter in a quaint
way by describing a prisoner confined in a dungeon
who in vain tries to break the bars of his window, and
to remove the stones from the walls, until a happy
thought struck him ; “ he opened the door and walked
out.” Some such simplification has become desirable
in chemical nomenclature, and the man who will
suggest a way of “opening the door” to such a con-
summation will deserve the thanks of his fellows— and,
we may say, especially fellows of the Chemical Society.
Turning over the pages of the last “proceedings” of
that highly useful body of workers, we come upon
several terms which may be highly descriptive, but are
certainly jaw-breaking. We will only quote one, and
here it is : oximidolactone of xylylphenylacetoxime-
orthocarboxylic acid. We hasten to offer a prize to
the first among our readers who will go to the nearest
chemist’s and ask for a pennor’th of it.
But seriously, cannot something be done in the
direction indicated ? Chemistry has always prided
itself on the fact that its symbols convey in a simple
manner a definite meaning, and not only give the com-
position of a substance, but the proportions in which
its constituents are present. In this way it is far
ahead of its sister science, botany, where the names of
Smith, Brown, & Co. — that well-known quartette — are
dragged in with other common surnames and turned
into ridiculous Latin. The problem is a hard one, but
it ought to be more easy of solution than some of the
nuts chemists have had to crack.
Why does not the Government have the Hessian fly
— when it is caught — photographed ? A Government
paper has been issued, in which illustrations of the
usual character are given ; but we are afraid that, to
the average bucolic mind, these illustrations will not
convey a vivid idea of the pest. A photograph
slightly enlarged, on the other hand, would not only
picture the insect in a recognisable form, but would
bring home the truth, that there is such a thing as the
Hessian fly ; because, if it did not exist, how could it
be photographed ?
595
The late Sir Richard Wallace has to be included
amongst those strong-minded, not to say eccentric,
persons who object to sitting for their photographs, and
it is said that it is doubtful if a photograph of this
well-known patron of art is in existence. We are
afraid that the old days of photography have much to
answer for. The length of the sittings frightened a
great number of people, and led to the stereotyped
remark, “ I always come out badly in a photograph.”
This kind of thing has, of course, long passed away,
but the dislike, or prejudice, or whatever the feeling
may be called, still remains among sitters who were
photographed thirty years or so ago.
We do not know whether it is a practice of photo-
graphers who are fortunate enough to number among
their clientele a goodly proportion of celebrities, to keep
an album in which their sitters can record their senti-
ments, but it would not be a bad idea. We believe
that during Emerson’s last visit to England he sat to
Elliott and Fry, and wrote this in their album : —
“ The man who lias a thousand friends
Has not a friend to spare,
But he who has one enemy
Will meet him everywhere.”
A photographic outfit is an indispensable adj unct to
the “ caravan ” method of taking a holiday. One of
these holiday homes upon wheels has lately been
described by a society journal. Among other informa-
tion, we are told of a photographic apparatus and a
small photographic dark room. What we want to know
now to make the picture complete is a little history of
caravan photographic experience. To the ordinary
villager a caravan is a caravan, and the difference
between the peripatetic “ likeness taker ” and the
aristocratic amateur photographer is not apparent.
Hence very odd episodes must inevitably happen, and
anyone who goes in for photography on wheels should
have some curious stories to tell. We are inclined to
exclaim with Sir Toby Belch, “Why arc these things
hid?”
It is rather rash to depend upon what is called a
post mortem photograph as evidence of identity. A
curious incident has just been reported. Some six
months ago a man was fouud dead in bed in a common
lodging house in Southwark. The body was photo-
graphed by the police, and buried as unidentified.
About a month ago, a woman whose husband had
been missing for twelve months was shown the
photograph at Scotland Yard, and at once identified
it as being the portrait of her husband, who was
insured for £17. She forthwith made an affidavit,
obtained the money, put on widow’s weeds, and
mourned her husband as dead. About a fortnight
since she was startled by her husband— who had been
to America — reappearing, and it is only fair to the
widow to say that she at once recognised him, and
received him in the most affectionate manner. The
most disagreeable part of the business will probably
be the returning of the £17.
596
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
THE STUDIO IN SUMMER-TIME.
BY JOHN A. TENNANT.
Now that the summer days are fairly upon us, a few
remarks upon the studio in summer-time may not be out
of place.
It is a great mistake to think, as many country photo-
graphers do, that the best way of obviating the difficulties
supposed to be connected with studio work in summer, is
to flee the glass-house and erect a temporary canvas
arrangement in which to do what operating is required
during the hot season.
The photographer should realize that in his skylight,
and in his experience of the facilities of lighting which
it offers, lies his chief strength as a picture maker. Fur-
thermore, his past experience will show him that portraits
taken in the open seldom or never equal those manipu-
lated under the skylight.
Nor is there any real need to desert the carefully
planned studio, for there are many simple contrivances
by which it may be kept cool and attractive for summer
patrons. The plan recently suggested in this magazine,
of arranging a supply of water along the ridge of the glass
roof by means of a perforated pipe through which the
water could flow in a thin stream over the whole surface
of the roof, is admirable, and will commend itself wherever
practicable. Another plan is to erect a perpendicular
screen above the roof so as to shield the glass area from
the direct rays of the sun, by which coolness may be
secured in some measure. A simple arrangement of
hinged ventilating traps along the top of the walls, so
placed as to secure a current of cold air along under the
roof, would also be of great service ; besides which the
side-lights should be fitted in grooves, and be made to
slide back, and so throw the whole side of the studio open
if required. Much, too, depends upon the interior fur-
nishing of a studio as to whether it appear hot or cool.
In the first place, all heavy curtains, mats or rugs, sur-
plus backgrounds, heavily upholstered furniture, dirty
screens, and accumulations of apparatus should be
cleared out, and clean, light-coloured curtains and screens,
rush or rattan chairs, with straw matting, take their place.
As little apparatus as possible should be allowed to stand
about in the studio during summer. The bellows of the
camera should also be dusted and oiled — somehow this
item never seems to have any attention ; in all the studios
I have known the camera bellows was a perfect dust trap,
save on new instruments. Then there should be plenty
of big-leaved plants, such as ferns and palms, and these
should have plenty of water and attention. Well looked
after, a nice collection of such plants always makes a
studio cool and inviting. The change of furnishing, if
carried out as suggested, will give a new character to your
photography, and make your specimen cases perfectly
irresistible to would-be patrons, and is sure to bring more
business.
Just as the studio requires different treatment at the
varying seasons, so also with the other rooms. The
reception room, with the aid of a few new pictures, and a
light tapestry rug, with tasteful draperies (all of which
may be obtained at a trifling cost) at the windows, may
be made quite a pretty apartment. A point that should
not be neglected is the providing of good, fresh literature
for the amusement and recreation of your clients whilst
waiting or resting.
The dark room also calls for special attention at this
time of the year. Care should first of all be taken to test
the non-actinic medium used to guard the room from
white light. Often this medium becomes so much bleached
as to be unsafe for the purpose for which it is intended.
The shelves should be cleared of all unused bottles, empty
plate boxes, paper wrappings, remains of winter experi-
ments, and relics of dearly bought but worthless processes,
old baths, and all other unnecessary rubbish or dust accumu-
lators. The floor and shelves should never be dusted with
a brush or dry cloth, but a damp cloth should be used to
prevent any dust arising to work mischief in future hours.
The water-sink — generally a most convenient receptacle
for spoilt plates and wrapping-paper — should now be
frequently cleansed to avoid bad smells, and all the un-
mentionable rubbish under the sink should be cleaned
right out. A continuous supply of water running over the
sink, although forbidden by waterworks companies, is a
certain cure for evil-doers, and has a wonderful cooling
influence during spells of hot weather. The hypo fixing
bath smells stale sooner now than in winter, and needs
frequent renewal. It is a good rule in summer to mix
only sufficient developer to last one day, and to keep it,
when mixed, bottled and immersed in tins of water changed
often. Another point is that the developer may be con-
siderably weaker in summer than in winter with advantage.
By using slower plates, and developing with weaker solu-
sions than ordinarily used, softer and more detailed
negatives of light-coloured stuffs may be obtained than
otherwise. This point will be sufficient to help many to
attain greater success in photographing ladies or children
clad in light-coloured or white dresses.
The work-rooms and printing-room should be carefully
overhauled before the hot, dusty days come. Such rooms,
and the printing-room in particular, require a thorough
cleansing to keep them sweet and in good condition.
The suggestions here given, with others, which different
circumstances will make evident to the thinking photo-
grapher, will go a long way to make the gallery in summer-
time far from the stuffy, uncomfortable hole it generally
is in small country towns. — Wilson's Photographic Magazine.
A Remedy fob Green Fog. — Soak in a solution of bichro-
mate of potash, and afterwards wash thoroughly in water. —
Wilson’s Photographic Magazine,
The peculiar branch of photography which consists of tak-
ing a series of instantaneous photographs of objects in motion,
as developed by Anschutz, Muybridge, and others, and described
in this magazine at various times, has received from the French
the name of chrono- photography. — Wilson’s Photographic
Magazine.
Lantern Slides. — M. Lirondelle, of the Photographic Society
of the North of France, gives the following process for making
on gelatino-bromide plates positives for the lantern : A contact
exposure is made ; the light used is from a piece of ribbon of
magnesium 3 centimetres in length by 2 millimetres in
width (l£ inch by j1., of an inch), and the pressure-frame is
placed 40 centimetres (16 inches) from the luminous focus.
To develop, plunge in a bath formed of two-t birds of neutral
oxalate of potash at 30 per cent-., and one-third of bromide of
potassium at 12 percent. At the end of a few moments pour,
drop by drop, whilst agitating the bath, a very small quantity
of a solution of proto-sulphate of iron, and wait a few minutes
for the coming of the image. Use no more of this last solution
unless the image is too slow in making its appearance, and
allow the development to go on. If the image is too weak,
increase the quantity of iron, but only at the end, and when
it is found to be indispensable in obtaining the desired intensity.
Fix, and afterwards wash. By this process the positives are
clear and remarkably brilliant. — L’ Amateur Photography
August 1, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
597
TREATING FLEXIBLE PLATES.
BY M. BALAGNY.
We have ascertained that the use of alum after develop-
ment produced on flexible plates an effect that rendered
manipulation difficult. It was necessary to first learn if
it was the support or the gelatine film that caused cockling.
For this purpose we made several negatives, and we
detached the gelatine film from its support. The support
remained absolutely flat, consequently it was the gelatine
that caused the cockling. But we also discovered that
this effect is produced more strongly when the gelatine
film has been alumed before or after fixing. We have,
therefore, done away with the use of alum. AVe have
also done away with alcohol in the glycerine bath, which
produces the same effect as alum, and which may sometimes,
also, shorten the length of our negative. AVe want our
flexible plate to be able, more than any other preparation,
to give scientific results. For this it is necessary that the
gelatine film should be rendered absolutely inextendible
in the fullest acceptation of the word. To do this we
have entirely mollified the mode of drying. This is our
present mode of operating : The negative, after develop-
ing, is washed and fixed. If we have reason to fear the
yellow colouration, pass in citric acid at two per cent,
before fixing, which is done in a solution of hyposulphite
of twenty per cent. After fixing, wash well the flexible
plates, and plunge them in a bath composed of : —
AVater 1 litre
Glycerine 30 to 40 c.c.
Leave the plates in this bath two hours, or all night if
not hurried in the printing. It is absolutely necessary
that each negative should absorb a small quantity of
glycerine, an operation that has for its object to give it
more flexibility. It is well to change the place of the
negatives in the dish of glycerinated water, especially if
many had been placed together in this dish. This being
done, varnish — a very easy operation— with lac varnish and
water. This varnish, called hydrophite, is now found
almost everywhere. It is poured over the flexible plates
whilst they are still wet. The plate is taken from the
glycerinated water and placed on a glass plate rather
larger, so that the lower right-hand corner of the flexible
plate exactly coincides with the lower right-hand corner
of the other plate ; the gelatine film should be on top, of
course. Make the same disposition of a second, then of a
third negative, and allow them to drain for about five
minutes against the wall . Afterwards take the first and
float on the surface a coat of varnish. AVith a badger
blender, or with the finger, direct the liquid so that it
covers the whole of the negative, and pour off the excess
of varnish into a glass. Give at once a second coating of
varnish, which has been placed ready for use on another
glass, and pour off the excess into the first glass in order
to prevent air-bubbles. Now drain. Each negative
should be varnished in this manner. After a drainage of
five minutes, raise each plate from the glass on which it is
found, place it flat with the film on top on a sheet of
bibulous paper. All the negatives are thus placed side by
side, and allowed to dry on a table. Once dry, the
negatives are absolutely plaue, and show no tendency to
cockle. Moreover, they have undergone neither exten-
sion ndr shrinking ; their dimensions are exactly similar to
that of the flexible plates before being placed in the frame.
It is possible to do away with varnishing, but we recom-
mend it very strongly. In this case it is well to sponge
the coating on coming from the bath, so that no trace of
glycerine remains on the surface of the negative, as the
glycerine might, later, at the time of printing on albu-
menised paper, give rise to spots. But in sponging with
a fine sponge steeped in pure water, and then pressed
between the fingers to free it from all excess of water,
spotting is no longer to be feared. — Moniteur.
lUterarg Notice.
Lecons Elementaikes de Ciiimie Photograph iqi'E, by
L. Mathet. (Societe Generate <V Editions, Paris, 1890.)
This is a new dictionary of photographic chemistry, a
volume of 726 pages, containing information on the sub-
ject down to the latest date. Its author, M. Mathet, is a
cheniiste pharmacien de premiere classe. In dealing in the book
with chemical substances, he states what qualities they pos-
sess likely to be of use in photography, and the theoretical
reasons why they should be so employed. He also tells
how to manufacture the said substances when the method
of manufacture is of a simple nature, likely to be within
the means and grasp of the photographer. lie also tells
how to detect impurities in purchased photographic chem-
icals.
In the course of an article on toning with the salts of
platinum, he says that the chloroplatinite of platinum may
be purchased ready-made, or the common tetrachloride of
platinum of commerce maybe approximately reduced, and
used for the same purpose, by boiling it with a weak solution
of tartrate of soda, containing one gramme of the latter
salt to every four grammes of tetrachloride of platinum.
The weak solution has to be boiled until its yellow colour
changes to dull grey; its volume is then made up to one
litre with distilled water, and is acidified by means of five
grammes — which seems a great deal — of pure sulphuric
acid. Vegetable acids will not preserve the toning bath
long, especially when it is exposed to light.
The experience of M. Mathet with eikonogen is : —
1. The time of development is notably shortened — we
presume in comparison with that of ferrous-oxalate, the
favourite developer on the Continent. Even when the
exposure has been very short the image comes out well.
2. The bath does not, relatively speaking, discolour
much by exposure to the air, and there is no fear of its
staining the gelatine ; the image keeps clear and without
fog ; the developer does not stain the fingers of the
operator.
3. The colour of the reduced silver, not being modified
by accidental staining of the gelatine, such as that given
by pyrogallol, has a blackish blue tone which favours
rapidity in printing ; the colour of the image approaches
that given by ferrous-oxalate.
4. Several plates can be developed successively in
the same bath without any appreciable difference in
appearance.
The author then devotes a few pages to the subject of
getting density with eikonogen.
Altogether, the work is a useful book of reference for
the photographer.
The London and Provincial Photographic Association.
— The subject for August 7th will be “ Home Portraiture ; ”
the discussion thereupon will be opened by Mr. \Y. E. Deben-
liarn. Bank Holiday outing, St. Albans ; train 10.24 a. in,
from Moorgate Street. A’isitors invited.
598
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
PIIOTO-C 1 1 EMI CAL INVESTIGATIONS .*
BY FERDINAND MUSTER, PH.D., AND V. C. DRIFFIELD.
I.— What is a Perfect Negative? — Density, Opacity,
Transparency.
The production of a perfect picture by means of photo-
graphy is an art ; the production of a technically perfect
negative is a science.
A perfect negative demands, in the first place, a perfect
plate, and as the manufacture of dry sensitive plates is a
large and rapidly groAving chemical industry, we need
offer no apology for bringing this subject before this
Society.
Our researches, Avhich have covered a period of over
ten years, were made with a view to rendering the produc-
tion of perfect negatives as far as possible a matter of
certainty.
What is a perfect negative ? A negative is theoretically
perfect Avhen the amount of light transmitted through its
various gradations is in inverse ratio to that which the
corresponding parts of the original subject sent out.
The negative is mathematically the true inverse of the
original when the opacities of its graduations are propor-
tional to the light reflected by those parts of the original
which they represent.
Before Ave can clearly understand this definition, it Avill
be necessary to state shortly the laws of absorption of
light by opaque black substances, and to define clearly
the meaning we attach to the terms opacity, transparency,
and density of a negative. It is the more necessary to do
this, as the whole of our investigations depend upon these
laws.
For substances Avhich do not reflect much light, such as
black opaque bodies, or transparent coloured bodies, the
relation between the light absorbed and the quantity of
the substance present is very simple. If between the eye
and a source of light we place a thin layer of dilute Indian
ink, that layer absorbs light, and thereby reduces the
intensity of the light transmitted. Assume that such a
layer absorbs one-half of the light, then one-half of the
light will be transmitted. Whatever may be the intensity
of the original light, the intensity after passing this layer
of iuk will be one-half of what it was. The interposition
of two such layers will reduce the light to one-fourth
the original intensity ; three such layers will reduce it to
one-eighth, and so on, each layer reducing the intensity
to one-half of Avhat it receives.
Had the first layer allowed one-third of the light to pass
through, then two such layers Avould reduce the intensity to
one-ninth, three layers to one-twentyseventh, &c. In
general, any number of layers would reduce the intensity of
the light to a fraction which is equal to the fraction the first
layer allows to pass, but raised to a power the index of which
is the number of layers employed. If n equal layers were
employed, and the first one reduced the intensity of the
t
light to a fraction m , the n layers would reduce it to
If, instead of using so many successive layers, the first
layer were made to contain as much Indian ink as the n
successive layers contain altogether, we should find that
the one layer now reduces the intensity of light by exactly
the same amount as the n layers did. The reduction of
* This piper is quoted by permission from the Journal of the Society of
Chemical Industry The full title of it, as given by the authors, is “ Photo-
Chemical Investigations, and a New Method of Determination of the Sensi-
tiveness of Photographic Plates.”— Ed.
the intensity is, of course, due to the black particles, and
depends simply upon the number of them which are
interposed per unit of area. We can thus replace the
number of layers by the number of particles, and the
law takes this form : The intensity Tx of light, after pass-
ing A molecules of a substance, is a fraction of the original
intensity T, such that —
Tx / l_ \ A.
T \ C )
For purely mathemathical reasons the fraction i is
usually expressed as a negative poAver of the base of the
hyperbolic logarithms E, say — = E , and we can write —
V
T —k\.
— = E
T
Avhere k is called the coefficient of absorption. This form
T
of the laAV avc shall frequently use again. The fraction
represents and measures the transparency of the substance.
T I'A
The inverse of that fraction, or - — E , measures the
I X
opacity of the substance. It indicates Avhat intensity of
light must fall on one side of the substance in order that
unit intensity may be transmitted.
In our investigations avc use the letter T to denote
transparency, and O to denote opacity, and the tAvo
symbols arc related thus : — 0 X T = 1.
We must further define what avc mean by density as
distinct from opacity. By density avc mean the number
of particles of a substance spread over unit area, multi-
plied by the coeflicient of absorption ; k\ is what we term
density, and mark by the letter 1).
For our purposes, i.e., in its application to negatives, the
density is directly proportional to the amount of silver
deposited per unit area, and may be used as a measure of
that amount.
The relations betAveen the three terms, transparency,
opacity, and density, are the folloAving : —
— D
T = E
0 = E-
D = log,; 0 = — logt T.
The density is the logarithm of the opacity, or the
negative logarithm of the transparency.
These relations hold good for some substances Avith
regard to ordinary white fight, for others only Avith regard
to monochromatic fight, and for others they do not hold
good at all. We have satisfied ourselves that they do
hold good for the silver deposited as a black substance in
negatives as long as the silver does not assume a metallic
lustre, and reflects but a very small amount of light.
By means of these definitions avc are uoav in a position
to trace the connection between the densities of a theoreti-
cally perfect negative and the fight intensities which pro-
duced them.
Since the density is the logarithm of the opacity, and
since, in a theoretically perfect negative, the opacities are
directly proportional to the intensities of the fight which
produced them, it follows that each density must be pro-
portional to the logarithm of the fight intensity which
produced it. (More correctly, the density is a linear
function of the logarithm of the intensity of fight and time
of exposure.)
The result is this: In a theoretically perfect negative,
the amounts of sil\rer deposited in the various parts are
proportional to the logarithms of the intensities of fight
proceeding from the corresponding parts of the object.
August 1, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS
599
The question arises, can such a negative be produced in
practice ?
In order to answer this question, we had first to find a
simple method of measuring the density of the silver
deposited in negatives. We have then to study the in-
fluence of the developers upon the density of the deposits,
and we were then in a position to investigate the action of
the light itself.
(To be continued.)
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE*
BY PROFESSOR RAPHAEL MELDOLA, F.R.S., M.R.I.
The photographic image is impressed on a modern film
in an inappreciable fraction of a second, whereas the
photo-salt requires an appreciable time for its produc-
tion. The image is invisible simply because of the
extremely minute quantity of haloid decomposed. In
the present state of knowledge it cannot be asserted that
the material composing this image is identical in composi-
tion with the photo-salt, for we kuow the composition of
neither the one nor the other. But they are analogous in
so far as they are both the result of photo-chemical de-
composition, and there is great probability that they are
closely related, if not identical, chemically, it may turn
out that there are various kinds of invisible images,
according to the vehicle or halogen absorbent — in other
words, according to the sensitiser with which the silver
haloid is associated. The invisible image is revealed by
the action of the developer, into the function of which 1
do not propose to enter. It will suffice to say that the
final result of the developing solution is to magnify the
deposit of photo-salt by accumulating metallic silver
thereon by accretion or reduction. Owing to the circum-
stance that the image is impressed with such remarkable
rapidity, and that it is invisible when formed, it has been
maintained, and is still held by many, that the first action
of light on the film is molecular or physical, and not
chemical. The arguments in favour of the chemical theory
appear to me to be tolerably conclusive, and I will venture
to submit a few of them.
The action of reagents upon the photographic film is
quite similar to the action of the same reagents upon the
silver haloids when exposed to the point of visible coloura-
tion. Reducing agents and halogen absorbents increase
the sensitiveness of the film; oxidising and halogenising
agents destroy its sensitiveness. It is difficult to sec, on
the physical theory, why it should not be possible to impress
an image on a film, say, of pure silver bromide, as readily
as on a film of the same haloid embedded in gelatine.
Everyone knows that this cannot be done. I have myself
been surprised at the extreme insensitiveness of films of
pure bromide prepared by exposing films of silver
deposited on glass to the action of bromine vapour. ( Jn
the chemical theory we know that gelatine is a splendid
sensitiser — i.e., bromine absorbent. There is another
proof which has been in our hands for nearly thirty years,
but I do not think it has been viewed in this light before.
It has been shown by Carey Lea, Eder, and especially
by Abney — who has investigated the matter most
thoroughly — that a shearing stress applied mechanically to
a sensitive film leaves an impression which can be de-
veloped in just the same way as though it had been pro-
duced by the action of light. [Pressure marks on East-
man bromide paper developed by ferrous-oxalate.] Now
* Concluded from page 581.
that result cannot be produced on a surface of the pure
haloid ; some halogen absorbent, such as gelatine, must
be associated with the haloid. We are concerned here
with a chemical change of that class so ably investigated
by Professor Spring, of Liege, who has shown that by
mere mechanical pressure it is possible to bring about
chemical reaction between mixtures of finely divided
solids.* Then, again, mild reducing agents, too feeble to
reduce the silver haloids directly to the metallic state,
such as alkaline hypophospliites, glucose or lactose, and
alkali, &c., form invisible images which can be developed
in precisely the same way as the photographic image. All
this looks like chemical change, and not physical modifi-
cation pure and simple.
I have in this discourse stoically resisted the tempting
opportunities for pictorial display which the subject
affords. My aim has been to summarise the position in
which we find ourselves with respect to the invisible image
after fifty years’ practice of the art. This image is, I
venture to think, the property of the chemist, and by him
must the scientific foundation of photography be laid.
We may not be able to give the formula of the photo-
salt, but if the solution of the problem has hitherto
eluded our grasp it is because of the intrinsic diffi-
culties of the investigation. The photographic image
brings us face to face, not with an ordinary, but
with an extraordinary class of chemical changes due
entirely to the peculiar character of the silver salts. The
material composing the image is not of that definite
nature with which modern chemical methods are in the
habit of dealing. The stability of the photo-salt is deter-
mined by some kind of combination between the sub-
haloid or oxyhaloid, or whatever it may be, and the excess
of unaltered haloid which enters into its composition.
The formation of the coloured product presents certain
analogies with the formation of a saturated solution ; the
product of photo-chemical decomposition is formed
under the influence of light up to a certain percentage of
the whole photo-salt, beyond which it cannot be increased
— in other words, the silver haloid is saturated by a very
minute percentage of its own product of photo-decom-
position. The photo-salt belongs to a domain of chemistry
— a no-man’s land — peopled by so-called “ molecular com-
pounds,” into which the pure chemist ventures but
timidly. But these compounds are more and more
urging their claims for consideration, and sooner or
later they will have to be reckoned with, even if
they lack that definiteness which the modern chemist
regards as the essential criterion of chemical individu-
ality. The investigation may lead to the recognition of
a new order of chemical attraction, or of the old chemical
attraction in a different degree. The chemist who dis-
courses here upon this subject at the end of the half-
century of photography into which we have now entered,
will no doubt know more about this aspect of chemical
affinity ; and if I may invoke the spirit of prophecy in
concluding, I should say that a study of the photographic
film with its invisible image wdl have contributed materi-
ally to its advancement.
The American Journal of Photography is published by Messrs,
McCollin and Co., 1030, Aroh Street, Philadelphia.
* The connectioa between the two phenomena was suggested during a
course of lec'ures delivered by me two years ago (“Chemistry of Photo-
graphy,” p. 191). I have since learnt that the same conclusion had been
arrived at independently by Mr. 0. II. Bothamiey, of the Yorkshire Col-
lege, Leeds.
600
the photographic news.
[August 1, 1890.
PHOTO-ENGRAVING AS A BUSINESS.
During the past two or three years we have repeatedly
drawn the attention of progressive photographers to the
lucrative openings constantly recurring in the evolution of
photo-engraving as an illustrative art. The ever-increasing
demand for men skilled in this and photo-mechanical
processes, together with the engaging prospects this
youngest of professions holds out as inducements to its
followers, have led us to embody here a few ideas which
may help some who are looking for a better condition of
things than photography in the studio affords.
Photo-engraving is a process by means of which a draw-
ing in line or half-tone, a photograph, a water-colour or
oil painting, or anything depicted by lines, colours, or tones,
may be reproduced upon a zinc, copper, or steel base, and
printed from the printer’s press together with descriptive
matter. The same end has, for many years, been accom-
plished, in some slight measure, by wood-blocks, upon
which the design to be printed was cut by hand. This
latter proceeding, however, had numerous disadvantages,
amongst which we might mention that the success of the
resulting picture depended wholly upon the fidelity of the
work of the wood-cutter ; also that the process was tedious
and slow, requiring considerable skill on the part of the
workman ; consequently, the work was costly ; and,
beyond all this, there remained the fact that to obtain true
likenesses of people, places, or things was generally im-
possible, because of the facilities offered in the wood-
block to produce idealised representations of the objects
depicted. Photo-engraving obviates all these difficulties,
reproducing, as it does, with the actual fidelity of a photo-
graph every detail of light and shade pictured in the
original ; and doing this, furthermore, within an incredibly
short time.
Small wonder, then, can we express when we hear that
this latest phase of reproductive art is driving all before it.
We do not, however, believe that the spread of photo-
engraving will result in the extinction of the branches of
wood-cutting, steel-engraving, and the like. No ! These
have their own place, and mil hold it, but without doubt
photo-engraving is the reproductive art of the future, and, on
that score, demands the earnest attention of all interested
in photography, which is the fruitful source of this and all
similar processes by which half-tone reproductions are
obtained.
Now to the point. There are many photographers
throughout our country who learnt the art in “wet-plate
days,” and who have never succeeded in the methods of
dry-plate photography now in vogue. To such as these
— and they are many — photo-engraving offers even greater
inducements than to the modern dry-plate worker.
Without a practical knowledge of the collodion process it
is useless to try to accomplish anything in photo-engraving,
but with this knowledge the workman is already half-way
to the goal.
Some little time ago we called attention to an advertise-
ment in a contemporary offering §50 per week to a skilled
photo-engraver, and, so far as we know, that offer still
holds good.
Anyway, it is absolutely certain that a man “ worth his
salt” iu photo-engraving can obtain a salary all the way
from 825 to 850 per week, whilst girls are employed in
the lighter departments of the work at salaries ranging
from S9 to S20 per week. AVhat we particularly desire
our interested readers to note is that, whilst photo-engrav-
ing as a comparatively new line of business is open to
“live ” workers from all allied trades, it is peculiarly open
to photographers acquainted with the collodion processes
of wet-plate days. The work is lighter and pleasanter
than the general run of gallery work ; the demand for good
workmen is, and for some years will be, a steadily increasing
one ; the remuneration is greater than photography can
offer under similar conditions to similar workmen, and
the prospects of advancement are much more promising.
In a conversation with Mr. M. Wolfe, of Dayton, Ohio,
who produces the most perfect screen plates for photo-
engraving purposes we have yet seen, he told us that if he
had twelve competent men skilled in this class of work
he could put them into good positions right away. —
Wilson's Photographic Magazine.
MILITARY PHOTOGRAPHY.
Captain Crimes, of the Royal Engineers, has written a
series of articles on the above subject, which were pub-
fished in the Broad Arrow. Iu the last of the series he
gives a description of his photographic outfit He says: —
“The one object I have kept in view all through has
been to simplify the art as much as possible, and to make
each photographic section complete in itself, and able to
take, develop, and print a picture without any outside help,
in the shortest time possible. Having this end in view,
my equipment supplies, in the first place, two fight
knapsacks, to be carried in a reconnaissance by two
mounted officers or men. One contains a very fight
fold-up camera, capable of taking pictures 10 iu. by 12 in.,
round which is wrapped the focussing cloth. It has not
appeared to me desirable to place before a general a
view of a country smaller than this. The extra weight
would be more than compensated by the comprehensive
picture obtained ; moreover, in a small plate, I take it,
distance would not be fairly and distinctly portrayed.
The other knapsack carries three dark slides, very fight
but strong, each containing two plates. This knapsack
also contains the lens, instantaneous shutter, &c. Both
knapsacks are made to fit close to the back, and, in
addition to the straps passing over the shoulders, are
secured to the sword-belt, thus preventing any injurious
motion when riding. By the simple act of unbuckling one
strap, each can be at once uusluug ready to be unpacked.
The tripod, which is made as light as can be consistently with
strength and stability, is carried folded up in a packet
attached to the saddle, and fixes immediately on to the
camera. We next proceed to the all-important subject of
“ developing ” in the field. For this purpose I use a tent com-
posed of a large, folding, umbrella-shaped top, made of a
material which admitsadeep ruby light. When this is opened
and fixed in the ground it stands just clear of a tall man's
head. Over it is dropped a sort of sack, open at bottom
ends, the top end being much smaller than the bottom end,
and callable of being drawn together by means of two
cords. This sack is lightproof and waterproof. The
lower end is held down by means of a fight iron hoop or
ring, which also folds up to facilitate packing. The
hoop is attached to the bottom of the sack in such a way
that a bonier of the material extends beyond it, and rests
upon the ground. This, in the ordinary way, is sufficient
to keep out light, but should any find its way in, a few
handfuls of earth or stoues heaped up round the border
will effectually keep it out. The stick of the umbrella is
a hollow bamboo, open at the top. It is pierced with
August 1, 1890.J
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
601
holes to about half its length ; this ventilates the tent.
A cap placed over the top of the stick excludes light,
but not air. We now have a complete tent in which a man
can move about freely, and use his hands without con-
straint, and, above all, he is not half stifled, as one gene-
rally is in the usual run of developing tents. It can be
taken down at a moment’s notice, and packed in a very
small compass, the whole being exceedingly light and com-
pact. A few stays may be necessary in windy weather to
keep it steady. The person about to develop a plate slings
over his shoulders, knapsack fashion, a small metal tank,
containing sufficient water to wash several plates ; attached
to it is a gutta-percha tube and tap. Round the waist is
buckled a broad leather belt, in which are fixed bottles
containing the developing solutions, &c. A light, fold-up
trough, with a gutta-percha drain-pipe, carried outside the
tent, and two light shelves, hook on to the stick of the
umbrella. All that now has to be done is to lift up the
walls of the tent, step inside, and develop and print the
picture, which, by using bromide paper (undoubtedly the
process for military use), would take something like a
quarter of an hour ; the printing, of course, to be done
from the wet plate. I may mention that I use scarcely
any glass beyond the plates (which I believe in) ; those
articles which are made of glass are protected to prevent
breakage. I believe myself that the whole of the articles
now made of glass can ba manufactured from a preparation
of celluloid, which is strong, light, and durable. 1 hope
shortly to have a comple te set of bottles and measures
made of celluloid.”
Ox Saturday last Mr. Charles Knight, photographer, of
Newport, Isle of Wight, had the honour, he says, of photo-
graphing H.K.H. the Duke of Connaught in Rifle Brigade
uniform. The I’rince is honorary colonel of the battallion.
The FuL'.iUR Universal Lame. -—The Fulgur lamp consists
essentially of a coal oil lamp whose reservoir contains a porous
substance absorbing about two hundred centimetres of petro
leum ; it is furnished with a chimney of white glass, serving
for ordinary lighting, enlargements, and magnesium flash-light,
and with a chimney of red glass for lighting the dark room.
The petroleum reservoir has over it a smaller reservoir contain-
ing magnesium in powder. By means of a faucet a small quan-
tity of the powder is made to fall in a tube entering the flame,
through which it is projected by means of a rubber bulb ; the
small quantity of magnesium smoke is entirely condensed on
thr chimney. The price of the lamp is 20 marks. — Deutsche
Photographen Zeitung.
Phosphorescence Produced bv Ozone. — Herr Ernst
Fahrig says in The Chemical News : — “ I was in a dark room,
and having in my hand a sealed bottle about three-quarters
full of a preparation of ozone (in this instance a solution of
ozone in water containing a small peicentage of other sub-
stances, which I ha\'e found in the course of my experience are
necessary to retain the ozone in solution), I, with no particular
purpose in view, gave the bottle a vigorous shaking up ; in-
stantly I saw a soft, phosphorescent glow of light floating above
the surface of the liquid and permeating the space in the upper
part of the bottle. Its appearance was only momentary ; but
on shaking the liquid up again immediately afterwards it was
observed again, but in much diminished intensity. Further
repetition failed to produce any results, but after an interval
of ten days the liquid had apparently regenerated its power,
and the same effects could be observed, though weaker.
I observed the phenomenon in another way, and obtained some
especially remarkable results, by pouring a small quantity of an
ozone solution into a glass beaker containing ordinary water.
At first the cone-like projection of the solution where it falls
into the water becomes luminous, and then the light suffuses
the whole mass as the liquids become thoroughly mingled, and
finally disappears.”
PHOTOGRAPHING UPON WOOD.
The Magazinist, The Century, Harper's, and other popular
monthlies use “process” engravings more and more.
Photography on wood is their mainstay, and has abnost
superseded the draughtsman on wood. A sketch, say, a
dozen times as large as the proposed engraving is made,
reduced by photography, and then put upon the wood.
Photographing on wood by the wet-plate process is
done thus : A slight modification of the collodion transfer
will no doubt meet all requirements. First make a
reversed collodion transparency in the camera from the
negative. A tough and horny collodion should be used.
Develop with —
Pyrogallic acid ... ... ... ... 100 grains
Citric acid ... ... ... ... 60 ,,
Acetic acid ... ... ... ... 2 ounces
Water ... ... ... ... ... 20 ,,
and fix in hyposulphite of soda. Coat the wood with the
following hot solution of gelatine : —
Gelatine ... ... ... ... ... 4 ounces
Water ... ... ... ... ... 1 pint
Dissolve the gelatine by placing in a vessel of warm water,
and then add 4 grains of chrome alum and mix thoroughly.
The wood, having been coated, is allowed to dry. The
gelatine surface is then moistened with water for ten or
fifteen minutes, and the transparency, still wet from the
washing water, is laid down upon it and pressed lightly
in contact, and allowed to dry under slight pressure.
When dry, the collodion readily leave. s the glass, and
remains in contact with the block.
Here are some further points : The plate is cleaned as
usual, and dusted with powdered talc and polished off ; it
is then coated with positive collodion, sensitised and
exposed as usual, fixed with cyanide of potassium, and
placed in a dish of warm water. In the meantime, have
your block blackened by rubbing drop black on it, or
ordinary blacking, and coat and drain well with a solution
of the commonest glue you can get, 1 ounce to 12 ounces
of hot water ; the common glues are the best, for they
take a much longer time to set than better ones, and so
you can get a much thinner coat with draining. Place
your block in a vessel of water, having it immersed about
three inches, then bring your photo from the dish, place
it over the block and under the water. You will find by
touching the edges of the film it will readily leave the
glass ; you can then turn it about any way under the
water, and when in position raise your block gently out of
the water, bringing the film with it ; if it is puckered at
all, it is owing to raising too roughly, and must be placed
in the water again. If satisfactory, place at an angle to
drain, and dry in warm, airy place. The whole operation,
from focussing to getting the block ready for drying, will
not take a practised hand more than twenty minutes. The
common glue will not block the tool at all if you drain
the block well, and when cut all can be removed imme-
diately with a sponge and warm water. I may add that
a very good Avay to black the block is to hold it over a
petroleum lamp with its chimney removed. The glue-
water Avill not come off it if applied in the same manner as
applying varnish to a negative, and under no circum-
stances be induced to use a black varnish, for it is next to
impossible to do a good job, for the graver slips as if it
were cutting on glass. — Wilson s Photographic Magazine.
At the Photographic Club the following subjects will be
considered : — Wednesday, August 6th, “ New Hand- Cameras ” j
August 13th, “On Extemporising Apparatus,”
602
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 1, 1890.
patent KntclltgcftK*
Applications for Letters Patent.
11,420. John Lewis, 99, Gladstone Road, Birmingham,
“Improvements in Photographic Printing Paper.” — July
22nd.
11,431. H. Simpson, 26, Castle Street, Liverpool, “Photo-
graphic Apparatus.” — July 22nd.
11,476. G. Mattioli, 45, Southampton Buildings, London,
“ Photographic Apparatus.”-— July 22nd.
11,478. J. R. Gotz, 433, Strand, London, “Photographic
Film Holders.” — July 22nd.
Specifications Published.
14,220. September 9th, 1889. — “ Photographic Focussing
Magnifiers.” Frank Bishop, of the firm of Marion and Co.,
22 and 23, Soho Square, London, W., Dealers in Photo-
graphic Materials.
This invention, which has already been described in these
pages, has for its object to provide a means whereby a focus-
sing magnifier, sometimes used in focussing a picture in the
photographic camera, may be temporarily fixed against the
focussing screen in position for viewing the image, so that the
hand of the operator, instead of being occupied in holding the
magnifier, is at liberty to make the necessary adjustments of
the camera.
The invention consists in the combination with the focussing
magnifier of a suction device in the form of an india-rubber
cupped disc which, when pressed flat against the focussing
screen, remains adherent thereto by atmospheric pressure, in
the manner of a sucker, with sufficient tenacity to support the
focussing glass in position against the screen, and permit of its
being shifted about thereon.
14,270. September lOf/i, 1889. — “ Photographic Shutter.”
Henri Tuunbekrv, Manufacturer of Photographic Shutters,
22, Rue de Bretagne, Paris.
This invention has for its object to provide a new form of
shutter for photographic cameras.
This shutter may be employed at will for effecting instan-
taneous exposure, or exposures of which the duration may be
regulated as desired. It is actuated by a compressed air
piston, through an india-rubber tube terminating in a pear or
ball as usual.
The piston alternately moves two slides, which constitute
the shutter apparatus properly so called, from top to bottom,
and which, in sliding vertically one in front of the other,
alternately open and close the objective opening of the
apparatus. The two slides are respectively actuated one by
the other, each of them being provided on its side with a rack,
the teeth of each of which engage at the same time with a
pinion common to both, and which turns freely on its axis
under the impulse given by either one of the said slides when
itself actuated by the piston.
It will be understood that no matter which of the said
slides is caused to move upwards by the piston, its movement
in that direction, at the same time, through the action of the
common pinion, imparts the opposite movement — that is to
say, the downward movement — to the other slide. They
therefore slide one over the other, and thus in succession pro-
duce the opening and closing of the objective opening. The
alternate action of the piston upon the two slides is regulated
by two springs in the form of elongated arcs, which alter-
nately force the said piston under each of the slides. These
two slides, in descending and rising, themselves counteract the
said springs, and render them free in succession.
The above description applies to what is called instantaneous
exposure.
For exposures of varying duration the travel of the slides is
controlled to a given extent. Such limitation is effected by
means of a bolt which arrests the upward movement of one of
them, and through it the downward movement of the other
slide, the action of the one being governed by the other, as
above described. This bolt is actuated in a horizontal direction
by a pin cut off slantingly, and which enters vertically a
transverse slot formed in the said bolt, and which is also made
slanting. An opposing spring placed in the bottom of the
socket or box in which the bolt is confined pushes it automa-
tically each time the pin in rising renders it free. This pin,
and the slot which it enters in the bolt, are correspondingly
inclined, as above stated, and slide one over the other with a
gentle friction. It will be understood by this that, when the
finger of the operator presses on the said pin, the latter
pushes the bolt which limits the travel of the two slides to
the bottom of its socket, and at same time compressess the
opposing spring. When, on the contrary, the finger is with-
drawn, the opposing spring, by expanding, then forces the bolt
in the direction of the slides, and causes the pin to it-
self rise to its position of rest. In the latter position the
shutter is adapted for what is known as varying exposure, the
duration being, as it is easy to understand, regulated by the
operator by means of the pin already described.
Besides what has been above described, a special arrangement
enables the diameter of the objective opening to be reduced,
with the object of enabling the shutter to l>e readily adapted
to different sized apparatus.
This arrangement consists of a ring which is not entirely
closed, and which forms the orifice itself, or the inner edge
of the opening in the shutter, and which may 1* diminished
or increased alternately under the pressure of two cylinders,
screwed one over the other, and between which it is imprisoned.
To produce the effect indicated, the said ring is broken at a
point in its circuit, and its extremities are made so that when
being decreased they slide one into the other. Further, the
body of the said ring is triangular in cross section, the apex
thereof being the external edge, while the base is, on the con-
trary, the internal edge of such ring. It will, therefore, be
seen that the two cylinders, by screwing one on to the other,
lessen the space left between them, and within which the ring
for regulating the opening is enclosed, and consequently pro-
gressively press the said ring, and drive it towards its centre,
thus producing its contraction and diminution.
The reverse effect will, on the contrary, be produced by
unscrewing the two cylinders.
We have reason to believe that one of the aluminium alloys
will come largely into use in the photographic apparatus of
the future.
A Celluloid Varnish. — It is not generally known that the
best varnish for celluloid films of all kinds is a plain, spirituous
celluloid solution. This is made of old celluloid film negatives
from which the gelatine coating has been removed. The cellu-
loid is cut into small trimmings and dissolved in common
alcohol. This varnish is applied to the film in a cold state,
and dried slowly without the application of heat. It flows
smoothly and sets evenly, if made of the proper consistence.
It has a greater degree of toughness than any resinous varnish,
and has the additional advantage of being entirely devoid of
“tackiness.” — Wilson’s Photographic Magazine.
Lkttekinu Prints. — M. Stravos Zellis, of Alexandria, recom-
mends the following process for marking or lettering on the
sensitised paper such names as we wish to give the prints.
He takes a piece of thin white paper, and traces upon it the
words which he wishes to have at the bottom of his negative,
and oils it on both sides. Having removed the excess of oil
by rubbing it between two sheets of bibulous paper, he coats
it with varnish on both sides, and allows it to dry. On the
other hand, he removes from the bottom of the negative a
portion of the gelatine equal to the size of the paper, and
substitutes for it the paper, which he sticks by means of a
solution of gum arabic and water. He removes then the
air-bubbles, which would prevent complete adherence, and,
this being done, waits for his work to dry. If, when printing
on the sensitised paper, it is found that the letters do not
show very white, the defective portions should be retouched
on the back of the oiled paper. To write his name, M. Zellis
makes use of a mixture of gum arabic, lampblack, and water.
This process is simple, cheap, and gives excellent results. —
A n nals Photographiquc.
Acoust 1, 1890.]
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
fi03
(^ormfpon&enct.
COPYRIGHT LAW.
Sin, — In your “ Notes ” of last week, on page 575, you say :
“ This decision in the case of photography involves a certain
amount of absurdity, because it is clear that one man may pose
the sitter, and make all the arrangements, and be responsible
for the art qualities of the picture ; while the other man does
no more than take off the cap and develop the plate. Yet the
mechanical operator is deemed the author !” The decision you
refer to is, I understand, that of Mr. Justice Wills in Kenrick
v. Lawrence. If that is so, it seems to me that your note is
somewhat misleading, as this case only decides that where one
person directs another to make a drawing of a given subject, it
is not the person by whose direction the drawing is made who
is the author within the meaning of the Copyright Act. The
judge did not decide who was the author, as it was unnecessary
for him to do so, but at the end of his judgment he suggests
that possibly they may both be joint authors.
The decision in this case is substantially the sameas that in the
other one to which you refer, namely, Nottage v. Jackson. It
will be remembered that in that case the plain tiffs directed one
of their assistants to go to the Oval and photograph the Austra-
lian cricketers in a group, and it was decided that the plaintiffs
were not the authors of the photograph.
Who is the author of a photograph is a question of consider-
able difficulty, unless the whole of the work has been done by
one person ; but the Master of the Rolls, in giving judgment in
the latter case, said, “The nearest I can come to is that it
is the person who effect ively is, as near as he can be, the
cause of the picture which is produced, that is, the person
who has superintended the arrangement, who has actually
formed the picture by putting the people into position, and
arranging the place in which the people are to be — the man who
is the effective cause of that. Although he may only have
done it by standing in the room and giving orders about it,
still it is his mind and art, as far as anybody’s mind and art are
concerned, which is the effective cause of the picture, such as
it is, when it is produced.”
Hence, it seems that if one person poses and arranges the
sitter, and another merely takes off thecapand develops the plate,
then it is the former, and not the mechanical operator, who is
the author of the photograph. In many cases, however, in
which more than one person has been engaged in the taking of
a photograph, it would probably be better to register them all
as joint authors. C. Fleetwood Piutchakd.
3, Paper Buildings, Temple, E.C., July 29 th, 1890.
AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHERS IN BOURNEMOUTH.
Sib, — At this time of the year you have, doubtless, mauy
inquiries from amateur photographers as to facilities in this
town for changing and developing plates, Ac. I shall be glad
if you will kindly refer such correspondents to me.
Stbwart Hardwick.
21, Commercial lload, Bournemouth, July 24 th, 1890.
Grey Bromide Prints. — To give a grey tone to prints on
bromide paper, the Photo. Mitthcilungen quotes M. Senier as
recommending the alteration of the bromide to chloride by the
use of a solution of chlorine (chlorine water), followed by re-
development with oxalate or pyro, with the addition of con-
siderable bromide. A red tone will be given by the addition of
4 parts of potassium bromide to 100 parts of the developer.
Photographic Periodicals. — The leaves of Vallombrosa and
the multitudinous waves of the sea are simply not in it for
numerousness with the new photographic periodicals which are
sprouting hopeless around us. The latest edition — up to date
of writing — which we have to welcome to the galaxy is the
Photograph isclien Neuheiten, which appeared abouc the 1st of
February in Berlin. It is under the protection of the house
of Rom&in Talbot, aud the editorship of Mr. Robert Talbot.
It will appear monthly in French, English, aud German edi-
tions.— Wilson’s Photographic. Magazine.
^roccctfings of iporictits.
London and Provincial Photographic Association.
At the meeting on the 24th iust. Mr. H. M. Smith occupied
the chair. The subject for the evening’s discussion was “ Printing
through Coloured Media.”
The Hon. Secretary exhibited two slips of silver albu-
menised paper that had been sent to him by Mr. Otto Schcilzig,
showing the comparative actinic values of different coloured
glasses. Different sections of the strips of paper had been
exposed for a given time under dark yellow', ruby, blue, dark
green, single green, and orange coloured pieces of glass. One
strip of paper was left untoned for comparison of the colour of
the deposits.
Mr F. A. Bridge read an extract from an article he had
written in the Photographic News Year-Book of 1873,
advocating the use of a thin sheet of green or pale red
gelatine in printing from a thin negative, thereby getting a
better result.
Mr. W. E. Debenham said that it had been asserted that with
a certain class of negative a better and brighter effect was
obtained by slow printing on a weak light than by exposure
to a strong light ; this he denied. He showed four prints on
as many sections of a sheet of silver albumenised paper, all .
made from the same negative, using different coloured pieces
of glass, and exposing from ten minutes to twenty hours in a
weak light. No difference was noticeable in either of the prints
except the exposure made under a piece of brownish orange
glass. This Mr. Debenham accounted for by stating that
the difference probably arose from the organic compound of
silver being insensitive to orange light.
Mr. T. E. Freshw'ater showed some bromide prints deve-
loped with eikonogen of the last outing of the members at
Wanstead Park.
Mr. F. A. Bridge showed an enlargement from a quarter-
plate negative taken at Chester of some interesting carvings on
one of the old houses.
The Chairman, as one of the delegates appointed to repre-
sent the Association at the Chester Convention, gave his report
about the same.
The Bank Holiday outing on Monday next was arranged to
take place at St. Albans.
Birmingham Photographic Society.
At the ordinary meeting of the above Society on July 24th,
held at St. Edmund's College, Mr. W. Griffiths gave a very
interesting paper on “Stereoscopic Photography.” The lec-
turer described the different apparatus required and mode of
working, and illustrated his remarks with a number of beautiful
stereoscopic slides on paper and glass.
Mri W. J. Harrison, F.G.S., who was in the chair, compli-
mented Mr. Griffiths on his instructive paper, and said he was
sorry a larger number of members had not availed themselves
of the pleasure of hearing the paper.
Messrs. Karleese, Middleton, Taylor, and others took part in
the discussion which follow'ed.
The result of the first photographic competition tov.'ards the
Warwickshire Photographic Survey was announced. A gold
medal was offered by Mr. S. G. Mason, a silver medal by the
Society, and a bronze medal by Mr. A. Constantine for six
photographs taken in Warwickshire at places accessible to the
general public ; to be taken between March 1st and June 30th.
Three to be open landscapes, part of each to be a river or
stream, and three to be of a rustic cottage or cottages ; the
six prints to be exhibited on one mount. The awards were
offered for excellence of the group of photographs, artistically
and technically ; the negatives of the prize photographs to be
placed at the disposal of the Photographic Survey of Warwick-
shire Committee. The photographs were sent to Mr. George
Bankart, President of the Leicester Society, to judge, who
awarded the prizes as follows : — Gold medal — Benjamin Kar-
leese, “ Light and Truth Silver medal — Arthur J. Leeson,
“ Cannon Bronze medal — W. Jerome Harrison, “ Avon.”
fi04
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[ArorsT 1, 1890.
On Saturday last a good number of members and friends
took part in the monthly half-day excursion, Warwick being
the rendezvous for the afternoon. A pleasant afternoon
was spent under the leadership of Mr. George A. Thomason,
when over 100 plates were exposed.
The Bath Photographic Society.
On Saturday, the 26th inst., the Society met at Prior Park, by
invitation of the Rev. Canon Williams, the principal of the
College. The grounds are some 200 acres in extent, and
present many picturesque subjects for the camera. Promin-
ent among them stand three handsome piles of buildings, with
the mansion in central position, 150 feet wide, with a
Corinthian portico of six columns, and the two wings used as
colleges, and dedicated respectively to St. Peter and St. Paul.
A church has also recently been added for the convenience of
worshippers in the district. The interior is richly ornamented
with carving in alabaster- imported from Rome. It is lofty and
well lit, a large and valuable Vandyke of Jesus being easily
photographed along with the interior ; when quite finished
the floor will be of white marble throughout. There is also a
private chapel, or chapel royal, in the mansion, said to have
been intended for the use of George III ; it is unique. These
buildings take the form of a crescent, are situated on aslope 400
* feet above the Avon, and are generally considered to command
a landscape full of Italian beauty. Far away down the slope so
richly fringed with woods, and spanning the expansive fishponds,
stands the Palladium Bridge, well known to visitors.
At five p.m. the party assembled under the portico of the
mansion, where the Canon welcomed his fellow members to
tea ; Mr. and Mrs. Austin J. King and Miss King assisted in
dispensing hospitality to the guests. After tea more photo-
graphs were taken, and the swimming bath, priory, and other
points of interest visited. The sky being cloudy, with
occasional showers, the light was too weak for many subjects,
but some good and picturesque photographs were nevertheless
obtained.
THR DAGUERRE MEMORIAL.
The committees which have been appointed by the Photo-
graphic Association of America, with and by Chairman
McMichael, of the general committee, are as follows : —
The General Committee. — H. McMichael, G. M. Carlisle,
O. P. Scott, J. M. Appleton, G. H. Hastings.
The Washington Committee. — E. J. Pullman, Thomas W.
Smillie, Hon. A. A. Adee, A. Dickinson Jewett, Dr. Griffiths,
U.S.N.
The Chicago Committee. — Gay ton A. Douglass, Richard
Sweet, Thomas Pattison, O. P. Scott, Dr. John Nicol.
The St. Louis Committee. — G. Cramer, M. A. Seed, J. C.
Somerville, H. A. Hyatt, F. W. Guerin, W. H. H. Clark.
The Philadelphia Committee. — W. J. Ent rekin, W. P.
Buchanan, John G. Hood, Edmund Stirling, J. Carbutt,
J. Bartlett.
The Boston Committee. — George H. Hastings, W. H. Roby,
T. H. Blair, Wilfred A. French, C. A. Chandler.
Tne New York Committee. — J. Wells Champney, H. Little-
john, Edward L. Wilson, Ph.D., Dr. Arthur H. Elliot, W. I.
Lincoln Adams.
Each of these committees holds a book of certificates for
subscribers to the fund, and is authorized to give receipts.
Bichromate of Soda in Photography. — J. Husnik recom-
mends the employment of the bichromate of soda in place of
the bichromate of potash in all the processes where a salt of
chromium is used, such as zincography and photo-lithography.
Not only, he says, does the soda salt contain more chromium
in a given weight, and is more than a third cheaper ; but it
also has the advantage of being far more soluble in water than
the other, thus has not its tendency to crystallize out when
dextrine or gelatine is added to the solution. He states that
he has used it with entire success in all his processes for some
time past.
Ensfocrs to ©omspon&cntg*
All questions requiring a reply in this column should bo addressed to
Mr- John Spiller, F.C.S., 2, St. Mary’s Road, Canonbury, London, N.
All Advertisements and communications relating to money matters, and
to the sale of the paper, should be addressed to the Publishers of tha
Photographic News, Messrs. Piper & Carter, 5, Furnival Street, London.
H. S. — Cabinet Vignettes Shoiuing Brush Marks. Since com-
municating with you last week we have taken occasion to test
the cards upon which the photographs are mounted. We can
find nothing in them to account for such defects, for the
boards are absolutely free from bleaching chlorides, sulphites
or hyposulphites, and the edges are finished with pure gold.
It would seem, therefore, that the mountant was at fault.
Photargus. — Lead Pipes for Bain Water Supply. Although
it may happen that rain water acts slightly upon pure lead,
the quantity of metal dissolved is so excessively minute that
it is impossible to believe that such traces could exert any
appreciable effect in photographic operations. Tin piping is
absolutely safe, or even the alloy of lead and tin known as
“ composition pipe,” but you must attach them to a slate
cistern or water butt, for if put in contact with a lead-lined
reservoir there is always increased danger of metallic corro-
sion, as the consequence of galvanic action being set up
between dissimilar metals.
E. O. C. (Boston Photogravure Company, Mass.) — In a letter
dated July 15th, our correspondent makes an excellent sug-
gestion for overcoming irregularities in the development of
celluloid films, by cementing them down with Canada balsam
upon a plate of glass before proceeding to apply the chemi-
cals. He thinks this idea may be worthy the attention of
Colonel Waterhouse, who found difficulties in making enlarge-
ments from celluloid films in consequence of the varying
thickness and opacity of the material he employed. The further
details promised by our correspondent will be very accept-
able ; meanwhile we thank him for this letter already to
hand.
J. M. B. — Spots of Reversed Action. Your communication is
extremely interesting and important ; we have never seen
the effect produced in this way before, although the end
windows of churches and other interiors very frequently
show halation and reversal.
Perished. — Bed Rubber Bulbs and Tubing. The pneumatic
apparatus attached to instantaneous shutters very often
gets rigid and rotten, and has to lie replaced. A short
immersion in warm water helps to make it serviceable for a
time, but the change is due to oxidation of the caoutchouc,
and is inevitable.
L. T. — Licsegang's Fixing Bath. The precipitate which you
noticed may have resulted from the action of the alkali in the
gold toning bath upon the magnesium salt, in throwing
down the carbonate or hydrate of magnesia. Be careful
to wash the toned prints well before immersion in the fixing
liquor.
M. E. — Pyro and Ammonia Developer. This is very apt to
stain the film whenever the development is prolonged ; try
the substitution of carbonate of soda for the ammonia in the
proportion of about one to five of soda.
R. S. (Ipswich). — Measure Pip>ettes. Provide a series of
1, 2, 5, and 10 c.c. pipettes ; above this measure the
graduated cylinders are better, say 50, 100, and 500 c.c.
These, with a set of gramme weights, should meet all your
requirements, or you might add to them a litre flask.
J. P. — Storage of Bain Water. There is nothing better than
a well-cleansed petroleum cask or rum puncheon ; and if
you can, by being always on the spot, allow the first wash-
ings from the roof to run to waste, and then collect only the
pure rain water, you will be spared much trouble in filtering ;
but smuts so readily accumulate in towns that it will nearly
always be necessary to filter the rain water before use.
W. T. — Reducing Silver-Chloride. Putina few slips of zinc,
and allow to remain for some days ; then withdraw the excess
of zinc, wash well by decantation, and lastly on a filter.
Finally, melt the reduced silver in a Cornish crucible with a
little dry carbonate of sod^ and borax as flux.
<jAYS.
THE
TIK
PAOI
Photographic Tourists and the Channel Passages 605
Literary Notices 606
The Photographic Annuals 607
The Progress of the Photo-Mechanical Printing Processes. By
Hermann E. Gunther 608
Photography in Florence 609
The Recent City Photographic Exhibition 609
Group Drawbacks. By Moses Back 610
Photography in Germany. By Dr. H. W. Vogel 610
Truth in Photography. By H. Colebrookc 612
The Metric System in Photography. By W. It. Seaman, M.D. 613
Notes 614
PAOX
Washing Prints 616
Enamelling. By F. Tarniquet 616
The New Premises of the Camera Club. By E. Ferrero 617
Photography in Natural Colours. By J. Gaedicke 618
How to Make a Group. By Charles P. Marshall 619
Aluminium in the Construction of Photographic Apparatus.
By Ernest Seyd 620
The British Association at Leeds 621
Patent Intelligence 621
Correspondence 623
Proceedings of Societies 623
Answers to Correspondents 624
TOURIST PHOTOGRAPHERS AND THE
CHANNEL PASSAGES.
Photographic periodical literature on both sides of the
Atlantic teems with items showing that the hot weather
and the “dead” season are now upon us, and that
those camera bearers who can do so are fleeing to the
seaside or to the mountains. Within the last four
or five years, as proved by the official returns,
the passenger traffic between England and the
Continent has been increasing by leaps and bounds, so
altogether this seems an opportune moment to deal
with the subject of the more frequented Channel pas-
sages, their boats, harbours, and subjects worth photo-
graphing from the deck of the ship.
The first question which troubles the tourist more
than he cares to own, is whether he will suffer the
horrors of sea-sickness on his comiug journey. Some
misconception is prevalent about liability to sea-sick-
ness; most persons think that they will suffer less
from it by taking the short passage between Dover
and Calais, or Folkestone and Boulogne, instead of a
longer route. The short passages have shallow harbours,
especially on the French side, hence their passenger boats
are all small, and draw little water, so that in the short
“ chopping ” seas which are common enough in the
narrowest part of the Channel, passengers are sometimes
well tossed about, and made seasick upon breezy sun-
shiny days, when the same journey would have been
altogether pleasant had they been upon a deep-sea
boat. In a short passage of about seventy minutes
the trouble is soon over, but passengers often have to
leave the ship when they can scarcely walk, and if
they say tha; they will remain on board for a short
time, may be told that they cannot, as the boat will
soon move away from the quay. A method of cheat-
ing the sea of its prey, sometimes adopted by those
who have plenty of leisure, especially ladies, is to
stay a day or two, if necessary, at the port of embarka-
tion until the sea is smooth, and then slip across.
Beginning with the Dover- Ostend route, the boats
are rather small, for the reason already stated, and the
actual passage occupies in fine weather a little over
three hours. The boats carry the mails, and are the
property of the Belgian Government; they were built
in Belgium, and engined by the Cockerill Co. ; the
engines are of first class workmanship, and of great
power as compared with the size of the boat, conse-
quently the speed of the latter is high. J ohn Cockerill,
an Englishman, founded the great Belgian iron works
in the past generation at Seraing, near Liege,
but for a long time past they have been the
property of a Belgian Company. On those days
when the sea is smooth, the restaurant department of
the Ostend boat is much patronised ; cooking goes on
on board, and the charges fixed by the Belgian autho-
rities and displayed for the benefit of the passengers
are particularly moderate. The stewards are all in the
employment of an hotel keeper at Ostend, who con-
tracts for the vending of refreshments on the boats ;
hence it is no use consulting these officials in the
expectation of getting disinterested information about
Ostend hotels. At the present time Ostend is full of
Germans, and all the hotels are, practically speaking,
full. This is due partly to the circumstance of the
German Emperor having visited the town a few days
ago, and partly to the fact that there is an excellent
railway service between Ostend and Cologne, which
draws off from the Rhine districts and places eastwards
thereof, those who seek rest and relaxation at the sea
side. At Ostend there is little worth photographing
from the deck of the boat ; tall and roomy houses, with
a sandy beach in front, represent Ostend as seen from
the sea ; the country around is absolutely flat. On
the Dover side, the return boat approaches the
Admiralty Pier in such a direction that admirable
views can be taken in suitable weather of Dover Castle
and the cliffs whereon it stands, with sea and boats in
the foreground. A lens of moderately long focus is
necessary. The Ostend boat reduces its speed when
so close to its destination, and this is in favour of the
photographer, who, at the same time, sees Dover Castle
before him from perhaps the most picturesque point of
GOG
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS.
[August 8, 1890.
view. In fine weather this route across the Channel
is exceedingly pleasant ; in bad weather it is doubtless
the reverse, what with the three hours’ passage and
the size of the boats.
Turn we now to the Harwich-Antwerp line to the
Continent, which has the advantage of deep water
harbours on both sides of the Channel ; consequently
deep sea boats are put on the service. Sleeping bunks
and cabins are provided for the passengers ; the cabins
are illuminated by the electric light, and have “goose-
neck ” ventilators to keep the air pure. In times past
this route was not spoken of in London with over-much
respect ; but of late years much money and care have
been expended to make the service one of the best, and
it is drawing a large share of the Channel passage
traffic. The boats leave Parkeston Quay a little before
ten o’clock at night, and reach Antwerp between eight
and ten next morning ; the direction of the tide in the
Scheldt influences the time of arrival. Passengers liable
to sea-sickness have (1) the advantage of being on
board a large sea-going ship, which does not toss about
like a walnut shell ; (2) the advantage of not being
exposed to the full force of the Atlantic in bad weather,
being sheltered therefrom by the mainland of England ;
(3) the advantage, if sick at all, of being in a comfort-
able bed ; (4) the advantage of ending the voyage with
several hours’ smooth steaming up the River Scheldt,
giving abundance of time for recoveiy from sea-sick-
ness before landing.
The steamers on this route are all twin-screw boats,
and the largest of them is the Colchester. Twin-screw
boats will rotate upon their vertical axis when the
screws are moved in opposite directions, so the ship
can turn in small space in a river. The breaking of
the screw shaft is one of the most serious accidents
which can befall a steamer at sea ; but, with a twin-
screw ship, if one shaft be broken, the boat can go
ahead by means of the other shaft and the other screw.
Great speed is obtainable with twin-screw ships;
indeed, our first experience with one was at the trial
trip, off the measured mile, of a twin-screw vessel built
to carry four guns, and scandalously rumoured to have
been constructed to run the Ameiican blockade.
She was, however, never used for that purpose,
but was bought by the Brazilian Government
to chase river pirates, because of her speed and
power of turning in narrow places. The small Margate
passenger steamers go at a good speed, yet the twin-
screw boat rap